CN111798203A - Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system - Google Patents
Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111798203A CN111798203A CN202010564169.5A CN202010564169A CN111798203A CN 111798203 A CN111798203 A CN 111798203A CN 202010564169 A CN202010564169 A CN 202010564169A CN 111798203 A CN111798203 A CN 111798203A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- review
- project
- expert
- declaration
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 154
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 100
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system, wherein the evaluation method comprises the following steps: the reporting unit registers the nodes participating in the result evaluation on line and becoming the block chain, and fills the materials of the reporting project on line and uploads the materials to the reporting project library; selecting a review expert corresponding to the application project from an engineering construction result evaluation expert library, wherein the review expert becomes a node of a block chain; the evaluation expert performs evaluation initial evaluation on the reporting project on line and uploads the grade of the reporting project, and evaluates the reporting project participating in evaluation and review; organizing the evaluation and review, wherein the evaluation and review expert who evaluates the initial review and the conference review expert which is composed of other experts evaluate and review the declaration project; and integrating the scores of the evaluation experts and other experts, and outputting the evaluation result of the engineering construction result. The project construction achievement evaluation method and system based on the block chain, provided by the invention, realize the public and transparent evaluation activities and ensure the fairness of the evaluation results.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of constructional engineering, and relates to a block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system.
Background
Along with the development of economic construction in China, more and more construction projects are generated in the engineering construction industry, the related range is wider and wider, and in order to effectively promote the popularization and application of excellent achievements in the engineering construction field and the overall progress of the technology, more and more evaluation activities are generated in the engineering construction industry.
However, due to the fact that the current evaluation standard is incomplete, the process is not complete, the evaluation result is not uniform, and the problems are solved. At present, the optimization process in the engineering construction field is often not open and transparent enough, the final result is often influenced by evaluation suggestions or opinions of partial personnel such as evaluation committee experts, sponsors and the like, the optimization result often cannot achieve the purpose of optimization, and troubles are brought to the initial purpose of optimization.
Therefore, it is necessary to design a method and a system for evaluating engineering construction results based on a block chain to solve the technical problems in the prior art.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve at least part of technical problems in the prior art to a certain extent, and provides a block chain-based engineering construction result evaluation method and system, which are reasonable in structure, solve the problems of unpublished and opaque evaluation activities, avoid human intervention and improve the fairness of evaluation results.
In order to solve the technical problem, the invention provides a block chain-based engineering construction result evaluation method, which comprises the following steps:
s1, the reporting unit registers the nodes participating in the result evaluation on line and becoming the block chain, and fills the materials of the reporting project on line and uploads the materials to the reporting project library;
s2, selecting a review expert corresponding to the declaration project from the engineering construction result review expert library, wherein the review expert becomes a node of a block chain;
s3, the assessment expert performs online evaluation initial review on the declaration project, uploads the score of the declaration project and assesses and selects the declaration project participating in evaluation and review;
s4, organizing the evaluation and review, wherein the conferee review experts consisting of the evaluation and review experts who evaluate the initial review and other experts review the declaration project;
and S5, integrating the scores of the review experts and other experts, and outputting the engineering construction result evaluation result.
As a preferred embodiment, the expert of the engineering construction result evaluation expert base is matched with the declaration project in the relevance degree, and the expert with the relevance degree exceeding a set value is a selected evaluation expert.
In step S3, when performing the initial evaluation review, the review expert uses online voting to review the declaration items participating in the initial evaluation review.
In step S3, the review expert scores the declared items online and notes the reasons for selection or elimination.
As a preferred embodiment, the reporting unit initiates a complaint procedure if there is a doubt as to the reason for the scoring and/or elimination of the reported item.
In a preferred embodiment, the reporting item that starts the complaint program executes steps S2 and S3, and if the reporting item enters the review for evaluation, then step S4 is executed.
As a preferred embodiment, the review conference includes introduction and question answering of the declaration unit to the declaration item and introduction and question answering of the review of the declaration item by the review expert.
As a preferred embodiment, the evaluation expert who evaluates the initial review has a rating A1Said other expert having a score of A2Then, the comprehensive score of the declaration item is as follows: a ═ η1A1+η2A2(ii) a Wherein eta is1To evaluate the best and make a first passEvaluating the weight coefficient of the expert; eta2Are the weighting coefficients of other experts.
In a preferred embodiment, the weighting factor is a correlation factor between the participating review experts and the declared item.
In addition, the invention also discloses an engineering construction achievement evaluation system based on the block chain, which comprises an online registration module, an evaluation expert selection module, an evaluation initial examination module, an evaluation consultation module, a complaint module and a comprehensive analysis module; the reporting unit fills materials of the reporting project by using the online registration module and uploads the materials to a reporting project library; the evaluation expert selection module selects evaluation experts corresponding to the application project from an engineering construction result evaluation expert library; the evaluation expert utilizes the evaluation initial examination module to perform evaluation initial examination on the declaration project and upload the scores of the declaration project, and evaluates and selects the declaration project participating in the evaluation and review; the conferred review experts consisting of the review experts who evaluate the initial review and other experts utilize the evaluation review module to review the declared project; the comprehensive analysis module calculates the scores of the review experts and other experts and outputs the engineering construction result evaluation result; and if the scoring and/or elimination reasons of the declared items are doubtful, the declaration unit starts a declaration program by using the declaration module.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the project construction achievement evaluation method and system based on the block chain are reasonable in structure, the problems that evaluation activities are not open and opaque are solved, manual intervention is avoided, and the fairness of the evaluation results is improved. Specifically, the method comprises the following steps:
(1) in the invention, the evaluation experts of the evaluation initial evaluation do not distinguish the main evaluation from the auxiliary evaluation, thereby realizing decentralization and effectively avoiding the influence of individual evaluation experts and the suggestions of evaluation sponsors in the past evaluation results.
(2) In the invention, the declaration unit can track and inquire the information of the whole process of the evaluation process, thereby realizing the traceability of the evaluation process, ensuring that the project evaluation process is public, fair and transparent,
(3) in the invention, the assessment expert can perform tracking and information query on the whole assessment process, thereby preventing the assessment result from being falsified.
(4) The project construction achievement evaluation system based on the block chain comprises a complaint module, provides complaint opportunities for evaluating rejected initially-checked and rejected candidate projects, creates conditions for correcting errors possibly existing in the evaluation process, increases the probability of evaluating the excellent projects, and achieves the purpose of evaluation more easily.
(5) In the invention, the statistical analysis of the evaluation result is completed by a computer program, thereby avoiding human intervention and ensuring the fairness and transparency of the result.
Drawings
The above advantages of the present invention will become more apparent and more readily appreciated from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, which are intended to be illustrative, not limiting, of the invention and in which:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a block chain-based engineering construction result evaluation method according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a blockchain-based project construction achievement evaluation initial review;
FIG. 3 is a block chain-based module schematic diagram of an engineering construction result evaluation system.
Detailed Description
Fig. 1 to fig. 3 are related schematic diagrams of a block chain-based engineering construction result evaluation method and system according to the present application, and the present invention is described in detail below with reference to specific embodiments and accompanying drawings.
The examples described herein are specific embodiments of the present invention, are intended to be illustrative and exemplary in nature, and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. In addition to the embodiments described herein, those skilled in the art will be able to employ other technical solutions which are obvious based on the disclosure of the claims and the specification of the present application, and these technical solutions include technical solutions which make any obvious replacement or modification for the embodiments described herein.
The drawings in the present specification are schematic views to assist in explaining the concept of the present invention, and schematically show the shapes of respective portions and their mutual relationships. It is noted that the drawings are not necessarily to the same scale so as to clearly illustrate the structures of the various elements of the embodiments of the invention. Like reference numerals are used to denote like parts.
The invention relates to a flow chart of a project construction achievement evaluating method based on a block chain, which is shown in figure 1. The project construction achievement evaluating method based on the block chain comprises the following steps:
s1, the reporting unit registers the nodes participating in the result evaluation on line and becoming the block chain, and fills the materials of the reporting project on line and uploads the materials to the reporting project library;
specifically, the reporting unit can register the nodes which become the block chain on line, fill in information related to the reporting project on line, such as information of technical field, technical summary, core keywords and the like, and upload the result evaluation report at the same time. Since the declaration unit is a node of the block chain, the flow related to the declaration project review can be tracked and viewed.
S2, selecting a review expert corresponding to the declaration project from the engineering construction result review expert library, wherein the review expert becomes a node of a block chain;
in the invention, when the evaluation expert selects, the expert of the engineering construction result evaluation expert base matches the relevance with the reporting project, and the expert with the relevance exceeding the set value is the selected evaluation expert. In some embodiments, the set value of the correlation between the expert of the engineering construction achievement evaluation expert base and the declaration project is 0.6-1. When the correlation degree is matched, the reporting project mainly considers the technical field, the core keywords and the like, and the expert of the engineering construction result evaluation expert base mainly considers the condition of the research direction, the main scientific research results and the historical result evaluation of the expert. In the invention, the correlation degree is evaluated by adopting a Peason correlation coefficient.
And if the correlation matching between the experts of the project construction result evaluation expert base and the declared project is carried out to obtain the equal Peason correlation coefficient, the result evaluation and review committee limits the number of the experts. Then the experts with equal Peason correlation coefficient can be determined by online voting of the declaration unit, and finally the review experts are determined.
S3, the assessment expert performs online evaluation initial review on the declaration project, uploads the score of the declaration project and assesses and selects the declaration project participating in evaluation and review;
a flow chart of the evaluation of the initial trial is shown in fig. 2. And when the evaluation initial review is carried out, the evaluation experts adopt an online voting mode to evaluate and select the declaration items participating in the evaluation and the evaluation consultation. The evaluation experts do not divide the main evaluation and the auxiliary evaluation, so that decentralization can be realized, and the influence of the main evaluation experts on the evaluation initial evaluation result is eliminated. In the primary evaluation process, if more than half of the evaluation experts vote to eliminate the declared project, the primary evaluation result of the declared project is eliminated.
As an embodiment of the invention, the review expert scores the declared items online and notes the reasons for selection or elimination. The reporting unit can inquire the evaluation result of the reporting project on line and check the reason of selection or elimination on line. If the reporting unit has a doubt as to the reason for the scoring and/or elimination of the reported item, a complaint procedure is initiated. In addition, the declaration unit can also improve the project management and implementation capacity by looking up the reason of selection or elimination.
S4, organizing the evaluation and review, wherein the conferee review experts consisting of the evaluation and review experts who evaluate the initial review and other experts review the declaration project;
specifically, the review and review process includes the introduction and the answer of the reporting project by the reporting unit and the review introduction and the answer of the reporting project by the review expert. And the participating review experts perform online scoring on the declaration items participating in the evaluation and the review and comment the scoring reason.
The grade of the evaluation expert who evaluates the excellent and initial evaluation is A1Said other expert having a score of A2Then, the comprehensive score of the declaration item is as follows: a ═ η1A1+η2A2(ii) a Wherein eta is1The weight coefficient of the evaluation expert who evaluates the quality and performs initial evaluation; eta2Are the weighting coefficients of other experts. Wherein the weight coefficient is a correlation coefficient between the participating review expert and the declaration item. And the calculation of the correlation coefficient of the evaluation expert who evaluates the initial evaluation and the declaration project is the same as the correlation coefficient obtained in the patent selection process. And obtaining the correlation coefficient by adopting the same method for calculating the correlation coefficient of other experts in the participator and the declared project.
And S5, integrating the scores of the review experts and other experts, and outputting the engineering construction result evaluation result. In the invention, the statistical analysis of the evaluation result is completed by a computer program, thereby avoiding human intervention and ensuring the fairness and transparency of the result.
As another embodiment of the present invention, the declaration item that starts the complaint program executes steps S2 and S3, and if the declaration item enters the review, then step S4 is executed. Specifically, the reporting project that initiates the complaint program requires re-selection of the review experts to prevent interference of individual review experts with the outcome evaluation.
In addition, the invention also discloses an engineering construction result evaluation system based on the block chain, which comprises an online registration module, an evaluation expert selection module, an evaluation initial examination module, an evaluation consultation module, a complaint module and a comprehensive analysis module, and is shown in fig. 2.
The reporting unit fills materials of the reporting project by using the online registration module and uploads the materials to a reporting project library; the evaluation expert selection module selects evaluation experts corresponding to the application project from an engineering construction result evaluation expert library; the evaluation expert utilizes the evaluation initial examination module to perform evaluation initial examination on the declaration project and upload the scores of the declaration project, and evaluates and selects the declaration project participating in the evaluation and review; and the conferee review experts consisting of the review experts who evaluate the initial review and other experts utilize the evaluation review module to review the declared project.
The comprehensive analysis module calculates the scores of the review experts and other experts and outputs the engineering construction result evaluation result; and if the scoring and/or elimination reasons of the declared items are doubtful, the declaration unit starts a declaration program by using the declaration module.
Compared with the defects and shortcomings of the prior art, the project construction achievement evaluation method and system based on the block chain are reasonable in structure, the problems that evaluation activities are not public and opaque are solved, manual intervention is avoided, and the fairness of the evaluation results is improved.
The present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and any other products in various forms can be obtained by the teaching of the present invention, but any changes in the shape or structure thereof, which are the same as or similar to the technical solutions of the present invention, fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A project construction achievement evaluation method based on a block chain is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, the reporting unit registers the nodes participating in the result evaluation on line and becoming the block chain, and fills the materials of the reporting project on line and uploads the materials to the reporting project library;
s2, selecting a review expert corresponding to the declaration project from the engineering construction result review expert library, wherein the review expert becomes a node of a block chain;
s3, the assessment expert performs online evaluation initial review on the declaration project, uploads the score of the declaration project and assesses and selects the declaration project participating in evaluation and review;
s4, organizing the evaluation and review, wherein the conferee review experts consisting of the evaluation and review experts who evaluate the initial review and other experts review the declaration project;
and S5, integrating the scores of the review experts and other experts, and outputting the engineering construction result evaluation result.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the expert in the engineering construction result evaluation expert database matches the relevance of the declared project, and the expert with the relevance exceeding the set value is the selected evaluation expert.
3. The method for evaluating engineering construction results according to claim 1, wherein in step S3, when performing the initial evaluation review, the review experts use an online voting method to review the declaration items participating in the evaluation review.
4. The method for evaluating engineering construction results according to claim 3, wherein in step S3, the review expert scores the declared projects online and notes the reason for selection or elimination.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the reporting unit initiates a complaint procedure if the reasons for scoring and/or elimination of the filed project are suspect.
6. The method for evaluating engineering construction results according to claim 5, wherein the declaration project of the declaration program is started to execute the steps S2 and S3, and if the declaration project enters the evaluation review, the step S4 is executed.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the review and the review meeting comprise an introduction and an answer of the reporting unit to the reporting project and an introduction and an answer of the review expert to the reporting project.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the evaluation expert in the initial evaluation has a rating of A1Said other expert having a score of A2Then, the comprehensive score of the declaration item is as follows: a ═ η1A1+η2A2(ii) a Wherein eta is1The weight coefficient of the evaluation expert who evaluates the quality and performs initial evaluation; eta2Are the weighting coefficients of other experts.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the weighting factor is a correlation factor between an expert involved in review and the declared project.
10. An engineering construction achievement evaluation system based on a block chain is characterized by comprising an online registration module, an evaluation expert selection module, an evaluation initial evaluation module, an evaluation and review module, a complaint module and a comprehensive analysis module; the reporting unit fills materials of the reporting project by using the online registration module and uploads the materials to a reporting project library; the evaluation expert selection module selects evaluation experts corresponding to the application project from an engineering construction result evaluation expert library; the evaluation expert utilizes the evaluation initial examination module to perform evaluation initial examination on the declaration project and upload the scores of the declaration project, and evaluates and selects the declaration project participating in the evaluation and review; the conferred review experts consisting of the review experts who evaluate the initial review and other experts utilize the evaluation review module to review the declared project; the comprehensive analysis module calculates the scores of the review experts and other experts and outputs the engineering construction result evaluation result; and if the scoring and/or elimination reasons of the declared items are doubtful, the declaration unit starts a declaration program by using the declaration module.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010564169.5A CN111798203A (en) | 2020-06-19 | 2020-06-19 | Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010564169.5A CN111798203A (en) | 2020-06-19 | 2020-06-19 | Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111798203A true CN111798203A (en) | 2020-10-20 |
Family
ID=72803600
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010564169.5A Pending CN111798203A (en) | 2020-06-19 | 2020-06-19 | Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111798203A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114707946A (en) * | 2022-02-09 | 2022-07-05 | 国网安徽省电力有限公司 | Technical improvement overhaul project review system based on virtual reality technology |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003108662A (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-11 | Nippon Keiei:Kk | Medical service fee evaluating system and its program |
| CN107464096A (en) * | 2017-08-02 | 2017-12-12 | 合肥哲诚项目管理有限公司 | A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management |
| CN109064031A (en) * | 2018-08-03 | 2018-12-21 | 四川民工加网络科技有限公司 | Project stakeholder's credit assessment method, block chain and storage medium based on block chain |
| CN109190947A (en) * | 2018-08-20 | 2019-01-11 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | A kind of traffic control evaluation system |
| CN110751544A (en) * | 2019-10-18 | 2020-02-04 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Bidding information, supervision information and bid evaluation information processing method, terminal and system |
-
2020
- 2020-06-19 CN CN202010564169.5A patent/CN111798203A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003108662A (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-11 | Nippon Keiei:Kk | Medical service fee evaluating system and its program |
| CN107464096A (en) * | 2017-08-02 | 2017-12-12 | 合肥哲诚项目管理有限公司 | A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management |
| CN109064031A (en) * | 2018-08-03 | 2018-12-21 | 四川民工加网络科技有限公司 | Project stakeholder's credit assessment method, block chain and storage medium based on block chain |
| CN109190947A (en) * | 2018-08-20 | 2019-01-11 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | A kind of traffic control evaluation system |
| CN110751544A (en) * | 2019-10-18 | 2020-02-04 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Bidding information, supervision information and bid evaluation information processing method, terminal and system |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114707946A (en) * | 2022-02-09 | 2022-07-05 | 国网安徽省电力有限公司 | Technical improvement overhaul project review system based on virtual reality technology |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110008288B (en) | Construction method and application of knowledge map library for network fault analysis | |
| Chen | A comparative analysis of score functions for multiple criteria decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy settings | |
| JP2022518887A (en) | Profit evaluation method for implementing technical standardization for large and medium-sized companies | |
| Samoilenko et al. | Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for monitoring efficiency-based performance of productivity-driven organizations: Design and implementation of a decision support system | |
| Li et al. | DEA models for extended two-stage network structures | |
| Ma et al. | A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations | |
| CN109509551A (en) | A kind of common disease intelligent diagnosing method and system | |
| Lefstin | The Measure of the Doubt: Dissent, Indeterminacy, and Interpretation at the Federal Circuit | |
| Kim et al. | Mapping political communities: A statistical analysis of lobbying networks in legislative politics | |
| Popescu et al. | Assessment of the state of implementation of excellence model common assessment framework (CAF) 2013 by the national institutes of research–development–innovation in Romania | |
| CN114741482B (en) | Bid-winning information matching method, system, equipment and medium based on bid-winning information | |
| Wichapa et al. | Aggregating the results of benevolent and aggressive models by the CRITIC method for ranking of decision-making units: A case study on seven biomass fuel briquettes generated from agricultural waste | |
| CN111798203A (en) | Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system | |
| CN103970651A (en) | Software architecture safety assessment method based on module safety attributes | |
| CN110175726A (en) | Cross-project defect prediction method based on migration analysis | |
| Stausberg et al. | Concordance and robustness of quality indicator sets for hospitals: an analysis of routine data | |
| CN115660296A (en) | Method for automatically issuing non-compliance project suggestion scheme based on machine learning | |
| Zhang | Research on the identification model of interest conflict influencing factors in PPP projects construction of smart city | |
| CN110766248A (en) | Workshop human factor reliability evaluation method based on SHEL and interval intuition fuzzy evaluation | |
| Priambudi et al. | Optimizing Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Legal Enquiry on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Legislative Drafting | |
| Liu et al. | A group decision making technique for appraising the performance of organizations | |
| Takeda et al. | Evaluating scholarly influence through social network analysis: The next step in evaluating scholarly influence | |
| Coombes et al. | Modelling the influence of individual and spatial factors underlying variations in the levels of secondary school examination results | |
| Chopra et al. | Information fusion for intelligence analysis | |
| Ding | Do academic scientists on corporate boards influence innovation? |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |