CN112711190B - Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system - Google Patents

Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112711190B
CN112711190B CN202011557795.8A CN202011557795A CN112711190B CN 112711190 B CN112711190 B CN 112711190B CN 202011557795 A CN202011557795 A CN 202011557795A CN 112711190 B CN112711190 B CN 112711190B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
mechanical system
sub
fault
observer
ith
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202011557795.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112711190A (en
Inventor
郭斌
佃松宜
赵涛
向国菲
钟羽中
游星星
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sichuan University
Original Assignee
Sichuan University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sichuan University filed Critical Sichuan University
Priority to CN202011557795.8A priority Critical patent/CN112711190B/en
Publication of CN112711190A publication Critical patent/CN112711190A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112711190B publication Critical patent/CN112711190B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Abstract

The application provides a self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, a control device and a control system. The adaptive fault-tolerant controller comprises: the preset distributed comprehensive observer is used for acquiring tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system; estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information; and the preset sliding mode surface is used for determining compensation information of the sub-mechanical system based on the fault interference information and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information. By the method, the fault interference information can be estimated based on the trigger information received by the sub-mechanical system, so that the interference compensation is carried out on the sub-mechanical system, and the controller is ensured to stably and effectively track the sub-mechanical system.

Description

Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of nonlinear systems, in particular to a self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and a control system.
Background
With the continuous improvement of the industrial automation degree, modern industrial systems comprise more and more nonlinear subunits, and in order to complete complex industrial control targets, a plurality of interconnected sub-mechanical systems are often required to be integrated. The system belongs to a typical nonlinear large system, and connection with multi-state multi-physical coupling characteristics is involved in the connection process. However, since the characteristics of each subsystem are different, the connection mechanism is complex, which also brings many challenges to the control of the system. On one hand, as the number of mechanical systems of the interconnected sub-machines is large, the number of channels for interference to enter the system is increased, so that the system is easily influenced by external interference; on the other hand, actuators in the system are prone to failure, and the working performance of the system is also affected.
Disclosure of Invention
An object of the embodiment of the present application is to provide a self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, a control device, and a control system, so as to improve the problem that "the working performance of the entire interconnection system is affected due to the fact that there are many interconnected sub-mechanical systems, the sub-mechanical systems are easily interfered by the outside, and the actuator itself fails.
The invention is realized by the following steps:
in a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an adaptive fault-tolerant controller, which is applied to a sub-mechanical system in an interconnected nonlinear mechanical system, where the adaptive fault-tolerant controller includes: the preset distributed comprehensive observer is used for acquiring tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system; estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information; and the preset sliding mode surface is used for determining compensation information of the sub-mechanical system based on the fault interference information and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information.
In an embodiment of the present application, an adaptive fault tolerant controller includes: a preset distributed comprehensive observer and a preset sliding mode surface. The preset distributed integrated observer acquires tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system and estimates fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information; and the preset sliding mode surface determines compensation information of the system based on the fault interference information, and compensates the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information. Namely, the fault interference information can be estimated based on the trigger information received by the sub-mechanical system through the mode, so that the interference compensation is carried out on the sub-mechanical system, and the stable and effective tracking of the controller on the sub-mechanical system is ensured.
With reference to the technical solution provided by the first aspect, in some possible implementations, the controller is constructed based on a preset distributed integrated observer and a preset sliding mode surface; the preset distributed comprehensive observer is used for estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information, and the preset sliding mode surface is used for determining compensation information of the system based on the fault interference information and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information.
With reference to the technical solution provided by the first aspect, in some possible implementation manners, the preset distributed comprehensive observer includes a state observer, a failure factor observer, and a total disturbance observer; the state observer is used for estimating the state of the sub-mechanical system and is constructed based on a pre-constructed state model of the sub-mechanical system and a trigger value of an output channel; wherein, the output channel is a channel between a controller and a sensor of the sub-mechanical system;
the mathematical expression of the state model of the sub-mechanical system is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000021
wherein x isi(t)=[xi1,xi2,...,xin]T∈RnRepresenting the state of the ith sub-mechanical system, including the speed and acceleration of the ith sub-mechanical system, Δ fi(x,t,χ)=[Δfi1(x,t,χ),...,Δfin(x,t,χ)]T,Fi(x)=[Fi1(x),...,Fin(x)]TRespectively representing smooth non-linear functions related to the mass of the ith sub-mechanical system; χ represents a constant related to the friction of the ith sub-mechanical system, di(t)=[di1(t),...,din(t)]TRepresenting external interference from the ith sub-mechanical system, including wind resistance and external load fluctuation; u. ofi(t)=[ui1(t),...,uim(t)]TAnd yi(t)=[yi1(t),...,yip(t)]TRespectively representing the electric signal input of the actuator of the ith sub-mechanical system itself and the speeds and angular velocities of the ith sub-mechanical system, giRepresents the motor torque control gain, C, of the ith sub-mechanical systemiRepresenting the i-th sub-mechanical system output matrix, ΠijAn interconnection matrix representing the ith and jth sub-mechanical systems; x is the number ofj(t) represents a state quantity of the jth sub-mechanical system; lambda [ alpha ]i=diag(λi1,...,λim) Denotes the ith sub-mechanical system failure factor, λik∈[λ12](k=1,...,m),λ1An upper bound representing a failure factor; lambda [ alpha ]2A lower bound representing a failure factor; sigmai=diag(σi1,...,σim) Denotes an indicator factor, where σik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m);εi=diag(εi1,...,εim),εik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m),usi(t) represents an actuator deflection fault of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein the predetermined interference is bounded, then
Figure BDA0002859133950000031
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000032
represents the equivalent interference, theta, of the ith systemsiIs an unknown gain, ξi(t) represents a variable related to the ith sub-mechanical system disturbance;
correspondingly, the mathematical expression of the state observer is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000033
the above-mentioned
Figure BDA0002859133950000034
Respectively represent xi(t),Fi(t),λi(t),Δfi(x,t,χ),yi(t) estimation, yi(tk) A trigger value, L, representing the output channelqiRepresenting the gain, δ, of the state observerqi(t) a compensation term representing the state observer;
the fault failure factor observer is used for estimating a system fault failure factor of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein, the mathematical expression of the fault failure factor observer is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000035
wherein h ism=-σiudi(t)Tgi TPiesi
Figure BDA0002859133950000036
Indicating the state estimation error, PiIs a positive definite symmetric matrix;
the total disturbance observer is used for estimating actuator fault disturbance and external disturbance on the ith sub-mechanical system through the state difference value of the ith sub-mechanical system.
The preset distributed comprehensive observer provided by the embodiment of the application comprises a state observer, a failure factor observer and a total disturbance observer, so that multi-dimensional estimation and estimation are realized.
With reference to the technical solution provided by the first aspect, in some possible implementations, a mathematical expression of the compensation term of the state observer is:
Figure BDA0002859133950000041
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000042
is expressed in the pair thetasiEstimate of, LqiRepresenting observer gain, ηm=2(λ21)(λn21) Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure BDA0002859133950000043
Figure BDA0002859133950000044
to represent
Figure BDA0002859133950000045
Euler norm of, λn>0,ξi(t) is a new variable to be defined, km>0 and τm>0 is respectively two scalars, kmExpressed as a constant, τ, preventing the introduction of fluctuations in the interference estimatemA constant relating to the acceleration of the ith sub-mechanical system, g (y) is a known function relating to the centripetal force of the ith sub-mechanical system,
Figure BDA0002859133950000046
ey=yi(tk)-yi(t),Pirepresenting a positive definite symmetric matrix;
Figure BDA0002859133950000047
g (y, t) and Fi(y) representing two known functions, respectively; wherein, Fi(y) represents a known function related to the mass of the ith sub-mechanical system, and G (y, t) represents a measurable non-linear member function of the interconnection portion of the ith sub-mechanical system.
In the embodiment of the application, the compensation item for compensating the system error is introduced into the state observer, so that the observation flexibility of the observer is improved.
With reference to the technical solution provided by the first aspect, in some possible implementation manners, the preset mathematical expression of the sliding mode surface is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000048
wherein e ismi=yi(t)-yid(t) represents the difference between the ith sub-mechanical system speed and the desired speed; y isid(t) represents the ith sub-mechanical system desired speed; u. ofdi(t) represents the control input of the ith sub-mechanical system at time t,
Figure BDA0002859133950000051
α>0,β>0; two adaptive parameters are respectively expressed as
Figure BDA0002859133950000052
mi>0,ai>0,ci>0,pi>0,bi>0,zi>0, Q matrix is a selection matrix such that QC is a nonsingular matrix, emi (n-1)(t) represents emi(n-1) derivative of (t), li(I ═ 2, 3., n) corresponds to the gain factor, which is a positive number, and I denotes an identity matrix.
In the embodiment of the application, the influence of the total interference signal and the tracking error on the control precision is respectively considered by the self-adaptive parameters in the sliding mode surface, so that the robustness of the system is enhanced and the trembling property in the approaching process is reduced through the design of the self-adaptive parameters.
With reference to the technical solution provided by the first aspect, in some possible implementations, the controller performs tracking by using two channels;
wherein, the first channel is a channel between a controller and a sensor of the sub-mechanical system; the second channel is the channel between the controller and the actuator of the sub-mechanical system itself.
With reference to the technical solution provided by the first aspect, in some possible implementation manners, the triggering condition of the first channel is:
Figure BDA0002859133950000053
wherein psimA matrix of weights is represented by a matrix of weights,
Figure BDA0002859133950000054
ey=yi(tk)-yi(t),yi(t) denotes the ith sub-mechanical system current output, y (t)k)(k=0,1,...,t00) indicates that the ith sub-mechanical system has last triggered the transmission value.
In the embodiment of the application, the condition trigger value is set in the first channel, and by the mode, the information transmission quantity required by the observer for stabilization can be reduced under the condition that the observer is stable, namely, effective variable observation is realized by using relatively less output quantity.
With reference to the technical solution provided by the first aspect, in some possible implementation manners, the triggering condition of the second channel is:
Figure BDA0002859133950000055
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000061
Figure BDA0002859133950000062
to represent
Figure BDA0002859133950000063
In that
Figure BDA0002859133950000064
The value of the time of day is,
Figure BDA0002859133950000065
kci>0,kdi>0,ksi>0,δmi>0,δni>0,δsi>0,δhi>0,tpiin order to trigger the time series,
Figure BDA0002859133950000066
is an adaptive parameter, whereinaiAnd τbiAre two optionally positive numbers.
In the embodiment of the application, the condition trigger value is set in the second channel, and by the mode, the information transmission quantity required by the observer for stabilization can be reduced under the condition that the observer is stable, namely, effective variable observation is realized by using relatively less output quantity.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an adaptive fault-tolerant control method, which is applied to the adaptive fault-tolerant controller provided in the foregoing first aspect, where the method includes: acquiring tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system; estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information; determining compensation information for the sub-mechanical system based on the fault interference information, and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a control apparatus, including: a controller and a memory, the controller and the memory being connected; the memory is used for storing programs; the controller is configured to call a program stored in the memory to perform the method as provided in the embodiment of the second aspect.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a control system, including: the controller is respectively connected with the sensor and the actuator; the controller is configured to perform the method as provided in the embodiment of the second aspect.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings that are required to be used in the embodiments of the present application will be briefly described below, it should be understood that the following drawings only illustrate some embodiments of the present application and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope, and that those skilled in the art can also obtain other related drawings based on the drawings without inventive efforts.
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of an interconnected nonlinear mechanical system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Fig. 2 is a control block diagram of an adaptive fault-tolerant control method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Fig. 3 is a flowchart illustrating steps of an adaptive fault-tolerant control method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application.
In view of the problems that the existing interconnected sub-mechanical systems are more and are easily interfered by the outside world and the actuators have faults, so that the working performance of the whole interconnected system is affected, the inventor of the present application has conducted research and proposes the following embodiments to solve the problems.
Referring to fig. 1, an interconnected nonlinear mechanical system is provided in an embodiment of the present application, which includes a plurality of sub-mechanical systems, each coupled to one or more other sub-mechanical systems. Each sub-mechanical system comprises a controller, a sensor and an actuator. The controller is respectively connected with the sensor and the actuator.
It should be noted that the actuator is an essential component of the mechanical system. It is used to receive the control signal from the controller and change the size of the controlled medium to maintain the controlled variable in the required value or range.
The sensor is a detection device which can sense the measured information and convert the sensed information into an electric signal or other information in a required form according to a certain rule to output so as to meet the requirements of information transmission, processing, storage, display, recording, control and the like.
The sub-machine system may be a metallurgical machine system, a mining machine system, an engineering transport machine system, or a metal cutting machine system, but the present application is not limited thereto.
The following explains the configuration of the controller. In the embodiment of the application, the controller is constructed based on a preset distributed comprehensive observer and a preset sliding mode surface. The preset distributed comprehensive observer is used for estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information, and the preset sliding mode surface is used for determining compensation information of the system based on the fault interference information and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information.
Optionally, the preset decentralized integrated observer includes a state observer, a failure factor observer, and a total disturbance observer.
The state observer is used for estimating the state of the sub-mechanical system and is constructed based on a pre-constructed state model of the sub-mechanical system and a trigger value of an output channel; wherein the output channel is a channel between a controller and a sensor of the sub-mechanical system itself. That is, the tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system can be obtained from the output channel.
The mathematical expression of the state model of the sub-mechanical system is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000081
the sub-mechanical system state model in the formula (1) is constructed by an initial sub-mechanical system state model and a pre-constructed fault model of the actuator of the interconnected mechanical system.
The expression of the initial sub-mechanical system state model is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000082
in the formula (2), xi(t)=[xi1,xi2,...,xin]T∈RnRepresenting the state of the ith sub-mechanical system, including the speed and acceleration of the ith sub-mechanical system, Δ fi(x,t,χ)=[Δfi1(x,t,χ),...,Δfin(x,t,χ)]T,Fi(x)=[Fi1(x),...,Fin(x)]TRespectively representing smooth non-linear functions related to the mass of the ith sub-mechanical system; χ represents a constant related to the friction of the ith sub-mechanical system, di(t)=[di1(t),...,din(t)]TRepresenting external interference from the ith sub-mechanical system, including wind resistance and external load fluctuation; u. ofi(t)=[ui1(t),...,uim(t)]TAnd yi(t)=[yi1(t),...,yip(t)]TRespectively represent the ith sub-machineElectrical signal input to the actuator of the system itself and the ith sub-mechanical system speed and angular speed output, giRepresents the motor torque control gain, C, of the ith sub-mechanical systemiRepresenting the ith sub-mechanical system output matrix, CiGenerally, the vector is a row vector, which indicates that the ith sub-mechanical system state quantity is selected as an output quantity (for example, the angular velocity is selected as an output quantity), ΠijAn interconnection matrix representing the ith and jth sub-mechanical systems, i.e., an intercoupling matrix between the two systems. x is the number ofj(t) represents the state quantities of the jth sub-mechanical system, including speed and acceleration.
It should be noted that in a differential equation, there are cases where a derivative with respect to time and a derivative with respect to a certain dimension occur, and the top circle point represents the derivative with respect to time, that is, the dots in the above formula and on the parameter top in the following text represent the derivative.
The expression of the fault model of the interconnected mechanical system actuator is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000091
λi=diag(λi1,...,λim) Denotes the ith sub-mechanical system failure factor, λik∈[λ12](k=1,...,m),λ1An upper bound representing a failure factor; lambda [ alpha ]2Representing a lower bound for a failure factor. Sigmai=diag(σi1,...,σim) Denotes an indicator factor, where σik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m);εi=diag(εi1,...,εim),εik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m),usi(t) represents an actuator deflection fault of the ith sub-mechanical system. Suppose that
Figure BDA0002859133950000092
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000093
to represent
Figure BDA0002859133950000094
Euler norm of (a), where λn>0。
That is, the sub-mechanical system state model of the formula (1) can be obtained by substituting the formula (3) into the formula (2).
Because the external fluctuation of the load of each sub-mechanical system is always bounded, and the corresponding upper bound is not easy to determine, the interference is preset to be bounded, and then
Figure BDA0002859133950000095
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000096
represents the equivalent interference, theta, of the ith systemsiIs an unknown gain, ξi(t) represents a variable related to the ith sub-mechanical system disturbance.
In the embodiment of the application, when the state model of the sub-mechanical system is constructed, the upper bound condition of the equivalent interference is preset, so that the subsequent state observer, the fault failure factor observer and the total interference observer do not need to set specific upper bound values in the interference observation process.
Correspondingly, the mathematical expression of the state observer constructed based on the state model of the sub-mechanical system is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000101
the above-mentioned
Figure BDA0002859133950000102
Respectively represent xi(t),Fi(t),λi(t),Δfi(x,t,χ),yi(t) estimation, yi(tk) A trigger value, L, representing the output channelqiRepresenting the gain, δ, of the state observerqi(t) represents a compensation term for the state observer.
Wherein, the mathematical expression of the compensation term of the state observer is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000103
in the formula (5), the first and second groups,
Figure BDA0002859133950000104
is expressed in the pair thetasiEstimate of, LqiRepresenting observer gain, ηm=2(λ21)(λn21),ξi(t) is a new variable to be defined, km>0 and τm>0 is respectively two scalars, kmExpressed as a constant, τ, preventing the introduction of fluctuations in the interference estimatemA constant relating to the acceleration of the ith sub-mechanical system, g (y) is a known function relating to the centripetal force of the ith sub-mechanical system,
Figure BDA0002859133950000105
ey=yi(tk)-yi(t),Pirepresenting a positive definite symmetric matrix;
Figure BDA0002859133950000106
Figure BDA0002859133950000107
g (y, t) and Fi(y) representing two known functions, respectively; fi(y) represents a known function related to the mass of the ith sub-mechanical system, and G (y, t) represents a measurable non-linear member function of the interconnection portion of the ith sub-mechanical system.
In the embodiment of the application, the compensation item for compensating the system error is introduced into the state observer, so that the observation flexibility of the observer is improved.
The fault failure factor observer is used for estimating a system fault failure factor of the ith sub-mechanical system.
The mathematical expression of the fault failure factor observer is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000108
wherein h ism=-σiudi(t)Tgi TPiesi
Figure BDA0002859133950000109
Indicating the state estimation error, PiIs a positive definite symmetric matrix.
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present application, the fault failure factor observer is used for detecting the fault failure factor λi(t) observed thati(t) is a function of variable time variation, namely the fault signal can more widely represent the fault in the actual system, and the lambda is further realized by the state error driving of the state observeri(t) accurate observation.
And the total disturbance observer is used for estimating actuator fault disturbance and external disturbance on the ith sub-mechanical system through the state difference value of the ith sub-mechanical system.
Figure BDA0002859133950000111
The derivation of equation (7) is described below to estimate the mechanical system interference signal
Figure BDA0002859133950000112
The following variables are defined:
Figure BDA0002859133950000113
wherein, ω isi(t) is an intermediate variable, which is updated according to the formula (9):
Figure BDA0002859133950000114
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000115
αi(t) is defined as formula (10):
Figure BDA0002859133950000116
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000117
is thetasiIs determined by the estimated value of (c),
Figure BDA0002859133950000118
the updating method is as shown in the formula (11)
Figure BDA0002859133950000119
That is, the interference signal for estimating the mechanical system can be obtained by equations (8) to (11) in combination with equations (4) to (6)
Figure BDA00028591339500001110
The total disturbance observer of (1).
It should be noted that a compensation term for compensating system errors is also introduced into the total disturbance observer, by which the observer observation flexibility is also increased, where δqiThe mathematical expression of (t) can refer to the aforementioned formula (5).
Of course, in other embodiments, the total disturbance observer and the state observer may not introduce a compensation term, and the application is not limited thereto.
In summary, the preset distributed comprehensive observer provided in the embodiment of the present application includes a state observer, a failure factor observer, and a total disturbance observer, so as to achieve estimation and estimation in multiple dimensions, that is, the failure disturbance information includes information estimated by the state observer, the failure factor observer, and the total disturbance observer.
Of course, in other embodiments, the preset decentralized integrated observer may also include only one or two of the observers, which is not limited in this application.
In the embodiment of the present application, the preset mathematical expression of the sliding mode surface is as follows:
Figure BDA0002859133950000121
wherein e ismi=yi(t)-yid(t) represents the difference between the ith sub-mechanical system speed and the desired speed; y isid(t) represents the ith sub-mechanical system desired speed; u. ofdi(t) represents the control input of the ith sub-mechanical system at time t,
Figure BDA0002859133950000122
α>0,β>0; two adaptive parameters are respectively expressed as
Figure BDA0002859133950000123
mi>0,ai>0,ci>0,pi>0,bi>0,zi>0, Q matrix is a selection matrix such that QC is a nonsingular matrix, emi (n-1)(t) represents emi(n-1) derivative of (t), li(I ═ 2, 3., n) corresponds to the gain factor, which is a positive number, and I denotes an identity matrix.
In the embodiment of the application, the influence of the total interference signal and the tracking error on the control precision is respectively considered by the self-adaptive parameters in the sliding mode surface, so that the robustness of the system is enhanced and the trembling property in the approaching process is reduced through the design of the self-adaptive parameters.
Optionally, in this embodiment, the controller performs tracking using two channels.
The first channel is a channel between the controller and the sensor of the sub-mechanical system itself, i.e. the output channel mentioned in the previous embodiment. The second channel is a channel between the controller and the actuator of the sub-mechanical system, and is corresponding to the input channel of the sub-mechanical system.
Of course, in other embodiments, the tracking may be performed only through any one of the channels, and the present application is not limited thereto.
Optionally, when the first channel is used for tracking, the triggering condition of the first channel is:
Figure BDA0002859133950000131
wherein psimThe weight matrix is expressed, and can be selected as a diagonal matrix according to the ith sub-mechanical system in practical application,
Figure BDA0002859133950000132
ey=yi(tk)-yi(t),yi(t) denotes the ith sub-mechanical system current output, y (t)k)(k=0,1,...,t00) indicates that the ith sub-mechanical system has last triggered the transmission value.
Optionally, when the first channel is used for tracking, the triggering condition of the second channel is:
Figure BDA0002859133950000133
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000134
Figure BDA0002859133950000135
to represent
Figure BDA0002859133950000136
In that
Figure BDA0002859133950000137
The value of the time of day is,
Figure BDA0002859133950000138
kci>0,kdi>0,ksi>0,δmi>0,δni>0,δsi>0,δhi>0,
Figure BDA0002859133950000139
in order to trigger the time series,
Figure BDA00028591339500001310
is an adaptive parameter, whereinaiAnd τbiAre two optionally positive numbers.
In the embodiment of the application, the condition trigger values are set in the first channel and the second channel, and by this way, the information transmission quantity required by the observer for stabilization can be reduced under the condition that the observer is stable, that is, effective variable observation is realized by using relatively less output quantity.
Finally, the mathematical expression of the controller can be obtained through the above formula (4), formula (6), formula (7), formula (12) and formula (14).
The mathematical expression of the controller is:
Figure BDA00028591339500001311
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00028591339500001312
Figure BDA00028591339500001313
in an update manner of
Figure BDA00028591339500001314
Figure BDA0002859133950000141
Figure BDA0002859133950000142
It should be noted that parameters not defined in the present application all belong to intermediate quantities in the calculation process.
The specific meaning of the formula (15) can be understood with reference to the control process shown in fig. 2. I.e. u acquired by two channels respectivelydi(t) and yi(tk) And after observation is carried out by a distributed comprehensive observer of the ith sub-mechanical system, state estimation, failure factor estimation and total interference estimation are output, and finally, compensation is carried out through a sliding mode surface to realize stable control tracking.
The tracking performance is mainly analyzed to be the limited time accessibility of the sliding mode surface, and in the method, parameter self-adaptive updating is introduced to ensure the limited time to reach. The demonstration can be expressed as: the design choice of the Lyapunov function is:
Figure BDA0002859133950000143
certifying that
Figure BDA0002859133950000144
The following analysis was performed for the ith mechanical subsystem trigger condition:
for the
Figure BDA0002859133950000145
It is possible to obtain:
Figure BDA0002859133950000146
further inferences can be made based on equation (16):
Figure BDA0002859133950000147
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002859133950000148
Figure BDA0002859133950000149
the two adjacent triggers have lower bounds, and the situation of infinite triggering cannot occur.
It should be noted that, for parameters in the following formulas, reference may be made to explanations in the embodiments of the foregoing formulas, for example, for parameters in formulas (6) to (17), reference may be made to explanations of the parameters in formulas (1) to (5), and repeated descriptions are not repeated to avoid redundancy.
In summary, the embodiment of the application designs a new adaptive fault-tolerant controller based on an event trigger mechanism, which effectively reduces the information transmission amount of the system while ensuring the output trajectory tracking capability of the interconnected nonlinear mechanical system, and proves the trajectory tracking performance of the designed controller. The method and the device can effectively solve the problem that the system effectively tracks and controls the interconnected nonlinear mechanical system under the conditions of actuator faults and external disturbance.
Referring to fig. 3, based on the same inventive concept, an embodiment of the present application provides an adaptive fault-tolerant control method applied to the above interconnected nonlinear mechanical systems, where each sub-mechanical system executes the control method based on a controller, where the control method includes: step S101-step S103.
Step S101: and acquiring tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system.
Step S102: fault interference information for the sub-mechanical system is estimated based on the tracking trigger information.
Step S103: determining compensation information for the sub-mechanical system based on the fault interference information, and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information.
In the embodiment of the present application, the tracking control of each sub-mechanical system is performed according to the controller. Specifically, tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system is obtained; estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information; and finally, determining compensation information of the system based on the fault interference information, and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information. Namely, the fault interference information can be estimated based on the trigger information received by the sub-mechanical system through the mode, so that the interference compensation is carried out on the sub-mechanical system, and the stable and effective tracking of the controller on the sub-mechanical system is ensured.
Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the application also provides a control device. The control device comprises a controller and a memory, wherein the controller is connected with the memory. The controller is electrically connected, directly or indirectly, with the memory to effect the transfer or interaction of data.
The Memory may be, but is not limited to, Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Programmable Read-Only Memory (PROM), Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), and electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM). The memory is used for storing a program, and the controller executes the program after receiving the execution instruction. For example, after receiving the execution, the controller executes to acquire tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system; estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information; determining compensation information for the system based on the fault interference information, and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information.
It should be noted that, as those skilled in the art can clearly understand, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the above-described systems, apparatuses and units may refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and are not described herein again.
Based on the same inventive concept, the present application further provides a storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed, the computer program performs the method provided in the foregoing embodiments.
The storage medium may be any available medium that can be accessed by a computer or a data storage device including one or more integrated servers, data centers, and the like. The usable medium may be a magnetic medium (e.g., floppy Disk, hard Disk, magnetic tape), an optical medium (e.g., DVD), or a semiconductor medium (e.g., Solid State Disk (SSD)), among others.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units is only one logical division, and there may be other divisions when actually implemented, and for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units through some communication interfaces, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
In addition, units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
Furthermore, the functional modules in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated together to form an independent part, or each module may exist separately, or two or more modules may be integrated to form an independent part.
In this document, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions.
The above description is only an example of the present application and is not intended to limit the scope of the present application, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims (8)

1. An adaptive fault-tolerant controller for a sub-mechanical system in an interconnected non-linear mechanical system, the adaptive fault-tolerant controller comprising:
the preset distributed comprehensive observer is used for acquiring tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system; estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information;
the preset sliding mode surface is used for determining compensation information of the sub-mechanical system based on the fault interference information and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information;
the preset distributed comprehensive observer comprises a state observer, a fault failure factor observer and a total disturbance observer;
the state observer is used for estimating the state of the sub-mechanical system and is constructed on the basis of a pre-constructed state model of the sub-mechanical system and a trigger value of an output channel; wherein, the output channel is a channel between a controller and a sensor of the sub-mechanical system;
the mathematical expression of the state model of the sub-mechanical system is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000011
wherein x isi(t)=[xi1,xi2,...,xin]T∈RnRepresenting the state of the ith sub-mechanical system, including the speed and acceleration of the ith sub-mechanical system, Δ fi(x,t,χ)=[Δfi1(x,t,χ),...,Δfin(x,t,χ)]T,Fi(x)=[Fi1(x),...,Fin(x)]TRespectively represent smooth non-linear functions related to the mass of the ith sub-mechanical system and
Figure FDA0003450474610000012
Figure FDA0003450474610000013
representing an unknown function associated with the mechanical system; fi(y) represents a known function; χ represents a constant related to the friction of the ith sub-mechanical system, di(t)=[di1(t),...,din(t)]TRepresenting external interference from the ith sub-mechanical system, including wind resistance and external load fluctuation; u. ofdi(t)=[udi1(t),...,udim(t)]TAnd yi(t)=[yi1(t),...,yip(t)]TRespectively representing the electric signal input of the actuator of the ith sub-mechanical system itself and the speeds and angular velocities of the ith sub-mechanical system, giRepresents the motor torque control gain, C, of the ith sub-mechanical systemiRepresenting the i-th sub-mechanical system output matrix, ΠijAn interconnection matrix representing the ith and jth sub-mechanical systems; x is the number ofj(t) represents a state quantity of the jth sub-mechanical system; lambda [ alpha ]i=diag(λi1,...,λim) Denotes the ith sub-mechanical system failure factor, λik∈[λ12](k=1,...,m),λ1A lower bound representing a failure factor; lambda [ alpha ]2An upper bound representing a failure factor; sigmai=diag(σi1,...,σim) Denotes an indicator factor, where σik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m);εi=diag(εi1,...,εim),εik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m),usi(t) represents an actuator deflection fault of the ith sub-mechanical system; u. ofdi(t) represents a control input to an actuator of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein the predetermined interference is bounded, then
Figure FDA0003450474610000021
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003450474610000022
represents the equivalent interference, theta, of the ith systemsiIs an unknown gain, ξi(t) represents a variable related to the ith sub-mechanical system disturbance;
correspondingly, the mathematical expression of the state observer is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000023
the above-mentioned
Figure FDA0003450474610000024
Respectively represent xi(t),Fi(t),λi(t),Δfi(x,t,χ),yi(t) estimation, yi(tk) A trigger value, L, representing the output channelqiRepresenting the gain, δ, of the state observerqi(t) a compensation term representing the state observer;
the fault failure factor observer is used for estimating a system fault failure factor of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein, the mathematical expression of the fault failure factor observer is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000025
wherein h ism=-σiudi(t)Tgi TPiesi
Figure FDA0003450474610000026
Indicating the state estimation error, PiIs a positive definite symmetric matrix;
the total disturbance observer is used for estimating actuator fault disturbance and external disturbance on the ith sub-mechanical system through the state difference value of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein, the mathematical expression of the preset slip form surface is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000031
wherein e ismi=yi(t)-yid(t) represents the difference between the ith sub-mechanical system speed and the desired speed; y isid(t) represents the ith sub-mechanical system desired speed; u. ofdi(t) represents the control input of the ith sub-mechanical system at time t,
Figure FDA0003450474610000032
alpha is more than 0, beta is more than 0; two adaptive parameters are respectively expressed as
Figure FDA0003450474610000033
mi>0,ai>0,ci>0,pi>0,bi>0,zi> 0, Q matrix is a selection matrix, so that QC is a nonsingular matrix, emi (n-1)(t) represents emi(n-1) derivative of (t), li(I ═ 2, 3., n) corresponds to the gain factor, which is a positive number, and I denotes an identity matrix.
2. The adaptive fault-tolerant controller according to claim 1, characterized in that the mathematical expression of the compensation term of the state observer is:
Figure FDA0003450474610000034
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003450474610000035
is expressed in the pair thetasiEstimate of, LqiRepresenting observer gain, ηm=2(λ21)(λn21) Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure FDA0003450474610000036
Figure FDA0003450474610000037
to represent
Figure FDA0003450474610000038
Euler norm of, λn>0,ξi(t) is a new variable to be defined, km> 0 and τm> 0 are two scalars, κ, respectivelymExpressed as a constant, τ, preventing the introduction of fluctuations in the interference estimatemA constant relating to the acceleration of the ith sub-mechanical system, g (y) is a known function relating to the centripetal force of the ith sub-mechanical system,
Figure FDA0003450474610000039
ey=yi(tk)-yi(t),Pirepresenting a positive definite symmetric matrix;
Figure FDA00034504746100000310
g (y, t) and Fi(y) representing two known functions, respectively;
Figure FDA00034504746100000311
presentation pair
Figure FDA00034504746100000312
(ii) an estimate of (d); wherein, Fi(y) represents a known function related to the mass of the ith sub-mechanical system, and G (y, t) represents a measurable non-linear member function of the interconnection portion of the ith sub-mechanical system.
3. The adaptive fault-tolerant controller of claim 1, wherein the controller tracks using two channels;
wherein, the first channel is a channel between a controller and a sensor of the sub-mechanical system; the second channel is the channel between the controller and the actuator of the sub-mechanical system itself.
4. The adaptive fault-tolerant controller according to claim 3, wherein the triggering condition of the first channel is:
Figure FDA0003450474610000041
wherein psimA matrix of weights is represented by a matrix of weights,
Figure FDA0003450474610000042
ey=yi(tk)-yi(t),yi(t) denotes the ith sub-mechanical system current output, y (t)k)(k=0,1,...,t00) indicates that the ith sub-mechanical system has last triggered the transmission value.
5. The adaptive fault-tolerant controller according to claim 3, wherein the triggering condition of the second channel is:
Figure FDA0003450474610000043
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003450474610000044
Figure FDA0003450474610000045
to represent
Figure FDA0003450474610000046
At tpiThe value of the time of day is,
Figure FDA0003450474610000047
kci>0,kdi>0,ksi>0,δmi>0,δni>0,δsi>0,δhi>0,tpiin order to trigger the time series,
Figure FDA0003450474610000048
is an adaptive parameter, whereinaiAnd τbiAre two optionally positive numbers.
6. An adaptive fault-tolerant control method applied to an adaptive fault-tolerant controller according to any one of claims 1 to 5, the method comprising:
acquiring tracking trigger information of the sub-mechanical system;
estimating fault interference information of the sub-mechanical system based on the tracking trigger information;
determining compensation information for the sub-mechanical system based on the fault interference information, and compensating the sub-mechanical system based on the compensation information;
the preset distributed comprehensive observer comprises a state observer, a fault failure factor observer and a total disturbance observer;
the state observer is used for estimating the state of the sub-mechanical system and is constructed on the basis of a pre-constructed state model of the sub-mechanical system and a trigger value of an output channel; wherein, the output channel is a channel between a controller and a sensor of the sub-mechanical system;
the mathematical expression of the state model of the sub-mechanical system is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000051
wherein x isi(t)=[xi1,xi2,...,xin]T∈RnRepresenting the state of the ith sub-mechanical system, including the speed and acceleration of the ith sub-mechanical system, Δ fi(x,t,χ)=[Δfi1(x,t,χ),...,Δfin(x,t,χ)]T,Fi(x)=[Fi1(x),...,Fin(x)]TRespectively represent smooth non-linear functions related to the mass of the ith sub-mechanical system and
Figure FDA0003450474610000052
Figure FDA0003450474610000053
representing an unknown function associated with the mechanical system; fi(y) represents a known function; χ represents a constant related to the friction of the ith sub-mechanical system, di(t)=[di1(t),...,din(t)]TRepresenting external interference from the ith sub-mechanical system, including wind resistance and external load fluctuation; u. ofdi(t)=[udi1(t),...,udim(t)]TAnd yi(t)=[yi1(t),...,yip(t)]TRespectively representing the electric signal input of the actuator of the ith sub-mechanical system itself and the speeds and angular velocities of the ith sub-mechanical system, giRepresents the motor torque control gain, C, of the ith sub-mechanical systemiRepresenting the i-th sub-mechanical system output matrix, ΠijAn interconnection matrix representing the ith and jth sub-mechanical systems; x is the number ofj(t) represents a state quantity of the jth sub-mechanical system; lambda [ alpha ]i=diag(λi1,...,λim) Denotes the ith sub-mechanical system failure factor, λik∈[λ12](k=1,...,m),λ1A lower bound representing a failure factor; lambda [ alpha ]2An upper bound representing a failure factor; sigmai=diag(σi1,...,σim) Denotes an indicator factor, where σik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m);εi=diag(εi1,...,εim),εik∈{0,1}(k=1,...,m),usi(t) represents an actuator deflection fault of the ith sub-mechanical system; u. ofdi(t) represents a control input to an actuator of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein the predetermined interference is bounded, then
Figure FDA0003450474610000054
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003450474610000055
represents the equivalent interference, theta, of the ith systemsiIs an unknown gain, ξi(t) represents a variable related to the ith sub-mechanical system disturbance;
correspondingly, the mathematical expression of the state observer is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000061
the above-mentioned
Figure FDA0003450474610000062
Respectively represent xi(t),Fi(t),λi(t),Δfi(x,t,χ),yi(t) estimation, yi(tk) A trigger value, L, representing the output channelqiRepresenting the gain, δ, of the state observerqi(t) a compensation term representing the state observer;
the fault failure factor observer is used for estimating a system fault failure factor of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein, the mathematical expression of the fault failure factor observer is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000063
wherein h ism=-σiudi(t)Tgi TPiesi
Figure FDA0003450474610000064
Indicating the state estimation error, PiIs a positive definite symmetric matrix;
the total disturbance observer is used for estimating actuator fault disturbance and external disturbance on the ith sub-mechanical system through the state difference value of the ith sub-mechanical system;
wherein, the mathematical expression of the preset slip form surface is as follows:
Figure FDA0003450474610000065
wherein e ismi=yi(t)-yid(t) represents the difference between the ith sub-mechanical system speed and the desired speed; y isid(t) represents the ith sub-mechanical system desired speed; u. ofdi(t) represents the control input of the ith sub-mechanical system at time t,
Figure FDA0003450474610000066
alpha is more than 0, beta is more than 0; two adaptive parameters are respectively expressed as
Figure FDA0003450474610000067
mi>0,ai>0,ci>0,pi>0,bi>0,zi> 0, Q matrix is a selection matrix, so that QC is a nonsingular matrix, emi (n-1)(t) represents emi(n-1) derivative of (t), li(I ═ 2, 3., n) corresponds to the gain factor, which is a positive number, and I denotes an identity matrix.
7. A control apparatus, characterized by comprising: a controller and a memory, the controller and the memory being connected;
the memory is used for storing programs;
the controller is configured to execute a program stored in the memory to perform the method of claim 6.
8. A control system, comprising: the controller is respectively connected with the sensor and the actuator;
the controller is configured to perform the method of claim 6.
CN202011557795.8A 2020-12-25 2020-12-25 Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system Active CN112711190B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011557795.8A CN112711190B (en) 2020-12-25 2020-12-25 Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011557795.8A CN112711190B (en) 2020-12-25 2020-12-25 Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112711190A CN112711190A (en) 2021-04-27
CN112711190B true CN112711190B (en) 2022-03-08

Family

ID=75545674

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011557795.8A Active CN112711190B (en) 2020-12-25 2020-12-25 Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112711190B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113885314B (en) * 2021-10-22 2023-05-23 电子科技大学 Nonlinear system tracking control method with unknown gain and interference
CN114563953B (en) * 2022-01-31 2023-05-09 四川大学 Adaptive fault-tolerant reliable control system and method for wheeled robot considering multi-factor influence
CN114859847B (en) * 2022-03-11 2023-05-09 四川大学 Reliable optimal control system and method suitable for interconnection nonlinear system

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103838145A (en) * 2014-01-17 2014-06-04 南京航空航天大学 Vertical take-off and landing airplane robust fault-tolerant control system and method based on cascaded observers
CN104749959A (en) * 2015-04-27 2015-07-01 重庆大学 Generalized sliding mode estimator-based fault-tolerant control method for unit variable pitch
CN106873369A (en) * 2017-02-28 2017-06-20 北京交通大学 For train input-bound and the adaptive fusion method of actuator failures
CN110658724A (en) * 2019-11-20 2020-01-07 电子科技大学 Self-adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control method for nonlinear system
CN111258221A (en) * 2020-01-21 2020-06-09 中国西安卫星测控中心 Spacecraft fault-tolerant control method based on self-adaptive sliding mode theory
CN111564996A (en) * 2020-06-01 2020-08-21 哈尔滨理工大学 Fault-tolerant operation control method of six-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor without position sensor

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103838145A (en) * 2014-01-17 2014-06-04 南京航空航天大学 Vertical take-off and landing airplane robust fault-tolerant control system and method based on cascaded observers
CN104749959A (en) * 2015-04-27 2015-07-01 重庆大学 Generalized sliding mode estimator-based fault-tolerant control method for unit variable pitch
CN106873369A (en) * 2017-02-28 2017-06-20 北京交通大学 For train input-bound and the adaptive fusion method of actuator failures
CN110658724A (en) * 2019-11-20 2020-01-07 电子科技大学 Self-adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control method for nonlinear system
CN111258221A (en) * 2020-01-21 2020-06-09 中国西安卫星测控中心 Spacecraft fault-tolerant control method based on self-adaptive sliding mode theory
CN111564996A (en) * 2020-06-01 2020-08-21 哈尔滨理工大学 Fault-tolerant operation control method of six-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor without position sensor

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Event-Triggered Robust Adaptive Sliding Mode Fault-Tolerant Control For Nonlinear Systems;Bin Guo,等;《IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS》;20201130;第16卷(第11期);第6892-6992页 *
考虑输入输出受限的无人机自适应滑模容错控制;丁岩,等;《系统工程与电子技术》;20201031;第42卷(第10期);第2340-2347页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112711190A (en) 2021-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112711190B (en) Self-adaptive fault-tolerant controller, control equipment and control system
Li et al. Adaptive fuzzy output-constrained fault-tolerant control of nonlinear stochastic large-scale systems with actuator faults
CN107121977B (en) Mechanical arm actuator failures fault-tolerant control system and its method based on double-layer structure
Tohidi et al. Fault tolerant control design using adaptive control allocation based on the pseudo inverse along the null space
Ichalal et al. Sensor fault tolerant control of nonlinear Takagi–Sugeno systems. Application to vehicle lateral dynamics
Wen et al. Consensus of multi‐agent systems with nonlinear dynamics and sampled‐data information: a delayed‐input approach
CN105629727B (en) A kind of motor position servo system adaptively exports feedback robust control method
CN113110059B (en) Control method for actual tracking of single-link mechanical arm system based on event triggering
Awan et al. Adaptive backstepping based sensor and actuator fault tolerant control of a manipulator
Fan Iterative learning and adaptive fault‐tolerant control with application to high‐speed trains under unknown speed delays and control input saturations
Xia et al. Adaptive output feedback dynamic surface control of stochastic nonlinear systems with state and input unmodeled dynamics
Bedioui et al. Simultaneous sensor and actuator fault estimation for continuous-time polytopic LPV system
CN111600519A (en) Servo motor control method, servo motor control device, electronic equipment and storage medium
Wan et al. Real‐time nonlinear moving horizon observer with pre‐estimation for aircraft sensor fault detection and estimation
Habibi et al. Bayesian fault probability estimation: Application in wind turbine drivetrain sensor fault detection
Chen et al. Adaptive event‐triggered neural control for nonlinear uncertain system with input constraint
Qiu et al. Cyber-attack localisation and tolerant control for microgrid energy management system based on set-membership estimation
Liu et al. Fault estimation and control for unknown discrete-time systems based on data-driven parameterization approach
Liu et al. Observer-based finite-time H∞ sliding mode control of stochastic nonlinear singular systems and its applications
Sun et al. Fuzzy observer-based command filtered tracking control for uncertain strict-feedback nonlinear systems with sensor faults and event-triggered technology
Leissner et al. Some controllability aspects for iterative learning control
CN117032172A (en) Fault diagnosis method and system based on digital-analog linkage
Chen et al. Sensor cascading fault estimation and control for hypersonic flight vehicles based on a multidimensional generalized observer
Chen et al. Adaptive diagnosis and compensation for hypersonic flight vehicle with multisensor faults
Rahmani Industrial internet of things: design and stabilization of nonlinear automation systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant