CN111371600A - Method and device for determining expansion rationality - Google Patents

Method and device for determining expansion rationality Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111371600A
CN111371600A CN202010120543.2A CN202010120543A CN111371600A CN 111371600 A CN111371600 A CN 111371600A CN 202010120543 A CN202010120543 A CN 202010120543A CN 111371600 A CN111371600 A CN 111371600A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
area network
metropolitan area
network equipment
class
ports
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010120543.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111371600B (en
Inventor
晏家豪
魏汝翔
洪伟
马笑笑
刘雪峰
曾雄华
马季春
卢红波
李彤
屠礼彪
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
China Information Technology Designing and Consulting Institute Co Ltd
Original Assignee
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
China Information Technology Designing and Consulting Institute Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd, China Information Technology Designing and Consulting Institute Co Ltd filed Critical China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN202010120543.2A priority Critical patent/CN111371600B/en
Publication of CN111371600A publication Critical patent/CN111371600A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111371600B publication Critical patent/CN111371600B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/14Network analysis or design
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0866Checking the configuration
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0896Bandwidth or capacity management, i.e. automatically increasing or decreasing capacities
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/14Network analysis or design
    • H04L41/147Network analysis or design for predicting network behaviour
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0876Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0876Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
    • H04L43/0894Packet rate

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for determining expansion rationality, relates to the technical field of communication, and can comprehensively determine whether a candidate expansion strategy is rational and improve the accuracy of expansion requirement evaluation. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and expansion information corresponding to a candidate expansion strategy, wherein the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy comprises the expansion information of each of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices; and determining that the candidate capacity expansion strategy is reasonable under the condition that the capacity expansion verification condition is satisfied based on the state information of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices and the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion strategy.

Description

Method and device for determining expansion rationality
Technical Field
The embodiment of the invention relates to the technical field of communication, in particular to a method and a device for determining expansion rationality.
Background
At present, when judging whether the capacity expansion requirement of the metro network is reasonable, the predicted traffic of the metro network in the next year (for example, 2020) may be calculated according to the traffic development trend of the metro network in recent years (for example, 2017 to 2019), and the predicted bandwidth of the metro network in the next year (for example, 2020) may be determined according to the predicted traffic, and if the existing bandwidth of the metro network (for example, the bandwidth of the metro network in the current year (for example, 2019) is smaller than the predicted bandwidth, the capacity expansion requirement may be determined to be reasonable.
However, the above method of determining the predicted bandwidth only by predicting the traffic and then determining whether the capacity expansion requirement is reasonable may not fully evaluate the rationality of the capacity expansion requirement.
For example, assuming that a metro network device has a platform capability of 400 gigabytes (G), the metro network device has been configured with a board card with 4 100 Gigabit Ethernet (GE) ports (i.e., 4 100GE ports have been configured on the metro network device), wherein 2 100GE ports are occupied in a first direction, 1 100GE port is occupied in a second direction, and 1 100GE port is unoccupied (i.e., unused); in the first direction, the predicted traffic, the predicted bandwidth, and the existing bandwidth in the next year in the first direction are 200G, 300G, and 200G, that is, in the first direction (or the metropolitan area network device), the bandwidth of 100G needs to be expanded (that is, 1 port needs to be expanded by 100 GE), and assuming that the value of the bandwidth that needs to be expanded in the second direction is 0, then a board card that needs to be expanded by the device and includes 4 ports of 100GE is obtained (in general, for a device with a platform capability of 400G, the sum of the number of ports of the expanded board card should be an integral multiple of 400). Obviously, there are 1 unoccupied 100GE ports in the 4 configured 100GE ports, which can meet the capacity expansion requirement of the metro network device, that is, the capacity expansion requirement is unreasonable.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for determining the expansion rationality, which can comprehensively determine whether a candidate expansion strategy is reasonable or not and improve the accuracy of the evaluation of the expansion requirement.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for determining expansion rationality, including: acquiring state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and expansion information corresponding to a candidate expansion strategy, wherein the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy comprises the expansion information of each of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices; the state information of a metropolitan area network device includes port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network device, port use condition of the metropolitan area network device, existing traffic from the metropolitan area network device to other metropolitan area network devices, the number of offline ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of obsolete ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, platform capability of the metropolitan area network device, slot position number of the metropolitan area network device, and used slot position number of the metropolitan area network device; the port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network device comprises the configuration number of ports with different granularities of the metropolitan area network device, and the port use condition of the metropolitan area network device comprises the use number of the ports with different granularities of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device; the capacity expansion information of a metropolitan area network device comprises predicted flow of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, target bandwidth of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of target ports of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of ports to be expanded of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, and board card information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device; and determining that the candidate capacity expansion strategy is reasonable under the condition that the capacity expansion verification condition is satisfied based on the state information of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices and the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion strategy.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus for determining expansion rationality, including: the device comprises an acquisition module and a determination module; the acquisition module is used for acquiring state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and capacity expansion information corresponding to a candidate capacity expansion strategy, wherein the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion strategy comprises the capacity expansion information of each of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices; the state information of a metropolitan area network device includes port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network device, port use condition of the metropolitan area network device, existing traffic from the metropolitan area network device to other metropolitan area network devices, the number of offline ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of obsolete ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, platform capability of the metropolitan area network device, slot position number of the metropolitan area network device, and used slot position number of the metropolitan area network device; the port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network device comprises the configuration number of ports with different granularities of the metropolitan area network device, and the port use condition of the metropolitan area network device comprises the use number of the ports with different granularities of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device; the capacity expansion information of a metropolitan area network device comprises predicted flow of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, target bandwidth of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of target ports of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of ports to be expanded of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, and board card information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device; the determining module is configured to determine that the candidate expansion policy is reasonable based on the status information of the multiple metro network devices and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion policy under the condition that the expansion checking condition is satisfied.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides another apparatus for determining expansion rationality, where the apparatus includes: a processor, a memory, a bus, and a communication interface; the memory is used for storing computer execution instructions, the processor is connected with the memory through a bus, and when the determination device for the rationality of expansion runs, the processor executes the computer execution instructions stored in the memory, so that the determination device for the rationality of expansion executes the determination method for the rationality of expansion provided by the first aspect.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, which includes instructions that, when running on a device for determining the reasonableness of capacity expansion, cause the device for determining the reasonableness of capacity expansion to execute a method for determining the reasonableness of capacity expansion provided in the first aspect.
In a fifth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a computer program product including instructions, which, when run on a computer, causes the computer to execute the method for determining the expansion rationality of the first aspect and any one of the implementations of the first aspect.
The method and the device for determining the expansion rationality provided by the embodiment of the invention can acquire the state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy, and determine the candidate expansion strategy to be rational under the condition that the expansion check condition is satisfied. In the embodiment of the invention, because the state information of the metropolitan area network equipment comprises information in various aspects such as the port use condition of the metropolitan area network equipment, the existing flow from the metropolitan area network equipment to other metropolitan area network equipment, the platform capability of the metropolitan area network equipment, the slot position number of the metropolitan area network equipment and the like, whether the candidate expansion strategy is reasonable or not can be comprehensively determined according to the state information of the metropolitan area network equipment and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy, and the accuracy of the expansion demand evaluation can be improved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below.
Fig. 1 is a schematic architecture diagram of a communication system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a hardware schematic diagram of a server according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a determination method of capacity expansion rationality according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a first schematic structural diagram of a device for determining the rationality of capacity expansion according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a second apparatus for determining the rationality of capacity expansion according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The following describes in detail a method and an apparatus for determining the expansion rationality according to an embodiment of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The terms "first" and "second", etc. in the description and drawings of the present application are used to distinguish different objects and not to describe a particular order of the objects, e.g., the first threshold value and the second threshold value, etc. are used to distinguish different threshold values and not to describe a particular order of the threshold values.
Furthermore, the terms "including" and "having," and any variations thereof, as referred to in the description of the present application, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not limited to only those steps or elements but may alternatively include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
It should be noted that in the embodiments of the present application, words such as "exemplary" or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations or explanations. Any embodiment or design described herein as "exemplary" or "e.g.," is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs. Rather, use of the word "exemplary" or "such as" is intended to present concepts related in a concrete fashion.
The term "and/or" as used herein includes the use of either or both of the two methods.
In the description of the present application, the meaning of "a plurality" means two or more unless otherwise specified.
Based on the problems in the background art, embodiments of the present invention provide a method and an apparatus for determining the rationality of capacity expansion, which may obtain status information of multiple metropolitan area network devices and capacity expansion information corresponding to a candidate capacity expansion policy, and determine that the candidate capacity expansion policy is rational under the condition that a capacity expansion check condition is satisfied. In the embodiment of the invention, because the state information of the metropolitan area network equipment comprises information in various aspects such as the port use condition of the metropolitan area network equipment, the existing flow from the metropolitan area network equipment to other metropolitan area network equipment, the platform capability of the metropolitan area network equipment, the slot position number of the metropolitan area network equipment and the like, whether the candidate expansion strategy is reasonable or not can be comprehensively determined according to the state information of the metropolitan area network equipment and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy, and the accuracy of the expansion demand evaluation can be improved.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an architecture of a communication system according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the communication system may include a backbone network device 101, a provincial network device 102, a core routing device 103, a broadband remote access service device 104, a full service routing device 105, a switching device 106, an Optical Line Terminal (OLT) device 107, a mobile internet (general packet radio service (GPRS) internet, GI) device 108, an Internet Data Center (IDC) device 109, an independent network address translation (NAT 44) device 110, a service support system device 111, a large client device 112, a Content Delivery Network (CDN) center device 113, and a CDN edge device 114.
The core routing device 103, the bandwidth access remote service device 104, the full-service routing device 105, and the switching device 106 belong to a metropolitan area network device, and other devices (i.e., devices other than the metropolitan area network device in fig. 1) may communicate with a certain metropolitan area network device, for example, the backbone network device 101 may communicate with the core routing device 103.
The core routing device 103 belongs to a core convergence layer in a metropolitan area network, the core routing device 103 may be a Core Router (CR), and the core routing device 103 establishes communication relationships with 10 different types of network devices respectively (i.e., corresponding to 10 transmission directions corresponding to the CR device in the embodiment of the present invention).
The broadband access remote service device 104 belongs to a service control layer in a metropolitan area network, the broadband access remote service device 104 may be a broadband access server (BRAS), and the broadband access remote service device 104 establishes communication relationships with 4 different types of network devices respectively (that is, corresponding to 4 transmission directions corresponding to the BRAS device in the embodiment of the present invention).
The full-service routing device 105 also belongs to a service control layer in a metropolitan area network, the full-service routing device 105 may be a full-Service Router (SR), and the full-service routing device 105 establishes communication relationships with 4 different types of network devices respectively (i.e., corresponding to 4 transmission directions corresponding to the SR device in the embodiment of the present invention).
The switching device 106 belongs to an access convergence layer in a metropolitan area network, the switching device 106 may be a Switch (SW), and the switching device 106 establishes communication relationships with 3 different types of network devices (that is, 3 transmission directions corresponding to the SW devices in the embodiment of the present invention).
The CDN network includes a CDN center node (e.g., CDN center device 113 shown in fig. 1) and a CDN edge node (e.g., CDN edge device 114 shown in fig. 1), where the CDN center node may establish a communication relationship with a core convergence layer device (e.g., a CR device in the embodiment of the present invention) in the metropolitan area network, and the CDN edge node may establish a communication relationship with a service control layer device (e.g., a BRAS device and an SR device in the embodiment of the present invention) in the metropolitan area network.
It is to be understood that, one transmission direction corresponding to the above-mentioned metro network device is used to indicate a communication relationship from the metro network device to a network device (including the metro network device), and exemplarily, 3 transmission directions corresponding to the SW device refer to a transmission direction from the SW device to the BRAS device, a transmission direction from the SW device to the SR device, and a transmission direction from the SW device to the OLT device, respectively.
It should be noted that, for convenience of example, the foregoing communication system architecture only shows 1 of each network device (including a metropolitan area network device) according to the embodiment of the present invention, and the number of the network devices (including the metropolitan area network device) is not specifically limited in the embodiment of the present invention.
The device or apparatus for executing the method for determining the capacity expansion rationality according to the embodiment of the present invention may be a server, and fig. 2 is a hardware schematic diagram of the server according to the embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 2, the server 20 may include a processor 201, a memory 202, a communication interface 203, and the like.
The processor 201: is a core component of the server 20, and is used for running an operating system of the server 20 and application programs (including system application programs and third party application programs) on the server 20.
In this embodiment of the present invention, the processor 201 may specifically be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), a general purpose processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, a transistor logic device, a hardware component, or any combination thereof, which may implement or execute various exemplary logic blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the disclosure of the embodiment of the present invention; a processor may also be a combination of computing functions, e.g., comprising one or more microprocessors, a DSP and a microprocessor, or the like.
The memory 202: may be used to store software programs and modules that are executed by processor 201 to perform various functional applications and data processing of server 20 by operating on software programs and modules stored in memory 202. Memory 202 may include one or more computer-readable storage media. The memory 202 includes a storage program area that may store an operating system, an application program required for at least one function, and the like, and a storage data area that may store data created by the server 20, and the like.
In this embodiment of the present invention, the memory 202 may specifically include a volatile memory (volatile memory), such as a random-access memory (RAM); the memory may also include a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), such as a read-only memory (ROM), a flash memory (flash memory), a Hard Disk Drive (HDD) or a solid-state drive (SSD); the memory may also comprise a combination of memories of the kind described above.
The communication interface 203: the interface circuit for the server 20 to communicate with other devices may be a transceiver, a transceiver circuit, or the like having a transceiver function, and the communication interface includes a serial communication interface and a parallel communication interface.
It should be understood that, due to the fact that the prior art is insufficient in current status statistics of the metro network devices, for example, only the current status traffic status of one metro network device is counted, and the current status traffic status of the metro network device in different directions is not considered, a situation that a calculation error occurs in target bandwidths corresponding to different directions may be caused, and judgment of the rationality of capacity expansion requirements may be affected. Therefore, a method for determining the rationality of capacity expansion is urgently needed, and the rationality of the capacity expansion requirement can be comprehensively evaluated. As shown in fig. 3, a method for determining the expansion rationality according to an embodiment of the present invention may include: S101-S102:
s101, obtaining state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion strategies.
It should be appreciated that the plurality of metropolitan area network devices may include at least two of a core convergence layer device, a traffic control layer device, or an access convergence layer device. The core convergence layer device comprises a core routing device, and the core routing device may be a CR device; the service control layer device comprises a broadband remote access service device and a full service routing device, wherein the broadband remote access service device can be a BRAS device, and the full service routing device can be an SR device; the access convergence layer device includes a switch device, which may be a SW device.
Specifically, the status information of a metropolitan area network device includes a port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network device, a port usage condition of the metropolitan area network device, an existing traffic from the metropolitan area network device to each of the other metropolitan area network devices, the number of offline ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of obsolete ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, a platform capability of the metropolitan area network device, the number of slot positions of the metropolitan area network device, and the number of used slot positions of the metropolitan area network device.
The port configuration condition of the metro network device includes the configuration number of ports of different granularities of the metro network device, and the usage condition of the ports of the metro network device includes the usage number of ports of different granularities of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device, for example, 5 ports of 100GE, 10 ports of 10GE, and 20 ports of 1GE may be configured on one CR device, and 5 ports of 100GE, 10 ports of 10GE, and 20 ports of 1GE may also be used in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the CR device; the platform capability of the metro network device is used to indicate a maximum value of a granularity sum of ports that a single board card of the metro network device can configure, for example, assuming that a board card of a certain metro network device can configure 4 ports of 100GE at most (or 40 ports of 10GE, or 400 ports of 1 GE), it may be determined that the platform capability of the metro network device is 400G.
It should be understood that a metro network device may have a platform capability of 20G, 40G, 100G, 400G, 800G, or 1 terabyte (T), and a port may have a granularity of 1GE, 10GE, or 100 GE.
In conjunction with the above description of fig. 1, it should be understood that one metropolitan area network device may correspond to a plurality of transmission directions, and the plurality of transmission directions are used to indicate a communication relationship between the metropolitan area network device and other devices.
With reference to fig. 1, the metropolitan area network may be divided into three layers according to the positioning of the metropolitan area network device in the metropolitan area network, where the CR device belongs to a core convergence layer of the metropolitan area network, the BRAS device and the SR device belong to a service control layer of the metropolitan area network, the SW device belongs to an access convergence layer of the metropolitan area network, the CR device may correspond to 10 transmission directions (including transmission direction numbers 1 to 10), the BRAS device may correspond to 4 transmission directions (including transmission direction numbers 11 to 14), the SR device may correspond to 4 transmission directions (including transmission direction numbers 15 to 18), and the SW device may correspond to 3 transmission directions (including transmission direction numbers 19 to 21). As shown in table 1 below, an example of multiple transmission directions for different metro network devices.
TABLE 1
Figure BDA0002392834480000081
It should be understood that the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion policy includes capacity expansion information of each of the multiple metro network devices, and the capacity expansion information of one metro network device may include predicted traffic in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device, target bandwidths in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device, the number of target ports in different granularities in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device, the number of ports to be expanded in different granularities in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device, and board card information to be expanded of the metro network device.
For example, the platform capacity of one CR device is 100G, the capacity expansion information of the CR device may include boards whose predicted flow from the CR device to one SR device (that is, the transmission direction number corresponding to the CR device is 4 (hereinafter, referred to as transmission direction 4)) is 100G, the target bandwidth corresponding to the transmission direction 4 of the CR device is 150G, the number of target ports whose port granularity corresponding to the transmission direction 4 of the CR device is 100GE is 1, the number of ports to be expanded whose port granularity corresponding to the transmission direction 4 of the CR device is 10GE is 5, and the port granularity of 1 port to be expanded of the CR device is 10GE (information of the boards to be expanded of the CR device).
It should be noted that the existing traffic from the metro network device to each of the other metro network devices refers to a peak traffic from the metro network device to each of the other metro network devices within a preset historical time (i.e., a period of time before the current time), and the predicted traffic in the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device refers to a peak traffic in the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device within a preset future time (i.e., a period of time after the current time).
And S102, determining that the candidate expansion strategy is reasonable under the condition that the expansion checking condition is satisfied based on the state information of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy.
In the embodiment of the present invention, it may be determined that the candidate expansion policy is reasonable when all of the following expansion conditions are satisfied according to the status information of the plurality of metro network devices and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion policy.
The condition 1 is that the configuration number of the ports of the mth granularity of the metropolitan area network device k is greater than or equal to the usage number of the ports of the mth granularity of the metropolitan area network device k.
The number of ports with M-th granularity of the metropolitan area network device K is the sum of the number of ports with M-th granularity of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device K, K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metropolitan area network devices, and M is 1,2, …, M, and M is the number of the port granularities of the metropolitan area network devices.
It should be understood that, for a plurality of metro network devices, the configured number of ports of a certain granularity of a certain metro network device should be greater than or equal to the used number of ports of the certain granularity of the metro network device, and for example, assuming that the configured number of ports of a CR device with the port granularity of 10GE is 10, the maximum used number of ports of the CR device with the port granularity of 10GE is also 10.
In the embodiment of the present invention, with reference to the transmission direction of the metro network devices shown in table 1, condition 1 is described for different types of metro networks:
(1) for each CR device in a metropolitan area network, condition 1 specifically includes,
Figure BDA0002392834480000101
wherein DP1Represents the configuration number of ports with the port granularity of 1GE of the CR equipment,
Figure BDA0002392834480000102
a sum of the used number of ports with a port granularity of 1GE representing a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the CR device
Figure BDA0002392834480000103
In (1)
Figure BDA0002392834480000104
The number of ports with a port granularity of 1GE used for indicating the transmission direction Q corresponding to the CR device, where Q is 1,2, …, Q, and Q are used for indicating the number of transmission directions corresponding to the CR device.
It should be noted that, in the following description,
Figure BDA0002392834480000105
and
Figure BDA0002392834480000106
is explained in
Figure BDA0002392834480000107
Are similar and will not be described in detail here.
In connection with the above description of the embodiments, it should be understood that, for each CR device, Q is 10, that is, each CR device corresponds to 10 transmission directions (i.e., the transmission direction numbers 1 to 10), and the usage number of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE of the CR device is the sum of the usage numbers of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE of the 10 transmission directions corresponding to the CR device, that is, the above description is used for each CR device
Figure BDA0002392834480000108
Similarly, the number of ports with a port granularity of 10GE of one CR device is the sum of the number of ports with a port granularity of 10GE in the 10 transmission directions corresponding to the CR device, and the number of ports with a port granularity of 100GE of one CR device is the sum of the number of ports with a port granularity of 100GE in the 10 transmission directions corresponding to the CR device, that is, the sum is used
Figure BDA0002392834480000109
(2) For each BRAS device in the metropolitan area network, condition 1 specifically includes,
Figure BDA00023928344800001010
and
Figure BDA00023928344800001011
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA00023928344800001012
indicating the configured number of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE of the BRAS equipment,
Figure BDA00023928344800001013
the sum of the used number of the ports with the port granularity of 1G of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the BRAS equipment
Figure BDA00023928344800001014
In (1)
Figure BDA00023928344800001015
And the number of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE is used for indicating the transmission direction Q corresponding to the BRAS equipment, wherein Q is 1,2, …, Q and Q are used for indicating the number of the transmission directions corresponding to the BRAS equipment.
It should be noted that, in the following description,
Figure BDA00023928344800001016
and
Figure BDA00023928344800001017
is explained in
Figure BDA00023928344800001018
Are similar and will not be described in detail here.
Combined with the above-described embodimentsIt should be understood that, for each BRAS device, Q is 4, that is, each BRAS device corresponds to 4 transmission directions (that is, the transmission direction numbers 11 to 14), and the usage number of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE of the BRAS device is the sum of the usage numbers of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE of the 4 transmission directions corresponding to the BRAS device, that is, the above-mentioned Q is 4
Figure BDA0002392834480000111
Similarly, the number of the ports with the port granularity of 10GE of one BRAS device is the sum of the number of the ports with the port granularity of 10GE in the 4 transmission directions corresponding to the BRAS device, and the number of the ports with the port granularity of 100GE of one BRAS device is the sum of the number of the ports with the port granularity of 100GE in the 4 transmission directions corresponding to the BRAS device, that is to say
Figure BDA0002392834480000112
Figure BDA0002392834480000113
(3) For each SR device in a metropolitan area network, condition 1 specifically includes,
Figure BDA0002392834480000114
and
Figure BDA0002392834480000115
in particular, the method comprises the following steps of,
Figure BDA0002392834480000116
Figure BDA0002392834480000117
(4) for each SW device in the metro network, condition 1 specifically includes,
Figure BDA0002392834480000118
and
Figure BDA0002392834480000119
in particular, the method comprises the following steps of,
Figure BDA00023928344800001110
Figure BDA00023928344800001111
it should be understood that the explanation of the formula related to the SR device in the above (3) and the formula related to the SW device in the above (4) is similar to the explanation of the formula related to the CR device in the above (1) and the formula related to the BRAS device in the above (2), and will not be described in detail here.
And 2, the existing flow from the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the existing flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment.
The existing traffic from the ith class metropolitan area network device to the jth class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the existing traffic from all the ith class metropolitan area network devices to all the jth class metropolitan area network devices, the existing traffic from the jth class metropolitan area network device to the ith class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the existing traffic from all the ith class metropolitan area network devices to the ith class metropolitan area network device, i is 1,2, …, N, j is 1,2, …, N, and i is not equal to j.
In conjunction with the description of the above embodiments, it should be understood that the metro network devices may include at least two of core convergence layer devices, service control layer devices, or access convergence layer devices.
LX can be used for the existing flow from one CR device to one BRAS device3Represents the LX3Where 3 denotes the transmission direction from the CR device to the BRAS device (i.e. the transmission direction number 3 shown in table 1, hereinafter referred to as transmission direction 3), LX can be used for the existing traffic from one BRAS device to one CR device11Represents the LX1111 in (a) indicates a transmission direction from the BRAS device to the CR device (i.e., the transmission direction number 11 shown in table 1 above, hereinafter referred to as the transmission direction 11).
For example, assume a class i metro areaThe network device is CR device, the jth class metropolitan area network device is BRAS device, the sum of the existing flow from all the ith class metropolitan area network device to all the jth class metropolitan area network device can be ∑All CR apparatusLX3It is shown that the sum of the existing traffic from all class j metro network devices to all class i metro network devices can be used ∑All BRAS devicesLX11Is shown, namely ∑All CR apparatusLX3=∑All BRAS devicesLX11
Obtained by the same token, ∑All CR apparatusLX4=∑All SR apparatusLX15、∑All BRAS devicesLX13=∑All SW devicesLX19And ∑All SR apparatusLX17=∑All SW devicesLX20Wherein, ∑All CR apparatusLX4∑ representing the sum of the existing traffic in the transmission direction from all CR devices to all SR devices (i.e. the transmission direction number 4 shown in Table 1, hereinafter referred to as transmission direction 4)All SR apparatusLX15∑ representing the sum of the existing traffic in the transmission direction from all SR devices to all CR devices (i.e., the transmission direction number 15 shown in Table 1, hereinafter referred to as the transmission direction 15)All BRAS devicesLX13∑, which represents the sum of the existing traffic in the transmission direction from all BRAS devices to all SW devices (i.e. the transmission direction number 13 shown in table 1, hereinafter referred to as transmission direction 13)All SW devicesLX19∑, which represents the sum of the existing traffic in the transmission direction from all SW devices to all BRAS devices (i.e., the transmission direction number 19 shown in Table 1 above, hereinafter referred to as the transmission direction 19)All SR apparatusLX17The sum of the existing traffic flows indicating the transmission directions of all SR devices to all SW devices (i.e., the transmission direction number 17 shown in table 1, hereinafter referred to as the transmission direction 17) indicates the sum of the existing traffic flows indicating the transmission directions of all SW devices to all SR devices (i.e., the transmission direction number 20 shown in table 1, hereinafter referred to as the transmission direction 20).
Optionally, an error range may be added to the existing traffic from the i-th class of metropolitan area network device to the j-th class of metropolitan area network device or the existing traffic from the j-th class of metropolitan area network device to the i-th class of metropolitan area network device, that is, when the existing traffic from the i-th class of metropolitan area network device to the j-th class of metropolitan area network device satisfies the error range of the existing traffic from the j-th class of metropolitan area network device to the i-th class of metropolitan area network device (or when the existing traffic from the j-th class of metropolitan area network device to the i-th class of metropolitan area network device satisfies the error range of the existing traffic from the i-th class of metropolitan area network device to the j-th class of metropolitan area network device), it may.
Illustratively, the error range of the existing traffic of the jth class of metropolitan area network devices to the ith class of metropolitan area network devices may be represented by α.
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a CR device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is a BRAS device, ∑ aboveAll CR apparatusLX3=∑All BRAS devicesLX11Can be as follows:
(1-α)×∑all BRAS devicesLX11≤∑All CR apparatusLX3≤(1+α)×∑All BRAS devicesLX11
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a CR device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is an SR device, ∑All CR apparatusLX4=∑All SR apparatusLX15Can be as follows:
(1-α)×∑all SR apparatusLX15≤∑All CR apparatusLX4≤(1+α)×∑All SR apparatusLX15
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a BRAS device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is a SW device, ∑All BRAS devicesLX13=∑All SW devicesLX19Can be as follows:
(1-α)×∑all SW devicesLX19≤∑All BRAS devicesLX13≤(1+α)×∑All SW devicesLX19
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is an SR device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is an SW device, ∑All SR apparatusLX17=∑All SW devicesLX20Can be as follows:
(1-α)×∑all SW devicesLX20≤∑All SR apparatusLX17≤(1+α)×∑All SW devicesLX20
It should be understood that α can be chosen according to actual needs, for example, when α is 0.1, the above error range is 10%.
And 3, the predicted flow from the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the predicted flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment.
The predicted traffic from the i-th class metropolitan area network device to the j-th class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the predicted traffic from all the i-th class metropolitan area network devices to all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices, the predicted traffic from the j-th class metropolitan area network device to the i-th class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the predicted traffic from all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices to the i-th class metropolitan area network device, i is 1,2, …, N, j is 1,2, …, N, and i is not equal to j.
In conjunction with table 1 above, it should be appreciated that the predicted traffic from a CR device to a BRAS device may be predicted using LM3Is shown by the LM33 in (1) is used to indicate the transmission direction 3, and the predicted flow from one BRAS device to one CR device can be LM11Is shown by the LM1111 is used to indicate the transmission direction 11.
For example, assuming that the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a CR device, the j-th class metropolitan area network device is a BRAS device, and the sum of the predicted traffic from all i-th class metropolitan area network devices to all j-th class metropolitan area network devices may be ∑All CR apparatusLM3It is shown that the sum of the predicted traffic from all jth class metropolitan area network devices to all ith class metropolitan area network devices may be used ∑All BRAS devicesLM11Is shown, namely ∑All CR apparatusLM3=∑All BRAS devicesLM11
Obtained by the same token, ∑All CR apparatusLM4=∑All SR apparatusLM15、∑All BRAS devicesLM13=∑All SW devicesLM19And ∑All SR apparatusLM17=∑All SW devicesLM20Wherein, ∑All CR apparatusLM4Represents the sum of the predicted flows from all CR devices to all SR devices (i.e., transmission direction 4), ∑All SR apparatusLM15Represents the sum of the predicted flows from all SR devices to all CR devices (i.e., the transmit direction 15), ∑All BRAS devicesLM13Represents the sum of the predicted traffic from all BRAS devices to all SW devices (i.e., the direction of transmission 13), ∑All SW devicesLM19Represents the sum of the predicted traffic from all SW devices to all BRAS devices (i.e., the direction of transmission 19), ∑All SR apparatusLM17Representing the sum of the predicted flows from all SR devices to all SW devices (i.e., the transmit direction 17), ∑All SW devicesLM20Representing the sum of the predicted flows of all SW devices to all SR devices (i.e., the transmit direction 20).
Optionally, an error range may be added to the predicted traffic from the i-th class of metropolitan area network device to the j-th class of metropolitan area network device or the predicted traffic from the j-th class of metropolitan area network device to the i-th class of metropolitan area network device, that is, when the predicted traffic from the i-th class of metropolitan area network device to the j-th class of metropolitan area network device satisfies the error range of the predicted traffic from the j-th class of metropolitan area network device to the i-th class of metropolitan area network device (or when the predicted traffic from the j-th class of metropolitan area network device to the i-th class of metropolitan area network device satisfies the error range of the predicted traffic from the i-th class of metropolitan area network device to the j-th class of metropolitan area network device), it may.
For example, the error range of the predicted traffic from the j-th class metropolitan area network device to the i-th class metropolitan area network device may be represented by β.
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a CR device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is a BRAS device, ∑ aboveAll CR apparatusLM3=∑All BRAS devicesLM11Can be as follows:
(1-β)×∑all BRAS devicesLM11≤∑All CR apparatusLM3≤(1+β)×∑All BRAS devicesLM11
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a CR device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is an SR device, ∑All CR apparatusLM4=∑All SR apparatusLM15Can be as follows:
(1-β)×∑all SR apparatusLM15≤∑All CR apparatusLM4≤(1+β)×∑All SR apparatusLM15
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a BRAS device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is a SW device, ∑All BRAS devicesLM13=∑All SW devicesLM19Can be as follows:
(1-β)×∑all SW devicesLM19≤∑All BRAS devicesLM13≤(1+β)×∑All SW devicesLM19
When the i-th class metropolitan area network device is an SR device and the j-th class metropolitan area network device is an SW device, ∑All SR apparatusLM17=∑All SW devicesLM20Can be as follows:
(1-β)×∑all SW devicesLM20≤∑All SR apparatusLM17≤(1+β)×∑All SW devicesLM20
It should be understood that β can be chosen according to actual needs, for example, when β is 0.1, the above error range is 10%.
And 4, the using number of ports with m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the using number of ports with m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment.
Wherein, the usage number of the ports with M-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network device to the j-th class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the usage numbers of the ports with M-th granularity from all the i-th class metropolitan area network devices to all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices, the usage number of the ports with M-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network device to the i-th class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the usage numbers of the ports with M-th granularity from all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices to all the i-th class metropolitan area network devices, i is 1,2, …, N, j is 1,2, …, N, and i is not equal to j, M is 1,2, …, M is the number of the port granularity of the metropolitan area network device.
As described in connection with the above embodiments, the granularity of one port may be 1GE, 10GE or 100GE,
Figure BDA0002392834480000141
the number of ports with port granularity of 1GE in the transmission direction q corresponding to one metro network device may be represented, and the transmission direction of the metro network device shown in table 1 may be adopted
Figure BDA0002392834480000142
The number of ports with the port granularity of 1GE from the CR equipment to a BRAS equipment (namely, the transmission direction 3) of one CR equipment is adopted
Figure BDA0002392834480000151
The number of ports with a port granularity of 1GE from the BRAS device representing a BRAS device to a CR device (i.e., the direction of transmission 11) is used.
For example, it is assumed that the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a CR device, the j-th class metropolitan area network device is a BRAS device, and the sum of the usage number of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE from all the i-th class metropolitan area network devices to all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices may be used
Figure BDA0002392834480000152
Indicating that the sum of the usage number of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE from all the j-type metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-type metropolitan area network equipment can be used
Figure BDA0002392834480000153
Is shown, i.e.
Figure BDA0002392834480000154
In the same way, the method can obtain,
Figure BDA0002392834480000155
and
Figure BDA0002392834480000156
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002392834480000157
represents the sum of the used number of ports with port granularity of 1GE from all CR devices to all SR devices (i.e. transmission direction 4),
Figure BDA0002392834480000158
represents the sum of the number of ports with a port granularity of 1GE from all SR devices to all CR devices (i.e. the transmission direction 15),
Figure BDA0002392834480000159
represents the sum of the number of usage of ports with port granularity of 1GE from all BRAS devices to all SW devices (i.e. the transmission direction 13),
Figure BDA00023928344800001510
represents the sum of the number of ports used with a port granularity of 1GE from all SW devices to all BRAS devices (i.e. the direction of transmission 19),
Figure BDA00023928344800001511
represents the sum of the number of ports used with a port granularity of 1GE from all SR devices to all SW devices (i.e. the direction of transmission 17),
Figure BDA00023928344800001512
represents the sum of the number of ports used with a port granularity of 1GE from all SW devices to all SR devices (i.e., the transmit direction 20).
Similarly, for a port with a port granularity of 10GE of the metro network device, the condition 4 may specifically include:
Figure BDA00023928344800001513
Figure BDA00023928344800001514
and
Figure BDA00023928344800001515
similarly, for a port with a port granularity of 100GE of the metro network device, the condition 4 may specifically include:
Figure BDA00023928344800001516
Figure BDA00023928344800001517
and
Figure BDA00023928344800001518
and 5, the number of the m-th granularity target ports from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the number of the m-th granularity target ports from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment.
Wherein, the number of target ports of M-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network device to the j-th class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the numbers of target ports of M-th granularity from all the i-th class metropolitan area network devices to all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices, the number of target ports of M-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network device to the i-th class metropolitan area network device is the sum of the numbers of target ports of M-th granularity from all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices to all the i-th class metropolitan area network devices, i is 1,2, …, N, j is 1,2, …, N, and i is not equal to j, M is 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularity of the metropolitan area network device.
In conjunction with the above description of the embodiments, it should be understood that the number of target ports with a port granularity of 1GE from the CR device to the BRAS device (i.e., transmission direction 3) of one CR device may be used
Figure BDA0002392834480000161
Indicating that the number of target ports with a port granularity of 1GE from the BRAS device of a BRAS device to a CR device (i.e., the transmission direction 11) is available
Figure BDA0002392834480000162
And (4) showing.
For example, it is assumed that the i-th class metropolitan area network device is a CR device, the j-th class metropolitan area network device is a BRAS device, and the sum of the numbers of target ports with port granularity of 1GE from all the i-th class metropolitan area network devices to all the j-th class metropolitan area network devices may be used
Figure BDA0002392834480000163
Indicating that the sum of the number of target ports with the port granularity of 1GE from all the j-type metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-type metropolitan area network equipment can be used
Figure BDA0002392834480000164
Expression, i.e. condition 4, may comprise a formula
Figure BDA0002392834480000165
In the same way, the method can obtain,
Figure BDA0002392834480000166
and
Figure BDA0002392834480000167
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002392834480000168
represents the sum of the number of destination ports with a port granularity of 1GE from all CR devices to all SR devices (i.e. transmission direction 4),
Figure BDA0002392834480000169
represents the sum of the number of destination ports with a port granularity of 1GE from all SR devices to all CR devices (i.e. the transport direction 15),
Figure BDA00023928344800001610
represents the sum of the number of target ports with a port granularity of 1GE from all BRAS devices to all SW devices (i.e. the transmission direction 13),
Figure BDA00023928344800001611
representing all SW devices to all BRAS devices (i.e. direction of transmission 19)Has a port granularity of 1GE and the sum of the number of target ports,
Figure BDA00023928344800001612
represents the sum of the number of destination ports with a port granularity of 1GE from all SR devices to all SW devices (i.e. the direction of transmission 17),
Figure BDA00023928344800001613
represents the sum of the number of destination ports with a port granularity of 1GE from all SW devices to all SR devices (i.e., the transmit direction 20).
Similarly, for a port with a port granularity of 10GE of the metro network device, the condition 4 may specifically include:
Figure BDA00023928344800001614
Figure BDA00023928344800001615
and
Figure BDA00023928344800001616
similarly, for a port with a port granularity of 100GE of the metro network device, the condition 4 may specifically include:
Figure BDA00023928344800001617
Figure BDA00023928344800001618
and
Figure BDA00023928344800001619
the embodiment of the invention can verify whether the status information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and the data in the expansion information corresponding to the candidate strategy have errors through the formulas in the 5 conditions, thereby improving the reasonable accuracy of determining the candidate expansion strategy.
The condition 6 is that target bandwidths of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k are respectively greater than or equal to a first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and less than or equal to a second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction.
The first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and the second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction are determined according to the predicted traffic of the transmission direction, and K is 1,2, …, where K is the total number of the metropolitan area network devices.
Specifically, the reasonable range of the target bandwidth corresponding to one transmission direction may be determined according to the predicted traffic corresponding to the transmission direction. For example, a capacity expansion threshold may be configured for a predicted traffic corresponding to a transmission direction, and a maximum value and a minimum value of the predicted traffic divided by the capacity expansion threshold are a reasonable range of the target bandwidth (i.e., a first threshold and a second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction).
For example, assuming that a predicted traffic (i.e., 100G) corresponding to a transmission direction 3 of one CR device (i.e., one CR device to one BRAS device) is 100G, and the capacity expansion threshold is 50% -70%, a first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction 3 of the CR device is 100G/70% ≈ 143G, and a second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction 3 of the CR device is 100G/50% ≈ 200G (i.e., a reasonable range 143G-200G of the target bandwidth of the transmission direction 3 of the CR device), and assuming that the target bandwidth of the transmission direction 3 of the CR device is 160G, it may be determined that the target bandwidth of the transmission direction 3 of the CR device satisfies a condition 6.
Similarly, the determination methods of the first thresholds corresponding to the transmission directions and the second thresholds corresponding to the transmission directions are the same as or similar to those described in the foregoing embodiments, and are not repeated herein.
And under the condition 7, the number of ports to be expanded with the m-th granularity in the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k of the metropolitan area network device k is equal to the number of ports to be expanded with the m-th granularity in the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k.
The number of ports to be expanded in the expected m-th granularity of multiple transmission directions corresponding to a metropolitan area network device k is determined according to the number of target ports in the m-th granularity of multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, the number of offline ports in the m-th granularity of multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, and the number of obsolete ports in the m-th granularity of multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k; where K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metro network devices, M is 1, 2.
The number of expected ports to be expanded in the mth granularity of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k meets the following requirements:
Figure BDA0002392834480000171
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002392834480000172
the number of the expected ports to be expanded with the port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000173
the number of target ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000174
the number of ports with port granularity x corresponding to the metro network device k in the transmission direction y is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000175
the number of offline ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000176
the number of the obsolete ports with the port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is represented. Specifically, y represents a transmission direction corresponding to the metro network device, x represents port granularity of the metro network device, y has a value in a range of 1 to 21, for example, y is 1, which represents a transmission direction 1 shown in table 1, and x may have a value of 1, 10, or 100, for example, x is 1, which represents port granularity of the metro network deviceThe degree is 1 GE.
It should be understood that a down port corresponding to a metro network device in one transmission direction is used to indicate that a board where the port is located cannot be repaired due to damage or the metro network device (or the board) stops providing service (EOS), that is, the metro network device or the board is too old and a manufacturer no longer provides service for the metro network device or the board. The obsolete port of a transmission direction corresponding to a metro network device is used to indicate other transmission directions that the port was used for before for the metro network device, and since the other transmission directions do not use the port any more, the port can be applied to a certain transmission direction (i.e. the corresponding transmission direction). For example, the obsolete port of the transmission direction 3 corresponding to one CR device may be previously applied to any one of a plurality of transmission directions (e.g., transmission direction 1, transmission direction 2, and transmission directions 4-10) corresponding to the CR device, and the embodiment of the present invention is not limited in particular.
In the embodiment of the present invention, when determining the number of ports to be expanded expected for the mth granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to one metropolitan area network device k, when subtracting the number of ports of the mth granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k from the number of target ports of the mth granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, the number of offline ports of the mth granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k may be added, and the number of obsolete ports of the mth granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k may be subtracted.
Illustratively, it is assumed that 1 CR device corresponds to a number of target ports with a port granularity of 1GE in the transmission direction 3 of 10, i.e. the number is 1GE
Figure BDA0002392834480000181
The number of the ports with the port granularity of 1GE corresponding to the CR equipment in the transmission direction 3 is 5, namely
Figure BDA0002392834480000182
The number of offline ports with the port granularity of 1GE in the transmission direction 3 corresponding to the CR equipmentIs 3, i.e.
Figure BDA0002392834480000183
The number of the used ports corresponding to the CR equipment and having the port granularity of 1GE in the transmission direction 3 is 4, namely
Figure BDA0002392834480000184
It may be determined that the number of the ports to be expanded, which have the port granularity of 1GE in the transmission direction 3 corresponding to the CR device, is 4, that is, the number of the ports to be expanded is 4
Figure BDA0002392834480000185
It should be understood that the capacity expansion information of the metropolitan area network device k includes the number of ports to be expanded with the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, and when the number of ports to be expanded with the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is equal to the number of ports to be expanded with the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, it is determined that the condition 7 is satisfied.
And (8) the information of the board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network equipment k is consistent with the information of the expected board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network equipment k.
The expected board card information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device K is determined according to port information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device K, platform capability of the metropolitan area network device K, and a remaining slot position of the metropolitan area network device K, where the remaining slot position is a difference between the number of the slot positions of the metropolitan area network device K and the number of the used slot positions of the metropolitan area network device K, the port information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device K includes the number of ports to be expanded of different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device K, and K is 1,2, …, K, and K is the total number of the metropolitan area network device.
In conjunction with the description of the above embodiments, it should be understood that the platform capability of the metro network device is used to indicate the maximum value of the granularity sum of the ports that a single board card of the metro network device can configure, that is, assuming that the platform capability of one metro network device is 400G, a board card in the metro network device can configure 4 ports of 100GE at most (or 40 ports of 10GE, or 400 ports of 1 GE).
For example, assume that table 2 is port information to be expanded of one SR device.
TABLE 2
Figure BDA0002392834480000191
As can be seen from Table 2, the SR apparatus is to expand 100 ports of 1GE, 20 ports of 10GE and 1 port of 100 GE.
Assuming that the platform capacity of the SR device is 100G, and the number of remaining slots of the SR device is equal to 5, it may be determined that the expected card information to be expanded of the SR device may be expansion 4 cards, including 1 card with a port granularity of 1GE for 100 ports, 2 cards with a port granularity of 10GE for 10 ports, and 1 card with a port granularity of 100GE for 1 port.
If the information of the board card to be expanded of the SR device is not consistent with the information of the expected board card to be expanded of the SR device, it may be determined that the condition 8 is not satisfied. For example, if the information of the board card to be expanded of the SR device is 5 expansion board cards, including 1 board card with a port granularity of 1GE for 100 ports, 3 board cards with a port granularity of 10GE for 10 ports, and 1 board card with a port granularity of 100GE for 1 port, because the expected information of the board card to be expanded of the SR device includes 2 board cards with a port granularity of 100GE for 10 ports, that is, there is no need to expand the board cards with a port granularity of 100GE for 3 ports 10, it may be determined that the information of the board card to be expanded of the SR device is unreasonable, that is, the above condition 8 does not hold. For another example, if the information of the board card to be expanded of the SR device is expansion 3 board cards, including 1 board card with 100 ports and a granularity of 1GE, 1 board card with 20 ports and a granularity of 10GE, and 1 board card with 1 port and a granularity of 100GE, since the 1 board card with 20 ports and a granularity of 10GE is adapted to the metropolitan area network device with a platform capability greater than or equal to 400GE (that is, the sum of the granularities of all the ports of the board card already exceeds the platform capability of the SR device), it may be determined that the information of the board card to be expanded of the SR device is unreasonable. For another example, if the information of the board cards to be expanded of the SR device is expansion 6 board cards, including 3 board cards with port granularity of 1GE of 40 ports, 2 board cards with port granularity of 10GE of 10 ports, and 1 board card with port granularity of 100GE of 1 port, it is obvious that the number of the board cards to be expanded (i.e., 6) in the information of the board cards to be expanded of the SR device exceeds the number of the remaining slots of the SR device, and therefore, it may be determined that the information of the board cards to be expanded of the SR device is unreasonable.
Optionally, when the number of the remaining slots of the SR device in the above example is less than 5, but the SR device at least needs to expand 5 blocks of boards (that is, the number of the remaining slots of the SR device cannot satisfy the number of the boards that the SR device at least needs to expand), an original low-density board (for example, a board with a port granularity of 1GE of 20 ports) may be replaced with a high-density board (for example, a board with a port granularity of 1GE of 40 ports or a board with a port granularity of 1GE of 100 ports), a platform capability of the SR device may also be upgraded (for example, the platform capability of the SR device is upgraded from 100G to 400G), a device replacement mode may also be adopted, for example, the SR device may be replaced with an SR device with a larger number of the remaining slots (that is, the number of the remaining slots is greater than or equal to 5).
It should be noted that, the same board card of the same metro network device may select the port configuration with the same granularity, that is, one board card of one metro network device may select the configuration of 100 ports with a granularity of 1GE, the configuration of 10 ports with a granularity of 10GE, or the configuration of 1 port with a granularity of 100GE (that is, the platform capability of the metro network device is 100G), and the same board card of the same metro network device may also select the port configuration with different granularities, that is, one board card of one metro network device may select the configuration of 50 ports with a granularity of 1GE, 15 ports with a granularity of 10GE, and 2 ports with a granularity of 100GE (that is, the platform capability of the metro network device is 400G), which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.
The embodiment of the invention can acquire the state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion strategies, and determine that the candidate capacity expansion strategies are reasonable under the condition that the capacity expansion verification condition is satisfied. In the embodiment of the invention, because the state information of the metropolitan area network equipment comprises information in various aspects such as the port use condition of the metropolitan area network equipment, the existing flow from the metropolitan area network equipment to other metropolitan area network equipment, the platform capability of the metropolitan area network equipment, the slot position number of the metropolitan area network equipment and the like, whether the candidate expansion strategy is reasonable or not can be comprehensively determined according to the state information of the metropolitan area network equipment and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy, and the accuracy of the expansion demand evaluation can be improved.
In the embodiment of the present application, the determination device for capacity expansion rationality and the like may be divided into functional modules according to the above method example, for example, each functional module may be divided corresponding to each function, or two or more functions may be integrated into one processing module. The integrated module can be realized in a hardware mode, and can also be realized in a software functional module mode. It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present application, the division of the module is schematic, and is only one logic function division, and there may be another division manner in actual implementation.
In the case of dividing each functional module according to each function, fig. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a possible structure of the determination device for capacity expansion rationality according to the foregoing embodiment, and as shown in fig. 4, the determination device 30 for capacity expansion rationality may include: an acquisition module 301 and a determination module 302.
An obtaining module 301, configured to obtain status information of multiple pieces of metropolitan area network equipment and capacity expansion information corresponding to a candidate capacity expansion policy, where the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion policy includes capacity expansion information of each of the multiple pieces of metropolitan area network equipment;
the state information of a metropolitan area network device includes port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network device, port use condition of the metropolitan area network device, existing traffic from the metropolitan area network device to other metropolitan area network devices, the number of offline ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of obsolete ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, platform capability of the metropolitan area network device, slot position number of the metropolitan area network device, and used slot position number of the metropolitan area network device; the port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network device comprises the configuration number of ports with different granularities of the metropolitan area network device, and the port use condition of the metropolitan area network device comprises the use number of the ports with different granularities of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device;
the capacity expansion information of a metropolitan area network device includes predicted traffic of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, target bandwidths of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of target ports of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of ports to be expanded of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, and board card information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device.
The determining module 302 is configured to determine that the candidate expansion policy is reasonable based on the status information of the multiple metro network devices and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion policy under the condition that the expansion checking condition is satisfied.
Optionally, the metropolitan area network device includes at least two of the following devices: core convergence layer equipment, service control layer equipment or access convergence layer equipment.
Optionally, the expansion checking condition includes:
the method comprises the following steps that 1, the configuration number of ports with the m-th granularity of metropolitan area network equipment k is larger than or equal to the use number of the ports with the m-th granularity of the metropolitan area network equipment k; the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity of the metropolitan area network equipment k is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment k; wherein K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metro network devices, M is 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that 2, the existing flow from an ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to a jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the existing flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment; the existing flow from the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the existing flow from all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment, and the existing flow from the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the existing flow from all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment; wherein i ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ≠ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) a condition 3 is that the predicted flow from the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the predicted flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment; the predicted flow from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the predicted flows from all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment, and the predicted flow from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the predicted flows from all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment; wherein i ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ≠ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j;
condition 4, the number of the ports with m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the number of the ports with m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment; the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity from all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment, and the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity from all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment; where i ≠ j, M ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ═ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j, M ═ 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) a condition 5 is that the number of target ports with m-th granularity from an i-th class metropolitan area network device to a j-th class metropolitan area network device of the i-th class metropolitan area network device is equal to the number of target ports with m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network device to the i-th class metropolitan area network device of the j-th class metropolitan area network device; the number of the m-th granularity target ports from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the number of the m-th granularity target ports from all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment, and the number of the m-th granularity target ports from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the number of the m-th granularity target ports from all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment; where i ≠ j, M ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ═ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j, M ═ 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
condition 6, target bandwidths of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k are respectively greater than or equal to a first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and less than or equal to a second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction, and the first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and the second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction are determined according to predicted traffic of the transmission direction; wherein K is 1,2, …, and K is the total number of metropolitan area network devices;
the method includes the steps that a condition 7 is that the number of ports to be expanded with m-th granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to metropolitan area network equipment k of the metropolitan area network equipment k is equal to the number of ports to be expanded with m-th granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment k; the number of ports to be expanded in the expected m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is determined according to the number of target ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, the number of offline ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, and the number of obsolete ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k; wherein K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metro network devices, M is 1,2, and M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method includes the steps that condition 8 is that information of a board card to be expanded of a metropolitan area network device k is consistent with information of an expected board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k, the information of the expected board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k is determined according to information of a port to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k, platform capacity of the metropolitan area network device k and a residual slot position of the metropolitan area network device, the residual slot position is the difference between the number of the slot positions of the metropolitan area network device k and the number of the used slot positions of the metropolitan area network device k, and the information of the port to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k includes the number of the ports to be expanded of different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k; where K is 1,2, …, and K is the total number of metro network devices.
Optionally, the number of expected ports to be expanded in the mth granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k satisfies:
Figure BDA0002392834480000231
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure BDA0002392834480000232
the number of the expected ports to be expanded with the port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000233
the number of target ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000234
the number of ports with port granularity x corresponding to the metro network device k in the transmission direction y is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000235
the number of offline ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure BDA0002392834480000241
the number of the obsolete ports with the port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is represented.
In the case of an integrated unit, fig. 5 shows a schematic diagram of a possible structure of the expansion rationality determining means according to the above-described embodiment. As shown in fig. 5, the expansion rationality determining means 40 may include: a processing module 401 and a communication module 402. The processing module 401 may be configured to control and manage the action of the determination device 40 of the capacity expansion rationality, for example, the processing module 401 may be configured to support the determination device 40 of the capacity expansion rationality to execute S101 and S102 in the above-described method embodiment. The communication module 402 may be used to support communication of the determination device 40 of the expansion rationality with other entities. Optionally, as shown in fig. 5, the determination device 40 for determining the rationality of expansion may further include a storage module 403 for storing the program code and data of the determination device 40 for determining the rationality of expansion.
The processing module 401 may be a processor or a controller (for example, the processor 201 shown in fig. 2). The communication module 402 may be a transceiver, a transceiver circuit, a communication interface, etc. (e.g., may be the communication interface 203 as shown in fig. 2). The storage module 403 may be a memory (e.g., may be the memory 202 described above and shown in fig. 2).
When the processing module 401 is a processor, the communication module 402 is a transceiver, and the storage module 403 is a memory, the processor, the transceiver, and the memory may be connected by a bus. The bus may be a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, an Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus, or the like. The bus may be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc.
It should be understood that, in various embodiments of the present invention, the sequence numbers of the above-mentioned processes do not mean the execution sequence, and the execution sequence of each process should be determined by its function and inherent logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present invention.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the various illustrative elements and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware or combinations of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
It is clear to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the above-described systems, apparatuses and units may refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and are not described herein again.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
In the above embodiments, the implementation may be wholly or partially realized by software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. When implemented using a software program, may be implemented in whole or in part in the form of a computer program product. The computer program product includes one or more computer instructions. The procedures or functions described in accordance with the embodiments of the invention are all or partially effected when the computer program instructions are loaded and executed on a computer. The computer may be a general purpose computer, a special purpose computer, a network of computers, or other programmable device. The computer instructions may be stored on a computer readable storage medium or transmitted from one computer readable storage medium to another, for example, from one website, computer, server, or data center to another website, computer, server, or data center via wire (e.g., coaxial cable, fiber optics, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)) or wireless (e.g., infrared, wireless, microwave, etc.). The computer-readable storage medium can be any available medium that can be accessed by a computer or can comprise one or more data storage devices, such as a server, a data center, etc., that can be integrated with the medium. The usable medium may be a magnetic medium (e.g., floppy Disk, hard Disk, magnetic tape), an optical medium (e.g., DVD), or a semiconductor medium (e.g., Solid State Disk (SSD)), among others.
The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present invention, and all the changes or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (10)

1. A method for determining the rationality of expansion is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and expansion information corresponding to a candidate expansion strategy, wherein the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion strategy comprises the expansion information of each of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices;
the state information of one metropolitan area network device comprises port configuration conditions of the metropolitan area network device, port use conditions of the metropolitan area network device, existing flow from the metropolitan area network device to other metropolitan area network devices, the number of offline ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of worn ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, platform capacity of the metropolitan area network device, the number of slot positions of the metropolitan area network device and the number of used slot positions of the metropolitan area network device; the port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network equipment comprises the configuration number of ports with different granularities of the metropolitan area network equipment, and the port use condition of the metropolitan area network equipment comprises the use number of the ports with different granularities of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment;
the capacity expansion information of a metropolitan area network device comprises predicted flow of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, target bandwidth of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of target ports of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of ports to be expanded of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, and board card information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device;
and determining that the candidate capacity expansion strategy is reasonable under the condition that a capacity expansion check condition is satisfied based on the state information of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices and the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion strategy.
2. The method of claim 1,
the metropolitan area network devices include at least two of the following: core convergence layer equipment, service control layer equipment or access convergence layer equipment.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the capacity expansion check condition comprises:
the method comprises the following steps that 1, the configuration number of ports with the m-th granularity of metropolitan area network equipment k is larger than or equal to the use number of the ports with the m-th granularity of the metropolitan area network equipment k; the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity of the metropolitan area network equipment k is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment k; wherein K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metro network devices, M is 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that 2, the existing flow from an ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to a jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the existing flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment; the existing flow from the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the existing flow from all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment, and the existing flow from the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the existing flow from all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment; wherein i ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ≠ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) a condition 3 is that the predicted flow from an ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to a jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the predicted flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment; the predicted flow from the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the predicted flows from all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment, and the predicted flow from the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the predicted flows from all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment; wherein i ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ≠ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j;
the method comprises the following steps that a condition 4 is met, the number of usage of ports with m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the number of usage of ports with m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment; the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity from all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment, and the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity from all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment; where i ≠ j, M ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ═ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j, M ═ 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) the number of target ports with m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the number of target ports with m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment; the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment, and the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment; where i ≠ j, M ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ═ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j, M ═ 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
condition 6, target bandwidths of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to a metropolitan area network device k are respectively greater than or equal to a first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and less than or equal to a second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction, and the first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and the second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction are determined according to predicted traffic of the transmission direction; wherein K is 1,2, …, and K is the total number of metropolitan area network devices;
the method includes the steps that a condition 7 is that the number of ports to be expanded with m-th granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to metropolitan area network equipment k of the metropolitan area network equipment k is equal to the number of ports to be expanded with m-th granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment k; the number of ports to be expanded in the expected m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is determined according to the number of target ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, the number of offline ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, and the number of obsolete ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k; wherein K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metro network devices, M is 1,2, and M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) condition 8, information of a board card to be expanded of a metropolitan area network device k is consistent with information of an expected board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k, the information of the expected board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k is determined according to information of a port to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k, platform capacity of the metropolitan area network device k and a residual slot position of the metropolitan area network device, the residual slot position is the difference between the number of the slot positions of the metropolitan area network device k and the number of the used slot positions of the metropolitan area network device k, and the information of the port to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k comprises the number of the ports to be expanded of different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k; where K is 1,2, …, and K is the total number of metro network devices.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the number of ports expected to be expanded with m-th granularity of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k satisfies:
Figure FDA0002392834470000031
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0002392834470000032
the number of the expected ports to be expanded with the port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is represented,
Figure FDA0002392834470000037
the number of target ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure FDA0002392834470000034
the number of ports with port granularity x corresponding to the metro network device k in the transmission direction y is represented,
Figure FDA0002392834470000035
the number of offline ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure FDA0002392834470000036
the number of the obsolete ports with the port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is represented.
5. An expansion rationality determining apparatus, comprising: the device comprises an acquisition module and a determination module;
the acquisition module is used for acquiring state information of a plurality of metropolitan area network devices and capacity expansion information corresponding to a candidate capacity expansion strategy, wherein the capacity expansion information corresponding to the candidate capacity expansion strategy comprises the capacity expansion information of each of the plurality of metropolitan area network devices;
the state information of one metropolitan area network device comprises port configuration conditions of the metropolitan area network device, port use conditions of the metropolitan area network device, existing flow from the metropolitan area network device to other metropolitan area network devices, the number of offline ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of worn ports with different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, platform capacity of the metropolitan area network device, the number of slot positions of the metropolitan area network device and the number of used slot positions of the metropolitan area network device; the port configuration condition of the metropolitan area network equipment comprises the configuration number of ports with different granularities of the metropolitan area network equipment, and the port use condition of the metropolitan area network equipment comprises the use number of the ports with different granularities of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment;
the capacity expansion information of a metropolitan area network device comprises predicted flow of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, target bandwidth of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of target ports of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, the number of ports to be expanded of different granularities of the plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device, and board card information to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device;
the determining module is configured to determine that the candidate expansion policy is reasonable based on the status information of the multiple metro network devices and the expansion information corresponding to the candidate expansion policy under the condition that an expansion verification condition is satisfied.
6. The apparatus of claim 5,
the metropolitan area network devices include at least two of the following: core convergence layer equipment, service control layer equipment or access convergence layer equipment.
7. The apparatus of claim 5 or 6, wherein the capacity expansion checking condition comprises:
the method comprises the following steps that 1, the configuration number of ports with the m-th granularity of metropolitan area network equipment k is larger than or equal to the use number of the ports with the m-th granularity of the metropolitan area network equipment k; the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity of the metropolitan area network equipment k is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment k; wherein K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metro network devices, M is 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that 2, the existing flow from an ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to a jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the existing flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment; the existing flow from the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the existing flow from all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment, and the existing flow from the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the existing flow from all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment; wherein i ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ≠ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) a condition 3 is that the predicted flow from an ith class of metropolitan area network equipment to a jth class of metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the predicted flow from the jth class of metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class of metropolitan area network equipment; the predicted flow from the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to the jth class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the predicted flows from all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment to all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment, and the predicted flow from the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to the ith class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the predicted flows from all the jth class metropolitan area network equipment to all the ith class metropolitan area network equipment; wherein i ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ≠ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j;
the method comprises the following steps that a condition 4 is met, the number of usage of ports with m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the number of usage of ports with m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment; the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity from all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment, and the using number of the ports with the m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the using numbers of the ports with the m-th granularity from all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment; where i ≠ j, M ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ═ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j, M ═ 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) the number of target ports with m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is equal to the number of target ports with m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment of the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment; the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment, and the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment is the sum of the number of the target ports with the m-th granularity from all the j-th class metropolitan area network equipment to all the i-th class metropolitan area network equipment; where i ≠ j, M ≠ 1,2, …, N, j ═ 1,2, …, N, and i ≠ j, M ═ 1,2, …, M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
condition 6, target bandwidths of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to a metropolitan area network device k are respectively greater than or equal to a first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and less than or equal to a second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction, and the first threshold corresponding to the transmission direction and the second threshold corresponding to the transmission direction are determined according to predicted traffic of the transmission direction; wherein K is 1,2, …, and K is the total number of metropolitan area network devices;
the method includes the steps that a condition 7 is that the number of ports to be expanded with m-th granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to metropolitan area network equipment k of the metropolitan area network equipment k is equal to the number of ports to be expanded with m-th granularity in multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network equipment k; the number of ports to be expanded in the expected m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is determined according to the number of target ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, the number of offline ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k, and the number of obsolete ports in the m-th granularity of the multiple transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k; wherein K is 1,2, …, K is the total number of the metro network devices, M is 1,2, and M is the number of port granularities of the metro network devices;
the method comprises the following steps that (1) condition 8, information of a board card to be expanded of a metropolitan area network device k is consistent with information of an expected board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k, the information of the expected board card to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k is determined according to information of a port to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k, platform capacity of the metropolitan area network device k and a residual slot position of the metropolitan area network device, the residual slot position is the difference between the number of the slot positions of the metropolitan area network device k and the number of the used slot positions of the metropolitan area network device k, and the information of the port to be expanded of the metropolitan area network device k comprises the number of the ports to be expanded of different granularities in a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k; where K is 1,2, …, and K is the total number of metro network devices.
8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the number of ports expected to be expanded with m-th granularity of a plurality of transmission directions corresponding to the metro network device k satisfies:
Figure FDA0002392834470000061
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0002392834470000062
expected to-be-expanded port granularity x representing transmission direction y corresponding to metropolitan area network equipment kThe number of the receiving ports is such that,
Figure FDA0002392834470000063
the number of target ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure FDA0002392834470000064
the number of ports with port granularity x corresponding to the metro network device k in the transmission direction y is represented,
Figure FDA0002392834470000065
the number of offline ports with port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metro network device k is represented,
Figure FDA0002392834470000066
the number of the obsolete ports with the port granularity x in the transmission direction y corresponding to the metropolitan area network device k is represented.
9. A determination device of expansion rationality, characterized by comprising: a processor, a memory, a bus, and a communication interface; the memory is configured to store computer instructions, and when the determination device of the flash rationality is operated, the processor executes the computer instructions stored in the memory, so that the determination device of the flash rationality performs the method of determining the flash rationality according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
10. A computer-readable storage medium having stored therein instructions that, when executed on a determination device of expansion rationality, cause the determination device of expansion rationality to execute the determination method of expansion rationality according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
CN202010120543.2A 2020-02-26 2020-02-26 Method and device for determining expansion rationality Active CN111371600B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010120543.2A CN111371600B (en) 2020-02-26 2020-02-26 Method and device for determining expansion rationality

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010120543.2A CN111371600B (en) 2020-02-26 2020-02-26 Method and device for determining expansion rationality

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111371600A true CN111371600A (en) 2020-07-03
CN111371600B CN111371600B (en) 2022-06-07

Family

ID=71211187

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010120543.2A Active CN111371600B (en) 2020-02-26 2020-02-26 Method and device for determining expansion rationality

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111371600B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113114516A (en) * 2021-05-20 2021-07-13 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Router management method and device

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110208844A1 (en) * 2008-10-29 2011-08-25 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Cluster system, method and device for expanding cluster system
CN110166280A (en) * 2019-04-10 2019-08-23 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 A kind of network expansion method and device

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110208844A1 (en) * 2008-10-29 2011-08-25 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Cluster system, method and device for expanding cluster system
CN110166280A (en) * 2019-04-10 2019-08-23 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 A kind of network expansion method and device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113114516A (en) * 2021-05-20 2021-07-13 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Router management method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111371600B (en) 2022-06-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN114040467B (en) Transmission path determining method, device, server and storage medium
CN111866162B (en) Service distribution method and device
EP3504849B1 (en) Queue protection using a shared global memory reserve
CN114650254B (en) Method, device and computer readable storage medium for determining service path
US9069663B2 (en) Allocating memory based on performance ranking
CN110166280B (en) Network capacity expansion method and device
CN111371600B (en) Method and device for determining expansion rationality
CN108683528B (en) Data transmission method, central server, server and data transmission system
CN110177010B (en) Link switching method and device
CN108574631B (en) Route distribution method and device
CN105119993A (en) Virtual machine deployment method and apparatus
CN114385370B (en) Memory allocation method, system, device and medium
CN107124398B (en) Method, device and system for authenticating terminal equipment
CN109963316B (en) Multipath routing method and equipment for mobile satellite network
CN108270672A (en) A kind of method and device for calculating circuit routing
CN113472591B (en) Method and device for determining service performance
CN109769020B (en) CDN cluster acceleration service resource management method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN110139166B (en) Video data transmission method, device and system and electronic equipment
CN111131095B (en) Message forwarding method and device
CN113890847A (en) Flow forwarding method and device
CN114826950B (en) Port number prediction method, device and storage medium
CN113094199A (en) Service switching strategy management method, device and equipment in disaster area
CN113132500B (en) Address allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium
KR20110064685A (en) Method for calculating correction factor in ip networks in preparation for traffic variation and network element failure, and method of link capacity planning using that
CN111865808B (en) Data flow control method and device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant