JP2003304642A - Power consignment management method and management system - Google Patents

Power consignment management method and management system

Info

Publication number
JP2003304642A
JP2003304642A JP2002106658A JP2002106658A JP2003304642A JP 2003304642 A JP2003304642 A JP 2003304642A JP 2002106658 A JP2002106658 A JP 2002106658A JP 2002106658 A JP2002106658 A JP 2002106658A JP 2003304642 A JP2003304642 A JP 2003304642A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
power generation
power
load
demand
power transmission
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2002106658A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3834788B2 (en
Inventor
Akira Osawa
陽 大澤
Yoshio Sato
美雄 佐藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP2002106658A priority Critical patent/JP3834788B2/en
Publication of JP2003304642A publication Critical patent/JP2003304642A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3834788B2 publication Critical patent/JP3834788B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To satisfy the restriction of 'the same time, the same amount' in power consignment, and achieve power consignment management that can improve profitability. <P>SOLUTION: The 'the same time, the same amount' restriction with respect to power consignment is satisfied by regrouping the load apparatus to which a generator facility relating to one power consignment contract supplies power and the load apparatus to which a generator facility relating to another power consignment contract supplies power (S4, S5); and further the implementation of the regrouping is selected by evaluating profitability (S6-S8). <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2004,JPO

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、電力系統に接続さ
れた発電設備と負荷設備との間で同時同量を満たして売
電する電力託送管理方法及び管理システムに係り、特
に、収益率を改善する電力託送管理に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a power consignment management method and management system for simultaneously selling the same amount of electricity between a power generation facility and a load facility connected to a power system, and more particularly, to a profit rate. For improved power consignment management.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】自由化された電力市場では、発電事業
者、電力消費者、これらを仲立ちする中間業者(以下マ
ーケッタと称す)により市場が構成され、これらの構成
員により種々の形態で電力が取引される。なお、市場の
構成員は、これらの形態に限られるものではなく、発電
設備を所有するマーケッタや、電力消費者ともなる発電
事業者なども存在する。
2. Description of the Related Art In a liberalized electric power market, a market is composed of a power generation company, a power consumer, and an intermediary (hereinafter referred to as a marketer) who mediates between them, and these members generate electric power in various forms. Be traded. The members of the market are not limited to these forms, and there are marketers who own power generation facilities and power generation companies who also serve as power consumers.

【0003】このような電力市場では、市場構成員のそ
れぞれが、自己の収益を最大にするように活動する。つ
まり、発電事業者はできるだけ高く電力を売ろうとし、
マーケッタは電力をできるだけ安く購入してできるだけ
高く売ろうとし、消費者はできるだけ安く電力を購入し
ようとする。
In such a power market, each of the market members acts to maximize their profit. In other words, generators try to sell electricity as high as possible,
Marketers try to buy electricity as cheaply as possible and sell it as high as possible, and consumers try to buy electricity as cheaply as possible.

【0004】一方で、これらの市場構成員は、長期的な
収益の安定性をも重要視する。例えば、発電事業者は、
短期的な収入が最大になる可能性があるが変動が予想さ
れる売電先よりも、単価が比較的安くても長期間供給量
と価格が保証される安定した契約を選ぶ傾向にある。
On the other hand, these market members also attach importance to long-term profit stability. For example, a power producer
They tend to choose stable contracts with long-term supply and price guarantees, even when unit prices are relatively low, rather than power distribution destinations, where short-term income may be maximized but fluctuations are expected.

【0005】このような自由化された電力取引に対応し
て、発電事業者の収益を最大にする発電設備の運用決定
法が、例えば特開2001−86645号公報に提案さ
れている。これによれば、複数の市場価格を予測し、最
も価格の高い市場に向けて電力を売るように意思決定
し、収益を最大にするように発電設備の運用を決めるよ
うにしている。また、消費者側の収益を最大にする買電
法が、例えば特開2000−78747号公報に提案さ
れている。
In response to such liberalized power trading, a method for determining the operation of a power generation facility that maximizes the profit of a power generation company has been proposed, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-86645. According to this, it predicts multiple market prices, makes a decision to sell electricity to the market with the highest price, and decides the operation of power generation equipment to maximize profits. Further, a power purchase method for maximizing the profit on the consumer side has been proposed, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-78747.

【0006】一般に、自由化された電力市場における取
引の大部分は、相対取引または店頭外取引と呼ばれる、
発電事業者と消費者の一対一の中長期契約であり、短期
のスポット市場は多くても全需要の20%程度であると
予想されている。したがって、取引量の点からも、市場
構成員にとっては、短期のスポット市場を上手く利用す
る手法も重要であるが、最適な中長期契約を締結するこ
との方がより重要である。
Generally, most of the transactions in the liberalized electricity market are called bilateral or over-the-counter transactions,
It is a one-to-one medium-to-long term contract between a power producer and a consumer, and the short-term spot market is expected to account for about 20% of all demand at most. Therefore, from the viewpoint of trading volume, it is important for market members to make good use of short-term spot markets, but it is more important to conclude optimal medium- to long-term contracts.

【0007】[0007]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところで、発電事業者
又はマーケッタ(以下、発電事業者と総称する。)は、
自己が発電又は調達した電力を一般電気事業者(いわゆ
る電力会社)の電力系統を利用して消費者に売電するこ
とが多い。このように、電力会社の送電網を経由して売
電する方式を、一般に電力託送と称し、一定の託送料を
電力会社に支払うようになっている。電力託送契約は、
一般に、契約対象の発電設備と負荷設備をそれぞれ1箇
所で電力系統に接続し、その接続点において監視する電
力の需給が一定の許容範囲以内で一致しなければならな
い、いわゆる同時同量の制約がある。つまり、発電量と
消費量が同一時に、同一量であることが前提で、これに
違反した場合は一定のペナルティが課せられる。
By the way, a power generation company or marketer (hereinafter collectively referred to as a power generation company) is
In many cases, the electric power generated or procured by itself is sold to consumers by using the electric power system of a general electric power company (so-called electric power company). In this way, the method of selling power via the power transmission network of an electric power company is generally called electric power consignment, and a certain amount of shipping fee is paid to the electric power company. The electricity consignment contract is
Generally, there is a so-called simultaneous constraint that the contracted power generation equipment and the load equipment must be connected to the power system at one location and the power supply and demand monitored at the connection points must match within a certain allowable range. is there. That is, when the amount of power generation and the amount of consumption are the same, it is assumed that they are the same amount, and if they violate this, a certain penalty will be imposed.

【0008】したがって、同時同量の制約を守り、しか
も収益が安定し、かつ最大にできる売電契約をすること
が、自由化市場における発電事業者にとって最も重要な
課題である。
[0008] Therefore, it is the most important issue for the power generation business operator in the liberalized market to make a power sale contract that can keep the same amount of restrictions at the same time, stabilize profit and maximize the profit.

【0009】しかし、従来の技術においては、同時同量
の制約を考慮していないという問題があった。すなわ
ち、同時同量の制約を守るために、発電設備は負荷設備
の需要(以下、デマンドと称する。)に対応して追従制
御により過不足なく発電しなければならない。ところ
が、中長期契約の場合、当初は予想できなかった事由
や、消費者側の事情によって、デマンドが発電設備の運
用制限に近づき、あるいは制限を超えることがある。こ
こで、運用制限とは、例えば、発電設備に最低負荷制限
が設定され、発電出力がこれを下回ると発電設備を停止
させなければならない場合がある。その理由は、低負荷
では環境規制を守れないためであったり、火力発電所の
場合は安定な燃焼が保持できない場合等である。
However, the conventional technique has a problem in that the same amount of restrictions is not taken into consideration. In other words, in order to keep the same amount of restrictions at the same time, the power generation equipment must generate power without excess or deficiency by follow-up control in response to demand of load equipment (hereinafter referred to as demand). However, in the case of a medium- to long-term contract, the demand may approach or exceed the operational limit of the power generation facility due to reasons that could not be predicted at the beginning and circumstances of the consumer. Here, the operation restriction may be, for example, a case where a minimum load restriction is set for the power generation equipment and the power generation equipment must be stopped when the power generation output falls below this. The reason is that environmental regulations cannot be observed under a low load, and stable combustion cannot be maintained in the case of a thermal power plant.

【0010】したがって、デマンドが発電設備の最低負
荷制限を下回った場合における発電設備の選択枝は、発
電設備の停止又は最低負荷の保持のいずれかになる。し
かし、いずれの場合も、同時同量を守れなくなるから、
需給差に応じて電力会社にペナルティを支払う必要があ
り、発電事業者にとっては大きな損失となる。また、発
電設備を停止する場合は、起動停止に伴うエネルギー損
失も生ずる。
Therefore, when the demand falls below the minimum load limit of the power generation equipment, the choice of the power generation equipment is either stop of the power generation equipment or maintenance of the minimum load. However, in any case, the same amount cannot be protected at the same time,
It is necessary to pay a penalty to the electric power company according to the difference in supply and demand, which is a large loss for the power generation company. Further, when the power generation equipment is stopped, energy loss occurs due to the start and stop.

【0011】一方、電力託送に関する約款で、逆潮流、
即ち供給量が消費量を上回ることが禁止されている場合
は、逆潮流が発生すると系統管理者である電力会社の指
令によって、発電設備側の遮断機を開き、強制的に発電
を停止させられることがある。
On the other hand, in terms of power transmission, the reverse flow,
That is, if the supply amount is prohibited from exceeding the consumption amount, when a reverse power flow occurs, the breaker on the side of the power generation facility is opened and the power generation is forcibly stopped according to a command from the power company who is the system administrator. Sometimes.

【0012】本発明は、電力託送における同時同量の制
約を満たす電力託送管理方法及び管理システムを実現す
ることを第1の課題とする。
[0012] A first object of the present invention is to realize a power delivery management method and a management system that satisfy the constraint of the same amount of power delivery at the same time.

【0013】また、本発明は、第1の課題に加えて、収
益率を改善できる電力託送管理方法及び管理システムを
実現することを第2の課題とする。
Further, in addition to the first problem, the second object of the present invention is to realize a power delivery management method and management system capable of improving the profit rate.

【0014】[0014]

【課題を解決するための手段】第1の課題を解決する本
発明の電力託送管理は、一の電力託送契約に係る発電設
備の電力供給先の負荷設備と、他の電力託送契約に係る
発電設備の電力供給先の負荷設備とを組替えて、電力託
送に係る同時同量の制約を満足させることを特徴とする
ものであり、コンピュータを用いて実現することができ
る。
[MEANS FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEMS] The power transmission management of the present invention which solves the first problem is to perform load power generation at a power supply destination of a power generation facility according to one power transmission contract and power generation at another power transmission contract. The present invention is characterized in that the load equipment of the power supply destination of the equipment is recombined to satisfy the same amount of restrictions on the power transmission at the same time, which can be realized by using a computer.

【0015】すなわち、本発明は、発電事業者が契約に
基づいて電力消費者に電力を託送する際に、託送契約に
係る発電設備と負荷設備の需給関係を組替えることによ
り、発電業者全体の収益が例えば最大になるように、電
力託送を管理する。例えば、中長期の電力託送契約を結
んでいる発電事業者と消費者の複数の契約について、一
の発電事業者の発電設備が運用制限を受ける可能性があ
る場合、他の発電事業者の発電設備の売電契約先の負荷
設備と一時的に交換することにより、運用制限を回避し
て損失を低減することを特徴とするものである。
That is, according to the present invention, when a power generation company consigns electric power to an electric power consumer based on a contract, by rearranging the supply and demand relationship between the power generation equipment and the load equipment related to the consignment contract, Manage power transmission to maximize returns, for example. For example, if there is a possibility that the power generation equipment of one power generation operator may be subject to operational restrictions for multiple contracts between the power generation operator and the consumer who have a medium- to long-term power transmission contract, the power generation of another power generation operator may be restricted. It is characterized by avoiding operational restrictions and reducing losses by temporarily replacing the load equipment with the power sales contract partner of the equipment.

【0016】ところで、契約先を交換することによっ
て、一の発電事業者の損失は低減できるが、他の発電事
業者の収益は必ずしも増加しないことがある。この場合
は、契約先の交換に伴う損益の減少分または利益の増加
分を原資にして、全体として増加した収益を分け合う清
算をすることで、双方にメリットが発生するようにす
る。
By the way, by exchanging contract parties, the loss of one power generation company can be reduced, but the profit of another power generation company may not necessarily increase. In this case, the decrease in profit or loss or the increase in profit associated with the exchange of the contracting party is used as a source of funds to liquidate the increased profit as a whole, so that there is a merit for both parties.

【0017】また、本発明の電力託送管理方法は、複数
の電力託送契約に係る各負荷設備の需要の変動を記録す
るとともに、将来の一定期間における需要を予測し、該
予測された需要に対応する発電設備の前記一定期間にお
ける出力を予測し、該予測された出力が当該発電設備の
運用制限を超えるか否か判断し、この判断結果が前記運
用制限を超える場合には、前記複数の電力託送契約に係
る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを替えれば前記運用制限
を回避できるか否か判断し、この判断結果が前記運用制
限を回避できる場合は、当該組替えに従って前記電力託
送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組替えを前記一定期
間について実行するようにすることができる。
Further, the power delivery management method of the present invention records fluctuations in demand of each load facility relating to a plurality of power delivery contracts, predicts demand in a certain future period, and responds to the predicted demand. The output of the power generation equipment for a certain period of time, it is determined whether the predicted output exceeds the operation limit of the power generation equipment, and if the result of the determination exceeds the operation limit, the plurality of electric power It is judged whether the operation restriction can be avoided by changing the combination of the power generation equipment and the load equipment related to the consignment contract. If the result of the judgment is that the operation restriction can be avoided, the power generation equipment related to the power transfer contract according to the reclassification. The load equipment can be recombined for the fixed period.

【0018】第2の課題は、前記組替えを実行するに際
し、組替えを実行した場合と実行しない場合の前記複数
の電力託送契約に係る収益を比較し、該収益が増加する
場合に前記組替えを実行することにより解決できる。ま
た、前記運用制限を回避できる組替えが複数ある場合
は、最も収益が高い組替えを選択することが好ましい。
さらに、前記組替えにより増加した収益を、当該組替え
に係る複数の発電設備間で分配することが好ましい。
A second problem is that, when executing the reclassification, the profits relating to the plurality of power transmission contracts when the reclassification is executed and when the recomposition is not executed are compared, and when the profit increases, the reclassification is executed. It can be solved by doing. Further, when there are a plurality of recombinations that can avoid the operation restriction, it is preferable to select the recombination with the highest profit.
Further, it is preferable that the profit increased by the reclassification is distributed among a plurality of power generation facilities related to the reclassification.

【0019】また、本発明の電力託送契約の管理システ
ムは、電力系統に接続された複数の発電設備と複数の負
荷設備との間で締結された複数組の電力託送契約に従っ
て、前記各負荷設備の需要に応じて契約に係る発電設備
の出力を追従制御する電力託送契約の管理システムであ
って、前記各負荷設備の需要変動データを収集して記録
する記録手段と、前記各負荷設備の需要変動データに基
づいて、将来の一定期間における需要を予測する需要予
測手段と、該予測された需要の負荷設備に対応する発電
設備の前記一定期間における出力を予測する出力予測手
段と、該予測された出力が当該発電設備の運用制限を超
えるか否か判断する手段と、この判断結果が前記運用制
限を超える場合に、前記複数の電力託送契約に係る発電
設備と負荷設備の組合せを替えて、前記運用制限を回避
できるか否か判断する手段と、この判断結果が前記運用
制限を回避できる場合に、当該組替えに従って前記電力
託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組替え指令を前記
一定期間について出力する組替え手段とを備えてなるこ
とを特徴とする。
Further, the electric power transmission contract management system according to the present invention is characterized in that the load facilities are connected in accordance with a plurality of sets of electric power transmission contracts concluded between a plurality of power generation facilities and a plurality of load facilities connected to an electric power system. Is a management system of a power transmission contract that follows and controls the output of the power generation equipment related to the contract according to the demand of the demand, recording means for collecting and recording the demand fluctuation data of the load equipment, and the demand of the load equipment. Demand prediction means for predicting demand in the future fixed period based on the fluctuation data, output prediction means for predicting output of the power generation equipment corresponding to the load equipment of the predicted demand in the fixed period, and the predicted Means for determining whether the output exceeds the operation limit of the power generation facility, and if the determination result exceeds the operation limit, the power generation facility and the load facility related to the plurality of power transmission contracts By changing the combination, means for determining whether or not the operation restriction can be avoided, and if the result of this determination is that the operation restriction can be avoided, a rearrangement command for the power generation facility and the load facility related to the power transmission contract according to the rearrangement is issued. And a rearrangement means for outputting for a certain period of time.

【0020】[0020]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明を実施の形態に基づ
いて説明する。図1に本発明の電力託送管理方法に係る
一実施形態のフローチャートを示し、図2に本発明の電
力託送管理システムを適用してなる電力託送システムの
全体構成図を示す。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The present invention will be described below based on embodiments. FIG. 1 shows a flowchart of an embodiment of a power delivery management method of the present invention, and FIG. 2 shows an overall configuration diagram of a power delivery system to which the power delivery management system of the present invention is applied.

【0021】図2に示すように、複数系統の発電設備1
0N(N=a〜n)は、それぞれ図示していない変電設
備を介して電力系統70に接続されている。また、複数
系統の負荷設備60N(N=a〜n)も、それぞれ図示
していない変電設備を介して電力系統70に接続されて
いる。電力系統70はいわゆる電力会社が所有する送電
網である。図において、太線は電力の流れを示し、点線
は情報の流れを示している。また、図中の添え字a〜n
は、同一の添え字を有する発電設備と負荷設備同士が、
電力託送の基本契約を締結している関係にあることを示
している。なお、図示を省略したが、電力系統70には
電力会社の発電所及び他の消費者の負荷設備が接続され
ている。
As shown in FIG. 2, a plurality of systems of power generation equipment 1
0N (N = a to n) is connected to the electric power system 70 via substation equipment (not shown). Further, the load facilities 60N (N = a to n) of a plurality of systems are also connected to the power system 70 via substation facilities (not shown). The electric power system 70 is a power transmission network owned by a so-called electric power company. In the figure, thick lines indicate the flow of electric power, and dotted lines indicate the flow of information. Also, subscripts a to n in the figure
Indicates that power generation equipment and load equipment with the same subscript
It indicates that the relationship is such that a basic contract for power transmission is concluded. Although not shown, the power system 70 is connected to a power plant of a power company and load equipment of other consumers.

【0022】発電設備10Nで発生した電力は、それぞ
れ変電設備で昇圧されて電力系統70に出力される。一
方、負荷設備60Nで消費する電力は、電力系統70か
らそれぞれ変電設備により降圧されて供給される。発電
設備10Nから電力系統70に供給される電力量は、接
続点AN(N=a〜n)において計測され、同時同量制
御手段80N(N=a〜n)に入力されている。また、
電力系統70から負荷設備60Nに出力される電力量
は、接続点BN(N=a〜n)において計測され、切替
器95を介して同時同量制御手段80Nに入力されてい
る。同時同量制御手段80Nは、それぞれ入力されるA
N点における電力供給量と、BN点における電力需要量
とを比較し、それらの供給と需要の差が設定された一定
時間内で、制限範囲以内に収まるように、対応する発電
設備10Nの出力を制御するようになっている。つま
り、発電設備10Nの出力は、それぞれ託送関係にある
負荷設備60Nの電力需要に、一定の制限内で一致して
いなければならないという、同時同量の制約を遵守する
ようになっている。
The electric power generated in the power generation equipment 10N is boosted by the substation equipment and output to the electric power system 70. On the other hand, the electric power consumed by the load equipment 60N is stepped down and supplied from the electric power system 70 by the substation equipment. The amount of electric power supplied from the power generation equipment 10N to the electric power system 70 is measured at the connection point AN (N = a to n) and input to the simultaneous equal amount control means 80N (N = a to n). Also,
The amount of electric power output from the electric power system 70 to the load equipment 60N is measured at the connection point BN (N = a to n) and is input to the simultaneous equal amount control means 80N via the switch 95. Simultaneous same amount control means 80N receives A
The power supply amount at the N point is compared with the power demand amount at the BN point, and the output of the corresponding power generation facility 10N is adjusted so that the difference between the power supply and the demand falls within the limited range within the set fixed time. To control. In other words, the output of the power generation facility 10N complies with the simultaneous same amount constraint that the power demands of the load facilities 60N, which are in a consignment relationship, must match within a certain limit.

【0023】一方、電力託送管理システム100は、管
理制御装置101と、データベース102と、入出力装
置103を有して構成され、コンピュータにより形成さ
れている。管理制御装置101は、入出力装置103を
介して、接続点BNにおける需要量の時系列データを取
り込み、データベース101に需要変動データとして保
存する。さらに、入出力装置103を介して気象状況や
経済動向などの需要変動要因データを取り込みデータベ
ース101に格納する。また、入出力装置103を介し
て発電設備10Nの運転状態データ及び特性データ等を
取り込み、データベース101に発電設備データとして
保存するようになっている。なお、外部とやりとりする
データは、入出力装置103を介して、例えばインター
ネット等の通信網を介して送受することができる。
On the other hand, the power delivery management system 100 is composed of a management control device 101, a database 102, and an input / output device 103, and is formed by a computer. The management control device 101 fetches the time series data of the demand amount at the connection point BN via the input / output device 103 and stores it in the database 101 as demand fluctuation data. Further, demand fluctuation factor data such as weather conditions and economic trends is fetched via the input / output device 103 and stored in the database 101. Further, the operating state data and the characteristic data of the power generation facility 10N are fetched via the input / output device 103 and stored in the database 101 as the power generation facility data. The data exchanged with the outside can be transmitted and received via the input / output device 103, for example, via a communication network such as the Internet.

【0024】次に、図1を用いて、管理制御装置101
における処理及び制御手順を説明する。図1のフローチ
ャートは、所定の期間ごとに起動され、ステップS1で
接続点BNにおける負荷設備60Nの需要DNを取り込
み、データベース102に記録する。次いで、ステップ
S2において、データベース102に保存されている需
要履歴データと、気象状況や経済動向などの負荷変動要
因データと、現在の需要DNとに基づいて、将来の一定
期間(i)における負荷設備60Nの需要(デマンド)
DNiを予測する。そして、ステップS3において、予
測デマンドDiと現在の契約組合せに基づいて、各負荷
設備60Nに対応する発電設備10Nの発電出力PNi
を予測する。ステップS4において、予測された発電出
力PNiがその発電設備に定められた負荷運用制限の最
低負荷制限LNiを下回るか否か、最高負荷制限HNi
を上回るか否か判断する。つまり、PNi<LNi 又
はPNi>HNiかを判断する。その判断が、いずれも
否定(NO)のときは、処理を終了する。
Next, referring to FIG. 1, the management control device 101
The processing and control procedure in step 1 will be described. The flowchart of FIG. 1 is started every predetermined period, and in step S1, the demand DN of the load equipment 60N at the connection point BN is fetched and recorded in the database 102. Next, in step S2, load history data stored in the database 102, load variation factor data such as weather conditions and economic trends, and the current demand DN are used to load the load equipment in a future fixed period (i). 60N demand (demand)
Predict DNi. Then, in step S3, the power generation output PNi of the power generation facility 10N corresponding to each load facility 60N is based on the predicted demand Di and the current contract combination.
Predict. In step S4, it is determined whether or not the predicted power generation output PNi falls below the minimum load limit LNi of the load operation limits set for the power generation equipment, and the maximum load limit HNi.
To determine whether or not That is, it is determined whether PNi <LNi or PNi> HNi. If the determination is negative (NO), the process ends.

【0025】この判断が肯定(YES)のとき、つまり
負荷運用制限に抵触するときは、ステップS5に進み、
基本契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを入替える
ことができる組替え案を抽出する。例えば、図3の
(a)に示すように、負荷設備60aの予測需要Dai
が減少し、時刻T1において発電設備10aの最低負荷
制限Laを下回る予測のときは、データベース102を
検索して、その予測需要Daiよりも低い最低負荷制限
を有する発電設備の有無を探す。そして、同図の(b)
に示すように、発電設備10bの最低負荷制限Lbが予
測需要Daiよりも低く、かつ一定期間(i)における
発電設備10bに対するデマンドDbiが、発電設備1
0aの運用制限Lai及びHaiを満たしている場合、
契約の組替えによる対応が可能である。なお、この場
合、最低負荷制限LNよりも高い余裕を持ったしきい値
LNsを基準にすることが好ましい。また、発電設備1
0Nに対応する負荷設備60N以外の所内電力等の負荷
がある場合は、それらを考慮して発電出力PNiを予測
する。このようにして、組替え可能な案を全て抽出し、
1組でも組替え案が抽出された場合は、契約組替えによ
る対応可能と判断する。
If this determination is affirmative (YES), that is, if the load operation limit is violated, the operation proceeds to step S5,
Extract a reshuffle plan that can replace the combination of power generation equipment and load equipment related to the basic contract. For example, as illustrated in (a) of FIG. 3, the predicted demand Dai of the load facility 60a is
Is predicted to fall below the minimum load limit La of the power generation facility 10a at time T1, the database 102 is searched to find the presence or absence of a power generation facility having a minimum load limit lower than the predicted demand Dai. And (b) of the same figure
As shown in, the minimum load limit Lb of the power generation equipment 10b is lower than the predicted demand Dai, and the demand Dbi for the power generation equipment 10b in a certain period (i) is the power generation equipment 1
When the operation restrictions Lai and Hai of 0a are satisfied,
It is possible to deal by rearranging contracts. In this case, it is preferable to use the threshold value LNs having a margin higher than the minimum load limit LN as a reference. In addition, power generation equipment 1
When there is a load such as in-house power other than the load facility 60N corresponding to 0N, the power generation output PNi is predicted in consideration of them. In this way, all recombinable plans are extracted,
If even one group of reclassification plans is extracted, it is determined that contract reclassification is possible.

【0026】ステップS5における判断が否定のときは
処理を終了する。つまり、発電設備10aと負荷設備6
0aの契約に係る同時同量を満たす対応索はないことに
なる。この場合は、従来と同様に、発電設備10aを停
止するか、最低負荷制限Laによる運転継続を行なう。
If the determination in step S5 is negative, the process ends. That is, the power generation equipment 10a and the load equipment 6
There will be no response line that satisfies the same amount of 0a contract at the same time. In this case, as in the conventional case, the power generation equipment 10a is stopped or the operation is continued with the minimum load limit La.

【0027】一方、ステップS5における判断が肯定の
ときは、ステップS6に進み、組替え可能な全ての組替
え案について、収益性を評価する。つまり、発電出力の
変化に応じて発電効率が変化すること、発電効率が変化
すると燃料費用が変化することから、発電費用が増減す
る。また、同時同量のペナルティを免れることができる
利益がある。したがって、組替え後の発電設備と負荷設
備の組合せについてそれぞれ需給予測を実行し、発電費
用の増減、免れ得る同時同量のペナルティ、その他の収
益を考慮して、総合的な収益性を評価する。
On the other hand, if the determination in step S5 is affirmative, the process proceeds to step S6, and the profitability is evaluated for all the possible recombination plans. That is, since the power generation efficiency changes according to the change in the power generation output, and the fuel cost changes when the power generation efficiency changes, the power generation cost increases or decreases. There is also the benefit of avoiding the same amount of penalties at the same time. Therefore, the demand and supply forecast is executed for each combination of power generation equipment and load equipment after reclassification, and overall profitability is evaluated in consideration of increase / decrease in power generation costs, the same amount of penalties that can be avoided, and other income.

【0028】次いで、ステップS7において、ステップ
S6における評価に基づいて、収益性が改善される組替
え案の有無を判断し、無ければ処理を終了する。収益性
が改善される組替え案があれば、ステップS8に進んで
最も収益性が高い組替え案を選択する。そして、一定期
間(i)のタイミングに合わせて選択した組替え案に係
る組合せに基づいて、入出力装置103を介して切替器
95に切替指令を出力する。これにより、例えば、発電
設備10aの同時同量制御手段80aには負荷設備60
bの接続点Bbにおいて計測される需要Dbが入力さ
れ、発電設備10bの同時同量制御手段80bには負荷
設備60aの接続点Baにおいて計測される需要Daが
入力され、電力託送契約の組替えが行なわれる。
Next, in step S7, it is judged whether or not there is a recombination plan for improving profitability based on the evaluation in step S6, and if there is not, the process ends. If there is a recombination plan that improves profitability, the process proceeds to step S8, and the recombination plan with the highest profitability is selected. Then, the switching command is output to the switching unit 95 via the input / output device 103 based on the combination related to the recombination plan selected at the timing of the certain period (i). As a result, for example, the load equipment 60 can be provided to the simultaneous equal amount control means 80a of the power generation equipment 10a.
The demand Db measured at the connection point Bb of b is input, and the demand Da measured at the connection point Ba of the load facility 60a is input to the simultaneous equal amount control means 80b of the power generation equipment 10b, so that the power transmission contract can be recombined. Done.

【0029】その結果、発電設備10aは停止又は最低
負荷運用を免れ、発電設備10bは負荷設備60aの負
荷低減に追従して、同時同量の制約を満た運用を行なう
ことができる。
As a result, the power generation facility 10a is spared from the stop or the minimum load operation, and the power generation facility 10b can follow the load reduction of the load facility 60a and simultaneously operate while satisfying the same amount of restrictions.

【0030】また、管理制御装置101は、サブルーチ
ンS20を実行して、組替えを行なった一定期間(i)
における組替えに係る発電設備と負荷設備の需給関係、
発電量、等の収益に関係する実績データを収集し、予め
定めた清算ルールに従って、清算処理を実行する。
Further, the management control device 101 executes the subroutine S20 to perform the rearrangement for a certain period (i).
Supply-demand relationship between power generation equipment and load equipment related to recombination in
Performance data related to profits such as the amount of power generation is collected, and a clearing process is executed according to a predetermined clearing rule.

【0031】このように構成される実施形態の効果につ
いて、次に説明する。比較のため、従来方式の電力託送
管理について説明する。図2において切替器95がない
場合、例えば、発電設備10aと負荷設備60a、発電
設備10bと負荷設備60bが、それぞれ同時同量制御
しなければならない。すなわち、同時同量制御手段80
aは、接続点Aaと接続点Baの電力量を比較し、それ
らが同量になるように発電設備10aの出力を調節す
る。また、同時同量制御手段80bは、接続点Abと接
続点Bbの電力量を比較し、それらが同量になるように
発電設備10bの出力を調節する。
The effects of the embodiment thus constructed will be described below. For comparison, the conventional power transmission management will be described. In the case where the switch 95 is not provided in FIG. 2, for example, the power generation equipment 10a and the load equipment 60a, and the power generation equipment 10b and the load equipment 60b must be controlled in the same amount at the same time. That is, the simultaneous equal amount control means 80
a compares the electric power amounts at the connection point Aa and the connection point Ba, and adjusts the output of the power generation equipment 10a so that the electric power amounts become equal. Further, the simultaneous equal amount control means 80b compares the electric power amounts at the connection point Ab and the connection point Bb, and adjusts the output of the power generation equipment 10b so that they become the same amount.

【0032】このように制御していた場合、図4に示す
ように、時刻T1において何らかの理由により負荷設備
60aのデマンドDaが、発電設備10aの最低負荷制
限Laよりも下回ることがある。この最低負荷制限は、
これ以下の出力では、例えば環境規制が守られないと
か、火力発電設備の場合は燃焼の安定性が保証できない
などの理由から設定される。したがって、デマンドDa
が発電設備10aの最低負荷制限Laを下回った場合、
(1)速やかに発電設備10aを停止させる実運用Iを
選択するか、(2)発電設備10aを最低負荷制限La
で保持する実運用IIのいずれかを選択することになる。
しかし、いずれの場合も、同時同量を守れないので、図
中斜線の(a)または(b)の領域に相当する需給差に
応じてペナルティを支払うことになる。一方、発電設備
10bの最低負荷制限Lbは、負荷設備60aのデマン
ドDaよりも低く、かつ負荷設備60bのデマンドDb
は発電設備10aの最低負荷制限Laよりも高い状態に
ある。
In the case of controlling in this way, as shown in FIG. 4, the demand Da of the load equipment 60a may fall below the minimum load limit La of the power generation equipment 10a for some reason at time T1. This minimum load limit is
Outputs below this are set, for example, because environmental regulations cannot be observed, or in the case of thermal power generation equipment, combustion stability cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the demand Da
Is below the minimum load limit La of the power generation equipment 10a,
(1) Select the actual operation I that promptly stops the power generation equipment 10a, or (2) set the power generation equipment 10a to the minimum load limit La.
You will have to select one of the actual operation II to be held in.
However, in either case, since the same amount cannot be protected at the same time, the penalty is paid according to the supply and demand difference corresponding to the shaded area (a) or (b) in the figure. On the other hand, the minimum load limit Lb of the power generation equipment 10b is lower than the demand Da of the load equipment 60a, and the demand Db of the load equipment 60b.
Is higher than the minimum load limit La of the power generation equipment 10a.

【0033】本来的には、一般に一年単位の中長期売電
契約は、図4のような運用にならないように締結され
る。しかし、契約期間中に消費者側の事情が変わること
がしばしばあるため、想定していなかった低負荷運用を
強いられるケースが発生する。このような場合に、発電
設備10aは、他の短期的な売電先を探して対応するこ
とも考えられる。しかし、スポット市場や店頭市場が成
立しなければ、そのような短期需要を見つけることは困
難である。また、例え市場があったとしても、一般的に
発電効率が低い中間負荷で発電された電力は、単価が高
いことから、短期市場で売れる保証はない。
Originally, a one-year medium- to long-term power sale contract is generally concluded so as not to operate as shown in FIG. However, the situation on the consumer side often changes during the contract period, so there are cases in which a low-load operation that is not expected is forced. In such a case, the power generation equipment 10a may search for another short-term power sale destination and deal with it. However, it is difficult to find such short-term demand unless a spot market or an over-the-counter market is established. In addition, even if there is a market, there is no guarantee that the power generated by an intermediate load, which generally has low power generation efficiency, will be sold in the short-term market because the unit price is high.

【0034】本実施形態は、そのような問題を解決する
ものであり、例えば発電設備10aと負荷設備60aの
電力託送契約と、別の発電設備10bと負荷設備60b
の電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを、
契約期間中ならば任意に交換できるという前提に立つも
のである。
The present embodiment solves such a problem. For example, a power transmission contract between the power generation facility 10a and the load facility 60a, and another power generation facility 10b and the load facility 60b.
The combination of power generation equipment and load equipment related to the power transmission contract of
It is based on the premise that it can be exchanged arbitrarily during the contract period.

【0035】すなわち、本実施形態において、発電設備
10a、10bの運用に問題が生じない通常時において
は、切替器95は同時同量制御手段80a、80bに基
本契約の負荷設備に係る接続点Ba、Bbの需要Da、
Dbを入力している。これに対し、図3における時刻T
1以降のように、負荷設備60aのデマンドDaが発電
設備10aの最低負荷制限Laを下回る場合は、管理制
御手段101からの指令により、切替器95は接続点B
aの計測値を同時同量制御手段80bに渡し、接続点B
bの計測値を同時同量制御手段80aに渡すように動作
する。
That is, in the present embodiment, during normal times when there is no problem in the operation of the power generation equipment 10a, 10b, the switching device 95 causes the simultaneous equal amount control means 80a, 80b to connect the connection point Ba related to the load equipment of the basic contract. , Demand for Bb Da,
You are entering Db. On the other hand, the time T in FIG.
When the demand Da of the load equipment 60a is less than the minimum load limit La of the power generation equipment 10a as in 1 and after, the switching unit 95 causes the switch 95 to be at the connection point B according to a command from the management control means 101.
The measured value of a is passed to the same amount control means 80b at the same time, and the connection point B
It operates so as to pass the measured value of b to the simultaneous same quantity control means 80a.

【0036】なお、実際には負荷設備60aのデマンド
が、発電設備10aの最低出力制限Laを下回る時刻T
1になってから契約の組替えをすると、自動運転されて
いる発電設備10aは停止か、最低負荷保持のどちらか
を選択しなければならなくなる。そこで、本実施形態で
は、前述したように需要予測に基づいて判断し、最低出
力制限Laを下回る前に売電契約を交換するようにして
いる。すなわち、図3に示すように、最低負荷制限La
に近いところにしきい値Lsを設け、負荷設備60aの
予測デマンドDaiが低下してしきい値Lsを下回った
ときに、契約の組替えを実施するようにしている。
Actually, the time T at which the demand of the load equipment 60a falls below the minimum output limit La of the power generation equipment 10a.
If the contracts are recombined after becoming 1, the power generation equipment 10a that is being automatically operated will have to select either stop or minimum load holding. Therefore, in the present embodiment, as described above, the judgment is made based on the demand forecast, and the power sale contract is exchanged before the value falls below the minimum output limit La. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the minimum load limit La
A threshold value Ls is provided in the vicinity of, and when the predicted demand Dai of the load facility 60a decreases and falls below the threshold value Ls, the contract is rearranged.

【0037】その結果、発電設備10aの出力Paは、
より高い負荷設備60bのデマンドDbに従って推移す
るため、最低負荷制限Laを下回らずに運転を継続でき
る。一方、発電設備10bは、負荷設備60aの低いデ
マンドDaに対しても最低負荷制限Lbまで余裕がある
から、通常の運転を継続できる。
As a result, the output Pa of the power generation equipment 10a is
Since the demand Db of the higher load equipment 60b changes, the operation can be continued without falling below the minimum load limit La. On the other hand, since the power generation facility 10b has a margin up to the minimum load limit Lb even for the low demand Da of the load facility 60a, normal operation can be continued.

【0038】このようにして契約の組替えを行なうこと
により、発電設備10aの停止又は最低負荷保持運転に
よる損失を回避することができる。例えば、停止した場
合に比べると、図3の斜線部(b)、(c)の領域に相
当する発電による収益が上げられる。一方、発電設備1
0bは、領域(c)分の出力を下げなければならないか
ら、発電量(c)に相当する損失が発生する。そこで、
契約組替えを実施するに当たり、発電設備10aから発
電設備10bに対して、相応の対価が支払われなければ
ならない。その対価は最低でも、発電設備10bが図4
のように運転を継続できた場合の収益を保証できる金額
でなければならない。ここで、発電設備の発電効率は、
一般的に出力の関数になっており、高出力ほど高く、低
出力ほど低い。したがって、上記の損失および収益の計
算には、この発電効率の非線形性も考慮する必要があ
る。
By reconstituting the contract in this way, it is possible to avoid the loss due to the stop of the power generation equipment 10a or the minimum load holding operation. For example, compared to the case of the stop, the profit from power generation corresponding to the shaded areas (b) and (c) in FIG. 3 can be increased. On the other hand, power generation facility 1
In 0b, the output corresponding to the region (c) must be reduced, so that a loss corresponding to the power generation amount (c) occurs. Therefore,
When carrying out the contract rearrangement, the power generation facility 10a must pay a corresponding consideration to the power generation facility 10b. Even if the price is at a minimum, the power generation facility 10b is shown in FIG.
It should be the amount that can guarantee the profit if the driver can continue driving. Here, the power generation efficiency of the power generation equipment is
Generally, it is a function of output, with higher output being higher and lower output being lower. Therefore, the above non-linearity of power generation efficiency also needs to be taken into account in the above loss and profit calculation.

【0039】ここで、図1のサブルーチンS20におい
て行なう契約交換に伴う対価の清算処理について説明す
る。契約組替えに伴う対価は、契約に組合せを交換する
時点で一定の対価を支払う事前清算方式と、組替え運用
中の実際の収支をある期間にわたって積算し、組替えを
行なわなかった場合に推定される収支と比較して差益を
計算し、その差益に基づいて清算する事後清算方式が考
えられる。後者の事後清算方式における対価は比較的簡
単な方法で計算できる。これは契約の組替えによって収
益が低下する側の発電設備に対して、その収益低下分を
保障する額を基本として、これに組替えそのもののプレ
ミアムを加算する方法が考えられる。このプレミアム
は、例えば契約交換をしなかった場合に発生したはずの
損益に対して一定の比率を乗じて求める方法がある。
Here, a description will be given of the payment settlement process associated with the contract exchange performed in the subroutine S20 of FIG. The consideration associated with contract reclassification is the pre-clearing method in which a certain amount of consideration is paid when the combination is exchanged for the contract, and the actual income and expenditure during the reclassification operation are accumulated over a certain period of time, and the income and expenditure estimated if the reclassification is not performed. A post-settlement method may be considered in which the margin is calculated in comparison with the above, and the settlement is performed based on the margin. The consideration in the latter ex-post settlement method can be calculated by a relatively simple method. A possible method is to add a premium of the reclassification itself to the power generation equipment on the side of which the profit is reduced due to the contract reclassification, based on the amount that guarantees the decrease in the profit. There is a method of obtaining this premium, for example, by multiplying the profit or loss that would have occurred if the contract was not exchanged by a certain ratio.

【0040】一方、前者の事前清算方式における対価の
計算は、例えば事後清算方式と同様な計算を、出力予測
に基づいて事前に実施する方法が考えられる。また、組
替えは金融工学のオプションとみなすことも出来るの
で、オプション価格理論に基づいて事前に対価(ここで
は契約の価格)を決定することができる。すなわち、発
電設備10aは、消費者60aの出力を変動要因とし
て、消費者60aのデマンドが発電設備10aの最低負
荷を下回った場合に、受給契約を交換する権利を、発電
設備10bから購入する。これはコールオプションであ
り、ヨーロピアンオプションのオプション価格決定方法
に基づいて、オプションプレミアムを決定することがで
きる。
On the other hand, for the calculation of the consideration in the former pre-clearing method, for example, a method of performing the same calculation as the post-clearing method in advance based on the output prediction can be considered. Further, since the reclassification can be regarded as an option of financial engineering, the consideration (here, the price of the contract) can be determined in advance based on the option price theory. That is, the power generation equipment 10a purchases the right to exchange the receiving contract from the power generation equipment 10b when the demand of the consumer 60a falls below the minimum load of the power generation equipment 10a with the output of the consumer 60a as a variable factor. This is a call option and the option premium can be determined based on the option pricing method of the European option.

【0041】次に、図1のステップS2において行なう
負荷設備のデマンド予測方法について説明する。一般的
に、変動する需要や価格の予測には、ニューラルネット
によるパターン推定や、重回帰分析及び最小二乗推定な
どの統計による予測など、いくつかの方法が知られてい
る。これらは、確定的なパターンを推定する方法であ
る。この他に、確率的な予測方法として、確率微分方程
式で変動する需要をモデル化し、将来における需要の期
待値と分散を求める方法がある。
Next, the demand forecasting method of the load facility performed in step S2 of FIG. 1 will be described. Generally, for predicting fluctuating demand and price, several methods are known, such as pattern estimation by a neural network, and statistical prediction such as multiple regression analysis and least squares estimation. These are methods for estimating a deterministic pattern. In addition to this, as a probabilistic prediction method, there is a method of modeling a demand that fluctuates with a stochastic differential equation and obtaining an expected value and variance of the demand in the future.

【0042】ステップS2においては、いずれの予測方
法によって予測デマンドを算出してもよい。ただし、確
定的予測方法と、確率的予測方法では、結果の取り扱い
が異なる。確定的予測値を使う場合は、予測値又は予測
された需要曲線について、しきい値との関係を計算すれ
ばよい。しかし、確率的予測値、すなわち確定分の他に
その分散も考慮する場合は、予測値に標準偏差の何倍か
を加算または減算した値と、設定したしきい値との関係
を評価する必要がある。また、需要の分散を考慮した全
体の経済評価にも、分散が現れる。
In step S2, the prediction demand may be calculated by any prediction method. However, the deterministic prediction method and the probabilistic prediction method handle the results differently. When using the deterministic forecast value, the relationship between the forecast value or the forecast demand curve and the threshold value may be calculated. However, when considering the probabilistic predicted value, that is, the variance in addition to the fixed value, it is necessary to evaluate the relationship between the predicted value and the value obtained by adding or subtracting a number of standard deviations to the set threshold value. There is. Dispersion also appears in the overall economic evaluation considering the dispersion of demand.

【0043】ところで、上述の実施形態においては、発
電設備10Nが最低負荷制限を下回ることが予測された
場合、及び発電設備10Nが最高負荷制限を上回ること
が予測された場合の処理を例に説明したが、これに限ら
ず、次の条件で契約の組替え処理による電力託送の管理
をすることにより、電力託送契約の群管理により収益向
上を期待することができる。 (1)ある発電設備が緊急停止した場合 (2)運用制限にかかわらず、全体の収益予測を実施し
て、契約を交換した場合のほうが収益の向上が見込まれ
る場合 なお、発電設備の出力の変動が大きいと、契約組替え後
の組合せによっては、同時同量の制約を守れなくなる場
合がある。そこで、契約の組替えに基づく同時同量制御
の切替えの成立条件として、契約組替えを実施する発電
設備同士の出力差が一定範囲以内にあることを加味する
ことにより、同時同量の制約を守りやすくなる。 (変形例)発電設備10Nは、1系統の発電装置からな
る場合に限らず、並列された複数の発電装置を備えて構
成される場合にも適用できる。この場合は、複数の発電
装置を1系統の発電設備として取扱えば良い。
By the way, in the above-described embodiment, the processing when the power generation equipment 10N is predicted to fall below the minimum load limit and when the power generation equipment 10N is predicted to exceed the maximum load limitation will be described as an example. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and it is possible to expect an increase in profit by managing the group of power transmission contracts by managing the power transmission by the contract rearrangement processing under the following conditions. (1) When a certain power generation facility has an emergency stop (2) Regardless of operational restrictions, if the profit is expected to improve if the entire profit forecast is executed and the contract is exchanged. If the fluctuations are large, it may not be possible to keep the same amount of restrictions at the same time depending on the combination after contract reclassification. Therefore, by considering that the output difference between the power generation facilities that perform contract reclassification is within a certain range as a condition for establishing the simultaneous same-quantity control switching based on contract reclassification, it is easy to comply with the simultaneous equal-quantity constraint. Become. (Modification) The power generation facility 10N is not limited to the case where it is composed of one system of power generation devices, but can be applied to the case where it is configured to include a plurality of power generation devices arranged in parallel. In this case, a plurality of power generators may be handled as one system of power generation equipment.

【0044】また、発電設備10Nが、変電設備を介し
て電力系統70に電力を送出する上流側に、発電設備1
0Nとは独立に内部で電力を消費する負荷設備(以下、
内部需要設備という。)を有する場合は、電力の内部需
要についても予測が必要になる。そこで、負荷設備60
Nについての需要予測と同様に、内部需要設備の需要予
測を行なう。内部需要設備の需要について負荷設備と同
様に、需要の変動を計測してデータベース101に記録
する。そして、管理制御装置101に、内部需要予測の
機能を追加し、図1のステップS2における負荷需要予
測と同様の計算を実施する。そして、発電設備10Nの
出力にその内部需要分を加算して、ステップS3以降の
処理を実施する。内部需要の予測手法及び記録内容は、
負荷設備60Nに関する場合と同様である。
In addition, the power generation facility 10N is connected to the power generation facility 1 upstream of the power transmission to the power system 70 via the substation facility.
Load equipment that consumes power internally independently of 0N (hereinafter,
It is called internal demand equipment. ), It is necessary to predict the internal demand for electricity. Therefore, the load equipment 60
Similar to the demand forecast for N, the demand forecast of the internal demand equipment is performed. Regarding the demand of the internal demand equipment, like the load equipment, the fluctuation of the demand is measured and recorded in the database 101. Then, an internal demand forecasting function is added to the management control device 101, and the same calculation as the load demand forecast in step S2 of FIG. 1 is performed. Then, the internal demand amount is added to the output of the power generation equipment 10N, and the processing from step S3 is performed. The internal demand forecasting method and record content are
This is similar to the case regarding the load facility 60N.

【0045】また、図1の実施形態においては、ステッ
プS4において運用制限が問題にならない場合は、契約
組替え処理は実行しないで、そのときの組合せに基づく
電力託送を継続する例について説明した。しかし、運転
制約条件が問題にならない場合でも、本発明の契約組替
えによる収益改善を図る管理方法を適用することができ
る。すなわち、図1のフローチャートにおけるステップ
S4、S5を省略し、ステップS3から直接ステップS
6に進んで、全ての組替え案について収益性を評価す
る。そして、実施形態1の場合と同じく、最も収益性が
高い組合せを選択して、その予測期間についての契約組
替えに基づき切替指令を切替器95に出力する。また、
一方で、組替された契約に基づいて、サブルーチンS2
0の清算処理を行なうことはいうまでもない。
Further, in the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, an example has been described in which the contract rearrangement process is not executed and the power transmission based on the combination at that time is continued if the operation restriction does not matter in step S4. However, even when the operation constraint does not matter, the management method of the present invention for improving profit by contract reorganization can be applied. That is, steps S4 and S5 in the flowchart of FIG. 1 are omitted, and steps S3 to S
Proceed to step 6 to evaluate profitability for all recombination plans. Then, as in the case of the first embodiment, the combination with the highest profitability is selected, and the switching command is output to the switch 95 based on the contract reclassification for the predicted period. Also,
On the other hand, based on the reclassified contract, the subroutine S2
It goes without saying that the clearing process of 0 is performed.

【0046】[0046]

【発明の効果】以上述べたように、本発明によれば、電
力託送における同時同量の制約を満たして、収益率を改
善できる。
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to satisfy the constraint of the same amount of power transmission at the same time and improve the profit rate.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の一実施形態の電力託送管理方法の処理
手順を示すフローチャートである。
FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of a power delivery management method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】本発明の一実施形態の電力託送管理システムを
適用してなる電力託送システムの全体構成図である。
FIG. 2 is an overall configuration diagram of a power delivery system to which the power delivery management system of one embodiment of the present invention is applied.

【図3】本発明の契約組替えによる同時同量の効果を説
明するための線図である。
FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the effect of the same amount of contract reassignment according to the present invention.

【図4】図3と比較のため同時同量の制約による従来の
問題点を説明するための線図である。
FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining a conventional problem due to the same amount of constraint for comparison with FIG.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

10a、10b、…10n 発電設備 60a、60b、…60n 負荷設備 70 電力系統 80a、80b、…80n 同時同量制御手段 95 切替器 100 電力託送管理システム 101 データベース 103 入出力装置 10a, 10b, ... 10n Power generation equipment 60a, 60b, ... 60n Load equipment 70 power system 80a, 80b, ... 80n Simultaneous same amount control means 95 switch 100 Power Consignment Management System 101 database 103 I / O device

Claims (6)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 一の電力託送契約に係る発電設備の電力
供給先の負荷設備と、他の電力託送契約に係る発電設備
の電力供給先の負荷設備とを組替えて、電力託送に係る
同時同量の制約を満足させることを特徴とする電力託送
管理方法。
1. A load facility at a power supply destination of a power generation facility according to one power transmission contract and a load facility at a power supply destination of a power generation facility according to another power transmission contract are recombined so that the same load related to power transmission can be performed at the same time. A power transmission management method characterized by satisfying a quantity constraint.
【請求項2】 複数の電力託送契約に係る各負荷設備の
需要の変動を記録するとともに、将来の一定期間におけ
る需要を予測し、該予測された需要に対応する発電設備
の前記一定期間における出力を予測し、該予測された出
力が当該発電設備の運用制限を超えるか否か判断し、こ
の判断結果が前記運用制限を超える場合には、前記複数
の電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを替
えれば前記運用制限を回避できるか否か判断し、この判
断結果が前記運用制限を回避できる場合は、当該組替え
に従って前記電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の
組替えを前記一定期間について実行する電力託送管理方
法。
2. The fluctuation of the demand of each load facility relating to a plurality of power transmission contracts is recorded, the demand in a certain future period is predicted, and the output of the power generation facility corresponding to the predicted demand in the certain period. And determine whether the predicted output exceeds the operation limit of the power generation facility, and if the result of the determination exceeds the operation limit, the power generation facility and the load facility related to the plurality of power transmission contracts. If it is possible to avoid the operation restriction by changing the combination of the above, if the result of the determination is that the operation restriction can be avoided, the power generation facility and the load facility related to the power transmission contract are reconfigured according to the reconfiguration for the certain period of time. Power Consignment Management Method Performed About.
【請求項3】 前記組替えを実行するに際し、該組替え
を実行した場合と実行しない場合の前記複数の電力託送
契約に係る収益を比較し、該収益が増加する場合に前記
組替えを実行することを特徴とする請求項2に記載の電
力託送管理方法。
3. When performing the reclassification, comparing the profits relating to the plurality of power transmission contracts when the reclassification is executed and when the recomposition is not executed, and performing the reclassification when the profit increases. The power transmission management method according to claim 2, which is characterized in that.
【請求項4】 前記運用制限を回避できる組替えが複数
ある場合は、最も収益が高い組替えを選択することを特
徴とする請求項3に記載の電力託送管理方法。
4. The power transmission management method according to claim 3, wherein when there are a plurality of reclassifications that can avoid the operation restriction, the recombining with the highest profit is selected.
【請求項5】 前記組替えにより増加した収益を、当該
組替えに係る複数の発電設備間で分配することを特徴と
する請求項3又は4に記載の電力託送管理方法。
5. The power transmission management method according to claim 3, wherein the profit increased by the rearrangement is distributed among a plurality of power generation facilities related to the rearrangement.
【請求項6】 電力系統に接続された複数の発電設備と
複数の負荷設備との間で締結された複数組の電力託送契
約に従って、前記各負荷設備の需要に応じて契約に係る
発電設備の出力を追従制御する電力託送契約の管理シス
テムであって、 前記各負荷設備の需要変動データを収集して記録する記
録手段と、 前記各負荷設備の需要変動データに基づいて、将来の一
定期間における需要を予測する需要予測手段と、 該予測された需要の負荷設備に対応する発電設備の前記
一定期間における出力を予測する出力予測手段と、 該予測された出力が当該発電設備の運用制限を超えるか
否か判断する手段と、この判断結果が前記運用制限を超
える場合に、前記複数の電力託送契約に係る発電設備と
負荷設備の組合せを替えて、前記運用制限を回避できる
か否か判断する手段と、 この判断結果が前記運用制限を回避できる場合に、当該
組替えに従って前記電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷
設備の組替え指令を前記一定期間について出力する組替
え手段とを備えてなる電力託送管理システム。
6. According to a plurality of sets of power transmission contracts concluded between a plurality of power generation facilities connected to an electric power system and a plurality of load facilities, the power generation facilities related to the contract are demanded according to the demand of each load facility. A management system for a power transmission contract that controls output tracking, a recording unit that collects and records demand fluctuation data of each load facility, based on the demand fluctuation data of each load facility, in a certain future period Demand prediction means for predicting demand, output prediction means for predicting the output of the power generation equipment corresponding to the load equipment of the predicted demand in the fixed period, and the predicted output exceeds the operation limit of the power generation equipment. And a means for determining whether or not the operation limit can be avoided by changing the combination of the power generation facility and the load facility related to the plurality of power transmission contracts when the determination result exceeds the operation limit. And a rearrangement unit for outputting a rearrangement command for the power generation facility and the load facility related to the power transmission contract according to the rearrangement for a certain period when the determination result can avoid the operation restriction. Power transmission management system.
JP2002106658A 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system Expired - Lifetime JP3834788B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002106658A JP3834788B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002106658A JP3834788B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003304642A true JP2003304642A (en) 2003-10-24
JP3834788B2 JP3834788B2 (en) 2006-10-18

Family

ID=29390913

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002106658A Expired - Lifetime JP3834788B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3834788B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010148244A (en) * 2008-12-18 2010-07-01 Cosmo Oil Co Ltd Retail power supply control method, computer program for the same, and retail power supply system
CN106485605A (en) * 2016-12-05 2017-03-08 北京耀能科技有限公司 Clean energy resource electricity step price forward purchasing platform and control method
US9754330B2 (en) 2013-06-20 2017-09-05 Yahoo Japan Corporation Electric power retail management apparatus and method, for generators and customer facilities existing in an area including a plurality of regions
CN117077986A (en) * 2023-10-16 2023-11-17 华中科技大学 Situation awareness method and related equipment for extreme operation risk scene of power system

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010148244A (en) * 2008-12-18 2010-07-01 Cosmo Oil Co Ltd Retail power supply control method, computer program for the same, and retail power supply system
US9754330B2 (en) 2013-06-20 2017-09-05 Yahoo Japan Corporation Electric power retail management apparatus and method, for generators and customer facilities existing in an area including a plurality of regions
CN106485605A (en) * 2016-12-05 2017-03-08 北京耀能科技有限公司 Clean energy resource electricity step price forward purchasing platform and control method
CN106485605B (en) * 2016-12-05 2023-05-16 华北电力大学 Clean energy electricity stepped electricity price pre-purchase platform and control method
CN117077986A (en) * 2023-10-16 2023-11-17 华中科技大学 Situation awareness method and related equipment for extreme operation risk scene of power system
CN117077986B (en) * 2023-10-16 2024-01-30 华中科技大学 Situation awareness method and related equipment for extreme operation risk scene of power system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3834788B2 (en) 2006-10-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Wu et al. Cost of reliability analysis based on stochastic unit commitment
Kargarian et al. Probabilistic reactive power procurement in hybrid electricity markets with uncertain loads
Chowdhury et al. Application of customer interruption costs in transmission network reliability planning
US7430459B1 (en) System and method to control distributed power generation network
Alvehag et al. Risk-based method for distribution system reliability investment decisions under performance-based regulation
Roudbari et al. Resilience-oriented operation of smart grids by rescheduling of energy resources and electric vehicles management during extreme weather condition
Ahmadi et al. A novel two-stage stochastic programming model for uncertainty characterization in short-term optimal strategy for a distribution company
JP3966236B2 (en) Power generation facility operation planning method and power generation facility operation planning system
KR20150011423A (en) Reliability Evaluation of Power System Considering Reliability Model of Demand Response
Geiger Strategic power plant investment planning under fuel and carbon price uncertainty
Khojasteh Multi-objective energy procurement strategy of electricity retail companies based on normalized normal constraint methodology
Chawda et al. Risk‐based retailer profit maximization: Time of Use price setting for elastic demand
JP3834788B2 (en) Power consignment management method and management system
Feng et al. Iterative approach to generator maintenance schedule considering unexpected unit failures in restructured power systems
Doshi et al. Transmission Integration and the Market for Congestion Revenue Rights
Ibrahim et al. A novel generic architecture for the implementation of demand response programs in a smart grid
Li et al. Risk-constrained generation asset arbitrage in power systems
JP3880471B2 (en) Power generation planning method
Junlakarn et al. Provision of differentiated reliability services under a market-based investment decision making
US20040225486A1 (en) System for generating a resultant model for a power system
JP4434634B2 (en) Power generation facility operation support system
Abbasi et al. Risk based maintenance optimization of overhead distribution networks utilizing priority based dynamic programming
Urbano et al. Optimization of industrial plants for exploiting energy assets and energy trading
Hillsman et al. BUILD-1: a disaggregate model of the US electric utility industry
Elkasrawy et al. Annual demand response procurement method using an options contract technique—A planning tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20040810

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20060614

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20060620

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20060714

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3834788

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100804

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110804

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120804

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130804

Year of fee payment: 7

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term