NZ272185A - Current carrying guide cable sensor - Google Patents

Description

New Zealand No. 272185 International No. PCT/ TO BE ENTERED AFTER ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLICATION Priority dates: 23.05.1995 Complete Specification Filed: 23.05.1995 Classification:^) G01R29/08; G01V3/11; G05D1/03; B62D1/00 Publication date: 19 December 1997 Journal No.: 1423 NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION Title of Invention: Method and apparatus for guiding a driverless vehicle using a sensor tracking a cable emitting an electromagnetic field Name, address and nationality of applicant(s) as in international application form: JERVIS B. WEBB INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, a Michigan corporation of 34375 West Twelve Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331-5624, United States of America Patents Form No. 5 Our Ref: JT204789 NEW ZEALAND N.Z. PATENT OFFICE 23 MAY 1995 PATENTS ACT 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION METHOD AMD APPARATUS FOR GUIUIWG A DRIVERLBSS VEHICLE USING A SENSOR TRACKING A CABLE EMITTING AM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD We, JEKVTS B. WEBB INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, A Michigan corporation, USA, of 34375 West Twelve Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331-5624, United States Of Aaerica hereby declare the Invention, for which We pray that a patent may be granted to us and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement: PT0510552 (Followed by page la) la METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GUIDING A DRIVERLESS VEHICLE TECHNICAL FIELD This invention relates to apparatus and 5 method for guiding a driverless vehicle along a guide cable buried in a road surface and more particularly to the use of two detecting coils placed in an X configuration on the vehicle for sensing an electromagnetic field direction vector 10 independent of spacial and electromagnetic field magnitudes which information is used to measure lateral displacement of the vehicle relative to the guide cable to steer the vehicle so as to track the guide cable.

BACKGROUND ART Perpendicularly disposed coils have been mounted on a driverless vehicle and used to detect the electromagnetic field surrounding a guide cable for automatically guiding the driverless vehicle 20 along the cable. In known apparatus, one coil is disposed vertically and the other coil is disposed horizontally. Voltages induced in the coils are compared and used to determine the lateral location of the coils relative to the guide cable. This 25 location information is processed and used to steer the vehicle. (followed by page 2) 272 2 The output voltage associated with these coils varies proportionately with current frequency in the guide cable, guide cable current magnitude, radial distance from the guide cable, coil core 5 size, number of coil wire turns and the angle found between the major axis of the coil relative to a line from the cable to the center of the coil, referred to as angle beta.

As each coil is rotated in a plane 10 perpendicular to the cable generating the electromagnetic field, it's output will become maximum when the coil core is parallel to the circular lines of flux. Its output will become minimum (zero) when the coil core is perpendicular 15 to the flux, i.e. pointing to, or away from, the wire. Thus the relative effectiveness of the coil varies as the .'sin' of the angle beta.

The sin (beta) term, reflects the ratio of the radial to circular field sensed at each coil 20 location and affects the sensor output. Therefore, the difference in magnitude sensed between the two coils is based on the radius term, the respective distances between each coil and the cable current. Changes in any of these factors have a profound 25 effects on the output signal. Additionally, depending on angle beta, some of either the radial and/or circular field information associated with conventional apparatus must be discarded, resulting in a less than ideal signal to noise ratios. 30 Another disadvantage with conventional coil arrangements is that the information provided c 2721 3 by the coils only indicates the approximate lateral displacement from the guide cable and not che measure or distance of the lateral displacement. Therefore, vehicle steering correction can only be 5 made in the direction opposite the displacement and not with precision.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION It would be desirable -to provide an apparatus for guiding a driverless 10 vehicle along a guide cable disposed in a road surface that measures the lateral deviation of the vehicle from the guide cable.

It would also be desirable to provide an apparatus for guiding a driverless 15 vehicle along a guide cable disposed in a road surface having an increased 'field of view1 of the cable over conventional apparatus.

It would further be desirable to provide an apparatus including 20 perpendicularly disposed coils for providing off-center displacement measurement information for guiding a driverless vehicle on the basis of sensed lateral displacement from a guide cable disposed in a road surface wherein the sensed lateral 25 displacement is determined solely from an electromagnetic field direction vector and is independent of all electromagnetic field magnitude components. •' 2721 4 It would also be desirable to provide a method for sensing an electromagnetic field direction vector at a single spacial point for providing an error signal that 5 defines a measurement for guiding a driverless vehicle over a guide cable disposed in a rdad surface.

Accordingly there is provided an apparatus for guiding a 10 driverless vehicle along a path defined by a guide cable disposed in a road surface, wherein the guide cable carries a current generating an electromagnetic field in the space surrounding the guide cable, includes a sensor for sensing the 15 direction and magnitude of the electromagnetic field surrounding the cable. The sensor is defined by first and second spaced detecting coils having major axes being mounted in an X-coil configuration on said vehicle such that the major axes are 20 intersecting in the direction of current and are oriented generally at +/-45 degrees relative to the road surface. Each detecting coil senses both the radial and circular field vectors of the magnetic field at a given point and a processor in 25 communication with the first and second detecting coils compares the magnitude of the radial vector with the magnitude of the circular vector whereby the measurement of the lateral position of the sensor relative to said guide cable is determined.

There is further provided a method for guiding the driverless vehicle along a path defined by a guide cable c 27218 disposed in a horizontal road surface, wherein the guide cable carries a current generating an electromagnetic field in the space surrounding the guide cable, includes the steps of; mounting a first coil, having a major coil axis, at + 45 degrees relative to the horizontal on said vehicle,- mounting a second coil, having a major coil axis, at - 45 degrees relative to the 10 horizontal on said vehicle such that the axes of the first and second coils intersect in the direction of current; sensing both the radial and circular field vectors of the electromagnetic field with 15 each coil; comparing the magnitude of the radial vector with the magnitude of the circular vector to establish the lateral position of the intersection point of the axes of the coils relative to the path 20 off-center displacement information; and communicating this information to a steering assembly to steer the vehicle.

The invention will now be described by way example with reference to the accompanying drawings. f 272 6 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGURE 1 is a schematic diagram of the front or rear of a driverless vehicle being guided over a guide cable; FIGURE 2 is a diagram illustrating first and second coils mounted generally at +/- 45 degrees relative to the horizontal accordance with the present invention, field lines and voltage vectors in the electromagnetic field due to the 10 guide cable which carries alternating current,- FIGURE 3 is a block diagram illustrating the various voltages occurring in the detecting coils and their conversion to an output'off center distance measurement signal; and FIGURE 4 is a schematic block diagram of one embodiment of the invention.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION With reference to FIGURE 1, a driverless vehicle 10 is seen from the front or rear for 20 following a guide cable 12 disposed in a horizontal road surface 14. Mounted on the vehicle 10 is a sensor 16 defined by two detecting coils 18,20. One coil 18 is mounted at +45 degrees relative to the road surface 14, and the other coil 20 is 25 mounted at -45 degrees. The terms +45 and -45 degrees refer to the angle of the axis of the coil or its core relative to the road surface 14 7 27213 or horizontal. The axes of the coils 16,18 intersect in the direction of current flow. The guide cable 12 carries an alternating current which, when undisturbed, generates an 5 electromagnetic field having circular magnetic field lines which generate in the coils 18 and 20 voltages that may be used for measuring the lateral off center position of the vehicle 10 relative to the guide cable 12 and subsequently for steering 10 the vehicle to follow the cable.

The manner in which the driverless vehicle 10 is guided over the cable 12 will now be discussed with reference to FIGURES 2-4. The dashed lines in FIG. 2 are intended to represent 15 the circular vectors of the magnetic field surrounding the guide cable 12. These field lines are intended to represent the case where the vicinity of the cable 12 is free of ferromagnetic objects and other current carriers which would 20 distort the circular cross section of the field lines. The elevational location or height h of the detector coils 18,20 remains constant.

Due to the mounting geometry of the coils 18,3,0 wherein each major axis is positioned at +/-25 45 degrees to the horizontal, each coil produces an output voltage which is the vector sum of both the horizontal and vertical portions of the guide cable's 12 cylindrical electromagnetic field. When the sensor 16 is centered over the cable each coil 27 18,20 sees equal horizontal and vertical signal magnitudes. However, the signs of each signal are opposite, as each coil 18,20 sees the source on different sides of their major axis. When the 5 sensor 16 is moved laterally to the left or right of the guide cable 12, the output of each coil 18, 20 changes as a function of the sum of it's orientation to the horizontal plane (+/- 45 degrees) and the error angle Theta, in the vertical 10 plane.

Either coil's signal or voltage is maximum when it's major axis is perpendicular to the guide cable 12 and alternatively is minimum (zero) when it's major axis is pointing toward the 15 guide cable. Since these coils 18, 20 move in a plane parallel to the cable 12, while cutting it's cylindrical electromagnetic field, the form of their output signals are proportional to the SIN of (Beta Coil 1 or 2).

Accordingly, the true position of the sensor 16 or error position information for a feedback loop as hereinafter described, is found by dividing the radial vector difference by the circular vector sum sensed by the coils 18,20. The 25 actual signs imply that it is the sum of the radial vectors that is divided by the difference of the circular vectors, but to preserve a hardware phase comparator operation for monitoring 'guide-safe', the polarity of the coils 18,20 is chosen such that 30 when the sensor 16 is centered over the cable 12, the output of the coils are 180 degrees out f 27218 9 of phase. Thus, when the sensor 16 is centered over the cable 12, vectors being equal but of opposite sign, the radial vectors cancel in the numerator, while the circular vectors add to 5 double, in the denominator. As the height h remains positive, i.e. the sensor 16 stays above the cable 12, the denominator will never reach zero and cause an invalid divide operation.

With reference to FIGURE 2, the following 10 equations apply: Signal Coil 1 - K1 * SIN (Beta Coil 1) Signal Coil 2 - K1 • SIM (Beta Coil 2) Therefore: Signal of Coil 2 + Signal of Coil 1 Distance (+/- Err) - Height * —- Signal of Coil 2 - Signal of Coil 1 The following is a mathematical proof for the above linear measurement equation.

Where by definition: Clock Wise (CW) Angles, from vertical, are positive.

Radius r is defined as the line/distance between the center of the coils 18, 20 and the center of the cable 12.

Current is defined as the electrical current in the wire.

Frequency is defined as the frequency of the Current.

Height h is the vertical distance from the 30 cable to the horizontal plane in which the C 27 coils 18,20 can move.

Distance d (+/-) is the horizontal distance from the cable to the center of the coils.

Alpha Coil 1 is the off-vertical angle of coil 1 (+45) Alpha Coil 2 is the off-vertical angle of coil 2 (-45) Theta is the error angle between the radius and the height and Kl is proportional to current, frequency and inductance and inversely proportional to radius Signal Coil 1 - Kl • SIN (Beta Coil 1) (eq. 1) Signal Coil 2 - Kl • SIN (Beta Coil 2) (eq. 2.' As seen in FIGURE 2: Beta Coil 1 « Theta - Alpha Coil 1 and Beta Coil 2 ■ Theta - Alpha Coil 2 since when Theta » Alpha Coil 1, Beta Coil 1 goes to zero and when Theta = Alpha Coil 2, Beta Coil 2 goes to zero.

Therefore: Signal Coil 1 - Kl * SIN (Theta - Alpha Coil 1) (eq. 3) Signal Coil 2 « Kl * SIN (Theta - Alpha Coil 2) (eq. 4) From the 'SIN(A-B) m SIN (A)*COS(B) - COS(A)*SIN (B) ' trigonometric identity, equations 3 and 4 above can be expanded as: Signal Coil 1 • Kl • (SIN(Theta) «COS(Alpha Coil 1) - COS (Theta) *S IN (Alpha Coil 1)) (eq. 5) Signal Coil 2 • Kl * (SIN(Theta)*COS (Alpha Coil 2) - COS (Theta) «SIN(Alpha Coil 2)) ( eq . 6 ) G 11 27 Since, by definition: Alpha Coil X » ♦ 45 degrees and Alpha Coil 2 • - 45 degrees we see: SIN(Alpha Coil 1) - COS (Alpha Coil 1) --SIN (Alpha Coil 2) - COS(Alpha Coil 2) with all magnitudes being equal to (Square Root of 2)/2 which is approximately equal to 0.707...

Further referring to the geometry illustrated in FIGURE 2, it can also be seen: SIM(Theta) - Distance / Radius » d / r and COS(Theta) » Height / Radius ■ h / r Equations 5 and 6 can now be simplified by substitution: Signal Coil 1 - Kl « (d/r * 0.707 - h/r * 0.707) 15 Signal Coil 2 - Kl • (d/r • 0.707 - h/r « -.707) or when: Signal Coil 1 • X*. * (d - h) K' - (Kl • 0.707) fx Signal Coil 2 - K' • (d ♦ h) To solve for the desired error Distance (+/-d) in 20 terms of the sensor's height (h), the two coil outputs are combined as follows: Signal Coil 2 * Signal Coil 1 K' * ((d + h) + (d - h)) Signal Coil 2 - Signal Coil 1 K' * {(d * h) - (d - h)) K" * (d ♦ h + d - h) 2d d Distance K' * (d * h - d + h) 2h h Height Therefore: Signal Coil 2 * Signal Coil 1 Distance (♦/- Err) « Height * — — Signal Coil 2 - Signal Coil 1 27 12 Use of this solution. In combination with known devices for a driverless vehicle steering, can be implemented as illustrated in the block diagram of FIGURE 3.

With reference to FIGURE 3, it can be seen that the single add, subtract, divide and multiply are all that is required for implementation of this solution, and can be handled by either analog or digital electronics. 10 Additional signal conditioning, i.e. filtering, AC demodulation, A/C conversions can be easily accomplished.

In order to use sensor 16, the output of the coils 18,20 has to be synchronously demodulated, in order to preserve the sign information.

FIGURE 4 illustrates in block diagram form one method of implementing the 'X-Coil' sensor 16 into the steering system of a driverless vehicle 20 10.

With reference to FIGURE 4, an example of the herinabove described 'X-Coil' configuration was designed for vehicle 10 steering for a working height of 3 , inches above a 100 milliampere 25 guidepath cable, yielding a hardware 'guide-safe' width of +/- 3 inches. However, for those cases where the sensor height h has to be either higher or lower, and the software 'guide-safe' feature hereinafter below described may be employed so that 272185 13 the sensor 16 will easily cover the 1 to 6 inch height range. With use of AGC, a digital steering package can handle a cable current range of 20 to 400 milliamperes, a height range of 1 to 6 inches 5 and a horizontal displacement range of +/- 12 inches.

Using high Q filters and synchronous demodulators, all external signals, not synchronous in frequency and phase, are rejected. One signal 10 that will not be rejected, however, is the same wire nearby, such as with a 'return cut1 in the path. A return cut will distort the electromagnetic field, thereby shifting the null as seen by the sensor. This distortion will cause a null shift 15 that is a direct proportion of the distances of the sensor to each of the cables, i.e. if the height is 3 inches and the return cut is 24 inches, the null will shift 3/24 times the unity output position (3 inches at a 3 inch height), or 3/24 * 3 = 3/8 of an 20 inch, with the direction of the shift depending on the phase of the 'return cut'. At one half the distance between the two cables, everything fails as the resulting circular vector, the division, goes to zero. Linearity also falls off 25 at the 10 to 12 inch range due to return cuts' as close as 20 feet. For these reasons, the current package scales the sensor's output signal to +/-full range at +/-8 inches of horizontal displacement.

Accordingly the field of view seen by sensor 16 is greatly increased, without losing port f 272 14 and starboard directions. This improves the 'off-wire maneuver' recapture procedv :e. Also with the vastly improved linearity, and current provisions for entry of the vehicles sensor height, all 5 outputs become a uniform ratio of +/- 8 inches, thereby providing off-wire steering adjustments of +/- 4 inches, to account for 'return cuts' and/or to center on loads.

