CN115829142A - Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method - Google Patents

Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115829142A
CN115829142A CN202211610802.5A CN202211610802A CN115829142A CN 115829142 A CN115829142 A CN 115829142A CN 202211610802 A CN202211610802 A CN 202211610802A CN 115829142 A CN115829142 A CN 115829142A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
energy
representing
power
industrial enterprise
equipment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202211610802.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
时珊珊
方陈
张宇
苏运
王皓靖
吴琼
任洪波
李琦芬
杨涌文
张月
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Electric Power University
State Grid Shanghai Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shanghai Electric Power University
State Grid Shanghai Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Electric Power University, State Grid Shanghai Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical Shanghai Electric Power University
Priority to CN202211610802.5A priority Critical patent/CN115829142A/en
Publication of CN115829142A publication Critical patent/CN115829142A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an optimization planning method for an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system, which comprises the following steps: collecting equipment related data of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system; determining equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system based on a multi-party participating subject of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system; establishing equipment models and equipment capacity constraints based on equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system; establishing a multi-subject game model, wherein a non-cooperative game is performed between multi-benefit subjects and industrial enterprise users in the multi-subject game model, and a cooperative game is performed between the multi-benefit subjects; solving a non-cooperative game in the multi-main-body game model based on a KKT-BM method, and determining the equipment capacity and the transaction price of the comprehensive energy system; and (3) solving the cooperative game in the multi-subject game model based on a Shapley value method, and performing benefit distribution on the multi-benefit subjects. Compared with the prior art, the invention considers multi-subject benefit interaction, improves the benefits of each participating subject, enhances the renewable energy consumption capability and can provide stable energy supply for users.

Description

Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of optimization planning of an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system, in particular to an optimization planning method of an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system based on multi-benefit-subject game.
Background
An industrial integrated energy system relates to the production, transfer and consumption of various energy sources such as electricity, heat, cold, gas and the like. The traditional industrial enterprise power distribution and utilization system lacks effective interaction between a production capacity side and a demand side, so that the problems of resource waste and energy shortage generally exist, and the system operation efficiency and the economic and environmental benefits are greatly influenced. In recent years, with the development of intelligent power distribution and utilization technologies and demand response technologies, a scientific and reasonable interaction mechanism becomes an effective solution for realizing the optimization of industrial enterprise comprehensive users and promoting multi-party interaction, and the method is favorable for better meeting the energy demand of users and reducing the energy cost. Meanwhile, the development of energy Internet and multi-energy complementary technology also provides technical and environmental conditions for interactive response among various energy systems such as electricity, heat, cold and the like.
Due to the fact that the structure of the comprehensive energy system and the flow coupling relation of various energy sources are complex, involved operation main bodies comprise a plurality of energy source subsystems such as an electric power system, a natural gas system and a thermal system, users installed with new energy sources and the like, benefit targets of different main bodies are different, and considered operation constraints are different. The countries encourage social capital to participate in the power market, including various power generation enterprises, power selling enterprises, power users, power trading organizations, power dispatching organizations, independent auxiliary service providers and the like, so as to improve the diversity and competitiveness of the power market main body. The spot market can be divided into an electric energy market, an auxiliary service market, a demand response market and the like from the commodity attribute, and the comprehensive energy system is used as a distribution side role and participates in the spot trading market by means of a superior power grid. Therefore, a reasonable energy transaction mechanism is established, and energy transaction and scheduling strategies with balanced benefits are sought on the basis of ensuring the safe operation of different benefit agents, so that the method is an important basis for ensuring the efficient and reasonable utilization of energy.
At present, many related researches on a multi-interest subject interaction mechanism in an integrated energy system at home and abroad are carried out, a mechanism for transaction among the multi-interest subjects in a series of integrated energy systems is provided, the diversity of energy supply channels in the integrated energy system is greatly improved, the consumption capability of renewable energy of the system is enhanced, and the realization of a double-carbon target is facilitated.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects in the prior art and provide an optimization planning method for an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system, which considers multi-subject benefit interaction, improves the benefits of each participating subject, enhances the renewable energy consumption capability and can provide stable energy supply for users.
The purpose of the invention can be realized by the following technical scheme:
an optimization planning method for an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system comprises the following steps:
collecting equipment related data of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system;
determining the equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system based on a multi-party participation main body of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system, wherein the participation main body comprises an energy storage operator, a comprehensive energy operator and an industrial enterprise user, and the energy storage operator and the comprehensive energy operator form a cooperative alliance to serve as a multi-benefit main body;
establishing equipment models and equipment capacity constraints based on the equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system;
establishing a multi-subject game model, wherein a non-cooperative game is performed between multi-subject and industrial enterprise users in the multi-subject game model, and a cooperative game is performed between the multi-subject;
solving a non-cooperative game in the multi-main-body game model based on a KKT-BM method, and determining the equipment capacity and the transaction price of the comprehensive energy system;
and solving the cooperative game in the multi-subject game model based on a Shapley value method, and performing benefit distribution on the energy storage operator and the comprehensive energy operator.
As a preferred scheme of the present invention, the data related to the industrial enterprise integrated energy device includes annual power and heat load data of industrial enterprise users, gas turbine performance parameters, gas boiler performance parameters, photovoltaic device performance parameters, power storage device performance parameters, heat storage device performance parameters, electric boiler performance parameters, power distribution network time-of-use prices, gas purchase costs, and heat supply network heat prices.
As a preferable aspect of the present invention, the integrated energy system device is configured to: the equipment configuration is related to the subject attributes, and the comprehensive energy operator is an energy producer and consists of a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) unit, a gas boiler and a photovoltaic panel; the energy storage operator is also an energy producer and consists of a hybrid energy storage system, and the hybrid energy storage system specifically comprises an electricity storage device (a storage battery), a heat storage device (a heat storage tank) and an electric boiler; industrial enterprise users are energy consumers and are not equipped with energy supply equipment.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the equipment model is:
Figure BDA0003999535480000031
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000032
the total power, kW, generated after the CHP unit burns natural gas is represented; h g The average low heat value of the natural gas is expressed, and 9.97 kW.h/m is taken 3
Figure BDA0003999535480000033
Represents the inlet air power of the CHP unit, m 3 /h;
Figure BDA0003999535480000034
Respectively representing the power generation and heat generation of the CHP unit, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000035
represents the electrical efficiency of the CHP unit,%;
Figure BDA0003999535480000036
representing the thermoelectric ratio of the CHP unit; eta HE Represents heat exchanger efficiency,%;
Figure BDA0003999535480000037
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000038
is the power of a gas boiler, kW; eta GB Efficiency of gas boiler,%;
Figure BDA00039995354800000325
the inlet air power m of the gas boiler 3 /h;
Figure BDA0003999535480000039
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800000310
representing the output of photovoltaic power generation, kW; g t Representing hourly solar radiation, kW/m 2 (ii) a λ represents the photovoltaic module power generation efficiency,%; a is the area of the photovoltaic panel, m 2
Figure BDA00039995354800000311
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800000312
representing the storage energy of the storage battery during the period t, kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800000313
respectively charging and discharging the energy efficiency of the battery by percent;
Figure BDA00039995354800000314
respectively battery charging power and discharging power, kW; Δ t represents a unit time period, h;
Figure BDA00039995354800000315
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800000316
representing the heat storage quantity of the heat storage tank during the time period t, kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800000317
the heat storage efficiency and the heat release efficiency,%, of the heat storage tank are respectively expressed;
Figure BDA00039995354800000318
respectively representing heat storage power and heat release power of the heat storage tank, kW; Δ t represents a unit time period, h;
Figure BDA00039995354800000319
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800000320
the power of the electric boiler is kW; eta EB Represents the electric heat conversion efficiency of the electric boiler,%;
Figure BDA00039995354800000321
indicating the power consumption of the electric boiler, kW.
As a preferable aspect of the present invention, the device capacity constraint includes:
Figure BDA00039995354800000322
Figure BDA00039995354800000323
Figure BDA00039995354800000324
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000041
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the output electric power of the CHP unit, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000042
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the output force of the gas boiler, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000043
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit, kW, of the output electric power of the distributed photovoltaic equipment;
Figure BDA0003999535480000044
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000045
the capacity of energy storage equipment at the starting time and the ending time of battery scheduling is respectively represented, and kWh is equal to the capacity of the energy storage equipment at the starting time and the ending time of the battery scheduling, so that the continuity of scheduling is ensured;
Figure BDA0003999535480000046
the upper limit and the lower limit of the capacity of the power storage equipment, kWh;
Figure BDA0003999535480000047
respectively representing the upper limit, kW, of the charging and discharging power of the power storage system;
Figure BDA0003999535480000048
and
Figure BDA0003999535480000049
the variables are 0-1 respectively representing the charging and discharging states of the energy storage system;
Figure BDA00039995354800000410
represents the charging and discharging power of the electricity storage system, positive represents discharging, negative represents charging, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800000411
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800000412
respectively representing the capacities of energy storage equipment at the dispatching starting time and the dispatching finishing time of the heat storage tank, wherein the balance between the capacities is the continuity of dispatching;
Figure BDA00039995354800000413
respectively representing the upper and lower limits of the capacity of the heat storage equipment, kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800000414
respectively representing the upper limits of the heat storage power and the heat release power of the heat storage system, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800000415
and
Figure BDA00039995354800000416
the variable is 0-1 respectively representing the heat storage and release states of the energy storage system;
Figure BDA00039995354800000417
the heat storage system is used for storing and releasing heat, positive represents heat release, negative represents heat storage and kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800000418
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800000419
indicating the rated capacity of the electric boiler, kW.
As a preferred scheme of the present invention, in a multi-party participating subject of the integrated energy system, the interaction mechanism of the multi-party participating subject is:
in the comprehensive energy system, each main body has the capability of autonomous selection and autonomous regulation in the transaction process. Different energy conversion devices and market trading bodies, and the energy management mechanism and the information sharing and other elements in the trading process form a multi-body interaction mechanism of the system. The types of market exchange subjects include two categories, energy producer attributes and energy consumer attributes: energy producers reasonably make energy quotations according to the energy demands of users; energy consumers reasonably arrange own energy consumption strategies according to energy quotations of all parties;
in the integrated energy system, an integrated energy service provider and an energy storage operator, namely an energy producer, cooperate and play among the integrated energy service provider and the energy storage operator to form a cooperation alliance, and a uniform energy selling price is formulated to supply energy to energy consumers, namely industrial enterprise users. And the final benefits of the cooperation game of the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator are distributed by a Shapley value method. The industrial enterprise users are energy consumers, and complete information dynamic games are played between energy producers and energy consumers, namely master-slave games, wherein the producers are leaders and the consumers are followers. The producer carries out pricing according to the load demand of the consumer, then the consumer makes the energy ordering strategy according to the energy price and the objective function to the maximum, and the energy supply side adjusts the equipment capacity according to the energy ordering condition of the user to carry out reasonable planning, thereby achieving the optimal benefit. The producer and the consumer carry out non-cooperative game, solve the non-cooperative game by a KKT-BM method, and obtain the capacity and the energy transaction price of each device, and further obtain the specific outsourcing energy quantity and the output condition of each device.
As a preferable scheme of the invention, the multi-principal gaming model comprises objective functions of multi-principal benefits, objective functions of industrial enterprise users, non-cooperative gaming constraints and cooperative gaming constraints.
As a preferred scheme of the invention, the objective function of the multi-interest subject is as follows:
Figure BDA0003999535480000051
wherein: pi p The benefit function of the cooperative alliance formed by the energy supply side comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator is represented, and is a difference value between income obtained by selling energy to a user at a demand side and expenses such as equipment investment cost, operation cost and the like;
Figure BDA0003999535480000052
representing energy supply side energy selling benefit;
Figure BDA0003999535480000053
the annual average investment cost of equipment on the energy supply side is represented;
Figure BDA0003999535480000054
representing the cost of energy purchase from an external network on the energy supply side;
Figure BDA0003999535480000055
representing annual operation and maintenance cost of energy supply side equipment;
Figure BDA0003999535480000056
wherein s is the typical day; s is a typical number of days, representing several typical days with obvious seasonality in a year (summer/transition season/winter typical days); d s Days, days of the s typical day; t is a scheduling period, and 24h is taken; delta t is a scheduling time interval and is taken as 1h; p is a radical of e,t 、p h,t Respectively representing unit electricity price and heat price, yuan/kWh, of energy sold by the energy supply side to industrial enterprise users; w e ,t 、W h,t Respectively representing the actual electric load and the actual heat load, kW, of the industrial enterprise user;
Figure BDA0003999535480000061
wherein, the initial investment cost of the equipment is converted to each year through an annual equal investment conversion coefficient; k is the equipment type owned by the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator; k is the number of device types; alpha is alpha k Is the unit capacity installation cost of equipment k, yuan/kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000062
is the installation capacity of the equipment k, kW; r is annual rate,%; y is k The operating life of the equipment k is year;
Figure BDA0003999535480000063
Figure BDA0003999535480000064
wherein p is g Expressing the price per unit of natural gas, yuan/m 3
Figure BDA00039995354800000615
Representing an integrated energy facilitatorTotal intake power per unit time period, m 3 /h;
Figure BDA0003999535480000065
The time-of-use electricity price of the power distribution network is expressed, yuan/kWh;
Figure BDA0003999535480000066
indicating that the power supply side distributes the electric power purchased by the power grid, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000067
represents the heat rate of the heat net, yuan/kWh;
Figure BDA0003999535480000068
power, kW, representing the power at which the energy supply side purchased heat to the hot wire;
Figure BDA0003999535480000069
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800000610
respectively representing the unit capacity operation and maintenance cost, yuan/kWh, of the CHP unit, the gas boiler and the distributed photovoltaic power generation of the comprehensive energy service provider;
Figure BDA00039995354800000611
respectively representing the operation and maintenance costs of a storage battery, a heat storage tank and an electric boiler of an energy storage operator, unit/kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800000612
respectively show the output of comprehensive energy service provider CHP unit, gas boiler and distributed photovoltaic equipment, kW.
As a preferred scheme of the invention, the objective function of the industrial enterprise user is as follows:
Figure BDA00039995354800000613
wherein, F u A utility function for industrial enterprise users;
Figure BDA00039995354800000614
wherein: ae. be respectively represents preference constants of the electric energy consumption of the industrial enterprise users; ah. bh respectively represents preference constants of heat energy consumption of industrial enterprise users; these constants are associated with the performance characteristics of different users and can affect the demand response capabilities of the users.
As a preferred scheme of the invention, the non-cooperative game constraint conditions comprise an electric balance constraint, a thermal balance constraint, a demand response constraint, an energy storage device operation constraint and a user transaction price constraint:
the electrical balance constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000071
Figure BDA0003999535480000072
wherein:
Figure BDA0003999535480000073
indicating that the power is directly sold to a user part in the power purchasing of the power grid, namely kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000074
indicating that the power grid purchases electricity for selling to an energy storage operator part, namely kW;
the thermal equilibrium constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000075
Figure BDA0003999535480000076
the demand response constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000077
Figure BDA0003999535480000078
Figure BDA0003999535480000079
wherein:
Figure BDA00039995354800000710
representing the fixed electrical load of the user, i.e. the electrical load required to maintain the normal operation of the user, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800000711
representing that a user can translate the load in a time period t, and adjusting based on the real-time energy price, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800000712
a numerical upper limit, kW, representing the user's translatable electrical load;
Figure BDA00039995354800000713
representing the total amount of the translatable electric load, kW, in the T period of the user;
the energy storage device operational constraints include:
Figure BDA00039995354800000714
wherein:
Figure BDA00039995354800000715
representing that the electricity purchasing power is used for a storage battery charging part, kW;
if t is in the valley period, then there are:
Figure BDA00039995354800000716
if t is in the peak time period, the energy storage operator does not purchase electricity to the power distribution network, then:
Figure BDA00039995354800000717
the energy trading price constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000081
wherein:
Figure BDA0003999535480000082
respectively representing minimum and maximum value constraints of electricity price sold to users by the energy supply side, yuan/kWh;
Figure BDA0003999535480000083
represents the upper limit of the average electricity price, yuan/kWh.
As a preferred solution of the present invention, the cooperative game constraint conditions are:
according to the cooperative game idea, the interest appeal of the main body participating in the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system is divided into an individual rationality part and a collective rationality part: for a cooperative alliance with distributed profit, the overall profit of the cooperative alliance is not less than the sum of individual profits before the alliance, namely, the collective rationality; the benefit of individuals participating in the cooperation must be better than the individual benefit before cooperation, i.e., individuality. If and only if each participant in the cooperative alliance S meets the above requirements, the cooperative alliance can be established; accordingly, the constraint conditions of the cooperative game of the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator are as follows:
Figure BDA0003999535480000084
wherein: v (i) represents the revenue, element, allocated by the participating principal i in the cooperative federation G; u (i) represents revenue, dollars, for participating in the independent operation of principal i;
Figure BDA0003999535480000085
Figure BDA0003999535480000086
wherein: u shape CO Representing the total revenue of the cooperative alliance; n represents the number of participating agents.
As a preferred scheme of the present invention, the solving of the non-cooperative game based on the KKT-BM method includes:
the KKT-BM conversion method is characterized in that a target function of a user is converted into a constraint condition of an energy supply side, so that double-layer optimization conversion is based on nonlinear programming of a KKT condition, and a specific expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0003999535480000087
Figure BDA0003999535480000088
Figure BDA0003999535480000089
Figure BDA00039995354800000810
wherein: l is GU A Lagrangian function representing an industrial enterprise user construct; theta e, theta esu and mu e respectively represent dual variables introduced by a KKT condition, wherein theta e and theta esu respectively represent Lagrange multipliers corresponding to inequality constraints, and mu e represents Lagrange multiplication corresponding to equality constraintsCounting; "a ≠ b" means a ≧ 0, b ≧ 0, a × b =0;
because complementary constraints are nonlinear, all convex optimization is needed, and the original nonlinear expression is converted into mixed integer linear programming constraints by introducing a variable of 0-1 by using a Big-M transformation method, which is specifically represented as the following formula:
Figure BDA0003999535480000091
wherein: beta is a θe 、β θesu Representing a variable from 0 to 1, wherein M is a positive number which is large enough, and the constraint linearization of the type can be realized by using a large M method, so that a linear single-layer model of the non-cooperative game is finally obtained;
at the same time, the user can select the desired position,
Figure BDA0003999535480000092
according to the KKT condition, the dual variable is used for converting the dual variable into a secondary term, and the secondary term is specifically shown as the following formula:
Figure BDA0003999535480000093
after the conversion, the nonlinear terms in the game are only secondary terms, a KKT-BM method is utilized to equivalently convert a double-layer game model into a single-layer mixed integer nonlinear programming problem, and the equipment capacity and the transaction price of the comprehensive energy system are solved and determined.
As a preferred aspect of the present invention, the allocating benefits to each participating subject in the cooperative alliance based on the sharley value method includes:
Figure BDA0003999535480000094
wherein:
Figure BDA0003999535480000095
representing the benefit that participant i should be allocated; (| G | -1) |! Ranking aggregate when representing coalition of participantsA number where G represents the number of partial participants, and the remaining (n-G) participants are ordered by (n-G |)! In the method for preparing the seed coating,
Figure BDA0003999535480000096
dividing different sorting combinations representing the participation of each participant in the cooperation by the random sorting of n participants to obtain the weight occupied by each participant; v (G) represents the benefit of federation G when participant i participates in the collaboration; v (G \ i }) represents the benefit of federation G in removing participant i; v (G) -v (G \ i }) represents the marginal contribution of participant i participating in the creation of a different federation G.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects:
the optimization planning method for the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system based on the multi-interest-subject game is provided, multi-subject interest interaction is considered, benefits of all participating subjects are improved, the renewable energy consumption capability is enhanced, stable energy supply can be provided for users, the problem that only a single energy supply operator is considered for supplying energy to the users in the prior art is solved, the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system based on the multi-interest-subject game is considered, and therefore the optimal equipment configuration scheme for the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system considering multi-interest fairness is achieved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings based on these drawings without inventive labor. Wherein:
FIG. 1 is a multi-benefit agent interaction diagram of a method for optimizing and planning an industrial enterprise integrated energy system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a diagram of a multi-interest-subject game model of an industrial enterprise integrated energy system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a time-by-time thermoelectric load diagram of a typical day of an industrial enterprise according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a model solution flowchart of an industrial enterprise integrated energy system optimization planning method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 5 is a diagram illustrating a typical summer solar power output balance under the optimal operation of the system of the method for optimizing and planning an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 6 is a typical daily electricity output balance diagram in a transition season under the optimal operation of the system of the industrial enterprise integrated energy system optimization planning method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 7 is a diagram illustrating typical daily output balance in winter under optimal operation of the system of the method for optimally planning the integrated energy system of the industrial enterprise according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 8 is a time-of-use electricity price chart of an industrial user of the method for optimizing and planning an industrial enterprise integrated energy system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the aforementioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention comprehensible, specific embodiments accompanied with figures are described in detail below, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are a part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be obtained by a person skilled in the art without any inventive step based on the embodiments of the present invention, shall fall within the scope of the present invention.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention, but the present invention may be practiced in other ways than those specifically described herein, and it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Furthermore, the references herein to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" refer to a particular feature, structure, or characteristic that may be included in at least one implementation of the present invention. The appearances of the phrase "in one embodiment" in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments.
Meanwhile, in the description of the present invention, it should be noted that the terms "upper, lower, inner and outer" and the like indicate orientations or positional relationships based on the orientations or positional relationships shown in the drawings, and are only for convenience of describing the present invention and simplifying the description, but do not indicate or imply that the referred device or element must have a specific orientation, be constructed in a specific orientation and operate, and thus, cannot be construed as limiting the present invention.
Example 1:
referring to fig. 1 and fig. 2, the invention provides an optimization planning method for an industrial enterprise integrated energy system, comprising the following steps:
s1, collecting relevant data of equipment of an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system, and analyzing annual electricity and heat load of a user;
it should be noted that: the system comprises annual power and heat load data of industrial enterprise users, gas turbine performance parameters, gas boiler performance parameters, photovoltaic equipment performance parameters, power storage device performance parameters, heat storage device performance parameters, power boiler performance parameters, power grid time-of-use electricity price, heat grid time-of-use heat price and gas purchase cost, wherein 1 typical daily load data in each quarter is selected as key load analysis when the annual power and heat load of the industrial enterprise users is analyzed.
S2, determining equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system based on a multi-party participation subject of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system; the participation main body of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system comprises an energy storage operator, a comprehensive energy operator and an industrial enterprise user, and the energy storage operator and the comprehensive energy operator form a cooperative union to serve as a multi-benefit main body;
the equipment configuration is related to the subject attributes, and the comprehensive energy operator is an energy producer and consists of a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) unit, a gas boiler and a photovoltaic panel; the energy storage operator is also an energy producer and consists of a hybrid energy storage system, and the hybrid energy storage system specifically comprises an electricity storage device (a storage battery), a heat storage device (a heat storage tank) and an electric boiler; industrial enterprise users are energy consumers and are not equipped with energy supply equipment.
S3, establishing each equipment model and equipment capacity constraint based on the equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system;
wherein, the equipment model includes:
(1) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) unit
Figure BDA0003999535480000121
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000122
the total power, kW, generated after the CHP unit burns natural gas is represented; h g The average low heat value of the natural gas is expressed, and 9.97 kW.h/m is taken 3
Figure BDA0003999535480000123
Represents the intake power of the CHP unit, m 3 /h;
Figure BDA0003999535480000124
Respectively representing the power generation and heat generation of the CHP unit, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000125
represents the electrical efficiency of the CHP unit,%;
Figure BDA0003999535480000126
represents the thermoelectric ratio of the CHP unit; eta HE Represents heat exchanger efficiency,%;
(2) Gas boiler
Figure BDA0003999535480000127
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000128
is the power of a gas boiler, kW; eta GB Efficiency of gas boiler,%;
Figure BDA0003999535480000129
for the inlet power of a gas boiler, m 3 /h;
(3) Photovoltaic panel
Figure BDA00039995354800001210
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800001211
expressing the output of photovoltaic power generation, kW; g t Representing hourly solar radiation, kW/m 2 (ii) a λ represents the photovoltaic module power generation efficiency,%; a is the area of the photovoltaic panel, m 2
(4) Electricity storage equipment (accumulator)
Figure BDA00039995354800001212
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800001213
representing the storage energy of the storage battery during the period t, kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800001214
respectively charging and discharging the energy efficiency of the battery by percent;
Figure BDA00039995354800001215
battery charging power and discharging power, kW, respectively; Δ t represents a unit time period, h;
(5) Heat-storage equipment (Heat storage pot)
Figure BDA00039995354800001216
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800001217
representing the heat storage quantity of the heat storage tank during the time period t, kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800001218
the heat storage efficiency and the heat release efficiency,%, of the heat storage tank are respectively expressed;
Figure BDA00039995354800001219
respectively representing heat storage power and heat release power of the heat storage tank, kW; Δ t represents a unit time period, h;
(6) Electric boiler
Figure BDA00039995354800001220
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800001221
the power of the electric boiler is kW; eta EB Represents the electric heat conversion efficiency of the electric boiler,%;
Figure BDA0003999535480000131
indicating the power consumption of the electric boiler, kW.
The device capacity constraints include:
(1) Comprehensive energy operator
Figure BDA0003999535480000132
Figure BDA0003999535480000133
Figure BDA0003999535480000134
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000135
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the output electric power of the CHP unit, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000136
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the output force of the gas boiler, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000137
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit, kW, of the output electric power of the distributed photovoltaic equipment;
(2) Energy storage operator
Figure BDA0003999535480000138
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000139
the capacity of energy storage equipment at the starting time and the ending time of battery scheduling is respectively represented, and kWh is equal to the capacity of the energy storage equipment at the starting time and the ending time of the battery scheduling, so that the continuity of scheduling is ensured;
Figure BDA00039995354800001310
the upper limit and the lower limit of the capacity of the power storage equipment, kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800001311
respectively representing the upper limit, kW, of the charging and discharging power of the power storage system;
Figure BDA00039995354800001312
and
Figure BDA00039995354800001313
0-1 variable respectively representing charging and discharging states of the energy storage system;
Figure BDA00039995354800001314
represents the charge-discharge power of the electricity storage system, positive represents discharge, negative represents charge, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800001315
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800001316
respectively representing the capacities of energy storage equipment at the dispatching starting time and the dispatching finishing time of the heat storage tank, wherein the balance between the capacities is the continuity of dispatching;
Figure BDA00039995354800001317
respectively representing the upper and lower limits of the capacity of the heat storage equipment, kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800001318
respectively representing the upper limits of the heat storage power and the heat release power of the heat storage system, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800001319
and
Figure BDA00039995354800001320
the variable is 0-1 respectively representing the heat storage and release states of the energy storage system;
Figure BDA00039995354800001321
the heat storage system stores and releases heat, positive means releases heat, negative means stores heat, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000141
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0003999535480000142
indicating the rated capacity of the electric boiler, kW.
S4, establishing a multi-subject game model, wherein a non-cooperative game is performed between multi-benefit subjects and industrial enterprise users in the multi-subject game model, and a cooperative game is performed between the multi-benefit subjects;
in the multi-party participation main body of the comprehensive energy system, the interaction mechanism of the multi-party participation main body is as follows:
in the comprehensive energy system, each main body has the capability of autonomous selection and autonomous regulation in the transaction process. Different energy conversion devices and market trading bodies, and the energy management mechanism and the information sharing and other elements in the trading process form a multi-body interaction mechanism of the system. The types of market exchange subjects include two categories, energy producer attributes and energy consumer attributes: energy producers reasonably make energy quotations according to the energy demands of users; energy consumers reasonably arrange own energy consumption strategies according to energy quotations of all parties;
in the integrated energy system, an integrated energy service provider and an energy storage operator, namely an energy producer, cooperate and play among the integrated energy service provider and the energy storage operator to form a cooperation alliance, and a uniform energy selling price is formulated to supply energy to energy consumers, namely industrial enterprise users. And the final benefits of the cooperation game of the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator are distributed by a Shapley value method. The industrial enterprise users are energy consumers, and complete information dynamic games are played between energy producers and energy consumers, namely master-slave games, wherein the producers are leaders and the consumers are followers. The producer carries out pricing according to the load demand of the consumer, then the consumer makes the energy ordering strategy according to the energy price and the objective function to the maximum, and the energy supply side adjusts the equipment capacity according to the energy ordering condition of the user to carry out reasonable planning, thereby achieving the optimal benefit. And (3) carrying out non-cooperative game on the producer and the consumer, solving the non-cooperative game by a KKT-BM method to obtain the capacity and the energy transaction price of each device, and further obtaining the specific outsourcing energy quantity and the output condition of each device.
Therefore, in the established multi-principal game model, the non-cooperative game between the multi-principal and the industrial enterprise users and the cooperative game between the multi-principal are established. The multi-principal game model comprises objective functions of multi-principal interests, objective functions of industrial enterprise users, non-cooperative game constraint conditions and cooperative game constraint conditions.
Firstly, performing master-slave game balance existence certification:
the cooperation alliance formed by the multi-interest bodies is a leader in a non-cooperation game, has the pricing right of energy and is an energy supply side, namely a supply side; the industrial enterprise user is a follower, and adjusts own energy utilization strategy for a demand side, also called an energy utilization side, according to the energy price published by an energy supply side. In the primary and secondary games, solving the Nash equilibrium solution is the final purpose of the non-cooperative game and is also the theoretical verification of the research result. The equilibrium solution means that when all participants obtain the equilibrium solution strategy, any participant cannot promote self interest by only changing own strategy, namely, the equilibrium strategy is the strategy that each rational participant benefits the most under a certain environment.
When Nash equilibrium exists in the game model, the definition of Nash equilibrium indicates that (h) * ,z * ) The game model is an equilibrium solution of the game model, namely an equilibrium solution H on the energy supply side and a strategy Z on the user side. The benefits of both parties can reach the optimum value of Nash equilibrium meaning. Let H, Z be the tight subset of the metric space, and Z be the non-null convex set of the metric space, it can be known that when the master-slave game satisfies the following conditions at the same time, the game equilibrium exists:
(1)π u is a continuous convex function with respect to policy set Z;
(2)π u is about W e,t A quasi-convex function of (a);
(3)π p is a continuity function with respect to policy set H;
firstly, conditions (1) and (3) are proved, because the objective function of the energy supply side is the difference value between income and expenditure, the benefit function of an industrial enterprise user is calculated according to the utility function and the objective function, the continuity of the two variables is obvious, nash equilibrium is proved to exist, and whether the second condition is met or not is mainly proved.
By definition "a function pi (x) is defined in the open interval W, if
Figure BDA0003999535480000151
With pi [ rx ] 1 +(1-r)x 2 ]≤rπ(x 1 )+(1-r)π(x 2 ) Then, it is called pi (x) to be a convex function or a downward convex function in the interval W. "by deductive calculation,. Pi u Satisfy the convex function characteristic in the definition, with respect to W e,t A quasi-convex function of (a).
In conclusion, the demand side users have unique optimal response to the energy price, and all strategy sets participating in the game are non-empty and compact, so that a master-slave game equilibrium solution for energy transaction between the energy supply side users and the demand side users exists.
(1) The objective function for the multi-benefit agent is:
Figure BDA0003999535480000152
wherein: pi p The benefit function of the cooperative alliance formed by the energy supply side comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator is represented, and is a difference value between income obtained by selling energy to a user at a demand side and expenses such as equipment investment cost, operation cost and the like;
Figure BDA0003999535480000153
representing energy supply side energy selling benefit;
Figure BDA0003999535480000154
the annual average investment cost of equipment on the energy supply side is represented;
Figure BDA0003999535480000155
representing the cost of energy purchase from an external network on the energy supply side;
Figure BDA0003999535480000156
representing annual operation and maintenance cost of energy supply side equipment;
Figure BDA0003999535480000157
wherein s is the typical day; s is a typical number of days, representing several typical days with obvious seasonality in a year (summer/transition season/winter typical days); d s Days, of the s typical day; t is a scheduling period, and 24h is taken; delta t is a scheduling time interval and is taken as 1h; p is a radical of e,t 、p h,t Respectively representing unit electricity price and heat price, yuan/kWh, of energy sold by an energy supply side to industrial enterprise users; w e ,t 、W h,t Respectively representing the actual electric load and the actual heat load, kW, of the industrial enterprise user;
Figure BDA0003999535480000161
wherein, the initial investment cost of the equipment is converted to each year through an annual equal investment conversion coefficient; k is the equipment type owned by the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator; k is the number of device types; alpha is alpha k Is the unit capacity installation cost of equipment k, yuan/kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000162
is the installation capacity of the equipment k, kW; r is annual rate,%; y is k Is the operating life of the equipment k, years;
Figure BDA0003999535480000163
Figure BDA0003999535480000164
wherein p is g Expressing the price per unit of natural gas, yuan/m 3
Figure BDA0003999535480000165
Represents the total intake power m of the integrated energy service provider in unit time period 3 /h;
Figure BDA0003999535480000166
Representing the time-of-use electricity price of the power distribution network, yuan/kWh;
Figure BDA0003999535480000167
indicating that the power supply side distributes the electric power purchased by the power grid, kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000168
represents the heat rate of the heat net, yuan/kWh;
Figure BDA0003999535480000169
indicating heat purchase from the side of the energy supply to the hot-wirePower, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800001610
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00039995354800001611
respectively representing the unit capacity operation and maintenance cost, yuan/kWh, of the CHP unit, the gas boiler and the distributed photovoltaic power generation of the comprehensive energy service provider;
Figure BDA00039995354800001612
respectively representing the operation and maintenance costs of a storage battery, a heat storage tank and an electric boiler of an energy storage operator, unit/kWh;
Figure BDA00039995354800001613
and the output power, kW, of the CHP unit, the gas boiler and the distributed photovoltaic equipment of the comprehensive energy service provider is respectively expressed.
(2) The objective function of the industrial enterprise user is as follows:
Figure BDA00039995354800001614
wherein, F u A utility function for industrial enterprise users;
Figure BDA00039995354800001615
wherein: ae. be respectively represents preference constants of the electric energy consumption of the industrial enterprise users; ah. bh respectively represents preference constants of heat energy consumption of industrial enterprise users; these constants are associated with the performance characteristics of different users and can affect the demand response capabilities of the users.
(3) The non-cooperative game constraint conditions comprise an electric balance constraint, a thermal balance constraint, a demand response constraint, an energy storage device operation constraint and a user transaction price constraint:
the electrical balance constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000171
Figure BDA0003999535480000172
wherein:
Figure BDA0003999535480000173
indicating that the power is directly sold to a user part in the power purchasing of the power grid, namely kW;
Figure BDA0003999535480000174
indicating that the power grid purchases power and sells the power to an energy storage operator part, namely kW;
the thermal equilibrium constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000175
Figure BDA0003999535480000176
the demand response constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000177
Figure BDA0003999535480000178
Figure BDA0003999535480000179
wherein:
Figure BDA00039995354800001710
representing the user's identityDetermining the electric load, namely maintaining the electric load, kW, required by normal operation of a user;
Figure BDA00039995354800001711
representing that a user can translate the load in a time period t, and adjusting based on real-time energy price, kW;
Figure BDA00039995354800001712
a numerical upper limit, kW, representing the user's translatable electrical load;
Figure BDA00039995354800001713
representing the total amount of the translatable electric load, kW, in the T period of the user;
energy storage device operational constraints include:
Figure BDA00039995354800001714
wherein:
Figure BDA00039995354800001715
indicating that the electricity purchasing power is used for a storage battery charging part, kW;
if t is in the valley period, then there are:
Figure BDA00039995354800001716
if t is in the peak time period, the energy storage operator does not purchase electricity from the power distribution network, and the following steps are performed:
Figure BDA00039995354800001717
the energy trading price constraints include:
Figure BDA0003999535480000181
wherein:
Figure BDA0003999535480000182
respectively representing minimum and maximum value constraints of electricity price sold to users by the energy supply side, yuan/kWh;
Figure BDA0003999535480000183
represents the upper limit of the average electricity price, yuan/kWh.
(4) The constraint conditions of the cooperative game are as follows:
according to the cooperative game idea, the interest appeal of the main body participating in the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system is divided into an individual rationality part and a collective rationality part: for a cooperative alliance with distributed profit, the overall profit of the cooperative alliance is not less than the sum of individual profits before the alliance, namely, the collective rationality; the benefit of individuals participating in the cooperation must be better than the individual benefit before cooperation, i.e., individuality. If and only if each participant in the cooperative alliance S meets the above requirements, the cooperative alliance can be established; accordingly, the constraint conditions of the cooperative game of the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator are as follows:
Figure BDA0003999535480000184
wherein: v (i) represents the revenue, element, allocated by the participating principal i in the cooperative federation G; u (i) represents revenue, dollars, for participating in the independent operation of principal i;
Figure BDA0003999535480000185
Figure BDA0003999535480000186
wherein: u shape CO Representing the total revenue of the cooperative alliance; n represents the number of participating agents.
S5, solving a non-cooperative game in the multi-main-body game model based on a KKT-BM method, and determining the equipment capacity and the transaction price of the comprehensive energy system;
it should be noted that: solving the non-cooperative game based on a KKT-BM method to obtain the capacity of each device, wherein the energy transaction price of the result can be taken as an influence factor to obtain the specific outsourcing energy quantity of an energy supply side and the output condition of the device in unit time;
the KKT-BM conversion method is characterized in that a target function of a user is converted into a constraint condition of an energy supply side, so that double-layer optimization conversion is based on nonlinear programming of a KKT condition, and a specific expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0003999535480000187
Figure BDA0003999535480000188
Figure BDA0003999535480000189
Figure BDA00039995354800001810
wherein: l is a radical of an alcohol GU A Lagrangian function representing an industrial enterprise user construct; theta e, theta esu and mu e respectively represent dual variables introduced by a KKT condition, wherein the theta e and the theta esu respectively represent Lagrange multipliers corresponding to inequality constraints, and the mu e represents Lagrange multipliers corresponding to equality constraints; "a ≠ b" means a ≧ 0, b ≧ 0, a × b =0;
because complementary constraints are nonlinear, all convex optimization is needed, and the original nonlinear expression is converted into mixed integer linear programming constraints by introducing a variable of 0-1 by using a Big-M transformation method, which is specifically represented as the following formula:
Figure BDA0003999535480000191
wherein: beta is a θe 、β θesu Represents a variable of 0 to 1, M is oneThe positive number is large enough, the type can be subjected to constraint linearization by using a large M method, and a linear single-layer model of the non-cooperative game is finally obtained;
at the same time, the user can select the desired position,
Figure BDA0003999535480000192
according to the KKT condition, the dual variable is used for converting the dual variable into a secondary term, and the secondary term is specifically shown as the following formula:
Figure BDA0003999535480000193
after the conversion, the nonlinear terms in the game are only secondary terms, a KKT-BM method is utilized to equivalently convert a double-layer game model into a single-layer mixed integer nonlinear programming problem, and the equipment capacity and the transaction price of the comprehensive energy system are solved and determined.
S6, solving a cooperative game in the multi-subject game model based on a Shapley value method, and performing benefit distribution on an energy storage operator and a comprehensive energy operator, specifically comprising the following steps:
Figure BDA0003999535480000194
wherein:
Figure BDA0003999535480000195
representing the benefit that participant i should be allocated; (| G | -1) |! Represents the total number of ranks each participant engaged in the coalition, where | G | represents the number of partial participants and the remaining (n- | G |) participants have ranks of (n- | G |) |. In the method for preparing the seed coating,
Figure BDA0003999535480000196
dividing different sequencing combinations for representing the participation of each participant in the cooperation by the random sequencing of n participants to obtain the weight occupied by each participant; v (G) represents the benefit of federation G when participant i participates in the collaboration; v (S \ i }) represents the benefit of federation G in removing participant i; v (G) -v (G \ i }) represents that participant i participates in the marginal tributes created by different alliances GA document is presented.
Example 2:
in order to verify and explain the technical effect of the method, the embodiment selects load data of an industrial enterprise to perform simulation modeling so as to verify the real effect of the method.
In this embodiment, a certain industrial enterprise in the sea is a research object, and a configuration planning analysis is performed on the comprehensive energy system of the multi-benefit-subject game based on the established model, the electricity price of the comprehensive energy system adopts the time-of-use electricity price of a single system of general industry and commerce, the electricity price has the power price in summer and non-summer, a thermoelectric load curve of the industrial enterprise on a typical day is shown in fig. 3, specific equipment parameters are shown in table 1, and equipment investment cost and maintenance cost are specifically shown in table 2.
Table 1: device technology parameter table.
Figure BDA0003999535480000201
Table 2: equipment investment and operation and maintenance costs.
Device Investment cost (Yuan/kW) Operation and maintenance cost (Yuan/kW. H)
Cogeneration of heat and electricity 8000 0.2079
Gas boiler 800 0.08
Photovoltaic device 6300 0.06
Electric boiler 1000 0.04
Storage battery 1400 0.029
Heat storage tank 35 0.00536
3 typical scenes are set in the case, wherein the scene 1 is that a comprehensive energy service provider independently supplies energy to industrial enterprises, and an energy storage operator does not participate in energy supply; scenario 2 is that an energy storage operator independently supplies energy to an industrial enterprise, and a comprehensive energy service provider does not participate in energy supply; scenario 3 is that the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator form a cooperative union to supply energy to the industrial enterprises. The specific solving flow of the model is shown in fig. 4.
Based on the parameter setting, the optimization model constructed by the invention is applied to establish the configuration of the equipment at the supply side under 3 typical scenes, and the planning capacity and the optimal benefit of the equipment under different scenes are obtained by operation, which is specifically shown in table 3. From table 3, it is apparent that the net profit of the supply-side cooperative alliance is larger than the profit of the sum of the independent energy supply operation, the cooperative alliance is established, and further benefit distribution is performed by the sharley value method, so that the net profit of the IEO (integrated energy service provider) in the cooperative alliance is 251.04 ten thousand yuan, the net profit of the ESO (energy storage provider) is 3.60 ten thousand yuan, and the growth rates are 5.99% and 5.88%, respectively.
Table 3: and (4) optimizing configuration of equipment and a benefit result table under different scenes.
Figure BDA0003999535480000211
Based on the system configuration, the cooperation of the supply sides can bring greater benefits, and although the equipment investment is obviously increased compared with the other two scenarios, the benefit brought by the investment is also obviously increased. As can be seen from the typical daily electric balance diagrams in fig. 5 to fig. 7, the electric load of the industrial enterprise does not change much all the year around, the demand is relatively stable, and the demand response is not obvious because the fixed load ratio required by the industrial enterprise to maintain normal operation is large. Accordingly, the power transaction between the supply and demand sides is a time-sharing power selling price close to the power distribution network, as shown in fig. 8.
The foregoing detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented. It should be understood that numerous modifications and variations could be devised by those skilled in the art in light of the present teachings without departing from the inventive concepts. Therefore, the technical solutions available to those skilled in the art through logic analysis, reasoning and limited experiments based on the prior art according to the concept of the present invention should be within the scope of protection defined by the claims.

Claims (10)

1. An optimization planning method for an industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
collecting equipment related data of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system;
determining the equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system based on a multi-party participating main body of the industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system, wherein the participating main body comprises an energy storage operator, a comprehensive energy operator and an industrial enterprise user, and the energy storage operator and the comprehensive energy operator form a cooperative union to serve as a multi-benefit main body;
establishing equipment models and equipment capacity constraints based on the equipment configuration of the comprehensive energy system;
establishing a multi-subject game model, wherein a non-cooperative game is performed between multi-subject and industrial enterprise users in the multi-subject game model, and a cooperative game is performed between the multi-subject;
solving a non-cooperative game in the multi-main-body game model based on a KKT-BM method, and determining the equipment capacity and the transaction price of the comprehensive energy system;
and solving the cooperative game in the multi-main-body game model based on a Shapley value method, and performing benefit distribution on the energy storage operator and the comprehensive energy operator.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the equipment model is:
Figure FDA0003999535470000011
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003999535470000012
representing the total power generated by the CHP unit after natural gas combustion; h g Represents the average lower heating value of natural gas;
Figure FDA0003999535470000013
representing the inlet air power of the CHP unit;
Figure FDA0003999535470000014
respectively representing electricity generation power and heat generation power of the CHP unit;
Figure FDA0003999535470000015
representing the electrical efficiency of the CHP unit;
Figure FDA0003999535470000016
representing the thermoelectric ratio of the CHP unit; eta HE Represents the heat exchanger efficiency;
Figure FDA0003999535470000017
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003999535470000018
is the gas boiler power; eta GB To gas boiler efficiency;
Figure FDA0003999535470000019
the gas inlet power of the gas boiler is obtained;
Figure FDA00039995354700000110
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA00039995354700000111
representing the output of photovoltaic power generation; g t Representing time-wise solar radiation; lambda represents the generating efficiency of the photovoltaic module; a is the area of the photovoltaic panel;
Figure FDA0003999535470000021
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003999535470000022
representing the energy storage capacity of the storage battery in the t period;
Figure FDA0003999535470000023
respectively charging and discharging the energy of the battery;
Figure FDA0003999535470000024
charging power and discharging power for the battery respectively; Δ t represents a unit time period;
Figure FDA0003999535470000025
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003999535470000026
representing the heat storage quantity of the heat storage tank in the time period t;
Figure FDA0003999535470000027
respectively representing the heat storage efficiency and the heat release efficiency of the heat storage tank;
Figure FDA0003999535470000028
respectively representing the heat storage power and the heat release power of the heat storage tank; Δ t represents a unit time period;
Figure FDA0003999535470000029
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure FDA00039995354700000210
representing the heat production power of the electric boiler; eta EB The electric heat conversion efficiency of the electric boiler is shown;
Figure FDA00039995354700000211
representing the consumed electrical power of the electrical boiler.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the equipment capacity constraint comprises:
Figure FDA00039995354700000212
Figure FDA00039995354700000213
Figure FDA00039995354700000214
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA00039995354700000215
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the output electric power of the CHP unit;
Figure FDA00039995354700000216
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the output force of the gas boiler;
Figure FDA00039995354700000217
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the output electric power of the distributed photovoltaic equipment;
Figure FDA00039995354700000218
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure FDA00039995354700000219
respectively representing the capacities of energy storage equipment at the starting time and the ending time of battery scheduling;
Figure FDA00039995354700000220
Figure FDA00039995354700000221
respectively the upper limit and the lower limit of the capacity of the power storage equipment;
Figure FDA00039995354700000222
respectively representing the upper limits of the charging power and the discharging power of the power storage system;
Figure FDA00039995354700000223
and
Figure FDA00039995354700000224
0-1 variable respectively representing charging and discharging states of the energy storage system;
Figure FDA00039995354700000225
represents the charge-discharge power of the electricity storage system, positive represents discharge, and negative represents charge;
Figure FDA0003999535470000031
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003999535470000032
respectively representing the capacities of the energy storage equipment at the dispatching starting time and the dispatching ending time of the heat storage tank;
Figure FDA0003999535470000033
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the capacity of the heat storage equipment;
Figure FDA0003999535470000034
respectively representing the upper limit of the heat storage power and the upper limit of the heat release power of the heat storage system;
Figure FDA0003999535470000035
and
Figure FDA0003999535470000036
the variable is 0-1 respectively representing the heat storage and release states of the energy storage system;
Figure FDA0003999535470000037
the heat storage system is used for storing and releasing heat, positive represents heat release, and negative represents heat storage;
Figure FDA0003999535470000038
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003999535470000039
indicating the rated capacity of the electric boiler.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the multi-principal gaming model comprises objective functions of multi-principals, objective functions of industrial enterprise users, non-cooperative gaming constraints, and cooperative gaming constraints.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the objective function of the multi-benefit agent is:
Figure FDA00039995354700000310
wherein: pi p The benefit function of the multi-interest-subject cooperative alliance formed by the energy supply side comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator is represented and is the difference value of income and expenditure obtained by selling energy to the user of the demand side industrial enterprise;
Figure FDA00039995354700000311
representing energy sale income of the energy supply side;
Figure FDA00039995354700000312
the annual average investment cost of equipment on the energy supply side is represented;
Figure FDA00039995354700000313
representing the payment of energy purchased by the energy supply side from the external network;
Figure FDA00039995354700000314
representing annual operation and maintenance cost of equipment on the energy supply side;
Figure FDA00039995354700000315
wherein s is the typical day; s is the typical number of days; d s Day of the s typical dayCounting; t is a scheduling period; Δ t is a scheduling time interval; p is a radical of e,t 、p h,t Respectively representing unit electricity price and heat price of the energy sold by the energy supply side to the industrial enterprise users; w e,t 、W h,t Respectively representing the actual electric load and the heat load of the industrial enterprise user;
Figure FDA00039995354700000316
wherein: k is the equipment type owned by the comprehensive energy service provider and the energy storage operator; k is the number of device types; alpha is alpha k The installed cost per unit volume of equipment k;
Figure FDA00039995354700000317
is the installed capacity of device k; r is annual interest rate; y is k Is the operating life of the device k;
Figure FDA0003999535470000041
Figure FDA0003999535470000042
wherein p is g Represents the price per unit of natural gas;
Figure FDA0003999535470000043
the total intake power of the comprehensive energy service provider in unit time period is represented;
Figure FDA0003999535470000044
representing the time-of-use electricity price of the power distribution network;
Figure FDA0003999535470000045
representing the power purchased by the power supply side power distribution network;
Figure FDA0003999535470000046
representing the heat price of the heat supply network;
Figure FDA0003999535470000047
power representing the energy supply side purchasing heat to the heat network;
Figure FDA0003999535470000048
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003999535470000049
respectively representing the unit capacity operation and maintenance costs of the CHP unit, the gas boiler and the distributed photovoltaic power generation of the comprehensive energy service provider;
Figure FDA00039995354700000410
respectively representing the operation and maintenance costs of a storage battery, a heat storage tank and an electric boiler of an energy storage operator;
Figure FDA00039995354700000411
respectively representing the output of the CHP unit of the comprehensive energy service provider, the gas boiler and the distributed photovoltaic equipment.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the objective function of the industrial enterprise user is:
Figure FDA00039995354700000412
wherein, F u A utility function for industrial enterprise users;
Figure FDA00039995354700000413
wherein: ae. be respectively represents preference constants of the electric energy consumption of the industrial enterprise users; ah. bh respectively represent preference constants for the thermal energy consumption of the industrial enterprise users.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein the non-cooperative game constraints include electrical balance constraints, thermal balance constraints, demand response constraints, energy storage device operation constraints, and user transaction price constraints:
the electrical balance constraints include:
Figure FDA00039995354700000414
Figure FDA0003999535470000051
wherein:
Figure FDA0003999535470000052
the part of the power grid which is directly sold to industrial enterprise users in power purchasing is shown;
Figure FDA0003999535470000053
the part of the energy storage operator is shown to purchase the electricity from the power grid;
the thermal equilibrium constraints include:
Figure FDA0003999535470000054
Figure FDA0003999535470000055
the demand response constraints include:
Figure FDA0003999535470000056
Figure FDA0003999535470000057
Figure FDA0003999535470000058
wherein:
Figure FDA0003999535470000059
representing a fixed electrical load of an industrial enterprise user;
Figure FDA00039995354700000510
indicating that the industrial enterprise user can translate the load in the t period;
Figure FDA00039995354700000511
a numerical upper limit representing the translatable electrical load of an industrial enterprise user;
Figure FDA00039995354700000512
representing the total amount of the translatable electric loads in the period T of the industrial enterprise users;
the energy storage device operating constraints include:
Figure FDA00039995354700000513
wherein:
Figure FDA00039995354700000514
indicating that the electricity purchasing power is used for a storage battery charging part;
if t is in the valley period, then there are:
Figure FDA00039995354700000515
if t is in the peak time period, the energy storage operator does not purchase electricity to the power distribution network, then:
Figure FDA00039995354700000516
the energy trading price constraints include:
Figure FDA00039995354700000517
wherein:
Figure FDA00039995354700000518
respectively representing the minimum value and the maximum value of the price of electricity sold by the energy supply side to the users of the industrial enterprise
Value constraint;
Figure FDA0003999535470000061
represents the upper limit of the average electricity rate.
8. The optimization planning method for the integrated energy system of the industrial enterprise according to claim 4, wherein the cooperation game constraint conditions are as follows:
Figure FDA0003999535470000062
wherein: v (i) represents the revenue that the participating principal i allocated in the cooperative alliance G; u (i) represents revenue for participating in the independent operation of subject i;
Figure FDA0003999535470000063
Figure FDA0003999535470000064
wherein: u shape CO Representing the total profit of the cooperative union; n represents the number of participating agents.
9. The method for optimizing and planning the industrial enterprise integrated energy system according to claim 7, wherein solving the non-cooperative game based on the KKT-BM method comprises:
converting an objective function of an industrial enterprise user into a constraint condition of an energy supply side, and converting double-layer optimization into nonlinear programming based on a KKT condition, wherein the specific expression is as follows:
Figure FDA0003999535470000065
Figure FDA0003999535470000066
Figure FDA0003999535470000067
Figure FDA0003999535470000068
wherein: l is GU A Lagrangian function representing an industrial enterprise user construct; theta e, theta esu and mu e respectively represent dual variables introduced by a KKT condition, wherein the theta e and the theta esu respectively represent Lagrange multipliers corresponding to inequality constraints, and the mu e represents Lagrange multipliers corresponding to equality constraints; "a ≧ b" means a ≧ 0, b ≧ 0, a × b =0;
converting the original nonlinear expression into a mixed integer linear programming constraint by introducing a variable of 0-1 by using a Big-M transformation method, wherein the mixed integer linear programming constraint is specifically represented as the following formula:
Figure FDA0003999535470000069
wherein: beta is a θe 、β θesu Represents a variable of 0 to 1, M being a sufficiently large positive number;
at the same time, the user can select the desired position,
Figure FDA0003999535470000071
according to the KKT condition, the dual variable is used for converting the dual variable into a secondary term, and the secondary term is specifically shown as the following formula:
Figure FDA0003999535470000072
after the conversion, the nonlinear term is only a quadratic term, and the equipment capacity and the transaction price of the comprehensive energy system are solved and determined.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the allocating benefits of each participating entity in the collaborative league based on the sharley value method comprises:
Figure FDA0003999535470000073
wherein:
Figure FDA0003999535470000074
represents the benefit that participant i should receive; (| G | -1) |! Represents the total number of ranks for each participant in the principal federation, where | G | represents the number of partial participants and the remaining (n- | G |) participants have ranks of (n- | G |) |. In the method for preparing the seed coating,
Figure FDA0003999535470000075
dividing different sorting combinations representing the participation of each participant in the cooperation by the random sorting of n participants to obtain the weight occupied by each participant;v (G) represents the benefit of federation G when participant i participates in the collaboration; v (G \ i }) represents the benefit of federation G when participant i is removed; v (G) -v (G \ i }) represents the marginal contribution of participant i in the creation of a different federation G.
CN202211610802.5A 2022-12-14 2022-12-14 Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method Pending CN115829142A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211610802.5A CN115829142A (en) 2022-12-14 2022-12-14 Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211610802.5A CN115829142A (en) 2022-12-14 2022-12-14 Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115829142A true CN115829142A (en) 2023-03-21

Family

ID=85547325

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202211610802.5A Pending CN115829142A (en) 2022-12-14 2022-12-14 Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115829142A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116227755A (en) * 2023-05-09 2023-06-06 华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司 Method and device for deploying multi-energy coupling system
CN116957139A (en) * 2023-06-28 2023-10-27 湖南大学 Multi-comprehensive-energy microgrid optimal operation method and system considering carbon transaction among microgrids
CN117172815A (en) * 2023-07-18 2023-12-05 南京工业大学 Hybrid game method and system for active power distribution network of multiple water, electricity and gas energy subsystems

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116227755A (en) * 2023-05-09 2023-06-06 华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司 Method and device for deploying multi-energy coupling system
CN116227755B (en) * 2023-05-09 2023-08-08 华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司 Method and device for deploying multi-energy coupling system
CN116957139A (en) * 2023-06-28 2023-10-27 湖南大学 Multi-comprehensive-energy microgrid optimal operation method and system considering carbon transaction among microgrids
CN117172815A (en) * 2023-07-18 2023-12-05 南京工业大学 Hybrid game method and system for active power distribution network of multiple water, electricity and gas energy subsystems

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Gu et al. Bi-level optimal low-carbon economic dispatch for an industrial park with consideration of multi-energy price incentives
Luo et al. Distributed peer-to-peer energy trading based on game theory in a community microgrid considering ownership complexity of distributed energy resources
Liu et al. Hybrid energy sharing for smart building cluster with CHP system and PV prosumers: A coalitional game approach
CN111881616A (en) Operation optimization method of comprehensive energy system based on multi-subject game
CN115829142A (en) Industrial enterprise comprehensive energy system optimization planning method
CN110163411A (en) A kind of regional complex energy system operation optimization method
Nosratabadi et al. Simultaneous planning of energy carriers by employing efficient storages within main and auxiliary energy hubs via a comprehensive MILP modeling in distribution network
CN112068436B (en) Layered and distributed control method and system for comprehensive energy system of industrial park
CN112564102B (en) Multi-microgrid load optimization scheduling method and system
Zhang et al. Parametric optimization-based peer-to-peer energy trading among commercial buildings considering multiple energy conversion
CN114881794B (en) Master-slave game transaction method considering comfort and energy-substituted comprehensive energy market
CN112883584A (en) Benefit interaction-considered multi-energy micro-grid group cooling, heating and power multi-energy coupling optimization method
CN114662752A (en) Comprehensive energy system operation optimization method based on price type demand response model
CN112016825A (en) Centralized transaction optimization decision method of regional comprehensive energy system
CN115204562A (en) Interconnected micro energy network distributed collaborative optimization scheduling method and system considering multi-energy sharing
Zhang et al. Low-carbon optimal operation strategy of multi-park integrated energy system considering multi-energy sharing trading mechanism and asymmetric Nash bargaining
CN112001613A (en) Benefit distribution strategy based on multi-micro-energy-source network system cooperative game decision mechanism
CN116341268A (en) Cold-hot electric coupling type microgrid group three-layer main body distributed optimization method
CN110555562A (en) layered energy management method for comprehensive energy system in ubiquitous power Internet of things
CN116070754A (en) Multi-main-body comprehensive energy system optimization operation method and system considering energy sharing
Xu et al. A hierarchical game theory based demand optimization method for grid-interaction of energy flexible buildings
CN114330909A (en) Shared energy storage and multi-microgrid distributed coordination optimization operation method
Cui et al. A double layer energy cooperation framework for prosumer groups in high altitude areas
Sun et al. A Distributed Optimization Strategy for Multienergy Microgrids Considering Nash Bargaining
Bian et al. Economic Dispatch of A Virtual Power Plant with Wind-photovoltaic-storage Considering Demand Response

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination