CN110851369A - Policy data processing method and device - Google Patents
Policy data processing method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110851369A CN110851369A CN201911134623.7A CN201911134623A CN110851369A CN 110851369 A CN110851369 A CN 110851369A CN 201911134623 A CN201911134623 A CN 201911134623A CN 110851369 A CN110851369 A CN 110851369A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- security
- determining
- error
- test
- execution
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
The embodiment of the invention provides a policy data processing method and a device, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error policy; determining a transaction execution sequence according to at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security; determining an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security; determining a test case set according to the error security; and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case. The method and the device are used for quickly determining error security and saving time for determining error security.
Description
Technical Field
The embodiment of the invention relates to the field of insurance testing, in particular to a policy data processing method and device.
Background
The production problem reproduction refers to a process for reproducing the problem by a tester when some unexpected problems occur when a user uses the application product after the insurance application product is developed, tested and marketed in sequence.
At present, the method for reproducing the production problem comprises the following steps: after the problem policy is determined, the execution identification corresponding to each security item on the problem policy is obtained, the tester tests the execution identification corresponding to each security item to obtain the test result corresponding to each security item, the reason of the problem generated by the problem policy is analyzed according to the test result, the test case set is rewritten according to the reason, then the test step is determined, and the test case set is executed according to the test step. In the process, problems caused by problem policy analysis are solved, the test case set is rewritten according to the reasons, the test steps are determined, and the test case set is executed according to the test steps, which are all completed by test personnel, so that the test efficiency is low.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention provides a policy data processing method and device, which are used for rapidly determining error security and saving the time for determining the error security. The delivery speed is improved, the work rate of a test team is further improved, and the test rework work is reduced.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a policy data processing method and apparatus, including:
acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error policy;
determining a transaction execution sequence according to at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security;
determining an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security;
determining a test case set according to the error security;
and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case.
In one possible embodiment, determining an error security based on the transaction execution order and the at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security comprises:
obtaining test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier;
executing the test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier according to the transaction execution sequence to obtain a test result;
and determining error security according to the test result.
In another possible embodiment, determining a set of test cases based on the error preservation includes:
acquiring related information of error protection, wherein the related information comprises at least one of risk types, sales channels, types and applicant information of the error protection;
determining a set of related information as a set of test conditions;
determining a related security set according to the transaction execution sequence, the error security and the error security execution identification;
and determining the test condition set and the related preservation set as a test case set.
In another possible embodiment, determining the associated security set based on the transaction execution order, the error protection, and the error protection performance indicator comprises:
determining at least one first secured set according to the transaction execution order and the error-secured execution identifier;
determining a second set of safeguards based on the error safeguards, the second set of safeguards including the error safeguards and associated types of safeguards of the error safeguards;
at least one first secured set and the set of the second secured sets are determined as related secured sets.
In another possible embodiment, determining at least one first security set based on the transaction execution order and the error-protected execution identifier includes:
determining at least one relevant execution identifier in a transaction execution sequence according to the error-protected execution identifier and a preset identifier threshold;
determining at least one associated security based on the at least one associated performance identifier;
at least one first set of protections is determined based on at least one associated security, wherein a first set of protections includes an associated security and an associated type of security for the associated security.
In another possible embodiment, the testing of the at least one test case comprises:
receiving a type test instruction, wherein the type test instruction carries a test type, and the test type is a cross coverage test or a complete coverage test;
and testing at least one test case according to the type test instruction.
In another possible embodiment, determining the transaction execution sequence according to the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security includes:
acquiring a submission time corresponding to at least one security;
and sequencing execution identifications corresponding to the at least one security according to the submission time corresponding to the at least one security to obtain a transaction execution sequence.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a policy data processing apparatus, including: an acquisition module, a determination module, and a test module, wherein,
the acquisition module is used for acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error insurance policy;
the determining module is used for determining a transaction execution sequence according to the execution identifier corresponding to at least one security;
the determining module is further used for determining error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security;
the determining module is also used for determining a test case set according to the error security;
the determining module is further used for determining at least one test case according to the test case set;
the test module is used for testing at least one test case.
In a possible implementation, the determining module is specifically configured to:
obtaining test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier;
executing the test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier according to the transaction execution sequence to obtain a test result;
and determining error security according to the test result.
In another possible implementation, the determining module is specifically configured to:
acquiring related information of error protection, wherein the related information comprises at least one of risk types, sales channels, types and applicant information of the error protection;
determining a set of related information as a set of test conditions;
determining a related security set according to the transaction execution sequence, the error security and the error security execution identification;
and determining the test condition set and the related preservation set as a test case set.
In another possible implementation, the determining module is specifically configured to:
determining at least one first secured set according to the transaction execution order and the error-secured execution identifier;
determining a second set of safeguards based on the error safeguards, the second set of safeguards including the error safeguards and associated types of safeguards of the error safeguards;
at least one first secured set and the set of the second secured sets are determined as related secured sets.
In another possible implementation, the determining module is specifically configured to:
determining at least one relevant execution identifier in a transaction execution sequence according to the error-protected execution identifier and a preset identifier threshold;
determining at least one associated security based on the at least one associated performance identifier;
at least one first set of protections is determined based on at least one associated security, wherein a first set of protections includes an associated security and an associated type of security for the associated security.
In another possible embodiment, the test module is specifically configured to:
receiving a type test instruction, wherein the type test instruction carries a test type, and the test type is a cross coverage test or a complete coverage test;
and testing at least one test case according to the type test instruction.
In another possible embodiment, the determining module is further configured to:
acquiring a submission time corresponding to at least one security;
and sequencing execution identifications corresponding to the at least one security according to the submission time corresponding to the at least one security to obtain a transaction execution sequence.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a policy data processing apparatus, including: a processor and a memory;
the memory is used for storing computer execution instructions;
the processor is configured to execute the computer executable instructions stored by the memory to cause the processor to perform the method of any one of the above first aspects.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, in which computer-executable instructions are stored, and when the processor executes the computer-executable instructions, the method according to any one of the above first aspects is implemented.
The embodiment of the invention provides a policy data processing method and a device, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error policy; determining a transaction execution sequence according to at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security; determining an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security; determining a test case set according to the error security; and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case. In the method, the error security is determined according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to at least one security, the error security can be determined quickly, and the time for determining the error security is saved. Further, determining a test case set according to the error security; and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case, so that the delivery speed can be increased, the work rate of a test team can be increased, and the test rework work can be reduced.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to these drawings without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 is a first schematic flow chart of a policy data processing method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a second flowchart illustrating a policy data processing method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a transaction record of a fault policy provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is an interface diagram of a system error prompt provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an insurance policy data processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of a hardware structure of a policy data processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, but not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Fig. 1 is a first flowchart illustrating a policy data processing method according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 1, the policy data processing method includes:
s101: and acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error insurance policy.
Optionally, the execution subject of the embodiment of the present invention is a terminal device, and may also be a policy data processing device disposed in the terminal device, where the policy data processing device may be implemented by a combination of software and/or hardware.
Specifically, a false policy is a policy that presents problems in the process of using an insurance product by a user after the insurance product is marketed.
Further, security is an after-market service work item that is developed by the insurance company around the items such as contract change, annuity, or installment of the installment in the policy.
For example, the at least one security may comprise: canceling additional insurance, returning the whole insurance policy, sending a notice, collecting premium, conducting unit transaction, and renewing benefit charge. Specifically, please refer to "description" in the error insurance policy shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3 is a transaction record of a fault policy provided by an embodiment of the present invention. The transaction record of the error insurance policy shown in fig. 3 includes at least one of a date of submission, a description, a code, etc. of the insurance.
It should be noted that at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security is obtained from the transaction record of the error insurance policy.
Specifically, the execution identifier may be a code composed of numbers and letters. For example, the execution identifier for canceling the additional risk is T514, and the execution identifier returned by the policy as a whole is T656.
S102: and determining a transaction execution sequence according to the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security.
Specifically, the execution identifiers corresponding to at least one security are sorted according to the submission time of at least one security in the transaction records of the error insurance policy, so as to obtain a transaction execution sequence.
For example, determining the transaction execution sequence (determined by the order of the submission times) based on at least one execution identifier (i.e., "code") corresponding to the security policy of the error shown in FIG. 3 may include: b521, BA73, B674, B633, B522, B521, BA73, B674, B633, B522, B521, T656, T514, etc.
S103: and determining an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identification corresponding to the at least one security.
It should be noted that each of the execution identifiers corresponds to one of the test operations. Wherein each test operation may be implemented by at least one operation.
For example: the test operations corresponding to B521, BA73, B674, B633 respectively can be realized by a journal (direct) menu item operation.
For example: b522 corresponds to a test operation by: two operations, payment and direct menu item.
For example: t656 corresponds to a test operation by: the policy service 1, the revocation of the security operation and the revocation of B521 are realized.
For example: t514 corresponds to a test operation by: the policy service 1 and the cancellation of the additional risk (termination processing) are realized.
Further, according to the transaction execution sequence, executing the test operation corresponding to the execution identifier in the transaction execution sequence to obtain error security. And the error security is the corresponding security when the terminal equipment terminates the execution of the test operation.
It should be noted that when the terminal device terminates the execution of the test operation, a system error prompt may be displayed, and details of error preservation may be displayed in the system error prompt. Specifically, please refer to a system error prompt shown in fig. 4. Fig. 4 is an interface diagram of a system error prompt provided in the embodiment of the present invention. In the system error prompt shown in fig. 4, the details of error preservation include: transaction code, date, etc.
S104: and determining a test case set according to the error security.
Specifically, the test condition set may be determined according to the related information of error preservation; determining a related security set according to the transaction execution sequence, the error security and the error security execution identification; and determining a test case set according to the test condition set and the related preservation set. Wherein the related information comprises at least one of risk category, sales channel, type of error protection, and applicant information.
For example, when the error security is the change of the electricity payment method, the test case set can be as shown in table 1 below.
TABLE 1
Where the relevant savesets in Table 1 include a first saveset and a second saveset. The first savvy set includes 3 savvy: and (4) canceling the additional risk, adding the additional risk and failing the additional risk. The second preservation set includes 3 preserves: change of payment frequency, change of payment mode and change of payment day. Further, please refer to S206 to S208 in the embodiment of fig. 2 for a detailed description of the first security set and the second security set.
S105: and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case.
Specifically, a test precondition is determined in the test condition set, a security is determined in each security set of the relevant security set, and a test case is obtained according to the test precondition and the determined security in each security set.
For example, the test preconditions are: the dangerous type-B30, payment mode-cash, payment frequency-year. The one or more policies determined in the first set of policies are: the additional risk is cancelled. The security determined in the second security set is: and changing the payment mode. And determining the dangerous type-B30, payment mode-cash, payment frequency-year, additional insurance cancellation and payment mode change as a test case.
It should be noted that, the test cases may be, for example: under the precondition of the advanced test of the dangerous type-B30, payment mode-cash, payment frequency-year, the additional danger is cancelled by the test, and then the payment mode change is tested.
The policy data processing method provided by the embodiment of the invention comprises the following steps: acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error policy; determining a transaction execution sequence according to at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security; determining an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security; determining a test case set according to the error security; and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case. In the method, the error security is determined according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to at least one security, the error security can be determined quickly, and the time for determining the error security is saved. Further, determining a test case set according to the error security; and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case, so that the delivery speed can be increased, the work rate of a test team can be increased, and the test rework work can be reduced.
The technical means shown in the present application will be described in detail below with reference to specific examples. It should be noted that the following embodiments may be combined with each other, and the description of the same or similar contents in different embodiments is not repeated.
Fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of a policy data processing method according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 2, the policy data processing method includes:
s201: and acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error insurance policy.
Specifically, the execution method of S101 is the same as the execution method of S201, and the execution process of S201 is not described herein again.
S202: and acquiring the submission time corresponding to at least one security, and sequencing the execution identifications corresponding to the at least one security according to the submission time corresponding to the at least one security to obtain a transaction execution sequence.
Specifically, the transaction record of the error insurance policy is obtained, and because the submission time corresponding to at least one kind of security is recorded in the transaction record, the submission time corresponding to at least one kind of security can be obtained from the transaction record.
Further, the execution identifiers corresponding to the at least one security may be sorted according to the sequence of the submission times corresponding to the at least one security, so as to obtain a transaction execution sequence. Wherein, the transaction execution sequence comprises at least one execution identifier corresponding to each security.
For example, the execution identifier corresponding to the security whose submission time is prior is arranged before the transaction execution sequence.
It should be noted that in the present application, the transaction record of the error insurance policy determines the error insurance, automatically determines and compiles the program of the test case according to the error insurance, and automatically completes the software test processes of completing the requirement management, the test management, the case compilation, and the like, thereby saving the review time, shortening the approval period, and improving the test efficiency.
S203: obtaining test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier; executing the test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier according to the transaction execution sequence to obtain a test result; and determining error security according to the test result.
Specifically, the test operation corresponding to each saved execution identifier may be obtained from a preset database.
Optionally, the test result may be a system error prompt displayed by the terminal device, or may be a test log of the terminal device.
For example, when the test result is a system error prompt displayed by the terminal device, the error security may be determined according to the transaction code recorded in the system error prompt.
S204: acquiring related information of error insurance, wherein the related information comprises at least one of risk species, sales channels, types and applicant information of the error insurance, and determining a set of the related information as a test condition set.
Optionally, when the error security is the change of the electric sales payment method, the related information may be a risk type (B30, a71, SSB), a payment method (cash, transfer), a payment frequency (year, season, month, day), and a payment channel (individual risk, electric sales, bank security). For example, the set of test conditions determined from the correlation information may be the set of test conditions in table 1.
S205: at least one relevant execution identifier is determined in the transaction execution sequence based on the error-protected execution identifier and a preset identifier threshold.
Alternatively, the preset identification threshold may be 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. Specifically, in the present application, a specific value of the preset identification threshold is not limited. In practical application, a tester can determine a specific value of the preset identification threshold according to actual test requirements.
For example, the transaction execution sequence includes: b521, BA73, B674, B633, B522, B521, BA73, B674, B633, B522, B521, T656, T514. If the preset flag threshold is 1, one correlation execution flag may be determined in the transaction execution sequence, that is, the correlation execution flag is T514, and if the preset flag threshold is 2, two correlation execution flags may be determined in the transaction execution sequence, that is, the correlation execution flags are divided into T656 and T514.
S206: at least one associated security is determined based on the at least one associated implementation identifier, and at least one first set of security is determined based on the at least one associated security, wherein a first set of security includes an associated security and an associated type of security for the associated security.
For example, if the associated execution identifier is T514, then the associated security may be determined to be the cancellation of the additional risk. For example, if the relevant executions are identified as T656, T514, then the relevant security can be determined to return, cancel additional risks for the policy as a whole.
Further, where the associated security is to cancel the additional risk, a first set of security (e.g., the first set of security in FIG. 1) may be determined. It should be noted that, in the first insurance set shown in table 1, the related type of insurance for canceling the additional insurance is to add the additional insurance and disable the additional insurance.
S207: based on the error protections, a second set of protections is determined, the second set of protections including the error protections and associated types of protections for the error protections.
For example, if the incorrect security is a change of payment method, the determined second security set is the second security set shown in fig. 1. In the second security set shown in table 1, the related types of security of the payment manner change are payment day change and payment frequency change.
S208: at least one first secured set and the set of the second secured sets are determined as related secured sets.
Alternatively, the relevant saveset may be the relevant saveset shown in Table 1.
S209: and determining the test condition set and the related preservation set as a test case set.
Alternatively, the set of test cases may be as shown in table 1.
S210: and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case.
Specifically, the execution method of S210 is the same as the execution method of S105, and the execution process of S210 is not described herein again.
In one possible embodiment, after determining the set of test cases based on the error preservation, the method further comprises:
receiving a type test instruction, wherein the type test instruction carries a test type, and the test type is a cross coverage test or a complete coverage test;
and executing each test case in the test case set according to the type test instruction.
The policy data processing method provided by the embodiment of the invention comprises the following steps: acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error policy; acquiring the submission time corresponding to at least one security, and sequencing execution identifiers corresponding to the at least one security according to the submission time corresponding to the at least one security to obtain a transaction execution sequence; obtaining test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier; executing the test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier according to the transaction execution sequence to obtain a test result; determining error security according to the test result; acquiring related information of error insurance, wherein the related information comprises at least one of risk species, sales channels, types and policyholder information of the error insurance, and determining a set of the related information as a test condition set; determining at least one relevant execution identifier in a transaction execution sequence according to the error-protected execution identifier and a preset identifier threshold; determining at least one associated security based on the at least one associated implementation identifier, determining at least one first set of security based on the at least one associated security, wherein a first set of security includes an associated security and an associated type of security for the associated security; determining a second set of safeguards based on the error safeguards, the second set of safeguards including the error safeguards and associated types of safeguards of the error safeguards; determining at least one first security set and the set of the second security sets as related security sets; determining a test case set by using the test condition set and the related preservation set; and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case. In the method, the test operation corresponding to the execution identification of each security is executed according to the transaction execution sequence to obtain the test result, so that the error security can be quickly determined, and the time for determining the error security is saved. Furthermore, the test condition set and the related preservation set are determined as a test case set, at least one test case is determined according to the test case set, and the test case is tested, so that the delivery speed can be increased, the work rate of a test team can be increased, and the test rework work can be reduced.
It should be noted that the automation function for determining at least one test case provided by the embodiment of the present invention can also be applied to case copying, which is convenient for later test maintenance, saves copying time, and improves copying efficiency.
Fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an insurance policy data processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 5, the policy data processing device 10 includes: an acquisition module 11, a determination module 12 and a testing module 13, wherein,
the obtaining module 11 is configured to obtain an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error policy;
the determining module 12 is configured to determine a transaction execution sequence according to at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security;
the determining module 12 is further configured to determine an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security;
the determining module 12 is further configured to determine a test case set according to the error preservation;
the determining module 12 is further configured to determine at least one test case according to the test case set;
the test module 13 is configured to test at least one test case.
The apparatus provided in this embodiment may be used to implement the technical solutions of the above method embodiments, and the implementation principles and technical effects are similar, which are not described herein again.
In a possible implementation, the determining module 12 is specifically configured to:
obtaining test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier;
executing the test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier according to the transaction execution sequence to obtain a test result;
and determining error security according to the test result.
In another possible implementation, the determining module 12 is specifically configured to:
acquiring related information of error protection, wherein the related information comprises at least one of risk types, sales channels, types and applicant information of the error protection;
determining a set of related information as a set of test conditions;
determining a related security set according to the transaction execution sequence, the error security and the error security execution identification;
and determining the test condition set and the related preservation set as a test case set.
In another possible implementation, the determining module 12 is specifically configured to:
determining at least one first secured set according to the transaction execution order and the error-secured execution identifier;
determining a second set of safeguards based on the error safeguards, the second set of safeguards including the error safeguards and associated types of safeguards of the error safeguards;
at least one first secured set and the set of the second secured sets are determined as related secured sets.
In another possible implementation, the determining module 12 is specifically configured to:
determining at least one relevant execution identifier in a transaction execution sequence according to the error-protected execution identifier and a preset identifier threshold;
determining at least one associated security based on the at least one associated performance identifier;
at least one first set of protections is determined based on at least one associated security, wherein a first set of protections includes an associated security and an associated type of security for the associated security.
In another possible embodiment, the test module 13 is specifically configured to:
receiving a type test instruction, wherein the type test instruction carries a test type, and the test type is a cross coverage test or a complete coverage test;
and testing at least one test case according to the type test instruction.
In another possible embodiment, the determining module 12 is further configured to:
acquiring a submission time corresponding to at least one security;
and sequencing execution identifications corresponding to the at least one security according to the submission time corresponding to the at least one security to obtain a transaction execution sequence.
The apparatus provided in this embodiment may be used to implement the technical solutions of the above method embodiments, and the implementation principles and technical effects are similar, which are not described herein again.
Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of a hardware structure of a policy data processing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 6, the policy data processing device 20 includes: a processor 21 and a memory 22, wherein,
the memory 22 is used for storing computer execution instructions;
Alternatively, the memory 22 may be separate or integrated with the processor 21.
When the memory 22 is provided separately, the policy data processing apparatus further includes a bus 23 for connecting the memory 22 and the processor 21.
An embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, where a computer executes instructions, and when a processor executes the computer to execute the instructions, a policy data processing apparatus in any of the above method embodiments is implemented.
In the embodiments provided in the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. For example, the above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of modules is only one logical division, and other divisions may be realized in practice, for example, a plurality of modules may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or modules, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
The integrated module implemented in the form of a software functional module may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. The software functional module is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to enable a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) or a processor to execute some steps of the methods according to the embodiments of the present application.
It should be understood that the Processor may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), etc. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like. The steps of a method disclosed in connection with the present invention may be embodied directly in a hardware processor, or in a combination of the hardware and software modules within the processor.
The memory may comprise a high-speed RAM memory, and may further comprise a non-volatile storage NVM, such as at least one disk memory, and may also be a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a read-only memory, a magnetic or optical disk, etc.
The bus may be an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, an Extended ISA (EISA) bus, or the like. The bus may be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc. For ease of illustration, the buses in the figures of the present application are not limited to only one bus or one type of bus.
The storage medium may be implemented by any type or combination of volatile or non-volatile memory devices, such as Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), read-only memory (ROM), magnetic memory, flash memory, magnetic or optical disks. A storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that: all or a portion of the steps of implementing the above-described method embodiments may be performed by hardware associated with program instructions. The program may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When executed, the program performs steps comprising the method embodiments described above; and the aforementioned storage medium includes: various media that can store program codes, such as ROM, RAM, magnetic or optical disks.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, and not to limit the same; while the invention has been described in detail and with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some or all of the technical features may be equivalently replaced; and the modifications or the substitutions do not make the essence of the corresponding technical solutions depart from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A policy data processing method, comprising:
acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error policy;
determining a transaction execution sequence according to the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security;
determining an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security;
determining a test case set according to the error security;
and determining at least one test case according to the test case set, and testing the at least one test case.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining an error security based on the execution order of the transactions and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security comprises:
obtaining test operation corresponding to each security execution identifier;
executing the test operation corresponding to the execution identifier of each security according to the transaction execution sequence to obtain a test result;
and determining the error security according to the test result.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a set of test cases based on the error protection comprises:
acquiring related information of the error protection, wherein the related information comprises at least one of risk category, sales channel, type and applicant information of the error protection;
determining the set of related information as a set of test conditions;
determining a related security set according to the transaction execution sequence, the error security and the error security execution identifier;
and determining the set of the test conditions and the set of the related security sets as the test case set.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein determining a set of associated policies based on the transaction execution order, the error protection, and the error protection performance indicator comprises:
determining at least one first secured set based on the transaction execution order and the error-secured execution identification;
determining a second set of safeguards in accordance with the error safeguard, the second set of safeguards including the error safeguard and an associated type of safeguard of the error safeguard;
determining the at least one first secured set and the set of second secured sets as the related secured set.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein determining at least one first security set based on the transaction execution order and the error-protected execution identification comprises:
determining at least one relevant execution identifier in the transaction execution sequence according to the execution identifier of the error protection and a preset identifier threshold;
determining at least one associated security based on the at least one associated execution identifier;
determining the at least one first security set based on the at least one associated security, wherein a first security set comprises an associated security and an associated type security of the associated security.
6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said testing said at least one test case comprises:
receiving a type test instruction, wherein the type test instruction carries the test type, and the test type is a cross coverage test or a complete coverage test;
and testing the at least one test case according to the type test instruction.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the transaction execution order based on the at least one execution identifier corresponding to the security comprises:
acquiring a submission time corresponding to the at least one security;
and sequencing execution identifications corresponding to the at least one security according to the submission time corresponding to the at least one security to obtain the transaction execution sequence.
8. A policy data processing apparatus, comprising: an acquisition module, a determination module, and a test module, wherein,
the acquisition module is used for acquiring an execution identifier corresponding to at least one security included in the error insurance policy;
the determining module is used for determining a transaction execution sequence according to the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security;
the determining module is further configured to determine an error security according to the transaction execution sequence and the execution identifier corresponding to the at least one security;
the determining module is further used for determining a test case set according to the error security;
the determining module is further used for determining at least one test case according to the test case set;
the test module is used for testing the at least one test case;
the testing module is used for testing the error insurance policy according to the testing case set.
9. A policy data processing apparatus, comprising: a processor and a memory;
the memory is used for storing computer execution instructions;
the processor is configured to execute the computer-executable instructions stored by the memory to cause the processor to execute the policy data processing apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon which, when executed by a processor, implement the policy data processing apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911134623.7A CN110851369A (en) | 2019-11-19 | 2019-11-19 | Policy data processing method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911134623.7A CN110851369A (en) | 2019-11-19 | 2019-11-19 | Policy data processing method and device |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110851369A true CN110851369A (en) | 2020-02-28 |
Family
ID=69602323
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911134623.7A Pending CN110851369A (en) | 2019-11-19 | 2019-11-19 | Policy data processing method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110851369A (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104794057A (en) * | 2015-04-29 | 2015-07-22 | 瑞斯康达科技发展股份有限公司 | Automatic testing method and device for crossed event |
| CN105930259A (en) * | 2015-12-23 | 2016-09-07 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for WEB regression testing |
| CN107391376A (en) * | 2017-07-26 | 2017-11-24 | 成都科来软件有限公司 | A kind of regression testing method |
| US20180025503A1 (en) * | 2016-07-25 | 2018-01-25 | Intuit Inc. | Visual regression testing tool |
| CN108664372A (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2018-10-16 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Monitoring device, method and the computer readable storage medium of test process |
| CN109344047A (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2019-02-15 | 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 | System regression testing method, computer readable storage medium and terminal device |
-
2019
- 2019-11-19 CN CN201911134623.7A patent/CN110851369A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104794057A (en) * | 2015-04-29 | 2015-07-22 | 瑞斯康达科技发展股份有限公司 | Automatic testing method and device for crossed event |
| CN105930259A (en) * | 2015-12-23 | 2016-09-07 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for WEB regression testing |
| US20180025503A1 (en) * | 2016-07-25 | 2018-01-25 | Intuit Inc. | Visual regression testing tool |
| CN107391376A (en) * | 2017-07-26 | 2017-11-24 | 成都科来软件有限公司 | A kind of regression testing method |
| CN108664372A (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2018-10-16 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Monitoring device, method and the computer readable storage medium of test process |
| CN109344047A (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2019-02-15 | 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 | System regression testing method, computer readable storage medium and terminal device |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN108596759A (en) | loan application information detecting method and server | |
| CN111144697A (en) | Data processing method, data processing device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN111931172A (en) | Financial system business process abnormity early warning method and device | |
| CN108230130B (en) | Method and device for verifying daily cutting data and electronic equipment | |
| CN113420057A (en) | Account checking data processing method and related device | |
| CN110781134A (en) | Data processing method and device, computer storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN113609011A (en) | Method, device, medium and equipment for testing insurance product factory | |
| CN117495544A (en) | Sandbox-based wind control evaluation method, sandbox-based wind control evaluation system, sandbox-based wind control evaluation terminal and storage medium | |
| CN110851369A (en) | Policy data processing method and device | |
| CN115600972A (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for verifying and selling of bad assets | |
| CN113220598B (en) | System test method, device, equipment, medium and program product | |
| CN114638503A (en) | Asset risk pressure testing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110674491B (en) | Method and device for real-time evidence obtaining of android application and electronic equipment | |
| CN114511314A (en) | Payment account management method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114581093A (en) | Virtual currency transaction monitoring method, device, storage medium and equipment | |
| CN113704123A (en) | Interface test method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113254352A (en) | Test method, device, equipment and storage medium for test case | |
| CN111625458A (en) | Service system testing method, device and equipment | |
| CN111737080A (en) | Abnormal transaction suspicion monitoring method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110956552A (en) | Insurance problem processing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110955464A (en) | Service processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111429132B (en) | Service processing method and device | |
| CN108765172B (en) | Problem positioning method, device, storage medium and apparatus | |
| CN110928788B (en) | Service verification method and device | |
| CN117911170A (en) | New and old insurance system migration configuration verification method and device and computer equipment |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200228 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |