EP0772166A1 - A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors - Google Patents

A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0772166A1
EP0772166A1 EP95202914A EP95202914A EP0772166A1 EP 0772166 A1 EP0772166 A1 EP 0772166A1 EP 95202914 A EP95202914 A EP 95202914A EP 95202914 A EP95202914 A EP 95202914A EP 0772166 A1 EP0772166 A1 EP 0772166A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
doors
transceiver
multiplicity
message
dcu
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP95202914A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0772166B1 (en
EP0772166B2 (en
Inventor
Gad Talmom
Zvi Dershowitz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BANKOM SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD.
Original Assignee
Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=8220776&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0772166(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority to EP95202914A priority Critical patent/EP0772166B2/en
Priority to AT95202914T priority patent/ATE176070T1/en
Priority to ES95202914T priority patent/ES2130519T5/en
Priority to DE69507485T priority patent/DE69507485T3/en
Application filed by Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd filed Critical Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd
Publication of EP0772166A1 publication Critical patent/EP0772166A1/en
Priority to HK98110605A priority patent/HK1010001A1/en
Publication of EP0772166B1 publication Critical patent/EP0772166B1/en
Publication of EP0772166B2 publication Critical patent/EP0772166B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05GSAFES OR STRONG-ROOMS FOR VALUABLES; BANK PROTECTION DEVICES; SAFETY TRANSACTION PARTITIONS
    • E05G1/00Safes or strong-rooms for valuables
    • E05G1/06Safes or strong-rooms for valuables having provision for multiple compartments
    • E05G1/08Safes or strong-rooms for valuables having provision for multiple compartments secured individually
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07FCOIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F17/00Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services
    • G07F17/10Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services for means for safe-keeping of property, left temporarily, e.g. by fastening the property
    • G07F17/12Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services for means for safe-keeping of property, left temporarily, e.g. by fastening the property comprising lockable containers, e.g. for accepting clothes to be cleaned

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to monitoring apparatus generally and more particularly to electro-optical monitoring apparatus.
  • the present invention seeks to provide an improved system for monitoring which is particularly useful for monitoring the opening and closing of a plurality of doors arranged in a generally planar array.
  • a system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors including at least one optical transceiver mounted on each of the multiplicity of doors and communications apparatus for communicating with each of the multiplicity of doors thereby to verify their position.
  • the communications apparatus is operative to communicate with at least some of the optical transceivers via others of the optical transceivers.
  • the communications apparatus is operative to communicate with the optical transceivers on the multiplicity of doors via a plurality of alternative communications pathways.
  • each transceiver includes, for at least some of the multiplicity of doors, a plurality of optical transmitters and receivers operative in a plurality of different directions.
  • Each transceiver is preferably autonomously powered.
  • each transceiver includes at least one light emitting diode and light sensor.
  • each transceiver includes a microprocessor.
  • each transceiver is operative to provide an indication of an open door or inoperative transceiver downstream thereof in a communications chain.
  • the communications apparatus includes a personal computer and communicates with the transceivers via at least two communications interfaces.
  • the plurality of doors are doors of a bank of safe deposit boxes.
  • system also includes apparatus for logging door openings and inoperative transceivers on a time based log.
  • Fig. 1 is a simplified pictorial illustration of a system for monitoring a plurality of doors, constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system is here shown in the context of monitoring a bank of safe deposit boxes, which is a preferred application. It is to be appreciated, however, that the invention is not limited to this or any other particular application.
  • the bank of safe deposit boxes is arranged in a plurality of vertical columns 22, labeled A - G, and a plurality of horizontal rows 24, labeled 1 - 8. It is to be appreciated that any suitable number of boxes may be monitored in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system includes a multiplicity of door monitoring units 26, hereinafter termed “DCU”s or transceivers, each of which is mounted on the door of a separate box.
  • DCU door monitoring units
  • ECU edge monitoring units
  • a plurality of ECUs 28 are arranged along the bottom of the bank of boxes 20, one ECU being arranged in registration with one column of DCUs 26, such that, for example, the ECU labeled A communicates with the DCUs in column A and so on.
  • the ECUs could be arranged along a vertical edge of the bank 20.
  • the ECUs are arranged for communication and are referred to collectively as a common block, hereinafter termed "ECB”.
  • a system control unit 32 hereinafter termed “SCU” controls the ECUs 30 and may in turn be controlled by a system manager 34, which may be embodied in software and be operated by an operator using a conventional personal computer.
  • each ECU 28 typically comprises an optical transceiver 40, preferably an LED 42 and a light sensor 44, such as a Schmitt photodetector.
  • the optical transceiver pair 40 communicates with a controller 46, which in turn communicates along the ECB block 30 and with the SCU 32.
  • Each DCU preferably includes four optical transceivers 40, disposed along each edge thereof, communicating with a controller 50.
  • the optical transceiver pairs 40 of each DCU 26 are arranged in opposite registration with adjacent corresponding optical transceiver pairs 40 on adjacent DCUs 26 and, where appropriate, with an optical transceiver pair 40 of an adjacent ECU 28, such that serial communication of all adjacent DCUs with each other and with adjacent ECUs 28 is provided, as will be described hereinafter in greater detail.
  • the four optical transceiver pairs 40 are designated as follows: Two vertically directed pairs, identified by reference numerals 41 and 43 respectively are termed UPPER LINK and LOWER LINK. Two horizontally directed pairs, identified by reference numerals 45 and 47 respectively are termed RIGHT LINK and LEFT LINK.
  • transceiver pairs on the ECUs and SCUs are also labeled in accordance with the above convention.
  • the ECUs, SCUs and DCUs may include the same hardware platform.
  • the RIGHT LINK and LEFT LINK of adjacent transceivers may communicate either by wire, as illustrated in Fig. 2, or optically.
  • Controller 50 is delineated by dashed lines and includes a CPU 52 and an associated RAM 54 and ROM 56.
  • the CPU 52 communicates via an I/O bus with respective transmit and receive registers 58 and 60.
  • Register 58 communicates via a LED buffer 62 with four LEDS 64, 66, 68 and 70, each directed in a different direction.
  • Register 60 communicates via a sensor buffer 72 with four sensors 74, 76, 78 and 80, each directed in a different direction.
  • a power module 82 provides power to the controller 50 and preferably includes an autonomous power source such as solar cells 84 or an RF energy receiver and rectifier assembly 86.
  • the autonomous power source provides electrical power to a power supply 88, which converts the electrical power to voltages appropriate for use by the various elements of the DCU 26.
  • Controller 46 includes a CPU 102 and an associated RAM 104 and ROM 106.
  • the CPU 102 communicates via an I/O bus with respective transmit and receive registers 108, 134, 110 and 130.
  • Register 108 communicates via a LED buffer 112 with an LED 114.
  • Register 110 communicates via a sensor buffer 116 with a sensor 118.
  • Register 130 receives, via a buffer 132, information from an adjacent ECU, if present.
  • Register 134 transmits via a buffer 136 to an adjacent ECU, if present.
  • serial input 103 and serial output 105 from the CPU 102 provide communication with the SCU 32.
  • FIG. 5 A schematic illustration of a preferred embodiment of DCU, circuitry appears in Fig. 5. The schematic illustration is believed to be self explanatory, accordingly, no additional description thereof is believed to be necessary. Identical circuitry is employed also for the ECU and SCU circuitry. A listing of software resident in the microcontroller of Fig. 5 appears in Appendix A, for DCU, ECU and SCU functionalities.
  • the system manager is operative following initialization to confirm that no door is open and that no door has been authorized to be opened.
  • the system manager is then prepared to deal with any one of three events: a timer event, a user input, receipt of a message from the SCU 32 (Fig. 1). Following occurrence of an event, the system manager returns to an idle state.
  • Fig. 6B The operation of the system manager upon occurrence of a timer event is illustrated in Fig. 6B. If an excessive time has passed since the last message, a report to that effect is logged and an alarm is sounded. Otherwise, a request is transmitted to the SCU 32 to perform a block poll, as will be described hereinbelow.
  • Figs. 6F, 6D, 6E and 6G The subroutines dedicated to the above messages NBIO, LBIO, RBIO and ENDP are illustrated in respective Figs. 6F, 6D, 6E and 6G.
  • Each of the subroutines shown in Figs. 6F, 6D and 6E employ a subroutine which is explained hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 6I.
  • the subject matter of Figs. 6F, 6D, 6E and 6G is not believed to require further explanation.
  • Fig. 6H The operation of the system manager upon receipt of an input from a user is illustrated in Fig. 6H.
  • a user indicates a single door which he is authorized to open and normally provides the requisite identification to a security operative.
  • the system manager notes in a register that the indicated door is authorized to be opened.
  • the system manager notes in a register that the indicated door is no longer authorized to open.
  • the system as described herein is configured to only permit one authorized box opening at any given time. Alternatively, the system could be configured to permit more than one authorized box opening at a given time.
  • Fig. 6I The operation of the system manager upon reception of a message from a SCU, indicating the open status of a door is illustrated in Fig. 6I.
  • the system checks to determine whether the door which is indicated to be open is authorized to be open. If not, an alarm is sounded. In any event, the open status of the door is logged by column and row numbers.
  • Figs. 7A and 7B illustrate the operation of SCU circuitry 32.
  • the SCU circuitry awaits a poll command from the system manager 34. Upon receipt of the poll command it conducts polling the status of block 20 (Fig. 1).
  • the task of the SCU is to transmit a poll instruction message to a first ECU in response to a poll system instruction from the system manager 34 (Fig. 1) and to then receive the various return messages therefrom. These messages are then retransmitted by the SCU to the system manager 34.
  • the polling of block 20 is achieved by transmitting a poll message to a first ECU and then awaiting a message from the ECU. If the message is properly received, it is echoed to the system manager 34. If the message is not properly received, the SCU exits the subroutine of Fig. 7B. The subroutine is operative until an ENDP message is received and echoed to the system manager 34.
  • FIG. 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D, 8E and 8F illustrating the operation of the system manager of Figs. 1-5.
  • the ECU waits for a wake-up signal and upon receipt thereof handles a start-bit from a LINK HX.
  • the ECU circuitry upon receipt of the message along LINK HX, and if the message is successfully received, the ECU circuitry deals with the following types of messages received from LINK HX:
  • the ECU upon receipt of an NBIO, RBIO or LBIO message, the ECU retransmits the same message with the received column and row indices (COL, ROW) changed to (COL+1,ROW) to LINK 1 - HX, i.e. the opposite link on the same transceiver.
  • the ECU upon receipt of an ENDP message from LINK HX, the ECU performs a DCU column poll and transmits an ENDP message with the received (COL, ROW) indication changed to (COL+1,ROW) to link 1 - HX, i.e. the opposite link.
  • the ECU upon receipt of a POLL message from LINK HX, the ECU also transmits a poll message to LINK 1 - HX. If the transmission is not successful it performs a DCU column poll and transmits the result to link 1 - HX. It also transmits a ENDP message with a column indication 0 to link 1 - HX.
  • the ECU transmits a POLL message to the most adjacent DCU (transceiver). If the transmission is not successful, the ECU transmits an NBIO message with indices (0,0) to LINK HX for ultimate transmittal to the SCU 32 and the system manager 34.
  • the ECU awaits a message from the adjacent DCU. If such a message is not received successfully, the ECU exits the subroutine. If a message is successfully received from the adjacent DCU, it is dealt with depending on the type of message, i.e. LBIO, RBIO or NBIO.
  • the ECU transmits a message of the same type to a link HX for ultimate transmittal to the SCU 32 and the system manager 34.
  • the index of the message is a column index 0 and a row index equal to the received index incremented by +1.
  • the ECU In the event of receipt of RBIO and LBIO messages, the ECU remains in the subroutine awaiting further messages. If an NBIO message is received, the ECU exits the subroutine.
  • Figs. 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D, 9E, 9F, 9G, 9H, 9I and 9J are flow charts illustrating the operation of the DCU circuitry of Figs. 1 - 5.
  • the DCU upon supply of power to the DCU circuitry and initialization thereof, the DCU remains in a dormant state until it is awakened up by a received signal.
  • the received signal may come from a source which is vertically separated from the DCU or a source which is horizontally separated from the DCU. Once the received signal has been dealt with, the DCU returns to its dormant state.
  • the DCU retransmits the communication back to the source. If, however, as seen in Fig. 9C, the signal is received from a source that is vertically separated from the DCU, the DCU checks if the message has been correctly received. If so, each message is handled separately and when it has been handled, the DCU returns to its dormant state.
  • Fig. 9D illustrates handling of a POLL message from a LINK VX and indicates that the received POLL message is retransmitted to an opposite link, LINK 1 - VX. If the transmission is not successful, the DCU transmits the status of its right and left neighbors back to link VX and also transmits an NBIO message with index 0 to link VX.
  • Fig. 9E Transmission of the status of the right and left neighbors is illustrated in Fig. 9E. An inquiry is made as to whether the right neighbor door is open. If so, an RBIO message is transmitted to link VX with index 0. An inquiry is made if the left neighbor door is open. If so, an LBIO message is transmitted to link VX with index 0.
  • Reading status of a neighbor is illustrated in Fig. 9F and includes the steps of communicating with a neighboring DCU. If the communication is successful, an indication is provided that the neighboring door is closed. If the communication is not successful, an indication is provided that the neighboring door is open.
  • Handling of an NBIO message is illustrated in Fig. 9G and includes transmitting the status of the right and left neighbors as described hereinabove and afterwards transmitting an NBIO message with an ROW index incremented by +1 to the opposite link 1 - VX.
  • Handling of an RBIO message is illustrated in Fig. 9H and includes transmitting an RBIO message with a ROW index incremented by +1 to the opposite link 1 - VX.
  • Handling of an LBIO message is illustrated in Fig. 9I and includes transmitting an LBIO message with an ROW index incremented by +1 to the opposite link 1 - VX.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
  • Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)
  • Closed-Circuit Television Systems (AREA)
  • Special Wing (AREA)

Abstract

A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors including at least one optical transceiver mounted on each of the multiplicity of doors and communications apparatus for communicating with each of the multiplicity of doors thereby to verify their position.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to monitoring apparatus generally and more particularly to electro-optical monitoring apparatus.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • There exist in the patent literature a variety of patents which deal with monitoring the opening and closing of a door. The following U.S. patents are representative of the prior art: 3,816,745; 3,875,403; 3,987,428; 4,266,124; 4,319,332; 4,324,977; 4,390,867; 4,583,082; 4,650,990; 4,742,337; 4,812,810; 4,841,283; 4,903,009; 4,965,551; 5,015,840; 5,063,288; 5,111,184; 5,134,386 and 5,138,299.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention seeks to provide an improved system for monitoring which is particularly useful for monitoring the opening and closing of a plurality of doors arranged in a generally planar array.
  • There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors including at least one optical transceiver mounted on each of the multiplicity of doors and communications apparatus for communicating with each of the multiplicity of doors thereby to verify their position.
  • Preferably the communications apparatus is operative to communicate with at least some of the optical transceivers via others of the optical transceivers.
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the communications apparatus is operative to communicate with the optical transceivers on the multiplicity of doors via a plurality of alternative communications pathways.
  • Preferably each transceiver includes, for at least some of the multiplicity of doors, a plurality of optical transmitters and receivers operative in a plurality of different directions. Each transceiver is preferably autonomously powered.
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention each transceiver includes at least one light emitting diode and light sensor. Preferably each transceiver includes a microprocessor.
  • Additionally in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, each transceiver is operative to provide an indication of an open door or inoperative transceiver downstream thereof in a communications chain.
  • Preferably, the communications apparatus includes a personal computer and communicates with the transceivers via at least two communications interfaces.
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the plurality of doors are doors of a bank of safe deposit boxes.
  • Additionally in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the system also includes apparatus for logging door openings and inoperative transceivers on a time based log.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will be more fully understood and appreciated from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
    • Fig. 1 is a pictorial illustration of a monitoring system constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
    • Fig. 2 is a simplified partially pictorial, partially block diagram illustration of part of the system of Fig. 1;
    • Fig. 3 is a simplified block diagram of DCU circuitry mounted on each door being monitored in the system;
    • Fig. 4 is a simplified block diagram of ECU circuitry forming part of the apparatus of Figs. 1 and 2;
    • Fig. 5 is an electrical schematic illustration of electrical circuitry employed in a preferred embodiment of the ECU, DCU and SCU circuitry;
    • Figs. 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6G, 6H and 6I are flow charts illustrating the operation of the system manager of Figs. 1 and 2;
    • Figs. 7A and 7B are flow charts illustrating the operation of the SCU circuitry of Figs. 1 - 5;
    • Figs. 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D, 8E and 8F are flow charts illustrating the operation of the ECU circuitry of Figs. 1 - 5; and
    • Figs. 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D, 9E, 9F, 9G, 9H and 9I are flow charts illustrating the operation of the DCU circuitry of Figs. 1 - 5.
    LIST OF APPENDICES
    • Appendix A is a software listing in Intel Intellec - 8 HEX dump format of software resident in the DCU, ECU and SCU circuitry;
    • Appendix B is a listing of a sequence of events which characterizes operation of an embodiment of the invention including four DCUs in four different operational cases.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Reference is now made to Fig. 1, which is a simplified pictorial illustration of a system for monitoring a plurality of doors, constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The system is here shown in the context of monitoring a bank of safe deposit boxes, which is a preferred application. It is to be appreciated, however, that the invention is not limited to this or any other particular application.
  • For the purpose of explanation, the bank of safe deposit boxes, indicated generally by reference numeral 20, is arranged in a plurality of vertical columns 22, labeled A - G, and a plurality of horizontal rows 24, labeled 1 - 8. It is to be appreciated that any suitable number of boxes may be monitored in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the system includes a multiplicity of door monitoring units 26, hereinafter termed "DCU"s or transceivers, each of which is mounted on the door of a separate box. Communicating with the door monitoring units 26 are a plurality of edge monitoring units 28, hereinafter termed "ECU"s.
  • In the illustrated embodiment, a plurality of ECUs 28 are arranged along the bottom of the bank of boxes 20, one ECU being arranged in registration with one column of DCUs 26, such that, for example, the ECU labeled A communicates with the DCUs in column A and so on. Alternatively, the ECUs could be arranged along a vertical edge of the bank 20.
  • The ECUs are arranged for communication and are referred to collectively as a common block, hereinafter termed "ECB". A system control unit 32, hereinafter termed "SCU" controls the ECUs 30 and may in turn be controlled by a system manager 34, which may be embodied in software and be operated by an operator using a conventional personal computer.
  • Reference is now made to Fig. 2, which illustrates a representative part of the system of Fig. 1. It is seen that each ECU 28 typically comprises an optical transceiver 40, preferably an LED 42 and a light sensor 44, such as a Schmitt photodetector. The optical transceiver pair 40 communicates with a controller 46, which in turn communicates along the ECB block 30 and with the SCU 32.
  • Each DCU preferably includes four optical transceivers 40, disposed along each edge thereof, communicating with a controller 50. The optical transceiver pairs 40 of each DCU 26 are arranged in opposite registration with adjacent corresponding optical transceiver pairs 40 on adjacent DCUs 26 and, where appropriate, with an optical transceiver pair 40 of an adjacent ECU 28, such that serial communication of all adjacent DCUs with each other and with adjacent ECUs 28 is provided, as will be described hereinafter in greater detail.
  • The four optical transceiver pairs 40 are designated as follows: Two vertically directed pairs, identified by reference numerals 41 and 43 respectively are termed UPPER LINK and LOWER LINK. Two horizontally directed pairs, identified by reference numerals 45 and 47 respectively are termed RIGHT LINK and LEFT LINK.
  • For the sake of convenience in notation, correspondingly positioned transceiver pairs on the ECUs and SCUs are also labeled in accordance with the above convention. In practice, for engineering and manufacturing simplicity, the ECUs, SCUs and DCUs may include the same hardware platform. In the ECUs, the RIGHT LINK and LEFT LINK of adjacent transceivers may communicate either by wire, as illustrated in Fig. 2, or optically.
  • Reference is now made to Fig. 3, which is a simplified block diagram illustration of the DCU 26. Controller 50 is delineated by dashed lines and includes a CPU 52 and an associated RAM 54 and ROM 56. The CPU 52 communicates via an I/O bus with respective transmit and receive registers 58 and 60. Register 58 communicates via a LED buffer 62 with four LEDS 64, 66, 68 and 70, each directed in a different direction. Register 60 communicates via a sensor buffer 72 with four sensors 74, 76, 78 and 80, each directed in a different direction.
  • A power module 82 provides power to the controller 50 and preferably includes an autonomous power source such as solar cells 84 or an RF energy receiver and rectifier assembly 86. The autonomous power source provides electrical power to a power supply 88, which converts the electrical power to voltages appropriate for use by the various elements of the DCU 26.
  • Reference is now made to Fig. 4, which is a simplified block diagram illustration of the ECU 28. Controller 46 includes a CPU 102 and an associated RAM 104 and ROM 106. The CPU 102 communicates via an I/O bus with respective transmit and receive registers 108, 134, 110 and 130. Register 108 communicates via a LED buffer 112 with an LED 114. Register 110 communicates via a sensor buffer 116 with a sensor 118.
  • Register 130 receives, via a buffer 132, information from an adjacent ECU, if present. Register 134 transmits via a buffer 136 to an adjacent ECU, if present.
  • The serial input 103 and serial output 105 from the CPU 102 provide communication with the SCU 32.
  • A schematic illustration of a preferred embodiment of DCU, circuitry appears in Fig. 5. The schematic illustration is believed to be self explanatory, accordingly, no additional description thereof is believed to be necessary. Identical circuitry is employed also for the ECU and SCU circuitry. A listing of software resident in the microcontroller of Fig. 5 appears in Appendix A, for DCU, ECU and SCU functionalities.
  • The operation of the apparatus of Figs. 1 - 5 will now be explained with particular reference to Figs. 6A - 6I.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 6A, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the system manager is operative following initialization to confirm that no door is open and that no door has been authorized to be opened. The system manager is then prepared to deal with any one of three events: a timer event, a user input, receipt of a message from the SCU 32 (Fig. 1). Following occurrence of an event, the system manager returns to an idle state.
  • The operation of the system manager upon occurrence of a timer event is illustrated in Fig. 6B. If an excessive time has passed since the last message, a report to that effect is logged and an alarm is sounded. Otherwise, a request is transmitted to the SCU 32 to perform a block poll, as will be described hereinbelow.
  • The operation of the system manager upon receipt of a message from the SCU is illustrated in Fig. 6C. Four types of messages are dealt with as will be described hereinbelow:
    • NBIO - NO BOX IS OPEN
    • RBIO - RIGHT BOX IS OPEN
    • LBIO - LEFT BOX IS OPEN
    • ENDP - END OF POLL
  • The subroutines dedicated to the above messages NBIO, LBIO, RBIO and ENDP are illustrated in respective Figs. 6F, 6D, 6E and 6G. Each of the subroutines shown in Figs. 6F, 6D and 6E employ a subroutine which is explained hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 6I. Other than this subroutine, the subject matter of Figs. 6F, 6D, 6E and 6G is not believed to require further explanation.
  • The operation of the system manager upon receipt of an input from a user is illustrated in Fig. 6H. A user indicates a single door which he is authorized to open and normally provides the requisite identification to a security operative. The system manager notes in a register that the indicated door is authorized to be opened. When the user has completed accessing a given vault via the door, the system manager notes in a register that the indicated door is no longer authorized to open. The system as described herein is configured to only permit one authorized box opening at any given time. Alternatively, the system could be configured to permit more than one authorized box opening at a given time.
  • The operation of the system manager upon reception of a message from a SCU, indicating the open status of a door is illustrated in Fig. 6I. The system checks to determine whether the door which is indicated to be open is authorized to be open. If not, an alarm is sounded. In any event, the open status of the door is logged by column and row numbers.
  • Reference is now made to Figs. 7A and 7B which illustrate the operation of SCU circuitry 32. Following initialization, the SCU circuitry awaits a poll command from the system manager 34. Upon receipt of the poll command it conducts polling the status of block 20 (Fig. 1).
  • Generally speaking, the task of the SCU is to transmit a poll instruction message to a first ECU in response to a poll system instruction from the system manager 34 (Fig. 1) and to then receive the various return messages therefrom. These messages are then retransmitted by the SCU to the system manager 34.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 7B, the polling of block 20 is achieved by transmitting a poll message to a first ECU and then awaiting a message from the ECU. If the message is properly received, it is echoed to the system manager 34. If the message is not properly received, the SCU exits the subroutine of Fig. 7B. The subroutine is operative until an ENDP message is received and echoed to the system manager 34.
  • Reference is now made to Figs. 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D, 8E and 8F illustrating the operation of the system manager of Figs. 1-5.
  • The following notation will be employed in the discusion which follows:
    • LINK HX - one of the two horizontal links on a transceiver (DCU, ECU or SCU).
    • LINK 1 - HX - the other one of the two horizontal links on the transceiver (DCU, ECU or SCU).
    • LINK VX - one of the two vertical links on a transceiver (DCU, ECU or SCU).
    • LINK 1 - VX - the other one of the two vertical links on the transceiver (DCU, ECU or SCU).
  • As seen in Fig. 8A, following initialization, the ECU waits for a wake-up signal and upon receipt thereof handles a start-bit from a LINK HX.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 8B, upon receipt of the message along LINK HX, and if the message is successfully received, the ECU circuitry deals with the following types of messages received from LINK HX:
    • NBIO - NO BOX IS OPEN
    • RBIO - RIGHT BOX IS OPEN
    • LBIO - LEFT BOX IS OPEN
    • ENDP - END OF POLL
    • POLL - POLL INSTRUCTION
  • As illustrated in Fig. 8C, upon receipt of an NBIO, RBIO or LBIO message, the ECU retransmits the same message with the received column and row indices (COL, ROW) changed to (COL+1,ROW) to LINK 1 - HX, i.e. the opposite link on the same transceiver.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 8D, upon receipt of an ENDP message from LINK HX, the ECU performs a DCU column poll and transmits an ENDP message with the received (COL, ROW) indication changed to (COL+1,ROW) to link 1 - HX, i.e. the opposite link.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 8E, upon receipt of a POLL message from LINK HX, the ECU also transmits a poll message to LINK 1 - HX. If the transmission is not successful it performs a DCU column poll and transmits the result to link 1 - HX. It also transmits a ENDP message with a column indication 0 to link 1 - HX.
  • As seen in Fig. 8F, the ECU transmits a POLL message to the most adjacent DCU (transceiver). If the transmission is not successful, the ECU transmits an NBIO message with indices (0,0) to LINK HX for ultimate transmittal to the SCU 32 and the system manager 34.
  • If the transmission is successful, the ECU awaits a message from the adjacent DCU. If such a message is not received successfully, the ECU exits the subroutine. If a message is successfully received from the adjacent DCU, it is dealt with depending on the type of message, i.e. LBIO, RBIO or NBIO.
  • In the event of receipt of any of the above three types of messages the ECU transmits a message of the same type to a link HX for ultimate transmittal to the SCU 32 and the system manager 34. The index of the message is a column index 0 and a row index equal to the received index incremented by +1.
  • In the event of receipt of RBIO and LBIO messages, the ECU remains in the subroutine awaiting further messages. If an NBIO message is received, the ECU exits the subroutine.
  • Reference is now made to Figs. 9A, 9B, 9C, 9D, 9E, 9F, 9G, 9H, 9I and 9J which are flow charts illustrating the operation of the DCU circuitry of Figs. 1 - 5.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 9A, upon supply of power to the DCU circuitry and initialization thereof, the DCU remains in a dormant state until it is awakened up by a received signal. The received signal may come from a source which is vertically separated from the DCU or a source which is horizontally separated from the DCU. Once the received signal has been dealt with, the DCU returns to its dormant state.
  • As seen in Fig. 9B, if the signal is received from a source that is horizontally separated from the DCU, the DCU retransmits the communication back to the source. If, however, as seen in Fig. 9C, the signal is received from a source that is vertically separated from the DCU, the DCU checks if the message has been correctly received. If so, each message is handled separately and when it has been handled, the DCU returns to its dormant state.
  • The description of the handling of the various types of messages is provided with reference to the drawings in accordance with the following table:
    MESSAGE TYPE FIGURE
    POLL Fig. 9D
    NBIO Fig. 9G
    RBIO Fig. 9H
    LBIO Fig. 9I
  • Fig. 9D illustrates handling of a POLL message from a LINK VX and indicates that the received POLL message is retransmitted to an opposite link, LINK 1 - VX. If the transmission is not successful, the DCU transmits the status of its right and left neighbors back to link VX and also transmits an NBIO message with index 0 to link VX.
  • Transmission of the status of the right and left neighbors is illustrated in Fig. 9E. An inquiry is made as to whether the right neighbor door is open. If so, an RBIO message is transmitted to link VX with index 0. An inquiry is made if the left neighbor door is open. If so, an LBIO message is transmitted to link VX with index 0.
  • Reading status of a neighbor is illustrated in Fig. 9F and includes the steps of communicating with a neighboring DCU. If the communication is successful, an indication is provided that the neighboring door is closed. If the communication is not successful, an indication is provided that the neighboring door is open.
  • Handling of an NBIO message is illustrated in Fig. 9G and includes transmitting the status of the right and left neighbors as described hereinabove and afterwards transmitting an NBIO message with an ROW index incremented by +1 to the opposite link 1 - VX.
  • Handling of an RBIO message is illustrated in Fig. 9H and includes transmitting an RBIO message with a ROW index incremented by +1 to the opposite link 1 - VX.
  • Handling of an LBIO message is illustrated in Fig. 9I and includes transmitting an LBIO message with an ROW index incremented by +1 to the opposite link 1 - VX.
  • It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the present invention is defined only by the claims which follow:
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
    Figure imgb0004
    Figure imgb0005
    Figure imgb0006
    Figure imgb0007
    Figure imgb0008
    Figure imgb0009
    Figure imgb0010
    Figure imgb0011
    Figure imgb0012
    Figure imgb0013
    Figure imgb0014
    Figure imgb0015
    Figure imgb0016
    Figure imgb0017
    Figure imgb0018
    Figure imgb0019
    Figure imgb0020
    Figure imgb0021
    Figure imgb0022
    Figure imgb0023
    Figure imgb0024

Claims (10)

  1. A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors comprising:
    at least one optical transceiver mounted on each of the multiplicity of doors; and
    communication apparatus for communicating with said at least one optical transceiver mounted on each of the multiplicity of doors thereby toverify their position, said communication appratus being operative to communicate with the at least one optical transceiver on each of said multiplicity od doors via plural alternative serial communications pathways, at least one of said plural pathways extending via optical transceviers mounted on a plurality of different doors.
  2. A system according to claim 1 and wherein said at least one transceiver comprises, for at least some of said multiplicity of doors, a plurality of optical transmitters and receivers operative in a plurality of different directions.
  3. A system according to claim 1 and wherein said at least one transceiver on each of said plurality of doors is autonomously powered.
  4. A system according to claim1 and wherein said at least one transceiver comprises at least one light emitting diode and light sensor.
  5. A system according to claim 1 and wherein said at least one transceiver comprises a microprocessor.
  6. A system according to claim 1 and wherein said at least one transceiver is operative to provide an indication of an open door or inoperative transceiver downstream thereof in a communications chain.
  7. A system according to claim 1 and wherein said communications apparatus comprises a personal computer.
  8. A system according to claim 1 and wherein said communications apparatus communicates with said transceivers via at least two communications interfaces.
  9. A system according to claim 1 and wherein said plurality of doors are doors of a bank of safe deposit boxes.
  10. A system according to claim 1 and also comprising apparatus for logging door openings and inoperative transceivers on a time based log.
EP95202914A 1995-10-27 1995-10-27 A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors Expired - Lifetime EP0772166B2 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP95202914A EP0772166B2 (en) 1995-10-27 1995-10-27 A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors
AT95202914T ATE176070T1 (en) 1995-10-27 1995-10-27 MONITORING SYSTEM FOR A VARIETY OF DOORS
ES95202914T ES2130519T5 (en) 1995-10-27 1995-10-27 SYSTEM FOR SURVEILLANCE OF A MULTIPLICITY OF DOORS.
DE69507485T DE69507485T3 (en) 1995-10-27 1995-10-27 Surveillance system for a variety of doors
HK98110605A HK1010001A1 (en) 1995-10-27 1998-09-11 A sytem for monitoring a multiplicity of doors

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP95202914A EP0772166B2 (en) 1995-10-27 1995-10-27 A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0772166A1 true EP0772166A1 (en) 1997-05-07
EP0772166B1 EP0772166B1 (en) 1999-01-20
EP0772166B2 EP0772166B2 (en) 2003-02-12

Family

ID=8220776

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95202914A Expired - Lifetime EP0772166B2 (en) 1995-10-27 1995-10-27 A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0772166B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE176070T1 (en)
DE (1) DE69507485T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2130519T5 (en)
HK (1) HK1010001A1 (en)

Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3816745A (en) 1972-11-20 1974-06-11 Innovation Ind Inc Optically-coupled sensing and control system
US3875403A (en) 1973-02-27 1975-04-01 Lars Erik Svensson Light beam apparatus
US3987428A (en) 1975-06-16 1976-10-19 The Raymond Lee Organization, Inc. Optical laser security system
US4266124A (en) 1979-08-10 1981-05-05 Data Instruments, Inc. Photoelectric object detector system
US4319332A (en) 1978-04-28 1982-03-09 Zellweger Uster Ltd. Method and apparatus for space monitoring by means of pulsed directional beam
US4324977A (en) 1979-03-08 1982-04-13 Brauer Malcolm M Synthesized target system
US4390867A (en) 1981-08-03 1983-06-28 James Queren Burglar alarm system
FR2526474A1 (en) * 1982-05-04 1983-11-10 Muller Henri Intelligent monitoring system for bank safe deposit room - uses microcomputer to cyclically interrogate individual box lock detectors and to test for abnormal numbers or frequency of openings
US4583082A (en) 1983-06-09 1986-04-15 Igt Optical door interlock
US4650990A (en) 1984-08-16 1987-03-17 Joensson Nils Processor-controlled light screen wherein light beam carries coded signals
US4742337A (en) 1985-08-28 1988-05-03 Telenot Electronic Gmbh Light-curtain area security system
US4812810A (en) 1988-01-25 1989-03-14 Whirlpool Corporation Fiber optic door sensor for a domestic appliance
US4841283A (en) 1987-12-21 1989-06-20 Southern Steel Company Security hinge utilizing concealed radiative sensing to detect hinge position
US4903009A (en) 1988-05-18 1990-02-20 Eastman Kodak Company Intrusion detection device
US4965551A (en) 1988-12-05 1990-10-23 Richard Box Burglar alarm system for multi-unit mailboxes
US5015840A (en) 1990-01-09 1991-05-14 Scientific Technologies Incorporated Self-checking light curtain system and method of operation
US5063288A (en) 1989-08-23 1991-11-05 Hsu Chi Hsueh Apparatus for securing a confined space with a laser emission
US5111184A (en) 1991-02-25 1992-05-05 Atlantic Research Corporation Tamper-proof device for detecting opening and closing of a secure container
US5134386A (en) 1991-01-31 1992-07-28 Arbus Inc. Intruder detection system and method
US5138299A (en) 1991-03-07 1992-08-11 Honeywell Inc. Showcase alarm system
GB2253727A (en) * 1991-03-05 1992-09-16 Terrence John Keating Drawer monitoring apparatus
US5198799A (en) * 1991-09-26 1993-03-30 Allied-Signal Inc. Opto-electronic security fence

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AT395632B (en) † 1988-05-06 1993-02-25 Keba Gmbh & Co LOCKER SYSTEM WITH SEVERAL LOCKERS

Patent Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3816745A (en) 1972-11-20 1974-06-11 Innovation Ind Inc Optically-coupled sensing and control system
US3875403A (en) 1973-02-27 1975-04-01 Lars Erik Svensson Light beam apparatus
US3987428A (en) 1975-06-16 1976-10-19 The Raymond Lee Organization, Inc. Optical laser security system
US4319332A (en) 1978-04-28 1982-03-09 Zellweger Uster Ltd. Method and apparatus for space monitoring by means of pulsed directional beam
US4324977A (en) 1979-03-08 1982-04-13 Brauer Malcolm M Synthesized target system
US4266124A (en) 1979-08-10 1981-05-05 Data Instruments, Inc. Photoelectric object detector system
US4390867A (en) 1981-08-03 1983-06-28 James Queren Burglar alarm system
FR2526474A1 (en) * 1982-05-04 1983-11-10 Muller Henri Intelligent monitoring system for bank safe deposit room - uses microcomputer to cyclically interrogate individual box lock detectors and to test for abnormal numbers or frequency of openings
US4583082A (en) 1983-06-09 1986-04-15 Igt Optical door interlock
US4650990A (en) 1984-08-16 1987-03-17 Joensson Nils Processor-controlled light screen wherein light beam carries coded signals
US4742337A (en) 1985-08-28 1988-05-03 Telenot Electronic Gmbh Light-curtain area security system
US4841283A (en) 1987-12-21 1989-06-20 Southern Steel Company Security hinge utilizing concealed radiative sensing to detect hinge position
US4812810A (en) 1988-01-25 1989-03-14 Whirlpool Corporation Fiber optic door sensor for a domestic appliance
US4903009A (en) 1988-05-18 1990-02-20 Eastman Kodak Company Intrusion detection device
US4965551A (en) 1988-12-05 1990-10-23 Richard Box Burglar alarm system for multi-unit mailboxes
US5063288A (en) 1989-08-23 1991-11-05 Hsu Chi Hsueh Apparatus for securing a confined space with a laser emission
US5015840A (en) 1990-01-09 1991-05-14 Scientific Technologies Incorporated Self-checking light curtain system and method of operation
US5015840B1 (en) 1990-01-09 1995-04-11 Scient Technologies Inc Self-checking light curtain system and method of operation.
US5134386A (en) 1991-01-31 1992-07-28 Arbus Inc. Intruder detection system and method
US5111184A (en) 1991-02-25 1992-05-05 Atlantic Research Corporation Tamper-proof device for detecting opening and closing of a secure container
GB2253727A (en) * 1991-03-05 1992-09-16 Terrence John Keating Drawer monitoring apparatus
US5138299A (en) 1991-03-07 1992-08-11 Honeywell Inc. Showcase alarm system
US5198799A (en) * 1991-09-26 1993-03-30 Allied-Signal Inc. Opto-electronic security fence

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2130519T5 (en) 2003-10-16
DE69507485D1 (en) 1999-03-04
ES2130519T3 (en) 1999-07-01
ATE176070T1 (en) 1999-02-15
EP0772166B1 (en) 1999-01-20
EP0772166B2 (en) 2003-02-12
DE69507485T2 (en) 1999-09-02
HK1010001A1 (en) 1999-06-11
DE69507485T3 (en) 2003-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5504325A (en) System for monitoring a multiplicity of doors using multiple optical transceivers mounted on each door
US5742238A (en) System for communication between a central controller and items in a factory using infrared light
CA2107610C (en) Personnel and equipment locator system
MX2007012001A (en) Generic radio transmission network for door applications.
US6218967B1 (en) Arrangement for the optical remote control of apparatus
AU658857B2 (en) Electronic identification system
US5627524A (en) Infrared locator system
ATE193273T1 (en) ELEVATOR SYSTEM WITH DETECTION DEVICE
CN102183937B (en) Intelligent monitoring system for confidential documents based on radio frequency identification (RFID)
CN101523453A (en) Sensor fusion for RFID accuracy
BR9205419A (en) Electronic identification system with automatic remote response capability and automatic identification control process for the same
CN101599186A (en) Traveler self-help transit control system
EP0635800A1 (en) System and device for the transfer of vehicle data
EP0772166A1 (en) A system for monitoring a multiplicity of doors
CN202351685U (en) Subway automatic frequency control (AFC) passenger traffic control system
US4625100A (en) Coded data carrier and reader and electronic security tour system employing same
CN207816340U (en) Intelligent integrated sensor and articles from the storeroom detecting system
JPS63184892A (en) Managing system for identifying human being and object
JP2001006008A (en) Entrance and exit management system outputting slip
KR20220111368A (en) Intelligent smart farm management apparatus and system thereof
JPS62235101A (en) Stocker system
CN101111868A (en) Method and system for control and registration of personnel movement between any number of points
BE1012388A6 (en) Control element and device for carrying out a check with the aid of such acontrol element
EP0766488A3 (en) Method for coupling of data processing units, method for controlling an exchange, data processing unit, control device and exchange
JPH06168366A (en) Method for managing moving object

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19971104

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19980424

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19990120

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990120

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 176070

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19990215

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69507485

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19990304

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: STUDIO TORTA S.R.L.

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990420

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990421

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: BANKOM SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD.

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG

NLT2 Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin

Owner name: BANKOM SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2130519

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: KEBA AG

Effective date: 19991020

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: KEBA AG

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20010918

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20011026

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20021027

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20021028

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20030212

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AEN

Free format text: AUFRECHTERHALTUNG DES PATENTES IN GEAENDERTER FORM

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition

Effective date: 20030212

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
NLR3 Nl: receipt of modified translations in the netherlands language after an opposition procedure
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: DC2A

Date of ref document: 20030509

Kind code of ref document: T5

ET3 Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Payment date: 20031028

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20031028

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20031030

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20031030

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20031031

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20031031

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20031103

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20031105

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20031128

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041027

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041027

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041031

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041031

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *BANKOM SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD

Effective date: 20041031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050501

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050630

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20050501

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051027

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20041028

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *BANKOM SECURITY SYSTEMS LTD

Effective date: 20041031