JPH0634559A - Method of detecting flaw in surface inspecting apparatus - Google Patents

Method of detecting flaw in surface inspecting apparatus

Info

Publication number
JPH0634559A
JPH0634559A JP4192060A JP19206092A JPH0634559A JP H0634559 A JPH0634559 A JP H0634559A JP 4192060 A JP4192060 A JP 4192060A JP 19206092 A JP19206092 A JP 19206092A JP H0634559 A JPH0634559 A JP H0634559A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
foreign matter
new
divisions
adjacent
extraneous matter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP4192060A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Atsuko Kawai
敦子 川合
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP4192060A priority Critical patent/JPH0634559A/en
Publication of JPH0634559A publication Critical patent/JPH0634559A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To provide the number of extraneous matters on the surface of a wafer and also to judge as to whether a detected extraneous matter is a flaw or not, by a method wherein when a division adjacent to a detection unit division judged to have an extraneous matter has also an extraneous matter, these extraneous matter are regarded as a new extraneous matter. CONSTITUTION:The surface of a wafer is divided by basic detection divisions and each division is inspected to detect any extraneous matter. When divisions 4 and 5 are judged to have an extraneous matter, the divisions adjacent to the divisions 4, 5 are inspected as to whether or not an extraneous matter exists, and when it exists therein, the two divisions wherein the extraneous matters exist are regarded as one new extraneous matter (a hatched part). When the detection is completed for all of adjacent divisions, the number (a) of divisions occupied by the new extraneous matter is calculated, as 14, for instance. Next, the number (b) of divisions occupied by the minimum rectangle containing the new extraneous matter is calculated, as 36, for instance. Then, a/b is determined and, when the value of a/b is a constant (p) or below set by the user, the new extraneous matter is regarded as a flaw, while it is regarded as a large extraneous matter when the value is larger than the constant (p). When a=b, no flaw nor large extraneous matter is regarded as not existing. The constant (p) is set on the basis of a shape model of the flaw, or the like.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】この発明は、検査対象の表面の異
物の有無を検査する表面検査装置において、検査結果が
キズか否かを判別するキズ判別方法に関するものであ
る。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a surface inspection apparatus for inspecting the surface of an object to be inspected for foreign matter, and a method for determining whether or not the inspection result is a defect.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】図5は、従来の表面検査装置による検査
結果表示の一例を示す図である。図において、1はウエ
ハであり、そのウエハ1表面の黒い部分が「異物あり」
と判別された区分である。2は15個の隣接している区
分からなっている集合体である。3は1個の区分からな
っている異物(検査装置自身からのゴミ)である。
2. Description of the Related Art FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of an inspection result display by a conventional surface inspection apparatus. In the figure, reference numeral 1 is a wafer, and the black portion on the surface of the wafer 1 is "with foreign matter"
It is a category determined to be. 2 is an aggregate consisting of 15 adjacent sections. Reference numeral 3 denotes a foreign substance (dust from the inspection device itself) which is composed of one section.

【0003】次に、従来のキズ判別方法について説明す
る。各検査装置では、ウエハ表面を基本検出単位で区分
し、区分ごとに異物の有無を判別する。これにより「異
物あり」と判別された区分は黒く表示され、黒く表示さ
れた区分の数が異物の数とみなされる。図5の例によれ
ば、区分の集合体2は15個の区分にまたがる大きな異
物またはキズを示しているにもかかわらず「15個の異
物」となり、8個の「異物あり」の区分とあわせて、ウ
エハ全体では「23個の異物」と表示される。したがっ
て異物が検出されたあと、人間が顕微鏡を覗く等により
それぞれの異物がキズか大異物か、それとも検査装置自
身からのゴミかを経験によって判別ししていた。
Next, a conventional flaw discrimination method will be described. In each inspection device, the wafer surface is divided into basic detection units, and the presence or absence of foreign matter is determined for each division. As a result, the section determined to have "foreign matter" is displayed in black, and the number of sections displayed in black is regarded as the number of foreign matter. According to the example shown in FIG. 5, the aggregate 2 of the sections is “15 pieces of foreign matter” even though it shows a large foreign matter or a scratch that extends over 15 sections, and is divided into eight “foreign matter” sections. In addition, "23 foreign matters" are displayed on the entire wafer. Therefore, after the foreign matter is detected, a person looks into the microscope to determine whether each foreign matter is a scratch or a large foreign matter or dust from the inspection apparatus itself by experience.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】従来のキズ判別方法は
以上のようになされているので、正確な異物数を得るこ
とができないうえに、異物がキズか否かを判別すること
ができないため、人間が経験によって判別する必要があ
った。したがって検査装置自身からのゴミの正確な数が
得られないので不要な検査装置の掃除を行ったり、ウエ
ハ上のキズの存在しない部分の製品を活かすことができ
ないなどの問題点があった。
Since the conventional flaw determination method is performed as described above, it is impossible to obtain an accurate number of foreign matters and it is impossible to determine whether or not the foreign matters are scratched. It was necessary for human beings to judge by experience. Therefore, since the exact number of dusts from the inspection device itself cannot be obtained, there is a problem in that the inspection device cannot be cleaned unnecessarily, or the product in the portion having no flaw on the wafer cannot be utilized.

【0005】この発明は上記のような問題点を解消する
ためになされたもので、ウエハ表面の正確な異物数を得
ることができるとともに、検出した異物がキズか否かを
判別できるキズ判別方法を得ることを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in order to solve the above-mentioned problems, and it is possible to obtain an accurate number of foreign matters on the wafer surface and to determine whether or not the detected foreign matters are flaws. Aim to get.

【0006】[0006]

【課題を解決するための手段】この発明に係る第1のキ
ズ判別方法は、「異物あり」の区分に対して、その隣接
区分にも異物があるか否かを判別するステップ、判別し
た結果が「異物あり」の場合、隣接しあう区分の2つの
異物を同一異物とみなして新異物とするステップ、上記
新異物を包括する最小の長方形が占める区分数をカウン
トするステップ、上記新異物が占める区分数の上記長方
形が占める区分数に対する割合を算出するステップ、お
よびその割合から上記新異物がキズか否かを判別するス
テップを含んだものである。
According to a first flaw judging method of the present invention, a step of judging whether or not there is a foreign matter also in the adjacent section with respect to the "presence of foreign matter" section, the result of the decision Is "existence of foreign matter", two foreign matter in adjacent sections are regarded as the same foreign matter to be a new foreign matter, a step of counting the number of categories occupied by the smallest rectangle including the new foreign matter, and the new foreign matter is It includes a step of calculating a ratio of the number of divisions to the number of divisions occupied by the rectangle, and a step of determining from the ratio whether or not the new foreign matter is a flaw.

【0007】また本発明に係る第2のキズ判別方法は、
上記新異物を検出したあとその新異物のへりにあたる周
辺区分のそれぞれに対して、「異物あり」の隣接区分数
をカウントするステップ、上記「異物あり」の隣接区分
数の全隣接区分数に対する割合を算出するステップ、上
記周辺区分ごとに「異物あり」の隣接区分数の全隣接区
分数に対する割合を予め設定した定数と比較するステッ
プ、その比較条件を満たす周辺区分数の全周辺区分数に
対する割合を算出するステップ、およびその割合から上
記新異物がキズか否かを判別するステップを含んだもの
である。
The second flaw determination method according to the present invention is
After detecting the new foreign matter, counting the number of adjacent divisions with "foreign matter" for each peripheral division corresponding to the edge of the new foreign matter, ratio of the number of adjacent divisions with "foreign matter" to the total number of adjacent divisions A step of calculating the ratio of the number of adjacent divisions with "foreign matter" to the total number of adjacent divisions for each of the peripheral divisions to a preset constant, the ratio of the number of peripheral divisions satisfying the comparison condition to the total number of peripheral divisions And a step of determining whether or not the new foreign matter is scratched from the ratio.

【0008】[0008]

【作用】この発明における第1のキズ判別方法において
は、「異物あり」の区分の隣接する区分も「異物あり」
ならばそれらの異物は同一異物とみなされ新異物とし、
ウエハ表面の正確な異物数をカウントする。更に、それ
ぞれの新異物に対して、その新異物を包括する最小の長
方形の中で占める割合が、定数p(ユーザ指定)以下の
ときキズと判断される。
In the first flaw determination method according to the present invention, the section adjacent to the section "with foreign matter" is also "with foreign matter".
If so, those foreign substances are regarded as the same foreign substance, and are regarded as new foreign substances,
Count the exact number of foreign particles on the wafer surface. Furthermore, when the ratio of each new foreign substance in the smallest rectangle that includes the new foreign substance is equal to or smaller than the constant p (specified by the user), it is determined as a flaw.

【0009】これに対して第2のキズ判別方法において
は、上記新異物のへりにあたる周辺区分に着目し、周辺
区分の隣接区分のうち「異物あり」の区分の占める割合
を求め、この割合が定数q(ユーザ指定)以上である周
辺区分の数の全周辺区分数に対する割合が定数r(ユー
ザ指定)以下のときキズと判断される。
On the other hand, in the second flaw determination method, attention is paid to the peripheral section corresponding to the edge of the new foreign matter, and the proportion of the section "with foreign matter" in the adjacent sections to the peripheral section is calculated, and this proportion is calculated. When the ratio of the number of peripheral sections that is equal to or larger than the constant q (specified by the user) to the total number of peripheral sections is equal to or smaller than the constant r (specified by the user), it is determined as a flaw.

【0010】[0010]

【実施例】【Example】

実施例1.以下、この発明の一実施例を図について説明
する。図1はウエハ表面の異物をウエハマップで表示し
た図であり、図において4および5は「異物あり」と検
知した検出単位区分であり、その他の斜線区分も同様で
ある。6は「異物なし」の検出単位区分である。
Example 1. An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram in which foreign matter on the wafer surface is displayed in a wafer map. In the figure, 4 and 5 are detection unit classifications for detecting “presence of foreign matter”, and other shaded areas are the same. 6 is a detection unit classification of "no foreign matter".

【0011】次に動作について図2のフローチャートを
参照しながら説明する。まず、それぞれの検出単位区分
について異物があるか否かを判別し(S1)異物がなけ
れば次の区分に移る(S1でNOの時)。異物があれば
(S1でYESの時)その区分の隣接区分にも異物があ
るか否かを判別する(S2)。隣接区分にも異物があれ
ば(S2でYESの時)、2つの隣接した「異物あり」
の区分を新たに1つの異物(新異物)とみなす(S
3)。すべての隣接区分について異物の有無を判別が完
了すると(S2でNOの時)、新たに検知された新異物
についてその占める区分数aを算出する(S4)。図1
の例では、新異物として検出された異物の占める区分数
は14個である。次に、上記新異物が含まれる最小の長
方形が占める区分数bを算出する(S5)。図1の例で
は、点線で示されている部分がこの長方形であり、占め
ている区分数は5×7=35個である。
Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. First, it is determined whether or not there is a foreign substance in each detection unit category (S1). If there is no foreign substance, the next category is entered (NO in S1). If there is a foreign substance (YES in S1), it is determined whether or not there is a foreign substance also in the adjacent section to that section (S2). If there is a foreign substance also in the adjacent section (when YES in S2), two adjacent foreign substances are present.
Is newly regarded as one foreign matter (new foreign matter) (S
3). When the presence / absence of foreign matter is completed for all the adjacent foreign matters (NO in S2), the number of categories a occupied by the newly detected new foreign matter is calculated (S4). Figure 1
In this example, the number of divisions occupied by the foreign matter detected as a new foreign matter is 14. Next, the number of divisions b occupied by the smallest rectangle containing the new foreign matter is calculated (S5). In the example of FIG. 1, the portion indicated by the dotted line is this rectangle, and the number of occupying sections is 5 × 7 = 35.

【0012】続いて、新異物の占める区分数の長方形の
占める区分数に対する割合(a/b)を求める(S
6)。a/b=1ならば(S7でYESの時)、その新
異物は一点、一直線または長方形状であり、そのような
キズまたは大異物は存在しないため処理を終了する。a
/bが1でないならば(S7でNOの時)、予めユーザ
が設定した定数pと比較する(S8)。一般的にキズは
大異物に比べてより細い線状をしていることから、a/
bが定数p以下ならば(S8でYESの時)その新異物
をキズとみなし、定数pより大きければ(S8でNOの
時)大異物とみなす。上記定数は、キズの形状モデル等
により設定される。たとえば定数pを0.5としたな
ら、図1の例では割合=14/35=0.4<0.5で
あるので、キズと判別される。以上の処理により、ウエ
ハの表面にキズまたは大異物がある場合も正確な異物数
を得るとともに、定数pの設定によりキズか否かをも判
別できる。
Next, the ratio (a / b) of the number of sections occupied by the new foreign matter to the number of sections occupied by the rectangle is determined (S
6). If a / b = 1 (YES in S7), the new foreign matter is a point, a straight line, or a rectangular shape, and since there is no such flaw or large foreign matter, the process ends. a
If / b is not 1 (NO in S7), it is compared with a constant p preset by the user (S8). Generally, scratches have a finer line shape than large foreign matter, so a /
If b is equal to or smaller than the constant p (YES in S8), the new foreign matter is regarded as a flaw, and if larger than the constant p (NO in S8), it is regarded as a large foreign matter. The above constants are set by a flaw shape model or the like. For example, if the constant p is set to 0.5, the ratio is 14/35 = 0.4 <0.5 in the example of FIG. By the above processing, even if there are scratches or large foreign particles on the surface of the wafer, it is possible to obtain an accurate number of foreign particles and also to determine whether or not there are scratches by setting the constant p.

【0013】実施例2.なお、上記実施例ではキズか否
かの判別を、新異物の占める区分数のそれを包括する最
小の長方形が占める区分数に対する割合によって行うも
のを示したが、以下に示す方法によるものでもよい。図
3は実施例1と同様にして、検出単位区分ごとに異物の
有無を判別して検出された新異物を表示した図である。
斜線部分は「異物あり」の区分であり、そのうち「・」
で示す部分7は新異物のへりにあたる周辺区分を示す。
次に動作について図4のフローチャートを参照しながら
説明する。まず実施例1と同様に、検出単位区分ごとに
異物の有無を判別し、隣接した区分に異物があれば同一
異物とみなして新異物を検出する(T1〜T3)。次に
新異物のへりにあたる周辺区分7のそれぞれについて、
その隣接区分のうち「異物あり」の区分数cを算出し
(T4)、その区分数cの全隣接区分数に対する割合
(c/d)を算出する(T5)。全ての周辺区分7につ
いてT4〜T5の処理を行ったあと、Nの初期値を0と
し、それぞれ算出した割合(c/d)が予めユーザが設
定した定数qよりも大きい時にN=N+1と加算してい
き、全ての周辺区分のうち割合(c/d)が定数qより
も大きい周辺区分の数Nを求める(T6〜T9)。この
場合のqは隣接区分数によって異なるので周辺区分ごと
に決定する。次に全周辺区分数Mに対する上記Nの割合
N/Mを求め(T10)、上記N/Mをユーザ設定の定
数rと比較する(T11)。一般的に、キズは大異物に
比べて鋭くとがったへりが多いことから、上記N/Mが
定数rよりも大きければ(T11でYESの時)大異物
とみなし、小さければ(T11でNOの時)キズとみな
して処理を終了する。なお、この場合のrもキズの形状
モデル等から決定する。この例においても正確な異物数
を把握できるとともに、定数q,rの設定によりキズか
否かの判別が可能となる。
Example 2. In the above embodiment, whether or not there is a scratch is determined by the ratio of the number of divisions occupied by the new foreign matter to the number of divisions occupied by the smallest rectangle encompassing the new foreign matter, but it may be determined by the method described below. . FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the new foreign matter detected by determining the presence / absence of the foreign matter for each detection unit category, similarly to the first embodiment.
The shaded area is the category of "foreign matter", of which "・"
A portion 7 indicated by indicates a peripheral section corresponding to the edge of the new foreign matter.
Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. First, as in the first embodiment, the presence or absence of a foreign substance is determined for each detection unit segment, and if there is a foreign substance in an adjacent segment, it is regarded as the same foreign substance and a new foreign substance is detected (T1 to T3). Next, for each of the peripheral section 7 that corresponds to the edge of the new foreign matter,
Among the adjacent sections, the number c of the sections with “foreign matter” is calculated (T4), and the ratio (c / d) of the number of the sections c to the total number of adjacent sections is calculated (T5). After performing the processes of T4 to T5 for all the peripheral sections 7, the initial value of N is set to 0, and when the calculated ratio (c / d) is larger than the constant q preset by the user, N = N + 1 is added. Then, the number N of peripheral divisions in which the ratio (c / d) of all the peripheral divisions is larger than the constant q is obtained (T6 to T9). In this case, q varies depending on the number of adjacent sections, so it is determined for each peripheral section. Next, the ratio N / M of the N to the total number M of peripheral sections is calculated (T10), and the N / M is compared with the constant r set by the user (T11). In general, scratches are sharp and have many sharp edges as compared with large foreign matter, so if N / M is larger than the constant r (when YES in T11), it is regarded as large foreign matter, and if it is small (NO in T11). When) it is regarded as a scratch and the process ends. Note that r in this case is also determined from a flaw shape model or the like. Also in this example, the number of foreign matters can be accurately grasped, and whether or not there is a flaw can be determined by setting the constants q and r.

【0014】[0014]

【発明の効果】以上のように、この発明によればウエハ
表面の正確な異物数を得て、さらに検出した異物がキズ
か大異物かを判別できるようにしたので、キズおよび大
異物以外の異物(検査装置自身からのゴミ)の正確な数
を得ることが可能となり、検査装置の掃除が必要最小限
でよい。また、ウエハ上のキズの存在しない部分の製品
を活かすことが可能となる。
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to obtain the accurate number of foreign matters on the wafer surface and to determine whether the detected foreign matters are scratches or large foreign matters. It is possible to obtain an accurate number of foreign substances (dust from the inspection device itself), and the inspection device may be cleaned with the minimum necessary amount. In addition, it is possible to make the most of the product on the wafer where there are no scratches.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】この発明の実施例1で検査対象としたウエハ表
面の異物を示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing foreign matter on a surface of a wafer which is an inspection target in a first embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】この発明の実施例1による処理の流れを示すフ
ローチャートである。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a processing flow according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

【図3】この発明の実施例2で検査対象としたウエハ表
面の異物を示す図である。
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing foreign matter on the surface of a wafer which is an inspection target in the second embodiment of the present invention.

【図4】この発明の実施例2による処理の流れを示すフ
ローチャートである。
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the flow of processing according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

【図5】従来のウエハ表面検査装置による検査結果表示
の一例を示す図である。
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of an inspection result display by a conventional wafer surface inspection device.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 ウエハ 2 異物 3,4,5 「異物あり」とみなした検出単位区分 6 「異物なし」とみなした検出単位区分 7 異物のへりにあたる周辺区分 1 Wafer 2 Foreign matter 3, 4, 5 Detection unit category considered to be “foreign matter” 6 Detection unit category considered to be “no foreign matter” 7 Peripheral category corresponding to edge of foreign matter

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 ウエハの表面を基本検出単位で区分し、
基本検出単位区分(以下、区分と略す)ごとに異物の有
無を判別する表面検査装置において、 「異物あり」の区分に対して、その隣接区分にも異物が
あるか否かを判別するステップ、判別した結果が「異物
あり」の場合、隣接しあう区分の2つの異物を同一異物
とみなして新異物とするステップ、上記新異物を包括す
る最小の長方形が占める区分数をカウントするステッ
プ、上記新異物が占める区分数の上記長方形が占める区
分数に対する割合を算出するステップ、およびその割合
から上記新異物がキズか否かを判別するステップを含む
ことを特徴とするキズ判別方法。
1. The wafer surface is divided into basic detection units,
In a surface inspection apparatus that determines the presence or absence of foreign matter for each basic detection unit category (hereinafter, abbreviated as category), for the category of "foreign matter", a step of determining whether there is a foreign matter also in the adjacent section, If the result of the determination is "foreign matter present", two foreign matter in adjacent sections are regarded as the same foreign matter to be new foreign matter, a step of counting the number of categories occupied by the smallest rectangle including the new foreign matter, A flaw determination method comprising: a step of calculating a ratio of the number of categories occupied by new foreign matter to the number of categories occupied by the rectangle; and a step of determining whether or not the new foreign matter is flawed from the rate.
【請求項2】 ウエハの表面を基本検出単位で区分し、
区分ごとに異物の有無を判別する表面検査装置におい
て、 「異物あり」の区分に対して、その隣接区分にも異物が
あるか否かを判別するステップ、判別した結果が「異物
あり」の場合、隣接しあう区分の2つの異物を同一異物
とみなして新異物とするステップ、上記新異物のへりに
あたる周辺区分のそれぞれに対して、「異物あり」の隣
接区分数をカウントするステップ、上記「異物あり」の
隣接区分数の全隣接区分数に対する割合を算出するステ
ップ、上記周辺区分ごとに「異物あり」の隣接区分数の
全隣接区分数に対する割合を予め設定した定数と比較す
るステップ、その比較条件を満たす周辺区分数の全周辺
区分数に対する割合を算出するステップ、およびその割
合から上記新異物がキズか否かを判別するステップを含
むことを特徴とするキズ判別方法。
2. The surface of the wafer is divided into basic detection units,
In the surface inspection device that determines the presence / absence of foreign matter for each category, the step of determining whether there is any foreign matter in the adjacent category for the category of "foreign matter". , A step of considering two foreign matter in adjacent categories as a new foreign matter as the same foreign matter, and a step of counting the number of adjacent categories with "foreign matter" for each of the peripheral categories corresponding to the edge of the new foreign matter, The step of calculating the ratio of the number of adjacent sections of "foreign matter" to the total number of adjacent sections, the step of comparing the ratio of the number of adjacent sections of "foreign object" to the total number of adjacent sections for each of the peripheral sections with a preset constant, And a step of calculating a ratio of the number of peripheral divisions satisfying the comparison condition to the total number of peripheral divisions, and a step of determining from the ratio whether or not the new foreign matter is a flaw. How to identify scratches.
JP4192060A 1992-07-20 1992-07-20 Method of detecting flaw in surface inspecting apparatus Pending JPH0634559A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4192060A JPH0634559A (en) 1992-07-20 1992-07-20 Method of detecting flaw in surface inspecting apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4192060A JPH0634559A (en) 1992-07-20 1992-07-20 Method of detecting flaw in surface inspecting apparatus

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0634559A true JPH0634559A (en) 1994-02-08

Family

ID=16284959

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4192060A Pending JPH0634559A (en) 1992-07-20 1992-07-20 Method of detecting flaw in surface inspecting apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0634559A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6636302B2 (en) 1994-12-08 2003-10-21 Kla-Tencor Corporation Scanning system for inspecting anamolies on surfaces
US6888627B2 (en) 1996-06-04 2005-05-03 Kla-Tencor Corporation Optical scanning system for surface inspection

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6636302B2 (en) 1994-12-08 2003-10-21 Kla-Tencor Corporation Scanning system for inspecting anamolies on surfaces
US6888627B2 (en) 1996-06-04 2005-05-03 Kla-Tencor Corporation Optical scanning system for surface inspection
US7075637B2 (en) 1996-06-04 2006-07-11 Kla-Tencor Corporation Optical scanning system for surface inspection

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5436979A (en) Process for detecting and mapping dirt on the surface of a photographic element
TW550720B (en) Equipment and method of detecting faults in semiconductor integrated circuits
JP4225579B2 (en) A method for inspecting the surface of a moving strip by segmenting its image into skeptical zones
CN102435616B (en) Monitoring method of stability of crystal edge detector
CN113340909B (en) Glue line defect detection method based on machine vision
US4958083A (en) Inspecting apparatus capable of accurately inspecting an object
Jacob et al. Comparison of two quantitative methods of discerning airspace enlargement in smoke-exposed mice
JPH0634559A (en) Method of detecting flaw in surface inspecting apparatus
JP2001516457A (en) Method for inspecting the surface of a moving strip by pre-classification of detected surface irregularities
JPH04218712A (en) Method for assesing quality of thread and apparatus for executing this method
WO2023029491A1 (en) Panel array short circuit detection method and apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium
JP2003232759A (en) Odor discrimination apparatus
CN110634124A (en) Method and equipment for area detection
JPH07333197A (en) Automatic surface flaw detector
US7679737B2 (en) Method, system and apparatus of inspection
JP4998722B2 (en) Work defect inspection method by image processing
JPH11211674A (en) Method and apparatus for inspection of flaw on surface
JPH07225843A (en) Method for measuring center position of circle
JP2001242163A (en) Method for measuring cleanliness index of hot-rolled material for shadow mask
JP3107700B2 (en) Water turbidity measuring method and turbidity measuring device
JP3156702B2 (en) Inspection data analysis system and inspection data analysis method
JP2004177170A (en) Defect inspection method by image recognition
CN109544541A (en) Cigarette apparent flaws detection method and device
JPH08189902A (en) Picture processing device
JP2001092966A (en) Method and device for processing image