GB2350677A - Enzyme detection - Google Patents

Enzyme detection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2350677A
GB2350677A GB9913051A GB9913051A GB2350677A GB 2350677 A GB2350677 A GB 2350677A GB 9913051 A GB9913051 A GB 9913051A GB 9913051 A GB9913051 A GB 9913051A GB 2350677 A GB2350677 A GB 2350677A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
enzyme
polymer
substrate
signal
detecting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB9913051A
Other versions
GB9913051D0 (en
Inventor
Steffi Krause
Claire Sumner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CAMBRIDGE LIFE SCIENCES
Cambridge Life Sciences PLC
Original Assignee
CAMBRIDGE LIFE SCIENCES
Cambridge Life Sciences PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CAMBRIDGE LIFE SCIENCES, Cambridge Life Sciences PLC filed Critical CAMBRIDGE LIFE SCIENCES
Priority to GB9913051A priority Critical patent/GB2350677A/en
Publication of GB9913051D0 publication Critical patent/GB9913051D0/en
Priority to EP00936818A priority patent/EP1185688A2/en
Priority to PCT/EP2000/004855 priority patent/WO2000075360A2/en
Publication of GB2350677A publication Critical patent/GB2350677A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/34Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving hydrolase
    • C12Q1/37Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving hydrolase involving peptidase or proteinase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/34Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving hydrolase
    • C12Q1/44Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving hydrolase involving esterase
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/58Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving labelled substances
    • G01N33/581Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving labelled substances with enzyme label (including co-enzymes, co-factors, enzyme inhibitors or substrates)

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)

Abstract

A method for detecting the presence of an enzyme comprises contacting the sample to be analysed with a substrate part of which is covered with a layer of a biodegradable polymer. The polymer is degraded by the enzyme to produce a measureable signal. The signal is typically detected by measuring changes in the polymer layer using surface plasmon resonance, ellipsometry, impedance spectroscopy or capacitance measurements. Substrate can be an electrode, transducer or a capacitor. Enzyme is e.g. a protease, dextranase or a pepsin. Utility is in immunoassay.

Description

2350677 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EZYME DETECTION
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method for detecting the presence of an enzyme, and an apparatus for use in the method. Backaround of the Inventio 10 Enzyme electrodes are well known in the art. For example, WO 87/07295 and WO 89/03871 disclose enzyme electrodes capable of responding amperometrically to the catalytic activity of the enzyme in the presence of its respective substrates, wherein the enzyme is immobilised or adsorbed onto the surface of an electrically conductive 15 support member. The advantages of amperometric biosensors which incorporate enzymes have been reviewed in some detail (Aston and Turner, Biotech. Genet. Eng. Rev. 1984, 1, 89120, ed. G. Russell, Intercept, Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Davis G., Biosensors, 1985, 20 1, 161-178). The biosensors discussed therein vary in the mode of signal transduction and are loosely classified as (a) those in which the electrical response arises from the oxidation of a product of the enzyme reaction at an electrode, (b) "mediator assisted" reactions in which the electrons are transported from the enzyme to the electrode with the aid of an oxidation-reduction ("redox") reagent, or 25 (c) "direct electron transfer (DET) in which no such mediator assistance is required. There are several disadvantages associated with the use of a mediator in signal transduction, including the possibility of the mediator leaching out from the region containing the biocatalyst, diffusion limitations of oxidised and/or reduced forms, 30 and the inherent instability of the mediator itself As a consequence, mediatorless biosensors have been targeted as an alternative (Tarasevich, Bioelectrochemistry, 1985, 10, 231-295).
2 Ianeillo et al (1982) Anal Chem 54, 1098-1101, describes mediatorless sensors In which glucose oxidase and L-amino acid oxidase were covalently bonded to a graphite electrode by the cyanuric chloride method. However, it was shown that these enzyme electrodes had only a limited working lifetime (laniello and Yacynynch, Anal Chem 1981, 53, 2090-2095).
Up to now, mediatorless enzyme electrodes have often incorporated conducting organic polymers, e.g. structural units similar to that of methyl viologen, and/or conducting organic salts such as NMP+TCNQ_ (N-methyl phenazinium tetracyano 4-quinodimethane) which modify the properties of the electrode and fulfil the role of mediators. However, due to the instability of many conducting polymers, mediatorless electrodes of this type commonly exhibited a short half life and were often oxygen sensitive.
More recently, a novel sensor principle based on measurement of capacitance changes produced during enzyme catalysed dissolution of polymer coatings on electrodes has been developed (McNeil, C.J.; Athey, D.; Ball, M.; Ho, W.O. ; Krause, S.; Armstrong, R.D.; Wright, J.D.; Rawson, K., Anal Chem 1995, 67, 3928-3935). Electrodes were coated with a biodegradable coating, a copolymer of methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid. Dissolution is exemplified by a localised increase in pH near the surface of the coating due to the enzymatic reaction between urea and urease. Film degradation is accompanied by an increase in capacitance of up to four orders of magnitude. The method has been developed into a fast and simple disposable sensor for urea in serum and whole blood (Ho, W.O., Krause, S., McNeil, C.J., Pritchard, J.A., Armstrong, R.D., Athey, D. and Rawson, K.
1999 'Electrochemical sensor for measurement of urea and creatinine in serum based on AC impedance measurement of enzyme-catalyzed polymer breakdown'.
Anal Chem In Press). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the high sensitivity and the fast response of this technique could be utilised for immunosensing using urease as the enzyme label.
3 However, there are several drawbacks associated vith the above method, including the time required to produce the localised pH change to dissolve the polymer, the addition of an enzyme substrate and the need to wash (remove) excess enzyme label. Furthermore, following the polymer degradation by capacitance measurements only works effectively if the polymer coating is sufficiently insulating.
Thus, the present invention is advantageous as it addresses the aforementioned problems associated with the prior art.
Statements of Invention
In a broad aspect, the present invention provides sensors based on the enzyme- induced degradation of polymer films.
In one embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method for detecting the presence of an enzyme comprising contacting the sample to be analysed with a substrate, at least part of which is covered with a layer of a biodegradable polymer, said polymer being degraded by said enzyme to produce a signal; and measuring any signal produced.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the signal is measured by detecting changes in the polymer layer using quartz crystal microbalance.
In a second preferred embodiment of the invention the signal is measured by detecting changes in the polymer layer using surface plasmon resonance.
In a third preferred embodiment of the invention the signal is measured by detecting changes in the polymer layer using ellipsometry.
In a fourth preferred embodiment of the invention the signal is measured by 4 detecting changes in the polymer layer using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
In a fifth preferred embodiment, the signal is measured by detecting changes in the 5 polymer layer using capacitance measurements.
In one embodiment of the present invention the substrate is an electrode.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the substrate is a capacitor. 10 In another embodiment of the present invention the substrate is a transducer.
Preferably, the transducer is an electrochemical transducer, an optical transducer or a capacitor.
The enzymes of the present invention may be the analytes present in the sample or introduced as part of reagent system (e.g. an immunoassay label to detect an analyte present in the sample).
In one embodiment of the invention the biodegradable polymer is a poly (esteramide) and the enzyme is a protease.
In another embodiment of the invention, the biodegradable polymer is a dextran hydrogel and the enzyme is a dextrana e.
In another embodiment of the invention, the biodegradable polymer is an albumin crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone hydrogel and the enzyme is a pepsin In another embodiment of the invention, the biodegradable polymer is a polyester 30 such as poly (trimethylene succinate) and the enzyme is a lipase.
In a further embodiment the invention provides an assay comprising the steps of bringing a sample to be detected for the presence,,of an analyte into contact with a substrate comprising binding sites for the analyte, in the presence of a conjugate of the analyte and an enzyme label; and detecting the presence of unbound conjugate using the method of the present invention.
Preferably the samples used in the current invention are in the form of an aqueous sample, or a biological fluid, for example, blood, urine, serum, plasma or saliva.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus for detecting the 10 presence of an enzyme according to the method of any preceding claim comprising a substrate, at least part of which is covered with a biodegradable polymer.
Detailed Desgliption of the Inventio 15 Various preferred features and embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of non-limiting example with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Fig. 1 shows the structure of poly(ester amide).
Fig. 2 shows SPR measurements showing degradation at different concentrations of (x-chymotrypsin: (a) 4xlO-10M, (b) 4xlO-9M, (c) 9.6xlO9M, (d) 2x104M, (e) 2.8xlO-'3M, (f) 4x1CF8M, (g) 1.2xlO-7M, (h) 2.8x1O -7 M. (where 1 element = 5.3x10-3 degrees.) Fig. 3 shows calibration curves for cc-chymotrypsin assay for different molecular weights of poly(ester amide). 30 Fig. 4 shows impedance measurements during degradation of poly (trimethylene succinate) in the presence of lipase.
6 Fig. 5 shows SPR measurements during degradation of poly(trimethylene succinate) films at different concentrations of lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens (42.5 U/mg).
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, biodegradable polymer films are deposited onto the transducer surface of known thickness and are then dissolved (degraded) directly due to an enzyme or enzyme label acting on the polymer film. The enzyme or enzyme label is in close proximity or attached to the polymer film.
The films proposed in the present sensor system are very homogeneous and respond in a matter of minutes due to enzyme amplification, thus resulting in higher sensitivities and lower limits of detection. Coating degradation may be followed using SPR, QCM or ellipsometry and the rate of dissolution of the film has been shown to be directly related to the concentration of enzyme.
Thus the present invention provides a new generic sensor format using biodegradable polymers such as poly (ester amides) which can be degraded specifically as a direct result of an enzymatic reaction. The major advantage over the prior art is that the electrode coating itself serves as the enzyme substrate, i.e.
no additional enzyme substrate needs to be added or immobilised in order to mediate between the enzymatic reaction and the electrode coating. The present invention simplifies the sensor by reducing the number of sensor components and reactants as well as removing the absolute requirement for additional washing steps in the immunoassay. As a consequence, production costs should be reduced and the sensor systems should display increased reliability.
The signals measured in the present invention may be produced in response to a reduction of the polymer layer on the substrate, either in terms of the area of the substrate covered by the polymer layer, or in terms of the depth of the polymer layer. The signal may also be produced in response to the quality of the polymer layer, for example in terms of pore fromation, swelling and/or delamination.
7 Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM),. surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and ellipsometry may be used to determine properties of surfaces and thin films. All of these techniques have been applied successfully to biosensing, especially to monitoring of direct binding events between antigens and antibodies (Rickert, J,; Brecht, A.; Gopel, W., Biosensors and Bioelectronics 1997, 12, 567-575: Toyama, S.; Shoji, A.; Yoshida, Y.; Yamauchi, S.; Ikariyama, Y., Sensors and Actuators B Chemical 1998, 52, 65-71: Arwin, H., 77zin Solid Filins 1998, 313-314, 764-774).
Direct binding produces changes to the electrode surfaces that are more indicative of a porous layer, resulting in very small changes being observed.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy provides information about film properties such as incomplete coverage, pore formation, swelling and delamination. The initial film quality and film degradation of the present invention may be studied using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy over a frequency range from 0. lniHz to lOOkHz. In addition to the information extracted from impedance spectroscopy, impedance measurements at quartz crystals provide data such as changes in mass and the visco-elastic properties of the films during degradation. In order to extract this information, the quartz-crystal impedance spectra may be fitted to the equivalent circuit of a coated quartz crystal given in Auge, J.; Hauptmann, P.; Eichelbaum, F.; Rosler, S., Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 1994, 19, 518-522.
Typically, impedance measurements are performed at polymer coated quartz crystals at a number of frequencies close to the resonance frequency of 10 MHz.
The term degradation is used in its conventional sense, i.e., a chemical reaction in which a compound is converted, or decomposes in some way, to give a simpler compound, for example, by dissolution. Monitoring film degradation using QCM, SPR, ellipsometry or electrochemical impedance spectroscopy has shown that the rate of dissolution of the polymer film is directly related to the enzyme concentration. Thus, using this system for the development of a generic immunosensor with enzyme as the antigen and antibody label has the advantage that no enzyme substrate needs to be added. The electrode coating itself serves as the substrate thus making the electrode an integral part of the sensing process and 8 eliminating washing steps otherwise required in stapdard immunoassay techniques.
The electrodes of the present invention are noble metal electrodes. Noble metals include metals such as gold, silver and platinum, or alloys thereof, which display resistance to corrosion or oxidation. Preferably the electrode is gold. Typically, the gold is deposited by thermal evaporation onto a chromium coated glass slide. The thickness of the gold coating may vary considerably, but is usually between 20 and nm. Preferably, the thickness of the gold coating is between 45 and 80 nm.
The substrate is coated with a film of the biodegradable material. The film may range from monolayers to several hundred nm thick. Preferably, the film is from 5 to 100 nm thick. More preferably, the film is 10 to 100 nm thick. Typically, the films are deposited on the surface of the substrate by spin-coating using, a solution of the polymer in an appropriate solvent (for example, chloroform, or acetone).
The biodegradable films degrade rapidly under the catalytic action of a specific enzyme directed to the polymer used to coat the substrate.
The preferred coatings in the present application degrade within a matter of seconds or minutes in the presence of a single enzyme, thereby leading to a fast sensor response. In contrast, up to now, most biodegradable materials described in the literature are reported to degrade over the course of several hours or days (Arabuli, N.; Tsitlanadze, G.; Edilashvili, L.; Kharadze, D.; Goguadze, T.; Beridze, V.; Gornurashvili, Z.; Katsarava, R., Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 1994, 195, 2279-2289; Brondsted, H.; Hovgaard, L.; Simonsen, L., Srp Pharma Sciences 1995, 5, 60-64). Thus the present invention provides a sensor displaying short response times.
The assay of the present invention typically employs binding pairs. A nonexclusive list of commonly used binding pairs includes avidin/biotin, antibody/antigen, haptens and nucleic acid (DNA and RNA). Generally, when the binding pair is antibody/antigen the assay is referred to as an immunonassay. Other biosubstances capable of molecular recognition include lectins for saccharides, hormone receptors 9 for hormones and drug receptors for drugs and active drug metabolites.
In a preferred aspect, the method of the present invention is used for performing an immunoassay.
Typically, in enzyme immunoassays, an enzyme is used as a label or marker which is bound to one member of the antigen-anotibody pair identical to that in the sample to be measured. The enzyme bound antigenlantibody then competes with the sample antigenlantibody for the binding site on a limited supply of its complement antibodylantigen.
Classical methods for immunoassay include:
(i) a capture antibody on a solid phase, such as a plastic microtitre plate, exposure to the biological sample to attach the antigen of interest, washing and then exposure to a second labelled antibody. The label on the antibody may be an enzyme for example. Further washing is followed by detection of the label (and hence the amount of antigen in the original sample). This is known as a sandwich assay or two-site assay.
(ii) a capture antibody on the solid phase followed by exposure to the biological sample containing antigen and an added amount of labelled antigen. Labelled and unlabelled antigen compete on the solid phase for the antibody sites. The amount of label revealed after washing is inversely proportional to the amount of true antigen in the biological sample. This is known as a competitive assay.
The concept of integrating enzyme and immunoassay techniques into the sensor devices disclosed in the present invention thus offers the prospect of reagentless analysis with little or no sample preparation. The major advantage of this approach for medical use is ease of operation, thereby allowing deployment of sensors in decentralised laboratories and facilitating a more rapid return of clinical information. The net benefit is an earlier institution of appropriate therapy.
In a preferred embodiment an immunosensor can be produced where the sample flows through a series of zones. The first of these, is a blood separation membrane, which removes the cellular component. In the next zone, the capture antibody or antigen is immobilised on a substrate such as nitrocellulose membrane or polystyrene. A sample is introduced containing the analyte to be measured and mixes with an enzyme/antigen or enzyme/antibody conjugate. The mixture of analyte and conjugate will then flow over the capture antibody or antigen. Both conjugate and analyte compete for the binding sites. Flow through the capture membrane will remove some of the enzyme-analyte conjugate in a competitive manner. In the next zone, the unbound complex reaches the biodegradable polymer and causes it to degrade. The rate of polymer dissolution is directly proportional to the amount of analyte in the sample. The immunoassay can be set up in the competitive or sandwich assay format.
The present invention is further illustrated by way of the following nonlimiting examples.
Exa=le I One such biodegradable material is poly (ester amide) shown in Figure 1. Poly (ester amides) of 18800 g mol-1, 10218 g mol-1 and 6407 g mol-1 were synthesised by polycondensation as described in Arabuli, N.; Tsitlanadze, G.; Edilashvili, L.; Kharadze, D.; Goguadze, T.; Beridze, V.; Gomurashvili, Z.; Katsarava, R., Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 1994, 195, 2279-2289. The polydispersity of the polymer was lowered to 1.28 using fractionation. 3 am chromium and then 45 nm gold were thermally evaporated onto the whole surface of the glass slides.
The shape is not critical as the laser beam hits the middle of the surface. The gold layer is on top of the chromium and therefore always in contact with the polymer.
The two metals were deposited without opening the evaporator in between. 10 nm thick films of the poly (ester amides) were spin-coated onto the gold surface from a 0. 13 w% solution of the polymer in chloroform at a speed of 3000 rpm. The polymer films were left to dry at room temperature for at least 24 hours.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and SPR were used to characterise the polymer films and to follow their degradation inthe presence of achyrnotrypsin. The cell was thermostated at 25'C to eliminate any effect that temperature changes may cause in the rate of the polymer degradation. The detection system of the SPR monitor essentially consists of a monochromatic and polarised light source, a glass 5 prism, a thin metal film in contact with the prism, and a photodetector.
The polymer was degraded rapidly by the proteolytic enzyme ccchyrnotrypsin. The rate of hydrolysis of esters is 105 times higher than the corresponding amides when both are catalysed by (x-chymotrypsin (Arabuli, N.; Tsitlanadze, G.; Edilashvili, L.; Kharadze, D.; Goguadze, T. ; Beridze, V.; Gomurashvili, Z.; Katsarava, R., Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 1994, 195, 2279-2289), i.e.
cc-chymotrypsin preferentially attacks the ester bonds. (x-Chymotrypsin is also a suitable enzyme label for immunosensing since it is virtually never present in the blood circulation.
The polymer films were shown to be stable in a pH 7.3 buffer containing 140 mM NaCI and 10 mM phosphate. Addition of (x-chymotrypsin to the buffer solution resulted in rapid and reproducible polymer breakdown. The degradation of the polymer was complete in less than 20 minutes for enzyme concentrations greater than 9x1079 mol/1 (see Figure 2). After an initial period the SPR response changed linearly with time. To obtain a calibration graph, the slopes of the linear region of the breakdown curves in Figure 2 were calculated and the data presented in Figure 3. Using the rate of change as a measure for the enzyme concentration rather than the time needed to degrade the film completely has the advantage, that considerably lower enzyme concentrations can be detected in a reasonable period of time.
However, to visualise the sensitivity over the whole concentration range, a logarithmic plot is shown (Figure 3). The calibration graph (Figure 3) shows that cc-chymotrypsin concentrations as low as 4x10-10 mol/1 could be detected in less than 30 minutes. The degradation was shown to be dependent on the enzyme concentration. Thus, the system can be used as part of an immunosensor based on the detection of a-chymotrypsin concentrations - 12 Exa=le 2 S Polyesters such as poly (trimethylene succinate) can be hydrolysed by lipases. The dissolution of poly (trimethylene succinate) powder and films was investigated by Walter, T.; Augusta, J.; Muller, R.J.; Widdecke, H.; Klein, J., Enzyme and Microbial Technology 1995, 17, 218-224. The enzyme activity for the interaction of lipase with an insoluble substrate was found to be highly reproducible. Succinic acid (38.8g, 0.33mol) and 1,3-propanediol (26.25mL, 0.33mol) were mixed in a flask under nitrogen with mechanical stirring and heated slowly to 9011C. Methane sulphonic acid (0.071g, 0.07mmol) was then added and the temperature raised to 1000C. Water vapour was evolved and collected using a microdistillation head. The reaction was left overnight at 1000C then cooled to give a thick orange oil. Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPQ showed that the molecular weight was still very low so 28.Og of the pale orange oil was further reacted with (0. 10g, lmmol) of 15 the catalyst overnight at around 1000C, the temperature was then increased to 1401C to remove any excess water. The polymer was then isolated by precipitation from methanol overnight to give a high molecular weight fraction of polymer. Total yield was 3g. GPC - Mw = 5765, Polydispersity = 1.212 Glass substrates were prepared from microscope slides and washed by boiling in 20 50:50 nitric acid (70%): hydrogen peroxide for 5 minutes. The slides were then washed with ultra pure water and dust free methanol before blow-drying with nitrogen. Chromium was then deposited to give a - 20nm layer, followed by an - 80nm layer of gold. Vacuum deposition was carried out with an Edwards E306A coating system, and an IL150 quartz crystal rate monitor was used to monitor the 25 deposition rate and layer thickness. The gold-coated slides were spin-coated with the poly (trimethylene succinate) using acetone as the solvent and a concentration of 0.093g/mL of the polymer. As previously the electrodes were dried for 24h at room temperature before use. All the impedance measurements were performed using an Autolab frequency response analyser. Measurements were conducted at 30 zero potential using a 2-electrode system with a platinum electrode as the counter electrode in parallel to the polymer coated gold electrode The polymer coated metallised glass slides were placed into the bottom of a Perspex well. The 13 dimensions of the measuring area were determiped by an 0-ring with an inner diameter of 7 mm which formed the waterproof connection between the metallised glass slide and the well. A platinum coil was placed opposite the working electrode at a distance of 4 mm and served as the counter electrode. The electrodes were characterised in 0.5n1L of a pH 7.4 buffer solution containing 1OmM phosphate and 10OmM sodium chloride. The effect of the enzyme addition was investigated.
Measurements were performed at a single frequency (3.5kHz) every 10s. O. SmL of lipase solution (Img/mI of lipase from Pseudomonasfluorescens with an activity of 42.5 Wrng in buffer) was added after around 20 min. The result (Figure 4) shows polymer degradation.
The degradation of poly (trimethylene succinate) films in the presence of different concentrations of lipase was also followed using SPR measurements (Figure 5).
Substrate preparation, spin coating and SPR measurements were carried out under the same conditions as described in Example 1.
14

Claims (17)

Claims 1
1. A method for detecting the presence of an enzyme comprising contacting the sample to be analysed with a substrate, at least part of which is covered with a layer of a biodegradable polymer, said polymer being degraded by said enzyme to produce a signal; and measuring any signal produced.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the signal is measured by detecting changes in the polymer layer using quartz crystal microbalance.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the signal is measured by detecting changes in the polymer layer using surface plasmon resonance.
4. A method according to claim I wherein the signal is measured by detecting 15 changes in the polymer layer using ellipsometry.
5. A method according to claim I wherein the signal is measured by detecting changes in the polymer layer using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
6. A method according to claim 1 wherein the signal is measured by detecting changes in the polymer layer using capacitance measurements.
7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the substrate is a transducer.
8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the substrate is an electrode.
9. A method according to claim 7 wherein the substrate is a capacitor.
10. A method according to claim 7 wherein the transducer is an electrochemical 30 transducer or an optical transducer.
11. A method according to any preceding qlairn wherein the biodegradable polymer is a poly (ester-amide) and the enzyme is a protease.
12. A method according to any one of claims I to 10 wherein the biodegradable 5 polymer is a dextran hydrogel and the enzyme is a dextrana e.
13. A method according to any one of claims I to 10 wherein the biodegradable polymer is an albumin crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone hydrogel and the enzyme is a pepsin.
14. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein the biodegradable polymer is a polyester such as poly (trimethylene succinate) and the enzyme is a lipase.
15. An assay comprising the steps of bringing a sample to be detected for the presence of an analyte into contact with a substrate comprising binding sites for the analyte, in the presence of a conjugate of the analyte and an enzyme label; and detecting the presence of unbound conjugate using the method of any one of claims 1 to 14.
16. A method according to any preceding claim wherein the sample is an aqueous sample, or a biological fluid.
17. An apparatus for detecting the presence of an enzyme according to the method of any preceding claim comprising a substrate, at least part of which is covered with a biodegradable polymer.
GB9913051A 1999-06-04 1999-06-04 Enzyme detection Withdrawn GB2350677A (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9913051A GB2350677A (en) 1999-06-04 1999-06-04 Enzyme detection
EP00936818A EP1185688A2 (en) 1999-06-04 2000-05-27 Method and apparatus for enzyme detection
PCT/EP2000/004855 WO2000075360A2 (en) 1999-06-04 2000-05-27 Method and apparatus for enzyme detection

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9913051A GB2350677A (en) 1999-06-04 1999-06-04 Enzyme detection

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9913051D0 GB9913051D0 (en) 1999-08-04
GB2350677A true GB2350677A (en) 2000-12-06

Family

ID=10854768

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB9913051A Withdrawn GB2350677A (en) 1999-06-04 1999-06-04 Enzyme detection

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1185688A2 (en)
GB (1) GB2350677A (en)
WO (1) WO2000075360A2 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007096637A1 (en) * 2006-02-23 2007-08-30 Mologic Ltd Protease detection
WO2008047095A1 (en) 2006-10-16 2008-04-24 Queen Mary & Westfield College Method
WO2008135930A1 (en) * 2007-05-03 2008-11-13 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Sensor system based on compound with solubility depending on analyte concentration
US7611860B2 (en) 2000-10-13 2009-11-03 Cambridge Meditech Limited Indicator for in-situ detecting of lysozyme
CN101796402A (en) * 2007-09-06 2010-08-04 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 The chemico-analytic method and apparatus that is used for fluid
WO2011069997A3 (en) * 2009-12-09 2011-11-17 Iti Scotland Limited Detecting analytes
WO2012013937A1 (en) 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Queen Mary & Westfield College Sensor coasting layer, device and method
US8241588B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2012-08-14 Mologic Ltd Binding assay
US8361386B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2013-01-29 Mologic Ltd Enzyme detection
GB2514825A (en) * 2013-06-06 2014-12-10 Univ Bangor Sensors

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103555817B (en) * 2013-10-09 2015-08-19 上海工程技术大学 The dynamic degradation method of high-molecular biologic degradable material
CN107727861B (en) * 2017-08-22 2019-10-22 厦门依柯利斯医疗科技有限公司 A kind of pepsin assay kit and measuring method
US20200323469A1 (en) * 2017-11-08 2020-10-15 Mölnlycke Health Care Ab Novel biosensor and related wound dressing system

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4444892A (en) * 1980-10-20 1984-04-24 Malmros Mark K Analytical device having semiconductive organic polymeric element associated with analyte-binding substance
EP0311768A2 (en) * 1987-08-19 1989-04-19 Ohmicron Corporation Immunosensor
US5015843A (en) * 1990-02-15 1991-05-14 Polysense, Inc. Fiber optic chemical sensors based on polymer swelling
EP0467219A2 (en) * 1990-07-19 1992-01-22 Bayer Corporation Conductive sensors and their use in diagnostic assays
GB2278447A (en) * 1993-05-29 1994-11-30 Cambridge Life Sciences Dielectric porosity change immunoassay
WO1994028414A1 (en) * 1993-05-29 1994-12-08 Cambridge Life Sciences Plc Sensors based on polymer transformation
WO1996004398A1 (en) * 1994-08-01 1996-02-15 Medisense Inc. Electrodes and their use in analysis
WO1998019153A1 (en) * 1996-10-26 1998-05-07 The Victoria University Of Manchester Sensor employing impedance measurements

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4444892A (en) * 1980-10-20 1984-04-24 Malmros Mark K Analytical device having semiconductive organic polymeric element associated with analyte-binding substance
EP0311768A2 (en) * 1987-08-19 1989-04-19 Ohmicron Corporation Immunosensor
US5015843A (en) * 1990-02-15 1991-05-14 Polysense, Inc. Fiber optic chemical sensors based on polymer swelling
EP0467219A2 (en) * 1990-07-19 1992-01-22 Bayer Corporation Conductive sensors and their use in diagnostic assays
GB2278447A (en) * 1993-05-29 1994-11-30 Cambridge Life Sciences Dielectric porosity change immunoassay
WO1994028414A1 (en) * 1993-05-29 1994-12-08 Cambridge Life Sciences Plc Sensors based on polymer transformation
WO1996004398A1 (en) * 1994-08-01 1996-02-15 Medisense Inc. Electrodes and their use in analysis
WO1998019153A1 (en) * 1996-10-26 1998-05-07 The Victoria University Of Manchester Sensor employing impedance measurements

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Analytical Chemistry 1995, 67, pages 3928 - 3935 *

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7611860B2 (en) 2000-10-13 2009-11-03 Cambridge Meditech Limited Indicator for in-situ detecting of lysozyme
US8241588B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2012-08-14 Mologic Ltd Binding assay
US8846328B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2014-09-30 Mologic Ltd Method for detecting the presence of a protease enzyme in a sample
US8361386B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2013-01-29 Mologic Ltd Enzyme detection
WO2007096637A1 (en) * 2006-02-23 2007-08-30 Mologic Ltd Protease detection
US7935497B2 (en) 2006-02-23 2011-05-03 Mologic Ltd Protease detection
US8278064B2 (en) 2006-10-16 2012-10-02 Queen Mary & Westfield College Method for detecting a protease
WO2008047095A1 (en) 2006-10-16 2008-04-24 Queen Mary & Westfield College Method
WO2008135930A1 (en) * 2007-05-03 2008-11-13 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Sensor system based on compound with solubility depending on analyte concentration
CN101796402A (en) * 2007-09-06 2010-08-04 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 The chemico-analytic method and apparatus that is used for fluid
WO2011069997A3 (en) * 2009-12-09 2011-11-17 Iti Scotland Limited Detecting analytes
WO2012013937A1 (en) 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Queen Mary & Westfield College Sensor coasting layer, device and method
GB2514825A (en) * 2013-06-06 2014-12-10 Univ Bangor Sensors
GB2514825B (en) * 2013-06-06 2017-11-08 Bangor Univ Sensors
US10591428B2 (en) 2013-06-06 2020-03-17 Bangor University Sensors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1185688A2 (en) 2002-03-13
WO2000075360A2 (en) 2000-12-14
GB9913051D0 (en) 1999-08-04
WO2000075360A3 (en) 2001-04-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Darain et al. Disposable amperometric immunosensor system for rabbit IgG using a conducting polymer modified screen-printed electrode
Darain et al. Development of an immunosensor for the detection of vitellogenin using impedance spectroscopy
Contractor et al. Conducting polymer-based biosensors
Aydın et al. Selective and ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensing of NSE cancer biomarker in human serum using epoxy-substituted poly (pyrrole) polymer modified disposable ITO electrode
EP0700520B1 (en) Sensors based on polymer transformation
Skládal Advances in electrochemical immunosensors
Justino et al. Review of analytical figures of merit of sensors and biosensors in clinical applications
Authier et al. Gold nanoparticle-based quantitative electrochemical detection of amplified human cytomegalovirus DNA using disposable microband electrodes
Pearson et al. Analytical aspects of biosensors
Chen et al. An electrochemical impedance immunosensor with signal amplification based on Au-colloid labeled antibody complex
Li et al. Molecularly imprinted sensor based on an enzyme amplifier for ultratrace oxytetracycline determination
Murugaiyan et al. Biosensors in clinical chemistry: An overview
JP4567333B2 (en) Method for manufacturing a highly sensitive potentiometric sensor
Lee et al. Disposable liposome immunosensor for theophylline combining an immunochromatographic membrane and a thick-film electrode
US20030119208A1 (en) Electrochemical immunosensor and kit and method for detecting biochemical anylyte using the sensor
EP0125139A2 (en) Assay techniques utilising specific binding agents
US6344333B2 (en) Reagent-free immunoassay monitoring electrode assembly
Cosnier et al. Poly (pyrrole–biotin): a new polymer for biomolecule grafting on electrode surfaces
JPH07301615A (en) Electro-biochemical method, system and electrode thereof fordetermining specimen under test, which is constituent of recognization pair in liquid medium
Viet et al. Gold-linked electrochemical immunoassay on single-walled carbon nanotube for highly sensitive detection of human chorionic gonadotropinhormone
Bozgeyik et al. A novel thin film amperometric urea biosensor based on urease-immobilized on poly (N-glycidylpyrrole-co-pyrrole)
JP3127301B2 (en) Analysis technology
GB2350677A (en) Enzyme detection
Du et al. Reagentless amperometric carbohydrate antigen 19-9 immunosensor based on direct electrochemistry of immobilized horseradish peroxidase
Ribeiro et al. Electrochemistry combined-surface plasmon resonance biosensors: A review

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)