JP2021004808A - Test piece for magnetic particle flaw detection inspection, and manufacturing method thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

To create a test piece for magnetic particle flaw detection inspection capable of evaluating detection performance of a flaw that is a flaw created naturally or artificially, permits easy cleaning, prevents magnetic particles from entering inside, and has high reproducibility as the test piece for magnetic particle flaw detection inspection.SOLUTION: A test piece for magnetic particle flaw detection inspection impregnates a nonmagnetic substance as a resin up to nearly the bottom of a flaw created naturally or artificially by using a vacuum equal to or less than minus 70 KPa in a test piece for evaluating flaw detection performance of a magnetic particle flaw detection inspection system, and removes a nonmagnetic substance not impregnated into the flaw on a surface of the test piece.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

The present invention relates to a test piece having a scratch for magnetic particle inspection and a method for manufacturing the same.

The magnetic particle flaw detection inspection is applied to the flaw detection inspection of the surface of a steel material such as a billet or an automobile part to be inspected, and is standardized in JIS-Z-2320. In the magnetic particle inspection method, a magnetic field is generated on the magnetic material to be inspected by the axial energization method or the coil method, and a magnetic powder liquid or the like is applied to the surface of the magnetic material to inspect the object to be inspected. When there is a gap, the wound is detected by the accumulation of magnetic powder on the wound.

Evaluation of the scratch detection performance of the magnetic particle inspection device and the magnetic particle for magnetic particle inspection is required by users of the magnetic particle inspection device such as magnetic powder makers, steel makers, and automobile makers. In order to confirm whether the current or magnetic field applied to the object to be inspected or the magnetic powder is suitable for the magnetic particle inspection, a magnetic member having appropriate natural or artificially created scratches is required. On the other hand, the added magnetic powder enters the scratches that open on the surface, making cleaning work difficult and causing problems in reproducibility during reuse.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 9-43203

Patent Document 1 discloses a test body prepared by attaching a sheet body having a thickness of 0.1 to 0.5 mm to an artificially made scratch as a test body for magnetic particle inspection. ing. This sheet body simplifies the cleaning work without magnetic particles getting inside the artificially created scratches. However, the thin sheet has a problem of strength, and there is a problem that a clear magnetic particle instruction pattern cannot be formed due to the thickness of the sheet.

In addition, when the scratch is open on the surface, magnetic powder enters the inside of the scratch, and when this is detected by the fluorescent magnetic particle flaw detection method, if there is an angle in the width direction, the visibility is lowered and the evaluation result is deteriorated. There was a case.

In order to solve the above problems, the present invention is a wound that is naturally or artificially made as a test piece for magnetic particle inspection, is easy to clean, and is reproducible without magnetic particles getting inside the wound. The challenge is to create a specimen for magnetic particle inspection, which enables high evaluation of scratch detection performance.

In order to solve the above problems, the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention is used.
In a test piece of a ferromagnetic material such as iron for evaluating the scratch detection performance of a magnetic particle inspection system,
It is characterized by impregnating the inside of a wound with a non-magnetic substance.

Further, the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention is
The non-magnetic substance is characterized in that it is impregnated to substantially the bottom of the scratch.

Further, the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention is
The non-magnetic substance is characterized by being silicone.

Further, the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention is
The non-magnetic substance that has not been impregnated inside the scratches on the surface of the test piece has been removed.

Furthermore, in the manufacturing method of the test piece for evaluating the scratch detection performance of the magnetic particle inspection system,
The process of applying a non-magnetic substance to the surface of the scratch,
A step of impregnating the non-magnetic substance to substantially the bottom inside the scratch using a vacuum, and
It is characterized by having a step of removing the non-magnetic substance that has not been impregnated inside the scratch.

Further, the method for manufacturing the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention is as follows.
The vacuum is characterized by being minus 70 kPa or less.

According to the present invention, in a test piece of a ferromagnetic material such as iron for evaluating the scratch detection performance of a magnetic particle inspection system, the inside of the scratch is impregnated with a non-magnetic substance, so that cleaning work is easy. It is possible to provide a magnetic particle flaw detection test specimen capable of highly reproducible scratch detection performance evaluation in which magnetic powder does not enter the inside of a scratch.

Further, in the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention, since the non-magnetic substance is impregnated to substantially the bottom of the scratch, the non-magnetic substance inside the scratch is not removed even by the cleaning operation, and the scratch detection with high reproducibility is performed. It is possible to provide a magnetic particle flaw detection test specimen capable of performance evaluation.

Further, in the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention, since the non-magnetic substance is silicone, the entire test piece can be easily cleaned, has high reproducibility, and can be reproduced without magnetic particles getting inside the scratch. It is possible to provide a magnetic particle flaw detection test specimen capable of highly highly scratch-detecting performance evaluation.

Further, in the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention, the non-magnetic substance that has not been impregnated inside the scratches on the surface of the test piece has been removed, so that the entire test piece can be easily cleaned and reproducible. It is possible to provide a specimen for magnetic particle inspection, which is high and can evaluate scratch detection performance with high reproducibility without magnetic particles getting inside the scratch.

Furthermore, the manufacturing method of the test piece for evaluating the scratch detection performance of the magnetic particle inspection system is a step of applying a non-magnetic substance to the surface of the scratch and impregnating the non-magnetic substance to almost the bottom inside the scratch using vacuum. Since it has a step and a step of removing the non-magnetic substance that has not been impregnated inside the scratch, the non-magnetic substance inside the scratch is not removed even by the cleaning operation, and it is possible to evaluate the scratch detection performance with high reproducibility. , It is possible to provide a specimen for magnetic particle inspection.

Further, in the method for manufacturing the magnetic particle flaw detection test piece of the present invention, since the vacuum is minus 70 kPa or less, the non-magnetic substance inside the scratch is not removed even by the cleaning work, and the scratch detection performance with high reproducibility can be evaluated. It is possible to provide a test piece for magnetic particle flaw detection inspection.

It is a perspective view of the magnetic particle inspection test piece which concerns on this embodiment. FIG. 1 is a sectional view taken along the line AA of FIG. It is a perspective view of another magnetic particle inspection test piece which concerns on this embodiment. FIG. 3 is a sectional view taken along line BB in FIG. It is the angle dependence of the amount of light emitted from the fluorescent magnetic particle inspection of the test piece. It is an enlarged photograph before the test of Example 1. It is an enlarged photograph after cleaning of Example 1. It is an enlarged photograph before the test of Comparative Example 1. It is an enlarged photograph after cleaning of Comparative Example 1.

The magnetic particle inspection system usually uses fluorescent magnetic powder to which a fluorescent substance is added when targeting fine scratches. When a magnetic object to be inspected, such as an iron billet, is magnetized by an axial energization method, a coil method, or the like, magnetic flux leaks from scratches on the surface or scratches near the surface. When magnetic powder is applied here, the magnetic powder is adsorbed by the magnetic flux and accumulated. When this fluorescent magnetic powder is irradiated with ultraviolet rays, it emits fluorescence, and a fluorescent magnetic powder instruction pattern can be obtained.

The axial energization method uses a magnetic field in which an electric current is applied to a long magnetic material inspection object in the axial direction and generated in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the electric current. In this case, it is possible to detect axial scratches because it is sensitive to scratches perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field.

In the coil method, a magnetic field is applied from the outside in the axial direction of a long magnetic material inspection object. A magnetic circuit is formed by the magnetic poles of the coil and the object to be inspected. In this case as well, since it is sensitive to scratches in the direction perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field, it is possible to detect scratches in the circumferential direction.

In the combined magnetization of the coil method and the axial energization method, the magnetic fields of the coil method and the axial energization method, which are orthogonal to each other, are combined to generate a magnetic field whose directionality rotates. It is possible to detect scratches in all directions by this rotating magnetic field.

On the other hand, in order to diagnose whether this magnetic particle inspection system is operating normally or whether the fluorescent magnetic particle solution is appropriate, it is necessary to evaluate the performance using natural or artificially created scratches. ..

When a magnetic field is applied in the direction perpendicular to the scratch, if the object to be inspected is a ferromagnetic material such as iron, the magnetic permeability of the object to be inspected is much larger than the magnetic permeability of the gap between the scratches. A magnetic pole is generated in the part. When magnetic powder is applied here, the magnetic powder is captured by the magnetic flux leaking from the magnetic poles and accumulated. If this scratch is open, magnetic particles will get inside the scratch. It is very difficult to remove the magnetic powder that has entered the inside of the scratch because it is necessary to degauss the object to be inspected and scrape it out with a scrubbing brush or the like. If the magnetic powder in the scratch is reused in a state where it cannot be completely removed, the magnetic powder that is not removed affects the result at the time of retesting. That is, the result may show scratch detection performance higher than the original performance.

The test piece 1 shown in FIG. 1 is prepared by using a material of a ferromagnetic material such as iron as a test piece for magnetic particle inspection. FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line AA. The artificial scratch 2 is created by laser processing or electric discharge machining. The width is 10 to 100 μm, the length is 2 to 20 mm, and the depth is 0.1 to 3.0 mm. This scratch 2 is in the axial direction and is effective in the axial energization method. The scratch 2 is impregnated with a non-magnetic substance 3 which is a resin up to substantially the bottom 4. The non-magnetic substance, which is a resin that has not been impregnated inside the scratches on the surface of the test piece, is solidified and then removed using a cutter knife or the like.

Further, as another embodiment of the present invention, the test body 11 is shown in FIG. FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of BB. The artificial scratch 12 is created in the same manner as described above, is in the circumferential direction, and is effective in the coil method. The artificial scratch 12 is impregnated with a non-magnetic substance 13 which is a resin up to substantially the bottom 14.

As the magnetic particle inspection test piece, in addition to the axial scratches in FIG. 1 and the circumferential scratches in FIG. 3, diagonal scratches (not shown) may be used. This oblique scratch is effective for the combined magnetization of the coil method and the axial energization method, which generate a magnetic field in the oblique direction.

The object to be inspected in FIGS. 1 and 3 has a columnar shape, but may have a prismatic shape or other shape.

The non-magnetic substances 3 and 13 impregnated in the scratches 2 and 12 are resins, and silicone having a viscosity of 70 Pa · s or less is preferable. If the viscosity exceeds 70 Pa · s, the air inside the scratch does not come out into the vacuum, so it is not possible to impregnate the deep part of the scratch. Further, the resin may be a natural resin such as an epoxy resin or a varnish.

When a magnetic particle flaw detection inspection is performed using a normal test piece, magnetic powder enters the inside through the opening of the scratch. When irradiating this with ultraviolet rays and observing the magnetic powder instruction pattern, if the observation unit such as ultraviolet illumination, visual inspection, or a camera is angled in the width direction, the visibility is deteriorated. That is, the image must be taken from the vertical direction of the surface of the object to be inspected. In the case of a scratch having a width of 50 μm, a length of 5 mm, and a depth of 0.3 mm, an angle of 10 ° reduces the brightness by about 50%.

When reusing a test piece once used for magnetic particle inspection, it is necessary to remove magnetic powder in advance. First, the object to be inspected must be degaussed. After mechanically removing the magnetic powder inside the scratch with a scrubbing brush or the like, it is necessary to wash it with ultrasonic cleaning for several minutes. If magnetic powder remains inside the scratch, the remaining magnetic powder will be evaluated in addition to the magnetic powder adhered by the performance of the original magnetic particle inspection system, and the performance will be overestimated.

When a non-magnetic substance such as silicone is applied to the inside of the scratch on the surface of the test piece by hand, it cannot be inserted into the scratch and is thin only on the surface of the machined surface or the surface layer of the scratch. It will only be applied. In this case, if the test surface is mechanically cleaned with a scrubbing brush or the like, the kneaded resin such as silicone is easily removed.

Further, as in Cited Document 1, there is also a method of attaching a thin sheet of non-magnetic material having a thickness of about 0.1 to 0.5 mm to the scratch surface. In this case, the thickness of the sheet is preferably thinner, but a thin sheet of 0.1 mm or less has a problem in strength. The obtained magnetic particle instruction pattern becomes unclear depending on the thickness of the sheet, which is not preferable.

Therefore, in the present invention, a resin such as silicone is impregnated into the inside of the scratch using a vacuum. A non-magnetic resin substance such as silicone is applied to the scratch openings on the surfaces of the artificial scratches 2 and 12 created to a thickness of 0.8 mm or less. This is put in a vacuum chamber and evacuated with a vacuum degree of -7 kPa or less. Then, the air inside the wound is released. When the pressure is returned to atmospheric pressure, the non-magnetic substance on the surface of the scratch is evacuated and impregnated to substantially the bottoms 4 and 14 of the scratch as shown in FIGS. 2 and 4. After the non-magnetic substance of the resin such as silicone has hardened, the silicone that has not been impregnated inside the scratches on the surface of the test piece is removed to obtain the non-magnetic substances 3 and 13 shown in FIGS. 2 and 4.

When the degree of vacuum when impregnating a resin such as silicone to the inside of a scratch using a vacuum is lower than minus 70 kPa, the impregnation does not reach substantially the bottom of the scratch, and the filling of a non-magnetic substance becomes incomplete. In this case, it may be easily removed by cleaning with a scrubbing brush.

Silicone is suitable as the non-magnetic substance that is a resin. The viscosity of the silicone is preferably 70 Pa · s or less. The thickness of the silicone depends on the viscosity as shown in Table 1 below, and when the viscosity is high, it is necessary to apply it thinly. Table 1 shows the data when applied to a scratch having a width of 50 μm, a length of 5 mm, and a depth of 0.3 mm. If the viscosity of the silicone is greater than 70 Pa · s, or if the thickness to be applied is thicker than 0.8 mm, the air inside the scratch does not come out into the vacuum, so it cannot be impregnated inside the scratch.

When the test bodies 1 and 11 of the present invention are large enough not to fit in the vacuum chamber, they are evacuated by using a portable vacuum device. A suction device having a vacuum seal such as an O-ring is brought into close contact with the wound portion and vacuum suction is performed to impregnate the wound with a non-magnetic substance. A rotary pump, a diaphragm pump, or the like is used as the vacuum pump. A manual pump may be used.

When the magnetic powder is applied to the surfaces of the test bodies 1 and 11 created by the present invention, the magnetic powder does not enter the inside of the scratches 2 and 12. Therefore, the magnetic particle instruction pattern can be observed even if the illumination or the observation unit is arranged diagonally. Further, since the magnetic powder does not enter the inside of the scratches 2 and 12, cleaning after the inspection is easy.

In the magnetic particle inspection method, first, the surface of a ferromagnetic material such as steel to be inspected is cleaned with a solvent or the like, and then dried. Next, the ferromagnet is magnetized by an electromagnet or the like. There are a continuous method in which magnetic powder is applied during magnetization and a residual method in which magnetic powder is detected after removing the magnetic field. There are two types of magnetic powder: a dry method in which magnetic powder is sprayed and sprinkled in the air, and a wet method in which water or an organic solvent is used. Sprinkle magnetic powder with fluorescent material on it. There is a scratched part where the magnetic powder is sprinkled, and if there is a leaking magnetic field, the magnetic powder stays there. When irradiated with ultraviolet rays, the fluorescent substance attached to the magnetic powder emits light, and an indicated pattern of the scratched portion can be obtained. The scratched part is judged visually. Alternatively, it is imaged by an imaging device and automatically determined by a computer. Marking may be performed on the portion where a scratch is detected. In the case of automatic judgment by a computer, the scratched part can be confirmed efficiently by marking automatically.

The object to be inspected after the flaw detection inspection is subjected to post-treatment such as degaussing, cleaning, and rust prevention.

In the magnetic particle inspection test piece of the present invention, a scratch is artificially made on a ferromagnetic member such as iron, which is an object to be inspected, by laser processing or electric discharge machining, and the surface of the scratch is made of a resin such as silicone. The magnetic substance is applied to a thickness of 0.8 mm or less. This is exposed to a vacuum of minus 70 kPa or less using a vacuum device or a portable vacuum device to evacuate the inside of the scratch, and in the process of returning this from the vacuum state to atmospheric pressure, the non-magnetic substance on the surface is impregnated to almost the bottom inside the scratch. Let me. When the non-magnetic substance, which is a resin such as silicone, has solidified, the excess non-magnetic substance on the scratch surface is removed.
When this test piece is used for magnetic particle inspection, it is possible to form a magnetic particle instruction pattern regardless of the illumination angle or observation angle. Further, since the structure does not allow the magnetic powder to enter the inside of the scratch after use, the magnetic powder can be easily removed and the reproducibility is high.

Next, the present invention will be specifically described with reference to examples, but these examples do not limit the present invention in any way.

(Example 1)
As Example 1 of the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, an artificial scratch having a width of 50 μm, a length of 5 mm, and a depth of 0.3 mm was created on the horizontal bar by a laser processing method. After applying silicone with a viscosity of 40 Pa · s to this test piece to a thickness of 0.5 mm, the air inside the scratch is removed with a vacuum of minus 75 kPa, and in the process of returning this to atmospheric pressure, the silicone is substantially bottomed inside the scratch. Impregnated to. This test piece was magnetized by energizing a current of 500 A for 5 seconds by the axial energization method. Fluorescent magnetic powder was applied to obtain a magnetic powder instruction pattern.

(Comparative Example 1)
As Comparative Example 1, a test piece in which silicone was manually applied to an iron rod having an artificial scratch similar to that prepared in Example 1 was prepared. This test piece was magnetized by the axial energization method, and fluorescent magnetic powder was applied to obtain a magnetic particle instruction pattern.

(Comparative Example 2)
As Comparative Example 2, a test piece in a state where nothing was filled inside the wound was prepared using an iron rod having an artificial scratch similar to that prepared in Example 1. This test piece was magnetized by the axial energization method, and fluorescent magnetic powder was applied to obtain a magnetic particle instruction pattern.

(Magnetic particle inspection)
The magnetic particle instruction patterns obtained as a magnetic particle inspection were compared. FIG. 5 shows the angle dependence of the amount of fluorescent magnetic powder light. The angle is the angle in the direction perpendicular to the scratch. In Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, the brightness of the indicated pattern hardly changed even when the observation angle in the width direction of the scratch was changed as shown in FIG. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 2, as shown in FIG. 5, a large observation angle dependence was observed. It was brightest in the direction perpendicular to the surface, and when the observation angle was set to 10 °, the brightness decreased to 50%.

(Cleaning and reuse)
In order to reuse the test piece, degaussing and brushing were performed. Enlarged photographs of the surfaces of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 are shown in FIGS. 6A, 6B, 7A, and 7B. A scale of 0.1 mm is displayed at the lower right of the figure. FIG. 6A shows the state before use of Example 1, and FIG. 6B shows the state after cleaning of Example 1. In Example 1, after cleaning, the magnetic powder was removed, but the silicone inside the scratch was not removed, and the material can be reused. FIG. 7A shows the state of Comparative Example 1 before use, and FIG. 7B shows the state after cleaning of Comparative Example 1. In the case of Comparative Example 1, the magnetic powder was removed, but a part of the silicone in the artificial wound was also removed. In Comparative Example 1, if it is reused, magnetic powder enters the inside of the scratch, so that reproducibility cannot be obtained. In the case of Comparative Example 2, the magnetic powder inside the artificial wound could not be completely removed.

(Summary of results)
As an example of the magnetic particle inspection test piece, as a result of performing the magnetic particle inspection of Example 1, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2, the magnetic particle instruction pattern of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 was obtained regardless of the observation angle. It was. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 2, the magnetic particle instruction pattern was obtained, but there was a defect that the brightness was reduced when the measurement angle was changed.
Further, in the cleaning, the magnetic powder could be removed in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, but the magnetic powder remained in the scratches in Comparative Example 2. Regarding reuse, Example 1 was good, but Comparative Example 1 could not be reused because the silicone applied to the inside of the wound was removed during cleaning. Comparative Example 2 also could not be reused because magnetic powder remained inside the wound.

The specimen for magnetic particle inspection of the present disclosure relates to the optimization of the magnetic field and current of the magnetic particle inspection system and the optimization of the particle size and concentration of the magnetic powder used in the magnetic particle inspection such as the axial energization method and the coil method. It is possible to evaluate the scratch detection performance with high reproducibility.

1,11 Magnetic particle inspection test piece 2,12 Scratch 3,13 Non-magnetic substance 4,14 Bottom

Claims (6)

In a test piece of a ferromagnetic material such as iron for evaluating the scratch detection performance of a magnetic particle inspection system,
A magnetic particle inspection test piece characterized by impregnating the inside of a scratch with a non-magnetic substance. The non-magnetic substance is impregnated up to substantially the bottom of the scratch.
The test piece for magnetic particle inspection according to claim 1. The non-magnetic substance is silicone.
The test piece for magnetic particle inspection according to claim 1 or 2. The non-magnetic substance that has not been impregnated inside the scratches on the surface of the test piece has been removed.
The test piece for magnetic particle inspection according to any one of claims 1 to 3. In the manufacturing method of the test piece for evaluating the scratch detection performance of the magnetic particle inspection system
The process of applying a non-magnetic substance to the surface of the scratch,
A step of impregnating the non-magnetic substance to substantially the bottom inside the scratch using a vacuum, and
It is characterized by having a step of removing the non-magnetic substance that has not been impregnated inside the scratch.
A method for manufacturing a specimen for magnetic particle inspection. The vacuum is characterized by being minus 70 kPa or less.
The method for producing a test piece for magnetic particle inspection according to claim 5.