KR102062885B1 - Method for transaction of patent technology comprising trial and law suit information - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention allows a technology evaluator, a potential technical consumer, to evaluate the value of an intangible technology, including intangible property rights, such as patent claims and patent rights triggered by litigation information. It is about. According to the present invention, when one of a plurality of suppliers (eg, a technology seller) requests a technology valuation while providing a technology to be evaluated to a server, the server makes a valuation request to an unspecified or specific number of evaluators. When each evaluator evaluates the technology and presents the valuation value, the valuation data is collected and analyzed to determine the technical value, and the supplier is informed of the determined technical value. Patent trials and litigation information may increase the interest of the evaluator, thereby further facilitating technology transactions.

Description

Method for transaction of patent technology comprising trial and law suit information}

The present invention relates to a patented technology trading method.

Patent transactions and patent recommendation systems are required for technology transactions, and building such a system by itself was not easy because it cost more than billions of dollars. Most domestic and foreign venture firms at home and abroad are unable to establish their own patent retrieval and patent recommendation systems, and have been seeking patent retrieval and useful technologies by requesting patent law firms. This difficulty has been an obstacle to the development of the technology commercialization market through patent technology transactions.

Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1692701 discloses a technique for recommending a patent based on patent information, patent classification information, and social tagging information. Incentives are given to users to pay points according to event activity details and the accumulated points can be cashed through the bank. This technology allows users to search for patents using the search function, tag the patents they are interested in, search for and recommend similar patents, and in this case, the technology similarity, content similarity, Social tag similarity is determined and weighted to recommend technology more efficiently. Through this, it is characterized by recommending patents desired by the user.

Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1619566 discloses a technology value evaluation method. In the above invention, if one of the plurality of suppliers (technical sellers) provides the server with the technology to be evaluated, the server collects the evaluation value and notifies the supplier of the technical value when the technical consumer evaluates and provides the value. It features. This allows technology suppliers to identify market needs and technology consumers to receive information about the technology they need. Receiving information about the technology by the technical consumer can be seen as playing the role of "recommended" of the Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1692701. Patent No. 10-1692701 analyzes whether the user's tag is tagged or not. Only if qualitative analysis is possible, Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1619566 proposes a price. The difference is that quantitative analysis is possible. However, Korean Patent Registration No. 10-1619566 does not include the technology to consider when determining the recommended patent by analyzing the technology similarity and content similarity.

Even though these types of patents are registered for the transaction of patent technology, there is a difficulty in evaluating the technology value and trading if there is no active participation of the participants. Both of the above patents tried to increase participation by giving participants in some form of incentives, but it seems difficult to bring out the participants' active participation.

While making efforts to promote technology value evaluation and technology transaction through active participation of the evaluator, the evaluator's active participation knows that participation is increased by how big his / her profit is, In the case of suggesting that the high degree of participation, the present invention was completed by adding a database to rearrange the profits by improving the prior patent 10-1619566.

It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved technology trading method.

For the above purpose, the present invention provides a technology trading method further comprising providing keywords related to the benefits of the technical value evaluator in addition to the technique of the prior art 10-1619566. More specifically, the step of collecting patent judgment, litigation information from the patent judge, the patent trial in the court and patent litigation data; It provides a technology transaction method comprising the step of requesting a valuation of the attached patent technology while presenting the patent-related judgment and litigation materials to the technology value evaluator registered in the same technology category as the determined technical field.

Providing the server with the evaluation system server with the technology to be traded by one of the plurality of suppliers; Classifying a technical field with respect to the provided technology; Receiving a detailed technical field of a technical value assessor; Classifying a technical field of the technical value assessor; Selecting a technical value evaluator having high agreement between the technical field of the evaluation target technical field and the technical evaluator; Collecting patent judgment and litigation information from patent trial and patent litigation data; Requesting the technical value assessor to evaluate the technical value of the provided technology together with the extracted patent judgment and litigation information; In the case of requesting the evaluation of the technology of two or more, providing the technology to be evaluated in order to be evaluated first as the similarity of the technical field of the provided technology and the technical value evaluator becomes higher; When each of the one or more evaluators evaluates the value of the technology and presents the evaluation value, collecting and analyzing the evaluation value data to determine the technical value; Notifying the technology supplier of the determined technical value; Storing information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step; And performing a technology transaction matching using information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined by the evaluation management unit.

In other words, when one of the plurality of suppliers makes a valuation request while providing the technology to be evaluated to the server, the server makes a valuation request to an unspecified or specific number of evaluators. At this time, the evaluator provides patent information that may be of interest. When each of the multiple evaluators evaluates the technology and presents its value, the valuation data is collected and analyzed to determine the value of the technology and notify the supplier of the determined value.

The valuation method according to the present invention is performed by the valuation management unit of the valuation system.

The evaluation management unit has a technical field decision unit. The technical field of the provided technology and the technical field of the technical evaluator are subdivided.

The evaluation management unit has a patent trial and a litigation information extraction unit. The patent trial and litigation information extraction unit collects patent judgment and litigation information from the patent trial and patent litigation data. The patent trial and litigation information is sent to the evaluator along with the provided technology, and serves to induce the evaluator to evaluate the provided technology.

There is an evaluation order determining unit in the evaluation management unit. The evaluation order determining unit determines the order so that the higher the similarity between the provided technology and the technical value assessor, the higher the technical field is.

There is an evaluation control unit in the evaluation management unit. The evaluation control unit performs the technical valuation sequentially. If the evaluator does not evaluate the first technique presented, then the second technique is not given an opportunity to evaluate. Only the evaluator who evaluated the second technique is given the opportunity to evaluate the third technique. Therefore, evaluation is compelled so that technical evaluation cannot be continued unless the evaluation is faithful. The same holds true for the remaining technical evaluations. Therefore, the evaluator who wants to evaluate or verify the second technique must mandatoryly evaluate the first technique. In this way, the evaluator's evaluation procedure should be restricted to enforce the evaluation. Bad evaluators are potentially deleted from the evaluator database.

There is an evaluation history management department. The evaluation history manager manages the evaluation history. The evaluator who earns the evaluation is given credits for the evaluation integrity (such as cyber money). The evaluator who did not perform the evaluation in good faith will deduct the prepaid credit according to the evaluation insufficiency. If all credits have been deducted, you will lose the qualification and if the penalty period has elapsed, you will be credited again to participate in the evaluation.

The evaluation history management department separately manages appraisers such as those with high technical values among technology suppliers and appraisers or companies with a large number of employees as potential technical consumers. The information of the technical consumer is kept confidential and owned by the operator of the evaluation system. The evaluation system operator can use the information of the technology supplier and the technology owner to utilize the technology transaction.

The evaluation technical information provider presents the technical information to the technical supplier, that is, the technical value determined by the evaluator. The technology value estimation method uses CVM (contingent valuation methods). Various modifications to the CVM will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, Kwon Oh-sang, 2nd edition of 'Environmental Economics' (Park Young-sa, 1999) pp 495-596.

It stores the information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined in the evaluation history management step.

The technology transaction server manages a technology transaction matching process by using technology information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined by the evaluation management unit.

The present invention provides a patent judgment and litigation information for attracting a technical value evaluator to enable technology trading to be activated as compared to the conventional technology trading method. Similar to the price determination of commodities, evaluators and suppliers are directly involved in evaluating the value of intangible technology and intangible property rights, so that the existing subjective pricing decisions are overcome. It becomes possible to achieve objectification or coherence of price determination for property rights and the like.

The present invention facilitates technology trading by preliminarily evaluating the value of technology that has not yet entered the market.

The present invention is useful for identifying potential technology consumers.

The present invention activates technology transactions by developing market-friendly products by deriving various values of technology values based on information of technology evaluators so that they can be useful references for technology suppliers.

1 is an overall configuration diagram of a method according to the invention.
Figure 2 is an internal configuration diagram of the evaluation management unit for administering the performance of the method of the present invention.
3 is a more detailed process of the technical evaluation application in FIG.
4 is an exemplary view of a questionnaire usable at the time of a valuation request.
FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of the questionnaire of FIG. 4. FIG.
6 is an example process for granting a given credit to an evaluator who has completed a valuation.
7 is a process for determining the value of the technology by analyzing this valuation data when multiple evaluators have presented valuation values.

1 is a schematic process flowchart of a method for evaluating technical value according to the present invention.

Multiple technology provider clients and multiple technology evaluator clients communicate over the server. Hereafter, the supplier client is referred to as 'provider' and the evaluator client is referred to as 'evaluator'. At this time, the supplier and the evaluator are mainly used as client computers. It was also used as a subject of buying act.

When one of a number of suppliers submits a technology valuation application while providing a technology to the server that they wish to trade or to be valued, the server provides the patent referee and litigation information that the evaluator should be interested in so that the unspecified or specific multiple evaluators Ask for a valuation. The value of the technology is determined by collecting and analyzing the valuation data presented by a plurality of evaluators, and the supplier is informed of the determined technology value.

The technology transaction server performs technology transaction matching using information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined by the evaluation management unit.

2 is a configuration diagram of the evaluation management unit.

The technical field decision unit subdivides the technical field of the provided technology and the technical field of the technical evaluator.

The patent judgment and litigation information extraction unit includes a patent trial and litigation information extraction unit. The patent trial and litigation information extraction unit collects patent judgment and litigation information from the patent trial and patent litigation data.

The evaluation order determining unit determines the order so that the higher the similarity of the technical field between the provided technology and the technical value assessor, the priority is evaluated.

The evaluation control unit performs the evaluation sequentially, and does not give the evaluator an opportunity to evaluate the second technique unless the first technique is valuation. Only the evaluator who evaluated the second technique is given the opportunity to evaluate the third technique. The same holds true for the remaining technical evaluations. Therefore, the evaluator who wants to evaluate the value of the second technology or want to confirm the technology should make a mandatory evaluation of the first technology. In this way, the evaluator's evaluation procedure should be restricted to enforce the evaluation. Bad evaluators are potentially deleted from the evaluator database.

The evaluation order determining unit determines the order so that a plurality of techniques can be evaluated. Multiple techniques can be evaluated at one time. The order of evaluation techniques may be arranged randomly or presented to evaluators in a certain order. Preferably, they are arranged randomly so that the evaluation opportunity does not change for each technique according to the evaluation order. An evaluator who is presented with a skill may evaluate the second skill after evaluating the first skill, and only after evaluating the second skill. If the first technique is not evaluated, the remaining techniques cannot be evaluated.

The evaluation history manager manages the evaluation history. The history of the assessment is managed and evaluated. The evaluator who faithfully evaluates the cyber money for the evaluation integrity. The evaluator who did not faithfully evaluate shall deduct the prepaid cyber money according to the unfaithful evaluation. If all the cyber money is deducted, the evaluation qualification will be lost. If the penalty period is exceeded, the cyber money will be paid again to participate in the evaluation. The evaluation history management department separately manages potential technical consumer information selected from the evaluators, such as those with high technical values among technology suppliers and evaluators, or companies with a large number of employees. The information of the technical consumer is kept confidential and owned by the operator of the evaluation system. The evaluation system operator can use the information of the technology supplier and the technology owner to utilize the technology transaction.

The evaluation technical information provider informs the technical supplier of the evaluation technical information, that is, the technical value evaluated by the evaluator. As a technique value estimation method, for example, CVM (contingent valuation methods) is used.

The evaluation management department stores the information of potential technical consumers and technology suppliers determined at the evaluation history management stage.

3 illustrates a more detailed process of a technology valuation application in FIG. 1.

When a supplier submits a valuation request by providing his or her technology or patent rights to a server, the valuation application is stored in the server's technical database. Upon receipt of the application, or at some point after being stored in the "evaluation technology" database, it is sent directly to the relevant evaluator (eg via email or push service) or broadcasted in a post, such as a homepage, to request a valuation.

Valuation requests can be made in the form of questionnaires. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the questionnaire may post the technical content together with the patent information including the profit keyword, and allow the evaluator to directly write the evaluation amount or select the evaluation amount by a radio button. In addition, the evaluator basic information (eg, industry, number of employees, gender, age, etc.) that can be reflected in the valuation can be entered. When inputting the basic information of the evaluator, the formal entry may be selected through a radio button.

On the other hand, after completing the response to the questionnaire of the first technology as shown in FIG. 5, and subsequently request a valuation for the next technology (second technology), the evaluator presses the button at the bottom of the questionnaire 2 You can have the questionnaire respond to a questionnaire about the technology (of course, other options are possible, for example, using a negative query method such as "If you don't want a valuation of the technology then press exit") It is also possible to have an assessment questionnaire developed for the next technology automatically unless you press it). This process is repeated for the third, fourth, .... techniques and the questionnaire is finally completed. When the evaluator has completed the evaluation, the evaluator may be given a predetermined cyber money as a credit (see FIG. 6). The cyber money or credit granted to the evaluator may be used for various purposes. (For example, when a trader applies for a technology he or she owns as a supplier, he can use it to calculate costs and give priority to those with high credit.)

7 illustrates a process of collecting and analyzing the valuation data when a plurality of evaluators have presented the valuation value to determine the value of the corresponding technology.

First, the data are collected and analyzed. For analysis, the distribution of valuations by type of business or number of employees in the evaluator's basic information is identified. This is the same as illustrated in FIG. In FIG. 7, an analysis of distribution of valuation value data by an evaluator company of 1 to 10 employees, 10 to 50 employees, and 50 to 100 employees in the A-type business is illustrated. For example, the technical value ranges P1 to P2, P1 'to P2', and P1 "to P2" distributed between a predetermined percentage or more of the number of responders (e.g., 70, 80, 90, 95%, etc.) and the highest value are described. Determined as the range of technical values evaluated for.

The supplier is notified when the technical value range is determined. Notification can also be performed using a 1: 1 communication method such as an e-mail or a push service, or posting to a post such as a homepage.

Claims (9)

When the server receives a valuation request with a patent from the supplier,
Storing the valuation application in the evaluation description database of the server;
Classifying a technical field with respect to a technology to be traded by the server;
Receiving, by the server, a detailed technical field of a technical value assessor, and determining the 'technical field of the technical value assessor';
The server selects a technical value evaluator that matches the technical field to be evaluated, but if there is a request for evaluation of a plurality of technologies, the technical value evaluator having a technical field that matches the technical field of the technology to be traded preferentially Selecting;
Selecting, by the server, a 'profit keyword' for a technical value assessor by collecting patent judgment and litigation information from the patent trial and patent litigation data of the 'technical value assessor's technical field';
Providing the valuation request by the server transmitting the patent judgment litigation information including the 'profit keyword' and the valuation application directly to a related evaluator or by broadcasting in a post published through a communication network—the valuation request Is configured to include an area for posting patent judgment or litigation information including the 'profit keyword', an area for preparing an evaluation amount, and an area for inputting evaluator basic information that can be reflected in the valuation;
Providing, by the server, a first questionnaire associated with the valuation request;
If the server receives a response to the first questionnaire, providing a lower button for requesting a valuation of a next technology;
The server granting the evaluator a predetermined cyber money credit;
If the server receives a request for valuation from the evaluator, deducting credits granted to the evaluator and granting a priority evaluation authority;
When the server receives the evaluation value by evaluating the value of the technology from each of the one or more evaluators, the server collects and analyzes the received evaluation value data-the analysis of the evaluation value data is input through the valuation request Determining the distribution of the valuation by the type of business or the number of employees in the evaluated evaluator basic information, and determining the distribution by dividing the number of employees into 1 to 10, 10 to 50, and 50 to 100 sections;
Determining, by the server, the technical value of the technology to be traded, and notifying the technology provider of the determined technical value;
Storing, by the server, information of the determined potential technology consumer and technology provider; And
And performing, by the server, a technology transaction matching using information of potential technology consumers and technology providers determined.

delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete

Images