EP0648606B1

EP0648606B1 - Drop-on dermand ink-jet head apparatus and method

Info

Publication number: EP0648606B1
Application number: EP94307663A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Laurent A. Regimbal; Ronald F. Burr
Original assignee: Tektronix Inc
Current assignee: Tektronix Inc
Priority date: 1993-10-19
Filing date: 1994-10-19
Publication date: 1998-07-01
Anticipated expiration: 2014-10-19
Also published as: DE69411347T2; DE69411347D1; EP0648606A3; EP0648606A2; JPH07178926A; JP3099653B2

Description

This invention relates to ink-jet printing and more particularly to a method and an apparatus for ejecting ink drops from an ink-jet head at substantially constant ejection velocities over a wide range of ejection repetition rates.

There are previously known apparatus and methods for ejecting ink drops from an ink-jet print head at a high repetition rate. The physical laws governing ink-jet drop formation and ejection are complexly interactive. Therefore, U.S. Pat. No. 4,730,197, issued March 8, 1988 for an IMPULSE INK JET SYSTEM describes and characterizes numerous interactions among ink-jet geometric features, transducer drive waveforms, ink meniscus and pressure chamber resonance, and ink drop ejection characteristics. A multiple-orifice print head is thereafter described in which "dummy channels" and compliant chamber walls are provided to minimize drop nonuniformity caused by jet-to-jet cross-talk. Increased drop ejection rates are achieved with piezoelectric transducer ("PZT") drive waveform compensation techniques that account for print head resonances, fluidic resonances, and past droplet timing compensation. The adaptive PZT drive waveform circuitry and complex ink-jet head structures achieve drop ejection rates "up to and including seven KHz."

U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,177, issued December 8, 1992, for a METHOD OF OPERATING AN INK JET TO ACHIEVE HIGH PRINT QUALITY AND HIGH PRINT RATE, assigned to the assignee of the present application, describes PZT drive waveforms having a spectral energy distribution that is minimized at the "dominant acoustic resonant frequency". The dominant frequency is described as including any of the meniscus resonance frequency, Helmholtz resonance frequency, PZT drive resonance frequency, and various acoustic resonance frequencies of the different channels and passageways forming the ink-jet print head. Suppressing PZT energy at the ink-jet outlet channel resonant frequency is said to produce a constant ink drop volume and ejection velocity at drop ejection rates up to 10 KHz.

Subjecting ink drops to an electric field is known to increase ink drop ejection repetition rate as described in copending European Patent EP-A-437062 (corresponding to U.S. Pat. Application No. 07/892494 of Roy et al., filed June 3, 1992, for METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRINTING WITH A DROP-ON-DEMAND INK-JET PRINT HEAD USING AN ELECTRIC FIELD). A time invariant electric field provides time-to-paper compensation for ink drops of different volumes, provides a wider range of drop volume ejection, and provides ink drop injection with decreased PZT drive energy, thereby allowing an increased maximum drop ejection rate of "up to eight KHz or greater". Unfortunately, the electric field apparatus adds complexity, cost, and shock hazard. Reliability and print quality are possible problems because the electric field attracts dust.

What is needed, therefore, is a simple, ink-jet print head system that provides substantially constant ink drop ejection velocity, without using an electric field, for ink drops ejected at rates ranging from zero to beyond 13,000 drops per second.

An object of this invention is, therefore, to provide an ink-jet apparatus and printing method for ejecting ink drops from an ink-jet head at substantially constant ejection velocities over a wide range of ejection repetition rates.

Another object of this invention is to provide an improved method of driving a conventional ink-jet head to enhance its jetting performance without requiring an electric field.

According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided an apparatus for ejecting a fluid from an orifice, the apparatus comprising a pressure chamber fluidically coupled to a fluid manifold by an inlet channel and to the orifice by an outlet channel, a transducer driver generating an energy input; a transducer coupled to the pressure chamber to excite in the orifice a modal meniscus shape in response to the energy input, the energy input having a spectral energy distribution which is concentrated around a dominant resonant frequency of the affected fluid mass in the apparatus, excluding the fluid in the fluid manifold, and which is substantially reduced around resonant frequencies of the inlet channel and the outlet channel; whereby a drop of the fluid is ejected at an ejection velocity from the orifice in response to the energy input.

According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of ejecting an ink drop from an orifice of an individual ink-jet apparatus having a pressure chamber that is fluidically coupled to an ink manifold by an inlet channel and to an orifice by an outlet channel, the method comprising providing a source of energy input; adjusting the source of energy to concentrate a spectral energy contents of the energy input around a dominant resonant frequency of an affected fluid mass in the ink-jet apparatus, excluding the ink in the ink-jet manifold; adjusting the source of energy to suppress the spectral energy content of the energy input near resonant frequencies of the inlet channel and the outlet channel; and connecting the energy input to a transducer coupled to the pressure chamber to eject from the orifice an ink drop having an ejection velocity.

It is an advantage that the invention provides for ejection of ink drops that have substantially the same ejection velocity over a wide range of ejection repetition rates, thereby providing high-resolution, high-speed printing.

It is another advantage that the invention provides drive waveform shaping principles usable to enhance the jetting performance of conventional ink-jet heads.

Additional objects and advantages of this invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment thereof that proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Fig. 1 is a diagrammatical cross-sectional view of a PZT-driven ink-jet representative of one found in a typical ink-jet array print head of a type used with this invention.

Figs. 2A, 2B, and 2C are enlarged pictorial cross-sectional views of an orifice portion of the print head of Fig. 1 showing illustrative orifice fluid flow operational modes zero, one, and two to which this invention could be applied.

Fig. 3 is a schematic block diagram showing the electrical interconnections of a prior art apparatus used to generate a PZT drive waveform according to this invention.

Fig. 4 is a waveform diagram showing a preferred electrical voltage versus timing relationship of a PZT drive waveform used to produce ink drops at a high repetition rate in a manner according to this invention.

Fig. 5 graphically shows spectral energy as a function of frequency for the PZT drive waveform shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 6 graphically compares ink drop time-to-paper as a function of drop ejection rate for ink drops ejected with a prior art PZT drive waveform that does not suppress energy at the frequency of an inlet channel and with the preferred drive waveform (160) shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of an ink-jet 10 that is part of a multiple-orifice ink-jet print head suitable for use with the invention. Ink-jet 10 has a body that defines an ink manifold 12 through which ink is delivered to the ink-jet print head. The body also defines an ink drop forming orifice 14 together with an ink flow path from ink manifold 12 to orifice 14. In general, the ink-jet print head preferably includes an array of orifices 14 that are closely spaced from one another for use in printing drops of ink onto a print medium (not shown).

A typical color ink-jet print head has at least four manifolds for receiving black, cyan, magenta, and yellow ink for use in black and color printing. However, the number of such manifolds may be varied depending upon whether a printer is designed to print solely in black ink or with less than a full range of color. Ink flows from manifold 12, through an inlet port 16, an inlet channel 18, a pressure chamber port 20, and into an ink pressure chamber 22. Ink leaves pressure chamber 22 by way of an offset channel port 24, flows through an optional offset channel 26 and an outlet channel 28 to nozzle 14, from which ink drops are ejected.

Ink pressure chamber 22 is bounded on one side by a flexible diaphragm 34. An electromechanical transducer 32, such as a PZT, is secured to diaphragm 30 by an appropriate adhesive and overlays ink pressure chamber 22. In a conventional manner, transducer 32 has metal film layers 34 to which an electronic transducer driver is electrically connected. Although other forms of transducers may be used, transducer 32 is operated in its bending mode such that when a voltage is applied across metal film layers 34, transducer 32 attempts to change its dimensions. However, because it is securely and rigidly attached to the diaphragm, transducer 32 bends, deforming diaphragm 30, thereby displacing ink in ink pressure chamber 22, causing the outward flow of ink through passage 26 to nozzle 14. Refill of ink pressure chamber 22 following the ejection of an ink drop is augmented by reverse bending of transducer 34 and the concomitant movement of diaphragm 30.

To facilitate manufacture of the ink-jet print head usable with the present invention, ink-jet 10 is preferably formed of multiple laminated plates or sheets, such as of stainless steel. These sheets are stacked in a superimposed relationship. In the illustrated Fig. 1 embodiment of the present invention, these sheets or plates include a diaphragm plate 40 that forms diaphragm 30; an ink pressure chamber plate 42 that defines ink pressure chamber 22; a separator plate 44 that defines pressure chamber port 20, bounds one side of ink pressure chamber 22, and defines a portion of outlet channel port 24; an inlet channel plate 46 that defines inlet channel 18 and a portion of outlet channel port 24; another separator plate 48 that defines inlet port 16 and portions of outlet channel port 24 and manifold 12; an offset channel plate 50 that defines offset channel 26 and a portion of manifold 12; a separator plate 52 that defines portions of outlet channel 28 and manifold 12; an outlet plate 54 that defines a portion of outlet channel 28; and an orifice plate 56 that defines orifice 14 of the ink-jet.

More or fewer plates than those illustrated may be used to define the various ink flow passageways, manifolds, and pressure chambers of the ink-jet print head. For example, multiple plates may be used to define an ink pressure chamber instead of the single plate illustrated in Fig. 1. Also, not all of the various features need be in separate sheets or layers of metal. For example, patterns in the photoresist that are used as templates for chemically etching the metal (if chemical etching is used in manufacturing) could be different on each side of a metal sheet. Thus, as a more specific example, the pattern for the ink inlet passage could be placed on one side of the metal sheet while the pattern for the pressure chamber could be placed on the other side and in registration front to back. Thus, with carefully controlled etching, separate ink inlet passage and pressure chamber containing layers could be combined into one common layer.

To minimize fabrication costs, all of the metal layers of the ink-jet print head, except orifice plate 56, are designed so that they may be fabricated using relatively inexpensive conventional photo-patterning and etching processes in metal sheet stock. Machining or other metal working processes are not required. Orifice plate 56 has been made successfully using any number of processes, including electroforming with a sulfumate nickel bath, micro-electric discharge machining in 300 series stainless steel, and punching 300 series stainless steel, the last two approaches being used in concert with photo-patterning and etching all of the features of orifice plate 56 except the orifices themselves. Another suitable approach is to punch the orifices and use a standard blanking process to form any remaining features in the plate.

Table 1 shows acceptable dimensions for the ink-jet of Fig. 1. The actual dimensions employed are a function of the ink-jet array and its packaging for a specific application. For example, the orifice diameter of the orifices 14 in orifice plate 56 may vary from about 25 microns to about 150 microns.

All dimensions in millimeters
Feature	Length	Width	Height	Cross Section
Inlet port	0.2	.41	.41	Circular
Inlet channel	6.4	.30	0.2	Rectangular
Pressure chamber port	.2	.41	.41	Circular
Pressure chamber	.2	2.20	2.20	Circular
Offset channel port	0.8	.41	.41	Circular
Offset channel	2.1	.41	.81	Rectangular
Outlet separator	.2	.36	.36	Circular
Outlet channel	.2	.25	.25	Circular
Orifice	.08	.08	.08	Circular

The electromechanical transducer mechanism selected for the ink-jet print heads of the present invention can comprise hexagonally kerfed ceramic transducers bonded with epoxy to the diaphragm plate 40, with each of the transducers being centered over a respective ink pressure chamber 22. For this type of transducer mechanism, the hexagonal shape is substantially circular, a shape which has the highest electromechanical efficiency with regard to volume displacement for a given area of the piezoceramic element.

Ejecting ink drops having controllable volumes from an ink-jet head such as that of Fig. 1 entails providing from transducer driver 36, multiple selectable drive waveforms to transducer 32. Transducer 32 responds to the selected waveform by inducing pressure waves in the ink that cause ink fluid flow in orifice 14.

Referring to Figs. 2A, 2B, and 2C, an ink column 60 having a meniscus 62 is shown positioned in orifice 14. Meniscus 62 is shown excited in three operational modes, referred to respectively as modes zero, one, and two in Figs. 2A, 2B, and 2C. Fig. 2C shows a center excursion Ce of the meniscus surface of a high order oscillation mode.

In Fig. 2A, operational mode zero corresponds to a bulk forward displacement of ink column 60 within a wall 64 of orifice 14. Prior workers have based ink-jet and drive waveform design on mode zero operation but have failed to fully exploit its possibilities. Ink surface tension and viscous boundary layer effects associated with wall 64 cause meniscus 62 to have a characteristic rounded shape indicating the lack of higher order modes. The natural resonant frequency of mode zero is primarily determined by the bulk motion of the ink mass interacting with the compression of the ink inside the ink-jet (i.e., like a Helmholtz oscillator in which a "capacitive" pressure chamber 22 forms a parallel resonant circuit with "inductive" inlet channel 18 and combined

outlet channel structures

24, 26, 28, and orifice 14. The geometric dimensions of the various fluidically coupled ink-jet components, such as the

channels

18, 26, and 28; the manifold 12; the

part

16, 20, and 22; and the pressure chamber 22, all of Fig. 1, are sized to avoid extraneous or parasitic resonant frequencies that would interact with the orifice resonance modes.

Designing drive waveforms suitable for constant drop ejection velocity over a wide range of ejection rates requires knowledge of the natural frequencies of the system elements so that a waveform can be designed that concentrates energy at frequencies near the natural frequency of the desired mode and suppresses energy at the natural frequencies of other mode(s) and extraneous or parasitic resonant frequencies that compete with the desired mode for energy. These extraneous or parasitic resonant frequencies adversely affect the ejection of ink droplets from the ink-jet orifice in several ways, including, but not limited to, ink drop size and the drop speed or the time it takes the drop to reach the print media once ejected from the orifice, thereby also affecting the drop placement accuracy on the media.

To design the waveform used to operate ink-jet 10 of Fig. 1, we must know the fundamental resonant frequencies of inlet channel 18 and the combined outlet channel structures that include offset channel port 24, offset channel 26, outlet channel 28, and orifice 14.

Using basic organ-pipe frequency calculations, and assuming that manifold 12 and ink pressure chamber 22 act as constant pressure boundaries, the approximate resonant frequency of inlet channel can be calculated using the equation f=a/2L, where "a" is the velocity of sound in a fluid and "L" is the inlet channel length. In like manner for the combined outlet channel structures, assuming that orifice 14 behaves as a closed (zero velocity) boundary, the approximate resonant frequency of the combined outlet channel structures can be calculated using the equation f=a/4L.

Referring to Table 1, ink-jet 10 has an inlet channel length of about 6.35 millimeters and an a combined outlet channel length of about 3.50 millimeters. The speed of sound in a fluid is about 1,000 meters per second. Therefore, the inlet resonant frequency is approximately 79 KHz and the outlet resonant frequency is approximately 73 KHz.

The foregoing theory has been applied in practice together with the fluid flow theory to design PZT drive waveforms for ink-jet 10. The electrical waveforms generated by transducer driver 36 concentrate energy in the frequency range of the desired mode while suppressing energy in other competing modes and at the resonant frequencies of the inlet and outlet channel structures of ink jet 10.

Fig. 3 diagrammatically shows a conventional apparatus representative of transducer driver 36 that is suitable for generating PZT drive waveforms according to this invention. Of course, other waveform generators may be employed.

A processor 100 provides a trigger pulse to negative pulse timer 102 that drives a field-effect transistor 104 such that a resistor network 106 is electrically connected to a negative voltage source -V_o for a time period determined by processor 100.

When negative pulse timer 102 times out, a wait period timer 108 is triggered for a wait time period determined by processor 100. When wait period timer 108 times out, a positive pulse timer 110 drives a field-effect transistor 112 such that resistor network 106 is electrically connected to a positive voltage source +V_o for a time period determined by processor 100.

Resistor network 106 is electrically disconnected from voltage sources +V_o and -V_o during periods when

timers

102 and 110 are inactive or when timer 108 is active. A bipolar electrical drive is thereby produced that is electrically connected through resistor network 106 to metal one of film layers 34 of transducer 32.

Resistor network 106 includes a series resistor 114 having a value ranging between 5,000 and 6,000 ohms and a shunt resistor 116 having a value of about 5,560 ohms. Series resistor 114 is trimmed to a value that establishes a predetermined drop ejection velocity from ink jet 10 as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,212,497, issued May 18, 1993 for ARRAY JET VELOCITY NORMALIZATION, which is assigned to the assignee of this application. This application is not directly concerned with establishing the predetermined ejection velocity, but rather describes how to maintain a substantially constant ejection velocity over a wide range of drop ejection rates.

Fig. 4 shows a preferred PZT drive waveform 160 that provides a substantially constant mode zero drop ejection velocity at drop ejection rates approaching 14 KHz. Drive waveform 160 is shaped to concentrate energy around the dominant (Helmholtz) resonant frequency and to suppress energy near the resonant frequencies of input channel 18 and the combined outlet channel structures. Many drive waveform shapes can achieve the same result, but drive waveform 160 achieves the desired result by having transducer driver 36 (Fig. 3) generate a bipolar drive waveform 162 that includes a 12.5-microsecond duration negative 50-volt pulse 164 separated by a 12.5-microsecond wait period 166 from a 12.5-microsecond duration positive 50-volt pulse 168. Suitable drive waveforms may be generated in which each of the above-described pulse durations and wait periods may be in a range from about 4-microseconds to about 30-microseconds.

Pressure transducer 32 has a characteristic capacitance of about 500 picofarads which together with resistor network 106 forms a simple resistance-capacitance ("RC") filter that causes the characteristic rolled-off shape of drive waveform 160. Skilled workers will recognize that other RC value combinations are possible and that bipolar waveform 162 may be suitably adjusted to compensate.

Fig. 5 shows a Fourier series approximation of an energy distribution 170 versus frequency resulting from driving pressure transducer 32 with drive waveform 160. Energy distribution 170 is concentrated at a peak 172 surrounding the 19 KHz dominant resonant frequency of ink-jet 10 and is suppressed at a null 174 near the respective inlet and outlet channel resonant frequencies of 79 KHz and 73 KHz.

Fig. 6 graphically compares the jetting performance that results from driving ink-jet 10 with a prior art waveform and with preferred drive waveform 160 of Fig. 4. The prior art drive waveform was shaped as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,177 to concentrate energy around a 19 KHz dominant frequency but to minimize energy only at the 73 KHz resonant frequency of the outlet channel. The prior art waveform results when transducer driver 36 (Fig. 3) generates a bipolar drive waveform having a 12.0-microsecond duration negative 50-volt pulse separated by a 3.0-microsecond wait period from an 11.0-microsecond duration positive 50-volt pulse.

Ink-jet 10 was driven with the prior art waveform and the time required for ejected ink drops to travel from orifice 14 to a print medium spaced 0.81 millimeter away was recorded versus the drop ejection rate. A curve 180 shows that 100-microsecond time-to-media variations result when ink-jet 10 is driven by the prior art waveform over a range of ejection rates from one to 10 KHz. The 50 percent time-to-media variation can cause drop placement errors that limit printing speed in high-resolution printing applications.

Ink-jet 10 was then driven with preferred drive waveform 160, and the time required for ejected ink drops to travel from orifice 14 to a print medium spaced 0.81 millimeter away was again recorded versus the drop ejection rate. A curve 182 shows that 65-microsecond time-to-media variations result when ink-jet 10 is driven by preferred drive waveform 160 over a range of ejection rates from one to 13 KHz. Time-to-media variations of 40 microseconds result if ink-jet 10 is limited to an ejection rate of 12.5 KHz. The resulting 20 to 30 percent time-to-media variations represent a 50 percent variation improvement combined with a 25 percent to 30 percent drop ejection rate improvement.

High-speed, high-resolution printing applications may likewise be improved by using transducer drive waveforms designed and shaped according to the principles described in this application.

Alternative embodiments of portions of this invention include, for example, its applicability to jetting various fluid types including, but not limited to, aqueous and phase-change inks of various colors.

Skilled workers will realize that waveforms other than waveform 160 can achieve the desired results and that a spectrum analyzer or fast-Fourier-transform displaying oscilloscope may be used to view a resulting energy spectrum while shaping a waveform to achieve a predetermined energy distribution. Moreover, filtering other than RC filtering, or no filtering at all may be employed to achieve the desired drive waveform energy distribution.

It should be noted that this invention is useful in combination with various prior art techniques including dithering and electric field drop acceleration to provide further enhanced image quality and drop placement accuracy.

In summary, the invention is amenable to any fluid jetting drive mechanism and architecture capable of providing the required drive waveform energy distribution to a suitable orifice.

It will be obvious to skilled workers that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments of this invention without departing from the underlying principles thereof. For example, electromechanical transducers other than the PZT bending-mode type described may be used. Shear-mode, annular constrictive, electrostrictive, electromagnetic, and magnetostrictive transducers are suitable alternatives. Similarly, although described in terms of electrical energy waveforms to drive the transducers, any other suitable energy form could be used to actuate the transducer, such as, but not limited to, acoustical or microwave energy. Where electrical waveforms are employed, the desired energy distribution can be equally well established by unipolar or bipolar pairs or groups of pulses. Accordingly, it will be appreciated that this invention is, therefore, applicable to fluid ejection applications other than those found in ink-jet printers.

Claims

An apparatus for ejecting a fluid from an orifice (14), the apparatus comprising a pressure chamber (22) fluidically coupled to a fluid manifold (12) by an inlet channel (18) and to the orifice (14) by an outlet channel (24, 26, 28), a transducer driver generating an energy input; a transducer (32) coupled to the pressure chamber (22) to excite in the orifice (14) a modal meniscus shape in response to the energy input, the energy input having a spectral energy distribution which is concentrated around a dominant resonant frequency of the affected fluid mass in the apparatus, excluding the fluid in the fluid manifold (12), and which is substantially reduced around resonant frequencies of the inlet channel (18) and the outlet channel (24, 26, 28); whereby a drop of the fluid is ejected at an ejection velocity from the orifice (14) in response to the energy input.
An apparatus as claimed in Claim 1 in which the modal meniscus shape is a mode zero type, a mode one type and a mode two type.
An apparatus as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2 in which the dominant resonant frequency is a Helmholtz resonance resulting from co-action among the pressure chamber (22), the inlet channel (18), the outlet channel (24, 26, 28) and the orifice (14).
An apparatus as claimed in Claim 3 in which the outlet path from the pressure chamber (22) to the orifice (14) is formed from outlet channel (24) and outlet channel (28) and optionally offset channel (26), said channels being formed by separator plate (48), outlet plate (54) and optionally offset channel plate (50) when offset channel (26) is included.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim in which the energy input is repetitively applied to actuate the transducer (32) in a repetition rate range of from 1 KHz to at least about 15 KHz and in which the drop ejection velocity remains substantially constant over the range.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim in which the energy input is an electrical waveform.
An apparatus as claimed in Claim 6 in which the character of the electrical waveform is established by a bipolar pair of pulses separated by a wait period.
An apparatus as claimed in Claim 6 or Claim 7 in which the transducer driver (36) includes a processor that causes repetitive generation of the electrical waveform such that the drops of fluid are ejected at a drop ejection rate ranging from 1,000 to at least about 15,000 drops per second.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim in which the transducer (32) is of a piezoelectric type.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim in which the orifice (14) is an ink-jet orifice and the fluid is ink.
A method for ejecting an ink drop from an orifice of an individual ink-jet apparatus having a pressure chamber (22) that is fluidically coupled to an ink manifold (12) by an inlet channel (18) and to an orifice (14) by an outlet channel (24, 26, 28), the method comprising providing a source of energy input; adjusting the source of energy to concentrate a spectral energy content of the energy input around a dominant resonant frequency of an affected fluid mass in the ink-jet apparatus, excluding the ink in the ink-jet manifold (12); adjusting the source of energy to suppress the spectral energy content of the energy input near resonant frequencies of the inlet channel (18) and the outlet channel (24, 26, 28); and connecting the energy input to a transducer (32) coupled to the pressure chamber (22) to eject from the orifice (14) an ink drop having an ejection velocity.
A method as claimed in Claim 11 in which the dominant resonant frequency is a Helmholtz resonance resulting from co-action among the pressure chamber (22), the inlet channel (18), the outlet channel (24, 26, 28), and the orifice (14).
A method as claimed in Claim 12 and including the step of forming the outlet path from the pressure chamber (22) to the orifice (14) formed from outlet channel (24) and outlet channel (28) and optionally offset channel (26), said channels being formed by separator plate (48), outlet plate (54) and optionally offset channel plate (50) when offset channel (26) is included.
A method as claimed in any one of Claims 11 to 13 and including the step of applying the energy input repetitively to the transducer (32) at a repetition rate within a range of from 1 KHz to at least about 15 KHz, wherein the drop ejection velocity remains substantially constant over the repetition rate range.
A method as claimed in any one of Claims 11 to 14 in which the generating step comprises generating an electrical waveform.
A method as claimed in Claim 15 and including the step of shaping the electrical waveform with an RC network.
A method as claimed in Claim 15 or Claim 16 in which the generating step comprises forming an electrical pulse having a first relative voltage polarity and a first duration; waiting a predetermined time period; and forming an electrical pulse having a second relative voltage polarity and a second duration.
A method as claimed in Claim 17, in which the first and second time durations and the predetermined time period are all substantially equal.
A method as claimed in Claim 17 or Claim 18 in which the first and second time durations and the predetermined time period each range from about 4 microseconds to about 30 microseconds.