JP2000061672A - Laser welding state detecting method - Google Patents

Laser welding state detecting method

Info

Publication number
JP2000061672A
JP2000061672A JP10233721A JP23372198A JP2000061672A JP 2000061672 A JP2000061672 A JP 2000061672A JP 10233721 A JP10233721 A JP 10233721A JP 23372198 A JP23372198 A JP 23372198A JP 2000061672 A JP2000061672 A JP 2000061672A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welding
light
laser
state
defect
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP10233721A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3184962B2 (en
Inventor
Hidetoshi Tsukihara
英敏 月原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority to JP23372198A priority Critical patent/JP3184962B2/en
Publication of JP2000061672A publication Critical patent/JP2000061672A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3184962B2 publication Critical patent/JP3184962B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a laser welding state detecting method capable of highly precisely and minutely detecting defects of a weld zone. SOLUTION: This method is applied to the welding method for welding a work 500 by being irradiated with an irradiating light Lw and is used for detecting the weld state of the work 500. The welding state is detected based on the state information of both of plasma light Lp emitted from and reflection light Lr on the work 500 at the time of laser welding.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、レーザ光をワーク
に照射して溶接を行うレーザ溶接方法に適用され、ワー
クにおける欠陥有無等の溶接状態を検出するレーザ溶接
の溶接状態検出方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention is applied to a laser welding method for irradiating a workpiece with laser light to perform welding, and relates to a welding state detecting method of laser welding for detecting a welding state such as presence or absence of a defect in a workpiece.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】レーザ溶接は、レーザ発振器から出力さ
れたパルス状のレーザ光を対象ワークに照射して溶接を
行うものである。レーザ溶接における溶接状態、特に溶
接欠陥の検査は、検査がオフラインにて目視や検査機器
の使用により行うことが多い。この場合、自動車製造の
ような大量生産ラインでは多量箇所の検査が必要とな
り、検査員の負担は大きい。また、生産ラインの生産性
の観点から検査時間は短い必要があり、溶接と並行して
欠陥検査を行うことが最も望ましい。
2. Description of the Related Art In laser welding, a target work is irradiated with pulsed laser light output from a laser oscillator to perform welding. Inspecting a welding state, particularly a welding defect, in laser welding is often performed by visual inspection or by using an inspection device while the inspection is offline. In this case, in a mass production line such as automobile manufacturing, it is necessary to inspect a large number of places, which imposes a heavy burden on the inspector. Further, the inspection time needs to be short from the viewpoint of the productivity of the production line, and it is most desirable to perform the defect inspection in parallel with the welding.

【0003】一般に、レーザ溶接における溶接状態のオ
ンライン計測技術としては、溶接時に溶接部分にて発生
するプラズマを利用したもの、溶接時に発生する音(溶
接音)を利用したもの、あるいはYAGレーザを用いた
レーザ溶接時に溶接部から発生する散乱光(以後、反射
光と呼ぶ)を利用したものが有る。具体的には、プラズ
マ光強度、プラズマ電位、溶接音レベル、あるいは反射
光強度を測定し、その測定値に基づいて溶接欠陥を検出
するものが、提案、開示、もしくは実施されている。反
射光強度を測定し、その測定値に基づいて溶接欠陥を検
出する技術は、特願平9−213223号として提案さ
れている。
Generally, as an on-line measuring technique of a welding state in laser welding, a technique utilizing plasma generated at a welding portion during welding, a technique utilizing sound generated during welding (welding sound), or a YAG laser is used. There is also one that utilizes scattered light (hereinafter referred to as reflected light) generated from the welded portion during laser welding. Specifically, there has been proposed, disclosed, or implemented a device which measures plasma light intensity, plasma potential, welding sound level, or reflected light intensity and detects a welding defect based on the measured value. A technique for measuring the intensity of reflected light and detecting a welding defect based on the measured value is proposed as Japanese Patent Application No. 9-213223.

【0004】上述したオンライン計測技術を応用して溶
接欠陥の自動検出を行うようにした実例は少いが、例え
ば、「溶接学会論文集(1996年)、第500巻、第
4号、第689〜693頁」にて、プラズマ光の強度変
化から欠陥を自動検出する方法が開示されている。
Although there are few actual examples in which the above-described online measurement technique is applied to automatically detect welding defects, for example, "Welding Society Papers (1996), Vol. 500, No. 4, 689." ~ Page 693 "discloses a method for automatically detecting defects from changes in the intensity of plasma light.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところで、反射光は、
ワークへの照射されるレーザ光(照射光)がワークによ
って全て吸収されることはなく、その吸収されないレー
ザ光が様々な方向へ向かって反射する作用に基づいてい
る。よって、反射光といえども、レーザ光全般にみられ
る指向性の強さという性質を有している。このため、反
射光を測定する技術においては、反射光の全てを受光セ
ンサによって受光することは実際上不可能であるし、何
時も決まった量の反射光を受光できるとは限らない。つ
まり、計測に必要な反射光を確実に得られない場合もあ
り得る。したがって、反射光を測定する技術は、測定の
安定性が十分である技術と言い切ることはできない。
By the way, the reflected light is
The laser light applied to the work (irradiation light) is not entirely absorbed by the work, and is based on the effect that the unabsorbed laser light reflects in various directions. Therefore, even reflected light has the property of directivity that is generally found in laser light. Therefore, in the technique of measuring reflected light, it is practically impossible to receive all of the reflected light by the light receiving sensor, and it is not always possible to receive a fixed amount of reflected light. That is, the reflected light necessary for measurement may not be reliably obtained. Therefore, the technique of measuring the reflected light cannot be said to be a technique with sufficient measurement stability.

【0006】また、プラズマ光を測定する技術は、得ら
れるプラズマ光の特性とその際の溶接状態との関係を未
だ一義的に定められていないため、各特性の識別や詳細
な分析が難しいという実状にある。
Further, in the technique for measuring plasma light, the relationship between the characteristics of the obtained plasma light and the welding state at that time has not yet been unambiguously defined, so that it is difficult to identify and analyze each characteristic. It is in reality.

【0007】本発明の課題は、溶接箇所の欠陥を高精度
かつ詳細に検出できるレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法を
提供することである。
An object of the present invention is to provide a welding state detecting method of laser welding capable of detecting defects in a welding portion with high accuracy and detail.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明によれば、レーザ
光をワークに照射して溶接を行うレーザ溶接方法に適用
され、ワークにおける溶接状態を検出するレーザ溶接の
溶接状態検出方法において、レーザ溶接時にワークから
放出されるプラズマ光および反射光両光の状態情報に基
づいて溶接状態を検出することを特徴とするレーザ溶接
の溶接状態検出方法が得られる。
According to the present invention, the method is applied to a laser welding method for irradiating a workpiece with a laser beam to perform welding, and in a welding state detecting method of laser welding for detecting a welding state in a workpiece, a laser is used. A welding state detecting method for laser welding is provided, which is characterized in that the welding state is detected based on the state information of both plasma light and reflected light emitted from a work during welding.

【0009】本発明によればまた、前記プラズマ光およ
び前記反射光両光の強度を、両光の前記状態情報として
用いる前記レーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法が得られる。
According to the present invention, there is also provided a welding state detecting method for laser welding, which uses the intensities of both the plasma light and the reflected light as the state information of both lights.

【0010】本発明によればさらに、前記プラズマ光の
強度を、予め設定した溶接良好時のプラズマ光の強度範
囲と比較する共に、前記反射光の強度を、予め設定した
溶接良好時の反射光の強度範囲と比較し、両比較結果に
応じて、溶接の良好/不良ならびに不良時での不良の種
類および不良の原因を溶接状態として検出する前記レー
ザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法が得られる。
Further, according to the present invention, the intensity of the plasma light is compared with a preset intensity range of the plasma light at the time of good welding, and the intensity of the reflected light is set at the preset reflection light at the time of good welding. According to both comparison results, the welding state detection method for laser welding is obtained in which the good / bad state of welding and the type of fault at the time of failure and the cause of the fault are detected as the welding state.

【0011】本発明によればまた、前記比較結果と前記
溶接状態とを対応づけたテーブルを予め用意してなる前
記レーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法が得られる。
According to the present invention, there is also provided a welding state detecting method for laser welding in which a table in which the comparison result and the welding state are associated with each other is prepared in advance.

【0012】本発明によればさらに、前記プラズマ光お
よび前記反射光両光の強度に加え、レーザ光のソース強
度にも基づいて溶接状態を検出する前記レーザ溶接の溶
接状態検出方法が得られる。
According to the present invention, there is further provided a welding state detection method for laser welding, which detects the welding state based on the source intensity of laser light in addition to the intensities of both the plasma light and the reflected light.

【0013】[0013]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、図面を参照して、本発明の
実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法を説明
する。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION A welding state detecting method for laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

【0014】図1を参照して、本発明による溶接状態検
出方法を実現するためのレーザ溶接システムは、パルス
状のレーザ光を発生するYAGレーザ発振器301と、
発生したレーザ光を伝搬する光ファイバ302と、図示
しない走査機構が接続され、伝搬されたレーザ光が入力
されるレーザトーチ303とを有している。レーザトー
チ303から出射されるレーザ光は、照射光Lwとして
図示しない走査テーブル上に載置されたワーク500に
照射され、レーザ溶接が行われる。溶接時には、ワーク
500の溶接部から、反射光Lrおよびプラズマ光Lp
が発生する。
Referring to FIG. 1, a laser welding system for realizing a welding state detecting method according to the present invention includes a YAG laser oscillator 301 for generating pulsed laser light,
It has an optical fiber 302 for propagating the generated laser light, and a laser torch 303 to which a scanning mechanism (not shown) is connected and into which the propagated laser light is input. The laser light emitted from the laser torch 303 is irradiated as the irradiation light Lw onto the work 500 placed on a scanning table (not shown), and laser welding is performed. At the time of welding, the reflected light Lr and the plasma light Lp are emitted from the welded portion of the workpiece 500.
Occurs.

【0015】レーザトーチ303は、トーチ本体303
aおよびトーチ上部303cからなる筐体を備えてい
る。トーチ本体303a内には、光ファイバ302を通
して伝搬されたレーザ光を反射する一方、反射光Lrお
よびプラズマ光Lpを透過するYAGレーザ反射ミラー
303bと、YAGレーザ反射ミラー303bで反射さ
れたレーザ光を照射光Lwとして集光する図示しない集
光レンズと、YAGレーザ反射ミラー303bを透過し
た反射光Lrおよびプラズマ光Lpを集光する図示しな
い集光レンズと、YAGレーザ反射ミラー303bを透
過した反射光Lrおよびプラズマ光Lpのうちお概ねプ
ラズマ光Lpを透過する一方、お概ね反射光Lrを反射
するYAG光反射ミラー303dと、YAG光反射ミラ
ー303dを透過したプラズマ光Lpを含む光のうちか
らプラズマ光Lpのみを抽出する図示しないフィルタ
と、YAG光反射ミラー303dを反射した反射光Lr
を含む光のうちから反射光Lrのみを抽出する図示しな
いフィルタとが備えられている。
The laser torch 303 is a torch body 303.
It has a housing composed of a and the torch upper part 303c. Inside the torch body 303a, the YAG laser reflecting mirror 303b that reflects the laser light propagated through the optical fiber 302, while transmitting the reflected light Lr and the plasma light Lp, and the laser light reflected by the YAG laser reflecting mirror 303b. A condenser lens (not shown) that condenses as irradiation light Lw, a condenser lens (not illustrated) that condenses the reflected light Lr and the plasma light Lp that have passed through the YAG laser reflection mirror 303b, and a reflected light that has passed through the YAG laser reflection mirror 303b. Of the Lr and the plasma light Lp, the plasma light Lp is transmitted, while the YAG light reflection mirror 303d that reflects the reflected light Lr and the light including the plasma light Lp that is transmitted through the YAG light reflection mirror 303d are plasma. A filter (not shown) for extracting only the light Lp, and a YAG light reflecting mirror Reflected light Lr reflected by the 03d
And a filter (not shown) that extracts only the reflected light Lr from the light including the light.

【0016】さらに、本レーザ溶接システムは、ワーク
500における溶接状態を検出するレーザ溶接状態検出
装置100を有している。レーザ溶接状態検出装置10
0は、トーチ上部303cに取り付けられ、YAG光反
射ミラー303dを透過後にフィルタによってろ過され
たプラズマ光Lpを受光してその光強度に応じた電気信
号Spを出力するプラズマ光用センサ102と、トーチ
上部303cに取り付けられ、YAG光反射ミラー30
3dを反射後にフィルタによってろ過された反射光Lr
を受光してその光強度に応じた電気信号Srを出力する
反射光用センサ103と、プラズマ光用センサ102お
よび反射光用センサ103からの電気信号Spおよび電
気信号Srを用いてプラズマ光Lpおよび反射光Lr両
光の状態情報としての両光強度に基づいて溶接状態を検
出する溶接状態判定処理部101と、検出した溶接状態
をディスプレイ等に表示するための表示部104と、検
出した溶接状態を記憶するための記憶部105とを備え
ている。
Further, the present laser welding system has a laser welding state detecting device 100 for detecting the welding state of the work 500. Laser welding state detection device 10
Reference numeral 0 denotes a plasma light sensor 102 which is attached to the torch upper portion 303c, receives the plasma light Lp filtered by the filter after passing through the YAG light reflection mirror 303d, and outputs an electric signal Sp according to the light intensity, and the torch. Attached to the upper part 303c, the YAG light reflection mirror 30
Reflected light Lr filtered by a filter after reflecting 3d
The sensor 103 for reflected light that receives the light and outputs the electric signal Sr corresponding to the light intensity, and the electric signal Sp and electric signal Sr from the sensor 102 for plasma light and the sensor 103 for reflected light are used to generate the plasma light Lp and Welding state determination processing unit 101 that detects the welding state based on the two light intensities as the state information of both reflected light Lr, the display unit 104 that displays the detected welding state on a display, and the detected welding state. And a storage unit 105 for storing

【0017】溶接状態判定処理部101は、アナログの
電気信号Spおよび電気信号Srをデジタル信号に変換
するA/D変換器と、そのデジタル信号を処理するCP
Uと、処理の際に用いるデータ等を例えば予め記憶した
メモリとを備えている。
The welding state determination processing unit 101 includes an A / D converter for converting the analog electric signal Sp and the electric signal Sr into a digital signal, and a CP for processing the digital signal.
U and a memory in which, for example, data used in processing are stored in advance.

【0018】図2(a)は、溶接状態判定処理部101
に入力される電気信号Sp、即ち、プラズマ光用センサ
102によって検出されたプラズマ光Lpの光強度の一
例を、時系列的に示している。また、図2(b)は、溶
接状態判定処理部101に入力される電気信号Sr、即
ち、反射光用センサ103によって検出された反射光L
rの光強度の一例を、時系列的に示している。溶接状態
判定処理部101のCPUは、図2(a)および図2
(b)のような電気信号を、A/D変換器を通して、実
際にはデジタル信号の形態で得る。
FIG. 2A shows a welding state determination processing unit 101.
An electrical signal Sp input to the, that is, an example of the light intensity of the plasma light Lp detected by the plasma light sensor 102 is shown in time series. Further, FIG. 2B shows an electric signal Sr input to the welding state determination processing unit 101, that is, the reflected light L detected by the reflected light sensor 103.
An example of the light intensity of r is shown in time series. The CPU of the welding state determination processing unit 101 is shown in FIG.
An electric signal as shown in (b) is actually obtained in the form of a digital signal through an A / D converter.

【0019】図2(a)を参照して、PThHおよびP
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定されたプラズマ光Lpの光
強度について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、
溶接状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。
Referring to FIG. 2 (a), PTh H and P
Th L is a threshold value of good / bad welding condition for the preset light intensity of the plasma light Lp,
It is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101.

【0020】CPUは、基本的には、プラズマ光Lpの
光強度が上限しきい値PThHを超過した場合には溶接
欠陥以外の不良、下限しきい値PThL未満の場合には
溶接欠陥不良、また、下限しきい値PThL以上上限し
きい値PThH以下の範囲内であれば溶接が良好である
と判定する。ただし、本発明においては、CPUは、以
下に示す反射光強度の判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な
判定を行う。
Basically, the CPU has a defect other than welding defects when the light intensity of the plasma light Lp exceeds the upper threshold value PTh H , and a welding defect defect when the light intensity is less than the lower threshold value PTh L. Further, if it is in the range of the lower limit threshold value PTh L or more and the upper limit threshold value PTh H or less, it is determined that the welding is good. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the following determination of the reflected light intensity as well.

【0021】図2(b)を参照して、RThHおよびR
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定された反射光Lrの光強度
について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、溶接
状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。
Referring to FIG. 2 (b), RTh H and R
Th L is a threshold value of the welding state good / defective with respect to the preset light intensity of the reflected light Lr, and is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101.

【0022】CPUは、基本的には、反射光Lrの光強
度が上限しきい値RThHを超過した場合には溶接欠陥
不良、下限しきい値RThL未満の場合には溶接欠陥以
外の不良、また、下限しきい値RThL以上上限しきい
値RThH以下の範囲内であれば溶接が良好であると判
定する。ただし、本発明においては、CPUは、上述し
たプラズマ光強度の判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な判
定を行う。
Basically, the CPU has a welding defect defect when the light intensity of the reflected light Lr exceeds the upper threshold value RTh H and a defect other than the welding defect when it is less than the lower threshold value RTh L. Also, if the lower limit threshold value RTh L or more and the upper limit threshold value RTh H or less is satisfied, it is determined that the welding is good. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the determination of the plasma light intensity described above.

【0023】尚、本発明においては、溶接状態判定処理
部内のA/D変換器とCPUとの間にローパスフィルタ
を設けてもよい。この場合には、図3(a)および
(b)に示すような高周波成分が除去された信号を処理
することになる。高周波成分が除去された信号を処理す
る方が、検出精度に優れることが多い。
In the present invention, a low pass filter may be provided between the A / D converter and the CPU in the welding state determination processing section. In this case, the signal from which the high frequency component is removed as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B is processed. It is often more excellent in detection accuracy to process a signal from which high frequency components have been removed.

【0024】図3(a)は、デジタル化された電気信号
Spをさらにローパスフィルタでろ過した信号、即ち、
高周波成分が除去されたプラズマ光Lpの光強度の一例
を、時系列的に示している。また、図3(b)は、デジ
タル化された電気信号Srをさらにローパスフィルタで
ろ過した信号、即ち、反射光Lrの光強度の一例を、時
系列的に示している。
FIG. 3A shows a signal obtained by filtering the digitized electric signal Sp with a low-pass filter, that is,
An example of the light intensity of the plasma light Lp from which the high frequency components have been removed is shown in time series. Further, FIG. 3B shows a signal obtained by filtering the digitized electric signal Sr with a low-pass filter, that is, an example of the light intensity of the reflected light Lr in time series.

【0025】図3(a)を参照して、FPThHおよびFP
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定されたプラズマ光Lpの光
強度について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、
溶接状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。
CPUは、基本的には、プラズマ光Lpの光強度が上限
しきい値FPThHを超過した場合には溶接欠陥以外の不
良、下限しきい値FPThL未満の場合には溶接欠陥不
良、また、下限しきい値FPThL以上上限しきい値FPT
H以下の範囲内であれば溶接が良好であると判定す
る。ただし、本発明においては、CPUは、以下に示す
反射光強度の判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な判定を行
う。
Referring to FIG. 3A, FPTh H and FP
Th L is a threshold value of good / bad welding condition for the preset light intensity of the plasma light Lp,
It is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101.
The CPU basically has a defect other than welding defects when the light intensity of the plasma light Lp exceeds the upper threshold value FPTh H , and a welding defect defect when the light intensity is less than the lower threshold value FPTh L. Lower threshold value FPTh L or more Upper threshold value FPT
If it is within the range of h H or less, it is determined that the welding is good. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the following determination of the reflected light intensity as well.

【0026】図3(b)を参照して、FRThHおよびFR
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定された反射光Lrの光強度
について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、溶接
状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。CP
Uは、基本的には、反射光Lrの光強度が上限しきい値
FRThHを超過した場合には溶接欠陥不良、下限しきい
値FRThL未満の場合には溶接欠陥以外の不良、また、
下限しきい値FRThL以上上限しきい値FRThH以下の範
囲内であれば溶接が良好であると判定する。ただし、本
発明においては、CPUは、上述したプラズマ光強度の
判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な判定を行う。
Referring to FIG. 3 (b), FRTh H and FR
Th L is a threshold value of the welding state good / defective with respect to the preset light intensity of the reflected light Lr, and is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101. CP
U is basically the upper limit of the light intensity of the reflected light Lr.
If it exceeds FRTh H , the welding defect is defective. If it is less than the lower limit threshold value FRTh L , it is a defect other than welding defect.
Welding is judged to be good if it is within the range from the lower limit threshold value FRTh L to the upper limit threshold value FRTh H. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the determination of the plasma light intensity described above.

【0027】さて、上記したように、溶接状態判定処理
部101のメモリに予め記憶した各しきい値を参照し
て、プラズマ光Lpの強度を溶接良好時のプラズマ光L
pの強度範囲と比較する共に、反射光Lrの強度を予め
設定した溶接良好時の反射光Lrの強度範囲と比較し、
両比較結果に応じて、溶接の良好/不良ならびに不良時
での不良の種類および不良の原因を溶接状態として検出
する。具体的には、比較結果と溶接状態とを対応づけた
テーブルを、溶接状態判定処理部101のメモリ内に予
め記憶している。このテーブルの一例を図4に示す。
As described above, the intensity of the plasma light Lp is referred to by referring to the threshold values stored in advance in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101, and the plasma light L when the welding is good is performed.
In addition to comparing with the intensity range of p, the intensity of the reflected light Lr is compared with a preset intensity range of the reflected light Lr at the time of good welding,
Based on the results of both comparisons, the type of failure and the cause of the failure are detected as the welding state. Specifically, a table in which the comparison result and the welding state are associated with each other is stored in advance in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101. An example of this table is shown in FIG.

【0028】図4を参照して、本テーブルは、プラズマ
光Lpの強度と反射光Lrの強度それぞれのしきい値と
の比較結果を複合的に判定することを可能にする。例え
ば、プラズマ光Lpが下限しきい値PThL(または、F
RThL)未満であり、かつ反射光Lrが上限しきい値R
ThH(または、FRThH)超過である場合には、溶接欠
陥であると判定する。
Referring to FIG. 4, this table makes it possible to make a composite determination of the results of comparison between the intensity of the plasma light Lp and the respective thresholds of the intensity of the reflected light Lr. For example, the plasma light Lp is the lower threshold PTh L (or F
RTh L ) and the reflected light Lr is the upper threshold R
If it exceeds Th H (or FRTh H ), it is determined to be a welding defect.

【0029】さらに、本テーブルでは、溶接欠陥の有無
だけではなく、欠陥以外の不良の判定、さらに、欠陥の
場合にはその種類を推定できる。例えば、プラズマ光L
pが下限しきい値PThL(または、FRThL)未満であ
り、かつ反射光Lrが上限しきい値RThH(または、F
RThH)超過である場合には、「溶け込みが悪い」とい
う欠陥種類であると推定する。
Further, in this table, not only the presence / absence of a welding defect, but also a defect other than a defect can be determined, and in the case of a defect, its type can be estimated. For example, plasma light L
p is less than the lower threshold PTh L (or FRTh L ) and the reflected light Lr is the upper threshold RTh H (or F
If it exceeds RTh H ), it is presumed that the defect type is “poor melting”.

【0030】さらに、本テーブルによれば、例えば、上
記比較結果の場合、「溶け込みが悪い」という欠陥種類
を推定するだけではなく、その欠陥要因が「ワーク50
0の溶接箇所に対して照射光Lwがデフォーカスであ
る」、「カバーガラスの汚れ」、「レーザ用光学系の劣
化」、もしくはこのいずれか複数の組み合わせが考えら
れ得る旨をも推定できる。
Further, according to this table, for example, in the case of the above comparison result, not only is the defect type "melting poor" estimated, but the defect factor is "work 50".
It can be estimated that the irradiation light Lw is defocused on the welded place of 0 "," dirt on the cover glass "," deterioration of the laser optical system ", or a combination of any two or more thereof.

【0031】尚、図4に示したテーブル例では、説明の
煩雑さを避けるために、*印を付した各セルの判定、欠
陥種類、欠陥要因等は省略しているが、実施の際には、
各セル毎に、判定、欠陥種類、欠陥要因等を設定してお
く。
In the table example shown in FIG. 4, the judgment of each cell marked with *, the defect type, the defect factor, etc. are omitted in order to avoid the complexity of the description, but in the case of implementation. Is
The judgment, defect type, defect factor, etc. are set for each cell.

【0032】溶接状態判定処理部101による判定およ
び推定結果(溶接の良好/不良、欠陥種類、欠陥要因)
は、表示部104によって表示され、また、記憶部10
5によって記憶される。表示方法としては、ディスプレ
イ表示だけではなく、プリントアウトしてもよい。ま
た、記憶部105で記憶するだけではなく、レーザ溶接
システムの主制御装置に直結するデータベース記憶手段
に記憶してもよい。また、ネットワークを介してレーザ
溶接システムの主制御装置に送出し、レーザ溶接システ
ムの制御をフィードバック制御としてもよい。
Judgment and estimation results by the welding state judgment processing unit 101 (good / bad welding, defect type, defect factor)
Is displayed by the display unit 104, and the storage unit 10
Stored by 5. As a display method, not only display but also printout may be performed. In addition to being stored in the storage unit 105, it may be stored in a database storage unit directly connected to the main controller of the laser welding system. Further, it may be sent to the main controller of the laser welding system via a network, and the control of the laser welding system may be feedback control.

【0033】本発明において、上述のごとく、プラズマ
光強度と反射光強度それぞれのしきい値との比較結果を
複合的に判定することで、溶接状態の良好/不良(欠陥
をも含む)の高精度な判定に加えて、欠陥種類および欠
陥要因等を推定できるのは、プラズマ光および反射光の
特性の違いに基づいている。即ち、プラズマ光は、レー
ザ溶接の際の溶融現象で発生する光の成分を総合的に評
価するのに用いられるので、この結果、様々な現象変化
を捕えることが可能になる。一方、反射光は、ワークへ
の吸収性を有する照射光をオリジナルとするために、反
射光強度はワークに対する吸収度に応じるので、レーザ
溶接の状態の観点からすれば、溶け込み現象と強い相関
関係にある。よって、溶け込み深さの管理に用いられ
る。
In the present invention, as described above, the result of comparison of the threshold values of the plasma light intensity and the reflected light intensity is compositely determined, whereby the welded state is high / bad (including defects). In addition to the accurate determination, the defect type, the defect factor, and the like can be estimated based on the difference in the characteristics of the plasma light and the reflected light. That is, the plasma light is used to comprehensively evaluate the components of the light generated by the melting phenomenon at the time of laser welding, and as a result, various phenomenon changes can be captured. On the other hand, since the reflected light is originally the irradiation light that has absorptivity to the work, the reflected light intensity depends on the degree of absorption to the work, so from the viewpoint of the state of laser welding, there is a strong correlation with the penetration phenomenon. It is in. Therefore, it is used for managing the penetration depth.

【0034】以上説明した実施の形態の変形例として、
プラズマ光および反射光両光の強度に加え、照射光Lw
の光強度をも、判定のパラメータとしてもよい。具体的
には、YAGレーザ発振器301からパワーモニタ信号
を取得するようにする。
As a modification of the embodiment described above,
Irradiation light Lw in addition to the intensities of both plasma light and reflected light
The light intensity of may also be used as a determination parameter. Specifically, the power monitor signal is acquired from the YAG laser oscillator 301.

【0035】さらに、プラズマ光および反射光両光のバ
ッチ的な強度に加え、両光のトレンド的な強度に基づい
て、経時的なパラメータによって生じる欠陥要因等を推
定するようにしてもよい。具体的には、グラフ上の検出
信号として、その横軸をワーク毎(製品番号)とし、縦
軸を製品毎の信号レベルの平均値とする。
Further, in addition to the batchwise intensities of both the plasma light and the reflected light, the defect factors and the like caused by the temporal parameters may be estimated based on the trend intensities of both lights. Specifically, as the detection signal on the graph, its horizontal axis is for each work (product number), and the vertical axis is the average value of the signal level for each product.

【0036】尚、上記の説明では、レーザ発振器として
YAGレーザ発振器を用いているが、これに限らず、他
の例えばCO2 レーザ発振器、エキシマレーザ発振器を
用いても良い。この場合、照射レーザ光の反射光の検出
が可能なように、光学系の構成や光電変換素子の選定を
行う。
In the above description, the YAG laser oscillator is used as the laser oscillator, but the present invention is not limited to this, and other CO2 laser oscillator or excimer laser oscillator may be used. In this case, the configuration of the optical system and the photoelectric conversion element are selected so that the reflected light of the irradiation laser light can be detected.

【0037】また、溶接状態判定処理部101の構成自
体は信号処理装置として一般的であり、パソコンを利用
して容易に実現できる。
The configuration of the welding state determination processing unit 101 is generally a signal processing device and can be easily realized by using a personal computer.

【0038】[0038]

【発明の効果】本発明によるレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出
方法は、レーザ光をワークに照射して溶接を行うレーザ
溶接方法に適用され、ワークにおける溶接状態を検出す
るレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法において、レーザ溶接
時にワークから放出されるプラズマ光および反射光両光
の状態情報に基づいて溶接状態を検出するため、溶接箇
所の欠陥を高精度かつ詳細に検出できる。また、プラズ
マ光と照射レーザ光の反射光とを利用することで多角的
に溶接状態が判定できる。さらに、検査員の省人・省力
化を実現でき、オンライン計測による検査時間短縮化を
図れるので、欠陥検出自動化による生産ライン自動化
(無人化)へ大きく寄与する。
The welding state detecting method of laser welding according to the present invention is applied to a laser welding method of irradiating a workpiece with laser light to perform welding, and a welding state detecting method of laser welding for detecting a welding state of a workpiece. Since the welding state is detected based on the state information of both the plasma light and the reflected light emitted from the work during laser welding, it is possible to detect defects at the welding location with high accuracy and detail. In addition, the welding state can be determined in multiple directions by using the plasma light and the reflected light of the irradiation laser light. In addition, labor and labor can be saved for inspectors, and inspection time can be shortened by online measurement, which greatly contributes to automation of production lines (automation) through automation of defect detection.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を実現するためのレーザ溶接システムの構成
を示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a laser welding system for realizing a welding state detection method for laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を説明するための図であり、(a)はプラズ
マ光の光強度を時系列的に示し、(b)は反射光の光強
度を時系列的に示す。
2A and 2B are views for explaining a welding state detecting method of laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which FIG. 2A shows the light intensity of plasma light in time series, and FIG. The light intensity is shown in time series.

【図3】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を説明するための図であり、(a)は高周波
除去されたプラズマ光の光強度を時系列的に示し、
(b)は高周波除去された反射光の光強度を時系列的に
示す。
FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining a welding state detection method of laser welding according to the embodiment of the present invention, in which (a) shows the light intensity of plasma light from which high frequency is removed in a time series manner;
(B) shows the light intensity of the reflected light from which the high frequency is removed in time series.

【図4】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を説明するための図であり、を示す図であ
り、プラズマ光および反射光両光の状態情報と溶接状態
(良好/不良、欠陥種類、欠陥要因)との対応テーブル
を示す。
FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining a welding state detecting method of laser welding according to the embodiment of the present invention, showing the state information of both plasma light and reflected light and the welding state (good / defective). , Defect type, defect factor).

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

100 レーザ溶接状態検出装置 101 溶接状態判定処理部 102 プラズマ光用センサ 103 反射光用センサ 104 表示部 105 記憶部 301 YAGレーザ発振器 302 光ファイバ 303 レーザトーチ 303a トーチ本体 303b YAGレーザ反射ミラー 303c トーチ上部 303d YAG光反射ミラー 500 ワーク 100 Laser welding condition detector 101 welding state determination processing unit 102 Plasma light sensor 103 Reflected light sensor 104 display 105 storage 301 YAG laser oscillator 302 optical fiber 303 laser torch 303a Torch body 303b YAG laser reflection mirror 303c Torch top 303d YAG light reflection mirror 500 work

Claims (5)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 レーザ光をワークに照射して溶接を行う
レーザ溶接方法に適用され、ワークにおける溶接状態を
検出するレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法において、レー
ザ溶接時にワークから放出されるプラズマ光および反射
光両光の状態情報に基づいて溶接状態を検出することを
特徴とするレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法。
1. A welding state detection method for laser welding, which is applied to a laser welding method for irradiating a workpiece with laser light to perform welding, and detects a welding state in a workpiece. A welding state detection method for laser welding, characterized in that the welding state is detected based on state information of both reflected light.
【請求項2】 前記プラズマ光および前記反射光両光の
強度を、両光の前記状態情報として用いる請求項1に記
載のレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法。
2. The welding state detection method for laser welding according to claim 1, wherein the intensities of both the plasma light and the reflected light are used as the state information of both lights.
【請求項3】 前記プラズマ光の強度を、予め設定した
溶接良好時のプラズマ光の強度範囲と比較する共に、前
記反射光の強度を、予め設定した溶接良好時の反射光の
強度範囲と比較し、両比較結果に応じて、溶接の良好/
不良ならびに不良時での不良の種類および不良の原因を
溶接状態として検出する請求項2に記載のレーザ溶接の
溶接状態検出方法。
3. The intensity of the plasma light is compared with a preset intensity range of the plasma light when the welding is good, and the intensity of the reflected light is compared with a preset intensity range of the reflection light when the welding is good. Good welding /
The welding state detecting method of laser welding according to claim 2, wherein a defect, a type of the defect at the time of the defect, and a cause of the defect are detected as a welding state.
【請求項4】 前記比較結果と前記溶接状態とを対応づ
けたテーブルを予め用意してなる請求項3に記載のレー
ザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法。
4. The welding state detecting method for laser welding according to claim 3, wherein a table in which the comparison result and the welding state are associated with each other is prepared in advance.
【請求項5】 前記プラズマ光および前記反射光両光の
強度に加え、レーザ光のソース強度にも基づいて溶接状
態を検出する請求項2に記載のレーザ溶接の溶接状態検
出方法。
5. The welding state detecting method for laser welding according to claim 2, wherein the welding state is detected based on the source intensity of the laser light in addition to the intensities of both the plasma light and the reflected light.
JP23372198A 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method Expired - Fee Related JP3184962B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23372198A JP3184962B2 (en) 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23372198A JP3184962B2 (en) 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000061672A true JP2000061672A (en) 2000-02-29
JP3184962B2 JP3184962B2 (en) 2001-07-09

Family

ID=16959531

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP23372198A Expired - Fee Related JP3184962B2 (en) 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3184962B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000271768A (en) * 1999-03-23 2000-10-03 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Monitoring method of quality for yag laser beam welded part
JP2002210575A (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-07-30 Nippon Steel Corp Method for discriminating weld condition in laser welding
CN1310734C (en) * 2002-07-31 2007-04-18 尤尼泰克米亚奇公司 Laser welding monitor
JP2008183614A (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-08-14 Tokyu Car Corp Laser welding method
JP2009115767A (en) * 2007-11-09 2009-05-28 Toyota Motor Corp Welding quality inspection apparatus and welding quality inspection method
JP2012024781A (en) * 2010-07-20 2012-02-09 Amada Co Ltd Fiber laser machining device and method of controlling the same
JP2016170026A (en) * 2015-03-12 2016-09-23 株式会社ワイテック Welded part inspection device

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000271768A (en) * 1999-03-23 2000-10-03 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Monitoring method of quality for yag laser beam welded part
JP2002210575A (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-07-30 Nippon Steel Corp Method for discriminating weld condition in laser welding
CN1310734C (en) * 2002-07-31 2007-04-18 尤尼泰克米亚奇公司 Laser welding monitor
JP2008183614A (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-08-14 Tokyu Car Corp Laser welding method
JP4617324B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2011-01-26 東急車輛製造株式会社 Laser weld formation method
JP2009115767A (en) * 2007-11-09 2009-05-28 Toyota Motor Corp Welding quality inspection apparatus and welding quality inspection method
JP2012024781A (en) * 2010-07-20 2012-02-09 Amada Co Ltd Fiber laser machining device and method of controlling the same
JP2016170026A (en) * 2015-03-12 2016-09-23 株式会社ワイテック Welded part inspection device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3184962B2 (en) 2001-07-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101240980B1 (en) Method for checking quality of laser welding and equipment thereof
US6399915B1 (en) Method and apparatus for determining quality of welding at weld between working material pieces
JP3227650B2 (en) Laser welding machine and laser welding condition monitoring method
CN113245693B (en) Laser welding penetration information monitoring equipment for optical weak coherent imaging and detection method thereof
CN114502313A (en) Laser processing system for carrying out a processing operation on a workpiece by means of a laser beam and method for monitoring a processing operation on a workpiece by means of a laser beam
JP3184962B2 (en) Laser welding detection method
JP3154177B2 (en) Laser welding state determination method and laser state determination apparatus
CN112518122B (en) Laser processing piece fusion depth detection method, device and system
JP2021058927A (en) Laser welding quality detecting method and laser welding quality detecting device
KR20180091480A (en) System and Method for detecting weld defects by type
JP5187121B2 (en) Laser processing apparatus and laser processing method
CN115476062A (en) Laser outer light path light beam monitoring system and method
WO2022181359A1 (en) Laser machining condition determination method and determination device
JP2017024046A (en) Laser welding monitoring device and laser welding monitoring method
JP2861649B2 (en) Steel plate weld inspection method
JP2967671B2 (en) Monitoring device for welding status
JP4441129B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining welding state in laser spot lap welding
Park et al. Development of a weld quality monitoring system in CO 2 laser welding by using photodiodes
WO2022181060A1 (en) Determination method and determination device for laser processing state
JP3136556B2 (en) Laser welding machine
WO2023218701A1 (en) Machining condition determination method and determination device
JP5472380B2 (en) Welding state detection device and welding state detection method
JP5186914B2 (en) Welding state detection device and welding state detection method
JP3355546B2 (en) Laser welding defect detection device and defect detection method
NL2030748B1 (en) Optical coherence tomography testing system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20010328

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080511

Year of fee payment: 7

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080511

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090511

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100511

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110511

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120511

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120511

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130511

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130511

Year of fee payment: 12

S802 Written request for registration of partial abandonment of right

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R311802

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees