JP5717184B2 - Method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour - Google Patents

Method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5717184B2
JP5717184B2 JP2011048438A JP2011048438A JP5717184B2 JP 5717184 B2 JP5717184 B2 JP 5717184B2 JP 2011048438 A JP2011048438 A JP 2011048438A JP 2011048438 A JP2011048438 A JP 2011048438A JP 5717184 B2 JP5717184 B2 JP 5717184B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
bread
flour
water
gel layer
making
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2011048438A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2012183029A (en
Inventor
和憲 宮村
和憲 宮村
武弘 加藤
武弘 加藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NIPPN Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Flour Mills Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Flour Mills Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Flour Mills Co Ltd
Priority to JP2011048438A priority Critical patent/JP5717184B2/en
Publication of JP2012183029A publication Critical patent/JP2012183029A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5717184B2 publication Critical patent/JP5717184B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Bakery Products And Manufacturing Methods Therefor (AREA)

Description

本発明は、小麦粉の製パン性評価方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating bread-making properties of wheat flour.

小麦粉の製パン性を評価するには実際にパンを製造して評価する方法が確実であるが、時間や費用がかかるという問題がある。
実際にパンを製造することなく製パン性を評価する方法としては、ファリノグラフやエクステンソグラフ等を使用して製パン性と関連性が高い生地の物性を測定する方法が知られている(例えば非特許文献1参照)。
また、中種製パン法における本捏工程の初期段階のパン生地を採取して凍結しミクロトームで薄片状の生地として染色し生地の蛋白質組織模様を顕微鏡を使用して観察する工程を含む小麦粉の製パン性評価方法が知られている(例えば特許文献1参照)。
In order to evaluate the bread-making property of flour, a method of actually producing and evaluating bread is reliable, but there is a problem that it takes time and cost.
As a method for evaluating bread-making properties without actually producing bread, a method for measuring physical properties of a dough that is highly related to bread-making properties using a farinograph or an extensograph is known (for example, Non-patent document 1).
In addition, the production of flour including the process of collecting and freezing the dough at the initial stage of the main koji process in the middle-class bread making method, dyeing it as a flaky dough with a microtome, and observing the protein texture pattern of the dough using a microscope A bread property evaluation method is known (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

特開2007−312606号公報JP 2007-312606 A

「再改訂版 小麦粉」、日本麦類研究会、1981年1月31日“Revised Wheat Flour”, Japan Wheat Research Society, January 31, 1981

本発明の目的は、小麦粉の製パン性を実際にパンを製造することなく評価する方法を提供することである。   An object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour without actually producing bread.

本発明者らは前記の目的を達成するために鋭意研究を重ねた結果、小麦粉に水と油脂を加え振とうしこれを遠心分離することで生じるゲル層の幅が製パン性と相関があることを見出し、本発明を完成するに至った。
従って、本発明は、水及び小麦粉を攪拌混合した後これに油脂を加えてさらに攪拌混合しこれを遠心分離して生じるゲル層の幅を測定しその幅が製パン性が既知の小麦粉より広ければ製パン性が既知の小麦粉より製パン性が良く、狭ければ悪いと製パン性を評価する小麦粉の製パン性の評価方法である。
As a result of intensive studies to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present inventors have found that the width of the gel layer produced by adding water and fat to wheat flour, shaking and centrifuging it is correlated with bread-making properties. As a result, the present invention has been completed.
Accordingly, the present invention, the water and flour and added with oil after mixing stirring was further mixed with stirring which was measuring the width of the gel layer generated was centrifuged, the width of the bread properties than known flour If the breadth is wide, the breadmaking property is better than the flour having a known breadmaking property, and if it is narrow , the breadmaking property is evaluated.

小麦粉の製パン性を実際にパンを製造することなく評価することができる。   The bread-making property of flour can be evaluated without actually producing bread.

遠心分離した状態を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the state which centrifuged. 製パン性の異なる小麦粉を遠心分離した結果を示す写真である。It is a photograph which shows the result of having centrifuged the flour from which bread-making property differs.

以下、本発明を詳細に説明する。
本発明により製パン性を評価できる小麦粉は特に限定なく薄力粉、中力粉、強力粉のいずれでも評価することが可能である。
しかし、強力粉以外は製パン性を評価するまでもなく一般に製パン性が悪いので本発明の評価対象は主に強力粉である。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.
The flour that can be evaluated for bread-making properties according to the present invention is not particularly limited, and it is possible to evaluate any of flour, medium flour, and strong flour.
However, since the bread-making property is generally poor without evaluating the bread-making property except for the strong powder, the evaluation object of the present invention is mainly the strong powder.

本発明ではまず、小麦粉と水を攪拌混合する。
この場合、小麦粉と水を混合する方法は特に限定はなく、小麦粉に水を加えても水に小麦粉を加えてもよい。
使用する水の種類は遠心分離した際にゲル層を生じさせることができれば特に限定はなく、イオン交換水、蒸留水、水道水などを挙げることができる。
使用する水の量が少ない場合、ゲル層が出ないため使用する水の量(質量)は小麦粉の3倍以上が基準となる。
この段階での混合状態はだまがないように均一に混ざり合っていればよく例えばボルテックスミキサーで10秒程度振とうするだけで十分である。
この状態で静置しておくとゲル層の幅は少しずつ増え、比較が難しくなるため5分以内に次の工程へ移ることが好ましい。
In the present invention, flour and water are first stirred and mixed.
In this case, the method of mixing the flour and water is not particularly limited, and the flour may be added to the water or the water.
The kind of water to be used is not particularly limited as long as it can form a gel layer when centrifuged, and examples thereof include ion exchange water, distilled water, and tap water.
When the amount of water used is small, the gel layer does not come out, so the amount (mass) of water used is 3 times or more that of flour.
It is sufficient that the mixing state at this stage is uniformly mixed so as not to be frustrated. For example, it is sufficient to shake for about 10 seconds with a vortex mixer.
If left standing in this state, the width of the gel layer increases little by little, making comparison difficult, so it is preferable to move to the next step within 5 minutes.

次にこの小麦粉と水の混合物に油脂を加えさらに攪拌混合する。
使用する油脂は攪拌混合するときに液状であれば特に限定はなく、サラダ油、コーン油、オリーブ油など常温で液状の油脂や常温で固形のショートニングなどでも融解して使用できる。
しかし、常温で固形の油脂を使用する場合は、融点以上の温度を維持して試験することになり操作が煩雑となることや、ゲル層と固化した油脂を区別するのが難しいため好ましくない。
本発明では試験する温度は室温が好ましく固形油脂を使用した場合でも60℃以上では小麦粉に影響がでるため試験には適さず、0℃以下では水が凍ることがあり試験には適さない。
使用する油脂の量は水に対して多すぎる場合はゲル層がうまく出ず使用する油の量(質量)は水の2倍以下が基準となる。
Next, fats and oils are added to the mixture of wheat flour and water and further stirred and mixed.
The fats and oils to be used are not particularly limited as long as they are liquid when they are stirred and mixed, and can be used after being melted even in oils and fats that are liquid at room temperature such as salad oil, corn oil, olive oil, or shortening that is solid at room temperature.
However, the use of solid fats and oils at room temperature is not preferable because the test is performed while maintaining a temperature higher than the melting point, and the operation becomes complicated and it is difficult to distinguish between the gel layer and the solidified fats and oils.
In the present invention, the temperature to be tested is preferably room temperature, and even when solid fats are used, wheat flour is affected at 60 ° C. or higher, so that it is not suitable for the test.
When the amount of oils and fats used is too much for water, the gel layer does not come out well, and the amount (mass) of oil to be used is based on twice or less of water.

本発明では、水と小麦粉を予め攪拌混合して油脂を後から加えることにより遠心分離した際に安定した幅のゲル層を得ることができる。
例えば、この順番ではなく油脂と水と小麦粉を同時に攪拌混合する場合や油脂と小麦粉を先に混ぜ水を加えた場合には遠心分離した際にゲル層の出る幅が安定しない。
この段階の攪拌混合は、遠心分離した際にゲル層が出るまで十分に行う。
例えば、振とう速度275/min、振幅40mmの振とう機を使用する場合は、振とう時間は1分以下でもゲル層はでるがゲルが不安定のため10分間程度振とうするのが好ましい。
また、前記振とう機を使用する場合では30分以上振とうする必要はなく10分間程度で十分にゲル層は安定する。
攪拌混合の手段は、振とう機やホモジナイザー、ジューサーミキサー等を使用することができるが、この後に遠心分離するため容器の移し替えの必要がない遠心管で振とうすることが効率的で好ましい。
振とう後は遠心せずに静置しておくとゲル層が少しずつ増え比較が難しくなるので5分以内に遠心することが好ましい。
In the present invention, a gel layer having a stable width can be obtained when centrifugal separation is performed by mixing water and flour in advance and adding oil and fat later.
For example, when the oil and fat, water and flour are stirred and mixed at the same time, or when the oil and flour are first mixed with water and added with water, the width of the gel layer is not stable when centrifuged.
The stirring and mixing at this stage is sufficiently performed until a gel layer comes out upon centrifugation.
For example, when a shaker with a shaking speed of 275 / min and an amplitude of 40 mm is used, it is preferable to shake for about 10 minutes because the gel is unstable even if the shaking time is 1 minute or less but the gel is unstable.
In the case of using the shaker, it is not necessary to shake for 30 minutes or more, and the gel layer is sufficiently stabilized in about 10 minutes.
As a means for stirring and mixing, a shaker, a homogenizer, a juicer mixer, or the like can be used. However, since this is followed by centrifugation, it is efficient and preferable to shake with a centrifuge tube that does not require transfer of the container.
After shaking, if the gel layer is allowed to stand without being centrifuged, the gel layer gradually increases and comparison becomes difficult. Therefore, it is preferable to centrifuge within 5 minutes.

次に、この水と小麦粉と油脂の混合物を遠心分離する。
遠心分離は、ゲル層が生じるように適宜調整する。
例えば卓上遠心機で50TC×2アッセンブリ(最高回転速度3600rpm、最大遠心加速度2390×G)を使用した場合では3000rpmで10分間程度遠心分離する。
遠心した後、遠心管の中には一番下に小麦粉を主に含む小麦粉の沈殿した層、その上に水を主に含む層、その上に白いゲル状の層ができ一番上に主に油脂を含む層と4つの層ができる。
製パン性の評価は水と油脂の間にできるゲル層の幅を測定することによって行う。
測定は遠心管を立てたままでゲル層の周囲4点を定規で測定し平均を測定値とする。
ゲルが不安定の場合は後方面が見えなくなる点を測定する。
遠心後、すぐに測定できるが静置していれば一日後でも測定可能である。
なお、遠心分離の程度が強くなるに従って徐々にゲル層の量は減少していきコントロールとの測定差が小さくなり評価が難しくなるので程度が強すぎても好ましくない。
遠心分離した結果、水と小麦粉と油脂の混合物は図1に示すように層状となる。
図1において、1は小麦粉を主に含む層、2は水を主に含む層、3はゲル層、4は油脂を主に含む層である。
本発明では、図1に示すゲル層3の幅Wを測定する。
Next, the mixture of water, flour and fat is centrifuged.
Centrifugation is appropriately adjusted so that a gel layer is formed.
For example, when a 50TC × 2 assembly (maximum rotational speed 3600 rpm, maximum centrifugal acceleration 2390 × G) is used in a tabletop centrifuge, the centrifugal separation is performed at 3000 rpm for about 10 minutes.
After centrifugation, the centrifuge tube has a flour-precipitated layer mainly containing flour at the bottom, a layer mainly containing water on it, and a white gel-like layer on top. A layer containing oil and fat and four layers are formed.
Evaluation of bread-making property is performed by measuring the width of the gel layer formed between water and fat.
For the measurement, with the centrifuge tube standing, measure the four points around the gel layer with a ruler and use the average as the measured value.
If the gel is unstable, measure the point at which the rear face disappears.
It can be measured immediately after centrifugation, but can be measured even one day after standing.
It should be noted that since the amount of the gel layer gradually decreases as the degree of centrifugation increases and the measurement difference from the control becomes smaller and the evaluation becomes difficult, it is not preferable that the degree is too strong.
As a result of the centrifugation, the mixture of water, flour and fat becomes layered as shown in FIG.
In FIG. 1, 1 is a layer mainly containing flour, 2 is a layer mainly containing water, 3 is a gel layer, and 4 is a layer mainly containing fats and oils.
In the present invention, the width W of the gel layer 3 shown in FIG. 1 is measured.

本発明では、ゲル層の幅を測定することにより製パン性を評価するが、これは相対評価となるのでコントロールとなる製パン性が既知の小麦粉が必要となる。
即ち、製パン性が既知の小麦粉をコントロールとして、その小麦粉よりゲル層の幅が広ければ製パン性が良く、狭ければ製パン性は悪い。
また、複数の製パン性が既知の小麦粉により検量線を求め製パン性を評価することもできる。
ゲル層の幅は試験の条件によって影響を受けるためコントロールとは同じ試験条件で実施することが必要である。
In the present invention, the bread-making property is evaluated by measuring the width of the gel layer. However, since this is a relative evaluation, flour having a known bread-making property is required as a control.
That is, with flour having a known bread-making property as a control, the bread-making property is good if the gel layer is wider than the wheat flour, and the bread-making property is bad if it is narrow.
It is also possible to evaluate the bread-making property by obtaining a calibration curve with a plurality of flours having known bread-making properties.
Since the width of the gel layer is affected by the test conditions, it is necessary to perform the test under the same test conditions as the control.

以下本発明を実施例により具体的に説明するが、本発明はこれらの実施例に限定されるものではない。
[試料となる強力小麦粉の製パン性の確認試験]
製パン性のことなる5種類のパン用強力小麦粉(小麦粉1〜5)の製パン性を実際にパンを製造することで評価した。
評価は以下のとおり中種法の製パン試験によって行った。
[中種配合]
パン用強力小麦粉 70質量部
イースト 2.2質量部
イーストフード 0.1質量部
水 40質量部
上記資材をSKミキサー使用して低速2分間、中速2分間ミキシングし中種生地を得た。
捏上温度は24℃だった。
この生地を27℃、湿度75%で4時間発酵した。
[本捏配合]
パン用強力小麦粉 30質量部
食塩 2質量部
砂糖 5質量部
脱脂粉乳 2質量部
ショートニング 5質量部
水 25質量部
前記中種生地にショートニング以外の上記本捏資材を加え、低速2分間、中速3分間、中高速1分間ミキシングし、ショートニングを加え、低速1分間、中速3分間、中高速5分間ミキシングして本捏生地を得た。
この本捏生地を、27℃、湿度75%で20分間フロアタイムをとったあと、220g×4に分割し丸め、ベンチタイム20分間とり、モルダーを使用して成形した。
生地性、吸水性は下記の評価基準でミキシング後、分割、成形時に評価した。
この生地を食パン型(2斤型)に収容し、38℃、湿度80%で75%までホイロをとった後、200℃で35分間焼成した。
これを冷却後、ビニール袋に包装し、翌日スライサーでスライスし、以下の評価基準で10名のパネラーにより評価を行った。
また3日後にも以下の評価基準で同様に食味の評価を行った。
生地性、吸水性
5点 べたつきなく、伸展性あり、弾力あり非常によい
4点 ややべたつき少なく、やや伸展性あり、やや弾力あり、よい。
3点 普通
2点 ややべたつきあり、やや伸展性なく、弾力弱くやや悪い。
1点 べたつき、伸展性なく、弾力なく悪い
内相、食感
5点 非常に内相細かく伸びあり良い。弾力のバランス良く、口溶け良い。
4点 内相やや細かくやや伸びがあり良い。やや弾力のバランス良く、やや口溶け良い
3点 普通
2点 内相やや粗く伸び少なくやや悪い。やや弾力のバランス悪く、やや口溶け悪い。
1点
内相粗く伸びなく悪い。弾力のバランス悪く、口溶け悪い。
老化
5点 弾力のバランス良く、口溶け良い。
4点 やや弾力のバランス良くやや口溶け良い
3点 普通
2点 やや弾力のバランス悪く、やや口溶け悪い。
1点 弾力のバランス悪く、口溶け悪い。
EXAMPLES The present invention will be specifically described below with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples.
[Confirmation test of bread-making property of strong flour as sample]
The bread-making properties of five types of strong wheat flours (flours 1 to 5) having different bread-making properties were evaluated by actually producing bread.
The evaluation was carried out by the bread making test of the middle seed method as follows.
[Medium type]
Strong flour for bread 70 parts by weight yeast 2.2 parts by weight yeast food 0.1 part by weight water 40 parts by weight The above materials were mixed using a SK mixer for 2 minutes at low speed and 2 minutes at medium speed to obtain a medium seed dough.
The soot temperature was 24 ° C.
This dough was fermented at 27 ° C. and 75% humidity for 4 hours.
[Combination of main ingredients]
Powerful wheat flour 30 parts by weight Salt 2 parts by weight Sugar 5 parts by weight Nonfat dry milk 2 parts by weight Shortening 5 parts by weight Water 25 parts by weight Add the above-mentioned main ingredients other than shortening to the medium seed dough, low speed 2 minutes, medium speed 3 Mixing for 1 minute for medium to high speed, adding shortening, mixing for 1 minute for low speed, 3 minutes for medium speed, and 5 minutes for medium high speed to obtain a main roll dough.
After taking the floor time at 27 ° C. and humidity of 75% for 20 minutes, this homemade dough was divided into 220 g × 4, rounded, taken for a bench time of 20 minutes, and molded using a molder.
The dough properties and water absorption were evaluated at the time of division and molding after mixing according to the following evaluation criteria.
This dough was placed in a bread type (2 cocoon type), crushed to 75% at 38 ° C. and 80% humidity, and then baked at 200 ° C. for 35 minutes.
This was cooled, then packed in a plastic bag, sliced with a slicer the next day, and evaluated by 10 panelists according to the following evaluation criteria.
In addition, after 3 days, the taste was similarly evaluated according to the following evaluation criteria.
5 points of dough, water absorption, non- stickiness, extensibility, elasticity, very good 4 points Slightly less stickiness, slightly extensibility, slightly elasticity, good.
3 points Normal 2 points Slightly sticky, slightly extensibility, weak and somewhat poor.
1 point Stickiness, no extensibility, poor elasticity
Inner phase, texture 5 points Good balance of elasticity and good melting.
4 points The inner phase is slightly fine and slightly good. Slightly balanced in elasticity, slightly melting in the mouth 3 points Normal 2 points The inner phase is slightly rough and slightly stretched and somewhat bad. Slightly poor balance of elasticity and slightly poor melting.
1 point
The inner phase is rough and does not stretch. The balance of elasticity is poor and the mouth melts.
Aging 5 points Good balance of elasticity, good melting in the mouth.
4 points 3 points with good balance of elasticity, 3 points of good melting, 2 points of normal balance, slightly poor balance of elasticity, slightly poor melting of mouth.
1 point The balance of elasticity is poor and the mouth melts.

得られた評価結果(平均値)を表1に示す。
総合評価は、◎、○、△、×の順で悪い評価となる。
The obtained evaluation results (average values) are shown in Table 1.
Comprehensive evaluation becomes bad evaluation in order of (double-circle), (circle), (triangle | delta), and x.

[本発明の製パン性評価方法]
グライナー社製容量50mlの遠心管に水15.0gを入れ、これに前記パン用強力小麦粉(小麦粉1〜5)2gを加え振とう機(タイテック社製、商品名:RECIPRO
SHAKER SR−2s 振とう条件:振とう速度275/min、振幅40mm)で15秒間振とうし攪拌混合した後、サラダ油を20.0g加え、同じ振とう機で10分間振とうし攪拌混合した。
これを、遠心機(日立工機社製、商品名:日立卓上遠心機CT6D、50TC×2アッセンブリ(最高回転速度3600rpm、最大遠心加速度2390×G使用))で3000rpm、10分間遠心した。
遠心機から遠心管を取り出し、遠心管を傾けないようにしてゲル層の幅の長さを測定した。
[Method for evaluating bread-making property of the present invention]
15.0 g of water is put into a 50 ml centrifuge tube manufactured by Greiner, and 2 g of the above-mentioned strong wheat flour for flour (flour 1-5) is added to the shaker (trade name: RECIPRO, manufactured by Taitec Corporation).
Shaker SR-2s Shaking conditions: shaking speed 275 / min, amplitude 40 mm), and stirring and mixing for 15 seconds, 20.0 g of salad oil was added, and the same shaking machine was shaken and mixed for 10 minutes.
This was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes with a centrifuge (manufactured by Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd., trade name: Hitachi desktop centrifuge CT6D, 50TC × 2 assembly (maximum rotational speed 3600 rpm, maximum centrifugal acceleration 2390 × G used)).
The centrifuge tube was taken out from the centrifuge, and the width of the gel layer was measured without tilting the centrifuge tube.

得られた評価結果を表2に示す。
The obtained evaluation results are shown in Table 2.

その結果、ゲル層の幅が最も長かった小麦粉1の生地は吸水性、伸展性、弾力がありよく内相細かく食味は弾力のバランスよく口溶けもよかった。また3日後の食味でも評価よかった。
小麦粉2、3、4、5とゲル層の幅が短くなるにつれて生地性はべたつき、伸展性なく、弾力も弱く悪く、パンの内相は粗く伸びなく、食感も弾力弱くなり口溶け悪かった。また3日後の食味でも評価は悪かった。
小麦粉1から5の製パン性はゲル層の幅が長い順番で優れていた。
As a result, the flour 1 having the longest gel layer had water absorbability, extensibility and elasticity, and had a fine internal texture and a good balance of elasticity and good melting in the mouth. In addition, the taste after 3 days was also good.
As the widths of the flours 2, 3, 4, 5 and the gel layer were shortened, the dough became sticky, not extensible, and the elasticity was weak and poor, the inner phase of the bread was not roughly stretched, the texture became weak and the mouth was not melted. Moreover, evaluation was bad also in the taste after 3 days.
The bread-making properties of the flours 1 to 5 were excellent in the order of increasing the gel layer width.

1 小麦粉を主に含む層
2 水を主に含む層
3 ゲル層
4 油脂を主に含む層
1 Layer mainly containing flour 2 Layer mainly containing water 3 Gel layer 4 Layer mainly containing fats and oils

Claims (1)

水及び小麦粉を攪拌混合した後これに油脂を加えてさらに攪拌混合しこれを遠心分離して生じるゲル層の幅を測定しその幅が製パン性が既知の小麦粉より広ければ製パン性が既知の小麦粉より製パン性が良く、狭ければ悪いと製パン性を評価する小麦粉の製パン性の評価方法。 Water and flour added to this oil and fat was mixed and stirred further mixing and stirring this to measure the width of the gel layer generated was centrifuged, the width of the bread resistance is baking quality if wider than known flour A method for evaluating the bread-making property of flour, in which the bread-making property is better than that of known flour and the bread-making property is evaluated if it is narrower .
JP2011048438A 2011-03-07 2011-03-07 Method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour Active JP5717184B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011048438A JP5717184B2 (en) 2011-03-07 2011-03-07 Method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011048438A JP5717184B2 (en) 2011-03-07 2011-03-07 Method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012183029A JP2012183029A (en) 2012-09-27
JP5717184B2 true JP5717184B2 (en) 2015-05-13

Family

ID=47013728

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2011048438A Active JP5717184B2 (en) 2011-03-07 2011-03-07 Method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5717184B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107345954A (en) * 2017-07-19 2017-11-14 天津狗不理食品股份有限公司 A kind of flour method of determination and evaluation for being used to make fermented pasta
CN110274849A (en) * 2019-07-26 2019-09-24 山东睿科仪器有限公司 One kind automatically adding water speed regulation farinograph and method

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007312606A (en) * 2006-05-23 2007-12-06 Nippon Flour Mills Co Ltd Method for evaluating bread-making property of wheat flour using freezing microtome
US9451778B2 (en) * 2010-06-11 2016-09-27 Novozymes A/S Enzymatic flour correction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2012183029A (en) 2012-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Matos et al. Establishing the function of proteins on the rheological and quality properties of rice based gluten free muffins
Chaiya et al. Quality of batter and sponge cake prepared from wheat-tapioca flour blends
O'Shea et al. The rheology, microstructure and sensory characteristics of a gluten-free bread formulation enhanced with orange pomace
Majzoobi et al. Effects of percentage and particle size of wheat germ on some properties of batter and cake
CA3092021A1 (en) Aquafaba composition and methods of manufacture
EP4152952A1 (en) Microalgae-based egg substitute
WO2021095827A1 (en) Method for producing heated and ground wheat flour, heated and ground wheat flour, mix for bakery foods and method for producing same
JP5717184B2 (en) Method for evaluating the bread-making properties of flour
Nurul Ain et al. THE EFFECT OF AVOCADO PUREE AS FAT REPLACE ON THE PHYSICAL QUALITY OF MUFFIN.
KR101610913B1 (en) Rice dough composition and confectionery food manufactured thereby
JP6584185B2 (en) Method for producing rice bread without gluten and thickener
JP6105452B2 (en) Bakery top dough
Schamne et al. Obtention and characterization of gluten-free baked products
KR20170055802A (en) Gluten-free Bread Containing Rice Powder and Starch Composition Manufacturing Method Thereof
Lin Gluten-free bread: characterization and development of pre-and post-baked gluten free bread
Awal et al. Effects of Water Addition Level on Physical Properties, Rheological Profile and Sensory Evaluation of Gluten-Free Bread: A Preliminary Approach
JP6779536B2 (en) Method for producing rice flour bread that does not contain gluten and thickener
TW201927168A (en) Starch for baked confectionery
JP6853679B2 (en) Mix for baked goods
Bai-Ngew et al. Microwave vacuum-dried durian flour and its application in biscuits
Lasekan et al. Effect of different pineapple juice (Ananas comosus L.) preparations on the microstructure, staling and textural properties of wheat bread
JP7337516B2 (en) Flour composition for confectionery and method for producing confectionery
Korus et al. Influence of Wheat-Mesquite (L.) Composite Flour on Dough Rheology and Quality of Bread
Ramona BIOTECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS MET IN OBTAINING SWEET BREAD.
JPH03117449A (en) Improved doughs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20130710

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20140718

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20140819

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140924

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20150312

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20150312

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5717184

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250