CN110956280A - Civil aircraft maintenance program verification method - Google Patents
Civil aircraft maintenance program verification method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110956280A CN110956280A CN201911028986.2A CN201911028986A CN110956280A CN 110956280 A CN110956280 A CN 110956280A CN 201911028986 A CN201911028986 A CN 201911028986A CN 110956280 A CN110956280 A CN 110956280A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- verification
- maintenance program
- program
- maintenance
- content
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for verifying a civil aircraft maintenance program, which comprises the following steps: determining verification contents and requirements of the civil aircraft maintenance program from the use requirements of the maintenance program, the airworthiness safety requirements, the type of the maintenance program, the verification environment, the verification implementation conditions and the verification use time; setting evaluation indexes for evaluating the applicability of the civil aircraft maintenance program from the maintenance program verification contents of each dimension, and definitely verifying a profile element set; and verifying and checking the applicability of the civil aircraft maintenance program by using methods such as an onboard ground operation verification test, a ground sliding verification test, an air test flight verification test, a simulator verification test and the like according to the evaluation index and the verification profile element set. The embodiment of the invention is simple and accurate, and has the technical effects of remarkably improving the verification normalization of the civil aircraft maintenance program and ensuring the scientific validity of the verification result.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of aircraft general quality characteristic evaluation verification, in particular to a method and a device for verifying a civil aircraft maintenance program.
Background
In recent years, with the rapid development of global economy, the market of civil aviation is continuously expanding, and in the market of civil aviation with intense competition, aviation companies have high requirements on the safety, economy, comfort and environmental protection of airplane use. The maintenance program is an important file for the operation and continuous airworthiness of the civil aircraft, is used for guiding an operator to correctly operate and maintain the aircraft, directly influences the signing efficiency, the flight safety and the competitiveness of the future market of the aircraft, and is important embodiment of the soft strength of the civil aircraft.
In order to ensure the integrity, accuracy, operability, scientificity, economy and safety of the maintenance procedures of the delivery civil airlines, it is necessary to carry out the use verification of the maintenance procedures in the flight test phase of the civil aircrafts. However, a complete set of effective method means for verifying whether the maintenance procedure meets the relevant use requirements is lacking at present.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is as follows: the embodiment of the invention provides a method for verifying a civil aircraft maintenance program, which aims to solve the technical problems that a civil aircraft flight test maintenance program lacks relevant verification specifications, the maintenance program verification work is difficult to develop, and the verification depth, the verification breadth and the verification precision are low.
A method of civil aircraft maintenance procedure verification, comprising the steps of:
determining the verification content of the maintenance program according to the use requirement of the maintenance program and the airworthiness safety requirement;
determining a maintenance program verification requirement from the maintenance program verification content, the maintenance program type, the verification environment, the verification implementation condition and the latitude of the verification use time;
setting an evaluation index for evaluating the applicability of the maintenance program according to the verification content and requirements of the maintenance program, and definitely verifying the profile element set;
verifying the applicability of the maintenance program by respectively utilizing four verification scenes of an onboard ground operation test, a ground sliding test, an air test flight test and a simulator test according to the evaluation index for evaluating the applicability of the maintenance program;
and providing a verification profile element set according to the verification content and the verification method of the maintenance program to form a maintenance program verification scheme.
Preferably, determining the service procedure verification content and requirements comprises:
determining the verification content of the maintenance program according to the use requirement and the airworthiness safety requirement of the maintenance program;
and determining the verification requirement of the maintenance program according to the verification content of the maintenance program, the type of the maintenance program, the verification environment, the verification implementation condition and the verification use time.
Preferably, the service program verification contents include: including the integrity, accuracy, operability, scientificity, economy and safety of the maintenance procedures.
Preferably, the service procedure verification requirements include: multiple latitude requirements and multiple maintenance procedure types. Wherein:
the plurality of dimensions include one or more of the following dimensions: the maintenance procedure verifies environment, verification times, verification timing, and maintenance procedure integrity, accuracy, operability, comprehensibility, economy, and safety.
The requirements of the various types of service procedures include one or more of the following: disassembly and assembly, operation testing, leakage detection, built-in self-detection, service and the like.
Preferably, the method further comprises the following steps: determining a verification profile element set according to the type of the maintenance program, the verification environment and the verification time;
and verifying the applicability of the maintenance program according to the verification profile element set.
Further comprising: according to the verification scene, decomposing the verification task into a plurality of task segments;
when the task segment can evaluate the service program verification content, the service program verification content is evaluated according to the task segment.
Preferably, when the task segment cannot evaluate the service program verification content, a special verification means is implemented to evaluate the service program verification content.
The invention has the advantages that:
the invention has the beneficial effects that: aiming at the problem that the civil aircraft maintenance program verification depth, breadth and precision are insufficient and are suitable for engineering application, the maintenance program verification content is determined according to the civil aircraft maintenance program use requirement and airworthiness safety requirement, the maintenance program verification content and requirement are determined in a full-flow multi-dimension mode based on combined verification and special verification according to the maintenance verification content, the maintenance program type, the verification environment, the verification implementation condition and the verification use time, and the verification breadth is ensured; based on verification contents and requirements of the maintenance programs of all dimensions, maintenance program verification indexes are respectively set, factors such as the types of the maintenance programs, verification environments, verification times, verification opportunities and the like in the maintenance programs are fully considered, a verification profile element set is determined, and the verification depth is ensured; the method comprises the steps that verification scenes are set through verification means such as an on-board ground operation test, a ground sliding test, an air test flight test and a simulator test, verification schemes are formed according to requirements from verification preparation, verification requirements, verification risk assessment, verification implementation, verification information acquisition, verification summary and the like, civil aircraft flight test verification is carried out, and a civil aircraft flight test verification device is developed to ensure verification accuracy; meanwhile, the method and the device provided by the invention can be widely applied to the evaluation and verification of maintenance procedures of other airplanes, and have wide application range.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments of the present invention will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings based on these drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a civil aircraft maintenance program verification method according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a civil aircraft maintenance procedure verification index framework according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a civil aircraft service procedure verification scheme in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Detailed Description
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a civil aircraft maintenance program verification method according to an embodiment of the invention.
As shown in fig. 1, the method includes the following steps.
S101: multiple dimension determination of repair procedure verification content and requirements
According to the civil aircraft maintenance program using requirements and airworthiness safety requirements, determining verification contents of the civil aircraft maintenance program, which relate to six parts of integrity, accuracy, operability, comprehensibility, economy and safety, wherein the integrity mainly comprises the integrity of the maintenance program, and the elements of the maintenance program such as outline, work preparation, main program, ending work and the like are related, wherein the work preparation relates to areas, covers, special requirements, tools/equipment, consumables, spare parts and safety information; the accuracy mainly comprises the error rate of the maintenance program; the operability mainly comprises the number of execution interruption times under the maintenance profile and the difficulty degree of maintenance implementation; intelligibility mainly includes the time taken for program understanding; economics primarily include maintenance time; security mainly includes the number of identified security risks or occurrences of insecurity events and the risk assessment level.
Determining the multi-dimensional and multi-type requirements of the maintenance program applicability verification according to the use requirements of the maintenance program, the airworthiness safety requirements, the maintenance verification contents, the maintenance program type, the verification environment, the verification implementation conditions and the verification use opportunity, wherein the multiple dimensions comprise one or more of the following dimensions: the maintenance program verifies the environment, the verification times, the verification time and the integrity, the accuracy, the operability, the comprehensibility, the economy and the safety of the maintenance program; the multi-type requirements include one or more of the following types: disassembly and assembly, operation test, leakage detection, built-in self-detection and service.
Meanwhile, the verification content and requirements of the maintenance program are perfected in multiple dimensions based on dynamic maintenance program verification by combining the whole process of preventive maintenance and repairability maintenance of the civil aircraft.
S102: setting an evaluation index of maintainability applicability;
and determining a maintenance program evaluation index system based on the verification content and requirements of the applicability of each dimension maintenance program, and covering specific index factor sets such as integrity, accuracy, operability, comprehensibility, economy, safety and the like.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a civil aircraft maintenance procedure verification index framework according to an embodiment of the invention. As shown in fig. 2, the verification indexes of the civil aircraft maintenance program consist of a second-level system, the first-level indexes include 6 types of integrity, accuracy, operability, comprehensibility, economy and safety of the civil aircraft maintenance program, and 8 types of second-level indexes, and in addition, detailed verification requirements and indexes are formulated according to specific steps of each maintenance program, so that the verification breadth and comprehensiveness are ensured.
Based on the determined evaluation index system, factors such as the content of a specific maintenance program of the maintenance program, a verification environment, a use stage and the like are fully considered and fused, a profile element set is clearly verified, a test task book is formulated, and a test point and a corresponding conformity criterion are clearly determined.
S103: a maintenance program verification scheme is formulated from the aspects of verification preparation, verification requirements, verification information acquisition and the like;
starting from preventive maintenance tasks and repairability maintenance tasks, the maintenance tasks are decomposed into a plurality of task segments according to needs, and civil aircraft maintenance program verification is carried out. And when the maintenance task progress does not meet the verification requirement, carrying out special verification on the civil aircraft maintenance program.
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a civil aircraft maintenance program verification scheme according to an embodiment of the invention.
As shown in fig. 3, the verification scheme for the civil aircraft maintenance procedure includes verification preparation, verification requirements, verification risk assessment, verification implementation, verification information acquisition, verification summary and other element combinations, and specifies verification contents of different types and dimensions, verification test points and verification sections of requirements, and ensures verification depth and validity.
Claims (9)
1. A method for verification of civil aircraft maintenance procedures, characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
determining the verification content and requirement of the maintenance program from the use requirement of the maintenance program, the airworthiness safety requirement, the type of the maintenance program, the verification environment, the verification times and the latitude of the verification time;
setting an evaluation index for the applicability of the maintenance program according to the verification content and requirements of the maintenance program, and definitely verifying the profile element set;
verifying the applicability of the maintenance program by respectively utilizing four verification scenes of an onboard ground operation test, a ground sliding test, an air test flight test and a simulator test according to the evaluation index for evaluating the applicability of the maintenance program;
and providing a verification profile element set according to the verification content and the verification method of the maintenance program to form a maintenance program verification scheme.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining service procedure verification content and requirements comprises: determining the verification content of the maintenance program according to the use requirement and the airworthiness safety requirement of the maintenance program; and determining the verification requirement of the maintenance program according to the verification content of the maintenance program, the type of the maintenance program, the verification environment, the verification implementation condition and the verification use time.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the service program verification content comprises: integrity, accuracy, operability, comprehensibility, economy, and safety.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the service procedure verification requirement comprises: multiple dimensions and multiple repair procedure types.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the plurality of dimensions include one or more of: the maintenance program verifies the environment, the verification times, the verification time and the integrity, the accuracy, the operability, the comprehensibility, the economy and the safety of the maintenance program; the requirements of the various types of service procedures include one or more of the following: disassembly and assembly, operation test, leakage detection, built-in self-detection and service.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the verification profile element set is determined according to a maintenance program type, a verification environment, a verification number, and a verification timing; and verifying the applicability of the maintenance program according to the verification profile element set.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the validation task is decomposed into a plurality of task segments according to a validation scenario.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the service program validation content is evaluated based on the task segment when the task segment can evaluate the service program validation content.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein when the task segment fails to evaluate the service program validation content, a special validation means is implemented to evaluate the service program validation content.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911028986.2A CN110956280A (en) | 2019-10-25 | 2019-10-25 | Civil aircraft maintenance program verification method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911028986.2A CN110956280A (en) | 2019-10-25 | 2019-10-25 | Civil aircraft maintenance program verification method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110956280A true CN110956280A (en) | 2020-04-03 |
Family
ID=69975801
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911028986.2A Pending CN110956280A (en) | 2019-10-25 | 2019-10-25 | Civil aircraft maintenance program verification method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110956280A (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107766610A (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2018-03-06 | 中国飞行试验研究院 | A kind of civil aircraft seaworthiness authorizes reliability monitoring method of taking a flight test |
| WO2019026137A1 (en) * | 2017-07-31 | 2019-02-07 | 日本電気株式会社 | Program verification system, method, and program |
| CN110032200A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-19 | 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 | A kind of modeling method for Capability Maturity Model of taking a flight test |
-
2019
- 2019-10-25 CN CN201911028986.2A patent/CN110956280A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019026137A1 (en) * | 2017-07-31 | 2019-02-07 | 日本電気株式会社 | Program verification system, method, and program |
| CN107766610A (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2018-03-06 | 中国飞行试验研究院 | A kind of civil aircraft seaworthiness authorizes reliability monitoring method of taking a flight test |
| CN110032200A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-19 | 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 | A kind of modeling method for Capability Maturity Model of taking a flight test |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 张晓刚: ""民机维修手册试飞阶段验证方法"" * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN112380625A (en) | aMBSE method suitable for design of aircraft airborne system architecture | |
| CN107944701B (en) | Method and device for detecting runway rushing-out risk in aircraft landing process | |
| CN105501464A (en) | Method for testing performance of aviation airborne radio communication and navigation system during test flight | |
| CN110956280A (en) | Civil aircraft maintenance program verification method | |
| CN110991793A (en) | Aviation security equipment identification resource allocation method | |
| CN110942227A (en) | Verification method and device for ground support equipment of civil aircraft | |
| Viitanen et al. | A review of aeronautical fatigue investigations in finland april 2019-april 2021 | |
| Li et al. | Prognostics and health management techniques for integrated avionics systems | |
| CN105628333A (en) | Method for determining pneumatic error on the condition of high altitude and high Mach number | |
| Cramer et al. | Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA) performance system comparative evaluation | |
| Dvorska et al. | GBAS CAT II/III operational validation input for business aircraft–flight tests and simulations | |
| Zhou et al. | Exploring the modeling method of flight test maturity model | |
| CN111241486B (en) | Quality assessment method and system for navigation data production | |
| Liu | A Preliminary Study on Intelligent Technology for Zonal Safety Analysis of Civil Aircraft | |
| KR102375013B1 (en) | Method for optimizing the electircal load analysis for modifying the avionics equipment on the aged aircraft | |
| CN110969336A (en) | Design method and device for human factor verification scene of civil aircraft maintenance program | |
| Akdeniz | The impact of mandated aging airplane programs on jet transport airplane scheduled structural inspection programs | |
| Rules | Final Documents/Your Two Cents—January 2018 | |
| CN115358051A (en) | Method for verifying candidate items of recommendation of main minimum equipment list of aviation product | |
| Álvarez Vázquez | Development of an Aeronautical Certification Process Focused on Avionics Equipment | |
| Felux et al. | Flight Technical Error Evaluations for GBAS Navigation Requirement Definition | |
| Галайко et al. | CERTIFICATION OF AVIATION PRODUCTS AND EQUIPMENT | |
| Wang et al. | Research on MTTR Allocation of Commercial Aircraft | |
| Novotný et al. | Czech Armed Forces and Some Aspects of Helicopters Acquisition | |
| Bhagat et al. | Current and future inspection and maintenance challenges |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |