EP1453941B1 - Water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent - Google Patents

Water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1453941B1
EP1453941B1 EP02792755A EP02792755A EP1453941B1 EP 1453941 B1 EP1453941 B1 EP 1453941B1 EP 02792755 A EP02792755 A EP 02792755A EP 02792755 A EP02792755 A EP 02792755A EP 1453941 B1 EP1453941 B1 EP 1453941B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
water
package
composition
component
surfactant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP02792755A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1453941A1 (en
Inventor
Feng-Lung Unilever Research U.S. Inc. HSU
Neeraj Unilever R & D Vlaardingen GUPTA
Kwang Ho Unilever Research U.S. Inc LEE
John Leslie Unilever R & D Port Sunlight STOREY
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP1453941A1 publication Critical patent/EP1453941A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1453941B1 publication Critical patent/EP1453941B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/04Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties combined with or containing other objects
    • C11D17/041Compositions releasably affixed on a substrate or incorporated into a dispensing means
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D17/0017Multi-phase liquid compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/04Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties combined with or containing other objects
    • C11D17/041Compositions releasably affixed on a substrate or incorporated into a dispensing means
    • C11D17/042Water soluble or water disintegrable containers or substrates containing cleaning compositions or additives for cleaning compositions
    • C11D17/043Liquid or thixotropic (gel) compositions

Definitions

  • a water-soluble single-use package comprising a layered liquid detergent in the water-soluble body portion and a process of its preparation.
  • Detergent compositions are provided in many forms, of which granular and liquid compositions are the most prevalent. More recently, unit dose forms of detergent have been proposed in the form of compressed tablets of detergent powder or water-soluble packages, which are consumed during a single cleaning application. The unit dose forms are preferred by some consumers, in that the dose is pre-measured and, consequently, the unit dose form is faster, easier and less messy to use. Water-soluble packages filled with liquid detergent composition are desired especially by consumers who are used to liquid detergents.
  • EP 116422, EP 175485, GB 1247189, WO 99/47635, and Ginn disclose dual layer liquid cleaning compositions in a bottle or a water insoluble package.
  • the layers are achieved by employing an electrolyte, which when added to an aqueous surfactant solution, forces the separation of the surfactant from the aqueous phase.
  • electrolyte which when added to an aqueous surfactant solution, forces the separation of the surfactant from the aqueous phase.
  • the phenomenon of separating an organic component from an aqueous layer, by the addition of a salt (electrolyte) is known as "salting out.”
  • the salt increases the ionic character of water and drives the organic, less polar, component away.
  • the present invention includes a layered liquid detergent composition in a water-soluble single use package, the composition comprising at least two layers, with a surfactant and an organic electrolyte distributed within the layers.
  • the preferred inventive compositions include water, yet the water-soluble package remains intact on storage.
  • any particular upper concentration can be associated with any particular lower concentration.
  • Water-soluble body as used herein means soluble in cold water, i.e. soluble at 5°C and above.
  • Organic cation as used herein means a non-metal, positively charged ionic entity.
  • Organic electrolyte as used herein means an electrolyte containing an organic cation.
  • Transparent as used herein includes both transparent and translucent and means that an ingredient, or a mixture, or a phase, or a composition, or a package according to the invention preferably has a transmittance of more than 25%, more preferably more than 30%, most preferably more than 40%, optimally more than 50% in the visible part of the spectrum (approx. 410-800 nm).
  • absorbency may be measured as less than 0.6 (approximately equivalent to 25% transmitting) or by having transmittance greater than 25% wherein % transmittance equals: 1/10 absorbancy x 100%.
  • % transmittance equals: 1/10 absorbancy x 100%.
  • composition or "liquid detergent composition” as used herein means the final detergent composition (i.e., the detergent composition itself, but not the water-soluble body), including at least two layers.
  • the at least two layers comprise between them a surfactant and an organic electrolyte.
  • the package is preferably made of a clear, sealable, cold water soluble film such as polyvinyl alcohol. Thickness could range from 25 to 100 ⁇ m, more preferably from 35 to 80 ⁇ m, most preferably from 45 to 55 ⁇ m. Other materials from which the package can be made include but are not limited to methyl hydroxy propyl cellulose and polyethylene oxide. Polyvinyl alcohol is preferred due to its ready availability and low cost.
  • One supplier of polyvinyl alcohol film is Monosol Inc. European suppliers of suitable films include but are not limited to Monosol supplied by Monosol Inc. or PT supplied by Aicello or K-series supplied by Kurary or Hydrafilm supplied by Rainier Specialty polymers ltd, or QSA series by Polymer Films, Inc.
  • the water-soluble film of the base wall is the same material as that used to make the body wall. Both thermoforming and cold forming (e.g., with water) are possible.
  • the essential ingredients of the inventive laundry compositions are surfactant and organic electrolyte.
  • compositions of the invention contain one or more surface active agents (surfactants) selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic, ampholytic and zwitterionic surfactants or mixtures thereof.
  • surfactants selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic, ampholytic and zwitterionic surfactants or mixtures thereof.
  • the preferred surfactant detergents for use in the present invention are mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants although it is to be understood that any surfactant may be used alone or in combination with any other surfactant or surfactants.
  • the surfactant should comprise at least 5%, e.g., 5% to 80%, preferably at least 10% to 80%, more preferably 15% to 40%; even more preferably 15% to 35% of the composition.
  • Nonionic synthetic organic detergents which can be used with the invention, alone or in combination with other surfactants, are described below. Nonionic surfactants are typically included.
  • Nonionics surfactants are nonionic surfactants whch are pourable liquids, gels or pastes at 25°C.
  • Nonionic detergent surfactants normally have molecular weights of from about 300 to about 11,000. Mixtures of different nonionic detergent surfactants may also be used, provided the mixture is a liquid gel or paste at 25°C.
  • the composition may comprise one or more nonionic surfactants which are solid at 25°C. These dissolved and/or dispersed in either or both liquid layers.
  • nonionic detergents are characterized by the presence of an organic hydrophobic group and an organic hydrophilic group and are typically produced by the condensation of an organic aliphatic or alkyl aromatic hydrophobic compound with ethylene oxide (hydrophilic in nature).
  • suitable nonionic surfactants are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,316,812 and 3,630,929 and applicants' published European specification EP-A-225,654.
  • the nonionic detergents are polyalkoxylated lipophiles wherein the desired hydrophile-lipophile balance is obtained from addition of a hydrophilic polyalkoxy group to a lipophilic moiety.
  • a preferred class of nonionic detergent is the alkoxylated alkanols wherein the alkanol is of 9 to 18 carbon atoms and wherein the number of moles of alkylene oxide (of 2 or 3 carbon atoms) is from 3 to 12. Of such materials it is preferred to employ those wherein the alkanol is a fatty alcohol of 9 to 11 or 12 to 15 carbon atoms and which contain from 5 to 8 or 5 to 9 alkoxy groups per mole.
  • Nonionics are represented by the commercially well- known class of nonionics sold under the trademark Plurafac®.
  • the Plurafacs® are the reaction products of a higher linear alcohol and a mixture of ethylene and propylene oxides, containing a mixed chain of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, terminated by a hydroxyl group. Examples include C 13 - C 15 fatty alcohol condensed with 6 moles ethylene oxide and 3 moles propylene oxide, C 13 - C 15 fatty alcohol condensed with 7 moles propylene oxide and 4 moles ethylene oxide, C 13 - C 15 fatty alcohol condensed with 5 moles propylene oxide and 10 moles ethylene oxide, or mixtures of any of the above.
  • a particularly preferred group of glycoside surfactants for use in the practice of this invention includes those of the formula above in which R is a monovalent organic radical (linear or branched) containing from about 6 to about 1 8(especially from about 8 to about 18) carbon atoms; y is zero; z is glucose or a moiety derived therefrom; x is a number having an average value of from 1 to about 4 (preferably from about 1 to 4).
  • Nonionic surfactants particularly useful for this application include, but are not limited to: alcohol ethoxylates (e.g. Neodol® 25-9 from Shell Chemical Co.), alkyl phenol ethoxylates (e.g. Tergitol® NP-9 from Union Carbide Corp.), alkylpolyglucosides (e.g. Glucapon® 600CS from Henkel Corp.), polyoxyethylenated polyoxypropylene glycols (e.g. Pluronic® L-65 from BASF Corp.), sorbitol esters (e.g. Emsorb® 2515 from Henkel Corp.), polyoxyethylenated sorbitol esters (e.g.
  • Emsorb® 6900 from Henkel Corp.
  • alkanolamides e.g. Alkamide® DC212/SE from Rhone-Poulenc Co.
  • N-alkypyrrolidones e.g. Surfadone® LP-100 from ISP Technologies Inc.
  • Mixtures of two or more of the nonionic surfactants can be used.
  • the preferred anionic surface active agents are the alkali metal, ammonium or alkanolamide salts of higher alkyl benzene sulfonates and alkali metal, ammonium or alkanolamide salts of higher alkyl sulfonates.
  • Preferred higher alkyl sulfonates are those in which the alkyl groups contain 8 to 26 carbon atoms, preferably 12 to 22 carbon atoms and more preferably 14 to 18 carbon atoms.
  • the alkyl group in the alkyl benzene sulfonate preferably contains 8 to 16 carbon atoms and more preferably 10 to 15 carbon atoms.
  • a particularly preferred alkyl benzene sulfonate is the sodium or potassium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, e.g. sodium linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate.
  • the alkyl substituent is preferably linear, i.e. normal alkyl, however, branched chain alkyl sulfonates can be employed, although they are not as good with respect to biodegradability.
  • the alkane, i.e. alkyl, substituent may be terminally sulfonated or may be joined, for example, to the carbon atom of the chain, i.e. may be a secondary sulfonate. It is understood in the art that the substituent may be joined to any carbon on the alkyl chain.
  • the higher alkyl sulfonates can be used as the alkali metal salts, such as sodium and potassium.
  • the preferred salts are the sodium salts.
  • the preferred alkyl sulfonates are the C 10 to C 18 primary normal alkyl sodium and potassium sulfonates, with the C 10 to C 15 primary normal alkyl sulfonate salt being more preferred.
  • normal alkyl and branched chain alkyl sulfates e.g., primary alkyl sulfates
  • anionic component e.g., sodium sulfate
  • the higher alkyl polyether sulfates used in accordance with the present invention can be normal or branched chain alkyl and contain lower alkoxy groups which can contain two or three carbon atoms.
  • the normal higher alkyl polyether sulfates are preferred in that they have a higher degree of biodegradability than the branched chain alkyl and the lower poly alkoxy groups are preferably ethoxy groups.
  • the preferred higher alkyl poly ethoxy sulfates used in accordance with the present invention are represented by the formula: R'--O(CH 2 CH 2 O) p --SO 3 M, where R' is C 8 to C 20 alkyl, preferably C 10 to C 18 and more preferably C 12 to C 15 ; p is 2 to 8, preferably 2 to 6, and more preferably 2 to 4;and M is an alkali metal, such as sodium and potassium, or an ammonium cation.
  • the sodium and potassium salts are preferred.
  • a preferred higher alkyl poly ethoxylated sulfate is the sodium salt of a triethoxy C 12 to C 15 alcohol sulfate having the formula: C 12-15 --O--(CH 2 CH 2 O) 3 --SO 3 Na
  • alkyl ethoxy sulfates examples include C 12-15 normal or primary alkyl triethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; n-decyl diethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; C 12 primary alkyl diethoxy sulfate, ammonium salt; C 12 primary alkyl triethoxy sulfate, sodium salt: C 15 primary alkyl tetraethoxy sulfate, sodium salt, mixed C 14-15 normal primary alkyl mixed tri- and tetraethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; stearyl pentaethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; and mixed C 10-18 normal primary alkyl triethoxy sulfate, potassium salt.
  • the normal alkyl ethoxy sulfates are readily biodegradable and are preferred.
  • the alkyl poly-lower alkoxy sulfates can be used in mixtures with each other and/or in mixtures with the above discussed higher alkyl benzene, alkyl sulfonates, or alkyl sulfates.
  • the alkali metal higher alkyl poly ethoxy sulfate can be used with the alkylbenzene sulfonate and/or with an alkyl sulfonate or sulfonate, in an amount of 0 to 70%, preferably 10 to 50% and more preferably 10 to 20% by weight of entire composition.
  • Anionic surfactants particularly useful for this application include, but are not limited to: linear alkyl benzene sulfonates (e.g. Vista® C-500 from Vista Chemical Co.), alkyl sulfates (e.g. Polystep® B-5 from Stepan Co.), polyoxyethylenated alkyl sulfates (e.g. Standapol® ES-3 from Stepan Co.), alpha olefin sulfonates (e.g. Witconate® AOS from Witco Corp.), alpha sulfo methyl esters (e.g. Alpha-Step® MC-48 from Stepan Co.), alkyl ether sulfates and isethionates (e.g. Jordapon® Cl from PPG Industries Inc.).
  • linear alkyl benzene sulfonates e.g. Vista® C-500 from Vista Chemical Co.
  • alkyl sulfates e.g. Polystep
  • Anionic surfactants may be added pre-neutralized or, preferably, may be formed in situ, by neutralizing a precursor acid (fatty acid in the case of soaps). Further, the anionic precursor or fatty acid should be over-neutralised (i.e. there should be an excess of the alkaline material used to form the counter-ion). Further still, it is preferable to use the organic counter-ion used for the organic electrolyte. Preferably, monoethanolamine salt of the anionic precursor acid is employed.
  • cationic surfactants are known in the art, and almost any cationic surfactant having at least one long chain alkyl group of about 10 to 24 carbon atoms is suitable in the present invention. Such compounds are described in "Cationic Surfactants", Jungermann, 1970, incorporated by reference.
  • Ampholytic synthetic detergents can be broadly described as derivatives of aliphatic or aliphatic derivatives of heterocyclic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic radical may be a straight chain or a branched and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents contains from about 8 to 18 carbon atoms and at least one contains an anionic water-solubilizing group, e.g. carboxylate, sulfonate, sulfate.
  • an anionic water-solubilizing group e.g. carboxylate, sulfonate, sulfate.
  • Examples of compounds falling within this definition are sodium 3(dodecylamino)propionate, sodium 3-(dodecylamino)propane-1-sulfonate, sodium 2-(dodecylamino)ethyl sulfate, sodium 2-(dimethylamino)octadecanoate, disodium 3-(N- carboxymethyldodecylamino)propane 1-sulfonate, disodium octadecylimminodiacetate, sodium 1-carboxymethyl-2-undecylimidazole, and sodium N, N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-sulfato-3-dodecoxypropylamine.
  • Sodium 3-(dodecylamino)propane-1-sulfonate is preferred.
  • zwitterionic surfactants which may be used are set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,062,647, hereby incorporated by reference.
  • the surfactant in the laundry compositions of the invention is anionic and/or nonionic, especially linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, alkyl ether sulfate, alcohol ethoxylates and mixtures thereof.
  • mixtures of anionic and nonionc surfactants are especially preferred, for optimum greasy stain and particulate soil removal.
  • the most effective mixtures employ anionic to nonionic ratio of from 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably from 5:1 to 1:5, most preferably from 3:1 to 1:3.
  • nonionic surfactants are employed, in the absence of, or lower levels of, anionic surfactants, alone or in combination with cationic surfactants and/or antifoams.
  • an electrolyte containing an organic cation results in formulations which may contain more water, yet by virtue of much reduced water activity level, without damaging the water-soluble package, resulting in more cost-effective product. Higher amounts of water are also advantageous to accommodate hydrophilic functional ingredients. Furthermore, the use of organic electrolyte resulted in improved transparency of the compositions, compared to the same compositions containing an inorganic electrolyte (i.e., inorganic cation). In addition, organic electrolytes decrease the potential for surfactant crystallizing out during storage.
  • Electrolyte may be pre-formed or formed in situ.
  • organic electrolytes suitable for use in the present invention meet both of the following criteria:
  • Preferred electrolytes are selected from the group consisting of monoethanolamine, triethanolamine, and ammonium oxide salts of citrate, carbonate, bicarbonate, borate and sulfate.
  • Monoethanolamine salt is the most effective.
  • Monoethanolamine citrate, monoethanolamine carbonate and monoethanolamine borate are the most preferred, due to their ability to also function as builders and/or buffering agents in the detergent composition.
  • Monoethanolamine citrate is optimum, due to its optimum ability to salt out a surfactant and/or reduce the water activity.
  • the liquid detergent composition of the invention generally includes from 1 to 50%, more preferably from 5 to 40%, most preferably from 5 to 35%, and optimally from 10 to 30% of the organic electrolyte, in order to attain a stable layered composition, at optimum cost.
  • concentration of electrolyte to create a two-layered composition depends on the surfactant concentration, the water amount and the identity of the electrolyte.
  • the concentration needed may be predicted by calculating the ionic strength of the electrolyte at a particular concentration. It has been found as part of the present invention that the preferred electrolytes and preferred concentrations are those that have a calculated ionic strength of at least 4.2, preferably at least 4.4, more preferably at least 5.
  • the liquid laundry detergent according to the invention comprises at least two layers. Both layers are preferably isotropic (a single phase when viewed macroscopically), after standing still for at least 24 hours at 20°C. "Isotropic" is used herein to describe each layer of the inventive composition, since the composition overall contains at least two layers and thus could not be isotropic overall.
  • compositions comprise two layers, with the top layer containing majority, preferably all, of the surfactant, and the bottom layer containing the majority, preferably all, of the electrolyte.
  • compositions of the resultant layers do not necessarily correspond with the compositions of the respective layers prior to their being combined into a single composition. This is because of reaction between ingredients, in particular the acidic ingredients and the basic ingredients (e.g., monoethanolamine) and also, because of possible migration of material between the two layers, or emulsification of some of the layers within each other. Consequently, it is to be understood that the composition of the components as herein described pertains to the compositions prior to their being combined into a single composition. By virtue of employing a surfactant and an organic electrolyte in the amounts as herein described (and optional ingredients, including those described below), the composition separates into at least two layers, wherein the composition of the layers may differ from the composition of the initial components.
  • a surfactant and an organic electrolyte in the amounts as herein described (and optional ingredients, including those described below)
  • the ranges of the surfactant, electrolyte, and water content within the respective components or layers are as follows (% by weight of the relevant component): Surfactant Electrolyte Total Water Surfactant Component or Layer General 5-100 0-15 0-60 Preferred 10-70 0-5 1-40 Most Preferred 20-60 0-1 5-30 Optimum 20-55 0-1 5-25 Electrolyte Component or Layer General 0-5 1-100 0-90 Preferred 0-1 5-95 10-60 Most Preferred 0-1 10-60 20-70 Optimum 0-1 15-40 20-50
  • the volume ratio of the two components in the final composition is generally in the range of from 10:90 to 90:10, more preferably from 20:80 to 80:20, most preferably from 70:30 to 30:70, and optimally from 40:60 to 60:40, in order to provide the most pleasing appearance and optimum cleaning benefits.
  • the resulting layers have the volume ratios in the same ranges as described above (but the layer ratio may not be the same as the component ratio). More than two layers may be present.
  • the additional layer may be a capsule, dispersion or emulsion layer, as described below under Optional Ingredients.
  • a surfactant component may include both highly polar and highly non-polar ingredients, which might separate into more than one organic-rich layer.
  • the preferred laundry composition may include one or more well-known laundry ingredients, such as builders (from 0.1 to 20%), anti-redeposition agents, fluorescent dyes, perfumes, soil-release polymers, colorant, enzymes, buffering agents, antifoam agents, UV-absorber, etc. Electrolytes may serve as builders in the composition, yet additional builders may be present.
  • a particularly preferred optional ingredient is water.
  • the liquid detergent compositions of the invention may (but do not have to) contain significant amounts of water. Relatively high water amount is beneficial, in order to incorporate hydrophilic ingredients into the composition.
  • the layered composition is attained which may contain high amounts of water, yet the water present in the composition does not dissolve the water-soluble package enveloping the composition.
  • the liquid detergent composition of the invention generally includes from 0 to 70% of total (free and bound) water, more preferably from 5 to 50%, most preferably from 10 to 50%, and optimally from 25 to 40%, in order to obtain clarity and ease of the dispersion of the composition during use (% by weight of the composition). Yet, by virtue of employing the electrolyte as taught herein the water activity of the inventive compositions is generally low: typically less than 0.94, preferably less than 0.93, more preferably less than 0.9, optimally less than 0.8. in order to obtain compositions which contain optimum amounts of water, yet may be stored safely in a water-soluble package.
  • Water activity is the ratio of the vapor pressure of a solution to that of pure water. It is related to the inverse of the relative humidity of the atmosphere above the sample at equilibrium.
  • Apparatus Aqualab CX-2 Water Activity meter; Sample containers; Transfer pipets Water Activity Standards and Values: Lithium chloride (LiCl) 0.113 +/- 0.003 Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) 0.328 +/- 0.002 Sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.753 +/- 0.001 Potassium chloride (KCl) 0.843 +/- 0.003 Potassium sulfate (K2SO4) 0.973 +/- 0.005 Deionized water 1.000 +/- 0.003
  • hydrotrope which prevents liquid crystal formation.
  • the hydrotrope is typically included in the surfactant layer. The addition of the hydrotrope thus aids the clarity/transparency of the composition.
  • Suitable hydrotropes include but are not limited to propylene glycol, ethanol, salts of benzene sulphonate, toluene sulphonate, xylene sulphonate or cumene sulphonate.
  • Suitable salts include but are not limited to sodium, potassium, ammonium, monoethanolamine, triethanolamine.
  • the hydrotrope is selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, xylene sulfonate, ethanol, and urea to provide optimum performance.
  • the amount of the hydrotrope is generally in the range of from 0 to 30%, preferably from 0.5 to 20%, most preferably from 1 to 15%.
  • a dye in order to create a composition with visually appealing colored layer or layers.
  • a dye is an organic molecule and so will partition into the organic (surfactant) layer. It is possible, although less usual that a dye may partition into the electrolyte layer.
  • Suitable dyes include but are not limited to:
  • the Azo and Pyrene families of dyes are suitable for inclusion into an electrolyte layer (i.e. these dyes will likely partition into the electrolyte layer-but may do so along with the surfactant layer).
  • One of the preferred embodiments is to include both a dye that will partition into a surfactant layer and a dye that will partition into an electrolyte layer, in order to provide a 2-colored composition.
  • the inventive compositions generally include from 0.0001 to 1%, more preferably from 0.0005 to 0.1 %, most preferably from 0.0001 to 0.1 % of the dye, in order to provide a pleasing appearance (% by weight of the composition).
  • the liquid compositions may include encapsulated ingredients, preferably in the form of transparent or colored capsules or an emulsion, or a dispersion. These capsules, emulsion, or dispersion, may be distributed in one or more layers of the inventive compositions, or may be present as an additional layer.
  • Preferred ingredients to be encapsulated are enzymes, bleaches, colorants, perfumes, and mixtures thereof to minimize the damage to these ingredients from water or surfactant, or alkaline ingredients, and/or to enhance the appearance of the product.
  • Preferred inventive compositions comprise from 0.5 to 20%, more preferably from 0.1 to 10%, most preferably from 0.3 to 6%, and optimally from 0.5 to 5%, in order to attain optimum performance and/or appearance (% by weight of the composition).
  • the pH of the inventive compositions is generally in the range of from 2.5 to 12.5, preferably in the range of from 4 to 10, most preferably from 6 to 9, in order to attain optimum laundry cleaning.
  • the composition of the components employed for making the inventive layered composition is as follows: Ingredients of component 1 (% by weight of the component): Anionic Surfactant 0 to 30% Non-ionic Surfactant 5 to 60 % Cationic Surfactant 0 to 5% Fatty Acid 0 to 20% Monoethanolamine 0 to 20% Propylene Glycol 5 to 30% Perfume 0 to 3.0% Phosphonate 0 to 2% Protease 0.1 to 2.0% Cellulase 0.01 to 0.5% Lipase 0 to 0.5% Anti-dye transfer polymers 0 to 1.0% Anti redeposition polymers 0 to 1.0 % water 0 to 20% Colorant To suitable color Silicone Antifoam 0 to 2.0 % Ingredients of component 2 (% by weight of the component): Citric Acid 30 to 60 % Monoethanolamine 10 to 60 % Water 5 to 70% Phosphonate 0 to 2.0% Carbonate 0 to 20% Bi-carbonate
  • the packages of the invention may be prepared from polyvinyl alcohol film, or other suitable material, which is filled, then sealed, preferably heat-sealed or water-sealed.
  • the packages may be filled in any suitable way.
  • the liquid detergent composition is pre-mixed (both components) and filled in the same manner as a single phase composition would be.
  • the composition may also be filled component by component.
  • the package may take many shapes as viewed in a plan view, such as rectangular, square, triangle, round, etc.
  • the package is in a polyhedral shape (e.g., tetrahedron or a pyramid).
  • the package is mixed with water (e.g., inside a laundry machine), in order to dissolve the body and to release the contents of the package.
  • water e.g., inside a laundry machine
  • Raw Material % Supplier Surfactant component Sodium Xylene Sulfonate 1.7 Stepan Co.
  • the product was a stable-two-layered liquid. 25 grams of each component were added into a polyvinyl alcohol pouch made of 75.6 microns thickness of polyvinyl alcohol film ex.
  • the pouch was stable for at least 3 weeks, with no visible impact on the film. Two transparent layers were visible in the pouch and separated easily after shaking.
  • the composition contained no water.
  • Component 1 (70% of total volume of the composition) % by weight of component
  • Anionic surfactant Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonate C12
  • Nonionic surfactant C12-15 7 ethylene oxide 60.00
  • Monopropylene Glycol 6.69 Monoethanolamine 3.81 Perfume 1.00 Phosphonate 0.50
  • Protease 1.00 Poly (vinylpyrrolidone) 0.30 Water 6.20 Colourant (acid dye) 0.00012 Silicone antifoam 0.50
  • Component 2 (30% of total volume of the composition) Citric Acid 33.02 Monoethanolamine 31.98 Water 35.00 Ionic strength, for component 2 10.32
  • Example 3 The two components each of Examples 3 and 4 were respectively dosed at 25ml per each package sealed by VFFS (vertical form film system), the package being formed of MONOSOL T film.
  • VFFS vertical form film system
  • compositions of Examples 3 and 4 showed superior clarity, separation between the layers and storage stability over several weeks at room temperature, as evidenced by lack of precipitation.
  • the packages were filled and sealed by HFFS (horizontal form film system) with no difference in performance.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Wrappers (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention includes a layered liquid detergent composition in a water−soluble single use package, the composition comprising at least two layers, with the at least two layers comprising a surfactant and an organic electrolyte. Preferred compositions include water. Preferred compositions are transparent and are enclosed within a transparent body, with at least one of the layers colored.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • A water-soluble single-use package comprising a layered liquid detergent in the water-soluble body portion and a process of its preparation.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Detergent compositions are provided in many forms, of which granular and liquid compositions are the most prevalent. More recently, unit dose forms of detergent have been proposed in the form of compressed tablets of detergent powder or water-soluble packages, which are consumed during a single cleaning application. The unit dose forms are preferred by some consumers, in that the dose is pre-measured and, consequently, the unit dose form is faster, easier and less messy to use. Water-soluble packages filled with liquid detergent composition are desired especially by consumers who are used to liquid detergents.
  • Water-soluble unit dose packages containing liquids are known. See, for instance, Kennedy (US Patent 4,973,416), Dickler et al. (US Patent 6,037,319), Haq (US Patent 4,416,791) and Richardson (US Patent 4,115,292). The packages may contain various amounts, including relatively high, amounts of water. See for instance WO 94/14941, EP 518 689, WO 97/27743, and JP 06/340,899.
  • It is sometimes desirable to separate various ingredients of the detergent composition. See for instance WO 01/60966 disclosing a multi-compartment water-soluble pouch. It is also desirable to increase the visual appeal of the package and, also, provide a unique appearance to be associated by consumers with a particular product. In addition, it is desirable to provide a visual signal to a consumer of the presence of special (e.g., benefit) ingredient in the composition.
  • EP 116422, EP 175485, GB 1247189, WO 99/47635, and Ginn (US Patent 4,348,292) disclose dual layer liquid cleaning compositions in a bottle or a water insoluble package. The layers are achieved by employing an electrolyte, which when added to an aqueous surfactant solution, forces the separation of the surfactant from the aqueous phase. The phenomenon of separating an organic component from an aqueous layer, by the addition of a salt (electrolyte) is known as "salting out." The salt increases the ionic character of water and drives the organic, less polar, component away.
  • It is desirable to provide a layered liquid detergent composition in a water-soluble single use package. Unfortunately, this presents a problem since bottled layered compositions frequently contain ingredients which would threaten the integrity of the water-soluble package. An especially unique challenge of providing layers of liquid laundry detergent compositions within a water-soluble package is that the integrity of the water soluble package has to be maintained, despite the presence of water in the composition.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention includes a layered liquid detergent composition in a water-soluble single use package, the composition comprising at least two layers, with a surfactant and an organic electrolyte distributed within the layers. The preferred inventive compositions include water, yet the water-soluble package remains intact on storage.
  • The following detailed description and the examples illustrate some of the effects of the inventive compositions. The invention and the claims, however, are not limited to the following description and examples.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Except in the operating and comparative examples, or where otherwise explicitly indicated, all numbers in this description indicating amounts of material or conditions of reaction, physical properties of materials and/or use are to be understood as modified by the word "about." All amounts are by weight of the liquid detergent composition, unless otherwise specified.
  • It should be noted that in specifying any range of concentration, any particular upper concentration can be associated with any particular lower concentration.
  • For the avoidance of doubt the word "comprising" is intended to mean "including" but not necessarily "consisting of" or "composed of." In other words, the listed steps or options need not be exhaustive.
  • "Water-soluble body" as used herein means soluble in cold water, i.e. soluble at 5°C and above.
  • "Liquid" as used herein means that a continuous phase or predominant part of the composition is liquid and that a composition is flowable at 20°C.
  • "Organic cation" as used herein means a non-metal, positively charged ionic entity.
  • "Organic electrolyte" as used herein means an electrolyte containing an organic cation.
  • "Transparent" as used herein includes both transparent and translucent and means that an ingredient, or a mixture, or a phase, or a composition, or a package according to the invention preferably has a transmittance of more than 25%, more preferably more than 30%, most preferably more than 40%, optimally more than 50% in the visible part of the spectrum (approx. 410-800 nm). Alternatively, absorbency may be measured as less than 0.6 (approximately equivalent to 25% transmitting) or by having transmittance greater than 25% wherein % transmittance equals: 1/10 absorbancy x 100%. For purposes of the invention, as long as one wavelength in the visible light range has greater than 25% transmittance, it is considered to be transparent/translucent.
  • The term "composition" or "liquid detergent composition" as used herein means the final detergent composition (i.e., the detergent composition itself, but not the water-soluble body), including at least two layers. The at least two layers comprise between them a surfactant and an organic electrolyte.
  • WATER-SOLUBLE BODY PORTION
  • The package is preferably made of a clear, sealable, cold water soluble film such as polyvinyl alcohol. Thickness could range from 25 to 100 µm, more preferably from 35 to 80 µm, most preferably from 45 to 55 µm. Other materials from which the package can be made include but are not limited to methyl hydroxy propyl cellulose and polyethylene oxide. Polyvinyl alcohol is preferred due to its ready availability and low cost. One supplier of polyvinyl alcohol film is Monosol Inc. European suppliers of suitable films include but are not limited to Monosol supplied by Monosol Inc. or PT supplied by Aicello or K-series supplied by Kurary or Hydrafilm supplied by Rainier Specialty polymers ltd, or QSA series by Polymer Films, Inc.
  • Preferably the water-soluble film of the base wall is the same material as that used to make the body wall. Both thermoforming and cold forming (e.g., with water) are possible.
  • DETERGENT COMPOSITION
  • The essential ingredients of the inventive laundry compositions are surfactant and organic electrolyte.
  • Surfactant
  • The compositions of the invention contain one or more surface active agents (surfactants) selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic, ampholytic and zwitterionic surfactants or mixtures thereof. The preferred surfactant detergents for use in the present invention are mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants although it is to be understood that any surfactant may be used alone or in combination with any other surfactant or surfactants. The surfactant should comprise at least 5%, e.g., 5% to 80%, preferably at least 10% to 80%, more preferably 15% to 40%; even more preferably 15% to 35% of the composition.
  • Nonionic Surfactant
  • Nonionic synthetic organic detergents which can be used with the invention, alone or in combination with other surfactants, are described below. Nonionic surfactants are typically included.
  • Preferred nonionics surfactants are nonionic surfactants whch are pourable liquids, gels or pastes at 25°C. Nonionic detergent surfactants normally have molecular weights of from about 300 to about 11,000. Mixtures of different nonionic detergent surfactants may also be used, provided the mixture is a liquid gel or paste at 25°C. Optionally, the composition may comprise one or more nonionic surfactants which are solid at 25°C. These dissolved and/or dispersed in either or both liquid layers.
  • As is well known, the nonionic detergents are characterized by the presence of an organic hydrophobic group and an organic hydrophilic group and are typically produced by the condensation of an organic aliphatic or alkyl aromatic hydrophobic compound with ethylene oxide (hydrophilic in nature). Typical suitable nonionic surfactants are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,316,812 and 3,630,929 and applicants' published European specification EP-A-225,654.
  • Usually, the nonionic detergents are polyalkoxylated lipophiles wherein the desired hydrophile-lipophile balance is obtained from addition of a hydrophilic polyalkoxy group to a lipophilic moiety. A preferred class of nonionic detergent is the alkoxylated alkanols wherein the alkanol is of 9 to 18 carbon atoms and wherein the number of moles of alkylene oxide (of 2 or 3 carbon atoms) is from 3 to 12. Of such materials it is preferred to employ those wherein the alkanol is a fatty alcohol of 9 to 11 or 12 to 15 carbon atoms and which contain from 5 to 8 or 5 to 9 alkoxy groups per mole.
  • Exemplary of such compounds are those wherein the alkanol is of 12 to 15 carbon atoms and which contain about 7 ethylene oxide groups per mole, e.g. Neodol® 25-7 and Neodol® 23®-6.5, which products are made by Shell Chemical Company, Inc. The former is a condensation product of a mixture of higher fatty alcohols averaging about 12 to 15 carbon atoms, with about 7 moles of ethylene oxide and the latter is a corresponding mixture wherein the carbon atoms content of the higher fatty alcohol is 12 to 13 and the number of ethylene oxide groups present averages about 6.5. The higher alcohols are primary alkanols.
  • Other useful nonionics are represented by the commercially well- known class of nonionics sold under the trademark Plurafac®. The Plurafacs® are the reaction products of a higher linear alcohol and a mixture of ethylene and propylene oxides, containing a mixed chain of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, terminated by a hydroxyl group. Examples include C13 - C15 fatty alcohol condensed with 6 moles ethylene oxide and 3 moles propylene oxide, C13 - C15 fatty alcohol condensed with 7 moles propylene oxide and 4 moles ethylene oxide, C13 - C15 fatty alcohol condensed with 5 moles propylene oxide and 10 moles ethylene oxide, or mixtures of any of the above.
  • Another group of liquid nonionics are commercially available from Shell Chemical Company, Inc. under the Dobanol® trademark: Dobanol® 91-5 is an ethoxylated C9 -C11 fatty alcohol with an average of 5 moles ethylene oxide and Dobanol® 23-7 is an ethoxylated C12-C13 fatty alcohol with an average of 7 moles ethylene oxide per mole of fatty alcohol. In the compositions of this invention, preferred nonionic surfactants include the C12 -C15 primary fatty alcohols with relatively narrow contents of ethylene oxide in the range of from about 7 to 9 moles, and the C9 to C11 fatty alcohols ethoxylated with about 5-6 moles ethylene oxide. Another class of nonionic surfactants which can be used in accordance with this invention are glycoside surfactants. Glycoside surfactants suitable for use in accordance with the present invention include those of the formula: RO--R'Oy-- (Z)x    wherein R is a monovalent organic radical containing from about 6 to about 30 (preferably from about 8 to about 18) carbon atoms; R' is a divalent hydrocarbon radical containing from about 2 to 4 carbons atoms; 0 is an oxygen atom; y is a number which can have an average value of from 0 to about 12 but which is most preferably zero; Z is a moiety derived from a reducing saccharide containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms; and x is a number having an average value of from 1 to about 10 (preferably from about 1.5 to about 10).
  • A particularly preferred group of glycoside surfactants for use in the practice of this invention includes those of the formula above in which R is a monovalent organic radical (linear or branched) containing from about 6 to about 1 8(especially from about 8 to about 18) carbon atoms; y is zero; z is glucose or a moiety derived therefrom; x is a number having an average value of from 1 to about 4 (preferably from about 1 to 4).
  • Nonionic surfactants particularly useful for this application include, but are not limited to: alcohol ethoxylates (e.g. Neodol® 25-9 from Shell Chemical Co.), alkyl phenol ethoxylates (e.g. Tergitol® NP-9 from Union Carbide Corp.), alkylpolyglucosides (e.g. Glucapon® 600CS from Henkel Corp.), polyoxyethylenated polyoxypropylene glycols (e.g. Pluronic® L-65 from BASF Corp.), sorbitol esters (e.g. Emsorb® 2515 from Henkel Corp.), polyoxyethylenated sorbitol esters (e.g. Emsorb® 6900 from Henkel Corp.), alkanolamides (e.g. Alkamide® DC212/SE from Rhone-Poulenc Co.), and N-alkypyrrolidones (e.g. Surfadone® LP-100 from ISP Technologies Inc.).
  • Mixtures of two or more of the nonionic surfactants can be used.
  • Anionic Surfactant
  • Anionic surface active agents which may be used in the present invention are those surface active compounds which contain a long chain hydrocarbon hydrophobic group in their molecular structure and a hydrophilic group, i.e.; water solubilizing group such as sulfonate, sulfate or carboxylate group. The anionic surface active agents include the alkali metal (e.g. sodium and potassium) water soluble higher alkyl benzene sulfonates, alkyl sulfonates, alkyl sulfates and the alkyl polyether sulfates. They may also include fatty acid or fatty acid soaps. The preferred anionic surface active agents are the alkali metal, ammonium or alkanolamide salts of higher alkyl benzene sulfonates and alkali metal, ammonium or alkanolamide salts of higher alkyl sulfonates. Preferred higher alkyl sulfonates are those in which the alkyl groups contain 8 to 26 carbon atoms, preferably 12 to 22 carbon atoms and more preferably 14 to 18 carbon atoms. The alkyl group in the alkyl benzene sulfonate preferably contains 8 to 16 carbon atoms and more preferably 10 to 15 carbon atoms. A particularly preferred alkyl benzene sulfonate is the sodium or potassium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, e.g. sodium linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate.
  • The primary and secondary alkyl sulfonates can be made by reacting long chain alpha-olefins with sulfites or bisulfites, e.g. sodium bisulfite. The alkyl sulfonates can also be made by reacting long chain normal paraffin hydrocarbons with sulfur dioxide and oxygen as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,503,280, 2,507,088, 3,372, 188 and 3,260,741 to obtain normal or secondary higher alkyl sulfonates suitable for use as surfactant detergents.
  • The alkyl substituent is preferably linear, i.e. normal alkyl, however, branched chain alkyl sulfonates can be employed, although they are not as good with respect to biodegradability. The alkane, i.e. alkyl, substituent may be terminally sulfonated or may be joined, for example, to the carbon atom of the chain, i.e. may be a secondary sulfonate. It is understood in the art that the substituent may be joined to any carbon on the alkyl chain. The higher alkyl sulfonates can be used as the alkali metal salts, such as sodium and potassium. The preferred salts are the sodium salts. The preferred alkyl sulfonates are the C10 to C18 primary normal alkyl sodium and potassium sulfonates, with the C10 to C15 primary normal alkyl sulfonate salt being more preferred.
  • Mixtures of higher alkyl benzene sulfonates and higher alkyl sulfonates can be used as well as mixtures of higher alkyl benzene sulfonates and higher alkyl polyether sulfates.
  • Also normal alkyl and branched chain alkyl sulfates (e.g., primary alkyl sulfates) may be used as the anionic component).
  • The higher alkyl polyether sulfates used in accordance with the present invention can be normal or branched chain alkyl and contain lower alkoxy groups which can contain two or three carbon atoms. The normal higher alkyl polyether sulfates are preferred in that they have a higher degree of biodegradability than the branched chain alkyl and the lower poly alkoxy groups are preferably ethoxy groups.
  • The preferred higher alkyl poly ethoxy sulfates used in accordance with the present invention are represented by the formula: R'--O(CH2 CH2 O)p --SO3 M,    where R' is C8 to C20 alkyl, preferably C10 to C18 and more preferably C12 to C15; p is 2 to 8, preferably 2 to 6, and more preferably 2 to 4;and M is an alkali metal, such as sodium and potassium, or an ammonium cation. The sodium and potassium salts are preferred.
  • A preferred higher alkyl poly ethoxylated sulfate is the sodium salt of a triethoxy C12 to C15 alcohol sulfate having the formula: C12-15 --O--(CH2 CH2 O)3 --SO3 Na
  • Examples of suitable alkyl ethoxy sulfates that can be used in accordance with the present invention are C12-15 normal or primary alkyl triethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; n-decyl diethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; C12 primary alkyl diethoxy sulfate, ammonium salt; C12 primary alkyl triethoxy sulfate, sodium salt: C15 primary alkyl tetraethoxy sulfate, sodium salt, mixed C14-15 normal primary alkyl mixed tri- and tetraethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; stearyl pentaethoxy sulfate, sodium salt; and mixed C10-18 normal primary alkyl triethoxy sulfate, potassium salt.
  • The normal alkyl ethoxy sulfates are readily biodegradable and are preferred. The alkyl poly-lower alkoxy sulfates can be used in mixtures with each other and/or in mixtures with the above discussed higher alkyl benzene, alkyl sulfonates, or alkyl sulfates.
  • The alkali metal higher alkyl poly ethoxy sulfate can be used with the alkylbenzene sulfonate and/or with an alkyl sulfonate or sulfonate, in an amount of 0 to 70%, preferably 10 to 50% and more preferably 10 to 20% by weight of entire composition.
  • Anionic surfactants particularly useful for this application include, but are not limited to: linear alkyl benzene sulfonates (e.g. Vista® C-500 from Vista Chemical Co.), alkyl sulfates (e.g. Polystep® B-5 from Stepan Co.), polyoxyethylenated alkyl sulfates (e.g. Standapol® ES-3 from Stepan Co.), alpha olefin sulfonates (e.g. Witconate® AOS from Witco Corp.), alpha sulfo methyl esters (e.g. Alpha-Step® MC-48 from Stepan Co.), alkyl ether sulfates and isethionates (e.g. Jordapon® Cl from PPG Industries Inc.).
  • Anionic surfactants may be added pre-neutralized or, preferably, may be formed in situ, by neutralizing a precursor acid (fatty acid in the case of soaps). Further, the anionic precursor or fatty acid should be over-neutralised (i.e. there should be an excess of the alkaline material used to form the counter-ion). Further still, it is preferable to use the organic counter-ion used for the organic electrolyte. Preferably, monoethanolamine salt of the anionic precursor acid is employed.
  • Cationic Surfactants
  • Many cationic surfactants are known in the art, and almost any cationic surfactant having at least one long chain alkyl group of about 10 to 24 carbon atoms is suitable in the present invention. Such compounds are described in "Cationic Surfactants", Jungermann, 1970, incorporated by reference.
  • Specific cationic surfactants which can be used as surfactants in the subject invention are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,497,718, hereby incorporated by reference.
  • As with the nonionic and anionic surfactants, the compositions of the invention may use cationic surfactants alone or in combination with any of the other surfactants known in the art. Of course, the compositions may contain no cationic surfactants at all.
  • Amphoteric Surfactants
  • Ampholytic synthetic detergents can be broadly described as derivatives of aliphatic or aliphatic derivatives of heterocyclic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic radical may be a straight chain or a branched and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents contains from about 8 to 18 carbon atoms and at least one contains an anionic water-solubilizing group, e.g. carboxylate, sulfonate, sulfate. Examples of compounds falling within this definition are sodium 3(dodecylamino)propionate, sodium 3-(dodecylamino)propane-1-sulfonate, sodium 2-(dodecylamino)ethyl sulfate, sodium 2-(dimethylamino)octadecanoate, disodium 3-(N- carboxymethyldodecylamino)propane 1-sulfonate, disodium octadecylimminodiacetate, sodium 1-carboxymethyl-2-undecylimidazole, and sodium N, N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-sulfato-3-dodecoxypropylamine. Sodium 3-(dodecylamino)propane-1-sulfonate is preferred.
  • Zwitterionic surfactants can be broadly described as derivatives of secondary and tertiary amines, derivatives of heterocyclic secondary and tertiary amines, or derivatives of quaternary ammonium, quaternary phosphonium or tertiary sulfonium compounds. The cationic atom in the quaternary compound can be part of a heterocyclic ring. In all of these compounds there is at least one aliphatic group, straight chain or branched, containing from about 3 to 18 carbon atoms and at least one aliphatic substituent containing an anionic water solubilizing group, e. g., carboxy, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate, or phosphonate.
  • Specific examples of zwitterionic surfactants which may be used are set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,062,647, hereby incorporated by reference.
  • Preferably, the surfactant in the laundry compositions of the invention is anionic and/or nonionic, especially linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, alkyl ether sulfate, alcohol ethoxylates and mixtures thereof.
  • For higher foaming formulations (top-loading washing machines), mixtures of anionic and nonionc surfactants are especially preferred, for optimum greasy stain and particulate soil removal. When mixtures are used, the most effective mixtures employ anionic to nonionic ratio of from 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably from 5:1 to 1:5, most preferably from 3:1 to 1:3.
  • When low foaming formulations are desired, e.g., for front-loading machines, nonionic surfactants are employed, in the absence of, or lower levels of, anionic surfactants, alone or in combination with cationic surfactants and/or antifoams.
  • Electrolyte
  • The electrolyte employed in the present invention contains an organic (i.e. non-metal) cation. Suitable cations include but are not limited to ammonium, ammonium hydroxide, amines, more preferably alkanolamines (e.g., monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, isopropylamine).
  • It has been found, as part of the present invention, that the use of an electrolyte containing an organic cation results in formulations which may contain more water, yet by virtue of much reduced water activity level, without damaging the water-soluble package, resulting in more cost-effective product. Higher amounts of water are also advantageous to accommodate hydrophilic functional ingredients. Furthermore, the use of organic electrolyte resulted in improved transparency of the compositions, compared to the same compositions containing an inorganic electrolyte (i.e., inorganic cation). In addition, organic electrolytes decrease the potential for surfactant crystallizing out during storage.
  • Suitable anions include but are not limited to sulphate, nitrate, fluoride, chloride, bromide, iodide, acetate, tartrate, ammonium tartrate, benzenesulphonate, benzoate, bicarbonate, carbonate, bisulphate, bisulphite, sulphate, sulphite, borate, borotartrate, bromate, butyrate, chlorate, camphorate, chlorite, cinnamate, citrate, disilicate, dithionate, ethylsulphate, ferricyanide, ferrocyanide, fluorosilicate, formate, glycerophosphate, hydrogenphosphate, hydroxostannate, hypochlorite, hyponitrite, hypophosphite, iodate, isobutyrate, lactate, laurate, metaborate, metasilicate, methionate, methylsulphate, nitrite, oleate, orthophosphate, orthophosphite, orthosilicate, oxalate, perborate, perchlorate, phosphate, polyfluoride, polychloride, polyiodide, polybromide, polysulphide, polysulphate, polysulphite, salicylate, silicate, sorbate, stannate, stearate, succinate or valerate.
  • Mixtures of electrolytes may be employed.
  • Electrolyte may be pre-formed or formed in situ.
  • Preferably, organic electrolytes suitable for use in the present invention meet both of the following criteria:
  • (1) they have a high salting out ability;
  • (2) they are able to lower water activity (if water is present in the formulation).
  • Preferred electrolytes are selected from the group consisting of monoethanolamine, triethanolamine, and ammonium oxide salts of citrate, carbonate, bicarbonate, borate and sulfate. Monoethanolamine salt is the most effective. Monoethanolamine citrate, monoethanolamine carbonate and monoethanolamine borate are the most preferred, due to their ability to also function as builders and/or buffering agents in the detergent composition. Monoethanolamine citrate is optimum, due to its optimum ability to salt out a surfactant and/or reduce the water activity.
  • The liquid detergent composition of the invention generally includes from 1 to 50%, more preferably from 5 to 40%, most preferably from 5 to 35%, and optimally from 10 to 30% of the organic electrolyte, in order to attain a stable layered composition, at optimum cost. The concentration of electrolyte to create a two-layered composition depends on the surfactant concentration, the water amount and the identity of the electrolyte. For the inventive compositions containing water, the concentration needed may be predicted by calculating the ionic strength of the electrolyte at a particular concentration. It has been found as part of the present invention that the preferred electrolytes and preferred concentrations are those that have a calculated ionic strength of at least 4.2, preferably at least 4.4, more preferably at least 5.
  • Ionic strength represents interactions of ions with water molecules and other ions in the solution. Ionic strength may be calculated as follows: I = ½ ∑ zi 2mi    ∑=a sum for i number of ions
       I = ionic strength
       z = valence factor
       m = molal concentration of the ith ion concentration
  • LAYERS
  • The liquid laundry detergent according to the invention comprises at least two layers. Both layers are preferably isotropic (a single phase when viewed macroscopically), after standing still for at least 24 hours at 20°C. "Isotropic" is used herein to describe each layer of the inventive composition, since the composition overall contains at least two layers and thus could not be isotropic overall.
  • Both layers are preferably transparent/translucent. Preferably, at least one layer is colored. Generally, the layers are attained when the sufficient amount of the electrolyte is added to the surfactant. The amount differs in each specific case, depending on the identity and the amount of the surfactant(s), water and electrolyte(s). The discussion of ionic strength in the immediately preceding paragraph is relevant here, since the electrolyte should be present in a sufficient concentration to force surfactant salting out, thus creating layers.
  • Another advantage of employing an organic electrolyte is that at least some of the organic electrolytes are or could be liquid. Furthermore, they can be liquid, in the presence of extra organic neutralizing agent (as is the case with monoethanolamine citrate in the presence of extra monoethanolamine). Since the surfactant may also be liquid, it is possible to prepare a layered liquid composition in the absence of water. Such is not a case with inorganic electrolytes, which are solid salts.
  • Preferred compositions comprise two layers, with the top layer containing majority, preferably all, of the surfactant, and the bottom layer containing the majority, preferably all, of the electrolyte.
  • When shaken, the layers within the composition will coalesce. Yet, they will separate into visible layers, with each layer regaining its clarity, upon standing for at most 24 hours at 20°C.
  • It should be noted that in the final composition, the compositions of the resultant layers do not necessarily correspond with the compositions of the respective layers prior to their being combined into a single composition. This is because of reaction between ingredients, in particular the acidic ingredients and the basic ingredients (e.g., monoethanolamine) and also, because of possible migration of material between the two layers, or emulsification of some of the layers within each other. Consequently, it is to be understood that the composition of the components as herein described pertains to the compositions prior to their being combined into a single composition. By virtue of employing a surfactant and an organic electrolyte in the amounts as herein described (and optional ingredients, including those described below), the composition separates into at least two layers, wherein the composition of the layers may differ from the composition of the initial components.
  • Generally the ranges of the surfactant, electrolyte, and water content within the respective components or layers are as follows (% by weight of the relevant component):
    Surfactant Electrolyte Total Water
    Surfactant Component or Layer
       General 5-100 0-15 0-60
       Preferred 10-70 0-5 1-40
       Most Preferred 20-60 0-1 5-30
       Optimum 20-55 0-1 5-25
    Electrolyte Component or Layer
       General 0-5 1-100 0-90
       Preferred 0-1 5-95 10-60
       Most Preferred 0-1 10-60 20-70
       Optimum 0-1 15-40 20-50
  • The volume ratio of the two components in the final composition is generally in the range of from 10:90 to 90:10, more preferably from 20:80 to 80:20, most preferably from 70:30 to 30:70, and optimally from 40:60 to 60:40, in order to provide the most pleasing appearance and optimum cleaning benefits. The resulting layers have the volume ratios in the same ranges as described above (but the layer ratio may not be the same as the component ratio). More than two layers may be present. The additional layer may be a capsule, dispersion or emulsion layer, as described below under Optional Ingredients. Also possible is that a surfactant component may include both highly polar and highly non-polar ingredients, which might separate into more than one organic-rich layer.
  • Optional Ingredients
  • In addition to the surfactant and the electrolyte, the preferred laundry composition may include one or more well-known laundry ingredients, such as builders (from 0.1 to 20%), anti-redeposition agents, fluorescent dyes, perfumes, soil-release polymers, colorant, enzymes, buffering agents, antifoam agents, UV-absorber, etc. Electrolytes may serve as builders in the composition, yet additional builders may be present.
  • Water
  • A particularly preferred optional ingredient is water. The liquid detergent compositions of the invention may (but do not have to) contain significant amounts of water. Relatively high water amount is beneficial, in order to incorporate hydrophilic ingredients into the composition. By virtue of employing the organic electrolyte as taught herein, the layered composition is attained which may contain high amounts of water, yet the water present in the composition does not dissolve the water-soluble package enveloping the composition.
  • The liquid detergent composition of the invention generally includes from 0 to 70% of total (free and bound) water, more preferably from 5 to 50%, most preferably from 10 to 50%, and optimally from 25 to 40%, in order to obtain clarity and ease of the dispersion of the composition during use (% by weight of the composition). Yet, by virtue of employing the electrolyte as taught herein the water activity of the inventive compositions is generally low: typically less than 0.94, preferably less than 0.93, more preferably less than 0.9, optimally less than 0.8. in order to obtain compositions which contain optimum amounts of water, yet may be stored safely in a water-soluble package.
  • Measurement of water activity
  • Water activity (Aw) is the ratio of the vapor pressure of a solution to that of pure water. It is related to the inverse of the relative humidity of the atmosphere above the sample at equilibrium.
  • Apparatus: Aqualab CX-2 Water Activity meter; Sample containers; Transfer pipets
    Water Activity Standards and Values:
       Lithium chloride (LiCl) 0.113 +/- 0.003
       Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) 0.328 +/- 0.002
       Sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.753 +/- 0.001
       Potassium chloride (KCl) 0.843 +/- 0.003
       Potassium sulfate (K2SO4) 0.973 +/- 0.005
       Deionized water 1.000 +/- 0.003
  • Preparation of Salt Standards:
  • 1. Salt standards should be prepared in deionized water every six months, or as needed. They are stored at room temperature, and are used to calibrate the water activity machine with each use.
  • 2. A super-saturated solution must be made of each salt.
  • 3. To prepare a super-saturated solution, keep adding salt crystals to deionized water, shaking well, until there is undissolved salt at the bottom of the jar.
  • 4. Keep the salt solutions at room temperature overnight to reach equilibrium.
  • 5. If salt remains undissolved at the bottom of the jar, a super-saturated solution has been reached. If all of the salt is dissolved, repeat steps 3 and 4.
  • Aqualab Procedure to Measure Water Activity:
  • 1. The Aqualab measures the inverse of the relative humidity of a solution, by evaluating the condensation that forms on a mirror within the machine. Samples containing high levels of propylene glycol are not usually run with the Aqualab because PPG coats the mirror.
  • 2. Turn on the machine so that it can warm up for at least one hour prior to use.
  • 3. Test all samples and standards in duplicate.
  • 4. The Aqualab must be standardized before samples are run. Deionized water should always be evaluated at the beginning of the run. Chose the appropriate salt solutions that are closest to the projected Aw of the test sample, so that the sample's value is bracketed with standards. After the standards are run, the test samples are evaluated.
  • 5. Use a transfer pipet to add the sample to the sample containers. The containers should only be filled half-way. Load the container in the sleeve of the Aqualab, and push in the sleeve.
  • 6. Turn the Aqualab dial from the upright position ("open/load") to the left position ("read") to start reading the sample.
  • 7. When the sample is finished (within a few minutes), the machine will beep until the dial is turned back to the upright position. Record the Aw and the temperature.
  • 8. Every 6-8 samples, new standards should be run. In addition, standards should be run after the last sample to ensure that the machine remained calibrated.
  •    Note: the Aqualab variability is +/- .0003 units.
  • Hydrotrope
  • Another particularly preferred optional ingredient is a hydrotrope, which prevents liquid crystal formation. The hydrotrope is typically included in the surfactant layer. The addition of the hydrotrope thus aids the clarity/transparency of the composition. Suitable hydrotropes include but are not limited to propylene glycol, ethanol, salts of benzene sulphonate, toluene sulphonate, xylene sulphonate or cumene sulphonate. Suitable salts include but are not limited to sodium, potassium, ammonium, monoethanolamine, triethanolamine. Preferably, the hydrotrope is selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, xylene sulfonate, ethanol, and urea to provide optimum performance. The amount of the hydrotrope is generally in the range of from 0 to 30%, preferably from 0.5 to 20%, most preferably from 1 to 15%.
  • Dye
  • Another particularly preferred ingredient is a dye, in order to create a composition with visually appealing colored layer or layers. Typically, a dye is an organic molecule and so will partition into the organic (surfactant) layer. It is possible, although less usual that a dye may partition into the electrolyte layer. Suitable dyes include but are not limited to:
    Figure 00180001
  • Of these, the Azo and Pyrene families of dyes are suitable for inclusion into an electrolyte layer (i.e. these dyes will likely partition into the electrolyte layer-but may do so along with the surfactant layer). One of the preferred embodiments is to include both a dye that will partition into a surfactant layer and a dye that will partition into an electrolyte layer, in order to provide a 2-colored composition. The inventive compositions generally include from 0.0001 to 1%, more preferably from 0.0005 to 0.1 %, most preferably from 0.0001 to 0.1 % of the dye, in order to provide a pleasing appearance (% by weight of the composition).
  • Capsules
  • The liquid compositions may include encapsulated ingredients, preferably in the form of transparent or colored capsules or an emulsion, or a dispersion. These capsules, emulsion, or dispersion, may be distributed in one or more layers of the inventive compositions, or may be present as an additional layer. Preferred ingredients to be encapsulated are enzymes, bleaches, colorants, perfumes, and mixtures thereof to minimize the damage to these ingredients from water or surfactant, or alkaline ingredients, and/or to enhance the appearance of the product. Preferred inventive compositions comprise from 0.5 to 20%, more preferably from 0.1 to 10%, most preferably from 0.3 to 6%, and optimally from 0.5 to 5%, in order to attain optimum performance and/or appearance (% by weight of the composition).
  • The pH of the inventive compositions is generally in the range of from 2.5 to 12.5, preferably in the range of from 4 to 10, most preferably from 6 to 9, in order to attain optimum laundry cleaning.
  • In one of the preferred embodiments, which is especially preferred for the front-loading washing machines, the composition of the components employed for making the inventive layered composition, is as follows:
    Ingredients of component 1 (% by weight of the component):
    Anionic Surfactant 0 to 30%
    Non-ionic Surfactant 5 to 60 %
    Cationic Surfactant 0 to 5%
    Fatty Acid 0 to 20%
    Monoethanolamine 0 to 20%
    Propylene Glycol 5 to 30%
    Perfume 0 to 3.0%
    Phosphonate 0 to 2%
    Protease 0.1 to 2.0%
    Cellulase 0.01 to 0.5%
    Lipase 0 to 0.5%
    Anti-dye transfer polymers 0 to 1.0%
    Anti redeposition polymers 0 to 1.0 %
    water 0 to 20%
    Colorant To suitable color
    Silicone Antifoam 0 to 2.0 %
    Ingredients of component 2 (% by weight of the component):
    Citric Acid 30 to 60 %
    Monoethanolamine 10 to 60 %
    Water 5 to 70%
    Phosphonate 0 to 2.0%
    Carbonate 0 to 20%
    Bi-carbonate 0 to 10%
    Sulphate 0 to 20%
    Silicate 0 to 10%
    Perfume 0 to 2.0%
    Optional Colorant To suitable color
    Anti-dye transfer polymers 0 to 1.0%
    Anti-redeposition polymers 0 to 1.0 %
  • Preferably, the detergent composition is a transparent/translucent composition packaged in the transparent/translucent body.
  • The packages of the invention may be prepared from polyvinyl alcohol film, or other suitable material, which is filled, then sealed, preferably heat-sealed or water-sealed.
  • The packages may be filled in any suitable way. Preferably, the liquid detergent composition is pre-mixed (both components) and filled in the same manner as a single phase composition would be. The composition may also be filled component by component.
  • The package may take many shapes as viewed in a plan view, such as rectangular, square, triangle, round, etc. In one preferred embodiment, the package is in a polyhedral shape (e.g., tetrahedron or a pyramid).
  • In use, the package is mixed with water (e.g., inside a laundry machine), in order to dissolve the body and to release the contents of the package.
  • The following specific examples further illustrate the invention, but the invention is not limited thereto.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • A composition as in Table 1, within the scope of the invention, was prepared by mixing the ingredients in the order listed for each component.
    Raw Material % Supplier
    Surfactant component
       Sodium Xylene Sulfonate 1.7 Stepan Co.
       Propylene Glycol 3.3 Eastman Chemical
       Alcohol Ethoxylate, Neodol® 25-9 8.8 Shell
       Alkylbenzene Sulfonic Acid 8.8 Stepan Co.
       Sodium Ethoxylated Alcohol Sulfate (59.39%) 8.8 Stepan Co.
       Monoethanolamine 1.4 Dow Chemical
       Water 16.6 -
       Miscellaneous 0.4 -
    Electrolyte component
       Monoethanolamine citrate 27.4 Dow/Fisher
       Water 22.8
    Total 100.00
    Water Activity 8.2
    Ionic Strength, electrolyte 8.79
    pH, electrolyte component 9.47
    pH, surfactant component 9.78
  • The product was a stable-two-layered liquid. 25 grams of each component were added into a polyvinyl alcohol pouch made of 75.6 microns thickness of polyvinyl alcohol film ex.
  • Monosol and sealed. The pouch was stable for at least 3 weeks, with no visible impact on the film. Two transparent layers were visible in the pouch and separated easily after shaking.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • A composition as in Table 2, within the scope of the invention, was prepared by mixing the ingredients in the order listed for each component. The composition contained no water.
    Ingredient Weight % Supplier
    Alcohol Ethoxylate, Neodol® 25-9 24.39 Shell Co.
    Alkylbenzene Sulfonic Acid 24.39 Stepan Co.
    Monoethanolamine 14.63 Dow Chemical
    Citric Acid 12.20 Fisher Scientific
    Monoethanolamine 24.39 Dow Chemical
    Total 100
  • The product was a stable two-layered, clear liquid. The product separated into layers easily, even after shaking. 25 grams of each component were added into a polyvinyl alcohol pouch made of 75.6 microns thickness of polyvinyl alcohol film ex. Monosol and sealed. The pouch was stable for at least 3 weeks, with no visible impact on the film. Two transparent layers were visible in the pouch and separated easily after shaking.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • A composition as in Table 3, within the scope of the invention, was prepared:
    Component 1 (70% of total composition volume) % by weight of component
    Anionic surfactant (Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonate C12) 20.00
    Nonionic surfactant C12-15 7 ethylene oxide (av) 19.56
    Fatty acid C12-C18 saturated 17.00
    Monoethanolamine 9.65
    Propylene Glycol 22.35
    Perfume 1.35
    Phosphonate 1.00
    Protease 1.00
    Cellulase 0.15
    Poly (vinylpyrrolidone) 0.50
    Water 6.44
    Colorant (acid dye) 0.00012
    Silicone antifoam 0.50
    Antiredeposition polymer (carboxylate) 0.50
    Component 2 (30% of total composition volume)
    Citric Acid 33.02
    Monoethanolamine 31.98
    Water 35.00
    Ionic strength for component 2 10.32
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • A composition as in Table 4, within the scope of the invention, was prepared.
    Component 1 (70% of total volume of the composition) % by weight of component
    Anionic surfactant (Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonate C12) 20.00
    Nonionic surfactant C12-15 7 ethylene oxide 60.00
    Monopropylene Glycol 6.69
    Monoethanolamine 3.81
    Perfume 1.00
    Phosphonate 0.50
    Protease 1.00
    Poly (vinylpyrrolidone) 0.30
    Water 6.20
    Colourant (acid dye) 0.00012
    Silicone antifoam 0.50
    Component 2 (30% of total volume of the composition)
    Citric Acid 33.02
    Monoethanolamine 31.98
    Water 35.00
    Ionic strength, for component 2 10.32
  • The two components each of Examples 3 and 4 were respectively dosed at 25ml per each package sealed by VFFS (vertical form film system), the package being formed of MONOSOL T film.
  • In comparison with control examples in which the citric acid was pre-neutralised with sodium hydroxide (the amount of monoethanolamine to neutralise the anionic precursor of a surfactant being reduced accordingly), the compositions of Examples 3 and 4 showed superior clarity, separation between the layers and storage stability over several weeks at room temperature, as evidenced by lack of precipitation.
  • In a variant of Examples 3 and 4, the packages were filled and sealed by HFFS (horizontal form film system) with no difference in performance.

Claims (20)

  1. A laundry detergent package for use in a single laundry application, the package comprising:
    (a) a water - soluble body;
    (b) a liquid laundry detergent composition contained within the water-soluble body for release upon the dissolution of the water-soluble body, the composition comprising:
    at least two layers, said at least two layers comprising in total:
    from about 10 to about 90% of a detergent surfactant; by weight of the composition; and
    from about 1 to about 50% of an organic electrolyte, by weight of the composition.
  2. The package of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises at least about 10% total water.
  3. The package of claim 2, wherein the water activity of the composition is less than about 0.94.
  4. The package of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises from about 25% to about 70% of water, and wherein the water activity of the composition is less than about 0.94.
  5. The package of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises a hydrotrope.
  6. The package of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises a dye.
  7. The package of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises water and the ionic strength of the electrolyte is at least about 4.4.
  8. The package of claim 1, wherein the detergent surfactant in the composition comprises a mixture of an anionic and a nonionic surfactant.
  9. The package of claim 8, wherein the ratio of the anionic surfactant to the nonionic surfactant is from about 10:1 to about 1:10.
  10. The package of claim 1, wherein the volume ratio of the first layer to the second layer is from about 10:90 to about 90:10.
  11. The package of claim 1, wherein the water-soluble body is transparent.
  12. The package of claim 1, wherein the package is in the shape of tetrahedron.
  13. The package of claim 1, further comprising a third layer.
  14. The package of claim 13, wherein the third layer is a layer of capsules or emulsion.
  15. A laundry detergent package for use in a single laundry application, the package comprising:
    (a) a water - soluble body;
    (b) a liquid laundry detergent composition contained within the water-soluble body for release upon the dissolution of the water-soluble body, the composition comprising at least two components:
    (b1) a first component comprising:
    (b11) from about 5% to about 100%, by weight of the first component of a detergent surfactant;
    (b12) from about 0 to about 60% by weight of the first component of total water
    (b13) from about 0 to about 15%, by weight of the first component of an organic electrolyte;
    (b2) a second component comprising:
    (b21) from about 1 to about 100%, by weight of the second component of an organic electrolyte;
    (b22) from about 0 to about 90%, by weight of the second component of total water
    (b23) from about 0 to about 5% by weight of the second component of a detergent surfactant.
  16. The package of claim 15, wherein the ionic strength of the electrolyte is at least 4.4.
  17. The package of claim 15, wherein the composition further comprises a hydrotrope in the first component.
  18. The package of claim 15, wherein the composition is transparent.
  19. The package of claim 18, wherein the water-soluble body is transparent.
  20. A process of making a laundry detergent package comprising a layered liquid detergent composition for use in a single laundry application, the process comprising:
    (a) preparing a detergent composition comprising at least two liquid detergent components:
    (a1) a first component comprising:
    (a11) from about 5% to about 100%, by weight of the first component of a detergent surfactant;
    (a12) from about 0 to about 60% by weight of the first component of total water
    (a13) from about 0 to about 15%, by weight of the first component of an organic electrolyte;
    (a2) a second component comprising:
    (a21) from about 1 to about 100%, by weight of the second component of an organic electrolyte;
    (a22) from about 0 to about 90%, by weight of the second component of total water
    (a23) from about 0 to about 5% by weight of the second component of a detergent surfactant;
    (b) filling the detergent composition into a water-soluble body.
EP02792755A 2001-12-14 2002-11-12 Water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent Expired - Lifetime EP1453941B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2046201A 2001-12-14 2001-12-14
US20462 2001-12-14
PCT/EP2002/012624 WO2003052040A1 (en) 2001-12-14 2002-11-12 Water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1453941A1 EP1453941A1 (en) 2004-09-08
EP1453941B1 true EP1453941B1 (en) 2005-06-29

Family

ID=21798744

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02792755A Expired - Lifetime EP1453941B1 (en) 2001-12-14 2002-11-12 Water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1453941B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE298784T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002358498A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60204914T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2244828T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2003052040A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014152547A2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-25 Novozymes A/S Detergent pouch with enzymatic water-soluble film
CN109266467A (en) * 2018-08-20 2019-01-25 四川建元天地环保科技有限公司 Purposes of the organic electrolyte in product surface decontamination

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9006169B2 (en) 2005-06-03 2015-04-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Personal care compositions with improved hyposensitivity
EP1666021B1 (en) 2004-07-02 2015-07-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Personal care compositions with improved hyposensitivity
WO2006130647A1 (en) * 2005-06-01 2006-12-07 The Procter & Gamble Company Water-soluble, liquid-containing pouch
PL1854869T5 (en) * 2006-05-09 2015-06-30 Procter & Gamble Water-soluble, liquid-containing pouch
PT2404988T (en) 2010-07-07 2018-03-15 Dalli Werke Gmbh & Co Kg Laundry pre-spotting composition
CA2945608C (en) * 2014-04-22 2021-06-29 The Sun Products Corporation Unit dose detergent compositions
WO2018140566A1 (en) 2017-01-27 2018-08-02 Henkel Ip & Holding Gbmh Stable unit dose compositions with high water content and structured surfactants
EP3363888A1 (en) * 2017-02-21 2018-08-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Use of liquid laundry detergent composition to minimize adverse effects upon accidental exposure to contents of water-soluble unit dose articles

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
LU55174A1 (en) * 1967-12-28 1969-08-08 Unilever Nv
DE19951635A1 (en) * 1999-10-26 2001-05-17 Henkel Kgaa Aqueous multiphase detergent

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014152547A2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-25 Novozymes A/S Detergent pouch with enzymatic water-soluble film
WO2014152547A3 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-11-20 Novozymes A/S Detergent pouch with enzymatic water-soluble film
US11028352B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2021-06-08 Novozymes A/S Detergent pouch with enzymatic water-soluble film
CN109266467A (en) * 2018-08-20 2019-01-25 四川建元天地环保科技有限公司 Purposes of the organic electrolyte in product surface decontamination

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2002358498A1 (en) 2003-06-30
DE60204914T2 (en) 2006-04-27
WO2003052040A1 (en) 2003-06-26
EP1453941A1 (en) 2004-09-08
ES2244828T3 (en) 2005-12-16
ATE298784T1 (en) 2005-07-15
DE60204914D1 (en) 2005-08-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1453942B1 (en) Water-soluble package with multiple distinctly colored layers of liquid laundry detergent
EP1367118B1 (en) Liquid laundry detergent with emulsion layer
US6037319A (en) Water-soluble packets containing liquid cleaning concentrates
US4886615A (en) Hydroxy polycarboxylic acid built non-aqueous liquid cleaning composition and method for use, and package therefor
US6972278B2 (en) Laundry detergent gel with suspended particles
EP1453941B1 (en) Water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent
EP3101104B1 (en) Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
EP3101102B2 (en) Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
AU2015303029A1 (en) Detergent
EP1319707B1 (en) Laundry pouch
ZA200501216B (en) Gel laundry detergent and/or pre-treater composition
EP1539916B1 (en) Gel laundry detergent and/or pre-treater which piles up after dispensing
EP1539914A1 (en) Liquid or gel laundry detergent
US20030139316A1 (en) Layered liquid laundry detergent with colored bottom layer
US20230374424A1 (en) Laundry detergent composition
EP1453945A1 (en) Water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent
EP1453944B1 (en) Polyhedron water-soluble package with layered liquid laundry detergent
JP2005171020A (en) Packed bleaching cleanser product
JP2003160800A (en) Encased synthetic detergent

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20040409

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNILEVER PLC

Owner name: UNILEVER N.V.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60204914

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20050804

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050929

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050929

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050929

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051130

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051207

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2244828

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20060330

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20201125

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20201120

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20201120

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20201120

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20201119

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20201125

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20210122

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: PD

Owner name: UNILEVER IP HOLDINGS B.V.; NL

Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), ASSIGNMENT; FORMER OWNER NAME: UNILEVER N.V.

Effective date: 20210413

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: PD

Owner name: UNILEVER IP HOLDINGS B.V.; NL

Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), ASSIGNMENT; FORMER OWNER NAME: UNILEVER N.V.

Effective date: 20210607

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60204914

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20211201

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20211112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20211130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211112

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20230210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211113