KR20170123289A - Apparatus for providing service which suggesting tender price - Google Patents

Abstract

Disclosed is an apparatus for providing a bidding price recommendation service. The apparatus of the present invention is as follows: receiving basic information necessary for calculating a performance ability; when there is a penalty point in a performance ability score, determining a minimum bidding rate gap, which is a difference from a minimum bidding rate in a minimum price score considering the determined penalty point in the performance ability score, and a minimum bidding rate when the performance ability score is full; searching past bidding information containing bidding rates of a plurality of bidding companies; arranging the bidding rates of the plurality of bidding companies in descending order; selecting at least one candidate section which has a close bidding rate gap (adjacent bidding rate) larger than the minimum bidding rate gap; selecting a biggest value among values smaller than a past company bidding rate corresponding to a bigger bidding rate among two bidding rates which correspond to the candidate section; and determining a recommended company bidding rate by using the same. According to the present invention, when there is a penalty point in performance, a competition with other rival companies is excluded and a negotiated advantage can be obtained.

Description

[0001] APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING SERVICE WHICH SUGGESTING TENDER PRICE [0002]

The present invention relates to an apparatus for providing a touched value recommendation service for recommending a touched amount in bidding in which a qualified examination is performed.

Generally, there are various kinds of qualification screening. However, the qualification screening considered in the present invention is an examination requiring that the score when the performance ability score and the tipping amount score are added is equal to or greater than the reference score. .

In case of qualifying examination, the successful bidder is selected in order of lowest price. If the rating does not reach the standard score, the company whose price is the next price will be examined. On the other hand, the price score decreases as the difference between a certain percentage of the planned price (for example, 88%) and the tipping rate increases. Under such a selection system, it is desirable to minimize the amount of tipping in such a way that the rating can be acquired to a minimum so as to pass the qualification examination. Of course, this process is accompanied by a prediction of the planned price.

If there is a deduction factor in the performance ability score under the selection system described above, it will be smaller than the case where the coverage rate of a company that satisfies the condition above the reference score is perfect. And the minimum penetration rate that satisfies the reference score is high. This situation is a disadvantage in bid competition.

First, if the range of the coverage rate that can satisfy the criteria above the standard score is small, the probability of passing the qualification examination itself decreases even if there is no competitor.

Second, it is disadvantageous to compete with a company whose performance ability score is perfect. In the case of firms with full performance capability scores, the minimum bid rate that meets the benchmark score is lower than when there is a deduction in the performance ability score (this value is equal to the lower bid rate) to be.

In order to overcome the disadvantages in the bidding, the first element mentioned above can be overcome to some extent if it is predicted correctly. However, it can be difficult to overcome the disadvantage of the second factor only by the prediction of the planned price.

The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a tentative amount recommendation service which can acquire a negotiation advantage by eliminating competition with other companies when there is a penalty in performance ability.

In order to solve the above-described technical problem, an apparatus of an embodiment of the present invention for providing a tentative gold recommendation service for notifying a user that a rating value obtained by adding a performance ability score and a tentative amount score is required to be higher than a reference score, A communication unit for receiving basic information necessary for the mobile terminal; If there is a deduction in the performance ability score, the minimum bid rate at the minimum price point determined by considering the deduction of the performance ability score and the minimum bid rate, which is the difference between the minimum bid rate An arithmetic unit for determining the number A searching unit for searching past bidding information including a tack-up rate of a plurality of companies; A sorting unit for sorting a plurality of companies in a descending order and sorting at least one candidate section in which a difference in an adjacent pairing ratio is greater than a difference in the minimum pairing ratio; And a decision unit for selecting the largest possible value among the values of the past companies that correspond to a large tap rate among the two tap rates corresponding to the candidate section, have.

In order to solve the above-described technical problem, an apparatus of an embodiment of the present invention, which provides a tentative gold recommendation service for notifying a user that a rating score obtained by adding a performance ability score and a tentative amount score is equal to or greater than a reference score, A communication unit for receiving basic information necessary for estimating a score; If there is a deduction in the performance ability score, the minimum bid rate at the minimum price point determined by considering the deduction of the performance ability score and the minimum bid rate, which is the difference between the minimum bid rate An arithmetic unit for determining the number A searching unit for searching past bidding information including a tack-up rate of a plurality of companies; It is also possible to arrange the tipping rates of a plurality of companies in a descending order so that the difference of the adjacent tipping ratio is larger than the minimum value of the tamping rate range (tamping rate range) for obtaining the difference between the minimum tamping rate difference and the qualification examination, A selector for selecting at least one candidate section that is small; And a decision unit for selecting the largest possible value among the values of the past companies that correspond to a large tap rate among the two tap rates corresponding to the candidate section, have.

The present invention has the effect of obtaining a negotiation advantage by eliminating competition with other companies when there is a penalty in the performance capability.

1 is a diagram illustrating a relationship between a tenderer terminal, a torn amount recommendation service providing server, and an announcement server according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a diagram illustrating a truant value recommendation service providing server according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a diagram illustrating a method of providing a tactical value recommendation service according to an embodiment of the present invention.

In order to fully understand the structure and effects of the present invention, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described below, but may be embodied in various forms and various changes may be made. However, the description of the present embodiment is intended to provide a complete disclosure of the present invention and to fully disclose the scope of the invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention belongs. In the accompanying drawings, the constituent elements are enlarged in size for the convenience of explanation, and the proportions of the constituent elements can be exaggerated or reduced.

It is to be understood that when an element is referred to as being "on" or "tangent" to another element, it may be understood that another element may be directly in contact with or connected to the image, something to do. On the other hand, when an element is described as being "directly on" or "directly on" another element, it can be understood that there is no other element in between. Other expressions that describe the relationship between components, for example, between 'between' and 'directly between' can be similarly interpreted.

The terms " first, " " second, " and the like may be used to describe various elements, but the elements should not be limited by the above terms. The above terms may only be used for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another. For example, without departing from the scope of the present invention, a 'first component' may be referred to as a 'second component', and similarly, a 'second component' may also be referred to as a 'first component' .

The singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term "comprising" or "having" is used to specify that a feature, a number, a step, an operation, an element, a part or a combination thereof is described in the specification, A step, an operation, an element, a part, or a combination thereof.

The terms used in the embodiments of the present invention may be interpreted as commonly known to those skilled in the art unless otherwise defined.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings.

1 is a block diagram of a tenderer terminal 200 and a tender fee recommendation service providing server 100 (hereinafter referred to as a 'service providing server 100') and announcement servers 310, 320, and 330 according to an embodiment of the present invention. ).

1, the torture value recommendation service providing server 100 is connected to the bidder terminal 200, the announcement server 1 310, the announcement server 2 320, and the announcement server 330 through a network .

The service providing server 100 receives basic information necessary for service provision from the bidder terminal 200 and transmits information related to the bid amount to the bidder terminal 200.

The service providing server 100 collects and utilizes information related to past or present announcements through a network connection with the announcement servers 310 to 330. [

The bidding company terminal 200 accesses the service providing server 100 to a terminal used by a company participating in the bidding to obtain desired information.

The announcement servers 310 to 330 can acquire information on the bid announcement, and various servers other than those shown in the figure may exist.

2 is a diagram illustrating a service providing server 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

2, a service providing server 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a communication unit 110, an operation unit 120, a search unit 130, a selection unit 140, a determination unit 150, A prediction unit 170, and a storage unit 180. [0031]

The communication unit 110 is connected to the bidder terminal 200 and the announcement servers 310 and 330 through a network to exchange information.

The communication unit 110 receives basic information necessary for estimating the performance capability score from the bidder terminal 200.

The basic information necessary for calculating the performance ability score means the relevant information of the bidders, which is necessary for calculating the score such as the performance and the management status to be evaluated for each client. However, the bidding company may directly calculate the performance capability score and transmit the performance capability score to the service providing server 100 through the bidding company terminal 200. [

The communication unit 110 provides a bidding company terminal 200 with information related to the tipping amount after a series of analysis processes in the service providing server 100. [

The information related to the tipping amount may be either direct information about the tipping amount or indirect information such as the rate of the company's assessment.

The rate of company assessment is calculated by (touched amount / base amount) / lower bid rate, which is the ratio related to the tipping amount determined by the vendor. Here, the tipping amount refers to the bid price proposed when the bid participant participates in the tender, the base amount means the price announced at the tender announcement, and the lower bid rate is the lowest price satisfying the standard score in the qualifying examination standard Price ratio with price. The planned price is not disclosed before the selection and the lower limit of the winning bid is presented at the time of announcement. In the present invention, the lower limit of the winning bid rate is the same as the minimum bid rate when the performance ability score is perfect, but the meaning of the lower bid rate may be different depending on the client or the nature of the announcement.

The tipping rate means the tipping amount divided by the planned price.

If we rewrite the formula for the rate of company assessment, it is the ratio of the touched amount / (base amount × lower limit of the winning bid), so the estimation rate of the company is the ratio of the touched amount to the price corresponding to the lower winning bid rate.

The planned price is determined by a predetermined procedure within a certain range based on the base amount (for example, within ± 0.3% of the base amount), and the range and procedure may vary depending on the ordering party.

For example, the change in the planned price can be explained by introducing the concept of the rate of interest.

For example, the assessment rate is calculated as the planned price / base amount as a percentage of the planned price for the base amount. In the case of the above example, the estimation rate has a value in the range of 0.997 to 1.003.

If the performance ability score is perfect, the estimation rate is the same as the lower limit of the winning bid rate when the prediction rate is predicted and the bid rate is determined by the same ratio of the rate of bidder.

If there is a deduction in the performance ability score, the case should be predicted and the minimum tipping rate should be determined. It is preferable that the minimum tie-in rate is determined to be the minimum amount satisfying the qualifying examination standard score, and a description thereof will be described later. For example, if the estimation of the assessment rate and the determination of the prediction rate are completed, the estimation rate of the vendor for obtaining the target prediction rate is as shown in the following equation (1).

The calculating unit 120 calculates the minimum difference between the minimum bid rate and the minimum bid rate that satisfies at least the reference score of the bidder based on the basic information received by the communication unit 110. [ In this case, if the bidders' performance ability score is perfect, there is no difference in the bid rate and it can be excluded from the analysis. If the bidder has a deduction, the minimum bid rate may be equal to the minimum bid rate that satisfies the bidder's standard score.

This will be described by way of example.

It is assumed that the rating formula for the tipping amount score (bid price) announced by the client is as shown in the following formula (2).

Here, the tipping amount / scheduled price means the tacking rate.

Assuming that the performance score is 20 points and the standard score is 95 points, the total score of the performance ability score and the tipping score must be 95 or more to pass the qualifying examination conditions.

The score of the tipping amount (score) is 80 points, and the tipping ratio at this time is 0.88 according to (Equation 2). If the performance ability score is out of 20 points, only 75 points are required for the tender amount to pass the qualification examination. In this case, the minimum tentative rate is 0.8775. However, in actual bidding, rounding is performed at the fifth decimal place, so the minimum bid rate is lowered to 0.87745. This value also means the lower limit value of winning bid.

If there is a penalty point, the minimum penalty rate for passing the qualification screening can be calculated as shown in Equation (3) by taking the absolute value as a positive number and summarizing the penalty rate in [Equation 2].

Here, the minimum price score is the minimum amount of tender amount required according to the deduction of the performance ability score. In the above example, if the performance ability score is 2 points and 18 points, the minimum price score is 77, and the minimum bid rate of the bidder is 0.8785. Of course, considering the above-mentioned criteria for rounding, it is lower than 0.87845. If there is a deduction in the performance ability score, the minimum price score will be higher and the minimum tipping rate will also increase accordingly.

The difference in the minimum tie ratio calculated by the calculation unit 120 increases as the grading point of the performance ability score increases. Considering this point, the present invention regards the difference of the minimum tie ratio as an index of the analysis when there is a penalty in the performance ability score. In the above example, if the performance ability score is 2 points, the difference between the minimum and the highest is 0.001.

A company with a deductible performance score should inevitably set a higher bid rate than the lower bid rate even if the rate is in line with the forecast. As a result, there is a tendency of the bidder between the bidder's bid rate and the lower bidder's bid rate, and if the qualification examination conditions of other companies are passed, the priority will be given to other companies. Therefore, it is desirable to participate in bidding in the direction of avoiding the competition as much as possible because the companies with deductibility score are in an adverse position in the competition.

The search unit 130 searches past bidding information including past bid rates of a plurality of companies and provides the bidding information to the selector 140.

The search unit 130 may access the announcement servers 310 to 330 or the database unit 160 to obtain past bid information. In the case of obtaining the past bid information, it is desirable to search for a result announcement in which the score calculation method for the price, the area restriction, the fluctuation range of the planned price (for example, the estimation rate range) It is desirable to obtain information from the latest result announcements in time.

The sorting unit 140 sorts the tentative ratios of past companies in descending order from the past bidding information collected by the search unit 130.

The selector 140 extracts tactile ratio values having a difference between adjacent tactile rates greater than the difference between the minimum tactical rate.

The selection unit 140 selects at least one candidate range as the range between the target tactile ratios satisfying the above conditions.

For example, in the above example, the selector 140 extracts past bidder rates with an adjacent bid rate difference of greater than 0.001 if the minimum bid rate difference is 0.001. If the past bid rate of the past company is 0.88745 and the next highest bid rate is 0.88545, the difference is 0.002, so the range of 0.88545 to 0.88745 is the candidate interval. If the previous bid rate is 0.88345 and the next bid rate is 0.88305, the bid difference rate is 0.0004, so it is excluded from the candidate interval. A plurality of such candidate intervals may be selected.

In the candidate section, when the performance ability score is deducted, the ratio of the past firms is analyzed, so as to exclude the competition with other companies by selecting the sections with low concentration.

The determination unit 150 determines the criterion rate using the candidate interval. The selection rate of recommendation companies is selected from among the candidate intervals, and the largest possible value among the two rates corresponding to the larger one of the two reference rates corresponding to the candidate interval, .

The past rate of company assessment can be calculated from past bid information. The rate of past companies' appraisal is calculated as the amount of tramp, base amount, and tramp rate of previous companies. The calculation of past vendor rate is shown in Equation (4).

Equation (4) differs from Equation (1) in that, in Equation (1), the eigenvalue is the predicted value and the target rate is the target value, while in Equation (4) And the penetration rate.

The reason for choosing the highest bid rate in the candidates section is to avoid competition with competitors that are expected to have low bid rates.

On the other hand, if there is a penalty in the performance ability score, there is a range of the inserting rate to obtain a score that can pass the qualification examination.

According to the above equation (2), examples of the difference between the minimum transmission rate (denoted by C) and the coverage rate (denoted by R) for obtaining a score that can pass the qualification examination are shown in Table 1 below.

Deduction C R One 0.0005 0.004 2 0.0010 0.003 3 0.0015 0.002 4 0.0020 0.001

For example, if the performance ability score is 2 points, the minimum transfer rate of 0.87845 is 0.88155 (0.8816 when the rounding rate is out of the range of R = 0.003) The total score of 18 points is 94.8 points.

In addition, if the candidate interval is too large, it means that the range of possible bid rates increases and the business is not overcrowded.

Therefore, when selecting a candidate section, it is not only to find only a section that is equal to or greater than the difference in the minimum tipping ratio, but may also consider both the C and R values.

For example, it is possible to select a tap rate interval corresponding to a case where the difference in the adjacent tap rate is greater than or equal to the minimum value of C and R, and less than or equal to the maximum value of C and R, as the candidate interval.

In this case, the criterion for selecting the candidate section is as shown in the following equation (5).

For example, if the performance ability score is 2 points, the minimum transfer rate of 0.87845 is 0.88155 (0.8816 when the rounding rate is out of the range of R = 0.003) The total score of 18 points is 94.8 points.

In addition, if the candidate interval is too large, it means that the range of possible bid rates increases and the business is not overcrowded.

Therefore, when selecting a candidate section, it is not only to find only a section that is equal to or greater than the difference in the minimum tipping ratio, but may also consider both the C and R values.

For example, it is possible to select a tap rate interval corresponding to a case where the difference in the adjacent tap rate is greater than or equal to the minimum value of C and R, and less than or equal to the maximum value of C and R, as the candidate interval.

In this case, the criterion for selecting the candidate section is as shown in the following equation (5).

On the other hand, in the case of a five point deduction, there is no method that can only be successful in predicting the ejaculation rate 100% accurately, so it can be excluded from the analysis according to the present invention.

The database unit 160 stores relevant data necessary for analysis. The database unit 160 may store past bidding information collected by the search unit 130. In this process, the past bidding information can be classified and stored according to the announcement date and selection date of the past bidding, the base amount, the scheduled price, and the bid rate according to each company.

The prediction unit 170 predicts a predetermined price and provides it to the calculation unit 120. [

With respect to prediction of the planned price, various existing methods can be tried, and detailed description thereof will be omitted.

The prediction of the planned price is for suggesting a more probable candidate section among a plurality of candidate sections. From the predicted value of the scheduled price, for example, a predicted value of the rate of change can be obtained. It is desirable that the selection of the candidate section be based on the ratio of companies that correspond to the large ratio of the candidates, that is, the ratio of companies that correspond to the amount to be tapped and the degree of prediction that is close to the ratio.

In one embodiment of the present invention, it is determined whether the assessment rate is included in the range of the assessment rate corresponding to the bid rate of the candidate interval, and if the assessment rate of the recommended bidder is within the range of the assessment rate corresponding to the candidate interval do. In this case, in order to avoid the competition, it is possible to make the rate of the supplier corresponding to the large screening rate of the candidate section as the case of the recommendation company as in the case described above. In order to make the estimation rate closer to the assessment rate, The rate of companies that can have a bid rate can be determined by the rate of recommendation companies.

As an example of the latter case, in the case of the qualifying examination conditions as described above, one of the candidate sections having the difference of the performance ability score of the bidder with two points and the difference of the ratio of the difference between the minimum difference rate of more than 0.001 is in the range of 0.88765 to 0.88965 , And the past example is 1.002, the range of the corresponding estimation ratio is in the range of 1.01365 to 1.01593 by using [Equation 4]. If the prediction rate is 1.00145, the prediction rate is substituted into the equation (1), and the bid rate is 0.8004, which is the minimum bid rate for the performance ability score -2. do.

The storage unit 180 may temporarily store necessary information in the analysis process, and may store information related to the analysis result.

The storage unit 180 may temporarily store the basic information of the bidder, the difference of the minimum bid rate, the bidder ratio of the extracted past company, the candidate period, and the like necessary for the score calculation.

The storage unit 180 may store the estimation rate of the recommendation company, which is the analysis result, the estimation rate, and the estimation rate.

3 is a diagram illustrating a method of providing a tactical value recommendation service according to an embodiment of the present invention.

A method of providing a tile amount recommendation service by the service providing server 100 described above with reference to FIG. 3 will be described.

Referring to FIG. 3, in step S310, the communication unit 110 receives announcement selection information from a bidder's terminal. Of course, in the previous step, the communication unit 110 may provide relevant information to the terminal of the bidding company by providing information on the bidding notification and selecting it.

In step S320, the communication unit 110 receives basic information necessary for calculating the performance capability score of the bid supplier from the bid supplier terminal.

In operation S330, the calculation unit 120 calculates the difference between the minimum bid rate and the minimum bid rate, which is the difference between the minimum bid rate and the bid rate lower than the reference point that can pass the qualification screen by using the basic information.

In step S340, the search unit 130 searches for past bid information including a bid rate of a plurality of companies in the past.

In step S350, the sorting unit 140 sorts the tentative rates of a plurality of companies in the past in descending order, and if the difference in the adjacent tentative rates is larger than the minimum tentative rate difference, do.

In step S360, the determination unit 150 determines a recommendation company assessment rate using the candidate section.

In step S370, the communication unit 110 transmits information corresponding to the recommendation company assessment rate to the terminal of the bidder.

The information corresponding to the recommendation rate can be the recommended tipping amount. The recommended tipping amount can be calculated by the recommended rate of the recommendation company × the base amount × the lower limit of the winning bid.

While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Accordingly, the true scope of protection of the present invention should be determined by the following claims.

100: service providing server 110:
120: Operation unit 130:
140: selection unit 150: determination unit
160: Database unit 170: Prediction unit
180:

Claims (2)

And a tentative sum of the tentative ability score and the tentative amount score is required to be equal to or greater than a reference score, the apparatus comprising:
A communication unit for receiving basic information necessary for calculating the performance score;
If there is a deduction in the performance ability score, the minimum bid rate at the minimum price point determined by considering the deduction of the performance ability score and the minimum bid rate, which is the difference between the minimum bid rate An arithmetic unit for determining the number
A searching unit for searching past bidding information including a tack-up rate of a plurality of companies;
A sorting unit for sorting a plurality of companies in a descending order and sorting at least one candidate section in which a difference in an adjacent pairing ratio is greater than a difference in the minimum pairing ratio; And
Selecting a largest possible value among values of the past bidder rates corresponding to the large bid rate among the two bid rates corresponding to the candidate section and determining the recommended bidder rate using the selected maximum bidder bid rate; Device.
And a tentative sum of the tentative ability score and the tentative amount score is required to be equal to or greater than a reference score, the apparatus comprising:
A communication unit for receiving basic information necessary for calculating the performance score;
If there is a deduction in the performance ability score, the minimum bid rate at the minimum price point determined by considering the deduction of the performance ability score and the minimum bid rate, which is the difference between the minimum bid rate An arithmetic unit for determining the number
A searching unit for searching past bidding information including a tack-up rate of a plurality of companies;
It is also possible to arrange the tipping rates of a plurality of companies in a descending order so that the difference of the adjacent tipping ratio is larger than the minimum value of the tamping rate range (tamping rate range) for obtaining the difference between the minimum tamping rate difference and the qualification examination, A selector for selecting at least one candidate section that is small; And
Selecting a largest possible value among values of the past bidder rates corresponding to the large bid rate among the two bid rates corresponding to the candidate section and determining the recommended bidder rate using the selected maximum bidder bid rate; Device.

Images