JP2015060432A - Program, computer, and training data generation support method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a program, a computer, and a training data generation support method capable of determining an operator's operation skill related to generation of training data with a simple method.SOLUTION: Provided is a program causing a computer to execute determining an operation skill of a first operator or a second operator on the basis of first training data generated by operation of the first operate for first data and first processing result data generated for the first data according to first rule data generated by machine learning using second training data generated by operation of the second operator for second data.

Description

  The present invention relates to a program, a computer, and a training data creation support method.

  For example, in the field of document management and the Internet, in order to perform automatic document organization, spam removal, search, etc., each document is assigned a label indicating some predetermined category (classification). Has been done.

  In document classification, a document classifier that determines a classification label (hereinafter referred to as a label) to be applied based on the document content may be used. For generation of a document classifier (hereinafter referred to as a classifier) A method using machine learning is known. In the case of using machine learning, rules (classification rules) for assigning labels possessed by these documents are automatically acquired as training data (also referred to as learning data or teacher data). The classifier can automatically assign a label to a new document using the acquired classification rule.

  In creating the training data, a label is attached to the document by the worker.

JP 2009-217528 A

  In order to generate a classifier with high accuracy by machine learning, the quality and quantity of training data are greatly affected. Therefore, when creating training data, it is recommended that experienced workers who have performed similar tasks in the past be selected as workers so that training data with appropriate labels attached to the documents is created. Is called. However, if there are a large number of documents to be labeled, it is not possible to secure an experienced person corresponding to that number as an operator, and an inexperienced person or an inexperienced person often has to be selected as an operator. Even an inexperienced person preferably satisfies the expected skill level in the labeling operation.

  Therefore, a method for determining the work skill of the worker is required. For this purpose, for example, a skill determination document in which a label (correct answer label) to be given in advance is known is prepared, the document is handed over to the worker, and the label given to the document by the worker and the correct answer label There is a method of judging the worker's labeling work skill by looking at the match.

  However, according to the above-described method, man-hours for preparing a document for skill determination including creation of a correct answer label and workers for assigning a label to the document for skill determination are generated. The more people there are, the more inefficient.

  An object of one aspect of the present invention is to provide a program, a computer, and a training data creation support method that can determine a worker's work skill related to creation of training data by a simple method.

  According to one aspect of the invention, the first training data created by the work of the first worker for the first data and the work of the second worker for the second data are created in the computer. Based on the first processing result data generated for the first data according to the first rule data generated by machine learning using the second training data, the first worker or the second worker A program for determining the work skill is executed.

  According to one embodiment, the man-hour for preparing a label-added document for skill determination and the man-hour for an operator for giving a label to the document for skill determination do not occur with a simple method, It is possible to provide a program, a computer, and a training data creation support method capable of determining a worker's work skill related to creation.

FIG. 1 shows an example of a training data creation support system. FIG. 2 shows an example of the hardware configuration of the training data creation support apparatus. FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a training data creation support method by the training data creation support device. FIG. 4 shows an example of the training data DB. FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the matching degree determination process. FIG. 6 shows an example of the classification rule. FIG. 7 shows an example of the determination work DB. FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a process for determining the degree of coincidence of label assignment results. FIG. 9 shows an example of the counter. FIG. 10 shows an example of the determination result DB. FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the extraction process of the model worker and the confirmation target person. FIG. 12 shows an example of the confirmation target person DB. FIG. 13 shows an example of the model worker DB. FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the skill determination process for the person to be confirmed. FIG. 15 shows an example of a confirmation target person determination DB. FIG. 16 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a label determination result match determination process. FIG. 17 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a process for determining a matching degree of a label addition result. FIG. 18 shows an example of a training data creation support system according to another embodiment. FIG. 19 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a training data creation support method by the training data creation support device according to another embodiment. FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a label assignment instruction process for an exemplary worker. FIG. 21 shows an example of a training data creation support system in another embodiment. FIG. 22 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a training data creation support method by the training data creation support device according to another embodiment. FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a transmission process of a grant target document.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to FIGS.

  FIG. 1 shows an example of a training data creation support system. As shown in FIG. 1, the training data creation support system includes a training data creation support device 10 and a plurality of terminal devices 30. The training data creation support device 10 and the plurality of terminal devices 30 are connected via a network 50 so that they can communicate with each other.

  The training data creation support apparatus 10 is an example of a computer that supports creation of training data. The training data creation support apparatus 10 determines whether or not the work skill of the worker who is responsible for creating the training data satisfies a predetermined level. As described above, the training data is used for machine learning when generating a classifier that performs document classification automatically. The training data creation support apparatus 10 is realized by computer hardware such as a personal computer (PC) or a server and software operating on the hardware. Processing executed by the training data creation support device 10 will be described later.

  The terminal device 30 is a terminal device used by each worker who creates training data. The terminal device 30 is, for example, a PC, a mobile phone, a smartphone, a tablet terminal, or the like. Each worker assigns a label to an individually given labeling target document and creates a labeled document. This labeled document is training data. Each worker transmits the created training data from the terminal device 30 to the training data creation support device 10.

  The label is a classification name indicating what category (classification) the content of the document belongs to. “FOOD” or the like indicating a food category is an example of a label. The document to which the label is given is, for example, a text written on social media such as a news article, Twitter (registered trademark), or a blog.

  In FIG. 1, a plurality of terminal devices 30 respectively connected to the network 50 are shown, but one device (terminal device 30 or other management terminal) communicates with the training data creation support device 10 mutually. The one apparatus may collect the training data from each worker (each terminal apparatus 30) and transmit it to the training data creation support apparatus 10.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the training data creation support device 10 includes a first storage unit 11, a second storage unit 12, a reception unit 13, a classifier generation unit 14, a determination unit 15, a classification processing unit 16, a transmission unit 17, and An output unit 18 is provided.

  The first storage unit 11 stores a training data creation support program. The training data creation support program is a program that uses the training data created by the worker and executes processing for determining the worker's work skill based on the relationship between the training data. For example, the process of determining the work skill of the worker is to identify the worker whose work skill has not reached a predetermined level.

  The 2nd memory | storage part 12 stores the database (DB) for memorize | storing the various information used for the process of this invention.

  The receiving unit 13 receives training data created by an operator from each terminal device 30. The receiving unit 13 is set to have an address indicating the training data creation support device 10 or an upload using a protocol such as Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) or File Transfer Protocol (FTP) from the terminal device 30. Training data can be received by sending an email. Then, the receiving unit 13 registers the received training data in the training data DB. The training data DB is stored, for example, in the second storage unit 12. Details of the training data DB will be described later.

  The classifier generating unit 14 generates a classifier for each worker using the training data received by the receiving unit 13 for use in determining each worker's labeling work skill. Here, generation of a classifier for each worker is equivalent to generation of a classification rule for each worker. A method for generating the classifier will be described later.

  The determination unit 15 uses a first training data group created by the first worker and a classifier generated using machine learning for the second training data group created by the second worker. Judgment processing is performed. The determination unit 15 matches the label given by the first operator with the label automatically given by the classifier generated as described above for the document to be labeled when creating the first training data group. It is determined whether or not.

  In addition, for example, the determination unit 15 has a suspicion that the work skill does not reach a predetermined level from among the workers, and the worker (hereinafter, referred to as a confirmation target person) whose work skill is to be determined. An operator who should be a model (hereinafter referred to as a model worker) is extracted. The worker here is, for example, a creator of training data registered in the training data DB. Then, the determination unit 15 performs a work skill determination process on the extracted confirmation target person, and determines whether or not the work skill of the confirmation target person has reached a predetermined level. It should be noted that the work skill is determined for the confirmation target person because the work skill of the confirmation target person (worker) does not reach a predetermined level, or it is difficult to determine the label to be assigned. This is because it is determined whether or not the person to be confirmed (operator) could not temporarily assign an appropriate label.

  The classification processing unit 16 assigns a label to the target document using a classifier (based on the classification rule).

  The transmission unit 17 transmits information such as a label addition target document to each terminal device 30. The transmission unit 17 downloads the terminal device 30 by using a protocol such as HTTP or FTP by the terminal device 30, and an address indicating each terminal device 30 (e-mail address of a worker who uses the terminal device 30). By sending an e-mail set as a destination, a labeling target document or the like can be sent.

  The output unit 18 outputs a processing result based on the determination result by the determination unit 15. For example, the output unit 18 outputs a processing result indicating whether or not the work skill of the confirmation target person has reached a predetermined level. The output unit 18 is a display device such as a liquid crystal display, a plasma display, or an organic EL display.

  Note that the above-described units may be integrated with other units or further subdivided to realize the functions of these units.

  Next, the hardware configuration of the training data creation support apparatus 10 will be described.

  FIG. 2 shows an example of the hardware configuration of the training data creation support apparatus 10. As shown in FIG. 2, the training data creation support device 10 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 61, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 62, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 63, a storage device 64, a network interface 65, and a portable type. A hardware element such as a storage medium drive 66 is provided. The training data creation support apparatus 10 is an example of a computer that includes these hardware elements. These hardware elements are connected to a bus 67 and can communicate data with each other via the bus 67.

  The CPU 61 is an example of a processor. The CPU 61 loads the program read from the ROM 62 or the storage device 64 to the RAM 63 and executes it. Instead of this, the CPU 61 may be a micro-processing unit (MPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), or other processing circuit.

  The ROM 62 stores basic programs such as BIOS (Basic Input / Output System) and UEFI (Unified Extended Firmware Interface), and various data used when executing the programs.

  The RAM 63 is a volatile memory that temporarily stores programs and various data. The RAM 63 is used as a work area when the CPU 61 executes a program.

  The storage device 64 is, for example, a hard disk drive (HDD) or a solid state drive (SSD). The storage device 64 is preferably a nonvolatile storage device.

  The network interface 65 is a communication circuit that connects the training data creation support apparatus 10 to the network so that it can communicate with other apparatuses via the network. A network interface card (NIC) is an example of the network interface 65.

  The portable storage medium drive 66 is a device for accessing the portable storage medium 68. The portable storage medium drive 66 performs data write to the portable storage medium 68 and data read from the portable storage medium 68 based on commands from the host device (for example, the CPU 61). The portable storage medium 68 includes, for example, an optical disc such as a compact disc (CD) and a DVD (Digital Versatile Disc), a universal serial bus (USB) memory, a flexible disc (FD), a magneto-optical disc (MO), a magnetic tape, It is.

  The storage device 64 and the portable storage medium 68 are examples of computer-readable storage media.

  The training data creation support program of the present invention is stored in the storage device 64, for example. The CPU 61 (a computer that is an example of the training data creation support apparatus 10) reads the training data creation support program from the storage device 64, loads it into the RAM 63, and executes the training data creation support program. Thereby, each process of the training data creation support program is executed, and each function of the training data creation support apparatus 10 is realized. The training data creation support program may be stored in the ROM 62 or the portable storage medium 68. In that case, CPU61 should just access the storage medium in which the training data creation assistance program is stored, acquire a training data creation assistance program, and run it.

  An example of the correspondence between each hardware element in FIG. 2 and each function in FIG. 1 is as follows.

  The CPU 61 is an example of the classifier generation unit 14, the determination unit 15, and the classification processing unit 16 in FIG.

  The ROM 62, the storage device 64, the portable storage medium drive 66, or the portable storage medium 68 is an example of the first storage unit 11 in FIG.

  The ROM 62, RAM 63, storage device 64, portable storage medium drive 66, or portable storage medium 68 is an example of the second storage unit 12 in FIG.

  The network interface 65 and the CPU 61 are examples of the receiving unit 13 and the transmitting unit 17 in FIG.

  A display device (not shown) such as a liquid crystal display, a plasma display, or an organic EL display is an example of the output unit 18.

  Next, a training data creation support method by the training data creation support device 10 in this embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a training data creation support method by the training data creation support device.

  First, the receiving unit 13 receives training data created by each worker from each terminal device 30 (S101). The receiving unit 13 can receive training data created for each worker by each worker transmitting training data from the terminal device 30 to the training data creation support device 10. The receiving unit 13 stores the received training data in the training data DB of the second storage unit 12.

  Note that a document to be given and a candidate for a label to be given are distributed to each worker in advance. Different documents to be assigned are distributed for each worker, and candidate labels to be given are common to the workers. At this time, it is preferable that a plurality of documents to be distributed are distributed to each worker. The number may be appropriately determined according to the total number of training data to be generated, the total number of workers, the desires of each worker, etc., but it is preferable that all workers have a certain number or more. These pre-distributions may be performed by the training data creation support apparatus 10, or may be performed by other means such as a work supervisor sending to each worker by e-mail.

  Each worker assigns one of the defined label candidates to the distributed grant target document, and creates training data. The receiving unit 13 receives these training data created by each worker.

  FIG. 4 shows an example of the training data DB. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the training data DB includes fields for an operator, a label, a document ID, and a grant target document. Each training data is registered in the training data DB as a record.

  The field “worker” in the training data DB indicates a worker who has given a label to the assignment target document. That is, the field “worker” indicates the worker who created the training data. In this field, identification information indicating the worker is registered.

  The field “label” indicates a label given to the document to be worked. Label candidates are also notified when the document to be granted is distributed to the worker, and the contents of this field are the labels that the worker has determined to be applicable from the candidates based on the content of the document to be granted (grant result label). ).

  A field “document ID” indicates identification information of a document to be labeled. Each document is identified by this document ID. In this embodiment, different grant target documents are distributed to each worker. That is, the document ID of each training data is unique in the training data DB.

  The field “assignment target document” is a document corresponding to the identification information of the field “document ID”, and indicates the contents of the label assignment target document distributed as a work target to the worker.

  With respect to the training data DB having such a structure, the following processing is performed in accordance with the processing of this embodiment.

  For example, when distributing a grant target document to a worker, information is provided in the fields “worker”, “document ID”, and “grant target document” of the training data DB based on the grant destination document and the grant target document to be distributed. sign up. In addition, based on the document ID included in the training data received from the worker, the label content as the assignment result may be registered in the field “label” of the record of the training data DB that matches the document ID. .

  Also, for example, when distributing the grant target document to the worker, nothing is registered in the training data DB, and each field corresponding to each piece of information included in the training data when receiving training data from the worker You may make it register to. In this case, the document ID may be distributed without giving the document ID to the grant target document, and the document ID may be registered by automatically incrementing the value of the field “document ID” in accordance with the addition of the record to the training data DB. Good. An appropriate method may be employed as the information registration procedure in the training data DB.

  The training data DB shown in FIG. 4 has two label candidates, “FOOD” and “Not-FOOD”, and allows each worker to determine whether the grant target document is related to food, and based on the determination result. The training data when labeling any of the candidates is illustrated. It should be noted that the label “FOOD” is a label to be given when the grant target document is related to food, and the label “Not-FOOD” is a label to be given when the grant target document is not related to food. In this way, by referring to the training data DB, it is possible to grasp what label is assigned to what kind of grant target document by which worker.

  After the reception of the training data by the reception unit 13 and the registration of the training data in the training data DB are completed, the determination unit 15 uses the training data created by a certain worker (hereinafter referred to as a determination target person). A classifier (including classification rules) is generated on a trial basis by learning, and the automatic label assignment result by the classifier for the assignment target document distributed to other workers (hereinafter referred to as comparison target persons) And the degree of coincidence with the label assignment result for the given document by the comparison subject (S102 in FIG. 3). In this example, when a certain worker is set as a judgment target, all other workers are set as comparison targets, and the degree of coincidence between the automatic label assignment result and the label assignment result by the worker for all combinations of workers. A determination is made. In this example, when a certain worker is set as a determination target person, the worker is also set as a comparison target person.

  If the labeling result by the classifier generated based on the training data of the judgment subject is significantly different from the labeling result by the comparison subject, the quality of the training data is poor because the judgment subject's work skills are low, and the classifier May not be able to perform proper labeling, or because the comparison target person's work skill is low, the appropriate labeling result given by the classifier and the labeling result by the comparison target person may be different. On the other hand, if these labeling results match or are similar to a certain threshold value or more, it is considered that both the determination target person and the comparison target person satisfy a certain skill level. By determining the degree of coincidence of label assignment results for all combinations of workers, it is possible to find the person to be confirmed and the model worker from the result bias. The description of the person to be confirmed and the model worker will be described later. Hereinafter, the determination process for the degree of coincidence will be described.

  FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the matching degree determination process.

  First, the determination unit 15 searches the training data DB stored in the second storage unit 12 and selects a determination target person (S201). For example, the determination unit 15 may select a worker who has not yet been selected as a determination target person based on the field “worker” in each record from the first record to the last record in accordance with the record order of the training data DB. .

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 targets the training data created by the determination target person registered in the training data DB, and generates a classifier including the classification rule using the classifier generation unit 14 (S202). ). The classifier generation unit 14 may generate a classifier by using various known learning methods such as a decision tree and Support Vector Machines. The generated classifier is stored in the second storage unit 12, for example.

  FIG. 6 shows an example of the classification rule. As shown in FIG. 6, the classification rule is used for processing by the classifier, and is, for example, rule data including correspondence information between conditions and labels. The condition includes, for example, information on a character string (keyword) and its appearance position. The label indicates a label to be given to a document including content that matches the conditions. The classifier uses such a classification rule, for example, compares the content of the target document with a condition, and gives a label corresponding to the condition to the target document when the content of the target document matches the condition. FIG. 6 shows an example of a classification rule generated based on training data created by the worker A illustrated in FIG.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 selects a comparison target person from the training data DB stored in the second storage unit 12 (S203). For example, the determination unit 15 may select a worker who has not yet been selected as a comparison target person based on the field “worker” in each record from the first record to the last record in accordance with the record order of the training data DB. . In this example, as described above, the same worker as the determination target person is also selected as the comparison target person.

  Then, the determination unit 15 instructs the classification processing unit 16 to give a label together with the generated classifier and the notification of the comparison target person. The classification processing unit 16 automatically assigns a label to each of the assignment target documents distributed as work targets to the notified comparison target person using the notified classifier (S204). The classification processing unit 16 identifies the record in which the identification information of the worker selected as the comparison target person is registered in the field “worker” from the training data DB, and the field “grant target document” in the identified record. The label is automatically given to the documents registered in "" using the classifier. For example, the classification processing unit 16 sequentially identifies corresponding records from among the records from the first record to the last record in accordance with the record order of the training data DB, and automatically assigns a label. The determination work DB is used in association with this processing, and the label assignment results by the determination target person and the classifier, the label assignment results by the comparison target person and the comparison target person, and the like are registered in the determination work DB. In addition, a comparison determination result between the label assignment result by the classifier and the label assignment result by the person to be compared is also registered in the determination work DB. This determination work DB is stored in, for example, the second storage unit 12. The determination work DB will be described below.

  FIG. 7 shows an example of the determination work DB. As shown in FIG. 7, the determination work DB includes fields for a determination result, a comparison target, a label assignment result by the comparison target, a determination target person, a label assignment result by a classifier, a document ID, and a grant target document. .

  The field “determination result” in the determination work DB indicates a comparison result between the field “label application result by the comparison target” and the field “label application result by the classifier”. For example, when the value of the field “judgment result” is “1”, it indicates that the contents of the field “labeling result by the comparison target” and the field “labeling result by the classifier” match. For example, if the value is “0”, it indicates that the contents of the field “labeling result by comparison target” and the field “labeling result by classifier” do not match.

  The field “comparison target” indicates identification information of the worker who is the comparison target selected in the process of S203 of FIG. In this field, the content of the field “worker” in the record of the training data DB specified by the classification processing unit 16 is registered.

  The field “label assignment result by comparison target person” indicates the label assignment result by the comparison target person for the assignment target document indicated by the field “document ID” described later. In this field, the content of the field “label” in the record of the training data DB specified by the classification processing unit 16 is registered.

  The field “determination target person” indicates identification information of an operator who is selected in the process of S201 in FIG. 5 and who is a determination target person who has used training data for generating the classifier in S202 of FIG. In this field, the identification information of the worker who is the determination target is registered in accordance with the automatic label assignment by the classification processing unit 16 using the classifier, which is the processing of S204 in FIG.

  The field “Labeling result by classifier” indicates the processing result generated by the classification processing unit 16 in the processing of S204 of FIG. That is, the label automatically given to the assignment target document indicated by the field “document ID” by the processing of the classification processing unit 16 using the classifier is shown.

  The field “document ID” indicates the document ID of the assignment target document to which the label indicated by the field “label assignment result by comparison target person” is assigned. In this field, the content of the field “document ID” in the record of the training data DB identified by the classification processing unit 16 is registered.

  The field “assignment target document” indicates the content of the assignment target document corresponding to the document ID indicated by the field “document ID”. In this field, the content of the field “assignment target document” corresponding to the field “document ID” in the record of the training data DB identified by the classification processing unit 16 is registered.

  The contents of the record specified in the training data DB and the determination result are registered in the above fields by the classification processing unit 16.

  The three records in the determination work DB illustrated in FIG. 7 indicate the following.

  Of the three records, the first record and the second record are based on training data created by the worker A when the worker A is selected as the determination target person and the worker B is selected as the comparison target person. The comparison result of the automatic label assignment result by the classifier generated in FIG. 5 and the label assignment result given by the worker B to the assignment target document included in the training data created by the worker B is shown.

  The worker B indicates that the label “FOOD” is assigned to the assignment target documents whose document IDs are 101 and 102, respectively. On the other hand, the classifiers generated based on the training data created by the worker A for these documents indicate that the labels “FOOD” have been automatically assigned using the classification rules illustrated in FIG. 6. .

  The third record is a label generated by the classifier generated based on the training data created by the worker A when the worker A is selected as the determination target and the worker C is selected as the comparison target. The comparison result of the automatic grant result and the label grant result given by the worker C to the grant target document included in the training data created by the worker C is shown.

  The worker C indicates that the worker C has given the label “FOOD” to the assignment target document whose document ID is 201. On the other hand, the classifier generated based on the training data created by the worker A for the document is automatically assigned the “Not-FOOD” label using the classification rule illustrated in FIG. Show.

  As a result of the above comparison, since the same label is assigned to the assignment target documents having the document IDs 101 and 102, the value “1” is registered in the field “judgment result”, and the assignment target document having the document ID 103 is registered. Since a different label is given, it indicates that the value “0” is registered in the field “judgment result”.

  The determination unit 15 determines whether or not there is an unselected worker as a comparison target in the training data DB after the processing by the classification processing unit 16 in the processing of S204 of FIG. 5 (FIG. 5). S205).

  When there is an unselected worker as a comparison target (S205; affirmative), the determination unit 15 returns to S203, selects the worker as a comparison target, and executes the process of S204. The determination unit 15 repeatedly executes the processes of S203 to S205 until there is no unselected worker as a comparison target person. On the other hand, when there is no unselected worker as a comparison target (S205; No), the determination unit 15 determines whether there is an unselected worker as a determination target in the training data DB. (S206).

  When there is an unselected worker as a determination target person in the training data DB (S206; affirmative), the determination unit 15 returns to S201, selects the worker as a determination target person, and performs the processes of S202 to S205. Execute. The determination unit 15 repeatedly executes the processes of S201 to S206 until there are no unselected workers.

  On the other hand, when there is no unselected worker as a determination target person (S206; No), the determination unit 15 uses the determination work DB created by the classification processing unit 16 to combine the determination target person and the comparison target person. Every time, the degree of coincidence between the result of automatic label assignment by the classifier and the result of label assignment to the document to be assigned by the comparison subject is determined (S207 in FIG. 5). The determination unit 15 stores the degree of coincidence that is the determination result in the determination result DB. This determination result DB is stored in, for example, the second storage unit 12. In the following, a process for determining the degree of coincidence of label assignment results will be described.

  FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a process for determining the degree of coincidence of label assignment results.

  The determination unit 15 generates a counter as preprocessing (S301). For example, the determination unit 15 identifies each determination target person based on the identification information of the worker registered in the field “determination target person” for each record from the first record to the last record of the determination work DB. Based on the field “comparison subject” in each record, each comparison subject is specified for each judgment subject, and a counter corresponding to all combinations of the judgment subject and the comparison subject is generated.

  FIG. 9 shows an example of the counter. The figure shows an example of a counter when the workers who are the judgment subject and the comparison subject are the worker A, the worker B, and the worker C.

  FIG. 9A shows each worker indicated by the identification information registered in the field “determination person” and identification information registered in the field “comparator” in the determination work DB. It is a counter that holds the total number of corresponding records for each combination with the worker. In FIG. 5A, the counter for each combination of the determination target person and the comparison target person is indicated by TCNT (m, n). For example, TCNT (A, B) indicates all records in the determination work DB. Of these, the total number of records in which the determination target person is the worker A and the comparison target person is the worker B is shown.

  FIG. 9B illustrates each worker indicated by the identification information registered in the field “determination person” and identification information registered in the field “comparison person” in the determination work DB. For each combination with the worker, the counter holds the total number of records in which the value “1” is registered in the field “judgment result” among the records corresponding to the combination. That is, the counter of FIG. 7B has a value “1” in the field “determination result” in the total number of records indicated by the counter corresponding to the combination of the determination target person and the comparison target person of FIG. Indicates the total number of registered records. In FIG. 5B, for example, MCNT (A, B) is displayed in the field “determination result” in all the records of the determination work DB in which the determination target person is the worker A and the comparison target person is the worker B. The value “1” indicates the total number of registered records.

  The determination unit 15 initializes the value of each generated counter to “0” when generating a counter in the process of S301.

  After generating the counter, the determination unit 15 performs the main process of the matching degree determination process. In this main process, the determination unit 15 selects a record in the determination work DB (S302). For example, the determination unit 15 may select a record that has not yet been selected in the main process from each record from the first record to the last record in accordance with the record order of the determination work DB. In the main process, each counter generated in the preprocess is used.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 determines the counter shown in FIG. 9A based on the identification information of the workers registered in the field “determination target person” and the field “comparison target person” of the selected record. In step S303, the counter value (total number of records) corresponding to the combination of the determination target person and the comparison target person is incremented. That is, a value obtained by adding “1” to the current total number of records becomes a new total number of records.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 determines whether or not the determination result in the selected record is “1” (S304). When the determination result is “1” (S304; affirmative), the determination unit 15 uses the identification information of the workers registered in the fields “determination target person” and “comparison target person” in the selected record, respectively. In the counter shown in FIG. 9B, the counter value (total number of matches) corresponding to the combination of the determination target person and the comparison target person is incremented (S305).

  The determination unit 15 determines whether or not an unselected record exists in the determination work DB in the main process after the above-described processing or when the determination result is not “1” (No in S304). (S306).

  When there is an unselected record (S306; affirmative), the determination unit 15 returns to S302, selects the record, and executes the processes of S303 to S305. The determination unit 15 repeatedly executes the processes of S302 to S306 until there are no unselected records in the main process. On the other hand, when there is no unselected record (S306; No), the determination unit 15 calculates the degree of coincidence based on the record total value and the match total value obtained by the above-described processing. The determination unit 15 determines, for example, each counter value (total number of matches) for each combination of the determination target person and the comparison target person shown in FIG. 9B and the determination target person and the comparison target person shown in FIG. By dividing by each counter value (total number of records) for each combination, a ratio (percentage) of the total number of matching values to the total number of records may be obtained and used as the degree of matching. The determination unit 15 identifies a record and a field of the determination result DB based on the determination target person and the comparison target person related to the matching degree, and registers the calculated matching degree (S307).

  FIG. 10 shows an example of the determination result DB. As illustrated in FIG. 10, the determination result DB includes a record corresponding to each worker. Each record has a field corresponding to each worker. In the example of FIG. 10, the record is shown as corresponding to the determination target person, and the field is shown as corresponding to the comparison target person.

  For example, in FIG. 10, the first record is a classifier generated based on the training data created by the worker A for each grant target document included in the training data created by the workers A, B, and C. The degree of coincidence between the label application result obtained by automatically applying the label using the label and the label application result provided by each of the workers A, B and C is shown. In this example, for the document to be included included in the training data created by the worker A, the degree of coincidence between the automatic label assignment result by the classifier and the label assignment result by the worker A is 100%. . In addition, regarding the document to be added included in the training data created by the worker B, the degree of coincidence between the automatic label assignment result by the classifier and the label assignment result by the worker B is 85%. Further, for the document to be included included in the training data created by the worker C, the degree of coincidence between the automatic label assignment result by the classifier and the label assignment result by the worker C is 50%.

  After performing these processes, the determination unit 15 ends the process of the flowchart shown in FIG. As described above, the degree-of-match determination process is performed, and a determination result DB indicating the determination result is constructed.

  Next, the determination unit 15 extracts a confirmation target person and an exemplary worker (S103 in FIG. 3). Hereinafter, a method for extracting the confirmation target person and the model worker will be described.

  FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the extraction process of the model worker and the confirmation target person.

  The determination unit 15 refers to the determination result DB illustrated in FIG. 10 and selects a determination target person (S401). For example, the determination unit 15 may select a determination target person who has not yet been selected in this process according to the record order of the determination result DB.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 acquires data of the matching degree corresponding to the determination target person selected by the process of S401 from the determination result DB (S402). For example, the determination unit 15 extracts data on the degree of coincidence of all comparison target persons with respect to the selected determination target person from the determination result DB.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 determines whether or not the selected determination target person is a confirmation target person based on the extracted data of coincidence (S403). For example, the determination unit 15 calculates the number of all coincidence data extracted in S402 (the number of persons to be compared) and the number of coincidence data below the reference value of the coincidence among all the extracted coincidence data. Count each. Then, the determination unit 15 calculates the ratio of the number of coincidence data that is equal to or less than the reference value of the coincidence with respect to all the extracted coincidence data. The determination unit 15 determines whether or not the calculated ratio exceeds a predetermined threshold value. If the calculated ratio exceeds the predetermined threshold value, the selected determination target person is determined as a confirmation target person. The matching value reference value and the predetermined threshold value may be set in advance according to the expected labeling accuracy. Here, the predetermined threshold value is a threshold value used for determining the ratio below the reference value.

  When it is determined that the selected determination target person is a confirmation target person (S403; affirmative), the determination unit 15 registers the selected determination target person as a confirmation target person in the confirmation target person DB (S404). . Details of the confirmation target person DB will be described later.

  On the other hand, when it is not determined that the selected determination target person is the confirmation target person (S403; No), the determination unit 15 performs a work in which the determination target person is higher than the worker registered in the exemplary worker DB. It is determined whether or not there is a skill (S405). In the model worker DB, a worker who is a model worker and a score of the worker are registered. Details of the model worker DB will be described later.

  For example, the determination unit 15 uses data on the degree of coincidence in the determination result DB for the determination of the model worker. The determination unit 15 adds the numerical values of all the data of the degree of coincidence extracted in S402, and uses the total value as the score of the selected determination target person. The determination unit 15 compares the score of the selected determination target person with the score of the model worker registered in the model worker DB. When the score of the selected determination target person is larger than the score of the model worker, the determination unit 15 has a higher work skill than the worker registered in the model worker DB. judge.

  When it is determined that the selected determination target person has a higher work skill than the worker registered in the exemplary worker DB (S405; affirmative), the determination unit 15 updates the exemplary worker DB (S406). ). The determination unit 15 updates the worker information and the score information in the exemplary worker DB using the identification information indicating the currently selected determination target person and the score thereof.

  On the other hand, when it is not determined that the selected determination target person has a higher work skill than the worker registered in the exemplary worker DB (S405; No), or the determination target person selected in S404 Is registered in the confirmation target person DB, the determination unit 15 determines whether or not there is an unselected worker as a determination target person in the determination result DB (S407).

  When there is an unselected determination target person in the determination result DB (S407; affirmative), the determination unit 15 returns to S401, selects the determination target person, and executes the processes of S402 to S406. The determination unit 15 repeatedly executes the processes of S401 to S407 until there is no unselected determination target person.

  On the other hand, when there is no unselected determination target person (S407; No), the determination unit 15 ends the process of the flowchart illustrated in FIG. As a result of these processes, a worker who is a confirmation target person is registered in the confirmation target person DB, and it is determined that the model worker DB has the highest work skill among the workers registered in the training data DB. The registered worker is registered as a model worker. In this way, the confirmation target person and the model worker are extracted.

  FIG. 12 shows an example of the confirmation target person DB. As illustrated in FIG. 12, the confirmation target person DB includes fields for a confirmation target person, a matching degree, and a determination result. When there are a plurality of confirmation subjects, records corresponding to each confirmation subject are registered in the confirmation subject DB.

  The field “confirmation subject” in the confirmation subject DB indicates identification information of an operator who is a judgment subject who is determined as a confirmation subject in S403 of FIG. 11 and registered in the confirmation subject DB in S404 of FIG.

  The field “matching degree” is for the assignment target document that was distributed to the worker who was determined to be a model worker and acquired training data, and the determination work that was determined to be the confirmation result person and the label assignment result by the model worker The degree of coincidence with the label assignment result by the worker who is a worker is shown.

  The field “determination result” indicates whether or not the value of the field “matching degree” is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold value. For example, if the value of the field “degree of matching” is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold, the value “1” is registered. Further, for example, when the value of the field “degree of matching” does not reach a predetermined threshold value, the value “0” is registered. This value also indicates whether or not the worker registered in the field “confirmation target person” of the corresponding record is finally recognized as the confirmation target person. For example, when the value is “0”, the worker registered in the field “person to be confirmed” of the corresponding record is finally recognized as the person to be confirmed.

  The fields “matching degree” and “judgment result” are used in the process of FIG. 14 described later. These fields will be described in detail in the processing description.

  For example, in the example of the determination result DB illustrated in FIG. 10, as described above, records relating to the degree of coincidence of the workers A, B, and C are registered as determination workers. When the reference value of the coincidence is 50% and the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10 is taken as an example, for the worker A, one of the three data (100%, 85%, 50%) matches. Of the three data (85%, 100%, 30%) for the worker B, one of the data is less than the reference value of the matching degree, and three for the worker C Of the data (10%, 10%, 90%) are less than the reference value of the degree of coincidence.

  For example, if the predetermined threshold value of the ratio below the reference value for determination in S403 in FIG. 11 is 50%, the worker A is 33% (one data out of all three), and the worker B is 33% (all 1 data out of 3) and 67% for worker C (2 data out of all 3), the operator C is determined as a confirmation target by the process of S403 in FIG. Registered in the user DB.

  The determination target person may be determined by excluding data in the determination result DB illustrated in FIG. 10 when the comparison target person is the same worker as the determination target person. Further, the same worker as the determination target person may not be selected as the comparison target person in the comparison target person selection process in S203 of FIG. In either case, the same data is used for the determination of the person to be confirmed. Taking the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10 as an example, the following data is used for the determination process for the person to be confirmed.

  For worker A, two pieces of data (85% (for worker B) and 50% (for worker C)) are used. Assuming that the reference value of the coincidence is 50% as described above, in this case, one of the two data is less than or equal to the reference value of the coincidence. For worker B, two pieces of data (85% (for worker A) and 30% (for worker C)) are used. In this case, one of the two pieces of data is equal to or less than the reference value of the matching degree. For worker C, two pieces of data (10% (for worker A) and 10% (for worker B)) are used. In this case, two of the two pieces of data are equal to or less than the reference value of the matching degree.

  For example, if the predetermined threshold value of the ratio below the reference value for determination in S403 in FIG. 11 is 50% as described above, the worker A is 50% (one data out of two), and the worker B is 50% (1 data out of all 2) and 100% for worker C (2 out of 2 data), and the processing of S403 in FIG. A worker C exceeding 50% is determined as a confirmation target person and registered in the confirmation target person DB.

  FIG. 13 shows an example of the model worker DB. As illustrated in FIG. 13, the model worker DB includes model worker and score fields.

  The field “exemplary worker” in the exemplary worker DB has the highest work skill among the workers (determination workers) registered in the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10 by the processing of S405 in FIG. The identification information of the worker determined to be present.

  The field “score” indicates the score of the worker registered in the field “exemplary worker” calculated by the process of S405 of FIG.

  For example, taking the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10 and the confirmation target person DB shown in FIG. 12 as an example, among the workers A, B, and C registered as determination workers in the determination result DB, the worker C is a figure. 11 is determined as a confirmation target person and is excluded from the exemplary worker candidates. For the remaining workers A and B, the score of worker A is calculated as 235 (100 + 85 + 50) and the score of worker B is calculated as 215 (85 + 100 + 30) in the process of S405 of FIG. Accordingly, the identification information and the score of the worker A having the highest score among the workers A and B are registered in the exemplary worker DB by the process of S406 in FIG.

  Returning to the description of the processing in FIG. The determination unit 15 determines whether or not a confirmation target person has been extracted in the process of S103 of FIG. 3 (S104 of FIG. 3). For example, the determination unit 15 searches the confirmation target person DB and determines whether or not the information of the worker who is the confirmation target person is registered in the confirmation target person DB. When the worker information is registered in the confirmation target person DB (S104; affirmative), the determination unit 15 determines whether or not the worker's work skill has reached a predetermined level (S105).

  As described above, the person to be confirmed is a worker who is suspected of having not reached a predetermined level in the work skill. In order to judge whether the worker's work skill has not reached the predetermined level, or whether the assignment target document he was in charge of has a high degree of difficulty, and the worker has not been able to temporarily assign an appropriate label. The work skill level of the worker is determined using another grant target document. Here, since it is considered that the model worker determined to have the best work skill in the process of S103 is likely to give an appropriate label to the grant target document, the model worker in S101. The document to be assigned in the training data received from is used to determine the work skill of the person to be confirmed here. A method for determining whether or not the work skill of the person to be confirmed has reached a predetermined level will be described below.

  FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the skill determination process for the person to be confirmed.

  First, the determination unit 15 transmits the grant target document in the training data created by the model worker to the verification target person (S501). For example, the determination unit 15 of the training data creation support apparatus 10 accesses the model worker DB and identifies the model worker. And the determination part 15 specifies the assignment | providing object document of the training data which the model worker created from the records registered into training data DB. Thereafter, the determination unit 15 transmits the specified grant target document to the person to be confirmed (terminal device 30) using the transmission unit 17. A candidate for a label is also transmitted to the person to be confirmed together with the document to be given. The same label candidates are distributed to all the confirmation target persons, and are the same label candidates as the training data previously created by the verification target person (training data received in the process of S101 in FIG. 3).

  As the determination unit 15 sends the grant target document to the check target person in this way, the determination unit 15 registers each information of the model worker, the sent grant target document, and the check target person in the check target determination DB. In addition, when the determination unit 15 identifies the grant target document distributed as the work target to the model worker, the determination unit 15 acquires the label assignment result given by the model worker to the grant target document from the training data DB. Then, it is registered in the confirmation target person determination DB.

  The confirmation target person receives the grant target document and the label candidate distributed as described above, assigns a label to each received grant target document, and creates training data. Then, the person to be confirmed transmits the created training data from the terminal device 30 to the training data creation support device 10.

  The receiving unit 13 of the training data creation support apparatus 10 receives the training data created by the person to be confirmed transmitted from the terminal device 30 (S502). The receiving unit 13 stores the received training data in the confirmation target person determination DB in the second storage unit 12. When storing the training data in the confirmation target person determination DB, the receiving unit 13 searches the confirmation target person determination DB based on the training data document ID and the information on the confirmation target person, and identifies the corresponding record. In this record, the labeling result in the training data is registered. In addition, this training data is for confirmation object person determination, and is not added to training data DB.

  Subsequently, after the reception of the training data by the receiving unit 13 and the registration of the training data in the confirmation target person determination DB are completed, the determination unit 15 labels the confirmation target person in each record in the confirmation target person determination DB. A determination is made as to whether the application result matches the label application result by the model worker (S503). In the following, a process for determining a match between a verification target person determination DB and a label assignment result will be described.

  FIG. 15 shows an example of a confirmation target person determination DB. As illustrated in FIG. 15, the confirmation target person determination DB includes each of a determination result, a model worker, a label assignment result by the model worker, a confirmation target person, a label assignment result by the confirmation target person, a document ID, and a grant target document. Has a field.

  The field “determination result” in the confirmation target person determination DB indicates a comparison result between the field “label application result by the exemplary worker” and the field “label application result by the confirmation target person”. For example, when the value of the field “determination result” is “1”, it indicates that the contents of the field “label application result by the exemplary worker” and the field “label application result by the confirmation target person” match. Further, for example, when the value is “0”, it indicates that the contents of the field “label application result by the model worker” and the field “label application result by the confirmation target person” do not match.

  The field “exemplary worker” indicates identification information of the worker who is the exemplary worker determined in the process of S103 of FIG. Therefore, this model worker is also a worker registered in the model worker DB of FIG.

  The field “label assignment result by the model worker” indicates the label assignment result by the model worker for the document to be assigned indicated by the field “document ID” described later.

  The field “confirmation target person” indicates the identification information of the worker registered in the confirmation target person DB in the process of S103 of FIG.

  The field “result of label assignment by the person to be confirmed” is received by the process of S502 of FIG. 14 by transmitting the document to be given indicated by the field “document ID” described later in the process of S501 of FIG. The label given to the grant target document by the person to be checked is shown.

  The field “document ID” indicates the identification information of the label assignment target document transmitted to the confirmation target person as the work target in the process of S501 in FIG. 14, and the confirmation target person received from the confirmation target person in the process of S502 in FIG. The target document labeled with is shown.

  The field “assignment target document” is a document corresponding to the identification information of the field “document ID”, and indicates the contents of the label assignment target document distributed as a work target to the confirmation target person.

  In the confirmation target person determination DB, the fields “Label assignment result by model worker”, “Document ID”, and “Grant target document” include information on the field “worker” in the training data DB shown in FIG. The contents registered in the fields “Label”, “Document ID”, and “Granting document” of the record that is the identification information of the model worker are registered (transcribed).

  FIG. 16 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a label determination result match determination process.

  The determination unit 15 selects a record in the confirmation target person determination DB (S601). For example, the determination unit 15 may select a record that has not yet been selected in accordance with the record order of the confirmation target person determination DB.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 labels the selected record based on the contents registered in the field “result of labeling by the person to be confirmed” and the field “result of labeling by the model worker”, respectively. It is determined whether or not the application result matches the label application result by the model worker (S602). When the result of label assignment by the person to be confirmed matches the result of label assignment by the model worker (S602; Yes), the determination unit 15 stores the value “1” in the field “determination result” of the selected record as the determination result (S603). ). On the other hand, if the result of labeling by the person to be confirmed does not match the result of labeling by the exemplary worker (S602; No), the determination unit 15 stores the value “0” in the field “determination result” of the selected record as the determination result. (S604).

  As described above, the determination unit 15 determines whether the confirmation target person and the model worker match the labeling result, stores the determination result in the confirmation target person determination DB, and then determines whether the confirmation target person determination DB stores the determination result. It is determined whether there is a record that has not yet been selected (S605).

  When there is an unselected record (S605; affirmative), the determination unit 15 returns to S601, selects the record, and executes the processes of S602 to S604. The determination unit 15 repeatedly executes the processing of S601 to S605 until there are no unselected records. On the other hand, when there is no unselected record (S605; No), the determination unit 15 ends the process of the flowchart illustrated in FIG.

  Next, the determination unit 15 selects a certain confirmation target person from the confirmation target person DB (S504 in FIG. 14). Hereinafter, the confirmation target person thus selected from the confirmation target person DB is referred to as a confirmation determination target person. For example, the determination unit 15 may select an unselected confirmation target person as the confirmation determination target person in accordance with the record order of the confirmation target person DB.

  Then, the determination unit 15 calculates the degree of coincidence between the label application result by the confirmation determination target person and the label application result by the model worker (S505). In the following, a process for determining the degree of coincidence of label assignment results will be described.

  FIG. 17 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a process for determining a matching degree of a label addition result.

  The determination unit 15 selects a record in the confirmation target person determination DB (S701). For example, the determination unit 15 may select a record that has not yet been selected in accordance with the record order of the confirmation target person determination DB. Note that a record total value and a matching total value, which will be described later, may be initialized to a value “0” here.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 determines whether the confirmation target person who created the training data registered in the selected record is a confirmation determination target person (S702). When the confirmation target person is the confirmation determination target person (S702; affirmative), the determination unit 15 increments the record total value (S703). That is, a value obtained by adding 1 to the current total number of records becomes a new total number of records.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 15 determines whether or not the value of the field “determination result” in the selected record is “1” (S704). When the value of the field “determination result” is “1” (S704; affirmative), the determination unit 15 increments the total number of matches (S705).

  When the determination unit 15 determines that the person to be confirmed is not the person to be confirmed after the above-described processing (S702; negative), or the value of the field “determination result” is not “1”. (S704; No), it is determined whether or not there is an unselected record in the confirmation target person determination DB (S706).

  When there is an unselected record (S706; affirmative), the determination unit 15 returns to S701, selects the record, and executes the processing of S702 to S705. The determination unit 15 repeatedly executes the processes of S701 to S706 until there are no unselected records. On the other hand, when there is no unselected record (S706; No), the determination unit 15 calculates the degree of coincidence based on the record total value and the match total value. For example, the determination unit 15 may divide the total number of matches by the total number of records to obtain a ratio (percentage) of the total number of matches to the total number of records, and use this as the degree of match. The determination unit 15 registers the calculated degree of coincidence in the field “coincidence” of the record corresponding to the confirmation target person as the confirmation determination target person in the confirmation target person DB of FIG. 12 (S707). The determination unit 15 obtains a record in which the content of the field “confirmation target person” in the confirmation target person DB matches the identification information of the worker who is the current confirmation determination target person, and calculates the record in the field “matching degree”. Register the degree of coincidence.

  As described above, the degree of coincidence between the labeling result by the person to be judged and the labeling result by the exemplary worker is obtained, and the judging unit 15 judges whether or not the degree of coincidence exceeds the reference value of the degree of coincidence ( S506 in FIG. An appropriate value may be set as the reference value for the degree of coincidence according to the expected work skill level.

  When it is determined that the degree of coincidence exceeds the reference value of the degree of coincidence (S506; affirmative), the determination unit 15 determines the field “determination result of the record corresponding to the confirmation target person as the confirmation determination target person in the confirmation target person DB. The value “1” is stored in “” (S507). On the other hand, when the degree of coincidence is equal to or less than the reference value of the degree of coincidence (S506; No), the determination unit 15 sets the field “determination result” of the record corresponding to the confirmation target person as the confirmation determination target person in the confirmation target person DB. The value “0” is stored (S508). Thus, in the confirmation target person DB, the confirmation target person whose value “1” is stored in the field “determination result” indicates that the work skill has been determined to satisfy the predetermined level, and the field “determination” The confirmation target person with “0” stored in the “result” indicates that the work skill is determined not to satisfy the predetermined level.

  The determination unit 15 determines the work skill of each confirmation target person selected as the determination target person as described above, stores the determination result in the confirmation target person DB, and then confirms the determination in the confirmation target person DB. It is determined whether there is an unselected confirmation target person (record) as the target person (S509).

  When there is an unselected confirmation worker (S509; affirmative), the determination unit 15 returns to S504, selects the confirmation worker as a confirmation determination target person, and executes the processing of S505 to S508. The determination unit 15 repeatedly executes the processes of S504 to S509 until there is no unselected confirmation worker. On the other hand, when there is no unselected confirmation target person (S509; No), the determination part 15 determines that the work skill determination process of the confirmation target person is completed, and the process of S106 of FIG. Migrate to The determination part 15 outputs a determination result based on the process by S105 of FIG. 3 (S106). Also, when the worker information is not registered in the confirmation target person DB (S104; No), the determination unit 15 outputs the result in the process of S106.

  For example, the determination unit 15 may output a list of workers whose field “determination result” is “0” in the confirmation target person DB as the determination result. The list output in this way indicates workers who are determined that their work skills have not reached a predetermined level. Moreover, the determination part 15 may output the content itself of confirmation subject DB as a determination result. The user of the training data creation support apparatus 10 is a worker whose work skill has not reached a predetermined level for a worker whose field “judgment result” is “0” based on the contents of the output confirmation target person DB. Can be judged. Furthermore, the determination part 15 may output the content of the training data which the corresponding worker produced as a determination result with a list | wrist of a worker. What is necessary is just to output the record which is the identification information of the worker to whom the content of the field "worker" corresponds from training data DB. The user of the training data creation support apparatus 10 can confirm what label is assigned to what grant target document by the corresponding worker based on the content of the output training data, It is possible to determine whether or not the worker has not reached a predetermined level of skill.

  According to the processing of the present embodiment, the work skill is created using the training data and the grant target document that has been distributed for creating the training data, from among the workers whose work skills are unknown. It is possible to specify an operator who is determined not to reach the predetermined level. By excluding the workers identified in this way, workers with high work skills are identified, and training data is created only for those workers with high work skills (labeling the documents to be assigned). Can be requested. High-quality training data can be obtained from the worker who has so requested, and using such training data, a classifier (classification rule) with high classification accuracy can be generated when document classification is performed.

  Further, the determination unit 15 does not output a list of workers as a determination result, but deletes training data created by a worker whose work skill does not reach a predetermined level from the training data DB ( It is also possible to delete the record whose field “worker” is the identification information of such a worker) and output the training data DB after the deletion. By using the training data DB thus output, a classifier (classification rule) with high classification accuracy can be generated from high-quality training data.

  Note that the determination unit 15 does not delete the training data, but may output the training data DB that disables the training data created by the worker who is determined that the work skill does not reach the predetermined level. Good. For example, a field that makes it possible to control the use of each training data is provided in the training data DB, training data to be used is determined based on the contents of the field, and a classifier (classification rule) is based on the determined training data. It may be generated. Even in such a form, a classifier (classification rule) with high classification accuracy can be generated as described above.

  Education for improving a worker's work skill may be provided to a worker whose work skill specified by the process of the present embodiment does not reach a predetermined level. As a result, the number of workers for generating a classifier (classification rule) with high classification accuracy can be secured.

  In this embodiment, a separate document for skill determination is prepared for identifying a worker whose work skill does not reach a predetermined level from among workers who perform label assignment work on the assignment target document. However, it is possible for each worker to specify the skill determination document without performing the label assignment work separately from the original training data creation work. Therefore, it is possible to determine a worker's work skill by a simple method that does not generate man-hours for preparing a document for skill determination and for each worker to perform labeling work on the document for skill determination. it can.

  Although the present embodiment has been described above, modifications thereof will be described below. This modification relates to the process of S103 in FIG. 3, that is, the extraction process of the confirmation target person and the exemplary worker, which is the process of FIG.

  In the processing of FIG. 11, the determination unit 15 performs the processing of S402 and S403, and the reference value of the matching degree with respect to the number of data of all comparison target persons (number of comparison target persons) in the record corresponding to the determination target person in the determination result DB The ratio of the following data numbers was calculated, and the confirmation target person was determined by comparing the ratio with a predetermined threshold value of the ratio below the reference value. At this time, when the ratio exceeds a predetermined threshold, the determination target person is determined to be a confirmation target person. That is, in the processing of this embodiment, as a method for determining the work skill of a certain worker, the classifier generated based on the training data created by the worker correctly corrects the training data created by other work. It is determined whether it can be classified.

  With regard to this processing, in a modified example, as a method for determining the work skill of a certain worker, a training data grant target document created by the worker is targeted, and based on the training data created by each worker. It may be determined whether the generated classifier can be correctly classified. For example, in the process of S402 in FIG. 11, when acquiring the data of the matching degree corresponding to the determination target person, the determination unit 15 handles the worker who is the determination target person in each record from the determination result DB illustrated in FIG. It is sufficient to extract the data of the field.

  In the example of the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10, as described above, the degree of coincidence of the workers A, B, and C is registered as the determination worker. In the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10, each classifier generated based on the training data created by each worker A, B, and C for the training data grant target document created by the worker A. The data on the degree of coincidence when using is 100% (corresponding to worker A), 85% (corresponding to worker B), and 10% (corresponding to worker C). In addition, the degree of coincidence when using each classifier generated based on the training data created by each worker A, B, and C for the training data grant target document created by the worker B is used. There are three types of data: 85% (for worker A), 100% (for worker B), and 10% (for worker C). Further, the degree of coincidence when each classifier generated based on the training data created by each worker A, B, and C is used for the training data grant target document created by the worker C. There are three types of data: 50% (corresponding to worker A), 30% (corresponding to worker B), and 90% (corresponding to worker C).

  If the reference value of the degree of coincidence in the determination processing of S403 in the above-described embodiment is 50% and the predetermined threshold value of the ratio below the reference value is 50%, the ratio below the reference value is 33% for the worker A (all 3 One of them is below the reference value for the matching degree), 33% for the worker B (one of all three pieces is below the reference value for the matching degree), 67% for the worker C (all three pieces) Two of them are equal to or less than the reference value of the degree of coincidence). As a result, since the ratio regarding the worker C exceeds a predetermined threshold value of the ratio below the reference value, in the verification target person extraction process in this modification, the determination unit 15 determines the worker C as the verification target person, and confirms The identification information indicating the worker C is registered in the target person DB.

  Note that the worker's score (the process of S405 in FIG. 11) for extracting the model worker in this modified example is also the same as the method for obtaining data of the matching degree corresponding to the determination target person in this modified example. What is necessary is to calculate as follows. Then, the worker with the highest score may be the model worker.

  As described above, since worker C is determined to be a confirmation subject, the scores of worker A and worker B may be calculated. In the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10, the score for worker A is calculated as 195 (100 + 85 + 10), and the score for worker B is calculated as 195 (85 + 100 + 10). In this way, when the scores are the same, for example, among the workers having the same score, the worker whose score is calculated first or the worker whose score is calculated last may be used as the model worker.

  As another modification, the above-described embodiment and the above-described modification may be integrated to determine the work skill of a certain worker. For example, the determination unit 15 may determine whether or not the person is a confirmation target by using data of all the degrees of coincidence regarding the worker selected as the determination target registered in the determination result DB. That is, data of each field of a record corresponding to a certain worker and data of a field corresponding to a certain worker in each record may be used for the determination.

  In the example of the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10, as described above, the degree of coincidence of the workers A, B, and C is registered as the determination worker. In the determination result DB shown in FIG. 10, there are five data on the degree of coincidence related to the worker A: 100%, 85%, 50%, 85%, and 10%. Further, there are five pieces of coincidence data related to the worker B, 85%, 100%, 30%, 85%, and 10%, in the determination result DB. Further, there are five pieces of coincidence data related to the worker C: 10%, 10%, 90%, 50%, and 30% in the determination result DB.

  If the reference value of the degree of coincidence in the determination in the above-described embodiment is 50% and the predetermined threshold value of the ratio below the reference value is 50%, the ratio below the reference value is 40% for the worker A (out of all five). 2 is less than the reference value for matching), 40% for worker B (2 out of all 5 are below the reference value for matching), 60% for worker C (3 out of 5) Is equal to or less than the reference value of the degree of coincidence). As a result, since the ratio regarding the worker C exceeds a predetermined threshold, in the extraction process of the confirmation target person in this modification, the determination unit 15 determines the worker C as the confirmation target person and performs the work in the confirmation target person DB. The identification information indicating the person C is registered.

  Also in this modified example, the worker's score for extracting the model worker (the process of S405 in FIG. 11) is set in the same manner as in the method for obtaining the matching degree data corresponding to the determination target person in this modified example. What is necessary is just to calculate as follows. Then, the worker with the highest score may be the model worker.

  As described above, since worker C is determined to be a confirmation subject, the scores of worker A and worker B may be calculated. In the determination result DB illustrated in FIG. 10, the score for worker A is calculated as 330 (100 + 85 + 50 + 85 + 10), and the score for worker B is calculated as 310 (85 + 100 + 30 + 85 + 10). Therefore, in this modification, the worker A having a high score is determined as the model worker.

  Next, another embodiment will be described.

  In the process of determining the work skill of the confirmation target person in S105 of FIG. 3, when it is determined that the work skill of the worker registered in the confirmation target person DB has reached a predetermined level, S101 of FIG. There is a possibility that a document that is difficult to give a label may be included in the training data grant target document created by the worker received in step (1). Therefore, in the present embodiment, a configuration is provided in which an exemplary worker is instructed to perform such label assignment work on the assignment target document.

  FIG. 18 shows an example of a training data creation support system according to another embodiment. As illustrated in FIG. 18, the training data creation support system includes a training data creation support device 100 and a plurality of terminal devices 30. The training data creation support device 100 and the plurality of terminal devices 30 are connected via a network 50 so that they can communicate with each other.

  The training data creation support device 100 is a device that supports creation of training data. The terminal device 30 is a terminal device used by each worker who creates training data. The terminal device 30 is the same as that in FIG.

  The training data creation support apparatus 100 includes a first storage unit 11, a second storage unit 12, a reception unit 13, a classifier generation unit 14, a classification processing unit 16, a transmission unit 17, an output unit 18, a determination unit 19, and an assignment instruction unit. 20. In the training data creation support apparatus 100, the same components as those in the data creation support apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 1 are denoted by the same reference numerals, and descriptions of functions and processes thereof are omitted. Also, the determination unit 19 is different from the determination unit 15 in the process described later, and performs the same processing as the determination unit 15 in the other processes. The description of the same processing as that of the determination unit 15 in the determination unit 19 is omitted.

  Further, the training data creation support apparatus 100 has the same hardware configuration as that in FIG. 2, and the above-described units similar to the training data creation support apparatus 10 have the same hardware as the units of the training data creation support apparatus 10 described above. Corresponds to the wear element. An example of hardware elements corresponding to the determination unit 19 and the assignment instruction unit 20 in FIG. 18 is the CPU 61 in FIG. 2. The training data creation support program for realizing the training data creation support device 100 may be executed in the same manner as in the above-described embodiment, and any function of the training data creation support device 100 may be realized. Hereinafter, a training data creation support method by the training data creation support apparatus 100 according to another embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 19 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a training data creation support method by the training data creation support device according to another embodiment. In FIG. 19, the same processes as those in FIG. 3 are denoted by the same reference numerals, and the description of the processes is omitted. Note that after the process of FIG. 14 as an example of the process of S105 ends, the process proceeds to S800 of FIG. 19 instead of S106.

  The determination unit 19 instructs the exemplary worker to give a label after the process of S105 (S800). The determination unit 19 gives an instruction to the assignment instruction unit 20.

  FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a label assignment instruction process for an exemplary worker.

  The assignment instruction unit 20 determines whether there is a confirmation target person whose work skill satisfies a predetermined level among the confirmation target persons whose work skill has been determined (S802). For example, the assignment instruction unit 20 may determine whether there is a record in which the value “1” is registered in the field “determination result” in the confirmation target person DB illustrated in FIG.

  If there is no confirmation target person whose work skill satisfies the predetermined level (S802; No), the process proceeds to S106 in FIG.

  On the other hand, when there is a confirmation target person whose work skill satisfies the predetermined level (S802; affirmative), the assignment instruction unit 20 is among the assignment target documents of the training data created by the worker who is the confirmation target person. From this, the grant target document to be transmitted to the model worker is specified (S804).

  For example, the assignment instructing unit 20 is the identification information of the worker who is the confirmation target in the field “comparison person” and the model worker in the field “determination person” from the determination work DB shown in FIG. It is only necessary to identify a record in which the identification information of the worker is registered and the value of the field “judgment result” is “0”. Thereby, a record in which the labeling result by the classifier generated based on the labeling result by the person to be confirmed and the training data created by the model worker is different is specified. The assignment instruction unit 20 may set the content registered in the field “assignment target document” of the specified record as the transmission target assignment target document. When there are a plurality of records that match the above-described conditions in the determination work DB, the assignment instruction unit 20 assigns the contents registered in the field “assignment target document” of those records to the transmission target The target document may be used. In addition, when there are a plurality of confirmation target persons whose work skills satisfy a predetermined level, the assignment instruction unit 20 may specify each record in the determination work DB for each confirmation target person.

  Then, the assignment instruction unit 20 transmits the specified assignment target document to the model worker and instructs label assignment (S806). For example, the assignment instruction unit 20 transmits the contents registered in the field “document to be assigned” in the record specified as described above to the exemplary worker (addressed to the corresponding terminal device 30) by the transmission unit 17. That's fine. It should be noted that the document ID may be included when transmitting the grant target document, and the document ID may be included in the training data created by the exemplary worker. Further, when transmitting the grant target document to the model worker, a label that is a grant target candidate (the same label as the training data received in S101 in FIG. 3) is also notified.

  Thereafter, the receiving unit 13 receives the training data created by the model worker from the terminal device 30 (S808), and stores the training data in the training data DB shown in FIG. 4 (S810). For example, the receiving unit 13 may specify a record that matches the document ID included in the training data in which the content registered in the field “document ID” is received from the training data DB. Then, the receiving unit 13 includes the identification information of the worker who is a model worker in the field “worker” in the specified record, and the label (included in the training data) given to the field “label” in the record by the model worker. Each label) can be registered. That is, the corresponding record in the training data DB is thereby updated with information related to the model worker. For the corresponding record in the training data DB, the content registered in the field “label” is compared with the label given by the model worker, and if they match, the receiving unit 13 does not update the corresponding record. Also good.

  According to the other embodiment described above, the training data created by the confirmation target person is correctly replaced by the training data created by the exemplary worker determined to have higher work skills than the confirmation target person. The training data to which is given increases. As a result, a classifier (classification rule) with higher classification accuracy than the classifier (classification rule) generated by the above-described embodiment can be generated.

  In the other embodiments described above, it is determined that it is difficult to give a label from among the training data grant target documents created by the confirmation target person who has been determined that the work skill has reached a predetermined level. Only the document was sent to the model worker. Instead of transmitting only such a document to the model worker, all the training data grant target documents created by such a confirmation target user may be transmitted to the model worker. By doing in this way, the training data correctly labeled is further increased, and a classifier (classification rule) with higher classification accuracy can be generated.

  Next, still another embodiment will be described.

  Even if the assignment target document with uneven content is assigned as a work target to a specific worker and the grant target document is distributed to each worker, even if the training data received from each worker is the correct label assignment result The classifier generated from the training data may not be able to perform proper labeling. For example, if the content of the grant target document used to create training data differs significantly from the grant target document that is labeled by the classifier generated based on the training data, the classifier The classification rules used may not work effectively. In such a case, there is a possibility that the work skill of each worker cannot be determined accurately and fairly even if the matching degree determination of the label assignment result is performed in the process of S102 of FIG.

  Therefore, in another embodiment, a grant target document to be distributed as a work target to each worker is determined while preventing a grant target document having specific contents from being concentrated on a certain worker.

  FIG. 21 shows an example of a training data creation support system in another embodiment. As illustrated in FIG. 21, the training data creation support system includes a training data creation support device 200 and a plurality of terminal devices 30. The training data creation support device 200 and the plurality of terminal devices 30 are connected via a network 50 so that they can communicate with each other.

  The training data creation support device 200 is a device that supports creation of training data. The terminal device 30 is a terminal device used by each worker who creates training data. The terminal device 30 is the same as that in FIG.

  The training data creation support apparatus 200 includes a first storage unit 11, a second storage unit 12, a reception unit 13, a classifier generation unit 14, a determination unit 15, a classification processing unit 16, a transmission unit 17, an output unit 18, and a cluster generation unit. 21 and an assigning unit 22. In the training data creation support apparatus 200, the same reference numerals are given to the same components as those in the data creation support apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 1, and descriptions of functions and processes thereof are omitted.

  The cluster generation unit 21 performs cluster processing on a plurality of grant target documents that are work targets. By this cluster processing, each of the plurality of grant target documents is classified into a plurality of categories according to the contents thereof.

  The allocating unit 22 determines an assignment target document to be distributed to each worker based on the processing result of the cluster generating unit 21.

  The training data creation support apparatus 200 has the same hardware configuration as that in FIG. 2, and the above-described units similar to the training data creation support apparatus 10 have the same hardware as the respective units of the training data creation support apparatus 10 described above. Corresponds to the wear element. An example of the hardware elements corresponding to the cluster generation unit 21 and the allocation unit 22 in FIG. 21 is the CPU 61 in FIG. The training data creation support program for realizing the training data creation support device 200 may be executed in the same manner as in the above-described embodiment, and any function of the training data creation support device 200 may be realized. Hereinafter, a training data creation support method by the training data creation support apparatus 200 in another embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 22 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a training data creation support method by the training data creation support device according to another embodiment. In FIG. 22, the same processes as those in FIG. 3 are denoted by the same reference numerals, and the description of the processes is omitted.

  The transmission unit 17 transmits the determined grant target document to each worker (S900). FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a transmission process of a grant target document.

  The cluster generation unit 21 acquires a grant target document to be transmitted (S902). For example, the cluster generation unit 21 sequentially acquires grant target documents stored in advance in the second storage unit 12. For example, as described above, the grant target document may be stored in the second storage unit 12 in the form of the training data DB illustrated in FIG. In this case, information regarding each grant target document may be registered in the field “document ID” and the field “grant target document” among the fields of the training data DB.

  Subsequently, the cluster generation unit 21 generates a plurality of clusters in which grant target documents having similar contents are grouped based on the acquired contents of the grant target documents (S904). In generating the cluster, various known methods such as k-means may be used. For example, when the grant target document is stored in the second storage unit 12 in the form of the training data DB shown in FIG. 4, a field for registering information for identifying the cluster is added to the training data DB. Also good. Hereinafter, this field is referred to as a field “cluster ID”. And the cluster production | generation part 21 should just register the produced | generated cluster identification information in the field "cluster ID" of the record corresponding to each grant object document in training data DB. The same cluster identification information is assigned to grant target documents having similar contents, and different cluster identification information is assigned to grant target documents having different contents. In this way, the relationship information between the grant target document and the cluster is created. Also, instead of adding a field to the training data DB, correspondence information such as a table showing the relationship between each grant target document (each document ID) and the cluster is created and used separately from the training data DB. May be.

  The allocating unit 22 determines a document to be allocated to each worker based on the cluster generated by the cluster generating unit 21 (S906). For example, in the training data DB to which the field “cluster ID” is added as described above, the assigning unit 22 performs a plurality of assignment target documents in which the same cluster identification information is registered in the field “cluster ID”. What is necessary is just to determine the assignment | providing object document to each worker so that it may distribute and assign to an operator. For example, the same number (equivalently) of the assignment target documents in which the same cluster identification information is registered may be assigned to each worker. By doing in this way, it is prevented that the grant target documents having the similar contents in the same cluster are assigned to different workers, and the grant target documents having specific contents are not concentrated on a certain worker. When the assignment assignment target document to each worker is determined in this way, the assignment unit 22 may register identification information indicating the worker in the field “worker” of the training data DB. Thereby, the worker of the grant target document is determined for each record (each grant target document) in the training data DB.

  The assignment unit 22 instructs the transmission unit 17 to transmit the assignment target document after determining the assignment of the assignment target document to each worker.

  The transmission unit 17 receives the instruction from the allocation unit 22 and transmits the document to be assigned determined as described above to each worker (S908). For example, the transmission unit 17 transmits the contents registered in the field “assignment target document” of each record of the training data DB to the worker indicated by the identification information registered in the field “worker” of the same record. . The transmission method of the grant target document to the worker by the transmission unit 17 may be the same as in the above-described embodiment. Moreover, the reception of training data from each worker and the subsequent processing may be the same as in the above-described embodiment.

  According to the other embodiments described above, since the assignment target documents can be evenly allocated to the respective workers so that the assignment target documents having specific contents are not concentrated on a certain worker, the classifier of the training data is biased. Performance degradation can be prevented, and the operator's work skill can be determined appropriately. Note that the determination unit 15 in the training data creation support apparatus 200 in the present embodiment may be the determination unit 19 in the training data creation support apparatus 100 in FIG.

  The preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, but the present invention is not limited to specific embodiments, and various modifications and changes may be made.

  For example, the training data DB illustrated in FIG. 4 includes fields for an operator, a label, a document ID, and a grant target document, but a DB in which these pieces of information are different may be used. For example, the configuration may be such that the training data DB has fields for workers, labels, and document IDs, and the other DB has fields for document IDs and grant target documents. Records are associated between these DBs using the field “document ID” as a key. Alternatively, the training data DB may have serial number, worker, and label fields, and the other DB may have serial number, document ID, and grant target document fields. In this case, records are associated between these DBs using the field “serial number” as a key.

  In the embodiment of the present invention, the labeling target is a document, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, other data such as images, moving images, audio data, user accounts, and the like may be set as labels.

Regarding the above embodiment, the following additional notes are disclosed.
(Appendix 1)
On the computer,
By machine learning using first training data created by the work of the first worker for the first data and second training data created by the work of the second worker for the second data Based on the first processing result data generated for the first data according to the generated first rule data, the work skill of the first worker or the second worker is determined.
A program to make things happen.
(Appendix 2)
In the computer,
The first rule for the first training data, the first processing result data, the third training data created by the work of a third worker for the third data, and the third data Based on the second processing result data generated according to the data, the work skill of the second worker is determined.
The program according to appendix 1 for executing the above.
(Appendix 3)
In the computer,
According to the second rule data generated by machine learning using the first training data, the first processing result data, and the third training data created by the work of the third worker for the third data. Based on the second processing result data generated for the first data, the work skill of the first worker is determined.
The program according to appendix 1 for executing the above.
(Appendix 4)
In the computer,
Based on the second training data and the second processing result data generated for the second data according to the second rule data generated by machine learning using the first training data, the first work Determining the work skill of the worker or the second worker,
The program according to appendix 1 for executing the above.
(Appendix 5)
In the computer,
Based on the degree of coincidence between the first training data and the first processing result data, the work skill of the first worker or the second worker is determined.
The program according to appendix 1 for executing the above.
(Appendix 6)
In the computer,
Based on the first degree of coincidence between the first training data and the first process result data and the second degree of coincidence between the third training data and the second process result data, the work skill of the second worker Determine
The program according to appendix 2 for executing the above.
(Appendix 7)
In the computer,
Based on the relationship between the first coincidence degree and the second coincidence degree and a reference value, the work skill of the second worker is determined.
The program according to appendix 6 for executing the above.
(Appendix 8)
In the computer,
Based on the first degree of coincidence between the first training data and the first process result data and the second degree of coincidence between the first training data and the second process result data, the work skill of the first worker Determine
The program according to attachment 3 for executing the above.
(Appendix 9)
In the computer,
Based on the relationship between the first coincidence degree and the second coincidence degree and a reference value, the work skill of the first worker is determined.
The program according to appendix 8 for executing the above.
(Appendix 10)
In the computer,
Based on the first degree of coincidence between the first training data and the first processing result data and the second degree of coincidence between the second training data and the second processing result data, the first operator or the first 2 Determine work skills of workers,
The program according to appendix 4 for executing the above.
(Appendix 11)
In the computer,
Based on the relationship between the first matching degree and the second matching degree and a reference value, the work skill of the first worker or the second worker is determined.
The program according to supplementary note 10 for executing the above.
(Appendix 12)
In the computer,
If it is determined that the work skill of the first worker is higher than the work skill of the second worker, the work for the second data is requested to the first worker, while the second work If it is determined that the work skill of the worker is higher than the work skill of the first worker, the second worker is requested to work on the first data.
The program according to any one of appendices 1 to 11 for executing the above.
(Appendix 13)
In the computer,
Perform cluster processing on multiple data based on content similarity,
Determining the first data and the second data from the plurality of data so that each includes data classified into different clusters;
Based on the determination, the first worker is requested to work on the first data, and the second worker is requested to work on the second data.
The program according to any one of appendices 1 to 12 for executing the program.
(Appendix 14)
The work is to give a label to the target data according to the content of the target data,
The first training data, the second training data, and the first processing result data are labeling result data,
The program according to any one of appendices 1 to 13.
(Appendix 15)
The program according to any one of appendices 1 to 14, wherein the first data and the second data are different data.
(Appendix 16)
The program according to any one of appendices 1 to 15, wherein the first worker and the second worker are different workers.
(Appendix 17)
The program according to any one of appendices 1 to 15, wherein the first worker and the second worker are the same worker.
(Appendix 18)
A receiving unit that receives the first training data created by the work of the first worker for the first data and the second training data created by the work of the second worker for the second data When,
A generating unit that generates rule data by machine learning using the second training data;
A determination unit for determining work skills of the first worker or the second worker based on the first training data and processing result data created for the first data according to the rule data;
A computer comprising:
(Appendix 19)
In a training data creation support method executed on a computer,
By machine learning using first training data created by the work of the first worker for the first data and second training data created by the work of the second worker for the second data Based on the first processing result data generated for the first data according to the generated first rule data, the work skill of the first worker or the second worker is determined.
A training data creation support method characterized by that.

10: training data creation support device 11: first storage unit 12: second storage unit 13: reception unit 14: classifier generation unit 15: determination unit 16: classification processing unit 17: transmission unit 18: output unit 100: training data Creation support device 19: Determination unit 20: Assignment instruction unit 200: Training data creation support device 21: Cluster generation unit 22: Assignment unit 30: Terminal device 50: Network 61: CPU
62: ROM
63: RAM
64: Storage device 65: Network interface 66: Portable storage medium drive 67: Bus 68: Portable storage medium

Claims (9)

On the computer,
By machine learning using first training data created by the work of the first worker for the first data and second training data created by the work of the second worker for the second data Based on the first processing result data generated for the first data according to the generated first rule data, the work skill of the first worker or the second worker is determined.
A program to make things happen. In the computer,
The first rule for the first training data, the first processing result data, the third training data created by the work of a third worker for the third data, and the third data Based on the second processing result data generated according to the data, the work skill of the second worker is determined.
The program according to claim 1, for executing the operation. In the computer,
According to the second rule data generated by machine learning using the first training data, the first processing result data, and the third training data created by the work of the third worker for the third data. Based on the second processing result data generated for the first data, the work skill of the first worker is determined.
The program according to claim 1, for executing the operation. In the computer,
Based on the second training data and the second processing result data generated for the second data according to the second rule data generated by machine learning using the first training data, the first work Determining the work skill of the worker or the second worker,
The program according to claim 1, for executing the operation. In the computer,
Based on the degree of coincidence between the first training data and the first processing result data, the work skill of the first worker or the second worker is determined.
The program according to claim 1, for executing the operation. In the computer,
If it is determined that the work skill of the first worker is higher than the work skill of the second worker, the work for the second data is requested to the first worker, while the second work If it is determined that the work skill of the worker is higher than the work skill of the first worker, the second worker is requested to work on the first data.
The program of any one of Claim 1 thru | or 5 for performing this. In the computer,
Perform cluster processing on multiple data based on content similarity,
Determining the first data and the second data from the plurality of data so that each includes data classified into different clusters;
Based on the determination, the first worker is requested to work on the first data, and the second worker is requested to work on the second data.
The program of any one of Claims 1 thru | or 6 for performing this. A receiving unit that receives the first training data created by the work of the first worker for the first data and the second training data created by the work of the second worker for the second data When,
A generating unit that generates rule data by machine learning using the second training data;
A determination unit for determining work skills of the first worker or the second worker based on the first training data and processing result data created for the first data according to the rule data;
A computer comprising: In a training data creation support method executed on a computer,
By machine learning using first training data created by the work of the first worker for the first data and second training data created by the work of the second worker for the second data Based on the first processing result data generated for the first data according to the generated first rule data, the work skill of the first worker or the second worker is determined.
A training data creation support method characterized by that.

Images