JP2013205672A - Business game execution management device, business game execution management program and business game execution management method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To require no management by a supervisor and reduce a burden of execution.SOLUTION: A business game execution management server 10 comprises: a scenario database 10-2 that stores a scenario including a description of execution procedure for a business game; and a scenario execution part 10-1 that interprets and executes the scenario. The scenario execution part 10-1 comprises: a determination part that determines whether or not a learner inputs decision making data at each round; a total demand setting processing part that, when the decision making data is determined to be input, sets total demand at any time in accordance with the number of learners for the game; a total demand distribution processing part that distributes the total demand set at any time to each learner; a result display processing part that uses a learner terminal to display a distribution result after the distribution; an achievement evaluation processing part that calculates each achievement of the learners and uses the learner terminal to display the calculated achievement; and an improvement advice processing part that presents each improvement of the learners on the basis of the calculated achievement.

Description

  The present invention relates to a business game execution management device, a business game execution management program, and a business game execution management method.

  Conventionally, a business game in which a learner and a supervisor meet together in a face-to-face class is known (for example, see Patent Document 1). In a business game, a learning system is constructed by connecting one main server computer and a plurality of subordinate terminals via a network. In this learning system, a virtual economic market environment is constructed on a server computer. Each of the plurality of learners becomes a company manager in a pseudo manner, and inputs decision-making data for product manufacture and sales to the terminal. The input data is aggregated by the server computer, and the sales and profits of the management results of each learner are calculated. Each learner confirms this result and further makes the next decision. By repeating this process, learners will improve their management skills.

JP 2005-284230 A

  In the conventional technology described above, when a business game is executed, supervisors are required to check whether decision-making data for all learners has been input and to manage time limits for input. . For this reason, a plurality of learners and supervisors had to gather at the same place at the same time and conducted face-to-face. This limited the time and place for the learner to learn, and was a factor that reduced the chance of learning participation. In addition, the embodiment in which the learner participates in the game from different times and places using the network not only places a heavy burden on the supervisor, but also in a competitive environment when the number of learners participating is small. There was little effect to experience management.

  The present invention has been made in consideration of the above circumstances, and eliminates the need for supervisory management and can reduce the implementation burden. Business game execution management device, business game execution management program, and business game An object is to provide an execution management method.

  In order to solve the above-described problem, one aspect of the present invention is a business game execution management device that executes a business game based on decision-making data input from a plurality of learner terminals, and executes the business game A scenario database storing a scenario in which a procedure is described; an execution processing unit that interprets and executes the scenario stored in the scenario database at a predetermined time interval; A determining unit that determines whether decision data has been input, and a total demand setting processing unit that sets the total demand according to the number of learners when the determining unit determines that the decision-making data has been input A total demand distribution processing unit that distributes the total demand in association with a learner, and a distribution result distributed by the total demand distribution processing unit, A result display processing unit to be displayed more, a grade evaluation processing unit for calculating a learner's grade and displaying the grade on the learner terminal, and an improvement point advice for presenting the improvement point of the learner based on the grade A business game execution management device comprising: a processing unit.

  In one aspect according to the invention described above, the total demand setting processing unit sets the total demand as needed according to the number of learners participating in the business game, thereby obtaining an optimal total demand at that time. It is characterized by setting.

  In one aspect according to the invention described above, the total demand setting processing unit, when there is new decision-making data, records the participation of the learner corresponding to the decision-making data, and stores the new decision-making data. Substituting into learner data, adding 1 to the total number of participants, if there is no new decision data and there is no previous decision data, initialize the learner data and the total number of participants, If there is no new decision data and there is previous decision data, the previous decision data is adopted as this decision data, and the previous value is maintained as the total number of participants. Also, it is characterized in that the total demand is calculated by multiplying the reference demand indicating the demand per participant per round by the total number of participants.

  In one aspect of the invention described above, the grade evaluation processing unit calculates a maximum value, a minimum value, and an average value for each item of management results of all participants, which is a grade evaluation standard, and the same for each learner. The item is characterized by obtaining superiority or inferiority in comparison with the evaluation criteria, determining the rank of each learner according to the superiority or inferiority, and displaying a message notifying the rank performance of each learner on the learner terminal. .

  In one aspect of the invention described above, the improvement point advice processing unit extracts the cause of the change when there is an item that has changed beyond a predetermined change rate for each item of management results of all participants, The improvement message for the cause is displayed on the learner terminal.

  In order to solve the above-described problem, according to one aspect of the present invention, a computer that executes a business game based on decision-making data input from a plurality of learner terminals is described as a procedure for executing the business game. A scenario database that stores the scenario, an execution processing unit that interprets and executes the scenario stored in the scenario database at predetermined time intervals, and the decision-making data is input from the learner terminal for each round A determining unit that determines whether or not the decision making data has been input, a total demand setting processing unit that sets a total demand according to the number of learners when the determining unit determines that the decision-making data has been input; A total demand distribution processing unit that distributes demand in association with a learner, and a distribution result distributed by the total demand distribution processing unit is displayed on the learner terminal. A result display processing unit; a grade evaluation processing unit for calculating the learner's grade and displaying the grade by the learner terminal; and an improvement point advice processing unit for presenting a learner's improvement based on the grade; , A business game execution management program for functioning as

  In order to solve the above-described problem, one aspect of the present invention is a business game execution management method for executing a business game based on decision-making data input from a plurality of learner terminals, wherein a predetermined time The execution processing unit interprets and executes the scenario in which the execution procedure of the business game is described at intervals, and whether the determination unit inputs the decision-making data from the learner terminal for each round. A total demand setting process in which the total demand setting processing unit sets the total demand according to the number of learners when it is determined in the determination step that the decision-making data has been input. A total demand distribution processing step in which the total demand distribution processing unit distributes the total demand in association with a learner, and distribution in the total demand distribution processing step A result display processing step in which the result display processing unit displays the distributed result on the learner terminal, and a result in which the result evaluation processing unit calculates the learner's score and displays the score on the learner terminal. A business game execution management method comprising: an evaluation processing step; and an improvement point advice processing unit that presents an improvement point advice processing step for presenting a learner's improvement point based on the score.

  According to the present invention, supervisory management is unnecessary, and the burden of implementation can be reduced.

It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the business game system by embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the scenario stored in the scenario database by this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the scenario stored in the scenario database by this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the scenario stored in the scenario database by this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the scenario stored in the scenario database by this embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the scenario stored in the scenario database by this embodiment. It is a flowchart for demonstrating operation | movement of the business game execution management server by this embodiment. It is a conceptual diagram which shows the scenario (a part of FIGS. 2-6) of the total demand setting process by this embodiment. It is a flowchart for demonstrating operation | movement of the total demand setting process by this embodiment. It is a conceptual diagram which shows the scenario (a part of FIGS. 2-6) of the results evaluation process by this embodiment. It is a flowchart for demonstrating operation | movement of the results evaluation process by this embodiment. It is a conceptual diagram which shows the scenario (a part of FIGS. 2-6) of the improvement point advice process by this embodiment. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the operation | movement of the improvement point advice process by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (input screen) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (data input condition) of the supervisor terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (result display) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (improvement point message) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (data input condition) of the supervisor terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (result display) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (input screen) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (result display) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (improvement point message) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (result display) of the learner terminal by this embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows an example of the display screen (score evaluation message) of the learner terminal by this embodiment.

Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a business game system 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, a business game system 1 includes a business game execution management server (business game execution management device) 10, a supervisor terminal 11, and learner terminals 12-1, 12-2, ..., 12-n. Is done. The business game execution management server 10, the supervisor terminal 11, and the learner terminals 12-1 to 12-n may be installed anywhere as long as the environment is connected to the network 13. In the following description, the learner terminals 12-1 to 12-n are collectively or individually referred to as learner terminals 12.

