KR101254082B1 - Inducement weapon assignment system and method using CLP method and computer-readerable storage medium having a program recorded thereon where the program is to carry out its method - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to an anti-aircraft induced weapons allocation system and method using the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique and a storage medium recording a computer program for performing the same. The mission computer interfaces with the radar, interfaces with the operational console, and consists of a track management board and engagement control board. The engagement control board is composed of a threat assessment module, a CLP weapon assignment module, an engagement control module, a radar interface module, an operator interface module, and a launch pad interface module for allocating an anti-aircraft guided weapon using the CLP technique of the present invention. The software in the CLP weapon assignment module uses the threat track and the target distance between the weapon, the range of the missile, the current reserves, and the missile cost attributes to calculate the threat track and the weapon mating score (S) against the target distance. A period mating score calculator; And CLP weapon allocation based on the dynamic score matrix for threat tracks. In the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, the mission computer's engagement control board conducts a threat assessment of the threat tracks of multiple enemy aircraft in order to minimize the interference between the armed forces and to conduct simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons. In addition, the CLP technique is applied by the CLP Weapon Allocation Module to efficiently allocate guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from launchers and guided missiles in anti-aircraft guided weapon systems.

Description

Duced weapon assignment system and method using CLP method and computer-readerable storage medium having a program recorded thereon where the program is to carry out its method}

The present invention relates to an anti-aircraft guided weapons allocation system and method using a CLP technique and a computer-readable recording medium. Anti-aircraft using the CLP technique in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, which efficiently assigns launchers and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launchers and guided missiles in the air-guided weapon system by applying the CLP technique. A computer-readable recording medium recording a guided weapon allocation system and method and a program for performing the same.

The anti-aircraft guided weapons system is designed to improve the air defense capability of major military facilities by detecting and shooting down main fighters, planes, air force maneuvers and airfields, and fighter planes and planes to improve short, medium and long range air defense capabilities.

The short-range surface-to-air guided weapons system fires guided missiles to improve air defense against the bandit, destroying enemy enemy targets and improving its local air defense capabilities.

The anti-aircraft guided weapons system monitors and manages airborne tracks, performs threat assessments on threatened tracks, calculates the information needed to shoot down missiles for launching missiles, and inputs the necessary data into the computer inside the missile. Conduct. The anti-aircraft guided weapon system handles not only the tracks detected by its own sensors, but also the external tracks received by interlocking with multiple adjacent systems through tactical data links to effectively cope with air threats from enemy planes. Determine the identity and assign a missile to the launch pad.

However, existing techniques related to assigning missiles to attack target enemy aircraft from multiple launch pads and guided missiles during multi-target simultaneous combat situations in anti-aircraft guided weapons systems minimize the interference between armed forces and reduce weapons during multi-target concurrent weapons. Although there is a similar technology in the field of technology that performs simultaneous engagement with the most targets, domestic technology level only considers engagement against a single target, and there is no way to consider multi-target simultaneous engagement by applying the CLP technique. Did.

The object of the present invention for solving the problems of the prior art is to interface with the radar to minimize the interference between the armed forces in the multi-target simultaneous combat situation with the enemy aircraft in the anti-aircraft guided weapons system and to conduct simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons The CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique is applied by the CLP weapon assignment module of the mission computer's engagement control board linked to the operation console to efficiently allocate guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from the launch pads and guided missiles in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system. In addition, the present invention provides a system to which the air-guided weapons allocation method using the CLP technique is applied.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique and a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for performing the same.

In order to achieve the object of the present invention, the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation system applying the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system is an anti-aircraft guided weapon system at the same time a plurality of enemy planes and multiple targets in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system An operational console that controls the allocation of guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft among multiple launchers and guided missiles in the vehicle; A radar that tracks multiple targets of a plurality of enemy aircraft and provides wake information; And airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircraft to interface with the radar, to be connected to the operational console, to minimize the interference between the armed forces during multi-target simultaneous engagement in the air-guided weapon system and to simultaneously engage the most targets with limited weapons. A mission computer that monitors / manages and efficiently allocates weapons by applying CLP techniques, wherein the mission computer includes airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircraft during multi-target simultaneous combat with enemy aircraft in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system. A track management board that monitors / manages the target, conducts a threat assessment on the anti-air target, and calculates the information necessary to shoot down the target to launch the missile's guided missile to manage the track information; Control board to control multi-target simultaneous combat by assigning launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launch pads and guided missiles using air-to-air guided weapon allocation method using CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique Characterized in that consists of.

In order to achieve the above object of the present invention, the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, (a) by the operation console during the multi-target simultaneous battle with a plurality of enemy planes in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system; Controlling the allocation of launchers and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from among various launchers and guided missiles in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system; (b) tracking a plurality of targets of a plurality of enemy aircraft from the radar and receiving track information to the mission computer; And (c) monitoring / managing the airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircraft by using a track management board provided in the mission computer when simultaneously engaging enemy air vehicles with the multi-target in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system and performing a threat assessment on the threat track. To manage the track information by calculating the information necessary to shoot down the missile to launch the missile's guided missile; and the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method applying the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique by the engagement control board provided in the mission computer. Assigning launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launch pads and guided missiles against airborne wakes.

In order to achieve the another object of the present invention, the present invention provides a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for performing the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique in the air-guided weapon system, (a) Analyzing the attack characteristics of the enemy aircraft by the threat assessment module of the engagement control board provided in the mission computer according to the airborne track information of the plurality of enemy aircraft during the simultaneous multi-target engagement with a plurality of enemy aircraft in the guided weapon system Calculating threats quantitatively and performing threat assessments on the assets to be attacked; (b) Multiple launch pads using the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique to minimize the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed forces in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system and to simultaneously engage the most targets with limited weapons. In order to assign a missile to attack enemy aircraft among the guided missiles, the threat tracks and target-to-arm target distances and guided missiles of the anti-aircraft guided weapon system are determined by the threat track and weapon-to-weapon mating score calculator of the CLP weapon assignment module of the engagement control board. Calculating the mating score (S) between the threat track and the weapon for the target distance using the range, the current reserve, and the missile consumption attributes; (c) CLP method based on a dynamic score matrix for the threat track by the CLP weapon allocation unit based on the dynamic score matrix of the CLP weapon allocation module of the engagement control board provided in the mission computer. The ability to assign launchers and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launchers and guided missiles; (d) controlling the engagement by the engagement control module to fire multiple launchers of guided missiles against airborne wakes in the anti-aircraft guidance weapon system; (e) a function of interfacing with a radar for tracking a track of air of the plurality of enemy aircraft by a radar interface module; (f) a function of interfacing with the operational console by an operator interface module; And (g) a computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for realizing a function of interfacing with a missile launch pad in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system by the launch pad interface module.

The storage medium recording the anti-aircraft guided weapons allocation system and method and the computer program for performing the same according to the present invention can minimize the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed forces during the multi-target simultaneous combat situation in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system. CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique is applied by the CLP weapon assignment module of the mission control board of the mission computer that interfaces with the radar and interlocks with the operation console to enable simultaneous simultaneous engagement with the most targets. Efficiently assign weapons to launch enemy aircraft Wake i.

The software implemented by the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique of the present invention minimizes the interference between the armed forces in the multi-target simultaneous engagement situation in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system and enables the simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons. The present invention is similarly applied to the logistics loading scheduling method and the flight scheduling method in the civil field, and can be applied to the air defense guided weapon system field having a similar purpose in the military field, and the ripple effect is great.

1 is a system configuration of the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method to which the CLP technique is applied in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system according to the present invention.
2 is a configuration diagram of a software module implanted in the engagement control board.
3 is a configuration diagram of a software module implementing the CLP weapon allocation method.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the threat track and the weapon mating score calculator of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the CLP weapon allocation unit based on the dynamic score matrix of FIG. 3.

Hereinafter, with reference to the accompanying drawings, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail the configuration and operation.

1 is a system configuration of the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method to which the CLP technique is applied in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system according to the present invention.

In the anti-aircraft guided weapon system according to the present invention, the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique is applied to the air-guided weapon system in a multi-target simultaneous combat situation with a plurality of enemy planes in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system. Operating consoles 100 and 110 for controlling allocation of guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft among various launchers and guided missiles; A radar (300) for tracking a plurality of targets of the plurality of enemy aircraft and providing track information to the mission computer (200); And interfacing with the radar 300, connected to the operation console (100, 110), in the anti-aircraft guided weapons system to minimize the interference between the armed at the same time the multiple targets and a plurality of targets to enable simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons It consists of a mission computer 200 that monitors and manages the airborne tracks of enemy aircraft and efficiently allocates weapons by applying the CLP technique.

 The mission computer 200 monitors / manages the airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircraft during a multi-target simultaneous combat with enemy aircraft in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, performs a threat assessment on the anti-air target, and launches a missile of the launch pad. A track management board 210 for calculating track information required to shoot down a target and managing track information; To control multi-target simultaneous engagement by assigning launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launch pads and guided missiles against enemy aircraft's airborne missiles using the air-guided weapon allocation method using CLP (Constraint Logic Programming). It consists of a control board 220.

2 is a configuration diagram of a software module implanted in the engagement control board.

Engagement control board 220 is a threat assessment module 221, CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique according to the present invention by applying a CLP weapon allocation module 222, the engagement control module 223 , Radar interface module 224, operator interface module 225, and launch pad interface module 226.

Equipment directly using the air-guided weapons allocation method using the CLP method according to the present invention is the engagement control board 220, the software included in the engagement control board 220 according to the airborne track information of a plurality of enemy aircraft A threat evaluation module 221 which analyzes the attack characteristics of the enemy aircraft, calculates the threat value as a quantitative value, and performs a threat assessment on the assets to be attacked; In the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, in order to minimize the interference between the enemy aircraft and the multi-target at the same time, and to conduct simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons, the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique according to the present invention is applied to various launch pads. A CLP weapon assignment module 222 for assigning a launch pad and a missile to attack enemy aircraft among the missiles; An engagement control module 223 for allocating launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from among various launch pads and guided missiles in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, and controlling engagement to fire guided missiles of various launchers; A radar interface module 224 interfaced with a radar for tracking the airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircraft; An operator interface module 225 interfaced with the operation consoles 100 and 110; And a launch pad interface module 226 interfaced with the missile launch pad in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system.

2, the software implemented by the present invention is the CLP weapon assignment module 222 of the engagement control board 220.

As shown in FIG. 3, the software of the CLP weapon allocation module 222 in which the weapon allocation method applying the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique is implemented is the threat track, the target distance between the weapon and the range of the missile in the air defense guided weapon system. A threat track and weapon mating score calculation unit 222-1 for calculating a threat track and a weapon mating score (S) with respect to the target distance using current possession and guided missile consumption attributes; And a CLP weapon allocator 222-2 for allocating launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft among various launch pads and guided missiles by applying a CLP method based on a dynamic score matrix for threat tracks.

The flowchart of the mating score calculation unit 222-1 between the track and the weapon, which is the first step of the CLP weapon assignment module 222 of the engagement control board 220 of FIG. 3, is illustrated in FIG. 4.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the threat track and the weapon mating score calculator of FIG. 3.

The threat track and weapon pairing score calculator 222-1 classifies the structure of the anti-aircraft guided weapon system into a heterogeneous launch pad or the same type of launch pad, and classifies the equal consumption and the concentrated consumption using the guided missile consumption attributes, respectively. Calculate the weapon mating score (S).

Where S = α _r x S _r + α _c x S _c ,

However, α _c + α _r = 1 (α _c : reflection coefficient of guided missile consumption, α _r : reflection coefficient parameter for range and target distance ratio, which can be adjusted according to system characteristics, S _c : Score, S _r : Score for range and target distance ratio)

MN: Maximum number of guided missiles in the subordinate weapons system

(E.g. Weapon System 1-The maximum number of guided missiles is 10,

Weapon System 2-The maximum number of guided missiles is 6,

Weapon System 3-If the maximum number of guided missiles is 4, the MN will be 10.)

Score (S _r ) for the range and the target distance ratio is divided into heterogeneous launch pads, homogeneous launch zones are expressed as follows.

(이기종 발사대는 사거리/표적거리 비율이 1에 가까울수록 효과적인 할당이다. 왜냐하면 단거리, 중거리, 장거리 무기체계가 함께 있을 경우 각각의 목적에 맞게 할당해 주는 것이 좋기 때문이다.)

(Heterogeneous launchers are effective allocations when the range / target range ratio is close to 1, because if you have a short, medium, or long range weapon system, it's better to allocate them for each purpose.)

(동종 발사대는 표적에 가까운 무기체계를 할당하는 것이 효과적이다.)

(As a homogeneous launcher, it is effective to assign a weapon system close to the target.)

Score (S _c ) for the missile consumption attribute is expressed as follows.

(균등소모는 현재 보유탄 수가 많은 발사대를 먼저 할당하는 것을 선호하는 정책, MN은 예하 무기체계 중 유도탄 최대 보유가능 수)

(Equal consumption is a policy that prefers to assign launchers with a large number of current bullets first.

(집중소모는 현재 보유탄 수가 적은 발사대를 먼저 할당하는 것을 선호하는 정책, MN은 예하 무기체계 중 유도탄 최대 보유가능 수)

(Intensive consumption is a policy that prefers to assign launchers with a small number of missiles currently.

The operation flowchart of the dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon assignment unit 222-1 of the CLP weapon assignment module 222 of the engagement control board 220 of FIG. 3 is illustrated in FIG. 5.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon allocation unit 222-2 of FIG. 3.

The dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon assignment unit 222-2 generates a score matrix of tracks 1 to n and launch pads 1 to m, as shown in Table 1 below. The score matrix is updated each time weapons are assigned, and the current reserves of each launch pad change according to the logical assignment of the launch pad according to the constraints in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system. Recalculate to update.

The dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon allocation unit 222-2 generates an initial score matrix of tracks 1 to n and launch pads 1 to m (S10), and i = 1 and 1 to n. The initial value of j for each track is set to 0 (S11), the value of track i is increased by 1 (i = i + 1) from enemy aircraft tracks i to n (S12), and the enemy vehicle tracks i It is determined whether or not there is a launch pad that can be allocated to the enemy vehicle track i according to the condition j> m where the number of the launch pads found (j) is larger than the number of launch pads (m) (S13).

In the S13 judgment step, if there is a launch pad for enemy aircraft track i (if not i> m), temporarily assign a launch pad and guided missile for enemy aircraft track i (S14), and attach a weapon (launcher) to one track. Each time you assign it, you check whether there is a logical guided missile inventory on the launch pad under Constraint 1, check the number of guided missiles that can be launched simultaneously on one launch pad under Constraint 2, and then wake up against launch pad j. checks whether there is a guided missile allocated to i, conducts a consistency check (S15) that simultaneously checks the launchable missile on the launcher (S15), and logically assigns launcher j to track i ( (S16), the number of guided missiles assigned to the launch pad decreases according to the logical assignment of the launch pad in the air-guided weapon system. Recalculate and update the score matrix (S17), increase the next enemy aircraft track i to i = i + 1 (S18), and i> n (n is the number of enemy aircraft tracks). If not satisfied, repeat steps S14-S19 to assign launchers / guided missiles to the next enemy aircraft track i, and exit if i> n (n is the number of tracks).

In the determination step S15, if the violation of the consistency check (Consistency Checking), the process of assigning the launch pad j for the enemy aircraft track i with j = j + 1 in the process S12 is repeated.

In step S13, if there is no launch pad that can be assigned to the enemy aircraft track i (if j> m), the value of j for the track i is set to 0 (S20), i = i-1 (S21), i If not = 0 (S22), cancel the logical assignment of the launch pad for track i (S23), update the score matrix again (S24), then go to step S12 and for the next enemy track track i The value is increased to j = j + 1, and j> m condition S13 is again determined whether there is no launch pad that can be allocated for the next enemy vehicle track i. If i = 0 in step S22, it ends immediately.

[ Score matrix  Create, update]

The score matrix is shown in Table 1 below, and the generation of the initial score matrix and the update of the score matirx are calculated using the equation shown in FIG. 4. It is necessary to recalculate the score matrix because the current reserves of each launch pad change according to the logical assignment of launch pads.

Score matrix i j Launcher 1 Launcher 2 Launcher 3 Launcher 4     ㆍ     ㆍ Launch pad Wake i S ₁₁ S ₁₂ S ₁₃ S ₁₄     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ Wake 2 S ₂₁ S ₂₂ S ₂₃ S ₂₄     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ Wake 3 S ₃₁ S ₃₂ S ₃₃ S ₃₄     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ Wake 4 S ₄₁ S ₄₂ S ₄₃ S ₄₄     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ Track n     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ     ㆍ

[ Consistency checking ]

The CLP weapon allocation unit 222-2 based on the dynamic score matrix checks whether there is a logical guided missile inventory specified in constraint 1 whenever a weapon is assigned to one track. (constraint 2) Consistency Checking is conducted to determine the number of guided missiles that can be launched simultaneously on a single launch pad.

Consistency checking is the process of checking that consistency is not broken against a set constraint.

constraint 1. Verify that the launch pad has a logical inventory of missiles.

constraint 2. Check the number of missiles that can be launched simultaneously from a single launch pad, determine if there is a missile capable of allocating to track i for launch pad j, and verify that the assigned number of launches exceeds the launchable missiles simultaneously.

<Interim assignment result from 1 to k tracks>

(ex1) k = 4 (when there are 4 tracks)     Wake i           Launch pad j value for track i       One               Launcher 1       2               Launcher 2       3               Launcher 2       4               Launcher 2

If guided missile inventory of launch pad 2 (weapon 2) is 2, if launch pad 2 has been previously assigned to track 2, assigning launch pad 2 to track 4 would be inconsistent with consistency1.

(ex2) k = 4     Wake i           Launch pad j value for track i       One                  One       2                  2       3                  One       4                  One

If the number of guided missiles capable of simultaneously firing launcher 1 (weapon 1) is 2, if launcher 1 has been previously assigned to track 1, assigning launcher 1 to track 4 would be inconsistent with consistency2.

The anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system according to the present invention includes: (a) an anti-aircraft guided weapon system by an operation console (100,110) during a multi-target simultaneous combat with a plurality of enemy planes in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system; Controlling the allocation of guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft among multiple launchers and guided missiles in the vehicle; (b) tracking a plurality of targets of a plurality of enemy aircraft from the radar 300 and receiving track information to the mission computer 200; And (c) monitoring / managing the airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircraft by the track management board 210 provided in the mission computer 200 when the multi-target simultaneous combat with enemy aircraft in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system. Threat assessment for the target, calculates the information necessary to shoot down the target to launch the launching missile missiles to manage the track information, the control board 220 provided in the mission computer 200 by the control control board 220 CLP (Constraint) Allocating launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launch pads and guided missiles using air defense guided weapon allocation methods using Logic Programming.

Engagement control board 220 of the step (c) (c1) by analyzing the attack characteristics of the enemy aircraft by the threat assessment module 221 according to the airborne track information of the plurality of enemy aircraft to a quantitative value of the threat Performing a threat assessment on the assets to be calculated and attacked; (c2) The CLP (Constraint) by the CLP weapon assignment module 222 to minimize the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed during the multi-target simultaneous engagement in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system and to perform simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons (c2) Allocating launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft tracks i among various launch pads and guided missiles; (c3) controlling the engagement by the engagement control module 223 to fire guided missiles of various launchers against airborne wakes in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system; (c4) interfacing with a radar for tracking the airborne tracks of the plurality of enemy aircraft by a radar interface module (224); (c5) interfacing with the operations console by an operator interface module 225; And (c6) interfacing with the missile launch pad in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system by the launch pad interface module 226.

The step (c2) (c2-1) by the threat track and the weapon mating score calculation unit 222-1 of the CLP weapon allocation module 222 and the target distance between the threat track and the weapon in the air-guided weapon system Calculating a mating score (S) between the threat track and the weapon for the target distance by using the missile's range, current reserve, and missile consumption attributes; And (c2-2) a dynamic score matrix based on a dynamic score matrix of the CLP weapon allocation module 222 based on a dynamic score matrix for the threat track by the CLP weapon allocation unit 222-2. Applying a CLP method to assign launchers and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft tracks i among multiple launchers and guided missiles.

The step (c2-1) is classified as a heterogeneous launch pad or a launch pad of the same type by the threat track and the weapon mating score calculation unit 222-1 of the CLP weapon assignment module 222, heterogeneous launch pad. The threat tracking and weapon mating score (S) are calculated by dividing the equal consumption and the concentrated consumption by using the missile consumption attributes.

[Wherein S = α _r x S _r + α _c x S _c However, α _c + α _r = 1 (α _c : guided missile propensity reflection coefficient, α _r : reflectance coefficient parameter for the ratio of range and target range, can be set to 0.5 by default, but the value of 0.5 can be set. Adjustable according to S _c : Score for guided missile expenditure, S _r : Score for range and target distance ratio)

The step (c2-2) is performed by the dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon allocation unit 222-2 of the CLP weapon allocation module 222. The score matrix is generated, the score matrix is updated each time a weapon is assigned to one track, and the score matrix is changed because the current reserves of each launch pad change according to the logical assignment of the launch pad in the AA system. Recalculate and update the score matrix, each time you assign weapons to a single track, check that there is a logical inventory of guided missiles under Constraint 1, and one launch pad under Constraint 2 Check the number of guided missiles that can be launched at the same time, check if there is a guided missile for launch pad j, and if the assigned number of launches exceeds the launchable missile at the same time, Conduct consistency checks to verify

The present invention provides a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for performing an anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique in an anti-aircraft guided weapon system. At the same time, the threat characteristics of the enemy aircraft are analyzed by the threat assessment module 221 of the engagement control board 220 provided in the mission computer 200 according to the airborne track information of the plurality of enemy aircrafts to quantitatively measure the threat value. Calculating threats and assessing the assets to be attacked; (b) Multiple launch pads using the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique to minimize the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed forces in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system and to simultaneously engage the most targets with limited weapons. The anti-aircraft guided weapons system by the threat track and weapon pairing score calculation unit 222-1 of the CLP weapon allocation module 222 of the engagement control board 220 to allocate a missile to attack enemy aircraft among the missiles. Calculating a mating score (S) between the threat track and the weapon with respect to the target distance by using the threat track and the target distance between the weapon, the range of the missile, the current number of bullets, and the missile consumption attribute; (C) the threat track by the dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon allocation unit 222-2 of the CLP weapon allocation module 222 of the engagement control board 220 provided in the mission computer 200. Assigning launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from among multiple launch pads and guided missiles by applying a CLP method based on a dynamic score matrix; (d) controlling engagement by the engagement control module 223 to fire guided missiles of various launchers against airborne wakes in the air-guided weapons system; (e) a function of interfacing with a radar that tracks airborne tracks of the plurality of enemy aircraft by a radar interface module 224; (f) a function of interfacing with the operations console by an operator interface module 225; And (g) a computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for realizing a function of interfacing with a missile launch pad in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system by the launch pad interface module 226.

As a result, the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation system and method applying the CLP technique according to the present invention minimizes the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed forces during the multi-target simultaneous engagement situation in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, and simultaneously performs simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons. In order to make it possible, CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique was applied to assign launchers and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft among multiple launchers and guided missiles. It has been re-calculated and updated, and among the launchers and guided missiles in the anti-aircraft missile system, the anti-aircraft missiles and guided missiles have been efficiently allocated.

As described above, the method of the present invention is implemented as a program, and can be read by using software and a device of a personal computer (CD-ROM, RAM, ROM, floppy disk, flash memory, hard disk, magneto-optical disk, etc.). Can be stored in.

As described above, as described above, the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been exemplarily described above, but the scope of the present invention is not limited only to such specific embodiments, and therefore, the present invention is directed to the present invention. It may be modified, changed or improved in various forms within the scope of the spirit and claims, and the protection scope of the present invention is included for all technical spirits within the scope equivalent to the claims below. Should be interpreted as.

100, 110: operation console 200: mission computer
210: wake management board 220: engagement control board
300: Radar 221: Threat Assessment Module
222: CLP weapon assignment module 223: engagement control module
224: radar interface 225: operator interface
226: launch pad interface
222-1: Mating Score between Wake and Weapon
222-2: CLP weapon allocation unit based on dynamic score matrix

Claims (12)

In the anti-aircraft guided weapons assignment system using the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique,
An operational console that controls the assignment of launchers and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launchers and guided missiles in the anti-aircraft missile system during simultaneous engagement with multiple enemy planes (multiple targets) in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system;
A radar that tracks a plurality of enemy aircraft and provides wake information; And
It is interfaced with the radar, connected to the operational console, and in the air-guided weapons system to reduce the interference between multiple targets and armed weapons, and to enable the airborne wake of multiple enemy aircraft to simultaneously engage multiple targets with limited weapons. A mission computer for monitoring / managing and assigning weapons using CLP techniques;
The mission computer monitors / manages the airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircrafts, conducts threat assessments against anti-aircraft targets, and shoots down targets to launch guided missiles in the anti-aircraft missile system. A track management board for calculating track information and managing track information; And
Engagement control to control multiple targets and simultaneous engagement by assigning launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launch pads and guided missiles using air defense guided weapon allocation using CLP (Constraint Logic Programming). Anti-aircraft guided weapons assignment system using CLP technique, characterized in that the board is configured. The method of claim 1,
The engagement control board software,
A threat assessment module that analyzes the attack characteristics of the enemy aircraft according to the airborne track information of the plurality of enemy aircrafts, calculates the threat value as a quantitative value, and performs a threat assessment on the assets to be attacked;
In the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, in order to reduce the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed weapons and to simultaneously engage the most targets with limited weapons, the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique is applied to various launch pads against the airborne tracks. And a CLP weapon assignment module for allocating launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft among guided missiles;
An engagement control module configured to control engagement to fire guided missiles of various launchers against airborne tracks in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system;
A radar interface module interfaced with a radar that tracks airborne tracks of the plurality of enemy aircrafts;
An operator interface module interfaced with the operation console; And
A launch pad interface module interfaced with the missile launch pad in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system;
Anti-aircraft induced weapons allocation system applying the CLP technique including a. The method of claim 2,
The CLP weapon assignment module,
In the anti-aircraft guided weapons system, the threat track and the weapon's mating score (S) for the target distance are calculated by using the target distance between the threat track and the weapon, the range of the missile, the current number of bullets, and the missile cost. A mating score calculator; And
Dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon allocation unit for assigning launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft among the multiple launch pads and guided missiles by applying a CLP method to the threat track based on a dynamic score matrix ;
Anti-aircraft induced weapons allocation system applying the CLP technique including a. The method of claim 3,
In the threat track and weapon mating score calculation unit,
Classify the composition of the anti-aircraft guided weapon system into a heterogeneous launch pad or the same type of launch pad, and classify the threat track and the weapon pairing score (S) by using the guided missile expenditure attributes, respectively. Anti-aircraft guided weapons allocation system using CLP technique.
S = α _r x S _r + α _c x S _c With α _c + α _r = 1
Where α _c : guided missile propensity reflection coefficient, α _r : reflected coefficient parameter for range and target distance ratio, S _c : score for guided missile consumption attribute, S _r : score for range and target distance ratio. The method of claim 3,
The dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon allocation unit,
Create a score matrix for tracks and launch pads, update the score matirx each time a weapon is assigned to a track, and hold each launch pad according to the logical assignment of the launch pad in the air-guided weapons system. An air-guided weapons allocation system using the CLP technique, characterized in that the score matrix is recalculated and updated because the number of bullets changes. The method of claim 3,
The dynamic score matrix (dynamic score matrix) based CLP weapon allocation unit,
Each time you assign a launch pad to a track according to a set constraint, you check the logical guided missile inventory on the launch pad, and the number of guided missiles that can be launched simultaneously on one launch pad and exceed the launchable missiles simultaneously on one launch pad. Air conduction weapon allocation system using CLP technique characterized by conducting consistency check (Consistency Checking). In the anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system,
(a) Control the allocation of launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launchers and guided missiles in the AA guided aircraft by the operational console during simultaneous engagement with multiple enemy planes (multiple targets) in the AA guided weapon system; step;
(b) tracking a plurality of enemy aircraft from the radar and receiving track information to the mission computer; And
(c) monitoring / managing the airborne tracks of a plurality of enemy aircraft by conducting a track management board provided in the mission computer and conducting threat assessments against the air targets in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system while simultaneously engaging enemy aircraft. Calculate the information needed to shoot down targets to launch guided missiles, manage track information, and use air-guided weapons allocation methods using the Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) technique by the engagement control board provided in the mission computer. Allocating launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from among multiple launch pads and missiles;
Anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method applying the CLP technique comprising a. The method of claim 7, wherein
In the engagement control board of step (c)
(c1) analyzing the attack characteristics of the enemy aircraft by the threat assessment module according to the airborne track information of the plurality of enemy aircrafts, calculating a threat value quantitatively, and performing a threat assessment on the assets to be attacked;
(c2) Applying the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique by the CLP weapon assignment module to reduce the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed forces in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system and to perform simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons. Assigning launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from among multiple launch pads and guided missiles;
(c3) controlling the engagement by the engagement control module to fire guided missiles of various launchers against airborne wakes in the air-guided weapons system;
(c4) interfacing with a radar for tracking the airborne tracks of the plurality of enemy aircraft by a radar interface module;
(c5) interfacing with the operations console by an operator interface module; And
(c6) interfacing with the missile launch pad in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system by the launch pad interface module;
Anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method applying the CLP technique comprising a. 9. The method of claim 8,
Step (c2) is
(c2-1) By using the threat track and weapon mating score calculation unit of the CLP weapon allocation module, the target track and the target distance between the weapon track and the weapon, the range of the guided missile, the current reserves, and the missile consumption attributes Calculating a mating score (S) between the threat track against the target distance and the weapon; And
(c2-2) A dynamic score matrix based on the dynamic score matrix of the CLP weapon allocation module, and the CLP technique is applied to the threat track based on a dynamic score matrix to apply various launchers and guided missiles. Allocating launch pads and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from the vehicle;
Anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method applying the CLP technique comprising a. 10. The method of claim 9,
Step (c2-1) is
Classify the composition of the anti-aircraft guided weapon system into a heterogeneous launch pad or the same type of launch pad by the threat track and the weapon mating score calculation unit of the CLP weapon allocation module, and classify the equal consumption and the concentrated consumption by using the missile expenditure attributes. The anti-aircraft induced weapon allocation method using the CLP technique, wherein the threat track and the weapon mating score (S) are calculated by the following equation.
S = α _r x S _r + α _c x S _c With α _c + α _r = 1
Where α _c : guided missile propensity reflection coefficient, α _r : reflected coefficient parameter for range and target distance ratio, S _c : score for guided missile consumption attribute, S _r : score for range and target distance ratio. 10. The method of claim 9,
Step (c2-2) is
Dynamic score matrix-based CLP weapon allocation unit of the CLP weapon allocation module generates a score matrix for the track and the launch pad, and every time the weapon is assigned to a track (score) update the matirx, recalculate and update the score matrix as the current reserves of each launch pad change according to the logical assignment of the launch pad in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system, and update the score matrix according to the established constraints. Each time a launch pad is assigned to a track, the launch pad checks the logical inventory of guided missiles and the number of guided missiles that can be launched simultaneously on one launch pad, and conducts consistency checks to ensure that the launch pads exceed the launchable missiles simultaneously. The anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique. A computer-readable recording medium recording a program for performing an anti-aircraft guided weapon allocation method using the CLP technique in an anti-aircraft guided weapon system,
(a) The enemy aircraft by the threat evaluation module of the engagement control board provided in the mission computer according to the airborne track information of the plurality of enemy aircraft during the simultaneous engagement with a plurality of enemy aircraft (multiple targets) in the air-guided weapon system. Analyzing threat characteristics, calculating threat values in quantitative values, and performing threat assessment on assets to be attacked;
(b) Among the launch pads and guided missiles using the CLP (Constraint Logic Programming) technique in order to reduce the interference between the enemy aircraft and the armed forces in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system and to perform simultaneous engagement with the most targets with limited weapons. In order to assign a missile to attack enemy aircraft, the threat track and weapon-to-weapons target range and missile range, the current range of the threat track and weapons in the anti-aircraft guided weapon system by the threat track and weapon mating score calculator of the CLP weapon assignment module of the engagement control board. Calculating the mating score (S) between the threat track and the weapon against the target distance by using the possessed and guided missile attributes;
(c) CLP method based on a dynamic score matrix for the threat track by the CLP weapon allocation unit based on the dynamic score matrix of the CLP weapon allocation module of the engagement control board provided in the mission computer. The ability to assign launchers and guided missiles to attack enemy aircraft from multiple launchers and guided missiles;
(d) controlling the engagement by the engagement control module to fire multiple launchers of guided missiles against airborne wakes in the anti-aircraft guidance weapon system;
(e) a function of interfacing with a radar for tracking a track of air of the plurality of enemy aircraft by a radar interface module;
(f) the ability to interface with the operations console by the operator interface module; And
(g) interfacing with the missile launch pad in the anti-aircraft missile system by means of a launch pad interface module;
Readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for realizing the program.

Images