JP2007232564A - Facilities diagnostic support apparatus, system, and computer program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a facilities diagnostic support apparatus, system, and a computer program used for them, which extract spots, in electric power facilities such as a waterway installed in a power plant, requiring priority monitoring and detailed investigations and spots requiring countermeasures exhaustively and provide an understanding of secular changes of the facilities. <P>SOLUTION: The electric power facilities diagnostic support system 1 comprises: a display means 9; an inspection/investigation result evaluation means 3 for evaluating an inspection/investigation result for the facilities and displaying spots requiring priority monitoring or detailed investigations in the facilities on the display means prominently; a detailed investigation result evaluation means 4 for evaluating the detailed investigation result for the facilities and displaying spots requiring countermeasures in the facilities on the display means prominently; and a development creation means 5 for creating developments of the facilities and displaying them in a time series on the display means. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to an apparatus and a system for supporting diagnosis of electric power equipment, and a computer program used for them.

  The waterways such as pressure tunnels and non-pressure tunnels installed in the power plant are long-term by making 1) patrol, 2) inspection survey, 3) detailed survey, and 4) countermeasure work continuously. It is maintained and managed so that it can operate stably.

  The patrol is to easily investigate the appearance of a landslide or the like around a waterway or a natural ground of a passage and make a diagnosis based on the result. Its frequency is once per month.

  The inspection survey includes an inspection and a soundness inspection. The inspection is further divided into a periodic inspection and a temporary inspection. Periodic inspection refers to conducting a survey using visual inspection and simple instruments to confirm the degree of deformation and progress, and making a diagnosis based on the results. The frequency is once per year for external inspection (inspection of ground around the waterway, which does not require water breakage of the waterway), and once per year for internal inspection (inspection of the waterway inner surface that requires waterway breakage). 3 years. Temporary inspection refers to investigating and diagnosing when there is an abnormality in patrol or when there is concern about safety after an earthquake. In addition, the soundness survey is a survey using a measuring instrument in order to quantitatively grasp the deterioration status of the entire channel, and diagnoses based on the results. Implement sequentially. Deformation refers to abnormal places such as cracks, delamination / peeling, drilling, and spring water.

  The detailed survey is to investigate the cause of the deformation found in the inspection survey and to conduct a detailed survey to obtain the data necessary for the investigation of countermeasures.

  Countermeasure work is construction that is carried out for the purpose of proper maintenance and life extension against deformation.

  As a system for supporting the work of evaluating inspection investigation data and detailed investigation data or the work of examining countermeasures, for example, Patent Document 1 below describes a life cycle maintenance plan planning system for a plant. This technology is intended for plants that can monitor the operating conditions in real time, grasps the long-term trends of aging and performance degradation of plants and system equipment, draws up maintenance plans over the life of the plant, and communicates to the power company via the Internet. Can be presented.

JP 2004-170225 A

  However, many of the waterways installed at the power plant cannot automatically measure abnormal conditions, so engineers themselves still have 1) patrols, 2) inspections, 3) detailed surveys, and 4) countermeasures. However, there are the following problems.

  When extracting points that require priority monitoring or detailed survey from inspection survey data, or when extracting locations that require implementation of countermeasures from detailed survey data, the extraction of those locations will be leaked, leading to focus monitoring and details Investigation and countermeasure work may be carried out. In addition, since inspection survey data and detailed survey data are managed not in units of channels but in units of implementation using forms (paper), it is difficult to grasp the secular change of channels. However, Patent Document 1 does not describe a method for solving these problems.

  The present invention can extract a portion of a power facility such as a water channel installed in a power plant that requires priority monitoring or detailed investigation or a portion that requires implementation of countermeasure work without leaking, and grasps the secular change of the facility. An object of the present invention is to provide an equipment diagnosis support apparatus and system that can be used, and a computer program used for them.

  The first invention is a diagnosis support apparatus for electric power equipment, wherein the display means and the inspection survey result of the equipment are evaluated so that the point requiring priority monitoring or detailed investigation in the equipment is conspicuous on the display means. It is characterized by comprising inspection inspection result evaluation means for displaying, and a development drawing creation means for creating a development drawing of the equipment and displaying it in time series on the display means.

  The second invention is a diagnosis support device for electric power equipment, wherein the display means and the detailed investigation result of the equipment are evaluated, and the place where the countermeasure work in the equipment needs to be implemented is displayed prominently on the display means. A detailed survey result evaluation means for creating the development view of the equipment, and a development drawing creation means for displaying the development view in time series on the display means.

  The third invention is a diagnosis support apparatus for electric power equipment, wherein the display means and the inspection survey result of the equipment are evaluated so that the point requiring priority monitoring or detailed investigation in the equipment is conspicuous on the display means. Inspection survey result evaluation means for displaying, detailed survey result evaluation means for evaluating the detailed survey result of the equipment, and displaying the location where the countermeasure work in the equipment needs to be performed is prominently displayed on the display means, and the equipment And a development drawing creation means for creating a development drawing and displaying it in time series on the display means.

  The facility is, for example, a water channel installed in a power plant, and in the first or third invention, the inspection survey result evaluation unit determines a point in the water channel that requires priority monitoring or detailed survey for each water channel and the water channel. You may decide to display for every block of a waterway. In the second or third invention, the detailed investigation result evaluation means may display a location in the water channel where a countermeasure work needs to be performed for each block of the water channel.

  A power equipment diagnosis support system according to a fourth aspect of the present invention comprises the equipment diagnosis support apparatus according to any one of the first to third aspects of the invention, and a control terminal connected to the equipment diagnosis support apparatus via a communication network, the display means Is a display screen of the control terminal.

  A fifth invention is a program for causing a computer to execute a diagnosis support processing procedure for an electric power facility, and the processing procedure evaluates an inspection survey result of the facility and requires priority monitoring or detailed survey in the facility. An inspection survey result evaluation process for prominently displaying various parts on the display screen of the computer, and a development drawing creation process for creating a development drawing of the equipment and displaying it in time series on the display screen, To do.

  A sixth invention is a program for causing a computer to execute a diagnosis support processing procedure for a power facility, and the processing procedure needs to evaluate a detailed investigation result of the facility and implement a countermeasure work in the facility. A detailed survey result evaluation process for displaying a location prominently on the display screen of the computer, and a development drawing creation process for creating a development drawing of the equipment and displaying it in time series on the display screen. .

  A seventh invention is a program for causing a computer to execute a diagnosis support processing procedure for electric power equipment, wherein the processing procedure evaluates an inspection survey result of the facility and requires priority monitoring or detailed survey in the facility The inspection survey result evaluation process that displays a prominent location on the display screen of the computer and the detailed survey result of the facility are evaluated, and the location that requires implementation of countermeasure work in the facility is prominent on the screen It includes a detailed survey result evaluation process to be displayed, and a development drawing creation process for creating a development drawing of the equipment and displaying it in time series on the display screen.

  The facility is, for example, a water channel installed in a power plant. In the fifth or seventh invention, in the inspection survey result evaluation process, a point that requires priority monitoring or detailed survey in the water channel is determined for each water channel and the You may decide to display for every block of a waterway. Further, in the sixth or seventh invention, in the detailed survey result evaluation process, a place where countermeasure work in the water channel needs to be performed may be displayed for each block of the water channel.

  According to the present invention, when an inspection survey result or a detailed survey result is displayed on a display means or a display screen for a power facility such as a water channel installed at a power plant, a point or countermeasure that requires priority monitoring or a detailed survey is required. Since the places where the work needs to be performed are displayed prominently, the engineer can extract those places without leaking. And since the development view of the equipment is displayed in time series on the display means or the display screen, the engineer can grasp the secular change of the equipment.

  Hereinafter, the facility diagnosis support system of an Example is demonstrated. The power equipment targeted by the equipment diagnosis support system may be any, but here, the water channel installed in the power plant will be described.

  FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of an equipment diagnosis support system according to an embodiment. The equipment diagnosis support system 1 includes a server computer 2 and a computer 9 connected via a communication network 8 such as the Internet. The server computer 2 includes an inspection survey result evaluation unit 3, a detailed survey result evaluation unit 4, a development drawing creation unit 5, and a data storage area 6. One or more computers 9 may be connected to the server computer 2. The computer 9 is a control terminal of the server computer 2 and includes a display screen. The inspection survey result evaluation unit 3 includes an inspection result evaluation unit 121 and a soundness survey result evaluation unit 122. Note that the inspection survey result evaluation unit 3, the detailed survey result evaluation unit 4, and the development drawing creation unit 5 may be stored in the computer 9.

  When an engineer instructs input or selection on the computer 9, the server computer 2 processes the result, and the result is displayed on the screen of the computer 9.

Fig. 2 is a flowchart showing the work procedure when an engineer performs 1) patrol, 2) inspection, 3) detailed investigation, and 4) countermeasure work. The work is performed according to the following procedure.
(1) Patrol (step (hereinafter referred to as “ST”) 1).
(2) Inspect and inspect (ST2). As described above, the inspection investigation is divided into inspection (ST2-1) and soundness investigation (ST2-2). Either one or both may be implemented, but the accuracy of the inspection survey can be improved by implementing both. Inspection survey items and inspection survey contents of the inspection survey are as shown in the list in FIG.
(3) The inspection result is evaluated using the computer 9 (ST3). When the inspection is performed in ST2 (ST2-1), the inspection data is input on the inspection data input screen 21-1 (FIG. 6) described later, and is described later on the inspection result evaluation screen 31-1 (FIG. 8) described later. The evaluation result of the inspection result (hereinafter referred to as “inspection evaluation result”) is obtained (ST3-1). In addition, when a soundness survey is performed in ST2 (ST2-2), soundness survey data is input on a later-described soundness survey data input screen 21-2 (FIG. 10), and a later-described soundness survey result evaluation is performed. An evaluation result (hereinafter referred to as “health investigation evaluation result”) of a later-described soundness investigation result is obtained on screen 31-2 (FIG. 16) (ST3-2).
(4) The process is branched according to the waterway evaluation rank described later (ST4). When the waterway evaluation rank is “1 (in the case of inspection) or A or B (in the case of soundness survey)”, the process returns to ST1 and the inspection is continued. When the waterway evaluation rank is “2 (in the case of inspection) or C (in the case of soundness investigation)”, switching to the priority monitoring (ST5), returning to ST1 and continuing the inspection. Note that priority monitoring refers to a focused inspection survey of problem changes. In the case of “3 (in the case of inspection) or D (in the case of soundness investigation)”, the process proceeds to the next ST6.
(5) The process branches according to the necessity of detailed investigation (ST6). The necessity is determined according to the type of deformation (abnormal part). For example, when the deformation type is “(a) crack or (f) displacement / deformation”, it is determined that “detailed investigation is necessary”, the detailed investigation is performed (ST7), and the process proceeds to ST8 below. The survey contents, survey items, and survey methods of the detailed survey are as shown in the list in FIG. When the type of deformation is “(b) peeling / peeling or (c) drilling”, it is determined that “detailed investigation is not necessary”, and the process proceeds to ST10 below.
(6) Using the computer 9, the detailed survey data is input on the detailed survey data input screen 41, which will be described later, and the evaluation results of the detailed survey results, which will be described later (hereinafter referred to as "detailed survey evaluation results"). (ST8).
(7) The process branches according to the detailed survey evaluation rank described later (ST9). When the detailed survey evaluation rank is “a”, switching to priority monitoring (ST5), returning to ST1 and continuing the inspection. If the detailed survey evaluation rank is “any of b, c, d”, the process proceeds to ST10 below.
(8) A countermeasure work is determined in consideration of the detailed survey evaluation result (ST10), and the countermeasure work is performed (ST11). Thereafter, the process returns to ST1 and the inspection is continued.

  Hereinafter, each processing procedure of the inspection survey result evaluation unit 3 and the detailed survey result evaluation unit 4 will be described in order. The development drawing creating means 5 will be described later.

First, the processing procedure of the inspection result evaluation means 121 included in the inspection investigation result evaluation means 3 will be described. This corresponds to ST3-1 in FIG. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the inspection result evaluation unit 121.
(1) The inspection data input screen 21-1 shown in FIG. 6 is displayed (ST21-1). The inspection data input screen 21-1 has a deformation evaluation rank input area 22-1. The deformation evaluation rank input area 22-1 (area surrounded by a broken line in the figure) is an area for an engineer to input inspection data (deformation evaluation rank). The engineer obtains a deformation evaluation rank according to the correspondence table shown in FIG. 7 for each deformation at the time of inspection, and records this as inspection data. For example, if a certain deformation is "cracked" and it is "4) Longitudinal type" and "5-6 m or more on the right side wall of the waterway", the deformation evaluation rank is "2". (6th line in FIG. 7). When the engineer inputs the deformation evaluation rank in the deformation evaluation rank input area 22-1 on the inspection data input screen 21-1 and selects the registration button 28-1, the process proceeds to the next ST22-1.
(2) The deformation evaluation rank input to the deformation evaluation rank input area 22-1 is stored in the data storage area 6 (ST22-1).
(3) According to Table 1, the deformation evaluation rank is converted for each deformation to obtain a deformation evaluation point (ST23-1).

（４）各ブロックについて、ブロック評価点とブロック評価ランクを求める（ＳＴ２４−１）。ブロック評価点は、１ブロック内に存在する全変状の変状評価点の合計である。次に、下記の表２に従ってブロック評価ランクを求める。各ブロック評価ランクの評価内容は表２の通りである。

(4) A block evaluation point and a block evaluation rank are obtained for each block (ST24-1). The block evaluation point is the total of all the deformation evaluation points existing in one block. Next, a block evaluation rank is obtained according to Table 2 below. The evaluation contents of each block evaluation rank are as shown in Table 2.

(5) “P50 evaluation score” and “P90 evaluation score” are obtained as indices representing the deterioration of the entire waterway (ST25-1). Here, the “P50 evaluation score” is an index representing the average degree of deterioration of all blocks, and is an average of block evaluation points of all blocks. The “P90 evaluation score” is an index indicating that a block having a remarkable deterioration degree exists in the channel, and is within a range of 10% from the block having a higher block evaluation score (ie, the deterioration degree is remarkable) among all blocks. Is the average of the block evaluation points of the blocks included in. For example, in the case of a water channel composed of blocks shown in Table 3 below (the total number of blocks is 104 blocks), the P50 evaluation score and the P90 evaluation score are obtained as follows. First, the P50 evaluation score is (0 × 58 + 5 × 10 + 10 × 34 + 15 × 2) ÷ 104 = 4.0 points. The number of blocks included in the above 10% range is 104 × 0.1 = 10.4, rounded up to 11 blocks, so the P90 evaluation score is (15 × 2 + 10 × 9) ÷ 11 = 10.9 points.

（６）水路評価ランクを求める（ＳＴ２６−１）。下記の表４に従って、Ｐ５０評価点とＰ９０評価点との和によって、水路評価ランクを求める。各水路評価ランクの評価内容は表４の通りである。例えば、上述の表３の水路の場合には、Ｐ５０評価点とＰ９０評価点との和（Ｐ５０＋Ｐ９０）は、4.0＋10.9＝14.9点であるので、水路評価ランクは“II”となる。

(6) A waterway evaluation rank is obtained (ST26-1). According to the following Table 4, a waterway evaluation rank is calculated | required by the sum of P50 evaluation score and P90 evaluation score. Table 4 shows the evaluation contents of each waterway evaluation rank. For example, in the case of the channel shown in Table 3 above, the sum of the P50 evaluation score and the P90 evaluation score (P50 + P90) is 4.0 + 10.9 = 14.9 points, so the waterway evaluation rank is “II”.

(7) The inspection result evaluation screen 31-1 shown in FIG. 8 is displayed (ST27-1), and the process ends. The inspection result evaluation screen 31-1 has a display area 32-1 and a water channel evaluation area 34-1. The display area 32-1 (area surrounded by a broken line in the drawing) is an area for displaying the deformation evaluation point 35-1, the block evaluation rank 36-1, and the like. When the deformation evaluation point is “10 (consider necessity of detailed investigation)” and the block evaluation rank is “3 (consider necessity of detailed investigation)”, the deformation evaluation point 35a-1 and As in 36a-1, the background of the corresponding deformation evaluation point and block evaluation rank is displayed in a conspicuous manner such as red (filled in the drawing). The waterway evaluation area 34-1 is an area for displaying a waterway evaluation rank and evaluation contents. If the waterway evaluation rank is “IV (generally deteriorated, there are many blocks with significant deterioration)” or V (generally significant deterioration), (not shown) The background of the area is displayed prominently such as yellow or red. As a result of this conspicuous display, an engineer selects a block with a block evaluation rank of “2 or 3” as ST5 (priority monitoring) or ST6 (determines the necessity of detailed investigation) as the next work step. Can be prevented from leaking from the target.

  In addition, the engineer displays the inspection result evaluation display screen 31-1 in chronological order, for example, January 2003, January 2004, January 2005, so that the secular change of the water channel is displayed. I can grasp.

Next, the processing procedure of the soundness investigation result evaluation means 122 included in the inspection investigation result evaluation means 3 will be described. This corresponds to ST3-2 in FIG. FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the soundness investigation result evaluation means 3-2.
(1) The health investigation data input screen 21-2 shown in FIG. 10 is displayed (ST21-2). The soundness investigation data input screen 21-2 has a detailed information area 22-2 and a display area 23-2. The detailed information area 22-2 is an area for the engineer to input deformation information. The display area 23-2 is an area for displaying the deformed information input to the detailed information area 22-2. The horizontal direction represents a block, and the vertical direction represents a water channel part. The block refers to each part that is divided every 10 m (possibly for each construction section) from the waterway intake side wellhead, and each block is given a block number. The water channel parts are a right side wall part, an arch part (ceiling part), a left side wall part, and an invert part (bottom part) in order from the top. When the engineer first inputs the deformation code 24-2 and its positions 25a-2, 25b-2, 25c-2, and 25d-2 in the detailed information area 22-2, the deformation code is displayed in the display area 23-2. A graphic 26-2 showing the deformation corresponding to is displayed. Next, when the step 27-2, such as whether or not there is a step, is input and the registration button 28-2 is selected, the process proceeds to the next ST22-2.
(2) The soundness survey data input to the detailed information area 22-2 is stored in the data storage area 6 (ST22-2).
(3) For each deformation, a deformation evaluation rank and a deformation evaluation point are obtained (ST23-2). First, a deformation evaluation rank and a deformation evaluation point are obtained according to the correspondence table shown in FIG. For example, if a certain deformation is “cracked” and it has “cracking coefficient 1.5 and maximum width 3 mm”, the deformation evaluation rank is “c” and the deformation evaluation point is “5 points” (in the figure). 3rd line). Table 5 shows the evaluation contents of the deformation evaluation rank.

(4) A block evaluation point and a block evaluation rank are obtained for each block (ST24-2). The block evaluation point is the total of all the deformation evaluation points existing in one block. Next, a block evaluation rank is obtained according to Table 6 below. Table 6 shows the evaluation contents of each block evaluation rank.

(5) “P50 evaluation score” and “P90 evaluation score” are obtained as indices representing the deterioration of the entire waterway (ST25-2). Here, the “P50 evaluation score” is an index representing the average degree of deterioration of all blocks, and is an average of block evaluation points of all blocks. Further, the “P90 evaluation score” is an index indicating that a block having a remarkable deterioration degree exists in the water channel, and is 10% from the block evaluation score that is higher (that is, the deterioration degree is advanced) among all blocks. It is the average of the block evaluation points of the blocks included in the range. For example, in the case of a water channel composed of blocks shown in Table 7 below (the total number of blocks is 104 blocks), the P50 evaluation score and the P90 evaluation score are obtained as follows. First, the P50 evaluation score is (0 × 58 + 5 × 10 + 10 × 34 + 15 × 2) ÷ 104 = 4.0 points. The number of blocks included in the above 10% range is 104 × 0.1 = 10.4, rounded up to 11 blocks, so the P90 evaluation score is (15 × 2 + 10 × 9) ÷ 11 = 10.9 points.

（６）水路評価ランクを求める（ＳＴ２６−２）。下記の表８に従って、Ｐ５０評価点とＰ９０評価点との和によって、水路評価ランクを求める。各水路評価ランクの評価内容は表８の通りである。例えば、上述の表７の水路の場合には、Ｐ５０評価点とＰ９０評価点との和（Ｐ５０＋Ｐ９０）は、4.0＋10.9＝14.9点であるので、水路評価ランクは“II”となる。

(6) A waterway evaluation rank is obtained (ST26-2). According to the following Table 8, a waterway evaluation rank is calculated | required by the sum of P50 evaluation score and P90 evaluation score. Table 8 shows the evaluation contents of each waterway evaluation rank. For example, in the case of the channel shown in Table 7, the sum of the P50 evaluation score and the P90 evaluation score (P50 + P90) is 4.0 + 10.9 = 14.9 points, so the waterway evaluation rank is “II”.

(7) The soundness investigation result evaluation screen 31-2 shown in FIG. 12 is displayed (ST27-2), and the process is terminated. The soundness investigation result evaluation screen 31-2 includes a display area 32-2, a detailed information area 33-2, and a water channel evaluation area 34-2. The display area 32-2 is an area for displaying the position and size of deformation in the block, the deformation evaluation rank 35-2, the block evaluation rank 36-2, and the like. When the deformation evaluation rank is “d (consider necessity of detailed investigation)” and the block evaluation rank is “D (consider necessity of detailed investigation)”, 35a-2 and 36a-2 Thus, the background of the corresponding deformation evaluation rank and block evaluation rank is displayed so as to be conspicuous, such as being red (filled in the drawing). When an arbitrary deformation 37-2 is selected in the soundness investigation result display area 32-2, detailed information including the deformation evaluation rank is displayed in the detailed information area 33-2. The waterway evaluation area 34-2 is an area for displaying a waterway evaluation rank and evaluation contents. When the waterway evaluation rank is “IV (generally deteriorated and there are many blocks having a significant deterioration degree)” or V (generally a remarkable deterioration degree), although not shown, the waterway evaluation area Is displayed prominently, such as yellow or red. As a result of such a noticeable display, the engineer performs the next work step ST5 (priority monitoring) or ST6 (determines the necessity of detailed investigation) for the block with the block evaluation rank “C or D”. It is possible to prevent leakage from the implementation target.

  In addition, the engineer displays the soundness survey result evaluation display screen 31-2 in chronological order, for example, January 2003, January 2004, January 2005, so that the age of the water channel Can understand changes.

Next, the processing procedure of the detailed survey result evaluation unit 4 will be described. This corresponds to ST8 in FIG. FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure of the detailed investigation result evaluation means 4.
(1) The detailed survey data input screen 41 shown in FIG. 14 is displayed (ST41). The detailed survey data input screen 41 has a detailed survey data input area 42. An engineer inputs an average lining winding thickness, a design lining thickness, etc. into the detailed survey data input area 42 for each block. Next, when the button 43 to be evaluated is selected, the procedure proceeds to step (2).
(2) The input detailed survey data is stored in the data storage area 6 (ST42).
(3) For each block, the detailed survey result evaluation rank is obtained according to the correspondence table of FIG. 15 (ST43). For example, in a certain block, “(a) lining winding pressure” is investigated, and when “average lining thickness / design lining thickness is less than 50%”, the detailed survey result evaluation rank is “d” ( First line in the figure). Table 9 shows the evaluation contents of each detailed survey result evaluation rank.

（４）図１６に示す詳細調査結果評価画面５１を表示し（ＳＴ４４）、処理を終了する。詳細調査結果表画面５１は、詳細調査結果表示領域５２を有している。詳細調査結果表示領域５２には、詳細調査データの調査結果評価ランクと評価内容が表示され、調査結果評価ランクが“ｂ（計画的に改修する）、ｃ（早期に改修する）、ｄ（直ちに改修する）のいずれか”の場合には、５２ａのように、該当する調査結果評価ランクと評価内容の背景が黄色や赤色となる（図中では塗り潰されている）等のように目立つように表示される。このように目立つ表示であることにより、後工程のＳＴ１０（対策工を決定する）において、これらのブロックを実施対象から漏らしてしまうことを防ぐことができる。

(4) The detailed survey result evaluation screen 51 shown in FIG. 16 is displayed (ST44), and the process is terminated. The detailed survey result table screen 51 has a detailed survey result display area 52. In the detailed survey result display area 52, the survey result evaluation rank and the evaluation contents of the detailed survey data are displayed, and the survey result evaluation rank is “b (repair systematically)”, c (repair early), d (immediately). In the case of “Improved”), as in 52a, the background of the corresponding survey result evaluation rank and evaluation content is yellow or red (filled in the figure), etc. so that it stands out Is displayed. Such a conspicuous display can prevent these blocks from being leaked from the implementation target in the subsequent step ST10 (determining the countermeasure work).

Finally, the developed view creation means 5 will be described. This is a function for creating a development map for each channel based on inspection data, survey data, repair data, and the like stored in the data storage area 6. There are three types of development views that can be created: longitudinal views, deformation development views, and repair development views. FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the developed view creation means 5.
(1) The development view selection screen 81 shown in FIG. 18 is displayed (ST81). The engineer selects a development view by pressing a radio button in the development view area 82. The power plant 83a is selected from the combo box in the item designation area 83 and the power channel 83b is selected from the combo box in the water channel 83b, and the date 83c, the display position 83d, and the vertical scale 83e are input. Thereafter, the display button 84 is pressed.
(2) The process branches according to the development view selected in the development view area 82 (ST82). If the development view is “vertical view”, the vertical view display screen 91 shown in FIG. 19 is displayed (ST83), and the process is terminated. The longitudinal section display screen 91 displays a longitudinal section having each information of topography, geology, structure, repair location, inspection evaluation result, soundness investigation evaluation result, and detailed investigation evaluation result in each block of the waterway. If the development view is a “deformation development view”, the deformation development view display screen 101 shown in FIG. 20 is displayed (ST84), and the process is terminated. The deformed development view display screen 101 displays a diagram (deformed development view) showing information such as the type and position of deformation in each block of the water channel. If the development view is a “repair development view”, the repair development view display screen 111 shown in FIG. 21 is displayed (ST85), and the process is terminated. The repair development view display screen 111 displays a diagram (repair development view) showing information such as the repair method and position in each block of the waterway.

  The engineer displays the longitudinal view display screen 91, the deformed development view display screen 101, and the repair development view display screen 111 in time series, for example, January 2003, January 2004, January 2005. By displaying, the secular change of the channel can be grasped.

The block diagram of the equipment diagnosis assistance system of an Example. The flowchart which shows the work procedure of an engineer. List of inspection survey items and inspection survey contents in the inspection survey. List of survey contents, survey items, and survey methods in the detailed survey. The flowchart which shows the process sequence of an inspection result evaluation means. The figure which shows an inspection data input screen. Correspondence table of deformation evaluation rank in inspection. The figure which shows an inspection result evaluation screen. The flowchart which shows the process sequence of a soundness investigation result evaluation means. The figure which shows a soundness investigation data input screen. Correspondence table of deformation evaluation rank in soundness investigation. The figure which shows a soundness investigation result evaluation screen. The flowchart which shows the process sequence of a detailed investigation result evaluation means. The figure which shows a detailed investigation data input screen. Correspondence table of detailed survey result evaluation rank. The figure which shows a detailed survey result evaluation screen. The figure which shows the flowchart of an expanded view preparation means. The figure which shows an expanded view selection screen. The figure which shows a longitudinal view display screen. The figure which shows a deformation | transformation expanded view display screen. The figure which shows a repair development figure display screen.

Explanation of symbols

1: equipment diagnosis support system, 2: server computer, 3: inspection survey result evaluation means, 4: detailed survey result evaluation means, 5: development drawing creation means, 6: data storage area, 8: communication network, 9: computer, 21-1: Inspection data input screen, 21-2: Soundness survey data input screen, 31-1: Inspection result evaluation screen, 31-2: Soundness survey result evaluation screen, 41: Detailed survey data input screen, 51: Detailed survey result evaluation screen, 81: development view selection screen, 91: longitudinal view display screen, 101: deformation development view display screen, 111: repair development view display screen.

Claims (11)

A diagnosis support device for electric power equipment,
Display means;
An inspection survey result evaluation unit for evaluating the inspection survey result of the facility, and displaying a point requiring priority monitoring or detailed survey in the facility so as to stand out on the display unit;
A facility diagnosis support apparatus comprising: a development view creation means for creating a development view of the equipment and displaying the development view in time series on the display means. A diagnosis support device for electric power equipment,
Display means;
Detailed survey result evaluation means for evaluating the detailed survey results of the equipment, and prominently displaying on the display means a place where countermeasure work in the equipment is necessary,
A facility diagnosis support apparatus comprising: a development view creation means for creating a development view of the equipment and displaying the development view in time series on the display means. A diagnosis support device for electric power equipment,
Display means;
An inspection survey result evaluation unit for evaluating the inspection survey result of the facility, and displaying a point requiring priority monitoring or detailed survey in the facility so as to stand out on the display unit;
Detailed survey result evaluation means for evaluating the detailed survey results of the equipment, and prominently displaying on the display means a place where countermeasure work in the equipment is necessary,
A facility diagnosis support apparatus comprising: a development view creation means for creating a development view of the equipment and displaying the development view in time series on the display means. In the equipment diagnosis support device according to claim 1 or 3,
The facility is a waterway installed in a power plant,
The inspection survey result evaluation means displays, on the basis of the evaluation result of the inspection survey result, a point that requires priority monitoring or detailed survey in the water channel for each water channel and each block of the water channel. Equipment diagnosis support device. In the equipment diagnosis support device according to claim 2 or 3,
The facility is a waterway installed in a power plant,
The detailed survey result evaluation means displays, on the basis of the evaluation result of the detailed survey result, a portion of the water channel that needs countermeasure work to be performed for each block of the water channel. A diagnosis support system for electric power equipment,
A facility diagnosis support device according to any one of claims 1 to 5 and a control terminal connected to the facility diagnosis support device via a communication network,
The facility diagnosis support system, wherein the display means is a display screen of the control terminal. A program for causing a computer to execute a power equipment diagnosis support processing procedure,
The processing procedure is as follows:
An inspection survey result evaluation process that evaluates the inspection survey result of the facility, and displays a point that requires priority monitoring or detailed survey in the facility so as to stand out on the display screen of the computer,
A facility diagnosis support program comprising: a development view creation process for creating a development view of the equipment and displaying the development view in time series on the display screen. A program for causing a computer to execute a power equipment diagnosis support processing procedure,
The processing procedure is as follows:
A detailed survey result evaluation process for evaluating the detailed survey result of the facility, and prominently displaying a place on the display screen of the computer where a countermeasure work in the facility is necessary,
A facility diagnosis support program comprising: a development view creation process for creating a development view of the equipment and displaying the development view in time series on the display screen. A program for causing a computer to execute a power equipment diagnosis support processing procedure,
The processing procedure is as follows:
An inspection survey result evaluation process for evaluating the inspection survey result of the equipment, and displaying a point requiring priority monitoring or detailed survey in the equipment prominently on the display screen of the computer,
A detailed survey result evaluation process for evaluating the detailed survey result of the facility, and displaying a point where the countermeasure work in the facility is necessary to be performed prominently on the screen;
A facility diagnosis support program comprising: a development view creation process for creating a development view of the equipment and displaying the development view in time series on the display screen. In the equipment diagnosis support program according to claim 7 or 9,
The facility is a waterway installed in a power plant,
In the inspection survey result evaluation process, on the basis of the evaluation result of the inspection survey result, a point requiring priority monitoring or detailed survey in the water channel is displayed for each water channel and each block of the water channel. Equipment diagnosis support program. In the equipment diagnosis support program according to claim 8 or 9,
The facility is a waterway installed in the power plant,
In the detailed survey result evaluation process, a facility diagnosis support program that displays, for each block of the water channel, a location where countermeasure work in the water channel is required based on the evaluation result of the detailed survey result.

Images