JP2009140145A - Vehicle travel-supporting device - Google Patents

Vehicle travel-supporting device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2009140145A
JP2009140145A JP2007314562A JP2007314562A JP2009140145A JP 2009140145 A JP2009140145 A JP 2009140145A JP 2007314562 A JP2007314562 A JP 2007314562A JP 2007314562 A JP2007314562 A JP 2007314562A JP 2009140145 A JP2009140145 A JP 2009140145A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
vehicle
contact
oncoming
stationary object
possibility
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2007314562A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4952938B2 (en
Inventor
Yoji Sasabuchi
洋治 笹渕
Hiroaki Tani
裕章 谷
Hiroyuki Koike
弘之 小池
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honda Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Honda Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP2007314562A priority Critical patent/JP4952938B2/en
Publication of JP2009140145A publication Critical patent/JP2009140145A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4952938B2 publication Critical patent/JP4952938B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Control Of Driving Devices And Active Controlling Of Vehicle (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a vehicle travel-supporting device which executes measures-to-contact processing with adequate timing, in consideration of the presence or absence of a motionless object between an oncoming vehicle and its own vehicle and the shape of the motionless object, while preventing the execution of measures-to-contact processing, such as the issue of a warning and braking of its own vehicle, in an unnecessarily early stage. <P>SOLUTION: The vehicle travel-supporting device includes a between-its-own-vehicle-and-an-oncoming-vehicle motionless object determination means 7 which determines whether a motionless object permits vehicles to pass by it under the condition that the motionless object is detected between an oncoming vehicle and its own vehicle 1. When the result of the determination by the between-its-own-vehicle-and-an-oncoming-vehicle motionless object determination means 7 is positive, a contact possibility determination means 9 prevents the result of the determination whether the possibility of the contact between the oncoming vehicle and its own vehicle 1 exists from being a more positive determination result than in the case that a motionless object is not detected between the oncoming vehicle and its own vehicle 1. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、自車と周辺の物体との接触回避や接触時の衝撃軽減のための走行支援装置に関する。   The present invention relates to a driving support device for avoiding contact between an own vehicle and a surrounding object and reducing impact during contact.

従来、自車の進行方向前方に存在する物体(対向車、前走車など)を撮像カメラやレーダなどで検出しながら、その物体と自車との接触の可能性が有るか否かを判断し、該判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、運転者に対して警報を発したり、ブレーキ装置による車両の制動などを自動的に行なうようにすることで、自車と物体との接触回避や接触時の衝撃軽減を支援する走行支援装置が知られている。例えば特許文献1に見られる技術では、撮像カメラの撮像画像を基に白線などを検出することで、自車の車線エリアを認識すると共に、その認識した車線エリア内に他車などの障害物を検出する障害物領域を設定するようにしている。そして、該特許文献1の技術では、設定した障害物領域内でレーダにより検出された物体に対して、自車との接触の可能性を判断し、その接触の可能性が高いと判断した場合に、ブレーキ装置による自車の制動を自動的に行なうなどの接触対策処理を実行することで、自車と物体との接触回避や接触時の衝撃軽減を支援するようにしている。
特開2004−136785号公報
Conventionally, while detecting an object (oncoming vehicle, forward vehicle, etc.) that is ahead in the direction of travel of the vehicle with an imaging camera or radar, it is determined whether there is a possibility of contact between the object and the vehicle. If the determination result is affirmative, a warning is issued to the driver or the vehicle is automatically braked by a brake device, thereby avoiding contact between the vehicle and the object. There is known a driving support device that supports shock reduction at the time of contact. For example, in the technique shown in Patent Document 1, by detecting a white line or the like based on a captured image of an imaging camera, the lane area of the own vehicle is recognized, and obstacles such as other vehicles are placed in the recognized lane area. The obstacle area to be detected is set. Then, in the technique of Patent Document 1, when the object detected by the radar in the set obstacle area is determined as to the possibility of contact with the own vehicle, and it is determined that the possibility of the contact is high In addition, by performing contact countermeasure processing such as automatically braking the vehicle by the brake device, the vehicle avoids contact between the vehicle and an object, and assists in reducing impact.
JP 2004-136785 A

ところで、前記特許文献1に見られる技術では、ブレーキ装置の作動などの接触対策処理が過度に実行されるのを防止するために、自車の車線エリア内に設定した障害物領域の外側に存在する物体に対しては、自車との衝突の可能性を判断をしないようにしている。   By the way, in the technique seen in the said patent document 1, in order to prevent that contact countermeasure processing, such as the action | operation of a brake device, is performed excessively, it exists in the outer side of the obstruction area | region set in the lane area of the own vehicle. For objects that do, the possibility of collision with the vehicle is not judged.

このため、特許文献1に見られる技術では、次のような不都合があった。すなわち、例えば、自車の車線エリアと対向車の車線エリアとが、これらの車線に沿って連続的に延在し、且つある程度の高さを有する中央分離帯のような構造物で隔てられているような場合には、対向車が自車の車線エリアに進入してくることは基本的には無い。従って、このような場合には、自車と対向車との衝突の可能性を判断せずとも支障はない。   For this reason, the technique found in Patent Document 1 has the following disadvantages. That is, for example, the lane area of the own vehicle and the lane area of the oncoming vehicle are separated by a structure such as a median strip that continuously extends along these lanes and has a certain height. In such a case, there is basically no oncoming vehicle entering the lane area of the vehicle. Therefore, in such a case, there is no problem even if the possibility of a collision between the own vehicle and the oncoming vehicle is not determined.

一方、自車の車線エリアと対向車の車線エリアとが、例えば一定間隔で並ぶ柔軟なポールや、低い突起物で隔てられているような場合もある。そして、このような場合には、対向車が運転車の操縦ミスなどによって該ポールや突起物を乗り越えて自車の車線エリアに進入してくることもあり得る。   On the other hand, the lane area of the own vehicle and the lane area of the oncoming vehicle may be separated by, for example, flexible poles or low protrusions arranged at regular intervals. In such a case, an oncoming vehicle may enter the lane area of the host vehicle by overcoming the pole or protrusion due to a driving error of the driving vehicle.

しかるに、特許文献1に見られる従来の技術では、このような場合には、対向車が自車の車線エリアに進入してくるまで、該対向車と自車との接触の可能性が判断されず、ブレーキ装置の作動などの接触対策処理が遅れたり、あるいは、該接触対策処理が実行される前に対向車と自車との接触が生じる恐れがあった。   However, in the conventional technique shown in Patent Document 1, in such a case, the possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle is determined until the oncoming vehicle enters the lane area of the own vehicle. Therefore, the contact countermeasure process such as the operation of the brake device may be delayed, or contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle may occur before the contact countermeasure process is executed.

なお、この不都合を回避するために、対向車が自車の車線エリアに進入した場合と同様に、対向車と自車との接触の可能性を判断すると、対向車が対向車線エリア内での進路変更により自車に近づいた場合などに、過度に接触対策処理が実行されてしまうという不都合がある。   In order to avoid this inconvenience, as in the case where the oncoming vehicle enters the lane area of the own vehicle, when the possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle is judged, the oncoming vehicle is in the opposite lane area. There is an inconvenience that the contact countermeasure process is excessively executed when the vehicle approaches the vehicle due to a change of course.

本発明は、かかる背景に鑑みてなされたものであり、対向車と自車との間の静止物体の有無やその静止物体の形態を考慮して、必要以上に早期に警報発生や自車の制動などの接触対策処理が実行されるのを防止しつつ、適切なタイミングで該接触対策処理を実行することができる車両の走行支援装置を提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of such a background, and in consideration of the presence or absence of a stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle and the form of the stationary object, an alarm is generated earlier than necessary and It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle travel support apparatus that can execute contact countermeasure processing at an appropriate timing while preventing execution of contact countermeasure processing such as braking.

本発明の車両の走行支援装置は、かかる目的を達成するために、少なくとも自車の進行方向前方の領域を含む周辺領域に存在する物体を検出する物体検出手段と、該物体検出手段により検出された物体の自車に対する相対運動情報を含む物体情報を該物体検出手段の出力に基づいて取得する物体情報取得手段と、少なくとも該物体情報取得手段により取得された物体情報に基づいて前記検出された物体と自車との接触の可能性が有るか否かを判断する接触可能性判断手段と、該接触可能性判断手段により接触の可能性が有ると判断された場合に、所定の接触対策処理を実行する接触対策処理手段とを備えた車両の走行支援装置において、前記物体検出手段により前記物体としての対向車が検出され、且つ、該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されている状況で、該静止物体が、車両の通過が可能な物体であるか否かを前記物体情報に基づいて判断する自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段を備え、前記接触可能性判断手段は、少なくとも該自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段の判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、前記物体検出手段により前記対向車が検出され、且つ、該物体検出手段により該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されていない場合よりも、前記対向車と自車との接触可能性が有るか否かの判断結果が肯定的な判断結果となるのを抑制するように、該接触可能性が有るか否かを判断するための判断条件を変更する手段を備えることを特徴とする(第1発明)。   In order to achieve the above object, the vehicle driving support apparatus of the present invention detects an object existing in a peripheral area including at least a front area in the traveling direction of the own vehicle, and is detected by the object detecting means. Object information acquisition means for acquiring object information including relative motion information of the detected object with respect to the vehicle based on the output of the object detection means, and at least the object information acquired based on the object information acquired by the object information acquisition means Contact possibility determination means for determining whether there is a possibility of contact between the object and the vehicle, and predetermined contact countermeasure processing when the contact possibility determination means determines that there is a possibility of contact In the vehicle travel support device comprising the contact countermeasure processing means for executing the above-mentioned, an oncoming vehicle as the object is detected by the object detecting means, and a stationary object is present between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. The vehicle and the oncoming vehicle stationary object judging means for judging whether the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle can pass in the situation where the vehicle is passing, and the contact possibility judgment The means detects the oncoming vehicle by the object detecting means when the determination result of the stationary object determining means between the own vehicle and the oncoming vehicle is affirmative, and the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle are detected by the object detecting means. In order to suppress the determination result of whether or not there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle from being a positive determination result, compared to a case where no stationary object is detected between A means for changing a determination condition for determining whether or not there is a contact possibility is provided (first invention).

かかる第1発明によれば、前記物体検出手段により前記物体としての対向車が検出され、且つ、該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されている状況で、該静止物体が、車両の通過が可能な物体である場合には、該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されていない場合よりも、自車の進行方向前方の領域で前記物体検出手段により検出される物体と自車との接触可能性が有るか否かの判断結果が肯定的な判断結果となるのを抑制するように、該対向車と自車との接触可能性が有るか否かの判断結果が肯定的な判断結果となるのを抑制するように、該接触可能性が有るか否かを判断するための判断条件が変更される。   According to the first invention, when the oncoming vehicle as the object is detected by the object detecting means, and the stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle, the stationary object is If the vehicle is an object through which the vehicle can pass, it is detected by the object detection means in a region ahead of the traveling direction of the own vehicle, compared to a case where no stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. Whether or not there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle so as to prevent the judgment result of whether or not the object is in contact with the own vehicle from being a positive judgment result. The judgment condition for judging whether or not there is the possibility of contact is changed so as to suppress the judgment result from being a positive judgment result.

ここで、前記対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出され、且つ、その静止物体が車両の通過が可能な物体である場合には、該対向車が自車に向かって来るような状況であっても、該対向車は静止物体と接触して減速するので、該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が存在しない場合よりも、自車に接触するタイミングが遅くなる。従って、上記のように対向車と自車との間に、車両の通過が可能な静止物体が検出されている場合と、該静止物体が検出されていない場合とで、前記判断条件を変更することで、それぞれの場合に適したタイミングで、対向車と自車との接触の可能性が有るという判断をして、前記接触対策処理を実行することができる。また、対向車と自車との間に、車両の通過が可能な静止物体が検出されている場合には、該静止物体が検出されていない場合よりも対向車と自車との接触の可能性が有ると判断されるのが抑制される(該接触の可能性の判断がなされ難くなる)ので、前者の場合に過剰に早期に前記接触対策処理が実行されるのが防止される。   Here, when a stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle and the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle can pass, the oncoming vehicle may come toward the own vehicle. Even in the situation, the oncoming vehicle contacts with the stationary object and decelerates, so that the timing of contacting the own vehicle is delayed as compared with the case where there is no stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. Therefore, as described above, the determination condition is changed between a case where a stationary object capable of passing the vehicle is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle and a case where the stationary object is not detected. Thus, it is possible to determine that there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle at a timing suitable for each case, and to execute the contact countermeasure process. In addition, when a stationary object capable of passing the vehicle is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle, the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle can be contacted more than when the stationary object is not detected. Therefore, the contact countermeasure process is prevented from being performed excessively early in the former case because it is difficult to determine the possibility of contact.

よって、第1発明によれば、対向車と自車との間の静止物体の有無やその静止物体の形態を考慮して、必要以上に早期に警報発生や自車の制動などの接触対策処理が実行されるのを防止しつつ、適切なタイミングで該接触対策処理を実行することができる。   Therefore, according to the first invention, in consideration of the presence or absence of a stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle and the form of the stationary object, contact countermeasure processing such as generation of an alarm or braking of the own vehicle earlier than necessary. The contact countermeasure process can be executed at an appropriate timing while preventing the process from being executed.

なお、前記物体情報に含まれる相対運動情報としては、前記物体検出手段により検出された物体の自車に対する相対位置、相対速度などが挙げられる。また、物体情報には、前記物体検出手段により検出された物体の相対運動情報のほか、該物体のサイズ、形状、種類などの情報が含まれていてもよい。   Note that the relative motion information included in the object information includes a relative position, a relative speed, and the like of the object detected by the object detection unit. The object information may include information such as the size, shape, and type of the object in addition to the relative motion information of the object detected by the object detection unit.

かかる第1発明では、前記接触可能性判断手段は、例えば前記物体情報取得手段により取得された物体情報に基づいて、前記検出された物体と自車とが接触するまでの予測時間である接触時間を逐次予測する手段と、該接触時間が所定の閾値以下であるか否かを前記判断条件とし、該接触時間が該所定の閾値以下になった場合に前記接触の可能性が有ると判断する手段とを具備する。この場合、接触可能性判断手段は、さらに、少なくとも前記自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段の判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、前記物体検出手段により前記対向車が検出され、且つ、該物体検出手段により該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されていない場合よりも、前記所定の閾値を小さくするように該所定の閾値を変更することにより前記判断条件を変更する手段を備える(第2発明)。   In the first invention, the contact possibility determination means is a contact time that is an estimated time until the detected object comes into contact with the own vehicle based on the object information acquired by the object information acquisition means, for example. And determining whether or not the contact time is less than or equal to a predetermined threshold and determining that there is a possibility of contact when the contact time is less than or equal to the predetermined threshold Means. In this case, the contact possibility determining means further detects the oncoming vehicle by the object detecting means when the determination result of the stationary object determining means between the own vehicle and the oncoming vehicle is affirmative, and the object Means for changing the determination condition by changing the predetermined threshold so as to make the predetermined threshold smaller than when a stationary object is not detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle by the detecting means; Provided (second invention).

この第2発明によれば、前記自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段の判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、前記物体検出手段により前記対向車が検出され、且つ、該物体検出手段により該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されていない場合よりも、前記所定の閾値を小さくするように該所定の閾値を変更するので、該対向車と自車との間に車両の通過が可能な静止物体が存在する場合には、該静止物体が存在しない場合よりも、前記接触時間がより小さい閾値に達するまでは、前記接触可能性判断手段によって、該対向車と自車との接触の可能性が無いと判断されることとなる。従って、前記物体検出手段によって前記物体としての対向車が検出されるようになってから、該接触可能性判断手段によって、自車と該対向車との接触の可能性が有ると判断されるようになるまでの時間が、該対向車と自車との間に車両の通過が可能な静止物体が存在する場合の方が、該静止物体が存在しない場合よりも長くなる。これにより、該対向車と自車との間に車両の通過が可能な静止物体が存在する場合の方が、該静止物体が存在しない場合よりも、該対向車との接触の可能性が有ると判断されるタイミングが遅くなり、当該判断が抑制される。そして、前記接触時間に基づいて、該対向車と自車との接触の可能性を判断するので、該接触の可能性の判断を適切に行なうことができる。   According to the second aspect of the invention, when the determination result of the stationary object determination unit between the own vehicle and the oncoming vehicle is affirmative, the oncoming vehicle is detected by the object detecting unit, and the oncoming vehicle is detected by the object detecting unit. Since the predetermined threshold value is changed so that the predetermined threshold value is made smaller than when no stationary object is detected between the vehicle and the own vehicle, the vehicle passes between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. When there is a stationary object that can be touched, the contact possibility determination means determines whether the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle are in contact with each other until the contact time reaches a smaller threshold than when the stationary object does not exist. It will be judged that there is no possibility of contact. Therefore, after the oncoming vehicle as the object is detected by the object detecting means, the contact possibility determining means determines that there is a possibility of contact between the own vehicle and the oncoming vehicle. The time until the vehicle becomes longer is longer when there is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle than when there is no stationary object. Thus, there is a possibility of contact with the oncoming vehicle when there is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle, rather than when there is no stationary object. Is determined later, and the determination is suppressed. Since the possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle is determined based on the contact time, the possibility of contact can be appropriately determined.

前記第1発明または第2発明では、前記接触可能性判断手段は、前記物体検出手段により前記対向車が検出され、且つ、該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されている状況で、前記自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段の判断結果が否定的となる場合に、該対向車と自車との接触の可能性が無いと判断することが好ましい(第3発明)。   In the first invention or the second invention, the contact possibility judging means detects the oncoming vehicle by the object detecting means, and a stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. Thus, it is preferable to determine that there is no possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle when the determination result of the vehicle / oncoming vehicle stationary object determining means is negative (third invention).

この第3発明によれば、前記対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出され、且つ、その静止物体が車両の通過が不可能な物体である場合、すなわち、該対向車と自車との接触が該静止物体によって遮られる場合に、該対向車と自車との接触の可能性が無いと判断される。これにより、該対向車と自車との接触が接触し得ない状況で、前記接触対策処理が実行されるのが防止され、必要以上に過剰に該接触対策処理が実行されるのを効果的に防止できる。   According to the third aspect of the invention, when a stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle and the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle cannot pass, that is, the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. When the contact with the vehicle is blocked by the stationary object, it is determined that there is no possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle. As a result, it is possible to prevent the contact countermeasure process from being performed in a situation in which the contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle cannot come into contact, and to effectively perform the contact countermeasure process more than necessary. Can be prevented.

また、前記第1〜第3発明においては、前記対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されている場合において、例えば、次のようにして、該静止物体が車両の通過が可能な静止物体であるか否かを判断することができる。すなわち、前記対向車と自車との前記物体情報取得手段が取得する前記物体情報は、前記物体検出手段により検出された物体の形状および大きさの情報を含み、前記自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段は、前記対向車と自車との間の静止物体の高さが所定値以下であるか否かを該静止物体に関する前記物体情報に基づいて判断する高さ判断手段と、該静止物体が自車の進行方向に所定の長さ以上に連続した構造物であるか否かを該静止物体に関する前記物体情報に基づいて判断する連続性判断手段とを備え、該高さ判断手段の判断結果が肯定的となることと、該連続性判断手段の判断結果が否定的となることとのいずれか一方が成立する場合に、該静止物体が車両の通過が可能な物体であると判断する(第4発明)。   In the first to third aspects of the invention, when a stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle, for example, the stationary object can pass through the vehicle as follows. It can be determined whether or not the object is a stationary object. That is, the object information acquired by the object information acquisition unit between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle includes information on the shape and size of the object detected by the object detecting unit, and the stationary object between the own vehicle and the oncoming vehicle A determination unit configured to determine whether a height of a stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle is equal to or less than a predetermined value based on the object information regarding the stationary object; and the stationary object Continuity determining means for determining whether or not the structure is a structure continuous for a predetermined length or more in the traveling direction of the own vehicle based on the object information regarding the stationary object, and determining by the height determining means When either one of a positive result and a negative determination result of the continuity determination means is established, it is determined that the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle can pass. (4th invention).

この第4発明によれば、前記対向車と自車との間の静止物体の高さが所定値以下である場合、すなわち、該対向車が静止物体を乗り越えることできる程度に該静止物体の高さが低い場合、あるいは、該静止物体が自車の進行方向に所定の長さ以上に連続した構造物でない場合(例えば、該静止物体が自車の走行車線と、対向車線との間にこれらの車線沿いに一定間隔で1列に配列されたポールのような物体である場合)には、該静止物体が車両の通過が可能な物体であると判断される。また、該静止物体の高さが所定値を超える高さ(車両が乗り越えることできないような高さ)であって、且つ、該静止物体が自車の進行方向に所定の長さ以上に連続した構造物(例えば、自車の走行車線と、対向車線との間にこれらの車線沿いに連続的に延在する中央分離体のような構造物)である場合には、該静止物体が車両の通過が不可能な物体であると判断される。   According to the fourth aspect of the invention, when the height of the stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle is equal to or less than a predetermined value, that is, the height of the stationary object is such that the oncoming vehicle can get over the stationary object. Or when the stationary object is not a structure that is longer than a predetermined length in the traveling direction of the host vehicle (for example, the stationary object is located between the traveling lane of the host vehicle and the opposite lane. If the object is a pole-like object arranged in a line at regular intervals along the lane, the stationary object is determined to be an object through which the vehicle can pass. In addition, the height of the stationary object exceeds a predetermined value (a height at which the vehicle cannot get over), and the stationary object continues for a predetermined length or more in the traveling direction of the host vehicle. When the structure is a structure (for example, a structure such as a central separator continuously extending along the lane between the traveling lane of the host vehicle and the opposite lane), the stationary object is It is determined that the object cannot be passed.

これにより、該静止物体が、車両の通過が可能な物体であるか否かを適切に判断することができる。   As a result, it is possible to appropriately determine whether or not the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle can pass.

本発明の一実施形態を図1〜図5を参照して説明する。図1は本実施形態の装置の概略構成を示すブロック図、図2は図1の装置に備えたコントローラの処理を示すフローチャート、図3は図2のSTEP6の処理の詳細を示すフローチャート、図4および図5は本実施形態の装置の作動を説明するための図である。   An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of the apparatus of the present embodiment, FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing processing of a controller provided in the apparatus of FIG. 1, FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing details of processing of STEP 6 in FIG. And FIG. 5 is a figure for demonstrating the action | operation of the apparatus of this embodiment.

図1に示すように本実施形態の車両(自車)1には、その進行方向前方の領域に存在する他車両などの物体を検出するレーダ装置2と、該レーダ装置2により検出された物体と自車1との接触の可能性が有るか否かを判断したり、その判断結果に応じて車両1に備えた警報器4およびブレーキ装置5を適宜作動させるコントローラ3とが走行支援装置の構成要素として備えられている。なお、車両1は、エンジンを走行用動力源とする通常の自動車、エンジンと電動モータとを走行用動力源とするハイブリッド車、電動モータを走行用動力源とする電動車両のいずれであってもよい。   As shown in FIG. 1, a vehicle (own vehicle) 1 according to this embodiment includes a radar device 2 that detects an object such as another vehicle existing in a region ahead of the traveling direction, and an object detected by the radar device 2. The controller 3 that determines whether or not there is a possibility of contact between the vehicle 1 and the host vehicle 1 and appropriately operates the alarm device 4 and the brake device 5 provided in the vehicle 1 according to the determination result of the driving support device. It is provided as a component. The vehicle 1 may be any of a normal automobile using an engine as a driving power source, a hybrid vehicle using an engine and an electric motor as a driving power source, and an electric vehicle using an electric motor as a driving power source. Good.

レーダ装置2は、自車1のフロントグリルなどの前部に搭載されており、例えば図4(aまたは図5(a)に示すような領域A(自車1の進行方向前方の領域)にミリ波、レーザ光などの電磁波を放射し、その電磁波の反射波から該領域A(以下、監視領域Aという)に存在する他車両などの物体を検出する。   The radar device 2 is mounted on the front portion of the vehicle 1 such as a front grille. For example, the radar device 2 is located in an area A (an area ahead of the vehicle 1 in the traveling direction) as shown in FIG. 4 (a or 5a). An electromagnetic wave such as a millimeter wave or a laser beam is emitted, and an object such as another vehicle existing in the area A (hereinafter referred to as a monitoring area A) is detected from the reflected wave of the electromagnetic wave.

なお、本実施形態では、物体検出手段としてレーダ装置2を備えるようにしたが、レーダ装置2の代わりに、撮像カメラを用いてもよく、あるいは、レーダ装置2と撮像カメラとの両者を物体検出手段として併用してもよい。また、複数のレーダ装置あるいは複数の撮像カメラを自車1に搭載し、自車1の進行方向前方の領域だけでなく、自車1の後方や側方の領域を含めた自車1の周辺領域に存在する物体を検出し得るようにしてもよい。   In the present embodiment, the radar device 2 is provided as the object detection means. However, an imaging camera may be used instead of the radar device 2, or both the radar device 2 and the imaging camera are detected. You may use together as a means. In addition, a plurality of radar devices or a plurality of imaging cameras are mounted on the own vehicle 1, and the surroundings of the own vehicle 1 including not only the area in front of the own vehicle 1 in the traveling direction but also the rear and side areas of the own vehicle 1 are included. An object existing in the region may be detected.

コントローラ3は、マイクロコンピュータやインターフェース回路などを含む電子回路ユニットであり、レーダ装置2の出力が入力されると共に、図示しないセンサから自車1の車速、ヨーレートなどの自車1の運動状態の検出値が入力される。   The controller 3 is an electronic circuit unit including a microcomputer, an interface circuit, and the like. The output of the radar device 2 is input, and the motion state of the vehicle 1 such as the vehicle speed and yaw rate of the vehicle 1 is detected from a sensor (not shown). A value is entered.

そして、コントローラ3は、これに実装されたプログラムにより実現される機能として、物体情報取得手段6、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7、接触可能性判断手段8、接触対策処理手段9を備えている。   The controller 3 includes object information acquisition means 6, oncoming / in-vehicle stationary object determination means 7, contact possibility determination means 8, and contact countermeasure processing means 9 as functions realized by the program installed therein. ing.

物体情報取得手段6は、レーダ装置2の出力に基づいて、前記監視領域Aに存在する個々の物体(レーダ装置2で検出された物体)に関する物体情報を取得する手段である。該物体情報には、個々の物体の自車1に対する相対位置(もしくは該物体と自車1の距離)および相対速度を含む該物体の相対運動情報や、該物体のサイズ、形状、種類に関する情報などが含まれる。   The object information acquisition means 6 is means for acquiring object information relating to individual objects (objects detected by the radar apparatus 2) existing in the monitoring area A based on the output of the radar apparatus 2. The object information includes information on relative motion of the object including the relative position (or the distance between the object and the vehicle 1) and the relative velocity of each object, and information on the size, shape, and type of the object. Etc. are included.

また、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、物体情報取得手段6で取得された物体情報から、レーダ装置2により対向車が検出されていることが認識され、且つ、その対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が検出されていることが認識される場合に、その静止物体が車両の通過が可能な静止物体であるか否かを判断する手段である。そして、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、該静止物体が車両の通過が可能な静止物体であるか否かを判断するために、該静止物体の高さが所定値以下であるか否かを判断する高さ判断手段と、該静止物体が自車1の進行方向で連続する構造物(以下、単に連続構造物という)であるか否かを判断する連続性判断手段11とを具備している。   The oncoming vehicle-to-vehicle stationary object judging means 7 recognizes from the object information acquired by the object information acquiring means 6 that the radar apparatus 2 has detected an oncoming vehicle, and When it is recognized that a stationary object is detected between the vehicle 1 and the vehicle 1, it is a means for determining whether or not the stationary object is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass. The oncoming vehicle-to-vehicle stationary object determination means 7 determines whether the height of the stationary object is a predetermined value or less in order to determine whether or not the stationary object is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass. Height determining means for determining whether or not, and continuity determining means 11 for determining whether or not the stationary object is a structure continuous in the traveling direction of the host vehicle 1 (hereinafter simply referred to as a continuous structure). It has.

前記接触可能性判断手段8は、基本的には、物体情報取得手段6で取得された物体情報や、自車1の運動状態を基に、前記監視領域Aに存在する個々の物体と自車1との接触の可能性を判断する手段である。ただし、この判断においては、該接触可能性判断手段8は、前記連続性判断手段11の判断結果に応じて、接触の可能性の有無の判断条件を変更する。   Basically, the contact possibility determination means 8 is based on the object information acquired by the object information acquisition means 6 and the motion state of the own vehicle 1 and the individual objects and the own vehicle existing in the monitoring area A. It is a means for judging the possibility of contact with 1. However, in this determination, the contact possibility determination unit 8 changes the determination condition for the possibility of contact according to the determination result of the continuity determination unit 11.

前記接触対策処理手段9は、接触可能性判断手段8の判断結果が、接触の可能性が有るという判断結果となるような物体が存在する場合に、その接触の回避や接触時の衝撃軽減のための所定の接触対策処理を実行する手段である。本実施形態では、接触対策処理手段9は、自車1と物体との接触の可能性が有ることを運転者に認識させるために警報器4を作動させる処理と、自車1のブレーキ装置5を作動させて自車1の制動(減速)を行なう処理とを上記接触対策処理として実行する。   The contact countermeasure processing unit 9 avoids the contact and reduces the impact at the time of contact when there is an object whose determination result of the contact possibility determination unit 8 is a determination result that there is a possibility of contact. Means for executing a predetermined contact countermeasure process. In the present embodiment, the contact countermeasure processing means 9 performs a process of operating the alarm device 4 to make the driver recognize that there is a possibility of contact between the host vehicle 1 and an object, and a brake device 5 of the host vehicle 1. And the process of braking (decelerating) the vehicle 1 by operating the vehicle is executed as the contact countermeasure process.

補足すると、警報器4としては、例えばブザー音や音声による聴覚的な警報器、あるいは、運転者の視野領域での表示点滅などによる視覚的な警報器、あるいは、運転者用シートの振動もしくは運転者用シートベルトの張力変化による体感的な警報器、あるいは、これらを組合わせた警報器が使用される。また、接触対策処理として、ブレーキ装置5を作動させる代わりに、自車1の変速機の変速比を低速用変速比側に変化させることで、自車1の制動を行なうようにしてもよい。あるいは、走行用動力源として電動モータを備えたハイブリッド車両もしくは電動車両では、該電動モータの回生運転によって、自車1の制動を行なうようにしてもよい。さらに、接触対策処理として、警報器4の作動と、ブレーキ装置5の作動などによる自車1の制動とのうちのいずれか一方だけを行なうようにしてもよい。   Supplementally, as the alarm device 4, for example, an audible alarm device by a buzzer sound or voice, a visual alarm device by flashing display in the driver's visual field, or vibration or driving of the driver's seat A sensible alarm device due to a change in the tension of a seat belt for a person or a combination of these alarm devices is used. Further, as the contact countermeasure process, the vehicle 1 may be braked by changing the transmission gear ratio of the vehicle 1 to the low-speed gear ratio side instead of operating the brake device 5. Alternatively, in a hybrid vehicle or an electric vehicle provided with an electric motor as a driving power source, the host vehicle 1 may be braked by a regenerative operation of the electric motor. Furthermore, as the contact countermeasure processing, only one of the operation of the alarm device 4 and the braking of the host vehicle 1 by the operation of the brake device 5 or the like may be performed.

次に、前記対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7および接触可能性判断手段8のより具体的な処理を含めて、前記コントローラ3の全体的な処理を詳説する。   Next, the overall processing of the controller 3 will be described in detail, including more specific processing of the oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object determination means 7 and the contact possibility determination means 8.

自車1の走行中に、コントローラ3は、図2のフローチャートに示す処理を所定の演算処理周期で逐次実行する。   While the host vehicle 1 is traveling, the controller 3 sequentially executes the processing shown in the flowchart of FIG. 2 at a predetermined calculation processing cycle.

コントローラ3は、まず、自車1の車速、ヨーレートなどの運動状態を含む自車状態を図示しない種々のセンサの出力などから検出する(STEP1)。この自車状態には、車速やヨーレートのほか、自車1のウィンカー、ステアリングハンドルの操舵角、アクセルペダル、ブレーキペダルなどの自車1の操縦機器の操作状態の検出データや、GPSもしくは慣性航法システムによる自車1の位置情報、ナビゲーションシステムによる自車1の周辺の道路情報が含まれていてもよい。   First, the controller 3 detects the state of the vehicle including the state of motion such as the vehicle speed and yaw rate of the vehicle 1 from the outputs of various sensors (not shown) (STEP 1). In addition to the vehicle speed and yaw rate, this vehicle state includes detection data of the operation state of the steering device of the vehicle 1 such as the winker of the vehicle 1, the steering angle of the steering wheel, the accelerator pedal, and the brake pedal, and GPS or inertial navigation. The position information of the own vehicle 1 by the system and the road information around the own vehicle 1 by the navigation system may be included.

次いで、コントローラ3は、レーダ装置2の出力を基に、前記物体情報取得手段6によって、前記監視領域Aに存在する個々の物体に関する物体情報を取得する(STEP2)。すなわち、レーダ装置2により検出された個々の物体の自車1に対する相対位置(もしくは該物体と自車1との距離)、相対速度などの相対運動情報と、該物体のサイズ、形状、種類に関する情報とが取得される。   Next, the controller 3 acquires object information related to individual objects existing in the monitoring area A by the object information acquisition means 6 based on the output of the radar device 2 (STEP 2). That is, the relative position of each object detected by the radar device 2 with respect to the own vehicle 1 (or the distance between the object and the own vehicle 1), the relative motion information such as the relative speed, and the size, shape, and type of the object. Information is acquired.

次いで、コントローラ3は、レーダ装置2により検出された(監視領域Aに存在する)個々の物体について、該物体が自車1に接触するまでの予測時間である接触時間Tを接触可能性判断手段8により算出する(STEP3)。この場合、接触時間Tの算出は例えば次のように行なわれる。すなわち、接触可能性判断手段8は、自車1の現在の運動状態としての車速およびヨーレートの検出値と該自車1のサイズ(車幅など)とを基に、自車1の所定時間後までの進路領域(自車1の通過領域)を予測すると共に、検出された個々の物体の自車1に対する現在の相対位置および相対速度と該物体のサイズとを基に、該物体1の所定時間後までの進路領域(該物体の通過領域)を予測する。そして、自車1の進路領域と、物体の進路領域とが将来の同時刻において交わる(それらの進路領域の重なりを生じる)場合には、その交わりを生じる時刻と、現在時刻との差を該物体についての接触時間Tとして算出する。   Next, the controller 3 determines the contact possibility T for each object detected by the radar device 2 (existing in the monitoring area A), which is a predicted time until the object contacts the host vehicle 1. 8 (STEP 3). In this case, the contact time T is calculated as follows, for example. That is, the contact possibility determination means 8 is based on the detected value of the vehicle speed and yaw rate as the current movement state of the own vehicle 1 and the size (vehicle width, etc.) of the own vehicle 1 after a predetermined time. Is predicted based on the current relative position and relative speed of the detected individual object with respect to the own vehicle 1 and the size of the object 1. The course area (passage area of the object) until after time is predicted. Then, when the course area of the host vehicle 1 and the course area of the object intersect at the same time in the future (the overlapping of these course areas occurs), the difference between the time at which the intersection occurs and the current time is Calculated as the contact time T for the object.

また、自車1の進路領域と、物体の進路領域とが同時刻において交わりを生じない場合(例えば物体の相対速度のベクトルが自車1から遠ざかる向きのベクトルである場合や、該相対速度の大きさが0である場合など)には、該物体に関する接触時間Tは、後述する閾値Taiよりも必ず大きくなるようにあらかじめ定められた所定値に設定される。   Further, when the course area of the own vehicle 1 and the course area of the object do not intersect at the same time (for example, when the relative velocity vector of the object is a vector moving away from the own vehicle 1, In the case where the magnitude is 0), the contact time T related to the object is set to a predetermined value that is always larger than a threshold value Tai described later.

なお、物体の現在の相対速度のベクトルの向きが自車1に進行方向とほぼ一致し、且つ、該ベクトルの向きが自車1に近づく向きである場合には、該物体および自車1の進路領域を予測することなく、該物体と自車1との距離を該物体の相対速度の大きさで除算することにより、該物体についての接触時間Tを算出するようにしてもよい。また、自車1に対する物体の現在の相対速度のベクトルが、自車1から遠ざかる向きのベクトルである場合、あるいは、該相対速度の大きさが0である場合にも、自車1および物体の進路領域を予測することなく、該物体についての接触時間Tを上記所定値に設定するようにしてもよい。さらに、自車1の進路領域を予測する場合には、自車1の現在の車速およびヨーレートに加えて該車速およびヨーレートの過去履歴や、自車1のアクセルペダルやブレーキペダルの操作状態を考慮したり、ナビゲーションシステムに登録された目標経路を考慮してもよい。また、物体の進路領域を予測する場合においても、該物体の現在の相対位置および相対速度だけでなく、該相対位置および相対速度の過去履歴を考慮するようにしてもよい。   If the direction of the vector of the current relative speed of the object is substantially the same as the traveling direction of the host vehicle 1 and the direction of the vector is a direction approaching the host vehicle 1, the object and the host vehicle 1 You may make it calculate the contact time T about this object by dividing the distance of this object and the own vehicle 1 by the magnitude | size of the relative speed of this object, without estimating a course area | region. Further, when the vector of the current relative speed of the object with respect to the own vehicle 1 is a vector in a direction away from the own vehicle 1 or when the magnitude of the relative speed is 0, the own vehicle 1 and the object You may make it set the contact time T about this object to the said predetermined value, without predicting a course area. Furthermore, when predicting the course area of the host vehicle 1, in addition to the current vehicle speed and yaw rate of the host vehicle 1, the past history of the vehicle speed and yaw rate, and the operation state of the accelerator pedal and the brake pedal of the host vehicle 1 are considered. Or a target route registered in the navigation system may be taken into consideration. Also, when predicting the path area of an object, not only the current relative position and relative speed of the object but also the past history of the relative position and relative speed may be considered.

次いで、前記対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7によって、STEP4〜6の判断処理意を実行する。すなわち、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、まず、レーダ装置2により検出された個々の物体が対向車であるか否かを前記物体情報を基に判断する(STEP4)。この場合、検出された物体が対向車であるか否かは、例えば、該物体が一般的な車両相当のサイズを有すること、該物体の相対速度のベクトルの向きが自車1の進行方向とほぼ逆向きであること、並びに、該物体の相対速度の大きさが自車1の車速よりも大きいこと、という条件が満たされるか否かによって判断される。   Next, the determination processing in STEPs 4 to 6 is executed by the oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object determination means 7. That is, the oncoming vehicle / self-vehicle stationary object judging means 7 first judges whether or not each object detected by the radar device 2 is an oncoming vehicle based on the object information (STEP 4). In this case, whether or not the detected object is an oncoming vehicle is, for example, that the object has a size equivalent to a general vehicle, and the direction of the relative speed vector of the object is the traveling direction of the host vehicle 1. Judgment is made based on whether or not the conditions that the direction is substantially opposite and that the relative speed of the object is larger than the vehicle speed of the subject vehicle 1 are satisfied.

さらに、STEP4の判断結果が肯定的である場合には、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、該対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が存在するか否かを前記物体情報を基に判断する(STEP5)。この場合、例えば対向車と自車とを結ぶ直線に平行で、且つ該対向車の幅とほぼ同等の幅を有する領域上で、該対向車と自車との間に該対向車以外の物体が存在することが認識され、且つその物体が静止物体であるか否かによって、該対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が存在するか否かが判断される。なお、対向車と自車1との間の物体が静止物体であるか否かは、例えば、該物体の相対速度のベクトルの向きが自車1の進行方向とほぼ逆向きで、且つ、その相対速度の大きさが自車1の車速とほぼ等しいという条件が満たされるか否かによって判断される。   Further, when the determination result in STEP 4 is affirmative, the oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object judging means 7 determines whether or not a stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1. (STEP 5). In this case, for example, an object other than the oncoming vehicle between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle on a region parallel to a straight line connecting the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle and having a width substantially equal to the width of the oncoming vehicle. And whether or not a stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 is determined based on whether or not the object is a stationary object. Whether or not the object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 is a stationary object is determined by, for example, the direction of the relative speed vector of the object being substantially opposite to the traveling direction of the own vehicle 1 and The determination is made based on whether or not the condition that the magnitude of the relative speed is substantially equal to the vehicle speed of the host vehicle 1 is satisfied.

そして、STEP5の判断結果が肯定的である場合には、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、対向車と自車との間の静止物体が車両の通過が可能な静止物体であるか否かを判断する(STEP6)。   If the determination result in STEP 5 is affirmative, the oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object judging means 7 determines whether the stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass. It is determined whether or not (STEP 6).

STEP6の判断処理は、具体的には、図3のフローチャートに示すように実行される。すなわち、まず、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、前記連続性判断手段11によって、対向車と自車1との間の静止物体が前記連続構造物であるか否かを判断する(STEP61)。この場合、前記物体情報から認識される該静止物体の形状が、自車1の進行方向に所定長以上、連続している形状である場合に、該静止物体が連続構造物であると判断される。そして、これ以外の場合には、該静止物体が連続構造物でないと判断される。   The determination process in STEP 6 is specifically executed as shown in the flowchart of FIG. That is, first, the oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object determination means 7 determines whether or not the stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 is the continuous structure by the continuity determination means 11 ( (STEP 61). In this case, when the shape of the stationary object recognized from the object information is a continuous shape of a predetermined length or more in the traveling direction of the host vehicle 1, it is determined that the stationary object is a continuous structure. The In other cases, it is determined that the stationary object is not a continuous structure.

STEP61の判断結果が肯定的となる場合には、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7はさらに、前記高さ判断手段10によって、連続構造物であると判断された静止物体の高さ(路面からの高さ)が所定値以下であるか否かを判断する(STEP62)。この場合、該静止物体のサイズに関する物体情報から、該静止物体(連続構造物)の高さが推定され、その推定された高さが所定値以下であるか否かが判断される。ここで、該静止物体(連続構造物)の高さが所定値以下であるということは、該静止物体の高さが低く、対向車が該静止物体を乗り越えて自車1の車線に進入することが可能であることを意味する。また、該静止物体の高さが所定値を超えるということは、該静止物体の高さが高く、対向車が該静止物体を乗り越えることが不可能であることを意味する。   If the determination result in STEP 61 is affirmative, the oncoming vehicle-to-vehicle stationary object determination means 7 further determines the height (road surface) of the stationary object determined by the height determination means 10 as a continuous structure. It is determined whether or not (height from) is below a predetermined value (STEP 62). In this case, the height of the stationary object (continuous structure) is estimated from the object information relating to the size of the stationary object, and it is determined whether or not the estimated height is equal to or less than a predetermined value. Here, the height of the stationary object (continuous structure) being a predetermined value or less means that the height of the stationary object is low and the oncoming vehicle gets over the stationary object and enters the lane of the own vehicle 1. Means that it is possible. Moreover, that the height of the stationary object exceeds a predetermined value means that the height of the stationary object is high and it is impossible for an oncoming vehicle to get over the stationary object.

そして、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、STEP61の判断結果が否定的である場合、または、STEP62の判断結果が肯定的である場合に、対向車と自車1との間の静止物体が、車両の通過が可能な静止物体であると判断する(STEP63)。また、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7は、STEP61の判断結果が肯定的で、且つ、STEP62の判断結果が否定的である場合に、対向車と自車1との間の静止物体が、車両の通過が不可能な静止物体であると判断する(STEP64)。   Then, the oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object judging means 7 determines whether the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 are stationary when the determination result of STEP 61 is negative or when the determination result of STEP 62 is positive. It is determined that the object is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass (STEP 63). On the other hand, when the determination result of STEP 61 is positive and the determination result of STEP 62 is negative, the stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 The vehicle is determined to be a stationary object that cannot pass through (STEP 64).

以上が、STEP6の判断処理の詳細である。このSTEP6の判断処理によって、対向車と自車1との間の静止物体が、連続構造物であり、且つ、その高さが所定値よりも高い場合に、該静止物体が車両の通過が不可能な物体であると判断される。また、該静止物体が連続構造物でない場合、あるいは、連続構造物であってもその高さが所定値以下である場合には、該静止物体が車両の通過が可能な物体であると判断される。   The above is the details of the determination process in STEP6. As a result of the determination process in STEP 6, when the stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 is a continuous structure and its height is higher than a predetermined value, the stationary object does not pass the vehicle. It is determined that it is a possible object. In addition, if the stationary object is not a continuous structure, or if it is a continuous structure and its height is less than or equal to a predetermined value, it is determined that the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle can pass. The

ここで、具体的な例を図4および図5を参照して説明する。図4(a),(b)は、対向車線と自車1の走行車線との間に、自車1の進行方向に連続的に延在する連続構造物としての中央分離体Bが設けられている道路などを、それぞれ平面視、側面視で示している。この場合、自車1のレーダ装置2によって、対向車が検出される状況において、該対向車と自車1との間に、静止物体としての中央分離体Bがレーダ装置2によって検出される。このような状況では、前記STEP61の判断結果が肯定的となり、該中央分離体Bが連続構造物であると判断される。そして、該中央分離体Bの高さHが所定値よりも高い場合、すなわち、中央分離体Bが、レーダ装置2により検出されている対向車を含めて一般的な車両が乗り越えることができない程度の高さを有する場合には、前記STEP62の判断結果が否定的となる。この場合には、該中央分離体Bは、車両の通過が不可能な静止物体であると判断される。また、中央分離体Bがの高さHが所定値以下である場合、すなわち、中央分離体Bが、車両が乗り越えることができる程度の低いものである場合には、前記STEP62の判断結果が肯定的となる。この場合には、該中央分離対Bは、車両の通過が可能な静止物体であると判断される。   Here, a specific example will be described with reference to FIGS. 4 (a) and 4 (b), a central separator B as a continuous structure extending continuously in the traveling direction of the host vehicle 1 is provided between the oncoming lane and the traveling lane of the host vehicle 1. A road or the like is shown in a plan view and a side view, respectively. In this case, in the situation where the oncoming vehicle is detected by the radar device 2 of the own vehicle 1, the center separator B as a stationary object is detected by the radar device 2 between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1. In such a situation, the determination result in STEP 61 is affirmative, and it is determined that the central separator B is a continuous structure. When the height H of the central separator B is higher than a predetermined value, that is, the central separator B cannot travel over a general vehicle including an oncoming vehicle detected by the radar device 2. In the case of having the height of the above, the determination result of STEP 62 is negative. In this case, the central separator B is determined to be a stationary object that cannot pass through the vehicle. Further, when the height H of the central separator B is not more than a predetermined value, that is, when the central separator B is low enough to allow the vehicle to get over, the determination result of STEP 62 is affirmative. It becomes the target. In this case, it is determined that the center separation pair B is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass.

また、図5(a),(b)は、対向車線と自車1の走行車線との間に、自車1の進行方向に一定間隔で1列に配列されたポールCが設けられている道路などを、それぞれ平面視、側面視で示している。この場合、自車1のレーダ装置2によって、対向車が検出される状況において、該対向車と自車1との間に、静止物体としてのポールCがレーダ装置2によって検出される。このような状況では、ポールCは、自車1の進行方向に間欠的に並んでいるので、前記STEP61の判断結果が否定的となり、該ポールCが連続構造物でないと判断される。そして、該ポールCは、互いに隣合うものどうしの間に間隔があり、また、一般に柔軟なもの(可撓性を有するもの)であることから、対向車などの車両が該ポールCを乗り越えることが可能である。そこで、対向車と自車1との間の静止物体として、このようなポールCが検出されている場合(STEP61の判断結果が否定的となる場合)には、該静止物体としてのポールCは、車両の通過が可能な静止物体であると判断される。   5 (a) and 5 (b), poles C arranged in a line at regular intervals in the traveling direction of the host vehicle 1 are provided between the oncoming lane and the traveling lane of the host vehicle 1. Roads and the like are shown in a plan view and a side view, respectively. In this case, in a situation where an oncoming vehicle is detected by the radar device 2 of the own vehicle 1, the pole C as a stationary object is detected by the radar device 2 between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1. In such a situation, since the pole C is intermittently arranged in the traveling direction of the host vehicle 1, the determination result of STEP 61 is negative and it is determined that the pole C is not a continuous structure. The pole C has a space between adjacent ones and is generally soft (having flexibility), so that an oncoming vehicle or the like gets over the pole C. Is possible. Therefore, when such a pole C is detected as a stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 (when the determination result in STEP 61 is negative), the pole C as the stationary object is The vehicle is determined to be a stationary object that can pass through.

補足すると、対向車線と自車1の走行車線との間に高さの低い鋲状突起物が一定間隔で配列されているような場合もある。このような場合にも、基本的には、STEP61の判断結果が否定的となり、該突起物が車両の通過が可能な静止物体であると判断される。なお、該突起物の配列間隔が比較的小さいような場合には、レーダ装置2の分解能などの影響で、該突起物が連続構造物であると認識されるような場合(STEP61の判断結果が肯定的となる場合)もある。ただし、この場合であっても、その突起物の高さは一般に低いので、STEP62の判断結果が肯定的となり、ひいては、該突起物は車両の通過が可能な静止物体であると判断される。   Supplementally, there may be a case where hook-shaped projections having a low height are arranged at regular intervals between the oncoming lane and the traveling lane of the host vehicle 1. Even in such a case, basically, the determination result in STEP 61 is negative, and it is determined that the protrusion is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass. In addition, when the arrangement interval of the projections is relatively small, the projection is recognized as a continuous structure due to the influence of the resolution of the radar device 2 (the determination result of STEP 61 is In some cases, it may be positive). However, even in this case, since the height of the protrusion is generally low, the determination result in STEP 62 is positive, and as a result, it is determined that the protrusion is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass.

図2の説明に戻って、対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段7により上記した如く実行されるSTEP4〜6の判断結果は、接触可能性判断手段8に与えられる。そして、接触可能性判断手段8は、STEP6の判断結果が否定的となる場合を除いて、STEP4〜6の判断結果に応じて、STEP7または8の処理を実行した後、STEP9の処理を実行することによって、レーダ装置2により検出された各物体と自車1との接触の可能性を判断する。   Returning to the description of FIG. 2, the determination results of STEPs 4 to 6 executed as described above by the oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object determination unit 7 are given to the contact possibility determination unit 8. And the contact possibility determination means 8 performs the process of STEP9 after performing the process of STEP7 or 8 according to the determination result of STEP4-6 except the case where the determination result of STEP6 becomes negative. Thus, the possibility of contact between each object detected by the radar device 2 and the host vehicle 1 is determined.

本実施形態では、接触可能性判断手段8は、基本的には、前記STEP3で算出した接触時間Tを所定の閾値Taiと比較することによって物体と自車1との接触の可能性を判断する。   In this embodiment, the contact possibility determination means 8 basically determines the possibility of contact between the object and the vehicle 1 by comparing the contact time T calculated in STEP 3 with a predetermined threshold value Tai. .

この場合、接触可能性判断手段8は、STEP4〜6の判断結果に応じて、STEP7,8にて上記閾値Taiを設定する。   In this case, the contact possibility determination means 8 sets the threshold value Tai in STEPs 7 and 8 in accordance with the determination results in STEPs 4 to 6.

さらに詳細には、STEP4〜6の判断結果がいずれも肯定的となる物体、すなわち、自車1との間に静止物体が存在し、且つ該静止物体が車両の通過可能な静止物体であるような対向車については、接触可能性判断手段8は、上記閾値Taiを第1所定値TLに設定する(STEP7)。また、STEP4またはSTEP5の判断結果が否定的となるような物体、すなわち、対向車でない物体、あるいは、自車1との間に静止物体が存在しない対向車(例えば自車1の走行車線と対向車線とが単に白線などにより区分されている場合にレーダ装置2によって検出される対向車)については、上記閾値Taiを第2所定値THに設定する(STEP8)。ここで、第1所定値TLは、第2所定値THよりも小さい値である。   More specifically, an object in which the determination results in STEP 4 to 6 are all positive, that is, a stationary object exists between the vehicle 1 and the stationary object is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass. For an oncoming vehicle, the contact possibility determination means 8 sets the threshold value Tai to the first predetermined value TL (STEP 7). Further, an object for which the determination result of STEP 4 or STEP 5 is negative, that is, an object that is not an oncoming vehicle, or an oncoming vehicle in which no stationary object exists between the own vehicle 1 (for example, facing the traveling lane of the own vehicle 1). For the oncoming vehicle detected by the radar device 2 when the lane is simply separated by a white line or the like, the threshold value Tai is set to the second predetermined value TH (STEP 8). Here, the first predetermined value TL is a value smaller than the second predetermined value TH.

このSTEP7,8の処理によって、物体と自車1との接触の可能性を判断するための判断条件が変更される(本実施形態では閾値Taiが変更される)こととなる。この場合、特に、物体が対向車である場合において、自車1との間に車両の通過が可能な静止物体がレーダ装置2により検出されている状況(STEP4〜6の判断結果がいずれも肯定的となる状況)では、該対向車と自車1との間にレーダ装置2により静止物体が検出されていない状況(STEP4,5の判断結果がそれぞれ肯定的、否定的となる状況)よりも、閾値Taiがより小さい所定値TLに設定されることとなる。   By the processing of STEPs 7 and 8, the determination condition for determining the possibility of contact between the object and the vehicle 1 is changed (the threshold value Tai is changed in the present embodiment). In this case, in particular, when the object is an oncoming vehicle, a situation where the radar device 2 detects a stationary object that can pass through the vehicle with the own vehicle 1 (the determination results of STEPs 4 to 6 are all positive) In a situation where the stationary object is not detected by the radar device 2 between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 (a situation where the determination results in STEPs 4 and 5 are positive and negative respectively). The threshold value Tai is set to a smaller predetermined value TL.

そして、接触可能性判断手段8は、上記STEP7またはSTEP8で閾値Taiの値を設定したときには、その閾値Taiを設定した各物体について、該物体に関する接触時間Tが閾値Tai以下であるか否かを判断する(STEP9)。   When the threshold value Tai is set in STEP 7 or STEP 8, the contact possibility determination means 8 determines whether the contact time T related to the object is equal to or less than the threshold value Tai for each object for which the threshold value Tai is set. Judgment is made (STEP 9).

このとき、接触可能性判断手段8は、STEP9の判断処理を行なったいずれかの物体について該STEP9の判断結果が肯定的となる場合には、該物体と自車1との接触の可能性が有ると判断する。そして、この場合には、コントローラ3は、前記接触対策処理手段9の処理を実行する(STEP10)。これにより、前記警報器4が作動して、運転者に警報が発せられると共に、ブレーキ装置5が作動して、自車1の制動(減速)が行なわれる。   At this time, if the determination result in STEP 9 is positive for any object for which the determination process in STEP 9 has been performed, the contact possibility determination means 8 has a possibility of contact between the object and the vehicle 1. Judge that there is. In this case, the controller 3 executes the processing of the contact countermeasure processing means 9 (STEP 10). As a result, the alarm device 4 is actuated to alert the driver, and the brake device 5 is actuated to brake (decelerate) the host vehicle 1.

また、レーダ装置2で検出されたいずれの物体についても、STEP6の判断結果が否定的となる場合(すなわち、物体が対向車であって、且つ、該対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が有り、且つ、その静止物体が車両の通過が不可能な物体である場合)、あるいは、STEP9の判断結果が否定的となる場合には、接触可能性判断手段8は、レーダ装置2により検出されたいずれの物体についても、自車1との接触の可能性が無いと判断する。そして、この場合には、コントローラ3は、前記接触対策処理手段9の処理を実行することなく、今回の演算処理周期での図2の処理を終了する。   In addition, for any object detected by the radar device 2, if the determination result in STEP 6 is negative (that is, the object is an oncoming vehicle and the vehicle is stationary between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1. If there is an object and the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle cannot pass), or if the determination result in STEP 9 is negative, the contact possibility determination means 8 It is determined that there is no possibility of contact with the own vehicle 1 for any detected object. In this case, the controller 3 ends the process of FIG. 2 in the current calculation processing cycle without executing the process of the contact countermeasure processing means 9.

以上説明したコントローラ3の処理によって、レーダ装置2により対向車が検出されている場合に、その対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が存在しない状況では、前記閾値Taiとして、大きめの第2所定値THが設定される。このため、例えば、対向車が自車1の走行車線にはみ出して自車1に向かって来るような状況では、余裕を持った早めのタイミングで、該対向車と自車1との接触の可能性が有ると判断されて、前記接触対策処理が実行される。   When the oncoming vehicle is detected by the radar device 2 by the processing of the controller 3 described above, in a situation where there is no stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1, the threshold Tai is set to a larger first value. 2 A predetermined value TH is set. For this reason, for example, in a situation where the oncoming vehicle protrudes from the traveling lane of the own vehicle 1 toward the own vehicle 1, the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 can be contacted at an early timing with a margin. The contact countermeasure process is executed when it is determined that there is a characteristic.

一方、対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が存在し、且つ、その静止物体が前記ポールCのように車両の通過が可能な静止物体である場合には、前記閾値Taiとして、小さめの第1所定値TLが設定される。このため、例えば、対向車が対向車線側で自車1に向かって来るような状況(例えば図5(a)に示すような状況)では、該対向車と自車1との間に、静止物体が存在しない場合よりも、該対向車と自車1との接触の可能性が有ると判断されて、前記接触対策処理が実行されるタイミングが遅くなることとなる。換言すれば、該対向車と自車1との接触の可能性が有ると判断されるのが、該対向車と自車1との間に、静止物体が存在しない場合よりも抑制される。   On the other hand, when a stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 and the stationary object is a stationary object that can pass through the vehicle, such as the pole C, the threshold value Tai is set to be small. The first predetermined value TL is set. For this reason, for example, in a situation where the oncoming vehicle comes toward the own vehicle 1 on the opposite lane side (for example, the situation shown in FIG. 5A), the stationary vehicle is stationary between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1. It is determined that there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 as compared with the case where no object is present, and the timing at which the contact countermeasure process is executed is delayed. In other words, it is determined that there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 as compared with a case where no stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1.

ここで、対向車と自車1との間の静止物体が存在し、且つ、その静止物体が車両の通過が可能な静止物体である場合には、該対向車の運転者の操縦ミスなどにより該対向車が自車1に向かって来て、該対向車が静止物体を乗り越えるような場合であっても、該対向車が、自車1に接触する前に、自車1との間の静止物体に接触することで、該対向車が減速される。このため、該対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が存在しない場合よりも、該対向車と自車1との接触タイミングが遅くなる。従って、対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が存在し、且つ、その静止物体が前記ポールCのように車両の通過が可能な静止物体である場合に、前記閾値Taiとして、小さめの第1所定値TLを設定しても、前記接触対策処理の実行が遅くなり過ぎることはない。また、対向車と自車1との間に、静止物体が存在しない場合よりも、該対向車と自車1との接触の可能性が有ると判断されて、前記接触対策処理が実行されるタイミングが遅くなることから、該対向車と自車1との間に前記ポールCなどの静止物体が存在する状況、すなわち、対向車が本来、自車1の走行車線に進入することが許容されていない状況で、該対向車が対向車線上で自車1の走行車線寄りに進路変更した場合などに、過剰に頻繁に前記接触対策処理が実行されてしまうような事態を防止できる。   Here, when there is a stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 and the stationary object is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass, the driver of the oncoming vehicle may make a mistake. Even when the oncoming vehicle comes toward the own vehicle 1 and the oncoming vehicle gets over a stationary object, before the oncoming vehicle contacts the own vehicle 1, By contacting a stationary object, the oncoming vehicle is decelerated. For this reason, the contact timing between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 is delayed as compared with the case where no stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1. Therefore, when a stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 and the stationary object is a stationary object that can pass through the vehicle, such as the pole C, the threshold value Tai is set to be small. Even if the first predetermined value TL is set, the execution of the contact countermeasure process does not become too slow. Further, it is determined that there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 as compared with the case where no stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1, and the contact countermeasure processing is executed. Since the timing is delayed, a situation where a stationary object such as the pole C exists between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1, that is, the oncoming vehicle is allowed to enter the traveling lane of the own vehicle 1 originally. In such a situation, when the oncoming vehicle changes its course on the oncoming lane toward the traveling lane of the own vehicle 1, it is possible to prevent the contact countermeasure process from being executed too frequently.

加えて、本実施形態では、レーダ装置2により検出されている対向車と自車1との間に静止物体が存在し、且つその静止物体が車両の通過が不可能な構造物(例えば図4(a),(b)に示した中央分離体B)である場合には、その対向車については、接触時間Tによらずに、自車1との接触の可能性が無いと判断される。このため、対向車が自車1の走行車線に進入して来ることが無い状況で、該対向車と自車1との接触の可能性が有ると判断されて、前記接触対策処理が実行されてしまうのを防止することができる。   In addition, in the present embodiment, a stationary object exists between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle 1 detected by the radar apparatus 2 and the stationary object cannot pass through the vehicle (for example, FIG. 4). In the case of the central separator B) shown in (a) and (b), it is determined that the oncoming vehicle has no possibility of contact with the own vehicle 1 regardless of the contact time T. . For this reason, it is determined that there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 in a situation where the oncoming vehicle does not enter the travel lane of the host vehicle 1, and the contact countermeasure process is executed. Can be prevented.

このように、本実施形態によれば、必要以上に過剰に自車1と対向車との接触の可能性が有ると判断されて、前記接触対策処理が実行されるのを防止することができる。ひいては、運転者に煩わしさを及ぼすのを防止することができる。   As described above, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to prevent the contact countermeasure process from being executed when it is determined that there is a possibility of contact between the host vehicle 1 and the oncoming vehicle more than necessary. . As a result, it is possible to prevent the driver from being bothered.

なお、以上説明した実施形態では、レーダ装置2の出力から認識される物体情報に基づいて、対向車と自車1との間の静止物体が車両の通過が可能な静止物体であるか否かを判断したが、自車1に搭載した撮像カメラの撮像画像により、該静止物体の形状や種別を判断して、該静止物体が車両の通過が可能な静止物体であるか否かを判断するようにしてもよい。   In the embodiment described above, based on the object information recognized from the output of the radar apparatus 2, whether or not the stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle 1 is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass. However, the shape and type of the stationary object are determined from the captured image of the imaging camera mounted on the host vehicle 1, and it is determined whether the stationary object is a stationary object through which the vehicle can pass. You may do it.

また、前記実施形態では、接触時間Tと閾値Taiとの比較によって、物体と自車1の接触の可能性を判断したが、例えば、自車1の進路領域と、物体の進路領域とが将来の同時刻において交わる場合に、該物体と自車1との距離が、該物体の相対速度にあらかじめ定めた所定時間を乗じてなる値以下となる場合に、該物体の自車1との接触の可能性が有ると判断するようにしてもよい。   In the embodiment, the possibility of contact between the object and the host vehicle 1 is determined by comparing the contact time T with the threshold value Tai. For example, the course area of the host vehicle 1 and the course area of the object are determined in the future. When the distance between the object and the vehicle 1 is equal to or less than a value obtained by multiplying the relative speed of the object by a predetermined time, the object contacts the vehicle 1 It may be determined that there is a possibility of this.

また、TL<T≦THとなる状況では、前記STEP9の判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、ブレーキ装置5を作動させずに、警報器4だけを作動させるようにしてもよい。また、前記STEP9の判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、T≦TLとなる状況と、TL<T≦THとなる状況とで、ブレーキ装置5による自車1の制動力を異ならせる(後者の状況よりも、前者の状況の方が制動力を大きくする)ようにしてもよい。   In a situation where TL <T ≦ TH, when the determination result in STEP 9 is affirmative, only the alarm device 4 may be operated without operating the brake device 5. Further, when the determination result of STEP 9 is affirmative, the braking force of the vehicle 1 by the brake device 5 is made different between the situation where T ≦ TL and the situation where TL <T ≦ TH (the latter). The braking force may be greater in the former situation than in the situation).

また、図2のフローチャートの処理は、適宜実行順序を変更するようにしてもよい。例えばSTEP1,2の処理の実行順序を入れ替えたり、STEP3の処理をSTEP9の処理の直前に行なうようにしてもよい。また、図3のフローチャートにおいても、STEP62の判断処理をSTEP61の判断処理よりも前に実行するようにしてもよい。   Further, the execution order of the processing of the flowchart of FIG. 2 may be changed as appropriate. For example, the execution order of the processing of STEP1 and STEP2 may be changed, or the processing of STEP3 may be performed immediately before the processing of STEP9. Also in the flowchart of FIG. 3, the determination process in STEP 62 may be executed before the determination process in STEP 61.

また、接触対策処理として、警報の発生や、自車1の制動のほか、自車1のステアリング制御や、ステアリングハンドルの操作力の制御、ブレーキペダルの踏力の制御などを含めてもよい。   In addition to the generation of an alarm and braking of the host vehicle 1, the contact countermeasure processing may include steering control of the host vehicle 1, control of the steering handle operating force, control of the brake pedal depression force, and the like.

本発明の一実施形態の装置の概略構成を示すブロック図。The block diagram which shows schematic structure of the apparatus of one Embodiment of this invention. 図1の装置に備えたコントローラの処理を示すフローチャート。The flowchart which shows the process of the controller with which the apparatus of FIG. 1 was equipped. 図2のSTEP6の処理の詳細を示すフローチャート。The flowchart which shows the detail of the process of STEP6 of FIG. 図4(a),(b)は実施形態の装置の説明するための図。4A and 4B are diagrams for explaining the apparatus of the embodiment. 図5(a),(b)は実施形態の装置の作動を説明するための図。5A and 5B are views for explaining the operation of the apparatus of the embodiment.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1…車両(自車)、2…レーダ装置(物体検出手段)、6…物体情報取得手段、7…対向車・自車間静止物体判断手段、8…接触可能性判断手段、9…接触対策処理手段、10高さ判断手段、11…連続性判断手段。   DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Vehicle (own vehicle), 2 ... Radar apparatus (object detection means), 6 ... Object information acquisition means, 7 ... Oncoming vehicle / own vehicle stationary object judgment means, 8 ... Contact possibility judgment means, 9 ... Contact countermeasure processing Means, 10 height judging means, 11... Continuity judging means.

Claims (4)

少なくとも自車の進行方向前方の領域を含む周辺領域に存在する物体を検出する物体検出手段と、該物体検出手段により検出された物体の自車に対する相対運動情報を含む物体情報を該物体検出手段の出力に基づいて取得する物体情報取得手段と、少なくとも該物体情報取得手段により取得された物体情報に基づいて前記検出された物体と自車との接触の可能性が有るか否かを判断する接触可能性判断手段と、該接触可能性判断手段により接触の可能性が有ると判断された場合に、所定の接触対策処理を実行する接触対策処理手段とを備えた車両の走行支援装置において、
前記物体検出手段により前記物体としての対向車が検出され、且つ、該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されている状況で、該静止物体が、車両の通過が可能な物体であるか否かを前記物体情報に基づいて判断する自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段を備え、
前記接触可能性判断手段は、少なくとも該自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段の判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、前記物体検出手段により前記対向車が検出され、且つ、該物体検出手段により該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されていない場合よりも、前記対向車と自車との接触可能性が有るか否かの判断結果が肯定的な判断結果となるのを抑制するように、該接触可能性が有るか否かを判断するための判断条件を変更する手段を備えることを特徴とする車両の走行支援装置。
Object detection means for detecting an object existing in a peripheral area including at least a front area in the traveling direction of the own vehicle, and object information including information on relative motion of the object detected by the object detection means with respect to the own vehicle. Object information acquisition means acquired based on the output of the vehicle, and at least whether there is a possibility of contact between the detected object and the vehicle based on the object information acquired by the object information acquisition means In a vehicle travel support device comprising: a contact possibility determination unit; and a contact countermeasure processing unit that executes predetermined contact countermeasure processing when the contact possibility determination unit determines that there is a possibility of contact;
In the situation where an oncoming vehicle as the object is detected by the object detection means and a stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle, the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle can pass. A self-vehicle / oncoming vehicle stationary object determination means for determining whether or not there is based on the object information;
The contact possibility determination means detects the oncoming vehicle by the object detection means when the determination result of the stationary object determination means between the own vehicle and the oncoming vehicle is affirmative, and the object detection means Suppresses that the determination result of whether or not there is a possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle becomes a positive determination result, compared to the case where a stationary object is not detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. As described above, the vehicle driving support apparatus includes means for changing a determination condition for determining whether or not the contact possibility exists.
請求項1記載の車両の走行支援装置において、
前記接触可能性判断手段は、前記物体情報取得手段により取得された物体情報に基づいて、前記検出された物体と自車とが接触するまでの予測時間である接触時間を逐次予測する手段と、該接触時間が所定の閾値以下であるか否かを前記判断条件とし、該接触時間が該所定の閾値以下になった場合に前記接触の可能性が有ると判断する手段と、少なくとも前記自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段の判断結果が肯定的となる場合に、前記物体検出手段により前記対向車が検出され、且つ、該物体検出手段により該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されていない場合よりも、前記所定の閾値を小さくするように該所定の閾値を変更することにより前記判断条件を変更する手段とを備えることを特徴とする車両の走行支援装置。
The vehicle travel support device according to claim 1,
The contact possibility determination means sequentially predicts a contact time that is a prediction time until the detected object and the vehicle come into contact based on the object information acquired by the object information acquisition means; Means for determining whether or not the contact time is less than or equal to a predetermined threshold, and determining that there is a possibility of contact when the contact time is less than or equal to the predetermined threshold; and at least the vehicle When the determination result of the oncoming inter-vehicle stationary object determination means is affirmative, the oncoming vehicle is detected by the object detecting means, and a stationary object is detected between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle by the object detecting means. And a means for changing the determination condition by changing the predetermined threshold so as to make the predetermined threshold smaller than a case where the predetermined threshold is not detected.
請求項1または2記載の車両の走行支援装置において、前記接触可能性判断手段は、前記物体検出手段により前記対向車が検出され、且つ、該対向車と自車との間に静止物体が検出されている状況で、前記自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段の判断結果が否定的となる場合に、該対向車と自車との接触の可能性が無いと判断することを特徴とする車両の走行支援装置。   3. The vehicle travel support apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the contact possibility determination means detects the oncoming vehicle by the object detection means and detects a stationary object between the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. A vehicle that determines that there is no possibility of contact between the oncoming vehicle and the host vehicle when the determination result of the stationary object determining unit between the host vehicle and the oncoming vehicle is negative. Driving support device. 請求項1〜3のいずれか1項に記載の車両の走行支援装置において、
前記物体情報取得手段が取得する前記物体情報は、前記物体検出手段により検出された物体の形状および大きさの情報を含み、前記自車・対向車間静止物体判断手段は、前記対向車と自車との間の静止物体の高さが所定値以下であるか否かを該静止物体に関する前記物体情報に基づいて判断する高さ判断手段と、該静止物体が自車の進行方向に所定の長さ以上に連続した構造物であるか否かを該静止物体に関する前記物体情報に基づいて判断する連続性判断手段とを備え、該高さ判断手段の判断結果が肯定的となることと、該連続性判断手段の判断結果が否定的となることとのいずれか一方が成立する場合に、該静止物体が車両の通過が可能な物体であると判断することを特徴とする車両の走行支援装置。
The vehicle travel support device according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The object information acquired by the object information acquisition unit includes information on the shape and size of the object detected by the object detection unit, and the vehicle / oncoming vehicle stationary object determination unit includes the oncoming vehicle and the own vehicle. A height judging means for judging whether or not the height of the stationary object between the vehicle and the vehicle is less than a predetermined value based on the object information relating to the stationary object; Continuity determining means for determining whether or not the structure is more continuous based on the object information about the stationary object, the determination result of the height determining means being positive, A vehicle travel support device that determines that the stationary object is an object through which the vehicle can pass when either one of the determination result of the continuity determination means becomes negative. .
JP2007314562A 2007-12-05 2007-12-05 Vehicle travel support device Active JP4952938B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007314562A JP4952938B2 (en) 2007-12-05 2007-12-05 Vehicle travel support device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007314562A JP4952938B2 (en) 2007-12-05 2007-12-05 Vehicle travel support device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009140145A true JP2009140145A (en) 2009-06-25
JP4952938B2 JP4952938B2 (en) 2012-06-13

Family

ID=40870706

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007314562A Active JP4952938B2 (en) 2007-12-05 2007-12-05 Vehicle travel support device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4952938B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011195083A (en) * 2010-03-23 2011-10-06 Toyota Motor Corp Steering assistance device
JP2014099019A (en) * 2012-11-14 2014-05-29 Denso Corp Collision prevention apparatus for vehicle
JP2018116628A (en) * 2017-01-20 2018-07-26 パイオニア株式会社 Information display device and relay device
JP2018206314A (en) * 2017-06-09 2018-12-27 株式会社Subaru Vehicle control device
CN110001643A (en) * 2017-12-28 2019-07-12 本田技研工业株式会社 Controller of vehicle, control method for vehicle, storage medium and information acquisition device
JP2022154611A (en) * 2021-03-30 2022-10-13 本田技研工業株式会社 Drive assistance device, drive assistance method, and program
WO2023026522A1 (en) * 2021-08-24 2023-03-02 日立Astemo株式会社 Automatic emergency braking device

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1125397A (en) * 1997-07-09 1999-01-29 Toyota Motor Corp Traveling state judging device for vehicle
JP2004136785A (en) * 2002-10-17 2004-05-13 Toyota Motor Corp Controller for vehicle
JP2005010938A (en) * 2003-06-17 2005-01-13 Mazda Motor Corp Traveling supporting system and on-vehicle terminal equipment
JP2007272647A (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-18 Denso Corp Portable electronic equipment and on -vehicle electronic equipment

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1125397A (en) * 1997-07-09 1999-01-29 Toyota Motor Corp Traveling state judging device for vehicle
JP2004136785A (en) * 2002-10-17 2004-05-13 Toyota Motor Corp Controller for vehicle
JP2005010938A (en) * 2003-06-17 2005-01-13 Mazda Motor Corp Traveling supporting system and on-vehicle terminal equipment
JP2007272647A (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-18 Denso Corp Portable electronic equipment and on -vehicle electronic equipment

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011195083A (en) * 2010-03-23 2011-10-06 Toyota Motor Corp Steering assistance device
JP2014099019A (en) * 2012-11-14 2014-05-29 Denso Corp Collision prevention apparatus for vehicle
JP2018116628A (en) * 2017-01-20 2018-07-26 パイオニア株式会社 Information display device and relay device
JP2018206314A (en) * 2017-06-09 2018-12-27 株式会社Subaru Vehicle control device
CN110001643A (en) * 2017-12-28 2019-07-12 本田技研工业株式会社 Controller of vehicle, control method for vehicle, storage medium and information acquisition device
JP2019119296A (en) * 2017-12-28 2019-07-22 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle control device, vehicle control method, program, and information acquisition device
CN110001643B (en) * 2017-12-28 2022-03-04 本田技研工业株式会社 Vehicle control device, vehicle control method, storage medium, and information acquisition device
JP2022154611A (en) * 2021-03-30 2022-10-13 本田技研工業株式会社 Drive assistance device, drive assistance method, and program
JP7288923B2 (en) 2021-03-30 2023-06-08 本田技研工業株式会社 Driving support device, driving support method, and program
WO2023026522A1 (en) * 2021-08-24 2023-03-02 日立Astemo株式会社 Automatic emergency braking device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4952938B2 (en) 2012-06-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6115576B2 (en) Vehicle travel control device
JP6677822B2 (en) Vehicle control device
JP6507862B2 (en) Peripheral monitoring device and driving support device
JP4628683B2 (en) Pedestrian detection device and vehicle driving support device including the pedestrian detection device
JP6318864B2 (en) Driving assistance device
JP5345350B2 (en) Vehicle driving support device
JP5024255B2 (en) Driving assistance device
EP3078515A1 (en) Collision avoidance based on front wheel off tracking during reverse operation
CN109388137B (en) Driving assistance apparatus and storage medium
US20190071071A1 (en) Vehicle control device, vehicle control method, and storage medium
JP4952938B2 (en) Vehicle travel support device
JP4961592B2 (en) Vehicle travel support device
JP2008179251A (en) Traveling support device for vehicle and traveling support method for vehicle
JP7059786B2 (en) Out-of-vehicle notification device
JP7156988B2 (en) Travel control device, travel control method, and program
JP2017068461A (en) Vehicle driving assistance device
CN109969191B (en) Driving assistance system and method
JP4235090B2 (en) Vehicle travel support device
JP3672914B2 (en) Vehicle alarm device
US10948303B2 (en) Vehicle control device
JP2003276538A (en) Obstacle predicting device
KR101511860B1 (en) Driver assistance systems and controlling method for the same
JP2005199930A (en) Vehicle traveling control device
KR20230089780A (en) Method and apparatus for collision avoidance
JP2021117725A (en) Vehicle collision prevention device and vehicle collision prevention method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20091127

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110630

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110705

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110831

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120214

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120228

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4952938

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150323

Year of fee payment: 3