JP6980080B1 - Practice guidance provider - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a practice guidance providing device capable of suppressing a user from dropping out of practice. SOLUTION: A practice guidance providing device 4 transmits a first practice guidance information indicating a practice to be executed by a user to a user terminal 2, and receives practice feedback information and condition information from the user terminal 2. Then, the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition are calculated respectively, the degree of urgency of the risk that the user drops out of the practice is calculated based on them, and it is determined whether or not there is a sign of dropping out. If it is determined that there is a sign of dropping out, the second practice guidance information is determined based on the score of a predetermined standard determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information, and the user terminal 2 is used. Send. [Selection diagram] Fig. 1

Description

The present invention relates to a practice guidance providing device that provides practice guidance to a user, and more particularly to a technique for suppressing the user from dropping out of practice.

Conventionally, a system that provides an exercise menu and an exercise plan to a user has been proposed. For example, in the conventional system, an exercise menu and an exercise plan are provided so that a sufficient training effect can be obtained without causing overtraining or failure (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2018-33566

However, in the conventional device, although the occurrence of overtraining and failure is considered, no consideration is given to whether or not the user can be prevented from dropping out of the practice.

The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a practice guidance providing device capable of suppressing a user from dropping out of practice.

The practice guidance providing device of the present invention is a practice guidance providing device that provides practice guidance to a user, and receives practice timing information indicating a time when the user executes a practice from the user terminal of the user. The unit, the first practice guidance transmission unit that transmits the first practice guidance information indicating the practice to be executed by the user to the user terminal at a time determined based on the practice timing information, and the user terminal. , The practice feedback request unit for transmitting the practice feedback request indicating the practice feedback information indicating the feedback from the user regarding the execution of the practice, and the practice input by the user from the user terminal as a response to the practice feedback request. A practice feedback receiving unit for receiving feedback information, a condition requesting unit for transmitting a condition request for requesting condition information indicating the user's condition to the user terminal, and the user terminal as a response to the condition request. The condition receiving unit that receives the condition information input by the user, the practice feedback evaluation calculation unit that calculates the evaluation value of the practice feedback of the user based on the practice feedback information, and the user's condition information based on the condition information. The condition evaluation calculation unit that calculates the evaluation value of the condition, the urgency calculation unit that calculates the urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition, and the above. Based on the degree of urgency of the risk, the sign determination unit for determining whether or not the user has a sign of withdrawing from the practice, and the practice timing information when it is determined that the user has a sign of withdrawing from the practice. And the score calculation unit that calculates the score of a predetermined standard determined based on the practice feedback information and the condition information, and the second practice guidance information to be provided to the user is determined based on the score of the standard. It is provided with a practice guidance determination unit and a second practice guidance transmission unit for transmitting the second practice guidance information to the user terminal.

According to this configuration, it is possible to calculate the degree of urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition, and the user will drop out of the practice based on the degree of urgency of the risk. It is possible to determine whether or not there is a sign of a risk. Then, when it is determined that the user has a sign of dropping out of the practice, the user who is likely to drop out is selected based on the score of a predetermined standard determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information. On the other hand, appropriate practice guidance can be determined. By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

Further, in the practice guidance providing device of the present invention, the predetermined standard is a first standard determined based on the practice timing, the practice feedback information, and the condition information as a standard indicating the power of the user's intention. And, as a criterion showing the sense of accomplishment of the user, a second criterion determined based on the practice feedback information and the condition information, and as a criterion showing the respect of the user, based on the practice feedback information and the condition information. A third criterion determined by the above and a fourth criterion determined based on the condition information as a criterion indicating the degree of fatigue of the user are included, and the score calculation unit includes the first criterion to the above. For each of the fourth criteria, an average score for a predetermined period or a predetermined number of data is calculated, and the practice guidance determination unit uses the criterion having the lowest average score among the first criterion to the fourth criterion. The second practice guidance information for the user may be determined based on.

With this configuration, an average score is calculated for each of the four criteria (power of will, sense of accomplishment, respect, and degree of fatigue) determined based on practice timing information, practice feedback information, and condition information, and the standard with the lowest average score. Based on this, appropriate practice guidance can be determined for users who are likely to drop out. By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

Further, in the practice guidance providing device of the present invention, the practice feedback information includes execution history information regarding whether or not the user has executed the practice, and execution feedback information regarding whether or not the method of executing the practice is changed. And, the condition information includes self-check information input by the user himself / herself regarding the condition of the user and cooperation information input by an external device, and the first criterion is the said. It is determined based on the practice timing, the execution history information, the execution feedback information, and the self-check information, and the second criterion is determined based on the execution history information, the execution feedback information, and the self-check information. The third criterion may be determined based on the execution history information, the execution feedback information, and the self-check information, and the fourth criterion may be determined based on the self-check information and the linkage information. ..

According to this configuration, four criteria (power of intention, sense of accomplishment, respect, degree of fatigue) can be appropriately determined based on practice timing information, practice feedback information, and condition information. Therefore, it is possible to determine appropriate practice guidance for a user who is likely to drop out based on the average score of each of the four appropriately determined criteria (power of intention, sense of accomplishment, respect, degree of fatigue). By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

Further, the practice guidance providing device of the present invention includes an effectiveness determination unit for determining whether or not the second practice guidance information is valid based on the practice feedback information received in the past, and is not effective. If it is determined, the practice guidance determination unit may determine new second practice guidance information different from the previously determined second practice guidance information.

According to this configuration, the validity of the practice guidance is determined based on the practice feedback information received in the past, and if it is determined that the practice guidance is not effective, new practice guidance is provided to the user. In this way, effective practice guidance can be provided to users who are likely to drop out.

The method of the present invention is a method executed by a practice guidance providing device that provides practice guidance to a user, and the method receives practice timing information indicating a time when the user executes a practice from the user terminal of the user. The practice timing receiving step to be received, and the first practice guidance transmission step of transmitting the first practice guidance information indicating the practice to be executed by the user to the user terminal at a time determined based on the practice timing information. As a response to the practice feedback request step, the practice feedback request step for transmitting the practice feedback request indicating the practice feedback information indicating the feedback from the user regarding the execution of the practice to the user terminal, and the user terminal from the user terminal. The practice feedback receiving step for receiving the practice feedback information input by the user, the condition request step for transmitting the condition request for requesting the condition information indicating the user's condition to the user terminal, and the above-mentioned as a response to the condition request. Based on the condition reception step of receiving the condition information input by the user from the user terminal, the practice feedback evaluation calculation step of calculating the evaluation value of the practice feedback of the user based on the practice feedback information, and the condition information. The degree of urgency to calculate the degree of urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the condition evaluation calculation step for calculating the evaluation value of the condition of the user and the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition. A calculation step, a sign determination step for determining whether or not the user has a sign of withdrawal from practice based on the degree of urgency of the risk, and a sign determination step for determining whether or not the user has a sign of withdrawal from practice. , A score calculation step for calculating a predetermined reference score determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information, and a second provision to the user based on the reference score. The practice guidance determination step for determining the practice guidance information and the second practice guidance transmission step for transmitting the second practice guidance information to the user terminal are included.

Similar to the above device, this method can also calculate the degree of urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition, based on the degree of urgency of the risk. , It is possible to determine if there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice. Then, when it is determined that the user has a sign of dropping out of the practice, the user who is likely to drop out is selected based on the score of a predetermined standard determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information. On the other hand, appropriate practice guidance can be determined. By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

The program of the present invention is a program executed by a practice guidance providing device that provides practice guidance to the user, and the program is such that the user executes practice on the practice guidance providing device from the user terminal of the user. The practice timing reception process for receiving the practice timing information indicating the time to be performed and the first practice guidance information indicating the practice to be executed by the user at the time determined based on the practice timing information are transmitted to the user terminal. The first practice guidance transmission process, the practice feedback request process for transmitting the practice feedback request indicating the practice feedback information indicating the feedback from the user regarding the execution of the practice to the user terminal, and the response to the practice feedback request. As a practice feedback receiving process for receiving the practice feedback information input by the user from the user terminal, and a condition request process for transmitting the condition request for requesting the condition information indicating the user's condition to the user terminal. As a response to the condition request, a condition reception process for receiving the condition information input by the user from the user terminal and a practice feedback evaluation calculation for calculating an evaluation value of the practice feedback of the user based on the practice feedback information. The risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the process, the condition evaluation calculation process that calculates the evaluation value of the user's condition based on the condition information, and the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition. A urgency calculation process for calculating the degree of urgency, a sign determination process for determining whether or not there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice based on the urgency of the risk, and a sign that the user will drop out of practice. When it is determined that there is, the score calculation process for calculating the score of a predetermined standard determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information, and the user based on the standard score. The practice guidance determination process for determining the second practice guidance information provided to the user terminal and the second practice guidance transmission process for transmitting the second practice guidance information to the user terminal are executed.

Similar to the above device, this program can also calculate the urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition, based on the urgency of the risk. , It is possible to determine if there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice. Then, when it is determined that the user has a sign of dropping out of the practice, the user who is likely to drop out is selected based on the score of a predetermined standard determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information. On the other hand, appropriate practice guidance can be determined. By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

According to the present invention, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of practice.

It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the practice guidance providing system in embodiment of this invention. It is a sequence diagram for demonstrating the operation of the practice guidance providing apparatus in embodiment of this invention. It is a sequence diagram for demonstrating the operation of the practice guidance providing apparatus in embodiment of this invention. It is a sequence diagram for demonstrating the operation of the practice guidance providing apparatus in embodiment of this invention.

Hereinafter, the practice guidance providing device according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In this embodiment, the case of a system server or the like used in the practice guidance providing system is illustrated. Various functions of the practice guidance providing device described below can be realized by a program stored in the HDD, memory, or the like of the practice guidance providing device.

The configuration of the practice guidance providing device according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a practice guidance providing system according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the practice guidance providing system 1 is a device that provides practice guidance to a user, and includes a user terminal 2 operated by the user and a system server 4 connected to the user terminal 2 via a network 3. I have. As the user terminal 2, for example, a smartphone or the like is used. The system server 4 may be an SNS server capable of providing an SNS (social network service). Further, the system server 4 may be linked / linked with another SNS server.

Here, "practice" means to keep repeating in order to acquire a good lifestyle for the user. "Practice" includes, for example, exercise practice, self-cognitive behavior therapy practice, garbage separation practice, disparity / inequality thinking practice, social distance practice, piano practice, English learning, disaster prevention training, etc. Includes tea ceremony practice and design practice.

Further, the "practice guidance" refers to guidance indicating the practice to be executed by the user. "Practice guidance" includes, for example, practice themes (practice purpose: eliminating stiff shoulders, etc.), practice styles (practice (learning) forms: study mode, lifestyle mode, conditioning mode, etc.), practice menus (single practice content: Exercise size (strength, frequency, duration: 3 sets of 10 times per set with chest), practice recipe (combination of practice menu: stretch chest muscles after arm prostrate, etc.), practice Timing (time designation, action designation; at 21:00, before taking a bath, etc.), practice messages (column (meaning / intention to practice), voice calls (approval, support, encouragement), questions, etc.) are included.

The system server 4 corresponds to the practice guidance providing device of the present invention. Here, the configuration of the system server 4 will be described in detail with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 1, the system server 4 includes a receiving unit 10, a transmitting unit 11, a practice feedback request unit 12, a condition request unit 13, a practice feedback evaluation calculation unit 14, and a condition evaluation calculation unit 15. It includes a urgency calculation unit 16, a sign determination unit 17, a score calculation unit 18, a practice guidance determination unit 19, an effectiveness determination unit 20, and a data storage unit 21.

The receiving unit 10 has a function of receiving various data transmitted from the user terminal 2 to the system server 4. For example, the receiving unit 10 receives the practice timing information indicating the time when the user executes the practice from the user terminal 2. Further, the receiving unit 10 receives the practice feedback information input by the user from the user terminal 2 as a response to the practice feedback request (described later). Further, the receiving unit 10 receives the condition information input by the user from the user terminal 2 as a response to the condition request (described later). When the system server 4 is an SNS server, the receiving unit 10 can receive the above data from the user terminal 2 by using the chat function of the SNS.

The transmission unit 11 has a function of transmitting various data from the system server 4 to the user terminal 2. For example, the transmission unit 11 transmits the practice guidance information (first practice guidance information) indicating the practice to be executed by the user to the user terminal 2 at a time determined based on the practice timing information. Further, the transmission unit 11 transmits the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) determined based on a predetermined standard score (described later) to the user terminal 2. When the system server 4 is an SNS server, the transmission unit 11 can transmit the above data to the user terminal 2 by using the chat function of the SNS.

The practice feedback request unit 12 transmits a practice feedback request for requesting practice feedback information to the user terminal 2. The practice feedback information is information indicating feedback from the user regarding the execution of the practice. The practice feedback information includes, for example, execution history information regarding whether or not the user has performed the practice, and execution feedback information regarding whether or not the practice is executed. When the system server 4 is an SNS server, the practice feedback request unit 12 can transmit the above practice feedback request to the user terminal 2 by using the chat function of the SNS.

In this case, the execution history information includes, for example, image training information (information on whether or not image training has been performed), exercise information (information on whether or not practice has been performed), and retrospective information (information on whether or not review has been performed). ), Anchoring information (information on whether or not an anchoring act was performed), etc. are included. In addition, "anchoring" is to convey positive emotions and information to the brain by connecting positive emotions (joy, achievement, self-affirmation, etc.) and poses (for example, guts pose), and the brain is pleasant. Say to put it in a state. The execution feedback information includes, for example, timing change information (information on whether to change the practice timing), theme change information (information on whether to change the practice theme), and mode change information (practice style (“mode”). Information on whether to change), step change information (information on whether to change the practice menu, practice size, practice recipe (also called "step")), etc. are included.

The condition request unit 13 transmits a condition request for requesting condition information to the user terminal 2. The condition information is information indicating the condition of the user. The condition information includes, for example, self-check information input by the user himself / herself regarding the user's condition and cooperation information input by an external device. When the system server 4 is an SNS server, the condition request unit 13 can transmit the above condition request to the user terminal 2 by using the chat function of the SNS.

In this case, the self-check information includes, for example, body scan information (information on one's subjective condition regarding a part of the body), mind scan information (information on one's subjective condition regarding emotions), and cognitive scan information (thinking).・ Information on my subjective condition regarding beliefs / thinking habits), behavior scan information (information on my subjective condition regarding behavior (I was able to put up with smoking, point out the good points of people, etc.)) , Skill scan information (information on your subjective condition regarding physical / cognitive behavior / emotion management skills), Exercise scan information (information on your subjective condition regarding motivation, motivation, and degree of habituation to continue practicing) ), Record scan information (information on the overall subjective condition of oneself including one's mind and body when looking back on the record), etc. are included. In addition, the cooperation information includes wearable device information (information on objective conditions related to one's mind and body), medical staff input information (information on objective conditions related to one's symptoms and treatment status), and the like.

The practice feedback evaluation calculation unit 14 calculates the evaluation value of the user's practice feedback based on the practice feedback information. For example, first, among the execution history information included in the practice feedback information, the daily image training information is scored as "image training: 1 point, no image training: 5 points" for the image training information. , The score (for example, 3 points) rounded off on average for 7 days is calculated. In addition, regarding the exercise information, the daily exercise information is scored as "exercised: 1 point, not exercised: 5 points", and the score rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 2 points) is calculated. In addition, regarding the retrospective information, the daily retrospective information is scored as "retrospective: 1 point, no retrospective: 5 points", and the score rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 2 points) is calculated. Regarding the anchoring information, the daily anchoring information was scored as "anchoring act: 1 point, no anchoring act: 5 points", and the score was rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 1 point). ) Is calculated.

Similarly, among the execution feedback information included in the practice feedback information, the daily timing change information is scored as "the practice timing was not changed: 0 points, the practice timing was changed: 5 points". , The score (for example, 3 points) rounded off on average for 7 days is calculated. In addition, regarding the theme change information, the daily theme change information was scored as "I did not change the practice theme: 0 points, I changed the practice theme: 5 points", and the points were rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 4 points). Is calculated. In addition, regarding the mode change information, the daily mode change information was scored as "No change in practice style (mode): 0 points, change in practice style (mode): 5 points", and rounded off on average for 7 days. The score (for example, 5 points) is calculated. Regarding the step change information, the daily step change information was "Did not change the practice menu / practice size / practice recipe (step): 0 points, changed the practice menu / practice size / practice recipe (step): 5 points. , And rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 2 points) is calculated.

Then, the practice feedback evaluation calculation unit 14 totals all the points rounded off on average for 7 days for each information of the execution history information and the execution feedback information included in the practice feedback information, thereby evaluating the evaluation value of the practice feedback (for example, 22). Point = (3 + 2 + 2 + 1) + (3 + 4 + 5 + 2)) is calculated.

The condition evaluation calculation unit 15 calculates the evaluation value of the user's condition based on the condition information. For example, first of all, among the self-check information included in the condition information, regarding the body scan information, the daily body scan information is "The body part (for example, the knee. The part may change depending on the day) does not hurt: 1 point, It is scored as "Slightly painful: 2 points, Painful: 3 points, Quite painful: 4 points, Very painful: 5 points", and the points rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 4 points) are calculated. Also, regarding the mind scan information, the daily mind scan information is scored as "I don't think I was frustrated today: 1 point, I think a little: 2 points, I don't know: 3 points, I think: 4 points, I think very much: 5 points". Then, the points rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 1 point) are calculated. Also, regarding the cognitive scan information, I think that the daily cognitive scan information "recently thinks" often: 1 point, a little think: 2 points, I don't know: 3 points, I don't think so much: 4 points, I think It is scored as "No: 5 points", and the score rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 2 points) is calculated. Regarding the behavior scan information, the daily behavior scan information says, "I think I was able to point out the good points of people: 1 point, I think a little: 2 points, I don't know: 3 points, I don't think so much: 4 points, I don't think: 5 points. , And rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 2 points) is calculated. The "thinking to be done" is one of the "cognitive distortions" in cognitive behavioral therapy. Regarding the skill scan information, the daily skill scan information says, "I think I was able to calm down with breathing even if I was frustrated: 1 point, I think a little: 2 points, I don't know: 3 points, I don't think so much: 4 points, I think. It is scored as "No: 5 points", and the score rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 3 points) is calculated. Also, regarding the exercise scan information, the daily exercise scan information is scored as "I want to continue practicing: 1 point, I think a little: 2 points, I don't know: 3 points, I don't think so much: 4 points, I don't think: 5 points". The score is rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 3 points). Also, regarding the record scan information, the daily record scan information is scored as "I think I was able to change my behavior: 1 point, I think a little: 2 points, I don't know: 3 points, I don't think so much: 4 points, I don't think: 5 points". Then, the points rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 3 points) are calculated.

Similarly, among the cooperation information included in the condition information, regarding the wearable device information, the daily wearable device information is "The stress level judged from the heart rate is very low: 1 point, a little low: 2 points, normal: 3 points. , Slightly high: 4 points, fairly high: 5 points ", and the points rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 2 points) are calculated. Regarding the medical input information, the daily medical input information is "Rank 1: 1 point, Rank 2: 2 points, Rank 3: 3 points, Rank 4 of the medical check algorithm diagnosed from how the blood glucose level decreases. : 4 points, rank 5: 5 points ”, and the points rounded off on average for 7 days (for example, 2 points) are calculated.

Then, the condition evaluation calculation unit 15 totals all the points rounded off on average for 7 days for each information of the self-check information and the cooperation information included in the condition information, so that the evaluation value of the condition (for example, 22 points = (4 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 3)) ) + (2 + 2)).

The urgency calculation unit 16 calculates the urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition. For example, the urgency calculation unit 16 calculates the urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice (for example, 44 points = 22 + 22) by adding up the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition.

The sign determination unit 17 determines whether or not there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice based on the degree of urgency of the risk. For example, the sign determination unit 17 determines whether or not there is a sign of dropout, in order to determine a table showing the relationship between the degree of urgency of risk and the sign of dropout (tension degree 75 to 85 points: determination A, urgency 655-. 74 points: determination B, urgency 45 to 64 points: determination C, urgency 20 to 44 points: determination D, urgency 0-19 points: determination E) can be used. In this case, if the determination A is, it is determined that there is no sign of dropout, and if the determination is B or less, it is determined that there is a sign of dropout.

The score calculation unit 18 calculates a predetermined standard score based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information when it is determined that the user has a sign of dropping out of the practice. Predetermined criteria include a criterion that indicates the user's "power of will", a criterion that indicates the user's "feeling of accomplishment", a criterion that indicates the user's "respect (small step respect)", and a criterion that indicates the user's "tiredness". Includes criteria for "degree". "Small step respect" is one of the goal setting methods in cognitive behavioral therapy.

The criteria for showing the user's "power of will" are practice timing, exercise information and theme change information in practice feedback information, body scan information, mind scan information, cognitive scan information, and behavior scan information in condition information. It is determined based on the exercise scan information. For example, the score calculation unit 18 adds up the average score of the practice timing, the average score of the exercise information and the theme change information, and the average score of the body scan information, the mind scan information, the cognitive scan information, the behavior scan information, and the exercise scan information. By doing so, the score of the user's "power of will" (for example, 19 points = 1 + 2 + 4 + 4 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3) is calculated. The average score is calculated by rounding off the average score in a predetermined period (for example, 7 days) or a predetermined number of data (for example, 4). The practice timing score is a table showing the relationship between the practice timing time and the score (4 o'clock to 9 o'clock: 5 points, 10 o'clock to 14 o'clock: 4 points, 15 o'clock to 19 o'clock: 3 points, 20 o'clock to 20 o'clock. It can be calculated based on 22:00: 2 points, 23:00 to 3:00: 1 point).

The criteria for showing the user's "feeling of accomplishment" are mind scan information related to self-affirmation in condition information, exercise information, retrospective information and anchoring information in practice feedback information, and mind scan information in condition information. It is determined based on the cognitive scan information, behavior scan information, and exercise scan information. For example, the score calculation unit 18 has an average score of mind scan information regarding self-affirmation in condition information, an average score of exercise information, retrospective information, and anchoring information in practice feedback information, and condition information. By adding up the average scores of the mind scan information, the cognitive scan information, the behavior scan information, and the exercise scan information, the score of the user's "feeling of accomplishment" (for example, 15 points = 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3) is calculated. The mind scan information includes information on "self-affirmation", information on "liveliness", information on "irritability", information on "fatigue", information on "anxiety", information on "depression", etc. Is included. The average score of the mind scan information regarding self-affirmation is calculated based only on the information regarding self-affirmation among the mind scan information. On the other hand, the average score of the mind scan information (not limited to self-affirmation) is calculated based on all the information of the mind scan information.

The criteria for showing the user's "respect" are theme change information, mode change information, step change information, exercise information, reflection information, anchoring information, skill scan information and record scan in condition information in the practice feedback information. It is determined based on information. For example, the score calculation unit 18 has the average score of theme change information, mode change information, step change information, exercise information, retrospective information, and anchoring information in the practice feedback information, and skill scan information and records in the condition information. By adding up the average scores of the scan information, the user's "respect" score (for example, 22 points = 4 + 5 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 3) is calculated.

The criteria for indicating the user's "tiredness" are based on body scan information, mind scan information, cognitive scan information, behavior scan information, skill scan information, exercise scan information, wearable device information, and medical personnel input information among the condition information. It is decided. For example, the score calculation unit 18 totals the average scores of body scan information, mind scan information, cognitive scan information, behavior scan information, skill scan information, exercise scan information, wearable device information, and medical personnel input information among the condition information. By doing so, the score of the user's "tiredness" (for example, 20 points = 4 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 3) is calculated.

The practice guidance determination unit 19 determines the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) to be provided to the user based on the scores of the four criteria calculated by the score calculation unit 18. In this case, the lower the score (total of average scores), the more care is required for the user, and it is determined that the priority is higher. In this case, the practice guidance determination unit 19 determines the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) for the user based on the criterion having the lowest score (the criterion having the highest priority) among the four criteria. The practice guidance decision unit 19 is a table in which the standard and the practice guidance information correspond to each other (will power: practice guidance information a1, a2, a3 ... (practice guidance to improve the will power), sense of accomplishment: practice guidance information b1, b2, b3 ... (practice guidance to improve the sense of accomplishment), respect: practice guidance information c1, c2, c3 ... (practice guidance to improve respect), fatigue level: practice guidance information d1, d2, d3 ... Practice guidance to improve)) can be used. For example, when the criterion with the lowest score is "feeling of accomplishment (15 points)", the practice guidance determination unit 19 refers to the table and refers to the practice guidance information b1, b2, b3 ... One practice guidance information b1 is randomly selected from among them, and is determined as the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) to be provided to the user.

The validity determination unit determines whether or not the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) determined by the practice guidance determination unit 19 is valid based on the practice feedback information received from the user terminal 2 in the past. For example, if the user does not perform the practice according to the practice guidance even though the practice guidance information has been proposed to the user in the past, it is determined that the practice guidance information is not valid. When the effectiveness determination unit 20 determines that the effect is not valid, the practice guidance determination unit 19 determines the exercise guidance as the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) provided to the user. A new practice guidance information (for example, practice guidance information b2) different from the information (for example, practice guidance information b1) is determined.

The data storage unit 21 stores data such as practice timing information, practice feedback information, and condition information received from the user terminal 2. In addition, data such as practice guidance information transmitted to the user terminal 2 is also stored in the data storage unit 21.

The operation of the practice guidance providing device configured as described above will be described with reference to the sequence diagrams of FIGS. 2 to 4.

As shown in FIG. 2, in the practice guidance providing system 1 of the present embodiment, first, the application for the practice guidance providing system is started on the user terminal 2 (S1). Then, various user information (user ID and the like) are transmitted from the user terminal 2 to the system server 4 (S2). The user information may include information on a practice theme (for example, elimination of stiff shoulders) desired by the user.

Next, the user terminal 2 executes a process of inquiring the user whether or not to set (change if it has already been set) the practice timing (S3). When setting (or changing) the practice timing, the user inputs the desired practice timing (S4). The input practice timing information is transmitted from the user terminal 2 to the system server 4 (S5) and recorded in the data storage unit 21 (S6).

When the time determined based on the practice timing information arrives (S7), the system server 4 determines the practice guidance information (first practice guidance information) to be provided to the user (S8), and transmits the practice guidance information to the user terminal 2 (S8). S9). This practice guidance information (first practice guidance information) is determined based on user information (practice theme included in) and practice timing information. The user terminal 2 presents the practice guidance information (first practice guidance information) received from the system server 4 to the user (S10). This allows the user to perform the practice according to the practice guidance.

Next, the system server 4 transmits a practice feedback request to the user terminal 2 as shown in FIG. 3 (S11). When the user inputs the practice feedback information from the user terminal 2 (S12), the input practice feedback information is transmitted from the user terminal 2 to the system server 4 (S13) and recorded in the data storage unit 21 (S14). ..

Subsequently, the system server 4 transmits a condition request to the user terminal 2 (S15). When the user inputs the condition information from the user terminal 2 (S16), the input condition information is transmitted from the user terminal 2 to the system server 4 (S17) and recorded in the data storage unit 21 (S18).

Then, the system server 4 calculates the evaluation value of the practice feedback based on the practice feedback information recorded in the data storage unit 21 (S19). For example, for each information of the execution history information and the execution feedback information included in the practice feedback information, the evaluation value of the practice feedback (for example, 22 points = (3 + 2 + 2 + 1) + (3 + 4 + 5 + 2) + 2 by summing up all the points rounded off on average for 7 days. )) Is calculated.

Further, the system server 4 calculates the evaluation value of the condition based on the condition information recorded in the data storage unit 21 (S20). For example, the evaluation value of the condition (for example, 22 points = (4 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 3) + (2 + 2)) is obtained by summing all the points rounded off on average for 7 days for each information of the self-check information and the cooperation information included in the condition information. Calculated.

Then, the system server 4 calculates the degree of urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition (S21). For example, by summing the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition, the degree of urgency of the risk that the user drops out of the practice (for example, 44 points = 22 + 22) is calculated.

Next, the system server 4 determines whether or not there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice based on the calculated risk urgency (S22). For example, when the degree of urgency of risk is 44 points, it is determined that there is a sign of withdrawal (determination D) by referring to the table showing the relationship between the degree of urgency of risk and the sign of withdrawal. If it is determined that there is no sign of dropout (determination A), the process ends (S23).

Subsequently, the system server 4 calculates a standard score indicating "power of will" (S24). For example, by adding the average score of practice timing, the average score of exercise information and theme change information, and the average score of body scan information, mind scan information, cognitive scan information, behavior scan information, and exercise scan information, the user's The score of "power of will" (for example, 19 points = 1 + 2 + 4 + 4 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3) is calculated.

Further, the system server 4 calculates a standard score indicating "a sense of accomplishment" (S25). For example, the average score of mind scan information regarding self-affirmation in condition information, the average score of exercise information, retrospective information, and anchoring information in practice feedback information, and the mind scan information and cognitive scan in condition information. By adding up the average scores of the information, the behavior scan information, and the exercise scan information, the score of the user's "feeling of accomplishment" (for example, 15 points = 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3) is calculated.

Further, the system server 4 calculates a standard score indicating "respect" (S26). For example, the average score of theme change information, mode change information, step change information, exercise information, retrospective information, and anchoring information in the practice feedback information, and the average score of skill scan information and record scan information in the condition information. By adding up, the user's "respect" score (for example, 22 points = 4 + 5 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 3) is calculated.

Further, the system server 4 calculates a standard score indicating "tiredness" (S27). For example, by adding up the average scores of body scan information, mind scan information, cognitive scan information, behavior scan information, skill scan information, exercise scan information, wearable device information, and medical input information among the condition information, the user The score of "tiredness" (for example, 20 points = 4 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 3) is calculated.

The system server 4 determines the priority of the four calculated criteria (S28). In this case, the lower the score (total of average scores), the more care is required for the user, and it is determined that the priority is higher. For example, in the above example, it is determined that "feeling of accomplishment (15 points)" has the highest priority among the four criteria.

Then, the system server 4 determines the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) for the user based on the criterion having the lowest score (the criterion having the highest priority) (S29). For example, when the criterion with the lowest score is "feeling of accomplishment (15 points)", one of the practice guidance information b1, b2, b3 ... for improving the sense of accomplishment is randomly selected by referring to the table. The practice guidance information b1 is selected and determined as the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) to be provided to the user.

Next, the system server 4 determines whether or not the determined practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) is valid based on the practice feedback information received from the user terminal 2 in the past (S30). If it is determined that the system server 4 is not valid, the system server 4 uses the previously determined practice guidance information (for example, practice guidance information b1) as the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) to be provided to the user. ), And new practice guidance information (for example, practice guidance information b2) is determined (S29).

If it is determined to be effective, the determined practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) is transmitted to the user terminal 2 (S31). At the user terminal 2, the practice guidance information (second practice guidance information) received from the system server 4 is presented to the user (S32).

According to the practice guidance providing device of the present embodiment as described above, the degree of urgency of the risk of the user dropping out of the practice can be calculated based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition, and the urgency of the risk can be calculated. Based on the degree, it is possible to determine whether or not there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice. When it is determined that there is a sign that the user will drop out of the practice, the user who is likely to drop out will be asked based on the score of a predetermined standard determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information and the condition information. Can determine appropriate practice guidance. By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

Further, in the present embodiment, an average score is calculated for each of the four criteria (power of intention, sense of accomplishment, respect, degree of fatigue) determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information, and the average score is calculated. Can determine appropriate practice guidance for users who are likely to drop out, based on the lowest criteria. By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

Further, in the present embodiment, four criteria (power of intention, sense of accomplishment, respect, degree of fatigue) can be appropriately determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information. Therefore, it is possible to determine appropriate practice guidance for a user who is likely to drop out based on the average score of each of the four appropriately determined criteria (power of intention, sense of accomplishment, respect, degree of fatigue). By providing the user with the practice guidance determined in this way, it is possible to prevent the user from dropping out of the practice.

Further, in the present embodiment, the validity of the practice guidance is determined based on the practice feedback information received in the past, and if it is determined that the practice guidance is not effective, new practice guidance is provided to the user. .. In this way, effective practice guidance can be provided to users who are likely to drop out.

Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above by way of examples, the scope of the present invention is not limited to these, and can be changed or modified according to an object within the scope described in the claims. be.

As described above, the practice guidance providing device according to the present invention has an effect of suppressing the user from dropping out of the practice, and is useful as a system server or the like used in the practice guidance providing system. ..

1 Practice guidance providing system 2 User terminal 3 Network 4 System server 10 Receiver 11 Transmitter 12 Practice feedback request 13 Condition request 14 Practice feedback evaluation calculation 15 Condition evaluation calculation 16 Tensionness calculation 17 Sign judgment 18 Score Calculation unit 19 Practice guidance determination unit 20 Effectiveness judgment unit 21 Data storage unit

Claims (6)

It is a practice guidance providing device that provides practice guidance to the user.
A practice timing receiving unit that receives practice timing information indicating a time when the user executes a practice from the user terminal of the user.
A first practice guidance transmission unit that transmits the first practice guidance information indicating the practice to be executed by the user to the user terminal at a time determined based on the practice timing information.
A practice feedback request unit for transmitting a practice feedback request for requesting practice feedback information indicating feedback from the user regarding the execution of the practice to the user terminal, and a practice feedback request unit.
As a response to the practice feedback request, a practice feedback receiving unit that receives the practice feedback information input by the user from the user terminal,
A condition request unit for transmitting a condition request for requesting condition information indicating the condition of the user to the user terminal, and a condition request unit.
As a response to the condition request, a condition receiving unit that receives the condition information input by the user from the user terminal, and a condition receiving unit.
A practice feedback evaluation calculation unit that calculates an evaluation value of the user's practice feedback based on the practice feedback information,
A condition evaluation calculation unit that calculates an evaluation value of the user's condition based on the condition information, and a condition evaluation calculation unit.
A urgency calculation unit that calculates the urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition.
A sign determination unit that determines whether or not there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice based on the degree of urgency of the risk.
A score calculation unit that calculates a predetermined standard score determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information when it is determined that the user has a sign of dropping out of the practice.
A practice guidance determination unit that determines a second practice guidance information to be provided to the user based on the score of the reference.
A second practice guidance transmission unit that transmits the second practice guidance information to the user terminal,
A device that provides practice guidance. According to the above-mentioned predetermined criteria,
As the criteria for showing the power of the user's will, the practice timing, the practice feedback information, and the first criterion determined based on the condition information,
As the criteria for showing the user's sense of accomplishment, the practice feedback information, the second criterion determined based on the condition information, and the criteria.
As the criteria for showing the respect of the user, the practice feedback information, the third criterion determined based on the condition information, and the third criterion.
As a standard indicating the degree of fatigue of the user, a fourth standard determined based on the condition information and a fourth standard.
Is included,
The score calculation unit calculates an average score for a predetermined period or a predetermined number of data for each of the first criterion to the fourth criterion.
According to claim 1, the practice guidance determination unit determines the second practice guidance information for the user based on the criterion having the lowest average score among the first criterion to the fourth criterion. Described practice guidance providing device. The practice feedback information includes
Includes execution history information as to whether or not the user has performed the exercise and execution feedback information as to whether or not to change the way the exercise is performed.
The condition information includes
The self-check information input by the user himself / herself regarding the condition of the user and the cooperation information input by the external device are included.
The first criterion is determined based on the practice timing, the execution history information, the execution feedback information, and the self-check information.
The second criterion is determined based on the execution history information, the execution feedback information, and the self-check information.
The third criterion is determined based on the execution history information, the execution feedback information, and the self-check information.
The practice guidance providing device according to claim 2, wherein the fourth criterion is determined based on the self-check information and the cooperation information. A validity determination unit for determining whether or not the second practice guidance information is valid based on the practice feedback information received in the past is provided.
If it is determined that the training is not valid, the practice guidance determination unit determines new second practice guidance information different from the previously determined second practice guidance information, claim 1 to claim. The practice guidance providing device according to any one of items 3. There is a way to be performed on a practice guidance provider that provides practice guidance to the user,
The method is
A practice timing receiving step for receiving practice timing information indicating a time when the user executes a practice from the user terminal of the user, and a practice timing receiving step.
The first practice guidance transmission step of transmitting the first practice guidance information indicating the practice to be executed by the user to the user terminal at a time determined based on the practice timing information, and
A practice feedback request step for transmitting a practice feedback request for requesting practice feedback information indicating feedback from the user regarding the execution of the practice to the user terminal.
As a response to the practice feedback request, a practice feedback receiving step of receiving the practice feedback information input by the user from the user terminal, and a practice feedback receiving step.
A condition request step for transmitting a condition request for requesting condition information indicating the user's condition to the user terminal, and
As a response to the condition request, a condition receiving step of receiving the condition information input by the user from the user terminal, and a condition receiving step.
The practice feedback evaluation calculation step for calculating the evaluation value of the practice feedback of the user based on the practice feedback information, and the practice feedback evaluation calculation step.
A condition evaluation calculation step for calculating an evaluation value of the user's condition based on the condition information, and a condition evaluation calculation step.
A urgency calculation step for calculating the urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition.
A sign determination step for determining whether or not there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice based on the degree of urgency of the risk.
A score calculation step for calculating a predetermined standard score determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information when it is determined that the user has a sign of dropping out of the practice.
A practice guidance determination step that determines a second practice guidance information to be provided to the user based on the criteria score.
A second practice guidance transmission step for transmitting the second practice guidance information to the user terminal, and
Including, how. A program executed by a practice guidance provider that provides practice guidance to the user.
The program is attached to the practice guidance providing device.
The practice timing reception process for receiving the practice timing information indicating the time when the user executes the practice from the user terminal of the user, and the practice timing reception process.
The first practice guidance transmission process of transmitting the first practice guidance information indicating the practice to be executed by the user to the user terminal at a time determined based on the practice timing information.
A practice feedback request process for transmitting a practice feedback request for requesting practice feedback information indicating feedback from the user regarding the execution of the practice to the user terminal.
As a response to the practice feedback request, a practice feedback receiving process for receiving the practice feedback information input by the user from the user terminal, and a practice feedback receiving process.
Condition request processing for transmitting a condition request for requesting condition information indicating the condition of the user to the user terminal, and
As a response to the condition request, a condition reception process for receiving the condition information input by the user from the user terminal, and a condition reception process.
The practice feedback evaluation calculation process for calculating the evaluation value of the practice feedback of the user based on the practice feedback information, and the practice feedback evaluation calculation process.
Condition evaluation calculation processing that calculates the evaluation value of the user's condition based on the condition information, and
Based on the evaluation value of the practice feedback and the evaluation value of the condition, the urgency calculation process for calculating the urgency of the risk that the user will drop out of the practice, and the urgency calculation process.
A sign determination process for determining whether or not there is a sign that the user will drop out of practice based on the degree of urgency of the risk.
A score calculation process for calculating a predetermined standard score determined based on the practice timing information, the practice feedback information, and the condition information when it is determined that the user has a sign of dropping out of the practice.
The practice guidance determination process for determining the second practice guidance information to be provided to the user based on the score of the reference, and the practice guidance determination process.
The second practice guidance transmission process for transmitting the second practice guidance information to the user terminal, and
A program that runs.

Images