EP1117995A1

EP1117995A1 - Method and apparatus for determining and evaluating bacterial populations

Info

Publication number: EP1117995A1
Application number: EP98947259A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Simon Feldberg; Roman Feldberg; Dmitri Korolov
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 1998-10-09
Filing date: 1998-10-09
Publication date: 2001-07-25
Also published as: WO2000022431A1

Abstract

Volume dependent impedance measurements for determining of microorganism populations based on dividing a known volume of a liquid sample into a plurality of separate sub-samples, wherein it is known that the liquid sample contains a number of microorganisms which is substantially less than the number of sub-samples. The small volumes of the sub-samples and the fact that sub-samples without microorganisms are used as a standard in measurements allow the microorganisms to be detected fast and accurate.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING AND EVALUATING

BACTERIAL POPULATIONS

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to monitoring of microorganism populations in general and, more particularly, to testing liquid samples of mass-produced food, dairy, meat, seafood, cosmetics and pharmaceutical products. The invention can be used for total microbial counts and selective estimations of yeast, coliforms, lactic acid bacteria, shelf life determination, sterility testing, challenge tests and environmental monitoring.

Devices for determining the microorganism population in a liquid sample are well known in the art. There are patents (such as: Cady et al. US 3,743,581, 1973, US 3,890,201 , 1975 and US 4,072,578, 1978; Lanham et al. US 4,018,652, 1977; Hobbs at al. US 4,160,205, 1979; Giaever et al. US 5,187,096, 1993; Franzl et al. US 5,432,086, 1995; National Res. Dev. DE 2,747,033, 1978; Kobe Steel JP 2- 057954, 1990; Schutz et al. WO 92/16835, 1992; Celsis Limited WO 93/19199, 1993), articles (such as: Richards, J.C.S., et al., Electronic measurement of bacteria growth, J. Phis. E: Sci. Instrum., 1978, Vol. 11 ; Silverman, M.P., et al., Automated electrical impedance technique for rapid enumeration of fecal coliforms in effluent from sewage treatment plants, Applied and Env. Micro. March 1979; Kell, D.B., The principles and potential of electrical admittance spectroscopy: an introduction, Biosensors, Fundamentals and Applications, Oxford University Press, 1987; Henschke, P.A., et al., Detection of wine-spoiling yeasts by electronic methods, Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 1988, 64; Hagan, D., Electrical measurement of bacterial growth, Probidtech, February 1990) and companies information (such as: Malthus Technical Data, Malthus 2000 Incubator, Malthus Instruments Ltd., West Sussex, England, 1986; Bactometer Technical Data, Bactometer M128 microbiology system, bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Missouri, USA). Using approximations of the rate of growth of known bacterial populations, past populations are extrapolated based on respective present populations. For example, impedance measurements of a sample are carried out during growth of bacteria in the sample. As the bacteria population in the sample grows and metabolizes, the ionic concentration of the sample changes and the electrical properties of the sample, particularly its impedance, change. By measuring the changes in impedance at a constant temperature one can estimate the number of microorganism.

However, in addition to inevitable error resulting from the above mentioned extrapolations, existing methods and devices for monitoring bacteria populations are generally extremely inaccurate and require a long incubation and monitoring period before conclusive results are reached. That is because significant changes in the electrical properties of the inoculated sample, which can not be attributed to non- bacterial activity in the sample, occur only at high microorganism concentrations. Since longer incubation periods are required in order to obtain high microorganism concentrations, extrapolations are made over longer time periods and, thus, the extrapolated results are considerably less accurate.

A common approach for determining the bacterial population of liquid samples is based on impedance measurements across the sample. Since the impedance of a sample generally decreases as the bacterial population grows, impedance measurements across the sample provide a basis for estimating the bacterial population in the sample.

For impedance measurements in liquid samples, AC voltage rather than DC voltage is generally provided to electrodes in the sample, since DC voltage tends to cause rapid, insulative, polarization at the interface between the liquid and the electrodes. When high frequency AC voltage, typically 1 kHz or more, is used, the effect of such polarization on the measured impedance is greatly reduced. Existing microorganism-counting devices typically use 1 kHz or 10 kHz AC voltage. Unfortunately, existing bacteria growth testers are inaccurate and require long incubation periods to provide reasonable results. This is due mainly to the fact that significant impedance changes, typically several percent, appear only after long incubation periods, when very high bacterial concentrations, typically over 1 ,000,000 bacteria per cubic centimetres, are reached. In addition to their low sensitivity to changes in small bacterial populations, existing testers are extremely sensitive to temperature changes in the sample, which effect both the growth rate of the bacterial population and, more importantly, the magnitude of the measured impedance. Furthermore, since evaluation of past populations is generally based on measurement of the sample at the start of incubation as reference and no reference is available at the time of testing high detection threshold is required even when the temperature is strictly stabilized.

Henschke P.A. & D. Susan Thomas suggest the use of a chamber containing a sterilized medium as reference to the tested wine sample. Reference to the sterilized medium compensates for changes in the impedance of the wine sample due to physical and chemical factors not related to microbial growth. To distinguish between wine-spoiling yeasts and non-wine-spoiling yeasts this article explores the possibility of retarding the microbial growth in the non-wine-spoiling yeasts using ethanol. Cady et al. describes various bacteria monitoring devices, which are adapted for accommodating a plurality of liquid samples, wherein each sample is provided with a pair of electrodes for driving current therethrough. Such devices, typically referred to as multi-sensor impedance measuring devices, are useful for monitoring of a plurality of liquid samples, simultaneously. The devices of patents 3,743,581 and 3,890,201 include a plurality of individual chambers for accommodating a respective plurality of separate inoculated samples. The device described in patent 4,072,578 also includes computerized means for controlling the bacterial growth analysis of the separate chambers. Lanham et al. describes a process and apparatus for ascertaining the concentration of microorganism in a water specimen by optical techniques.

Ceisis describes a method for the analysis of biological material by optical techniques.

Hobbs et al. describes detection of bacterial activity by employing impedance measurements.

Franzi et al. describes apparatus for the automatic monitoring of microorganism culture employing impedance measurements.

Silverman et al. also describes the use of impedance measurements in a liquid sample.

Kobe Steel and Shuts show various techniques for bio-mass measurement.

A multi-chamber testing device based on the principles described above is commercially available from Malthus Instruments Ltd., England, under the trade name of Malthus 2000 Microbiology System. This device measures the conductance of up to 240 separate samples by providing 10 kHz AC voltage across electrodes associated with the samples. Microbial growth in each sample is detected by measuring changes in the conductance of a base, which absorbs metabolic CO₂ using a computerized microbiological analyzer.

It should be appreciated, however, that the above mentioned deficiencies of existing single chamber devices, e.g. a low sensitivity which results in poor accuracy and which requires long testing periods, also apply to each chamber of existing multi- chamber devices. It should also be appreciated that none of the existing multi- chamber devices allow accurate detection of a small number of microorganisms in liquid samples.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention seeks to provide a significantly improved device for supervising the microorganism population in a sample using impedance analysis. First, the present device requires shorter monitoring and incubation periods than prior art devices. Second, the present device is capable of very accurately measuring extremely small microorganism populations, even one or two bacteria in a sample. Third, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the device is particularly suitable for testing liquid samples of mass production processes.

According to one aspect of the present invention, a liquid sample to be tested is divided into a plurality, n, of sub-samples, contained in n, respective, separate cells. Each cell is associated with electrodes for applying an AC voltage of a preselected frequency across the sub-sample. When the microorganism population in the sample is small, typically when the number of microorganisms in the sample, M, is smaller than n, some of the sub-samples contain microorganisms and some sub- samples do not. The sub-samples containing microorganisms will be hereinafter referred to as inoculated samples. Statistically, when n is sufficiently larger than M, each inoculated sub-sample contains a single microorganism. It has been found by the present inventor that using the above described sub-sample configuration, it is possible to detect the presences of a single microorganism in an inoculated sub- sample by sensing a change in the impedance of the sub-sample due to subsequent growth of the microorganism after incubation. Thus, according to this aspect of the invention, it is possible to virtually count the number of organisms in the sample. The sub-sample configuration also reduces the incubation periods, which were previously required in order to obtain detectable populations. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the sub-samples, which do not contain any microorganisms, are used as reference sub-samples. The reference sub-samples, which are tested under the same environmental conditions, particularly the same temperature, as those of the inoculated sub-samples, provide an ideal reference to measurements performed on the inoculated sub-samples. Preferably, the impedance of each sub-sample is normalized based on its initial value to improve the accuracy of the reference. This increases the measurement accuracy considerably and, consequently, reduces the testing period required for obtaining significant results. Typically, a drop of approximately 0.1 percent or less in impedance, due to bacterial growth, will be sufficient for detection of the bacteria, in contrast to the several percent drop required by prior art devices.

According to another aspect of the present invention, particularly suitable for samples containing large bacterial populations, i.e. when M is considerably larger than n, the bacterial growth in some of the sub-samples is suppressed, for example by sterilization. The suppressed sub-samples are used as reference sub-samples for impedance analysis of the sub-samples, which are not suppressed.

According to yet another aspect of the present invention, the electrodes associated with the n cells are configured and electrically connected such that only 2n conductors and respective switches are required for separately addressing all the electrodes. This improvement of the present invention with respect to prior art multi- chamber devices, which typically required n+1 conductors and n switches, is particularly significant when the number of cells, n, is large. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the sub-samples are matrix addressed via a plurality of conducting rows and a plurality of conducting columns, wherein each sub-sample is electrically associated with one row and one column. A three terminal or a five terminal impedance measurement circuit is preferably used for separately measuring the sub-sample impedances, whereby all the rows and columns not associated with a measured sub-sample are connected to a common potential, preferably a ground potential.

It should be appreciated that this aspect of the present invention, i.e. matrix addressing impedance measurement, is applicable to any situation in which a plurality of impedances are measured separately and, thus, suitable for applications other than microbial growth detection.

None of the prior art references show or suggest the features of the present claimed invention, namely dividing a known volume of a liquid sample into a plurality of separate sub-samples, wherein it is known that the liquid sample contains a number of microorganisms which is substantially less than the number of sub-samples, determining the number of the sub-samples for which the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component is lower, by a preselected difference, from the at least one impedance component measured across others of the sub-samples, the number of sub-samples for which the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component is lower, by a preselected difference, from the at least one impedance component measured across others of sub-samples being an indication of the number of microorganisms in the liquid sample.

The present invention creates a plurality of sub-samples of sufficiently small volume such that some of the sub-samples do not contain any microorganism and can be used as a standard, the remainder can reasonably been assumed to contain only a single microorganisms confined in a smaller volume than initial. By using this technique, very substantially faster detection can be achieved, since it is not necessary to await culture of large quantities of microorganisms whose numbers can be distinguished from each other.

The present claimed invention thus provides a new technique for volume dependent impedance measurement, which is much faster than conventional techniques, which do not depend on the volume of the sample.

An example of the present invention is taking a 1-ml sample, which is known to contain less than 1000 microorganisms. The 1-ml sample is broken down into 1000 sub-samples each of volume 0.001 ml. So, after dividing, each microorganism confined in sub-sample represents 1000 microorganisms per ml concentration, which does not depend on initial number of microorganisms in a sample, 1 or 999. Irrespective of the technique used for counting the microorganisms, it can be readily seen that the sub-samples containing a microorganism can be distinguished in a shorter period of time from those not containing a microorganism, without long waiting for multiplication of the microorganisms, which are known to double in quantity every half-hour. Thus it may be appreciated that using the present invention and using a sufficient number of sub-samples such that many do not contain any microorganisms, enables counting without waiting for microorganism reproduction.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The present invention will be better understood from the following description of preferred embodiments of the invention, taken in conjunction with the following drawings in which:

Fig. 1 is a schematic, partly cutaway, exploded illustration of a multi-cell fixture for a bacteria population monitoring device, constructed in accordance with one preferred embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of circuitry used in one, preferred, embodiment of the bacteria population monitoring device of Fig. 1 ;

Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration of circuitry used in another, preferred, embodiment of the bacteria population monitoring device of Fig. 1 ; Fig. 4 is a schematic illustration of circuitry used in yet another, preferred, embodiment of the bacteria population monitoring device of Fig. 1 ;

Fig. 5 is a schematic, partly cutaway, exploded illustration of a multi-cell fixture for a bacteria population monitoring device, constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention in which matrix addressing impedance measurement is employed;

Figs. 6A and 6B are schematic illustrations of addressing circuitry used in a preferred embodiment of the bacteria monitoring device of Fig. 5;

Fig. 7A is a schematic illustration of impedance measurement circuitry used in a preferred embodiment of the bacteria monitoring device of Fig. 5; Fig. 7B is a schematic illustration of an equivalent circuit corresponding to the circuitry of Figs. 6B and 7A; Fig. 8 is a schematic illustration of a double-side, multi-cell, fixture for a bacteria population monitoring device, constructed in accordance with yet another, preferred, embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Reference is now made to Fig. 1, which schematically illustrates a multi-cell fixture 10 for a bacteria population monitoring device, constructed and operative in accordance with one preferred embodiment of the present invention. Fixture 10 includes a liquid container 16, adapted for accommodating a liquid sample (not shown), an individual cell-addressing top electrode arrangement 12 and a common cell-addressing bottom electrode 14. Bottom electrode 14, which preferably forms part of the bottom inside of container 16, may be electrically accessed through an electric connection, for example through bottom terminal 18.

To enable division of the sample into sub-samples, as described below, fixture 10 further includes a multi-cell block 20 adapted for placement in container 16, between bottom electrode 14 and top electrode arrangement 12, and having a plurality of separate cells 22. To ensure separation between the different cells 22, a sealing member or arrangement (not shown) in the form of a grid, adapted for the cell division layout of block 20, is preferably provided at the interface between bottom electrode 14 and block 20. The volume of the liquid sample is preferably such that, when container 16 accommodates both the liquid sample and block 20, the level of liquid sample very nearly reaches the bottom surface of top electrode arrangement 12.

Block 20, particularly the walls separating cells 22 is preferably formed of an electrically non-conductive material such that the volumes of sample liquid in cells 22, hereinafter referred to as sub-samples, are maintained electrically isolated. As shown in Fig. 1 , top electrode arrangement 12 includes a plurality of top electrodes 24 and respective electrical terminals 26, one electrode 24 and one terminal 26 for each cell 22. When top electrode arrangement 12 is placed on top of block 20, each top electrode 24 and its respective terminal 26 is associated with a respective cell 22 and the liquid sub-sample therein.

Reference is now made also to Figs. 2 - 4 which schematically illustrate three, alternative, electrical circuits for separately measuring the impedances of the sub- samples in cells 22. It should be appreciated that using fixture 10, as described above, the impedance of any one of the separate sub-samples can be measured by connecting only its terminals 26 to an impedance processor 28, as described below, which is also connected to terminal 18 of bottom electrode 14. The impedances of the separate sub-samples in cells 22 will be hereinafter denoted Z_1f Z₂, ..., Z_n, wherein n is the number of cells 22.

Fig. 2 shows one, alternative, circuit for separately measuring the impedances of the sub-samples in cells 22, i.e. impedances Zι, Z₂, .... Z_n, One terminal of impedance processor 28 is connected through a first conductor 30 to bottom electrode 14, which is associated as described above with the sub-samples in all of cells 22.

A second conductor 32 connects another terminal of impedance processor 28 to connections 26 of all of top electrodes 24, through respective switches SW_{1 f} SW₂,

..., SWn, thereby forming n parallel, separately addressed, measurement branches

having the impedances Z Z₂, ..., Z_P) respectively. Switches SW^ SW₂, ..., SW_n, which may be contact or non-contact switches, are preferably activated in accordance with a preselected activation sequence by appropriate control circuitry in impedance processor 28, so as to periodically measure the impedances.

Fig. 3 shows an alternative circuit for separately measuring the impedances of the sub-samples in cells 22, in which a four terminal connection scheme is employed. A four terminal connection is preferred, since impedances Zi, Z₂ Z_n must be measured very accurately. In this circuit, two additional terminals of impedance processor 28 are connected to bottom electrode 14 and top electrodes 24 via a third conductor 30' and a second conductor 32', respectively. According to this scheme, impedance processor 28 provides a preselected top potential Vt via conductor 32' and a preselected bottom potential V_D via conductor 30. As known in the art, potentials Vt and V compensate for the undue influence of the impedances of the different conductors, switches and electrodes included in the system.

Impedances Zi, Z₂, ..., Z_n are separately connected between potentials Vt and Vb via respective switches SW,, SW₂, ..., SW_n. Switches SW_L SW₂, ..., SW_n are preferably activated in accordance with a preselected activation sequence by the control circuitry in impedance processor 28. Fig. 4 shows yet another alternative circuit for separately measuring the impedances of the sub-samples in cells 22, while avoiding direct connection between bottom electrode 14 and impedance processor 28. According to this scheme, the sample in container 16 acts as a common bottom electrode, in place of bottom electrode 14. This may be achieved, for example, by leaving a gap between the bottom of container 16, i.e. electrode 14, and multi-cell block 20. It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that a four terminal connection variant (not shown) based on the circuit of Fig. 4, analog to the four terminal connection of Fig. 3, may be readily constructed. Fig. 4 depicts, as an example, a situation in which only impedance Zi is measured by impedance processor 28. Switch SWi connects impedance Zi to conductor 32, while the impedances of the remaining parallel branches, Z₂, Z₃, .... Z_n are connected via switches SW₂, SW₃, ..., SW_n to conductor 30. Thus, in the example of Fig. 4, impedance processor 28 measures impedance Z-i in series with the parallel equivalent of impedances Z₂, Z₃, ..., Z_n. The total impedance measured by impedance processor 28 is therefore: Z=Z₁+(Z₂+Z₃+...+Z_n)/(n-1). If n is sufficiently large, as is preferably the case, the contribution of second component, i.e. the parallel equivalent of the remaining impedances, is negligible and, thus, hardly affects the measurement of impedance Zi. This is because the absolute value of the second impedance component is n-1 times smaller than Zi. Therefore, in the example of Fig. 4, Z » Zi.

It should be appreciated that the remaining impedances can be measured in a similar manner. For example: Z₂ « Z₂+(Z₁+Z₃+...+Z_n)/(n-1), and so on.

The accuracy of the impedance measurements described above will generally be affected by factors, such as the resistance of the electrodes, the environmental temperature and the volume of the sub-samples in cells 22. These systematic factors have been known to have a considerable effect on impedance measurement accuracy in all traditional methods and devices for monitoring microorganism populations by measuring impedance changes during microorganism growth. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention multi-cell fixture 10 (Fig. 1) is kept in a temperature controlled environment suitable for microorganisms' growth. Due to the identical incubation conditions for all of the cells, when a given group of sub-samples all have the same number of microorganisms, for example one microorganism per sub-sample, the impedances across each sub-sample in the group is substantially the same. Similarly, when there are no microorganisms whatsoever in any sub-sample of a group of sub- samples, the impedance of each sub-sample in the group is substantially the same. This provides a reliable basis for using the impedances measured across some of the sub-samples, e.g. samples which are not inoculated, as references for the impedances measured across other sub-samples, e.g. inoculated samples, as described in detail below.

In the present invention, the influence of the above mentioned factors is substantially reduced, partly since the influence of these factors on all the sub- samples is approximately the same. However, since there are other, non- systematic, factors which effect the impedance measurements, for example slight differences between the conductivity at the electrode interfaces of different cells 22, normalization of the measured impedances may be required. One example of such normalization is based on determining the relative change, δZjt, in each sub-sample impedance Z\, at a time, t, relative to the impedance of the same sub-sample, i, at an initial reference time, 0: δZjt = (ZJO - Zjt)/ ZJO, wherein: Zjt - impedance of sub-sample i at time t; ZJO - impedance of sub-sample i at time 0, a reference point in time.

Since all sub-samples have substantially the same temperature, impedance measurements will not be affected by small, systematic, changes in temperature.

Furthermore, since normalized impedances are preferably used, for example the δZjt described above, the effect on measurement accuracy of physical differences between the elements associated with the different sub-samples is negligible. If, initially, the temperature in cells 22 is homogeneous and steady, differences in measurement conditions between different cells 22, e.g. electrode resistance and sub-sample volume, will not reduce the measurement accuracy as long as normalized impedances, such as the δZjt, are used. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, appropriate circuitry in impedance processor 28, for example a subtracter, is used for calculating the δZjt values.

The remaining factors which may affect the measured impedances include growth of the microorganism population, changes in the structure of the sample with time and random errors in the impedance measurement. Since time changes in sample structure are substantially the same for all cells and since random errors in the impedance measurement are generally negligible compared to sample-related errors, the δZjt values are expected to be reliable indicators of the rate of microorganism growth.

In the existing methods and devices, the environmental temperature must be sustained at given values with great indicated accuracy, typically ±0.2°C or more, and even greater short-term stability, typically ±0.05°C or more, in order to obtain reasonable measurement accuracy. The present invention overcomes these strict requirements, by utilizing the impedances measured across some sub-samples as references for impedances measured across other sub-samples.

In accordance with the present invention, appropriate circuitry in impedance processor 28, for example a comparator, is used for comparing between the different δZjt values. Significant differences, i.e. differences beyond a preselected threshold, between the compared δZjt values of different sub-samples indicate a difference in microorganism growth between the sub-samples. Due to the extremely high accuracy obtained by the methods and devices of the present invention, a threshold difference of less than 0.1 percent between the impedances of two given sub- samples will be generally sufficient for significantly distinguishing between the two samples, in contrast to prior art devices which generally require a threshold of several percent. Since such differences can be detected at relatively low bacterial concentrations, a shorter pre-testing period is required. It has been found by the present invention that sub-samples containing bacteria can be significantly distinguished from sub-samples, which do not contain bacteria by comparing their δZjt impedance values. When there are substantially less than n microorganisms in the entire sample, i.e. there are more cells 22 than microorganisms, the probability of more than one microorganism being in one cell 22 is very low. Thus, for small microorganism populations, the number of sub-samples containing microorganisms is practically equal to the number of microorganisms in the entire sample. Therefore, the present bacteria population monitoring device can practically count the number of microorganisms in the sample, when the microorganism population is sufficiently small. When the sample contains a large bacteria population, i.e. considerably larger than n, the number of bacteria in the sample can not be counted. However, by suppressing the bacterial growth in some of the sub-samples, for example by sterilization, the suppressed sub-samples can be used as reference sub-samples for impedance measurements of the remaining sub-samples, which were not suppressed. It should be appreciated that such use of reference samples can also be applied to conventional impedance analysis devices, thereby to improve the accuracy of such devices. As described above, the measurement accuracy achieved by using such a reference scheme may improve the significant detection threshold of conventional devices from the traditional several percent to 0.1 percent or better, thereby shortening the testing periods required by such conventional devices.

Reference is now made to Fig. 5, which schematically illustrates an alternative multi- cell fixture 11 , constructed and operative in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention. The fixture of Fig. 5 economizes on the number of conductors and switches required for separately connecting the sub- sample impedances Zi, Z₂ Z_n to impedance processor 28. It is appreciated that in the embodiment of Figs. 1-4, at least n+l conductors and n switches are necessary for separately addressing all of top electrodes 24 (Fig. 1).

Multi-cell fixture 11 includes a plurality of parallel bottom terminal lines 36 and a plurality of parallel top terminal lines 38, which are preferably substantially perpendicular to bottom terminal lines 36. Lines 36 and 38 will be hereinafter referred to as rows 36 and columns 38, respectively. A plurality, n, of individual bottom electrodes 34, which are connected in series along rows 36, are mounted on the bottom surface of container 16 so as to be associated with respective cells 22. If the n lower electrodes 34 are arranged in a square array, as is preferably the case, the number of terminal connections needed for addressing all of rows 36 is Vn.

Similarly, the n top electrodes 24 are connected in series along columns 38 via top connections 26. If the n top electrodes 24 are arranged in a square array, as is preferably the case, the number of terminal connections needed for addressing all of columns 38 is n. It should be appreciated that according to this embodiment, in which bottom electrodes 34 are addressed through rows 36 and top electrodes 24 are addressed through columns 38, the total number of connections and switches required for addressing all of cells 22 is only 2 n. This method of addressing the sub-samples will be hereinafter referred to as matrix addressing, since it is similar to matrix addressing as used in other fields. The impedance of a sub-sample connected between top column i and bottom row j will be hereinafter denoted Zj.j.

Fig. 6A shows a preferred circuit for matrix addressing of impedances Z_M, Z_2-I

Z -1 by impedance processor 28, via I bottom rows and k top columns. Switches

S _L SW₂, ..., SW are operative for connecting each of top columns 38 either to top conductor 32 or to a common conductor 42 which is connected to a ground terminal of impedance processor 28. Switches SWY SW'₂, ..., SW'i are operative for connecting each of bottom rows 36 to either a bottom conductor 40 of impedance processor 28 or with common conductor 42. Impedance Zj.j, for example, is measured when switches SWj and SW'j are switched to top conductor 32 and bottom conductor 40, respectively, while the remaining SW and SW' switches are switched to common conductor 42, which is grounded as described above.

Conductors 32, 40 and 42 are preferably connected to a three terminal impedance measurement circuit, in impedance processor 28, which enables the matrix addressing impedance measurement as described in detail below. It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that a five terminal circuit (not shown) may be readily constructed based on the three terminal circuit shown in Fig. 6A.

The circuit of Fig. 6B is equivalent to the circuit of Fig. 6A with switches SW and SW' switched for measuring impedance Z^. The remaining impedances Z_2-., ..., Z_k-ι, which are all connected to common conductor 42, have substantially no effect on the measurement of Z_M, due to the three-terminal impedance measurement circuitry used by impedance processor 28, as described below with reference to Figs. 7A and 7B. Fig. 7A schematically illustrates the three terminal impedance measurement circuitry, which is particularly suitable for the matrix addressing embodiment of Figs. 5, 6A and 6B. The three-terminal impedance measurement circuitry preferably includes an AC power source 100, a first voltmeter 102, an operational amplifier 104 and a second voltmeter 106. AC power source 100 generates an input voltage, V^ at preselected AC frequencies between top conductor 40 and the ground. Input voltage VT is measured by first voltmeter 102. One of the input terminals of amplifier 104, preferably its negative terminal is connected to top conductor 32 and the output terminal of amplifier 104 is grounded through second voltmeter 106 which, therefore, measures an output voltage, V₂. The other input terminal of amplifier 104, preferably its positive terminal, is grounded. A reference impedance Z_R, preferably a resistor, is connected in parallel with operational amplifier 104.

Reference is now also made to Fig. 7B, which schematically illustrates an equivalent circuit of the three terminal impedance measurement circuitry of Fig. 7A when connected to the addressing circuitry of Fig. 6B. The equivalent circuit of Fig. 7B includes an impedance under test, Zur, which is equal to Z_M in the example of Fig. 6B, and shunt impedances Zsi, Zs₂ and Z_S3 which represent three, respective, branches of parallel sub-sample impedances, as seen in Fig. 6B. Impedance Zm is connected between bottom conductor 40 and top conductor 32, shunt impedance Z_Si is connected between bottom conductor 40 and common conductor 42, shunt impedance Z_s2 is connected between top conductor 32 and common conductor 42 and both terminals of shunt impedance Zs₃ are connected to common conductor 42. As mentioned above, common conductor 42 is preferably grounded.

It will be appreciated that the voltage across Zs₂ is substantially zero, since it is connected between the grounded common conductor 42 and a substantially zero potential, i.e. a virtual ground, at the negative input of amplifier 104 and, therefore, impedance Z_S2 draws substantially zero current. Thus, the current flowing through impedance Z_DT is substantially equal to the current flowing through reference impedance Z_R. Thus, the following equation holds: V_T / Zm « V₂ / Z_R. It should be appreciated that the current drawn by impedance Z_Sι does not affect this equation, since the voltage drop between power source 100 and bottom conductor 40 is substantially zero. Since impedance Z_R is known and voltages Vi and V₂ are measured by voltmeters 102 and 106, impedance Zur is readily determined. This provides an accurate measurement of the impedance across each sub-sample using the above mentioned matrix addressing.

Fig. 8 schematically illustrates a double-side, multi-cell fixture 43, used in a further preferred embodiment of the present invention. Fixture 43 is adapted to increase the number of sample regions measured by impedance processor 28 and decrease cost of disposal sensors. Fixture 43 includes a liquid container 44, adapted for accommodating two liquid samples from both sides of a narrow central slit, when board 46 places in the slit. In this preferred embodiment of the invention, each sample is associated with electrodes 47 from opposite sides of board 46 and each sub-sample 45 is associated with a pair of electrodes 47 from one side of board 46. The electrodes of each fixture 43 can be addresses by a circuit similar to that of Figs. 6 and 7. Thus, by constructing a circuit which is equivalent to a plurality of circuits as in Figs. 6 and 7, connected in parallel, it is possible to address the different fixtures 43 (different multi-sensors for different samples) by using matrix addressing as described above. Sometimes more sensitive measurements can be obtained by the device of the present invention if only a particular component of the sub-sample impedances is measured by impedance processor 28, rather than the total impedance of the sub- samples. To synthesize a desired impedance component, it is necessary to construct an equivalent electrical circuit of the sample being tested, in which the desired impedance is included as a distinct circuit element.

Thus, the present invention is not limited to measurement of the total impedance for the purposes described above but, rather, to measurement of any component which may be found suitable for detecting and/or evaluating given bacteria related phenomena.

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been thus far described. Rather, the scope of the present invention is limited only by the following claims.

Claims

1. A method for determining the number of microorganisms in a liquid sample comprising: dividing a known volume of a liquid sample into a plurality of separate sub- samples, wherein it is known that the liquid sample contains a number of microorganisms which is substantially less then the number of sub-samples; connecting the plurality of sub-samples to a plurality of conducting rows and a plurality of conducting columns such that each sub-sample is row wise connected to a given row and column wise connected to a given column; measuring the magnitude of at least one impedance component across each of the sub-samples; and determining the number of the sub-samples for which the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component indicates microorganism growth, the number of sub-samples for which microorganism growth is indicated being an indication of the number of microorganisms in the liquid sample; wherein, for each measured sub-sample, measuring the magnitude of at least one impedance component comprises: grounding all rows and all columns other than the given row and given column which are connected to the measured sub-sample; and measuring the at least one impedance component between the given row and the given column which are connected to the measured sub-sample.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step of determining the number of the sub-samples for which the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component indicates microorganism growth includes a step of determining the number of the sub-samples for which the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component is lower, by a preselected difference, from the at least one impedance component measured across others of the sub-samples.

3. A method for evaluating the microorganism population in a plurality of liquid samples comprising: connecting the plurality of liquid samples to a plurality of conducting rows and a plurality of conducting columns such that each sample is row wise connected to a given row and column wise connected to a given column; measuring the magnitude of at least one impedance component across each of the samples; wherein, for each measured sample, measuring the magnitude of the at least one impedance component comprises: grounding all rows and all columns other than the given row and given column which are connected to the measured sample; and measuring the at least one impedance component between the given row and the given column which are connected to the measured sample.

4. A device for monitoring the number of microorganisms in a liquid sample comprising: a multi-cell fixture including a plurality of cells adapted to accommodate the liquid sample such that each cell contains a separate sub-sample of the liquid sample; and an impedance processor which measures the magnitude of at least one impedance component across at least some of the sub-samples and determines the number of the sub-samples for which the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component indicates microorganism growth.

5. A device according to claim 4 wherein the impedance processor includes a comparator which compares the at least one impedance component measured across at least one sub-sample to the at least one impedance component measured across at least one other sub-sample, the impedance processor being configured to determine the number of sub-samples for which the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component is lower, by a preselected threshold, than the measured magnitude of the at least one impedance component measured across the remaining sub-samples.

A device according to claim 4 wherein the impedance processor is electrically associated with the plurality of cells via a plurality of electrodes, at least two electrodes being electrically associated with each sub-sample and wherein the impedance processor comprises AC power source operative for applying AC voltage of at least one preselected frequency across the at least two electrodes of each of the sub-samples.

->->