EP1558059B1 - Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument - Google Patents

Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1558059B1
EP1558059B1 EP20050405298 EP05405298A EP1558059B1 EP 1558059 B1 EP1558059 B1 EP 1558059B1 EP 20050405298 EP20050405298 EP 20050405298 EP 05405298 A EP05405298 A EP 05405298A EP 1558059 B1 EP1558059 B1 EP 1558059B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hearing instrument
gain
hearing
active
user
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP20050405298
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1558059A2 (en
EP1558059A3 (en
Inventor
Silvia Allegro Baumann
Stefan Launer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sonova Holding AG
Original Assignee
Phonak AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Phonak AG filed Critical Phonak AG
Priority to DK05405298T priority Critical patent/DK1558059T3/en
Priority to DE200560021835 priority patent/DE602005021835D1/en
Priority to EP20050405298 priority patent/EP1558059B1/en
Publication of EP1558059A2 publication Critical patent/EP1558059A2/en
Publication of EP1558059A3 publication Critical patent/EP1558059A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1558059B1 publication Critical patent/EP1558059B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/55Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using an external connection, either wireless or wired
    • H04R25/552Binaural
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/30Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2460/00Details of hearing devices, i.e. of ear- or headphones covered by H04R1/10 or H04R5/033 but not provided for in any of their subgroups, or of hearing aids covered by H04R25/00 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2460/03Aspects of the reduction of energy consumption in hearing devices

Definitions

  • This invention is in the field of processing signals in or for hearing instruments. It more particularly relates to a method of controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument, and to a hearing instrument.
  • Binaural loudness summation is known in the field of audiology. Binaural loudness summation is the effect that the loudness of sound is greater when it is presented to both ears simultaneously than when it is presented to one ear alone. The magnitude of this effect varies between individuals. Usually, the increase in loudness is approximately 3 dB when the intensity level is near the person's hearing threshold. The effect increases at suprathreshold level.
  • Binaural loudness summation is one of the advantages of binaural amplification. For persons with bilateral hearing loss who are equipped with two hearing instruments, the applied gain may be reduced. Due to the reduced gain, the chance of feedback is decreased, and larger vents may be used.
  • the loss of binaural loudness summation accounts for a non-ideal gain fitting if a user, who usually wears two hearing instruments, occasionally only uses one hearing instrument. This may happen if the user deliberately only wears one hearing instrument or if one of the hearing instruments is not available.
  • WO 2004/114722 discloses a binaural hearing aid system, wherein an environment sound is detected based on a signal from the first hearing instrument and a signal from the second hearing instrument. The signal processing algorithm of both hearing instruments is selected based on the environment sound.
  • EP 1 465 454 a hearing instrument is described that automatically detects whether it is in the user's ear.
  • a hearing instrument in a hearing instrument it is once or repeatedly checked whether a second hearing instrument is present and active. If a second hearing instrument is active on the contralateral side, a first gain setting is adopted. If, however, no further hearing instrument is found to be active, a second gain setting is chosen.
  • the gain generated by the hearing instrument with the first gain setting may correspond to the gain for binaural fitting, whereas the gain of the second gain setting is increased in comparison.
  • the second gain may simply correspond to the first gain increased by a certain dB value. It may as an alternative be a specifically adapted gain characteristic of a monaural fitting for the user.
  • Gain is usually defined as the ratio between an input signal and an output signal. This ratio may be time-dependent and/or may be frequency dependent. In addition, the gain may be situation dependent (i.e. different gain settings for different hearing programs, which are associated to different acoustic situations).
  • a wireless communication channel may be a radio signal transmission or an inductive signal transmission (i.e., using magnetically coupled coils as antennas) or any other suitable wireless communication channel.
  • the signal used may be any signal transmitting any information.
  • the signal may just be a characteristic regularly repeated presence signal (e.g. a radio frequency carrier signal).
  • a wired communication channel may for example comprise a physical wire or may comprise the frame of a user's glasses.
  • the communication channel Since the only information that has to be transmitted is whether or not a second hearing instrument is active, the communication channel does not have to have a large bandwidth. Compared to prior art communication channels between two hearing instruments, the communication channel may therefore consume comparatively little power.
  • the remaining hearing instrument may, according to a special embodiment of the invention, initiate a signal informing the user of the battery failure of the unavailable hearing instrument and reminding the user to replace the battery of said hearing instrument.
  • a signal may be a beep signal, a voice message (like for example "left hearing aid not available” or "change battery of left hearing aid” etc.), a message displayed on a display unit of a remote control etc.
  • the battery charge level in a hearing aid is a quantity that is difficult to measure, at least without extra hardware, so that the "battery-low" warning signals are often unreliable.
  • a warning signal of this kind is, of course, not produced upon every check but for example only once when the other hearing instrument is found to be unavailable for the first time.
  • the occurrence of such a signal may but does not have to depend on a manually set switch value. For example, the user may switch to a monaural mode in which he deliberately uses one hearing instrument only, in which case a signal will not be output.
  • a signal warning the user of failure or imminent failure of the other hearing instrument may also be initiated in situations where, in contrast to the above-described principle, the gain setting of the remaining hearing instrument is not adapted in case the other hearing instrument is inactive.
  • hearing instrument or “hearing device”, as understood here, denotes on the one hand hearing aid devices that are therapeutic devices improving the hearing ability of individuals, primarily according to diagnostic results.
  • Such hearing aid devices may be Behind-The-Ear hearing aid devices or In-The-Ear hearing aid devices (including the so called In-The-Canal and Completely-In-The-Canal hearing aid devices, as well as partially and fully implanted hearing aid devices).
  • the term stands for devices which may improve the hearing of individuals with normal hearing e.g. in specific acoustical situations as in a very noisy environment or in concert halls, or which may even be used in the context of remote communication or of audio listening, for instance as provided by headphones.
  • the hearing devices addressed by the present invention are so-called active hearing devices which comprise at the input side at least one acoustical to electrical converter, such as a microphone, at the output side at least one electrical to acoustical converter, such as a loudspeaker (often also termed “receiver"), and which further comprise a signal processing unit for processing signals according to the output signals of the acoustical to electrical converter and for generating output signals to the electrical input of the electrical to mechanical output converter.
  • the signal processing circuit may be an analog, digital or hybrid analog-digital circuit, and may be implemented with discrete electronic components, integrated circuits, or a combination of both.
  • the hearing instrument system of Figure 1 comprises a set of two hearing instruments, each including at least one acoustic-to-electric converter 1.1, 1.2 (often, two or even three acoustic-to-electric converters are available in each hearing instrument), a signal processing unit (SPU) 3.1, 3.2 operable to apply a time- and/or frequency-dependent gain to the input signal or input signals S I,1 , S I,2 resulting in output signal S O,1 , S O,2 and at least one electric-to-acoustic converter 5.1, 5.2.
  • a communication channel 6 by which the hearing instruments may exchange information.
  • the communication interfaces of the hearing instruments are denoted by 7.1 and 7.2.
  • FIG. 2 An embodiment of the method according to the invention - as implemented in at least one, preferably in both of the hearing instruments - is illustrated in Figure 2 .
  • a check 12 is carried out by the hearing instrument via the communication channel.
  • the check it is determined whether the second hearing instrument is active. For example, it is checked whether a characteristic signal is received by a coil serving as antenna.
  • the overall gain setting - which may in addition depend on other parameters such as stored, pre-set user specific values, detected noise, incoming sound direction, a loudness level or an amplification level pre-set by the user etc.
  • a first gain setting 13 is applied in the case both hearing instruments are functional.
  • the first gain setting is adapted to binaural hearing and accounts for the phenomenon of binaural loudness summation.
  • a second gain setting 14 is applied.
  • the second gain setting may be qualitatively different from the first gain setting and may be based on different parameters (for example on different noise suppression algorithms, on different time constants, etc.). It may as an alternative be calculated from the first gain setting in an appropriate way, for example by adding a loudness and frequency dependent value to the gain.
  • the second gain (corresponding to the second gain setting) is higher compared to the first gain.
  • the gain is frequency dependent, this means that an average of the gain the audible part of the sound spectrum is higher.
  • the second gain may be specifically adapted to monaural hearing and to the characteristic hearing ability of the ear to which the remaining hearing instrument is associated.
  • the second gain and possibly also the first gain need not be identical for both hearing instruments of a hearing instrument system.
  • An example of a gain increase in case of a frequency dependent gain is illustrated very schematically in Figure 3 .
  • a first gain curve 23 depicts the frequency dependence of the first gain
  • a second gain curve 24 shows the frequency dependence of the second gain.
  • the second gain does not have to be higher than the first gain for all frequencies, although preferably in the part of the frequency spectrum which is most important for speech perception for the user, the second gain is on average higher than the first gain.
  • the step of checking whether both hearing instruments are functional is preferably repeated regularly.
  • a status information of a hearing instrument is transmitted to the other hearing instrument proactively, at regular intervals or on special occasions, such as in case of imminent failure (for example before the battery is empty).
  • a status information tag (or the like) in a memory of the receiving hearing instrument may be set to "not active” (referring to the other hearing instrument).
  • the step of determining whether the other hearing instrument is active then includes internally checking the status information tag.
  • the status information tag is re-set to "active" - for example manually or by a status information transmission by the other hearing instrument when it is switched on - when the other hearing instrument is activated again.
  • the hearing instrument may optionally once or repeatedly produce a signal 15 when the check reveals that the other hearing instrument is not active.
  • the signal may for example be acoustical or may be a warning message displayed on a display field of a remote control (not shown). By the signal, the user may for example be reminded by the still functioning hearing aid to replace the battery of the other hearing instrument.
  • the hearing instrument may manually be set to a mode where the signal does not appear so that the user is not disturbed by the signal in situations where he deliberately only uses only one hearing instrument.
  • FIG. 4 A second embodiment of the method according to the invention is shown in Figure 4 .
  • the embodiment of Figure 4 may be viewed as special, particularly simple variant of the embodiment of Figure 2 .
  • a check 12 is carried out by the hearing instrument via the communication channel.
  • a gain setting determination 31 - the gain may again depend on parameters such as be fixedly stored, for example user-characteristic values, detected noise, incoming sound direction a loudness level or amplification level pre-set by the user etc. - is carried out before or after or simultaneously to the check. If the check reveals that the other hearing instrument is not active, the gain is increased 32 in a predetermined manner.
  • a fixed dB value for example between 2 dB and 5 dB
  • the second gain curve 44 corresponds to the first gain curve plus a fixed value which is constant for all frequencies.
  • a fixed value which depends on the frequency may be added.
  • the embodiment of Figure 4 features the advantage that it is relatively simple. Also the embodiment of Figure 4 may comprise providing a signal 15 when it has been found that the other hearing instrument is not active.
  • a process of the kind shown in Figures 2 and 4 may be carried out in both hearing instruments. If one hearing instrument fails, the other one will switch to the second gain (or the increased gain).
  • a hearing instrument according to the invention comprises means for carrying out any embodiment of the above described method.
  • a hearing instrument system comprises two hearing instruments, shaped and adapted to be placed behind or in the left and right ear of the user, respectively.
  • the communication interfaces of the two hearing instruments are for example adjusted to each other so that only signals of the corresponding hearing instruments of the hearing instrument system may be detected or that signals of hearing instruments of other hearing instrument systems - for example of hearing instruments worn by other persons nearby - may be distinguished.
  • universal interfaces may be used, so that upon replacement of one hearing instrument no adaptation has to be done.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention is in the field of processing signals in or for hearing instruments. It more particularly relates to a method of controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument, and to a hearing instrument.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Binaural loudness summation is known in the field of audiology. Binaural loudness summation is the effect that the loudness of sound is greater when it is presented to both ears simultaneously than when it is presented to one ear alone. The magnitude of this effect varies between individuals. Usually, the increase in loudness is approximately 3 dB when the intensity level is near the person's hearing threshold. The effect increases at suprathreshold level.
  • Binaural loudness summation is one of the advantages of binaural amplification. For persons with bilateral hearing loss who are equipped with two hearing instruments, the applied gain may be reduced. Due to the reduced gain, the chance of feedback is decreased, and larger vents may be used.
  • Since the optimal gain is different between monaural and binaural fittings, the loss of binaural loudness summation accounts for a non-ideal gain fitting if a user, who usually wears two hearing instruments, occasionally only uses one hearing instrument. This may happen if the user deliberately only wears one hearing instrument or if one of the hearing instruments is not available.
  • WO 2004/114722 discloses a binaural hearing aid system, wherein an environment sound is detected based on a signal from the first hearing instrument and a signal from the second hearing instrument. The signal processing algorithm of both hearing instruments is selected based on the environment sound.
  • In EP 1 465 454 , a hearing instrument is described that automatically detects whether it is in the user's ear.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of this invention to provide a method of controlling a gain in a hearing instrument which allows to provide optimal gain characteristics in both, situations when the user wears two hearing instruments and situations when the user only wears one hearing instrument.
  • According to the invention, in a hearing instrument it is once or repeatedly checked whether a second hearing instrument is present and active. If a second hearing instrument is active on the contralateral side, a first gain setting is adopted. If, however, no further hearing instrument is found to be active, a second gain setting is chosen. The gain generated by the hearing instrument with the first gain setting may correspond to the gain for binaural fitting, whereas the gain of the second gain setting is increased in comparison. The second gain may simply correspond to the first gain increased by a certain dB value. It may as an alternative be a specifically adapted gain characteristic of a monaural fitting for the user.
  • "Gain" is usually defined as the ratio between an input signal and an output signal. This ratio may be time-dependent and/or may be frequency dependent. In addition, the gain may be situation dependent (i.e. different gain settings for different hearing programs, which are associated to different acoustic situations).
  • In a preferred embodiment of the invention, there exists some wireless or wired communication channel between the hearing instruments, across which there is a continuous or repeated communication between the hearing instruments.
  • A wireless communication channel may be a radio signal transmission or an inductive signal transmission (i.e., using magnetically coupled coils as antennas) or any other suitable wireless communication channel. The signal used may be any signal transmitting any information. In a most simple example, the signal may just be a characteristic regularly repeated presence signal (e.g. a radio frequency carrier signal).
  • A wired communication channel may for example comprise a physical wire or may comprise the frame of a user's glasses.
  • Since the only information that has to be transmitted is whether or not a second hearing instrument is active, the communication channel does not have to have a large bandwidth. Compared to prior art communication channels between two hearing instruments, the communication channel may therefore consume comparatively little power.
  • One of the often encountered reasons for a situation where only one hearing instrument of a binaural system is available is if the battery is empty. For this case, the remaining hearing instrument may, according to a special embodiment of the invention, initiate a signal informing the user of the battery failure of the unavailable hearing instrument and reminding the user to replace the battery of said hearing instrument. Such a signal may be a beep signal, a voice message (like for example "left hearing aid not available" or "change battery of left hearing aid" etc.), a message displayed on a display unit of a remote control etc. According to the prior art, it was possible to produce a warning signal when the battery in a hearing instrument was not yet empty but found to be low. However, it is a well-known fact that the battery charge level in a hearing aid is a quantity that is difficult to measure, at least without extra hardware, so that the "battery-low" warning signals are often unreliable.
  • A warning signal of this kind is, of course, not produced upon every check but for example only once when the other hearing instrument is found to be unavailable for the first time. The occurrence of such a signal may but does not have to depend on a manually set switch value. For example, the user may switch to a monaural mode in which he deliberately uses one hearing instrument only, in which case a signal will not be output.
  • A signal warning the user of failure or imminent failure of the other hearing instrument may also be initiated in situations where, in contrast to the above-described principle, the gain setting of the remaining hearing instrument is not adapted in case the other hearing instrument is inactive.
  • The term "hearing instrument" or "hearing device", as understood here, denotes on the one hand hearing aid devices that are therapeutic devices improving the hearing ability of individuals, primarily according to diagnostic results. Such hearing aid devices may be Behind-The-Ear hearing aid devices or In-The-Ear hearing aid devices (including the so called In-The-Canal and Completely-In-The-Canal hearing aid devices, as well as partially and fully implanted hearing aid devices). On the other hand, the term stands for devices which may improve the hearing of individuals with normal hearing e.g. in specific acoustical situations as in a very noisy environment or in concert halls, or which may even be used in the context of remote communication or of audio listening, for instance as provided by headphones.
  • The hearing devices addressed by the present invention are so-called active hearing devices which comprise at the input side at least one acoustical to electrical converter, such as a microphone, at the output side at least one electrical to acoustical converter, such as a loudspeaker (often also termed "receiver"), and which further comprise a signal processing unit for processing signals according to the output signals of the acoustical to electrical converter and for generating output signals to the electrical input of the electrical to mechanical output converter. In general, the signal processing circuit may be an analog, digital or hybrid analog-digital circuit, and may be implemented with discrete electronic components, integrated circuits, or a combination of both.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the following, embodiments of the invention are described with reference to drawings. The drawings are all schematical and show:
    • Fig. 1 a binaural hearing instrument system comprising two hearing instruments,
    • Fig. 2 a diagram of a first embodiment of the method according to the invention,
    • Fig. 3 an illustration of a gain increase in accordance with the first embodiment,
    • Fig. 4 a diagram of a second embodiment of the method according to the invention,
    • Fig. 5 an illustration of a gain increase in accordance with the second embodiment.
    DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The hearing instrument system of Figure 1 comprises a set of two hearing instruments, each including at least one acoustic-to-electric converter 1.1, 1.2 (often, two or even three acoustic-to-electric converters are available in each hearing instrument), a signal processing unit (SPU) 3.1, 3.2 operable to apply a time- and/or frequency-dependent gain to the input signal or input signals SI,1, SI,2 resulting in output signal SO,1, SO,2 and at least one electric-to-acoustic converter 5.1, 5.2. Between the two hearing instruments - in the shown embodiment between the signal processing units - there is a communication channel 6 by which the hearing instruments may exchange information. The communication interfaces of the hearing instruments are denoted by 7.1 and 7.2.
  • An embodiment of the method according to the invention - as implemented in at least one, preferably in both of the hearing instruments - is illustrated in Figure 2 . After initiation 11, a check 12 is carried out by the hearing instrument via the communication channel. By the check it is determined whether the second hearing instrument is active. For example, it is checked whether a characteristic signal is received by a coil serving as antenna. The overall gain setting - which may in addition depend on other parameters such as stored, pre-set user specific values, detected noise, incoming sound direction, a loudness level or an amplification level pre-set by the user etc. - applied to the input signal is chosen dependent on the result of this check (gain application 16). A first gain setting 13 is applied in the case both hearing instruments are functional. The first gain setting is adapted to binaural hearing and accounts for the phenomenon of binaural loudness summation. In case one of the hearing instruments is not functional, a second gain setting 14 is applied. The second gain setting may be qualitatively different from the first gain setting and may be based on different parameters (for example on different noise suppression algorithms, on different time constants, etc.). It may as an alternative be calculated from the first gain setting in an appropriate way, for example by adding a loudness and frequency dependent value to the gain.
  • The second gain (corresponding to the second gain setting) is higher compared to the first gain. In case the gain is frequency dependent, this means that an average of the gain the audible part of the sound spectrum is higher. The second gain may be specifically adapted to monaural hearing and to the characteristic hearing ability of the ear to which the remaining hearing instrument is associated. In other words, the second gain and possibly also the first gain need not be identical for both hearing instruments of a hearing instrument system. An example of a gain increase in case of a frequency dependent gain is illustrated very schematically in Figure 3 . A first gain curve 23 depicts the frequency dependence of the first gain, whereas a second gain curve 24 shows the frequency dependence of the second gain. The second gain does not have to be higher than the first gain for all frequencies, although preferably in the part of the frequency spectrum which is most important for speech perception for the user, the second gain is on average higher than the first gain.
  • The step of checking whether both hearing instruments are functional is preferably repeated regularly.
  • Once the temporarily unavailable hearing instrument becomes available again - for example since the battery has been replaced or since the instrument is functional again - this will be detected, and the gain re-set to "binaural" (i.e. to the first gain setting).
  • As an alternative to the repeated checking of the status of the other hearing instrument ("polling") a further possibility exists. According to an alternative, a status information of a hearing instrument is transmitted to the other hearing instrument proactively, at regular intervals or on special occasions, such as in case of imminent failure (for example before the battery is empty). Once such a proactively sent status information is received, a status information tag (or the like) in a memory of the receiving hearing instrument may be set to "not active" (referring to the other hearing instrument). The step of determining whether the other hearing instrument is active then includes internally checking the status information tag. The status information tag is re-set to "active" - for example manually or by a status information transmission by the other hearing instrument when it is switched on - when the other hearing instrument is activated again.
  • The hearing instrument may optionally once or repeatedly produce a signal 15 when the check reveals that the other hearing instrument is not active. The signal may for example be acoustical or may be a warning message displayed on a display field of a remote control (not shown). By the signal, the user may for example be reminded by the still functioning hearing aid to replace the battery of the other hearing instrument.
  • If the signal is acoustical, preferably the hearing instrument may manually be set to a mode where the signal does not appear so that the user is not disturbed by the signal in situations where he deliberately only uses only one hearing instrument.
  • A second embodiment of the method according to the invention is shown in Figure 4 . The embodiment of Figure 4 may be viewed as special, particularly simple variant of the embodiment of Figure 2. As in said previous embodiment, after initiation 11, a check 12 is carried out by the hearing instrument via the communication channel. A gain setting determination 31 - the gain may again depend on parameters such as be fixedly stored, for example user-characteristic values, detected noise, incoming sound direction a loudness level or amplification level pre-set by the user etc. - is carried out before or after or simultaneously to the check. If the check reveals that the other hearing instrument is not active, the gain is increased 32 in a predetermined manner. It may for example be increased by adding a fixed dB value (for example between 2 dB and 5 dB) for all frequencies. This is illustrated in Figure 5 , where the second gain curve 44 corresponds to the first gain curve plus a fixed value which is constant for all frequencies. As an alternative, a fixed value which depends on the frequency may be added.
  • The embodiment of Figure 4 features the advantage that it is relatively simple. Also the embodiment of Figure 4 may comprise providing a signal 15 when it has been found that the other hearing instrument is not active.
  • A process of the kind shown in Figures 2 and 4 may be carried out in both hearing instruments. If one hearing instrument fails, the other one will switch to the second gain (or the increased gain).
  • A hearing instrument according to the invention comprises means for carrying out any embodiment of the above described method. A hearing instrument system comprises two hearing instruments, shaped and adapted to be placed behind or in the left and right ear of the user, respectively. In the case of wireless communication, the communication interfaces of the two hearing instruments are for example adjusted to each other so that only signals of the corresponding hearing instruments of the hearing instrument system may be detected or that signals of hearing instruments of other hearing instrument systems - for example of hearing instruments worn by other persons nearby - may be distinguished. As an alternative, universal interfaces may be used, so that upon replacement of one hearing instrument no adaptation has to be done.

Claims (9)

  1. A method of controlling a gain setting of a hearing instrument, the hearing instrument being operable to determine an output audio signal from at least one input signal and to supply said output audio signal to one ear of a user, the hearing instrument comprising a communication interface (7.1, 7.2) operable to establish a communication link to a further hearing instrument associated with the other ear of the user, characterised in that the method comprises the steps of determining, using the communication interface, whether the further hearing instrument for the other ear of the user is active, of adopting a first gain setting if the further hearing instrument for the other ear of the user is active, and of adopting a second gain setting different from the first gain setting if the further hearing instrument is not active.
  2. A method according to claim 1, wherein an average gain value of the first gain setting is lower than an average gain value of the second gain.
  3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the gain in accordance with the second gain setting corresponds to the gain in accordance with the first gain setting increased by a fixed, possibly frequency dependent, dB value.
  4. A method according to any one of the previous claims, wherein the step of determining whether a further hearing instrument is active is carried out repeatedly at regular or random time intervals.
  5. A method according to any one of the previous claims, wherein, for determining whether the further hearing instrument associated with the other ear of the user is active, the hearing instrument sends a request signal demanding a status information from the potential further hearing instrument.
  6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein, in case the further hearing instrument is active, it sends a status information to the hearing instrument proactively.
  7. A method according to any one of the previous claims, wherein at least once a signal perceivable by the user is initiated by the still active hearing aid when the further hearing instrument is not active.
  8. A hearing instrument system comprising two hearing instruments, each comprising a signal processing unit (3.1, 3.2) operable to generate an output signal (SO,1, SO,2) from at least one input signal (SI,1, SI,2) and an electric-to-acoustic converter (5.1, 5.2), an input of which is operatively connected to an output of the signal processing unit (3.1, 3.2) and which is operable to supply an acoustic output signal to one ear of a user, each of the hearing instruments further comprising a communication interface (7.1, 7.2) operable to exchange information with the other hearing instrument associated with the other ear of the user, characterised in that the hearing instruments are programmed so as to be operable to detect, using the communication interface, whether the other hearing instrument associated with the other ear of the user is active, and to apply a first gain to the input signal (SI,1, SI,2) if the other hearing instrument is found to be active, or to apply a second gain to the input signal (SI,1 SI,2) if the other hearing instrument is not found to be active.
  9. A hearing instrument according to claim 8, wherein the communication interface (7.1, 7.2) is a wireless communication interface.
EP20050405298 2005-04-18 2005-04-18 Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument Not-in-force EP1558059B1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK05405298T DK1558059T3 (en) 2005-04-18 2005-04-18 Controlling a gain setting in a hearing aid
DE200560021835 DE602005021835D1 (en) 2005-04-18 2005-04-18 Gain adjustment control for a hearing instrument
EP20050405298 EP1558059B1 (en) 2005-04-18 2005-04-18 Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20050405298 EP1558059B1 (en) 2005-04-18 2005-04-18 Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1558059A2 EP1558059A2 (en) 2005-07-27
EP1558059A3 EP1558059A3 (en) 2005-11-23
EP1558059B1 true EP1558059B1 (en) 2010-06-16

Family

ID=34626583

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20050405298 Not-in-force EP1558059B1 (en) 2005-04-18 2005-04-18 Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1558059B1 (en)
DE (1) DE602005021835D1 (en)
DK (1) DK1558059T3 (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2039218B1 (en) 2006-07-12 2020-12-02 Sonova AG Method for operating a binaural hearing system as well as a binaural hearing system
SE530105C2 (en) 2006-07-12 2008-03-04 Peltor Ab Procedure for limiting the maximum allowable sound volume in a headphone and headphones for carrying out the procedure
EP2103178A1 (en) * 2006-12-13 2009-09-23 Phonak AG Method and system for hearing device fitting
SE532191C2 (en) * 2007-05-07 2009-11-10 3M Svenska Ab Method and apparatus for attenuating an audible signal
JP4530109B1 (en) * 2009-05-25 2010-08-25 パナソニック株式会社 Hearing aid system
JP6019553B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2016-11-02 ソニー株式会社 Earphone device
JP5919686B2 (en) * 2011-08-31 2016-05-18 ソニー株式会社 Sound playback device
US11510020B2 (en) 2018-12-14 2022-11-22 Sonova Ag Systems and methods for coordinating rendering of a remote audio stream by binaural hearing devices
GB2579802A (en) 2018-12-14 2020-07-08 Sonova Ag Systems and methods for coordinating rendering of a remote audio stream by binaural hearing devices

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK0941014T3 (en) * 1998-03-03 2006-05-22 Siemens Audiologische Technik Hearing aid system with two hearing aids
US7406179B2 (en) * 2003-04-01 2008-07-29 Sound Design Technologies, Ltd. System and method for detecting the insertion or removal of a hearing instrument from the ear canal
WO2004110099A2 (en) * 2003-06-06 2004-12-16 Gn Resound A/S A hearing aid wireless network
ATE527829T1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2011-10-15 Gn Resound As BINAURAL HEARING AID SYSTEM WITH COORDINATED SOUND PROCESSING

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE602005021835D1 (en) 2010-07-29
EP1558059A2 (en) 2005-07-27
EP1558059A3 (en) 2005-11-23
DK1558059T3 (en) 2010-10-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1558059B1 (en) Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument
EP3588985B1 (en) Binaural hearing device system with binaural active occlusion cancellation
US10003894B2 (en) Hearing prosthesis with accessory detection
US9456286B2 (en) Method for operating a binaural hearing system and binaural hearing system
EP2638708B1 (en) Hearing instrument and method of operating the same
US20180176696A1 (en) Binaural hearing device system with a binaural impulse environment detector
US9894446B2 (en) Customization of adaptive directionality for hearing aids using a portable device
US20030064746A1 (en) Sound enhancement for mobile phones and other products producing personalized audio for users
US11109165B2 (en) Hearing device incorporating dynamic microphone attenuation during streaming
EP3280159A1 (en) Binaural hearing aid device
US8224002B2 (en) Method for the semi-automatic adjustment of a hearing device, and a corresponding hearing device
EP2617127B2 (en) Method and system for providing hearing assistance to a user
EP2375787A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for improved noise reduction for hearing assistance devices
US7545944B2 (en) Controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument
US8218800B2 (en) Method for setting a hearing system with a perceptive model for binaural hearing and corresponding hearing system
EP3072314B1 (en) A method of operating a hearing system for conducting telephone calls and a corresponding hearing system
US20050175199A1 (en) Method to operate a hearing device and a hearing device
EP4184948A1 (en) A hearing system comprising a hearing instrument and a method for operating the hearing instrument
EP2835983A1 (en) Hearing instrument presenting environmental sounds
WO2023169755A1 (en) Method for operating a hearing aid
JP2022083433A (en) Binaural hearing system comprising bilateral compression
JP2007300544A (en) Listening device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060516

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): CH DE DK LI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20060720

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE DK LI

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005021835

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100729

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: FREI PATENTANWALTSBUERO AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110317

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602005021835

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110316

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20160427

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20160425

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20170430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602005021835

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20220427

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005021835

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231103