CN112307712B - Text evaluation device and method, storage medium, and computer device - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a text evaluation device, a text evaluation method, a storage medium, and a computer device, which are configured to equally divide a height M of a text into height regions of M/N heights corresponding to the number of rules displayed, allocate each of the height regions to a corresponding rule display region, and then display a presentation information conforming to the rule in the height region allocated to the rule. Accordingly, the text evaluation device of the present invention can promptly and simply display the presentation information indicating the portion of the text information which meets the predetermined rule.

Description

Text evaluation device and method, storage medium, and computer device

Technical Field

The invention relates to a text evaluation device, a text evaluation method, a storage medium and a computer device.

Background

Systems for highlighting portions of text that meet a specified rule, etc., for user feedback are well known. Such user feedback, such as in addition to text collation, is implemented when making (editing) phrases, names or titles. When a text is evaluated using a plurality of rules, a display screen is cluttered with a plurality of presentation information indicating the evaluation result, and there is a possibility that the presentation information is excessive and the user is confused. In order to avoid clutter caused by excessive prompt information, a method for selecting a scale according to user preference exists.

Patent document 1 (JP 2009-211716 a) discloses a text processor for the purpose of highlighting a word requiring long pronunciation, for controlling the color or gradation of each phrase, word, syllable, and the like to be changed with time shift.

Disclosure of Invention

However, in the method of selecting a scale according to the preference of the user, there is a problem in that an important text evaluation scale for conveying text contents to the user is not included due to the user's misselection operation.

Another problem is that, as shown in patent document 1, when presentation of the presentation information is time-shifted, it takes time to display the presentation information due to the shift time.

In view of the above problems, the present invention provides a text evaluation device and method, and a storage medium and a computer device, which can promptly and simply display presentation information indicating a location in text information that meets a predetermined rule.

In view of the above problems, the present invention provides a text evaluation device including a dividing unit configured to divide a display area of text information into height areas in a height direction corresponding to a number of displayed rules; a detection unit configured to detect a portion that meets a predetermined rule from the text information; and an attaching unit configured to attach the presentation information corresponding to the predetermined rule to a height region corresponding to the predetermined rule at a portion which is detected from the text information and which meets the predetermined rule.

The invention has the effect that prompt information of the part which accords with the specified rule in the text information can be timely and simply shown.

Drawings

Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a display mode of a presentation information of a text evaluation system as a comparative example.

Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a display mode of a presentation information of the text evaluation system according to the embodiment.

Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of the hardware configuration of the text evaluation system according to the embodiment.

Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the functional block configuration of the text evaluation system according to the embodiment.

Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram showing other functional block configurations of the text evaluation system according to the embodiment.

Fig. 6 is a flowchart for explaining a flow of user operations in the text evaluation system of the embodiment.

Fig. 7 is a flowchart for explaining another operation flow of the user in the text evaluation system of the embodiment.

Fig. 8 is a schematic diagram showing an example of display of a presentation information in the text evaluation system according to the embodiment.

Fig. 9 is a schematic diagram showing another example of display of the prompt message in the text evaluation system according to the embodiment.

Fig. 10 is a schematic diagram for explaining a replacement operation between morphemes and replacement candidate information required in the text evaluation system according to the embodiment.

Fig. 11 is a schematic diagram of a hint information display location for chinese.

Fig. 12 is a schematic diagram of a display example of hint information for a chinese illustrative sentence.

Fig. 13 is a schematic diagram for explaining a selection form of the replacement candidate information of the presentation generating unit.

Fig. 14 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the display of a chinese example sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "b", "2 nd", "a", "X".

Fig. 15 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the display of a chinese example sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "2 nd", "a", "X".

Fig. 16 is a schematic diagram of a display example of a chinese example sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "2 nd", "a", "X", and "j".

Fig. 17 is a schematic diagram of an example of a display of a chinese sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "c", "2 nd", "a", "X", and "t".

Fig. 18 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese illustrative sentence display of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "c", "2 nd", "B", "X", and "t".

Fig. 19 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese illustrative sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "c", "2 nd", "a" and "X".

Fig. 20 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese illustrative sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "c", "1 st", "a" and "X".

Fig. 21 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese illustrative sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "c", "1 st", "a" and "X".

Fig. 22 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the display of a chinese example sentence of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "B", "c", "2 nd", "B", "Y", "ss", and "j".

Fig. 23 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese illustrative sentence of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "B", "c", "2 nd", "B", "Y" and "t".

Detailed Description

Hereinafter, a text evaluation device, a text evaluation method, and a text evaluation system that implements a text evaluation program will be described with reference to the drawings.

[ Overview ]

The manner in which the text rating system is implemented is first outlined. Fig. 1 is a comparative example in which end points of portions that meet a predetermined rule are connected by lines. At this time, when the user identifies the sites that meet the rule, it is necessary to confirm the corresponding site number of "the number of corresponding rulesthe number of corresponding sites". In this case, the lines connecting the end points of the regular portions are superimposed in a complicated manner, thereby forming a disordered display form, and making the regular portions difficult to recognize.

In contrast, fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of the text evaluation system according to the present embodiment. As shown in fig. 2, when displaying presentation information of N types (N is a natural number) of rules for a morpheme or related words (e.g., class meaning words) of morphemes constituting a text, the text evaluation system of the present embodiment divides the height of the morpheme into height regions each of which is M/N, and displays presentation information corresponding to the rules in each of the height regions.

That is, in the text evaluation system according to the present embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, the text height M is equally divided into height regions of M/N height in accordance with the number N of display rules, and each height region is defined as a display region of a corresponding rule. Then, the prompt information conforming to the rule is displayed in the height area previously allocated to the rule.

Fig. 2 shows an example of the 1 st to 3 rd rules for "bear, or" morpheme ". In this case, in order to display 3 rules, the display area of the morpheme of "side" is trisected in the height direction (n=3). Then, for the morpheme "side edge" conforming to rule 1, in the height area which is the upper stage of the rule 1 display area, the presentation information corresponding to rule 1, which is indicated by being enclosed by a solid line quadrangle, is displayed.

Similarly, with respect to the "a" and "ka" conforming to the rule 2, in the height area which is the middle section of the rule 2 display area, the presentation information corresponding to the rule 2, which is indicated by being enclosed by a broken line quadrangle, is displayed. Further, similarly, for the morpheme "no" according to the 3 rd rule, in the height region which is the lower stage of the 3 rd rule display region, the presentation information corresponding to the 3 rd rule, which is indicated by being surrounded by four corners of a one-dot chain line, is displayed.

Therefore, by changing the height position and displaying different prompt messages according to different rules, overlapping among the prompt messages can be prevented, and the prompt messages are convenient to identify.

[ System configuration ]

Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary system configuration of a text evaluation system for implementing the embodiment. Fig. 3 (a) is an example of a text evaluation system configured in the client terminal apparatus 1. In this case, CPU (Center Processing Unit) of the client terminal apparatus 1 executes the text evaluation program stored in the storage unit such as RAM (Read Only Memory) or HDD (Hard Disc Drive) to realize the functions of the input/output function 10 and the presentation information generation function 11.

3 fig. 3 (b) shows an example in which the client terminal apparatus 1 and the server apparatus 2 are connected to each other via a designated network such as the internet or LAN (Local Area Network) to form a file evaluation system. In this case, the client terminal apparatus 1 performs the input/output function 10, and the server apparatus 2 performs the presentation information generation function 11. Then, the presentation information generated by the presentation information generation function 11 of the server apparatus 2 is displayed on the display function of the client terminal apparatus 1.

Fig. 3 (c) shows an example in which the client terminal apparatus 1 implements a text management function 12 for managing the display of text information of the presentation information together with the input/output function 10 and the presentation information generation function 11 according to a text evaluation program. Fig. 3 (d) shows an example in which the text management function 12 and the input/output function 10 are executed on the client terminal apparatus 1 side, and the presentation information generation function 11 is executed on the server apparatus 2 side. In contrast, fig. 3 (e) shows an example in which the input/output function 10 is executed on the client terminal apparatus 1 side, and the presentation information generation function 11 and the text management function 12 are executed on the server apparatus 2 side.

The text management function 12 may also be executed in other devices physically different from the client terminal apparatus 1 and the server apparatus 2. Fig. 3 (f) is an example in which the text management function 12 is executed in the 2 nd server apparatus 3 connected to the client terminal apparatus 1 and the server apparatus 2 via the network. In this case, the client terminal apparatus 1 executes the input/output function 10, and the 1 st server apparatus 2 executes the presentation information generation function 11.

Further, the text management function 12 may also be shared by the respective devices. Fig. 3 (g) is an example in which the 1 st server apparatus 2 and the 2 nd server apparatus 3 share the text management function 12. Fig. 3 (h) is an example in which the text management function 12 is shared by the client terminal apparatus 1, the 1 st server apparatus 2, and the 2 nd server apparatus 3.

The input/output function 10, the presentation information generation function 11, and the text management function 12 are each implemented by software using a file evaluation program, but some or all of them may be implemented by hardware such as IC (Integrated Circuit). The input/output function 10, the prompt message generation function 11, and the text management function 12 may be implemented by a file evaluation program alone, by another program, or indirectly by another program.

The text evaluation program may be provided by recording a file in an installable format or an installable format in a recording medium readable by a computer device such as a CD-ROM, a Flexible Disk (FD), or the like. The text evaluation program may be provided by being recorded on a recording medium readable by a computer device such as a CD-R, DVD (DIGITAL VERSATILE DISK), a blu-ray disc (registered trademark), a semiconductor memory, or the like. Further, the text evaluation program may be provided by being installed on a network such as the internet, or may be provided by being installed in advance in a ROM or the like in the device.

Detailed information

Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram detailing the functions of the input/output function 10, the prompt generation function 11, and the text management function 12. Fig. 4 (a) is a functional block diagram corresponding to an example in which the input/output function 10 and the presentation information generation function 11 are implemented in the client terminal apparatus 1, as shown in fig. 3 (a). As shown in fig. 4 (a), the input/output function 10 includes an input/output unit 20. The presentation information generation function 11 includes a text element analysis unit 31, a text element analysis rule reading unit 32, a text evaluation unit 33, a text evaluation rule reading unit 34, a presentation generation unit 35, and a presentation rule reading unit 36.

The input/output unit 20 supplies the text element analysis unit 31 with the input text, the desired text, the text of the replacement object among the texts, the text as the replacement candidate, or the designation information such as URL (Uniform Resource Locator) indicating the saved text and the folder name.

The storage unit such as ROM or HDD of the client terminal apparatus 1 stores text element analysis rule information, text evaluation rule information, and presentation rule information. The text element analysis rule reading unit reads the text element analysis rule information stored in the storage unit, and supplies the text element analysis rule information to the text element analysis unit 31.

The text element analysis rule information is rule information for extracting usage information such as word class information or pronunciation information from each morpheme information. Based on such text element analysis rule information, the text element analysis unit 31 extracts morphological information corresponding to the use information, such as word class information and pronunciation information, from among the morphological information of the input text. The text element analysis unit 31 extracts, based on the text element analysis rule information, morphological information corresponding to the use information, such as word class information and pronunciation information, from the morphological information of the text specified by the specification information.

The text evaluation rule reading unit 34 reads the text evaluation rule information from the storage unit and supplies the text evaluation rule information to the text evaluation unit 33. The text evaluation rule information is rule information indicating the evaluation scale with which the text is evaluated, for example, "the phoneme arrangement rule of difficultly uttered" or the like. The text evaluation unit 33 evaluates the arrangement of each morpheme information in the morpheme information extracted by the text element analysis unit 31 based on, for example, text evaluation rule information of phoneme arrangements which are difficult to pronounce, and supplies the evaluation result (for example, score) to the generation unit 35. The text evaluation unit 33 is also configured to determine a display position of the presentation information for the text.

The presentation rule reading unit 36 reads the presentation rule information stored in the storage unit, and supplies the presentation rule information to the presentation generating unit 35. The presentation generating section 35 is for providing information for presenting the evaluation result provided by the text evaluating section 33 in accordance with the presentation rule provided by the presentation rule reading section 36 to the input/output section 20. Based on this information, the input/output unit 20 displays presentation information at a predetermined height position on each morpheme of the text. This prevents overlapping of the presentation information, and allows the presentation information to be displayed in an easy-to-recognize state. The display mode of the prompt message will be described in detail below.

Fig. 4 (b) is a functional block configuration in which a text editing method analysis unit 37 is added to the basic configuration shown in (a). In this case, the use information extracted by the text element analysis section 31 is supplied to the text editing method analysis section 37. The text editing method analysis unit 37 forms replacement candidate information of each morpheme information based on the text editing rule information indicating the word class or the deletable auxiliary word read from the storage unit by the text editing rule reading unit 38.

The replacement candidate information is displayed in parallel with, for example, the lower stage of each morpheme information. After the required arrangement of each morpheme information and each replacement candidate information is adopted and edited, the text element analysis unit 31 again extracts morpheme information from the text set to the required arrangement, and supplies the extracted morpheme information to the text evaluation unit 33. The text evaluation unit 33 evaluates again the text of the arrangement of the morpheme information and the replacement candidate information subjected to the user editing operation, and the evaluation result (for example, score) is supplied to the input unit 20 through the presentation generating unit 35. Thus, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the text is displayed on the display unit together with the text in which the morphological information and the replacement candidate information are arranged, which has been subjected to the user editing operation. The user judges whether the editing operation is good or bad according to the evaluation result (e.g., score).

Fig. 5 (a) shows a configuration in which the text management unit 40 having a text data storage function and a text data editing function can perform reading control or writing control of text data. As shown in fig. 3 (g) or 3 (h), fig. 5 (b) shows a configuration in which a text storage destination is designated when a text management unit 40 is present in addition to the client terminal apparatus 1, and text is output.

[ Operation flow of user ]

Fig. 6 (a) and (b) and fig. 7 (a) and (b) are flowcharts showing a flow of user operations. The flowchart of fig. 6 (a) shows a user operation flow of the basic configuration. In this case, after the user has performed text input (step S1), text evaluation information is displayed (step S2). In step S3, whether or not the display is completed is determined, and if it is determined that the display is completed, the processing shown in the flow of fig. 6 (a) is completed.

Fig. 6 b shows a configuration in which a text operation is added to the user operation flow of the basic configuration (step S4). Fig. 7 (a) is a configuration in which a text operation (step S4) and a text saving operation (step S5, step S6) are added to the user operation flow of the basic configuration. Fig. 7 (b) is a configuration in which a text operation (step S4), a text saving operation (step S5, step S6), and a text saving destination setting operation (step S7) are added to a user operation flow of a basic configuration.

[ Prompt rules ]

An example of the presentation rule stored in the storage unit and read by the presentation rule reading unit 36 is shown below.

Rule "a" rule of marking only at the part conforming to the rule of the word boundary (rule for exclusively determining the part where the word arrangement has room for improvement (deletion/substitution) alone). When the replacement of a particular word is difficult and surrounding replacement is considered, the information can be narrowed down to make an efficient decision.

Rule "B". Fwdarw.the rule marked with the mark is only marked on the part conforming to the rule inside the word. Dedicated to the interior of words when alone. The replacement specification may be based on reduced information to make an efficient decision. In addition, it is effective for the case where the word itself can be replaced.

The rule "c" is a rule for marking a portion that is likely to be in compliance with the rule due to a text operation by the user at the word boundary when the sequence is changed, although the rule is not in compliance with the present situation. When the word arrangement is performed alone, the part which is likely to be an unwanted arrangement can be grasped before the improvement (deletion/replacement/order change) of the word arrangement is performed.

Such a combination of the rules "a" to "c" is effective in that information that can be simultaneously overlooked is added, and when it is desired to overlook the rule portions.

Rule 1. Fwdarw. Is a rule that cannot be oriented continuously, e.g., e_i is allowed, but i_e is not allowed, etc., and is oriented only if the order factor needs to be considered in the rule. Is effective for determining the position with arrangement factors.

Rule 2. Fwdarw. Is a simple rule that is also directional in succession. For users who feel that the displayed rules are more and are difficult to see clearly, prompt information and texts can be more easily seen.

Rule ais a rule in which the direction of the presentation information when the rule is satisfied is the direction in which the shape of the presentation information is formed. The direction of the hint information when the rule is satisfied is set as a rule (for example, a circle with 2 semi-circles opposing chord portions is formed) of the direction of the pattern formed by the combination of hint information.

Rule bis a rule in which the direction of the presentation information when the rule is satisfied is set as the direction in which the presentation information shape is not formed. The direction of the hint information when the rule is satisfied is set as a rule that the direction of the pattern is not formed by the combination of hint information (for example, if the arc portions of 2 semicircles are opposed, a circle is not formed).

The rule "X" is a rule that the hint information shape is made semicircular. The shape of the prompt message which indicates the compliance with the rule is selected by the user who prefers to have a circular shape.

The rule "Y" is a rule that the presentation information is shaped into a triangle. The shape of the presentation information indicating compliance with the rule is selected by the user who prefers the angular shape.

The rule "ss" is a rule for specifying a score display update. Is selected by a user who wants to grasp in real time an evaluation result (e.g., score) improved by execution of the text operation.

The rule "to" "is a rule that, when the distance between character strings affects the evaluation, prompt information indicating the range of influence is displayed. The impact reach of the rule-compliant location may be displayed.

The rule "M" "is a rule that designates display of display information of visual information other than colors, such as a pattern. By displaying the prompt information such as the pattern, the user with achromatopsia can visually recognize the prompt information.

[ Examples of bulletin information display ]

Fig. 8 to 10 show examples of the advertisement information. As shown in fig. 8 to 10, for example, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the text into four equal parts in the height direction so as to display the presentation information corresponding to 4 rules. In each of the height regions divided into four, the upper height region displays notice information attached when a vowel such as a part of speech is present at the end of the word, and the 2 nd height region displays notice information attached when a consonant such as a part of speech is present at the end of the word. In each of the height regions divided into four, the advertisement information attached when consonants of "t" or "r" exist at the head and tail of a word is displayed in the height region of the lower stage, and bar-shaped (rectangular) advertisement information indicating a range of 3 characters before and after the character of "r" is displayed in the height region of the 2 nd from the lower stage.

The presentation generating unit 35 is an example of a dividing unit and an adding unit. The dividing section is configured to divide a display area of the text information into height areas in a height direction corresponding to the displayed regular number. The adding unit adds the presentation information corresponding to the rule to the height region corresponding to the predetermined rule and corresponding to the predetermined rule at a position corresponding to the predetermined rule detected from the text information.

Fig. 8 (a) shows an example of an input text, in which a frame of a frame is used as an example, and the text element analysis unit 31, extracting the morphological information of 'side' and 'ka' and ca; a member (a member) and a member (a member) "taste", "pattern" and "pattern". The example of fig. 8 (a) shows that the text editing method analysis unit 37 forms "aryl alcohol" replacement candidate information from "yaka" morpheme information based on the text editing rule information, and displays the replacement candidate information. Here, the text evaluation unit 33 is an example of a detection unit for detecting a portion that meets a predetermined rule from the text information. The text editing method analysis unit 37 is an example of a replacement candidate generation unit for generating replacement candidate information that is displayed together with the divided morphemes and that can be used to replace the morphemes.

In the example of fig. 8 (a), the text editing method analysis unit 37 forms and displays "flavor-advancing" and "text" replacement candidate information from the "flavor" morpheme information. Further, the example of fig. 8 (a) shows that "" n "morpheme information is displayed as" "free" replacement candidate information, and "y" morpheme information is displayed as "operating" replacement candidate information.

The example of fig. 8 (a) also shows evaluation results (e.g., scores) obtained when the "side margin", "back", "taste", "back", "side", "shi" and "shi" morpheme information are arranged. The expression "score: 61.5 points" is a part of the evaluation result, and is an evaluation value concerning the difficulty in pronunciation. The text evaluation unit 33 is an example of an evaluation unit for evaluating a specific scale corresponding to each morpheme arrangement.

In the example of fig. 8 (a), since the "a" morphemes included in the tail sounds are continuous in the arrangement of the "a", "n", "v", and "a" morphemes, a pair of semicircular advertisement information is displayed at the height position of the upper stage of the "a" sound. In the example of fig. 8 (a), since the arrangement of the "taste" and "" and "word" are continuous with the "first" word in the word-tail pronunciation, a pair of semicircular advertisement information is displayed at the 2 nd height position from the upper stage of the "first" pronunciation. In addition, when the notice information is displayed, the color, pattern, brightness, shape, or the like of each segment is made different from each other, for example, the notice information displayed at the height position of the upper segment is indicated by orange, the notice information displayed at the 2 nd height position from the upper side is indicated by blue, or the like.

In the example of fig. 8 (b), since the morphemes of "side", "back", "top", "and" back "are continuous with the morphemes of" a "in the end-of-word pronunciation, one piece of semicircular notice information is displayed at the height position of the upper stage of the character of the end-of-word pronunciation" a ". That is, semicircular advertisement information is displayed on each character of "a", "ka", "v", and "tare".

In the example of fig. 8 (c), since the rule "a" and the rule "b" are adopted, the "a" and the "n" are carried in the "a" and "n" word-end pronunciations, and the "a" and the "n" are consecutive morphemes, a pair of semicircular advertisement information is displayed at the height position of the upper stage of the "a" pronunciations, and at the same time, one semicircular advertisement information is displayed at the height position of the upper stage of the character of the "a" word-end pronunciations.

In the example of fig. 8 (d), a bar-shaped hint information of a specified length is displayed on a height area that includes the 2 nd height position from below of the sound of "j. Specifically, "aralol ( u, y ,") is the word-end pronunciation, "j. If the morphemes containing the sound are continuous, sentences which are not easy to sound are formed. Therefore, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the bar-shaped presentation information in a height region extending over the 2 nd height position from the lower surface at 3 characters before and after the character containing "alcohol ((see also (out)"). Then, a predetermined color, pattern, brightness, mark, or the like is applied to the bar-shaped notice at a position corresponding to the position containing the "alcohol (binding (x)") of the "sound.

At this time, the presentation generating unit 35 may display the "alcohol (bar (j)") with a visible transparency by color, pattern, mark, or the like, or may display the "alcohol (bar (j)") on the back side of the text, in order to overcome the disadvantage that the "alcohol (bar (j)") is difficult to recognize.

In the example of fig. 8 (e), the presentation generating unit 35 displays semicircular presentation information at the top and bottom of the word-tail pronunciation "morpheme" such as "ha ma", "na", "v i a", and "ha shi ma", at the upper level.

Further, a bar-shaped prompt message of a predetermined length is displayed in a height region including the 2 nd height position from below of the sound of "h". Specifically, "aromatic alcohol ( u, ,") pronounces the suffix of the "morpheme. If the morphemes containing the sound are continuous, sentences which are difficult to sound are formed. For this purpose, the presentation generating unit 35 displays a bar-shaped presentation message in a height region that spans 3 letters before and after the "alcohol ((bar )," character) "and starts at the 2 nd height position from the bottom. Then, a predetermined color, pattern, brightness, mark, or the like is applied to the bar-shaped presentation information at a position corresponding to the position containing the "alcohol (the bar " of the sound).

At this time, the presentation generating unit 35 may display the "alcohol (bar (r)") character by a color, a pattern, a mark, or the like in a visible transparency of "alcohol (bar (r)") or may display the "alcohol (bar (r)") character on the back side of the text.

In the example of fig. 9 (a), the hint generating unit 35 displays semicircular hint information at the beginning and end of a morpheme with a "tail" such as "side" and "side" at the upper level.

The presentation generating unit 35 may change the color of the presentation information and display the same. Fig. 9 (b) is an example in which the color of the semicircular prompt information is changed to display. In this example, for example, an orange presentation information is displayed at the upper level of the "" word element, a blue presentation information is displayed at the 2 nd level of the "word element from the top, and a pink presentation information is displayed at the lower level of the" word element. By displaying different prompt messages, display of prompt messages which can be visually recognized by a user can be realized.

The presentation generating unit 35 may change the shape of the presentation information and display the presentation information. Fig. 9 (c) is an example of displaying semicircular prompt information and quadrangular prompt information. In this example, a quadrangle hint is displayed in orange, for example, at the upper level of the "rope" morpheme, a quadrangle hint is displayed in blue, for example, at the 2 nd level of the "" rope "morpheme from above, and a semicircular hint is displayed in pink, for example, at the lower level of the" rope "morpheme. The display of the prompt information which can be visually recognized by the user can be realized by the display colors and the shapes of the prompt information which are different from each other.

The presentation generating unit 35 may change the pattern of the presentation information and display the same. Fig. 9 (d) is an example of changing the pattern of the semicircular and quadrangle prompt message for display. This example changes the color, shape, and pattern of the hint information displayed at the height position of the upper segment of the "rope" morpheme, the hint information displayed at the 2 nd height position from above of the "rope" morpheme, and the hint information displayed at the height position of the lower segment of the "rope" morpheme. The display of the prompt information which can be visually recognized by the user can be realized by the colors, shapes and patterns of the prompt information which are different from each other.

Fig. 9 (e) shows an example of a continuous pronunciation part of "j" displayed in the bar-shaped prompt message. As described above, the bar-shaped notice information is displayed in the height area of the 2 nd height position from below. In the example of fig. 9 (e), the bar-shaped presentation information is displayed in a region corresponding to 3 characters in the front and rear of the first "n" in the "n" and the bar-shaped presentation information is displayed in a region corresponding to 3 characters in the front and rear of the second "n". In the example of fig. 9 (e), the bar-shaped presentation information is also displayed in the region corresponding to 3 words in front and back with respect to the first "n" of "the" ran "morpheme, and the bar-shaped presentation information is displayed in the region corresponding to 3 words in front and back with respect to the next" n ".

The user performs a replacement operation of replacing "retan" with, for example, replacement candidate information of "retan" so as not to enter morphemes of "retan" pronunciation as much as possible within the bar-shaped presentation information (within 3 words around "retan"). Thus, continuous "on" pronunciation can be reduced, and the pronunciation of the sentence is easy to be changed.

Fig. 10 (a) and (b) are diagrams for explaining an example of improving the evaluation result (score) by performing a replacement operation of replacing a specific morpheme with replacement candidate information. Fig. 10 (a) shows a display example of the advertisement information when the above-described rule "a", rule "B", rule "c", rule 2, rule B, rule "Y", and "j" are adopted. Rule "Y" is a rule that sets the alert information shape to a triangle.

In this case, the hint generation unit 35 displays triangle hint information at the height position of the upper stage of each morpheme of "a" sound is continuous "side and" side ".

Here, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the difficulty in pronunciation of the frame is set to 61.5 points. In contrast, since the score is not good enough, the user performs a replacement operation to replace each morpheme with replacement candidate information so as to avoid continuous "a" pronunciation as much as possible. The example of fig. 10 (b) is an example of a replacement operation in which the morphemes of "top hat" and "bottom hat" are replaced with the replacement candidate information "aryl alcohol" and the morphemes of "taste", "side hat" and "top hat" are replaced with the replacement candidate information "top hat", "side hat", "operating in" and "side hat".

That is, in the examples of FIGS. 10 (a) and (b), since the backing is back and forth, the number of parts continuing the pronunciation of the backing in the sentence of "backing" is large, the pronunciation is difficult, so that the sentence of the V-shaped transmission is modified into the sentence of the V-shaped transmission. In this way, the part with continuous sound of a is changed into 2 parts of the "flag" morpheme and the "frame" morpheme. For this reason, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the difficulty in pronunciation, which is obtained by the text evaluation unit 33, is increased to, for example, 80 points, as shown in fig. 10 (b).

In addition, when the user performs an operation of maintaining the evaluation or decreasing the evaluation with respect to the presented display, the presentation generating unit 35 may propose a method of increasing or maintaining the evaluation as an editing method. For example, when the user tries to change "a to" a (when the operation of keeping the evaluation unchanged is performed), the instruction generation unit 35 displays jianyi excluding "a". Thus, by excluding "out", the low evaluation factor can be reduced (evaluation can be improved).

[ Examples for other languages ]

Next, the text evaluation system according to the embodiment may be used for languages other than japanese. An example of a text evaluation system employing the embodiment in chinese is described below.

(Provision for Chinese)

In Chinese, "l" and "n" are not easily distinguished. Therefore, in the case of chinese, the presentation generating unit 35 displays predetermined presentation information on both "l" and "n" of the portions where "l" and "n" appear continuously. The presentation generating unit 35 does not display presentation information for discontinuous "l" and "n".

In Chinese, "ao" and "ou" are not easily distinguished. Therefore, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the bar-shaped (rectangular) notice information within a range of 2 syllables before and after the "ao" syllable. Similarly, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the bar-shaped (rectangular) notice information within a range of 2 syllables including the "ou" syllable.

In chinese, such as "Liu Laoliu (liu, lao, liu)" and the like, the pronunciation is inconvenient if the characters beginning with "l" are continuous. Therefore, the presentation generating unit 35 displays predetermined notice information on the "l" character continuation portion.

In Chinese, the "l" pronunciation and the "n" pronunciation are not easily distinguished. Therefore, both "l" and "n" in the "l" and "n" consecutive portions display predetermined presentation information. The presentation generating unit 35 does not display presentation information for discrete single "l" and "n".

Taking the Chinese winding password of 'Laohuiniujiujinlin town with building No. six, liu Laoliu living in building No. six' as an example, the display action of prompt information is described. The Pinyin of the example sentence is "Laohu (lao liu) Liu lin zhen (liu niu) with (you ge) No. six building (liu hao lou), liu Laoliu (liu lao liu) is located in (zhu zai) No. six building (liu hao lou)". Pinyin is a pronunciation expression system that divides Chinese syllables into phonetic characters and changes them into Latin characters for expression.

The reasons for such example sentences being unreadable are that "l" and "n", "iu" and "ou" and "ao" and "ou" are indistinguishable. In addition, as Liu Laoliu (liu lao liu), there are sentences in which the character beginning with "L (L)" is continuous 3 times, and it is difficult to pronounce. In addition, sentences composed of words (morphemes) with similar pronunciation as "liu" and "niu" in the aged six-step cow (lao liu liu niu) exist.

[ Display form of prompt message ]

Fig. 11 is a schematic diagram of a display position of a hint information for chinese. As in the case of japanese, the chinese language is the same as that described above, and the presentation generating unit 35 divides the text height M into M/N height regions of M/N height on average, as shown in fig. 11, in accordance with the number N (M, N is a natural number) of rules shown, and sets each height region as a display region of a corresponding rule. Then, the prompt information conforming to the rule is displayed in the height area previously allocated to the rule. Thus, the overlapping of the prompt messages can be prevented, and the prompt messages can be easily seen.

Specifically, fig. 12 is a schematic diagram showing an example of presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "2 nd", "a", and "X" in a chinese example sentence. In this case, since there are two rules to be displayed, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence in half in the height direction, displays the presentation information indicating the presence of "l" in the 1 st stage (upper stage), and displays the presentation information indicating the continuation of "l" and "n" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage), as shown in fig. 12 (a).

Fig. 12 (c) shows pinyin of the example sentence. As can be seen from comparison of fig. 12 (a) and (c), the presentation generating unit 35 displays semicircular presentation information in the 1 st stage as shown in fig. 12 (a) for characters such as "old (lao)", "six (liu)", and "willow (liu)", which are given on the head "l". The presentation generating unit 35 also displays semicircular presentation information on the 2 nd stage as shown in fig. 12 (a) for the characters "i" and "n" in the example sentence, for example, "walking (liu niu)".

As shown in fig. 12 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays substitution candidate information having the same meaning below a position where "l" and "n" which are difficult to sound are continuous and a position where a morpheme having "l" at the beginning is continuous by 3 or more. The pinyin of fig. 12 (d).

Fig. 13 is a schematic diagram for explaining a selection method in which the presentation generating unit 35 selects replacement candidate information.

The example of fig. 13 shows that the hint generating unit 35 selects six rooms (liushi), no. liu hao fang jian, or No. liu hao fang as the replacement candidate information of No. liu hao lou.

The presentation generating unit 35 selects the sixth name (di liu mini) as the replacement candidate information of the sixth building (di liu da sha).

The presentation generating unit 35 selects six rooms (liu shi), no. liu hao fang jian, or No. liu hao fang as the replacement candidate information for the ridge six (ling liu).

In the example sentence (a) of fig. 12, since the morphemes of "l" and "n" consecutive "bull (liu niu)" are not easy to pronounce, the presentation generating unit 35 displays replacement candidate information such as "cow (fang niu)" as shown in (b) of fig. 12. Since the morpheme of "No. six building (liu hao lou)" with the morpheme of "1" at the beginning is difficult to pronounce, the instruction generation unit 35 displays replacement candidate information of "six apartments (liu dong gongyu)" as shown in fig. 12 (b).

The user performs a replacement operation to replace the morphemes represented by the hint information with the replacement candidate information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the difficulty in pronunciation obtained by the text evaluation unit 33 can be improved.

Fig. 14 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "b", "2 nd", "a" and "X" in the chinese example sentence. In this case, since there are two rules to be displayed, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence in half in the height direction, displays the presentation information indicating "l" in the 1 st stage (upper stage), and displays the continuous presentation information indicating "l" and "n" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage) as shown in fig. 14 (a). In fig. 14, (c) indicates the pinyin of the example sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme for displaying the presentation information, and (d) indicates the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

The example of fig. 14 employs the rule of "b" described above. For this reason, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the presentation information only at the portions within the sentence that satisfy the rule, as shown in the 1 st (upper) and 2 nd (lower) paragraphs of the example sentence of fig. 14 (a). As shown in fig. 14 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays substitution candidate information having the same meaning below the parts where sound is difficult, that is, the parts where "l" and "n" are continuous and the parts where the morpheme with "l" at the beginning is continuous by 3 or more.

The user performs a replacement operation, and replaces the speech with the replacement candidate information and the morpheme displayed in the prompt message. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the difficulty in pronunciation obtained by the text evaluation unit 33 can be improved.

Fig. 15 is a schematic diagram showing an example of display of a chinese example sentence of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "2 nd", "a" and "X". In this case, since the rule displayed is 2, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence into halves in the height direction as shown in fig. 15 (a), displays presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage), and displays presentation information indicating that "l" and "n" are adjacent in the 2 nd stage (lower stage). In fig. 15, (c) indicates the pinyin of the modified sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme indicated by the presentation information, and (d) indicates the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

The example of fig. 15 employs the rules of "a" and "b" described above. Therefore, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the presentation information only at the rule-conforming portions on the word boundaries and at the rule-conforming portions inside the words, as shown in the 1 st (upper) and 2 nd (lower) paragraphs of the example sentence of fig. 15 (a). As shown in fig. 15 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays substitution candidate information having the same meaning below the parts where the sounds are difficult, that is, the parts where "l" and "n" are continuous and the parts where the morpheme with "l" at the beginning is continuous by 3 or more.

The user performs a replacement operation to replace the morphemes represented by the hint information with the replacement candidate information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the pronunciation easiness obtained by the text evaluation unit 33 can be improved.

Fig. 16 is a schematic diagram showing an example of display of a chinese example sentence of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "2 nd", "a", "X" and "t" described above. In this case, since there are two rules to be displayed, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence in half in the height direction as shown in fig. 16 (a), displays the presentation information indicating the presence of "l" in the 1 st stage (upper stage), and displays the presentation information indicating the continuation of "l" and "n" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage). In fig. 16, (c) represents the pinyin of the example sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme represented by the presentation information, and (d) represents the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

The example of fig. 16 employs the rule of "j" described above. For this reason, the presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information indicating the range of influence of the distance between character strings on the evaluation, as shown in the 1 st (upper) and 2 nd (lower) stages of the example sentence of fig. 16 (a). As shown in fig. 16 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays substitution candidate information having the same meaning below the part where sound is difficult, i.e., the part where "l" exists and the part where "l" and "n" are continuous.

The user performs a replacement operation to replace the morphemes represented by the hint information with the replacement candidate information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the pronunciation easiness obtained by the text evaluation unit 33 can be improved.

Fig. 17 is a schematic diagram of an example chinese sentence Wen Xian of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "c", "2 nd", "a", "X", and "t" described above. In this case, since the rule displayed is 2, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence into halves in the height direction, and displays the presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage) and the presentation information in which "n" adjacent to "l" is present in the 2 nd stage (lower stage) as shown in fig. 17 (a).

The presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information according to each rule of "a", "c", and "d" only in a rule-conforming portion of the word boundary, in a portion where the rule is likely to be satisfied due to a text operation by the user at the word boundary when the rule is not satisfied in the present situation, and displays presentation information in such a manner that an influence range in which the distance between character strings affects the evaluation is presented.

In fig. 17, (c) represents the pinyin of the example sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme displaying the presentation information, and (d) represents the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

As shown in fig. 17 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays replacement candidate information having the same meaning below the part where sound is not likely to occur, that is, the part where "l" exists and the part where "l" and "n" are continuous.

The user performs a replacement operation to replace the morphemes represented by the hint information with the replacement candidate information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the pronunciation easiness obtained by the text evaluation unit 33 can be improved.

Fig. 18 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a display of a chinese example sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "c", "2 nd", "B", "X" and "t" described above. In this case, since the rule displayed is2, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence into halves in the height direction, and displays the presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage) and the presence presentation information of "n" adjacent to "l" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage) as shown in fig. 18 (a).

The presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information according to each rule of "a", "c", and "d", only in a part of the word boundary that is in accordance with the rule, but in the present case is not in accordance with the rule, but in a part of the word boundary that is likely to be in accordance with the rule due to the text operation of the user when the replacement is performed, and displays the presentation information so that the influence range in which the distance between the character strings affects the evaluation is presented. When the presentation generator 35 displays the presentation information, the presentation information is not shaped according to the rule "B" when the direction of the presentation information is displayed. That is, for example, when 2 pieces of semicircular pieces of presentation information are displayed, the presentation generating section 35 faces each other through the arc portions of the semicircular pieces of presentation information so as not to form a circle with the 2 pieces of presentation information.

In fig. 18, (c) represents the pinyin of the example sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme represented by the presentation information, and (d) represents the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

As shown in fig. 18 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays substitution candidate information having the same meaning below the site where sound generation is difficult, i.e., the site where "l" exists, and the site where "l" and "n" are continuous.

The user performs a replacement operation for the morpheme and the replacement candidate information indicated by the hint information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the degree of pronunciation can be improved by the text evaluation unit 33.

Fig. 19 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese example sentence of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "c", "2 nd", "a", and "X" described above. In this case, since the rule displayed is also 2, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence into halves in the height direction as shown in fig. 19 (a), and displays the presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage) and the presence presentation information of "n" adjacent to "l" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage).

The presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information in accordance with each rule of "a", "b", and "c" only at the rule-conforming portion of the word boundary, only at the rule-conforming portion inside the word, and at the word boundary, a portion where there is a possibility that the rule is conforming by a text operation of the user when the replacement is performed. The presentation generating unit 35 displays 2 pieces of semicircular presentation information in a circular shape by facing each other according to each rule of "2 nd", "a" and "X".

In fig. 19, (c) represents the pinyin of the example sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme displayed in the presentation information, and (d) represents the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

As shown in fig. 19 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays replacement candidate information having the same meaning below the site where sound generation is difficult, that is, the site where "l" exists and the site where "l" and "n" are continuous.

The user performs a replacement operation for the morpheme and the replacement candidate information indicated by the hint information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the degree of pronunciation can be improved by the text evaluation unit 33.

Fig. 20 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese example sentence of the hint information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "c", "1 st", "a", and "X" described above. In this case, since the rule displayed is 2, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence into halves in the height direction as shown in fig. 20 (a), and displays the presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage) and the presence presentation information of "n" adjacent to "l" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage).

The presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information in accordance with each rule of "a", "b", and "c" only at the rule-conforming portion of the word boundary, only at the rule-conforming portion inside the word, and at the word boundary where there is a possibility that the rule is conforming due to the text operation of the user when the replacement is performed. In the rules of "a", "b", "c", "1 st", "a", and "X", the shape and the display direction of the presentation information cannot be specified. Therefore, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the presentation information having, for example, a quadrangle shape, which is not affected by the display direction.

In fig. 20, (c) represents the pinyin of the example sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme displayed in the presentation information, and (d) represents the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

As shown in fig. 20 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays replacement candidate information having the same meaning below the position where the sound is difficult to generate, that is, the position where "l" exists and the position where "l" and "n" are continuous.

The user performs a replacement operation for the morpheme and the replacement candidate information indicated by the hint information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the degree of pronunciation can be improved by the text evaluation unit 33.

Fig. 21 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese example sentence of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "b", "c", "1 st", "a", and "X" described above. In this case, since the rule displayed is also 2, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence into halves in the height direction as shown in fig. 21 (a), and displays the presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage) and the presence presentation information of "n" adjacent to "l" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage).

The presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information in accordance with each rule of "a", "b", and "c" only at the rule-conforming portion of the word boundary, only at the rule-conforming portion inside the word, and at the word boundary when the replacement is performed, a portion that may be conforming due to the text operation of the user. In the rules of "a", "b", "c", "1 st", "a", and "X", the shape and the display direction of the presentation information cannot be specified. Therefore, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the presentation information having, for example, a quadrangle shape, which is not affected by the display direction.

In this example, a rule of "M" for displaying the presentation information is used for visual information such as a pattern other than a color. For this purpose, the presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information of a quadrangle of a predetermined pattern as shown in fig. 21 (a).

In fig. 21, (c) represents the pinyin of the example sentence, (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme displayed in the presentation information, and (d) represents the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

As shown in fig. 20 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays replacement candidate information having the same meaning below the position where the sound is difficult to generate, that is, the position where "l" exists and the position where "l" and "n" are continuous.

The user performs a replacement operation for the morpheme and the replacement candidate information indicated by the hint information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the degree of pronunciation can be improved by the text evaluation unit 33.

Fig. 22 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese example sentence of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "B", "c", "2 nd", "B", "Y", "ss", and "j". In this case, since the rule displayed is also 2, the presentation generating unit 35 divides the example sentence into halves in the height direction as shown in fig. 22 (a), and displays the presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage) and the presence presentation information of "n" adjacent to "l" in the 2 nd stage (lower stage).

The presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information in accordance with each rule of "a", "b", and "c" only at the rule-conforming portion of the word boundary, only at the rule-conforming portion inside the word, and at the word boundary, a portion where there is a possibility that the rule is conforming by a text operation of the user when the replacement is performed. The presentation generating unit 35 displays triangle presentation information according to the "Y" rule as shown in fig. 22.

Further, the presentation generating unit 35 updates the evaluation result score improved by the text operation performed by the user in real time according to the rules of "su". Specifically, as shown in fig. 22 (a), the presentation generating unit 35 displays the replacement candidate information (replacement word) having the same meaning below the part where the sound is not easy to generate, that is, the part where "l" exists and the part where "l" and "n" are continuous, as shown in fig. 22 (b).

The user performs a replacement operation for the morpheme and the replacement candidate information indicated by the hint information. In this way, the evaluation result (score) corresponding to the difficulty in pronunciation can be obtained and updated in real time by the text evaluation unit 33. In fig. 22, the score indicated by (a) is a score of "61.5 points" in this example before the replacement candidate information is replaced (before improvement). In this regard, the score shown in (c) is a score after the replacement operation (after improvement) of the replacement candidate information, which is "80 points" in this example. This means that by performing the replacement operation of the replacement candidate information, the legibility of pronunciation is improved. Since such updating of the score is performed in real time, the user can confirm the evaluation result (score) of the pronunciation readability immediately after the replacement operation of the replacement candidate information.

Fig. 23 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a chinese sentence Wen Xian of the presentation information corresponding to each rule of "a", "B", "c", "2 nd", "B", "Y" and "t" described above. In this case, since the rule displayed is 3, the presentation generating unit 35, as shown in fig. 23 (a), trisects the example sentence in the height direction, displays the presentation information indicating that "l" is continuous in the 1 st stage (upper stage), and displays the presentation information in which "n" adjacent to "l" is present in the 3 rd stage (lower stage).

In addition, in Chinese, "ao" and "ou" are difficult to distinguish. Therefore, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the bar-shaped (rectangular) notice information within a range including the front and rear syllables of the "ao" syllable. Similarly, the presentation generating unit 35 displays the bar-shaped (rectangular) notice information within a range including the front and rear syllables of the "ou" syllable. For example, the example sentence "have (you)" in fig. 23 (a) includes "ou". For this purpose, the presentation generating unit 35 displays a bar-shaped presentation information having a length from "Lin Zhen" 2 morphemes adjacent to the left side of the "with" morpheme to "six" 2 morphemes adjacent to the right side of the "with" morpheme.

The presentation generating unit 35 displays presentation information in accordance with each rule of "a", "b", and "c" only at the rule-conforming portion of the word boundary, only at the rule-conforming portion inside the word, and at the word boundary, a portion where there is a possibility that the rule is conforming by a text operation of the user when the replacement is performed. The presentation generating unit 35 displays triangular presentation information according to the rule "Y", as shown in fig. 22 (a).

In fig. 23, (c) indicates the pinyin of the example sentence of (a), (b) is the replacement candidate information corresponding to the morpheme indicated by the presentation information, and (d) indicates the pinyin of each replacement candidate information.

As shown in fig. 23 (b) and (d), the presentation generating unit 35 displays substitution candidate information having the same meaning below the site where sound generation is difficult, that is, the site where "l" exists and the site where "l" and "n" are continuous.

The user performs a replacement operation for the morpheme and the replacement candidate information indicated by the hint information. Accordingly, as described above, the evaluation result (e.g., score) corresponding to the degree of pronunciation can be improved by the text evaluation unit 33.

Effect of the embodiment

As described above, the text evaluation system according to the present embodiment equally divides the text height M into the height regions having the height of M/N by the displayed rule number N, and allocates each of the height regions to the display region corresponding to the rule. Then, the prompt information conforming to the rule is displayed in the height area previously allocated to the rule.

Accordingly, prompt information indicating the part conforming to the prescribed rule in the text can be displayed timely and concisely.

By forming and displaying the replacement candidate information of each morpheme information of the text, a replacement operation can be performed to replace the corresponding morpheme to form a higher-rated text when the rating is performed at a specific scale.

The evaluation results (e.g., scores) of the evaluation on a specific scale, that is, the evaluation results (e.g., scores) of the pronunciation difficulty level, etc., for each morpheme arrangement are displayed. The user can visually recognize the evaluation result through the prompt information such as the graph, so that the evaluation result can be recognized timely and simply.

When the replacement candidate information is used to replace each morpheme, the evaluation result (for example, score) of each morpheme arrangement after the replacement operation when evaluating the evaluation on a specific scale is obtained again and displayed. The user can recognize the degree of improvement brought by the replacement operation by comparing the scores before and after the replacement operation.

Finally, the above-described embodiments are merely examples, which do not limit the scope of the present invention. The novel embodiment may be implemented in other various ways, and various omissions, substitutions, and changes may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.

For example, when the number of types of presentation information to be displayed is large, the height of the height area becomes low, and the presentation information to be displayed may become illegible. In contrast, the presentation generating unit 35 gradually increases the character information of the display text as the number of types of presentation information to be displayed increases. Accordingly, the height area is enlarged along with the number of the prompt information types, and the prompt information is displayed in a state convenient for identification.

Finally, it should be pointed out that the embodiments and variants thereof are not only comprised in the scope and gist of the present invention, but also within the scope of the invention as described in the claims and their equivalents.

Symbol description

A client terminal device 1, a server device 2, a server device 3, a10 input/output function, a presentation information generation function 11, a 12 text management function, a 20 input/output section, a 31 text element analysis section, a 32 text element analysis reading section, a 33 text evaluation section, a 34 text evaluation rule reading section, a 35 presentation generation section, a 36 presentation rule reading section, a 37 text editing method analysis section, a 38 text editing rule reading section, and a 40 text management section.

Claims (8)

1. A text evaluation device, wherein it has,

A dividing section for dividing a display area of the text information into height areas in a height direction corresponding to the displayed regular number;

a detection unit configured to detect a portion conforming to a predetermined rule from the text information, based on dividing the text information into predetermined morphemes; and

And an attaching unit configured to attach the presentation information corresponding to the predetermined rule to a height region corresponding to the predetermined rule at a position corresponding to the predetermined rule detected from the text information.

2. The text evaluation device according to claim 1, further comprising an evaluation unit configured to perform an evaluation on a specific scale corresponding to the morphological arrangement.

3. The text evaluation device according to claim 2, further comprising a replacement candidate generating unit for generating replacement candidate information which is displayed together with the divided morphemes and which can be used for replacement with the morphemes.

4. The text evaluation apparatus according to claim 3, wherein,

Further comprising a replacement control unit for creating a text subjected to replacement between the replacement candidate information and the morpheme at the time of the replacement operation,

The evaluation unit performs evaluation on a specific scale corresponding to the morphological arrangement of the text created by the substitution operation.

5. The text evaluation device according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the adding unit generates a presentation of a state or a combination of states among a color, a shape, a gradation, and a pattern corresponding to the predetermined rule, and adds the presentation to a height region corresponding to the predetermined rule at a position corresponding to the predetermined rule detected from the text information.

6. A text evaluation method includes, among others,

A dividing step of dividing a display area of the text information into height areas in a height direction corresponding to the displayed regular number;

a detection step of detecting a portion conforming to a predetermined rule from the text information on the basis of dividing the text information into predetermined morphemes; and

And an attaching step of attaching the presentation information corresponding to the predetermined rule to a height region corresponding to the predetermined rule at a position conforming to the predetermined rule detected from the text information.

7. A computer-readable storage medium, in which a text evaluation program for realizing the following functions by a computer is stored,

A dividing section for dividing a display area of the text information into height areas in a height direction corresponding to the displayed regular number;

a detection unit configured to detect a portion conforming to a predetermined rule from the text information, based on dividing the text information into predetermined morphemes; and

And an attaching unit configured to attach the presentation information corresponding to the predetermined rule to a height region corresponding to the predetermined rule at a position corresponding to the predetermined rule detected from the text information.

8. A computer apparatus having a storage device storing a text evaluation program and a processor, the program being executed by the processor to realize the functions of,

A dividing section for dividing a display area of the text information into height areas in a height direction corresponding to the displayed regular number;

a detection unit configured to detect a portion conforming to a predetermined rule from the text information, based on dividing the text information into predetermined morphemes; and

And an attaching unit configured to attach the presentation information corresponding to the predetermined rule to a height region corresponding to the predetermined rule at a position corresponding to the predetermined rule detected from the text information.