JP3369584B2 - Japanese parser - Google Patents

Japanese parser

Info

Publication number
JP3369584B2
JP3369584B2 JP33117591A JP33117591A JP3369584B2 JP 3369584 B2 JP3369584 B2 JP 3369584B2 JP 33117591 A JP33117591 A JP 33117591A JP 33117591 A JP33117591 A JP 33117591A JP 3369584 B2 JP3369584 B2 JP 3369584B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
word
case
japanese
clause
adnominal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP33117591A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH05143640A (en
Inventor
朗 高木
浩司 有原
Original Assignee
株式会社シーエスケイ
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社シーエスケイ filed Critical 株式会社シーエスケイ
Priority to JP33117591A priority Critical patent/JP3369584B2/en
Publication of JPH05143640A publication Critical patent/JPH05143640A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3369584B2 publication Critical patent/JP3369584B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Machine Translation (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】【0001】 【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、日本語文の句構造や係
り受け構造を機械的に解析する日本語構文解析装置に関
し、特に連体修飾節を含む日本語文において連体修飾節
の格を判断し得る日本語構文解析装置に関する。 【0002】 【従来の技術及び解決しようとする課題】従来、日本語
文の構文解析を機械的に行う場合、単語がもつ品詞等の
文法情報や他の語からの係りの可能性を制御する為の意
味制約情報等を手がかりに、句構造や係り受け構造が抽
出されている。また、日本語文が連体修飾節、すなわち
連体修飾を行う埋め込み文が含まれている場合、該連体
修飾節の種類の判断が行われて節構造が判定されてい
る。 【0003】ところで、連体修飾節の種類は、該連体修
飾節が修飾する語(以下、この語を先行詞と書く。)が
節内の述語に対して何らかの格関係を持ち得るか否か、
あるいは先行詞が内容属性を有し「〜という」等の同格
節を受け得るか等に基づいて判断される。 【0004】しかし、先行詞が「こと」、「もの」ある
いは「の」というような単独では意味を特定できない語
である場合、また多義の巾が大きく、節内の述語との関
係だけでは、その意味を特定できない語である場合に
は、上記の方法では連体修飾節の種類を判断できず、節
構造を判定することができない。 【0005】本発明は、上述のような意味不定の語を先
行詞とする連体修飾節を含む日本語文に対し、該連体修
飾節の種類を正確に判定し得る日本語構文解析装置を提
供することを目的とする。 【0006】 【課題を解決するための手段】上記の課題を解決するた
め本発明では、形態素解析を施された連体修飾節を含む
日本語複文を入力し、該日本語複文の構文解析を行う構
文解析部と、単語間の係り受けに関する情報を格納した
品詞マトリクステーブルとを備えた日本語構文解析装置
において、上記構文解析部は、形態素解析により付加さ
れた各単語の文法情報及び意味情報を参照し、上記品詞
マトリクステーブルに格納された単語間の係り受けに関
する解析規則を参照して単語相互の係り受け関係を判定
し、単語間の係り受け関係を表す解析木を作成する局所
的構文解析部と、上記局所的構文解析部によって作成さ
れた解析木を分析し、所定の解析規則に従って上記日本
語複文に含まれる連体修飾節の種類を判定し、上記解析
木を修正する大域的構文解析部とを備え、上記大域的構
文解析部は、上記連体修飾節の係る語が意味不定の語で
ある場合に、上記意味不定の語と上記意味不定の語が格
助詞を介して係る後の述語との間の格関係を上記述語の
格スロットを参照し判断して、上記述語との格関係にお
いて定義される、上記格スロットに格納された意味制約
情報を上記意味不定の語に付加し、付加された上記意味
制約情報に基づいて上記意味不定の語と上記連体修飾節
中の述語との間の格関係を判断して上記連体修飾節の種
類を決定することを特徴とする。 【0007】 【実施例】以下、本発明の実施例について図面を参照し
て説明する。図5は本発明の一実施例に係る日本語構文
解析装置の構成を示すブロック図である。 【0008】本実施例の解析処理装置1は、形態素解析
部2と、形態素解析部2に接続された日本語辞書部4
と、形態素解析された日本語文を入力して該日本語文の
係り受け構造を解析する構文解析処理装置60と、単語
間の係り受けに関する情報を格納した品詞マトリクステ
ーブル5とを備える。 【0009】図示のように上記構文解析処理装置60
は、形態素解析部2によって入力した日本語文を単語ご
とに分割し日本語辞書4を参照して各単語に文法情報及
び意味情報を付加する形態素解析処理が施された単語列
が入力される。ここで日本語辞書4には、各単語の品
詞、意味素性、格等の文法情報及び意味情報が登録され
ている。 【0010】上記構文解析処理装置60は形態素解析に
より得られた各単語の文法情報及び意味情報を利用し品
詞マトリクステーブル5に格納した解析規則に従って単
語相互の係り受け関係を判定し、単語間の係り受け関係
を表す解析木を作成する局所的構文解析部61と、局所
的構文解析部61によって作成された係り受け関係を表
す解析木を分析し、所定の解析規則に従って上記解析木
を修正する大域的構文解析部62とを備えてなる。 【0011】上記大域的構文解析部62は、解析する日
本語文が連体修飾節を含む場合に該連体修飾節の種類を
決定する。特に、上記連体修飾節の係る語が意味不定の
語である場合に、該意味不定の語と該意味不定の語が係
る後の述語との間の格関係を判断して、上記述語との格
関係において定義される意味制約情報を上記意味不定の
語に付加し、該付加された意味制約情報に基づいて上記
意味不定の語と上記連体修飾節中の述語との間の格関係
を判断して上記連体修飾節の種類を決定する。 【0012】上記品詞マトリクステーブル5は、係る語
と係られる語の品詞の組合せに応じた解析規則、すなわ
ち、2つの単語相互の組合せに対応する規則を格納す
る。 【0013】なお本実施例では、処理アルゴリズムの簡
潔さ等に鑑み、係り受け解析を文節間ではなく、単語間
の意味的依存的関係を解析するという形式で行うことと
して構文解析の説明を行うが、以下の記述は、文節間の
係り受け解析や句構造解析に基づく構文解析において
も、同様に適用しうる。 【0014】次に、図1乃至図4を参照して本実施例の
作用について説明する。図1は本実施例の解析処理装置
1に、「昨日買ったのを売った」という文を入力した場
合の解析処理を示す。なお、図1には、形態素解析部2
により「昨日/買った/の/を/売った」のように分割
した単語列を入力した場合の構文解析処理装置60によ
る処理を示してある。 【0015】構文解析処理装置60の局所的構文解析部
61は、上記単語ごとに係り受け関係を順次判断してい
くが、において述語「買った」が「の」を修飾してい
ることから「昨日」と「買った」が連体修飾節を形成す
ることを検出する。 【0016】次に、において大局所的文解析部62が
上記連体修飾節の種類を決定しようとするが、「の」の
意味が不定であるため何格か決定することができない。
そこで、仮に主格関係節であるとしておき、次の処理へ
進む。ここで、図中C1は連体修飾節を示す。また、
[PN]は仮想的に置かれた代名詞を示し、(sbj)は
[PN]が述語「買った」の主格であることを示す。こ
れによってC1は主格関係節を示すこととなる。 【0017】次に、局所的構文解析部61は、におい
て「の」と「を」の係り受け関係を判断し、次いでに
おいて「を」と「売った」の係り受け関係を判断する。
ここでは両方共係り受け関係が成立する。この際、大域
的構文解析部62は、図2(b) に示す「売った」の格ス
ロット41を参照して「の」が何格として「売った」に
係っているか判断する。ここでは対象格と認識する。そ
して、「売った」の対象格に定義される意味素性[商
品]を「の」に付加する。これによって、「の」は商品
を示すことが判断される。 【0018】この後、において大域的構文解析部62
は、「の」が商品を示すことを条件として加え、連体修
飾節C1の格の種類を再度判断する。図2(a)に示すよ
うに、「買った」に対して商品を示す「の」は対象格と
して係ることから連体修飾節C1は対象格関係節である
と判断され、主格関係節から対象格関係節に訂正され
る。ここで、図中(dobj)は[PN]が述語「買った」
の対象格であることを示す。 【0019】以上で本例文における解析処理を終了す
る。 【0020】次に図3を参照して、本実施例に「昨日買
ったのを後悔している」という文を入力した場合の解析
処理を説明する。なお、本解析例において、連体修飾節
C2を主格関係節と仮定するまでの処理は、図1の解析
例と同様であるため省略する。 【0021】局所的構文解析部61がで意味不定の
「の」と「を」の係り受け関係を判断し、次いでで
「を」と「後悔している」の係り受け関係を判断した
後、大域的構文解析部62は、図4に示す「後悔してい
る」の格スロット41を参照して「の」が何格として
「後悔している」に係っているか判断する。ここでは対
象格と認識する。そして、「後悔している」の対象格に
定義される意味素[行為内容]を「の」に付加する。こ
れによって、「の」は行為内容を示すことが判断され
る。 【0022】この後、において大域的構文解析部62
は、「の」が行為内容を示すことを条件として加え、連
体修飾節C2の格の種類を再度判断する。しかし、図2
(a)に示したように「買った」には行為内容が係るべき
格は存在しない。したがって、行為内容を示す「の」は
何格としても「買った」に係れないこととなる。そこで
連体修飾節C2は内容節に訂正される。ここで内容節と
は、修飾するべき語の内容を示す一連の文であって、
「〜という・・・(被修飾語)」という形で表現し得る
ものである。 【0023】図3において、[TH−PN]は仮想的に
置かれた代名詞を示し、これと直前に示される(とい
う)とでC2が内容節であることを示す。これは、上述
のように内容節を形成する文が「〜という(被修飾
語)」という形で表現し得ることによる。なお、内容節
中に文と先行詞の間を接続する「という」もしくはそれ
と同等な語句が陽に表現されているときは[TH−P
N]の前に(という)を付加する必要はない。 【0024】以上で本例文における解析処理を終了す
る。 【0025】ここで、図1と図3に示した例文を比較す
ると、同じ形態の文章でありながら、「の」の意味が不
定であるため動詞「売った」と「後悔している」の違い
により連体修飾節の種類が異なっている。このような場
合にも本実施例によれば、上述の処理により動詞の種類
から「の」の意味を推定し、連体修飾節の種類を正確に
判断することができる。 【0026】 【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明の日本語構
文解析装置は、日本語文における単語相互の係り受け関
係を判定する局所的構文解析部と、該局所的構文解析部
の判定結果を分析し連体修飾節の種類を判断し必要に応
じて上記判定結果を修正する大域的構文解析部とを備え
たため、文の係り受け構造の判定手段の適用範囲を拡
げ、性能の向上を図ることができるという効果がある。 【0027】また、大域的構文解析部が、先行詞とその
先行詞が係る後方の述語との関係により先行詞の意味を
推定して連体修飾節の種類を決定することとしたため、
先行詞が「こと」、「もの」あるいは「の」といった意
味不定の語であっても該先行詞に係る連体修飾節の種類
を正確に判断することができるという効果がある。
Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a phrase structure and
Japanese parser that mechanically analyzes the receiving structure
Especially in Japanese sentences containing adnominal modifier clauses.
The present invention relates to a Japanese parser capable of judging the case of Japanese. 2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, when syntactic analysis of a Japanese sentence is performed mechanically, it is necessary to control grammatical information such as part of speech of a word and the possibility of involvement from other words. The phrase structure and the dependency structure are extracted based on the semantic constraint information and the like. Also, when the Japanese sentence includes the adnominal modification clause, that is, an embedded sentence for performing adnominal modification, the type of the adnominal modification clause is determined to determine the clause structure. [0003] By the way, the kind of the adnominal modifier clause is determined by whether or not the word modified by the adnominal modifier clause (hereinafter, this word is referred to as an antecedent) can have some case relation with the predicate in the clause.
Alternatively, the determination is made based on whether or not the antecedent has a content attribute and can receive an equal clause such as “to”. [0004] However, if the antecedent is a word such as "koto", "mono" or "no" that cannot be specified by itself, or if the polysemy has a large width and is related only to the predicate in the clause, In the case of a word whose meaning cannot be specified, the type of the adnominal modified clause cannot be determined by the above method, and the clause structure cannot be determined. The present invention provides a Japanese parsing apparatus capable of accurately determining the type of a continuation modifier in a Japanese sentence including a continuation modifier whose preceding word is an indefinite word as described above. The purpose is to: [0006] In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, in the present invention, a Japanese compound sentence including a continuity modifier subjected to morphological analysis is input, and the syntax analysis of the Japanese compound sentence is performed. In a Japanese syntax analyzer having a syntax analyzer and a part-of-speech matrix table storing information on dependency between words, the syntax analyzer converts grammatical information and semantic information of each word added by morphological analysis. Local parsing that refers to, determines the dependency relationship between words by referring to the analysis rules regarding the dependency between words stored in the part-of-speech matrix table, and creates a parse tree representing the dependency relationship between words and part analyzes the parse tree created by the local parser to determine the type of adnominal clauses contained in the Japanese complex sentences in accordance with predetermined analysis rule, the parse tree A global parser to be modified, wherein the global parser, when the word associated with the adnominal modifier is an indeterminate word, the indeterminate word and the indeterminate word are case particles. Is determined by referring to the case slot of the above-described descriptive word, and the semantic constraint information defined in the case relationship with the above-described descriptive word and stored in the above-described case slot is converted to the above-described meaning. Determining the type of the adnominal modifier clause by determining the case relation between the indefinite word and the predicate in the adnominal modifier clause based on the semantic constraint information added to the indefinite word. It is characterized by. An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing a configuration of the Japanese syntax analyzer according to one embodiment of the present invention. The analytic processing apparatus 1 of this embodiment includes a morphological analysis unit 2 and a Japanese dictionary unit 4 connected to the morphological analysis unit 2.
And a syntax analysis processing device 60 for inputting a morphologically analyzed Japanese sentence and analyzing the dependency structure of the Japanese sentence, and a part-of-speech matrix table 5 storing information on dependency between words. As shown in FIG.
Is a word string that has been subjected to a morphological analysis process of dividing the Japanese sentence input by the morphological analysis unit 2 for each word and adding grammatical information and semantic information to each word with reference to the Japanese dictionary 4. Here, in the Japanese dictionary 4, grammatical information such as the part of speech, semantic feature, and case of each word and semantic information are registered. The syntactic analysis processing device 60 uses the grammatical information and semantic information of each word obtained by the morphological analysis to determine the dependency relationship between words in accordance with the analysis rules stored in the part-of-speech matrix table 5, and determines the interdependency between words. A local parsing unit 61 for creating a parse tree representing a dependency relationship, and a parse tree representing a dependency relationship created by the local parse unit 61 are analyzed, and the parse tree is corrected according to a predetermined analysis rule. And a global parsing unit 62. The global parsing unit 62 determines the type of the adnominal modifier clause when the Japanese sentence to be analyzed includes the adnominal modifier clause. In particular, when the word in the adnominal modifier is an indeterminate word, the case relation between the indeterminate word and the subsequent predicate to which the indeterminate word relates is determined, and Adding semantic constraint information defined in the case relation to the indeterminate word, and determining the case relation between the indeterminate word and the predicate in the adnominal modifier clause based on the added semantic constraint information To determine the type of the adnominal modifier clause. The part-of-speech matrix table 5 stores analysis rules corresponding to combinations of parts of speech of words related to the word, that is, rules corresponding to a combination of two words. In this embodiment, in consideration of the simplicity of the processing algorithm, etc., the parsing analysis will be described as performing dependency analysis not in terms of phrases but in the form of analyzing semantic dependency relationships between words. However, the following description can be similarly applied to syntactic analysis based on dependency analysis between phrases and phrase structure analysis. Next, the operation of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 1 shows an analysis process in a case where a sentence "bought and sold yesterday" is input to the analysis processing device 1 of the present embodiment. FIG. 1 shows a morphological analyzer 2
5 shows a process performed by the syntax analysis processing device 60 when a divided word string such as “yesterday / bought / no / a / sold” is input. The local parser 61 of the parser 60 sequentially determines the dependency relation for each of the above words. Since the predicate "buy" modifies "no" in " Detects that yesterday and "bought" form adnominal modifiers. Next, the large local sentence analyzer 62 tries to determine the type of the adnominal modifier clause, but cannot determine any case because the meaning of "no" is indefinite.
Therefore, it is assumed that this is a nominative relation clause, and the process proceeds to the next processing. Here, C1 in the figure indicates a noun modification clause. Also,
[PN] indicates a virtually placed pronoun, and (sbj) indicates that [PN] is the nominative of the predicate "buy". As a result, C1 indicates the nominative relation clause. Next, the local parsing unit 61 determines the dependency relationship between "no" and "wo", and then determines the dependency relationship between "wo" and "sold".
Here, a dependency relationship is established in both cases. At this time, the global parsing unit 62 refers to the case slot 41 of “sold” shown in FIG. 2B to determine what case “no” is related to “sold”. Here, it is recognized as a target case. Then, the semantic feature [product] defined in the target case of “sold” is added to “no”. Thus, it is determined that "no" indicates a product. Thereafter, the global parser 62
Adds the condition that "no" indicates a product, and again determines the type of case in the adnominal modifier clause C1. As shown in FIG. 2 (a), "no" indicating a product for "bought" is regarded as a target case, so that the adnominal modifier clause C1 is determined to be a target case relation clause. Corrected to case relation clause. Here, (PNJ) is the predicate "bought" in (dobj) in the figure.
Indicates that the subject is eligible. Thus, the analysis processing in the present example sentence ends. Next, with reference to FIG. 3, an explanation will be given on the analysis processing in the case where the sentence "I regret that I bought yesterday" is input to this embodiment. In this analysis example, the processing up to assuming the adnominal modification clause C2 as the nominative relation clause is the same as the analysis example in FIG. After the local parsing unit 61 determines the dependency relationship between "no" and "wo" whose meaning is indefinite, and then determines the dependency relationship between "wo" and "regret", The global parsing unit 62 refers to the case slot 41 of “regret” shown in FIG. 4 to determine what case “no” is related to “regret”. Here, it is recognized as a target case. Then, the semantic [action content] defined in the object of “regret” is added to “no”. Thus, it is determined that "no" indicates the content of the act. Thereafter, the global parser 62
Adds the condition that "no" indicates the content of the action, and determines again the type of the case of the adnominal modifier clause C2. However, FIG.
As shown in (a), "buy" has no case to be associated with the content of the act. Therefore, "no" indicating the content of the act is not related to "bought" at all. Thus, the adnominal modifier clause C2 is corrected to a content clause. Here, the content clause is a series of sentences indicating the content of the word to be modified,
It can be expressed in the form of "... (modifier)". In FIG. 3, [TH-PN] indicates a virtually placed pronoun, and the word "TH-PN" and "(") "immediately before (TH) indicate that C2 is a content clause. This is because, as described above, the sentence forming the content clause can be expressed in the form of “to (modifier)”. Note that when a phrase “to” connecting the sentence and the antecedent is explicitly expressed in the content clause, the expression [TH-P
[N] need not be added before [N]. Thus, the analysis processing in the present example sentence is completed. Here, comparing the example sentences shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 3, when the meanings of “no” are indefinite, the verbs “sold” and “regret” are given even though the sentences have the same form. Different types of adnominal modifier clauses are different. In such a case, according to the present embodiment, the meaning of "no" can be estimated from the type of the verb by the above-described processing, and the type of the adnominal modifier can be accurately determined. As described above, the Japanese syntax analyzer of the present invention comprises a local syntax analyzer for determining the dependency relationship between words in a Japanese sentence; It has a global parser that analyzes the judgment result, judges the type of the adnominal modifier clause, and corrects the above judgment result as necessary, so that the application range of the means for judging the dependency structure of the sentence is expanded and the performance is improved. There is an effect that can be achieved. Also, the global parser determines the type of the adnominal modifier by estimating the meaning of the antecedent based on the relationship between the antecedent and the predicate behind the antecedent.
Even if the antecedent is an indefinite word such as "koto", "mono" or "no", the effect is that the type of the adnominal modifier clause relating to the antecedent can be accurately determined.

【図面の簡単な説明】 【図1】図5の実施例による解析処理例を示す図であ
る。 【図2】図1の述語の格スロットを示す図である。 【図3】図5の実施例による他の解析処理例を示す図で
ある。 【図4】図3の述語の格スロットを示す図である。 【図5】本発明の一実施例に係る日本語構文解析装置を
示すブロック図である。 【符号の説明】 1:解析処理装置 60:構文解析処理装置 61:局所的構文解析部 62:大域的構文解析部 C1:連体修飾節 C2:連体修飾節
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of analysis processing according to the embodiment of FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a case slot of the predicate of FIG. 1; FIG. 3 is a diagram showing another example of analysis processing according to the embodiment of FIG. 5; FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a case slot of the predicate of FIG. 3; FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing a Japanese syntax analyzer according to one embodiment of the present invention. [Description of Signs] 1: Analysis processing device 60: syntax analysis processing device 61: local syntax analysis unit 62: global syntax analysis unit C1: adnominal modifier clause C2: adnominal modifier clause

フロントページの続き (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) G06F 17/21 - 17/28 JICSTファイル(JOIS)Continuation of the front page (58) Field surveyed (Int.Cl. 7 , DB name) G06F 17/21-17/28 JICST file (JOIS)

Claims (1)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】 【請求項1】形態素解析を施された連体修飾節を含む日
本語複文を入力し、該日本語複文の構文解析を行う構文
解析部と、 単語間の係り受けに関する情報を格納した品詞マトリク
ステーブルとを備えた日本語構文解析装置において、 上記構文解析部は、 形態素解析により付加された各単語の文法情報及び意味
情報を参照し、上記品詞マトリクステーブルに格納され
た単語間の係り受けに関する解析規則を参照して単語相
互の係り受け関係を判定し、単語間の係り受け関係を表
す解析木を作成する局所的構文解析部と、 上記局所的構文解析部によって作成された解析木を分析
し、所定の解析規則に従って上記日本語複文に含まれる
連体修飾節の種類を判定し、上記解析木を修正する大域
的構文解析部とを備え、 上記大域的構文解析部は、上記連体修飾節の係る語が意
味不定の語である場合に、上記意味不定の語と上記意味
不定の語が格助詞を介して係る後の述語との間の格関係
を上記述語の格スロットを参照し判断して、上記述語と
の格関係において定義される、上記格スロットに格納さ
れた意味制約情報を上記意味不定の語に付加し、付加さ
れた上記意味制約情報に基づいて上記意味不定の語と上
記連体修飾節中の述語との間の格関係を判断して上記連
体修飾節の種類を決定することを特徴とする日本語構文
解析装置。
(57) [Claims] [Claim 1] A parsing unit for inputting a Japanese compound sentence including a continuity modifier subjected to morphological analysis and performing syntax analysis of the Japanese compound sentence, and a relation between words. A Japanese part-of-speech matrix table that stores information related to reception, wherein the parsing unit refers to grammatical information and semantic information of each word added by morphological analysis, and stores the grammatical information and semantic information in the part-of-speech matrix table A local parsing unit for determining a dependency relationship between words by referring to a parsing rule regarding the dependency between words, and creating a parse tree representing the dependency relationship between words; analyzing the parse tree created by, it determines the type of adnominal clauses contained in the Japanese complex sentences in accordance with predetermined analysis rule, and a global parser to modify the parse tree, the large When the word in the adnominal modifier is an indeterminate word, the regional parser analyzes a case between the indeterminate word and the subsequent predicate in which the indeterminate word is connected via a case particle. The relationship is determined by referring to the case slot of the above-described descriptive word, and the semantic constraint information defined in the case relation with the above-described descriptive word and stored in the above-mentioned case slot is added to the above-mentioned indeterminate word, and the added above-mentioned meaning is added. A Japanese parsing apparatus, characterized in that a case relation between the indefinite word and a predicate in the adnominal modifier clause is determined based on constraint information to determine a type of the adnominal modifier clause.
JP33117591A 1991-11-20 1991-11-20 Japanese parser Expired - Fee Related JP3369584B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP33117591A JP3369584B2 (en) 1991-11-20 1991-11-20 Japanese parser

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP33117591A JP3369584B2 (en) 1991-11-20 1991-11-20 Japanese parser

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH05143640A JPH05143640A (en) 1993-06-11
JP3369584B2 true JP3369584B2 (en) 2003-01-20

Family

ID=18240727

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP33117591A Expired - Fee Related JP3369584B2 (en) 1991-11-20 1991-11-20 Japanese parser

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3369584B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6553345B1 (en) * 1999-08-26 2003-04-22 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Universal remote control allowing natural language modality for television and multimedia searches and requests
JP4451435B2 (en) 2006-12-06 2010-04-14 本田技研工業株式会社 Language understanding device, language understanding method, and computer program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH05143640A (en) 1993-06-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4024861B2 (en) Natural language parser with dictionary-based part-of-speech probabilities
US20050171757A1 (en) Machine translation
EP1571565A2 (en) Method and system for ranking words and concepts in a text using graph-based ranking
JP2007265458A (en) Method and computer for generating a plurality of compression options
JP3369584B2 (en) Japanese parser
JP2003108571A (en) Document summary device, control method of document summary device, control program of document summary device and recording medium
JP3300142B2 (en) Natural language processor
JP3222173B2 (en) Japanese parsing system
WO1997048058A1 (en) Automated translation of annotated text
WO1997048058A9 (en) Automated translation of annotated text
JP4033093B2 (en) Natural language processing system, natural language processing method, and computer program
JP5128328B2 (en) Ambiguity evaluation apparatus and program
JP4039282B2 (en) Natural language processing system, natural language processing method, and computer program
JP3251032B2 (en) Japanese analyzer
Min et al. Integrated control of chart items for error repair
WO1992009041A1 (en) Japanese sentence structure analyzing system
JP3810809B2 (en) Parser
JP3081232B2 (en) Language processor
JPH0785101A (en) Keyword extract processing unit
JPH05189492A (en) Automatic generator for retrieval formula
JP2849400B2 (en) Language processor
JPH09212507A (en) Character processor and analytic method for character string
Kyongho et al. Integrated Control of Chart Items for Error Repair
Dipper et al. German Reference Corpus
JPH07334503A (en) Natural language processing system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081115

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081115

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091115

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091115

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101115

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111115

Year of fee payment: 9

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R371 Transfer withdrawn

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R371

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111115

Year of fee payment: 9

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111115

Year of fee payment: 9

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees