CN113241181A - Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient - Google Patents

Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113241181A
CN113241181A CN202110725177.8A CN202110725177A CN113241181A CN 113241181 A CN113241181 A CN 113241181A CN 202110725177 A CN202110725177 A CN 202110725177A CN 113241181 A CN113241181 A CN 113241181A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
liver cancer
risk
scoring model
prognosis
model
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
CN202110725177.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
杨承刚
宋宏涛
董东
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Medintell Bioinformatic Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Beijing Medintell Bioinformatic Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Medintell Bioinformatic Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Beijing Medintell Bioinformatic Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN202110725177.8A priority Critical patent/CN113241181A/en
Publication of CN113241181A publication Critical patent/CN113241181A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/30ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6883Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
    • C12Q1/6886Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/20ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/118Prognosis of disease development
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/158Expression markers

Abstract

The invention relates to a prognosis risk evaluation model and an evaluation device for a liver cancer patient. In particular to a prognosis model for predicting the cumulative survival rate of liver cancer patients based on 3 genes. The invention establishes a prognosis model with 3 genes and divides liver cancer patients into high and low risk groups. The risk score of the liver cancer patient is obviously related to the cumulative survival rate through verification.

Description

Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of biological medicines, and particularly relates to a prognosis risk evaluation model and evaluation device for a liver cancer patient.
Background
Prognosis refers to empirically predicted disease progression. Prognosis is primarily related to three aspects, what outcome will occur, the likelihood of a poor outcome, and the point in time. The purpose of research and grading prognosis is to facilitate understanding of the degree of harm of diseases to humans, to explore factors affecting prognosis, and to research specific measures for improving prognosis. Prognostic analysis is a clinical study that is very practical and has a guiding role in clinical practice.
The liver is one of the most important organs for maintaining the stable environment and the health of the organism in the organism, and the fatty liver, the hepatitis, the cirrhosis and the liver cancer are the four most common serious diseases in the liver and are also one of the important reasons for harming the health of human beings. In fact, approximately one million people die each year from cirrhosis and liver cancer. Particularly, liver cancer, the most common primary malignancy of the liver, is the leading cause of death among various diseases in humans due to high morbidity, difficulty in finding, few treatment methods, and the like. Currently, liver cancer ranks fifth in terms of tumor fatality rate worldwide, while in some african and asian countries, liver cancer is already the first in neoplastic causes of death.
After decades of efforts, research on liver cancer has been greatly progressed, and the early treatment of small liver cancer and the second resection of narrowed liver cancer are taken as marks in the last century, which respectively contribute 10 percent to the improvement of the survival rate of liver cancer after operation, but the overall curative effect of liver cancer is still poor due to the rapid progression of the disease course of liver cancer and extremely high recurrence rate, and the overall survival rate of liver cancer people in 5 years is still only about 5 percent. In recent years, although some progress has been made in the basic and clinical research of liver cancer, the mechanism of liver cancer recurrence has not been clarified, and effective intervention measures have not been found. The high recurrence rate of liver cancer is the bottleneck affecting the improvement of the curative effect.
The biomarker is an indicator capable of objectively measuring and evaluating normal biological processes, pathological processes or drug intervention reactions, is also an important early warning index when an organism is damaged, and relates to the change of the molecular structure and function of cells, the change of biochemical metabolic processes, abnormal expression of physiological activities, abnormal change of individuals, groups or the whole ecological system and the like. The research of the biomarker is not only an important content of biochemical basic research, but also has important value in the aspects of new drug development, medical diagnosis and clinical research, is helpful for helping researchers to provide more effective diagnosis and treatment means, and particularly has important value in the prevention and control of chronic diseases and complex diseases such as tumors, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, neurological disorders and the like. Therefore, the method for searching the biomarkers related to the prognosis recurrence of the liver cancer can provide a new method for further reducing the clinical recurrence rate and the fatality rate of the liver cancer.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a construction method of a liver cancer prognosis model, which comprises the following steps:
acquiring transcription spectrum expression data of a plurality of liver cancer patients and a plurality of reference persons;
screening candidate genes based on the transcript expression data of the plurality of lung cancer patients and the plurality of reference humans; and
constructing a risk scoring model based on the candidate genes;
wherein the lung cancer prognosis model comprises the risk score model.
Further, constructing a risk scoring model based on the candidate genes, comprising:
acquiring a training data set;
determining genes related to the life cycle in the training dataset through single-factor Cox regression analysis based on the candidate genes; and
screening the genes related to survival by LASSO Cox regression analysis to determine the genes for constructing the risk scoring model and the risk scoring model, wherein the genes for constructing the risk scoring model comprise KIAA0907, LAMTOR1, RHEB.
Further, the risk scoring model is represented as: risk score 0.27498127 KIAA0907 gene expression level +0.37661406 LAMTOR1 gene expression level +0.38147651 RHEB gene expression level.
Further, constructing the risk scoring model based on the candidate genes, further comprising: evaluating the predictive performance of the risk scoring model based on the training dataset.
Further, assessing predictive performance of the risk scoring model based on the training dataset, comprising:
calculating a risk score for each subject in the training dataset based on the risk score model;
evaluating goodness-of-fit of a risk scoring model using a time-dependent subject working characteristic curve analysis of the training dataset;
determining a grouping cutoff value according to analysis of a time-dependent subject working characteristic curve of the training data set, and dividing the subjects in the training data set into a first high risk group and a first low risk group according to the grouping cutoff value; and
evaluating whether the first high-risk group and the first low-risk group have a significant difference in survival using a Kaplan-Meier curve of the training dataset.
Further, constructing the risk scoring model based on the candidate genes, further comprising:
obtaining a verification dataset; and
verifying the efficacy of the risk scoring model based on the verification dataset.
Further, verifying the efficacy of the risk scoring model based on the verification dataset comprises:
calculating a risk score for each subject in the validation dataset based on the risk score model;
analyzing a goodness-of-fit of a validation risk score model using a time-dependent subject working profile of the validation dataset; and
the subjects in the validation dataset are divided into a second high risk group and a second low risk group according to the group cutoff value, and the Kaplan-Meier curve of the validation dataset is used to validate whether the second high risk group and the second low risk group have a significant difference in survival.
The invention also provides a liver cancer prognosis model obtained by the construction method.
The invention also provides an application method of the liver cancer prognosis model, which comprises the following steps:
the lung cancer prognosis model comprises the risk scoring model constructed according to the construction method, and the application method comprises the following steps:
obtaining transcription profile expression data of a liver cancer patient sample, wherein the transcription profile expression data of the liver cancer sample comprise expression values of genes for constructing the risk scoring model; and
calculating a risk score for the prognosis of the liver cancer patient according to the risk score model based on the liver cancer sample transcript profile expression data.
The invention also provides a product for predicting liver cancer prognosis.
As an example of such a product, the product may be a gene combination comprising KIAA0907, LAMTOR1, RHEB.
As an example of the product, the product can be a device for predicting liver cancer prognosis, and the device comprises a prognosis prediction analysis unit which predicts the prognosis of a liver cancer patient by using the liver cancer prognosis model.
Further, the device further comprises a data collection unit that detects the expression level of the molecular marker.
Further, the device also comprises a display unit, and the display unit displays the prognosis prediction result of the liver cancer patient.
Further, the apparatus further includes an evaluation result transmitting unit that transmits the prognosis prediction result obtained by the prediction analysis unit to the display unit.
As an example of the product, the product can be a kit for predicting liver cancer prognosis, which comprises the reagent for detecting the gene expression level for constructing the risk scoring model as described above.
Further, the reagent comprises a reagent for detecting the expression level of the gene by a sequencing technology, a nucleic acid hybridization technology, a nucleic acid amplification technology and a protein immunity technology.
Still further, the reagents include primers, probes, antibodies, ligands.
Still further, the kit further comprises one or more substances selected from the group consisting of: container, instructions for use, positive control, negative control, buffer, adjuvant or solvent.
As an example of the product, the product can be a chip for predicting prognosis of liver cancer, which comprises the reagent for detecting the gene expression level for constructing the risk scoring model.
Further, the reagent is as defined above.
As an example of the product, the product may be an electronic device including: a memory for non-transitory storage of computer readable instructions; and a processor for executing the computer-readable instructions, wherein the computer-readable instructions, when executed by the processor, perform the aforementioned construction method or perform the following steps: calculating a risk score using the risk scoring model as described above based on the gene expression levels in the liver cancer patient sample used to construct the risk scoring model as described above.
As an example of the product, the product may be a storage medium storing non-transitory computer readable instructions, wherein the non-transitory computer readable instructions, when executed by a computer, perform instructions according to the aforementioned construction method or perform the following steps: calculating a risk score using the risk scoring model as described above based on the gene expression levels in the liver cancer patient sample used to construct the risk scoring model as described above.
The invention also provides application of the genome combination comprising KIAA0907, LAMTOR1 and RHEB in preparation of products for predicting liver cancer prognosis.
The invention also provides application of the risk scoring model in preparation of products for predicting liver cancer prognosis.
The application of the liver cancer prognosis model obtained by the construction method in preparing products for predicting the prognosis of liver cancer.
Further, the product is the product described above.
"KIAA 0907" as used herein refers to a nucleic acid encoding all or part of a KIAA0907 protein or substantially identical to all or part of a nucleic acid sequence or an analog thereof, and having a Gene ID of 22889.
"LAMTOR 1" as used herein refers to a nucleic acid encoding all or part of the LAMTOR1 protein or substantially the same nucleic acid sequence as all or part of the nucleic acid sequence or analog thereof, with a Gene ID of 55004.
"RHEB" as used herein refers to a nucleic acid encoding all or part of the RHEB protein or substantially the same nucleic acid sequence as all or part of the nucleic acid sequence or analogue thereof, with a Gene ID of 6009.
As used herein, a "sample" may include, but is not limited to, a single cell or a plurality of cells, a layer of cells, a tissue biopsy, excised tissue, a tissue extract, a tissue culture extract, a tissue culture medium, exhaled breath, whole blood, platelets, serum, plasma, red blood cells, white blood cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, macrophages, B cells or subsets thereof, T cells or subsets thereof, subsets of hematopoietic cells, endothelial cells, synovial fluid, lymphatic fluid, ascites fluid, interstitial fluid, bone marrow, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, tumor infiltrates, saliva, mucus, sputum, semen, sweat, urine, or any other bodily fluid. Samples may be obtained from a subject by means including, but not limited to, venipuncture, drainage, biopsy, needle aspiration, lavage, scraping, surgical excision, or other means known in the art.
Drawings
FIG. 1 shows a survival plot for the TCGA data set;
FIG. 2 shows a survival graph for a GEO data set;
FIG. 3 shows a ROC plot for the TCGA dataset;
FIG. 4 shows a ROC plot for the GEO data set.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions of the present invention are further illustrated by the following specific examples, which do not represent limitations to the scope of the present invention. Insubstantial modifications and adaptations of the present invention by others of the concepts fall within the scope of the invention.
Example 1 screening of genes involved in prognosis of liver cancer
1. Data download
Public gene expression data and complete clinical annotations were searched in a gene expression integration database (GEO) and a cancer genomic profile database (TCGA). For the data set in TCGA, RNA sequencing data (FPKM values) and clinical information for gene expression were downloaded from UCSC Xena (https:// gdc. The FPKM values were then converted to million per kilobase (TPM) value transcripts. The gene expression data of GSE76427 is downloaded from GEO database (http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GEO /), and is annotated by annotation file, the average value of multiple probes corresponding to the same gene is taken as the expression quantity, then gene expression matrix file is obtained. Wherein, the TCGA data set is used as a discovery queue, and the GEO data set is used as a verification queue. After removing the sample with incomplete clinical information, the number of samples contained in the TCGA cohort was paracancerous: carcinoma 50:368, the amount of samples in the GEO cohort is paracarcinoma: cancer 52: 115.
2. Differential expression analysis
Differential expression analysis was performed using the "limma" package in the R software, with screening criteria for differential genes being adj. pvalue <0.01, | log2FC | > 1. Under this standard, 1827 differentially expressed genes, 1463 up-regulated differentially expressed genes, and 364 down-regulated differentially expressed genes were present in TCGA. There were 724 differentially expressed genes in the GEO, 528 differentially expressed genes up-regulated and 196 differentially expressed genes down-regulated. There were 456 genes differentially expressed in the two databases, 399 genes consistently up-regulated and 157 genes consistently down-regulated.
3. One-factor Cox analysis
A one-way Cox analysis was performed on 456 genes whose differential expression was consistent, and genes with P <0.05 were considered to have an effect on survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Under this standard, there are 287 genes in the TCGA database and 32 genes in the GEO database. After the intersection treatment, the two genes have 18 genes in total.
4. LASSO Cox analysis
And (3) carrying out LASSO Cox analysis on 18 genes in the TCGA dataset, and screening out genes to form a prognosis gene signature. And calculating the risk score of each sample according to a formula, and dividing all samples into high-risk groups and low-risk groups according to the median of the risk scores.
Figure BDA0003138333090000071
Note: and (3) a calculation formula of the risk score, wherein n is a prognostic factor, expi is an expression value of the gene i, and beta i is a regression coefficient of the gene i.
The genes identified by the final screening for constructing the risk score model include the following three genes: KIAA0907, LAMTOR1, RHEB. Table 2 lists the relevant information and parameters for the 3 genes used to construct the risk scoring model. HR in the one-factor cox regression analysis is used to characterize the relative risk, wherein an HR value greater than 1 indicates that the expression value of the corresponding gene is in a positive correlation with the risk score, such that the corresponding LASSO coefficient is greater than 0, and an HR value less than 1 indicates that the expression value of the corresponding gene is in a negative correlation with the risk score, such that the corresponding LASSO coefficient is less than 0. In table 2, 95% CI indicates a 95% Confidence interval (Confidence interval).
TABLE 2 3 genes in the Risk score model
Figure BDA0003138333090000072
From the results in table 2, the risk score model for 3 genes is shown as:
risk score-0.27498127-KIAA 0907 gene expression level + 0.37661406-LAMTOR 1 gene expression level + 0.38147651-RHEB gene expression level
Survival analysis results showed that the survival time of patients in the high risk group was significantly shorter than that in the low risk group (fig. 1). To evaluate the accuracy of the prognostic model consisting of 3 genes in predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed for 1-year, 3-year and 5-year subjects, comparing the respective AUC values. The results showed that the AUC for 1 year, 3 years and 5 years were 0.76, 0.67, 0.64, respectively (fig. 3). The AUC value shows that the prognosis model composed of 3 genes has better distinguishing performance on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Next, the risk score of each sample was calculated using the same formula in the GEO validation set, and survival analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed, with the results showing the same trend as the training set (fig. 2 and 4). These results indicate that a risk score calculated based on 3 risk features may better predict the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Claims (10)

1. A construction method of a liver cancer prognosis model is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring transcription spectrum expression data of a plurality of liver cancer patients and a plurality of reference persons;
screening candidate genes based on the transcript expression data of the plurality of lung cancer patients and the plurality of reference humans; and
constructing a risk scoring model based on the candidate genes;
the lung cancer prognosis model comprises the risk score model;
constructing a risk scoring model based on the candidate genes, comprising:
acquiring a training data set;
determining genes related to the life cycle in the training dataset through single-factor Cox regression analysis based on the candidate genes; and
screening the genes related to survival by LASSOCox regression analysis to determine the genes for constructing the risk scoring model and the risk scoring model, wherein the genes for constructing the risk scoring model include KIAA0907, LAMTOR1, RHEB.
2. The method of construction of claim 1, wherein the risk scoring model is represented as: risk score 0.27498127 KIAA0907 gene expression level +0.37661406 LAMTOR1 gene expression level +0.38147651 RHEB gene expression level.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein constructing the risk scoring model based on the candidate genes further comprises:
evaluating the predictive performance of the risk scoring model based on the training dataset.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein evaluating the predictive performance of the risk scoring model based on the training dataset comprises:
calculating a risk score for each liver cancer patient in the training dataset based on the risk score model;
analyzing and evaluating goodness-of-fit of a risk scoring model using the time-dependent working characteristic curve of the training dataset for the liver cancer patient;
analyzing and determining a grouping cutoff value according to the time-dependent working characteristic curve of the liver cancer patient in the training data set, and dividing the liver cancer patient in the training data set into a first high risk group and a first low risk group according to the grouping cutoff value; and
evaluating whether the first high-risk group and the first low-risk group have a significant difference in survival using a Kaplan-Meier curve of the training dataset.
5. The method of constructing according to claim 4, wherein constructing the risk scoring model based on the candidate genes further comprises:
obtaining a verification dataset; and
verifying the efficacy of the risk scoring model based on the verification dataset.
6. The method of constructing as claimed in claim 5, wherein validating the efficacy of the risk scoring model based on the validation dataset comprises:
calculating a risk score for each liver cancer patient in the validation dataset based on the risk score model;
analyzing a goodness-of-fit of a validation risk scoring model using the time-dependent liver cancer patient working characteristic curve of the validation dataset; and
and dividing liver cancer patients in the verification data set into a second high-risk group and a second low-risk group according to the grouping cutoff value, and verifying whether the second high-risk group and the second low-risk group have significant difference in survival situation by using a Kaplan-Meier curve of the verification data set.
7. A product for predicting the prognosis of liver cancer, said product comprising any one of:
1) a gene combination comprising KIAA0907, LAMTOR1, RHEB;
2) the risk scoring model of claim 2;
3) a liver cancer prognosis model obtained by the construction method according to any one of claims 1 to 6;
4) a device for predicting prognosis of liver cancer, the device comprising a prognosis prediction analysis unit for predicting prognosis of a liver cancer patient by using a liver cancer prognosis model obtained by the construction method according to any one of claims 1 to 6;
5) a kit for predicting prognosis of liver cancer, the kit comprising reagents for detecting the expression level of genes for constructing a risk scoring model according to claim 1;
6) a chip for predicting prognosis of liver cancer, the chip comprising a reagent for detecting the expression level of a gene used in the construction of a risk scoring model according to claim 1;
7) an electronic device, the electronic device comprising: a memory for non-transitory storage of computer readable instructions; and a processor for executing the computer-readable instructions, wherein the computer-readable instructions, when executed by the processor, perform the construction method of any one of claims 1 to 6 or perform the steps of: calculating a risk score using the risk scoring model of claim 2 based on the level of gene expression in the subject sample used to construct the risk scoring model of claim 1;
8) a storage medium storing non-transitory computer readable instructions, wherein the non-transitory computer readable instructions, when executed by a computer, perform instructions of the construction method according to any one of claims 1-6 or perform the steps of: calculating a risk score using the risk scoring model of claim 2 based on the level of gene expression used to construct the risk scoring model of claim 1 in a sample from a liver cancer patient.
8. The product of claim 7, wherein the apparatus further comprises an information collecting unit that detects the expression levels of the genes of claim 1 used to construct the risk scoring model.
9. An application, characterized in that the application comprises any of the following:
1) use of the gene of claim 1 for constructing a risk score model for the preparation of a product for predicting the prognosis of liver cancer;
2) use of the risk scoring model of claim 2 in the preparation of a product for predicting the prognosis of liver cancer;
3) use of the liver cancer prognosis model obtained by the construction method according to any one of claims 1-6 in preparing a product for predicting liver cancer prognosis.
10. Use according to claim 9, characterized in that the product comprises the product of claim 7.
CN202110725177.8A 2021-06-29 2021-06-29 Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient Withdrawn CN113241181A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110725177.8A CN113241181A (en) 2021-06-29 2021-06-29 Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110725177.8A CN113241181A (en) 2021-06-29 2021-06-29 Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113241181A true CN113241181A (en) 2021-08-10

Family

ID=77141073

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110725177.8A Withdrawn CN113241181A (en) 2021-06-29 2021-06-29 Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113241181A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113539376A (en) * 2021-09-16 2021-10-22 浙江大学 Gene model for judging prognosis of liver cell liver cancer patient, construction method and application

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113539376A (en) * 2021-09-16 2021-10-22 浙江大学 Gene model for judging prognosis of liver cell liver cancer patient, construction method and application
CN113539376B (en) * 2021-09-16 2022-01-18 浙江大学 Gene model for judging prognosis of liver cell liver cancer patient, construction method and application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103299188B (en) Molecular diagnostic assay for cancer
US20150018238A1 (en) Multi-biomarker-based outcome risk stratification model for pediatric septic shock
CN113345589A (en) Construction method and application method of liver cancer prognosis model and electronic equipment
CN113436673A (en) Molecular marker for liver cancer prognosis prediction and application thereof
US20190018930A1 (en) Method for building a database
CN113462773A (en) Marker for predicting survival risk, immunotherapy response and applicability of cell apoptosis inducer of gastric cancer patient and application thereof
CN115588507A (en) Prognosis model of lung adenocarcinoma EMT related gene, construction method and application
CN111833963A (en) cfDNA classification method, device and application
CN114594259B (en) Novel model for colorectal cancer prognosis prediction and diagnosis and application thereof
CN115482880A (en) Head and neck squamous carcinoma glycolysis related gene prognosis model, construction method and application
CN115851951A (en) Construction of early liver cancer detection model containing multiple groups of chemical marker compositions and kit
CN114360721A (en) Prognosis model of endometrial cancer related to metabolism and construction method
CN113470754A (en) Gene marker for tumor prognosis evaluation, evaluation product and application
CN113241181A (en) Prognosis risk assessment model and assessment device for liver cancer patient
CN113450917A (en) Application of biomarker in prediction of liver cancer prognosis
CN113470813A (en) Survival rate prognosis model for liver cancer patient
CN114107515B (en) Early gastric cancer prognosis differential gene and recurrence prediction model
CN113234823B (en) Pancreatic cancer prognosis risk assessment model and application thereof
CN113450909A (en) Liver cancer prognosis prediction model and application thereof
CN116092674A (en) Exosome-mediated gastric cancer overall survival rate prognosis model, construction method and application
CN115261454A (en) Novel let-7d-5p and miR-140-5p biomarker panel diagnosis method
AU2016224709A1 (en) Method for assisting in prognostic diagnosis of colorectal cancer, recording medium and determining device
CN111500733A (en) Molecular marker for early diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer in peripheral blood mononuclear cells
CN115678999B (en) Application of marker in lung cancer recurrence prediction and prediction model construction method
Wu et al. Identification of Six Genes as Diagnostic Markers for Colorectal Cancer Detection by Integrating Multiple Expression Profiles

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20210810

WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication