JP2011003013A - Driving evaluation device - Google Patents

Driving evaluation device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2011003013A
JP2011003013A JP2009145489A JP2009145489A JP2011003013A JP 2011003013 A JP2011003013 A JP 2011003013A JP 2009145489 A JP2009145489 A JP 2009145489A JP 2009145489 A JP2009145489 A JP 2009145489A JP 2011003013 A JP2011003013 A JP 2011003013A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
evaluation
driving
time
driver
temporary stop
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2009145489A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5238623B2 (en
Inventor
Yoji Mizoguchi
洋司 溝口
Kazuya Sasaki
和也 佐々木
Osamu Ozaki
修 尾崎
Masumi Obana
麻純 小花
Nobutaka Tauchi
庸貴 田内
Kosuke Yamaoka
功佑 山岡
Tetsuya Oki
哲也 沖
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Denso Corp
Toyota Motor Corp
Original Assignee
Denso Corp
Toyota Motor Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Denso Corp, Toyota Motor Corp filed Critical Denso Corp
Priority to JP2009145489A priority Critical patent/JP5238623B2/en
Publication of JP2011003013A publication Critical patent/JP2011003013A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5238623B2 publication Critical patent/JP5238623B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a driving evaluation device for precisely evaluating the driving act of a driver at a temporary stop place.SOLUTION: When an evaluation block is set in a temporary stop place where it is determined that an own vehicle travels, a driving evaluation device 1 evaluates the operating act of the driver of an own vehicle within an evaluation section when a stop time within the evaluation block is less than a first time t1, and a passing time within the evaluation block is less than a second time t2. Thus, stop or slow moving resulted from disturbance (preceding vehicle, passing vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian or the like) in an easily visible place is excluded, and the driving act of the driver on the basis of temporary stop after consciously confirming safety of the driver to a hardly visible place.

Description

本発明は、一時停止箇所における運転者の運転行動を評価する運転評価装置に関する。   The present invention relates to a driving evaluation apparatus that evaluates a driving behavior of a driver at a temporary stop point.

自車両が一時停止箇所を走行する際に、一時停止箇所を通過したときの通過時間、渋滞状況及びその場所を加味した一時停止履行頻度に基づいて、自車両の運転者に対し、一時停止を履行させるための警報を発する一時停止警報装置が知られている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。   When the host vehicle travels through the temporary stop point, the driver of the host vehicle is temporarily stopped based on the frequency of temporary stop taking into account the transit time when the vehicle passes through the temporary stop point, the traffic congestion status, and the location. There is known a pause alarm device that issues a warning for fulfillment (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

特開2007−17411号公報JP 2007-17411 A

上述したような一時停止警報装置にあっては、視認し難い場所に対して運転者が意識的に安全確認を行った上での一時停止のみについて、一時停止を履行したものと判定することが重要である。つまり、視認し易い場所における外乱(先行車両、通過車両、自転車、歩行者等:以下、単に「外乱」という)に起因した停止においては、視認し難い場所に対して運転者が意識的に安全確認を行っていないおそれがあることから、そのような停止について、一時停止を履行したものと判定することは好ましくない。   In the temporary stop alarm device as described above, it is possible to determine that the temporary stop has been implemented only for the temporary stop after the driver consciously confirms the safety in a place that is difficult to visually recognize. is important. In other words, in a stop caused by a disturbance in a place where it is easy to visually recognize (preceding vehicle, passing vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, etc .; hereinafter simply referred to as “disturbance”), the driver is consciously safe from places that are difficult to see. Since there is a possibility that confirmation has not been performed, it is not preferable to determine that such a stop has been implemented as a temporary stop.

本発明は、このような事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、一時停止箇所における運転者の運転行動を精度良く評価することができる運転評価装置を提供することを目的とする。   This invention is made | formed in view of such a situation, and it aims at providing the driving | running evaluation apparatus which can evaluate a driver | operator's driving action in a temporary stop location with sufficient precision.

上記目的を達成するために、本発明に係る運転評価装置は、運転者による運転を評価する運転評価装置であって、自車両が一時停止箇所を走行すると判定した場合に、一時停止箇所に評価区間を設定する走行場面判定手段と、評価区間を複数の分割区間に分割する分割手段と、を備え、分割区間における走行状態に応じて、当該分割区間を含む評価区間を評価対象とするか否かを決定することを特徴とする。   In order to achieve the above object, a driving evaluation apparatus according to the present invention is a driving evaluation apparatus that evaluates driving by a driver, and is evaluated as a temporary stop position when it is determined that the host vehicle travels through a temporary stop position. Whether or not the evaluation section including the divided section is to be evaluated according to the traveling state in the divided section, comprising: a traveling scene determining means for setting the section; and a dividing means for dividing the evaluation section into a plurality of divided sections. It is characterized by determining.

この運転評価装置では、自車両が走行すると判定された一時停止箇所に評価区間を設定し、その評価区間を複数の分割区間に分割して、分割区間における走行状態に応じて、当該分割区間を含む評価区間を評価対象とするか否かを決定する。これにより、外乱に起因した停止や徐行が除外されて、視認し難い場所に対して運転者が意識的に安全確認を行った上での一時停止に基づいて、運転者の運転行動が評価されることになる。従って、この運転評価装置によれば、一時停止箇所における運転者の運転行動を精度良く評価することができる。なお、走行状態の例としては、通過時間の他、通過速度や停車時間等、通過時間に相当するパラメータを用いることができる。例えば、通過時間が所定時間以上である場合、通過速度が所定速度以下である場合、停車時間が所定時間以上である場合等に、評価対象から除外する。   In this driving evaluation apparatus, an evaluation section is set at a temporary stop point where it is determined that the host vehicle travels, the evaluation section is divided into a plurality of divided sections, and the divided sections are determined according to the driving state in the divided sections. It is determined whether or not to include the evaluation section to be evaluated. As a result, stopping and slowing down due to disturbance are excluded, and the driving behavior of the driver is evaluated based on the temporary stop after the driver consciously confirms safety in a place that is difficult to see. Will be. Therefore, according to this driving evaluation device, it is possible to accurately evaluate the driving behavior of the driver at the temporary stop point. As an example of the traveling state, parameters corresponding to the passing time such as the passing speed and the stop time can be used in addition to the passing time. For example, when the passage time is equal to or longer than a predetermined time, when the passage speed is equal to or lower than the predetermined speed, when the stop time is equal to or longer than the predetermined time, it is excluded from the evaluation target.

また、走行場面判定手段は、自車両の走行軌跡の曲率に基づいて評価区間を設定することが好ましい。この構成によれば、一時停止箇所における運転者の運転行動をより精度良く評価することが可能となる。なお、走行軌跡の曲率は、例えば、舵角、車幅方向の加速度(いわゆる横加速度)、ヨーレート、スリップ角等の車両状態量に基づいて判断することが可能である。また、走行軌跡の曲率は、例えば、ナビゲーションシステム及びGPS情報、車両外部の撮像データ等、車両状態量以外の情報に基づいて判断することも可能である。   Moreover, it is preferable that a driving | running | working scene determination means sets an evaluation area based on the curvature of the driving | running | working locus | trajectory of the own vehicle. According to this configuration, the driving behavior of the driver at the temporary stop point can be evaluated with higher accuracy. The curvature of the travel locus can be determined based on vehicle state quantities such as a steering angle, an acceleration in the vehicle width direction (so-called lateral acceleration), a yaw rate, a slip angle, and the like. Further, the curvature of the travel locus can be determined based on information other than the vehicle state quantity, such as a navigation system and GPS information, imaging data outside the vehicle, and the like.

本発明によれば、一時停止箇所における運転者の運転行動を精度良く評価することができる。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the driver | operator's driving action in the temporary stop location can be evaluated accurately.

本発明に係る運転評価装置の一実施形態の構成を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the structure of one Embodiment of the driving | running evaluation apparatus which concerns on this invention. 図1の走行場面判定部による評価区間の設定手順を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the setting procedure of the evaluation area by the driving scene determination part of FIG. 図1の走行場面判定部による評価区間の設定手順を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the setting procedure of the evaluation area by the driving scene determination part of FIG. 図1の運転評価ECUによって実行される処理を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the process performed by driving | operation evaluation ECU of FIG.

以下、本発明の好適な実施形態について、図面を参照して詳細に説明する。なお、各図において同一又は相当部分には同一符号を付し、重複する説明を省略する。   DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In addition, in each figure, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same or an equivalent part, and the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted.

図1は、本発明に係る運転評価装置の一実施形態の構成を示すブロック図である。図1に示されるように、運転評価装置1は、ナビゲーションシステム2と、操舵角センサ3と、車速センサ4と、加速度センサ5と、運転評価ECU(Electronic Control Unit)6と、ドライブレコーダ(記憶手段)7と、を備えている。運転評価ECU6は、一時停止箇所に設定された評価区間において、視認し難い場所に対して自車両(すなわち、運転評価装置1が搭載された車両)の運転者が意識的に安全確認を行ったか否かに関して、運転者の運転行動を段階的に評価する。   FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an embodiment of a driving evaluation apparatus according to the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, a driving evaluation device 1 includes a navigation system 2, a steering angle sensor 3, a vehicle speed sensor 4, an acceleration sensor 5, a driving evaluation ECU (Electronic Control Unit) 6, a drive recorder (memory). Means) 7. Whether the driver evaluation ECU 6 has consciously confirmed the safety of the driver of the host vehicle (that is, the vehicle on which the driving evaluation device 1 is mounted) for a place that is difficult to see in the evaluation section set as the temporary stop point. The driver's driving behavior is evaluated step by step regarding whether or not.

ナビゲーションシステム2は、複数のGPS衛星から電波を受信することにより自車両の位置を検出するGPS受信部、及び道路構造や施設の位置等を記憶した地図データを有している。ナビゲーションシステム2は、自車両の位置及び地図データに基づいて、自車両が走行する道路上の一時停止箇所に関する情報を運転評価ECU6に送信する。   The navigation system 2 has a GPS receiving unit that detects the position of the host vehicle by receiving radio waves from a plurality of GPS satellites, and map data that stores road structures, facility positions, and the like. The navigation system 2 transmits to the driving evaluation ECU 6 information related to a temporary stop point on the road on which the host vehicle travels based on the position of the host vehicle and map data.

操舵角センサ3は、自車両のステアリングの操舵角を検出して、操舵角に関する情報を運転評価ECU6に送信する。車速センサ4は、自車両の車速を検出して、車速に関する情報を運転評価ECU6に送信し、加速度センサ5は、自車両の前後方向及び左右方向の加速度を検出して、加速度に関する情報を運転評価ECU6に送信する。ドライブレコーダ7は、運転評価ECU6による評価結果を始めとして、自車両の運転状況や運転者の運転行動に関する情報等、種々の情報を記憶する。   The steering angle sensor 3 detects the steering angle of the steering of the host vehicle and transmits information related to the steering angle to the driving evaluation ECU 6. The vehicle speed sensor 4 detects the vehicle speed of the host vehicle and transmits information related to the vehicle speed to the driving evaluation ECU 6, and the acceleration sensor 5 detects acceleration in the front-rear direction and the left-right direction of the host vehicle and drives information related to the acceleration. It transmits to evaluation ECU6. The drive recorder 7 stores various information such as information on the driving situation of the host vehicle and the driving behavior of the driver, starting with the evaluation result by the driving evaluation ECU 6.

運転評価ECU6は、CPU、ROM、RAM等からなる電子制御ユニットであり、運転評価装置1を統括制御する。運転評価ECU6は、ROMに格納されているアプリケーションプログラムをRAM上にロードし、CPUで実行することによって、走行場面判定部(走行場面判定手段)8、停止時間判定部(停止時間判定手段)9、通過時間判定部(通過時間判定手段)11及び運転行動評価部(運転行動評価手段)12をソフトウェアで構成する。   The driving evaluation ECU 6 is an electronic control unit including a CPU, a ROM, a RAM, and the like, and comprehensively controls the driving evaluation apparatus 1. The driving evaluation ECU 6 loads an application program stored in the ROM onto the RAM and executes it by the CPU, whereby a driving scene determination unit (driving scene determination unit) 8 and a stop time determination unit (stop time determination unit) 9 are obtained. The transit time determination unit (passage time determination unit) 11 and the driving behavior evaluation unit (driving behavior evaluation unit) 12 are configured by software.

走行場面判定部8は、ナビゲーションシステム2から取得した情報(自車両が走行する道路上の一時停止箇所に関する情報を含む)、
操舵角センサ3から取得した操舵角に関する情報、車速センサ4から取得した車速に関する情報、加速度センサ5から取得した加速度に関する情報等を利用して、交差点での右折又は左折、車線変更、加速又は減速、コーナリング等の自車両の走行場面を判定する。走行場面が交差点での右折又は左折である場合、走行場面判定部8は、自車両が走行する道路上の一時停止箇所に関する情報に基づいて、自車両が一時停止箇所を走行するか否かを判定する。そして、自車両が一時停止箇所を走行すると判定した場合には、走行場面判定部8は、操舵角に関する情報に基づいて、自車両が走行する一時停止箇所に評価区間を設定する。
The travel scene determination unit 8 includes information acquired from the navigation system 2 (including information on a temporary stop point on the road on which the host vehicle travels),
Using the information about the steering angle acquired from the steering angle sensor 3, the information about the vehicle speed acquired from the vehicle speed sensor 4, the information about the acceleration acquired from the acceleration sensor 5, etc., turn right or left at the intersection, lane change, acceleration or deceleration The traveling scene of the vehicle such as cornering is determined. When the traveling scene is a right turn or a left turn at an intersection, the traveling scene determination unit 8 determines whether or not the host vehicle travels through the temporary stop point based on information on the temporary stop point on the road on which the host vehicle travels. judge. And when it determines with the own vehicle driving | running | working a temporary stop location, the driving scene determination part 8 sets an evaluation area in the temporary stop location where the own vehicle drive | works based on the information regarding a steering angle.

図2及び3は、図1の走行場面判定部による評価区間の設定手順を説明するための図である。図2に示されるように、走行場面判定部8は、自車両Vが走行する道路R1が優先道路R2と交差する交差点の一時停止箇所Sにおいて、自車両Vの操舵角がδ(例えば200deg)以上となった場合に右折又は左折場面と判定する。そして、走行場面判定部8は、右折又は左折に伴う操舵角が最大となった地点に最も近く、且つステアリングの切り始めの際に操舵角がδ以上となった地点をP(s)とし、右折又は左折に伴う操舵角が最大となった地点に最も近く、且つステアリングの切り戻しの際に操舵角がδ以下となった地点をP(e)として、P(s)とP(e)との中央地点をP(c)とする。   2 and 3 are diagrams for explaining the procedure for setting the evaluation section by the traveling scene determination unit in FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the traveling scene determination unit 8 determines that the steering angle of the host vehicle V is δ (for example, 200 deg) at the temporary stop point S at the intersection where the road R1 on which the host vehicle V travels intersects the priority road R2. When it becomes above, it judges with the right turn or the left turn scene. Then, the traveling scene determination unit 8 sets P (s) as the point closest to the point where the steering angle associated with the right or left turn is maximized and the steering angle becomes δ or more at the start of turning of the steering wheel, P (s) and P (e) are defined as P (e), where P (e) is the point closest to the point at which the steering angle associated with the right or left turn is maximized and the steering angle is less than or equal to δ when the steering is turned back. Let P (c) be the central point.

このように、P(s)とP(e)との中央地点P(c)を求めるのは、右折又は左折の際に同一の運転者が同じ右折又は左折行動をとっても、操舵角が最大となる地点がばらついてしまうからである。なお、同一の運転者であっても、右折と左折とで操舵の仕方が異なり得るため、右折と左折とでδの値を異ならせてもよい。   Thus, the central point P (c) between P (s) and P (e) is obtained because the steering angle is maximum even if the same driver takes the same right or left turn action at the time of right turn or left turn. This is because the points will vary. Even if the driver is the same, the steering method may be different between a right turn and a left turn, so the value of δ may be different between a right turn and a left turn.

続いて、図3に示されるように、走行場面判定部8は、地点P(c)から手前に向かって所定の距離(例えば1m)おきの地点をそれぞれP(1),P(2)・・・P(n)(例えばn=9)とする。そして、走行場面判定部8は、P(3)とP(n−1)との間の区間を評価区間Aと設定し、P(c)とP(1)との間の区間、P(1)とP(2)との間の区間・・・P(n−1)とP(n)との間の区間をそれぞれ分割区間D(1),D(2)・・・D(n)と設定する。P(3)とP(n−1)との間の区間が評価区間Aと設定されるのは、一時停止箇所において視認し難い場所に対して運転者が意識的に安全確認を行ったか否かに関する運転評価という観点からは、一時停止位置の手前のエリアが運転評価の対象エリアとして適切だからである。   Subsequently, as shown in FIG. 3, the traveling scene determination unit 8 selects points at predetermined distances (for example, 1 m) from the point P (c) toward the front, respectively P (1), P (2) · .. P (n) (for example, n = 9). Then, the traveling scene determination unit 8 sets a section between P (3) and P (n-1) as an evaluation section A, and a section between P (c) and P (1), P ( A section between 1) and P (2)... P (n-1) and a section between P (n) are divided into sections D (1), D (2). ) And set. The section between P (3) and P (n-1) is set as the evaluation section A because the driver has consciously confirmed safety for a place that is difficult to see at the temporary stop. This is because the area in front of the temporary stop position is appropriate as the target area for driving evaluation from the viewpoint of driving evaluation.

停止時間判定部9は、走行場面判定部8によって設定された評価区間A内で自車両Vが停止したと想定される停止時間が第1の時間t1以上であるか否かを判定する。ここでは、停止時間判定部9は、分割区間D(3)〜D(n)のそれぞれを自車両Vが通過する通過時間が時間t1秒以上であるか否かを判定することにより、評価区間A内での停止時間が時間t1以上であるか否かを判定する。一例として、停止時間判定部9は、1mの各分割区間D(3)〜D(9)を自車両Vが通過する通過時間が5秒以上であるか否かを判定することにより、停止時間が5秒以上であるか否かを判定する。その理由は、次の通りである。   The stop time determination unit 9 determines whether or not the stop time that the host vehicle V is assumed to have stopped in the evaluation section A set by the traveling scene determination unit 8 is equal to or longer than the first time t1. Here, the stop time determination unit 9 determines whether or not the passing time during which the host vehicle V passes through each of the divided sections D (3) to D (n) is equal to or longer than the time t1 second. It is determined whether or not the stop time in A is longer than time t1. As an example, the stop time determination unit 9 determines whether or not the passing time for the host vehicle V to pass through each 1m divided section D (3) to D (9) is 5 seconds or more, thereby determining the stop time. It is determined whether or not is longer than 5 seconds. The reason is as follows.

後述するように、運転評価ECU6は、停止時間が5秒未満であるときに、視認し難い場所に対して自車両Vの運転者が意識的に安全確認を行ったか否かに関して、運転者の運転行動を評価する。一時停止位置において運転者が意識的に安全確認を行った場合、その平均時間は2秒程度であるが、本来は、右・左・右と確実に首を振るような十分な安全確認が推奨され、その推奨時間は3秒程度である。ただし、実際には推奨時間にマージンを取る必要がある。そこで、運転評価ECU6は、停止時間が5秒以上であるときには、外乱に起因して停止させられたものとして運転者の運転行動を評価せず、停止時間が5秒未満であるときに、運転者の運転行動を評価するのである。なお、分割区間D(3)〜D(9)を判定対象とするのは、一時停止位置付近に停止した先行車両に起因して自車両Vが停止させられた場合等を確実に除外するためである。   As will be described later, when the stop time is less than 5 seconds, the driving evaluation ECU 6 determines whether or not the driver of the host vehicle V has consciously confirmed safety for a place that is difficult to visually recognize. Evaluate driving behavior. When the driver consciously checks the safety at the temporary stop position, the average time is about 2 seconds. However, it is recommended to check the safety enough to shake the head right, left and right. The recommended time is about 3 seconds. However, it is actually necessary to take a margin for the recommended time. Therefore, the driving evaluation ECU 6 does not evaluate the driving behavior of the driver as being stopped due to a disturbance when the stop time is 5 seconds or more, and when the stop time is less than 5 seconds, The driver's driving behavior is evaluated. The reason why the divided sections D (3) to D (9) are to be determined is to exclude the case where the host vehicle V is stopped due to the preceding vehicle stopped near the temporary stop position. It is.

通過時間判定部11は、走行場面判定部8によって設定された評価区間Aを自車両Vが通過する通過時間が第2の時間t2以上であるか否かを判定する。一例として、通過時間判定部11は、P(3)とP(8)との間の5mの区間を自車両Vが通過する通過時間が10秒以上であるか否かを判定する。その理由は、次の通りである。   The passage time determination unit 11 determines whether or not the passage time for the host vehicle V to pass through the evaluation section A set by the traveling scene determination unit 8 is equal to or longer than the second time t2. As an example, the passage time determination unit 11 determines whether or not the passage time for the host vehicle V to pass through a 5 m section between P (3) and P (8) is 10 seconds or more. The reason is as follows.

後述するように、運転評価ECU6は、通過時間が10秒未満であるときに、視認し難い場所に対して自車両Vの運転者が意識的に安全確認を行ったか否かに関して、運転者の運転行動を評価する。ここで、通過時間が10秒であって、上述したように停止時間が5秒である場合、P(3)とP(8)との間の5mの区間における自車両Vの平均速度は3.6km/hとなり、人間の歩行速度(4km/h)よりも遅くなる。そこで、運転評価ECU6は、通過時間が10秒以上であるときには、外乱に起因して徐行させられたり、或いは2回以上停止させられたりしたものとして、運転者の運転行動を評価せず、通過時間が10秒未満であるときに、運転者の運転行動を評価するのである。なお、P(3)とP(8)との間の区間を判定対象とするのは、一時停止位置付近に停止した先行車両に起因して自車両Vが停止させられた場合等を確実に除外するためである。   As will be described later, the driving evaluation ECU 6 determines whether or not the driver of the host vehicle V has consciously confirmed safety for a place that is difficult to visually recognize when the passing time is less than 10 seconds. Evaluate driving behavior. Here, when the passing time is 10 seconds and the stop time is 5 seconds as described above, the average speed of the host vehicle V in the 5 m section between P (3) and P (8) is 3 .6 km / h, which is slower than the human walking speed (4 km / h). Therefore, when the passing time is 10 seconds or more, the driving evaluation ECU 6 does not evaluate the driving behavior of the driver as being slowed down due to a disturbance or stopped twice or more, and does not pass. When the time is less than 10 seconds, the driving behavior of the driver is evaluated. It should be noted that the section between P (3) and P (8) is determined as a determination target when the host vehicle V is stopped due to a preceding vehicle stopped near the temporary stop position. This is because it is excluded.

運転行動評価部12は、走行場面判定部8によって評価区間Aが設定された場合において、停止時間判定部9によって停止時間が時間t1未満であると判定され、且つ通過時間判定部11によって通過時間が時間t2未満であると判定されたときに、評価区間Aを自車両Vが通過する通過時間に基づいて、評価区間Aにおける自車両Vの運転者の運転行動を評価し、その評価結果をドライブレコーダ7に記憶させる。ここでは、運転行動評価部12は、評価区間Aを自車両Vが通過する通過時間が時間t2未満の範囲内において長いほど、運転者の安全確認時間が長いものとして、運転行動を評価する。   When the evaluation section A is set by the driving scene determination unit 8, the driving behavior evaluation unit 12 determines that the stop time is less than the time t <b> 1 by the stop time determination unit 9 and the passing time by the passage time determination unit 11. Is determined to be less than time t2, the driving behavior of the driver of the host vehicle V in the evaluation section A is evaluated based on the transit time for the host vehicle V to pass through the evaluation section A, and the evaluation result is The data is stored in the drive recorder 7. Here, the driving behavior evaluation unit 12 evaluates the driving behavior on the assumption that the driver's safety confirmation time is longer as the passing time through which the host vehicle V passes through the evaluation section A is longer than the time t2.

例えば、運転行動評価部12は、P(3)とP(8)との間の5mの区間を自車両Vが通過する通過時間が4秒以上10秒未満である場合には「一時停止しており、視認し難い場所に対して意識的に安全確認を行っている:Ca」と評価し、通過時間が2秒以上4秒未満である場合には「一時停止していないが、徐行している:Cb」と評価し、通過時間が2秒未満である場合には「徐行すらしていない:Cc」と評価する。   For example, the driving behavior evaluation unit 12 “pauses” when the passing time for the host vehicle V to pass through a 5 m section between P (3) and P (8) is 4 seconds or more and less than 10 seconds. If the passage time is 2 seconds or more and less than 4 seconds, it is “not paused but slow down. Is evaluated as “Cb” and when the passage time is less than 2 seconds, it is evaluated as “not even slow: Cc”.

そして、運転評価ECU6は、自車両Vの走行終了後に、ドライブレコーダ7に記憶された評価結果に基づいて、運転者への評価結果の通知及びアドバイスの教示等を行う。例えば、上述したCc評価の割合が3割以上である場合には「一時停止交差点では必ず止まりましょう。」と教示し、それ以外で上述したCa評価の割合が7割以下である場合には「一時停止交差点では安全確認をしっかり行いましょう。」と教示し、それら以外で上述したCa評価の割合が9割以下である場合には「どんな一時停止交差点でも安全確認をしっかり行いましょう。」と教示し、更にそれら以外の場合には「一時停止交差点での安全確認はほぼできています。すばらしいですね。今後もこの調子で安全確認を行いましょう。」と教示する。   And after driving | running | working of the own vehicle V, driving evaluation ECU6 performs the notification of the evaluation result to a driver | operator, the advice of an advice, etc. based on the evaluation result memorize | stored in the drive recorder 7. FIG. For example, if the above-mentioned ratio of Cc evaluation is 30% or more, it is taught that “Let's stop at the temporary stop intersection.” Otherwise, if the above-mentioned ratio of Ca evaluation is 70% or less If the percentage of the Ca evaluation mentioned above is 90% or less other than that, teach "Let's make sure safety at any temporary intersection." In other cases, “That safety check at the temporary stop intersection is almost complete. It ’s wonderful. Let's continue to check the safety in this way.”

なお、運転評価ECU6は、運転者への評価結果の通知及びアドバイスの教示等を行うに際し、過去の運転実績等を反映させるようにしてもよい。また、運転者への評価結果の通知及びアドバイスの教示等を行う手段としては、ドライブレコーダ7やナビゲーションシステム2のディスプレイへの表示の他、インターネットを介したパーソナルコンピュータのディスプレイへの表示等がある。   The driving evaluation ECU 6 may reflect the past driving performance and the like when notifying the driver of the evaluation result and teaching advice. Further, as means for notifying the driver of the evaluation result and teaching advice, there are display on the display of the drive recorder 7 and the navigation system 2, and display on the display of a personal computer via the Internet. .

次に、運転評価ECU6によって実行される処理について、図4を参照して説明する。図4は、図1の運転評価ECUによって実行される処理を示すフローチャートである。   Next, processing executed by the driving evaluation ECU 6 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing processing executed by the driving evaluation ECU of FIG.

まず、自車両の走行中において、走行場面判定部8が、ナビゲーションシステム2から取得した情報(自車両が走行する道路上の一時停止箇所に関する情報を含む)、操舵角センサ3から取得した操舵角に関する情報、車速センサ4から取得した車速に関する情報、加速度センサ5から取得した加速度に関する情報等を利用して、交差点での右折又は左折、車線変更、加速又は減速、コーナリング等の自車両の走行場面を判定する。走行場面が交差点での右折又は左折である場合、走行場面判定部8が、自車両が走行する道路上の一時停止箇所に関する情報に基づいて、自車両が一時停止箇所を走行するか否かを判定する(S1)。そして、自車両が一時停止箇所を走行すると判定した場合には、走行場面判定部8が、操舵角(走行軌跡の曲率)に関する情報に基づいて、自車両が走行する一時停止箇所に評価区間を設定する(S2)。   First, during traveling of the host vehicle, the travel scene determination unit 8 acquires information from the navigation system 2 (including information on a temporary stop point on the road on which the host vehicle travels), and the steering angle acquired from the steering angle sensor 3. Using the information on the vehicle, information on the vehicle speed acquired from the vehicle speed sensor 4, information on the acceleration acquired from the acceleration sensor 5, etc., the right or left turn at the intersection, lane change, acceleration or deceleration, cornering, etc. Determine. When the traveling scene is a right turn or a left turn at an intersection, the traveling scene determination unit 8 determines whether or not the host vehicle travels through the temporary stop point based on information on the temporary stop point on the road on which the host vehicle travels. Determine (S1). And when it determines with the own vehicle driving | running | working a temporary stop location, the driving | running | working scene determination part 8 sets an evaluation area to the temporary stop location where the own vehicle drive | works based on the information regarding a steering angle (curvature of a driving | running track). Set (S2).

続いて、停止時間判定部9が、走行場面判定部8によって設定された評価区間内で自車両が停止したと想定される停止時間が第1の時間t1以上であるか否かを判定する(S3)。そして、停止時間が時間t1未満であると判定された場合には、通過時間判定部11が、走行場面判定部8によって設定された評価区間を自車両が通過する通過時間が第2の時間t2以上であるか否かを判定する(S4)。   Subsequently, the stop time determination unit 9 determines whether or not the stop time that the host vehicle is supposed to have stopped within the evaluation section set by the traveling scene determination unit 8 is equal to or longer than the first time t1 ( S3). And when it determines with stop time being less than time t1, the passage time determination part 11 passes the evaluation area set by the driving scene determination part 8, and the passage time for which the own vehicle passes is 2nd time t2. It is determined whether or not this is the case (S4).

その結果、通過時間が第2の時間t2であると判定された場合には、運転行動評価部12が、走行場面判定部8によって設定された評価区間を自車両が通過する通過時間に基づいて、評価区間における自車両の運転者の運転行動を評価し(S5)、その評価結果をドライブレコーダ7に記憶させる(S6)。なお、S3の判定において停止時間が時間t1以上であると判定された場合、及びS4の判定において通過時間が時間t2以上であると判定された場合には、一時停止箇所において視認し難い場所に対して運転者が意識的に安全確認を行ったか否かに関する運転評価を行うことは困難であることから、S1の判定に戻る。   As a result, when it is determined that the passing time is the second time t2, the driving behavior evaluating unit 12 is based on the passing time during which the host vehicle passes through the evaluation section set by the traveling scene determining unit 8. Then, the driving behavior of the driver of the own vehicle in the evaluation section is evaluated (S5), and the evaluation result is stored in the drive recorder 7 (S6). If it is determined in S3 that the stop time is greater than or equal to time t1, and if it is determined in S4 that the transit time is greater than or equal to time t2, the place where it is difficult to visually recognize at the temporary stop point. On the other hand, since it is difficult to perform the driving evaluation regarding whether or not the driver has consciously confirmed the safety, the process returns to the determination of S1.

続いて、運転評価ECU6が、自車両の走行が終了したか否かを判定する(S7)。その結果、自車両の走行が終了したと判定した場合には、運転評価ECU6が、ドライブレコーダ7に記憶された評価結果に基づいて、運転者への評価結果の通知及びアドバイスの教示等を行う(S8)。   Subsequently, the driving evaluation ECU 6 determines whether or not traveling of the host vehicle has ended (S7). As a result, when it is determined that the traveling of the host vehicle has been completed, the driving evaluation ECU 6 notifies the driver of the evaluation result and teaches advice based on the evaluation result stored in the drive recorder 7. (S8).

以上説明したように、運転評価装置1では、自車両が走行すると判定された一時停止箇所に評価区間が設定された場合において、評価区間内での停止時間が第1の時間t1未満であり、且つ評価区間の通過時間が第2の時間t2未満であるときに、評価区間における自車両の運転者の運転行動が評価される。これにより、外乱に起因した停止や徐行が除外されて、視認し難い場所に対して運転者が意識的に安全確認を行った上での一時停止に基づいて、運転者の運転行動が評価されることになる。従って、運転評価装置1によれば、一時停止箇所における運転者の運転行動を精度良く評価することができる。   As described above, in the driving evaluation device 1, when the evaluation section is set at the temporary stop point at which the host vehicle is determined to travel, the stop time in the evaluation section is less than the first time t1, And when the passage time of the evaluation section is less than the second time t2, the driving behavior of the driver of the host vehicle in the evaluation section is evaluated. As a result, stopping and slowing down due to disturbance are excluded, and the driving behavior of the driver is evaluated based on the temporary stop after the driver consciously confirms safety in a place that is difficult to see. Will be. Therefore, according to the driving evaluation apparatus 1, it is possible to accurately evaluate the driving behavior of the driver at the temporary stop point.

また、走行場面判定部8が、自車両の操舵角に基づいて評価区間を設定するので、自車両が一時停止箇所を右折又は左折する場合における運転者の運転行動を確実に評価することができる。   Further, since the traveling scene determination unit 8 sets the evaluation section based on the steering angle of the host vehicle, the driving behavior of the driver when the host vehicle turns right or left at the temporary stop point can be reliably evaluated. .

また、停止時間判定部9が、評価区間が複数に分割された分割区間のそれぞれを自車両が通過する通過時間が第1の時間t1以上であるか否かを判定することにより、評価区間内での停止時間が時間t1以上であるか否かを判定するため、外乱に起因して評価区間内で自車両が停止したと想定される場合を確実に除外することができる。   In addition, the stop time determination unit 9 determines whether or not the passing time during which the host vehicle passes through each of the divided sections obtained by dividing the evaluation section into a plurality of times is equal to or longer than the first time t1. In order to determine whether or not the stop time at the time t1 is equal to or longer than the time t1, it is possible to reliably exclude the case where the host vehicle is assumed to have stopped in the evaluation section due to disturbance.

また、運転行動評価部12が、評価区間を自車両が通過する通過時間が第2の時間t2未満の範囲内において長いほど、運転者の安全確認時間が長いものとして、運転行動を評価するというように、評価区間を自車両が通過する通過時間に基づいて運転行動を評価することから、視認し難い場所に対して運転者が意識的に安全確認を行ったか否かを簡易に且つ正確に判定することができる。   In addition, the driving behavior evaluation unit 12 evaluates the driving behavior as the driver's safety confirmation time is longer as the passing time through which the host vehicle passes through the evaluation section is longer than the second time t2. As described above, since the driving behavior is evaluated based on the passing time through which the host vehicle passes through the evaluation section, it is simply and accurately determined whether or not the driver has consciously confirmed the safety for the difficult-to-view place. Can be determined.

また、運転行動評価部12による評価結果がドライブレコーダ7に記憶されるので、例えば自車両の運転が終了した後に運転者に対して評価結果を通知し、運転行動の改善を図ることができる。   Moreover, since the evaluation result by the driving action evaluation part 12 is memorize | stored in the drive recorder 7, for example, after a driving | operation of the own vehicle is complete | finished, an evaluation result can be notified with respect to a driver | operator, and driving | operation improvement can be aimed at.

本発明は、上記実施形態に限定されるものではない。例えば、運転評価ECU6内の各処理部をソフトウェアで構成せず、ハードウェアで構成してもよい。また、運転行動評価部12による評価結果をナビゲーションシステム2のハードディスク等に記憶させるようにしてもよい。また、本発明に係る運転評価装置は、一時停止交差点以外の一時停止箇所(例えば踏切等)における運転者の運転行動の評価にも適用可能である。   The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment. For example, each processing unit in the driving evaluation ECU 6 may be configured by hardware instead of software. Further, the evaluation result by the driving behavior evaluation unit 12 may be stored in a hard disk or the like of the navigation system 2. The driving evaluation device according to the present invention can also be applied to the evaluation of the driving behavior of the driver at a temporary stop point (for example, a railroad crossing) other than the temporary stop intersection.

本発明に係る運転評価装置は、分割区間における走行状態に応じて、当該分割区間を含む評価区間を評価対象とするか否かを決定する。走行状態の例としては、通過時間の他、通過速度や停車時間等、通過時間に相当するパラメータを用いることができる。例えば、通過時間が所定時間以上である場合、通過速度が所定速度以下である場合、停車時間が所定時間以上である場合等に、評価対象から除外する。   The driving evaluation device according to the present invention determines whether or not an evaluation section including the divided section is to be evaluated according to the traveling state in the divided section. As an example of the running state, parameters corresponding to the passing time such as the passing speed and the stop time can be used in addition to the passing time. For example, when the passage time is equal to or longer than a predetermined time, when the passage speed is equal to or lower than the predetermined speed, when the stop time is equal to or longer than the predetermined time, it is excluded from the evaluation target.

そして、走行場面判定手段は、自車両の走行軌跡の曲率に基づいて評価区間を設定する。なお、走行軌跡の曲率は、例えば、舵角、車幅方向の加速度(いわゆる横加速度)、ヨーレート、スリップ角等の車両状態量に基づいて判断することが可能である。また、走行軌跡の曲率は、例えば、ナビゲーションシステム及びGPS情報、車両外部の撮像データ等、車両状態量以外の情報に基づいて判断することも可能である。   Then, the traveling scene determination means sets the evaluation section based on the curvature of the traveling locus of the host vehicle. The curvature of the travel locus can be determined based on vehicle state quantities such as a steering angle, an acceleration in the vehicle width direction (so-called lateral acceleration), a yaw rate, a slip angle, and the like. Further, the curvature of the travel locus can be determined based on information other than the vehicle state quantity, such as a navigation system and GPS information, imaging data outside the vehicle, and the like.

1…運転評価装置、7…ドライブレコーダ(記憶手段)、8…走行場面判定部(走行場面判定手段)、9…停止時間判定部(停止時間判定手段)、11…通過時間判定部(通過時間判定手段)、12…運転行動評価部(運転行動評価手段)。   DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Driving evaluation apparatus, 7 ... Drive recorder (memory | storage means), 8 ... Travel scene determination part (travel scene determination means), 9 ... Stop time determination part (stop time determination means), 11 ... Passing time determination part (passing time) Determination means), 12... Driving behavior evaluation section (driving behavior evaluation means).

Claims (2)

運転者による運転を評価する運転評価装置であって、
自車両が一時停止箇所を走行すると判定した場合に、前記一時停止箇所に評価区間を設定する走行場面判定手段と、
前記評価区間を複数の分割区間に分割する分割手段と、を備え、
前記分割区間における走行状態に応じて、当該分割区間を含む前記評価区間を評価対象とするか否かを決定することを特徴とする運転評価装置。
A driving evaluation device for evaluating driving by a driver,
When it is determined that the host vehicle travels through a temporary stop point, a driving scene determination unit that sets an evaluation section at the temporary stop point;
Dividing means for dividing the evaluation section into a plurality of divided sections,
A driving evaluation apparatus that determines whether or not the evaluation section including the divided section is to be evaluated according to a traveling state in the divided section.
前記走行場面判定手段は、前記自車両の走行軌跡の曲率に基づいて前記評価区間を設定することを特徴とする請求項1記載の運転評価装置。   The driving evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the traveling scene determination unit sets the evaluation section based on a curvature of a traveling locus of the host vehicle.
JP2009145489A 2009-06-18 2009-06-18 Driving evaluation device Expired - Fee Related JP5238623B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009145489A JP5238623B2 (en) 2009-06-18 2009-06-18 Driving evaluation device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009145489A JP5238623B2 (en) 2009-06-18 2009-06-18 Driving evaluation device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011003013A true JP2011003013A (en) 2011-01-06
JP5238623B2 JP5238623B2 (en) 2013-07-17

Family

ID=43560921

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009145489A Expired - Fee Related JP5238623B2 (en) 2009-06-18 2009-06-18 Driving evaluation device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5238623B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012146251A (en) * 2011-01-14 2012-08-02 Hitachi Automotive Systems Ltd Safe and pleasant drive support system and safe and pleasant drive support center
JP2013114319A (en) * 2011-11-25 2013-06-10 Denso Corp Driving evaluation system and driving evaluation device
JP2013140506A (en) * 2012-01-05 2013-07-18 Denso Corp Drive diagnostic device
JP2015087928A (en) * 2013-10-30 2015-05-07 本田技研工業株式会社 Safe driving support navigation system
JP2015114860A (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-22 日産自動車株式会社 Driving evaluation device and driving evaluation method
JP2015114859A (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-22 日産自動車株式会社 Driving evaluation device and driving evaluation method
JP2017156112A (en) * 2016-02-29 2017-09-07 三菱電機株式会社 Vehicle position detection device

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003099898A (en) * 2001-09-25 2003-04-04 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Driver's future condition forecasting device
JP2004348394A (en) * 2003-05-21 2004-12-09 Toyota Central Res & Dev Lab Inc Environment change device, and behavioral guideline information generation and presentation device
JP2007109001A (en) * 2005-10-13 2007-04-26 Toyota Motor Corp Road environment estimation system
JP2007219716A (en) * 2006-02-15 2007-08-30 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Operation support device, operation support method and vehicle with operation support device
JP2009217615A (en) * 2008-03-11 2009-09-24 Toyota Motor Corp Driving evaluation apparatus
JP2010039888A (en) * 2008-08-07 2010-02-18 Aisin Aw Co Ltd Safe driving evaluation device, safe driving evaluation program, and navigation device using the same
JP2010039920A (en) * 2008-08-07 2010-02-18 Aisin Aw Co Ltd Safe driving evaluation system and safe driving evaluation program

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003099898A (en) * 2001-09-25 2003-04-04 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Driver's future condition forecasting device
JP2004348394A (en) * 2003-05-21 2004-12-09 Toyota Central Res & Dev Lab Inc Environment change device, and behavioral guideline information generation and presentation device
JP2007109001A (en) * 2005-10-13 2007-04-26 Toyota Motor Corp Road environment estimation system
JP2007219716A (en) * 2006-02-15 2007-08-30 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Operation support device, operation support method and vehicle with operation support device
JP2009217615A (en) * 2008-03-11 2009-09-24 Toyota Motor Corp Driving evaluation apparatus
JP2010039888A (en) * 2008-08-07 2010-02-18 Aisin Aw Co Ltd Safe driving evaluation device, safe driving evaluation program, and navigation device using the same
JP2010039920A (en) * 2008-08-07 2010-02-18 Aisin Aw Co Ltd Safe driving evaluation system and safe driving evaluation program

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012146251A (en) * 2011-01-14 2012-08-02 Hitachi Automotive Systems Ltd Safe and pleasant drive support system and safe and pleasant drive support center
JP2013114319A (en) * 2011-11-25 2013-06-10 Denso Corp Driving evaluation system and driving evaluation device
JP2013140506A (en) * 2012-01-05 2013-07-18 Denso Corp Drive diagnostic device
JP2015087928A (en) * 2013-10-30 2015-05-07 本田技研工業株式会社 Safe driving support navigation system
JP2015114860A (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-22 日産自動車株式会社 Driving evaluation device and driving evaluation method
JP2015114859A (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-22 日産自動車株式会社 Driving evaluation device and driving evaluation method
JP2017156112A (en) * 2016-02-29 2017-09-07 三菱電機株式会社 Vehicle position detection device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5238623B2 (en) 2013-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6684714B2 (en) Method and system for vehicle driver assistance
JP5238623B2 (en) Driving evaluation device
JP6406131B2 (en) Driving assistance device
JP5979259B2 (en) Collision avoidance control device
JP6507862B2 (en) Peripheral monitoring device and driving support device
JP6137212B2 (en) Driving assistance device
CN110636962B (en) Electronic control device, vehicle control method, and storage device
JP4203857B2 (en) Safe driving support system
CN106043302B (en) The cruise active control system and its method of vehicle
US20150149088A1 (en) In-vehicle path verification
CN103359114A (en) System and method for vehicle lateral control
CN102822881A (en) Vehicle collision judgment device
JP2007241729A (en) Driving support device and driving support system
JP3973008B2 (en) Safe driving support device, method and recording medium
KR20180135847A (en) Deceleration-based direction detection and lane keeping system for autonomous vehicles
JPWO2019031407A1 (en) Judgment device, judgment method, and program
KR102050526B1 (en) Method and system to assess the risk of change of traffic lane during the driving of a leading vehicle on a roadway with at least two neighbouring traffic lanes
CN111833648A (en) Vehicle collision early warning method and device
JPWO2018173175A1 (en) Vehicle control device
JP6379510B2 (en) Driving diagnosis device and insurance fee calculation method
JP2019032712A (en) Determination device, method for determination, and program
JP5233711B2 (en) Running state recording device
JP2005138623A (en) Vehicle travel supporting device
JP2019501831A (en) Navigation optimized for safety
JP2010095078A (en) Route prediction device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110316

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20121017

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20121023

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121220

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121221

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130312

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130401

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 5238623

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20160405

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees