CN116168116A - Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan - Google Patents
Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116168116A CN116168116A CN202310425965.4A CN202310425965A CN116168116A CN 116168116 A CN116168116 A CN 116168116A CN 202310425965 A CN202310425965 A CN 202310425965A CN 116168116 A CN116168116 A CN 116168116A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- execution plan
- test
- execution
- presented
- plan
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/20—Drawing from basic elements, e.g. lines or circles
- G06T11/206—Drawing of charts or graphs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06316—Sequencing of tasks or work
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0633—Workflow analysis
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present disclosure provides methods and apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan. In the method, an execution plan to be presented is received, wherein the execution plan to be presented is determined from a total execution plan according to a level in a grading rule to which a display device belongs, the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to each test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented is subject to the test equipment and/or the test personnel and is displayed in the form of a Gantt chart.
Description
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to the technical field of chemical product testing, and in particular, to a method and apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan.
Background
In the field of chemical production, in addition to the production of chemical products on a production line, laboratories are provided for spot inspection and testing of the produced chemical products. Currently, the process of performing spot inspection on products on a production line is generally as follows, a staff in a laboratory samples from the production line, and then conveys the sampled samples to the laboratory to immediately perform sample testing on the samples, so as to obtain test results, and the test results are fed back to the staff on the production line. In the current test procedure, the test task currently being executed is displayed on the screen of the laboratory, and after one test task is completed, the test task is no longer displayed on the screen.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the foregoing, the present disclosure provides methods and apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan. Through the technical scheme of the disclosure, personalized display can be performed on different display devices in a targeted manner.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for visually displaying a test execution plan, performed by a display device, the method comprising: receiving an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to the level in a grading rule to which a display device belongs, wherein the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to each test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented takes test equipment and/or test personnel as objects and is displayed in a Gantt chart form, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is also provided an apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan, applied to a display device, the apparatus including: an execution plan receiving unit for receiving an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to a level in a hierarchical rule to which a display device belongs, wherein the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to a test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and an execution plan display unit for displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented is displayed in a Gantt chart form by taking the test equipment and/or the test personnel as objects, and the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is also provided an electronic apparatus including: at least one processor, a memory coupled with the at least one processor, and a computer program stored on the memory, the at least one processor executing the computer program to implement a method for visually displaying a test execution plan as described in any of the above.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is also provided a computer readable storage medium storing a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements a method for visually displaying a test execution plan as described above.
Drawings
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present disclosure may be realized by reference to the following drawings. In the drawings, similar components or features may have the same reference numerals.
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of one example of a method for visually displaying a test execution plan provided in accordance with the present disclosure.
FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic diagram of one example of a total execution plan provided in accordance with the present disclosure.
FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of one example of a hardware organization classification rule according to the present disclosure.
Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of one example of personnel rating rules according to the present disclosure.
Fig. 5 shows a schematic diagram of one example of a planning information display provided in accordance with the present disclosure.
Fig. 6 illustrates a block diagram of one example of an apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan provided in accordance with the present disclosure.
Fig. 7 shows a block diagram of an electronic device for implementing the visual display method of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
The subject matter described herein will be discussed below with reference to example embodiments. It should be appreciated that these embodiments are discussed only to enable a person skilled in the art to better understand and thereby practice the subject matter described herein, and are not limiting of the scope, applicability, or examples set forth in the claims. Changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements discussed without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Various examples may omit, replace, or add various procedures or components as desired. In addition, features described with respect to some examples may be combined in other examples as well.
As used herein, the term "comprising" and variations thereof mean open-ended terms, meaning "including, but not limited to. The term "based on" means "based at least in part on". The terms "one embodiment" and "an embodiment" mean "at least one embodiment. The term "another embodiment" means "at least one other embodiment". The terms "first," "second," and the like, may refer to different or the same object. Other definitions, whether explicit or implicit, may be included below. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the definition of a term is consistent throughout this specification.
In the field of chemical production, in addition to the production of chemical products on a production line, laboratories are provided for spot inspection and testing of the produced chemical products. Currently, the process of performing spot inspection on products on a production line is generally as follows, a staff in a laboratory samples from the production line, and then conveys the sampled samples to the laboratory to immediately perform sample testing on the samples, so as to obtain test results, and the test results are fed back to the staff on the production line.
In the current test procedure, the test task currently being executed is displayed on the screen of the laboratory, and after one test task is completed, the test task is no longer displayed on the screen.
The screen of the laboratory includes various kinds, for example, a display screen of the whole laboratory, and a display screen and a computer screen of a tester are also provided in each room of the laboratory. In order to achieve targeted personalized display on different display devices.
The present disclosure provides methods and apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan. In the method, an execution plan to be presented is received, wherein the execution plan to be presented is determined from a total execution plan according to a level in a grading rule to which a display device belongs, the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to each test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented takes test equipment and/or test personnel as objects and is displayed in a Gantt chart form, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row. Through the technical scheme of the disclosure, personalized display can be performed on different display devices in a targeted manner.
The method and apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan provided by the present disclosure are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
An application scenario of embodiments of the present disclosure is in a laboratory for sampling test of chemical products produced on a chemical production line.
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of one example 100 of a method for visually displaying a test execution plan provided in accordance with the present disclosure.
The solution shown in fig. 1 may be performed by a display device of a laboratory. The display device of the laboratory may include various types of devices, for example, a display device for displaying test task information of the entire laboratory, a display device for displaying test task information in each floor of the laboratory, a display device for displaying test task information in a department, a display device for displaying test task information in a project group, a display device for displaying test task information in a room, and a device owned by a person in the laboratory.
The personnel of the laboratory may include a supervisor managing the laboratory, a principal responsible for each department, a group leader responsible for each project group, and a tester, etc.
As shown in fig. 1, at 110, an execution plan to be presented, determined from a total execution plan according to a level in a hierarchical rule to which a display device belongs, may be received.
In the present disclosure, for each test task in a laboratory, a total execution plan for the test task to be performed may be generated, which may be presented in the form of a table. FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic diagram of one example of a total execution plan provided in accordance with the present disclosure.
The overall execution plan may include execution plans corresponding to respective test tasks, each of which includes a tester, test equipment, and test time for executing the test task. The overall execution plan is data structured with respect to test equipment and/or test personnel. Each execution plan corresponds to a test task.
In one example, the overall execution plan may be displayed in the form of a Gantt chart. The horizontal axis of the Gantt chart may represent time, as shown in FIG. 2. The time on the horizontal axis may be used to represent the estimated execution duration, the scheduled start time, the end time, etc. of each execution plan.
The Gantt chart of the overall execution plan may include a plurality of rows, each row being used to characterize a data structured object, test equipment or tester. As shown in fig. 2, the first row of objects is the test equipment of the moisture analyzer and the last row of objects is a tester.
In the Gantt chart of the overall execution plan, each row represents an execution plan for the characterized object, i.e., the execution plan in each row is performed requiring the object characterized by that row. Taking the example of fig. 2 as an example, for the moisture analyzer characterized by the first row, one execution plan assigned to the moisture analyzer is a moisture test starting at about 11:35, which is required to be executed by the moisture analyzer.
In this example, each execution plan may be represented by a block diagram, and the length of each block diagram on the horizontal axis may represent the expected execution duration of the corresponding execution plan. Taking fig. 2 as an example, in the first row, the estimated execution time period of the moisture test is 20 minutes when the start time of the moisture test allocated to the moisture analyzer on the horizontal axis is 11:35 and the end time is 11:55.
The individual execution plans may be distributed only in one row in the Gantt chart, or may be distributed in multiple rows. When the execution plan is distributed in a plurality of rows, it means that the execution plan requires a plurality of objects to execute, for example, at least one test apparatus and a tester. Taking fig. 2 as an example, an execution plan named "influence-10" is distributed on both rows representing the injection molding machine and testers representing "Lin Shuyan", and this execution plan is represented as requiring the injection molding machine and testers "Lin Shuyan" to execute.
In the present disclosure, the execution plan to be presented received by the display device may be part or all of the total execution plan. The execution plan to be presented received by each display device may be based on the display device, and the execution plan to be presented received by different display devices may be different.
In the present disclosure, the grading rule for the laboratory may be sequentially divided into a plurality of levels in order of levels from high to low, and execution plans displayed by display devices of different levels may be different.
In one example, the classification rules may include hardware organization classification rules and/or personnel classification rules. The hardware organization grading rules may be obtained by grading according to the hardware facilities and organization of the laboratory. The hardware facilities of the laboratory may include the entire laboratory, floors the laboratory includes, various rooms in the laboratory, various equipment in the laboratory, etc., and the organization may include departments, groups of projects, etc. in the laboratory.
In one example, the hardware organization level in the hardware organization hierarchy rule may include at least two of: the laboratory, floors comprised by the laboratory, departments for different professions in the laboratory, groups of items in the departments for performing different types of test tasks, rooms in the laboratory, and equipment in each room. The devices in the various rooms may include test equipment and personal devices owned by laboratory personnel. For example, the test equipment may include a moisture analyzer, analytical balance, muffle furnace, and the like. Personal devices of laboratory personnel may include personal computers, cell phones, etc., wherein personal devices may include work devices as well as personal devices.
The order of the hardware organization level in the hardware organization hierarchy rule from high to low may be: laboratory, floor, department, project group, room, and equipment. I.e. the laboratory level is highest and the equipment level is highest. The laboratory may include at least one floor, each floor may include at least one department, each department may include at least one project group, each project group may include at least one room, and each room includes at least one device therein. FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of one example of a hardware organization classification rule according to the present disclosure. As shown in fig. 3, the first level is highest, and the respective levels decrease in order from the first level to the sixth level.
In the hardware organization grading rule, the hardware or organization corresponding test tasks with high level may be more than the hardware or organization corresponding test tasks with low level, and may include the hardware or organization corresponding test tasks with low level. For example, the laboratory corresponding displayed test tasks may include the respective floor corresponding displayed test tasks. In one example, the execution plan to be presented displayed by the display device belonging to the laboratory level may be a total execution plan.
The correspondence between the device and the respective hardware organization levels in the hardware organization ranking rules may be predetermined. Each device may correspond to a hardware organization level. For example, the corresponding hardware organization level for a large screen device used to display the entire laboratory is the laboratory. In one example, one device may also correspond to multiple hardware organization levels. For example, the hardware organization level corresponding to one display device may be a floor and a department.
In one example, the personnel grading rules may be derived by grading individual personnel in the laboratory. Personnel in the laboratory may include: a manager of a management laboratory, a manager of each department, a team leader of each project team, a tester, etc.
The person levels in the person grading rule include at least two of: a manager of a management laboratory, a manager of each department, a team leader of each project team, a tester, etc. For the same person, one person level may be corresponding, and a plurality of person levels may also be corresponding. For example, one laboratory person may act as both a principal and a tester.
The order of the personnel levels in the personnel grading rule from high to low may be: a manager, a team leader and a tester. Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of one example of personnel rating rules according to the present disclosure. As shown in fig. 4, the first person level is highest, and the respective levels decrease in order from the first person level to the fourth person level.
In the personnel grading rule, the test tasks corresponding to the personnel with high level can be more than the test tasks corresponding to the personnel with low level, and the test tasks corresponding to the personnel with low level can be included. Here, the test task corresponding to the person refers to a test task displayed on the device of the corresponding person. For example, the test tasks displayed on the hosted device may include test tasks displayed on the hosted device. In one example, the execution plan to be presented displayed by the display device belonging to the supervisor level may be the total execution plan. Therefore, by means of personnel grading rules, high-level personnel can conveniently master all test tasks in charge of the managed personnel in real time.
The correspondence between each person level in the person classification rule and the device may be predetermined. Each device may correspond to a personnel level. For example, the person level corresponding to the display device for displaying the test task that a certain tester is responsible for is the tester. In one example, one device may also correspond to multiple personnel levels.
In one example, the execution plan to be presented may include a first execution plan to be presented derived from hardware organization ranking rules and/or a second execution plan to be presented derived from personnel ranking rules.
The first execution plan to be presented can be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the hardware organization level to which the display device belongs. In one manner, the hardware organization level of the display device in the hardware organization grading rule may be determined first, and then the execution plan of the hardware organization level is screened from the total execution plan, where the screened execution plan is the first execution plan to be presented.
In one example, when the hardware organization level to which the display device belongs includes a plurality of execution plans, the first execution plan to be presented is obtained according to an execution plan corresponding to the highest hardware organization level to which the display device belongs. In this example, the display device may be assigned to a different plurality of hardware organization levels, and then a highest hardware organization level having a highest level may be determined from the plurality of hardware organization levels. Then, a first execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device is obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the highest hardware organization level.
For example, the hardware organization level to which one display device belongs includes a laboratory and a floor, and then the first execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device may be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the laboratory.
The second execution plan to be presented can be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the personnel level to which the display device belongs. In one approach, the laboratory personnel to which the display device belongs may be determined first, and then the personnel level of the laboratory personnel in the personnel classification rules may be determined. The second execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device can be obtained according to the determined execution plan corresponding to the personnel level.
In one example, when the person level to which the display device belongs includes a plurality of person levels, the second execution plan to be presented is derived from the execution plan included in the highest person level to which the display device belongs. In this example, the display device may be assigned to a different plurality of personnel levels, and a highest personnel level having a highest level may be determined from the plurality of personnel levels. And then, obtaining a second execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device according to the execution plan corresponding to the highest personnel level.
For example, the personnel level to which one display device belongs includes a group leader and a tester, and the second execution plan to be presented corresponding to the display device can be obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the group leader.
In one example of a laboratory system, the display device may be communicatively coupled to a central control device and the overall execution plan may be generated or derived by the central control device. In this example, the central control device may determine a corresponding execution plan to be presented for each display device from the total execution plan according to the level in the hierarchical rule to which the display device belongs, and then may transmit the determined execution plan to be presented to the corresponding display device.
Returning to FIG. 1, at 120, the execution plan to be presented may be displayed.
In the present disclosure, an execution plan is to be presented for a test device and/or a tester and is displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, each row in which may be used to represent an execution plan for an object to which the row corresponds. The description of the characteristics of the execution plan to be presented, which is displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, may be referred to the description of the characteristics of the overall execution plan, which is displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, described above. For example, the execution plan to be presented displayed by the display device may be as shown in fig. 2.
The execution plan to be presented, which is displayed in the form of a Gantt chart, may include a plurality of rows, and in each row, a plurality of block diagrams for characterizing the execution plan may be displayed. Taking fig. 2 as an example, the object represented by the second row is an analytical balance, and two block diagrams are included in the row, and the execution plans represented by the two block diagrams are represented by the analytical balance.
In one example, each execution plan may be triggered in an execution plan displayed by the display device, and the manner of triggering may include clicking, double clicking, and the like. In one example, a block schematic diagram representing each execution plan in the Gantt chart may be triggered when displayed in the form of the Gantt chart.
In response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, plan information for the triggered execution plan may be displayed. The plan information may include at least one of a test device, a tester, a test start time, a test end time, an estimated execution duration, an execution plan identification, etc. for executing the execution plan, and may further include material information, a sample identification, etc.
In this example, the plan information of the execution plan may be presented in a floating window form. When the execution plan is triggered, a floating window can be generated on the display screen, and the plan information is displayed in the floating window. Fig. 5 shows a schematic diagram of one example of a planning information display provided in accordance with the present disclosure. As shown in fig. 5, after clicking on the execution plan of "influence", a floating window of the execution plan of "influence" may be displayed.
The position of the floating window display can be set in a self-defined mode, and the position of the floating window display can be arranged at the periphery of the triggered block schematic diagram for representing the execution plan. Taking fig. 5 as an example, a floating window may be displayed above the triggered block schematic for representing the execution plan. In one example, the size and position of the floating window may be determined based on the distribution location of each block diagram displayed to ensure that the floating window does not obscure other block diagrams. In another example, when it is unavoidable to hide other block diagrams, an area that can hide the least block diagram may be determined, and the size of the area is larger than the size of the floating window that can clearly display the plan information. This area may then be determined as the area where the floating window is located.
In one example, in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, other execution plans associated with the triggered execution plan may be screened from the displayed execution plans. The association here may include an execution plan belonging to the same upper layer, an execution plan that is responsible for the same tester, uses the same test equipment, an execution plan belonging to the same department, an execution plan belonging to the same project group, an execution plan belonging to the same floor, and the like. When a plurality of execution plans belong to the same upper-layer execution plan, the execution order may be provided among the plurality of execution plans in the upper-layer execution plan.
After other execution plans are screened out, the triggered execution plan and the other execution plans can be displayed according to a specified rule. At this time, only the triggered execution plan and the selected execution plan are displayed, and execution plans other than those may not be displayed.
The specified rules may include order of execution and/or degree of correlation, etc. The displayed execution plans are arranged according to the execution sequence, so that the execution sequence among the execution plans can be integrally displayed, and the overall progress of the execution plans can be conveniently mastered. In addition, when the displayed execution plans are arranged according to the degree of correlation, the execution plans may be arranged in order of the degree of correlation from high to low, so that other execution plans having a high degree of correlation with the triggered execution plan are emphasized. The rules of the correlation degree can be set in a self-defined manner. In one example, the relevance may be determined in order from high to low by the following factors: the same upper level execution plan, the same tester takes charge of, uses the same test equipment, the execution plan belonging to the same project group, the execution plan belonging to the same department, the execution plan belonging to the same floor. That is, when two execution plans belong to the same upper-layer execution plan, the correlation between the two execution plans is highest.
Fig. 6 shows a block diagram of one example of an apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan (hereinafter referred to as a visual display apparatus 600) provided in accordance with the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 6, the visual display device 600 includes: an execution plan receiving unit 610 and an execution plan display unit 620.
The execution plan receiving unit 610 may be configured to receive an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to a level in a hierarchical rule to which a display device belongs, wherein the total execution plan includes execution plans corresponding to respective test tasks, each of the execution plans corresponding to a test task includes a tester for executing the test task, a test device, and a test time, and the total execution plan is data-structured with respect to the test device and/or the tester; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different.
The execution plan display unit 620 may be configured to display an execution plan to be presented, where the execution plan to be presented is targeted for the test equipment and/or the test person and is displayed in the form of a gante graph, and a horizontal axis of the gante graph represents time, and each row is used to represent an execution plan for an object corresponding to the row.
In one example, in the execution plan to be presented, each execution plan required to be executed by the object corresponding to each row is represented by a block schematic diagram, and the length of the block schematic diagram corresponding to each execution plan in the horizontal axis direction represents the expected execution duration of the plan. The visual display apparatus 600 may further include a planning information display unit, which may be configured to: in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, plan information of the triggered execution plan is displayed in the generated floating window, the plan information including at least one of test equipment, test personnel, test start time, test end time, estimated execution duration, and execution plan identification for executing the execution plan.
In one example, the execution plan display unit 620 may be further configured to: in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, screening other execution plans associated with the triggered execution plan from the displayed execution plans; and displaying the triggered execution plan and other execution plans according to a specified rule, wherein the specified rule comprises an execution sequence and/or a correlation degree.
Embodiments of a method and apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan according to the present disclosure are described above with reference to fig. 1-7.
The apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan of the present disclosure may be implemented in hardware, or may be implemented in software or a combination of hardware and software. Taking software implementation as an example, the device in a logic sense is formed by reading corresponding computer program instructions in a memory into a memory by a processor of a device where the device is located. In the present disclosure, the means for visually displaying the test execution plan may be implemented with an electronic device, for example.
Fig. 7 illustrates a block diagram of an electronic device 700 for implementing the visual display method of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 7, electronic device 700 may include at least one processor 710, memory (e.g., non-volatile memory) 720, memory 730, and communication interface 740, and at least one processor 710, memory 720, memory 730, and communication interface 740 are connected together via bus 750. The at least one processor 710 executes at least one computer-readable instruction (i.e., the elements described above as being implemented in software) stored or encoded in memory.
In one embodiment, computer-executable instructions are stored in memory that, when executed, cause the at least one processor 710 to: receiving an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to the level in a grading rule to which a display device belongs, wherein the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to each test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented takes test equipment and/or test personnel as objects and is displayed in a Gantt chart form, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row.
It should be appreciated that the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory, when executed, cause the at least one processor 710 to perform the various operations and functions described above in connection with fig. 1-6 in various embodiments of the present specification.
According to one embodiment, a program product, such as a machine-readable medium, is provided. The machine-readable medium may have instructions (i.e., elements described above implemented in software) that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to perform the various operations and functions described above in connection with fig. 1-6 in various embodiments of the specification.
In particular, a system or apparatus provided with a readable storage medium having stored thereon software program code implementing the functions of any of the above embodiments may be provided, and a computer or processor of the system or apparatus may be caused to read out and execute instructions stored in the readable storage medium.
In this case, the program code itself read from the readable medium may implement the functions of any of the above-described embodiments, and thus the machine-readable code and the readable storage medium storing the machine-readable code form part of the present invention.
Computer program code required for operation of portions of the present description may be written in any one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, scala, smalltalk, eiffel, JADE, emerald, C ++, c#, VB, NET, python and the like, a conventional programming language such as C language, visual Basic 2003, perl, COBOL 2002, PHP and ABAP, a dynamic programming language such as Python, ruby and Groovy, or other programming languages and the like. The program code may execute on the user's computer or as a stand-alone software package, or it may execute partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any form of network, such as a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet), or the connection may be made to the cloud computing environment, or for use as a service, such as software as a service (SaaS).
Examples of readable storage media include floppy disks, hard disks, magneto-optical disks, optical disks (e.g., CD-ROMs, CD-R, CD-RWs, DVD-ROMs, DVD-RAMs, DVD-RWs), magnetic tapes, nonvolatile memory cards, and ROMs. Alternatively, the program code may be downloaded from a server computer or cloud by a communications network.
The foregoing describes specific embodiments of the present disclosure. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims can be performed in a different order than in the embodiments and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.
Not all steps or units in the above-mentioned flowcharts and system configuration diagrams are necessary, and some steps or units may be omitted according to actual needs. The order of execution of the steps is not fixed and may be determined as desired. The apparatus structures described in the above embodiments may be physical structures or logical structures, that is, some units may be implemented by the same physical entity, or some units may be implemented by multiple physical entities, or may be implemented jointly by some components in multiple independent devices.
The term "exemplary" used throughout this specification means "serving as an example, instance, or illustration," and does not mean "preferred" or "advantageous over other embodiments. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing an understanding of the described technology. However, the techniques may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the concepts of the described embodiments.
The alternative implementation manner of the embodiment of the present disclosure has been described in detail above with reference to the accompanying drawings, but the embodiment of the present disclosure is not limited to the specific details of the foregoing implementation manner, and various simple modifications may be made to the technical solution of the embodiment of the present disclosure within the scope of the technical concept of the embodiment of the present disclosure, and all the simple modifications belong to the protection scope of the embodiment of the present disclosure.
The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Various modifications to the disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other variations without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples and designs described herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Claims (11)
1. A method for visually displaying a test execution plan, performed by a display device, the method comprising: receiving an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to the level in a grading rule to which the display equipment belongs, wherein the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to each test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented takes test equipment and/or test personnel as objects and is displayed in a Gantt chart form, the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the grading rules comprise hardware organization grading rules and/or personnel grading rules, and the execution plan to be presented comprises a first execution plan to be presented obtained according to the hardware organization grading rules and/or a second execution plan to be presented obtained according to the personnel grading rules.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the hardware organization levels in the hardware organization ranking rule comprise at least two of: laboratory, floor that the laboratory includes, department for different specialty in the laboratory, set of items in the department for performing different types of test tasks, room in the laboratory and equipment in each room, including test equipment and laboratory personnel's personal equipment, the order of hardware organization level in the hardware organization grading rule from high to low is: the laboratory, the floor, the department, the project group, the room and the equipment, wherein the first to-be-presented execution plan is obtained according to the execution plan corresponding to the hardware organization level to which the display equipment belongs.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein, when the level of hardware organization to which the display device belongs comprises a plurality of, the first execution plan to be presented is derived from the execution plan corresponding to the highest level of hardware organization to which the display device belongs.
5. The method of claim 2, wherein the person levels in the person grading rule comprise at least two of: the management laboratory's person in charge, the owner who is responsible for each department, the group leader who is responsible for each project group and tester, personnel's order from high to low in the personnel grading rule is: the executive plan to be presented is obtained according to the executive plan corresponding to the personnel level of the display equipment.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein, when the person level to which the display device belongs includes a plurality of person levels, the second to-be-presented execution plan is obtained according to an execution plan corresponding to a highest person level to which the display device belongs.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein, in the execution plan to be presented, each execution plan required to be executed by the object corresponding to each row is represented by a block schematic diagram, and a length of the block schematic diagram corresponding to each execution plan in a horizontal axis direction represents an estimated execution duration of the plan, and the method further comprises: in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, plan information of the triggered execution plan is displayed in the generated floating window, the plan information including at least one of test equipment, a tester, a test start time, a test end time, an estimated execution duration, and an execution plan identification for executing the execution plan.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: in response to one of the displayed execution plans being triggered, screening other execution plans associated with the triggered execution plan from the displayed execution plans; and displaying the triggered execution plan and the other execution plans according to a specified rule, wherein the specified rule comprises an execution sequence and/or a correlation degree.
9. An apparatus for visually displaying a test execution plan for use with a display device, the apparatus comprising: an execution plan receiving unit for receiving an execution plan to be presented, which is determined from a total execution plan according to a level in a hierarchical rule to which the display device belongs, wherein the total execution plan comprises execution plans corresponding to all test tasks, each execution plan corresponding to a test task comprises a tester for executing the test task, test equipment and test time, and the total execution plan is subjected to data structuring by taking the test equipment and/or the tester as objects; the grading rule is sequentially divided into a plurality of grades according to the order from high grade to low grade, and the execution plans displayed by the display devices of different grades are different; and an execution plan display unit for displaying the execution plan to be presented, wherein the execution plan to be presented is displayed in a Gantt chart form by taking test equipment and/or test personnel as objects, and the horizontal axis of the Gantt chart represents time, and each row is used for representing the execution plan of the object corresponding to the row.
10. An electronic device, comprising: at least one processor, a memory coupled with the at least one processor, and a computer program stored on the memory, the at least one processor executing the computer program to implement the method of any of claims 1-8.
11. A computer readable storage medium storing a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of any of claims 1-8.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310425965.4A CN116168116B (en) | 2023-04-19 | 2023-04-19 | Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310425965.4A CN116168116B (en) | 2023-04-19 | 2023-04-19 | Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN116168116A true CN116168116A (en) | 2023-05-26 |
| CN116168116B CN116168116B (en) | 2023-07-21 |
Family
ID=86416646
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310425965.4A Active CN116168116B (en) | 2023-04-19 | 2023-04-19 | Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN116168116B (en) |
Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6711134B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2004-03-23 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Monitoring system and method implementing an automatic test plan |
| US20040119713A1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2004-06-24 | Michael Meyringer | Interactive and web-based Gantt Chart |
| US20050138031A1 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2005-06-23 | Wefers Wolfgang M. | Systems and methods for assigning task-oriented roles to users |
| US20070150327A1 (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2007-06-28 | Rncc Global Projects | Project management method and system |
| US20100128040A1 (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-05-27 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Project timeline visualization methods and systems |
| US20110088014A1 (en) * | 2009-10-08 | 2011-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated test execution plan generation |
| US20160171406A1 (en) * | 2014-12-16 | 2016-06-16 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for intelligent project schedule forecasting |
| US20190066028A1 (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2019-02-28 | Project Map Ltd. | A method and system for generating and displaying a project management plan |
| US20190138961A1 (en) * | 2017-11-07 | 2019-05-09 | Indidesk, S.L. (fna Smart Canvas Solutions Espana, S.L.) | System and method for project management using artificial intelligence |
| US20190325089A1 (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2019-10-24 | Reconstruct Inc. | Computation of point clouds and joint display of point clouds and building information models with project schedules for monitoring construction progress, productivity, and risk for delays |
| CN111476479A (en) * | 2020-04-02 | 2020-07-31 | 网易（杭州）网络有限公司 | Method, device and system for distributing tasks |
-
2023
- 2023-04-19 CN CN202310425965.4A patent/CN116168116B/en active Active
Patent Citations (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6711134B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2004-03-23 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Monitoring system and method implementing an automatic test plan |
| US20040119713A1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2004-06-24 | Michael Meyringer | Interactive and web-based Gantt Chart |
| US20050138031A1 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2005-06-23 | Wefers Wolfgang M. | Systems and methods for assigning task-oriented roles to users |
| US20070150327A1 (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2007-06-28 | Rncc Global Projects | Project management method and system |
| US20100128040A1 (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-05-27 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Project timeline visualization methods and systems |
| US20110088014A1 (en) * | 2009-10-08 | 2011-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated test execution plan generation |
| CN102576432A (en) * | 2009-10-08 | 2012-07-11 | 国际商业机器公司 | Automated test execution plan generation |
| US20160171406A1 (en) * | 2014-12-16 | 2016-06-16 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for intelligent project schedule forecasting |
| US20190066028A1 (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2019-02-28 | Project Map Ltd. | A method and system for generating and displaying a project management plan |
| US20190138961A1 (en) * | 2017-11-07 | 2019-05-09 | Indidesk, S.L. (fna Smart Canvas Solutions Espana, S.L.) | System and method for project management using artificial intelligence |
| US20190325089A1 (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2019-10-24 | Reconstruct Inc. | Computation of point clouds and joint display of point clouds and building information models with project schedules for monitoring construction progress, productivity, and risk for delays |
| CN111476479A (en) * | 2020-04-02 | 2020-07-31 | 网易（杭州）网络有限公司 | Method, device and system for distributing tasks |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN116168116B (en) | 2023-07-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Guo et al. | Characterizing and predicting which bugs get fixed: an empirical study of microsoft windows | |
| US10346290B2 (en) | Automatic creation of touring tests | |
| Espinosa‐Curiel et al. | A framework for evaluation and control of the factors that influence the software process improvement in small organizations | |
| CN110729054B (en) | Abnormal diagnosis behavior detection method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Brook et al. | A fast re‐sampling method for using reliability ratings of sightings with extinction‐date estimators | |
| Majumdar et al. | Assessing software upgradation attributes and optimal release planning using DEMATEL and MAUT | |
| JP5905651B1 (en) | Performance evaluation apparatus, performance evaluation apparatus control method, and performance evaluation apparatus control program | |
| CN116168116B (en) | Method and device for visually displaying test execution plan | |
| Boyne | Researching the new public management: the role of quantitative methods | |
| Khater et al. | A proposed technique for software development risks identification by using FTA model | |
| US20140351416A1 (en) | Characterizing Statistical Time-Bounded Incident Management Systems | |
| Tarhan et al. | Assessment of software process and metrics to support quantitative understanding | |
| Höst et al. | Usage of open source in commercial software product development–findings from a focus group meeting | |
| CN112506765A (en) | Software testing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116466683B (en) | Method and device for controlling test tasks | |
| Tarhan et al. | Assessment of software process and metrics to support quantitative understanding: Experience from an undefined task management process | |
| Mannan et al. | Semi-Automated Approach for Evaluation of Software Defect Management Process using ML Approach | |
| Komputer et al. | Open source programmers’ information seeking during software maintenance | |
| Madhuri et al. | Introduction of scope creep life cycle for effective scope creep management in software industries | |
| Rudžionienė | Establishing culture of performance evaluation: seeking the ways of better quality library management and university teaching methodology | |
| CN116187715B (en) | Method and device for scheduling execution of test tasks | |
| US10728118B2 (en) | Service tickets early warning system | |
| Seeliger et al. | Process Explorer: Interactive Visual Exploration of Event Logs with Analysis Guidance | |
| KR102006086B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for simulating subsequent work for usabiltiy improvement | |
| Osadská et al. | Safety Culture≈ Multi-dimensional phenomenon |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |