EP1353299B1 - Method for electronic polling and wireless polling system - Google Patents
Method for electronic polling and wireless polling system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1353299B1 EP1353299B1 EP03405253A EP03405253A EP1353299B1 EP 1353299 B1 EP1353299 B1 EP 1353299B1 EP 03405253 A EP03405253 A EP 03405253A EP 03405253 A EP03405253 A EP 03405253A EP 1353299 B1 EP1353299 B1 EP 1353299B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- voting
- vote
- individual
- evaluation unit
- central
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C13/00—Voting apparatus
Definitions
- the invention relates to an electronic voting method according to the preambles of claim 1.
- voting systems are used, for example, at shareholder meetings, political meetings or conferences. Each participant has access to a portable voting device, in which he can enter his voice or opinion at the touch of a button. These inputs are then transmitted from the individual voting devices to a central interrogation and evaluation unit, the transmission preferably being wireless.
- DE-A-43'21'801 describes such a wireless voting system with a central interrogation unit and a plurality of individual voting devices.
- the interrogation unit has an antenna, a transmitter, a receiver, an evaluation circuit and control electronics.
- the voting devices each have a transmitting-receiving antenna, a receiver, a transmitter and control electronics.
- a code corresponding to the vote is stored in the memory of that voting machine.
- the interrogation unit transmits sequentially code interrogation signals.
- a voting device receives a code interrogation signal corresponding to the stored code, it transmits a response signal to the interrogation unit. By measuring the respective received power of the response signals received after transmission of a code interrogation signal, it is possible to determine the number of persons who have delivered a certain vote.
- EP-A-0'556'853 also discloses a radio voting system.
- the individual voting machines have a small display on which the person with voting rights can recognize which vote he has cast. This vote is stored in the voting machine.
- Each voting machine is also provided with an individual code which allows identification.
- the central interrogation unit sequentially transmits these individual codes, upon which the individual voting devices to transmit your code together with the vote one after the other.
- voting systems have the disadvantage that many users are overwhelmed in the operation. Especially at shareholder meetings with a few hundred to a thousand participants, the individual shareholders are flooded with a wealth of information. On the one hand, every shareholder wants to follow the action on the podium or on the giant screen projection. On the other hand, he has to make sure that he gives his vote at the right time. Calls for votes, if any, are usually presented on other major projections. Since he must enter his vote in his individual voting device, he also lacks the certainty that his voice is actually taken into account. This often leads to unnecessary restlessness in the hall.
- the system comprises a lecturer base unit and a plurality of communication devices for the students, who can communicate with each other by radio.
- the base unit consists of a PC and a base unit connected to it.
- Base unit and communication devices are identically constructed and have an antenna, a battery, a keyboard, a display and a microprocessor. Since some large amounts of data are exchanged, the data transfer takes place via a relatively complex protocol. Therefore, the data transfer is relatively slow and not suitable for multi-party voting systems.
- the communication devices have a relatively high energy consumption.
- DE 198 25 978 discloses a system with data acquisition devices and a central evaluation unit, which allows bidirectional data transmission. The voting questions are stored in advance in the individual data collection devices.
- the subscriber is informed on a display of his portable voting device that he can now cast his vote.
- the present voting question is shown on the display, so that he recognizes which topic his opinion is in demand. If the voice has been transmitted to a central query and evaluation unit, he will also be informed.
- this communication with the user preferably takes place exclusively by means of the voting device.
- the transmission of the voting question takes place as a broadcast command, each question being provided with a question number.
- the query of the individual votes is made via individual requests to the individual voting machines, which provide their answer with the question number and their specific device identification.
- the number of individual, time-consuming queries can be kept to a minimum and the radio traffic is not overloaded.
- only a few details for the identification of the voter are stored on the voting device itself.
- the assignment of his vote with the weighting or number of votes to which he is entitled can, for example, be carried out in the central unit. This ensures that relevant personal information of each participant can be treated confidentially. Also, the radio traffic is not overloaded with such information, such as the number of votes.
- the individual positions of the various voting devices are detected by the central interrogation and evaluation before voting, so that the individual query can be done relatively quickly via suitable positioned in the hall antennas.
- This detection of the positions of the individual devices has further advantages: it increases safety, as it would be noticeable if an unnaturally high number of votes were cast from a single position in the hall or if the positions in the hall too change frequently. This would suggest a jammer.
- this position recording and a possible making of a map provides an organizer of such general meetings valuable information for the design of other General Meetings. In particular, this acquisition supports its learning process, as it best distributes the antennas in the room to achieve a uniform load and thus perform the query as efficiently as possible.
- the method according to the invention enables a relatively fast recording of all votes without complicated hand-shake or complicated data transmissions.
- the individual voting devices have a minimum of electronics and can thus be manufactured inexpensively.
- FIG. 1 the inventive voting system is shown schematically.
- the voting system consists essentially of a central interrogation and evaluation unit Z, at least one transmitting and receiving antenna A1, A2, A3, A4, which is in communication with the central interrogation and evaluation Z, and a plurality of individual, portable voting devices G
- the number of transmitting and receiving antennas A1, A2, A3, A4 is adapted to local conditions.
- the antennas A1, A2, A3, A4 are distributed in the hall or in the halls so that each voting device G can communicate with at least one antenna A1, A2, A3, A4.
- a voting device G has a housing 1, in which a plurality of input keys 20, 21, 22, 23 and a display surface or display 3 are arranged.
- the display 3 is preferably an LCD display of known type.
- a battery 4 In the housing 1 are, as in FIG. 3 1, a battery 4, a reception and transmission antenna 5, a radio signal transmission unit 6 connected to the antenna 5 and a control unit 7 connected to the transmission unit 6 are arranged.
- the reception and Transmitting antenna is for example a rod antenna, which is etched on a print, preferably that of the control unit 7.
- the transmission unit 6 comprises a high-frequency transmitter, a high-frequency oscillator and a modulator.
- the control unit 7 has among other things a memory, an encoder and a display control. To the control unit 7, the input keys 20, 21, 22, 23 and the display 3 are connected.
- the functions of the input keys 20, 21, 22, 23 are freely programmable.
- the keys 20, 21, 22, 23 are arranged on an edge of the display 3, so that on the display 3, the assignment of the keys 20, 21, 22, 23 can be displayed.
- the key 20 is used to vote "yes"
- the key 22 corresponds to a "no" vote
- the key 21 is pressed if the voter wishes to abstain.
- the key 23 is an information key via which information stored in the memory or requested by radio from the central interrogation and evaluation unit can be displayed on the display 3.
- the keys are assigned other input values, as explained below. The indication of which assignment currently applies appears on the display 3 in each case.
- the voting device G is a passive element, which is activated only upon receipt of a sent by the query and evaluation unit Z broadcast command and transmits its data via radio to this unit Z. The user can not therefore transmit his data to the central unit Z on his own initiative.
- FIG. 4 shows the method visible to the user during the meeting.
- the squares correspond to the content of the display 3 at the respective time.
- Each voter receives at the entrance of one of these portable voting devices G, which has been specially personalized for him. This means that his name and, for example, the number of votes he represents are stored in the memory.
- the information key 23 By means of the information key 23, other information can also be displayed.
- the display 3 appears in the assignment of the key 23 "back", so that the Benüt> zer can easily get back to the basic position of the device G.
- the user may choose the language of the ad.
- the central unit Z transmits with a broadcast command to all devices G the wording of the vote question.
- the question to be reconciled appears in the selected language.
- the voter is prompted on the display 3 to cast his vote, with the assignment of the keys 20, 21, 22 with "yes", “contain” and "no" is specified.
- he receives a confirmation of his choice on the display 3 and is asked to confirm this choice again by pressing a key.
- This communication with the user takes place without the participation of the central unit Z and is merely by the control unit 7 of the specific device G performed. This does not overload the radio connection.
- this step is repeated iteratively until the user gives his "ok” to his vote by pressing the corresponding button. If he has confirmed his consent, he receives from the control unit 7 via the display 3 confirmation that his voice is stored and that he should now wait.
- the central polling and control unit Z starts polling the individual devices G for their voice by radio.
- Each such requested voting device G transmits the vote of the user by radio to the central query and control unit Z, which receives the signal via one of the distributed in the hall antennas A1, A2, A3, A4.
- the central query and control unit Z receives the signal via one of the distributed in the hall antennas A1, A2, A3, A4.
- the number of votes represented per device is not transmitted.
- a subscriber list with all relevant information including the number of votes represented is stored. Upon receipt of the vote this is thus preferably provided only in the evaluation with the appropriate weighting.
- the central unit Z should reach and interrogate as many devices as possible in the shortest possible time, but that Nevertheless, it must be ensured that no voice is overlooked and that no vote is counted twice.
- a complete handshake between the individual devices G and the central unit Z would indeed ensure a clear identification. However, these handshakes would overload the radio traffic and take too much time for the evaluation.
- the question as well as all later broadcast signals are transmitted preferably at short intervals over all antennas A1, A2, A3, A4 several times to reach all devices G.
- the hall is flooded with the order, so to speak.
- the central query and evaluation unit Z When querying the individual votes, the central query and evaluation unit Z sends each device G an individual command to transmit the vote.
- the protocol for the command looks like this: Sync
- the voting apparatus G together with its vote, transmits the question number of the voting question. It can thus be guaranteed that the answers to the question are assigned error-free.
- voters can vote before the vote and that they are transmitted only at the appropriate time by the appropriate voting device G to the central unit Z. It is also possible that early votes are stored in the central unit Z and interrogated internally at the given time.
- the central unit Z transmits a broadcast blocking command whose protocol is structured as follows: Sync
- the central unit Z also broadcasts a broadcast signal to turn off all G devices.
- the central unit Z has a list of all devices G, of which an answer is expected.
- all devices G in the room are interrogated via a first antenna A1.
- the devices G, from which the central unit Z has already received a reply, are noted on the list.
- All devices G, which have not yet sent a response, are queried via a second antenna A2.
- the non-responding devices G are searched via the third antenna A3 and so on until all the antennas have been sent once the response request. If there is still no answer for a device G, it will come back the first antenna A1 started. After a certain time, as described above, the choice is canceled, so that the non-responding devices G are not taken into account in the election. If a device G does not work, then the user recognizes this due to the lack of reconfirmation on the display 3 and can make itself noticeable in order to be taken into account.
- a mapping or a reachability list is empirically determined in the first vote question or before the vote. That is, the central unit Z asks before the vote all devices G to send a response. This request is preferably sent according to the first variant.
- the central unit Z registers via which antenna it has received the answers of the individual devices G. In the following vote, the corresponding device is first requested by this antenna to transmit the answers to the voting questions. Only if no answer is received, the other antennas are searched.
- the contact between the individual voting devices and the central unit is maintained not only during voting but at regularly recurring intervals, so that the unit can detect a change in the location position at any time.
- These control queries are preferably not displayed to the user.
- the voting machine can also be use the voting machine to send messages to individual subscribers; For example, a message that they have received a telephone call and are asked to call back.
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein elektronisches Abstimmungsverfahren gemäss den Oberbegriffen des Patentanspruches 1.The invention relates to an electronic voting method according to the preambles of
Im Stand der Technik sind diverse Systeme zur Erfassung von Meinungen oder Reaktionen von Einzelpersonen bekannt. Diese Abstimmungssysteme werden beispielsweise bei Aktionärsversammlungen, bei politischen Versammlungen oder Konferenzen eingesetzt. Jeder Teilnehmer hat dabei Zugriff auf ein portables Abstimmungsgerät, in welches er über Tastendruck seine Stimme oder Meinung eingeben kann. Diese Eingaben werden dann von den einzelnen Abstimmungsgeräten an eine zentrale Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheit übermittelt, wobei die Übermittlung vorzugsweise drahtlos erfolgt.Various systems for detecting opinions or reactions of individuals are known in the art. These voting systems are used, for example, at shareholder meetings, political meetings or conferences. Each participant has access to a portable voting device, in which he can enter his voice or opinion at the touch of a button. These inputs are then transmitted from the individual voting devices to a central interrogation and evaluation unit, the transmission preferably being wireless.
DE-A-43'33'245 und
Bevorzugt ist jedoch eine Übermittlung der Stimmabgabe über Funk. So beschreibt DE-A-43'21'801 ein derartiges drahtloses Abstimmungssystem mit einer zentralen Abfrageeinheit und einer Vielzahl von einzelnen Abstimmungsgeräten. Die Abfrageeinheit weist eine Antenne, einen Sender, einen Empfänger, eine Auswerteschaltung und eine Steuerelektronik auf. Die Abstimmungsgeräte weisen je eine Sende-Empfangsantenne, einen Empfänger, einen Sender und eine Steuerelektronik auf. Bei Abgabe der Stimme in ein Abstimmungsgerät wird ein der Stimme entsprechender Code im Speicher dieses Abstimmungsgeräts gespeichert. Die Abfrageeinheit sendet zeitlich nacheinander Code-Abfragesignale aus. Empfängt ein Abstimmungsgerät ein dem gespeicherten Code entsprechendes Code-Abfragesignal, so übermittelt es ein Antwortsignal an die Abfrageeinheit. Durch Messung der jeweiligen Empfangsleistung der nach einer Aussendung eines Code-Abfragesignals erhaltenen Antwortsignale lässt sich die Zahl der Personen ermitteln, welche ein bestimmtes Votum abgegeben haben.However, preference is given to transmitting voting by radio. Thus, DE-A-43'21'801 describes such a wireless voting system with a central interrogation unit and a plurality of individual voting devices. The interrogation unit has an antenna, a transmitter, a receiver, an evaluation circuit and control electronics. The voting devices each have a transmitting-receiving antenna, a receiver, a transmitter and control electronics. When the vote is submitted to a voting machine, a code corresponding to the vote is stored in the memory of that voting machine. The interrogation unit transmits sequentially code interrogation signals. When a voting device receives a code interrogation signal corresponding to the stored code, it transmits a response signal to the interrogation unit. By measuring the respective received power of the response signals received after transmission of a code interrogation signal, it is possible to determine the number of persons who have delivered a certain vote.
EP-A-0'556'853 offenbart ebenfalls ein mittels Funk arbeitendes Abstimmungssystem. Hier verfügen die einzelnen Abstimmungsgeräte über einen kleinen Display, auf welchem die stimmberechtigte Person erkennen kann, welches Votum sie abgegeben hat. Dieses Votum wird im Abstimmungsgerät gespeichert. Jedes Abstimmungsgerät ist zudem mit einem individuellen Code versehen, welcher eine Identifikation ermöglicht. Die zentrale Abfrageeinheit sendet nacheinander diese individuellen Codes aus, worauf die einzelnen Abstimmungsgeräte nacheinander ihren Code zusammen mit dem Votum übermitteln.EP-A-0'556'853 also discloses a radio voting system. Here, the individual voting machines have a small display on which the person with voting rights can recognize which vote he has cast. This vote is stored in the voting machine. Each voting machine is also provided with an individual code which allows identification. The central interrogation unit sequentially transmits these individual codes, upon which the individual voting devices to transmit your code together with the vote one after the other.
Diese Abstimmungssysteme haben den Nachteil, dass viele Benützer in der Bedienung überfordert sind. Besonders bei Aktionärsversammlungen mit einigen hundert bis tausend Teilnehmern werden die einzelnen Aktionäre mit einer Fülle von Informationen überflutet. Einerseits möchte jeder Aktionär dem Geschehen vorne auf dem Podium bzw. auf der Grossleinwandprojektion folgen. Andererseits muss er darauf achten, dass er seine Stimme zum richtigen Zeitpunkt abgibt. Dabei werden Aufforderungen zur Abstimmung, wenn überhaupt, meistens auf anderen Grossprojektionen dargestellt. Da er seine Stimmabgabe in sein individuelles Abstimmungsgerät eingeben muss, fehlt ihm zudem die Sicherheit, dass seine Stimme auch tatsächlich berücksichtigt wird. Dies führt oft zu einer unnötigen Unruhe im Saal.These voting systems have the disadvantage that many users are overwhelmed in the operation. Especially at shareholder meetings with a few hundred to a thousand participants, the individual shareholders are flooded with a wealth of information. On the one hand, every shareholder wants to follow the action on the podium or on the giant screen projection. On the other hand, he has to make sure that he gives his vote at the right time. Calls for votes, if any, are usually presented on other major projections. Since he must enter his vote in his individual voting device, he also lacks the certainty that his voice is actually taken into account. This often leads to unnecessary restlessness in the hall.
Aus US-A-5'724'357 ist zwar ein drahtloses System bekannt, welches einen Dialog zwischen einem Vortragenden und seinen Zuhörern ermöglicht. Dieses System ist jedoch für den Einsatz in Vorlesungssälen von Universitäten entwickelt worden. Das System weist eine Basiseinheit für den Vortragenden und mehrere Kommunikationsgeräte für die Studenten auf, welche über Funk miteinander kommunizieren können. Die Basiseinheit besteht aus einem PC und einem daran angeschlossenen Basisgerät. Basisgerät und Kommunikationsgeräte sind identisch aufgebaut und verfügen über eine Antenne, eine Batterie, eine Tastatur, einen Display und einen Mikroprozessor. Da teilweise grosse Datenmengen ausgetauscht werden, erfolgt der Datentransfer über ein relativ aufwendiges Protokoll. Deshalb ist der Datentransfer relativ langsam und für Abstimmungssysteme mit vielen Teilnehmern nicht geeignet. Zudem weisen die Kommunikationsgeräte einen relativ hohen Energiebedarf auf.Although a wireless system is known from US-A-5'724'357, which allows a dialogue between a speaker and his listeners. However, this system has been developed for use in university lecture halls. The system comprises a lecturer base unit and a plurality of communication devices for the students, who can communicate with each other by radio. The base unit consists of a PC and a base unit connected to it. Base unit and communication devices are identically constructed and have an antenna, a battery, a keyboard, a display and a microprocessor. Since some large amounts of data are exchanged, the data transfer takes place via a relatively complex protocol. Therefore, the data transfer is relatively slow and not suitable for multi-party voting systems. In addition, the communication devices have a relatively high energy consumption.
Es ist deshalb Aufgabe der Erfindung, ein elektronisches Abstimmungsverfahren zu schaffen, welches die obengenannten Nachteile behebt.It is therefore an object of the invention to provide an electronic voting method which overcomes the above disadvantages.
Diese Aufgabe löst ein elektronisches Abstimmungsverfahren mit den Merkmalen des Patentanspruchs 1.This object is achieved by an electronic voting method having the features of
Im erfindungsgemässen Verfahren wird der Teilnehmer auf einem Display seines portablen Abstimmungsgeräts darüber informiert, dass er nun seine Stimme abgeben kann. Die vorliegende Abstimmungsfrage wird dabei auf dem Display angezeigt, damit er erkennt, zu welchem Thema seine Meinung gefragt ist. Wenn die Stimme an eine zentrale Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheit übermittelt worden ist, wird er auch darüber informiert.In the method according to the invention, the subscriber is informed on a display of his portable voting device that he can now cast his vote. The present voting question is shown on the display, so that he recognizes which topic his opinion is in demand. If the voice has been transmitted to a central query and evaluation unit, he will also be informed.
Dadurch wird jeder Benützer einerseits direkt während der Abstimmung angeleitet, wie er das Gerät benützen soll. Ferner erhält er eine Zusicherung, dass seine Stimme auch tatsächlich berücksichtigt worden ist.As a result, each user is instructed on the one hand directly during the vote on how he should use the device. Further he receives an assurance that his vote has actually been taken into account.
Vorteilhaft ist ferner, dass der Benützer die Möglichkeit hat, die Stimmabgabe zu ändern, ohne dass er dabei unter Zeitdruck gerät, da das Abstimmungsgerät stets eine Bestätigung der Eingabe verlangt. Um den Funkverkehr nicht zu belasten, erfolgt diese Kommunikation mit dem Benützer vorzugsweise ausschliesslich mittels des Abstimmungsgeräts.It is also advantageous that the user has the opportunity to change the vote without him doing time under pressure, since the voting device always a confirmation the input required. In order not to burden the radio traffic, this communication with the user preferably takes place exclusively by means of the voting device.
Die Übermittlung der Abstimmungsfrage erfolgt als Broadcast-Befehl, wobei jede Frage mit einer Fragenummer versehen ist. Die Abfrage der einzelnen Stimmabgaben erfolgt über individuelle Anfragen bei den einzelnen Abstimmungsgeräten, welche ihre Antwort mit der Fragenummer und ihrer spezifischen Geräteidentifikation versehen. Dadurch lässt sich die Anzahl der individuellen, zeitintensiven Abfragen auf ein Minimum begrenzen und der Funkverkehr wird nicht überlastet. Vorzugsweise sind auf dem Abstimmungsgerät selber nur wenige Angaben zur Identifikation des Abstimmenden gespeichert. Die Zuordnung seiner Stimme mit der ihm zustehenden Gewichtung oder Stimmenzahl kann beispielsweise in der zentralen Einheit erfolgen. Dadurch ist gesichert, dass relevante persönliche Daten jedes Teilnehmers vertraulich behandelt werden können. Auch wird der Funkverkehr mit derartigen Angaben, wie beispielsweise die Stimmenanzahl, nicht überbelastet.The transmission of the voting question takes place as a broadcast command, each question being provided with a question number. The query of the individual votes is made via individual requests to the individual voting machines, which provide their answer with the question number and their specific device identification. As a result, the number of individual, time-consuming queries can be kept to a minimum and the radio traffic is not overloaded. Preferably, only a few details for the identification of the voter are stored on the voting device itself. The assignment of his vote with the weighting or number of votes to which he is entitled can, for example, be carried out in the central unit. This ensures that relevant personal information of each participant can be treated confidentially. Also, the radio traffic is not overloaded with such information, such as the number of votes.
In einer bevorzugten Variante des Verfahrens werden vor der Abstimmung die einzelnen Positionen der verschiedenen Abstimmungsgeräte durch die zentrale Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheit erfasst, so dass die individuelle Abfrage relativ schnell über geeignete im Saal positionierte Antennen erfolgen kann. Diese Erfassung der Positionen der einzelnen Geräte weist weitere Vorteile auf: so wird die Sicherheit erhöht, da es auffallen würde, wenn von einer einzigen Position im Saal eine unnatürlich hohe Anzahl Stimmen abgegeben würden beziehungsweise wenn die Positionen im Saal zu häufig ändern. Dies liesse auf einen Störsender schliessen. Ferner liefert diese Positionserfassung und ein allfälliges Anfertigen einer Karte einem Organisator derartiger Generalversammlungen wertvolle Informationen für die Gestaltung weiterer Generalversammlungen. Insbesondere unterstützt diese Erfassung seinen Lernprozess, wie er die Antennen im Raum am besten verteilt, um eine gleichmässige Belastung zu erzielen und somit die Abfrage möglichst effizient durchzuführen. Diese Vorteile lassen sich auch ohne Verwendung des Displays erzielen.
Das erfindungsgemässe Verfahren ermöglicht eine relativ schnelle Erfassung aller Stimmabgaben, ohne aufwendige Hand-shake oder komplizierte Datenübermittlungen. Die individuellen Abstimmungsgeräte weisen ein Minimum an Elektronik auf und lassen sich somit kostengünstig fertigen. Die Verwendung von frei programmierbaren Eingabetasten vereinfacht das Abstimmungsgerät und somit dessen Bedienung.In a preferred variant of the method, the individual positions of the various voting devices are detected by the central interrogation and evaluation before voting, so that the individual query can be done relatively quickly via suitable positioned in the hall antennas. This detection of the positions of the individual devices has further advantages: it increases safety, as it would be noticeable if an unnaturally high number of votes were cast from a single position in the hall or if the positions in the hall too change frequently. This would suggest a jammer. Furthermore, this position recording and a possible making of a map provides an organizer of such general meetings valuable information for the design of other General Meetings. In particular, this acquisition supports its learning process, as it best distributes the antennas in the room to achieve a uniform load and thus perform the query as efficiently as possible. These advantages can also be achieved without using the display.
The method according to the invention enables a relatively fast recording of all votes without complicated hand-shake or complicated data transmissions. The individual voting devices have a minimum of electronics and can thus be manufactured inexpensively. The use of freely programmable input keys simplifies the voting device and thus its operation.
Weitere vorteilhafte Varianten des Verfahrens gehen aus den abhängigen Patentansprüchen hervor.Further advantageous variants of the method will become apparent from the dependent claims.
Im Folgenden wird der Erfindungsgegenstand anhand eines bevorzugten Ausführungsbeispiels, welches in der beiliegenden Zeichnung dargestellt ist, erläutert. Es zeigen:
Figur 1- eine schematische Darstellung eines erfindungsge mässen Abstimmungssystems;
Figur 2- eine Ansicht eines Abstimmungsgeräts;
Figur 3- eine schematische Darstellung der Elektronik eines Abstimmungsgerätes und
Figur 4- einen Funktionsablauf einer Stimmabfrage.
- FIG. 1
- a schematic representation of a erfindungsge according voting system;
- FIG. 2
- a view of a voting device;
- FIG. 3
- a schematic representation of the electronics of a voting device and
- FIG. 4
- a functional sequence of a voice query.
In
In der
Die Funktionen der Eingabetasten 20, 21, 22, 23 sind frei programmierbar. Die Tasten 20, 21, 22, 23 sind an einem Rand des Displays 3 angeordnet, so dass auf dem Display 3 die Belegungsart der Tasten 20, 21, 22, 23 angezeigt werden kann. Vorzugsweise dient während der Abstimmung die Taste 20 dazu, mit "ja" zu stimmen, die Taste 22 entspricht einer "nein" Stimme, die Taste 21 wird gedrückt, wenn sich der Stimmberechtigte der Stimme enthalten will. Die Taste 23 ist eine Info-Taste, über welche sich im Speicher gespeicherte oder über Funk von der zentralen Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheit abgefragte Informationen auf dem Display 3 anzeigen lassen. Je nach Stand des Abstimmungsprozederes sind den Tasten jedoch noch andere Eingabewerte zugewiesen, wie im folgenden dargelegt ist. Der Hinweis, welche Zuweisung gerade gilt, erscheint jeweils auf dem Display 3.The functions of the
Das Abstimmungsgerät G ist ein passives Element, welches lediglich bei Empfang eines von der Abfrage- und Auswertungseinheit Z gesandten Broadcast-Befehls aktiviert wird und seine Daten über Funk an diese Einheit Z übermittelt. Der Benützer kann somit nicht von sich aus seine Daten an die zentrale Einheit Z übermitteln.The voting device G is a passive element, which is activated only upon receipt of a sent by the query and evaluation unit Z broadcast command and transmits its data via radio to this unit Z. The user can not therefore transmit his data to the central unit Z on his own initiative.
In der
Ist die Versammlung so weit fortgeschritten, dass eine Abstimmung durchgeführt werden soll, übermittelt die zentrale Einheit Z mit einem Broadcast-Befehl an alle Geräte G den Wortlaut der Abstimmungsfrage. Auf dem Display 3 erscheint die zur Abstimmung stehende Frage in der gewählten Sprache. Der Stimmberechtigte wird auf dem Display 3 aufgefordert, seine Stimme abzugeben, wobei die Belegung der Tasten 20, 21, 22 mit "ja", "enthalten" und "nein" angegeben wird. Wenn er die gewünschte Taste gedrückt hat, erhält er auf dem Display 3 eine Bestätigung seiner Wahl und wird aufgefordert, diese Wahl nochmals durch Tastendruck zu bestätigen. Diese Kommunikation mit dem Benützer erfolgt ohne Beteiligung der zentralen Einheit Z und wird lediglich durch die Steuereinheit 7 des spezifischen Geräts G durchgeführt. Dadurch wird die Funkverbindung nicht überlastet.If the meeting has progressed so far that a vote is to be carried out, the central unit Z transmits with a broadcast command to all devices G the wording of the vote question. On
Korrigiert der Benützer seine Wahl, wird dieser Schritt iterativ so oft wiederholt, bis der Benützer durch Drücken der entsprechenden Taste sein "ok" zu seiner Stimmabgabe gibt. Hat er sein Einverständnis bestätigt, so erhält er von der Steuereinheit 7 über den Display 3 die Bestätigung, dass seine Stimme gespeichert ist und dass er nun warten soll.If the user corrects his or her choice, this step is repeated iteratively until the user gives his "ok" to his vote by pressing the corresponding button. If he has confirmed his consent, he receives from the
Zwischenzeitlich beginnt die zentrale Abfrage- und Steuereinheit Z, die einzelnen Geräte G per Funk nach ihrer Stimme abzufragen. Jedes derart aufgeforderte Abstimmungsgerät G übermittelt die Stimmabgabe des Benützers per Funk an die zentrale Abfrage- und Steuereinheit Z, welche das Signal über eine der im Saal verteilten Antennen A1, A2, A3, A4 erhält. Bei erfolgter Übermittlung erscheint auf dem Display 3 die Bestätigung, dass die Mitteilung übertragen und somit berücksichtigt worden ist. Üblicherweise wird die Anzahl der pro Gerät vertretenen Stimmen nicht übermittelt. In der zentralen Abfrage- und Steuereinheit Z beziehungsweise in einer mit dieser verbundenen Auswerteeinheit ist eine Teilnehmerliste mit allen relevanten Angaben inklusive der vertretenen Stimmenzahl gespeichert. Bei Eingang des Votums wird dieses somit vorzugsweise erst bei der Auswertung mit der entsprechenden Gewichtung versehen.In the meantime, the central polling and control unit Z starts polling the individual devices G for their voice by radio. Each such requested voting device G transmits the vote of the user by radio to the central query and control unit Z, which receives the signal via one of the distributed in the hall antennas A1, A2, A3, A4. Upon successful transmission appears on the
Bei der Kommunikation zwischen Abstimmungsgerät G und zentraler Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheit Z ist zu beachten, dass die zentrale Einheit Z möglichst viele Geräte innerhalb kürzerster Zeit erreichen und abfragen soll, dass aber trotzdem gewährleistet sein muss, dass keine Stimme übersehen wird und dass keine Stimme doppelt gezählt wird. Ein vollständiger Handshake zwischen den einzelnen Geräten G und der zentralen Einheit Z würde zwar eine eindeutige Identifikation gewährleisten. Diese Handshakes würden jedoch den Funkverkehr überlasten und zu viel Zeit für die Auswertung benötigen.In the communication between the voting device G and the central query and evaluation unit Z, it should be noted that the central unit Z should reach and interrogate as many devices as possible in the shortest possible time, but that Nevertheless, it must be ensured that no voice is overlooked and that no vote is counted twice. A complete handshake between the individual devices G and the central unit Z would indeed ensure a clear identification. However, these handshakes would overload the radio traffic and take too much time for the evaluation.
Die versandten Datenformate sind alle gleich aufgebaut und bestehen aus einem Startbit, mehreren Datenbits und einem Stopbit. Die als Broadcast-Signal von der zentralen Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheit Z versandte Abstimmungsfrage ist in einem Protokoll eingebettet, welches zusätzlich zum Text der Abstimmungsfrage auch eine Fragenummer enthält. Das Protokoll weist dabei den folgenden Aufbau auf:
Sync|SRequ|FC|CMD|QuestNr|Text|FCS
wobei
- Sync die Synchronisation,
- SRequ das Startzeichen,
- FC den Mitteilungstyp,
- CMD eine weitere Unterteilung des Mitteilungstyps und
- QuestNr die Fragenummer bezeichnet,
- Text den Fragetext enthält und
- FCS die Checksumme bedeutet.
Sync | SRequ | FC | CMD | QuestNr | text | FCS
in which
- Sync the synchronization,
- SRequ the start character,
- FC the message type,
- CMD another subdivision of the message type and
- QuestNo denotes the question number,
- Text contains the question text and
- FCS means the checksum.
Die Frage wie auch alle späteren Broadcast-Signale werden vorzugsweise in kurzen Zeitabständen über alle Antennen A1, A2, A3, A4 mehrmals übermittelt, um alle Geräte G zu erreichen. Der Saal wird sozusagen mit dem Befehl überflutet.The question as well as all later broadcast signals are transmitted preferably at short intervals over all antennas A1, A2, A3, A4 several times to reach all devices G. The hall is flooded with the order, so to speak.
Bei der Abfrage der einzelnen Stimmabgaben sendet die zentrale Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheit Z jedem Gerät G einen individuellen Befehl, die Stimmabgabe zu übermitteln. Das Protokoll für den Befehl sieht wie folgt aus:
Sync|SRequ|FC|ID|FCS
wobei
ID die Identifikationsnummer des jeweiligen Geräts G ist.When querying the individual votes, the central query and evaluation unit Z sends each device G an individual command to transmit the vote. The protocol for the command looks like this:
Sync | SRequ | FC | ID | FCS
in which
ID is the identification number of the respective device G.
Das angesprochene Abstimmungsgerät G antwortet mit
Pream|SResp|FC|ID|QuestNr|Result|FCS
wobei
- Pream die Synchronisation, SResp das Startzeichen bedeutet und
- Result die Stimmabgabe beinhaltet.
Pream | SResp | FC | ID | QuestNr | Result | FCS
in which
- Pream the synchronization, SResp means the start character and
- Result includes the vote.
Somit übermittelt das Abstimmungsgerät G zusammen mit seiner Stimmabgabe die Fragenummer der Abstimmungsfrage. Es lässt sich somit garantieren, dass die Antworten der Frage fehlerfrei zugeordnet werden. Durch diese Kopplung ist es auch möglich, dass Wähler bereits im Vorfeld der Abstimmung ihre Stimme abgeben können und dass diese erst zum geeigneten Zeitpunkt vom entsprechenden Abstimmungsgerät G an die zentrale Einheit Z übermittelt werden. Es ist auch möglich, dass vorzeitige Stimmabgaben in der zentralen Einheit Z gespeichert und zum gegebenen Zeitpunkt intern abgefragt werden.Thus, the voting apparatus G, together with its vote, transmits the question number of the voting question. It can thus be guaranteed that the answers to the question are assigned error-free. Through this coupling, it is also possible that voters can vote before the vote and that they are transmitted only at the appropriate time by the appropriate voting device G to the central unit Z. It is also possible that early votes are stored in the central unit Z and interrogated internally at the given time.
Ist die Zeitspanne für die Stimmabgabe zu einer spezifischen Frage abgelaufen, so übermittelt die zentrale Einheit Z einen Broadcast-Sperrbefehl, dessen Protokoll wie folgt aufgebaut ist:
Sync|SRequ|FC|CMD|FCSIf the time for voting on a specific question has expired, the central unit Z transmits a broadcast blocking command whose protocol is structured as follows:
Sync | SRequ | FC | CMD | FCS
Dadurch wird verhindert, dass einzelne Geräte G nach wie vor ihre Stimmabgabe übermitteln. Wird dieser Voting-Lock-Befehl übermittelt, schalten die Geräte G ihren Display 3 auf die Grundstellung zurück, wie in
Am Ende der Versammlung sendet die zentrale Einheit Z zudem ein Broadcast-Signal, um alle Geräte G abzuschalten.At the end of the assembly, the central unit Z also broadcasts a broadcast signal to turn off all G devices.
Um die einzelnen Geräte G möglichst schnell zu erreichen und abzufragen, lassen sich zwei verschiedene Verfahren einsetzen. In beiden Varianten verfügt die zentrale Einheit Z über eine Liste aller Geräte G, von welchen eine Antwort erwartet wird.In order to reach and query the individual devices G as quickly as possible, two different methods can be used. In both variants, the central unit Z has a list of all devices G, of which an answer is expected.
In einer ersten Variante des Verfahrens werden über eine erste Antenne A1 alle im Saal befindlichen Geräte G abgefragt. Die Geräte G, von welchen die zentrale Einheit Z bereits eine Antwort erhalten hat, werden auf der Liste vermerkt. Alle Geräte G, welche noch keine Antwort gesandt haben, werden über eine zweite Antenne A2 abgefragt. Die wieder nicht antwortenden Geräte G werden über die dritte Antenne A3 gesucht und so weiter, bis über alle Antennen einmal die Antwortaufforderung versandt worden ist. Fehlt für ein Gerät G nach wie vor eine Antwort, so wird wieder bei der ersten Antenne A1 angefangen. Nach einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt wird, wie oben beschrieben, die Wahl abgebrochen, so dass die nicht antwortenden Geräte G bei der Wahl nicht berücksichtigt werden. Sollte nun ein Gerät G nicht funktionieren, so erkennt dies der Benützer aufgrund der fehlenden Rückbestätigung auf dem Display 3 und kann sich entsprechend bemerkbar machen, um doch noch berücksichtigt zu werden.In a first variant of the method, all devices G in the room are interrogated via a first antenna A1. The devices G, from which the central unit Z has already received a reply, are noted on the list. All devices G, which have not yet sent a response, are queried via a second antenna A2. The non-responding devices G are searched via the third antenna A3 and so on until all the antennas have been sent once the response request. If there is still no answer for a device G, it will come back the first antenna A1 started. After a certain time, as described above, the choice is canceled, so that the non-responding devices G are not taken into account in the election. If a device G does not work, then the user recognizes this due to the lack of reconfirmation on the
In einer bevorzugten zweiten Variante des Verfahrens wird jedoch bei der ersten Abstimmungsfrage oder vor der Abstimmung empirisch ein Mapping oder eine Erreichbarkeitsliste eruiert. Das heisst, die zentrale Einheit Z fordert vor der Abstimmung alle Geräte G auf, eine Antwort zu senden. Diese Aufforderung wird vorzugsweise gemäss der ersten Variante gesendet. Die zentrale Einheit Z registriert, über welche Antenne sie die Antworten der einzelnen Geräte G erhalten hat. Bei der nachfolgenden Abstimmung wird das entsprechende Gerät jeweils als erstes über diese Antenne aufgefordert, die Antworten zu den Abstimmungsfragen zu übermitteln. Erst wenn keine Antwort erhalten wird, wird über die anderen Antennen gesucht.In a preferred second variant of the method, however, a mapping or a reachability list is empirically determined in the first vote question or before the vote. That is, the central unit Z asks before the vote all devices G to send a response. This request is preferably sent according to the first variant. The central unit Z registers via which antenna it has received the answers of the individual devices G. In the following vote, the corresponding device is first requested by this antenna to transmit the answers to the voting questions. Only if no answer is received, the other antennas are searched.
Vorzugsweise wird der Kontakt zwischen den einzelnen Abstimmungsgeräten und der zentralen Einheit nicht nur bei Abstimmungen sondern in regelmässig wiederkehrenden Zeitabständen aufrechterhalten, so dass die Einheit einen Wechsel in der Standortposition jederzeit feststellen kann. Diese Kontrollabfragen werden dem Benützer vorzugsweise nicht angezeigt.Preferably, the contact between the individual voting devices and the central unit is maintained not only during voting but at regularly recurring intervals, so that the unit can detect a change in the location position at any time. These control queries are preferably not displayed to the user.
In einer bevorzugten Variante des Verfahrens lässt sich zudem das Abstimmungsgerät dazu benutzen, einzelnen Teilnehmern Nachrichten zu übermitteln; beispielsweise eine Nachricht, dass sie einen Telephonanruf erhalten haben und um Rückruf gebeten werden.In a preferred variant of the method can also be use the voting machine to send messages to individual subscribers; For example, a message that they have received a telephone call and are asked to call back.
- A1A1
- erste Antennefirst antenna
- A2A2
- zweite Antennesecond antenna
- A3A3
- dritte Antennethird antenna
- A4A4
- vierte Antennefourth antenna
- ZZ
- zentrale Abfrage- und Auswerteeinheitcentral query and evaluation unit
- GG
- Abstimmungsgerätvoting machine
- 11
- Gehäusecasing
- 2020
- Eingabetastereturn key
- 2121
- Eingabetastereturn key
- 2222
- Eingabetastereturn key
- 2323
- Eingabetastereturn key
- 33
- Displaydisplay
- 44
- Batteriebattery
- 55
- Empfangs- und SendeantenneReceiving and transmitting antenna
- 66
- Funksignal-ÜbertragungseinheitRadio signal transmission unit
- 77
- Steuereinheitcontrol unit
Claims (4)
- Electronic voting method at a meeting, in which input keys (20, 21, 22, 23) are used to input votes into portable voting devices (G) for a voting issue, wherein each voting device (G) displays the votes input into said device (G) on a display (3) and wherein, following an individual prompt transmitted by radio by a central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z), each voting device (G) transmits the votes input into said voting device (G) to said central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z) by radio,
characterized
in that, if the meeting is so far advanced that voting can be carried out, the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z) transmits the text of the voting issue, together with an issue number, to the voting devices (G) as a command prior to the vote, whereupon the voting issue and a prompt for a vote appear on the display (3) of the individual voting devices (G),
in that, for the purpose of requesting the individual votes, the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z) sends each voting device (G) an individual command with an identification number for the respective voting device (G),
in that the response of the voting device (G) addressed by the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z) contains the identification number of the respective voting device (G), the issue number and the vote, and in that, following transmission of the vote to the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z), a confirmation appears on the display (3) that the cast vote has been transmitted to the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z). - Method according to Claim 1, characterized in that the prompt for a vote is accompanied by the appearance of advice of input keys (20, 21, 22, 23) to be pressed on the display (3).
- Method according to one of Claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the voting issue is transmitted as a broadcast signal to all voting devices (G).
- Method according to one of Claims 1 to 3, characterized in that, before or when a first voting issue is sent, the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z) receives individual signals from the individual voting devices (G) which the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z) uses to record which antenna (A1, A2, A3, A4) can be used to reach the individual voting devices (G) by radio, and in that, during the voting, the central interrogation and evaluation unit (Z) sends the individual prompt for transmission of the vote via the recorded antenna (A1, A2, A3, A4) in a first interrogation step.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CH6182002 | 2002-04-12 | ||
CH00618/02A CH705435B1 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2002-04-12 | Electronic voting system and wireless voting system. |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10001706.0 Division-Into | 2010-02-19 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1353299A2 EP1353299A2 (en) | 2003-10-15 |
EP1353299A3 EP1353299A3 (en) | 2006-04-19 |
EP1353299B1 true EP1353299B1 (en) | 2010-09-01 |
Family
ID=28048302
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP03405253A Expired - Lifetime EP1353299B1 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2003-04-11 | Method for electronic polling and wireless polling system |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1353299B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE479970T1 (en) |
CH (1) | CH705435B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE50313027D1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2005017822A1 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2005-02-24 | Markit Solutions (Pty) Ltd | Selection recalling system |
US7533813B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2009-05-19 | Iml Limited | Wireless voting method |
EP2000988B1 (en) * | 2007-06-05 | 2012-04-11 | Synegration AG | Electronic voting device and vote counting system |
EP2711900A1 (en) | 2012-09-20 | 2014-03-26 | Synegration AG | Electronic system and method for calibration |
DE202014009171U1 (en) * | 2014-11-19 | 2015-04-23 | Wilhelm Klein Gmbh | Electronic counting device |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4000133A1 (en) * | 1990-01-04 | 1991-07-11 | Maschf Augsburg Nuernberg Ag | Data acquisition and evaluation system, esp. for shareholder meetings - uses single card per person for removing entry, exit and voting via readers, linked to computer |
US5226177A (en) * | 1990-03-27 | 1993-07-06 | Viewfacts, Inc. | Real-time wireless audience response system |
US5724357A (en) * | 1992-01-28 | 1998-03-03 | Fleetwood Group, Inc. | Remote response system and data transfer protocol |
ITTO920140A1 (en) * | 1992-02-21 | 1993-08-23 | Italtest Srl | ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM AND RELATED METHOD. |
US5507035A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1996-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Diversity transmission strategy in mobile/indoor cellula radio communications |
DE4333245A1 (en) * | 1993-09-30 | 1995-04-27 | Maschf Augsburg Nuernberg Ag | Data acquisition and analysing device |
DE19607113C2 (en) * | 1996-02-26 | 1999-06-10 | Wolfgang Beyersdorf | System for recording the number of voters entitled to one or more votes as well as recording and evaluating with or without weighting the votes or abstentions cast by the voters |
DE19825978A1 (en) * | 1998-06-10 | 1999-12-23 | Wolf Dieter Goedecke | Data acquisition device |
-
2002
- 2002-04-12 CH CH00618/02A patent/CH705435B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2003
- 2003-04-11 EP EP03405253A patent/EP1353299B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-04-11 AT AT03405253T patent/ATE479970T1/en active
- 2003-04-11 DE DE50313027T patent/DE50313027D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1353299A2 (en) | 2003-10-15 |
DE50313027D1 (en) | 2010-10-14 |
ATE479970T1 (en) | 2010-09-15 |
CH705435B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 |
EP1353299A3 (en) | 2006-04-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE602004007534T2 (en) | METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR ASSIGNING NAMES TO FACILITIES IN A NETWORK | |
DE69528126T3 (en) | Method for collecting listener responses and data transmission protocol | |
DE2164719B2 (en) | MESSAGE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | |
DE3831762A1 (en) | BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | |
WO2014079626A1 (en) | Method and device for remote querying of vehicle data | |
DE2301121B2 (en) | Device for the transmission of messages between a large number of extensions and a centrally located computer | |
EP1353299B1 (en) | Method for electronic polling and wireless polling system | |
EP1317824A2 (en) | Method and system for controlling access | |
EP1560140A1 (en) | Method and system for electronic interaction in a network | |
DE60307338T2 (en) | Wireless answering and voting system | |
DE602004009006T2 (en) | Wireless communication device and method for establishing a communication connection | |
WO1999064984A2 (en) | Data entry unit | |
DE4321801C1 (en) | Voting registration system, for conference members etc. | |
DE3627446A1 (en) | Arrangement for transmission of control and information signals between a stationary unit and at least one non-stationary unit | |
DE602004012686T2 (en) | Method and system for viewing by Bluetooth | |
DE60222435T2 (en) | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOTE MONITORING OF MODEM STATUS | |
DE102019211792A1 (en) | Access arrangement for a vehicle | |
DE19826087C2 (en) | Establishment of a terminal of a telecommunications network | |
EP0632414B1 (en) | System for the wireless detection of responses from a plurality of persons | |
DE10318156B4 (en) | Method for announcing a device in a system | |
DE202015104885U1 (en) | System for coordination and implementation of a voting process | |
EP2000988B1 (en) | Electronic voting device and vote counting system | |
DE10061993B4 (en) | Process for sending and receiving messages | |
DE102016220821A1 (en) | Device for monitoring a parking condition of a parking space and method for operating such a device | |
DE19630808A1 (en) | Wireless partner recognition system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SYNEGRATION AG |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060927 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061025 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50313027 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20101014 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101202 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101212 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20110606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 50313027 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110606 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SYNEGRATION A.G. Effective date: 20110430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110411 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101201 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20180420 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20180419 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20180418 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20180418 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 479970 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190411 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190411 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190411 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190411 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190412 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190430 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20220420 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20220412 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 50313027 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |