CN109299550A - A kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method - Google Patents

A kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109299550A
CN109299550A CN201811151378.6A CN201811151378A CN109299550A CN 109299550 A CN109299550 A CN 109299550A CN 201811151378 A CN201811151378 A CN 201811151378A CN 109299550 A CN109299550 A CN 109299550A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
model
scheme
manufacturing
evaluation
enterprise
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201811151378.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109299550B (en
Inventor
惠记庄
雷景媛
张富强
丁凯
刘永健
程高
张金龙
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Changan University
Original Assignee
Changan University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Changan University filed Critical Changan University
Priority to CN201811151378.6A priority Critical patent/CN109299550B/en
Publication of CN109299550A publication Critical patent/CN109299550A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109299550B publication Critical patent/CN109299550B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/13Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides a kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method, by carrying out distinguishing hierarchy to steel structure bridge, corresponding manufacturing operation model is established, according to the corresponding manufacturing enterprise's model of manufacturing operation model foundation.Based on manufacturing operation and manufacturing enterprise's Construction of A Model ontology model, alternative enterprise's scheme is obtained by ontology inference.According to the alternative enterprise's scheme constructs multiattribute assessment system obtained, design triangle fuzzy number-TOPSIS method determines weight and realizes the sequence to fabrication scheme, obtains optimizing decision.Steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method of the present invention, manufacturing operation information model and manufacturing enterprise's information model are matched and establish ontology model, multiple attribute decision making (MADM) appraisement system is established for ontology model, the weight of attribute is determined using Triangular Fuzzy Number, combined structure Triangular Fuzzy Number-TOPSIS method is ranked up scheme and obtains optimizing decision, it realizes adaptive, the autonomous production of steel structure bridge, improves intelligent, the autonomized degree of bridge manufacturing process.

Description

A kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method
Technical field
The present invention relates to steel structure bridge manufacturing fields, are related to steel structure bridge manufacturing decision, and in particular to a kind of steel knot Structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method.
Background technique
As Internet of Things, information physical emerging system, the number emerging technologies such as twin are in manufacturing development and application, passing It unites in the manufacture of engineering goods, has been realized in real-time acquisition, processing and the analysis to manufacturing process running state data, improve The transparence degree of production process.However, the network cooperating established at present for the industrialization construction feature of steel structure bridge Manufacturing technology is still vacancy, it is difficult to obtain the optimal case of Decision-Making Evaluation in steel structure bridge manufacturing process, and then be difficult to realize Autonomized, the intelligent production and management of steel structure bridge manufacture.
For the fabrication scheme On The Choice of steel structure bridge, it is known that the design feature and manufacturing process of steel structure bridge, The best fabrication scheme of steel structure bridge how is accurately described by mathematical method just becomes bottleneck problem.
Summary of the invention
In view of the deficiencies of the prior art, the present invention intends to provide a kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision and comment Valence method solves that the fabrication scheme automated decision-making of steel structure bridge can not be established in the prior art and then realizes steel structure bridge Automation and intelligentification production with management the technical issues of.
In order to solve the above-mentioned technical problem, the present invention is realised by adopting the following technical scheme, and this method includes following step It is rapid:
Step 1: first by carrying out distinguishing hierarchy to steel structure bridge, corresponding manufacturing operation model, supplement system are established Task essential information, mission requirements and particular/special requirement are made, and establishes manufacturing operation essential information model, manufacturing operation requirement respectively Model and manufacturing operation particular/special requirement model;
Step 2: based on manufacturing operation model, manufacturing operation essential information model, manufacturing operation requirement model and system are established Make task particular/special requirement model foundation manufacturing operation information model;
Step 3: the management position information based on manufacturing enterprise's essential information, manufacturing enterprise's manufacturing capacity and manufacturing enterprise Establish manufacturing enterprise's information model;
Step 4: steel structure bridge manufacture matching mould is established based on manufacturing operation information model and manufacturing enterprise's information model Type obtains alternative enterprise's scheme by ontology inference;
Step 5: the attribute of alternative fabrication scheme model, alternative fabrication scheme is established according to the alternative enterprise's scheme obtained The weight model of all properties in model and alternative fabrication scheme, and construct initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix;
Step 6: determine that the Triangular Fuzzy Number of all properties of all schemes is mutual using Triangular Fuzzy Number-TOPSIS method Judgment matrix is mended, standardization processing is carried out to initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix using vector transformation, more attributes that obtain standardizing are determined Plan matrix is solved and is sorted to standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix, obtains preferred plan.
Further, in step 5, alternative enterprise's scheme model set P={ P1,P2,…,Pm, PiFor alternative enterprise side Case, 1≤i≤m, m are the quantity of alternative fabrication scheme;
Set U={ the u of attribute model1,u2,…,un, ujFor the different attribute in some scheme, 1≤j≤m, n are The quantity of the attribute of some scheme;
Set W={ the w of weight model1,w2,…,wn, wjFor the weight of different attribute in some scheme, 1≤j≤m, All weight definitions are as follows: w1+w2+…+wn=1;
According to the power of all properties in alternative fabrication scheme model, the attribute model of corresponding specific some scheme and the program The initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix X of weight model construction is as follows:
Wherein, xijFor the initial decision evaluation index of j-th of attribute of i-th of scheme in initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix Value.
Further, step 6 the following steps are included:
A) rememberFor Triangular Fuzzy Number, the desired value of Triangular Fuzzy Number is definedCalculation formula are as follows:
Wherein, 0≤λ≤1, aLFor most conservative evaluation of estimate, aMFor most probable Evaluation of estimate, aUFor most optimistic evaluation of estimate;
B) attribute is evaluated according to evaluation purpose and evaluation index two-by-two, establishes triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix, kth time The triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix A of assessmentk,WhereinIn formulaPoint Not Biao Shi most conservative evaluation of estimate of obtained i-th of the evaluation index of expert system kth time assessment relative to j-th of evaluation index, Most probable evaluation of estimate and most optimistic evaluation of estimate;
C) evaluation of estimate is assembled with weight, obtains the synthesis triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix about evaluation index Element:
In formula: i, j=1,2 ..., n, k are assessment number;ωkFor the authority of expert system kth time assessment;
D) for the Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of i-th of indexIt is calculated using following formula:
In formula,Indicate most conservative evaluation of estimate of i-th of evaluation index relative to j-th of evaluation index;Indicate i-th Most probable evaluation of estimate of a evaluation index relative to j-th of evaluation index;Indicate that i-th of evaluation index is commented relative to j-th The most optimistic evaluation of estimate of valence index;
E) policymaker takes neutral attitude herein, therefore takes λ=0.5, and desired value calculation formula becomes:
F) the weight ω of the ith attribute of each scheme in alternative enterprise's scheme set P is calculatedi,
G) weight statistics is carried out to more attributes of each of P scheme, establishes the triangle of all properties of all schemes Complementary Judgment Matrices with Fuzzy Numbers, using vector transformation method using triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix to initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) Matrix carries out standardization processing, obtains standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix Y,
Wherein, yijIndicate the weight of j-th of attribute of i-th of scheme;
H) the set C of ideal solution scheme is determined according to standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix numerical valuej *With minus ideal result scheme Set Cj 0, calculate weighted euclidean distance d of each scheme away from ideal solution and minus ideal resultj *And dj 0And comprehensive degree of approach index fj
I) all schemes are ranked up from small to large according to comprehensive degree of approach index, the comprehensive maximum side of degree of approach index Case is preferred plan.
Further, attitudes toward risk of the selection of λ depending on policymaker in step a):
When policymaker is biased to optimism, 0.5 < λ < 1;
When policymaker is biased to pessimistic attitude, 0 < λ < 0.5.
Further, step f) further includes the consistency checking to weighted value, and the judge index CI of consistency checking is calculated Formula are as follows:
In formula:Maximum characteristic root value;ForExpectation,
Consistency judgement factor CR calculation formula are as follows:In formula: RI is flat Equal random index;As CR < 0.1, then it is assumed that Triangular Fuzzy Number judgment matrix is by consistency check, if it can't pass Re-establish Triangular Fuzzy Number judgment matrix.
Aver-age Random Consistency Index RI is related with the dimension of judgment matrix, and specific corresponding relationship is as follows:
Matrix dimension 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
RI 0 0 0.58 0.90 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41 1.45
Further, in step 1, steel structure bridge according to being in turn divided into from low to high: characteristic layer, segment layer, spanning Layer and bridge layer.
Further, in step 3, the mathematical description of manufacturing enterprise's information model are as follows: ME={ ME_Basic, ME_ Capacity, ME_Status, ME_Auxiliary }, wherein ME_Basic indicates the essential information of manufacturing enterprise, ME_ Capacity indicates the manufacturing capacity of manufacturing enterprise, and ME_Status indicates the status information of enterprise, and ME_Auxiliary indicates enterprise The auxiliary information of industry.
Compared with prior art, the present invention having the following technical effect that
A kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method proposed by the present invention is drawn by carrying out level to steel structure bridge Point, corresponding manufacturing operation model is established, according to the corresponding manufacturing enterprise's model of manufacturing operation model foundation, manufacturing operation is believed Breath model and manufacturing enterprise's information model match and establish ontology model, obtain alternative enterprise's scheme, root by ontology inference According to the alternative enterprise's scheme constructs multiattribute assessment system obtained, the weight of attribute is determined using Triangular Fuzzy Number, in conjunction with TOPSIS method construct Triangular Fuzzy Number-TOPSIS method is ranked up and obtains according to comprehensive degree of approach exponential size to scheme Optimizing decision lays the foundation for adaptive, the autonomous production of steel structure bridge, improves intelligence, the autonomy of bridge manufacturing process Change degree.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is the implementation steps figure of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method;
Fig. 2 is manufacturing operation information model figure;
Fig. 3 is manufacturing enterprise's information model figure.
Specific embodiment
In compliance with the above technical solution, specific embodiments of the present invention are given below, it should be noted that the present invention not office It is limited to following specific embodiments, all equivalent transformations made on the basis of the technical solutions of the present application each falls within protection model of the invention It encloses.
Embodiment:
S bridge location is in Shaanxi Province border of the county, being built in 2001, since the use that overloads causes under the bridge bearing capacity throughout the year Drop.In order to guarantee the operation security of bridge, is entrusted by local Highway Administration, reconnaissance trip, and needle have been carried out to the bridge disease Construction drawing design work is carried out to the bridge disease.Construct again superstructure and bridge deck is finally determined, using steel plate combination The new structural scheme of beam.
Scheme is to guarantee build guality, mainly has following regulation to the manufacture view of steel structure bridge:
(1) steel structure bridge manufacturing enterprise must have corresponding steel construction processing and manufacturing second level and the above qualification.
(2) girder steel construction and examination must use the measurement instrument through measurement verification qualification, and should operate by pertinent regulations.
(3) girder steel should meet the regulation of GB/T 1591-2008 using steel.
(4) scheme that factory's manufacture carries out Plate division can construct after original design unit must be reported to confirm.
(5) cutting and edge processing: this bridge steel construction plate should use gas flame cuttiug, the cutting of main parts size in principle It should pay the utmost attention to using accurate cutting such as numerical control, automatic, semi-automatic cutting.
Referring to Fig.1, the present embodiment provides a kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method, comprising the following steps:
Step 1 is appointed first by carrying out distinguishing hierarchy to steel structure bridge according to the task creation of each level layer It is engaged in information model, and then establishes corresponding manufacturing operation model, supplement manufacturing operation essential information, mission requirements and special want It asks, and establishes manufacturing operation essential information model, manufacturing operation requirement model and manufacturing operation particular/special requirement model respectively;
Step 2 requires model and manufacture to appoint based on manufacturing operation model, manufacturing operation essential information model, manufacturing operation Business particular/special requirement model foundation manufacturing operation information model;
Step 3, the management position information based on manufacturing enterprise's essential information, manufacturing enterprise's manufacturing capacity and manufacturing enterprise Establish manufacturing enterprise's information model;
Step 4 establishes ontology model based on manufacturing operation information model and manufacturing enterprise's information model, and ontology model is Steel structure bridge manufactures Matching Model, obtains alternative enterprise's scheme by ontology inference;
Step 5 establishes corresponding alternative enterprise's scheme model, corresponding tool according to alternative enterprise's scheme that step 4 obtains The weight model of all properties in the attribute model and the program of body some scheme, and construct initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix;
Step 6 determines that the Triangular Fuzzy Number of all properties of all schemes is sentenced using Triangular Fuzzy Number-TOPSIS method Disconnected matrix carries out standardization processing to initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix using vector transformation, obtains standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) square Battle array is solved and is sorted to standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix, obtains preferred plan.
The method of the present invention includes two parts:
First part establishes ontology model, obtains alternative enterprise's scheme by ontology inference, including above-mentioned steps one are to step Rapid four;
Second part establishes initial more attributes and comments decision matrix, and standardized by Triangular Fuzzy Number-TOPSIS method Change multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix, and then obtain preferred plan, including above-mentioned steps five are to step 6.
First part: establishing ontology model, and the manufacturing operation for describing steel structure bridge first has to its clear hierarchical structure.It is logical Cross the element that manufacturing operation is determined to the analysis of level.
Referring to Fig. 2, steel structure bridge is in turn divided by step 1 from low to high according to level: characteristic layer, segment layer, Spanning layer, bridge layer.
(1) characteristic layer
Characteristic layer is the minimum level of steel structure bridge, can not continue to segment.The feature of steel structure bridge includes:
1., material characteristics M: manufacture steel structure bridge the first step be buying material, mainly include fashioned iron, steel plate and company Fitting.Such as use different materials (such as Q345B) hot rolling or welded H section steel;Some materials (such as steel plate) are needed together with related credentials It delivers goods together, manufacturing enterprise just needs to record the information such as relevant certificate, lot number to ensure that quality information can be chased after Track.
2., shape feature: the shape feature of steel structure bridge mainly has body (H-type, I type etc.), face (rubbing surface, coating surface Deng), hole (bolt hole etc.), slot (X-type groove, double V-groove, U-shaped groove etc.), assembly (be bolted, weld).
3. accuracy characteristic A: accuracy characteristic mainly has: derusting by sandblasting grade, surface roughness, coating thickness and machining accuracy (dimensional accuracy, form accuracy and position precision).
4. geometrical characteristic G: geometrical characteristic is used to describe the geometric dimension of manufacturing operation.
5. technology characteristics T: technique is the method and process that steel structure bridge expects finished product from former material, specific processing technology See 2.3 trifles.
6. operation resource feature R: implementing set of the resource of processing technology, including personnel, equipment etc..
(2) segment layer
It is characterized in the element of segment, segment is the set of feature.And segment is the smallest manufacture list that enterprise executes manufacture Member.The manufacturing operation of segment layer is indicated with T_Se herein.According to the definition of features above, the manufacturing operation of segment layer is carried out Ensemble is described as follows:
T_Sei={ M, S, A, G, T, R }
In formula: T_SeiIndicate the manufacturing operation for the segment that number is i.
(3) spanning layer: spanning layer is the set of all segments between two bridge piers, and segment passes through connection composition spanning.Gu Qiao The manufacturing operation of cross-layer is the set of the manufacturing operation of segment layer.Ensemble indicates are as follows:
T_Bsj={ T_SeiI=1,2,3 ..., n
In formula: T_BsjIndicate the manufacturing operation for the segment layer that number is j.
(4) bridge layer: representing bed rearrangement steel structure bridge, is the set of all spanning layers.So the manufacturing operation of bridge layer It is the set of spanning layer manufacturing operation, is total manufacturing operation.Ensemble indicates are as follows:
T_B={ T_BsjJ=1,2,3 ..., m
In formula: T_B indicates bridge layer manufacturing operation.
The processing and manufacturing of steel structure bridge is only unable to complete by above description, it is also necessary to by step 2 supplement it is some its The further perfect information model of his necessary information.
Step 2, the essential information T_Basic: essential information of manufacturing operation include the title of manufacturing operation, number and appoint The publisher of business, is shown below.
T_Basic={ T_name, T_id, T_customer }
In formula: T_name is the title of manufacturing operation;T_id is the number of manufacturing operation;T_customer is manufacturing operation Publisher.
Some manufacturing operation will also be defined it, propose corresponding require.For the system of steel structure bridge Task is made, delivery date, cost, qualification and the requirement for executing standard are generally comprised.The requirement T_Requirement of manufacturing operation is retouched It states as follows:
T_Requirement={ duedate, cost, qualification, standard }
In formula: duedate is delivery date;Cost is cost requirement;Qualification is qualification requirement;standard To execute standard.
The manufacturing operation of steel structure bridge should also include the requirement of special equipment and tooling.Particular/special requirement T_ Special is indicated, is described with following formula.
T_special={ s_equipment, s_tools }
In formula: s_equipment indicates special installation;S_tools indicates special tooling.
Synthesis assembles each element, and the manufacturing operation MT's of steel structure bridge is described as follows:
MT={ T_Basic, T_B, T_Requirement, T_Special }
Referring to Fig. 3, step 3: the foundation of manufacturing enterprise's information model, the mathematical description of manufacturing enterprise's information model are as follows:
ME={ ME_Basic, ME_Capacity, ME_Status, ME_Auxiliary },
Including:
The essential information ME_Basic={ E_name, E_location, E_contact } of manufacturing enterprise,
The manufacturing capacity ME_Capacity={ C-M, C-S, C-A, C-G, C-T, C-R } of manufacturing enterprise,
The status information ME_Status={ E-status, E-qualification } of enterprise,
The auxiliary information ME_Auxiliary={ OTD, Qualified-rate, M-experience } of enterprise.
E_name is manufacturing enterprise's title, and E_location is enterprise guard station, and E_contact is Enterprise linkage mode;
C-M, C-S, C-A, C-G, C-T, C-R are the evaluation of enterprise's manufacturing capacity, respectively can provide material, and shape can be processed Precision can be processed in shape, size can be processed, it is possible to provide processing technology, it is possible to provide operation resource;
E-status be manufacturing enterprise management position, including survival, in industry, revoke, nullify, move into, stop doing business and clear; E-qualification is manufacturing enterprise's qualification;
OTD is on-time-delivery rate, and Qualified-rate is manufacturing enterprise's qualification rate, and M-experience is enterprise's manufacture Experience.
Step 4: steel structure bridge manufacture matching mould is established according to manufacturing operation information model and manufacturing enterprise's information model Type, carries out ontology editing using Ontology Editing Tool, carries out ontology inference by Jena inference machine, constructs accurate complete ontology Model converts the intelligible model of computer for conceptual model, obtains alternative enterprise's option b1~B4
Step 5: second part establishes corresponding alternative enterprise's scheme model, corresponding tool according to above-mentioned alternative enterprise's scheme The weight model of all properties in the attribute model and the program of body some scheme, and construct initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix.
Above-mentioned alternative enterprise's scheme model set is described as P={ P1,P2,…,Pm, m is the quantity of fabrication scheme;Belong to The ensemble of property model is described as U={ u1,u2,…,un, n is the quantity of the attribute of some scheme;The set of weight model Change is described as W={ w1,w2,…,wn, all weight definitions are as follows: w1+w2+…+wn=1;
According to the power of all properties in alternative enterprise's scheme model, the attribute model of corresponding specific some scheme and the program The initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix of weight model construction is as follows:
Wherein, xijFor the initial decision evaluation index of j-th of attribute of i-th of scheme in initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix Value, such as the cost that the initial decision evaluation index value of cost nature is spent for the execution program.
Step 6: specifically includes the following steps:
A) rememberFor Triangular Fuzzy Number, the desired value calculation formula of Triangular Fuzzy Number is defined are as follows:
B) automatic reasoner is established according to the related data of evaluation purpose and evaluation index, using 0.1~0.9 scale (0.1 1.1)~0.9 scale setting table, which is shown in Table, evaluates two-by-two the importance of attribute and is extended to Triangular Fuzzy Number, then establish triangle Complementary Judgment Matrices with Fuzzy Numbers carries out five assessments, to B in expert system1~B4The specific data of assessment are as shown in table 1.2.
1.1 0.1~0.9 scale of table sets table
1.2 triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix of table
The weight of expert system five times assessments is respectively as follows: 0.3,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.1.Comprehensive weight obtains comprehensive triangle Complementary Judgment Matrices with Fuzzy Numbers, specific value are as shown in table 2.
Table 2 integrates triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix
By upper table, the Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of each index is calculated according to formula 2, as shown in table 3.
3 Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of table
According to formula 3 and formula 4, it is as follows that each index weight value can be found out in conjunction with upper table:
According to above-mentioned steps, successively the weight of the two-level index under These parameters is assessed, is calculated.C1And C2's Weight computing process is as follows:
4 triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix of table
5 Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of table
C1And C2Weight it is as follows:
C3To C7Weight calculating process it is as follows:
6 triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix of table
Table 7 integrates triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix
According to upper table, C is calculated3To C7Triangular Fuzzy Number weight, as shown in table 8 below.
8 Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of table
C is calculated according to upper table3To C7Weight it is as follows:
C8And C9Weight calculating process it is as follows:
9 triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix of table
Table 10 integrates triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix
11 Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of table
It obtainsWithNumerical value it is as follows:
C10And C11Weight calculating process it is as follows:
12 triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix of table
Table 13 integrates triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix
14 Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of table
Obtain C10And C11Weight it is as follows:
The calculated result statistics of above-mentioned weight is as shown in Table 15.
15 weight of table statistics
The steel structure bridge manufacturing operation information model of foundation with Steel structure manufacturing enterprises information model by matching To four sets of alternative enterprise's schemes.Standardization processing is carried out to initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix using vector transformation, is standardized Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix is solved and is sorted to standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix, obtains preferred plan.
Data after initial data and standardization processing are as shown in table 16.Wherein data × 10 after standardization processing-6
16 initial data of table and standardization processing
After the weight in table 15, weighted normal matrix can be obtained.Its specific value is as shown in table 16.
17 weighted normal matrix numerical value of table
It notices that C1, C2, C8 belong to negative attribute, therefore is minimized in ideal solution scheme set, in minus ideal result scheme It is maximized in set.In conjunction with upper table it is found that the set of ideal solution schemeAre as follows:
The set of minus ideal result schemeAre as follows:
Weighted euclidean distance of four kinds of schemes away from ideal solution and minus ideal resultIt is respectively as follows:
Calculate comprehensive degree of approach index fiAre as follows: fi=[0.9178,0.745,0.797,0.203]
Scheme is ranked up to obtain from small to large according to comprehensive degree of approach index: X4<X2<X3<X1.Therefore scheme one is most Good scheme, it is preferential to select, and scheme three is alternatively.

Claims (8)

1. a kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method, method includes the following steps:
Step 1: first by carrying out distinguishing hierarchy to steel structure bridge, corresponding manufacturing operation model is established, supplement manufacture is appointed Business essential information, mission requirements and particular/special requirement, and manufacturing operation essential information model, manufacturing operation requirement model are established respectively With manufacturing operation particular/special requirement model;
Step 2: based on manufacturing operation model, manufacturing operation essential information model, manufacturing operation requirement model and manufacture times are established Business particular/special requirement model foundation manufacturing operation information model;
Step 3: based on manufacturing operation information model establish alternative fabrication scheme model, alternative fabrication scheme attribute model and The weight model of all properties in alternative fabrication scheme, and construct initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix;
Step 4: determine that the triangle of all properties of all alternative fabrication schemes is fuzzy using Triangular Fuzzy Number-TOPSIS method Number Complementary Judgement Matrix carries out standardization processing to initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix using vector transformation, obtains belong to of standardizing more Property decision matrix, to standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix solved and sorted, obtain preferred plan.
2. steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that alternative to look forward in step 3 Industry scheme model set P={ P1,P2,…,Pm, PiFor alternative enterprise's scheme, 1≤i≤m, m are the quantity of alternative fabrication scheme;
Set U={ the u of attribute model1,u2,…,un, ujFor the different attribute in some scheme, 1≤j≤m, n are some The quantity of the attribute of scheme;
Set W={ the w of weight model1,w2,…,wn, wjFor the weight of different attribute in some scheme, 1≤j≤m owns Weight definition are as follows: w1+w2+…+wn=1;
According to the weight mould of all properties in alternative fabrication scheme model, the attribute model of corresponding specific some scheme and the program The initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix X of type building is as follows:
Wherein, xijFor the initial decision evaluation index value of j-th of attribute of i-th of scheme in initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix.
3. steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method as claimed in claim 2, which is characterized in that step 4 includes following step It is rapid:
A) rememberFor Triangular Fuzzy Number, the desired value of Triangular Fuzzy Number is definedCalculation formula are as follows:
Wherein, 0≤λ≤1, aLFor most conservative evaluation of estimate, aMFor most probable evaluation Value, aUFor most optimistic evaluation of estimate;
B) attribute is evaluated according to evaluation purpose and evaluation index two-by-two, establishes triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix, kth time assessment Triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrixWhereinIn formula It respectively indicates expert system kth time and assesses most conservative evaluation of i-th obtained of the evaluation index relative to j-th of evaluation index Value, most probable evaluation of estimate and most optimistic evaluation of estimate;
C) evaluation of estimate is assembled with weight, obtains the synthesis triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix member about evaluation index Element:
In formula: i, j=1,2 ..., n, k are assessment number;ωkFor the authority of expert system kth time assessment;
D) for the Triangular Fuzzy Number weight of i-th of indexIt is calculated using following formula:
In formula,Indicate most conservative evaluation of estimate of i-th of evaluation index relative to j-th of evaluation index;Indicate i-th of evaluation Most probable evaluation of estimate of the index relative to j-th of evaluation index;Indicate i-th of evaluation index relative to j-th of evaluation index Most optimistic evaluation of estimate;
E) policymaker takes neutral attitude herein, therefore takes λ=0.5, and desired value calculation formula becomes:
F) the weight ω of the ith attribute of each scheme in alternative enterprise's scheme set P is calculatedi,
G) weight statistics is carried out to more attributes of each of P scheme, the triangle for establishing all properties of all schemes is fuzzy Number Complementary Judgement Matrix, using vector transformation method using triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix to initial multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix Standardization processing is carried out, standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix Y is obtained,
Wherein, yijIndicate the weight of j-th of attribute of i-th of scheme;
H) the set C of ideal solution scheme is determined according to standardization multiple attribute decision making (MADM) matrix numerical valuej *With the set of minus ideal result scheme Cj 0, calculate weighted euclidean distance d of each scheme away from ideal solution and minus ideal resultj *And dj 0And comprehensive degree of approach index fj
I) all schemes are ranked up from small to large according to comprehensive degree of approach index, the comprehensive maximum scheme of degree of approach index is For preferred plan.
4. steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method as claimed in claim 3, which is characterized in that the selection of λ in step a) Attitudes toward risk depending on policymaker:
When policymaker is biased to optimism, 0.5 < λ < 1;
When policymaker is biased to pessimistic attitude, 0 < λ < 0.5.
5. steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method as claimed in claim 3, which is characterized in that step f) further includes to power The consistency checking of weight values, the judge index CI calculation formula of consistency checking are as follows:
In formula: λmaxForMaximum characteristic root value;ForExpectation, Consistency judgement factor CR calculation formula are as follows:In formula: RI is Aver-age Random Consistency Index;As CR < 0.1, then Think that Triangular Fuzzy Number judgment matrix by consistency check, re-establishes Triangular Fuzzy Number judgment matrix if it can't pass.
6. steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in step 1, steel construction Bridge according to being in turn divided into from low to high: characteristic layer, segment layer, spanning layer and bridge layer.
7. steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in step 3, be based on Manufacturing operation information model and manufacturing enterprise's information model establish steel structure bridge manufacture Matching Model, are obtained by ontology inference Alternative enterprise scheme;Then the attribute mould of alternative fabrication scheme model, alternative fabrication scheme is established further according to alternative enterprise's scheme The weight model of all properties in type and alternative fabrication scheme.
8. steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method as claimed in claim 7, which is characterized in that in step 3, manufacture enterprise The mathematical description of industry information model are as follows: ME={ ME_Basic, ME_Capacity, ME_Status, ME_Auxiliary }, In, ME_Basic indicates the essential information of manufacturing enterprise, and ME_Capacity indicates the manufacturing capacity of manufacturing enterprise, ME_Status Indicate the status information of enterprise, ME_Auxiliary indicates the auxiliary information of enterprise.
CN201811151378.6A 2018-09-29 2018-09-29 Steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method Active CN109299550B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811151378.6A CN109299550B (en) 2018-09-29 2018-09-29 Steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811151378.6A CN109299550B (en) 2018-09-29 2018-09-29 Steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109299550A true CN109299550A (en) 2019-02-01
CN109299550B CN109299550B (en) 2022-09-27

Family

ID=65161356

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201811151378.6A Active CN109299550B (en) 2018-09-29 2018-09-29 Steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109299550B (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111931336A (en) * 2020-06-30 2020-11-13 武汉理工大学 Complex welding part unit dividing method and device and readable storage medium
CN112084034A (en) * 2020-09-18 2020-12-15 杭州电子科技大学 MCT scheduling method based on edge platform layer adjustment coefficient
CN112733461A (en) * 2021-01-21 2021-04-30 广东工业大学 Digital twin driven real-time rendering method, system and computer readable medium
CN112084034B (en) * 2020-09-18 2024-05-24 杭州电子科技大学 MCT scheduling method based on edge platform layer adjustment coefficient

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004118552A (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-15 Toshiba Corp Method for supporting multipurpose decision making process and its program
CN102722634A (en) * 2012-04-20 2012-10-10 湖南省防雷中心 Regional lightning disaster risk evaluation method
CN107220498A (en) * 2017-05-26 2017-09-29 中南大学 A kind of mechanical material evaluation method and its system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004118552A (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-15 Toshiba Corp Method for supporting multipurpose decision making process and its program
CN102722634A (en) * 2012-04-20 2012-10-10 湖南省防雷中心 Regional lightning disaster risk evaluation method
CN107220498A (en) * 2017-05-26 2017-09-29 中南大学 A kind of mechanical material evaluation method and its system

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
廖勇: "基于三角模糊数的铁路客运站选址方案评价方法", 《中国铁道科学》 *
谢锡康: "基于模糊数学理论的桥梁技术状况评定方法研究", 《湖南交通科技》 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111931336A (en) * 2020-06-30 2020-11-13 武汉理工大学 Complex welding part unit dividing method and device and readable storage medium
CN112084034A (en) * 2020-09-18 2020-12-15 杭州电子科技大学 MCT scheduling method based on edge platform layer adjustment coefficient
CN112084034B (en) * 2020-09-18 2024-05-24 杭州电子科技大学 MCT scheduling method based on edge platform layer adjustment coefficient
CN112733461A (en) * 2021-01-21 2021-04-30 广东工业大学 Digital twin driven real-time rendering method, system and computer readable medium
CN112733461B (en) * 2021-01-21 2021-07-27 广东工业大学 Digital twin driven real-time rendering method, system and computer readable medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109299550B (en) 2022-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Liu et al. Digital twin-based process reuse and evaluation approach for smart process planning
Peng et al. A research on the cutting database system based on machining features and TOPSIS
CN102081706B (en) Process planning method based on similarity theory
Kotliar et al. Ensuring the economic efficiency of enterprises by multi-criteria selection of the optimal manufacturingprocess
CN102622663A (en) Structural metal feeding method and manufacturing system for structural metals
Sahu et al. Benchmarking CNC machine tool using hybrid-fuzzy methodology: a multi-indices decision making (MCDM) approach
CN111340306A (en) Machine tool equipment optimization method for intelligent manufacturing
CN107316140A (en) Digit Control Machine Tool method for optimizing under a kind of cloud manufacturing environment
CN107506863A (en) One kind is based on big data power network physical assets O&M cost of overhaul Forecasting Methodology
CN109299550A (en) A kind of steel structure bridge manufacturing decision evaluation method
Deng Research on evaluation of intelligent manufacturing capability and layout superiority of supply chains by big data analysis
Wahab et al. Factors-driven comparison between BIM-based and traditional 2D quantity takeoff in construction cost estimation
Zhang et al. An approach to evaluating sustainable supply chain risk management based on BWM and linguistic value soft set theory
Zha et al. A hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS for facility layout selection
Nagar et al. An AHP-based approach for the selection of HFMS: an Indian perspective
Wankhede et al. Application of total interpretive structural modeling for analyzing factors of additive manufacturing and industry 4.0 integration
CN105550813A (en) Commercial evaluation method for value network-based mechanized equipment cloud service resources
Helmann et al. Reference architectures for Industry 4.0: Literature review
Sahebjamnia et al. Designing a new model of distributed quality control for sub-assemble products based on the intelligent web information system
Chen et al. Towards comprehensive digital evaluation of low-carbon machining process planning
Petrillo et al. Lay-out optimisation through an integrated approach based on material flow and operations mapping using a commercial software
Khan et al. Role of CAD/CAM in designing challenges facing in manufacturing industry and developing manufacturing in modern manufacturing technology
Mróz The role of product cost deployment in the early product management methodology within the WCM system–a case study
Rodrigues et al. Multi-criteria group decision making in the supplier selection of capital parts
CN114240095B (en) Production method of PBOM (private branch exchange) process split piece oriented to complex scene

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant