CN107222363B - Storage protocol consistency test method and system - Google Patents
Storage protocol consistency test method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107222363B CN107222363B CN201710385435.6A CN201710385435A CN107222363B CN 107222363 B CN107222363 B CN 107222363B CN 201710385435 A CN201710385435 A CN 201710385435A CN 107222363 B CN107222363 B CN 107222363B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- protocol
- model
- format
- protocol model
- storage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 title claims description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 81
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/18—Protocol analysers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/06—Notations for structuring of protocol data, e.g. abstract syntax notation one [ASN.1]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/08—Protocols for interworking; Protocol conversion
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
- Communication Control (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method for testing the consistency of a storage protocol, which comprises the steps of firstly constructing a protocol model based on a general protocol package structure layer, then converting the protocol model into a specific protocol, and then testing the consistency of the storage protocol.
Description
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of storage system technologies, and in particular, to a method and a system for testing consistency of a storage protocol.
Background
The Storage protocols include various protocols such as a Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA), a Small Computer System Interface (SCSI), a System information System (SAS), etc., Management protocols include Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), Simple traffic Management Protocol (SMI-S), Advanced Storage Management Interface (Storage Management Protocol) standard, Representational Transfer Application Programming Interface (rtp), File sharing protocols include Network File System (NFS), Network File System (CIFS), Common Internet File System (CIFS), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), etc. Although protocol definitions vary, similar protocols have great similarity in core semantics, such as SMI-S and RestAPI. From the test perspective, there are two major difficulties, one is that the same protocol needs to test the support degree of different manufacturers; the other is to compile independent test cases for similar protocols, which has large workload and has many repeated actions when executing the test. Therefore, how to improve the testing efficiency of the consistency of the storage protocol is an urgent problem to be solved.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, the present invention provides a method for testing consistency of a storage protocol, which can effectively improve the testing efficiency of the consistency of the storage protocol.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
a storage protocol consistency test method comprises the following steps:
constructing a protocol model based on a universal protocol package structure layer;
converting the protocol model into a specific protocol;
the consistency of the storage protocol is tested.
Preferably, the constructing a protocol model based on a generic protocol package structure layer includes:
initializing the protocol model;
carrying out structured definition on the protocol model;
and defining the frame format of the protocol model.
Preferably, the initializing the protocol model specifically includes:
before the test case is executed, authentication, handshaking and data initialization with the device are completed.
Preferably, the structural definition of the protocol model specifically includes:
defining protocol layer and protocol message format.
Preferably, the defining the frame format of the protocol model specifically includes:
and encapsulating the structured definition content in the protocol model into a format transmitted on a hardware platform to complete the verification of the protocol content.
A storage protocol conformance test system, comprising:
the building module is used for building a protocol model based on the universal protocol package structure layer;
the conversion module is used for converting the protocol model into a specific protocol;
and the test module is used for testing the consistency of the storage protocol.
Preferably, the building block comprises:
the initialization unit is used for initializing the protocol model;
the structural definition unit is used for carrying out structural definition on the protocol model;
and the frame format definition unit is used for defining the frame format of the protocol model.
Preferably, the initialization unit is specifically configured to: before the test case is executed, authentication, handshaking and data initialization with the device are completed.
Preferably, the structural definition unit is specifically configured to: defining protocol layering and defining protocol message format.
Preferably, the frame format defining unit is specifically configured to: and encapsulating the structured definition content in the protocol model into a format transmitted on a hardware platform to complete the verification of the protocol content.
According to the technical scheme, the invention provides the method for testing the consistency of the storage protocol, when the consistency of the storage protocol needs to be tested, the protocol model is firstly built on the basis of the universal protocol package structure layer, then the protocol model is converted into the specific protocol, and then the consistency of the storage protocol is tested.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method of an embodiment 1 of a storage protocol consistency testing method disclosed in the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method of embodiment 2 of the storage protocol consistency testing method disclosed in the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment 1 of a storage protocol conformance testing system disclosed in the present invention;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment 2 of a storage protocol conformance testing system disclosed in the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
To more particularly emphasize implementation independence, this description refers to a number of modules or units. For example, a module or unit may be implemented by a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or arrays of gates, such as logic chips, transistors, or other components. A module or unit may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like.
Modules or units may also be implemented in software for execution by various forms of processors. An executable code module may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be formed as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module or element need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module or element and achieve the desired result for the module or element.
Indeed, a module or unit of executable code may be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules or units, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations having different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network.
Reference throughout this specification to "one embodiment" or similar language means that a feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases "in one embodiment," "in an embodiment," and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. The following description will provide many specific details such as examples of programming, software modules, user selections, network transactions, database queries, database structures, hardware modules, hardware circuits, hardware chips, etc., to provide an understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention may be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown in detail to avoid obscuring the invention.
As shown in fig. 1, which is a flowchart of an embodiment 1 of a storage protocol consistency testing method disclosed in the present invention, the method includes the following steps:
s101, constructing a protocol model based on a universal protocol package structure layer;
s102, converting the protocol model into a specific protocol;
and S103, testing the consistency of the storage protocol.
The general protocol stack structure includes: hardware interfaces, protocol coding rules, protocol packet format definitions, protocol semantics, protocol internal hierarchies, and protocol state machines and behaviors. Wherein, the hardware interface: processing the related content of the hardware interface, and for the network port, the related content is a transmission layer; protocol encoding rules: generally, the encoding format is text or binary, and here, only the basic encoding format, such as bencode encoding, base64 encoding and the like, is processed, and is not related to a specific protocol; the protocol packet format defines: the protocol packet format definition formed based on a certain specific encoding rule generally forms a protocol format tree after being decoded by software and exists in a memory. This protocol tree is important for protocol processing and protocol similarity determination. Protocol semantics: the specific meaning of each field in the protocol specification; protocol inner hierarchy: some protocols are also layered internally, such as a transport layer, a session layer, a transaction layer, etc.; protocol state machine and behavior: the protocol state machine is possessed by any protocol, and the protocol behavior is mainly the high-level interaction of the protocol and is also an indispensable component of the protocol.
When the consistency test of the storage protocol is needed, similar model definition is carried out on a common protocol package structure layer, one protocol package is a tree in structure, a detailed package structure is standardized on the layer, each new protocol arrival needs to be adapted to the common protocol package structure (mainly mapping protocol packages one by one), and the specific mapping method is tree operation: adding new nodes, deleting nodes and merging nodes. Wherein, the addition of the new node: mainly, the protocol capability is expanded, or new functions are brought by protocol version upgrading. If the representvolume field is added to the createspisupshot message in the RestAPI protocol 1.1 ratio to 1.0, a targetVolume field is added to the createspisupshot message structure tree.
And (3) deleting the nodes: some protocols discard some fields during expansion, which reflects the operation of deleting nodes on the protocol packet structure tree.
And (3) merging of nodes: some protocols do not change the structure of the original binary packet when discarding certain fields. Like protocol 1.0, field 1, is 4 bytes long and field 2 is 2 bytes long. In protocol 1.1, field 2 is deleted, but to ensure protocol compatibility, field 1 becomes 6 bytes in length. In this case we do the merge operation of the nodes.
And then converting the similar protocol model into a specific protocol, specifically, completing the adaptation process by adopting an adapter, wherein the adapter can be an independent node or a software module, and after a protocol packet is generated, the adapter is modified according to rules before being sent and finally sent to the tested storage equipment. The method is similar to a black box test method, and new test case generation is realized by modifying the output result. If inheritance relationship exists between protocols, an adaptive protocol stack exists, and the protocols 1 to 1.1 and then to 1.1.1 need to be adapted layer by layer.
In summary, in the above embodiments, when the consistency of the storage protocol needs to be tested, the protocol model is first constructed based on the generic protocol package structure layer, then the protocol model is converted into the specific protocol, and then the consistency of the storage protocol is tested.
As shown in fig. 2, which is a flowchart of an embodiment 2 of a storage protocol consistency testing method disclosed in the present invention, the method includes the following steps:
s201, initializing a protocol model;
s202, carrying out structural definition on a protocol model;
s203, defining a frame format of the protocol model;
when the consistency test needs to be performed on the storage protocol, firstly, a protocol model is designed, and when the protocol model is designed, the method specifically comprises the following steps: model initialization, structural definition, and frame format definition. Wherein, protocol model initialization: before the test case is executed, basic work such as authentication, handshake and data initialization with equipment is completed, and the purpose is to enable the equipment to reach a stable state so as to ensure the stability of a protocol test state and the accuracy of a protocol test result.
Structural definition: the method is used for describing the generalization characteristics of the protocol and finishing the abstract definition of the same type of protocol. The structured definition content of the protocol model mainly comprises the following steps: protocol layer definition and protocol message format definition.
The frame format defines: the method is used for encapsulating the structured definition content in the protocol model into a format which can be transmitted on a hardware platform, and meanwhile, the verification of the protocol content is completed.
S204, converting the protocol model into a specific protocol;
the instantiation function of a protocol is responsible for translating a protocol model into a specific protocol. The specific functions include: protocol format reassembly and encoding. The protocol format recombination function is responsible for deleting unsupported fields and increasing fields which the protocol model does not have, the protocol coding function is responsible for coding the protocol packet into a binary or text format according to the requirements of a specific protocol, and only the instantiated test protocol can run a test case.
And S205, testing the consistency of the storage protocol.
The input of the system is a test case, one test case is generally a test process, and the minimum test case comprises a request, a response and two messages. Through system conversion, one test case can be automatically converted into two sets of test cases with the storage protocols 1.0 and 1.1 for testing two sets of different test equipment. The process is as follows: (1) the input is a test case; (2) the system executes the test case, and finds out the protocol packet of the tested device to be tested from the test case, wherein the initial version is the lowest version 1.0; (3) converting the protocol packet into a protocol tree in a memory by adopting an instantiation method; (4) determining whether to convert into a protocol packet of 1.1 version or test 1.0 in the next time according to different target devices; (5) modifying the protocol tree structure in the step (4) according to the definition in the protocol model 1.1, so as to convert the protocol tree structure into a protocol packet 1.1; (6) generating a 1.1 packet structure; (7) the 1.1 packet or 1.0 packet is sent to the correct storage device over the underlying interface (IP or FC).
In conclusion, the invention only needs to compile one set of test set for the similar protocols or different versions of the same protocol, thereby realizing the high multiplexing of the test sets, saving the labor cost and realizing the automation of the test of the storage protocol.
As shown in fig. 3, which is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment 1 of a storage protocol consistency testing system disclosed in the present invention, the system includes:
a building module 301, configured to build a protocol model based on a generic protocol package structure layer;
a conversion module 302, configured to convert the protocol model into a specific protocol;
a test module 303, configured to test consistency of the storage protocol.
The general protocol stack structure includes: hardware interfaces, protocol coding rules, protocol packet format definitions, protocol semantics, protocol internal hierarchies, and protocol state machines and behaviors. Wherein, the hardware interface: processing the related content of the hardware interface, and for the network port, the related content is a transmission layer; protocol encoding rules: generally, the encoding format is text or binary, and here, only the basic encoding format, such as bencode encoding, base64 encoding and the like, is processed, and is not related to a specific protocol; the protocol packet format defines: the protocol packet format definition formed based on a certain specific encoding rule generally forms a protocol format tree after being decoded by software and exists in a memory. This protocol tree is important for protocol processing and protocol similarity determination. Protocol semantics: the specific meaning of each field in the protocol specification; protocol inner hierarchy: some protocols are also layered internally, such as a transport layer, a session layer, a transaction layer, etc.; protocol state machine and behavior: the protocol state machine is possessed by any protocol, and the protocol behavior is mainly the high-level interaction of the protocol and is also an indispensable component of the protocol.
When the consistency test of the storage protocol is needed, similar model definition is carried out on a common protocol package structure layer, one protocol package is a tree in structure, a detailed package structure is standardized on the layer, each new protocol arrival needs to be adapted to the common protocol package structure (mainly mapping protocol packages one by one), and the specific mapping method is tree operation: adding new nodes, deleting nodes and merging nodes. Wherein, the addition of the new node: mainly, the protocol capability is expanded, or new functions are brought by protocol version upgrading. If the representvolume field is added to the createspisupshot message in the RestAPI protocol 1.1 ratio to 1.0, a targetVolume field is added to the createspisupshot message structure tree.
And (3) deleting the nodes: some protocols discard some fields during expansion, which reflects the operation of deleting nodes on the protocol packet structure tree.
And (3) merging of nodes: some protocols do not change the structure of the original binary packet when discarding certain fields. Like protocol 1.0, field 1, is 4 bytes long and field 2 is 2 bytes long. In protocol 1.1, field 2 is deleted, but to ensure protocol compatibility, field 1 becomes 6 bytes in length. In this case we do the merge operation of the nodes.
And then converting the similar protocol model into a specific protocol, specifically, completing the adaptation process by adopting an adapter, wherein the adapter can be an independent node or a software module, and after a protocol packet is generated, the adapter is modified according to rules before being sent and finally sent to the tested storage equipment. The method is similar to a black box test method, and new test case generation is realized by modifying the output result. If inheritance relationship exists between protocols, an adaptive protocol stack exists, and the protocols 1 to 1.1 and then to 1.1.1 need to be adapted layer by layer.
In summary, in the above embodiments, when the consistency of the storage protocol needs to be tested, the protocol model is first constructed based on the generic protocol package structure layer, then the protocol model is converted into the specific protocol, and then the consistency of the storage protocol is tested.
As shown in fig. 4, which is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment 2 of a storage protocol consistency testing system disclosed in the present invention, the system includes:
an initialization unit 401, configured to initialize a protocol model;
a structural definition unit 402, configured to perform structural definition on the protocol model;
a frame format definition unit 403, configured to define a frame format of the protocol model;
when the consistency test needs to be performed on the storage protocol, firstly, a protocol model is designed, and when the protocol model is designed, the method specifically comprises the following steps: model initialization, structural definition, and frame format definition. Wherein, protocol model initialization: before the test case is executed, basic work such as authentication, handshake and data initialization with equipment is completed, and the purpose is to enable the equipment to reach a stable state so as to ensure the stability of a protocol test state and the accuracy of a protocol test result.
Structural definition: the method is used for describing the generalization characteristics of the protocol and finishing the abstract definition of the same type of protocol. The structured definition content of the protocol model mainly comprises the following steps: protocol layer definition and protocol message format definition.
The frame format defines: the method is used for encapsulating the structured definition content in the protocol model into a format which can be transmitted on a hardware platform, and meanwhile, the verification of the protocol content is completed.
A conversion module 404, configured to convert the protocol model into a specific protocol;
the instantiation function of a protocol is responsible for translating a protocol model into a specific protocol. The specific functions include: protocol format reassembly and encoding. The protocol format recombination function is responsible for deleting unsupported fields and increasing fields which the protocol model does not have, the protocol coding function is responsible for coding the protocol packet into a binary or text format according to the requirements of a specific protocol, and only the instantiated test protocol can run a test case.
A test module 405, configured to test consistency of the storage protocol.
The input of the system is a test case, one test case is generally a test process, and the minimum test case comprises a request, a response and two messages. Through system conversion, one test case can be automatically converted into two sets of test cases with the storage protocols 1.0 and 1.1 for testing two sets of different test equipment. The process is as follows: (1) the input is a test case; (2) the system executes the test case, and finds out the protocol packet of the tested device to be tested from the test case, wherein the initial version is the lowest version 1.0; (3) converting the protocol packet into a protocol tree in a memory by adopting an instantiation method; (4) determining whether to convert into a protocol packet of 1.1 version or test 1.0 in the next time according to different target devices; (5) modifying the protocol tree structure in the step (4) according to the definition in the protocol model 1.1, so as to convert the protocol tree structure into a protocol packet 1.1; (6) generating a 1.1 packet structure; (7) the 1.1 packet or 1.0 packet is sent to the correct storage device over the underlying interface (IP or FC).
In conclusion, the invention only needs to compile one set of test set for the similar protocols or different versions of the same protocol, thereby realizing the high multiplexing of the test sets, saving the labor cost and realizing the automation of the test of the storage protocol.
The embodiments are described in a progressive manner in the specification, each embodiment focuses on differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Claims (10)
1. A storage protocol consistency test method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
constructing a protocol model based on a universal protocol package structure layer;
converting the protocol model into a specific protocol through format recombination and coding; the format recombination comprises deleting fields which are not supported by the protocol and adding fields which are not in the protocol model; the encoding comprises encoding the protocol packet into a binary or text format;
the consistency of the storage protocol is tested.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein constructing the protocol model based on the generic protocol package structure layer comprises:
initializing the protocol model;
carrying out structured definition on the protocol model;
and defining the frame format of the protocol model.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein initializing the protocol model specifically includes:
before the test case is executed, authentication, handshaking and data initialization with the device are completed.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the structured definition of the protocol model is specifically:
defining protocol layer and protocol message format.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the defining the frame format of the protocol model specifically comprises:
and encapsulating the structured definition content in the protocol model into a format transmitted on a hardware platform to complete the verification of the protocol content.
6. A storage protocol conformance testing system, comprising:
the building module is used for building a protocol model based on the universal protocol package structure layer;
the conversion module is used for converting the protocol model into a specific protocol through format recombination and coding; the format recombination comprises deleting fields which are not supported by the protocol and adding fields which are not in the protocol model; the encoding comprises encoding the protocol packet into a binary or text format;
and the test module is used for testing the consistency of the storage protocol.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the building module comprises:
the initialization unit is used for initializing the protocol model;
the structural definition unit is used for carrying out structural definition on the protocol model;
and the frame format definition unit is used for defining the frame format of the protocol model.
8. The system according to claim 7, wherein the initialization unit is specifically configured to: before the test case is executed, authentication, handshaking and data initialization with the device are completed.
9. The system according to claim 8, wherein the structured definition unit is specifically configured to: defining protocol layer and protocol message format.
10. The system according to claim 9, wherein the frame format definition unit is specifically configured to: and encapsulating the structured definition content in the protocol model into a format transmitted on a hardware platform to complete the verification of the protocol content.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710385435.6A CN107222363B (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2017-05-26 | Storage protocol consistency test method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710385435.6A CN107222363B (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2017-05-26 | Storage protocol consistency test method and system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107222363A CN107222363A (en) | 2017-09-29 |
| CN107222363B true CN107222363B (en) | 2021-01-08 |
Family
ID=59946826
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710385435.6A Active CN107222363B (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2017-05-26 | Storage protocol consistency test method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107222363B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109324958B (en) * | 2018-06-27 | 2021-10-29 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | REST unified verification method, device, equipment and readable storage medium |
| CN109818955B (en) * | 2019-01-22 | 2021-10-29 | 上海鹰信智能技术有限公司 | Bidirectional transmission control coding method and system thereof |
| CN111835724B (en) * | 2020-06-11 | 2022-08-26 | 广州天源信息科技股份有限公司 | Protocol conflict matching method, system, storage medium and computer equipment |
| CN111884776A (en) * | 2020-07-02 | 2020-11-03 | 深圳市赛特新能科技有限公司 | Charging pile protocol consistency testing method |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1357981A (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2002-07-10 | 深圳黎明电脑网络有限公司 | Method of testing several kinds of application protocol |
| US8788685B1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2014-07-22 | Netapp, Inc. | System and method for testing multi-protocol storage systems |
| CN104125235A (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2014-10-29 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Integrated multi-protocol storage method |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7661034B2 (en) * | 2005-01-24 | 2010-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multilayered architecture for storage protocol conformance testing of storage devices |
| CN102542110B (en) * | 2011-12-29 | 2014-04-09 | 北京时代民芯科技有限公司 | Emulation verification method applied to mobile storage SOC (system on chip) chip |
| CN103198009B (en) * | 2012-01-04 | 2016-09-07 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | A kind of universal testing method, system and related device |
| CN103150264B (en) * | 2013-01-18 | 2014-09-17 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Extension Cache Coherence protocol-based multi-level consistency simulation domain verification and test method |
| CN105262644B (en) * | 2015-11-03 | 2018-08-21 | 株洲南车时代电气股份有限公司 | A kind of universal test system and test method based on protocol configuration |
| CN105718344A (en) * | 2016-01-19 | 2016-06-29 | 中国电子科技集团公司第三十八研究所 | Verification method of FPGA universal configurable UART protocol based on UVM |
-
2017
- 2017-05-26 CN CN201710385435.6A patent/CN107222363B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1357981A (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2002-07-10 | 深圳黎明电脑网络有限公司 | Method of testing several kinds of application protocol |
| US8788685B1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2014-07-22 | Netapp, Inc. | System and method for testing multi-protocol storage systems |
| CN104125235A (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2014-10-29 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Integrated multi-protocol storage method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN107222363A (en) | 2017-09-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107222363B (en) | Storage protocol consistency test method and system | |
| US7650346B2 (en) | User-defined type consistency checker | |
| US11106437B2 (en) | Lookup table optimization for programming languages that target synchronous digital circuits | |
| EP3912074B1 (en) | Generating a synchronous digital circuit from a source code construct defining a function call | |
| US20090037386A1 (en) | Computer file processing | |
| JP2010531481A (en) | Transfer of tabular parameters via tabular data stream protocol | |
| US10397051B1 (en) | Configuration and testing of network-based service platform resources using a service platform specific language | |
| US10817284B2 (en) | Melding of mediation flow service component architecture (SCA) components | |
| CN101185116A (en) | Using strong data types to express speech recognition grammars in software programs | |
| WO2022148390A1 (en) | Methods for deploying, updating and calling smart contract in blockchain | |
| US20200226051A1 (en) | Generating a debugging network for a synchronous digital circuit during compilation of program source code | |
| CN105656947A (en) | Method, device and system for interaction between transaction middleware and third-party system | |
| CN113381870A (en) | Message processing method and device | |
| CN111240772A (en) | Data processing method and device based on block chain and storage medium | |
| CN109388406A (en) | Convert method and device, the storage medium, electronic device of java code | |
| JP4776389B2 (en) | Encoded document decoding method and system | |
| CN108365976B (en) | Network service optimization method and device | |
| CN109783132B (en) | Method and device for realizing system singleization and distribution | |
| EP3005087A1 (en) | Declarative configuration elements | |
| CN115328679A (en) | Automatic integration method of heterogeneous function library, computing equipment and system thereof | |
| CN112749152A (en) | Data migration method and device of intelligent contract and storage medium | |
| EP4191407A1 (en) | Method and device for generating and registering ui service package and loading ui service | |
| CN111796816A (en) | Rapid development method of customized service system | |
| CN114116067A (en) | Information configuration method and device for internal and external systems, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN117632266A (en) | Hardware driving method and device of embedded real-time operating system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |
Effective date of registration: 20201202 Address after: 215100 No. 1 Guanpu Road, Guoxiang Street, Wuzhong Economic Development Zone, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province Applicant after: SUZHOU LANGCHAO INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd. Address before: 450018 Henan province Zheng Dong New District of Zhengzhou City Xinyi Road No. 278 16 floor room 1601 Applicant before: ZHENGZHOU YUNHAI INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd. |
|
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |