JP2002305971A - Method for forecasting crop disease and system therefor - Google Patents

Method for forecasting crop disease and system therefor

Info

Publication number
JP2002305971A
JP2002305971A JP2001108772A JP2001108772A JP2002305971A JP 2002305971 A JP2002305971 A JP 2002305971A JP 2001108772 A JP2001108772 A JP 2001108772A JP 2001108772 A JP2001108772 A JP 2001108772A JP 2002305971 A JP2002305971 A JP 2002305971A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
disease
crop
spraying
infection
drug
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2001108772A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hatsuo Onoda
初男 小野田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kawasaki Kiko Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Kawasaki Kiko Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kawasaki Kiko Co Ltd filed Critical Kawasaki Kiko Co Ltd
Priority to JP2001108772A priority Critical patent/JP2002305971A/en
Publication of JP2002305971A publication Critical patent/JP2002305971A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method for forecasting a crop disease that realizes prediction of economical efficiency of a pesticide spray and a system therefor. SOLUTION: The method comprises a processing for asking the application conditions of the pesticide from the amount of an infection source giving crops disease damages and a permissible percentage of the damage (application conditions input processing 418), a processing for calculating the final damage (final damage calculating processing 414), and a processing for determining whether the application of the pesticide is suitable or not (judging processing 424), whereby the crop damage by the disease is predicted and whether the application of the pesticide is needed or not is judged to increase the economy of the application of the pesticide, and environmental pollution also can be inhibited, since the frequency and volume of pesticide application can be reduced within the region.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、茶園等の圃場で発
生する病害の発生予察に用いられる病害発生予察方法及
びそのシステムに関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method and system for predicting disease occurrence used for predicting disease occurrence in a field such as a tea plantation.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、雨量、湿度、風速等の気象情報を
用いて稲のイモチ病について、感染好適日を求め、発生
量や発病の進展を予測するシステムがある。このシステ
ムの目的は、病害の感染好適日から薬剤散布の適期を求
めることにある。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, there has been a system which obtains a suitable date for rice blast disease by using weather information such as rainfall, humidity, wind speed and the like, and predicts the amount of rice blast disease and the progress of the disease. The purpose of this system is to determine the appropriate time for drug application from the preferred date of disease transmission.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、従来のシステ
ムでは、薬剤散布の適期を求めることができるものの、
散布の要否やコスト等について、判断していない。この
ため、薬剤散布の適期を知っても、薬剤散布の要否、経
済性等は依然として勘や経験に依存することとなる。
However, in the conventional system, although it is possible to obtain a suitable period for spraying the medicine,
Neither the necessity of spraying nor the cost is determined. For this reason, even if the user knows the appropriate time for spraying the medicine, the necessity of the spraying of the medicine, the economic efficiency, and the like still depend on intuition and experience.

【0004】そこで、本発明は、薬剤散布の経済効率の
予測を実現した病害発生予察方法及びそのシステムを提
供することを課題とする。
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a disease occurrence prediction method and a system for realizing the prediction of the economic efficiency of drug application.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の病害発生予察方
法は、着目作物と着目病害の伝染源量及び被害許容率か
ら薬剤の散布条件を求める処理(散布条件入力処理41
8)と、前記作物の最終被害量を算定する処理(最終被
害量算定処理414)と、前記作物に対する前記薬剤の
散布適否を判定する処理(散布適否判定処理424)と
を含むことを特徴とする。即ち、病害から作物を防護す
る薬剤が環境汚染や経済性等の観点からすれば、必ずし
も有効であるとは言えず、作物の病害による被害状況を
予測し、薬剤散布の要否を判定することにより、薬剤散
布の経済性を高め、地域内等の薬剤散布量や散布回数の
削減により、環境汚染等をも抑制することができる。
The disease occurrence forecasting method according to the present invention comprises a process of obtaining a spraying condition of a medicine from a crop of interest, a source of the disease of interest and an allowable damage rate (spraying condition input process 41).
8), a process of calculating the final damage amount of the crop (final damage amount calculation process 414), and a process of determining whether or not the medicine is to be sprayed on the crop (spraying appropriateness determination process 424). I do. In other words, chemicals that protect crops from diseases are not always effective from the viewpoint of environmental pollution and economics, and it is necessary to predict the damage situation due to crop diseases and determine whether or not chemical spraying is necessary. Accordingly, it is possible to improve the economics of spraying the medicine, and to suppress the environmental pollution and the like by reducing the amount of spraying the medicine and the number of times of spraying in a region or the like.

【0006】本発明の病害発生予察方法は、作物が持つ
葉の湿潤時間、気温、湿度又は雨量、又はこれらを含む
データ(計測データ402)と、前記病害の伝染源の感
染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適期との相関関係から、
前記病害の伝染源の感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適
期を判定する処理(判定処理408)と、伝染源量及び
被害許容率から薬剤の散布条件を求める処理(散布条件
入力処理418)と、前記作物の発育ステージ別の感受
性及び気象条件を表すデータ又はこれらを含むデータに
より、前記作物の最終被害量を算定する処理(最終被害
量算定処理414)と、前記処理を基に前記作物に対す
る前記薬剤の散布適否を判定する処理(散布適否判定処
理424)とを含むことを特徴とする。即ち、従来の薬
剤散布の適期の判定に加えて、薬剤散布の要否やコスト
等についても判定することで、薬剤の散布量を削減可能
としたものである。
The method for predicting disease occurrence according to the present invention comprises the following steps: the wet time of the leaves of a crop, temperature, humidity or rainfall, or data including these (measurement data 402); And from the correlation with the optimal time of drug application,
A process of determining a suitable infection date, a disease incidence, and a suitable period of application of the medicine of the disease source (judgment process 408), a process of obtaining the application condition of the drug from the amount of the infection source and the permissible damage ratio (application process 418). A process of calculating the final damage amount of the crop based on data representing or including sensitivity and weather conditions of the crop at each development stage (final damage amount calculation process 414); Determining whether or not the medicine is to be sprayed (spraying determination processing 424). That is, in addition to the conventional determination of the appropriate period of the application of the medicine, the necessity of the application of the medicine, the cost, and the like are also determined, so that the amount of the applied medicine can be reduced.

【0007】本発明の病害発生予察システムは、コンピ
ュータを用いて作物の病害発生を予察する病害発生予察
システムであって、病害発生を予察対象の作物が持つ葉
の湿潤時間、気温、湿度又は雨量、又はこれらを含むデ
ータを時系列で取り込み、記憶手段(RAM12)に記
憶させる手段(センサ群16、中央処理装置4)と、前
記記憶手段に記憶している前記データと、前記病害に関
する感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適期との相関関係
から感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適期を判定する手
段(中央処理装置4)と、伝染源量及び被害許容率から
薬剤の散布条件を取り込む手段(中央処理装置4)と、
前記作物の発育ステージ別の感受性及び気象条件を表す
データ又はこれらを含むデータにより、前記作物の最終
被害量を算定する手段(中央処理装置4)と、前記処理
を基に前記薬剤の散布適否を判定する手段(中央処理装
置4)とを備えたことを特徴とする。即ち、病害発生予
察方法を実施するシステムであって、薬剤散布の要否や
コスト等についても判定し、薬剤の散布量の削減を可能
にしている。
A disease occurrence forecasting system according to the present invention is a disease occurrence forecasting system for predicting a disease occurrence of a crop by using a computer. Or a means (sensor group 16, central processing unit 4) for fetching data including these in time series and storing the data in the storage means (RAM 12), the data stored in the storage means, and the infection related to the disease. A means for determining a suitable infection date, a disease incidence and a suitable time for spraying the drug from the correlation between the date, the disease incidence and a suitable time for spraying the drug (central processing unit 4); and a means for capturing the spraying condition of the drug from the amount of the source of infection and the allowable damage rate. (Central processing unit 4),
A means (central processing unit 4) for calculating the final damage amount of the crop based on data representing or showing sensitivity and weather conditions for each development stage of the crop, and determining whether or not the chemical is to be sprayed based on the processing. Determination means (central processing unit 4). In other words, this is a system for performing the disease occurrence prediction method, which also determines whether or not it is necessary to spray a medicine, the cost, etc., and makes it possible to reduce the amount of sprayed medicine.

【0008】[0008]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明及びその実施の形態
を図面に示した実施例を参照して詳細に説明する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention and embodiments thereof will be described below in detail with reference to embodiments shown in the drawings.

【0009】図1及び図2は本発明の病害発生予察方法
及びそのシステムの実施例を示し、図1はそのコンピュ
ータシステム、図2はシステム構成を示している。
FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 show an embodiment of a disease occurrence prediction method and system according to the present invention. FIG. 1 shows the computer system, and FIG. 2 shows the system configuration.

【0010】この病害発生予察方法及びそのシステム
は、データベース2、中央処理装置4、メモリ6、入力
装置8、出力装置10及び記憶手段としてRAM12等
を備えるとともに、これらはデータ等の授受を行うバス
14で連係されたコンピュータによって構成されてい
る。
The disease occurrence prediction method and system include a database 2, a central processing unit 4, a memory 6, an input device 8, an output device 10, a RAM 12 as storage means, and the like, and a bus for transmitting and receiving data and the like. It comprises a computer linked in 14.

【0011】データベース2は、バックグラウンドデー
タとして、第1に、過去の各種病害の発生消長、平年の
発生消長、前年よりの病菌・細菌の越冬量、前回の発生
量、対象作物の品種特性による発病データ、第2に、薬
剤(保護・治療剤)の効果、流亡・分解モデル、第3
に、肥料成分の違いによる各種病害の発生量との関係、
第4に、病害予察の対象作物の伸育過程中における病菌
・細菌の侵入、潜伏、発病データ等が格納されている。
The database 2 includes, as background data, first, based on the past and past occurrences of various diseases, the past and past occurrences of normal diseases, the amount of overwintering of the germs and bacteria from the previous year, the amount of previous occurrence, and the variety characteristics of the target crop. Pathogenesis data, second, effects of drugs (protective / therapeutic agents), runoff / decomposition models, third
In addition, the relationship with the amount of various diseases caused by differences in fertilizer components,
Fourth, data on invasion, latentness, disease occurrence, and the like of disease and bacteria during the growth process of the target crop for disease prediction are stored.

【0012】中央処理装置4は、データ処理手段であっ
て、作物の葉の濡れ具合の計測や気象条件データの時系
列計測処理及びそのデータ蓄積処理、病害の感染好適
日、発病率、薬剤散布適期等の判定処理、発育ステージ
別の感受性、気象条件等からの最終被害量算定処理、伝
染源量、被害許容率等からの薬剤の散布条件入力処理、
薬剤の散布コスト、散布適否、最適薬剤等の適否判定処
理等の処理を行う。
The central processing unit 4 is a data processing means, which measures the degree of wetness of the leaves of the crop, the time series measurement processing of the weather condition data and the data accumulation processing, the suitable date of disease infection, the disease incidence, the chemical spraying. Judgment processing such as appropriate time, sensitivity at each development stage, final damage amount calculation processing from weather conditions, etc., input of drug spraying conditions from infectious sources, damage tolerance rate, etc.,
Processing such as the application cost of the medicine, the applicability of the medicine, and the suitability judgment processing of the optimum medicine and the like are performed.

【0013】メモリ6には、処理プログラムの他、固定
データ等が格納されている。
The memory 6 stores fixed data and the like in addition to the processing program.

【0014】入力装置8には、センサ群16として、計
測部18を介して作物の濡れ具合を計測する濡れ葉セン
サ20、作物の環境条件としての気象条件の計測手段と
して、温度を計測する温度センサ22、湿度を計測する
湿度センサ24、雨量を計測する雨量センサ26等から
計測データが加えられている。濡れ葉センサ20は、例
えば、作物の葉の濡れ及びその蒸発による湿潤状態を電
気的に検出する手段であって、空気中の湿度とは別のデ
ータを得るものである。また、この入力装置8には、他
の入力手段としてキーボード28等が接続され、薬剤の
散布条件や伝染源量、被害許容率等が入力される。
The input device 8 includes a sensor group 16 as a sensor group 16 and a wet leaf sensor 20 for measuring the degree of wetting of the crop via a measuring unit 18, and a temperature measuring means for measuring weather conditions as environmental conditions of the crop. Measurement data is added from a sensor 22, a humidity sensor 24 for measuring humidity, a rainfall sensor 26 for measuring rainfall, and the like. The wet leaf sensor 20 is a means for electrically detecting, for example, the wetness of the leaf of the crop and the wet state due to evaporation thereof, and obtains data different from the humidity in the air. Further, a keyboard 28 or the like is connected to the input device 8 as other input means, and the spraying conditions of the medicine, the amount of the infectious source, the damage tolerance, and the like are input.

【0015】出力装置10には、表示装置30やプリン
タ32が接続され、表示装置30には表示出力として、
第1に、病害の感染好適日、発病率、薬剤散布適期等、
第2に、最終被害量、第3に、薬剤の散布コスト、散布
適否、最適薬剤等が表示され、これらの表示出力はプリ
ンタ32によっても印字される。
A display device 30 and a printer 32 are connected to the output device 10.
First, suitable dates for disease infection, disease incidence, appropriate time for drug application, etc.
Secondly, the final damage amount, thirdly, the spraying cost of the medicine, whether or not the medicine is sprayed, the optimum medicine, and the like are displayed. These display outputs are also printed by the printer 32.

【0016】また、RAM12には、入力装置8に加え
られたデータや出力装置10から出力されるデータが一
時的に格納され、図示しないバックアップ電源等によっ
てデータが停電等による消失から防護されている。
The RAM 12 temporarily stores data applied to the input device 8 and data output from the output device 10, and is protected from loss due to a power failure or the like by a backup power supply (not shown). .

【0017】そして、このコンピュータを用いて実現さ
れるシステムは、図2に示すように、中央処理装置4に
おける処理として、センサ群16からの計測データ40
2の計測処理404、この計測処理404及びその計測
データに基づき、病害の感染好適日、発病率又は薬剤散
布適期の判定結果406を求める判定処理408、この
判定処理408を前提として作物の発育状況を表す発育
ステージ別の感受性、気象条件等の入力データ410か
ら最終被害量412を求める最終被害量算定処理414
を行い、また、伝染源量及び被害許容率の入力データ4
16の散布条件入力処理418を行い、データベース2
から得られた薬剤データ420、散布条件入力処理41
8及び最終被害量算定処理414の各結果を参照して薬
剤の散布コスト、散布適否及び最適薬剤の判定結果42
2を求める散布適否判定処理424を行うという構成で
ある。
As shown in FIG. 2, a system realized by using this computer executes measurement data 40 from the sensor group 16 as processing in the central processing unit 4.
2, a measurement process 404, a determination process 408 for obtaining a determination result 406 of a suitable disease infection date, a disease incidence, or a drug spraying appropriate time period based on the measurement process 404 and the measurement data. Damage amount calculation processing 414 for obtaining the final damage amount 412 from input data 410 such as sensitivity, weather condition, etc. for each development stage representing
And input data 4 of the amount of transmission source and damage tolerance
Perform 16 spraying condition input processes 418, and
Data 420 obtained from the above, spraying condition input processing 41
8 and the result of the final damage amount calculation processing 414, the spraying cost of the medicine, the suitability of spraying, and the judgment result 42 of the optimum medicine.
2 is performed.

【0018】即ち、計測処理404では、濡れ葉センサ
20によって計測される濡れ時間、温度センサ22、湿
度センサ24、雨量センサ26によって計測される気
温、湿度、雨量等の気象条件データ、その他のセンサか
ら得られる計測データ402を時系列データとして蓄え
る。この計測データ402は、RAM12に格納され
る。判定処理408では、感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤
散布適期が求められる。最終被害量算定処理414で
は、作物の発育ステージ別の感受性及び気象条件等に基
づいて最終被害量412を算定する。散布条件入力処理
418では、作物における伝染源量及び被害許容率がキ
ーボード28等から入力されるが、これらのデータは、
フロッピィディスク等の外部記憶装置から入力してもよ
い。そして、散布適否判定処理424では、計測データ
等の諸条件を基に薬剤散布の適否が判定される。
That is, in the measurement processing 404, the wet time measured by the wet leaf sensor 20, the temperature condition data measured by the temperature sensor 22, the humidity sensor 24 and the rainfall sensor 26, the weather condition data such as the rainfall and the rainfall sensor 26, and other sensors. Is stored as time-series data. The measurement data 402 is stored in the RAM 12. In the determination process 408, a suitable infection date, disease incidence, and a suitable time for spraying the medicine are obtained. In the final damage amount calculation processing 414, the final damage amount 412 is calculated based on the sensitivity of each development stage of the crop, weather conditions, and the like. In the spraying condition input process 418, the infectious source amount and the damage tolerance in the crop are input from the keyboard 28 or the like.
It may be input from an external storage device such as a floppy disk. Then, in the spraying propriety determination processing 424, the propriety of the drug spraying is determined based on various conditions such as measurement data.

【0019】ところで、散布条件入力処理418は、人
間が入力しても良いし、センサを用いて自動入力として
も良い。さらに、被害許容率は、データベース2から対
象とする病気及びそれに対して使用する薬剤等の価格や
作業量等を取り出して自動判定しても良い。例えば、病
害Qの治療に薬剤Pを使用し、その薬剤Pは10アール
の面積当たりx円、その散布時間は10アールの面積当
たりy時間かかる。このコストは収穫に換算すると全収
穫のz%に相当する。
By the way, the spraying condition input processing 418 may be input by a human or may be automatically input using a sensor. Furthermore, the damage tolerance may be automatically determined by extracting the target disease and the price and work amount of the medicine used for the target disease from the database 2 and the like. For example, a medicine P is used for treating a disease Q, and the medicine P takes x circles per 10 ares and the spraying time is y hours per 10 ares. This cost is equivalent to z% of the total harvest when converted to the harvest.

【0020】このような処理に基づき、計測処理404
で計測されたデータに基づき、判定処理408で感染好
適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適期が求められ、最終被害量
算定処理414では、散布条件入力処理418で求めら
れる伝染源量と発病数(葉/m2 )を参照するととも、
濡れ葉データ及び気象条件データ等を参照し、作物の発
育ステージ別の感受性を考慮して最終被害量412が算
定される。そして、散布適否判定処理424では、これ
らの算定結果の対応に要するコストと比較して散布適否
を判定する。
Based on such processing, measurement processing 404
Based on the data measured in step 408, a suitable infection date, disease incidence and a suitable period of application of the medicine are determined in a judgment process 408, and in the final damage amount calculation process 414, the amount of the infectious source and the number of disease (leaf / M 2 )
The final damage amount 412 is calculated by referring to the wet leaf data, the weather condition data, and the like, and taking into account the sensitivity of each growth stage of the crop. Then, in the spraying propriety determination processing 424, the propriety of spraying is determined by comparing with the cost required for responding to these calculation results.

【0021】したがって、この病害発生予察方法及びそ
のシステムは、感染好適日を求め、病害の発生量や発病
の進展を予測することができるとともに、伝染源量と被
害許容率から薬剤散布の経済効率を予測でき、即ち、薬
剤散布に掛かる費用Bと散布しない場合の損害Aとを比
較し、A>Bの場合に薬剤散布が必要と判定され、栽培
効率の向上に寄与するものである。
Therefore, this disease occurrence forecasting method and system can determine a suitable date of infection, predict the amount of disease occurrence and the progress of disease onset, and use the amount of infectious sources and the allowable damage rate to reduce the economic efficiency of drug application. That is, the cost B required for spraying the medicine is compared with the damage A when the spraying is not performed. When A> B, the spraying of the medicine is determined to be necessary, which contributes to the improvement of the cultivation efficiency.

【0022】次に、図3は、この病害発生予察方法及び
そのシステムにおける感染好適日把握処理を示してい
る。この実施例では対象作物として茶を例に挙げて説明
する。
Next, FIG. 3 shows a process for predicting the preferred date of infection in this disease occurrence prediction method and its system. In this embodiment, tea is described as an example of a target crop.

【0023】この処理では、ステップS1で対象作物と
して例えば、茶葉の病気に対応する湿潤時間H(h)、
平均気温T(℃)及び平均湿度W(%)を決定し、例え
ば、所定値として、H=10、T=22及びW=80を
決定する。
In this process, in step S1, as a target crop, for example, the wet time H (h) corresponding to the disease of tea leaves,
The average temperature T (° C.) and the average humidity W (%) are determined. For example, H = 10, T = 22, and W = 80 are determined as predetermined values.

【0024】これら3条件の決定の後、ステップS2で
は、湿潤時間を0時間から計測を開始し、ステップS3
では、センサ群16の計測データ402から状態把握を
行う。即ち、茶葉の湿潤状態、気温、湿度及び雨量等の
気象条件データを把握する。
After the determination of these three conditions, in step S2, measurement of the wet time is started from 0 hour, and in step S3
Then, the state is grasped from the measurement data 402 of the sensor group 16. That is, weather condition data such as the wet state of tea leaves, temperature, humidity, and rainfall are grasped.

【0025】ステップS4では、茶葉が濡れているか否
かを判定し、濡れていない場合にはステップS2に戻
り、濡れている場合にはステップS5に移行する。ステ
ップS5では、その湿潤時間を計測し、所定時間後、ス
テップS6に移行する。
In step S4, it is determined whether or not the tea leaves are wet. If not, the process returns to step S2, and if so, the process proceeds to step S5. In step S5, the wet time is measured, and after a predetermined time, the process proceeds to step S6.

【0026】ステップS6では、湿潤時間が所定時間H
(=10)(h)より大であるか否かを判定し、大でな
い場合には感染の好適条件ではないので、ステップS3
に戻り、大である場合にはステップS7に移行する。
In step S6, the wet time is a predetermined time H
(= 10) It is determined whether the value is larger than (h). If the value is not larger, the condition is not a suitable condition for infection.
The process returns to step S7 if the value is large.

【0027】ステップS7では、平均気温が所定温度T
(=22)(℃)より大であるか否かを判定し、大でな
い場合には感染の好適条件ではないので、ステップS3
に戻り、大である場合にはステップS8に移行する。
In step S7, the average temperature is set to the predetermined temperature T.
(= 22) It is determined whether or not it is larger than (° C.). If it is not larger, it is not a suitable condition for infection.
Returning to step S8, if it is large, the process proceeds to step S8.

【0028】ステップS8では、平均湿度が所定湿度W
(=80)(%)より大であるか否かを判定し、大でな
い場合には感染の好適条件ではないので、ステップS3
に戻り、大である場合にはステップS9に移行する。
In step S8, the average humidity is equal to the predetermined humidity W.
(= 80) (%) is determined, and if not, it is not a suitable condition for infection.
The process returns to step S9 if the value is large.

【0029】ステップS9では、湿潤時間H、平均気温
T及び平均湿度Wの3条件から茶葉が病害に感染する感
染好適日が判定され、ステップS10では、この判定結
果が通知され、次の処理に移行する。この通知内容は表
示装置30やプリンタ32によって出力される。
In step S9, a suitable infection date at which the tea leaves are infected with the disease is determined from the three conditions of the wet time H, the average temperature T, and the average humidity W. In step S10, the determination result is notified, and the next processing is performed. Transition. This notification content is output by the display device 30 or the printer 32.

【0030】次に、図4は、病害の感染好適日を判定し
た後の最終被害量算定処理414を示している。
Next, FIG. 4 shows a final damage amount calculation process 414 after determining a suitable date of disease transmission.

【0031】ステップS11では、対象作物品種につい
ての作物品種認識(K)を行い、ステップS12では、
病害の原因である病原菌認識(D)を行い、ステップS
13では、病害の発病率についての発病率認識(N)を
行う。茶葉の場合、発病率は単位面積当たりの葉の枚数
(N枚/m2 )となる。
In step S11, crop type recognition (K) for the target crop type is performed. In step S12,
The pathogens causing the disease are identified (D), and step S
In step 13, the disease incidence rate recognition (N) for the disease incidence rate is performed. In the case of tea leaves, the disease incidence rate is the number of leaves per unit area (N / m 2 ).

【0032】ステップS14では、茶における伸育状態
認識(S)を行い、ステップS15では、茶葉の摘採の
有無についての摘採有無認識(P)を行う。即ち、茶の
発育ステージについて、S番茶の前後、摘採の有無を把
握する。これらの認識把握の後、ステップS16では、
病菌及び祖菌による最終被害量計算として被害Xが、 X=f(K,D,N,S,P) ・・・・・・(1) から求められ、表示装置30に表示される。この被害X
が、最終被害量を表している。この場合、データベース
2から病気、作物品種、発育ステージ毎に病菌、祖菌デ
ータが得られ、その侵入日数、潜伏日数及び発病日数が
求められる。
In step S14, the growth state of the tea is recognized (S), and in step S15, the recognition of the presence or absence of tea leaves (P) is performed. That is, regarding the growth stage of tea, the presence or absence of plucking before and after the S-th tea is grasped. After grasping these recognitions, in step S16,
As the final damage amount calculation by the diseased bacteria and progeny, the damage X is obtained from X = f (K, D, N, S, P) (1) and displayed on the display device 30. This damage X
Represents the final damage amount. In this case, the disease and crop data and progeny data are obtained from the database 2 for each disease, crop variety, and development stage, and the number of days of invasion, the number of incubation days, and the number of disease days are obtained.

【0033】次に、図5は、最終被害量算定処理414
に基づき、薬剤の散布適否判定処理424を示してい
る。
Next, FIG. 5 shows the final damage amount calculation processing 414.
424 shows a chemical spraying propriety determination process 424 based on the.

【0034】ステップS21では、薬剤散布の要否の対
象である作物品種認識(K)を行い、ステップS22で
は、病害の原因である病原菌認識(D)を行い、ステッ
プS23では、茶における伸育状態認識(S)を行い、
ステップS24では、茶葉の摘採の有無についての摘採
有無認識(P)を行う。ステップS25では、散布すべ
き薬剤について、散布薬剤と費用(B)との算出を行
い、ステップS26では、薬剤散布をしなかった場合の
最終被害率認識(X)を行う。最終被害率と最終被害量
との関係は、最終被害率に収穫量を乗算することによ
り、最終被害量が求められる。そして、ステップS27
では、茶葉によって被害金額が異なることから、茶葉型
について、被害金額(A)の算出を行う。
In step S21, recognition of the crop variety (K), which is the necessity of spraying the chemical, is performed. In step S22, recognition of the pathogenic bacteria (D), which is the cause of the disease, is performed. Perform state recognition (S),
In step S24, a pruning presence / absence recognition (P) regarding the presence / absence of plucking of tea leaves is performed. In step S25, the sprayed medicine and the cost (B) are calculated for the medicine to be sprayed, and in step S26, the final damage rate recognition (X) when the medicine is not sprayed is performed. The relationship between the final damage rate and the final damage amount is obtained by multiplying the final damage rate by the harvest amount. Then, step S27
Then, the amount of damage (A) is calculated for the tea leaf type because the amount of damage differs for each tea leaf.

【0035】そして、ステップS28では、算出された
被害金額Aと費用Bとの比較を行い、AがBより大きく
ない場合には、ステップS29に移行し、薬剤散布は不
要とし、それを表示装置30やプリンタ32に出力し、
この処理を終了する。また、AがBより大きい場合に
は、ステップS30に移行し、薬剤散布が必要であると
し、それを表示装置30やプリンタ32に出力し、同様
に、この処理を終了する。
In step S28, the calculated damage amount A is compared with the cost B. If A is not larger than B, the process proceeds to step S29, where it is determined that the spraying of the medicine is unnecessary, and the display device displays the result. 30 and the printer 32,
This processing ends. If A is larger than B, the process proceeds to step S30, where it is determined that the medicine needs to be sprayed, and the result is output to the display device 30 or the printer 32, and similarly, this process ends.

【0036】このように、データベース2から病気、作
物品種、発育ステージ毎に被害許容水準を求め、最終被
害率(X枚/m2 )を茶葉型として例えば、芽数型、芽
重型に対応する病気、作物品種、発育ステージを割り出
し、この最終被害率に収穫量を乗算することで、最終被
害量が求められる。そこで、これらのデータから算出さ
れた被害金額Aと費用Bとの比較を行うことにより、薬
剤散布の要否を判定している。即ち、薬剤散布の要否が
作業者の勘や経験だけでなく、科学的な分析に基づいて
行われ、その判定結果を参照することで、栽培効率の向
上を図ることができる。
As described above, the allowable damage level is determined for each disease, crop variety, and development stage from the database 2, and the final damage rate (X sheets / m 2 ) corresponds to, for example, a bud number type and a bud weight type as a tea leaf type. The disease, crop varieties and development stage are determined, and the final damage rate is multiplied by the yield to obtain the final damage amount. Thus, by comparing the damage amount A calculated from these data with the cost B, it is determined whether or not the medicine needs to be sprayed. That is, the necessity of spraying the chemical is determined based on not only the intuition and experience of the worker but also the scientific analysis, and the cultivation efficiency can be improved by referring to the determination result.

【0037】なお、実施例では、茶葉を例に取って説明
したが、病害発生予察の対象作物は茶の他、稲や野菜等
であってもよく、本発明は、各種の作物に適用できるも
のである。
In the embodiment, tea leaves have been described as an example. However, the target crop for predicting the occurrence of disease may be rice, vegetables, or the like in addition to tea, and the present invention can be applied to various crops. Things.

【0038】[0038]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明によれば、
次の効果が得られる。 a 作物に散布される薬剤の経済効率を予測することが
でき、栽培効率を高めることができる。 b 感染好適日を求め、病害の発生量や発病の進展予測
に加え、伝染源量と被害許容率から薬剤散布の経済効率
も予測することが可能である。 c 保護・治療剤等の薬剤の最適防除時期の予測、最適
防除薬剤の選定・指示、その散布防除必要度の要否判定
が容易になる。 d 最適防除により、減農薬栽培ができ、環境保護とと
もに安全性の高い作物を得ることができる。 e 薬剤抵抗性・リサージェンス問題からの軽減が可能
である。 f 作物の品種間差による発生予測が可能となる。 g シュミレーションモデルを用い、気象予測データに
よる地域別発生予察に役立てることができ、地域別薬剤
散布を策定することができる。
As described above, according to the present invention,
The following effects are obtained. a It is possible to predict the economic efficiency of the chemicals to be sprayed on the crop, and increase the cultivation efficiency. b) It is possible to determine the optimal date of infection and predict the economic efficiency of drug application from the amount of infectious sources and damage tolerance in addition to predicting the amount of disease and the progress of disease. c) It is easy to predict the optimal control time of chemicals such as protective / therapeutic agents, to select / instruct the optimal chemical, and to judge the necessity of spraying control necessity. d By the optimal control, reduced pesticide cultivation can be performed, and a crop with high environmental protection and high safety can be obtained. e Can reduce drug resistance and resurgence problems. f. Occurrence prediction based on differences between crop varieties is possible. g By using the simulation model, it can be used for forecasting occurrence by region based on weather forecast data, and it is possible to formulate drug spraying by region.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の病害発生予察方法及びそのシステムの
実施例を示すブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an embodiment of a disease occurrence prediction method and system according to the present invention.

【図2】本発明の病害発生予察方法及びそのシステムの
実施例におけるシステム構成を示すブロック図である。
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a system configuration in an embodiment of the disease occurrence prediction method and the system according to the present invention.

【図3】感染好適日把握処理を示すフローチャートであ
る。
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a suitable infection date grasping process.

【図4】最終被害量算定処理を示すフローチャートであ
る。
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a final damage amount calculation process.

【図5】薬剤の散布適否判定処理を示すフローチャート
である。
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a process for determining whether or not a medicine is to be sprayed;

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

4 中央処理装置 16 センサ群 20 濡れ葉センサ 22 温度センサ 24 湿度センサ 26 雨量センサ 402 計測データ 408 判定処理 414 最終被害量算定処理 418 散布条件入力処理 424 散布適否判定処理 4 Central Processing Unit 16 Sensor Group 20 Wet Leaf Sensor 22 Temperature Sensor 24 Humidity Sensor 26 Rainfall Sensor 402 Measurement Data 408 Judgment Processing 414 Final Damage Amount Calculation Processing 418 Spraying Condition Input Processing 424 Spraying Appropriate / Abstract Determination Processing

Claims (3)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 作物へ病害を与える伝染源量及び被害許
容率から薬剤の散布条件を求める処理と、 前記作物の最終被害量を算定する処理と、 前記作物に対する前記薬剤の散布適否を判定する処理
と、 を含むことを特徴とする病害発生予察方法。
1. A process for obtaining a condition for spraying a medicine from an amount of an infectious source causing a disease to a crop and a damage tolerance, a process for calculating a final damage amount of the crop, and judging whether or not the spraying of the drug on the crop is appropriate. A method for predicting disease occurrence, comprising:
【請求項2】 作物が持つ葉の湿潤時間、気温、湿度又
は雨量、又はこれらを含むデータと、前記病害の伝染源
の感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適期との相関関係か
ら、前記病害の伝染源の感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散
布適期を判定する処理と、 伝染源量及び被害許容率から薬剤の散布条件を求める処
理と、 前記作物の発育ステージ別の感受性及び気象条件を表す
データ又はこれらを含むデータにより、前記作物の最終
被害量を算定する処理と、 前記処理を基に前記作物に対する前記薬剤の散布適否を
判定する処理と、を含むことを特徴とする病害発生予察
方法。
2. The disease is obtained from the correlation between the wet time, temperature, humidity, or rainfall of the leaves of the crop, or data including these, and the suitable date of infection of the disease transmission source, the disease incidence, and the optimal time of application of the drug. A process of determining a suitable date of infection of the source of infection, a disease incidence and a suitable period of application of the drug; a process of obtaining a condition of application of the drug from the amount of the source of infection and a permissible damage ratio; and representing sensitivity and weather conditions for each development stage of the crop. A disease occurrence prediction method, comprising: a process of calculating a final damage amount of the crop based on data or data including the same; and a process of determining whether or not the chemical is sprayed on the crop based on the process. .
【請求項3】 コンピュータを用いて作物の病害発生を
予察する病害発生予察システムであって、 病害発生を予察対象の作物が持つ葉の湿潤時間、気温、
湿度又は雨量、又はこれらを含むデータを時系列で取り
込み、記憶手段に記憶させる手段と、 前記記憶手段に記憶している前記データと、前記病害に
関する感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適期との相関関
係から感染好適日、発病率及び薬剤散布適期を判定する
手段と、 伝染源量及び被害許容率から薬剤の散布条件を取り込む
手段と、 前記作物の発育ステージ別の感受性及び気象条件を表す
データ又はこれらを含むデータにより、前記作物の最終
被害量を算定する手段と、 前記処理を基に前記薬剤の散布適否を判定する手段と、 を備えたことを特徴とする病害発生予察システム。
3. A disease occurrence forecasting system for predicting disease occurrence of a crop using a computer, comprising: a wet time of leaf, a temperature,
Humidity or rainfall, or data containing these in a time series, means for storing in the storage means, the data stored in the storage means, the suitable date of infection related to the disease, the disease incidence and the appropriate time of drug spraying A means for determining a suitable infection date, a disease incidence rate, and a suitable time for spraying the drug from the correlation; a means for capturing the spraying condition of the drug from the amount of the source of infection and the permissible damage rate; and data representing the sensitivity and weather conditions for each growth stage of the crop. A disease occurrence forecasting system comprising: means for calculating the final damage amount of the crop based on data including the above; and means for determining whether or not the chemical is to be sprayed based on the processing.
JP2001108772A 2001-04-06 2001-04-06 Method for forecasting crop disease and system therefor Pending JP2002305971A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001108772A JP2002305971A (en) 2001-04-06 2001-04-06 Method for forecasting crop disease and system therefor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001108772A JP2002305971A (en) 2001-04-06 2001-04-06 Method for forecasting crop disease and system therefor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2002305971A true JP2002305971A (en) 2002-10-22

Family

ID=18960849

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2001108772A Pending JP2002305971A (en) 2001-04-06 2001-04-06 Method for forecasting crop disease and system therefor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2002305971A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006212008A (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-17 Nagano Prefecture Crop cultivation supporting device
JP2008125496A (en) * 2006-11-27 2008-06-05 Akita Prefectural Univ Method for predicting occurrence of welsh onion rust disease
WO2016178268A1 (en) * 2015-05-01 2016-11-10 株式会社日立製作所 Farm field management apparatus, farm field management method, and storage medium
KR101831880B1 (en) * 2016-08-02 2018-02-26 (주)유샘인스트루먼트 Drug dispersion making system
KR20190053703A (en) * 2017-11-10 2019-05-20 대한민국(농촌진흥청장) Irrigation Control Method Considering Water Stress According to Plant Leaf Temperature and Watering Control System Using Thereof
KR20200030148A (en) * 2018-09-11 2020-03-20 대한민국(농촌진흥청장) Method for estimating optimal control time in pest forecast system
WO2020137085A1 (en) 2018-12-27 2020-07-02 ボッシュ株式会社 Information processing device, and information processing system
WO2020136819A1 (en) * 2018-12-27 2020-07-02 株式会社オプティム Crop growing assistance system, crop growing assistance method, and program

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0630657A (en) * 1992-07-17 1994-02-08 Sumitomo Chem Co Ltd Device for maintaining and controlling lawn
JPH11171679A (en) * 1997-12-12 1999-06-29 Sumitomo Chem Co Ltd Compound fertilizer design system, designing of compound fertilizer, and recording medium recorded with compound fertilizer design program
JPH11275914A (en) * 1998-03-27 1999-10-12 Kubota Corp Information terminal device, agricultural equipment, communication system and recording medium
JPH11346578A (en) * 1998-06-03 1999-12-21 Hitachi Ltd Equipment for backing up farm work
JP2000002659A (en) * 1998-04-15 2000-01-07 Bio-Communication Technology Res Assoc Apparatus and method for determination of sprinkling amount of weed-killer
JP2000342066A (en) * 1999-06-04 2000-12-12 Kawasaki Kiko Co Ltd Method for planning tea plantation management plan and its system

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0630657A (en) * 1992-07-17 1994-02-08 Sumitomo Chem Co Ltd Device for maintaining and controlling lawn
JPH11171679A (en) * 1997-12-12 1999-06-29 Sumitomo Chem Co Ltd Compound fertilizer design system, designing of compound fertilizer, and recording medium recorded with compound fertilizer design program
JPH11275914A (en) * 1998-03-27 1999-10-12 Kubota Corp Information terminal device, agricultural equipment, communication system and recording medium
JP2000002659A (en) * 1998-04-15 2000-01-07 Bio-Communication Technology Res Assoc Apparatus and method for determination of sprinkling amount of weed-killer
JPH11346578A (en) * 1998-06-03 1999-12-21 Hitachi Ltd Equipment for backing up farm work
JP2000342066A (en) * 1999-06-04 2000-12-12 Kawasaki Kiko Co Ltd Method for planning tea plantation management plan and its system

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006212008A (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-17 Nagano Prefecture Crop cultivation supporting device
JP2008125496A (en) * 2006-11-27 2008-06-05 Akita Prefectural Univ Method for predicting occurrence of welsh onion rust disease
WO2016178268A1 (en) * 2015-05-01 2016-11-10 株式会社日立製作所 Farm field management apparatus, farm field management method, and storage medium
JPWO2016178268A1 (en) * 2015-05-01 2017-06-15 株式会社日立製作所 Field management device, field management method, and recording medium
US10817962B2 (en) 2015-05-01 2020-10-27 Hitachi, Ltd. Farm field management apparatus, farm field management method, and storage medium
KR101831880B1 (en) * 2016-08-02 2018-02-26 (주)유샘인스트루먼트 Drug dispersion making system
KR102032499B1 (en) * 2017-11-10 2019-10-25 대한민국 Irrigation Control Method Considering Water Stress According to Plant Leaf Temperature and Watering Control System Using Thereof
KR20190053703A (en) * 2017-11-10 2019-05-20 대한민국(농촌진흥청장) Irrigation Control Method Considering Water Stress According to Plant Leaf Temperature and Watering Control System Using Thereof
KR20200030148A (en) * 2018-09-11 2020-03-20 대한민국(농촌진흥청장) Method for estimating optimal control time in pest forecast system
KR102203800B1 (en) * 2018-09-11 2021-01-19 대한민국(농촌진흥청장) Method for estimating optimal control time in pest forecast system
WO2020137085A1 (en) 2018-12-27 2020-07-02 ボッシュ株式会社 Information processing device, and information processing system
WO2020136819A1 (en) * 2018-12-27 2020-07-02 株式会社オプティム Crop growing assistance system, crop growing assistance method, and program
KR20210109575A (en) 2018-12-27 2021-09-06 바이엘 크롭사이언스 케이. 케이. Information processing devices and information processing systems
JPWO2020136819A1 (en) * 2018-12-27 2021-09-09 株式会社オプティム Crop growth support system, crop growth support method and program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Madden et al. How to develop plant disease forecasters
Gleason Disease warning system
Krause et al. Predictive systems: modern approaches to disease control
Burleigh et al. Development of linear equations for predicting wheat leaf rust
JP6849958B2 (en) Prediction method, prediction program, and prediction device
JP2002305971A (en) Method for forecasting crop disease and system therefor
JP2021509212A (en) Disease prediction and control methods and their systems
EP3903566A1 (en) Information processing device, and information processing system
JP2006212008A (en) Crop cultivation supporting device
Bove et al. Simulation of potential epidemics of downy mildew of grapevine in different scenarios of disease conduciveness
CN112400184A (en) Information processing device, information processing system, and program
CN115271209A (en) Method, device, equipment and medium for predicting plant diseases and insect pests
Marimon et al. A decision support system based on degree-days to initiate fungicide spray programs for peach powdery mildew in Catalonia, Spain
CN113822225A (en) Intelligent monitoring method and system for forest diseases and insect pests
WO2020184241A1 (en) Crop yield amount prediction program and cultivation environment assessment program
JPWO2019156070A1 (en) Machine learning system and machine learning method
JP2001256289A (en) Production managing system for agriculture and fisheries
CN110414859B (en) 5T evaluation method for rice storage operation based on Internet of things technology
JPH01300830A (en) Predictor for plant growth period
WO2020079231A1 (en) Computer system and computer-implemented method for optimization of crop protection
CN100506016C (en) Application of wheat gibberellic disease by wet weather forecast
Matengu et al. Weather‐based models for forecasting Fusarium head blight risks in wheat and barley: A review
JP2016202157A (en) Prediction algorithm and determination system of capsicum-annuum anthrax onset
Bugiani et al. Forecasting models and warning services in Emilia‐Romagna (Italy) 1
Damania In situ conservation of biodiversity of wild progenitors of cereal crops in the Near East

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080407

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100526

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110614

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20111018