Both the wider 'field of view' and the 10 linearity, provide variable programmed 'guide-safe' limits. This feature has proven very useful in monitoring 'off-wire maneuvers', as the ANSI specifications allows a +/- 6 inch guide-safe window for such operations. The internal hardware 15 phase comparators provide a primary +/- 'guide safe' output. This window, however, is not set to +/- 3 inches for all sensor heights.

With the 'x-coil' configuration the +/-'guide safe' window becomes equal to the height h 20 of the coils 18, 20 above the wire, i.e. for a sensor 16 centered 3 inches above the wire, the 'guide-safe' window will be +/- 3 inches and will vary +/- 1/2 inch if the wire depth changes +/-1/2 inch. Under control of a vehicle r.xcroprocessor, 25 the digital steeri^ . controls which one, or both, of the 'guide-safe* signals are active.

While the best mode for carrying out the invention as been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention 30 relates will recognize various alternative designs f 2721 and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.

Claims (12)

( 27 16 WHAT #WE CLAIM IS:-

1. An apparatus for guiding a driverless vehicle along a path defined by a guide cable disposed in a horizontal road surface, said 5 guide cable carrying a current thereby generating an electromagnetic field in the space surrounding the guide cable, said apparatus comprising: sensor means for sensing the direction and magnitude of the electromagnetic field; 10 said sensor means including first and second spaced detecting coils having major axes being mounted in an X-coil configuration on said vehicle such that said major axes intersect and are oriented generally at +/-45 degrees relative to 15 said road surface; each detecting coil sensing both the radial and circular field vectors of said magnetic field; and means in communication with said first 20 and second detecting coils for comparing the magnitude of the radial vector with the magnitude of the circular vector whereby the lateral position of said sensor means relative to said guide cable is determined. 25

2. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said first and second coils have a core length and core diameter and wherein said spacing between said coils is at least equal to one core length.

3. Apparatus as in claim l further f t 27 17 1 including a mounting board having first and second sides for mounting said first detecting coil at +45 degrees on the first side of said mounting board and said second detecting coil at -45 degrees on 5 said second side and wherein said mounting board is fixed to said vehicle.

4. Apparatus as in claim 2 wherein said comparing means divides the sensed electromagnetic fields radial vector by the circular vector whereby 10 this ratio is proportional to the horizontal displacement of said sensor divided by the height of said sensor above said cable.

5. Apparatus as in claim 4 further including means for vehicle steering in 15 communication with said comparing means for steering said vehicle in response to output revised from said comparing means.

6. Apparatus as in claim 5 wherein said steering means is a digital steering system. 20

7. Apparatus as in claim 5 wherein said steering means is an analog steering system.

8. A method for guiding a driverless vehicle along a path defined by a guide cable disposed in a horizontal road surface, said guide 25 cable arrying a current thereby generating an electromagnetic field in the space surrounding the guide cable, said method comprising the steps of: mounting a first coil, having a major c 272 18 coil axis, at + 45 degrees relative to the horizontal on said vehicle; mounting A second coil, having a major coil axis, at -45 degrees relative to the 5 horizontal on said vehicle such that said axes of said first and second coils intersect; sensing both the radial and circular field vectors of the electromagnetic field with each coil; 10 comparing the magnitude of the radial vector with the magnitude of the circular vector for each coil whereby the lateral position of the intersection point of the axes of said coils is determined relative to the guide cable to indicate 15 the lateral displacement of said vehicle relative to said path.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said mounting of said second coil includes spacing said coils at least one coil core length. 20

10. The method of claim 9 further including the step of communicating said lateral displacement information to a controller for vehicle steering.

11. The method of claim 8 wherein the 25 lateral position of the intersection point of the axes of said coils is defined by: Signal of Coil 2 ♦ Signal of Coil 1 Distance (♦/- Err) « Height *;Signal of Coil 2 - Signal of Coil 1;272;19;wherein:;Distance (+/-) <= horizontal distance from the cable to the center of the coils;Height = vertical distance from the cable to the horizontal plane in which the coils can move.;

12. An apparatus substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.;14. A method as claimed in claim 8 substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.;JERVIS B. WEBB INTERNATIONAL COMPANY *~— By Its Attorneys / BALDWIN, SON & CAREY END OF CLAIMS