CN115081870A - Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium - Google Patents
Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115081870A CN115081870A CN202210697667.6A CN202210697667A CN115081870A CN 115081870 A CN115081870 A CN 115081870A CN 202210697667 A CN202210697667 A CN 202210697667A CN 115081870 A CN115081870 A CN 115081870A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- person
- cooperative
- ratee
- list
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 29
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 229
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 37
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008676 import Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012925 reference material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present disclosure provides an information processing method, apparatus, terminal, and storage medium. In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides an information processing method comprising: determining at least one cooperative person of the raters as a first rater of the raters based on the cooperative relationship of the raters in response to a first operation event, wherein the cooperative person and the raters have a cooperative relationship based on commonly involved cooperative matters; and determining the evaluation result of the first rater for the rateless person in response to the evaluation operation of the first rater for the rateless person. In some embodiments, by introducing a cooperative person as a first evaluator, evaluation dimensionality is enriched, and evaluation reliability is improved.
Description
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to an information processing method, an information processing apparatus, a terminal, and a storage medium.
Background
In an enterprise, the work of the employee sometimes needs to be evaluated to assess the work of the employee, and the employee evaluation can be carried out on the employee from multiple aspects such as the performance and the achievement of the employee.
Disclosure of Invention
The present disclosure provides an information processing method, apparatus, terminal, and storage medium.
The present disclosure adopts the following technical solutions.
In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides an information processing method comprising:
determining at least one cooperative person of the raters as a first rater of the raters based on the cooperative relationship of the raters in response to a first operation event, wherein the cooperative person and the raters have a cooperative relationship based on commonly involved cooperative matters;
and determining the evaluation result of the first rater for the rateless person in response to the evaluation operation of the first rater for the rateless person.
In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides an information processing apparatus comprising:
a determination unit configured to determine, in response to a first operation event, at least one collaborating person of a ratee as a first rater of the ratee based on a collaboration relationship of the ratee, wherein the collaborating person and the ratee have a collaboration relationship based on a commonly-involved collaboration item;
a control unit for determining an evaluation result of the first rater for the ratee person in response to an evaluation operation of the first rater for the ratee person.
In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides a terminal comprising: at least one memory and at least one processor;
the memory is used for storing program codes, and the processor is used for calling the program codes stored in the memory to execute the method.
In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides a computer-readable storage medium for storing program code that, when executed by a computer, causes the computer to perform the method of any of the above.
The present disclosure provides an information processing method, including: determining at least one cooperative person of the raters as a first rater of the raters based on the cooperative relationship of the raters in response to a first operation event, wherein the cooperative person and the raters have a cooperative relationship based on commonly involved cooperative matters; and determining the evaluation result of the first rater for the rateless person in response to the evaluation operation of the first rater for the rateless person. In some embodiments, by introducing a cooperative person as a first evaluator, evaluation dimensionality is enriched, and evaluation reliability is improved.
Drawings
The above and other features, advantages and aspects of various embodiments of the present disclosure will become more apparent by referring to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Throughout the drawings, the same or similar reference numbers refer to the same or similar elements. It should be understood that the drawings are schematic and that elements and elements are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an information processing method of an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Fig. 2 to 12 are schematic interface diagrams of an execution end of the information processing method according to the embodiment of the present disclosure.
Fig. 13 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
Embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. While certain embodiments of the present disclosure are shown in the drawings, it is to be understood that the present disclosure may be embodied in various forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein, but rather are provided for a more thorough and complete understanding of the present disclosure. It should be understood that the drawings and embodiments of the disclosure are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
It should be understood that various steps recited in method embodiments of the present disclosure may be performed in parallel and/or in parallel. Moreover, method embodiments may include additional steps and/or omit performing the illustrated steps. The scope of the present disclosure is not limited in this respect.
The term "include" and variations thereof as used herein are open-ended, i.e., "including but not limited to". The term "based on" is "based, at least in part, on". The term "one embodiment" means "at least one embodiment"; the term "another embodiment" means "at least one additional embodiment"; the term "some embodiments" means "at least some embodiments". Relevant definitions for other terms will be given in the following description.
It should be noted that the terms "first", "second", and the like in the present disclosure are only used for distinguishing different devices, modules or units, and are not used for limiting the order or interdependence relationship of the functions performed by the devices, modules or units.
It is noted that references to "a" or "an" in this disclosure are intended to be illustrative rather than limiting, and that those skilled in the art will recognize that reference to "one or more" unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The names of messages or information exchanged between devices in the embodiments of the present disclosure are for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the messages or information.
The embodiments of the present application will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flowchart of an information processing method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, which may be used in an evaluation system, such as a performance evaluation system in an enterprise, and the like, and includes the following steps S11-S12.
S11: and in response to the first operation event, determining at least one cooperative person of the evaluated persons as a first evaluator of the evaluated persons based on the cooperative relationship of the evaluated persons.
In some embodiments, the collaborating people and the ratee have a collaborative relationship based on a co-participating collaboration item. In some embodiments, the collaborators include: the event principal and at least one of the event participants. Taking the cooperative item as an internal project of the enterprise as an example, the item responsible person may be a project manager, and the item participator may be other persons participating in the cooperative item besides the project manager and the appraised person. The first operational event may be, for example, the creation or configuration of a ratings process for the ratee or the creation or configuration of a ratings template for the ratee. In some embodiments, in response to a first operation event, a collaboration event involving the evaluators is obtained to determine collaborators having a collaboration relationship with the evaluators, and then in response to a selection operation, a first evaluator of at least one seat evaluators is selected from the collaborators.
In some embodiments, the collaborations of the raters include collaborations determined based on the unorganized architecture relationship of the raters, the collaborations including people outside the organization architecture, and the people in the collaborations all belong to the same project.
In some embodiments, the collaboration of the ratee includes a collaboration determined based on the organizational structure relationship of the ratee, the collaboration includes the persons at upper and lower levels in the organizational structure where the ratee is located, or the collaboration of a plurality of levels of persons in the organizational structure, for example, the collaboration of the ratee a includes its upper level B and lower level C, and may also include the upper level D of the upper level B, the lower level E of the lower level C, and so on.
S12: in response to the evaluation operation of the first rater on the rateless person, the evaluation result of the first rater on the rateless person is determined.
In some embodiments, after at least one collaborator is set as a first rater of the raters, when the first rater opens, for example, a rating system, the task of rating the raters is viewed, which can rate the raters in the rating task, and the rating operation of the first rater will affect the overall rating of the raters. In some embodiments, the evaluated person may have a plurality of evaluators, which may be respectively responsible for the evaluation of a plurality of evaluation links, and the plurality of evaluators may further include a superordinate, a subordinate, and the like determined based on the superior-inferior relationship of the evaluated person, that is, the comprehensive evaluation result may be a comprehensive result of the evaluation results of the plurality of evaluation links.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, an evaluator, for example, a staff inside an enterprise, often needs to evaluate the job and other aspects of the evaluator, and in some embodiments, a selectable evaluator is an upper stage, a lower stage or a colleague of the evaluator, but the evaluator often participates in a collaboration, and other collaborators participating in the collaboration have more sufficient knowledge about the evaluator and can give detailed evaluation, so in some embodiments, one or more collaborators of the evaluator are provided as a first evaluator of the evaluator, and the first evaluator can evaluate the evaluator. For example, in the evaluation such as the periodic assessment, in addition to the persons having the superior-inferior relationship with the evaluated person, the collaborating person introducing the collaboration is allowed to participate in the evaluation of the evaluated person, for example, the performance evaluation of the evaluated person, and the collaboration between the evaluated person and the first evaluator can be displayed in the evaluation of the evaluated person by the first evaluator, so that when other evaluators evaluate the evaluated person, more sufficient information is provided to assist the evaluation.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, an overall flow of the information processing method provided by the present disclosure is shown in fig. 2, and may include the steps of configuring a qualification template, configuring a qualification cycle and project, inviting an evaluator, filling out an assessment, and performing performance calibration. In this embodiment, as an example, a collaborator is a project manager, in the step of configuring the assessment template, the project manager is selected as an evaluator (a first evaluator), the assessment content of the project manager is configured (the content that the project manager can evaluate the evaluateable person is determined), after the configuration of the assessment template is completed, an assessment period is created in the step axis of configuring the assessment period and the project, then the project and project manager participated by employees are imported (the employees are the evaluateable persons), the project assessment relationship of the project of the evaluable person is confirmed (the evaluable persons are the evaluable persons), and then the assessment is started. In the evaluator selecting step, firstly, the staff is searched (specific evaluators are determined), the project cooperative relationship of the staff is checked, a performance evaluation list is confirmed (namely, each evaluators is determined, including a first evaluator) is determined, in the evaluation filling step, for each evaluator, an evaluation task of a project member is received (namely, an evaluator task to the evaluators is received), the received evaluation content is checked (the evaluators may have already been evaluated by other evaluators, at the moment, the evaluations made by other evaluators can be checked), the evaluations are filled (the evaluators fill in the evaluations to the evaluators), the evaluations are submitted (the evaluations to the evaluators are submitted), in the performance calibrating step, a certain project or a certain project manager is screened (namely, screening is carried out under the conditions of cooperative matters or cooperative persons, the evaluators under the screened cooperative matters are checked, or the performances of the evaluators having the cooperative relationship with the screened cooperative persons are checked), and comparing the performances of all the project members (after screening, the performances of all the evaluated persons can be compared), and calibrating the result (namely, modifying the comprehensive evaluation result) to finish calibration.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, prior to responding to the first operational event, further comprising: in response to the configuration operation of the evaluation template, the cooperative person is set as an evaluator, and the range of the evaluation content of the cooperative person on the evaluateable person is set. In some embodiments, the raters are rated through a rating template, and in the rating template, collaborators are set as raters, that is, the rating links of the collaborator raters are added, but since the rating template is set, which collaborator is to rate which ratee is not specified. Setting the range of the evaluation content of the collaborator on the appraised person refers to specifying the project type of the appraised person that the project collaborator can evaluate, for example, setting the project type of the business ability, the work attitude, and the like that the collaborator can evaluate the appraised person. After the configuration of the evaluation template is completed, a specific evaluation period or/and cooperation matters can be configured based on the evaluation template, and specific cooperation persons are determined as first raters during the configuration of the specific evaluation period or/and cooperation matters.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, determining at least one collaborator of the rateees as a first rater of the rateees based on the collaborated relationship of the rateees in response to the first operation event comprises: displaying an evaluation list in response to a second operation event on a configuration interface of the evaluation task, wherein the evaluation list comprises one or more list options, and the list options comprise an evaluated person and cooperative persons; and in response to the selection operation of the first list option, determining the cooperative people in the first list option as first raters of the raters in the first list option.
In some embodiments, before responding to the second operation event, an evaluation period can be set in a configuration interface of the evaluation task, and the cooperative item is a cooperative item in the evaluation period. In some embodiments, referring to fig. 3, the second operation event may be, for example, an operation of importing a collaboration of a ratee, and in particular, in some embodiments, in response to the second operation event, in the configuration interface, in response to the second operation event, displaying a rating list, including: in response to the triggering operation of the first control of the configuration interface, determining the cooperation relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person based on the cooperation matters of the evaluated person, and displaying a rating list based on the cooperation relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person. For example, after clicking the "setup" in fig. 3 to show a first control "project collaboration management", and triggering the first control by clicking or the like, as shown in fig. 4, collaboration items that are participated by the ratee, such as "mobile phone project" and "computer project" in fig. 4, are shown, respectively, under each collaboration item, list options are shown, and the ratee and the collaborating person are displayed in one list option, the ratee may be a participant in the collaboration item, and the collaborating person may be a project principal (e.g., project manager) in the collaboration item, such as "lie one" and "lie two" respectively, which have collaborating person "zhang san" under the mobile phone item in fig. 4, and then an option is selected, the selected list option is a first option list, for the ratee in the selected first list option, the collaborators in the first list option will be the first rater for the rated person. In some embodiments, a control "import record" for viewing records may be presented in the interface displaying the shortlist option, and after the control is triggered, as shown in fig. 5, a selected record of the shortlist option may be presented.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, further comprising: displaying a first cooperation item associated with the first list option on the configuration interface, and responding to the triggering operation of the first cooperation item displayed on the configuration interface to display a detail page of the first cooperation item; and displaying the number of people or a list of people who need the first cooperative people as the first raters for rating in a sub-interface of a detail page of the first cooperative item, wherein the first cooperative people are cooperative people in the first cooperative item, and the list of rated people of the first cooperative people is displayed after the number of people is triggered.
In some embodiments, a first collaboration item associated with the selected first list option is displayed in the configuration interface, as shown in fig. 3, the "mobile phone item" and the "product department item" are first collaboration items, and collaboration persons and current status may be displayed in the displayed first collaboration item. After the first collaboration is triggered, for example, by clicking, etc., a detail page of the first collaboration is displayed, there may be one or more sub-interfaces in the detail page of the first collaboration, and in one of the sub-interfaces, as shown in fig. 6, an evaluation link that the first collaborator of the first collaboration can participate in is displayed, for example, the collaborator may be a project manager, and the project manager may participate in the evaluation links of "fill 360 ° evaluation", "project manager evaluation", "superior evaluation", and "performance calibration" in fig. 6. Wherein, in the area corresponding to the evaluation link in which the first collaborator participates as the first evaluator, the number of persons or the list of persons who display the first collaborator as the first evaluator to evaluate is displayed, for example, the first evaluator is the evaluator of the first evaluation link, the first evaluation link is the evaluation link of the project manager, the "this link for evaluating 5 evaluators" is displayed in the evaluation area of the project manager in fig. 6, of course, as shown in fig. 6, the number of persons of evaluators who have no cooperation relationship can also be displayed on the sub-interface of the detail page of the first collaboration, for example, the remaining 20 evaluators shown in fig. 6 have no cooperation relationship temporarily, by clicking the number of persons, the specific list of evaluators corresponding to the number of persons is displayed, for example, the number "5" in the evaluation area of the project manager is clicked, as shown in fig. 7, the specific list of evaluators who need to evaluate by the first collaborator the first evaluator is displayed, as shown in fig. 7, the first collaboration item may be one or more, and thus a plurality of collaboration items may be displayed in the displayed list of evaluators. Therefore, the appraised persons who need to evaluate the first link can be known in time.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the evaluation process of the evaluated person includes at least two evaluation links, the first evaluator is a person who evaluates the evaluated person in the first evaluation link; the method further comprises the following steps: adding the cooperation personnel of the evaluated person into a candidate evaluator list of at least one other evaluation link except the first evaluation link.
In some embodiments, the evaluated person may have a plurality of evaluation links, and the final evaluation result of the evaluated person may be determined by integrating the evaluation results of the plurality of evaluation links. In the first evaluation link, the first evaluator is the person who evaluates the evaluated person, and in other evaluation links, the corresponding evaluator needs to be selected, for example, in the 360 ° evaluation link shown in fig. 10, the corresponding evaluator needs to be selected, and after the collaborating person is the first evaluator, it is indicated that the collaborating person has the qualification of evaluating the evaluated person, so that the list of candidate evaluators added to other evaluation links can be used as the candidate evaluator. In some embodiments, considering that some specific evaluation links have specific requirements for raters, the evaluation links may have associated rater screening conditions, and therefore, the collaborating people may be added to the candidate rater list of the evaluation links meeting the rater screening conditions. In some embodiments, the cooperative people are added into the candidate list of other evaluation links, so that the evaluation abundance of other evaluation links can be improved, and the evaluated people can be better and comprehensively evaluated.
In some embodiments of the disclosure, the method further comprises: responding to the trigger operation of the evaluator selection control on an interface of a second evaluation link of the evaluated person, and displaying at least one candidate evaluator; responding to the selection operation of the candidate raters, and determining the selected candidate raters as raters of a second evaluation link; among the displayed candidate raters, a mark for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the raters, or the mark for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the raters and the cooperative items are displayed after the mark is triggered.
In some embodiments, in a second evaluation link of the evaluated person, the evaluator needs to be invited, and since the collaborating person is added to the list of candidate evaluators, the collaborating person may be invited to serve as the evaluator of the second evaluation link in a second evaluation link different from the first evaluation link. When the evaluator selection control is triggered by clicking and the like, candidate evaluators are displayed, if the displayed candidate evaluators are cooperative persons, the identifications for identifying the cooperative relationship are displayed, and the representations can be characters or icons, for example, as shown in fig. 10, the evaluator selection control can be a search control, the candidate evaluators are displayed in a search mode, wherein 'zhang san' is a candidate evaluator having the cooperative relationship with the evaluated person, the characters for "members in the same project" are displayed on the right side of the 'zhang san' to represent the cooperative relationship, the cooperative projects can be further displayed by hovering the mouse and other control identifications on the identifications, and the number of the displayed cooperative projects can be one or more, so that when the evaluators are selected, the cooperative relationship among the evaluators can be displayed to serve as a basis for selecting the evaluators.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, after determining at least one collaborator of the ratee as the first rater of the ratee in response to the first operational event, the method comprises: creating an evaluation task for evaluating a evaluated person for a first evaluator, and displaying the evaluation task on a task page of the first evaluator; responding to the trigger operation of the evaluation task, and displaying a personnel list of the evaluated person; and displaying an evaluation interface of the evaluated person in response to the triggering operation of the evaluated person in the person list.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 8, after selecting a collaborator as a first rater, an evaluation task may be displayed in a personal page of the first rater, a control for opening the evaluation task is provided, and a staff list of a ratee to be evaluated is displayed by triggering the evaluation task, for example, clicking the control for completing the evaluation task, for example, clicking "go complete" in fig. 8, and then the staff list as shown in fig. 9 is displayed, and in fig. 8, the first rater is a rater who is rated by a "project manager" in the first rating link, so that the staff list may be a sub-page located to the first rating link in the rating process page. As shown in fig. 9, one or more persons to be evaluated who need to be evaluated are shown in the staff list, and information such as the name and state of the person to be evaluated, the collaboration with the first evaluator, and the evaluation deadline is shown in the staff list. A review interface for reviewing a reviewer may be opened by selecting a reviewer from the list of people to review the reviewer.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, a human subject has an associated rating interface for rating the human subject; displaying at least one item of the following items in an evaluation interface of the evaluated person: one or more items of the evaluation results of the evaluated person in other evaluation links, the work content of the evaluated person, the first of the evaluated person, the work result of the evaluated person and the reference information.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 11, which schematically shows an evaluation interface associated with a person to be evaluated, it can be seen that there may be a first area and a second area in the evaluation interface, where the first area is used to display reference information, the second area is an area for evaluating the person to be evaluated, the left area in fig. 11 is a first area, the right area is an evaluation area, and a plurality of labels of the first area, such as upper-level evaluation, project management evaluation, 360 ° evaluation, self-evaluation, heavy work, OKR, more, etc. in fig. 11, after the labels are triggered, a corresponding sub-interface is displayed in the first area, so that information, such as evaluation results of other evaluation links, work content of the person to be evaluated, work results of the person to be evaluated, etc., which can be referred to by the person to be evaluated, so that the person to be evaluated can refer to the evaluation results of other persons and information of the person to be evaluated, thereby more comprehensively evaluating the evaluated person.
In some embodiments of the disclosure, the method further comprises: responding to the third operation event, displaying an evaluation calibration interface, and displaying a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluated person on the evaluation calibration interface; and in response to the evaluation of the first evaluated person in the evaluation calibration interface by the second evaluated person, taking the evaluation result of the second evaluated person as the comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person to replace the original comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person.
In some embodiments, the third operation event may be, for example, a trigger operation of selecting an identifier corresponding to the evaluation calibration interface in an evaluation flow page, where an evaluation flow page is displayed as shown in fig. 9, where identifiers of various evaluation links in the evaluation flow, such as "fill in summary", "invite 360 ° evaluator", "fill in self-rating", and the like, are displayed, and by taking the identifier corresponding to the evaluation calibration interface as "performance calibration" in fig. 9 as an example, by clicking the identifier of "performance calibration", the evaluation calibration interface as shown in fig. 12 may be displayed, and in the evaluation calibration interface, the second evaluator is a person who currently opens the evaluation calibration interface and has evaluation calibration authority. The comprehensive evaluation results of the evaluated persons are displayed on the evaluation and calibration interface, the comprehensive evaluation results of the performance and the input degree of the evaluated persons such as the Li I, Li II and the like are displayed as shown in fig. 12, an area for the second evaluated person to screen the evaluated persons is displayed on the evaluation and calibration interface, for example, an area corresponding to the ordinary screening is displayed on the right side of fig. 12, and the screening can be performed by inputting information such as member range, directly superior and the like. After the evaluators in the evaluation calibration interface are selected, an evaluation interface as shown in fig. 11 may be displayed, and the selected first evaluators may be evaluated in the evaluation interface, and the evaluation result of the second evaluators for the first evaluators may be used instead of the original comprehensive evaluation result. In some embodiments, the comprehensive evaluation result may be a final evaluation result, that is, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluated person may be finally determined by the second evaluator, so that the correction may be performed if the comprehensive evaluation result is inappropriate.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, further comprising: in response to a screening operation conditioned on a first collaboration event at the ratings calibration interface, determining at least one second ratee comprising the first ratee for participation in the first collaboration event; and displaying the determined comprehensive evaluation result of the second evaluated person.
In some embodiments, the second rater may be the rater with the highest privilege in the rater process for the ratee being. Which has a decision for the overall evaluation result of the evaluated person. The second rater requires reference material when he or she rates the rater (e.g., the first rater). The second evaluator often knows the service level and performance level among the members in a cooperative item, so it can transversely compare the service level and performance level of the members in the first cooperative item by screening out a certain first cooperative item, for example, if lie one performs better than lie two in item 1, and if the comprehensive evaluation result of lie one is found to be lower than lie two by screening out item 1, the comprehensive evaluation result of lie one can be adjusted. In the embodiment, the comprehensive evaluation results of the evaluated persons participating in the same cooperation item are displayed, so that a basis for transverse comparison is provided for adjusting the comprehensive evaluation results.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, there is also provided an information processing apparatus including:
a determination unit configured to determine, in response to a first operation event, at least one collaborating person of the rateed persons as a first rater of the rateed persons based on the collaboration relationship of the rateed persons, wherein the collaborating person and the rateed persons have a collaboration relationship based on commonly-involved collaboration matters;
and the control unit is used for responding to the evaluation operation of the first evaluator on the evaluated person and determining the evaluation result of the first evaluator on the evaluated person.
In some embodiments, the collaborators include: the event principal and at least one of the event participants.
In some embodiments, determining at least one collaborator of the rateees as the first rater of the rateees ahead of the at least one collaborator of the rateees based on the collaborated relationship of the rateees in response to the first operation event comprises: displaying an evaluation list in response to a second operation event on a configuration interface of the evaluation task, wherein the evaluation list comprises one or more list options, and the list options comprise an evaluated person and cooperative persons;
and in response to the selection operation of the first list option, determining the cooperative people in the first list option as first raters of the raters in the first list option.
In some embodiments, in response to the second operational event, displaying, at the configuration interface, the list of evaluations in response to the second operational event includes: in response to the triggering operation of the first control of the configuration interface, determining the cooperation relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person based on the cooperation matters of the evaluated person, and displaying a rating list based on the cooperation relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person.
In some embodiments, the control unit is further configured to: displaying a first cooperation item associated with the first list option on the configuration interface, and displaying a detail page of the first cooperation item in response to a trigger operation on the first cooperation item displayed on the configuration interface; and displaying the number of people or a list of people who need the first cooperative people as the first raters for rating in a sub-interface of the detail page of the first cooperative item, wherein the first cooperative people are cooperative people in the first cooperative item, and the list of rated people of the first cooperative people is displayed after the number of people is triggered.
In some embodiments, the evaluation process of the evaluated person comprises at least two evaluation links, wherein the first evaluator is a person who evaluates the evaluated person in the first evaluation link; the control unit is further configured to: adding the cooperation personnel of the evaluated person into a candidate evaluator list of at least one other evaluation link except the first evaluation link.
In some embodiments, the control unit is further configured to display at least one candidate rater at an interface of a second rating link of the rater in response to a trigger operation on a rater selection control; responding to the selection operation of the candidate raters, and determining the selected candidate raters as raters of a second evaluation link; among the displayed candidate raters, a mark for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the raters, or the mark for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the raters and the cooperative items are displayed after the mark is triggered.
In some embodiments, the control unit is further configured to, after determining at least one collaborator of the ratee as a first rater of the ratee in response to the first operation event, create a rating task for rating the ratee for the first rater and display the rating task on a task page of the first rater; responding to the trigger operation of the evaluation task, and displaying a personnel list of the evaluated person; and displaying an evaluation interface of the evaluated person in response to the triggering operation of the evaluated person in the person list.
In some embodiments, the evaluators have associated evaluation interfaces for evaluating the evaluators; displaying at least one of the following items in a appraisal interface of the appraised person: one or more items of evaluation results of the evaluated person in other evaluation links, work content of the evaluated person, work results of the evaluated person and reference information.
In some embodiments, the control unit is further configured to display an evaluation calibration interface in response to the third operation event, and display a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluated person on the evaluation calibration interface; and in response to the evaluation of the first evaluated person in the evaluation calibration interface by the second evaluated person, taking the evaluation result of the second evaluated person as the comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person to replace the original comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person.
In some embodiments, the control unit is further configured to: in response to a screening operation conditioned on the first collaboration item at the ratings calibration interface, determining at least one second ratee being involved in the first collaboration item, wherein the at least one second ratee comprises the first ratee; and displaying the determined comprehensive evaluation result of the second evaluated person.
For the embodiments of the apparatus, since they correspond substantially to the method embodiments, reference may be made to the partial description of the method embodiments for relevant points. The above-described apparatus embodiments are merely illustrative, wherein the modules described as separate modules may or may not be separate. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the present embodiment. One of ordinary skill in the art can understand and implement it without inventive effort.
The method and apparatus of the present disclosure have been described above based on the embodiments and application examples. In addition, the present disclosure also provides a terminal and a storage medium, which are explained below.
Referring now to fig. 13, a schematic diagram of an electronic device (e.g., a terminal device or server) 800 suitable for use in implementing embodiments of the present disclosure is shown. The terminal device in the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, but is not limited to, a mobile terminal such as a mobile phone, a notebook computer, a digital broadcast receiver, a PDA (personal digital assistant), a PAD (tablet computer), a PMP (portable multimedia player), a vehicle terminal (e.g., a car navigation terminal), and the like, and a stationary terminal such as a digital TV, a desktop computer, and the like. The electronic device shown in the drawings is only an example and should not bring any limitation to the functions and use range of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 13, the electronic device 800 may include a processing means (e.g., a central processing unit, a graphics processor, etc.) 801 that may perform various appropriate actions and processes in accordance with a program stored in a Read Only Memory (ROM)802 or a program loaded from a storage means 808 into a Random Access Memory (RAM) 803. In the RAM803, various programs and data necessary for the operation of the electronic apparatus 800 are also stored. The processing apparatus 801, the ROM 802, and the RAM803 are connected to each other by a bus 804. An input/output (I/O) interface 805 is also connected to bus 804.
Generally, the following devices may be connected to the I/O interface 805: input devices 806 including, for example, a touch screen, touch pad, keyboard, mouse, camera, microphone, accelerometer, gyroscope, etc.; output devices 807 including, for example, a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), speakers, vibrators, and the like; storage 808 including, for example, magnetic tape, hard disk, etc.; and a communication device 809. The communication means 809 may allow the electronic device 800 to communicate wirelessly or by wire with other devices to exchange data. While the figure illustrates an electronic device 800 having various means, it is to be understood that not all illustrated means are required to be implemented or provided. More or fewer devices may alternatively be implemented or provided.
In particular, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts may be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments of the present disclosure include a computer program product comprising a computer program embodied on a computer-readable medium, the computer program comprising program code for performing the method illustrated by the flow chart. In such an embodiment, the computer program may be downloaded and installed from a network through the communication means 809, or installed from the storage means 808, or installed from the ROM 802. The computer program, when executed by the processing apparatus 801, performs the above-described functions defined in the methods of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
It should be noted that the computer readable medium in the present disclosure can be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium or any combination of the two. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of the computer readable storage medium may include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the present disclosure, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In contrast, in the present disclosure, a computer readable signal medium may comprise a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, either in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated data signal may take many forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may also be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to: electrical wires, optical cables, RF (radio frequency), etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
In some embodiments, the clients, servers may communicate using any currently known or future developed network Protocol, such as HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol), and may interconnect with any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communications network). Examples of communication networks include a local area network ("LAN"), a wide area network ("WAN"), the Internet (e.g., the Internet), and peer-to-peer networks (e.g., ad hoc peer-to-peer networks), as well as any currently known or future developed network.
The computer readable medium may be embodied in the electronic device; or may exist separately without being assembled into the electronic device.
The computer readable medium carries one or more programs which, when executed by the electronic device, cause the electronic device to perform the methods of the present disclosure as described above.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present disclosure may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C + +, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the "C" programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the case of a remote computer, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet service provider).
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems which perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The units described in the embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented by software or hardware. Where the name of an element does not in some cases constitute a limitation on the element itself.
The functions described herein above may be performed, at least in part, by one or more hardware logic components. For example, without limitation, exemplary types of hardware logic components that may be used include: field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Application Specific Standard Products (ASSPs), system on a chip (SOCs), Complex Programmable Logic Devices (CPLDs), and the like.
In the context of this disclosure, a machine-readable medium may be a tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The machine-readable medium may be a machine-readable signal medium or a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of a machine-readable storage medium would include an electrical connection based on one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method including:
determining at least one cooperative person of the evaluated persons as a first evaluator of the evaluated persons based on the cooperative relationship of the evaluated persons in response to the first operation event, wherein the cooperative person and the evaluated persons have a cooperative relationship based on the cooperative matters participating together;
in response to the evaluation operation of the first rater on the rateless person, the evaluation result of the first rater on the rateless person is determined.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method in which a partner includes: the event principal and at least one of the event participants.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method for determining at least one collaborating person of a ratee as a first rater of the ratee before determining at least one collaborating person of the ratee as the first rater of the ratee based on a collaboration relationship of the ratee in response to a first operation event, including:
displaying an evaluation list in response to a second operation event on a configuration interface of the evaluation task, wherein the evaluation list comprises one or more list options, and the list options comprise an evaluated person and cooperative persons;
and in response to the selection operation of the first list option, determining the cooperative people in the first list option as first raters of the raters in the first list option.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method for displaying a rating list in response to a second operation event on a configuration interface in response to the second operation event, including:
in response to the triggering operation of the first control of the configuration interface, determining the cooperation relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person based on the cooperation matters of the evaluated person, and displaying a rating list based on the cooperation relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method, further including:
displaying a first cooperation item associated with the first list option on the configuration interface, and displaying a detail page of the first cooperation item in response to a trigger operation on the first cooperation item displayed on the configuration interface;
and displaying the number of people or a list of people who need the first cooperative people as the first raters for rating in a sub-interface of a detail page of the first cooperative item, wherein the first cooperative people are cooperative people in the first cooperative item, and the list of rated people of the first cooperative people is displayed after the number of people is triggered.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method, in which an evaluation flow of an evaluated person includes at least two evaluation links, a first evaluator is a person who evaluates the evaluated person in the first evaluation link;
the method further comprises the following steps: adding the cooperation personnel of the evaluated person into a candidate evaluator list of at least one other evaluation link except the first evaluation link.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method, the method further including:
responding to the trigger operation of the evaluator selection control on an interface of a second evaluation link of the evaluated person, and displaying at least one candidate evaluator;
responding to the selection operation of the candidate raters, and determining the selected candidate raters as raters of a second evaluation link;
among the displayed candidate raters, a mark for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the raters, or the mark for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the raters and the cooperative items are displayed after the mark is triggered.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method, after determining at least one cooperative person of a ratee as a first rater of the ratee in response to a first operation event, comprising:
creating an evaluation task for evaluating a evaluated person for a first evaluator, and displaying the evaluation task on a task page of the first evaluator;
responding to the trigger operation of the evaluation task, and displaying a personnel list of the evaluated person;
and displaying an evaluation interface of the evaluated person in response to the triggering operation of the evaluated person in the person list.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method, a human being evaluated having an associated evaluation interface for evaluating the human being; displaying at least one item of the following items in an evaluation interface of the evaluated person: one or more items of evaluation results of the evaluated person in other evaluation links, work content of the evaluated person, work results of the evaluated person and reference information.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method, further including:
responding to the third operation event, displaying an evaluation calibration interface, and displaying a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluated person on the evaluation calibration interface;
and in response to the evaluation of the first evaluated person in the evaluation calibration interface by the second evaluated person, taking the evaluation result of the second evaluated person as the comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person to replace the original comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing method, further including:
in response to a screening operation conditioned on the first collaboration item at the ratings calibration interface, determining at least one second ratee being involved in the first collaboration item, wherein the at least one second ratee comprises the first ratee;
and displaying the comprehensive evaluation result of the determined second evaluated person.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided an information processing apparatus including:
a determining unit, configured to determine at least one collaborator of the rateees as a first rater of the rateees based on the collaboration relationship of the rateees in response to the first operation event, wherein the collaborator and the rateees have a collaboration relationship based on commonly involved collaboration matters;
and the control unit is used for responding to the evaluation operation of the first evaluator on the evaluated person and determining the evaluation result of the first evaluator on the evaluated person.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided a terminal including: at least one memory and at least one processor;
wherein the at least one memory is configured to store program code, and the at least one processor is configured to call the program code stored in the at least one memory to perform the method of any one of the above.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium for storing program code which, when executed by a computer, causes the computer to perform the method of any of the above.
The foregoing description is only exemplary of the preferred embodiments of the disclosure and is illustrative of the principles of the technology employed. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the scope of the disclosure herein is not limited to the particular combination of features described above, but also encompasses other embodiments in which any combination of the features described above or their equivalents does not depart from the spirit of the disclosure. For example, the above features and (but not limited to) the features disclosed in this disclosure having similar functions are replaced with each other to form the technical solution.
Further, while operations are depicted in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order. Under certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Likewise, while several specific implementation details are included in the above discussion, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the disclosure. Certain features that are described in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Claims (14)
1. An information processing method characterized by comprising:
determining at least one cooperative person of the raters as a first rater of the raters based on the cooperative relationship of the raters in response to a first operation event, wherein the cooperative person and the raters have a cooperative relationship based on commonly involved cooperative matters;
and determining the evaluation result of the first rater for the rateless person in response to the evaluation operation of the first rater for the rateless person.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the collaborators comprise: the event principal and at least one of the event participants.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining at least one collaborator of a ratee as the first rater of the ratee before determining at least one collaborator of the ratee as the first rater of the ratee based on the collaborated relationship of the ratee in response to the first operational event comprises:
displaying an evaluation list in response to a second operation event on a configuration interface of the evaluation task, wherein the evaluation list comprises one or more list options, and the list options comprise a evaluated person and cooperative persons;
and responding to the selection operation of a first list option, and determining the cooperative people in the first list option as first raters of the rateed people in the first list option.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein displaying the list of ratings at the configuration interface in response to the second operational event comprises:
in response to the triggering operation of the first control of the configuration interface, determining the cooperative relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person based on the cooperation matters of the evaluated person, and displaying the evaluation list based on the cooperative relationship between the evaluated person and the cooperative person.
5. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
displaying a first cooperation item associated with the first list option on the configuration interface, and displaying a detail page of the first cooperation item in response to a triggering operation of the first cooperation item displayed on the configuration interface;
displaying the number of people or a list of people who need to evaluate the first cooperative people as a first rater in a sub-interface of a detail page of the first cooperative item, wherein the first cooperative people are cooperative people in the first cooperative item, and the list of rated people of the first cooperative people is displayed after the number of people is triggered.
6. The method of claim 1,
the evaluation process of the evaluated person comprises at least two evaluation links, wherein the first evaluator is a person who evaluates the evaluated person in the first evaluation link;
the method further comprises the following steps: and adding the cooperation personnel of the evaluated person into a candidate evaluator list of at least one other evaluation link except the first evaluation link.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
responding to the trigger operation of a control selected by the raters on the interface of the second rating link of the rateed person, and displaying at least one candidate rater;
responding to the selection operation of the candidate raters, and determining the selected candidate raters as raters of the second evaluation link;
wherein, in the displayed candidate raters, an identifier for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the ratee, or an identifier for representing the cooperative relationship is displayed on the periphery of the candidate raters having the cooperative relationship with the ratee, and the identifier displays the cooperative item after being triggered.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining at least one collaborator of a ratee as a first rater of the ratee in response to the first operational event comprises:
creating an evaluation task for evaluating the evaluated person for the first evaluator, and displaying the evaluation task on a task page of the first evaluator;
responding to the trigger operation of the evaluation task, and displaying a personnel list of the evaluated person;
and displaying an evaluation interface of the evaluated person in response to a triggering operation of the evaluated person in the person list.
9. The method of claim 1,
the appraised person has an associated appraisal interface for appraising the appraised person; displaying at least one of the following items in the appraisal interface of the appraised person: one or more items of the evaluation results of the evaluated person in other evaluation links, the work content of the evaluated person, the work result of the evaluated person and reference information.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
responding to a third operation event, displaying an evaluation calibration interface, and displaying a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluated person on the evaluation calibration interface;
and responding to the evaluation of a first evaluated person in the evaluation calibration interface by a second evaluated person, and taking the evaluation result of the second evaluated person as the comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person to replace the original comprehensive evaluation result of the first evaluated person.
11. The method of claim 10, further comprising:
determining at least one second ratee subject participating in the first collaboration session in response to a screening operation conditioned on the first collaboration session at the ratings calibration interface, wherein the at least one second ratee subject comprises the first ratee subject;
and displaying the determined comprehensive evaluation result of the second evaluated person.
12. An information processing apparatus comprising:
a determination unit configured to determine, in response to a first operation event, at least one collaborating person of a ratee as a first rater of the ratee based on a collaboration relationship of the ratee, wherein the collaborating person and the ratee have a collaboration relationship based on a commonly-involved collaboration item;
a control unit for determining an evaluation result of the first rater for the ratee person in response to an evaluation operation of the first rater for the ratee person.
13. A terminal, comprising:
at least one memory and at least one processor;
wherein the at least one memory is configured to store program code and the at least one processor is configured to invoke the program code stored in the at least one memory to perform the method of any of claims 1 to 11.
14. A computer-readable storage medium for storing program code which, when executed by a computer, causes the computer to perform the method of any of claims 1 to 11.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210697667.6A CN115081870A (en) | 2022-06-20 | 2022-06-20 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
| PCT/CN2023/101264 WO2023246739A1 (en) | 2022-06-20 | 2023-06-20 | Information processing method and apparatus, terminal, and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210697667.6A CN115081870A (en) | 2022-06-20 | 2022-06-20 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115081870A true CN115081870A (en) | 2022-09-20 |
Family
ID=83252794
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210697667.6A Pending CN115081870A (en) | 2022-06-20 | 2022-06-20 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115081870A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2023246739A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2023246739A1 (en) * | 2022-06-20 | 2023-12-28 | 北京字跳网络技术有限公司 | Information processing method and apparatus, terminal, and storage medium |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114047850A (en) * | 2021-11-15 | 2022-02-15 | 北京字跳网络技术有限公司 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
| CN114386830A (en) * | 2022-01-11 | 2022-04-22 | 北京飞书科技有限公司 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109559005A (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2019-04-02 | 蔚来汽车有限公司 | Evaluation method and equipment, the computer storage medium of employee |
| CN110209952B (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2023-03-24 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Information recommendation method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN111949837A (en) * | 2020-08-18 | 2020-11-17 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Information processing method, information processing apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium |
| CN112598249A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-04-02 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | Object evaluation method, device and equipment |
| CN115081870A (en) * | 2022-06-20 | 2022-09-20 | 北京字跳网络技术有限公司 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
-
2022
- 2022-06-20 CN CN202210697667.6A patent/CN115081870A/en active Pending
-
2023
- 2023-06-20 WO PCT/CN2023/101264 patent/WO2023246739A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114047850A (en) * | 2021-11-15 | 2022-02-15 | 北京字跳网络技术有限公司 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
| CN114386830A (en) * | 2022-01-11 | 2022-04-22 | 北京飞书科技有限公司 | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2023246739A1 (en) * | 2022-06-20 | 2023-12-28 | 北京字跳网络技术有限公司 | Information processing method and apparatus, terminal, and storage medium |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2023246739A1 (en) | 2023-12-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8788309B2 (en) | Application of cost constraints in event scheduling | |
| WO2023083370A1 (en) | Information processing method and apparatus, terminal, and storage medium | |
| US10938589B2 (en) | Communications analysis and participation recommendation | |
| CN114491185B (en) | Information display method, information display device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115660589A (en) | Business auditing method, device, equipment, computer readable medium and program product | |
| CN115081870A (en) | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium | |
| CN114911557A (en) | Information processing method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| US20130339077A1 (en) | Automated Delegation | |
| CN114331331A (en) | Information processing method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| US20240039968A1 (en) | Virtual meeting integration with customer relationship management platform | |
| CN114048716A (en) | Information processing method, device, terminal and storage medium | |
| CN115935916A (en) | Document auditing method, device, equipment, storage medium and program product | |
| CN113079085B (en) | Business service interaction method, business service interaction device, business service interaction equipment and storage medium | |
| US11665126B2 (en) | Communications and analysis system | |
| CN115237533A (en) | Information display method, device, equipment and medium | |
| US11038703B2 (en) | Incorporating contextual information in a conferencing system | |
| CN115712597A (en) | Information processing method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115913803A (en) | Information interaction method and device and electronic equipment | |
| US20100153283A1 (en) | Electronic professional mentoring framework | |
| El-Kiki | mGovernment: A reality check | |
| US20190281422A1 (en) | Message display apparatus and method | |
| US20240177119A1 (en) | Artificial intelligence agent | |
| CN114978762B (en) | Voting processing method, voting processing system, voting processing device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| WO2023011523A1 (en) | Session information display method and apparatus, and electronic device | |
| CN116389177A (en) | Information processing method, apparatus, electronic device and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |