EP0917113B1 - Seal detection system and method - Google Patents

Seal detection system and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0917113B1
EP0917113B1 EP98121376A EP98121376A EP0917113B1 EP 0917113 B1 EP0917113 B1 EP 0917113B1 EP 98121376 A EP98121376 A EP 98121376A EP 98121376 A EP98121376 A EP 98121376A EP 0917113 B1 EP0917113 B1 EP 0917113B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
marks
templates
distinctive
suspect
documents
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98121376A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0917113A3 (en
EP0917113A2 (en
Inventor
Zhigang Fan
John W. Wu
Mike C. Chen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xerox Corp
Original Assignee
Xerox Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xerox Corp filed Critical Xerox Corp
Publication of EP0917113A2 publication Critical patent/EP0917113A2/en
Publication of EP0917113A3 publication Critical patent/EP0917113A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0917113B1 publication Critical patent/EP0917113B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/20Testing patterns thereon
    • G07D7/202Testing patterns thereon using pattern matching
    • G07D7/206Matching template patterns

Definitions

  • This invention is generally related to electronic image recognition techniques and, more particularly, to a seal detection system and method that detects and authenticates seals in complex images.
  • the ability to detect seal patterns in an image can be useful in copier machines or scanners for the purpose of authenticating documents or preventing counterfeiting.
  • the challenge of incorporating such a method in current copier or scanning technology is the difficulty with detecting seals patterns in a rotation or shift invariant manner.
  • the pattern could be of any orientation and at any location of the image.
  • the orientation and the location of the seal can be relatively simple to estimate in the case of a single seal within a plain background; however, it becomes a major obstacle when the seals are embedded in some complicated image background.
  • the US Patent No 5 533 144 discloses an anti-counterfeit detector and method which identifies whether a platen image portion to be photocopied contains one or several note patterns.
  • An off-line training is performed by sampling suspect currencies and recording said samples to use them as templates, the detection is then performed in a rotation and shift invariant manner.
  • the pattern can be of any orientation and at any location of the image and can be embedded in any complicated image background.
  • the image to be tested is processed block by block. Each examined block goes through a smoothing to see if it possibly contains a pixel intensity orientation that corresponds to a preselected anchor point on the template. The orientation of the edges (anchor points) potentially contained in the blocks is then estimated. Finally, for a potential anchor point, a matching procedure is performed against stored templates to decide whether the pre-selected monetary note patterns are valid once detected.
  • a detection system and method that detects distinctive marks, such as seals or other patterns, in images for purposes of authentication or to defeat counterfeiting is presented.
  • This detection method has the ability to identify whether an image contains one or several pre-selected distinctive marks.
  • a detector is first trained off-line with smoothed examples of the distinctive marks of interest to be detected during operation.
  • the distinctive marks are each stored as templates.
  • a four step procedure consisting of binarization, location estimation, orientation estimation and template matching is performed.
  • Binarization extracts a binary bitmap from the input image. A pixel in the bitmap is set to be "1" if the color of the corresponding pixel in the input image is close to the color of the template to be matched to the input image.
  • Location estimation detects the "suspects", or the potential mark patterns, and estimates their location. The relative orientation of the suspects and the template is then evaluated, so they can be aligned (this method is rotation and shift invariant). Finally, after orientation, the suspect and template are compared and analyzed to verify if suspect is legitimate. A suspect mark can be in any orientation and at any location within an image.
  • the method can be carried out in a system comprising a microprocessor programmed to become familiarized with a plurality of seals through training and to analyze and detect distinctive marks within tested documents.
  • a memory is used to store a smoothed version of the marks of interest.
  • a scanner may be used during training and detection to accept training marks and images bearing suspect marks, and transmits the captured images to the microprocessor; however, digitized representations of the training marks and images may also be accepted electronically over networks.
  • a microprocessor-based document processing system wherein a microprocessor is programmed to detect control marks found on controlled documents, and suspend further action of suspect documents not bearing said control marks
  • the system comprises an indicator means for indicating whether said control marks and said suspect marks of said suspect document match.
  • the output from said indicator means is used by said system to facilitate further action on said suspect document.
  • the detector is first trained off-line with examples of the seals to be detected. Training is conducted by scanning seals into a microprocessor-based detection system using scanning techniques known in the art. The seals are converted into smoothed templates representing each respective seal. The training specific to this invention occurs after the system has received the electronic representation of the seals and consists of two steps. First, the color of the seal template is recorded. Second, the seal template is smoothed using an averaging filter (the same filter used in detection). The results, a smoothed version of the binary of the seal patterns, are recorded as a template.
  • averaging filter the same filter used in detection
  • Binarization extracts a binary bitmap from the input image. A pixel in the bitmap is set to be “1” if the color of the corresponding pixel in the input image is close to the color of the seal to be detected.
  • Location estimation detects the "suspect", or the potential seals, and estimates their location. The relative orientation of the suspect and the seal is then evaluated, so they can be aligned. Finally, a template match verifies if the candidate is really the seal to be detected.
  • the location estimation is performed in two resolution.
  • the detection of the suspects and the estimation of their rough positions are followed by a refinement of the locations.
  • a low resolution version of the bitmap is produced.
  • Each nxn pixels in the original bitmap is reduced to one pixel, which is set to be "1" if at least on of the nxn pixels is "1".
  • a matched filter is then applied to detect the presence of any suspects.
  • the kernel of the filter is given in Figure 1.
  • the strong peaks in the filtering result indicate the rough locations of the centers of the suspects. Once a strong peak is detected, the left, right top and bottom boundaries are searched in the original bitmap.
  • Figure 2 illustrates the detection of the left boundary at the fine resolution.
  • the first column which contains at least one "1" pixel gives the left boundary.
  • the right, top and bottom boundaries can be obtained in a similar fashion.
  • the data in the window are smoothed using an averaging filter to create a gray map.
  • the actual window size is slightly larger than the diameter of the tested mark.
  • a high (low) pixel value in the gray map corresponds dense "1" ("0") pixels in the bitmap.
  • a gray value in the middle results. This gray map is used for orientation estimation and template matching by comparing it to the gray map obtained from the mark to be detected.
  • FIG. 3 data are sampled in the gray map on a circle of radius c.
  • the highest peak (or the lowest valley) position of the data reveals the orientation.
  • Figure 4 illustrates a peak for the sample mark as "A”.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a peak for the template as "B”.
  • a difference in rotation is noticeable upon comparing the peaks of the two sequences of data, sample ( Figure 4) and template ( Figure 5).
  • the template must be rotated "RR", as shown in Figure 3, so that the peak of the template "B” matches the peak "A" of the sample.
  • the template which is the smoothed version of the seal bit pattern is rotated to align with the suspect.
  • a template matching can be performed as revealed in US Patent No. 5,533,144 to Fan, or by using any other standard techniques.
  • the detection method can be carried out in a system 11 comprising a microprocessor 14 programmed to become familiarized with a plurality of seals through training and to analyze and detect seals within tested documents.
  • a memory 13 is used to store the seals of interest works hand in hand with the microprocessor 14 during detection.
  • a scanner 12 is used with the system during training and detection to accept seals and images bearing seals (referred to as a "Test Image” in the figure) and transmit the seals and images to the microprocessor; however, the seals and images may also be transmitted electronically over networks, rather than directly from a scanner.
  • a testing result is "Output' to indicate counterfeit testing results.
  • the output can be used by controlled systems, such as copiers and scanners, to suspend further action on documents where counterfeiting is suspected.
  • the microprocessor may be replaced by hardware equivalents through technical methods know in the art.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • This invention is generally related to electronic image recognition techniques and, more particularly, to a seal detection system and method that detects and authenticates seals in complex images.
  • Background of the Invention
  • The ability to detect seal patterns in an image can be useful in copier machines or scanners for the purpose of authenticating documents or preventing counterfeiting. The challenge of incorporating such a method in current copier or scanning technology is the difficulty with detecting seals patterns in a rotation or shift invariant manner. Specifically, the pattern could be of any orientation and at any location of the image. The orientation and the location of the seal can be relatively simple to estimate in the case of a single seal within a plain background; however, it becomes a major obstacle when the seals are embedded in some complicated image background.
  • The US Patent No 5 533 144 discloses an anti-counterfeit detector and method which identifies whether a platen image portion to be photocopied contains one or several note patterns. An off-line training is performed by sampling suspect currencies and recording said samples to use them as templates, the detection is then performed in a rotation and shift invariant manner. Specifically, the pattern can be of any orientation and at any location of the image and can be embedded in any complicated image background. The image to be tested is processed block by block. Each examined block goes through a smoothing to see if it possibly contains a pixel intensity orientation that corresponds to a preselected anchor point on the template. The orientation of the edges (anchor points) potentially contained in the blocks is then estimated. Finally, for a potential anchor point, a matching procedure is performed against stored templates to decide whether the pre-selected monetary note patterns are valid once detected.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • It is an object of the present invention to improve counterfeit detection to detect distinctive marks in documents. This object is achieved by providing a counterfeit detection method according to claim 1 and a counterfeit detection system according to claim 3.
  • A detection system and method that detects distinctive marks, such as seals or other patterns, in images for purposes of authentication or to defeat counterfeiting is presented. This detection method has the ability to identify whether an image contains one or several pre-selected distinctive marks.
  • A detector is first trained off-line with smoothed examples of the distinctive marks of interest to be detected during operation. The distinctive marks are each stored as templates. After training, to detect marks, a four step procedure consisting of binarization, location estimation, orientation estimation and template matching is performed. Binarization extracts a binary bitmap from the input image. A pixel in the bitmap is set to be "1" if the color of the corresponding pixel in the input image is close to the color of the template to be matched to the input image. Location estimation detects the "suspects", or the potential mark patterns, and estimates their location. The relative orientation of the suspects and the template is then evaluated, so they can be aligned (this method is rotation and shift invariant). Finally, after orientation, the suspect and template are compared and analyzed to verify if suspect is legitimate. A suspect mark can be in any orientation and at any location within an image.
  • According to a first aspect of the invention, the method can be summarized as follows:
  • a detector is trained off-line with smoothed distinctive marks resulting in templates which are generated and recorded for each of the distinctive marks;
  • sample images bearing suspect marks are received by the detector and the location and orientation of the suspect marks are identified;
  • the templates are rotated and shifted for alignment of he templates to the suspect marks;
  • the templates and the suspects marks are compared to determine whether there is a match.
  • In a preferred embodiment the binary averaging means is a filter.
    In a further preferred embodiment said filter is also used by said detector for identifying said suspect marks.
    In a preferred embodiment a result is generated after said templates and said suspects marks are compared to determine whether there is a match, and said result is utilized to facilitate further action on said sample images.
    In a further preferred embodiment a result is generated after said matching and said result is used to facilitate further action on said documents being tested by with said method.
    In a further preferred embodiment said result is utilized by a copier system to prevent counterfeiting after detection of a mismatch between said templates and said suspect image patterns.
  • According to third aspect of the invention, the method can be carried out in a system comprising a microprocessor programmed to become familiarized with a plurality of seals through training and to analyze and detect distinctive marks within tested documents. A memory is used to store a smoothed version of the marks of interest. A scanner may be used during training and detection to accept training marks and images bearing suspect marks, and transmits the captured images to the microprocessor; however, digitized representations of the training marks and images may also be accepted electronically over networks.
    In a preferred embodiment is a microprocessor-based document processing system wherein a microprocessor is programmed to
       detect control marks found on controlled documents, and
       suspend further action of suspect documents not bearing said control marks
    In a further preferred embodiment the system comprises an indicator means for indicating whether said control marks and said suspect marks of said suspect document match.
    In a further preferred embodiment the output from said indicator means is used by said system to facilitate further action on said suspect document.
  • Other advantages and salient features of the invention will become apparent from the detailed description which, taken in conjunction with the drawings, disclose the preferred embodiments of the invention.
  • Description of the Drawings
  • Figure 1 is an illustration of a matched filter applied by the system to detect the presence of any suspects;
  • Figure 2 illustrates the detection starting from the left boundary of the original bitmap for a mark at the fine resolution (a search is conducted from left to right in two nxn blocks, which are m blocks away from the location of the strong peak);
  • Figure 3 illustrates a gray map on a circle of radius c with which data are sampled;
  • Figure 4 illustrates a peak for the sample mark as "A";
  • Figure 5 illustrates a peak for the template as "B"; and
  • Figure 6 is an block diagram of the system used to carry out the training and detection method of the invention.
  • Detailed Description of the Invention
  • "Seal" will be used throughout the balance of this disclosure to define distinctive marks and distinctive patterns which may be commonly used in the document authentication art.
  • The detector is first trained off-line with examples of the seals to be detected. Training is conducted by scanning seals into a microprocessor-based detection system using scanning techniques known in the art. The seals are converted into smoothed templates representing each respective seal. The training specific to this invention occurs after the system has received the electronic representation of the seals and consists of two steps. First, the color of the seal template is recorded. Second, the seal template is smoothed using an averaging filter (the same filter used in detection). The results, a smoothed version of the binary of the seal patterns, are recorded as a template.
  • To detect each seal, a four step procedure consisting of binarization, location estimation, orientation estimation and template matching is performed. Binarization extracts a binary bitmap from the input image. A pixel in the bitmap is set to be "1" if the color of the corresponding pixel in the input image is close to the color of the seal to be detected. Location estimation detects the "suspect", or the potential seals, and estimates their location. The relative orientation of the suspect and the seal is then evaluated, so they can be aligned. Finally, a template match verifies if the candidate is really the seal to be detected.
  • The location estimation is performed in two resolution. The detection of the suspects and the estimation of their rough positions are followed by a refinement of the locations. First, a low resolution version of the bitmap is produced. Each nxn pixels in the original bitmap is reduced to one pixel, which is set to be "1" if at least on of the nxn pixels is "1". A matched filter is then applied to detect the presence of any suspects. The kernel of the filter is given in Figure 1. The strong peaks in the filtering result indicate the rough locations of the centers of the suspects. Once a strong peak is detected, the left, right top and bottom boundaries are searched in the original bitmap. Figure 2 illustrates the detection of the left boundary at the fine resolution. A search is conducted from left to right in two nxn blocks, which are m blocks away from the location of the strong peak, where m = r/n and r is the radius of the seal to be detected. The first column which contains at least one "1" pixel gives the left boundary. The right, top and bottom boundaries can be obtained in a similar fashion. The x and y-coordinates of the center of the suspect are estimated as, x0 = (left boundary + bottom boundary)/2 and y0 = (top boundary + bottom boundary)/2, respectively.
  • The data in the window, centered at (x0,y0) as shown in Figure 1, are smoothed using an averaging filter to create a gray map. The actual window size is slightly larger than the diameter of the tested mark. A high (low) pixel value in the gray map corresponds dense "1" ("0") pixels in the bitmap. For the areas where "1" pixels and "0" pixels intermingle, a gray value in the middle results. This gray map is used for orientation estimation and template matching by comparing it to the gray map obtained from the mark to be detected.
  • Referring to Figures 3, data are sampled in the gray map on a circle of radius c. The highest peak (or the lowest valley) position of the data reveals the orientation. Features other than the peak or valley position, or a transformation of the original data can also be used to determine the orientation. Figure 4 illustrates a peak for the sample mark as "A". Figure 5 illustrates a peak for the template as "B". A difference in rotation is noticeable upon comparing the peaks of the two sequences of data, sample (Figure 4) and template (Figure 5). To accomplish alignment, the template must be rotated "RR", as shown in Figure 3, so that the peak of the template "B" matches the peak "A" of the sample.
  • Once the orientation of a suspect is determined, the template, which is the smoothed version of the seal bit pattern is rotated to align with the suspect. A template matching can be performed as revealed in US Patent No. 5,533,144 to Fan, or by using any other standard techniques.
  • Referring to Figure 5, the detection method can be carried out in a system 11 comprising a microprocessor 14 programmed to become familiarized with a plurality of seals through training and to analyze and detect seals within tested documents. A memory 13 is used to store the seals of interest works hand in hand with the microprocessor 14 during detection. A scanner 12 is used with the system during training and detection to accept seals and images bearing seals (referred to as a "Test Image" in the figure) and transmit the seals and images to the microprocessor; however, the seals and images may also be transmitted electronically over networks, rather than directly from a scanner. After processing through the microprocessor 14, a testing result is "Output' to indicate counterfeit testing results. The output can be used by controlled systems, such as copiers and scanners, to suspend further action on documents where counterfeiting is suspected. It is noted that the microprocessor may be replaced by hardware equivalents through technical methods know in the art.

Claims (6)

  1. A counterfeit detection method that detects distinctive marks in documents, comprising steps of:
    training a detector off-line with distinctive marks resulting in templates which are generated and recorded for each of said distinctive marks;
    receiving sample images bearing suspect marks by said detector and identifying the location and orientation of said suspect marks on said sample images;
    rotating and shifting said templates for alignment of said templates to said suspect marks; and
    comparing said templates and said suspects marks to determine whether there is a match
    characterized in that
    said step of training further comprises recording a color of said distinctive marks during training and smoothing said distinctive marks using a binary averaging means, whereby said color of said distinctive marks and said smoothed version of the binary averaging means of said distinctive marks are generated and recorded as said templates.
  2. The method of claim 1, wherein a result is generated by comparing said templates and said suspects marks to determine whether there is a match, and said result is utilized to facilitate further action on said sample images.
  3. A counterfeit detection system, comprising:
    a scanning means for capturing distinctive marks during training and related marks during detection;
    a mircoprocessor;
    means for transmitting said marks to the microprocessor;
    a memory for recording said distinctive mark;
    whereby the microprocessor comprises:
    means for generating templates for each of said distinctive marks,
    means for analyzing and detecting related marks within tested documents,
    characterized in that
    said templates comprise a color of said distinctive marks provided by using a binary averaging means.
  4. The system of claim 3, further comprising a signal means for indicating results of said analysis.
  5. The system of claim 4, wherein an output by said signal means is used by electronic document handling system to facilitate further action on said tested documents.
  6. The system of claim 5, wherein said signal means output can be used by controlled systems, such as copiers and scanners, to suspend further action on documents where counterfeiting is suspected.
EP98121376A 1997-11-13 1998-11-10 Seal detection system and method Expired - Lifetime EP0917113B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/969,491 US6067374A (en) 1997-11-13 1997-11-13 Seal detection system and method
US969491 1997-11-13

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0917113A2 EP0917113A2 (en) 1999-05-19
EP0917113A3 EP0917113A3 (en) 2000-02-23
EP0917113B1 true EP0917113B1 (en) 2004-08-25

Family

ID=25515627

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98121376A Expired - Lifetime EP0917113B1 (en) 1997-11-13 1998-11-10 Seal detection system and method

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US6067374A (en)
EP (1) EP0917113B1 (en)
JP (2) JPH11250260A (en)
BR (1) BR9804607B1 (en)
DE (1) DE69825842T2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007055658A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-18 Ko Khee Tay Security system and method
EP1887779A3 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-07-16 Xerox Corporation System and method for embedding miniature security marks
EP1901226A3 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-07-16 Xerox Corporation Hierarchical miniature security marks
US7676058B2 (en) * 2006-08-11 2010-03-09 Xerox Corporation System and method for detection of miniature security marks
US7864979B2 (en) 2007-01-23 2011-01-04 Xerox Corporation System and method for embedding dispersed miniature security marks

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6067374A (en) * 1997-11-13 2000-05-23 Xerox Corporation Seal detection system and method
US6952484B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2005-10-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for mark detection
US6317524B1 (en) 1999-04-29 2001-11-13 Xerox Corporation Anti-counterfeit detection method
US6580820B1 (en) * 1999-06-09 2003-06-17 Xerox Corporation Digital imaging method and apparatus for detection of document security marks
US6766058B1 (en) * 1999-08-04 2004-07-20 Electro Scientific Industries Pattern recognition using multiple templates
US6553136B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2003-04-22 Hewlett-Packard Company System and method for counterfeit protection
JP2001222732A (en) * 2000-02-07 2001-08-17 Yunirekku:Kk Device for deflecting identification object
US7002704B1 (en) 2000-11-06 2006-02-21 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for implementing anti-counterfeiting measures in personal computer-based digital color printers
JP2003099788A (en) * 2001-09-21 2003-04-04 Sharp Corp Image processor
US7068844B1 (en) * 2001-11-15 2006-06-27 The University Of Connecticut Method and system for image processing for automatic road sign recognition
US7162073B1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2007-01-09 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Methods and apparatuses for detecting classifying and measuring spot defects in an image of an object
US20040260775A1 (en) * 2003-06-20 2004-12-23 Xerox Corporation System and method for sending messages
JP5111794B2 (en) * 2005-08-08 2013-01-09 株式会社東芝 Paper sheet identification device, paper sheet identification method, and dictionary creation method
US20070041628A1 (en) * 2005-08-17 2007-02-22 Xerox Corporation Detection of document security marks using run profiles
CN100344144C (en) * 2005-09-22 2007-10-17 北京紫枫科技开发有限公司 Calibrating method for scanning instrument
US8155312B2 (en) * 2005-10-18 2012-04-10 The University Of Connecticut Optical data storage device and method
US8527285B2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2013-09-03 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage printing system for printing both postal and non-postal documents
US7916924B2 (en) * 2006-09-19 2011-03-29 Primax Electronics Ltd. Color processing method for identification of areas within an image corresponding to monetary banknotes
US7706593B2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2010-04-27 Primax Electronics Ltd. Verification method for determining areas within an image corresponding to monetary banknotes
US7738690B2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2010-06-15 Primax Electronics Ltd. Verification method for determining areas within an image corresponding to monetary banknotes
US7706592B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2010-04-27 Primax Electronics Ltd. Method for detecting a boundary of a monetary banknote within an image
US7885450B2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2011-02-08 Primax Electronics Ltd. Method for characterizing texture of areas within an image corresponding to monetary banknotes
US7949175B2 (en) 2007-01-23 2011-05-24 Xerox Corporation Counterfeit deterrence using dispersed miniature security marks
US8233670B2 (en) * 2007-09-13 2012-07-31 Cognex Corporation System and method for traffic sign recognition
CN102501647B (en) * 2011-10-28 2014-01-22 北京紫枫科技开发有限公司 Digital anti-counterfeiting system and digital anti-counterfeiting method for use process of seal of document recognition system
WO2013186625A1 (en) * 2012-06-11 2013-12-19 Hi-Tech Solutions Ltd. System and method for detection cargo container seals
CN106447905B (en) * 2016-09-12 2019-04-09 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 A kind of bank note currency type recognition methods and device
CN112009076A (en) * 2019-06-01 2020-12-01 余桦佳 Stamp, stamp manufacturing process and stamp identification method
TWI739387B (en) * 2020-04-10 2021-09-11 彰化商業銀行股份有限公司 Seal identification system and method thereof
US11769332B2 (en) * 2020-06-15 2023-09-26 Lytx, Inc. Sensor fusion for collision detection
US11557135B2 (en) * 2021-03-30 2023-01-17 Paul Abner Noronha System and method to determine the authenticity of a seal

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US415387A (en) 1889-11-19 hoain
JPS5313840A (en) * 1976-07-23 1978-02-07 Hitachi Ltd Analogy calculator
JPS5853788B2 (en) * 1979-03-19 1983-12-01 日本電信電話株式会社 Seal imprint verification processing method
EP0056116B1 (en) * 1980-12-16 1986-03-19 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Pattern discriminating apparatus
JPS58161082A (en) * 1982-03-19 1983-09-24 Fujitsu Ltd Collating system of seal impression
EP0382549B1 (en) * 1989-02-10 1995-11-29 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for image reading or processing
US5430525A (en) * 1990-11-30 1995-07-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus
CH684222A5 (en) * 1992-03-10 1994-07-29 Mars Inc Means for classifying a pattern, particularly a banknote or a coin.
JP2615401B2 (en) * 1992-06-04 1997-05-28 大蔵省印刷局長 Anti-counterfeit latent image pattern forming body and method of manufacturing the same
US5652803A (en) * 1992-08-10 1997-07-29 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Special-document discriminating apparatus and managing system for image forming apparatus having a special-document discriminating function
US5790165A (en) * 1992-08-24 1998-08-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and providing controlling addition of predetermined data in a border portion
CA2106706C (en) * 1992-09-28 1999-07-27 Rie Saito Image forming method and apparatus
CA2113789C (en) * 1993-01-19 2000-11-21 Yoichi Takaragi Image processing apparatus and method
US5291243A (en) * 1993-02-05 1994-03-01 Xerox Corporation System for electronically printing plural-color tamper-resistant documents
JPH07212584A (en) * 1994-01-20 1995-08-11 Omron Corp Image processor and copying machine using the same
JP3078442B2 (en) * 1994-03-29 2000-08-21 シャープ株式会社 Image processing device forgery prevention device
US5533144A (en) * 1994-10-17 1996-07-02 Xerox Corporation Anti-counterfeit pattern detector and method
JP3178305B2 (en) * 1995-06-29 2001-06-18 オムロン株式会社 Image processing method and apparatus, copier, scanner and printer equipped with the same
JPH0918709A (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-01-17 Omron Corp Image recognition method and its device, copying machine, scanner and printer mounting the device
JPH09274660A (en) * 1996-04-05 1997-10-21 Omron Corp Method, device for recognizing image, copy machine mounting the same and scanner
US6067374A (en) * 1997-11-13 2000-05-23 Xerox Corporation Seal detection system and method

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007055658A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-18 Ko Khee Tay Security system and method
EP1901226A3 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-07-16 Xerox Corporation Hierarchical miniature security marks
US7715057B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2010-05-11 Xerox Corporation Hierarchical miniature security marks
EP1887779A3 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-07-16 Xerox Corporation System and method for embedding miniature security marks
US7676058B2 (en) * 2006-08-11 2010-03-09 Xerox Corporation System and method for detection of miniature security marks
US7792324B2 (en) 2006-08-11 2010-09-07 Xerox Corporation System and method for embedding miniature security marks
US7864979B2 (en) 2007-01-23 2011-01-04 Xerox Corporation System and method for embedding dispersed miniature security marks

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0917113A3 (en) 2000-02-23
DE69825842D1 (en) 2004-09-30
JP2009104663A (en) 2009-05-14
EP0917113A2 (en) 1999-05-19
US6067374A (en) 2000-05-23
BR9804607A (en) 1999-11-03
DE69825842T2 (en) 2005-01-05
BR9804607B1 (en) 2009-08-11
JPH11250260A (en) 1999-09-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0917113B1 (en) Seal detection system and method
US6574366B1 (en) Line and curve detection using local information
US6181813B1 (en) Method for counterfeit currency detection using orthogonal line comparison
CA2157711C (en) Anti-counterfeit pattern detector and method
US6272245B1 (en) Apparatus and method for pattern recognition
US5530772A (en) Apparatus and method for testing bank notes for genuineness using Fourier transform analysis
US7920714B2 (en) Method and apparatus for comparing document features using texture analysis
US6768809B2 (en) Digital watermark screening and detection strategies
EP1953710B1 (en) Counterfeit Deterrence Using Dispersed Miniature Security Marks
US7155051B2 (en) Image recognition apparatus, image recognition method and image recognition program for specific pattern
US9499006B2 (en) Anti-counterfeiting feature generation method for valuable document and authentication method and device therefor
EP1887532B1 (en) System and method for detection of miniature security marks
Destruel et al. Color noise-based feature for splicing detection and localization
CN114757317B (en) Method for making and verifying anti-fake grain pattern
Hildebrandt et al. High-resolution printed amino acid traces: a first-feature extraction approach for fingerprint forgery detection
US7844098B2 (en) Method for performing color analysis operation on image corresponding to monetary banknote
KR102070002B1 (en) Hybrid counterfeit discrimination apparatus for improving counterfeit discrimination efficiency
JPH08287259A (en) Fingerprint identifying method
AU2009238260A1 (en) Forgery detection using finger print
MXPA98006038A (en) Detection to avoid falsification of currencies using lin detection
Ranbida et al. A methodical study on digital image forensics and counterfeit detection techniques
JP3651177B2 (en) Paper sheet identification device
Uliyan Region Duplication Forgery Detection Technique Based on Keypoint Matching
CN113269917A (en) Magnetic medium identification method and device, electronic equipment and readable medium
Meena et al. A Literature Review on Liveness Assessment of Multimodal Biometrics Through Image Quality Assessment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000823

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: DE FR GB

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020715

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69825842

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040930

Kind code of ref document: P

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050526

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20151022

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20151027

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20151023

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69825842

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20161110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161110

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170601