EP0818765A1 - Détecteur avec plusieurs capteurs et procédé de détermination locale d'une condition d'alarme potentielle - Google Patents

Détecteur avec plusieurs capteurs et procédé de détermination locale d'une condition d'alarme potentielle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0818765A1
EP0818765A1 EP96305065A EP96305065A EP0818765A1 EP 0818765 A1 EP0818765 A1 EP 0818765A1 EP 96305065 A EP96305065 A EP 96305065A EP 96305065 A EP96305065 A EP 96305065A EP 0818765 A1 EP0818765 A1 EP 0818765A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
detector
sensors
sensitivity
level
sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP96305065A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Peerouz Amleshi
Donald D. Anderson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pittway Corp
Original Assignee
Pittway Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Pittway Corp filed Critical Pittway Corp
Priority to EP96305065A priority Critical patent/EP0818765A1/fr
Publication of EP0818765A1 publication Critical patent/EP0818765A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/18Prevention or correction of operating errors
    • G08B29/20Calibration, including self-calibrating arrangements
    • G08B29/24Self-calibration, e.g. compensating for environmental drift or ageing of components

Definitions

  • the invention pertains to detectors for determining the presence of a selected condition based on a plurality of data inputs. More particularly, the invention pertains to a variable sensitivity, alarm condition detector which receives inputs from several different condition sensors and which provides an output to a control unit indicative of a locally determined potential alarm condition.
  • Tice et al. U.S. Patent 4,916,432.
  • the Tice et al. patent is assigned to the same assignee, Pittway Corporation, and is incorporated herein by reference.
  • a common control unit associated with this system Upon receipt of inputs from a plurality of detectors a common control unit associated with this system is able to make a determination as to whether or not a fire condition is present in one or more regions of interest. A variety of techniques have in the past been used for purposes of making this determination.
  • One known technique has been to compare one or more of the outputs of one or more detectors to one or more pre-established thresholds.
  • the use of multiple thresholds permits the evaluation of trend information from one or more detectors.
  • Known systems carry out such processing at the common control unit.
  • Detection systems are expanding and are able to support larger numbers of detector such as 600 to 800 or more. In this environment, it becomes desirable and important to be able to analyze outputs from large numbers of detectors at a relatively high rate so as to provide timely information as to trends as well as actual alarm conditions.
  • detectors have incorporated photoelectric and ionization type smoke sensors into a common detector housing. Heat sensors have also been used in combination with smoke sensors.
  • detectors and methods of operating same which not only incorporate different types of sensors but which can carry out some local processing so as to reduce the amount of information which must be processed at the control unit.
  • detectors will be implementable at costs which are comparable to the cost of known detectors.
  • a variable sensitivity fire detector incorporates different methods for different sensitivity levels.
  • the sensitivity levels are automatically switched, from the most sensitive to the least sensitive, as the smoke concentration and/or temperature increase.
  • five different sensitivity levels are provided.
  • the detector is initiated at the highest sensitivity level.
  • Processing is carried out on signals from one or more different types of smoke detectors and perhaps a heat detector. If the smoke concentration or combined heat and smoke level are higher than the initial sensitivity level, the detector will generate a level one status code and continue processing for a second or lower level of sensitivity. After the processing steps have been carried out, if the concentration of smoke or smoke in combination with heat exceed the second level of sensitivity, a level two status code will be generated and the processing will continue to determine whether or not the smoke concentration or smoke combined with temperature exceeds the next higher sensitivity level. Once the detector reaches the lowest sensitivity level that is not exceeded, the latest status indicator can be forwarded to a central control unit, such as a fire alarm panel, for further processing in combination with signals returned from one or more additional detectors.
  • a central control unit such as a fire alarm panel
  • averaging or time delays can be introduced into the processing.
  • the signals can be detected off of the sensors for each processing interation at a given sensitivity level. Alternately, a single reading can be made and the same signal values can be used as inputs for each of the sensitivity levels.
  • the invention involves the use of different methods for different sensitivity levels. These levels are automatically switched (from most sensitive to least sensitive) as the smoke concentration increases.
  • a processing method is established for each of, for example, five different levels.
  • the processing method is executed and if the smoke concentration is higher than a preset level 1, then the method for the second level is executed. After execution, and if the smoke concentration is higher than a preset level 2, then the method for the third level is executed. This continues through level 5.
  • the detector will output a value that indicates what level it is at.
  • an ambient condition detection system 10 which could be for example a fire alarm system, includes a common control unit 12.
  • the control unit 12 includes a programmed processor 14, which could be a microprocessor of a commercially available variety as well as memory or storage 16.
  • the storage circuits 16 could be read-only memory circuits or read-write memory circuits.
  • the particular details of the processor 14 or the storage element 16 are not a limitation of the present invention.
  • the control unit 12 is coupled to a bidirectional communication link 20. Coupled to the link 20 is a plurality of control or detector units 22.
  • the members of the plurality 22a--22n can be used to detect ambient conditions in the vicinity of the respective detector. Signals from the respective detector can be communicated to the control unit 12 via the bidirectional communication link 20.
  • the processor 14 in turn analyzes the signals from one or more of the detectors from the plurality 22, in order to make a determination as to whether or not a potential or an actual alarm condition is present.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary detector 22i from the plurality 22.
  • the detector 22i is coupled to the bidirectional communication link 20 by communication and interface circuits 30.
  • the communication and interface circuits 30 translate commands and data between the link 20 and a programmed control element 32 in the detector 22i.
  • the control element 32 can be implemented using a commercially available microprocessor.
  • the element 32 will include read-only memory 34 for program storage as well as read-write memory 36, which could be implemented as random access memory for storage of data, as well as information or commands received from the control unit 12 via the link 20.
  • the read-write memory 36 can include a plurality of parameter values, or related functions, used to establish several different sensitivity levels at the detector 22e.
  • the control element 32 based on received ambient condition signals, and under control of the program in read-only memory 34, is capable of automatically switching from a higher sensitivity level to a lower sensitivity level.
  • the control element 32 which can include an analog-to-digital converter circuit 38 is in turn coupled to sensor interface circuits 40a, 40b and 40c.
  • Each of the sensor interface circuits 40a, 40b, and 40c receives inputs from a respective sensor.
  • control/interface circuity 40a receives signals indicative of a detected level of smoke concentration from a photoelectric smoke sensor 42a.
  • Interface circuity 40b receives signals indicative of a sensed concentration of smoke from ionization smoke sensor 42b.
  • Interface circuity 40c receives temperature information from temperature sensors 42c and 42d which could be implemented as their thermistors.
  • Signals received from the plurality of sensors 42, when processed by the interface circuits 40, can in turn be analyzed by the programmed control element 32 on a digital basis.
  • control element 32 at the start of each processing cycle, will first read signals from each of the sensors 42.
  • the control element 32 then carries out a plurality of trouble checks to determine whether or not updated base line signals from the photo sensor 42a, and ionization sensor 42b are within low and high limits, which is indicative of proper operation. If not, respective low and high trouble condition indicators are set and forwarded, via the communication/interface circuits 32 and the link 20 to the control unit 12.
  • control element 32 runs through a plurality of thermal checks to establish, via output signals from temperature sensors 42c, 42d whether or not the sensed temperature exceeds a pre-determined threshold, such as 135 degrees fahrenheit for a pre-determined period of time, such as 5 seconds. If not, temperature rise is checked to determine whether or not the temperature is increasing at an excessive rate, such as 15 degrees fahrenheit per minute for 5 seconds. If either temperature check indicates an affirmative result, the detector 22i generates a level 5 output alarm indication to the control unit 12.
  • a pre-determined threshold such as 135 degrees fahrenheit for a pre-determined period of time, such as 5 seconds. If not, temperature rise is checked to determine whether or not the temperature is increasing at an excessive rate, such as 15 degrees fahrenheit per minute for 5 seconds. If either temperature check indicates an affirmative result, the detector 22i generates a level 5 output alarm indication to the control unit 12.
  • the detector 22i starts a processing cycle by determining whether or not the signals from the sensor 42 in combination or alone exceed a first or highest sensitivity level. For example, in the first level, sensitivity for the photoelectric smoke sensor 42a could be set at 1% per foot, the ionization detector 42b could be set at a sensitivity of .5% per foot. In the event that the signals received from the sensors 42 indicate that the smoke level is below the level 1 sensitivity, the processing sequence is terminated and sensors are read again.
  • the processor 32 will automatically increase the sensitivity level, for example to 2% per foot for the photoelectric and ionization detectors 42a, 42b and then make a determination as to whether or not the signals received therefrom exceed the level 2 or the next, lessor sensitivity level.
  • the detector 22i will output a sensitivity level indicator via interface 30 to the communication link 20 as it passes through each of the sensitivity levels, going from level 1, the most sensitive level, to level 5, the least sensitive level, indicative of continually increasing levels of smoke and/or temperature or both.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the steps of a method in accordance with the present invention.
  • the control element 32 initiates a processing sequence by reading current output values from each of the sensors 42.
  • the base lines for each type of sensor are updated as previously discussed. Additionally, in the step 62, the updated base line values for at least the photoelectric detector 42a and the ionization detector 42b are compared to lower and upper limit values to determine that the sensors appear to be operating properly. If the limits are exceeded, in the case of the upper limit or not met, in the case of a lower limit, appropriate status messages are generated by the control element 32 and forwarded via the link 20 to the control panel 12.
  • a step 64 the temperature values received from the sensors 42c, 42d are checked against both an upper limit and against an acceptable gradient. If excessive temperature is indicated or an excessive rate of increase of temperature is indicated, a level 3 output message is produced by the control element 32. If not the output status is set at level 0, corresponding to no detected smoke or fire condition.
  • Averaged values of signals from the sensors 42 are then compared in a set of steps 66a, 66b, 66c to appropriate thresholds established by the control element 32 to establish if the sensed and averaged values indicate a higher level of smoke or smoke and temperature taken together for a pre-determined time interval, exceed the level 1 sensitivity.
  • This sum of average values can then be compared, in step 66a to a level 1 sum threshold ST1.
  • This value need not be a constant but could in fact be a function of signal values read from the sensors 42 as well as time.
  • ST1 could correspond to 125%.
  • the control element 32 sets its output status to level 1.
  • steps 66b and 66c comparisons are made between averaged values from the ionization sensor 42b to a preset threshold IT1 as well as average values from photo sensor 42a to a preset threshold PT1.
  • the output status is set to a level 1 indication by the control element 32.
  • the control element 32 returns to the step 60 and initiates the read process again.
  • the control element 32 compares the sensor output values in a series of steps 70a, 70b, 70c to level 2 thresholds, which also could be variable and could be altered by the control element 32 over a period of time. While the steps 70a-70c can be carried out with respect to averaged values, in view of the fact that the control element 32 has now switched to a lower level of sensitivity, for example 2% per foot of smoke, it is preferable to compare the current, unaveraged, values from the sensors 42 to the preset thresholds ST2, IT2 and PT2, to determine whether or not sufficient smoke and temperature rise are present to warrant generating a level 2 output status in a step 72.
  • control element 32 returns to the step 60 and re-reads the sensors.
  • level 2 sensitivity has been exceeded
  • similar steps are carried out with respect to a level 3 sensitivity in steps 74a, 74b, 74c.
  • the control element 32 will generate a level 3 output status indicator in a step 76. It will then return to read the sensors again in the step 60.
  • Figure 4 is a flow diagram for a method in accordance with the present invention wherein 5 different sensitivity values are used. Steps from Figure 4 that correspond to steps from Figure 3 have been assigned the same identification numerals.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fire-Detection Mechanisms (AREA)
  • Fire Alarms (AREA)
EP96305065A 1996-07-10 1996-07-10 Détecteur avec plusieurs capteurs et procédé de détermination locale d'une condition d'alarme potentielle Withdrawn EP0818765A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP96305065A EP0818765A1 (fr) 1996-07-10 1996-07-10 Détecteur avec plusieurs capteurs et procédé de détermination locale d'une condition d'alarme potentielle

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP96305065A EP0818765A1 (fr) 1996-07-10 1996-07-10 Détecteur avec plusieurs capteurs et procédé de détermination locale d'une condition d'alarme potentielle

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0818765A1 true EP0818765A1 (fr) 1998-01-14

Family

ID=8225002

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96305065A Withdrawn EP0818765A1 (fr) 1996-07-10 1996-07-10 Détecteur avec plusieurs capteurs et procédé de détermination locale d'une condition d'alarme potentielle

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0818765A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2537940A (en) * 2015-05-01 2016-11-02 Thorn Security Fire detector drift compensation

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4088986A (en) * 1976-10-01 1978-05-09 Boucher Charles E Smoke, fire and gas alarm with remote sensing, back-up emergency power, and system self monitoring
EP0039761A2 (fr) * 1980-05-09 1981-11-18 Cerberus Ag Méthode et installation d'avertissement d'incendie
DE3415786A1 (de) * 1983-04-30 1984-11-29 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd., Kadoma, Osaka Feueralarmsystem
GB2161966A (en) * 1984-06-29 1986-01-22 Hochiki Co Detecting fires
GB2188725A (en) * 1986-03-18 1987-10-07 Hochiki Co Detecting system and detector

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4088986A (en) * 1976-10-01 1978-05-09 Boucher Charles E Smoke, fire and gas alarm with remote sensing, back-up emergency power, and system self monitoring
EP0039761A2 (fr) * 1980-05-09 1981-11-18 Cerberus Ag Méthode et installation d'avertissement d'incendie
DE3415786A1 (de) * 1983-04-30 1984-11-29 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd., Kadoma, Osaka Feueralarmsystem
GB2161966A (en) * 1984-06-29 1986-01-22 Hochiki Co Detecting fires
GB2188725A (en) * 1986-03-18 1987-10-07 Hochiki Co Detecting system and detector

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2537940A (en) * 2015-05-01 2016-11-02 Thorn Security Fire detector drift compensation
GB2537940B (en) * 2015-05-01 2018-02-14 Thorn Security Fire detector drift compensation
US10204508B2 (en) 2015-05-01 2019-02-12 Thorn Security Limited Fire detector drift compensation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5483222A (en) Multiple sensor apparatus and method
US4668939A (en) Apparatus for monitoring disturbances in environmental conditions
EP0729125B1 (fr) Appareil de détection des conditions d'ambiance et procédé d'employer un système d'alarme
US4831361A (en) Environmental abnormality alarm apparatus
CN101057265B (zh) 火灾检测系统及使用多个传感器的方法
US6320501B1 (en) Multiple sensor system for alarm determination with device-to-device communications
JP3724689B2 (ja) 火災監視装置及び火災感知器
JPH08335296A (ja) 火災感知器及び非火災感知器を含む装置
US5612674A (en) High sensitivity apparatus and method with dynamic adjustment for noise
JP4718844B2 (ja) 火災警報器
JP6631927B2 (ja) 感知器、感知方法、感知システム、プログラム
EP0818765A1 (fr) Détecteur avec plusieurs capteurs et procédé de détermination locale d'une condition d'alarme potentielle
JP3859360B2 (ja) 差動式火災警報装置
EP0655720B1 (fr) Appareil de détection d'incendie
JPH055150B2 (fr)
JP3461601B2 (ja) 火災報知設備
JP2001056888A (ja) 熱煙複合感知器及びそれを備えた火災警報システム並びに受信機及びそれを備えた火災警報システム
JPS603095A (ja) 警報表示装置
JP3120127B2 (ja) 複合型火災感知器
JP3091308B2 (ja) 火災警報システム
JP3093867B2 (ja) 火災警報システム
JP2914684B2 (ja) 差動式火災警報装置
JPH07182573A (ja) 火災警報システム
JP2950876B2 (ja) 火災感知器
JP2886603B2 (ja) 火災警報装置及び火災警報方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;SI

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: DE FR GB

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19980715