CN108614804B - Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test - Google Patents

Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108614804B
CN108614804B CN201810379450.4A CN201810379450A CN108614804B CN 108614804 B CN108614804 B CN 108614804B CN 201810379450 A CN201810379450 A CN 201810379450A CN 108614804 B CN108614804 B CN 108614804B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
state
parameters
parameter
signal
estimated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201810379450.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108614804A (en
Inventor
李豪
顾勇为
郭淑妹
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Information Engineering University of PLA Strategic Support Force
Original Assignee
Information Engineering University of PLA Strategic Support Force
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Information Engineering University of PLA Strategic Support Force filed Critical Information Engineering University of PLA Strategic Support Force
Priority to CN201810379450.4A priority Critical patent/CN108614804B/en
Publication of CN108614804A publication Critical patent/CN108614804A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108614804B publication Critical patent/CN108614804B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/18Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Filters That Use Time-Delay Elements (AREA)
  • Complex Calculations (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test. The method comprises the following steps: step 1, obtaining t k+1 State parameter X to be estimated at time k+1 Initial state estimation of
Figure DDA0001640687990000011
And a typical parameter theta k+1 Least squares estimation of
Figure DDA0001640687990000012
Step 2, according to the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 The ith parameter of
Figure DDA0001640687990000013
State estimation of
Figure DDA0001640687990000014
Determining
Figure DDA0001640687990000015
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of (1), 2 …, t-1, t, t is the number of state parameters to be estimated; step 3, according to the above
Figure DDA0001640687990000016
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of (2), the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 Dividing into interference-related state parameters and non-interference-related state parameters; step 4, estimating according to least square
Figure DDA0001640687990000017
Determining ridge parameters of disturbance-related state parameters
Figure DDA0001640687990000018
Ridge parameters with non-interference state parameters
Figure DDA0001640687990000019
Step 5, according to the ridge parameters
Figure DDA00016406879900000110
And
Figure DDA00016406879900000111
determining a state parameter X to be estimated k+1 To estimate said initial state
Figure DDA00016406879900000112
And (6) correcting. The invention effectively reduces the introduction of deviation while reducing the estimation variance of the state parameters, so that the estimation result of the state parameters is better in the mean square error sense.

Description

Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of dynamic data processing, in particular to a regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test.
Background
Kalman filtering is one of the most common methods for dynamic data processing, and has been extensively studied and widely applied in geodetic surveying, satellite navigation, and satellite orbit determination. The ill-conditioned nature of the observation matrix in the discrete dynamic system can produce very big influence to Kalman filtering state estimation, in order to overcome the influence of the ill-conditioned nature of the observation matrix, improve the precision of parameter estimation, many scholars have given improved algorithm.
Currently, there are some methods proposed by scholars to solve the ill-posed problem in discrete dynamic systems from the perspective of biased estimation: (1) the Biased estimation is combined with Kalman filtering to provide a Biased Kalman Filter. (2) The ridge regression and Kalman filtering are combined, and the gain array is corrected, so that the adverse effect of observation matrix ill-conditioned on a filtering value is overcome. (3) Combining Stein compression estimation and ridge regression with Kalman filtering, providing corresponding compression type Kalman filtering and ridge type Kalman filtering and their algorithms, and providing a method for selecting compression coefficients and ridge parameters.
In fact, the estimated hazard size of each state parameter is different according to the ill-condition of the observation matrix, and the hazard size is related to the magnitude of the state parameter itself and the degree of the complex collinearity of the observation matrix data column corresponding to the parameter.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a two-parameter ridge Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio measurement, which measures the influence of the ill-conditioned property of parameter state estimation by using signal-to-noise ratio statistics, takes targeted measures on a Kalman filtering recursion process according to a measurement result, improves a ridge Kalman filtering algorithm, and further reduces the influence of the ill-conditioned property of an observation matrix on the state estimation.
The invention provides a regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test, which comprises the following steps:
step 1, obtaining t k+1 State parameter X to be estimated at time k+1 Initial state estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000021
And a typical parameter theta k+1 Least squares estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000022
Step 2, according to the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 The ith parameter of
Figure GDA0003745529980000023
State estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000024
Determining
Figure GDA0003745529980000025
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of (1), 2 …, t-1, t, t is the number of state parameters to be estimated;
step 3, according to the above
Figure GDA0003745529980000026
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of (2), the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 Dividing into interference-related state parameters and non-interference-related state parameters;
step 4, estimating according to least square
Figure GDA0003745529980000027
Determining ridge parameters of disturbance-related state parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000028
Ridge parameters with non-interference state parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000029
Step 5, according to the ridge parameters
Figure GDA00037455299800000210
And
Figure GDA00037455299800000211
determining a state parameter X to be estimated k+1 To estimate said initial state
Figure GDA00037455299800000212
And (6) correcting.
Further, the method further comprises:
obtaining t k+1 Normal matrix N of time instants k+1
If the judgment result is positive matrix N k+1 Is greater than the preset condition number threshold, then for t k+1 And carrying out signal-to-noise ratio statistics on each state parameter at each moment.
Further, the step 2 specifically includes:
according to the formula
Figure GDA00037455299800000213
Determining
Figure GDA00037455299800000214
Signal to noise ratio statistic of
Figure GDA00037455299800000215
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure GDA00037455299800000216
is composed of
Figure GDA00037455299800000217
The variance of (c).
Further, the step 3 specifically includes:
if it is
Figure GDA00037455299800000218
Then the
Figure GDA00037455299800000219
Is a disturbance related state parameter;
if it is
Figure GDA00037455299800000220
Then
Figure GDA00037455299800000221
The non-interference state parameters are obtained;
wherein
Figure GDA00037455299800000222
Omega is the level of significance and is,
Figure GDA00037455299800000223
is center x 2 Distribution of
Figure GDA00037455299800000227
Upper omega quantile.
Further, the step 4 specifically includes:
the ridge parameters
Figure GDA00037455299800000224
And
Figure GDA00037455299800000225
respectively according to the following formula
Figure GDA00037455299800000226
Figure GDA0003745529980000031
Determining; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure GDA0003745529980000032
to represent
Figure GDA0003745529980000033
The maximum value of (a) is,
Figure GDA0003745529980000034
s is the number of interference-related state parameters.
Further, the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 The correction matrix of (a) is:
Figure GDA0003745529980000035
the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test provided by the invention divides the state parameters to be estimated into interference parameters and non-interference parameters according to the magnitude of the signal-to-noise ratio statistic of each state parameter; and then estimate based on least squares
Figure GDA0003745529980000036
Determining two ridge parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000037
And
Figure GDA0003745529980000038
so as to perform different intensity ridge-type corrections on the state estimates of the two part parameters. For interference parameters, the interference parameters are corrected
Figure GDA0003745529980000039
Relatively large, for non-involved parameters, make it correct ridge parameters
Figure GDA00037455299800000310
Is relatively small. The refined processing effectively reduces the introduction of deviation in ridge type Kalman filtering while reducing the state parameter estimation variance, so that the state parameter estimation result is better in the mean square error sense.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a variation of condition numbers of a normal matrix in each filtering method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating changes of mean square errors in filtering methods according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating changes in state estimation errors in each filtering method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, but not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Before describing the regularized Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test provided by the invention, a discrete dynamic system, a Kalman filtering elementary equation, a ridge-type Kalman filtering state estimation and the influence of the ill-conditioned observation matrix in the discrete dynamic system on the Kalman filtering state estimation are introduced in the following.
The embodiment of the invention adopts the following state space model to describe a discrete dynamic system:
X k+1 =Φ k+1,k X k +W k (1)
Y k =H k X k +V k (2)
in the formula, X k ∈R t For discrete dynamic systems at time t k The state of (1); y is k ∈R n Is the corresponding observed signal; phi k+1,k Is a t × t nonsingular matrix, is t k Time to t k+1 A one-step state transition matrix of the moment; h k Is an nxt observation matrix; w k ∈R t Input noise that is normally distributed; v k ∈R n Observed noise that follows a normal distribution. Equation (1) is called a state equation, and equation (2) is called an observation equation.
At the same time, assume W k And V k Satisfy the requirement of
E(W k )=0,Cov(W k ,W j )=E(W k W j T )=Q k δ kj
E(V k )=0,Cov(V k ,V j )=E(V k V j T )=R k δ kj
Cov(W k ,V j )=E(W k V j T )=0 (3)
In the formula, Q k For a covariance matrix of the input noise, assume Q k Is a non-negative array, R k To observe the covariance matrix of the noise, let R be assumed k Is a positive definite matrix; delta kj Is a Kronecher-delta function, which is defined as
Figure GDA0003745529980000041
As can be seen from formula (3), W k And V k Mean value of zero and covariance matrix of Q k And R k Is white uncorrelated noise.
The following relevant introduction is made to the basic equation of the kalman filter algorithm:
and (3) state one-step prediction:
Figure GDA0003745529980000051
one-step prediction covariance matrix:
Figure GDA0003745529980000052
a filter gain matrix:
Figure GDA0003745529980000053
and (3) updating the state:
Figure GDA0003745529980000054
estimating an error variance matrix:
Figure GDA0003745529980000055
equations (4) to (8) are basic equations of recursive kalman filtering. Given an initial value
Figure GDA0003745529980000056
And P 0 According to t k+1 Observed quantity Y of time k+1 Then t can be calculated by recursion k+1 State estimation of time of day
Figure GDA0003745529980000057
From the basic Kalman filtering equation, t k+1 The state estimate for a time instant can in turn be expressed as:
Figure GDA0003745529980000058
namely, it is
Figure GDA0003745529980000059
Is a solution of formula (10):
Figure GDA00037455299800000510
is provided with
Figure GDA00037455299800000511
N k+1 A normal matrix called kalman filtering. N is a radical of k+1 Is non-negative array, for N k+1 The decomposition of the characteristic value is carried out,
Figure GDA00037455299800000512
Then
Figure GDA00037455299800000513
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure GDA00037455299800000514
Figure GDA0003745529980000061
if the observation matrix H k+1 Presence of pathological conditions, then H k+1 And
Figure GDA0003745529980000062
is likely to be such that N k+1 The existence of the ill-conditioned character, which is shown by the practical work,
Figure GDA0003745529980000063
the control effect on the ill-conditioned nature of the observation matrix is weak and cannot eliminate the adverse effect of the ill-conditioned nature of the observation matrix on the state estimation.
From the formula (12), N can be seen k+1 Presence of one or more small eigenvalues
Figure GDA0003745529980000064
At this time, if Y k+1 And
Figure GDA0003745529980000065
there is a small observed error or bias to which the inverse of the small eigenvalue in the above equation amplifies, thereby causing the estimate to deviate far from the true value.
In order to reduce the influence of small characteristic values on the observation result, a ridge type Kalman filtering method is provided on the basis of the algorithm, t k+1 The ridge-type kalman filter state estimation at time is:
Figure GDA0003745529980000066
ridge-type Kalman filtering utilizes a ridge parameter α k+1 For small eigenvalue
Figure GDA0003745529980000067
And (4) suppressing is carried out, and the variance of state estimation is reduced, so that the amplification effect of small characteristic values on observation errors is weakened.
However, the ridge-type kalman filter has two drawbacks, one is that no ill-conditioned information is utilized, so that correction of ridge parameters is blindness, and all parameters are corrected completely and consistently; secondly, deviation is introduced by the ridge-type Kalman filtering, and the deviation introduced by the ridge-type Kalman filtering is possibly amplified in the continuous recursion process, so that the estimation precision is influenced.
From the above analysis, t k+1 State estimation of time of day
Figure GDA0003745529980000068
Associated with the normal matrix (see equation (10)), if normal matrix N k+1 If a pathological condition exists, t is k+1 The state estimate at the time will become very unstable, which is where the ill-conditioned nature of the observation matrix exerts an influence on the state estimate. Normal matrix N k+1 The reason for the morbidity is that the complex collinearity relationship exists between the data columns, thereby causing t k+1 The state estimation at the moment is not good, but not all the state estimation is not good, the ill-conditioned property of the normal matrix only has larger influence on the state parameter estimation corresponding to the data columns participating in the complex collinearity, and has smaller influence on the state parameter estimation corresponding to the data columns not participating in the complex collinearity.
The invention provides a regularization Kalman filtering method (DPRTKF for short) based on signal-to-noise ratio test on the basis of a ridge Kalman filtering method, which corrects the state parameters of two parts with smaller and larger ill-conditioned observed matrixes with different strengths. Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a regularization kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 1, the method comprises the steps of:
s101, acquiring t k+1 State parameter X to be estimated at time k+1 Initial state estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000071
And a typical parameter theta k+1 Least squares estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000072
Specifically, the method provided by the invention needs to acquire t in advance k+1 State parameter X to be estimated at time k+1 Initial state estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000073
And a typical parameter theta k+1 Least squares estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000074
Since the invention aims at estimating the state obtained by the existing Kalman filtering method
Figure GDA0003745529980000075
The correction is performed, so that the initial state estimation obtained by using the existing Kalman filtering method needs to be obtained in advance
Figure GDA0003745529980000076
And a typical rule parameter theta k+1 Least squares estimation of
Figure GDA0003745529980000077
For example, given initial values of state parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000078
And mean square error thereof
Figure GDA0003745529980000079
Using the kalman filter primitive equation:
one-step prediction equation of state:
Figure GDA00037455299800000710
one-step prediction covariance matrix equation:
Figure GDA00037455299800000711
filter gain matrix equation:
Figure GDA00037455299800000712
the following can be obtained:
Figure GDA00037455299800000713
Figure GDA00037455299800000714
typical parameters
Figure GDA00037455299800000715
Its least square estimation is
Figure GDA00037455299800000716
S102, according to the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 The ith parameter of
Figure GDA00037455299800000717
State estimation of
Figure GDA00037455299800000718
Determining
Figure GDA00037455299800000719
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of (1), 2 …, t-1, t, t is the number of state parameters to be estimated;
s103, according to the
Figure GDA00037455299800000720
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 Dividing into interference-related state parameters and non-interference-related state parameters;
s104, estimating according to least squares
Figure GDA00037455299800000721
Determining ridge parameters of disturbance-related state parameters
Figure GDA00037455299800000722
Ridge parameters with non-interference state parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000081
S105, according to the ridge parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000082
And
Figure GDA0003745529980000083
determining a state parameter X to be estimated k+1 To estimate said initial state
Figure GDA0003745529980000084
And (6) correcting.
The regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test provided by the invention divides the state parameters to be estimated into interference parameters and non-interference parameters according to the magnitude of the signal-to-noise ratio statistic of each state parameter; and then estimate based on least squares
Figure GDA0003745529980000085
Determining two ridge parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000086
And
Figure GDA0003745529980000087
so as to perform different intensity ridge-type corrections on the state estimates of the two part parameters. For interference parameters, the parameters are corrected
Figure GDA0003745529980000088
Relatively large, for non-involved parameters, make it correct ridge parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000089
Is relatively small. The refined processing effectively reduces the introduction of deviation in ridge Kalman filtering while reducing the state parameter estimation variance, so that the state parameter estimation result is better in mean square error sense.
On the basis of the above embodiment, the method further comprises the steps of:
obtaining t k+1 Normal matrix N of time instants k+1
If judging the learning method matrix N k+1 Is greater than the preset condition number threshold, then for t k+1 Each state parameter at a momentThe numbers are counted for signal to noise ratio.
In particular, the Fa matrix N k+1 If the condition number of the observation matrix is greater than the preset condition number threshold, the observation matrix is considered to be a sick matrix, and the ill-condition of the observation matrix can adversely affect the state estimation result of the state parameter to be estimated, so that the t needs to be estimated k+1 And carrying out signal-to-noise ratio statistics on each state parameter at each moment. Therefore, the state parameters to be estimated can be grouped for the following signal-to-noise ratio statistics based on each state parameter, and the state parameters to be estimated are divided into non-interference state parameters with small influence and interference state parameters with large influence.
On the basis of the foregoing embodiments, the step S102 in the method specifically includes: according to the formula
Figure GDA00037455299800000810
Determining
Figure GDA00037455299800000811
Signal to noise ratio statistic of
Figure GDA00037455299800000812
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure GDA00037455299800000813
is composed of
Figure GDA00037455299800000814
The variance of (c).
On the basis of the foregoing embodiments, the step S103 in the method specifically includes:
if it is
Figure GDA00037455299800000815
Then
Figure GDA00037455299800000816
The state parameter is a non-interference state parameter;
if it is
Figure GDA0003745529980000091
Then
Figure GDA0003745529980000092
Is a disturbance related state parameter;
wherein
Figure GDA0003745529980000093
Omega is the level of significance and is,
Figure GDA0003745529980000094
is center x 2 Distribution of
Figure GDA0003745529980000095
Upper omega quantile.
In particular, when
Figure GDA0003745529980000096
Considering the complex collinearity to estimate the corresponding state
Figure GDA0003745529980000097
The damage of the (A) is serious, and the estimation effect is not good; when in use
Figure GDA0003745529980000098
Considering the complex collinearity to estimate the corresponding state
Figure GDA0003745529980000099
The damage of (2) is small, and the estimation effect is good. By calculating the SNR statistic, t can be calculated k+1 The state parameter of the moment is divided into two parts
Figure GDA00037455299800000910
The s parameters for which the SNR statistic is smaller are
Figure GDA00037455299800000911
The complex collinearity is greatly damaged and is called as interference-related state parameter; the t-s parameters with larger signal-to-noise ratio statistics are
Figure GDA00037455299800000912
They are less compromised by complex collinearity and are referred to as non-interfering state parameters. For the
Figure GDA00037455299800000913
Because the estimation is poor, the parameters of the part are greatly corrected; for the
Figure GDA00037455299800000914
With minor modifications thereto. In practice, the threshold value
Figure GDA00037455299800000915
Can be determined flexibly according to the actual situation.
On the basis of the foregoing embodiments, step S104 in the method specifically includes:
the ridge parameters
Figure GDA00037455299800000916
And
Figure GDA00037455299800000917
respectively according to the following formula
Figure GDA00037455299800000918
Figure GDA00037455299800000919
Determining; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure GDA00037455299800000920
to represent
Figure GDA00037455299800000921
The maximum value of (a) is,
Figure GDA00037455299800000922
s is interferenceThe number of state parameters.
Specifically, all signal-to-noise ratio statistics are combined
Figure GDA00037455299800000923
Rearranged in descending order and numbered as
Figure GDA00037455299800000924
Order to
Figure GDA00037455299800000925
Figure GDA00037455299800000926
Is the signal to noise ratio, then its inverse
Figure GDA00037455299800000927
The larger the noise-to-signal ratio, the greater the degree to which the estimate of the corresponding state parameter is compromised by complex collinearity. By using
Figure GDA0003745529980000101
Noise signal ratio mean
Figure GDA0003745529980000102
And
Figure GDA0003745529980000103
noise signal ratio mean
Figure GDA0003745529980000104
Quantitatively reacting with the ratio of
Figure GDA0003745529980000105
And
Figure GDA0003745529980000106
the proportional relation between the complex collinearity harmfulness degrees of the parameter estimation is adopted to determine c k+1
On the basis of the above embodiments, the state parameter X to be estimated in the method k+1 The correction matrix of (a) is:
Figure GDA0003745529980000107
in particular, the correction matrix Z k+1 For t rows and t columns matrix, the first s rows of the matrix are all main diagonals
Figure GDA0003745529980000108
For correcting disturbance-related state parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000109
The front and back t-s rows of the matrix are main diagonals
Figure GDA00037455299800001010
For correcting non-interference state parameters
Figure GDA00037455299800001011
The invention is further illustrated by the following further specific examples.
Step 1, initialization: initial value of given state parameter
Figure GDA00037455299800001012
And mean square error thereof
Figure GDA00037455299800001013
Step 2, time updating:
Figure GDA00037455299800001014
Figure GDA00037455299800001015
and 3, updating the state:
Figure GDA00037455299800001016
Figure GDA00037455299800001017
Figure GDA00037455299800001018
step 4. judging method matrix
Figure GDA0003745529980000111
If the condition number is greater than 500, if so, go to step 5, otherwise return to step 2.
And 5, measuring the signal-to-noise ratio, and determining interference-related state parameters and non-interference-related state parameters.
Step 6, determining two ridge parameters
Figure GDA0003745529980000112
And parameter c k+1
And 7, correcting the state estimation by utilizing the two-parameter ridge Kalman filtering, and calculating a mean square error matrix
Figure GDA0003745529980000113
Figure GDA0003745529980000114
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure GDA0003745529980000115
step 8. order
Figure GDA0003745529980000116
And returning to the step 2, and aligning the next time by using Kalman filtering
And estimating the state parameters.
From the above, it can be seen that:
Figure GDA0003745529980000117
therefore, it is not only easy to use
Figure GDA0003745529980000118
Is that
Figure GDA0003745529980000119
A linear transformation of (a);
and because
Figure GDA00037455299800001110
Therefore, it is not only easy to use
Figure GDA00037455299800001111
Is a state parameter X k A biased estimate of (d);
at the same time
Figure GDA00037455299800001112
Therefore, it is not only easy to use
Figure GDA00037455299800001113
Is a state parameter X k A compressed biased estimation of (2).
In addition to this, the present invention is,
Figure GDA0003745529980000121
Figure GDA0003745529980000122
Figure GDA0003745529980000123
due to the fact that
Figure GDA0003745529980000124
Therefore, it is not only easy to use
Figure GDA0003745529980000125
And because, when selecting the appropriate initial value
Figure GDA0003745529980000126
And mean square error thereof
Figure GDA0003745529980000127
Time, Kalman filtering
Figure GDA0003745529980000128
Can be an unbiased estimation, while the ordinary ridge-type Kalman filtering
Figure GDA0003745529980000129
And regularized filtering provided by the present invention
Figure GDA00037455299800001210
Are all Kalman filtering
Figure GDA00037455299800001211
Is estimated by compression of
Figure GDA00037455299800001212
Filtering Kalman
Figure GDA00037455299800001213
Has a compressive strength greater than
Figure GDA00037455299800001214
Filtering Kalman
Figure GDA00037455299800001215
The compressive strength of (a), so from a deflection point of view,
Figure GDA00037455299800001216
is greater than
Figure GDA00037455299800001217
To be smaller than
Figure GDA00037455299800001218
Due to the fact that
Figure GDA00037455299800001219
So in the condition number sense
Figure GDA00037455299800001220
Algorithm condition number less than Kalman filter estimation
Figure GDA00037455299800001221
Larger than ridge Kalman filtering
Figure GDA00037455299800001222
The algorithm condition number.
In conclusion, the regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test provided by the invention not only has the anti-attitude property which is not possessed by the common Kalman filtering, but also overcomes the blind and excessive anti-attitude property of the common ridge Kalman filtering, thereby reducing the damage of excessive deviation caused by excessive anti-attitude property and achieving more accurate and proper effect.
The invention is further illustrated by the following further specific examples.
To verify the correctness of the pathological analysis herein and the validity of the new algorithm, the following algorithm was used to perform the simulation test. Setting a one-step State transition TorqueMatrix phi k+1,k Is composed of
Figure GDA0003745529980000131
Design observation matrix H k Of 5 column vectors of
a k1 =[15.57 44.02 20.42 18.74 49.20 44.92 55.48 59.28 94.39 128.02 96.00 131.42 127.21 252.90 409.20 463.70 510.22] T
a k2 =[2643 2048 3940 6505 5723 11520 5779 5969 8461 20106 13313 10771 45543 36194 34703 39204 86533] T
a k4 =[18.0 9.5 12.8 36.7 35.7 24.0 43.3 46.7 76.7 180.5 60.9 103.7 126.8 157.7 169.4 331.4 371.6] T
a k5 =[4.45 6.92 4.28 3.90 5.50 4.60 5.62 5.15 6.18 6.15 5.88 4.68 4.88 5.57 10.78 7.05 6.35] T
a k3 =2a k1 +0.5a k4 +e k ,e k ~N 17 (0,0.05 2 I)
H k =[a k1 a k2 a k3 a k4 a k5 ]
Q k =I 5 ,R k =0.5 2 ×I 17 Covariance matrices, initial values, of state noise sequence and observation noise sequence, respectively
Figure GDA0003745529980000132
Is composed of
Figure GDA0003745529980000133
Wherein X 0 =[200,15,35,16,-2.8,6] Τ In the true value, the value of,
Figure GDA0003745529980000134
is the initial error matrix.
In the embodiment of the invention, the data columns of the observation matrix are set to have approximate linear relation, so that the normal matrix has serious ill-conditioned property. Three filtering algorithms are used for calculation and their condition numbers, mean square errors and deviations are compared, and the effect pair is shown in fig. 2 to 4.
(1) As can be seen from fig. 2, the normal Kalman filter algorithm has a condition number of 10 for the normal Kalman filter algorithm 4 The order of magnitude of (2) exceeds a threshold value of 500, which shows that complex collinearity of an observation matrix can really cause ill-conditioned law matrix, and the condition numbers of law matrices of an RTKF algorithm (namely, ordinary ridge-type Kalman filtering in the figure) and a DPRTKF algorithm (namely, two-parameter ridge-type Kalman filtering in the figure) are effectively controlled.
(2) It can be seen from fig. 3 that the RTKF algorithm and the DPRTKF algorithm effectively weaken the ill-posed nature in the Kalman filtering, and the DPRTKF algorithm is superior to the general Kalman filtering algorithm and the RTKF algorithm in the mean square error sense.
(3) As can be seen from fig. 4, compared with the Kalman filter algorithm, the RTKF algorithm properly sacrifices the unbiased property of the state estimation in exchange for the great reduction of the variance, so that the estimation result is relatively stable, while the DPRTKF algorithm reduces the introduction of the deviation while reducing the state estimation variance, so that the euclidean distance between the solution and the true value is smaller than the Kalman filter algorithm and the RTKF algorithm.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above examples are only intended to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, but not to limit it; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some technical features may be equivalently replaced; and such modifications or substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the corresponding technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims (4)

1. A regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test is applied to a state parameter estimation process of a pathologically observed matrix in a discrete dynamic system, and a state space model is adopted to describe the discrete dynamic system:
X k+1 =Φ k+1,k X k +W k (1)
Y k =H k X k +V k (2)
in the formula, X k ∈R t For discrete dynamic systems at time t k The state of (1); y is k ∈R n Is the corresponding observed signal; phi k+1,k Is a t × t nonsingular matrix, is t k Time to t k+1 A one-step state transition matrix of the moment; h k Is an nxt observation matrix; w k ∈R t Input noise that is normally distributed; v k ∈R n Observed noise that is normally distributed; wherein the discrete dynamic system is any one of a geodetic surveying system, a satellite navigation system and a satellite orbit determination system, and the method comprises:
step 1, obtaining t k+1 State parameter X to be estimated at time k+1 Initial state estimation of
Figure FDA0003740170520000011
And a typical parameter theta k+1 Least squares estimation of
Figure FDA0003740170520000012
Step 2, according to the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 The ith parameter of
Figure FDA0003740170520000013
State estimation of
Figure FDA0003740170520000014
Determining
Figure FDA0003740170520000015
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of (1), 2 …, t-1, t, t is the number of state parameters to be estimated; the step 2 specifically comprises the following steps:
according to the formula
Figure FDA0003740170520000016
Determining
Figure FDA0003740170520000017
Signal to noise ratio statistic of
Figure FDA0003740170520000018
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA0003740170520000019
is composed of
Figure FDA00037401705200000110
The variance of (a);
step 3, according to the above
Figure FDA00037401705200000111
The signal-to-noise ratio statistic of (2), the state parameter X to be estimated k+1 Dividing into interference-related state parameters and non-interference-related state parameters; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
if it is
Figure FDA00037401705200000112
Then
Figure FDA00037401705200000113
Is a disturbance related state parameter;
if it is
Figure FDA00037401705200000114
Then
Figure FDA00037401705200000115
The non-interference state parameters are obtained;
wherein
Figure FDA00037401705200000116
Omega is the level of significance and is,
Figure FDA00037401705200000117
is center x 2 Distribution of
Figure FDA00037401705200000118
Upper omega quantile of (a);
step 4, estimating according to least square
Figure FDA0003740170520000021
Determining ridge parameters of disturbance-related state parameters
Figure FDA0003740170520000022
Ridge parameters with non-interference state parameters
Figure FDA0003740170520000023
Step 5, according to the ridge parameters
Figure FDA0003740170520000024
And
Figure FDA0003740170520000025
determining a state parameter X to be estimated k+1 To estimate said initial state
Figure FDA0003740170520000026
And (6) correcting.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to step 1:
obtaining t k+1 Normal matrix N of time instants k+1
If judging the learning method matrix N k+1 Is greater than the preset condition number threshold, then for t k+1 And carrying out signal-to-noise ratio statistics on each state parameter at each moment.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein step 4 is specifically:
the ridge parameters
Figure FDA0003740170520000027
And
Figure FDA0003740170520000028
respectively according to the following formula
Figure FDA0003740170520000029
Figure FDA00037401705200000210
Determining; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure FDA00037401705200000211
to represent
Figure FDA00037401705200000212
The maximum value of (a) is,
Figure FDA00037401705200000213
s is the number of interference state parameters, and all signal-to-noise ratio statistics are calculated
Figure FDA00037401705200000214
Rearranged in descending order and numbered as
Figure FDA00037401705200000215
4. Method according to claim 3, characterized in that said state parameter X to be estimated is a parameter X k+1 The correction matrix of (a) is:
Figure FDA0003740170520000031
CN201810379450.4A 2018-04-25 2018-04-25 Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test Expired - Fee Related CN108614804B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810379450.4A CN108614804B (en) 2018-04-25 2018-04-25 Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810379450.4A CN108614804B (en) 2018-04-25 2018-04-25 Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108614804A CN108614804A (en) 2018-10-02
CN108614804B true CN108614804B (en) 2022-09-02

Family

ID=63660835

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810379450.4A Expired - Fee Related CN108614804B (en) 2018-04-25 2018-04-25 Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108614804B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102020115919A1 (en) * 2020-06-17 2021-12-23 Fette Compacting Gmbh Method for operating a mixing device in a plant

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102064798A (en) * 2010-12-17 2011-05-18 北京大学 Negative-feedback self-adaption on-line and real-time filtering method and system
WO2012177335A1 (en) * 2011-06-21 2012-12-27 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Improved dispersion estimation by nonlinear optimization of beam-formed fields
CN103684349A (en) * 2013-10-28 2014-03-26 北京理工大学 Kalman filtering method based on recursion covariance matrix estimation
CN103902834A (en) * 2014-04-14 2014-07-02 重庆大学 Structural damage identification method based on ridge estimation and L curve method
CN104376383A (en) * 2014-11-27 2015-02-25 东北大学 Grid voltage monitoring and prediction system and method based on geographic information system
CN107425548A (en) * 2017-09-11 2017-12-01 河海大学 A kind of interpolation H ∞ EKFs generator dynamic state estimator method
CN107729845A (en) * 2017-10-20 2018-02-23 开沃新能源汽车集团有限公司 A kind of frequency respond noise-reduction method decomposed based on sub-space feature value

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TW200803262A (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-01-01 Pixart Imaging Inc Bumping algorithm used to estimate signal frequency and displacement-estimating method and device

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102064798A (en) * 2010-12-17 2011-05-18 北京大学 Negative-feedback self-adaption on-line and real-time filtering method and system
WO2012177335A1 (en) * 2011-06-21 2012-12-27 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Improved dispersion estimation by nonlinear optimization of beam-formed fields
CN103684349A (en) * 2013-10-28 2014-03-26 北京理工大学 Kalman filtering method based on recursion covariance matrix estimation
CN103902834A (en) * 2014-04-14 2014-07-02 重庆大学 Structural damage identification method based on ridge estimation and L curve method
CN104376383A (en) * 2014-11-27 2015-02-25 东北大学 Grid voltage monitoring and prediction system and method based on geographic information system
CN107425548A (en) * 2017-09-11 2017-12-01 河海大学 A kind of interpolation H ∞ EKFs generator dynamic state estimator method
CN107729845A (en) * 2017-10-20 2018-02-23 开沃新能源汽车集团有限公司 A kind of frequency respond noise-reduction method decomposed based on sub-space feature value

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A novel GLM-based method for the Automatic IDentification of functional Events (AIDE) in fNIRS data recorded in naturalistic environments;Pinti Paola 等;《Neuroimage》;20170731;第155卷;291-304 *
Nonparametric hemodynamic deconvolution of fMRI using homomorphic filtering;Sreenivasan K. R. 等;《IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging》;20141212;第34卷(第5期);1155-1163 *
一种改进的高斯近似滤波方法;黄玉龙 等;《自动化学报》;20151231;第42卷(第3期);385-401 *
基于信噪比检验的双参数岭型Kalman滤波及其在BDS星地联合定轨中的应用;李豪 等;《大地测量与地球动力学》;20181115;第38卷(第11期);1143-1148 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108614804A (en) 2018-10-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11245464B2 (en) Direction-of-arrival estimation and mutual coupling calibration method and system with arbitrary sensor geometry and unknown mutual coupling
CN111985093B (en) Adaptive unscented Kalman filtering state estimation method with noise estimator
Brüggemann et al. Inference in VARs with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form
US10754922B2 (en) Method and apparatus for sensor fusion
CN110061716B (en) Improved kalman filtering method based on least square and multiple fading factors
DelSole et al. Confidence intervals in optimal fingerprinting
CN107870001A (en) A kind of magnetometer bearing calibration based on ellipsoid fitting
CN109239653B (en) Multi-radiation source passive direct time difference positioning method based on subspace decomposition
CN110826021B (en) Robust identification and output estimation method for nonlinear industrial process
Metref et al. A non-Gaussian analysis scheme using rank histograms for ensemble data assimilation
CN117236084B (en) Intelligent management method and system for woodworking machining production
CN110032709B (en) Positioning and estimation method for abnormal point in geographic coordinate conversion
CN104463876B (en) Adaptive-filtering-based rapid multi-circle detection method for image under complex background
CN108614804B (en) Regularization Kalman filtering method based on signal-to-noise ratio test
CN113238227B (en) Improved least square phase unwrapping method and system combined with deep learning
CN111398523B (en) Sensor data calibration method and system based on distribution
Lederer et al. Estimating the Lasso's effective noise
CN111142062B (en) Grid-free target direction-of-arrival estimation method utilizing Toeplitz characteristic
CN110672127B (en) Real-time calibration method for array type MEMS magnetic sensor
CN103065021A (en) multistep effective method for finite element model updating
CN113569393B (en) Robust absolute orientation algorithm
CN112881971B (en) Direction finding method for coherent interference source under electromagnetic directional mutual coupling effect
CN109709586B (en) Method for establishing GPS reference station network coordinate time sequence three-dimensional noise model based on singular value decomposition and using method
CN107846241B (en) Beam forming method, storage medium and beam former under impulse noise environment
Weng et al. Why might relative fit indices differ between estimators?

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20220902

CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee