JP2004330972A - Travel safety device of vehicle - Google Patents

Travel safety device of vehicle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2004330972A
JP2004330972A JP2003131936A JP2003131936A JP2004330972A JP 2004330972 A JP2004330972 A JP 2004330972A JP 2003131936 A JP2003131936 A JP 2003131936A JP 2003131936 A JP2003131936 A JP 2003131936A JP 2004330972 A JP2004330972 A JP 2004330972A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
safety device
vehicle
behavior
driver
steering
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2003131936A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3872035B2 (en
Inventor
Kenji Odaka
賢二 小▲高▼
Yoshihiro Urai
芳洋 浦井
Makoto Kotabe
誠 小田部
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honda Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Honda Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP2003131936A priority Critical patent/JP3872035B2/en
Publication of JP2004330972A publication Critical patent/JP2004330972A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3872035B2 publication Critical patent/JP3872035B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Control Of Driving Devices And Active Controlling Of Vehicle (AREA)
  • Regulating Braking Force (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To immediately detect abnormality of a travel safety device of a vehicle. <P>SOLUTION: When a behavior detecting means M3 detects that a driver performs a speed reduction operation or a steering operation within a predetermined time after a control means M2 of a safety device operation issues a primary alarm and a secondary alarm to the driver for avoiding the vehicle from contacting with a precedent vehicle, this situation is equivalent to that the driver recognizes contacting possibility with the precedent vehicle based on the alarms and performs the speed reduction operation or the steering operation. Therefore, it is determined that a radar device Sa and the safety device 11 operate normally. When a predetermined times or more of matters where the behavior detecting means M3 does not detect a contact avoiding operation of the driver are repeated, a determining means M4 determines abnormality and stops the operations of the radar device Sa and the safety device 11. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、車両に設けた物体検知手段で物体を検知し、その物体に車両が接触する可能性がある場合に、安全装置を作動させて接触を回避する車両の走行安全装置に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
レーダー装置で自車の進行方向に存在する物体を検知し、自車と物体との車幅方向のオーバーラップ量(ステアリング回避量)に基づいて物体との接触可能性の有無を判定し、接触可能性があると判定された場合に警報や自動制動を実行して物体との接触を回避するものが、下記特許文献1により公知である。
【0003】
この種のレーダー装置の検知軸の方向が車体に対して正しく調整されていないとシステムが正常に作動しない可能性があるため、車両がほぼ直進走行しているときに、路側にある標識等をレーダー装置が検知した位置と車両の走行軌跡とを比較することで、レーダー装置の検知軸のずれを検知して調整するものが、下記特許文献2により公知である。
【0004】
【特許文献1】
特開平11−23705号公報
【特許文献2】
特開平11−14748号公報
【0005】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
しかしながら上記特許文献2に記載されたものは、車両がほぼ直進走行しているときにしかレーダー装置の検知軸を調整できない問題があり、しかも検知軸のずれを検知して調整するまでに比較的に長い時間を要するため、その間にシステムが不要な作動をする可能性があった。またレーダー装置が正常であっても、レーダー装置の検知結果に基づいて作動する警報装置、減速装置、操向装置に異常がある場合にも、それを検知できないためにシステムが不要な作動をする可能性があった。
【0006】
本発明は前述の事情に鑑みてなされたもので、車両の走行安全装置の異常を速やかに検知できるようにすることを目的とする。
【0007】
【課題を解決するための手段】
上記目的を達成するために、請求項1に記載された発明によれば、車両の進行方向に存在する物体を検知する物体検知手段と、物体検知手段の検知結果に基づいて車両と物体との相対位置を含む相対関係を算出する相対関係算出手段と、相対関係算出手段で算出した相対関係に基づいて車両と物体との接触可能性の有無を判定し、接触可能性がある場合に車両に設けた安全装置の作動を制御する安全装置作動制御手段とを備えた車両の走行安全装置において、安全装置の作動後のドライバーの挙動および車両の挙動の少なくとも一方を検知する挙動検知手段と、挙動検知手段の検知結果に基づいて物体検知手段の作動および安全装置の作動の少なくとも一方の作動が正常であるか否かを判定する判定手段とを備えたことを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0008】
上記構成によれば、車両が物体と接触するのを回避するために安全装置を作動させた後に、接触回避のためのドライバーの挙動、あるいは前記ドライバーの挙動の結果として発生する車両の挙動が検知されるか否かに基づいて、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動しているか否かを的確に判定することができる。
【0009】
また請求項2に記載された発明によれば、請求項1の構成に加えて、安全装置はドライバーに警報を発するものであり、判定手段は、安全装置の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段がドライバーの減速操作および操向操作の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0010】
上記構成によれば、安全装置が警報を発してから所定時間内にドライバーが減速操作あるいは操向操作を行えば、ドライバーが警報に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0011】
また請求項3に記載された発明によれば、請求項1の構成に加えて、安全装置はドライバーに警報を発するものであり、判定手段は、安全装置の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段が車両の減速挙動および旋回挙動の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0012】
上記構成によれば、安全装置が警報を発してから所定時間内に車両の減速挙動あるいは旋回挙動が検知されれば、ドライバーが警報に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0013】
また請求項4に記載された発明によれば、請求項1の構成に加えて、安全装置は減速手段および操向手段の何れかであり、判定手段は、安全装置の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段がドライバーの減速操作および操向操作の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0014】
上記構成によれば、安全装置が減速手段あるいは操向手段を作動させてから所定時間内にドライバーが減速操作あるいは操向操作を行えば、ドライバーが減速手段あるいは操向手段の作動に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0015】
また請求項5に記載された発明によれば、請求項1の構成に加えて、安全装置は減速手段および操向手段の何れかであり、判定手段は、安全装置の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段が該安全装置の作動による車両の減速挙動および旋回挙動の少なくとも一方を上回る車両の減速挙動および旋回挙動の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0016】
上記構成によれば、安全装置が減速手段あるいは操向手段を作動させてから所定時間内にドライバーが減速操作あるいは操向操作を行い、安全装置の作動による車両の減速挙動あるいは旋回挙動を上回る車両の減速挙動あるいは旋回挙動が検知されれば、ドライバーが減速手段あるいは操向手段の作動に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0017】
また請求項6に記載された発明によれば、請求項2〜請求項5の何れか1項の構成に加えて、安全装置は、一次安全装置と、該一次安全装置よりも接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置とからなり、前記所定時間は、一次安全装置の作動後のものより二次安全装置の作動後のものの方が短く設定されていることを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0018】
上記構成によれば、接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置は、その作動後の前記所定時間が短く設定されるので、接触回避の緊急度が高い場合に物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動しているか否かを速やかに判定することができる。
【0019】
また請求項7に記載された発明によれば、請求項2〜請求項6の何れか1項の構成に加えて、判定手段は、正常と判定されない回数が所定回数以上となったときに異常と判定することを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0020】
上記構成によれば、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常と判定されない回数が所定回数以上となったときに異常と判定するので、特殊な状況でたまたま正常と判定されない場合があっても、それにより異常と誤判定されるのを防止することができる。
【0021】
また請求項8に記載された発明によれば、請求項7の構成に加えて、安全装置は、一次安全装置と、該一次安全装置よりも接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置とからなり、前記所定回数は、一次安全装置の作動に関するものより二次安全装置の作動に関するものを少なく設定したことを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0022】
上記構成によれば、接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置は、異常を判定する前記所定回数が少なく設定されるので、接触回避の緊急度が高い場合に物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動しているか否かを速やかに判定することができる。
【0023】
また請求項9に記載された発明によれば、請求項1〜請求項8の何れか1項の構成に加えて、判定手段が異常と判定したとき、物体検知手段による物体の検知および安全装置作動制御手段による安全装置の作動の少なくとも一方を中止することを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置が提案される。
【0024】
上記構成によれば、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置に異常があるとその作動を中止するので、異常が発生した状態で物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が不適切に作動するのを防止することができる。
【0025】
尚、実施例の先行車V1は本発明の物体に対応し、実施例のレーダー装置Saは本発明の物体検知手段に対応する。
【0026】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下、本発明の実施の形態を、添付図面に示した本発明の実施例に基づいて説明する。
【0027】
図1〜図4は本発明の一実施例を示すもので、図1は走行安全装置を備えた車両の全体構成図、図2は車両の制動系のブロック図、図3は走行安全装置の制御系のブロック図、図4は走行安全装置の正常・異常判定のフローチャートである。
【0028】
図1および図2に示すように、本実施例の走行安全装置を搭載した四輪の車両(自車)Vは、エンジンEの駆動力がトランスミッションTを介して伝達される駆動輪たる左右の前輪WFL,WFRと、車両Vの走行に伴って回転する従動輪たる左右の後輪WRL,WRRとを備える。ドライバーにより操作されるブレーキペダル1は、電子制御負圧ブースタ2を介してマスタシリンダ3に接続される。電子制御負圧ブースタ2は、ブレーキペダル1の踏力を機械的に倍力してマスタシリンダ3を作動させるとともに、自動制動時にはブレーキペダル1の操作によらずに電子制御ユニットUからの制動指令信号によりマスタシリンダ3を作動させる。ブレーキペダル1に踏力が入力され、かつ電子制御ユニットUから制動指令信号が入力された場合、電子制御負圧ブースタ2は両者のうちの何れか大きい方に合わせてブレーキ油圧を出力させる。尚、電子制御負圧ブースタ2の入力ロッドはロストモーション機構を介してブレーキペダル1に接続されており、電子制御負圧ブースタ2が電子制御ユニットUからの信号により作動して前記入力ロッドが前方に移動しても、ブレーキペダル1は初期位置に留まるようになっている。
【0029】
マスタシリンダ3の一対の出力ポート8,9は、前輪WFL,WFRおよび後輪WRL,WRRにそれぞれ設けられたブレーキキャリパ5FL,5FR,5RL,5RRに油圧制御装置4を介して接続される。油圧制御装置4は4個のブレーキキャリパ5FL,5FR,5RL,5RRに対応して4個の圧力調整器6…を備えており、それぞれの圧力調整器6…は電子制御ユニットUに接続されて前輪WFL,WFRおよび後輪WRL,WRRに設けられたブレーキキャリパ5FL,5FR,5RL,5RRの作動を個別に制御する。
【0030】
電子制御ユニットUには、レーザーレーダー装置あるいはミリ波レーダー装置よりなる物体検知手段としてのレーダー装置Saと、車輪速に基づいて車速を検出する車速センサSb…と、車両Vのヨーレートを検出するヨーレートセンサScと、ステアリングホイール7の操舵トルクを検出する操舵トルクセンサSdと、ブレーキペダル1に入力される踏力を検出する踏力センサSeと、スピーカよりなる警報手段10とが接続される。
【0031】
しかして、電子制御ユニットUは、レーダー装置Sa、車速センサSb…、ヨーレートセンサSc、操舵トルクセンサSdおよび踏力センサSeの出力に基づいて、警報手段10、電子制御負圧ブースタ2および油圧制御装置4の作動を制御する。即ち、電子制御ユニットUからの指令で警報手段10が作動すると、警報音あるいは音声によりドライバーに警報が発せられ、また電子制御ユニットUからの指令で電子制御負圧ブースタ2が作動すると、マスタシリンダ3が発生したブレーキ油圧が油圧制御装置4で調圧されてブレーキキャリパ5FL,5FR,5RL,5RRに伝達され、前輪WFL,WFRおよび後輪WRL,WRRの制動力が各輪毎に独立に制御される。
【0032】
図3に示すように、電子制御ユニットUには、相対関係算出手段M1と、安全装置作動制御手段M2と、挙動検知手段M3と、判定手段M4とが設けられる。相対関係算出手段M1にはレーダー装置Sa、車速センサSb…およびヨーレートセンサScが接続され、相対関係算出手段M1に接続された安全装置作動制御手段M2には、本発明の安全装置11を構成する警報手段10、電子制御負圧ブースタ2および油圧制御装置4が接続される。挙動検知手段M3には、車速センサSb…、ヨーレートセンサSc、操舵トルクセンサSdおよび踏力センサSeが接続され、また挙動検知手段M3に接続された判定手段M4には安全装置作動制御手段M2およびレーダー装置Saに接続される。
【0033】
次に、上記構成を備えた実施例の作用を、図4のフローチャートを参照して説明する。
【0034】
先ず、電子制御ユニットUの相対関係算出手段M1が、ステップS1で車速センサSb…で検出した車速と、ヨーレートセンサScで検出した自車Vのヨーレートとを読み込み、ステップS2で車速およびヨーレートに基いて自車Vの将来の進路を予測する。直線走行時の自車Vの予測進路は直線になるが、右旋回時の予測進路は右にカーブし、左旋回時の予測進路は左にカーブするものであり、その曲率はヨーレートが大きいほど、またヨーレートを一定とすれば車速が小さいほど大きくなる。
【0035】
続くステップS3で、相対関係算出手段M1がレーダー装置Saの出力に基づいて自車Vの予測進路に存在する先行車V1のような物体の相対位置(方向および相対距離)と相対速度とを算出する。レーダー装置Saがミリ波レーダー装置であれば、物体の相対速度を直ちに求めることができ、レーダー装置Saがレーザーレーダー装置であれば、物体の相対速度を物体の相対距離の時間変化率として求めることができる。
【0036】
更にステップS3で、安全装置作動制御手段M2が、前記相対位置および前記相対速度に基づいて、自車Vが先行車V1に接触する可能性の有無を判定する。その結果、ステップS4で接触可能性がある場合には、ステップS5で接触可能性の大小を判定する。即ち、自車Vの予測進路に先行車V1が存在し、その先行車V1の相対距離ΔLを相対速度ΔVで除算した接触までの時間T(=ΔL/ΔV)が、大きい方の第1の所定値T1を下回ったときに、つまり接触可能性が小さいときに、ステップS6で安全装置作動制御手段M2が警報手段10を作動させて一次警報を出力する。また接触までの時間T(=ΔL/ΔV)が、小さい方の第2の所定値T2を下回ったときに、つまり接触可能性が大きいときに、ステップS6′で安全装置作動制御手段M2が警報手段10を作動させて二次警報を出力する。
【0037】
前記第1、第2の所定値T1,T2の大小関係は、T1>T2であり、大きい方の第1の所定値T1を接触までの時間Tが下回ったときには、接触可能性が小さくて緊急度が低く、小さい方の第2の所定値T2を接触までの時間Tが下回ったときには、接触可能性が大きくて緊急度が高いことになる。
【0038】
本実施例の一次警報は、警報手段10を作動させて警報音を発するものであり、また二次警報は、電子制御負圧ブースタ2および油圧制御装置4を作動させて警報としての弱い制動力を発生させるものである。何れの場合にも、ドライバーに先行車V1との接触可能性があることを警報して、接触回避のための自発的なブレーキ操作やステアリング操作を促すためのものである。
【0039】
このようにして一次、二次警報が発せられると、ステップS7,S7′で挙動検知手段M3および判定手段M4により、その警報が正常警報であるか否かを判定する。
【0040】
ステップS7において、一次警報が発せられてから二次警報が発せられるまでの間にΔT1が経過した時点で(T1<T1+ΔT1<T2)、ドライバーが先行車V1を回避するブレーキ操作やステアリング操作を行わなかったことを挙動検知手段M3が検知した場合、つまりドライバーがステアリングホイール7を所定値以上の操舵トルクで操作したことを操舵トルクセンサSdが検知せず、かつドライバーがブレーキペダル1を所定値以上の強さで踏み込んだことを踏力センサSeが検知しない場合、判定手段M4は前記一次警報が正常警報ではない異常警報と判定する。
【0041】
なぜならば、正常な一次警報が発せられていれば、ドライバーは先行車V1との接触を回避するためにステアリング操作かブレーキ操作を行うはずであり、それが行われないのは、一次警報が発せられていないか、一次警報が発せられていても、ドライバーは接触を回避するためのブレーキ操作やステアリング操作が不要と判断し、その警報を異常警報と認識して無視しているからである。従って、前記時間ΔT1は、一次警報が発せられてからドライバーがステアリングホイール7あるいはブレーキペダル1を操作するのに充分な時間として設定する必要がある。
【0042】
同様にして、ステップS7′において、二次警報が発せられてからΔT2が経過した時点で、ドライバーが先行車V1を回避する操作を行わなかったことを挙動検知手段M3が検知した場合、つまりドライバーがステアリングホイール7を所定値以上の操舵トルクで操作したことを操舵トルクセンサSdが検知せず、かつドライバーがブレーキペダル1を所定値以上の強さで踏み込んだことを踏力センサSeが検知しない場合、判定手段M4は前記二次警報が正常警報ではない異常警報と判定する。
【0043】
尚、二次警報後の時間ΔT2は、一次警報後の時間ΔT1よりも短くすることが望ましい。その理由は、二次警報が発せられるのは接触可能性が高い場合であるため、早めの判定が必要となるからである。
【0044】
以上のようにして一次警報あるいは二次警報が異常警報であると判定されると、ステップS8,S8′で異常警報カウンタを1ずつインクリメントし、ステップS9,S9′で異常警報カウンタのカウント数がそれぞれN1およびN2以上になると、ステップS10,S10′でレーダー装置Saおよび安全装置作動制御装置M2の作動を停止させることで、それ以上の異常警報が発せられるのを防止する。
【0045】
実施例では、一次警報の異常警報カウンタのカウント数の閾値N1は10回とされ、二次警報の異常警報カウンタのカウント数の閾値N2は3回とされる。このように、複数回の異常警報が検知された場合にシステムを停止させるので、先行車V1が急加速して接触の可能性がなくなったためにドライバーが接触回避操作を行わないような場合に、即座に異常判定がなされてシステムが停止する不具合を解消することができる。また二次警報の閾値N2を一次警報の閾値N1よりも小さくしたのは、接触の可能性が高い場合に発せられる二次警報が異常警報である場合に、早めにシステムを停止させる必要があるからである。
【0046】
尚、異常警報カウンタはイグニッションスイッチがオンされたときに0にリセットされ、次にイグニッションスイッチがオフするまでカウント値を積算する。カウント中に正常判定が行われても、それによりカウント値が変化することはない。また連続で数秒間(例えば、2〜3秒間)二次警報が発せられてもドライバーの回避操作が検知されない場合に、即座にシステムを停止することもできる。この判定条件は異常警報のカウント数がN2以上になったときにシステムを停止する判定条件に対してOR条件である。つまり、その何れか一方が成立したときにシステムが停止される。
【0047】
また実施例では、一次、二次警報の後にドライバーが接触回避操作を行ったか否かを、操舵トルクセンサSdや踏力センサSeの出力に基づいて判定しているが、車速センサSb…やヨーレートセンサScの出力に基づいて判定することができる。即ち、ドライバーが接触回避のためにブレーキ操作を行うと車速センサSb…が検出する車速が減少し、ドライバーが接触回避のためにステアリング操作を行うとヨーレートセンサScが検出するヨーレートが増加するからである。
【0048】
以上、本発明の実施例を説明したが、本発明はその要旨を逸脱しない範囲で種々の設計変更を行うことが可能である。
【0049】
例えば、一次警報および二次警報は、警報手段10よる警報音や、電子制御負圧ブースタ2および油圧制御装置4による弱い制動力の発生に限定されず、ブザー、チャイム、ランプ、LED等による音や光、あるいはステアリングホイール7を振動させる等の手段を採用することができる。
【0050】
またドライバーのステアリング操作を、操舵トルクセンサSdに代えて図示せぬ周知の操舵角センサで検知しても良い。この場合、操舵角センサにより所定値以上の舵角変化や所定値以上の舵角速度が検知されることにより、ドライバーのステアリング操作が行われたことを検知することができる。
【0051】
また一次警報および二次警報に代えて、電子制御負圧ブースタ2および油圧制御装置4を作動させる自動制動よりなる一次制動および二次制動を行ったり、電動パワーステアリング装置のアクチュエータを作動させて接触を回避する自動操舵よりなる一次操舵および二次操舵を行うこともできる。この場合、一次制動の制動力に対して二次制動の制動力は強く設定され、一次操舵の操舵トルクに対して二次操舵の操舵トルクは強く設定される。
【0052】
自動制動や自動操舵を行う場合、一次、二次制動あるいは一次、二次操舵が行われた結果、所定時間以内に操舵トルクセンサSdが接触回避のためのステアリング操作を検知するか、踏力センサSeが接触回避のためのブレーキ操作を検知すれば、正常な自動制動や自動操舵が行われたと判定することができる。また上記判定に際して、操舵トルクセンサSdあるいは踏力センサSeの出力に代えて、車速センサSb…やヨーレートセンサScの出力を使用することができる。なぜならば、自動制動の開始後にドライバーがブレーキ操作を行えば、車速センサSb…が自動制動による減速を上回る減速を検出し、自動操舵の開始後にドライバーがステアリング操作を行えば、ヨーレートセンサScが自動操舵によるヨーレートを上回るヨーレートを検出するからである。
【0053】
また、音や光による一次警報と、自動制動よりなる二次制動や自動操舵よりなる二次操舵とを組み合わせることもできる。
【0054】
また自動制動は実施例の油圧ブレーキに限定されず、エンジンブレーキであっても良い。この場合、一次制動でトランスミッションTを1段シフトダウンし、二次制動でトランスミッションTを2段シフトダウンすることができる。
【0055】
また本発明の物体は先行車V1に限定されず、対向車、路側の固定物、路上の落下物等であっても良い。
【0056】
【発明の効果】
以上のように請求項1に記載された発明によれば、車両が物体と接触するのを回避するために安全装置を作動させた後に、接触回避のためのドライバーの挙動、あるいは前記ドライバーの挙動の結果として発生する車両の挙動が検知されるか否かに基づいて、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動しているか否かを的確に判定することができる。
【0057】
また請求項2に記載された発明によれば、安全装置が警報を発してから所定時間内にドライバーが減速操作あるいは操向操作を行えば、ドライバーが警報に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0058】
また請求項3に記載された発明によれば、安全装置が警報を発してから所定時間内に車両の減速挙動あるいは旋回挙動が検知されれば、ドライバーが警報に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0059】
また請求項4に記載された発明によれば、安全装置が減速手段あるいは操向手段を作動させてから所定時間内にドライバーが減速操作あるいは操向操作を行えば、ドライバーが減速手段あるいは操向手段の作動に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0060】
また請求項5に記載された発明によれば、安全装置が減速手段あるいは操向手段を作動させてから所定時間内にドライバーが減速操作あるいは操向操作を行い、安全装置の作動による車両の減速挙動あるいは旋回挙動を上回る車両の減速挙動あるいは旋回挙動が検知されれば、ドライバーが減速手段あるいは操向手段の作動に基づいて物体との接触可能性を認識して減速操作あるいは操向操作を行ったことになり、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動していると判定することができる。
【0061】
また請求項6に記載された発明によれば、接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置は、その作動後の前記所定時間が短く設定されるので、接触回避の緊急度が高い場合に物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動しているか否かを速やかに判定することができる。
【0062】
また請求項7に記載された発明によれば、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常と判定されない回数が所定回数以上となったときに異常と判定するので、特殊な状況でたまたま正常と判定されない場合があっても、それにより異常と誤判定されるのを防止することができる。
【0063】
また請求項8に記載された発明によれば、接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置は、異常を判定する前記所定回数が少なく設定されるので、接触回避の緊急度が高い場合に物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が正常に作動しているか否かを速やかに判定することができる。
【0064】
また請求項9に記載された発明によれば、物体検知手段あるいは安全装置に異常があるとその作動を中止するので、異常が発生した状態で物体検知手段あるいは安全装置が不適切に作動するのを防止することができる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】走行安全装置を備えた車両の全体構成図
【図2】車両の制動系のブロック図
【図3】走行安全装置の制御系のブロック図
【図4】走行安全装置の正常・異常判定のフローチャート
【符号の説明】
11 安全装置
M1 相対関係算出手段
M2 安全装置作動制御手段
M3 挙動検知手段
M4 判定手段
Sa レーダー装置(物体検知手段)
V 車両
V1 先行車(物体)
[0001]
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a traveling safety device for a vehicle that detects an object by an object detection unit provided in the vehicle and activates a safety device to avoid the contact when the vehicle may come into contact with the object.
[0002]
[Prior art]
The radar device detects an object existing in the traveling direction of the own vehicle, determines whether there is a possibility of contact with the object based on the overlap amount (steering avoidance amount) between the own vehicle and the object in the vehicle width direction, and contacts the object. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. H11-163873 discloses a method of executing an alarm or automatic braking when it is determined that there is a possibility to avoid contact with an object.
[0003]
If the direction of the detection axis of this type of radar device is not correctly adjusted with respect to the vehicle body, the system may not operate properly. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. H11-163873 discloses a technique that compares a position detected by a radar device with a traveling locus of a vehicle to detect and adjust a deviation of a detection axis of the radar device.
[0004]
[Patent Document 1]
JP-A-11-23705 [Patent Document 2]
JP-A-11-14748
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, the one described in Patent Document 2 has a problem that the detection axis of the radar device can be adjusted only when the vehicle is traveling substantially straight ahead, and it is relatively difficult to detect and adjust the deviation of the detection axis. Requires a long time, during which time the system may perform unnecessary operations. Also, even if the radar device is normal, even if the alarm device, deceleration device, or steering device that operates based on the detection result of the radar device has an abnormality, it can not detect it and the system performs unnecessary operation There was a possibility.
[0006]
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and has as its object to be able to promptly detect an abnormality in a traveling safety device of a vehicle.
[0007]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to achieve the above object, according to the invention described in claim 1, an object detecting means for detecting an object existing in a traveling direction of the vehicle, and a vehicle and an object are detected based on a detection result of the object detecting means. A relative relationship calculating means for calculating a relative relationship including the relative position, and determining whether there is a possibility of contact between the vehicle and the object based on the relative relationship calculated by the relative relationship calculating means. A vehicle safety device provided with safety device operation control means for controlling the operation of the provided safety device, wherein a behavior detection means for detecting at least one of a driver behavior and a vehicle behavior after activation of the safety device; Determining means for determining whether at least one of the operation of the object detection means and the operation of the safety device is normal based on the detection result of the detection means. Safety device is proposed.
[0008]
According to the above configuration, after activating the safety device to prevent the vehicle from coming into contact with the object, the behavior of the driver for avoiding the contact or the behavior of the vehicle generated as a result of the behavior of the driver is detected. Whether or not the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally can be accurately determined based on whether or not the operation is performed.
[0009]
According to the second aspect of the present invention, in addition to the configuration of the first aspect, the safety device issues a warning to the driver, and the determining unit detects the behavior within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device. A driving safety device for a vehicle is proposed, wherein the device is determined to be normal when the means detects at least one of a deceleration operation and a steering operation of the driver.
[0010]
According to the above configuration, if the driver performs a deceleration operation or a steering operation within a predetermined time after the safety device issues an alarm, the driver recognizes the possibility of contact with an object based on the alarm and performs the deceleration operation or the operation. Since the direction operation has been performed, it can be determined that the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0011]
According to the third aspect of the present invention, in addition to the configuration of the first aspect, the safety device issues a warning to the driver, and the determining means detects the behavior within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device. A traveling safety device for a vehicle is proposed in which the device is determined to be normal when the means detects at least one of a deceleration behavior and a turning behavior of the vehicle.
[0012]
According to the above configuration, if the deceleration behavior or the turning behavior of the vehicle is detected within a predetermined time after the safety device issues an alarm, the driver recognizes the possibility of contact with an object based on the alarm and performs the deceleration operation or Since the steering operation has been performed, it can be determined that the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0013]
According to the fourth aspect of the invention, in addition to the configuration of the first aspect, the safety device is any one of a deceleration device and a steering device, and the determination device is configured to perform the determination within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device. In addition, there is proposed a traveling safety device for a vehicle, characterized in that when the behavior detecting means detects at least one of the deceleration operation and the steering operation of the driver, the operation is determined to be normal.
[0014]
According to the above configuration, if the driver performs a deceleration operation or a steering operation within a predetermined time after the safety device operates the deceleration unit or the steering unit, the driver performs an object operation based on the operation of the reduction unit or the steering unit. Recognizing the possibility of contact with the vehicle, it means that the deceleration operation or the steering operation has been performed, and it can be determined that the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0015]
According to the fifth aspect of the present invention, in addition to the configuration of the first aspect, the safety device is any one of a deceleration device and a steering device, and the determination device is provided within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device. The vehicle is determined to be normal when the behavior detecting means detects at least one of the deceleration behavior and the turning behavior of the vehicle that exceeds at least one of the deceleration behavior and the turning behavior of the vehicle due to the operation of the safety device. Is proposed.
[0016]
According to the above configuration, the vehicle performs a deceleration operation or a steering operation within a predetermined time after the safety device operates the deceleration unit or the steering unit, and the vehicle exceeds the deceleration or turning behavior of the vehicle due to the operation of the safety device. If the deceleration behavior or turning behavior of the vehicle is detected, the driver recognizes the possibility of contact with an object based on the operation of the deceleration means or the steering means, and has performed the deceleration operation or the steering operation. It can be determined that the means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0017]
According to the invention described in claim 6, in addition to the configuration according to any one of claims 2 to 5, the safety device may be in contact with the primary safety device more than the primary safety device. A secondary safety device that operates when the vehicle is at a high level, wherein the predetermined time is set shorter after the operation of the secondary safety device than after the operation of the primary safety device. A driving safety device is proposed.
[0018]
According to the above configuration, the secondary safety device that operates when the possibility of contact is high is set to be shorter than the predetermined time after the operation. Therefore, when the urgency of avoiding contact is high, the object detection unit or the safety device is used. Can be quickly determined whether or not is operating normally.
[0019]
According to the seventh aspect of the invention, in addition to the configuration of any one of the second to sixth aspects, the determining means may determine that the number of times that the determination is not normal is greater than or equal to a predetermined number. Is proposed.
[0020]
According to the above configuration, the object detection means or the safety device is determined to be abnormal when the number of times that the safety device is not determined to be normal is equal to or more than a predetermined number of times. It is possible to prevent erroneous determination as abnormal.
[0021]
According to the invention described in claim 8, in addition to the configuration of claim 7, the safety device includes a primary safety device and a secondary safety device that operates when the possibility of contact is higher than the primary safety device. A driving safety device for a vehicle is proposed, wherein the predetermined number is set to be smaller for the operation of the secondary safety device than for the operation of the primary safety device.
[0022]
According to the above configuration, the secondary safety device that operates when the possibility of contact is high is set to a small number of the predetermined times for determining the abnormality. Therefore, when the urgency of avoiding the contact is high, the object detection unit or the safety device is used. Can be quickly determined whether or not is operating normally.
[0023]
According to the ninth aspect of the present invention, in addition to the configuration according to any one of the first to eighth aspects, when the determining means determines that there is an abnormality, the object detecting means detects the object and the safety device. A traveling safety device for a vehicle is proposed in which at least one of the operations of the safety device by the operation control means is stopped.
[0024]
According to the above configuration, if there is an abnormality in the object detection unit or the safety device, the operation is stopped. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the object detection unit or the safety device from operating inappropriately in the state where the abnormality has occurred.
[0025]
Note that the preceding vehicle V1 of the embodiment corresponds to the object of the present invention, and the radar device Sa of the embodiment corresponds to the object detecting means of the present invention.
[0026]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described based on examples of the present invention shown in the accompanying drawings.
[0027]
1 to 4 show an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram of a vehicle provided with a driving safety device, FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a braking system of the vehicle, and FIG. FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a control system, and FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a normal / abnormal judgment of the traveling safety device.
[0028]
As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, a four-wheeled vehicle (own vehicle) V equipped with the traveling safety device of the present embodiment has left and right driving wheels, which are transmitted through a transmission T, of a driving force of an engine E. The vehicle includes front wheels WFL, WFR and left and right rear wheels WRL, WRR, which are driven wheels that rotate as the vehicle V travels. A brake pedal 1 operated by a driver is connected to a master cylinder 3 via an electronically controlled negative pressure booster 2. The electronic control negative pressure booster 2 mechanically boosts the depressing force of the brake pedal 1 to operate the master cylinder 3, and a braking command signal from the electronic control unit U regardless of the operation of the brake pedal 1 during automatic braking. Causes the master cylinder 3 to operate. When a pedaling force is input to the brake pedal 1 and a braking command signal is input from the electronic control unit U, the electronic control negative pressure booster 2 outputs a brake hydraulic pressure in accordance with the larger of the two. The input rod of the electronic control negative pressure booster 2 is connected to the brake pedal 1 via a lost motion mechanism, and the electronic control negative pressure booster 2 is actuated by a signal from the electronic control unit U to move the input rod forward. , The brake pedal 1 remains at the initial position.
[0029]
A pair of output ports 8, 9 of the master cylinder 3 are connected to brake calipers 5FL, 5FR, 5RL, 5RR provided on front wheels WFL, WFR and rear wheels WRL, WRR, respectively, via a hydraulic control device 4. The hydraulic control device 4 includes four pressure regulators 6... Corresponding to the four brake calipers 5FL, 5FR, 5RL, 5RR, and each pressure regulator 6 is connected to the electronic control unit U. The operation of the brake calipers 5FL, 5FR, 5RL, 5RR provided on the front wheels WFL, WFR and the rear wheels WRL, WRR is individually controlled.
[0030]
The electronic control unit U includes a radar device Sa as an object detecting means composed of a laser radar device or a millimeter wave radar device, a vehicle speed sensor Sb for detecting a vehicle speed based on wheel speed, and a yaw rate for detecting a yaw rate of the vehicle V. A sensor Sc, a steering torque sensor Sd for detecting a steering torque of the steering wheel 7, a tread force sensor Se for detecting a tread force input to the brake pedal 1, and an alarm unit 10 including a speaker are connected.
[0031]
Thus, the electronic control unit U is provided with the alarm means 10, the electronic control negative pressure booster 2, and the hydraulic control device based on the outputs of the radar device Sa, the vehicle speed sensor Sb, the yaw rate sensor Sc, the steering torque sensor Sd, and the pedaling force sensor Se. 4 is controlled. That is, when the warning means 10 is operated by a command from the electronic control unit U, a warning is issued to the driver by a warning sound or voice, and when the electronic control negative pressure booster 2 is operated by a command from the electronic control unit U, the master cylinder is activated. The brake hydraulic pressure generated by 3 is adjusted by the hydraulic control device 4 and transmitted to the brake calipers 5FL, 5FR, 5RL, 5RR, and the braking force of the front wheels WFL, WFR and the rear wheels WRL, WRR is independently controlled for each wheel. Is done.
[0032]
As shown in FIG. 3, the electronic control unit U includes a relative relationship calculating unit M1, a safety device operation controlling unit M2, a behavior detecting unit M3, and a determining unit M4. A radar device Sa, a vehicle speed sensor Sb... And a yaw rate sensor Sc are connected to the relative relationship calculating means M1, and the safety device operation control means M2 connected to the relative relationship calculating means M1 constitutes the safety device 11 of the present invention. The alarm means 10, the electronic control negative pressure booster 2, and the hydraulic control device 4 are connected. A vehicle speed sensor Sb, a yaw rate sensor Sc, a steering torque sensor Sd, and a pedaling force sensor Se are connected to the behavior detecting means M3, and the safety device operation control means M2 and the radar are connected to the determining means M4 connected to the behavior detecting means M3. It is connected to the device Sa.
[0033]
Next, the operation of the embodiment having the above configuration will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.
[0034]
First, the relative relationship calculation means M1 of the electronic control unit U reads the vehicle speed detected by the vehicle speed sensor Sb... In step S1 and the yaw rate of the own vehicle V detected by the yaw rate sensor Sc, and based on the vehicle speed and yaw rate in step S2. To predict the future course of the vehicle V. The predicted course of the vehicle V during straight running is straight, but the predicted course during right turn curves right, and the predicted course during left turn curves left, and the curvature is large in yaw rate. If the yaw rate is constant and the vehicle speed is low, the yaw rate increases.
[0035]
In the following step S3, the relative relationship calculating means M1 calculates the relative position (direction and relative distance) and the relative speed of the object such as the preceding vehicle V1 existing on the predicted course of the own vehicle V based on the output of the radar device Sa. I do. If the radar device Sa is a millimeter-wave radar device, the relative speed of the object can be immediately obtained. If the radar device Sa is a laser radar device, the relative speed of the object can be obtained as a time change rate of the relative distance of the object. Can be.
[0036]
Further, in step S3, the safety device operation control means M2 determines whether or not the own vehicle V may contact the preceding vehicle V1 based on the relative position and the relative speed. As a result, if there is a possibility of contact in step S4, the magnitude of the possibility of contact is determined in step S5. That is, the preceding vehicle V1 exists on the predicted course of the own vehicle V, and the time T (= ΔL / ΔV) until the contact obtained by dividing the relative distance ΔL of the preceding vehicle V1 by the relative speed ΔV is larger, whichever is greater. When the value falls below the predetermined value T1, that is, when the possibility of contact is small, the safety device operation control means M2 activates the alarm means 10 to output a primary alarm in step S6. When the time T until contact (= ΔL / ΔV) is smaller than the smaller second predetermined value T2, that is, when the possibility of contact is large, the safety device operation control means M2 issues an alarm at step S6 '. Activate the means 10 to output a secondary alarm.
[0037]
The magnitude relation between the first and second predetermined values T1 and T2 is T1> T2, and when the time T until the contact becomes smaller than the larger first predetermined value T1, the possibility of contact is small and an emergency If the degree is low and the time T until contact falls below the smaller second predetermined value T2, the possibility of contact is large and the degree of urgency is high.
[0038]
The primary alarm of this embodiment is to emit an alarm sound by activating the alarm means 10, and the secondary alarm is to activate the electronic control negative pressure booster 2 and the hydraulic control device 4 to generate a weak braking force as an alarm. Is generated. In either case, the driver is warned that there is a possibility of contact with the preceding vehicle V1 and urges a spontaneous brake operation or steering operation to avoid contact.
[0039]
When the primary and secondary alarms are issued in this way, in steps S7 and S7 ', the behavior detecting means M3 and the determining means M4 determine whether the alarm is a normal alarm.
[0040]
In step S7, when ΔT1 elapses between the time when the primary warning is issued and the time when the secondary warning is issued (T1 <T1 + ΔT1 <T2), the driver performs a brake operation or a steering operation to avoid the preceding vehicle V1. When the behavior detecting means M3 detects that the steering wheel 7 has not been operated, that is, the steering torque sensor Sd does not detect that the driver has operated the steering wheel 7 with a steering torque of a predetermined value or more, and the driver operates the brake pedal 1 by a predetermined value or more. When the treading force sensor Se does not detect that the pedal has been depressed with the strength of, the determination unit M4 determines that the primary alarm is an abnormal alarm that is not a normal alarm.
[0041]
This is because if a normal primary alarm has been issued, the driver should perform steering operation or brake operation to avoid contact with the preceding vehicle V1. This is because the driver determines that the brake operation or the steering operation for avoiding the contact is unnecessary, and ignores the alarm as an abnormal alarm even if the primary alarm is issued or the primary alarm is issued. Therefore, the time ΔT1 needs to be set as a time sufficient for the driver to operate the steering wheel 7 or the brake pedal 1 after the primary alarm is issued.
[0042]
Similarly, in step S7 ', when the behavior detecting means M3 detects that the driver has not performed an operation to avoid the preceding vehicle V1 when ΔT2 has elapsed since the secondary alarm was issued, The steering torque sensor Sd does not detect that the driver has operated the steering wheel 7 with a steering torque greater than or equal to a predetermined value, and the pedaling force sensor Se does not detect that the driver has depressed the brake pedal 1 with a strength greater than or equal to the predetermined value. The determination means M4 determines that the secondary alarm is an abnormal alarm that is not a normal alarm.
[0043]
It is desirable that the time ΔT2 after the secondary warning be shorter than the time ΔT1 after the primary warning. The reason is that the secondary alarm is issued when the possibility of contact is high, so that an early determination is required.
[0044]
When it is determined that the primary alarm or the secondary alarm is an abnormal alarm as described above, the abnormal alarm counter is incremented by one in steps S8 and S8 ', and the count number of the abnormal alarm counter is incremented in steps S9 and S9'. When N1 and N2 are exceeded, respectively, the operations of the radar device Sa and the safety device operation control device M2 are stopped in steps S10 and S10 ', thereby preventing further abnormal alarms from being issued.
[0045]
In the embodiment, the threshold N1 of the count of the abnormal alarm counter of the primary alarm is set to ten, and the threshold N2 of the count of the abnormal alarm counter of the secondary alarm is set to three. As described above, since the system is stopped when a plurality of abnormal alarms are detected, when the preceding vehicle V1 suddenly accelerates and the possibility of contact disappears, the driver does not perform the contact avoidance operation. It is possible to eliminate the problem that the abnormality is immediately determined and the system stops. The reason why the threshold value N2 of the secondary alarm is set smaller than the threshold value N1 of the primary alarm is that the system needs to be stopped early if the secondary alarm issued when the possibility of contact is high is an abnormal alarm. Because.
[0046]
The abnormal alarm counter is reset to 0 when the ignition switch is turned on, and counts up until the next time the ignition switch is turned off. Even if the normality determination is made during the counting, the count value does not change. Further, even if a secondary alarm is issued for several seconds (for example, two to three seconds) continuously, if the driver's avoidance operation is not detected, the system can be immediately stopped. This determination condition is an OR condition with respect to the determination condition for stopping the system when the count number of the abnormality alarm becomes N2 or more. That is, the system is stopped when one of them is established.
[0047]
In this embodiment, whether or not the driver has performed the contact avoidance operation after the primary and secondary warnings is determined based on the outputs of the steering torque sensor Sd and the pedaling force sensor Se. However, the vehicle speed sensors Sb. The determination can be made based on the output of Sc. That is, when the driver performs a brake operation to avoid contact, the vehicle speed detected by the vehicle speed sensor Sb decreases, and when the driver performs steering operation to avoid contact, the yaw rate detected by the yaw rate sensor Sc increases. is there.
[0048]
The embodiments of the present invention have been described above. However, various design changes can be made in the present invention without departing from the gist thereof.
[0049]
For example, the primary alarm and the secondary alarm are not limited to the alarm sound by the alarm means 10 and the generation of the weak braking force by the electronic control negative pressure booster 2 and the hydraulic control device 4, but the sound by a buzzer, a chime, a lamp, an LED, or the like. Light, light, or means for vibrating the steering wheel 7 can be employed.
[0050]
The driver's steering operation may be detected by a known steering angle sensor (not shown) instead of the steering torque sensor Sd. In this case, the steering angle sensor detects a change in the steering angle equal to or greater than a predetermined value or a steering angular speed equal to or greater than the predetermined value, thereby detecting that the driver has performed the steering operation.
[0051]
Also, in place of the primary alarm and the secondary alarm, primary braking and secondary braking including automatic braking for operating the electronic control negative pressure booster 2 and the hydraulic control device 4 are performed, or the actuator of the electric power steering device is activated to make contact. Primary steering and secondary steering consisting of automatic steering that avoids the above. In this case, the braking force of the secondary braking is set stronger than the braking force of the primary braking, and the steering torque of the secondary steering is set stronger than the steering torque of the primary steering.
[0052]
When performing the automatic braking or the automatic steering, as a result of the primary and secondary braking or the primary and secondary steering, the steering torque sensor Sd detects the steering operation for avoiding the contact within a predetermined time, or the pedaling force sensor Se. If it detects a brake operation for avoiding contact, it can be determined that normal automatic braking and automatic steering have been performed. In the above determination, the output of the vehicle speed sensor Sb or the output of the yaw rate sensor Sc can be used instead of the output of the steering torque sensor Sd or the pedaling force sensor Se. This is because if the driver performs a brake operation after the start of the automatic braking, the vehicle speed sensor Sb. This is because a yaw rate higher than the yaw rate due to steering is detected.
[0053]
Further, it is also possible to combine a primary warning by sound or light with a secondary steering composed of automatic braking and a secondary steering composed of automatic steering.
[0054]
The automatic braking is not limited to the hydraulic brake of the embodiment, but may be an engine brake. In this case, the transmission T can be shifted down one step by the primary braking, and the transmission T can be shifted down by two steps by the secondary braking.
[0055]
The object of the present invention is not limited to the preceding vehicle V1, but may be an oncoming vehicle, a fixed object on the roadside, a falling object on the road, or the like.
[0056]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the first aspect of the present invention, after activating the safety device to prevent the vehicle from contacting the object, the behavior of the driver for avoiding contact, or the behavior of the driver It can be accurately determined whether or not the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally based on whether or not the behavior of the vehicle generated as a result of the above is detected.
[0057]
According to the invention described in claim 2, if the driver performs a deceleration operation or a steering operation within a predetermined time after the safety device issues an alarm, the possibility of contact with the object based on the alarm is determined by the driver. It is recognized that the deceleration operation or the steering operation has been performed, and it can be determined that the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0058]
According to the third aspect of the present invention, if the deceleration behavior or the turning behavior of the vehicle is detected within a predetermined time after the safety device issues an alarm, the possibility of the driver contacting the object based on the alarm is provided. Is recognized, the deceleration operation or the steering operation is performed, and it can be determined that the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0059]
According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, if the driver performs a deceleration operation or a steering operation within a predetermined time after the safety device operates the deceleration unit or the steering unit, the driver performs the deceleration unit or the steering operation. The deceleration operation or the steering operation is performed by recognizing the possibility of contact with the object based on the operation of the means, and it can be determined that the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0060]
According to the invention described in claim 5, the driver performs the deceleration operation or the steering operation within a predetermined time after the safety device operates the deceleration means or the steering means, and the vehicle is decelerated by the operation of the safety device. If the deceleration or turning behavior of the vehicle exceeding the turning or turning behavior is detected, the driver recognizes the possibility of contact with the object based on the operation of the deceleration means or the steering means and performs the deceleration operation or the steering operation. This means that it can be determined that the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0061]
According to the invention described in claim 6, the secondary safety device that operates when the possibility of contact is high is set shorter than the predetermined time after the operation, so that the urgency of avoiding contact is high. It is possible to quickly determine whether the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0062]
According to the invention described in claim 7, when the number of times that the object detection means or the safety device is not determined to be normal is equal to or more than a predetermined number, it is determined to be abnormal. Even if there is, it can be prevented from being erroneously determined to be abnormal.
[0063]
According to the invention described in claim 8, the secondary safety device that operates when the possibility of contact is high is set to a small number of the predetermined times for determining an abnormality. It is possible to quickly determine whether the object detection means or the safety device is operating normally.
[0064]
According to the ninth aspect of the present invention, if there is an abnormality in the object detection means or the safety device, the operation is stopped. Therefore, the object detection means or the safety device operates improperly in the state where the abnormality has occurred. Can be prevented.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram of a vehicle equipped with a driving safety device. FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a braking system of the vehicle. FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a control system of the driving safety device. FIG. Flowchart of determination
11 Safety device M1 Relative relationship calculation means M2 Safety device operation control means M3 Behavior detection means M4 Judgment means Sa Radar device (object detection means)
V vehicle V1 preceding vehicle (object)

Claims (9)

車両(V)の進行方向に存在する物体(V1)を検知する物体検知手段(Sa)と、
物体検知手段(Sa)の検知結果に基づいて車両(V)と物体(V1)との相対位置を含む相対関係を算出する相対関係算出手段(M1)と、
相対関係算出手段(M1)で算出した相対関係に基づいて車両(V)と物体(V1)との接触可能性の有無を判定し、接触可能性がある場合に車両(V)に設けた安全装置(11)の作動を制御する安全装置作動制御手段(M2)と、
を備えた車両の走行安全装置において、
安全装置(11)の作動後のドライバーの挙動および車両(V)の挙動の少なくとも一方を検知する挙動検知手段(M3)と、
挙動検知手段(M3)の検知結果に基づいて物体検知手段(Sa)の作動および安全装置(11)の作動の少なくとも一方の作動が正常であるか否かを判定する判定手段(M4)と、
を備えたことを特徴とする車両の走行安全装置。
An object detection means (Sa) for detecting an object (V1) existing in the traveling direction of the vehicle (V);
A relative relation calculating means (M1) for calculating a relative relation including a relative position between the vehicle (V) and the object (V1) based on a detection result of the object detecting means (Sa);
The presence or absence of the possibility of contact between the vehicle (V) and the object (V1) is determined based on the relative relationship calculated by the relative relationship calculation means (M1). If there is a possibility of contact, the safety provided on the vehicle (V) is determined. Safety device operation control means (M2) for controlling the operation of the device (11);
In a driving safety device for a vehicle having
A behavior detecting means (M3) for detecting at least one of the behavior of the driver and the behavior of the vehicle (V) after the operation of the safety device (11);
Determining means (M4) for determining whether at least one of the operation of the object detecting means (Sa) and the operation of the safety device (11) is normal based on the detection result of the behavior detecting means (M3);
A traveling safety device for a vehicle, comprising:
安全装置(11)はドライバーに警報を発するものであり、判定手段(M4)は、安全装置(11)の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段(M3)がドライバーの減速操作および操向操作の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の車両の走行安全装置。The safety device (11) issues an alarm to the driver, and the determining means (M4) determines that the behavior detecting means (M3) operates within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device (11). The running safety device for a vehicle according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the vehicle is normal when at least one of the following is detected. 安全装置(11)はドライバーに警報を発するものであり、判定手段(M4)は、安全装置(11)の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段(M3)が車両(V)の減速挙動および旋回挙動の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の車両の走行安全装置。The safety device (11) issues a warning to the driver, and the determining means (M4) determines that the behavior detecting means (M3) determines the deceleration behavior of the vehicle (V) within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device (11). The running safety device for a vehicle according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the vehicle is normal when at least one of the turning behaviors is detected. 安全装置(11)は減速手段および操向手段の何れかであり、
判定手段(M4)は、安全装置(11)の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段(M3)がドライバーの減速操作および操向操作の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の車両の走行安全装置。
The safety device (11) is one of deceleration means and steering means,
The determining means (M4) determines that the operation is normal when the behavior detecting means (M3) detects at least one of the deceleration operation and the steering operation of the driver within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device (11). The driving safety device for a vehicle according to claim 1, wherein:
安全装置(11)は減速手段および操向手段の何れかであり、
判定手段(M4)は、安全装置(11)の作動後の所定時間内に挙動検知手段(M3)が該安全装置(11)の作動による車両(V)の減速挙動および旋回挙動の少なくとも一方を上回る車両(V)の減速挙動および旋回挙動の少なくとも一方を検知したときに正常であると判定することを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の車両の走行安全装置。
The safety device (11) is one of deceleration means and steering means,
The determining means (M4) determines that the behavior detecting means (M3) determines at least one of the deceleration behavior and the turning behavior of the vehicle (V) by the operation of the safety device (11) within a predetermined time after the operation of the safety device (11). 2. The vehicle safety device according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the vehicle is normal when at least one of a deceleration behavior and a turning behavior of the vehicle (V) exceeding the vehicle is detected. 3.
安全装置(11)は、一次安全装置と、該一次安全装置よりも接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置とからなり、
前記所定時間は、一次安全装置の作動後のものより二次安全装置の作動後のものの方が短く設定されていることを特徴とする、請求項2〜請求項5の何れか1項に記載の車両の走行安全装置。
The safety device (11) includes a primary safety device and a secondary safety device that operates when the possibility of contact is higher than the primary safety device,
The said predetermined time is set shorter after operation | movement of a secondary safety device than after operation | movement of a primary safety device, The said any one of Claims 2-5 characterized by the above-mentioned. Vehicle safety device.
判定手段(M4)は、正常と判定されない回数が所定回数以上となったときに異常と判定することを特徴とする、請求項2〜請求項6の何れか1項に記載の車両の走行安全装置。The traveling safety of a vehicle according to any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein the determining means (M4) determines that the vehicle is abnormal when the number of times that the vehicle is not determined to be normal is equal to or more than a predetermined number of times. apparatus. 安全装置(11)は、一次安全装置と、該一次安全装置よりも接触可能性が高いときに作動する二次安全装置とからなり、
前記所定回数は、一次安全装置の作動に関するものより二次安全装置の作動に関するものを少なく設定したことを特徴とする、請求項7に記載の車両の走行安全装置。
The safety device (11) includes a primary safety device and a secondary safety device that operates when the possibility of contact is higher than the primary safety device,
The driving safety device for a vehicle according to claim 7, wherein the predetermined number of times is set such that a number related to the operation of the secondary safety device is smaller than a number related to the operation of the primary safety device.
判定手段(M4)が異常と判定したとき、物体検知手段(Sa)による物体の検知および安全装置作動制御手段(M2)による安全装置(11)の作動の少なくとも一方を中止することを特徴とする、請求項1〜請求項8の何れか1項に記載の車両の走行安全装置。When the determining means (M4) determines that there is an abnormality, at least one of the detection of the object by the object detecting means (Sa) and the operation of the safety device (11) by the safety device operation control means (M2) is stopped. The vehicle safety device according to any one of claims 1 to 8.
JP2003131936A 2003-05-09 2003-05-09 Vehicle travel safety device Expired - Lifetime JP3872035B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003131936A JP3872035B2 (en) 2003-05-09 2003-05-09 Vehicle travel safety device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003131936A JP3872035B2 (en) 2003-05-09 2003-05-09 Vehicle travel safety device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2004330972A true JP2004330972A (en) 2004-11-25
JP3872035B2 JP3872035B2 (en) 2007-01-24

Family

ID=33506986

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003131936A Expired - Lifetime JP3872035B2 (en) 2003-05-09 2003-05-09 Vehicle travel safety device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3872035B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007023667A1 (en) * 2005-08-24 2007-03-01 Hino Motors, Ltd. Automatic brake control device
WO2008126474A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-23 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Traveling safety device of vehicle
JP2014094748A (en) * 2013-12-16 2014-05-22 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Driving operation support device and driving operation support method
WO2020111036A1 (en) * 2018-11-28 2020-06-04 日本精機株式会社 Display device

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07117593A (en) * 1993-10-21 1995-05-09 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Alarm device for vehicle
JPH09311996A (en) * 1996-05-23 1997-12-02 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Car navigation device
JPH11227582A (en) * 1998-02-18 1999-08-24 Honda Motor Co Ltd Braking control device for vehicle
JPH11278095A (en) * 1998-03-30 1999-10-12 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Constant speed running device for controlling inter-vehicle distance
JP2000108860A (en) * 1998-10-06 2000-04-18 Toyota Motor Corp Brake controller
JP2002029404A (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-01-29 Unisia Jecs Corp Brake control device
JP2002067904A (en) * 2000-08-29 2002-03-08 Toyota Motor Corp Running control device
JP2002163797A (en) * 2000-11-24 2002-06-07 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Collision-preventing device for vehicle
JP2002316601A (en) * 2001-04-19 2002-10-29 Mitsubishi Motors Corp Drive support device
JP2003063274A (en) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-05 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Control system for distance between two vehicles

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07117593A (en) * 1993-10-21 1995-05-09 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Alarm device for vehicle
JPH09311996A (en) * 1996-05-23 1997-12-02 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Car navigation device
JPH11227582A (en) * 1998-02-18 1999-08-24 Honda Motor Co Ltd Braking control device for vehicle
JPH11278095A (en) * 1998-03-30 1999-10-12 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Constant speed running device for controlling inter-vehicle distance
JP2000108860A (en) * 1998-10-06 2000-04-18 Toyota Motor Corp Brake controller
JP2002029404A (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-01-29 Unisia Jecs Corp Brake control device
JP2002067904A (en) * 2000-08-29 2002-03-08 Toyota Motor Corp Running control device
JP2002163797A (en) * 2000-11-24 2002-06-07 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Collision-preventing device for vehicle
JP2002316601A (en) * 2001-04-19 2002-10-29 Mitsubishi Motors Corp Drive support device
JP2003063274A (en) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-05 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Control system for distance between two vehicles

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007023667A1 (en) * 2005-08-24 2007-03-01 Hino Motors, Ltd. Automatic brake control device
US7983828B2 (en) 2005-08-24 2011-07-19 Hino Motors Ltd. Automatic brake control device
WO2008126474A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-23 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Traveling safety device of vehicle
US8521414B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2013-08-27 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Vehicle safety driving apparatus
JP2014094748A (en) * 2013-12-16 2014-05-22 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Driving operation support device and driving operation support method
WO2020111036A1 (en) * 2018-11-28 2020-06-04 日本精機株式会社 Display device
JP7435465B2 (en) 2018-11-28 2024-02-21 日本精機株式会社 display device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3872035B2 (en) 2007-01-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111016902B (en) Vehicle speed auxiliary control method and system during lane changing of vehicle and vehicle
JP3966673B2 (en) Object detection device and vehicle travel safety device
EP1475647B1 (en) Travel safety system for vehicle
KR20200021056A (en) Driving assistance system
US10773647B2 (en) Method for triggering an automatic emergency braking process with variable warning time period
KR101963481B1 (en) Method and device for determining an adaptive response time of vehicle driver
KR101478068B1 (en) Apparatus for preventing collision in vehicle and method thereof
JP2012121534A (en) Automatic braking device of vehicle
KR101188271B1 (en) Method for controlling forward collision warning and mitigation system
JP2003112618A (en) Braking controller for vehicle
CN113212425B (en) Driving assistance device
CN108146433B (en) Emergency automatic braking system and method for vehicle
WO2013098996A1 (en) Vehicle driving assistance device
WO2007116558A1 (en) Brake device for vehicle
JP2004355324A (en) Contact avoidance control device for vehicle
JP6521430B2 (en) Driving support device for vehicle
CN113104007A (en) Driving support device
JP2017016305A (en) Drive assist apparatus and drive assist method
JP2005010893A (en) Vehicular contact avoidance control system
KR20140091333A (en) Vehicle control apparatus and vehicle control method
JP2009035245A (en) Vehicle operation supporting device
KR20120027618A (en) Vehicle collision avoidance system and method for controlling the same
JP2011126319A (en) Traveling safety control device of vehicle
JP3872035B2 (en) Vehicle travel safety device
KR20200142154A (en) Driver assistance system and control method for the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20060215

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060222

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060421

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060621

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060803

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20060927

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20061018

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3872035

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091027

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101027

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101027

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111027

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111027

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121027

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131027

Year of fee payment: 7

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term