GB2284121A - Data compression using wavelet transformation; tree pruning - Google Patents

Data compression using wavelet transformation; tree pruning Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2284121A
GB2284121A GB9421658A GB9421658A GB2284121A GB 2284121 A GB2284121 A GB 2284121A GB 9421658 A GB9421658 A GB 9421658A GB 9421658 A GB9421658 A GB 9421658A GB 2284121 A GB2284121 A GB 2284121A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
trees
wavelet transform
datapoints
pruned
zero
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB9421658A
Inventor
Ido Bettesh
Itzhak Florentin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State of Israel
Original Assignee
State of Israel
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State of Israel filed Critical State of Israel
Publication of GB2284121A publication Critical patent/GB2284121A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03HIMPEDANCE NETWORKS, e.g. RESONANT CIRCUITS; RESONATORS
    • H03H17/00Networks using digital techniques
    • H03H17/02Frequency selective networks
    • H03H17/0211Frequency selective networks using specific transformation algorithms, e.g. WALSH functions, Fermat transforms, Mersenne transforms, polynomial transforms, Hilbert transforms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/60Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding
    • H04N19/63Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding using sub-band based transform, e.g. wavelets
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/60Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding
    • H04N19/63Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding using sub-band based transform, e.g. wavelets
    • H04N19/635Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding using sub-band based transform, e.g. wavelets characterised by filter definition or implementation details
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/60Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding
    • H04N19/63Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding using sub-band based transform, e.g. wavelets
    • H04N19/64Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding using sub-band based transform, e.g. wavelets characterised by ordering of coefficients or of bits for transmission
    • H04N19/647Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding using sub-band based transform, e.g. wavelets characterised by ordering of coefficients or of bits for transmission using significance based coding, e.g. Embedded Zerotrees of Wavelets [EZW] or Set Partitioning in Hierarchical Trees [SPIHT]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/10Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
    • H04N19/102Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the element, parameter or selection affected or controlled by the adaptive coding

Description

2284121 A SYSTEM FOR COMPACTION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF WAVELET DATA
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to data processing systems generally and to systems utilizing wavelet transforms in particular.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Data processing typically involves transforming the data from one space to another The best known transformation is the Fourier transformation which transforms a signal from a time space to a frequency space, indicating thereby the frequency components of the input signal.
Recently, wavelet transforms have been developed where each wavelet transform has a different curving "wavelet" shape and the result of the transformation indicates to what extent the input signal, a digital signal, is formed of a combination of the different wavelets The article "Wavelets and Signal Processing", by Olivier Rioul and Martin Vetterli, published in IEEE SP Magazine October 1991, pp 14 38, describes prior art wavelet transform operations and is incorporated herein by reference.
Typically, wavelet transforms are implemented in a multi-resolution manner.
The prior art multi-resolution method and exemplary output, for a onedimensional signal, are illustrated in Figs 1 A and 2, respectively, to which reference is now made.
Shown in Fig 1 A are three "wavelet transform units" 10 a 10 c Each wavelet transform unit 10 a 10 c is formed of its respective wavelet low pass filter (WLPF) 12 a 12 c, wavelet high pass filter (WHPF) 14 a 14 c and samplers 16 a 16 c The wavelet low and high pass filters 12 a 12 c and 14 a 14 c break the signal into its high and low wavelet frequency components and the samplers 16 a 16 c sample the output of each filter, thereby changing the resolution of the signal For one-dimensional input signals, the samplers 16 a - 16 c typically take every second datapoint, thereby reducing the number of points by two with each level Other sampling rates can also be implemented.
Each transform unit 10 a 10 c operates on a different resolution signal.
Therefore, the elements of each transform unit are labeled to indicate the resolution level or iteration, 1 3, at which they operate, wherein the highest level has the lowest resolution (least number of points) The first transform unit l Oa operates on the input signal and the other transform units l Ob l Oc operate on the low frequency output signals of the transform unit i O a l Ob, respectively, of the level previous to it The signals of Fig 1 are labeled to indicate the level and whether they are the low (L) or high (H) frequency output of the level.
The output of a wavelet transform operation comprises the following signals, the high frequency output signals H 1 H 3 and the low frequency output signal L 3 of the last level The low frequency output signal of the highest level, in this example signal L 3, is herein called the 'core" signal.
An exemplary input signal, labeled 18, and its corresponding three high frequency output signals are shown in Fig 2 As can be seen, the resolution is reduced at each level Furthermore, the activity of the lower resolution signals is near at the inflection point of the input signal 18.
If the input signal 18 is an image or some other two-dimensional signal, the wavelet low and high pass filters can either be separable or nonseparable The operations for separable and non-separable filters are shown in Figs 1 B and i C, respectively, to which reference is now made.
The wavelet transform units 10 for separable filtering include low and high pass wavelet filters 1 la and 1 lb (Fig 1 B) and samplers 13 a for rows and low and high pass wavelet filters 1 lc and 1 ld and samplers i 3 b for columns The rows of the input signal first pass through the low and high pass wavelet filters 1 la and I lb and are sampled by the samplers 13 a, thereby reducing the number of pixels in each row by two The columns of the row filtered signals then pass through the low and high pass wavelet filters 1 lc and 1 ld and are sampled by the samplers 13 b, thereby reducing the number of pixels in the columns by two Alternatively, the columns can be operated on first, followed by the rows.
The separable filtering method produces three high frequency signals Ha, H Ib, Hc and one low frequency signal L at each level Thus, the first level produces the signals Hla, Hlb, Hic and Li Each signal has one-fourth the number of pixels as the input signal.
The low frequency signal LI is then provided as the input signal to the next wavelet transform unit 10.
The wavelet transform units 10 for non-separable filtering operate differently for even and odd-numbered levels, as illustrated in Fig i C For odd levels, the input signal is operated on by non-separable low and high pass wavelet filters 15 a and 15 b, respectively, and quincunx odd samplers 17 a Odd samplers 17 a perform "quincunx" subsampling which removes every even datapoint in odd numbered rows and every odd datapoint in even numbered rows, leaving a checkerboard-like output image, illustrated in part in Fig 10 B In order to maintain the image, the datapoints are not actually removed; instead, they just are not operated upon by the following even level.
For even levels, the wavelet transform unit 10 operates on the checkerboard- like image with non-separable low and high pass wavelet filters 15 c and 15 d, respectively, and quincunx even samplers 17 b Even samplers 17 b also perform quincunx sampling on the checkerboard-like image, resulting in a more normal looking image, shown in part in Fig.
A, which is the input to the odd-level wavelet transform unit The image produced by even samplers 17 b has one-half the number of elements as the input image to the odd samplers 17 a.
The article "Predictive Interscale Image Coding Using Vector Quantization", by M Antonini et al and published in Signal Processing V:Theories and Applications, L.
Torres, E Masgrau and M A Lagunas, editors, Elsevier Science Publishers, B V 1990, pp.
1091 1094, describes an image compression method using biorthogonal wavelet transforms and an interscale prediction scheme The prediction scheme predicts the location and amplitude of edges in an image at one resolution based on their locations and amplitudes at the next highest resolution.
The article "Image Coding using Lattice Vector Quantization of Wavelet Coefficients', by M Antonini et al, ICASSP 91, pp 2273 2276 describes a compression method for wavelet transform data.
U.S Patent 5,014,134 to Lawton et al describes an image compression and decompression system which utilizes wavelet transforms.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a system and method of compaction and reconstruction of wavelet transform data which preserves areas of high information content in an input signal The input signal can be a one- dimensional signal, a two-dimensional image or a many dimensional signal.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a system for compaction and reconstruction of wavelet transform data of an input signal where the wavelet transform data is formed of a plurality of resolution levels.
The system includes a compaction unit and a converter The compaction unit is operative on forests of trees, wherein each tree has branches and each branch relates one datapoint in a low resolution level with the entirety of its descendant datapoints in higher resolution levels The compaction unit prunes branches from the trees and trees from the forest to remove all but areas of high information content in the input signal, thereby to produce pruned trees The converter converts the pruned trees to reconstructed wavelet transform data.
Additionally, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the compaction unit includes a) a non-null pruning unit for removing branches of the trees having datapoints thereon whose wavelet transform values are below predetermined threshold levels, producing thereby non-null pruned trees and b) a zero- crossed pruning unit for determining locations of transients in the input signal and for creating zero-crossed pruned trees having therein only datapoints of the non-null pruned trees which are at or near the locations of transients.
Moreover, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the datapoints of the zero-crossed pruned trees form nodes and the compaction unit further includes apparatus for associating datapoints of the non-null pruned trees with nodes of said zero-crossed pruned trees, wherein each datapoint can be within a local area of many nodes but is associated with only one of them.
Further, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the system includes a nullifier, operative prior to the compaction unit, for nulling those datapoints of the wavelet transform data which are below the predetermined threshold levels.
Still further, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the zero-crossed pruning unit includes apparatus for determining locations of zero- crossings in the wavelet transform data.
Finally, the method performs the operations of the elements of the system.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Fig 1 A is a block diagram illustration of a prior multi-resolution wavelet transform operation; Fig 1 B is a block diagram illustration of one section of a prior art wavelet transform operation for separable filtering; Fig 1 C is a block diagram illustration of two sections of a prior art wavelet transform operation for non-separable filtering; Fig 2 is a graphical illustration of an input signal and versions of the signal after wavelet transformation having high frequency information therein; Fig 3 is a block diagram illustration of a wavelet transform compaction and reconstruction system, constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; Fig 4 is a graphical illustration of the parent-child relationships between the signals of Fig 2, useful in understanding the operation of the present invention; Figs 5 A and SB are schematic illustrations of full and pruned trees, useful in understanding the operation of the system of Fig 3; Fig 6 is a block diagram illustration of a method of nullifying some wavelet transform data, useful in the system of Fig 3; Fig 7 is a flow chart illustration of the operation of a compaction unit forming part of the system of Fig 3; Fig 8 is a flow chart illustration of a method of producing a zerocrossed tree, forming part of the operations of the compaction unit of Fig 7; Fig 9 is a flow chart illustration of a method of computing zero-crossing locations forming part of the method of Fig 8; Fig 10 A is a schematic illustration of a local area within a two- dimensional image; Fig 10 B is a schematic illustration of a local area for an odd level wherein quincunx subsampling was performed; and Fig 11 is a flow chart illustration of a method of producing a fully pruned tree formning part of the method of Fig 7.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention will be described hereinbelow in the context of one and two-dimensional input signals, it being understood that input signals of other orders of magnitude are also included within the scope of the present invention.
Reference is now made to Fig 3 which illustrates a wavelet transform compaction and reconstruction system, constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention The system of the present invention typically comprises a compaction system 20 for compacting wavelet transform signals of a digital input signal and a reconstruction system 22 for reconstructing the input signal from the compacted wavelet transform signals.
The compaction system 20 typically comprises a wavelet transformer 24, a nullifier 26 for zeroing out values of the wavelet transform data W which are below a predetermined human-defined threshold and a compaction unit 28 which compacts the output W O of the nullifier 26.
The wavelet transformer 24 comprises a predetermined plurality of wavelet transform units 10 combined as described in the Background of the Present Invention For most of the examples herein, wavelet transformer 24 comprises three wavelet transform units 10, however it will be understood that other numbers of units 10, typically in the range of three to eight, are suitable.
The wavelet transform units 10 can be separable or non-separable It is noted that the type of wavelet transform utilized (either separable or non- separable) affects the percentage of compaction to be achieved, as will be described hereinbelow.
As is known in the art, the wavelet transformer 24 produces two types of signals, the core signal and the detailed signal The core signal is the low frequency signal, labeled L 3 in Fig 1, which has a low resolution The detailed signal comprises the high frequency signals Hi H 3 each having a different resolution.
If separable filtering was utilized on a two-dimensional input image, each high frequency signal Hi H 3 is formed of three signals For the remainder of this discussion, the term Hl will be utilized and it will refer to the output of both separable and non-separable filtering unless otherwise specified.
The compaction unit 28 eypically determine the areas of "high information content" or of detail in the nullified wavelet transform data WO These areas can be defined as those areas which have transients in them and which exist in most or all of the high frequency signals of the nullified wavelet data W 0.
In accordance with the present invention and as illustrated in Figs4, 5 A and SB to which reference is now briefly made, the compaction unit 28 organizes the detailed signal as a "forest" of "trees" connecting the datapoints of the higher resolution signals (H 1 and H 2) with their corresponding datapoints in the lowest resolution signal ( 113) The datapoints of the lowest resolution level form the "roots" of the trees and therefore, the lowest resolution signal H 3 is herein denoted the "root signal" There is no more than one tree for each datapoint in the root signal.
The compaction unit 28 then "prunes" the trees to remove datapoints having little information content The compaction unit 28 can also remove trees from the forest if there is no information in a tree.
Figs 5 A and SB illustrate two full trees 30 and two pruned trees 32 for two datapoints (i) and (in 1) of the root signal of a one-dimensional signal In this example, there are five levels and thus, five high frequency signals, H 1 H 5, are illustrated In this example, each wavelet transform unit 10 reduced the resolution of the signal by 2 Therefore, each datapoint at one resolution level corresponds to two datapoints in the next highest resolution level.
It is noted that each tree 30 and 32 comprises a multiplicity of branches 34 connecting each datapoint or node 35 of a signal with its corresponding datapoints of the signal having the next highest resolution It is also noted that there are no branches 34 of the pruned trees 32 which are not connected to the structure Thus, analogous to pruning a physical tree, when one branch 34 is removed, all of the branches 34 connected to it in the higher resolution signals must also be removed.
Referring back to Fig 3, the compaction unit 28 produces a forest of pruned trees 32, at most one tree for each datapoint in the root signal The forest of pruned trees 32 contains generally all the essential information in the input signal, but in a more compact format than the output of the wavelet transform The compact forest of pruned trees 32 can then be transmitted as desired and as illustrated in Fig 3 For the purposes of the present discussion, "transmission" indicates transmission between any two elements, whether through communication devices or by storing on a storage device.
The reconstruction system 22 of the present invention typically comprises a converter 40 for converting the pruned forest back to a wavelet transform representation WA and an inverse wavelet transformer 42 for performing the inverse wavelet transform operation, thereby to reconstruct the input signal from the wavelet transform representation WA.
Because the compaction system 20 maintains generally the essential details of the input signal, the reconstructed signal strongly resembles the input signal.
It will be appreciated that the system of the present invention can be utilized in any situation where the input signal must be reduced in size while the information content within it be maintained For example, if the input signal is a high quality digital image, comprised of more than one-quarter million picture elements or pixels, it can be compacted with the present system for storage and reconstructed for operation Alternatively, it can be transmitted to a second location after compaction and it can be reconstructed at the second location.
The compacted form of the wavelet transform lends itself easily to further compression, as follows: The core signal may be further compressed by known Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) methods; the full-pruned forest topology may be encoded by standard tree encoding methods; and the datapoints of each node of the fully-pruned forest may be considered as a vector and thus, vector quantization may be applied to compress them.
Reference is now made to Fig 6 which illustrates the operations of nullifier 26 The equations performed by the nullifier 26, for a two dimensional input signal (e g an image) are listed hereinbelow in the section labeled "Nullifier Equations" The index Q indicates the resolution level and (ij) are spatial indices The nullifier 26 determines a threshold level for nullifying, based on the type of input signal and on its particular features.
Any values of the wavelet data less than the threshold value are nullified (e g set to 0).
Because the wavelet transform data W is multi-resolutional and the values in a signal at one resolution level are not equivalent to those in a signal at another resolution level due to human response mechanisms to the specific type of input signal (audio, video, etc), the data W, in step 52, has to be normalized according to human responses.
The human response function R( 9,ij) depends on the resolution level Q and also on the position of each datapoint (ij) within the image For the type of wavelet transforms described hereinabove, an exemplary human response function R(eij) is:
R( 9,ij) = R(Q) = 0 95 2 2 a ( 1) Prior to normalization, in step 50, the absolute values of the data are determined, producing signal W The output of step 52 is a signal W 2.
After normalization, the data is quantized (step 54), with a quantization level Q, to reduce the number of possible values, and then clipped (step 56) to maintain the number of possible values to a finite and reasonable amount, such as 1024.
It will be appreciated that steps 5056 can be performed at once, if desired.
A histogram of the resultant normalized, quantized data from all of the high frequency signals, is produced in step 58 In step 60 an overall threshold level T is determined, based on the desired percentage, such as 80 %, of the histogram to be nullified.
The overall threshold level is the value of the histogram for which the desired percentage of the data has values less than or equal to it.
The overall threshold level cannot be utilized for the threshold operation (step 64) since its value is a normalized one Therefore, in step 62, the threshold is "denormalized" (i.e the inverse of the normalization operation) to provide threshold values T(Q,i,j) for each resolution level Q and across the image.
In step 64, the threshold operation is performed wherein each datapoint in each high frequency signal H 1 H 3 of the wavelet transform data W is compared to its corresponding threshold and those datapoints which are less in absolute value than the corresponding threshold are nullified.
Reference is now made to Fig 7 which illustrates the operations of compaction unit 28 Compaction unit 28 performs two types of pruning, a first pruning (step 70) to remove those branches which have null data on them, and a second pruning (step 72) to remove those branches which do not have transient data Since transients are typically more than one datapoint wide, compaction unit 28 then enlarges (step 74) the nodes of the resultant pruned tree to include at least some of the non-null datapoints near the datapoint of the node.
The pruning steps 70 74 can be performed by creating lists of the nodes which belong in each pruned tree In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, each datapoint can have many attributes and pruning is performed by updating the attributes of each node which belongs in the pruned tree The steps 70 74 will be described as though new pruned trees are produced, it being understood that either method can be performed.
Prior to discussing the specific details of each operation of compaction unit 28, we define a parent node and its child nodes of the level below it For a one-dimensional signal, a parent node W (Qi) has the following children nodes: W (R-1,2 i+ 11), W (Q-l,2 i).
For a two-dimensional signal upon which separable filtering was performed, a parent node W ( 9,d,ij) has the following child nodes: W (Q-l,d,2 i+ 1, 2 j+'1), W ( 9- 1,d,2 i+ 1,2 j), W (Q-l,d,2 i,2 j+l) and W ( 1-l,d,2 i,2 j), where d indicates the type of filtering performed For example, d = 1 indicates that the rows were low pass filtered and the columns were high pass filtered, d = 2 indicates that both rows and columns were high pass filtered and d = 3 indicates that the rows were high pass filtered and the columns were low pass filtered.
For a two-dimensional signal upon which quincunx subsampling was performed, a parent node W (Q,ij) of an even-numbered level has the following child nodes of the odd-numbered level below it: W (Q 1,2 i,2 j), W (Q 1,2 i+ 1,2 j+ 1) A parent node W (Qij) of an odd level has the following child nodes of the even-numbered level below it: W (Q-l,i,j) and W (Q-l,i+l,j) forj even and W (i-l,i,j) and W (e-l,i-l,j) forj odd It is noted that in the odd levels, if i+j is odd, the datapoint does not exist.
Similar relationships can be built for input signals of higher dimensions.
In step 70, the compaction unit 28 reviews the entirety of nodes in the forest of trees For each node which is null and whose descendants do not have significant information in them, where "significance" is defined hereinbelow in equation ( 2), the node and its descendants are removed from the tree to which it belongs Typically, the compaction unit 28 begins the review with the root signal H 3.
The significance S of the data in the descendants of the node is determined as follows:
S = 2 W ()R() ( 2) where () indicates indices and denotes a descendant of the node 35, W () is the value of the descendant, R() is the value of the normalization function for the descendant, and the sum is over all the descendants of the node S has to be above a predetermined threshold value in order for the node to be kept within the pruned tree structure.
For those nodes 35 which have null values, the compaction unit 28 determines whether or not the branches 34 attached to the node have significant data in them If so, it saves the node as part of the pruned tree structure.
The compaction unit 28 repeats the above determination for each of the datapoints in the root signal and for each of the high frequency signals The result is a forest of "non-null" pruned trees.
In step 72, the compaction unit 28 reviews the non-null pruned tree and the wavelet transformation W to determine the areas corresponding to "transients" A transient is herein defined as the location where the wavelet transformation value changes from positive to negative or vise-versa; in other words, a transient is the location of a "zero-crossing" By choosing the appropriate wavelet bases for the wavelet transformation operation (performed by wavelet transformer 24 (Fig 3)), the zero crossings can be forced to be at locations of maximum transitions in the input signal.
Selection of appropriate wavelet bases is discussed in the following article which is incorporated herein by reference: Stephane Mallet, "ZeroCrossings of a Wavelet Transform", IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Vol 37, No 4, July 1991, pp 1020 - 1033.
The operations performed are provided in the flow charts of Figs 8 and 9, to which reference is now made Fig 8 illustrates the operations performed to produce the zero- crossed pruned trees and Fig 9 illustrates the operations performed to determine where the zero-crossings occur.
In step 80 of Fig 8, which is detailed in Fig 9, the compaction unit 28 determines which nodes 35 of the non-null pruned forest are part of transients The location of the transients are determined through an iterative process operating on the non-nullified wavelet transform W.
The iteration process shown in Fig 9 operates on a "local area" or neighborhood in W of each node 35 in the non-null pruned tree Local areas for a two- dimensional input signal are shown in Figs 11 A and l OB to which reference is now briefly made For signals upon which two-dimensional separable sampling was performed, the neighborhood is typically an Nx N square of data surrounding the current node 35, where N is typically 3 7 This is illustrated in Fig 10 A If N is odd, then the node 35 sits in the very center of the neighborhood Otherwise, it sits slightly to one side If two-dimensional quincunx subsampling was performed, for even numbered levels, the local area is as shown in Fig 10 A For odd numbered levels, the neighborhood is an Nx N diamond, as shown in Fig 10 B. Referring back to Figs 8 and 9, in step 82, the compaction unit 28 selects a first node 35 of the non-null pruned forest as the current 'nucleus" In step 86 a zero- crossing location for the current local area surrounding the current nucleus is computed If the location of the zero-crossing happens to be at the current nucleus (step 88), then the current nucleus is "zero-crossed" and there are no more iterations Otherwise, the current nucleus is set to be at the location of the zero-crossing and the process is repeated for the new local area around the current nucleus The iterations continue until the current nucleus is at the location of a zero-crossing or a maximum number of iterations (typically 5 to 10) has been reached The last value for the zero-crossing, no matter how far from the original node, is saved (step 94) and the process repeated for each node of the non-null pruned forest.
The equations for determining the location of the zero-crossing are provided hereinbelow in the section labeled "Zero Crossing Equations".
The remaining steps of Fig 8 create "zero-crossed" trees which contain only those nodes which are zero-crossed or which have a zero-crossing within their local area.
Specifically, for each non-null pruned tree, the compaction unit 28 scans the first resolution signal H 1 Whenever (step 102) it finds a "zero-crossed node" (i e one on which the zero- crossing occurs directly) from the list produced in step 90, it checks if the node is already a node in some zero-crossed tree (step 104) in which case, it stops the present determinations and adds a temporary list STL to the zero-crossed tree to which the node belongs (step 110).
If it is not already part of the zero-crossed tree, the unit 28 saves the node in the temporary list STL (step 106).
Unit 28 then sets the current node to its parent node (step 108) and then has to determine if the parent node should be added to the zero-crossed tree It repeats steps 104 and 106 and, if the parent is not a root, the following criteria are checked: (step 112) is the parent nodezero-crossed, (step 114) does it have a zero-crossing in its local area based on the information from the method of Fig 9; or (step 116) are its parent and its child both zero- crossed In other words, step 116 indicates that the parent is a small gap in a branch of zero- crossed nodes and is a relaxation criterion vis-a-vis the other criteria.
If the parent node fulfills one of the criteria, it is added to the temporary list STL and the next parent is taken The determination is repeated until a datapoint from the root signal is reached (step 118) or when a node which is already part of a zero-crossed tree is found Otherwise, the determination for this node of the first high frequency signal level Hi is finished and the next node is taken When the nodes of H 1 are exhausted, the process is repeated for the other high frequency signals, starting from level H 2.
The nodes are scanned in quanta of local area size Thus, the first resolution level H 1 is divided into units the size of one local area For a two- dimensional input image, the units are squares or diamonds for the odd levels from quincunx subsampling During a first pass, the datapoints in the same position in each local area, for example in the top left corner, are checked In the next pass, the datapoints from the next position, for example, the next position in the top row, are checked.
The datapoints are first checked that they are nodes of the non-null tree If not, the next datapoint (i e from the next local area) is taken.
The result of the operations of Fig 8 are zero-crossed trees having therein only those datapoints which are at or near transients However, a human typically views a transient as having a certain thickness Thus, the zero-crossed trees do not contain enough information They must be filled with those nodes of the non-null pruned trees which are near the nodes of the zero-crossed trees.
Therefore, in step 74 of Fig 7, the compaction unit 28 adds data to the nodes of the zero-crossed trees The operations performed in step 74 are listed, in flow-chart format, in Fig 11.
The nodes of the new trees, called herein 'fully pruned trees", are first set to be the nodes of the zero-crossed trees (step 130).
The compaction unit 28 then scans the nodes N of each non-null pruned tree to determine which nodes are either already part of the structure (step 132) or are part of the local area of at least one node of the corresponding zero-crossed tree (step 134) A list M is produced of the nodes of the zero-crossed trees whose local area the current non-null node N is in.
If a node is neither part of the structure or part of the local area of a node, a new node is tested (step 136) If M has one member, m, the current node N is added to the fully pruned tree at node m' (step 138) If M has many members (i e the node N is part of many local areas), the node m which is closest to the current node N is selected as m 7 (step 140) and current node N is added to the fully pruned tree at node m (step 138) The process is then repeated for all nodes in each non-null pruned tree.
The process of Fig 11 ensures that, if a node of a non-null tree should be included in the fully pruned tree, it is included at only one node Thus, the fully pruned tree contains the areas of high information content in a non-redundant manner.
The converter 40 (Fig 3) of the decompression unit 22 reproduces the wavelet transform data W' by placing the value of zero at every pixel not included in the list The inverse wavelet transformer 42 then reproduces the input signal from the uncompacted wavelet transform data W'.
Nullifier Equations:
WI(jlij)= W( 4 ijl) O( 3) W 2 (l,i) = W(,I j) +i R(l,ij) ( 4) W 3 (, ij) +o 5 ( 5) Q where lx J is the floor of X which is the maximum integer smaller than X.
W 4,(,ij) =MINlW 3 (,i J'), Wmxl ( 6) K WUU ú+ 1 W Wua To=lKI Fj H 571 k) y H 571 k),E H 57 Tk)>-1 J, HST(k) ll ( 7) k-o P k o k-o P r-.
T( 14 i J)= QT ( 8) R( 4,ij) W (lij)= {O if W(Qi O<(lij) ( 9) {W(l,ij) otherwise Where R(li J) is a function of "importance" which may be fixed for each level ( R(l,i J)=R()) or data dependent (for example, the human visual response function may serve as the function R for image data), Q is a predetermined quantization step and W Ax is a predetermined maximum number of bins in the histogram.
Zero Crossing Equations:
The following is noted about the zero crossing equations: a) they are written for a two- dimensional input signal, b) as the zero crossing is done within the level, we drop the level index, c) W(i j) denotes a detailed signal datapoint and d) the operations are done for a w within a local area nucleus.
SPM=F W(i J) w>O Xpo S= i-W(il) w>O F Po;=i EW(ij) w>O S,,,=-F, woj) w<O Xg = i Ew(ij W)O w-Oo ( 10) ( 11) ( 12) ( 13) ( 14) I Y,,,=-jo W(ii) ( 15) X= x",s 8 osxsug ( 16) Spo S+Srg Yr -So, + YPO&Seg ( 17) SP Wx+Sleg It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove Rather the scope of the present invention is defined by the claims which follow:

Claims (12)

1 A system for compaction and reconstruction of wavelet transform data of an input signal, the wavelet transform data formed of a plurality of resolution levels, the system comprising:
a compaction unit, operative on forests of trees, each tree having branches which relate one datapoint in a low resolution level with the entirety of its descendant datapoints in higher resolution levels, for pruning branches from said trees and trees from said forest to remove all but areas of high information content in said input signal and for producing thereby pruned trees; and a converter for converting said pruned trees to reconstructed wavelet transform data.
2 A system according to claim 1 wherein said compaction unit comprises a non- null pruning unit for removing branches of said trees having datapoints thereon whose wavelet transform values are below predetermined threshold levels and for producing thereby non-null pruned trees.
3 A system according to claim 2 and wherein said compaction unit additionally comprises a zero-crossing pruning unit for determining locations of transients in said input signal and for creating zero-crossed pruned trees having therein only datapoints of said non- null pruned trees which are at or near said locations of transients.
4 A system according to claim 3 wherein said datapoints of said zerocrossing pruned trees form nodes and wherein said compaction unit further comprises means for associating datapoints of said non-null pruned trees with nodes of said zero-crossed pruned trees, wherein each datapoint can be within a local area of many nodes but is associated with only one of them.
5 A system according to claim 2 and including a nullifier, operative prior to said compaction unit, for nulling those datapoints of said wavelet transform data which are below said predetermined threshold levels.
6 A system according to claim 3 and wherein said zero-crossed pruning unit includes means for determining locations of zero-crossings in said wavelet transform data.
7 A method of compaction and reconstruction of wavelet transform data of an input signal, the wavelet transform data formed of a plurality of resolution levels, the method comprising the steps of:
pruning branches from trees and trees from forests to remove all but areas of high information content in said input signal and producing thereby pruned trees, wherein each tree has branches and each branch relates one datapoint in a low resolution level with the entirety of its descendant datapoints in higher resolution levels; and converting said pruned trees to reconstructed wavelet transform data.
8 A method according to claim 7 wherein said step of pruning comprises the step of removing those branches of said trees having datapoints thereon whose wavelet transform values are below predetermined threshold levels and producing thereby non- null pruned trees
9 A method according to claim 8 and also comprising the step of determining locations of transients in said input signal and creating zero-crossed pruned trees having therein only datapoints of said non-null pruned trees which are at or near said locations of transients.
A method according to claim 8 wherein said datapoints of said zerocrossed pruned trees form nodes and wherein said step of pruning further comprises the step of associating datapoints of said non-null pruned trees with nodes of said zero-crossed pruned trees, wherein each datapoint can be within a local area of many nodes but is associated with only one of them.
11 A method according to claim 8 and including the step, operative prior to said compaction unit, of nulling those datapoints of said wavelet transform data which are below said predetermined threshold levels.
12 A method according to claim 8 and wherein said step of determining includes the step of determining locations of zero-crossings in said wavelet transform data.
GB9421658A 1993-11-18 1994-10-27 Data compression using wavelet transformation; tree pruning Withdrawn GB2284121A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IL10765893A IL107658A0 (en) 1993-11-18 1993-11-18 A system for compaction and reconstruction of wavelet data

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2284121A true GB2284121A (en) 1995-05-24

Family

ID=11065473

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB9421658A Withdrawn GB2284121A (en) 1993-11-18 1994-10-27 Data compression using wavelet transformation; tree pruning

Country Status (4)

Country Link
DE (1) DE4440838A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2712754A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2284121A (en)
IL (1) IL107658A0 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2307380A (en) * 1995-11-14 1997-05-21 Western Atlas Int Inc Bit-stream data compression
WO1998036632A2 (en) 1997-02-12 1998-08-27 Sarnoff Corporation Apparatus and method for encoding wavelet trees generated by a wavelet-based coding method
GB2324220A (en) * 1997-04-11 1998-10-14 Nat Transcommunications Ltd Video data compression system
US5881176A (en) * 1994-09-21 1999-03-09 Ricoh Corporation Compression and decompression with wavelet style and binary style including quantization by device-dependent parser
DE19743203A1 (en) * 1996-01-06 1999-04-22 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Image compression system data compression control circuit
US5966465A (en) * 1994-09-21 1999-10-12 Ricoh Corporation Compression/decompression using reversible embedded wavelets
GB2339126A (en) * 1998-06-26 2000-01-12 Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc Recursive on-line wavelet data compression technique for use in data storage and communications
WO2001003306A1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2001-01-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Compressed storage of information
US6195465B1 (en) 1994-09-21 2001-02-27 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method and apparatus for compression using reversible wavelet transforms and an embedded codestream
US6222941B1 (en) 1994-09-21 2001-04-24 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Apparatus for compression using reversible embedded wavelets
US6314452B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2001-11-06 Rtimage, Ltd. System and method for transmitting a digital image over a communication network
EP1107607A3 (en) * 1999-12-10 2004-04-21 Xerox Corporation JPEG compression method
US7024046B2 (en) 2000-04-18 2006-04-04 Real Time Image Ltd. System and method for the lossless progressive streaming of images over a communication network
US8565298B2 (en) 1994-09-21 2013-10-22 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Encoder rate control
US10410644B2 (en) 2011-03-28 2019-09-10 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Reduced complexity transform for a low-frequency-effects channel

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19538852A1 (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-01-02 Deutsche Telekom Ag Method and arrangement for classifying speech signals
EP0797894B1 (en) * 1995-10-18 2002-02-06 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Region-based texture coding and decoding method, and corresponding systems
US5781881A (en) * 1995-10-19 1998-07-14 Deutsche Telekom Ag Variable-subframe-length speech-coding classes derived from wavelet-transform parameters

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993017524A1 (en) * 1992-02-26 1993-09-02 General Electric Company Data compression system including significance quantizer
WO1994023385A2 (en) * 1993-03-30 1994-10-13 Adrian Stafford Lewis Data compression and decompression

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993017524A1 (en) * 1992-02-26 1993-09-02 General Electric Company Data compression system including significance quantizer
WO1994023385A2 (en) * 1993-03-30 1994-10-13 Adrian Stafford Lewis Data compression and decompression

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8565298B2 (en) 1994-09-21 2013-10-22 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Encoder rate control
US6222941B1 (en) 1994-09-21 2001-04-24 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Apparatus for compression using reversible embedded wavelets
US5881176A (en) * 1994-09-21 1999-03-09 Ricoh Corporation Compression and decompression with wavelet style and binary style including quantization by device-dependent parser
US5966465A (en) * 1994-09-21 1999-10-12 Ricoh Corporation Compression/decompression using reversible embedded wavelets
US6195465B1 (en) 1994-09-21 2001-02-27 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method and apparatus for compression using reversible wavelet transforms and an embedded codestream
GB2307380A (en) * 1995-11-14 1997-05-21 Western Atlas Int Inc Bit-stream data compression
GB2307380B (en) * 1995-11-14 1999-10-27 Western Atlas Int Inc Bit-stream data compression
DE19743203A1 (en) * 1996-01-06 1999-04-22 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Image compression system data compression control circuit
DE19743203C2 (en) * 1996-01-06 1999-07-29 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Buffer data control method and circuitry in an image compression system
EP0960481A1 (en) * 1997-02-12 1999-12-01 Mediatek Inc. Apparatus and method for encoding wavelet trees generated by a wavelet-based coding method
EP0960481A4 (en) * 1997-02-12 2005-07-13 Sarnoff Corp Apparatus and method for encoding wavelet trees generated by a wavelet-based coding method
WO1998036632A2 (en) 1997-02-12 1998-08-27 Sarnoff Corporation Apparatus and method for encoding wavelet trees generated by a wavelet-based coding method
GB2324220B (en) * 1997-04-11 2001-03-28 Nat Transcomm Ltd Data compression
GB2324220A (en) * 1997-04-11 1998-10-14 Nat Transcommunications Ltd Video data compression system
GB2339126A (en) * 1998-06-26 2000-01-12 Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc Recursive on-line wavelet data compression technique for use in data storage and communications
US6215907B1 (en) 1998-06-26 2001-04-10 Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc. Recursive on-line wavelet data compression technique for use in data storage and communications
GB2339126B (en) * 1998-06-26 2003-08-20 Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc Data compression
WO2001003306A1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2001-01-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Compressed storage of information
US6314452B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2001-11-06 Rtimage, Ltd. System and method for transmitting a digital image over a communication network
EP1107607A3 (en) * 1999-12-10 2004-04-21 Xerox Corporation JPEG compression method
US7024046B2 (en) 2000-04-18 2006-04-04 Real Time Image Ltd. System and method for the lossless progressive streaming of images over a communication network
US10410644B2 (en) 2011-03-28 2019-09-10 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Reduced complexity transform for a low-frequency-effects channel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2712754A1 (en) 1995-05-24
IL107658A0 (en) 1994-07-31
DE4440838A1 (en) 1995-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
GB2284121A (en) Data compression using wavelet transformation; tree pruning
DE19534943B4 (en) Device for compression using embedded small waves
US5841473A (en) Image sequence compression and decompression
US5764807A (en) Data compression using set partitioning in hierarchical trees
US6931067B2 (en) Apparatus and method for image coding using tree-structured quantization based on wavelet transform
US6643406B1 (en) Method and apparatus for performing linear filtering in wavelet based domain
CN107801026B (en) Method for compressing image and device, compression of images and decompression systems
Munteanu et al. Wavelet‐based lossless compression scheme with progressive transmission capability
Pan et al. A fast and low memory image coding algorithm based on lifting wavelet transform and modified SPIHT
Hoang et al. Efficient and flexible hierarchical data layouts for a unified encoding of scalar field precision and resolution
Kofidis et al. Wavelet-based medical image compression
Boujelbene et al. A comparative study of recent improvements in wavelet-based image coding schemes
Elamaran et al. Comparison of DCT and wavelets in image coding
Morales et al. Wavelet coefficients clustering using morphological operations and pruned quadtrees
Kim et al. Lossless and lossy image compression using biorthogonal wavelet transforms with multiplierless operations
Ouafi et al. Color image coding by modified embedded zerotree wavelet (EZW) algorithm
Qureshi Image compression using wavelet transform
Padmashree et al. Images using Embedded Block Coding Optimization Truncation (EBCOT)
Rajpoot et al. Progressive image coding using augmented zerotrees of wavelet coefficients
Zhang et al. Variable tree size fractal compression for wavelet pyramid image coding
Timofeev et al. Spectral image compression
Scharinger Image compression by multilevel polynomial interpolation and wavelet texture coding
Kiely et al. Subband coding methods for seismic data compression
Kamra et al. Review of various image compression techniques and comparison of DCT, DWT and SPIHT
Benazza-Benyahia et al. A unifying framework for lossless and progressive image coding

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)