EP2722725B1 - Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source - Google Patents

Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2722725B1
EP2722725B1 EP12188687.3A EP12188687A EP2722725B1 EP 2722725 B1 EP2722725 B1 EP 2722725B1 EP 12188687 A EP12188687 A EP 12188687A EP 2722725 B1 EP2722725 B1 EP 2722725B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
voltage
power source
power
value
estimated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP12188687.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2722725A1 (en
Inventor
Nicolas Voyer
Nadine Chapalain
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe BV Netherlands
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe BV Netherlands
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp, Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe BV Netherlands filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to EP12188687.3A priority Critical patent/EP2722725B1/en
Priority to JP2013155545A priority patent/JP6198504B2/en
Publication of EP2722725A1 publication Critical patent/EP2722725A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2722725B1 publication Critical patent/EP2722725B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/66Regulating electric power
    • G05F1/67Regulating electric power to the maximum power available from a generator, e.g. from solar cell

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to a device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source like a photovoltaic cell or an array of cells or a fuel cell.
  • a photovoltaic cell directly converts solar energy into electrical energy.
  • the electrical energy produced by the photovoltaic cell can be extracted over time and used in the form of electric power.
  • the direct electric power provided by the photovoltaic cell is provided to energy conversion devices like DC-DC up/down converter circuits and/or DC/AC inverter circuits.
  • the current-voltage characteristics of photovoltaic cells cause the output power to change nonlinearly with the current drawn from photovoltaic cells.
  • the power-voltage curve changes according to climatic variations like light radiation levels and operation temperatures.
  • I pv I sc (L) - I o (T) (exp(V pv /V br )-1), where I sc is the shortcut circuit current of the photovoltaic cell under irradiance L, and Io is the cell body diode current under temperature T, V br is the breakdown voltage of the PV cell, which is independent on irradiance and has low variation with cell temperature.
  • the near optimal point at which to operate photovoltaic cells or arrays of cells is at or near the region of the current-voltage curve where the power is greatest. This point is denominated as the Maximum Power Point (MPP).
  • MPP Maximum Power Point
  • the location of the Maximum Power Point is not known, but can be located, either through calculation models or by search algorithms.
  • the Maximum Power Point also changes according to climatic variations.
  • Maximum Power point tracking algorithm uses fixed voltage step in order to track the maximum power point, the use of fixed voltage steps leads to some problems. If the voltage step is big, loss of the power provided by the power source occurs due to large oscillations around the maximum power point value. If the voltage step is small, the convergence to the maximum power point value is slow.
  • the present invention aims at providing a device which enables to provide a tracking of the maximum power point which is robust to climatic variations and with a limited increase of the duration of the perturbation cycle.
  • the present invention concerns a device for tracking the maximum power point of a power source, the device comprising:
  • the present invention concerns also a method for tracking the maximum power point of a power source, the method comprising the steps of:
  • the voltage step is almost equal to the voltage difference between the first voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point.
  • the device converges faster to the maximum power point.
  • the tracking of the maximum power point is then robust to climatic variations.
  • the voltage step is determined from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by a parameter which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source.
  • the determined step is equal to the voltage difference between the first voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point.
  • the device can converge to the maximum power point in one step.
  • the speed of acquisition of the maximum power point is greatly shortened. It should be noted that direct convergence to maximum power point can be obtained for any climatic conditions (L,T) without the need for climatic sensors.
  • the parameter is further dependent of a coefficient comprised between one and two.
  • the breakdown voltage may experience small variation due to unknown variations of the cell temperature, the breakdown voltage can be underestimated; leading the device to converge to the maximum power point in more than one step. Oscillations around the maximum power point can be minimised.
  • the breakdown voltage of the power source can easily be determined at the setup of the power source.
  • the proposed method will be effective at any irradiance conditions.
  • the proposed method is effective at any cell temperature.
  • the derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source is estimated from the power provided by the power source at the first voltage and from a power provided by the power source at another voltage.
  • the derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source is estimated from:
  • an accurate derivative of the power with voltage can be determined in ramping irradiance conditions.
  • the method for tracking the maximum power point of a power source is effective under ramping conditions.
  • the device for tracking the maximum power point is included in an energy conversion device.
  • the energy conversion device can operate the power source to its maximum power point, in dynamic climatic conditions and with very fast tracking ability.
  • the determined voltage step value is greater than a first predetermined positive value, the determined voltage step is set at the first predetermined positive value or if the determined voltage step value is lower than a second predetermined negative value, the determined voltage step is set at the second predetermined negative value.
  • the voltage step is limited and the difference between the second voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point can be reduced. As a result, power losses can be minimised.
  • the determined voltage step is set at a predetermined value which has the sign of the estimated derivative of the power provided by a voltage step used for determining the first voltage value.
  • the voltage step is limited and the difference between the second voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point can be reduced. As a result, power losses can be minimised.
  • Fig. 1 is an example of a curve representing the output current variations of a power source according to the output voltage of the power source.
  • Fig. 1 On the horizontal axis of Fig. 1 , voltage values are shown. The voltage values are comprised between null value and the open circuit voltage V OC .
  • Fig. 1 On the vertical axis of Fig. 1 , current values are shown. The current values are comprised between null value and the short circuit current I SC .
  • the power source PV is a photovoltaic array
  • Fig. 2 is an example of an energy conversion system wherein the present invention may be implemented.
  • the energy conversion system is composed of a power source PV like a photovoltaic cell or an array of cells or a fuel cell connected to an energy conversion device Conv like a DC-DC step-down/step-up converter and/or a DC/AC converter also named inverter, which output provides electrical energy to the load Lo.
  • a power source PV like a photovoltaic cell or an array of cells or a fuel cell
  • an energy conversion device Conv like a DC-DC step-down/step-up converter and/or a DC/AC converter also named inverter, which output provides electrical energy to the load Lo.
  • the energy conversion device Conv comprises at least one switch S.
  • the power source PV provides current intended to the load Lo.
  • the current I in and the voltage V in provided by the power source PV are converted by the energy conversion device Conv in output current I out and output voltage V out prior to be used by the load Lo.
  • the energy conversion system further comprises a controller device 20.
  • the controller device 20 determines, from successive power measurements, a regulation voltage value.
  • the regulation voltage value is an estimation of the input voltage value which maximizes the energy produced by the power source PV.
  • the controller device 20 controls the input voltage of the energy conversion device Conv, by controlling a duty cycle according to the regulation voltage value V pvref .
  • the duty cycle drives the ON/OFF state of the at least one switch S of the energy conversion device Conv.
  • the controller device 20 has, for example, an architecture based on components connected together by a bus 201 and a processor 200 controlled by the program related to the algorithm as disclosed in the Figs. 3a , 3b or 4 .
  • processor 200 is, in a variant, implemented under the form of one or several dedicated integrated circuits which execute the same operations as the one executed by the processor 200 as disclosed hereinafter.
  • the bus 201 links the processor 200 to a read only memory ROM 202, a random access memory RAM 203, an analogue to digital converter ADC 206 and to an interface 205.
  • the read only memory ROM 202 contains instructions of the program related to the algorithm as disclosed in the Figs. 3a , 3b or 4 which are transferred, when the controller device 20 is powered on to the random access memory RAM 203.
  • the RAM memory 203 contains registers intended to receive variables, and the instructions of the program related to the algorithm as disclosed in the Figs. 3a , 3b or 4 .
  • the analogue to digital converter 206 is connected to the input and the output of the energy conversion device Conv and converts voltages and currents at the input and the output of the energy conversion device Conv into binary information.
  • the processor 200 transfers, through interface module 205, the duty cycle D to be applied by the energy conversion device Conv.
  • the controller device 20 comprises:
  • Fig. 3 is an example of an algorithm for tracking the maximum power point of the power source according to a first mode of realization of the present invention.
  • the present algorithm is executed by the processor 200 of the controller device 20.
  • the processor 200 obtains the current I mp0 at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the short circuit current I sc0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage at maximum power V mp0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage v oc0 at open circuit at nominal characteristics of the power source and a coefficient coeff which is a predetermined value comprised between one and two.
  • These current and voltage values are provided by the power source maker. These current and voltage values are stored in the ROM memory 202 or stored by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • the coefficient coeff is stored in the ROM memory 202.
  • the processor 200 obtains, according to the present invention, a parameter Param.
  • the parameter Param is stored in the RAM memory 203 by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • the processor 200 checks if a variable noted Idx is equal to one.
  • variable Idx is set to one.
  • step S303 If the variable Idx is equal to one, the processor 200 moves to step S303. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S305.
  • the processor 200 is controlling the voltage provided by the power source PV to a voltage value V vref which is equal to a voltage value V A and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current I in at voltage V A .
  • the processor 200 reads in memory 203 initial value of the voltage V A .
  • the initial voltage of V A is equal to the null value or V OC0 .
  • the processor 200 determines a power value P1 provided by the power source PV at voltage value V A .
  • the processor 200 sets the voltage value V vref to a voltage value V B and controls, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to the voltage value V vref .
  • the processor 200 reads in memory 203 initial value of the voltage V B .
  • the initial voltage of V B is equal to the initial voltage VA plus a predetermined voltage step ⁇ V AB read in memory 203.
  • the predetermined voltage step ⁇ V AB is set to one volt.
  • step S304 the processor 200 steps the variable Idx to two.
  • the processor 200 moves to step S314 and waits a predetermined time period ⁇ t.
  • the predetermined time period is for example equal to one second.
  • the predetermined time period is representative of the periodicity of execution of the maximum power point tracking algorithm.
  • the processor 200 checks if a variable noted Idx is equal to two.
  • step S306 If the variable Idx is equal to two, the processor 200 moves to step S306. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S309.
  • the processor 200 is controlling, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to a voltage value V vref which is equal to the voltage value V B and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current I in at voltage V B .
  • the processor 200 determines a power value P2 provided by the power source PV at V B .
  • the processor 200 sets the voltage value V vref to the voltage value V A and controls, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to the voltage value V vref .
  • step S308 the processor 200 steps the variable Idx to three.
  • the processor 200 is controlling the voltage provided by the power source PV, through the interface 206 and the switch S, to a voltage value V vref which is equal to the voltage value V A and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current I in at voltage V A .
  • the processor 200 determines a power value P3 provided by the power source PV at V A .
  • the processor 200 computes a voltage step value ⁇ V to be used for tracking the maximum power point.
  • the voltage step value is computed from the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source and from the estimated current.
  • the processor 200 sets the variable V A to V A + ⁇ V and the variable V B to V B + ⁇ V.
  • the processor 200 sets the voltage value V vref to the voltage value V A .
  • the processor 200 sets the variable Idx to one.
  • Fig. 3b is an example of an algorithm for determining the voltage step value according to the present invention.
  • the processor 200 sets a variable P B to the value of P 2 and determines a mean value P A of P 3 and P 1 .
  • P A P 1 + P 3 / 2
  • the processor 200 checks if the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current value is lower than one.
  • step S320 If the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current value is lower than one, the processor 200 moves to step S320. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S319.
  • the processor 200 determines the voltage step ⁇ V to be applied for tracking the maximum power point from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by the parameter Param determined at step S301 which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source PV.
  • step S318 avoids that error may occur in the calculation of the voltage step ⁇ V at step S320.
  • the processor 200 checks if the voltage step ⁇ V determined at step S320 is upper than a first predetermined value.
  • step S320 If the voltage step ⁇ V determined at step S320 is higher than the first predetermined value, the processor 200 moves to step S322. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S324.
  • the first predetermined value is comprised between five and fifteen volts.
  • the first predetermined value is equal to ten volts.
  • the processor 200 checks if the voltage step ⁇ V determined at step S320 is lower than a second predetermined value.
  • step S320 If the voltage step ⁇ V determined at step S320 is lower than the second predetermined value, the processor 200 moves to step S325. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S311 of Fig. 3a .
  • the second predetermined value is comprised between minus five and minus fifteen volts.
  • the second predetermined value is equal to minus ten volts.
  • the processor 200 sets the voltage step ⁇ V at a third predetermined value, for example five volts, the sign of which is same as the sign of the estimated derivative dP/dV of the power provided by the power source.
  • step S322 the processor 200 sets the voltage step ⁇ V at the first predetermined value and moves to step S311 of Fig. 3a .
  • step S325 the processor 200 sets the voltage step ⁇ V at the second predetermined value and moves to step S311 of Fig. 3a .
  • Fig. 4 is an example of an algorithm for tracking the maximum power point of the power source according to a second mode of realization of the present invention.
  • the present algorithm is executed by the processor 200 of the controller device 20.
  • the processor 200 obtains the current I mp0 at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the short circuit current I sc0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage at maximum power V mp0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage v oc0 at open circuit at nominal characteristics of the power source PV and a coefficient coeff which is a predetermined value comprised between one and two.
  • These current and voltage values are provided by the power source maker. These current and voltage values are stored in the ROM memory 202 or stored in the RAM memory 203 by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • the coefficient coeff is stored in the ROM memory 202.
  • the processor 200 obtains, according to the present invention, a parameter Param.
  • the parameter Param is stored in the RAM memory 203 by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • the processor 200 is controlling, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to a voltage value V vref and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current I in at voltage V vref .
  • the processor 200 reads in memory 203 initial value of the voltage V vref .
  • the initial voltage of V vref is equal to the null value or V OC0 .
  • the processor 200 determines a power value P provided by the power source PV at V vref .
  • the processor 200 sets the variable I to I in value and memorises the variable I.
  • ⁇ Vprevious is equal to a predetermined value.
  • the predetermined value is equal to one volt.
  • the processor 200 checks if the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the current I is lower than one.
  • step S407 If the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the current value I is lower than one, the processor 200 moves to step S407. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S406.
  • the processor 200 determines the voltage step ⁇ V to be applied for tracking the maximum power point from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by the parameter Param which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source PV.
  • step S405 avoids that error may occur in the calculation of the voltage step ⁇ V at step S407.
  • the processor 200 sets the variable V ref to V ref + ⁇ V.
  • the processor 200 set the variables ⁇ Vprevious to the value of ⁇ V determined at step S407 or at step S406 and Pprevious to the value of P measured at step S402.
  • the processor 200 moves to step S410 and waits a predetermined time period ⁇ t.
  • the predetermined time period is for example equal to one second.
  • the predetermined time period is representative of the periodicity of execution of the maximum power point tracking algorithm.
  • step S402 the processor 200 returns to step S402 already described.
  • the processor 200 sets the voltage step ⁇ V at a predetermined value, for example five volts, the sign of which is same as the sign of the estimated derivative dP/dV of the power provided by the power source.
  • Fig. 5 shows plural curves representing the power variations versus voltage of the photovoltaic cells or arrays of cells at different climatic conditions and power measurement points taken according to the first mode of realization of the present invention.
  • the vertical axis representing the power provided by the power source PV is shown.
  • a first curve marked by label Idx1 corresponds to the measurement of the power at step S303 of the algorithm of Fig. 3a .
  • a second curve marked by label Idx2 corresponds to the measurement of the power at step S306 of the algorithm of Fig. 3a .
  • a third curve marked by label Idx3 corresponds to the measurement of the power at step S309 of the algorithm of Fig. 3a .
  • the voltage VA at which the powers P1 and P3 are measured and the voltage VB at which the power P2 is measured are shown.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Control Of Electrical Variables (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates generally to a device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source like a photovoltaic cell or an array of cells or a fuel cell.
  • A photovoltaic cell directly converts solar energy into electrical energy. The electrical energy produced by the photovoltaic cell can be extracted over time and used in the form of electric power. The direct electric power provided by the photovoltaic cell is provided to energy conversion devices like DC-DC up/down converter circuits and/or DC/AC inverter circuits.
  • However, the current-voltage characteristics of photovoltaic cells cause the output power to change nonlinearly with the current drawn from photovoltaic cells. The power-voltage curve changes according to climatic variations like light radiation levels and operation temperatures.
  • Current-voltage characteristics are modelled as Ipv = Isc(L) - Io(T) (exp(Vpv/Vbr)-1), where Isc is the shortcut circuit current of the photovoltaic cell under irradiance L, and Io is the cell body diode current under temperature T, Vbr is the breakdown
    voltage of the PV cell, which is independent on irradiance and has low variation with cell temperature.
  • The near optimal point at which to operate photovoltaic cells or arrays of cells is at or near the region of the current-voltage curve where the power is greatest. This point is denominated as the Maximum Power Point (MPP).
  • The location of the Maximum Power Point is not known, but can be located, either through calculation models or by search algorithms.
  • Therefore Maximum Power Point Tracking techniques are needed to maintain the photovoltaic cells or arrays of cells operating point at its Maximum Power Point.
  • As the power-voltage curve changes according to climatic variations, the Maximum Power Point also changes according to climatic variations.
  • It is then necessary to be able to identify the Maximum Power Point at any time.
  • If Maximum Power point tracking algorithm uses fixed voltage step in order to track the maximum power point, the use of fixed voltage steps leads to some problems. If the voltage step is big, loss of the power provided by the power source occurs due to large oscillations around the maximum power point value. If the voltage step is small, the convergence to the maximum power point value is slow.
  • The paper of Fangrui Liu entitled "A variable step Size INC MPPT method for PV systems" published in IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, vol 55, n° 7, pages 2622 to 2628 discloses variable step size determination using derivative of the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source.
  • The paper of Fang Luo entitled " A variable step maximum power point tracking method using differential equation solution" published in 2nd IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications pages 2259-2263 discloses a variable step MPPT tracking method.
  • The paper of Zhang entitled "A maximum power point tracking algorithm based on gradient descent method" published in Power and Energy society general meeting, pages 1-5 discloses a variable step MPPT tracking method.
  • The paper of Lee entitled "Advance incremental conductance MPPT algorithm with a variable step size" published in the 12th international power electronics and motion control conference pages 603-607 discloses a variable step MPPT tracking method.
  • The present invention aims at providing a device which enables to provide a tracking of the maximum power point which is robust to climatic variations and with a limited increase of the duration of the perturbation cycle.
  • To that end, the present invention concerns a device for tracking the maximum power point of a power source, the device comprising:
    • means for estimating, at a first voltage provided by the power source, a derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source,
    • means for estimating the current provided by the power source when the power source provides the first voltage,
    • means for determining a voltage step value from the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source and from the estimated current,
    • means for controlling the voltage of the power source in order to bring the voltage of the power source to a second voltage value which is equal to the first voltage value plus the determined voltage step.
  • The present invention concerns also a method for tracking the maximum power point of a power source, the method comprising the steps of:
    • estimating, at a first voltage provided by the power source, a derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source,
    • estimating the current provided by the power source when the power source provides the first voltage,
    • determining a voltage step value from the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source and from the estimated current,
    • controlling the voltage of the power source in order to bring the voltage of the power source to a second voltage value which is equal to the first voltage value plus the determined voltage step.
  • Thus, the voltage step is almost equal to the voltage difference between the first voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point. As a result, the device converges faster to the maximum power point. The tracking of the maximum power point is then robust to climatic variations.
  • According to a particular feature, the voltage step is determined from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by a parameter which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source.
  • Thus, if the parameter is set to one over the breakdown voltage, the determined step is equal to the voltage difference between the first voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point. The device can converge to the maximum power point in one step. The speed of acquisition of the maximum power point is greatly shortened. It should be noted that direct convergence to maximum power point can be obtained for any climatic conditions (L,T) without the need for climatic sensors.
  • According to a particular feature, the parameter is further dependent of a coefficient comprised between one and two.
  • Thus, as breakdown voltage may experience small variation due to unknown variations of the cell temperature, the breakdown voltage can be underestimated; leading the device to converge to the maximum power point in more than one step. Oscillations around the maximum power point can be minimised.
  • According to a particular feature, the parameter is determined according to the following formula: Param = I mp 0 I sc 0 I mp 0 + ln 1 I mp 0 I sc 0 2 V mp 0 V oc 0 * coeff ,
    Figure imgb0001
    wherein Imp0 is the current at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source, Isc0 is the short circuit current at nominal characteristics of the power source, Vmp0 is the voltage at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source and voc0 is the voltage at open circuit at nominal characteristics of the power source.
  • Thus, the breakdown voltage of the power source can easily be determined at the setup of the power source. As breakdown voltage is independent of irradiance conditions, the proposed method will be effective at any irradiance conditions. As breakdown voltage has small variation with temperature condition, the proposed method is effective at any cell temperature.
  • According to a particular feature, the derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source is estimated from the power provided by the power source at the first voltage and from a power provided by the power source at another voltage.
  • Thus, an accurate derivative of the power with voltage can be determined in static irradiance conditions.
  • According to a particular feature, the derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source is estimated from:
    • the first voltage value and a first power provided by the power source at a first time instant when the voltage provided by the power source is the first voltage value,
    • a third voltage value and a second power provided by the power source at a second time instant when the voltage provided by the power source is the third voltage value,
    • the first voltage value and a third power provided by the power source at a third time instant when the voltage provided by the power source is the first voltage.
  • Thus, an accurate derivative of the power with voltage can be determined in ramping irradiance conditions. The method for tracking the maximum power point of a power source is effective under ramping conditions.
  • According to a particular feature, the device for tracking the maximum power point is included in an energy conversion device.
  • Thus, the energy conversion device can operate the power source to its maximum power point, in dynamic climatic conditions and with very fast tracking ability.
  • According to a particular feature, if the determined voltage step value is greater than a first predetermined positive value, the determined voltage step is set at the first predetermined positive value or if the determined voltage step value is lower than a second predetermined negative value, the determined voltage step is set at the second predetermined negative value.
  • Thus, when noisy power measurement yields mistake in determining the distance to the maximum power point, the voltage step is limited and the difference between the second voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point can be reduced. As a result, power losses can be minimised.
  • According to a particular feature, if the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source divided by the estimated current is upper than one, the determined voltage step is set at a predetermined value which has the sign of the estimated derivative of the power provided by a voltage step used for determining the first voltage value.
  • Thus, when noisy power measurement yields mistake in determining the distance to the maximum power point, the voltage step is limited and the difference between the second voltage and the voltage corresponding to the maximum power point can be reduced. As a result, power losses can be minimised.
  • The characteristics of the invention will emerge more clearly from a reading of the following description of an example embodiment, the said description being produced with reference to the accompanying drawings, among which :
    • Fig. 1 is an example of a curve representing the output current variations of a power source according to the output voltage of the power source;
    • Fig. 2 is an example of an energy conversion system wherein the present invention may be implemented;
    • Fig. 3a is an example of an algorithm for tracking the maximum power point of the power source according to a first mode of realization of the present invention; Fig. 3b is an example of an algorithm for determining the voltage step value according to the present invention;
    • Fig. 4 is an example of an algorithm for tracking the maximum power point of the power source according to a second mode of realization of the present invention;
    • Fig. 5 shows plural curves representing the power variations versus voltage of the photovoltaic cells or arrays of cells at different climatic conditions and power measurement points taken according to the first mode of realization of the present invention.
  • Fig. 1 is an example of a curve representing the output current variations of a power source according to the output voltage of the power source.
  • On the horizontal axis of Fig. 1, voltage values are shown. The voltage values are comprised between null value and the open circuit voltage VOC.
  • On the vertical axis of Fig. 1, current values are shown. The current values are comprised between null value and the short circuit current ISC.
  • For example, if the power source PV is a photovoltaic array, at any given light level and photovoltaic array temperature, there is an infinite number of current-voltage pairs, or operating points, at which the photovoltaic array can operate. However, there exists a single maximum power point for a given light level and photovoltaic array temperature.
  • Fig. 2 is an example of an energy conversion system wherein the present invention may be implemented.
  • The energy conversion system is composed of a power source PV like a photovoltaic cell or an array of cells or a fuel cell connected to an energy conversion device Conv like a DC-DC step-down/step-up converter and/or a DC/AC converter also named inverter, which output provides electrical energy to the load Lo.
  • The energy conversion device Conv comprises at least one switch S.
  • The power source PV provides current intended to the load Lo. The current Iin and the voltage Vin provided by the power source PV are converted by the energy conversion device Conv in output current Iout and output voltage Vout prior to be used by the load Lo.
  • According to the invention, the energy conversion system further comprises a controller device 20.
  • The controller device 20 determines, from successive power measurements, a regulation voltage value. The regulation voltage value is an estimation of the input voltage value which maximizes the energy produced by the power source PV.
  • It has to be noted here that successive power measurements used by the controller device 20 can be realised at the input or at the output of the energy conversion device Conv.
  • The controller device 20 controls the input voltage of the energy conversion device Conv, by controlling a duty cycle according to the regulation voltage value Vpvref.
  • The duty cycle drives the ON/OFF state of the at least one switch S of the energy conversion device Conv.
  • The controller device 20 has, for example, an architecture based on components connected together by a bus 201 and a processor 200 controlled by the program related to the algorithm as disclosed in the Figs. 3a, 3b or 4.
  • It has to be noted here that the processor 200 is, in a variant, implemented under the form of one or several dedicated integrated circuits which execute the same operations as the one executed by the processor 200 as disclosed hereinafter.
  • The bus 201 links the processor 200 to a read only memory ROM 202, a random access memory RAM 203, an analogue to digital converter ADC 206 and to an interface 205.
  • The read only memory ROM 202 contains instructions of the program related to the algorithm as disclosed in the Figs. 3a, 3b or 4 which are transferred, when the controller device 20 is powered on to the random access memory RAM 203.
  • The RAM memory 203 contains registers intended to receive variables, and the instructions of the program related to the algorithm as disclosed in the Figs. 3a, 3b or 4.
  • The analogue to digital converter 206 is connected to the input and the output of the energy conversion device Conv and converts voltages and currents at the input and the output of the energy conversion device Conv into binary information.
  • The processor 200 transfers, through interface module 205, the duty cycle D to be applied by the energy conversion device Conv.
  • According to the invention, the controller device 20 comprises:
    • means for estimating, at a first voltage provided by the power source, a derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source,
    • means for estimating the current provided by the power source when the power source provides the first voltage,
    • means for determining a voltage step value from the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source and from the estimated current,
    • means for controlling the voltage of the power source in order to bring the voltage of the power source to a second voltage value which is equal to the first voltage value plus the determined voltage step.
  • Fig. 3 is an example of an algorithm for tracking the maximum power point of the power source according to a first mode of realization of the present invention.
  • More precisely, the present algorithm is executed by the processor 200 of the controller device 20.
  • At step S300 of Fig. 3a, the processor 200 obtains the current Imp0 at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the short circuit current Isc0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage at maximum power Vmp0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage voc0 at open circuit at nominal characteristics of the power source and a coefficient coeff which is a predetermined value comprised between one and two.
  • These current and voltage values are provided by the power source maker. These current and voltage values are stored in the ROM memory 202 or stored by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • The coefficient coeff is stored in the ROM memory 202.
  • At next step S301, the processor 200 obtains, according to the present invention, a parameter Param.
  • The parameter Param is determined by the processor 200 according to the following formula: Param = I mp 0 I sc 0 I mp 0 + ln 1 I mp 0 I sc 0 2 V mp 0 V oc 0 * coeff
    Figure imgb0002
  • It has to be noted here that in a variant, instead of being calculated by the processor 200, the parameter Param is stored in the RAM memory 203 by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • At next step S302, the processor 200 checks if a variable noted Idx is equal to one.
  • It has to be noted here that, at initialization of the energy conversion device Conv, the variable Idx is set to one.
  • If the variable Idx is equal to one, the processor 200 moves to step S303. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S305.
  • At step S303, the processor 200 is controlling the voltage provided by the power source PV to a voltage value Vvref which is equal to a voltage value VA and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current Iin at voltage VA.
  • At first execution of present algorithm, the processor 200 reads in memory 203 initial value of the voltage VA.
  • For example, the initial voltage of VA is equal to the null value or VOC0.
  • From the voltage VA and the current Iin values, the processor 200 determines a power value P1 provided by the power source PV at voltage value VA.
  • At next step S304, the processor 200 sets the voltage value Vvref to a voltage value VB and controls, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to the voltage value Vvref.
  • At first execution of present algorithm, the processor 200 reads in memory 203 initial value of the voltage VB.
  • For example, the initial voltage of VB is equal to the initial voltage VA plus a predetermined voltage step ΔVAB read in memory 203. For example, the predetermined voltage step ΔVAB is set to one volt.
  • At next step S304, the processor 200 steps the variable Idx to two.
  • After that, the processor 200 moves to step S314 and waits a predetermined time period Δt. The predetermined time period is for example equal to one second. The predetermined time period is representative of the periodicity of execution of the maximum power point tracking algorithm.
  • After that, the processor 200 returns to step S302.
  • At step S305, the processor 200 checks if a variable noted Idx is equal to two.
  • If the variable Idx is equal to two, the processor 200 moves to step S306. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S309.
  • At step S306, the processor 200 is controlling, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to a voltage value Vvref which is equal to the voltage value VB and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current Iin at voltage VB.
  • From the voltage VB and the current Iin values, the processor 200 determines a power value P2 provided by the power source PV at VB.
  • At next step S307, the processor 200 sets the voltage value Vvref to the voltage value VA and controls, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to the voltage value Vvref.
  • At next step S308, the processor 200 steps the variable Idx to three.
  • After that, the processor 200 moves to step S314 already disclosed.
  • At step S309, the processor 200 is controlling the voltage provided by the power source PV, through the interface 206 and the switch S, to a voltage value Vvref which is equal to the voltage value VA and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current Iin at voltage VA.
  • From the voltage VA and the current Iin values, the processor 200 determines a power value P3 provided by the power source PV at VA.
  • At next step S310, the processor 200 computes a voltage step value ΔV to be used for tracking the maximum power point.
  • The voltage step value is computed from the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source and from the estimated current.
  • The computation of the voltage step value will be disclosed in reference to the Fig. 3b.
  • At next step S311, the processor 200 sets the variable VA to VA +ΔV and the variable VB to VB +ΔV.
  • At next step S312, the processor 200 sets the voltage value Vvref to the voltage value VA.
  • At next step S313, the processor 200 sets the variable Idx to one.
  • After that, the processor 200 moves to step S314 already disclosed.
  • Fig. 3b is an example of an algorithm for determining the voltage step value according to the present invention.
  • At step S315, the processor 200 sets a variable PB to the value of P2 and determines a mean value PA of P3 and P1. P A = P 1 + P 3 / 2
    Figure imgb0003
  • At next step S316, the processor 200 determines an estimated current value I of the current provided by the power source PV from the power values PA and PB determined at step S315 according to the following formula: I = PA / VA + PB / VB / 2.
    Figure imgb0004
  • At next step S317, the processor 200 determines an estimate of the derivative of the power according to the following formula: dP / dV = PA PB / VA VB .
    Figure imgb0005
  • At next step S318, the processor 200 checks if the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current value is lower than one.
  • If the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current value is lower than one, the processor 200 moves to step S320. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S319.
  • At step S320, the processor 200 determines the voltage step ΔV to be applied for tracking the maximum power point from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by the parameter Param determined at step S301 which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source PV.
  • More precisely, the voltage step ΔV is determined according to the following formula: ΔV = log 1 dP / dV / I / Param .
    Figure imgb0006
  • When there is some noise effecting measurements, it may occur that the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current value is lower than one. In order to take into account such cases, the check of step S318 avoids that error may occur in the calculation of the voltage step ΔV at step S320.
  • At next step S321, the processor 200 checks if the voltage step ΔV determined at step S320 is upper than a first predetermined value.
  • If the voltage step ΔV determined at step S320 is higher than the first predetermined value, the processor 200 moves to step S322. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S324.
  • For example, the first predetermined value is comprised between five and fifteen volts.
  • For example, the first predetermined value is equal to ten volts.
  • At step S324, the processor 200 checks if the voltage step ΔV determined at step S320 is lower than a second predetermined value.
  • If the voltage step ΔV determined at step S320 is lower than the second predetermined value, the processor 200 moves to step S325. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S311 of Fig. 3a.
  • For example, the second predetermined value is comprised between minus five and minus fifteen volts.
  • For example, the second predetermined value is equal to minus ten volts.
  • At step S319, the processor 200 sets the voltage step ΔV at a third predetermined value, for example five volts, the sign of which is same as the sign of the estimated derivative dP/dV of the power provided by the power source.
  • At step S322, the processor 200 sets the voltage step ΔV at the first predetermined value and moves to step S311 of Fig. 3a.
  • At step S325, the processor 200 sets the voltage step ΔV at the second predetermined value and moves to step S311 of Fig. 3a.
  • Fig. 4 is an example of an algorithm for tracking the maximum power point of the power source according to a second mode of realization of the present invention.
  • More precisely, the present algorithm is executed by the processor 200 of the controller device 20.
  • At step S400, the processor 200 obtains the current Imp0 at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the short circuit current Isc0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage at maximum power Vmp0 at nominal characteristics of the power source PV, the voltage voc0 at open circuit at nominal characteristics of the power source PV and a coefficient coeff which is a predetermined value comprised between one and two.
  • These current and voltage values are provided by the power source maker. These current and voltage values are stored in the ROM memory 202 or stored in the RAM memory 203 by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • The coefficient coeff is stored in the ROM memory 202.
  • At next step S401, the processor 200 obtains, according to the present invention, a parameter Param.
  • The parameter Param is determined by the processor 200 according to the following formula: Param = I mp 0 I sc 0 I mp 0 + ln 1 I mp 0 I sc 0 2 V mp 0 V oc 0 * coeff
    Figure imgb0007
  • It has to be noted here that in a variant, instead of being calculated by the processor 200, the parameter Param is stored in the RAM memory 203 by the technical staff which installs the power source PV and the energy conversion device Conv.
  • At next step S402, the processor 200 is controlling, through the interface 206 and the switch S, the voltage provided by the power source PV to a voltage value Vvref and commands the analogue to digital converter ADC 206 in order to proceed to a measurement of the current Iin at voltage Vvref.
  • At first execution of present algorithm, the processor 200 reads in memory 203 initial value of the voltage Vvref.
  • For example, the initial voltage of Vvref is equal to the null value or VOC0.
  • From the voltage Vvref and the current Iin values, the processor 200 determines a power value P provided by the power source PV at Vvref.
  • At next step S403, the processor 200 sets the variable I to Iin value and memorises the variable I.
  • At next step S404, the processor 200 determines an estimate of the derivative of the power according to the following formula: dP / dV = P Pprevious / ΔVprevious
    Figure imgb0008
    wherein ΔVprevious is the previous voltage step determined by the present algorithm and Pprevious is the previous power P determined by the present algorithm.
  • At the first execution of the present algorithm, ΔVprevious is equal to a predetermined value. As example, the predetermined value is equal to one volt.
  • At next step S405, the processor 200 checks if the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the current I is lower than one.
  • If the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the current value I is lower than one, the processor 200 moves to step S407. Otherwise, the processor 200 moves to step S406.
  • At step S407, the processor 200 determines the voltage step ΔV to be applied for tracking the maximum power point from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source PV divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by the parameter Param which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source PV.
  • More precisely, the voltage step ΔV is determined according to the following formula: ΔV = log 1 dP / dV / I / Param .
    Figure imgb0009
  • When there is some noise effecting measurements, it may occur that the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source divided by the estimated current value is lower than one. In order to take into account such cases, the check of step S405 avoids that error may occur in the calculation of the voltage step ΔV at step S407.
  • At next step S408, the processor 200 sets the variable Vref to Vref +ΔV.
  • At next step S409, the processor 200 set the variables ΔVprevious to the value of ΔV determined at step S407 or at step S406 and Pprevious to the value of P measured at step S402.
  • After that, the processor 200 moves to step S410 and waits a predetermined time period Δt. The predetermined time period is for example equal to one second. The predetermined time period is representative of the periodicity of execution of the maximum power point tracking algorithm.
  • Once the predetermined time period Δt ends, the processor 200 returns to step S402 already described.
  • At step S406, the processor 200 sets the voltage step ΔV at a predetermined value, for example five volts, the sign of which is same as the sign of the estimated derivative dP/dV of the power provided by the power source.
  • After that, the processor moves to step S408 already disclosed.
  • Fig. 5 shows plural curves representing the power variations versus voltage of the photovoltaic cells or arrays of cells at different climatic conditions and power measurement points taken according to the first mode of realization of the present invention.
  • On the horizontal axis, the voltage provided by the power source PV is shown.
  • The vertical axis representing the power provided by the power source PV is shown.
  • Three different curves show the variations of the maximum power point of the power source PV.
  • A first curve marked by label Idx1 corresponds to the measurement of the power at step S303 of the algorithm of Fig. 3a.
  • A second curve marked by label Idx2 corresponds to the measurement of the power at step S306 of the algorithm of Fig. 3a.
  • A third curve marked by label Idx3 corresponds to the measurement of the power at step S309 of the algorithm of Fig. 3a.
  • The power values PA and PB determined at step S315 of the algorithm of Fig. 3b are shown.
  • The voltage VA at which the powers P1 and P3 are measured and the voltage VB at which the power P2 is measured are shown.
  • Naturally, many modifications can be made to the embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the present invention.

Claims (9)

  1. Device for tracking the maximum power point of a power source, the device comprising:
    - means for estimating (20), at a first voltage provided by the power source, a derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source,
    - means for estimating (20 )the current provided by the power source when the power source provides the first voltage,
    - means for determining (20) a voltage step value from the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source and from the estimated current, the voltage step being determined from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by a parameter which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source,
    - means for controlling (20) the voltage of the power source in order to bring the voltage of the power source to a second voltage value which is equal to the first voltage value plus the determined voltage step.
  2. Device according to claim 1, characterized in that the parameter is further dependent of a coefficient comprised between one and two.
  3. Device according to claim 2, characterized in the parameter is determined according to the following formula: Param = I mp 0 I sc 0 I mp 0 + ln 1 I mp 0 I sc 0 2 V mp 0 V oc 0 * coeff ,
    Figure imgb0010
    wherein Imp0 is the current at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source, Isc0 is the short circuit current at nominal characteristics of the power source, Vmp0 is the voltage at maximum power at nominal characteristics of the power source and voc0 is the voltage at open circuit at nominal characteristics of the power source.
  4. Device according to any of the claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source is estimated from the power provided by the power source at the first voltage and from a power provided by the power source at another voltage.
  5. Device according to any of the claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source is estimated from :
    - the first voltage value and a first power provided by the power source at a first time instant when the voltage provided by the power source is the first voltage value,
    - a third voltage value and a second power provided by the power source at a second time instant when the voltage provided by the power source is the third voltage value,
    - the first voltage value and a third power provided by the power source at a third time instant when the voltage provided by the power source is the first voltage.
  6. Device according to any of the claims 1 to 5, characterised in that the device for tracking the maximum power point is included in an energy conversion device.
  7. Device according to any of the claims 1 to 6, characterized in that if the determined voltage step value is greater than a first predetermined positive value, the determined voltage step is set at the first predetermined positive value or if the determined voltage step value is lower than a second predetermined negative value, the determined voltage step is set at the second predetermined negative value.
  8. Device according to any of the claims 1 to 7, characterized in that if the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source divided by the estimated current is greater than one, the determined voltage step is set at a predetermined value which has the sign of the estimated derivative of the power provided by a voltage step used for determining the first voltage value.
  9. Method for tracking the maximum power point of a power source, the method comprising the steps of:
    - estimating, at a first voltage provided by the power source, a derivative of the power provided by the power source with respect to a change of the voltage provided by the power source,
    - estimating the current provided by the power source when the power source provides the first voltage,
    - determining a voltage step value from the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source and from the estimated current, the voltage step being determined from a logarithm of one minus the estimated derivative of the power provided by the power source divided by the estimated current, the logarithm being divided by a parameter which is dependent of nominal characteristics of the power source,
    - controlling the voltage of the power source in order to bring the voltage of the power source to a second voltage value which is equal to the first voltage value plus the determined voltage step.
EP12188687.3A 2012-10-16 2012-10-16 Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source Not-in-force EP2722725B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12188687.3A EP2722725B1 (en) 2012-10-16 2012-10-16 Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source
JP2013155545A JP6198504B2 (en) 2012-10-16 2013-07-26 Apparatus and method for tracking the maximum power point of a power supply

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12188687.3A EP2722725B1 (en) 2012-10-16 2012-10-16 Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2722725A1 EP2722725A1 (en) 2014-04-23
EP2722725B1 true EP2722725B1 (en) 2017-05-24

Family

ID=47257445

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12188687.3A Not-in-force EP2722725B1 (en) 2012-10-16 2012-10-16 Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2722725B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6198504B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019178795A1 (en) * 2018-03-22 2019-09-26 General Electric Company Dual-sampling maximum power point tracking with dynamic power limiting for power systems

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104298296A (en) * 2014-09-24 2015-01-21 上海电力学院 Fuel cell maximum power tracking control method
CN105159388B (en) * 2015-09-02 2016-10-05 广东明阳龙源电力电子有限公司 A kind of method of the MPPT maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic microgrid system

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6285312A (en) * 1985-10-09 1987-04-18 Toshiba Corp Control method for maximum power of battery power source
JPH0962387A (en) * 1995-08-29 1997-03-07 Canon Inc Method and device for power control of battery power source and battery power source system
US7126294B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2006-10-24 Ebara Corporation Method and device for controlling photovoltaic inverter, and feed water device
JP5581965B2 (en) * 2010-01-19 2014-09-03 オムロン株式会社 MPPT controller, solar cell control device, photovoltaic power generation system, MPPT control program, and MPPT controller control method

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019178795A1 (en) * 2018-03-22 2019-09-26 General Electric Company Dual-sampling maximum power point tracking with dynamic power limiting for power systems
US11368023B2 (en) 2018-03-22 2022-06-21 General Electric Company Dual-sampling maximum power point tracking with dynamic power limiting for power systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2014081919A (en) 2014-05-08
EP2722725A1 (en) 2014-04-23
JP6198504B2 (en) 2017-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2023227A1 (en) Circuit and method for monitoring the point of maximum power for solar energy sources and solar generator incorporating said circuit
Coelho et al. A MPPT approach based on temperature measurements applied in PV systems
Raj et al. A novel maximum power point tracking technique for photovoltaic module based on power plane analysis of $ I $–$ V $ characteristics
EP2722726B1 (en) Device for controlling the occurrence of a power curve measurement
CN102597901A (en) Apparatus for obtaining information enabling the determination of the maximum power point of a power source
KR101371226B1 (en) MPPT method for mobile PV module
Elyaqouti et al. Implementation in Arduino of MPPT using variable step size P&O algorithm in PV installations
AU2018278210B2 (en) Maximum power point tracking hybrid control of an energy storage system
EP2624094B1 (en) Method and arrangement in connection with photovoltaic power generator composed of series-connected photovoltaic modules
EP2722725B1 (en) Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source
EP2620829A1 (en) Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source like a photovoltaic cell
EP2657804A1 (en) Method and arrangement for estimating power variations in photovoltaic systems
Restrepo et al. An MPPT algorithm for PV systems based on a simplified photo-diode model
WO2014002476A1 (en) Power generation control apparatus, solar power system, and power generation control method
KR101598458B1 (en) Photovoltaic inverter system for improving photovoltaic efficiency and control method thereof
Ayop et al. The resistance comparison method using integral controller for photovoltaic emulator
Ounnas et al. Design and hardware implementation of modified incremental conductance algorithm for photovoltaic system
Averbukh et al. Development of a quick dynamic response maximum power point tracking algorithm for off-grid system with adaptive switching (On–Off) control of dc/dc converter
KR101573277B1 (en) Solar generating apparatus having a function of dynamic mppt and the method thereof
EP2513736B1 (en) Method for obtaining information enabling the determination of a characteristic of a power source
Kargarnejad et al. A new fuzzy-based maximum power point tracker for a solar panel based on datasheet values
EP2513737B1 (en) Method for obtaining information enabling the determination of a characteristic of a power source
KR101201933B1 (en) Method and apparatus for most power point tracking of solar cell module
EP2450769B1 (en) Device for tracking a maximum power point of a power source
Ahmed et al. Direct switching maximum power point tracking technique for PV applications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20141023

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20161223

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 896317

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012032747

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170524

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 896317

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170524

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170824

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170825

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170824

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170924

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012032747

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20121016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170524

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190913

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20191018

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170524

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20201006

Year of fee payment: 9

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20201016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602012032747

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220503