CN110782281B - Day-ahead market clearing method for multi-owner cascade power station basin electric quantity transfer - Google Patents
Day-ahead market clearing method for multi-owner cascade power station basin electric quantity transfer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110782281B CN110782281B CN201911011266.5A CN201911011266A CN110782281B CN 110782281 B CN110782281 B CN 110782281B CN 201911011266 A CN201911011266 A CN 201911011266A CN 110782281 B CN110782281 B CN 110782281B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- constraint
- power
- market
- unit
- day
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 59
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000009194 climbing Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000452 restraining effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 9
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 4
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012886 linear function Methods 0.000 description 2
- PXKSAXUKRMRORY-ZWKOTPCHSA-N 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-n-[(1s,2r)-2-(2,5-dihydropyrrol-1-yl)cyclohexyl]-n-methylacetamide Chemical compound N1([C@@H]2CCCC[C@@H]2N(C)C(=O)CC=2C=C(Cl)C(Cl)=CC=2)CC=CC1 PXKSAXUKRMRORY-ZWKOTPCHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZXVONLUNISGICL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Chemical compound CC1=CC([N+]([O-])=O)=CC([N+]([O-])=O)=C1O ZXVONLUNISGICL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 240000001549 Ipomoea eriocarpa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005146 Ipomoea eriocarpa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010405 clearance mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008239 natural water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0206—Price or cost determination based on market factors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
The invention has disclosed the market clearing method before the day of a kind of multi-owner step power station basin electric quantity transfer, said method comprises (S1) after the market begins before the day of the electric power spot shipment, according to the relevant information of market that the electric power scheduling organization releases; (S2) calculating out the safety constraint unit combination SCUC optimization of the cascade hydroelectric power upstream and downstream power stations by only considering power constraint; (S3) checking the information obtained by SCUC optimization calculation by adopting a hydraulic checking model, and continuously calculating the result according to the SCED optimization calculation considering only the electric power constraint when the step hydropower output time interval meets the water constraint, and (S4) calculating the result by adopting the SCED optimization calculation considering both the hydraulic limitation condition and the electric power constraint when the step hydropower output time interval does not meet the water constraint.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of electric quantity clearing, and particularly relates to a day-ahead market clearing method for electric quantity transfer of a multi-owner cascade power station drainage basin.
Background
At present, China's electric power trade is beginning to move to electric power spot trade with a shorter time period, and the steady promotion of the electric power spot market will certainly enable the step hydropower station to compete with other types of power stations on the same platform. The upstream power station can flexibly participate in the spot market due to the good storage and regulation capacity, and the downstream power station with poor regulation capacity cannot independently participate in the market due to the fact that the power generation amount depends on the origin flow of the upstream power station. The upstream and downstream power stations of the cascade hydropower station in most areas of China are in different owners, and the benefits of all the power stations are difficult to coordinate, so that the cascade hydropower stations cannot be optimized and participate in the market.
Meanwhile, for the current market, the market operating organization mainly adopts two core models, namely Security-constraint unit combination (SCUC) and Security-constraint economic dispatch (SCED), to complete the current market. At this time, if the SCUC and SCED models in the market clearing model are considered to be optimized for clearing by taking the cascade hydropower upstream and downstream water connection and power constraint into consideration in the same way according to the traditional short-term scheduling method, the SCUC model contains integer variables, and the addition of the water connection constraint can generate a large amount of technical constraint and 0 and 1 integer decision variables for the power station, so that the possible association relationship of the upstream and downstream output is increased in geometric stages according to the runoff, a 'dimensional disaster' is generated, and the clearing result can not be obtained.
In conclusion, in the case that the cascade hydropower station cannot accurately acquire the market strategy information of the upstream power station, a clear scheme which is reasonable and can be applied to actual engineering is worth exploring. Currently, there are mainly 4 solutions to this problem.
The method I adopts a step hydropower agency mechanism to promote the step hydropower combined operation, namely, the upstream and downstream sides of the step hydropower station negotiate voluntarily to generate agency contracts, the upstream power station acts on the downstream power station to participate in the market, and the profit is distributed according to the contracts. (reference: meaning, Korean, Zhang particle. agency mechanism for efficient allocation of stepped hydroelectric resources in market Environment [ J ] electric Power System Automation, 2010,34(7):26-30)
And in the second method, a step hydropower benefit compensation mechanism is adopted, namely an effective and accurate compensation benefit verification method and a compensation benefit allocation method which is accepted and accepted by all parties are researched, and the multi-benefit subject step hydropower station group can be promoted to carry out joint economic operation. (reference: Li Jinpeng, Wang Yongxiang, Guo morning glory, etc.. Cascade Power station Compensation benefit apportioned group consensus coordinated planning method [ J ]. hydroelectric Power science 2010,28(7): 138-)
Although the two clearing methods can stimulate the upstream and downstream power stations of the cascade hydropower station to realize the optimal allocation of the cascade hydropower resources to maximize the benefit, the two clearing methods are both economic distribution problems in essence, different capital owners have the core of self-profit for participating in the market, and if the profits obtained by the joint participation of the two parties in the market cannot reach the expected profit, the collaborative mode faces the situation of collapse.
And thirdly, embedding the hydraulic power and electric power coupling relation between the upstream power station and the downstream power station of the cascade hydropower station into a clearing model, wherein the downstream power station is used as a price acceptor without quotation, and the generated energy of the downstream power station is related to the reported amount of the upstream power station, so that the downstream power station obtains a clearing result matched with the generated energy of the upstream power station when the market is cleared. (refer to Zhang particle, Liu Fang, xu Tong, etc.. the day-ahead market clearing model of multi-operation main body cascade hydropower station participation [ J ]. power system automation, 2018(1):104-
And on the basis of the third method, the downstream power station is provided to use self limited output margin to formulate a self-scheduling bidding strategy, namely the output adjustment of 'tenuous storage before peak and water storage after peak' is used for expanding the income space. (reference: Zhang particles, Liu Fang, permissive, etc.. Multi-subject step hydropower participation in the day-ahead market downstream stations self-scheduling bidding strategy [ J ] Power System Automation, 2018,42(19):33-39.)
In the two modes of realizing the joint participation of the cascade hydropower stations in the market through model optimization, most of the benefits of the downstream power stations are determined by the upstream power stations, the initiative of the downstream power stations in the market is ignored, and the competitiveness of the drainage basin cannot be improved.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to overcome the defects in the prior art, the invention provides a method for clearing the day-ahead market for transferring the electric quantity of the basin of the multi-owner cascade power station, which can avoid the situation that the trading result cannot be executed due to independent bidding of the upstream power station and the downstream power station, is beneficial to dividing the benefits of water and electricity, reduces the electricity and water abandonment and realizes the maximum utilization of water resources.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
a method for clearing the day-ahead market for transferring the electric quantity of a multi-owner cascade power station basin comprises the following steps:
(S1) after the market starts before the current power market, based on the market-related information issued by the power dispatching organization;
(S2) calculating out the safety constraint unit combination SCUC optimization clearing only considering the electric power constraint for the cascade hydropower upstream and downstream power stations;
(S3) verifying the clear information obtained by SCUC optimization calculation by adopting a hydraulic verification model, and continuously calculating the clear information according to the SCED optimization calculation considering only the electric power constraint to obtain a power generation unit output plan in the corresponding time interval for the step hydroelectric output time interval meeting the water constraint; continuing to execute the next step for the step hydropower output time interval which does not meet the water constraint;
(S4) for the step hydropower output time interval which does not meet the water constraint, SCED optimization calculation clearing is carried out by simultaneously considering the hydraulic limitation condition and the power constraint, and if a clearing result is obtained, all power generation unit output plans and LMPs of a running day are output after the obtained optimization result is inherited (S3) at the same time; and if the clearing result still cannot be obtained after the SCED optimization calculation, continuously returning the optimization calculation by using the relaxation constraint priority, taking the obtained optimization result as a signal for finishing the relaxation of the constraint condition, failing the optimization when the relaxation times exceed the maximum value and still not obtaining the clearing result, and readjusting the price information declared by the generator.
Further, the market-related information in the step (S1) includes a load prediction curve and a market limit.
Further, the power constraint in the step (S2) includes:
(S21) system load balancing constraints;
(S22) generating power limit constraints;
(S23) unit climbing restraint;
(S24) a unit limit/vibration zone constraint;
(S25) minimum continuous start-stop time constraint of the unit;
(S26) restraining the maximum start-stop times of the unit;
(S27) water level control interval constraints;
(S28) transmission branch power constraints.
Further, the SCED in the step (S3) is the minimum total electricity purchase cost, the constraint condition is the power constraint that needs to be considered for the operation of the unit or the power station, and the model input is the power generation unit sectional quotation curve and the time slot unit startup combination that the operation day obtained by the SCUC meets the water constraint; and outputting the model as an output plan of each unit in a corresponding time period of the operating day meeting the water constraint.
Specifically, the relaxation constraint priority in the step (S4) includes three levels, which are: the first-level priority constraint is a control water level interval constraint, the second-level priority constraint is a power transmission branch power constraint, the third-level priority constraint is a system load balance constraint, the maximum relaxation times are set to be (priority) III in parameter initialization, and the initial value is (priority) I.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects:
(1) compared with the agent agency mechanism and the hydropower interest compensation mechanism in the background technology, the method provided by the invention solves the embarrassing situation that upstream and downstream information is asymmetric, can ensure that a downstream power station fully participates in the market, improves the competitiveness of a drainage basin in the power spot market, can process the interest distribution problem of different owners of upstream and downstream cascade hydropower stations, ensures the market trade balance, and provides a thought for the weak regulation power station to participate in the spot market construction.
(2) The invention separately considers the electric power constraint and the hydraulic power constraint and adjusts the practical situation, firstly, the SCUC with the electric power constraint is optimized to obtain the clearance, and then the clearance mechanism of the electric power transfer is optimized by the hydraulic power constraint condition and the SCED, so that the situation that the clearance speed is influenced by too many 01 variables generated in the SCUC optimization process and even the clearance result can not be obtained can be avoided, the solving difficulty can be obviously reduced because the model in the electric power transfer process does not contain integer variables, the optimal solution can be always found after certain iteration, the dimension disaster is avoided, the clearance model and the algorithm are simplified to a certain extent, and the invention can be better suitable for practical engineering.
(3) Compared with the two hydropower combined clearing mechanisms in the background technology, the method can enhance the participation degree of the cascade hydropower downstream power station, enhance the competitiveness in the flow field and provide a new idea for the weakly-regulated hydropower station to participate in the spot market. And the electric quantity in the drainage basin is transferred, thereby being beneficial to the comprehensive configuration of water resources and effectively realizing the maximum utilization of the water resources.
(4) The constraint condition relaxation of the invention establishes priority, and increases solving feasible domain by short-time relaxation in a certain proportion range and the priority of the well-ordered constraint condition, thereby obtaining effective clearing optimization result.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the price report of the power generation commercial of the power station.
FIG. 3 shows the optimized output of each power station after SCUC optimization according to the present invention.
Fig. 4 shows the output flow of each power station after the SCUC optimization according to the present invention.
Fig. 5 shows scalar quantities of each power generation quotient after the power transfer according to the present invention.
Fig. 6 shows the output flow of each power station after the electric quantity is transferred.
FIG. 7 is a current price of the market node of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention is further illustrated by the following figures and examples, which include, but are not limited to, the following examples.
Examples
As shown in figures 1 to 7, the day-ahead market clearing method for the power transfer of the drainage basin of the multi-owner cascade power station adopts SCUC optimization calculation only considering power constraint to obtain a power generation business output plan at each time interval of an operating day, then uses a hydraulic power verification model and a SCED model jointly considering water and power constraint to carry out inter-drainage-basin power transfer adjustment on the output plan at a certain time interval which does not satisfy the upstream and downstream hydraulic power relation of cascade hydropower to obtain a new clearing result, output plans of all units and node marginal electricity prices (LMP) at the operating day, and simultaneously establishes constraint relaxation priority to expand the feasible area of the power optimization calculation. The specific implementation steps of the method are shown in fig. 2.
The method specifically comprises the following steps:
(S1) after the market starts before the spot-shipment of electric power, according to the market related information released by the electric power dispatching mechanism, such as a load prediction curve, a market limit price and the like, the cascade hydropower upstream power stations participating in the market provide basic unit constraint information to the market operating mechanism, declare a time-period cascade quotation curve, and need to report the current reservoir level, and the market operating mechanism determines the piecewise linear parameters of the function expression of the output and the generating flow of the hydropower station according to the reservoir level reported by the power generator. The unit constraint information and quotation information provided by the downstream power station to the market operating organization are consistent with those of the upstream power station. In addition, a predicted interval water inflow curve and piecewise linear parameters of a function expression of output and power generation flow obtained by calculation according to the current reservoir water level need to be reported.
(S2) calculating out a clear product by adopting SCUC optimization considering only power constraint aiming at the step hydropower station upstream and downstream power stations. The SCUC model objective function is the minimum total electricity purchasing cost; the constraint condition is the power constraint which needs to be considered in the operation of the unit or the power station; inputting a model into a power generation unit sectional quotation curve; and outputting the model as a group combination and an output plan of each unit at 96 starting points on the operating day.
SCUC model:
from the perspective of a market operating organization, an objective function of the SCUC optimization model is the maximization of social welfare and is expressed as the minimum of total electricity purchasing cost. The mathematical model is as follows:
wherein J is the total electricity purchase cost; t is the total time period number considered, and 24 is taken in the application; t is a time interval number; n is a radical ofGNumber of units, nGNumbering the units, wherein the thermal power generators quote according to the units, the hydroelectric power generators quote according to the stations, and the hydroelectric power generators only need to linearly superpose the unit output limit, the climbing rate, the vibration area and the like when quoting according to the stations; kGReporting the number of capacity segments, k, for the generatorGReporting the capacity segment number for the generator;
for the generator nGIn the capacity section kGThe winning bid amount in time period t;
for the generator nGIn the capacity section kGQuotes over a period of time t.
The power constraints are as follows:
(S21) system load balancing constraints.
Wherein j is a tie line number; t isj,tThe planned power for tie-line j at time t (positive input and negative output); NT is the total number of tie lines; dtThe system load for time period t.
(S22) generating power limit constraint.
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
and
for a time period of tGMaximum and minimum output forces;
for a time period of tGIs measured.
(S23) the unit climbing restraint.
Wherein, Δ Pi U、ΔPi DAre respectively a unit nGMaximum upward climbing rate and maximum downward climbing rate.
(S24) restraining a unit limiting area (vibration area).
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
are respectively a unit nG(typically a hydroelectric generating set) up/down limit of the kth vibration zone.
(S25) minimum continuous on-off time constraint of the unit.
Wherein, TU、TDRespectively the minimum continuous starting time and the minimum continuous stopping time of the unit;
are respectively a unit nGTime that has been continuously powered on and time that has been continuously powered off at time period t;
for a time period of tGThe state variable of (2).
And (S26) restraining the maximum starting and stopping times of the unit.
First, the startup and shutdown switching variables are defined. Definition of
Representing a unit nGWhether to switch to the activated state at time period t; definition of
Representing a unit nGWhether or not to switch to the shutdown state at time t,
the following conditions are satisfied:
unit nGThe start-stop number limit of (c) can be expressed as follows:
wherein, define
Representing a unit nGWhether to switch to the activated state at time period t; definition of
Representing a unit nGWhether to switch to a shutdown state at time t.
(S27) water level control interval constraint.
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
respectively representing the upper and lower water level limits of the hydropower station u at the moment t; zu,tRepresenting the water level of the hydroelectric station u at time t.
(S28) transmission branch power constraints.
-Pl max≤Pl,t≤Pl max (14)
Wherein, Pl maxThe power transmission limit of branch l for time period t; pl,tThe transmission power of branch l for a period t.
(S3) verifying the clear information obtained by SCUC optimization calculation by adopting a hydraulic verification model, and continuously calculating the clear information according to the SCED optimization calculation considering only the electric power constraint to obtain a power generation unit output plan in the corresponding time interval for the step hydroelectric output time interval meeting the water constraint; continuing to execute the next step for the step hydropower output time interval which does not meet the water constraint; wherein, the SCED model objective function is the minimum of the total electricity purchasing cost; the constraint condition is the power constraint (no longer related to the unit 01 integer variable) which needs to be considered in the operation of the unit or the power station; the model inputs a section quotation curve of a power generation unit and a time interval unit startup combination which is obtained by SCUC and has running days meeting water constraints; the model output is the output plan of each unit in the time period of the operation day meeting the water constraint.
Hydraulic verification model:
the relation between the optimized output and the generated flow of the cascade hydropower station can be generally expressed by adopting a piecewise linear function:
wherein u and d are serial numbers of upstream and downstream power stations respectively; pu,tAnd Pd,tAre respectively upper and lowerOutputting power by the trip power station;
and
respectively the output flow of an upstream power station and a downstream power station;
and
piecewise linear fitting parameters in a period t; k is a radical ofuAnd kdThe segment intervals are numbered.
The inflow water flow of the cascade hydroelectric downstream power station comprises the generated water flow of the upstream power station and the interval natural inflow water flow of
Wherein u is an upstream power station unit; d is a downstream power station unit;
the water inflow of a downstream power station in a time period t; i isd,tThe natural inflow water flow rate of the middle section in the time period t; tau isu,dIs the water flow time lag constant between the upstream and downstream power stations; e.g. of the typeγIs the river channel leveling coefficient.
After the SCUC optimization calculation obtains a clear result, the linear functions (15) and (16) of the optimized output and the power generation flow are converted into the output water quantities of the upstream and downstream of the step hydropower station, and then the hydraulic limitation is verified, namely the output water quantities of the upstream and downstream power stations of the step hydropower station are compared, and the water inflow reaching the downstream power station is ensured to be larger than or equal to the difference between the output water quantity of the downstream power station and the natural water inflow in the interval, and the result is expressed as:
for special requirements in actual scheduling, if a part of cascade hydropower downstream power stations cannot generate a water abandon phenomenon in a leveling period, the related hydraulic limitation of the part of cascade hydropower is checked as follows:
(S4) for the step hydropower output time interval which does not meet the water constraint, SCED optimization calculation considering the hydraulic limitation condition and the power constraint at the same time is adopted to obtain the clearance (wherein the SCED is the minimum total electricity purchase cost, the constraint condition is the hydraulic constraint and the power constraint which need to be considered in the operation of the unit or the power station, the model is input into the power generation unit subsection price curve and the time interval unit startup combination which is obtained by SCUC and does not meet the water constraint on the operation day), and if the clearance result is obtained, the obtained optimization result is inherited (S3) at the same time, and all power generation unit output plans and LMPs on the operation day are output. And if the clearing result still cannot be obtained after SCED optimization calculation, continuously returning optimization calculation by using the relaxation constraint priority, taking the obtained optimization result as a signal for finishing constraint condition relaxation, and if the clearing result is not obtained when the relaxation times exceed the maximum value, failing the optimization, and readjusting the price measurement information declared by the generator. And (5) constraint relaxation priority processing. In model solution, a few constraint conditions in the output model are usually allowed to relax within a certain proportion range in a short time to increase the solution feasible region, so that an effective output optimization result is obtained. Based on different degrees of influence of various constraints on the operation of the safety constraints of the power grid, the relaxation constraints are prioritized, and the secondary constraints are relaxed firstly. In the patent of the invention, the I-level priority constraint is a control water level interval constraint, the II-level priority constraint is a power transmission branch power constraint, and the III-level priority constraint is a system load balance constraint. Meanwhile, the maximum relaxation times are set to be III in parameter initialization, and the initial value is set to be I.
At the moment, the SCED model objective function is the minimum total electricity purchasing cost; the constraint conditions are power constraint and hydraulic limitation conditions (the integral variable of the unit 01 is not related) which need to be considered in the operation of the unit or the power station; the model inputs are a section quotation curve of a power generation unit, a starting combination of the unit in a running day which is obtained by SCUC and does not accord with a water constraint time interval, and an SCED optimization result in (S3); and outputting the model to be the re-optimized output plan of each unit in the running day which does not conform to the water constraint time period.
Constraint relaxation priority model:
the I-level priority constraint is a control water level interval constraint. When the clear result can not be obtained, the restriction of the control water level interval is returned to be adjusted, and the upper limit and the lower limit of the output of the power generation unit can be indirectly adjusted by properly loosening the control water level interval. That is, equation (13) adjusts to when a relaxation signal is received:
wherein Z isu,tRepresenting the water level of the hydropower station u at the time t;
the backward relaxation variable and the forward relaxation variable of the water level constraint interval are respectively.
The class ii priority constraint is (S28) a transmission branch power constraint, and the relaxation order of the plurality of lines is determined according to the scheduling experience, and a weight coefficient is added therein. Upon receipt of a signal that there is no clear result after the I-level priority constraint is relaxed, equation (14) is adjusted to:
-Pl max-ΔPl -≤Pl,t≤Pl max+ΔPl + (21)
wherein, Pl,tThe transmission power of branch l for a period t; delta Pl-、ΔPl +The backward and forward relaxation variables of the branch power constraint are respectively.
The level iii priority constraint is (S21) a system load balancing constraint, that is, the solution domain is expanded by limiting the amount of outgoing power at the load end or reducing the local load. When a signal that no clear result is obtained after the I-level and II-level priority constraints are relaxed is received, the formula (2) is adjusted as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the reduced part of the output electricity is sent; delta DtTo illustrate the portion of the total system load shedding; t is a unit ofj,tPlanned power for tie-line j at time t (feed is positive, output is negative); NT is the total number of tie lines; dtThe system load for time period t.
Meanwhile, when the K-level priority constraint is relaxed, the I-level priority constraint of K-I, K-II, K-III and the like still keeps a relaxed state.
SCED model:
in the present application, the optimized target of the SCED is consistent with the SCUC, which is the minimum total electricity purchase cost, the mathematical model is also expressed by formula (1), and the constraints of the SCED optimized model include electric power constraint and hydraulic power limitation check. Hydraulic limitation checking is represented by formulas (18) and (19); the power constraint no longer contains a 01 variable, and is given by equations (2), (14) and:
wherein m is0Numbering the vibration region regions which are determined by SCUC optimization; delta Pi U、ΔPi DAre respectively a unit nGThe maximum upward climbing speed and the maximum downward climbing speed;
are respectively provided withFor a unit nG(typically a hydro-electric unit) k-th vibration zone upper/lower limit.
In the embodiment, the market trading area of 3 thermal power generators and 2 hydroelectric power generators in the same river basin is constructed. Wherein, the generators 1, 2 and 3 are planned to be conventional thermal power plants; the power generators 4 and 5 are stepped hydroelectric upstream and downstream power stations of the basin 1, respectively. The method is used for constructing a market trading area including 4 thermal power generators and 2 hydropower generators in the same river basin based on an IEEE 13 node standard test system, and the line parameters are shown in a table 1. Wherein, the generators 1, 2, 3 and 4 are planned to be conventional thermal power plants; the power generators 5 and 6 are respectively the cascade hydroelectric upstream and downstream power stations of the basin 1, and part of the operation parameters are shown in table 2. The water flow time lag is assumed to be 1h, no interval water inflow exists, the river channel is smooth, and the power generation amount of a downstream power station is the power generation flow of an upstream power station.
TABLE 1 line parameters
TABLE 2 partial Generator operating parameters
Fig. 3 shows that various power station generators deal with load changes through strategic quotation, the results of two times of optimized output are basically consistent with the change trend of a load curve, and the optimized output is obviously higher than that in other periods during peak load periods. At the moment, the optimization model does not contain hydraulic restriction, meanwhile, the cascade hydropower downstream power station power generator adopts an independent flexible bidding strategy under the condition that strategy information of the upstream power station power generator is not obtained, and the downstream power station bears marginal units even at some load peak time.
According to the mathematical model, the output flow of the hydropower station and the optimized output are in a linear relation as shown in fig. 4, so that the flow trend after optimization is consistent with the optimized output trend of each power station in fig. 3, and the output flow at the peak load stage is obviously higher than that at other periods. However, on the premise that the water flow time lag is 1h and no interval water comes, the output flow of the downstream power station in the time periods of 7-13 and 16-20 is higher than that of the upstream power station in the previous 1h, and does not meet the hydraulic coupling relation of the upstream power station and the downstream power station of the cascade hydropower station, if the watershed electric quantity transfer is not carried out, the real power generation amount of the downstream power station is unbalanced with the optimized electric quantity, and therefore the transaction cannot be executed.
As can be seen by comparing fig. 5 with fig. 3, the trading power of the cascaded hydroelectric power generator changes significantly in some periods under the same price, for example: the actual transaction electric quantity of the downstream power station power generator is reduced by 43.5MW at the 7 th hour, reduced by 54MW at the 8 th hour, the subsequent time period is adjusted to be lower than that of the upstream power station, and the exchange electric quantity of the power generators of the power stations in the rest time periods is slightly adjusted.
As can be seen from fig. 6, the output flow of the downstream plant at each time interval at this time is significantly delayed or equal to the output flow of the upstream plant of the first 1 h: when the downstream plant output decreased by 43.5MW as in 7h, its output flow decreased by 74m3, which is on the same level as the upstream plant output flow for the first 1 h. The electric quantity transferring and clearing mechanism can effectively promote the competitive strength of the downstream power station in the drainage basin and realize the exertion of the overall benefit of the drainage basin while not violating the hydraulic coupling relation of the upstream power station and the downstream power station of the cascade hydropower.
In fig. 7, the day-ahead LMP of each node of the system is obtained by simulating day-ahead market trading, the overall trend of the LMP is basically consistent with the system load trend, and the change of the supply-demand relationship of the spot market is presented in the form of price. Comparing different LMPs in the graph, the LMPs of each node are equal at the time of 0:00-8:00 before the peak load, and in the subsequent two peak load periods, the LMPs of a few nodes are different, for example, the LMP of the node 2 at the time of 18:00 is 420 yuan/(MW & h), and the LMPs of the rest nodes are only 400 yuan/(MW & h), which is caused by the fact that the lines are blocked to different degrees, and at the time of 18:00-20:00, each power station is in the peak output stage, the transmission channel is blocked seriously, and the LMPs of the few nodes are increased.
The above embodiments are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, but all changes that can be made by applying the principles of the present invention and performing non-inventive work on the basis of the principles shall fall within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (5)
1. A method for clearing the day-ahead market for transferring the electric quantity of a multi-owner cascade power station basin is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(S1) after the market starts before the spot date of the electric power, the electric power dispatching mechanism issues market-related information;
(S2) calculating out the safety constraint unit combination SCUC optimization of the cascade hydroelectric power upstream and downstream power stations by only considering power constraint;
(S3) verifying the information obtained by SCUC optimization calculation by adopting a hydraulic verification model, and continuously scheduling SCED optimization calculation according to the safety constraint economy considering only the electric power constraint to obtain a power generation unit output plan in the corresponding time interval for the step hydroelectric output time interval meeting the water constraint; continuing to execute the next step for the step hydropower output time interval which does not meet the water constraint;
(S4) for the step hydropower output time interval which does not meet the water constraint, adopting Safety Constraint Economic Dispatch (SCED) for optimizing and calculating clearing by simultaneously considering the hydraulic limitation condition and the power constraint, and if a clearing result is obtained, outputting output plans of all power generation units in a running day and node marginal electricity prices (LMP) after inheriting the obtained optimization result (S3); and if the clearing result can not be obtained after the SCED optimization calculation by the security constraint economic dispatch, continuously returning the optimization calculation by using the relaxation constraint priority, taking the obtained optimization result as a signal for finishing the relaxation of the constraint condition, failing the optimization when the relaxation times exceed the maximum value and the clearing result can not be obtained, and readjusting the quantity and price information declared by the generator.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the market-related information in step (S1) includes load forecast curves and market limits.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step (S2) of power constraint includes:
(S21) system load balancing constraints;
(S22) generating power limit constraints;
(S23) restraining the unit from climbing a slope;
(S24) a unit limit/vibration zone constraint;
(S25) minimum continuous start-stop time constraint of the unit;
(S26) restraining the maximum start-stop times of the unit;
(S27) water level control interval constraints;
(S28) transmission branch power constraints.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the SCED in step (S3) is the minimum total electricity purchase cost, the constraint condition is the power constraint to be considered for the operation of the unit or station, and the model inputs are the power generation unit sectional quotation curve and the time slot unit startup combination of the operating day obtained by the SCUC and the water constraint; and outputting the model as an output plan of each unit in a corresponding time period of the operating day meeting the water constraint.
5. The method for the day-ahead market clearing of multi-owner echelon power plant watershed power transfer of claim 1, wherein the relaxation constraint priorities in said step (S4) include three levels, respectively: the first-level priority constraint is a control water level interval constraint, the second-level priority constraint is a power transmission branch power constraint, the third-level priority constraint is a system load balance constraint, the maximum relaxation times are set to be III in parameter initialization, and the initial value is I.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911011266.5A CN110782281B (en) | 2019-10-23 | 2019-10-23 | Day-ahead market clearing method for multi-owner cascade power station basin electric quantity transfer |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911011266.5A CN110782281B (en) | 2019-10-23 | 2019-10-23 | Day-ahead market clearing method for multi-owner cascade power station basin electric quantity transfer |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110782281A CN110782281A (en) | 2020-02-11 |
| CN110782281B true CN110782281B (en) | 2022-06-07 |
Family
ID=69386501
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911011266.5A Active CN110782281B (en) | 2019-10-23 | 2019-10-23 | Day-ahead market clearing method for multi-owner cascade power station basin electric quantity transfer |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110782281B (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111428922B (en) * | 2020-03-19 | 2022-04-05 | 云南电网有限责任公司 | Electric power market clearing method and system for rapid posterior condition section |
| CN113496075B (en) * | 2020-04-03 | 2024-03-08 | 国家电投集团电站运营技术（北京）有限公司 | Method and device for checking electric power data |
| CN111967986B (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2024-05-28 | 中国南方电网有限责任公司 | Electric power market clearing method, system, device and medium containing step hydropower |
| CN111861162B (en) * | 2020-07-06 | 2023-12-19 | 大连理工大学 | Method for clearing daily current goods of high-proportion hydroelectric system under step electric quantity linkage control |
| CN112103943B (en) * | 2020-08-13 | 2022-05-13 | 云南电网有限责任公司 | Safety checking method and device for delivery of electric power spot market in the day-ahead and storage medium |
| CN111950801A (en) * | 2020-08-21 | 2020-11-17 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | Cross-section interactive day-ahead market clearing method, system, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112288276A (en) * | 2020-10-28 | 2021-01-29 | 中国南方电网有限责任公司 | Real-time market clearing rapid calculation method considering hydropower vibration region constraint |
| CN112907286A (en) * | 2021-02-20 | 2021-06-04 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | Water-electricity-price three-dimensional linked market clearing method, system, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112907078A (en) * | 2021-02-20 | 2021-06-04 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | Market clearing method, system, equipment and readable storage medium for water-electricity coupling |
| CN113468755B (en) * | 2021-07-12 | 2022-10-04 | 云南电网有限责任公司 | Market iteration clearing method and device based on refined hydraulic connection check |
| CN113659580B (en) * | 2021-08-12 | 2022-08-05 | 国网福建省电力有限公司 | Method and system for determining feasible region of regional electric quantity transmission |
| CN116797077A (en) * | 2023-05-25 | 2023-09-22 | 国家电网有限公司华东分部 | Method and device for determining unit output plan in area and computer equipment |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105305485A (en) * | 2015-10-15 | 2016-02-03 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Large-scale intermittent energy consuming security constrained economic dispatch method |
| WO2017071230A1 (en) * | 2015-10-30 | 2017-05-04 | 南京南瑞集团公司 | Method for short-term optimal scheduling of multi-agent hydropower station group |
| CN109190951A (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2019-01-11 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of electricity market goes out clearing method, goes out clear device and clear equipment out |
| CN110224399A (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2019-09-10 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Power spot market based on wind power plant goes out clearing method, device and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9705336B2 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2017-07-11 | Abb Research Ltd. | Method and apparatus for security constrained economic dispatch in hybrid power systems |
-
2019
- 2019-10-23 CN CN201911011266.5A patent/CN110782281B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105305485A (en) * | 2015-10-15 | 2016-02-03 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Large-scale intermittent energy consuming security constrained economic dispatch method |
| WO2017071230A1 (en) * | 2015-10-30 | 2017-05-04 | 南京南瑞集团公司 | Method for short-term optimal scheduling of multi-agent hydropower station group |
| CN109190951A (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2019-01-11 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of electricity market goes out clearing method, goes out clear device and clear equipment out |
| CN110224399A (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2019-09-10 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Power spot market based on wind power plant goes out clearing method, device and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| An agent-based simulation of power generation company behavior in electricity markets under different market-clearing mechanisms;Danial Esmaeili Aliabadi等;《Energy Policy》;20170131;第100卷;第1-7节 * |
| 多主体梯级水电参与日前市场下游电站自调度投标策略;张粒子等;《电力系统自动化》;20181010;第42卷(第19期);第1-6节 * |
| 彭钰祥等.考虑多业主梯级水电站的日前市场分期出清方法.《电网技术》.2020,第44卷(第8期),第2837-2848页. * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN110782281A (en) | 2020-02-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110782281B (en) | Day-ahead market clearing method for multi-owner cascade power station basin electric quantity transfer | |
| CN109727158B (en) | Electric heating comprehensive energy system scheduling method based on improved weak robust optimization | |
| CN106845807B (en) | Settlement method and device based on peak regulation auxiliary service | |
| CN110555590B (en) | Secondary clearing method for watershed cascade upstream and downstream power stations participating in electric power spot market | |
| CN111882111B (en) | Power spot market clearing method based on source network load storage cooperative interaction | |
| CN103745023A (en) | Coupling modeling method for hydropower station power generated output scheme making and optimal load distribution | |
| CN105046395A (en) | Intraday rolling scheduling method of electric power system including multiple types of new energy | |
| CN110649598B (en) | Method and system for regulating node electricity price by virtual power plant in area | |
| CN109301876B (en) | Constraint condition elasticized electric power day-ahead market clearing method | |
| CN112101607A (en) | Active power distribution network rolling optimization scheduling method considering demand response time effect | |
| Ali | Development and Improvement of Renewable Energy Integrated with Energy Trading Schemes based on Advanced Optimization Approaches | |
| Tan et al. | Joint scheduling optimization of virtual power plants and equitable profit distribution using shapely value theory | |
| CN109978331B (en) | Method for decomposing daily electric quantity in high-proportion water-electricity spot market | |
| CN113256168B (en) | Power system planning method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| Huang et al. | Incentive-compatible market clearing for a two-stage integrated electricity-gas-heat market | |
| CN111130149A (en) | Power grid power generation active control method and system considering performance distribution characteristics | |
| CN104636831A (en) | Multi-power-grid-oriented hydropower station short period peak load regulation characteristic value searching method | |
| CN109726894A (en) | Ensure the new energy active command calculation method of spot exchange and medium-term and long-term electricity | |
| CN110556821B (en) | Multi-microgrid double-layer optimization scheduling method considering interactive power control and bilateral bidding transaction | |
| CN115423260A (en) | Quantitative analysis method for new energy utilization of electric power market and policy service | |
| Ningxin et al. | Clearing model for day-ahead market considering hydraulic coupling relationship of multi-operator cascade hydropower stations | |
| Su et al. | Research on Virtual Power Plant’s Participation in Power Market under the Background of Energy Internet in China | |
| Tang et al. | Framework design of load aggregators participating in electricity market | |
| Hu et al. | Agent-based simulation for electric vehicle aggregators’ bidding and pricing strategy considering reserve provision and EV response | |
| CN111612263B (en) | Water-faucet reservoir hydropower group transaction optimization method considering water resource utilization requirements |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |