GB2574895A

GB2574895A - Soft target movement platform

Info

Publication number: GB2574895A
Application number: GB201810313A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Soanes James
Original assignee: Anthony Best Dynamics Ltd
Current assignee: Anthony Best Dynamics Ltd
Priority date: 2018-06-22
Filing date: 2018-06-22
Publication date: 2019-12-25
Also published as: GB201810313D0

Abstract

A soft target movement platform 1 which comprises at least one drive unit 11, each unit having a motor carrier 12. The drive motor (21, figure 5) is preferably journaled in the motor carrier about an axis central and longitudinal of the motor. A drive wheel 6 is drivingly connected to the drive motor, with the wheel's axis of rotation offset from the central longitudinal axis by a lever arm (31, fig 8). The lever arm having a horizontal extent in use, whereby wheel load tends to rotate the motor with respect to the carrier about the longitudinal axis. A spring (32) acting between the drive motor and the carrier counteracts the wheel load rotation.

Description

SOFT TARGET MOVEMENT PLATFORM

The present invention relates to a soft target movement platform.

Soft target movement platforms are described in a series of patents in the name of Dynamic Research Inc (DRI). In particular, the abstract of US patent application No. 8,447,509 is as follows:

A Guided Soft Target (GST) system and method provides a versatile test system and methodology far the evaluation of various crash avoidance technologies. This system and method can be used to replicate the pre-crash motions of the CP in a wide variety of crash scenarios while minimizing physical risk, all while consistently providing a sensor signature substantially identical to that of the item being simulated. The GST system in various example embodiments may comprise a soft target vehicle or pedestrian form removably attached to a programmable, autonomously guided, self-propelled Dynamic Motion Element (DME), which may be operated in connection with a wireless computer network.; Specific geometries far the DME have been discovered that minimize the risk of the DME flipping up and hilling or otherwise damaging or disrupting the ride of typical test vehicles during impact of the test vehicles with the GST, all while minimizing the effect of the DME on the sensor signature of the GST.

We use the term “soft target movement platform” where DRI use “dynamic motion element”.

The object of the present invention is to provide an improved soft target movement platform.

According to the invention there is provided a soft target movement platform, comprising:

• at least one front steerable wheel at a front axle, • at least one rear steerable wheel at a rear axle, • a mechanism for selective steering of the front and rear wheels to respective steering angles, independently or dependently of the rear and front wheels for steering the platform substantially about a point of intersection of axes of the front and rear steerable wheels, • the mechanism being such that the point of intersection is selectively moveable laterally for quantum of steering movement and backwards and forwards for mode of steering movement and • means for controlling the mechanism for quantum and mode of steering.

Normally the soft target movement platform havsa central longitudinal axis, and the steerable wheels will be arranged as three or four wheels of which:

• at least one wheel is arranged at a front axle position along the central longitudinal axis, • at least one other wheel is similarly arranged at a rear axle position and • the other wheel or wheels is/are arranged at the axles whereby there are one or two front wheels and one or two rear wheels.

Where a single wheel is provided at an axle position, it will normally be substantially on the central longitudinal axis.

Where two wheels are provided at an axle position:

• they will normally be provided substantially equally spaced on either side of the central longitudinal axis;

• they will also normally be provided at substantially the same position along the axis; and • they may be on a single physical axle, such as a live axle or • they may be provided independently in a notional axle.

The axles will normally be substantially at right angles to the central longitudinal axis. Nevertheless there is no requirement for full symmetry of positioning of the opposite side wheels with respect to the central axis.

We can envisage a configuration with front and rear axles on the central axis and balance wheels to either side to keep the platform level. The balance wheels could be arranged as castor wheels.

We can also envisage configurations with more than four wheels.

The soft target movement platform may be longer in the central longitudinal axis direction than its width, the axles being transverse to this axis. In this case the position and orientation of the central longitudinal axis are self-evident. In the 10 preferred embodiment, the soft target movement platform is effectively square. In this case, the position and orientation of the central longitudinal axis is analogous. However for the avoidance of doubt, it can be said that the axis is transverse the axles and midway between any two of the wheels on one or other of the axles.

By “independent of each other” steering is intended that the front or rear one(s) of the wheel(s) are steered whilst the rear or front wheel(s) are not steered, i.e. remain straight ahead, with the centre of steering being on the non-steered one of the axes.

By “dependent of each other” steering is intended that the steering of individual wheels is a function of the steering of the others. Examples are:

• steering of all, usually four, wheels equally, whereby platform steers along an oblique straight axis, • steering of the front wheel(s) equally and oppositely to that of the rear wheels, whereby the centre of steering is on an transverse axis midway between the axles;

• steering of the front wheels to a great extent than the rear wheels, whereby the centre of steering is on an transverse axis behind the rear axle.

It will be understood that references above to equal steering include allowance for Ackermann steering whereby actual angles to which the wheels are steered differ for wheels inboard and outboard with respect to the centre of steering.

To help understanding of the invention, a specific embodiment thereof will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

Figure 1 is a perspective view of a soft target movement platform in accordance with the invention;

Figure 2 is a side view of the platform of Figure 1;

Figure 3 is an underneath view (without an underside cover) of the platform of Figure 1;

Figure 4 is view similar to Figure 3 with only part of the platform shown, but in greater detail;

Figure 5 is an underside view of a drive unit of the platform of Figure 1;

Figure 6 is a side view of the drive unit of Figure 5 in rebound position, with its wheel shown in outline;

Figure 7 is view similar to Figure 6 in bump position;

Figure 8 is a view similar to Figure 6, including the wheel and showing its lever arm with respect the motor;

Figure 9 is a cross-sectional view on the line B-B in Figure 8, through the centre of the wheel’s shaft;

Figure 10 is a cross-sectional view on the line C-C in Figure 8, through the centre of the motor’s rotor shaft;

Figure 11 is a perspective view of the drive unit’s suspension spring;

Figure 12 is a perspective view of the drive unit’s entire suspension and Figure 13 is a steering angle diagram for the platform.

Referring to the drawings, a soft target movement platform 1 has:

• A body 2 provided with a deck 3 on which a soft target (not shown) can be mounted, via a clamp 4. The target may be longer than the platform. Thus a simulated pedal or motor bicycle can be supported by a platform that is shorter than it. Typically the platform is of a size to accommodate the footprint of a simulated pedestrian;

• Ramps 5 around the central deck 3, to allow an automobile wheel to run over the platform in the event that a simulated collision occurs;

• Wheels 6 normally extending by a small amount below edges 6 of the ramps providing a small ground clearance C between the ramps and a road surface R on which the platform is being used.

The illustrated embodiment has four wheels 6, provided in respective handed but otherwise identical drive units 11. Each has generally “h” shaped carrier 12, with the upper limb being a steering arm 14, the two lower limbs 15 having motor journals 16 at their ends 17 and the middle portion 18 carring a pair of inwardly directed king pin studs 19 which engage in a tongue 20 fixed to the underside of the deck 3. Whilst the limbs are described with reference to their position in the “h”, they are of course arranged generally horizontally in use of the platform. The motor journaled between the limbs 15 is a DC motor 21, capable of high revolutions per minute for driving the platform at simulation speeds without rotational speed reduction to the wheels, which are necessarily small. The deck is of the order of 13mm above the road R in typical use, in other words C is typically 13mm. The journals 16 include plain bearings 22 encircling spigots 23 at the ends of a housing 24 of the motor. The journals are concentric with rotor bearings (not shown) within the motor. The drive end spigot 23 is fast with a portion 25 of the housing 24, in which is a 1:1 gear transfer. This has a first gear 26 fast with a motor output shaft 27 and a second gear 28, meshed with the first, and fast with an output shaft 29 to which the wheel 6 is fitted, the gears having equal numbers of teeth.

As seen in Figure 8, the wheels 6 are arranged at a lever arm 31 with respect to the motor, whereby wheel loads tend to turn the motors with respect to the carriers. This turning is resisted at each drive unit by a spring 32, not visible in Figure 5, but arranged above a plate 33 fast with the carrier portion 18. Above the plate is a rod 34 located between two lugs 35,36 fixed to the plate 33. The lug 35 at the wheel end of the unit carries a pulley 37 around which a cable 38 passes from a capstan groove 39 in the motor housing. An end of the cable is fast at a point 40 at the end of the groove remote from the pulley. The other end passes through the rod and bears at its end remote from the pulley on a knuckle 41 pressing on a spring cup 42 carried on the rod. This has slots 43 for the knuckle to extend from. It will be appreciated that upwards movement of the wheel tensions the cable and draws the spring cup along the rod towards the pulley. The cup 42 transfers wheel-load-induced force in the cable to the spring.

In normal, unladen state of the platform, a rebound stop 44 on a bracket 45 fast with the motor-housing portion 25 bears against the respective one of the limbs 15 to retain tension in the cable 38 and compression in the spring 32. If the platform is run over, the edges 7 of the ramps are grounded with the wheels being driven upwards with respect to the pressed down platform. This action turns the motors, with compression of the springs. Thus damage to the drive units is avoided. It will be noted that the wheel end limb 15 is scalloped at 46, to accommodate the spigot 23 of the motor-housing portion 25 through which the wheel shaft 29 passes.

Turning now from suspension of the platform to its steering, the four drive units are provided as a front pair and a rear pair in notional front and rear axles F,R. When all the wheels are all aligned with a central longitudinal axis A of the platform their individual axes f,r are aligned. The steering arms 14 are pivoted at their ends 51, which are inwards directed, to the outer ends of tie rods 52. The inner ends of these are pivoted to a displacement member 53. This is carried on a lead screw 55, itself driven by a servo motor 56. There is no mechanical connection between these steering components for the front axle and those for the rear axle. Indeed the mechanical components, drive, suspension and steering, are identical for both axles and their designation as front and rear is arbitrary based on the direction in which the platform is set up to travel when a remote control is activated. The platform will normally have a forwards marking D on it.

It will be noted that with the steering at both axles being mechanically independent, the servo motors can operated either • For steering of the front axles carriers and wheels only, as for instance a trolley with front castor wheels or • For steering of the rear axles carriers and wheels only, as for instance a trolley with rear castor wheels or • For steering of the front and rear axles carriers and wheels only, as for instance a trolley with front and rear castor wheels, with random steering at the axles.

The separation of the axles of the platform can be expected to be greater than those of a shopping trolley, so for a front castor wheel trolley, the platform will simulate manoeuvring by steering with an instantaneous centre of steering at the trolley’s rear axle, i.e. behind the platform. For trolley rear wheel steering, the opposite is needed.

How this is achieved can be understood with reference to Figure 12, which shows:

• The front wheels steered to an angle a - with a small Ackermann difference δ in a between the left and right wheels, • The rear wheels steered to an angle β, • The point of intersection of the front and rear wheel axes* intersection, i.e. the centre of steering S (shown as a single point although in practice the intersection is likely to be a small quadrilateral, giving rise to a minor amount of wheel scrub) • The point S is offset laterally, that is to the side of the central axis A by a distance Q, designating the quantum of steering. The smaller Q is, the greater is the angular rate of change of direction of the platform and • The point is offset longitudinally, that is in front or behind the mid-line L between the front and rear axles F,R, by a distance M, designating the mode of steering. It will be appreciated that for a trolley for instance giving rise to a fixed M in accordance with its size and whether it is front or rear wheel steering, the front and rear wheels of the platform will be steered to different angles a and β according to the desired Q. That said, the actual values of the angles a and β, i,e the displacement of the front and rear steering members 53 and the angular rotation of the servo motor 56 are readily determined for desired values of Q and M.

In the particular case of Figure 1, M is equal to zero, i.e. the point of axes intersection I centre of steering S is on the mid-line L. In this case the wheels are steered equally and oppositely, with a = - β. This mode gives the tightest turning circle for the platform, which is useful in simulating a pedestrian making a tight turn.

The servo motors are under the control of a controller 57. Normally it will have a mode set initially as a value of M and receive steering magnitude signals Q from the remote control. Thence it calculates and applies servo signals appropriate for a and β. The actual control programming is expected to be within the capabilities 5 of the skilled reader.

The invention is not intended to be restricted to the details of the above described embodiment. For instance the clamp 4 can be replaced by devices which release when a force threshold has been reached, such as magnetic holders or Velcro 10 pads or straps. The 1:1 gear drive of the wheels by their motors can be replaced by a reduction drive or even an over-drive according to the motors’ performance and the platform’s required speed.

Claims

1. A soft target movement platform comprising:

2. A soft target movement platform as claimed in claim 1, wherein:

• the said platform has a central longitudinal axis and • the steerable wheels are arranged as three or four wheels of which:

3. A soft target movement platform as claimed in claim 2, wherein a said single wheel provided at an axle position is on the central longitudinal axis.

4. A soft target movement platform as claimed in claim 2 or claim 3, wherein the two wheels provided at an axle position are:

• substantially equally spaced on either side of the central longitudinal axis and • preferably are also provided at substantially the same position along the axis, • on a single physical axle, such as a live axle, or • independently in a notional axle.

5. A soft target movement platform as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the axles are substantially at right angles to the central longitudinal axis.

6. A soft target movement platform as claimed in claim 1, having a configuration with front and rear wheels on the central axis and balance wheels to either side to

5 08 18 keep the platform level, the balance wheels preferably being arranged as castor wheels.

7. A soft target movement platform as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the said platform is longer in the central longitudinal axis direction than its width, the

5 axles being transverse to this axis.

8. A soft target movement platform as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the said platform is effectively square, the longitudinal axis being transverse the axles and midway between any two of the wheels on one or other of the axles.

9. A soft target movement platform as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the

10 selective steering mechanism is adapted to steer the front and rear wheels independently of each other whereby, the steering of the front or rear one(s) of the wheel(s) is nt a function of the steering of the rear or front one(s) of the wheel(s).

10. A soft target movement platform as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the selective steering mechanism is adapted to steer the front and rear wheels

15 dependently of each other, i.e. as a function of each other.

11. A soft target movement platform as claimed in claim 10, wherein the function is such that:

• steering of all, usually four, wheels equally, whereby platform steers along an oblique straight axis,

20 · steering of the front wheel(s) equally and oppositely to that of the rear wheels, whereby the centre of steering is on an transverse axis midway between the axles;

• steering of the front wheels to a great extent than the rear wheels, whereby the centre of steering is on an transverse axis behind the rear axle,

25 wherein references to equal steering include allowance for Ackermann steering, whereby actual angles to which the wheels are steered differ for wheels inboard and outboard with respect to the centre of steering.