CN117828905A - Rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control - Google Patents
Rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117828905A CN117828905A CN202410248709.7A CN202410248709A CN117828905A CN 117828905 A CN117828905 A CN 117828905A CN 202410248709 A CN202410248709 A CN 202410248709A CN 117828905 A CN117828905 A CN 117828905A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- rolling
- objective function
- steps
- population
- carrying
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 198
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 83
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 101100272279 Beauveria bassiana Beas gene Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002436 steel type Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 19
- 238000005265 energy consumption Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910001566 austenite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000739 chaotic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012938 design process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004836 empirical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001953 recrystallisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003079 width control Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Metal Rolling (AREA)
- Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control, which relates to the technical field of automatic control of steel rolling.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of automatic control of steel rolling, in particular to a rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control.
Background
With the rapid development of national economy, the national living standard is gradually improved, and the requirements for high-quality and high-performance plate and strip materials are increasingly increased. In the hot continuous rolling production process, the three-dimensional size and the internal performance are the most important quality indexes of the product. Therefore, products with excellent three-dimensional size and internal performance are obtained in the production process, and the method has very important significance for various iron and steel enterprises.
In the hot rolling production process, three-dimensional size control and performance control are generally divided into independent setting and control units. For example, for three-dimensional control, there are relatively independent thickness control systems, width control systems, and strip control systems, and control of product properties is provided by a finishing temperature and a coiling temperature control system. The three-dimensional size control and performance control systems are relatively independent, but are actually coupled with each other, and the change or fluctuation of the process parameters can affect the two and affect the final quality of the product. In order to realize high-quality control of products, the invention provides an optimization design method for rolling load distribution based on shape integrated control, and a process design capable of simultaneously ensuring the three-dimensional size and the product performance of the products is obtained through the design of load distribution, so that a good foundation is provided for shape integrated control in the production process.
The design of the rolling load distribution optimization usually adopts an empirical method, such as a rolling reduction distribution coefficient method and an energy consumption curve method. These methods require a large amount of field measurements and empirical data and update the curves as the production environment changes, which is inefficient and does not meet the needs of modern steel rolling production. With the development of computer technology, researchers have performed more efficient load distribution by finding the optimal solution of the objective function. For the design of a single objective function, the process parameters such as rolling force, finish rolling temperature, power or energy consumption and the like can be used as optimization objects to establish a prediction model, for example, a rolling mill load distribution method based on a chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm in China patent CN110751414 optimizes and calculates load through chaotic particle swarm optimization, and equal load distribution is used as the single objective function to calculate. However, as the rolling process becomes finer, it is increasingly difficult for such a single objective function to meet the requirements of the rolling process, and multi-objective optimization methods are becoming more and more important. According to the hot rolling rough rolling load distribution method considering the convexity of the intermediate billet, a multi-objective optimization function based on weight is established according to three single objective functions, namely the convexity of the intermediate billet, power balance and electric power cost, and an optimization algorithm is utilized to calculate the optimal solution of the multi-objective optimization function. The Chinese patent CN107716560 discloses a strip hot continuous rolling load distribution method, which is characterized in that a mathematical model is established by taking power proportionality, minimum energy consumption and good shape as objective functions, and process optimization is designed by solving through a mixed particle swarm optimization algorithm.
The existing method applied to the rolling load distribution optimization has two defects, on one hand, in the design process of the load distribution optimization, the control of the three-dimensional size of the product is more considered, and the control of the product performance is not considered; in the actual rolling process, the austenite grain size can be recrystallized and the grain grows along with the rolling process, and the final austenite grain size determines the internal performance of the product, which is not considered in the current rolling load distribution optimization design; on the other hand, in the load distribution optimization design process, the multi-objective optimization algorithm used by the related research has the phenomena of low solving speed and low solving efficiency, and is easy to sink into local optimization. Therefore, in order to realize the integrated control of the rolling process, optimization must be performed on the design and solving modes of the objective function, and the rolling load distribution optimization must be rapidly performed by improving the convergence and the universality of the solving method.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control.
A rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control specifically comprises the following steps.
Step 1: PDI data, rolling line basic parameters and rolling data in the production plan are determined.
The PDI data comprise steel types, slab sizes and finished product specifications; wherein the steel grade includes: name and chemical composition, slab dimensions include: slab length, width and thickness, finished product specifications include: width and thickness of the finished product.
The basic parameters of the rolling line comprise the number of rough rolling passes and finish rolling frames, the distance between the frames and the diameter of the roller.
Step 2: process constraints and equipment constraints of the rolling process are determined.
The process constraints include:
bite angle constraint:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein the biting condition is a biting angle +.>Representation, deltahFor depression amount->For friction angle>For friction coefficient>Is the radius of the roller;
reduction of each pass of rough rolling or each frame of finish rollingIs limited in a certain range: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is a frame->Maximum rolling reduction of (2);
temperature condition constraints: finish rolling inlet temperature according to production process requirementsFinishing temperature of last stand +.>Within a certain range: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->The minimum finish rolling inlet temperature, the maximum finish rolling inlet temperature, +.>And->The final rolling temperature of the minimum final stand and the final rolling temperature of the maximum final stand are respectively;
the device constraints include:
rolling force limitation: for the frameRolling force->Less than the maximum allowable rolling force: />;
Wherein,is the maximum allowable rolling force;
motor power limit: for the frameCorresponding motor device, motor power->Should be less than the maximum allowable motor power: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is the maximum allowable motor power.
Step 3: a multi-objective function decision variable is determined.
The outlet thickness of each frame for rough rolling each pass and finish rolling each passAs a decision variable; wherein,for the total number of passes>The exit thickness for the n-th pass.
Step 4: and respectively establishing a rolling power objective function, a three-dimensional size objective function and an internal performance objective function.
Step 4.1: the rolling power objective function is established, and the rolling power summation of each pass of rough rolling and each stand of finish rolling is used for representing the rolling piece:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is a rolling power objective function; />The total number of passes; />Is a functional relationship between decision variables and rolling power.
Step 4.2: establishing a three-dimensional size objective function using the rolled piece expressed by the sum of the relative convexity differences of each pass of rough rolling or each stand of finish rolling:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is a three-dimensional size objective function; />The relative convexity of each frame is for rough rolling each pass or finish rolling; />Is the relative convexity of the target; />Is a functional relationship between decision variables and relative convexity differences.
Step 4.3: establishing an internal performance objective function expressed by deviations of the average grain size of the rolled piece from the target size:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is an internal performance objective function; />The average grain size after rolling is +.>;/>The unit is +.about.>;/>Is a functional relationship between decision variables and grain size.
Step 5: and solving a rolling power objective function, a three-dimensional size objective function and an internal performance objective function by using an NSGA-III-DE algorithm to obtain the value of the optimized objective function.
Step 5.1: initializing a population.
Step 5.1.1: determining decision variables: outlet thickness of each pass of rough rolling or each frame of finish rolling。
Step 5.1.2: setting upper and lower limits of decision variables based on outlet thickness of each pass to enable iteration times to be setObtaining the first generation of the powder with the size ofNPIs a parent population of (c).
Step 5.2: generating population sizes ofNPAnd combining the parent and offspring to obtain a size of 2NPIs a new population of (a).
Step 5.3: selecting a previous selection from a new population by a selection mechanism of reference pointsNPIndividual members of the new offspring。
Step 5.3.1: generating a reference point:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For the number of reference points +.>For the purpose ofMark dimension->And->The number of boundary layer and inner layer divisions, respectively.
Step 5.3.2: adaptive normalization of populations.
Step 5.3.2.1: an ideal point is determined.
Step 5.3.2.1.1: selecting a minimum value of an objective function in a current populationAnd constructing ideal points.
Step 5.3.2.1.2: translating the population to make the ideal point as the origin:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->The objective function values before and after translation, respectively.
Step 5.3.2.2: calculating extreme points:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For the extreme point after deformation, < >>Is the unit direction vector of the coordinate axis.
Step 5.3.2.3: and constructing a hyperplane consisting of the ideal point and each extreme point.
Step 5.3.3: individuals in the population are associated with reference points, respectively.
Step 5.3.4: and selecting the reserved individuals according to the association degree of the reference points.
Step 5.4: will beAs a new parent population +.>The operator replaces the mutation and crossover process of the NSGA-III algorithm to generate a new generation of offspring population and mixes the parent and offspring populations.
Step 5.4.1: variation operation, generation and base vectorVariant individuals corresponding to one by one->:The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For scaling factor +.>And->Is different from +.>Is a subject of (a).
Step 5.4.2: cross operation fromAnd->Cross-generating new individuals->:/>The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For crossover probability->Is a random number.
Step 5.4.3: selecting, namely, base vectors in a populationIndividuals obtained by crossing->And comparing the quality to select the next generation population: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->Individual->And->A corresponding fitness function.
Step 5.5: repeating steps 5.3 to 5.4, and allowingUntil the number of iterations +>Reach maximum iteration number->。
Step 6: and selecting an optimal solution of the rolling power objective function, the three-dimensional size objective function and the internal performance objective function, and obtaining a corresponding load distribution result.
Step 6.1: performing satisfaction sequencing to obtain an optimal target functionNumerical value:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Satisfaction for the objective function; />Is->Mean value of the individual objective function solutions, +.>Is->Standard deviation of individual objective function solutions +.>Is->And the weight coefficient of each objective function solution.
Step 6.2: substituting the value of the decision variable corresponding to the selected optimal solution, namely the optimal objective function value, into the step 4 to obtain a rolling load distribution result comprising the thickness, rolling force, power, temperature, convexity and average grain size of each pass of rough rolling and each stand outlet of finish rolling.
The beneficial effects of adopting above-mentioned technical scheme to produce lie in:
compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects: the invention provides a rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control, which is characterized in that operators are introduced to replace the variation and crossing process of an NSGA-III algorithm, the obtained NSGA-III-DE algorithm is combined with load distribution optimization of hot continuous rolling production, the shape integrated control is considered, a hot continuous rolling full-flow optimization model with minimum power, good shape and minimum final rolling grain size deviation as objective functions is established, and the outlet thickness of each rough rolling pass and each finish rolling frame is used as decision variables to optimize load distribution. The effectiveness of the NSGA-III-DE optimization algorithm is proved by comparing the optimization results obtained by different methods, and the method can provide assistance for the production of hot rolled plate strip products.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a hot continuous rolling line according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a flowchart of the overall design method for optimizing rolling load distribution according to the embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an embodiment of the present invention employing NSGA-III-DE.
Detailed Description
The following describes in further detail the embodiments of the present invention with reference to the drawings and examples. The following examples are illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
A rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control adopts a typical hot continuous rolling production line in the embodiment, the arrangement form is shown in fig. 1, the whole flow chart is shown in fig. 2, and the method specifically comprises the following steps.
Step 1: PDI data, rolling line basic parameters and rolling data in the production plan are determined.
The PDI data includes steel grade, slab size, and finished product specifications.
Wherein the steel grade includes: name and chemical composition, slab dimensions include: slab length, width and thickness, finished product specifications include: width and thickness of the finished product.
The basic parameters of the rolling line comprise the number of rough rolling passes and finish rolling frames, the distance between the frames and the diameter of the roller.
The PDI data in this example are shown in table 1 and the mill pass line base parameters are shown in table 2.
TABLE 1 PDI data sheet
Sequence number | Content | Numerical value | Unit (B) |
1 | Name of steel grade | Q235B | - |
2 | Slab size | 9600×1500×250 | mm×mm×mm |
3 | Size of finished product | 1500×3.0 | mm×mm |
4 | Mn | 0.34 | % |
5 | C | 0.16 | % |
6 | Si | 0.10 | % |
7 | Al | 0.03 | % |
8 | Cr | 0.01 | % |
Table 2 basic parameter table of rolling line
Sequence number | Content | Numerical value | Unit (B) |
1 | Number of rough rolling passes | 6 | - |
2 | Number of finishing stands | 6 | - |
3 | Roughing stand spacing | 5.5 | m |
4 | Finishing mill stand spacing | 5.5 | m |
5 | Diameter of roughing roll | 1197 | mm |
6 | Diameter of finish rolling roll | 761 | mm |
Step 2: process constraints and equipment constraints of the rolling process are determined.
The process constraints include:
bite angle constraint:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein the biting condition is a biting angle +.>Representation, deltahFor the reduction in mm, ++>For friction angle>For friction coefficient>The radius of the roller is in mm;
reduction of each pass of rough rolling or each frame of finish rollingIs limited in a certain range: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is a frame->Maximum rolling reduction of (2);
temperature condition constraints: finish rolling inlet temperature according to production process requirementsFinishing temperature of last stand +.>Within a certain range: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->The minimum finish rolling inlet temperature and the maximum finish rolling inlet temperature are respectively expressed in DEG C, +.>And->The final rolling temperature of the minimum final stand and the final rolling temperature of the maximum final stand are respectively in the unit of DEG C;
the device constraints include:
rolling force limitation: the rolling force meets the requirements of hydraulic equipment and aims at the frameRolling force->Less than the maximum allowable rolling force:/>;
Wherein,the maximum allowable rolling force is given in kN;
motor power limit: the rolling power meets the load requirement of the motor and aims at the frameCorresponding motor device, motor power->Should be less than the maximum allowable motor power: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>The maximum allowable motor power is in kW.
The limiting conditions in this example are shown in table 3.
TABLE 3 Process equipment limitation table
Sequence number | Content | Numerical value | Unit (B) |
1 | Coefficient of friction | 0.26 | - |
2 | Maximum rolling reduction | 55% | - |
3 | Maximum finish rolling inlet temperature | 1070 | °C |
4 | Minimum finish rolling inlet temperature | 970 | °C |
5 | Maximum finishing temperature | 910 | °C |
6 | Minimum finishing temperature | 850 | °C |
7 | Maximum allowable rolling force | 44000 | kN |
8 | Maximum allowable motor power | 8000 | kW |
Step 3: a multi-objective function decision variable is determined.
The outlet thickness of each frame for rough rolling each pass and finish rolling each passAs decision variables.
Wherein,for the total number of passes>The exit thickness in mm is the n-th pass.
Step 4: and respectively establishing a rolling power objective function, a three-dimensional size objective function and an internal performance objective function.
Step 4.1: the rolling power objective function is established, and the rolling power summation of each pass of rough rolling and each stand of finish rolling is used for representing the rolling piece:
。
wherein,is a rolling power objective function; />The total number of passes; />Is a functional relationship between decision variables and rolling power.
In this embodiment, n=12, and has the following formula:
,/>。
wherein,the rolling moment of each pass of rough rolling or each stand of finish rolling is N.m; />The unit is rad/min for rough rolling each pass or finish rolling each frame rotation speed.
Step 4.2: establishing a three-dimensional size objective function using the rolled piece expressed by the sum of the relative convexity differences of each pass of rough rolling or each stand of finish rolling:
。
wherein,is a three-dimensional size objective function; />The relative convexity of each frame is for rough rolling each pass or finish rolling; />Is the relative convexity of the target; />A functional relationship between the decision variable and the relative convexity difference; in this embodiment, the following formula is provided:
,/>,/>。
wherein,and->Convexity and outlet thickness of each frame of finish rolling, mm, < >>And->The final product was taken to be 0.04mm and 3.0mm for the target convexity and target thickness, respectively.
In this embodiment, the change of the thickness of the strip steel mainly occurs in the rough rolling stage, and the rolling reduction of each stand is required to be reasonably distributed in the finish rolling stage, so that the relative convexity value of the strip steel is more approximate to the relative convexity of the target product, and therefore, the three-dimensional size objective function only considers the finish rolling 6 stands.
Step 4.3: establishing an internal performance objective function expressed by deviations of the average grain size of the rolled piece from the target size:。
wherein,is an internal performance objective function; />The average grain size after rolling is +.>;/>The unit is +.about.>;/>Is a functional relationship between decision variables and grain size.
In this embodiment, the following formula is provided:
,。
wherein,is the grain size after static recrystallization, the unit is +.>;/>Is carbon equivalent; />Temperature in->;Is the time between passes, the unit is->。
When the Q235B steel is finish rolled, the average grain size is 20The corresponding internal performance index is optimal.
Thus in this embodimentTake 20%>。
Step 5: and solving a rolling power objective function, a three-dimensional size objective function and an internal performance objective function by using an NSGA-III-DE algorithm to obtain the value of the optimized objective function.
The NSGA-III-DE algorithm flow chart is shown in FIG. 3 and the algorithm parameters are set forth in Table 4.
Table 4 parameter setting Table of NSGA-III-DE algorithm
NSGA-III parameters | Numerical value |
Population size | 200 |
Algebra of evolution | 1000 |
Selection mode | Tournament Selection |
Probability of variation | 0.5 |
Crossover probability | 0.3 |
Step 5.1: initializing a population.
Step 5.1.1: determining decision variables: outlet thickness of each pass of rough rolling or each frame of finish rolling。
Step 5.1.2: setting upper and lower limits of decision variables based on outlet thickness of each pass to enable iteration times to be setObtaining the first generation of the powder with the size ofNPIs a parent population of (a); in the present embodimentNP=100。
Step 5.2: generating population sizes ofNPAnd combining the parent and offspring to obtain a size of 2NPIs a new population of (a).
Step 5.3: selecting a previous selection from a new population by a selection mechanism of reference pointsNPIndividual members of the new offspring。
Step 5.3.1: generating a reference point:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For the number of reference points +.>For the target dimension +.>And->The number of boundary layer and inner layer divisions, respectively.
Step 5.3.2: adaptive normalization of populations.
Step 5.3.2.1: an ideal point is determined.
Step 5.3.2.1.1: selecting a minimum value of an objective function in a current populationAnd constructing ideal points.
Step 5.3.2.1.2: translating the population to make the ideal point as the origin:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->The objective function values before and after translation, respectively.
Step 5.3.2.2: calculating extreme points:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For the extreme point after deformation, < >>Is the unit direction vector of the coordinate axis.
Step 5.3.2.3: and constructing a hyperplane consisting of the ideal point and each extreme point.
Step 5.3.3: individuals in the population are associated with reference points, respectively.
Step 5.3.4: and selecting the reserved individuals according to the association degree of the reference points.
Step 5.4: will beAs a new parent population +.>The operator replaces the mutation and crossover process of the NSGA-III algorithm to generate a new generation of offspring population and mixes the parent and offspring populations.
Step 5.4.1: variation operation, generation and base vectorVariant individuals corresponding to one by one->:The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For scaling factor +.>And->Is different from +.>Is a subject of (a).
Step 5.4.2: cross operation fromAnd->Cross-generating new individuals->:/>The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For crossover probability->Is a random number.
Step 5.4.3: selecting, namely, base vectors in a populationIndividuals obtained by crossing->And comparing the quality to select the next generation population: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->Individual->And->A corresponding fitness function.
Step 5.5: repeating steps 5.3 to 5.4, and allowingUntil the number of iterations +>Reach maximum iteration number->. In this embodiment +.>。
Step 6: and selecting an optimal solution of the rolling power objective function, the three-dimensional size objective function and the internal performance objective function, and obtaining a corresponding load distribution result.
Step 6.1: performing satisfaction sequencing to obtain an optimal objective function value:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Satisfaction for the objective function; />Is->Mean value of the individual objective function solutions, +.>Is->Standard deviation of individual objective function solutions +.>Is->Weight coefficients of the objective function solutions; in this embodiment +.>。
Step 6.2: substituting the value of the decision variable corresponding to the selected optimal solution, namely the optimal objective function value, into the step 4 to obtain a rolling load distribution result comprising the thickness, rolling force, power, temperature, convexity and average grain size of each pass of rough rolling and each stand outlet of finish rolling.
According to the field data and the load distribution results of each rack obtained by the NSGA-III-DE optimization method used in the invention, and by combining with NSGA-III algorithm optimization results, comparison analysis is carried out, the rough rolling area is shown in table 5-1, and the finish rolling area is shown in table 5-2. And combining the data in the table to obtain each objective function value for comparison.
TABLE 5-1 load distribution results for each pass-roughing zone
TABLE 5-2 load distribution results for each frame-finish rolling zone
The sum of rolling power of NSGA-III-DE optimization results is as follows: 8404kW, the sum of the relative convexity differences is: 1.382, the deviation of the rolled grain size from the target size was 1.695 μm.
The sum of rolling power of NSGA-III optimization results is as follows: 8450kW, the sum of the relative convexity differences is: 1.580, the deviation of the rolled grain size from the target size was 2.187 μm.
The sum of rolling power of the field data is: 8717kW, the sum of the relative convexity differences is: 1.690 the deviation of the grain size after rolling from the target size was 2.439. Mu.m.
Therefore, the load distribution result obtained by optimizing the method is better than the field data in the aspects of rolling power objective function, three-dimensional size objective function and internal performance objective function, and the effectiveness of the method is proved.
And (3) carrying out load distribution optimization on each frame/pass through an NSGA-III-DE algorithm, and establishing a hot continuous rolling full-flow optimization model by taking the minimum power, good plate shape and minimum final rolling grain size deviation as three objective functions. Compared with the original rolling data, the total flow load distribution process of the hot continuous rolling mill reduces the sum of rolling power, the sum of relative convexity difference and the grain size deviation after rolling by 3.59%, 18.2% and 30.5%, which shows that the rolling power objective function, the three-dimensional size objective function and the internal performance objective function of the optimized result are all better than the original rolling result, and the purpose of shape integrated control can be achieved.
The foregoing description is only of the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure and description of the principles of the technology being employed. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the scope of the invention in the embodiments of the present disclosure is not limited to the specific combination of the above technical features, but encompasses other technical features formed by any combination of the above technical features or their equivalents without departing from the spirit of the invention. Such as the above-described features, are mutually substituted with (but not limited to) the features having similar functions disclosed in the embodiments of the present disclosure.
Claims (3)
1. The rolling load distribution optimization design method based on the shape integrated control is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step 1: determining PDI data, rolling line basic parameters and rolling data in a production plan;
the PDI data comprise steel types, slab sizes and finished product specifications; wherein the steel grade includes: name and chemical composition, slab dimensions include: slab length, width and thickness, finished product specifications include: width and thickness of the finished product;
the basic parameters of the rolling line comprise the number of rough rolling passes and finish rolling frames, the distance between the frames and the diameter of the roller;
step 2: determining process constraints and equipment constraints of the rolling process;
the process constraints include:
bite angle constraint:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein the biting condition is a biting angle +.>Representation, deltahFor depression amount->For friction angle>For friction coefficient>Is the radius of the roller;
reduction of each pass of rough rolling or each frame of finish rollingIs limited in a certain range: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is a frame->Maximum rolling reduction of (2);
temperature condition constraints: finish rolling inlet temperature according to production process requirementsFinal rolling of final standTemperature->Within a certain range: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->The minimum finish rolling inlet temperature, the maximum finish rolling inlet temperature, +.>And->The final rolling temperature of the minimum final stand and the final rolling temperature of the maximum final stand are respectively;
the device constraints include:
rolling force limitation: for the frameRolling force->Less than the maximum allowable rolling force: />;
Wherein,is the maximum allowable rolling force;
motor power limit: for the frameCorresponding motor device, motor power->Should be less than the maximum allowable motor power:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Maximum allowable motor power;
step 3: determining multiple objective function decision variables;
in step 3, the outlet thickness of each frame for rough rolling each pass and finish rolling each passAs a decision variable; wherein (1)>For the total number of passes>The outlet thickness of the n-th pass;
step 4: respectively establishing a rolling power objective function, a three-dimensional size objective function and an internal performance objective function;
the step 4 comprises the following steps:
step 4.1: the rolling power objective function is established, and the rolling power summation of each pass of rough rolling and each stand of finish rolling is used for representing the rolling piece:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is a rolling power objective function; />The total number of passes;the function relation between the decision variable and the rolling power is adopted;
step 4.2: establishing a three-dimensional size objective function using the rolled piece expressed by the sum of the relative convexity differences of each pass of rough rolling or each stand of finish rolling:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is a three-dimensional size objective function; />The relative convexity of each frame is for rough rolling each pass or finish rolling; />Is the relative convexity of the target; />A functional relationship between the decision variable and the relative convexity difference;
step 4.3: establishing an internal performance objective function expressed by deviations of the average grain size of the rolled piece from the target size:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Is an internal performance objective function; />The average grain size after rolling is +.>;/>The unit is +.about.>;/>Is a functional relationship between decision variables and grain size;
step 5: solving a rolling power objective function, a three-dimensional size objective function and an internal performance objective function by using an NSGA-III-DE algorithm to obtain an optimized objective function value;
step 6: and selecting an optimal solution of the rolling power objective function, the three-dimensional size objective function and the internal performance objective function, and obtaining a corresponding load distribution result.
2. The optimization design method for rolling load distribution based on shape integrated control according to claim 1, wherein the step 5 comprises the following steps:
step 5.1: initializing a population;
step 5.1.1: determining decision variables: outlet thickness of each pass of rough rolling or each frame of finish rolling;
Step 5.1.2: setting upper and lower limits of decision variables based on outlet thickness of each pass to enable iteration times to be setObtaining the first generation of the powder with the size ofNPIs a parent population of (a);
step 5.2: generating population sizes ofNPAnd combining the parent and offspring to obtain a size of 2NPIs a new population of (a);
step 5.3: selecting a previous selection from a new population by a selection mechanism of reference pointsNPIndividual members of the new offspring;
Step 5.3.1: generating a reference point:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For the number of reference points,for the target dimension +.>And->Dividing the boundary layer and the inner layer respectively;
step 5.3.2: self-adaptive standardization of population;
step 5.3.2.1: determining ideal points;
step 5.3.2.1.1: selecting a minimum value of an objective function in a current populationConstructing ideal points;
step 5.3.2.1.2: translating the population to make the ideal point as the origin:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Andrespectively the objective function values before and after translation;
step 5.3.2.2: calculating extreme points:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For the extreme point after deformation, < >>A unit direction vector of the coordinate axis;
step 5.3.2.3: constructing a hyperplane consisting of ideal points and extreme points;
step 5.3.3: associating individuals in the population with reference points, respectively;
step 5.3.4: selecting a reserved individual according to the association degree of the reference points;
step 5.4: will beAs a new parent population +.>The operator replaces the mutation and crossover process of NSGA-III algorithm to generate a new generation of offspring population and mixes the parent and offspring population;
step 5.4.1: variation operation, generation and base vectorVariant individuals corresponding to one by one->:The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>For scaling factor +.>And->Is different from +.>Is a subject of (2);
step 5.4.2: cross operation fromAnd->Cross-generating new individuals->:/>The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein,for crossover probability->Is a random number;
step 5.4.3: selecting, namely, base vectors in a populationIndividuals obtained by crossing->And comparing the quality to select the next generation population: />The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>And->Individual->And->A corresponding fitness function;
step 5.5: repeating steps 5.3 to 5.4, and allowingUntil the number of iterations +>Up to the maximum number of iterations。
3. The optimization design method for rolling load distribution based on shape integrated control according to claim 1, wherein the step 6 comprises the following steps:
step 6.1: performing satisfaction sequencing to obtain an optimal objective function value:the method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Wherein (1)>Satisfaction for the objective function; />Is->Mean value of the individual objective function solutions, +.>Is->Standard deviation of individual objective function solutions +.>Is->Weight coefficients of the objective function solutions;
step 6.2: substituting the value of the decision variable corresponding to the selected optimal solution, namely the optimal objective function value, into the step 4 to obtain a rolling load distribution result comprising the thickness, rolling force, power, temperature, convexity and average grain size of each pass of rough rolling and each stand outlet of finish rolling.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410248709.7A CN117828905B (en) | 2024-03-05 | 2024-03-05 | Rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410248709.7A CN117828905B (en) | 2024-03-05 | 2024-03-05 | Rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN117828905A true CN117828905A (en) | 2024-04-05 |
CN117828905B CN117828905B (en) | 2024-05-10 |
Family
ID=90523181
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410248709.7A Active CN117828905B (en) | 2024-03-05 | 2024-03-05 | Rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN117828905B (en) |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102014398A (en) * | 2010-09-21 | 2011-04-13 | 上海大学 | Optimal deployment method of large-scale industrial wireless sensor network based on differential evolution algorithm |
CN102451838A (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2012-05-16 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Method for overcoming camber defect in hot rolling process of steel plate |
CN102489524A (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2012-06-13 | 东北大学 | Machine frame load distribution method for decreasing energy consumption of rolling process of hot rolled strip steel |
CN102513351A (en) * | 2011-12-24 | 2012-06-27 | 东北大学 | Rolling method and device for strip steel tandem cold rolling |
CN105013832A (en) * | 2014-04-28 | 2015-11-04 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Hot rolled strip steel load distribution method giving consideration to rolling energy consumption and good strip shape |
CN110163422A (en) * | 2019-04-30 | 2019-08-23 | 张锐明 | A kind of optimization method of fuel cell generation steady-state output power and efficiency |
-
2024
- 2024-03-05 CN CN202410248709.7A patent/CN117828905B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102014398A (en) * | 2010-09-21 | 2011-04-13 | 上海大学 | Optimal deployment method of large-scale industrial wireless sensor network based on differential evolution algorithm |
CN102451838A (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2012-05-16 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Method for overcoming camber defect in hot rolling process of steel plate |
CN102489524A (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2012-06-13 | 东北大学 | Machine frame load distribution method for decreasing energy consumption of rolling process of hot rolled strip steel |
CN102513351A (en) * | 2011-12-24 | 2012-06-27 | 东北大学 | Rolling method and device for strip steel tandem cold rolling |
CN105013832A (en) * | 2014-04-28 | 2015-11-04 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Hot rolled strip steel load distribution method giving consideration to rolling energy consumption and good strip shape |
CN110163422A (en) * | 2019-04-30 | 2019-08-23 | 张锐明 | A kind of optimization method of fuel cell generation steady-state output power and efficiency |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
卢峰 等: "基于多种群的自适应差分进化算法", 东北大学学报(自然科学版), vol. 31, no. 11, 30 November 2010 (2010-11-30), pages 1538 - 1541 * |
姚峰;杨卫东;张明;: "基于多子群目标分段差分进化的多目标热连轧负荷分配", 北京科技大学学报, no. 11, 30 November 2010 (2010-11-30), pages 1506 - 1512 * |
曹瑞;: "差分进化算法解决电力系统经济负荷分配问题", 中国电力企业管理, no. 02, 15 January 2011 (2011-01-15), pages 100 - 103 * |
杨嘉慧 等: "板带热轧过程负荷分配优化策略", 冶金自动化, vol. 46, no. 6, 30 November 2022 (2022-11-30), pages 88 - 95 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN117828905B (en) | 2024-05-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN100362332C (en) | Method for online test of steel plate mechanic property during rolling process | |
CN109848221B (en) | Hot continuous rolling whole-process load distribution method | |
CN104209340B (en) | A kind of hot rolling martensitic stainless steel belt steel bilateral wave control method | |
Wang et al. | Multi-objective optimization of rolling schedule for tandem cold strip rolling based on NSGA-II | |
CN105013832A (en) | Hot rolled strip steel load distribution method giving consideration to rolling energy consumption and good strip shape | |
CN111008477B (en) | Method for adjusting technological parameters based on mechanical properties of cold-rolled galvanized strip steel | |
CN104511484A (en) | Slight center wave strip-shape control method of hot-rolled strip steel | |
CN111241750A (en) | BP network cold-rolled strip steel mechanical property prediction method combining genetic algorithm | |
CN103741028B (en) | Low yield strength ratio low temperature weldless steel tube and production method thereof | |
CN101658871A (en) | Optimization method of rolling schedule of non-reversible aluminum strip cold rolling mill | |
CN102489524B (en) | Machine frame load distribution method for decreasing energy consumption of rolling process of hot rolled strip steel | |
CN108062583A (en) | A kind of heating furnace technique parameter optimization method towards energy-saving and emission-reduction | |
Tian et al. | Robust optimization of the continuous annealing process based on a novel Multi-Objective Dragonfly Algorithm | |
CN117828905A (en) | Rolling load distribution optimization design method based on shape integrated control | |
KR102075245B1 (en) | Prediction apparatus for iron loss reduction of electric steel sheet | |
Zhang et al. | Rolling force prediction in heavy plate rolling based on uniform differential neural network | |
CN115218603B (en) | Cooling flow control method and device | |
CN110883105A (en) | Method for adjusting parameters of controlled cooling optimizing water tank of hot-rolled deformed steel bar in real time after rolling | |
CN109562423B (en) | Edge heater control device | |
CN111872116B (en) | Hot continuous rolling parameter determination method for clearly considering structural performance target requirement | |
CN112861394A (en) | Cold-rolling roller grinding amount optimization method and system based on genetic particle swarm optimization | |
CN112859595A (en) | Method for determining optimal control quantity of edge thinning of cold-rolled strip steel based on variable regulation and control efficacy | |
CN106399664B (en) | A kind of rotary heating furnace heating process optimization method | |
CN109338216A (en) | A kind of preparation method of high performance generation machine pawl pole steel | |
CN113850491B (en) | Continuous annealing same-product gauge strip steel scheduling optimization method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |