KR20100090903A - Method for measuring the effect of internetadvertisement - Google Patents
Method for measuring the effect of internetadvertisement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20100090903A KR20100090903A KR1020090010127A KR20090010127A KR20100090903A KR 20100090903 A KR20100090903 A KR 20100090903A KR 1020090010127 A KR1020090010127 A KR 1020090010127A KR 20090010127 A KR20090010127 A KR 20090010127A KR 20100090903 A KR20100090903 A KR 20100090903A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- advertisement
- population
- calculating
- advertising
- response information
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0241—Advertisements
- G06Q30/0242—Determining effectiveness of advertisements
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Disclosed is a method for measuring advertisement effect. The method includes selecting a male and female panel client having an analysis target advertisement and a predetermined age range among advertisements broadcast over the airwaves; Providing an electronic questionnaire including query information related to the selected advertisement to the selected panel client at an operation server; Receiving, by the operation server, an electronic questionnaire including response information about the query information and performing validation to construct an advertisement database; And calculating an advertisement effect based on the response information stored in the advertisement database, wherein calculating the advertisement effect comprises: a) a number of a crush panel client responding to the selected advertisement by the number of actual population; Converting to the likeable population with reference to; b) calculating a cumulative average cost per consumer's mind (CPCM) by dividing the average cumulative advertising cost of the selected advertising sector by the cumulative population; c) calculating the CM value by multiplying the converted crush population by the calculated industry average CPCM; And d) calculating a return on investment (ROI) based on the calculated CM value and the advertisement cost executed for the selected advertisement.
Description
The present invention relates to a method for measuring the advertising effect, and more particularly, to a method for measuring the advertising effect that can effectively measure the advertising effect by calculating the effective advertising costs.
In general, in order to contribute to brand loyalty, commercial advertisements, including TV advertisements, are more important than whether they are advertisements that appeal to consumers to induce purchases rather than simple cognitive reactions by consumers. In addition, because consumers are indiscriminately exposed to commercial advertisements of various products, they may be buried by better commercial advertisements in other industries, even if they are superior to competitors' commercial advertisements in recognition.
In this respect, there is a need for an objective tool to measure how much commercial advertising has reached and maintained the consumer's mind, that is, how much of it it is.
In this regard, although Korean Patent Publication No. 2007-29350 proposes a method of measuring advertising effect, it is not specifically presented how to analyze the cost-to-favorability of the advertising being executed based on the integrated database. Only the abstract process is described.
Therefore, there is a need for an advertisement effect measuring method capable of objectively measuring the advertisement effect based on the consumer's attractiveness to the commercial advertisement being executed as the advertisement effect.
An object of the present invention is to provide an advertising effect measuring method that can objectively measure the advertising effect by quantifying the likelihood through the calculation of the effective advertising cost.
The above object is to select a male and female panel client of a predetermined age range and the analysis target advertisement among advertisements broadcast over the airwaves; Providing an electronic questionnaire including query information related to the selected advertisement to the selected panel client at an operation server; Receiving, by the operation server, an electronic questionnaire including response information about the query information and performing validation to construct an advertisement database; And calculating an advertisement effect based on the response information stored in the advertisement database, wherein calculating the advertisement effect comprises: a) a number of a crush panel client responding to the selected advertisement by the number of actual population; Converting to the likeable population with reference to; b) calculating a cumulative average cost per consumer's mind (CPCM) by dividing the average cumulative advertising cost of the selected advertising sector by the cumulative population; c) calculating the CM value by multiplying the converted crush population by the calculated industry average CPCM; And d) calculating a return on investment (ROI) based on the calculated CM value and the advertisement cost executed on the selected advertisement.
Preferably, after step a), the method may further include calculating a MRP (Mind Rating Point) by dividing the converted crush population by the total population of the predetermined age range based on the population census of the year. .
In addition, the process of removing unsatisfactory response information from the response information, authenticating the responding consumer panel client, verifying the coding result of the response information, and filtering by an expert is further performed. can do.
According to the above configuration, the advertising effect can be analyzed objectively and reliably by quantifying the advertising effect.
Hereinafter, with reference to the accompanying drawings will be described an embodiment of the present invention.
1 is a diagram showing a network configuration to which the measuring method of the present invention can be applied.
The
The
The consumer panel client may be a
2 is a flowchart illustrating a method for measuring advertisement effect according to the present invention.
First, an analysis target advertisement is selected from the advertisements broadcast through the airwaves (step S10). The setting of the analysis target advertisement may be selected at the request of the advertiser, or arbitrarily selected for mutual comparison of the advertisements within the corresponding industry. There is no particular limitation on the selection of the analysis target advertisement, but considering the cost-effective aspect, for example, a program advertisement or a stub broadcast on the national or metropolitan area through the MBC, SBS, and KBS2 channels may be used as the analysis target advertisement.
Subsequently, age and region ranges and the number of people, survey methods, survey periods, etc. for the consumer panel are selected (step S20).
For example, in consideration of cost-effectiveness, the age may be 10 to 59 years old and the area may be limited to Seoul and the metropolitan area, and the number of people may be limited to 1,200. In addition, the survey method provides a standardized electronic questionnaire, and the survey period may be repeatedly selected by selecting a specific period each month, or may be selected for a long period from several months to several months.
Next, the
In this case, the query information may be previously formatted and provided for efficient analysis of the advertising effect. In other words, the analysis of advertisement effects is preformed in consideration of various forms of analysis, including not only the cost-effectiveness analysis of the advertisement itself, but also the analysis of the attractiveness factors of the advertisement and the analysis of the advertisement model.
The
Here, validation refers to a process of removing unsatisfactory response information, authenticating a responding consumer panel client, verifying a coding result of the response information, and filtering by an expert in an analysis process. Through this validation, the reliability of the response information can be improved by improving the reliability of the response information.
The
Hereinafter, the process of calculating the advertising effect will be described in detail.
Advertising effectiveness indicators can define MRP (Mind Rating Point) and CM Value (CM Value).
MRP (%) = Crush Population / Total Population
CM Value (KRW) = Crush Population × Industry Average CPCM
Specifically, the MRP means a ratio that remembers that the target advertisement is liked, and the crush population is divided by the total population. Here, the crush population refers to the number of respondents who responded by remembering that they liked the target advertisement among the respondents' panel, according to the actual population composition by age, and the total population was 10 to 59 based on the population census of the survey year. Refers to the entire male and female population of three.
In addition, the CM value refers to the cost of the advertising effect (MRP), that is, the effective advertising cost, and is calculated by multiplying the average population CPCM by the number of crush population. Here, CPCM (Cost Per Consumer's Mind) (KRW) is an advertisement efficiency index, which means the cost of a corresponding advertisement causing a crush on one consumer, and is calculated by dividing the execution advertisement cost by the number of crush population.
The advertising cost of the target advertisement was 11.34 million won, and among the 1,200 consumer panels surveyed from October 10, 2007 to March 2007, 112 voted that they liked the target advertisement, which was converted according to the actual population composition. The population was 3,034 thousand.
Meanwhile, since May 2005, the cumulative advertising cost of the industry to which the target advertisement belongs is 210 billion won, the cumulative population is 198 million, and the cumulative average CPCM is calculated based on this.
The industry's cumulative average CPCM = KRW 210bn / 198 million = 1,118 won.
Therefore, CM value (won) = 3,034 thousand x 1,118 won = 3,391 million won. In other words, if the advertising effect is converted into an amount, it would be 3,391 million won.
As a result, return on investment (ROI) is calculated by dividing the effective advertising cost by the actual advertising cost,
ROI = (3,391-1,134) / 1,134 × 100 = 199%.
After calculating the advertising effect as described above, it is possible to perform statistical analysis on the advertising effect between the calculated advertisements from various angles (step S60).
For example, by calculating the actual advertising cost, MRP, and CPCM for each brand to determine the ranking of advertising effectiveness, it is possible to provide brand information in the order of high advertising effectiveness regardless of the industry. In addition, the position of the target advertisement in the entire advertisement or the corresponding industry, the analysis of the advertising effect trend between competing brands, or the advertising execution share and the advertising share in the competition category can be analyzed. In addition, the degree of effect of the target target among the total consumers can be analyzed and compared with the competitors, and the favorable factors can be compared and analyzed for each advertisement of the competitive brand.
In the above description, the embodiment of the present invention has been described, but various changes can be made at the level of those skilled in the art. Therefore, the scope of the present invention should not be construed as being limited to the above embodiment, but should be interpreted by the claims described below.
1 is a diagram showing a network configuration to which the measuring method of the present invention can be applied.
2 is a flowchart illustrating a method for measuring advertisement effect according to the present invention.
Claims (3)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020090010127A KR20100090903A (en) | 2009-02-09 | 2009-02-09 | Method for measuring the effect of internetadvertisement |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020090010127A KR20100090903A (en) | 2009-02-09 | 2009-02-09 | Method for measuring the effect of internetadvertisement |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20100090903A true KR20100090903A (en) | 2010-08-18 |
Family
ID=42756286
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020090010127A KR20100090903A (en) | 2009-02-09 | 2009-02-09 | Method for measuring the effect of internetadvertisement |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR20100090903A (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2014015233A1 (en) * | 2012-07-20 | 2014-01-23 | Mastercard International Incorporated | System and method for protecting consumer privacy in the measuring of the effectiveness of advertisements |
US9524504B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2016-12-20 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Protecting privacy in audience creation |
KR20170139719A (en) * | 2016-06-09 | 2017-12-20 | 엔에이치엔엔터테인먼트 주식회사 | Method and system for providing ranking information using effect analysis data of informational data |
WO2022145601A1 (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2022-07-07 | (주)서베이피플 | Advertisement content reaction and advertisement effect pre-analysis system |
-
2009
- 2009-02-09 KR KR1020090010127A patent/KR20100090903A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9524504B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2016-12-20 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Protecting privacy in audience creation |
US10339545B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2019-07-02 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Protecting privacy in audience creation |
WO2014015233A1 (en) * | 2012-07-20 | 2014-01-23 | Mastercard International Incorporated | System and method for protecting consumer privacy in the measuring of the effectiveness of advertisements |
KR20170139719A (en) * | 2016-06-09 | 2017-12-20 | 엔에이치엔엔터테인먼트 주식회사 | Method and system for providing ranking information using effect analysis data of informational data |
WO2022145601A1 (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2022-07-07 | (주)서베이피플 | Advertisement content reaction and advertisement effect pre-analysis system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Leung et al. | Costs and benefits of ISO 9000 series: a practical study | |
Vandenbergh et al. | The carbon-neutral individual | |
Kopalle et al. | Setting quality expectations when entering a market: What should the promise be? | |
US7949561B2 (en) | Method for determining advertising effectiveness | |
US9363557B2 (en) | Methods and systems for forecasting and measurement of media viewership using a combination of data sets | |
US8973023B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus to determine audience duplication in cross-media campaigns | |
US8429013B2 (en) | Dynamic geo-location parameter for determining an impact of online behavior on offline sales | |
Yacob et al. | Visiting intention: A perspective of destination attractiveness and image in Indonesia rural tourism | |
US20100057534A1 (en) | Advertising-buying optimization method, system, and apparatus | |
JP2010152893A (en) | Online ad detection and ad campaign analysis | |
WO2006024108A8 (en) | Method, system and computer program product for measuring and tracking brand equity | |
KR20100090903A (en) | Method for measuring the effect of internetadvertisement | |
CN102004985A (en) | Object customization and management system | |
Thomas | Spillovers from mass advertising: An identification strategy | |
CN105978729A (en) | System and method for pushing mobile phone information based on user surfing log and position | |
Hess et al. | The Marketer's Dilemma: Focusing on a Target or a Demographic?: The Utility of Data-Integration Techniques | |
US20130166407A1 (en) | Computer implemented method for managing information | |
JP6364581B2 (en) | Program, information processing apparatus and information processing method | |
CN117575687A (en) | Method and device for monitoring new media operation effect of automobile based on big data | |
Silalahi et al. | Measuring Digital Customer Experience. | |
Kramer | Valuation and assessment of patents and patent portfolios through analytical techniques | |
WO2017141837A1 (en) | Program, information processing device, and information processing method | |
Sinha et al. | Practice prize reports | |
Zigmond et al. | Measuring advertising quality on television: deriving meaningful metrics from audience retention data | |
Gerke et al. | International database of efficient appliances (IDEA): A novel tool for efficiency program development and evaluation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
E601 | Decision to refuse application |