  The business game execution management server 10 includes a scenario execution unit 10-1, a scenario database 10-2, a reference demand database 10-3, a message database 10-4, and a change cause database 10-5. The scenario execution unit 10-1 realizes a business game by interpreting and executing a business game scenario stored in the scenario database 10-2, for example, a manufacturing industry, a retail industry, a service industry, or the like. The scenario describes the execution procedure of the business game, and is a source code in a text format so that it can be easily created by a supervisor who is a user.

  Specifically, the scenario execution unit 10-1 includes an execution processing unit that interprets and executes a scenario, a determination unit that determines whether or not decision-making data has been input by a learner, and participates in a game for each round. The total demand setting processing unit that sets the optimal total demand according to the number of learners, the total demand distribution processing unit that allocates the total demand according to the decision-making data of the learner, and the result display processing unit that displays the allocated result An achievement evaluation processing unit that evaluates the learner's results and an improvement point advice processing unit that presents improvement points based on the learner's results are realized. Detailed functions and operations of each processing unit will be described below.

  The scenario database 10-2 stores various data necessary for scenario execution in addition to the scenario. The reference demand database 10-3 stores the reference demand for each round (demand per participant). The message database 10-4 stores various messages to be presented to the learner terminal 12. The change cause database 10-5 is considered to be the cause that each item of the management effect (for example, sales, number of sales, etc.) of the learner has changed more than the previous round (decreased beyond a predetermined change rate). An environment (such as own decision-making data) and an external environment (such as decision-making data of other learners) are stored as patterns assumed in advance.

  The supervisor terminal 11 is operated by the supervisor, accesses the business game execution management server 10 on the web browser, and executes the business game on the web browser. For example, the supervisor terminal 11 causes the business game execution management server 10 to register the input learner ID (user code) and password. In addition, the screen of the supervisor terminal 11 displays the data input status of the learner.

  The learner terminal 12 is operated by the learner and, like the supervisor terminal 11, accesses the business game execution management server 10 on the web browser and executes the business game on the web browser. The learner terminal 12 registers in the business game execution management server 10 when the decision data (for example, the sale price of the product) designated by the game is input by the learner.

  In the business game execution management server 10, when the scenario execution unit 10-1 starts a program describing a business game scenario stored in the scenario database 10-2, the network is transferred from the supervisor terminal 11 and the learner terminal 12 to the network. The desired time can be accessed 24 hours a day via 13.

  The business game execution management server 10 has a timer management function, and starts the business game execution process by the scenario execution unit 10-1 at a time interval (for example, one hour interval) designated by the supervisor. In the business game execution management server 10, the scenario execution unit 10-1 analyzes and calculates the content of the decision-making data of the learner by interpreting and executing the activated scenario, and the management result (for example, sales) , Profit, etc.) and the result is displayed on the learner terminal 12 so that the learner can confirm it. The learner confirms his management result displayed on the learner terminal 12 and makes the next decision.

  In the business game system 1 of the present embodiment, the above series of processing is repeated a specified number of times. One repetition is called a round. In this way, the game progresses sequentially one round at a time. Then, when a predetermined period (for example, one week or a predetermined round) elapses, the game ends and access by the learner terminal 12 becomes impossible.

  Thus, in this embodiment, since the business game execution management server 10 realizes the automatic progress of the business game, management of the supervisor becomes unnecessary, and the burden of implementation can be reduced. In addition, the learner can learn anytime and anywhere, and in particular, it can increase opportunities for members of society to learn. In the present embodiment, in order to realize automatic progress of a business game, the following functions are provided.

  2 to 6 are diagrams showing examples of scenarios stored in the scenario database 10-2 according to the present embodiment. The scenario is described in a text format, for example. The scenario execution unit 10-1 of the business game execution management server 10 realizes a series of processes of a business game by interpreting and executing the scenario.

The meaning of each instruction used in the scenario is as follows.
The “gcon” command sets a constant that is common to each team throughout all rounds in the game.
“Tvar” defines (sets) a team variable representing the state of each team that performs a business game.
The “tlet” instruction indicates a calculation execution or substitution execution of a team variable.
The “tlet if () {}” instruction means that if {) is true, {} is executed.
The “svar” command defines (sets) one variable common to all teams in each round.
The “slet” instruction sets the contents of the variable specified by “svar”.
The [ivar] instruction specifies an input variable. When text input is performed, an input area of n characters × m lines is displayed by designating “texarea nm” (n and m are numerical values). The learner inputs text into this input area.
The “opage” command means output page, and displays on the screen.
The “<P> ˜ </ P>” instruction displays the text of “˜” part on the screen. The part enclosed by $ {} means to display the contents (text) of the variable name.

  In the scenario shown in the figure, line number 37 defines the number of teams “5”, and line number 38 defines the maximum number of rounds “6” (can be executed up to one less than the number set here). . In line numbers 42 to 45, a process for prompting the learner to input decision data (sales price) and the reason for the decision is performed. Line numbers 49 to 57 define variables used in the game. Line numbers 64 to 97 are “total demand setting processing logic” to be described later.

  In line numbers 99 to 111, general administrative expenses, number of customers (= total demand / sales price), sales (= sales price / number of customers), cost of sales (= material cost * number of customers), gross profit ( = Sales-cost of sales), operating profit (= gross profit-general administrative expenses), and cumulative operating profit (= cumulative operating profit @ 1 + operating profit). The above “@ 1” means the cumulative operating profit of the previous round.

  Next, line numbers 113 to 128 are “logic for improvement point advice processing” to the learner terminal 12, and line numbers 132 to 163 are “logic for evaluation evaluation process” to the learner terminal 12. Further, line numbers 165 to 206 are “result display process logic” to the learner terminal 12. The above-mentioned “logic for improving point advice processing”, “logic for score evaluation processing”, and “logic for result display processing” will also be described later.

(1) Business Game Execution Processing Procedure FIG. 7 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the business game execution management server 10 according to the present embodiment. In the business game execution management server 10, the scenario execution unit 10-1 interprets and executes the business game scenario stored in the scenario database 10-2 at a specified time interval.

  First, in the game execution process, it is determined whether all the learners registered to participate in the business game have input the decision data (sales price) for the current round (step S1: determination unit). If all the members have not input data (no step S1), the process waits until the data is input. On the other hand, if all the members have input data (step S1 is present), the process proceeds to step S2.

  In a normal business game, if there is a learner who has not entered any data, a process that distributes the total demand cannot be executed. In the face-to-face class, the supervisor needs to prompt the learner to input decision-making data, which is one of the burdens on the supervisor. In this case, for example, there is a method in which the system forcibly inputs an initial value to advance the execution process.

  Further, unlike the face-to-face class, the learner inputs decision-making data at an arbitrary time point in a predetermined period (for example, one week). Therefore, how many learners are participating in the game at a certain point changes dynamically. In general, the business game has a structure in which the total demand is determined by multiplying the number of learners by the reference demand per person, and this is distributed to each learner based on the quality of the decision-making data. If the number of learners participating changes, this mechanism does not work well, and when the number of learners participating is small, the amount to be distributed increases, which is not preferable for the educational effect.

  Therefore, in the present embodiment, the total demand setting process is executed, and the total demand is set as needed according to the number of learners participating in the game, thereby setting the optimum total demand at that time ( Step S2: Total demand setting processing unit). Details of the total demand setting process will be described later.

  Next, in the business game execution management server 10, the scenario execution unit 10-1 performs a process of distributing the set total demand to each learner (step S3: total demand distribution processing unit), and the learner terminal 12 The result is displayed (step S4: result display processing unit). Next, it is determined whether or not the scheduled number of rounds and the period have ended (step S5). If not (NO in step S5), the process returns to step S1 and the above-described processing is repeated.

  On the other hand, when the scheduled number of rounds or the period is over (YES in step S5), a score that is a game result of the learner is calculated, and a score evaluation process for presenting the score to the learner is executed (step S6). : Grade evaluation processing section), and an improvement point advice process for presenting the learner's improvement points based on the above grade is executed (step S7: improvement point advice processing section) to support the learner's learning. Details of the grade evaluation process and improvement point advice process will be described later.

  In the flowchart shown in FIG. 7, the grade evaluation process and the improvement point advice process are executed after all scheduled rounds are completed. However, every time one round is completed, the grade evaluation process and the improvement points are performed. Advice processing may be executed. By executing the grade evaluation process and the improvement point advice process for each round, the learner can be advised in real time for each round.

(2) Total demand setting process FIG. 8: is a conceptual diagram which shows the scenario (a part of FIGS. 2-6) of the total demand setting process by this embodiment. FIG. 9 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the total demand setting process according to the present embodiment. In this embodiment, the function which sets the optimal total demand is implement | achieved by the number of the learners who participate in the game for every round.

  In FIG. 8, in line numbers 64 to 68, if the decision-making data is input, the input value is used as the selling price, and if it is not input, the previous value is continued. In line numbers 70 to 74, a game participation flag indicating presence / absence of participation in the game is set according to the input of the decision data. Line numbers 91 to 97 define the base demand and the total demand, and calculate the base demand and the total demand.

  In FIG. 9, in the total demand setting process, it is first determined whether or not there is new input data (decision data input) (step S10). If there is new input data (decision data input) (in step S10), as a first participation setting process, the new participation flag is set to 1, the learner's participation is recorded, and the new input data is stored. Substituting into the learner data to be adopted as decision-making data, 1 is added to the total number of participants (step S11). The same applies when there is a learner who has newly joined the game at a certain point in time.

  On the other hand, if there is no new input data (decision data input) (no step S10), it is determined whether there is previous input data (step S12). If there is no previous input data (no step S12), the number of learners participating in the initial state is zero and there is no new input data or previous input data. As setting processing, both learner data and management result data are initialized (for example, zero), and the total number of participants is also set to zero (step S13).

  In addition, when there is no new input data (decision input) (no step S10) and there is previous input data (step S12), for example, a learner who has once participated in the game is next for some reason. This is equivalent to the case where no decision-making data is input at the time, so as the continuation setting process, the previous input data is adopted as the current decision-making data, and the previous value is maintained as the total number of participants (step S14). . Thereby, the continuity of the game can be maintained. This simulates that even in a real-world business, if the sales interval is not changed, the previous value is maintained.

  After that, as the total demand calculation process, the standard demand for each round (demand per participant) is acquired from the standard demand database 10-3, and the total demand is calculated by multiplying this standard demand by the total number of participants. (Step S15).

(3) Grade Evaluation Processing FIG. 10 is a conceptual diagram showing a scenario of grade assessment processing according to this embodiment (part of FIGS. 2 to 6). FIG. 11 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the grade evaluation process according to this embodiment. It is indispensable for the educational effect that the performance evaluation is performed at the time when the game time is finished or when each learner finishes a certain number of decisions.

  In FIG. 10, it is defined that the last round is “5” at line number 132, the ranks of learners are obtained at line numbers 133 to 135, and messages according to the ranks are displayed at line numbers 136 to 142. I do. Actually, the team and message of the highest operating profit are displayed at the line numbers 146 to 163 in the scenario shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 11, in the grade evaluation process, first, as an evaluation standard creation process, the maximum value, the minimum value, the average value, etc. are determined for each item (for example, profit) of the management results of all participants, which becomes the standard for grade evaluation. Calculate (step S20: line numbers 116 to 118 in FIG. 4). Next, as the subject evaluation process, superiority or inferiority is obtained for the same item of each learner as compared with the above evaluation criteria, and the rank of each learner is determined according to this superiority (step S21). Next, an optimum message corresponding to the grade is extracted for each learner from the message database 10-4 (step S22), and is displayed on the learner terminal together with the grade data (step S23).

(4) Improvement Point Advice Processing FIG. 12 is a conceptual diagram showing a scenario of improvement point advice processing according to this embodiment (part of FIGS. 2 to 6). FIG. 13 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of improvement point advice processing according to this embodiment. After the game is over, it is highly educational for the learner to look back on his management results and consider improvements.

  In FIG. 12, the highest price, the lowest price, and the average price are calculated at line numbers 113 to 118, and each item (for example, sales, sales number, etc.) of the management effect of the learner is calculated at line numbers 120 to 128. A round that has changed more than the previous round (exceeding a predetermined rate of change) is extracted, the cause of the change is extracted, and an improvement advice message is displayed.

  In FIG. 13, in the improvement point advice processing, as the change point extraction processing, a round in which each item (for example, sales, number of sales, etc.) of the learner's management effect has changed (for example, decreased) more than the previous round is extracted. (Step S30). Next, as a change cause extraction process, an internal environment (such as own decision data) and an external environment (such as other learners' decision data) that are considered to be the cause of a large change are converted into a change cause database (preliminarily assumed). 10-5 registered) (step S31). And the advice message of the optimal improvement point with respect to the determined change cause is extracted from the message database 10-4 (step S32), and is displayed on the learner terminal 12 (step S33).

  Next, the progress of the business game (restaurant game) by the business game execution management server 10 of this embodiment will be described. 14 to 24 are schematic diagrams illustrating examples of display screens of the learner terminal 12 and the supervisor terminal 11 according to the present embodiment. In the following, in the flowchart shown in FIG. 7, a case will be described in which the improvement point advice process is executed at the end of each round and the grade evaluation process is executed after the end of all rounds. The learner is called a player.

  First, the rules of the restaurant game will be described. In this restaurant game, the player inputs the daily lunch sales price (decision data) from the learner terminal 12. The lower the price, the more customers will enter. Each player shares customers with other stores (other learners). The number of customers changes every day with around 150 people per store. The learner terminal 12 displays the daily operating profit and the cumulative operating profit from the first day. The team with the highest cumulative operating profit wins.

  5 teams will conduct 5 rounds (1 round is equivalent to 1 day). The game is automatically advanced every hour (00 minutes). If the player has entered a sales price, that value is used. This value continues until the next data entry.

(1st round)
In the first round, the input screen shown in FIG. 14 is displayed on the screen of the learner terminal 12 of the player of team # 1. From the learner terminal 12, the player inputs 700 yen as the selling price (decision-making data) and the reason “I decided with the intuition to see the situation on the first day”. Similarly, Team # 2 and Team # 3 input 700 yen and the reason. Team # 4 and team # 5 have not yet participated in the game.

  When the decision-making reason is input, the business game execution management server 10 determines that the player has participated in the game, and sets the total demand for the number of participants (step S2 in FIG. 7, or FIGS. 8, 9). Refer to the total demand setting process shown in Next, at every hour on the hour (00 minutes), the game is automatically advanced, and the business game execution management server automatically inputs an initial value (0 in this game) to a player who has not input data.

  The supervisor terminal 11 displays a data input status screen shown in FIG. In the data input status screen shown in FIG. 15, the horizontal is the team number and the vertical is the round number. On the data input status screen, in the first round, the teams # 1, # 2, and # 3 are input by the player, so the circles, and the teams # 4 and # 5 are input by the computer without being input by the player. A ▲ mark is displayed.

(2nd round)
Next, the business game execution management server 10 proceeds to the second round and displays the calculation result (model calculation result) as shown in FIG. 16 on the screen of the learner terminal 12 (step S4 in FIG. 7: result). Display processing). Since 3 teams are participating, the demand is about 150 people x 3 stores. When the number of participating teams increases, the number automatically increases (step S2 in FIG. 7: total demand setting process).

  Since teams # 1, # 2, and # 3 have also given a price of 700 yen, the number of customers visiting the store is divided into three equal parts, and sales and operating profit are calculated (step S3 in FIG. 7: total demand distribution process). Further, a message as shown in FIG. 17 is displayed on the screen of the learner terminal 12 regarding the operating profit and the accumulated operating profit (step S7 in FIG. 7: improvement point advice processing). In the example shown in the figure, messages such as “1. Cumulative sales history of top team is 13200 yen” and “2. The highest operating profit so far is 3200 yen for 3 teams” are displayed.

  From the second round, team # 4 participates, inputs the price of 800 yen and the reason for decision making, and team # 5 has not yet participated in the game. Teams # 1, # 2, and # 3 have entered the next hour (00 minutes) without entering data, so the business game execution management server 10 adopts and inputs the previous input value of 700 yen. The initial value 0 is automatically input to team # 5 (step S2 in FIG. 7: total demand setting process).

  The supervisor terminal 11 displays a data input status screen shown in FIG. In the data input situation screen shown in FIG. 18, in the second round, teams # 1, # 2, and # 3 have entered the previous input value 700 yen without the data being input by the business game execution management server 10. A ▲ mark is displayed. Team # 4 newly participated and entered the price of 800 yen and the reason for decision making, so that the circle is marked with ○, and the business game execution management server 10 automatically entered the initial value of 0 for team # 5. Is displayed.

(3rd round)
Next, the business game execution management server 10 proceeds to the third round and displays the calculation result as shown in FIG. 19 on the screen of the learner terminal (step S4 in FIG. 7: result display process). Since the number of participating teams has reached 4, demand has increased to about 150 people x 4 = 600. Team # 4 has a small number of customers due to its high price, but its operating profit is higher than other stores (19,000 yen).

  Team # 5 participates in the third round and inputs 600 yen and the reason. Team # 1 lowers the price to 500 yen and inputs the reason "increase the number of customers at a low price". FIG. 20 shows an input screen for team # 1. Since the next hour (00 minutes) has arrived without the other teams entering the data, the business game execution management server 10 performs automatic data input and model calculation, and learns the calculation results as shown in FIG. Displayed on the screen of the person terminal 12.

  As shown in FIG. 21, since 5 teams participated in the screen of the learner terminal 12 as a result of the third round, the demand has increased to about 150 people × 5 = 750 people. Team # 1 lowered the price to 500 yen, so the number of customers increased to 191, but operating profit was in the red (-11,800 yen).

  The business game execution management server 10 analyzes the cause of the operating profit change and the improvement point, and displays an advice message as shown in FIG. 22 on the learner terminal 12 of the team # 1 (step S7 in FIG. 7: improvement point advice). processing). In the example shown in the figure, “1. The operating profit is decreasing because the selling price is low. How about raising the selling price a little?”, “2. The cumulative operating profit of the top team is 31200 yen”, “3. "The highest operating profit so far is 4 teams, 19000 yen."

(Round 4 & Round 5)
Thereafter, the team # 1 raises the price to 800 yen, and the fourth round and the fifth round (final round) are automatically advanced without inputting other teams. As shown in FIG. 23, the result display of the fifth round (final round) is displayed on the learner terminal 12 (step S4 in FIG. 7: result display process). As Team # 1 raised the price to 800 yen, it can be seen that operating profit has returned to the black of “17,500 yen”.

  When the final round is completed, the business game execution management server 10 evaluates the results of each team and displays a message on the learner terminal 12 (step S6 in FIG. 7: results evaluation processing). In the example shown in the figure, “1. Your rank was 4th out of 5 teams. Let's do our best.”, “2. Cumulative operating profit of top team is 63,000 yen.”, “3. The message “The highest operating profit is 17500 yen for 4 teams” is displayed.

  According to the above-described embodiment, management by a supervisor becomes unnecessary, and the burden of implementation can be reduced. In addition, the learner can learn anytime and anywhere, and in particular, can increase the learning opportunities of working adults.

  As mentioned above, although embodiment of this invention was explained in full detail with reference to drawings, the specific structure is not restricted to that embodiment, The design of the range which does not deviate from the summary of this invention, etc. are included.

1 Business Game System 10 Business Game Execution Management Server (Business Game Execution Management Device)
10-1 Scenario Execution Unit 10-2 Scenario Database 10-3 Standard Demand Database 10-4 Message Database 10-5 Change Cause Database 11 Supervisor Terminal 12, 12-1 to 12-n Learner Terminal

Claims (7)

A business game execution management device that executes a business game based on decision-making data input from a plurality of learner terminals,
A scenario database storing a scenario in which the execution procedure of the business game is described;
An execution processing unit that interprets and executes the scenario stored in the scenario database at a predetermined time interval;
A discriminator for discriminating whether or not the decision-making data is input from the learner terminal for each round;
When the determination unit determines that the decision-making data is input, a total demand setting processing unit that sets a total demand according to the number of learners;
A total demand distribution processing unit that distributes the total demand in association with learners;
A result display processing unit that causes the learner terminal to display a distribution result distributed by the total demand distribution processing unit;
A grade evaluation processing unit for calculating a grade of the learner and displaying the grade by the learner terminal;
Based on the results, an improvement point advice processing unit that presents improvement points of the learner,
A business game execution management device comprising: The total demand setting processing unit
2. The business game execution according to claim 1, wherein the optimal total demand at that time is set by setting the total demand as needed according to the number of learners participating in the business game. Management device. The total demand setting processing unit
If there is new decision-making data, record the participation of the learner corresponding to the decision-making data, substitute the new decision-making data into the learner data, add 1 to the total number of participants,
If there is no new decision data and no previous decision data, the learner data and the total number of participants are initialized,
When there is no new decision data and there is previous decision data, the previous decision data is adopted as this decision data, and the previous value is maintained as the total number of participants.
In any case, the total demand is calculated by multiplying the reference demand indicating the demand per participant per round by the total number of participants. The business game execution management device according to claim 2, wherein the total demand is calculated. The grade evaluation processing unit
For each item of the management results of all participants, which is the evaluation criteria of the grade, calculate the maximum value, the minimum value, the average value, and for each item of each learner, determine superiority or inferiority compared to the evaluation criteria, Determine the rank of each learner according to superiority or inferiority, and display a message to notify the rank performance of each learner by the learner terminal
The business game execution management device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein The improvement point advice processing unit
For each item of management results of all participants, if there is an item that has changed beyond a predetermined rate of change, the cause of the change is extracted and an improvement advice message for the cause is displayed on the learner terminal Let
The business game execution management device according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein A computer that executes a business game based on decision-making data input from a plurality of learner terminals,
A scenario database storing a scenario in which the execution procedure of the business game is described;
An execution processing unit that interprets and executes the scenario stored in the scenario database at a predetermined time interval;
A discriminator for discriminating whether or not the decision-making data is input from the learner terminal for each round;
When the determination unit determines that the decision-making data is input, a total demand setting processing unit that sets a total demand according to the number of learners;
A total demand distribution processing unit that distributes the total demand in association with learners;
A result display processing unit that causes the learner terminal to display a distribution result distributed by the total demand distribution processing unit;
A grade evaluation processing unit for calculating a grade of the learner and displaying the grade by the learner terminal;
Based on the results, an improvement point advice processing unit that presents improvement points of the learner,
Business game execution management program to function as. A business game execution management method for executing a business game based on decision-making data input from a plurality of learner terminals,
The execution processing unit interprets and executes a scenario describing the execution procedure of the business game at a predetermined time interval; and
A determination step for determining whether or not the decision-making data is input from the learner terminal for each round, and
In the determination step, when it is determined that the decision-making data has been input, a total demand setting processing unit sets the total demand according to the number of learners,
A total demand distribution processing unit that distributes the total demand in association with learners;
A result display processing step in which the result display processing unit displays the distribution result distributed in the total demand distribution processing step by the learner terminal; and
A grade evaluation processing unit calculates a learner's grade and displays the grade on the learner terminal; and
The improvement point advice processing unit presents the improvement point of the learner based on the score, and the improvement point advice processing step,
A business game execution management method characterized by comprising:

Images