GB2604916A

GB2604916A - A method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training

Info

Publication number: GB2604916A
Application number: GB2103833.6A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Ahtmann Allar; Chang Keano
Original assignee: Ibuildpro Holdings Ltd
Current assignee: Ibuildpro Holdings Ltd
Priority date: 2021-03-19
Filing date: 2021-03-19
Publication date: 2022-09-21
Also published as: GB202103833D0; WO2022195264A1

Abstract

A computer implemented method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training, the method including: allowing a user to create a user profile comprising user data; recording the user profile to a central resource; providing a mixed reality training session; associating the mixed reality training session with the user profile; initiating the mixed reality training session; monitoring the progress of the mixed reality training session; and recording the completion of the mixed reality training session to the central resource. A mixed reality training session is a training session in which real world and digital objects interact, such as a user interacting with a digital environment, and may include virtual reality or augmented reality. The training session may be recorded for review by a third party. The training session may include a plurality of distinct stages such that initiation of a distinct stage may require completion of at least one other distinct stage. An outcome of the training may also be recorded to the central resource and communicated to a third party. The user may be prompted to complete the training and an alert may be issued if the training is not completed in a predetermined time period.

Description

A METHOD FOR MONITORING PROGRESS OF MIXED REALITY TRAINING Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a computer implemented method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training. The present invention further relates to a data processing apparatus for carrying out the computer implemented method. The present invention also relates to a computer program for causing a computer to carry out the computer implemented method. The present invention further relates to a computer-readable medium for causing a computer to carry out the computer implemented method.

Background to the Invention

Practical training is important in many applications to ensure persons are adequately qualified to undertake tasks and are competent when working in potentially dangerous or resource heavy environments. A person having confidence and experience in their skills can undertake tasks in a safer and more efficient manner.

However, real world training is often dangerous, unfeasible, uneconomic or impossible in many applications. The resource requirements or risks associated with allowing untrained persons to undertaken such tasks makes training persons in these skills challenging. In contrast, mixed reality and virtual environments provide a training environment with low safety risks and a low resource demand. Such environments allow persons with low skill or confidence to develop their knowledge and practical experience through mixed reality training.

As such, there is a need for a means to provide training for persons wherein the risks associated with real world training are mitigated or eliminated entirely.

Embodiments and aspects of the present invention seek to address at least the above

problems of the prior art. 1.

Summary of the Invention

According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a computer implemented method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training comprising the method steps of: allowing a user to create a user profile comprising user data; recording the user profile to a central resource; providing a mixed reality training session; associating the mixed reality training session with the user profile; initiating the mixed reality training session; monitoring the progress of the mixed reality training session; and recording the completion of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.

In this way, there is advantageously provided a method for reliable recording and monitoring of a user's training progress to a central resource. Not only is an up-to-date data profile regarding the user built, but an accurate log of the user's training progress is also recorded to the central resource and can be used as proof in the user's professional progression. Such a resource is also advantageous when considering persons and professionals already in the work force looking to improve their skills and knowledge. Additionally, as allocation of the mixed reality training session can be determined based on the data provided by the user in the user profile, a training session tailored to the user can be provided and an improved user experience gained.

Preferably, the method further comprises the steps of; imaging the mixed reality training session for review by a third party; and recording the imaging of the mixed reality training session to the central resource. Preferably, the method further comprises the steps of; retrieving the imaging of the mixed reality training session from the central resource for review by a third party; and recording data regarding a third party review to the central resource. In this way, remote and non-simultaneous review of the training session can be undertaken. Further, by recording the imaging of the mixed reality training session to the central resource, the imaging can be retrieved from the central resource at any time by the user or a third party, both during training progress and upon completion of training. In this way, the imaging of the mixed reality training session can be utilised in future training sessions as an education resource. As such, the central resource comprises an educational resource.

Preferably, the mixed reality training session comprises a plurality of distinct stages. In this way, the mixed reality training session is divided into manageable stages that can be undertaken and repeated by the user, if required. Each stage can comprise separate goals or challenges to break the learning into clearly defined areas or tasks.

As such, deeper learning and greater training personalisation to fit the user can be achieved. Further, the training session can be divided into, for example, a tutorial stage, a practice stage and an assessment stage, allowing the user to develop, reinforce and then assess their knowledge and skills. Additionally, the number of stages and/or content of each stage of the plurality of distinct stages can be personalised to the user, improving user experience.

Preferably, the step of monitoring the progress of the mixed reality training session comprises monitoring the completion of each distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages. In this way, close monitoring of the user's training progression can be undertaken by the user and/or a third party. Preferably, the plurality of distinct stages are ranked and initiation of a distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages requires completion of at least one other distinct stage. In this way, the training session is structured such that stages are completed in a predefined order and a foundation of knowledge and skills is developed accordingly.

Preferably, the step of providing a mixed reality training session comprises providing a plurality of mixed reality training activities. Preferably, the user selects a mixed reality training activity from the plurality of mixed reality training activities. In this way, the user has freedom to personalise the training session to their preferences.

Preferably, the method further comprises the steps of; issuing an outcome of the mixed reality training session; and recording the outcome of the mixed reality training session to the central resource. For example, the outcome may be a grade, a pass/fail outcome or a ranked outcome such as poor/good/outstanding. Additionally or alternatively, the outcome may comprise data from the training session, such as the time for completion or the number of errors made during a training session.

Preferably, the method further comprises the step of; communicating the outcome of the mixed reality training session to at least one third party. For example, a trainer, tutor, employer, examination board or another appropriate third party is notified of the training progress of the user. In this way, a third party can monitor the user's training progress and, upon receipt of the outcome, can intervene to provide additional support if required. Additionally, the user is motivated to strive for a positive outcome of the training session, as the third party can make the user accountable for the outcome.

Preferably, the method further comprises the step of; associating a second mixed reality training session with the user profile. Preferably, the second mixed reality training session is selected by the central resource. In this way, the central resource tailors the user's training. For example, data provided by the user in the user profile and/or data regarding the first mixed reality training session can educate the selection of the second mixed reality training session. Alternatively, the second mixed reality training session is selected by a third party. In this way, a third party, such as a trainer, tutor or employer, can tailor the user's training to ensure the training is both appropriate and beneficial for the user.

Preferably, the method comprises prompting the user to complete the mixed reality training session. In this way, the user is encouraged to undertake the mixed reality training session in a timely manner. Preferably, the method further comprises issuing an alert if the mixed reality training session is not completed within at least one predetermined time period. In this way, the user is warned when they have fallen behind schedule and their training progression and skill development is stalling such that they can address this. Preferably, the at least one predetermined time period is retrieved from the central resource. Preferably, the mixed reality training session comprises the at least one predetermined time period.

Preferably, the method further comprises the steps of; identifying at least one incomplete mixed reality training session; and communicating the mixed reality training session and its status to at least one third party. In this way, a third party, such as a trainer, tutor or employer, can monitor the training progress of the user and intervene or provide additional support if the user is falling behind. Additionally, a third party can hold the user accountable for their training progression such that the user is motivated to complete the training session in a timely manner and to the best of their ability.

Preferably, the method further comprises the steps of; allowing a second user to create a user profile; recording the second user profile to the central resource; associating the mixed reality training session with the second user profile; and initiating the mixed reality training session for the first user and the second user simultaneously. In this way, two or more users can simultaneously undertake a mixed reality training session, allowing group training to be undertaken. This is beneficial, in particular, for training wherein a group setting reflects real world conditions. Preferably, the method further comprises recording the association between the user and the second user in the central resource. In this way, the central resource comprises a log of associations and users or third parties can use the log of associations for reference, such as to identify successful associations.

According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a data processing apparatus comprising means for carrying out the method according to the first aspect of the invention.

According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method according to the first aspect of the present invention.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of the first aspect of the present invention.

Detailed Description

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a schematic view of a computer implemented method according to the first aspect of the present invention; Figure 2 is a schematic view of a second embodiment of the computer implemented method of Figure 1, according to the first aspect of the present invention; and

S

Figure 3 is a schematic view of a second embodiment of the monitor session step of Figure 2.

Herein, the method is described in relation to a user enrolled in a training programme, such as a training programme run by an educational facility, a professional body, a company or other organisation. A mixed reality (MR) training session is a training session wherein the real world and digital objects interact, such as a user interacting with a digital environment. Herein, a MR training session may additionally comprise elements of only augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR) and/or other pre-recorded or responsive media.

Referring firstly to Figure 1, there is shown a schematic view of a computer implemented method 100. The method 100 allows a user to create a data profile and associates a MR training session with this data such that the mixed reality training progress of the user can be monitored. This allows a central resource of verified data to be built such that accurate information regarding the user's training progress can be recorded and monitored.

The first step of the method 100 is a USER PROFILE step 101. Herein, the user is allowed to create a profile containing user data. For example, this data can be in the form of; personal data, such a name, age and contact details; data regarding the user's interests, such as areas of desired specialism or training skills which are of greatest interest; data regarding a previous or current educational facility, trainer, teacher or mentor; data regarding a training programme, such as a training course start date; data regarding the user's location; data regarding the user's professional or personal portfolio; username and password data; and data concerning others, such as data concerning a second user. The data contained in the user profile may be provided in the form of documentation, such as ID or certificates, hyperlinks to websites and images or other media. In this example, the user data is a usemame, the user location, a user portfolio and the user's interests, namely that the user is interested in training to become a plumber.

The next step of the method 100 is a RECORD USER PROFILE step 102, wherein the user profile is recorded to a central resource, such as a central database or central ledger. The user's data is recorded onto the central resource. The USER PROFILE step 101 and RECORD USER PROFILE step 102 form the PROFILE phase 108 of the method 100.

There follows a PROVIDE SESSION step 103 wherein a MR training session is provided. In this embodiment, the MR training session comprises a plumbing training session, wherein a skill required in the plumbing profession is taught. The plumbing training session is selected based on the level of experience of the user, as provided in the user data recorded to the central resource. The next step of the method 100 is an ASSOCIATE SESSION step 104, where the MR training session is associated with the user profile.

There follows an INITIATE SESSION step 105, wherein the MR training session is initiated and the user commences training progression. Herein, the user undertakes the training session, developing their skills for the plumbing profession. The next step of the method 100 is a MONITOR SESSION step 106, wherein the progress of the MR training session is monitored. An MR training session may be considered complete, for example, when a virtual task set is completed, when the user has undertaken the full duration of the session or when other predetermined criteria have been met.

There follows a RECORD COMPLETION step 107, wherein the completion of the mixed reality training session is recorded to the central resource. The benefit of storing all data regarding user training on a central resource is that both the user and third parties can monitor the training progression of the user. This is of particular benefit to present or future employers of the user and also to training providers, as problems with training or user input are highlighted when they arise. The central resource additionally provides the user with proof of skills and qualifications achieved during training. Additionally, when a plurality of third parties are involved with or invested in user training, all parties can monitor the progression of the training.

As each step of the method 100 can be automated, time and resource savings can be achieved and an improved training experience is provided for both the user and any third parties involved in training, such as the trainer or an employer.

With reference to Figure 2, there is provided a second embodiment of a computer implement method 200 according to the first aspect of the invention. The method 200 comprises a PROFILE phase 201 in accordance with the PROFILE phase 108 of Figure 1. Additionally, similar steps of the method 200 of Figure 2 incorporate some or all of the features of the steps of the method 100 of Figure 1.

The user data provided in the PROFILE stage 201 is that the user is a part-qualified plumber but has a further interest in 'Electrical' training.

Following the PROFILE stage 201, a PROVIDE SESSION step 202 is initiated. Herein, a first MR training session is provided. The choice of the MR training session is determined using data recorded on the central resource in the PROFILE stage 201.

For example, as the user has selected an interest in 'Electrical' training but has no prior training in the electrical field, a foundation level electrical training session is provided. Alternatively, as the user is a part-qualified plumber, an advanced level plumbing training session may be provided. In this way, the user profile educates the choice of training session and a personalised training course is provided.

The MR training session provided in the PROVIDE SESSION step 202 comprises a plurality of distinct stages. In this way, training can be divided in stages based on a number of characteristics, such as the nature of the tasks, type of learning style, level of difficulty, learning progression or by individual skill. The stages are ranked and initiation of a distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages requires completion of at least one other distinct stage. In this way, the training provided is structured to improve the rate of learning of the user.

Each MR training session comprises a plurality of mixed reality training activities. For example, each distinct stage may comprise a plurality of MR training activities or each MR training activity may comprise a plurality of distinct stages. In this way, a number of training pathways are available and the MR training session can be further personalised to the user. In the PROVIDE SESSION step 202, the user selects a MR training activity from the plurality of mixed reality training activities. This provides user choice and flexibility in the training process. Alternatively, data recorded to the central resource can educate and the central resource selects one or more MR training activities for the user.

Upon selection of the first MR training activity, the ASSOCIATE SESSION step 203 is initiated. Herein, the personalised MR training session is associated with the user profile. There follows an INITIATE SESSION step 204, wherein the MR training session is initiated.

The INITIATE SESSION step 204 comprises imaging the MR training session for review by a third party and recording the imaging of the MR training session to the central resource. In this way, a portion or all of the MR training session is imaged and recorded on the central resource for review by the user or a third party. As such, data which may previously have been missed in real world training sessions can be recorded to the central resource for review. This is of benefit to the user as they may remotely review a historical training session to highlight areas of strength and weakness and to refresh their memory or understanding of the skills taught in the session. Additionally, a third party such as a trainer, employer or examiner may review the MR training session, allowing close monitoring of the user's training progression.

There follows a MONITOR SESSION step 205, wherein progress of the MR training session is monitored. The MONITOR SESSION step 205 comprises prompting the user to complete the MR training session, for example, if completion is not detected within a predetermined time period. Following the prompt, if the user subsequently fails to complete the MR training session, an ALERT step 210 is initiated. Herein, an alert is issued if the mixed reality training session is not completed within at least one predetermined time period. The predetermined time period may be retrieved from the central resource, such that, for example, the expected deadline for the MR training session completion is based on the user data or on data regarding the standard training pathway. The ALERT step 210 comprises identifying at least one incomplete mixed reality training session and communicating the mixed reality training session and its status to at least one third party, such as a trainer or employer. In this way, the third party can respond accordingly. If the user requires training assistance or is unable to keep up with the level of training, the method 200 allows a dialogue to be created between the user and a third party such that action can be taken to address any problems. Additionally, automated notification of the user's training progress is provided such that manual checking of the data on the central resource is not required.

Additionally or alternatively, the ALERT step 210 comprises identifying at least one incomplete mixed reality training session and communicating the mixed reality training session and its status to the user. In this way, the user is notified that their training progression is stalling and they have fallen behind such that they can take action to address this The MONITOR SESSION step 205 also comprises monitoring the completion of each distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages. In this way, if a user has failed to complete a distinct stage, the at least one incomplete stage can be identified and the stage and its status can be communicated to at least one third party. This provides a number of intermediate checkpoints from which the training progress can be monitored, highlighting when the user is falling behind at the time of occurrence. Additionally, the period or ease of progression through the distinct stages can be monitored and used to assess the training progression and educate future training choices and pathways.

There follows a REVIEW SESSION step 206 comprising retrieving the imaging of the MR training session from the central resource for review by a third party and recording data regarding a third party review to the central resource. A third party may undertake the review remotely and the third party is also able to review the MR training session with the user or another third party. In some instances, it is beneficial for a number of independent third parties to undertake a review of the MR training session, with each third party review recorded to the central resource. In this way, feedback and areas of strength are recorded on the central resource alongside the imaging of the MR training session.

Next, an ISSUE OUTCOME step 207 is initiated, comprising issuing an outcome of the mixed reality training session and recording the outcome of the mixed reality training session to the central resource. In this embodiment, the outcome comprises a 'Pass' or 'Fail' grade. The outcome may be determined by one or more factors, for example, the outcome may be determined by data recorded to the central resource, such as a third party review, or by predetermined assessment criteria. There follows a NOTIFICATION step 211 wherein the outcome of the MR training session is communicated to at least one third party. In this way, third parties can monitor the progress and the outcome of each MR training session.

A RECORD COMPLETION step 208 follows, wherein completion of the mixed reality training session is recorded to the central resource. Upon successful completion of the first training session, a SECOND SESSION step 209 is initiated. The SECOND SESSION step 209 comprises associating a second mixed reality training session with the user profile. In this embodiment, the second MR training session may be selected by either the central resource, a third party or the user. In this way, the MR training is personalised to the user and an improved learning experience is provided.

For example, data recorded on the central resource can educate the selection of the second MR training session using, such as, the user's interests, the users previous training experience or data regarding the first MR training session such as the time for completion, the grade outcome or the ease of completion. Alternatively, it may be beneficial for a third party, such as a trainer or employer, to select the second MR training session in order to match training to the desired skill and professional development of the user. Alternatively, the user may select the second training session to match their interests and preferences. Herein a second iteration of the method 200 can be undertaken from the PROVIDE SESSION step 202, wherein the second MR training session is provided. A plurality of iterations of the method 200 can be undertaken in training of the user.

As the experience and training completed by the user in the first MR training session is recorded to the central resource, a training portfolio is built as the user's level of expertise increases such that higher level and difficulty MR training sessions can be accessed. For example, the second MR training session may be an advanced plumbing training session. Third parties, such as external regulating bodies, can access the user's data profile recorded on the central resource and monitor the user's training progress.

By tailoring MR training sessions and training progression to the user, an improved learning experience can be provided. Learning preferences, speed and level of required challenge vary between users, with a personalised training pathway improving user experience and allowing for more comprehensive and deeper understanding of the training content to be achieved. The training pathway can be tailored to the user's goals and there is flexibility on the environment and level of difficulty undertaken in each MR training session. Additionally, variable and continuously changing MR environments provide further opportunity for educational growth by allowing unpredictable scenarios to be simulated. Additionally, gamified training pathways can be provided with difficulty increasing as the user progresses, incentivising the user and ensuring motivation is maintained. Personalised and tailored environments for artificial and theoretical learning and training skills are created specifically for the user, increasing flexibility regarding space or resources, as well as providing a safe environment to train complex or dangerous tasks.

With reference to Figure 3, there is provided a second embodiment of the MONITOR SESSION step 205 of Figure 2, wherein the method 200 further comprises the steps of; issuing an outcome of each distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages; and recording the outcome of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.

In this embodiment, the mixed reality training session comprises a plurality of distinct stages. The plurality of distinct stages are ranked and initiation of a distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages requires completion of at least one other distinct stage.

In this embodiment, STAGE A 301 is a tutorial stage, wherein the user learns the skill which is the focus of the session, and OUTCOME A 302 comprises using an outcome of STAGE A 301. If the user has participated in STAGE A 301 for the full duration, the stage is considered complete. In STAGE A 301, the user is provided with a MR learning environment wherein training is provided to improve the user's theoretical understanding and to demonstrate the skill or concept to be achieved.

STAGE B 303 follows, wherein the user is provided with a MR sandbox environment. In STAGE B 303, the user is provided with 'hands on' learning such that they can practice the skill taught in STAGE A 301. There is no penalty for errors or mistakes in STAGE B 303 and so the user can build confidence and learn from mistakes without real world costs or risks. For example, when learning how to join gas pipes in a building, any mistakes made in a real world training session may be both costly and dangerous. As such, a practical training session which mitigates risks may be unfeasible or may not accurately represent a real world scenario. MR training allows a realistic training environment to be provided without the physical risks.

The sandboxed environment allows the user to practice skills that they may be unable or unqualified to undertake in the real world. Further, as the competency of the user improves, the MR training session may comprise test scenarios to train the user in unexpected or emergency situations. For example, the user can be trained in response to a burst water pipe during the MR training session. STAGE B 303 allows the user to immediately reinforce the skills and knowledge gained in STAGE A 301, allowing skills to be developed over shorter periods.

Additionally, STAGE B 303 may comprise an open room or group activity such that a second user or a plurality of additional users participate and interact in the MR training session simultaneously and as a team. In such embodiments, it is envisaged that group participation in training can occur when users are located both proximate and remote to each other.

OUTCOME B 204 comprises issuing the outcome of STAGE B 203 and the outcome is determined by both the duration of time the user has spent participating in STAGE B 303 and on the user's confidence in the skill that is being taught. For example, the user may decide at the end of SAGE B 303 to re-enter STAGE A 301 to improve their understanding, if this is required, or the user may choose to participate in STAGE B 303 again to further practice the skill. Alternatively, the user can choose that they are ready to progress to STAGE C 305. The central resource can also comprise a predetermined period for STAGE B 303, such that a minimum time participating is required before the user can progress to STAGE C 305. This can be set by a third party or be determined by the central resource using data stored on the central resource. For example, the user portfolio data of the user profile or the number of completed MR training sessions in the field can educate the minimum training time required in STAGE B 303.

Following from OUTCOME B 304, STAGE C 305 comprises an assessment stage wherein the user is tested or assessed on the skill they have learnt and practiced in STAGE A 301 and STAGE B 303. OUTCOME C 306 may be determined by assessment criteria, such as a predetermined pass mark or weighted criteria. Alternatively, OUTCOME C 306 may be determined by one or more third party assessors during STAGE C 305 or afterwards using the imaging of the MR training session recorded to the central resource. The user can undertake STAGE C 305 a second time if successful completion of the stage is not achieved, effectively resitting the assessment, before the user must instead re-enter STAGE A 301 or STAGE B 303. In this way, if the user cannot successfully complete STAGE C 305, the user is guided to go back and reinforce their learning in STAGE A 301 or STAGE B 303.

OUTCOME A 302, OUTCOME B 304 and OUTCOME C 306 are recorded to the central resource. OUTCOME C 306 may be considered as the outcome of the MR training session, such that OUTCOME C 306 comprises issuing the outcome of the MR training session. By recording MR training session outcomes, a training portfolio is built on the central resource which can be used to supplement real world training and work completed by the user. Additionally, the central resource can be used as a reference resource to cross check and verify user credentials on future work and projects undertaken.

OUTCOME C 306 can be used by the user in their progression towards accreditation or certification. As such, clear training goals can be set and achievements can be quantified. Additionally, the method facilitates continued professional development and encourages user learning and development.

In addition, the MONITOR SESSION 205 step comprises allowing a second user to create a user profile, recording the second user profile to the central resource, associating the mixed reality training session with the second user profile, initiating the mixed reality training session for the first user and the second user simultaneously and recording the association between the user and the second user in the central resource. In this way, multiple users can participate in the same MR training session.

Peer-to-peer learning is beneficial in many applications, in particular when group interaction simulates real world conditions and environments. Additionally, the second user may comprise a trainer or teacher such that the user can undertake a MR training session alongside a third party provided training. Additionally, by recording a log of associations on the central resource, both successful and unsuccessful associations can be identified and a reference source of associations is created.

It is envisaged that the MR training session may additionally comprise elements of real world training or non-MR scenarios. For example, a distinct stage may comprise a real world task following on training from a MR task completed in a preceding stage.

In this way, both mixed reality and real world training is provided in the MR training session. For example, STAGE A 301 may comprise theoretical learning, STAGE B 303 may comprise a MR training task and STAGE C 305 may comprise the same task but in a real world setting. In this way, resource requirements are reduced and confidence is built in a virtual environment before the real world task is undertaken.

Mixed reality training sessions allows a user to participate in training scenarios which are too dangerous, expensive or too resource or time intensive to be undertaken in the real world. As digital and virtual objects and environments can be built and simulated to recreate both onsite and offsite scenarios, MR training sessions provide realistic and responsive environments, without the risks of physical simulation and with a reduced time and resource demand required by the user's trainer or employer. Extensive health and safety training and risk assessments are not required before training sessions are initiated, allowing the user a wider scope of learning from the onset of training. Additionally, MR training sessions provide creative and problem solving tasks and challenges to deepen user interaction with the session and provide a visual tool for learning. Further, the user can build confidence and experience in a MR environment before undertaking tasks in the real world.

Claims

CLAIMS1 A computer implemented method for monitoring progress of mixed reality training comprising the method steps of allowing a user to create a user profile comprising user data; recording the user profile to a central resource; providing a mixed reality training session; associating the mixed reality training session with the user profile; initiating the mixed reality training session; monitoring the progress of the mixed reality training session; and recording the completion of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
2 The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises the steps of; imaging the mixed reality training session for review by a third party; and recording the imaging of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
3 The computer implemented method of claim 2; wherein the method further comprises the steps of; retrieving the imaging of the mixed reality training session from the central resource for review by a third party; and recording data regarding a third party review to the central resource.
4. The computer implemented method of any one proceeding claim, wherein the mixed reality training session comprises a plurality of distinct stages
5. The computer implemented method of claim 4, wherein the step of monitoring the progress of the mixed reality training session comprises monitoring the completion of each distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages.
6 The computer implemented method of claim 5, wherein the plurality of distinct stages are ranked and initiation of a distinct stage of the plurality of distinct stages requires completion of at least one other distinct stage.
7 The computer implemented method of any one preceding claim, wherein the step of providing a mixed reality training session comprises providing a plurality of mixed reality training activities.
8. The computer implemented method of claim 7, wherein the user selects a mixed reality training activity from the plurality of mixed reality training activities.
9. The computer implemented method of any one preceding claim, wherein the method further comprises the steps of; issuing an outcome of the mixed reality training session; and recording the outcome of the mixed reality training session to the central resource.
10. The computer implemented method of claim 9, wherein the method further comprises the step of; communicating the outcome of the mixed reality training session to at least one third party.
11. The computer implemented method of any one preceding claim, wherein the method further comprises the step of; associating a second mixed reality training session with the user profile.
12. The computer implemented method of claim 11, wherein the second mixed reality training session is selected by the central resource.
13. The computer implemented method of claim 11, wherein the second mixed reality training session is selected by a third party.
14. The computer implemented method of any one preceding claim, wherein the method comprises prompting the user to complete the mixed reality training session.
15. The computer implemented method of claim 14, wherein the method further comprises issuing an alert if the mixed reality training session is not completed within at least one predetermined time period.
16. The computer implemented method of claim 15, wherein the at least one predetermined time period is retrieved from the central resource.
17 The computer implemented method of any one preceding claim, wherein the method further comprises the steps of; identifying at least one incomplete mixed reality training session; and communicating the mixed reality training session and its status to at least one third party.
18 The computer implemented method of any one proceeding claim, wherein the method further comprises the steps of; allowing a second user to create a user profile; recording the second user profile to the central resource; associating the mixed reality training session with the second user profile; and initiating the mixed reality training session for the first user and the second user simultaneously.
19. The computer implemented method of claim 18, wherein the method further comprises recording the association between the user and the second user in the central resource.
20. A data processing apparatus comprising means for carrying out the method of any one preceding claim.
21. A computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of any one of claims 1 to 19.
22. A computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of any one of claims 1 to 19