CN106289363A - A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method - Google Patents

A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106289363A
CN106289363A CN201610615084.9A CN201610615084A CN106289363A CN 106289363 A CN106289363 A CN 106289363A CN 201610615084 A CN201610615084 A CN 201610615084A CN 106289363 A CN106289363 A CN 106289363A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
sensor
data
value
minimum
fault
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201610615084.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
谢敏
刘小波
徐瑶
陈宏�
雷超
余志�
禹丽娥
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Changsha University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Changsha University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Changsha University of Science and Technology filed Critical Changsha University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201610615084.9A priority Critical patent/CN106289363A/en
Publication of CN106289363A publication Critical patent/CN106289363A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01DMEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D18/00Testing or calibrating apparatus or arrangements provided for in groups G01D1/00 - G01D15/00

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)

Abstract

A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method: set up sensor database, the data of sensor acquisition first contrast with respective value in initial data base, the data being between maximum sampling value and minimum sample value enter next link and analyze judgement further, the data automatic fitration of over range, to reduce data processing amount;The sensor mark that valid data quantity in unit interval is less than setting value is failure of removal sensor.Fault flag includes: to the valid data quantity in the unit interval less than the sensor of minimum quantity setting value, be labeled as failure of removal sensor;To the valid data quantity in the unit interval more than minimum quantity setting value, but it is not reaching to the sensor of normal number value, is labeled as the fault sensor of partial failure;Valid data quantity in unit interval, more than the sensor of normal number value, is labeled as qualified sensor.And disclose a kind of interference environment sensor fault labeling method and partial failure sensor effective percentage computational methods.

Description

A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method
Technical field
The present invention relates to sensor technical field, be specifically related to the breakdown judge side of a kind of interference environment lower sensor Method, interference environment lower sensor fault flag method and partial failure sensor effective percentage computational methods.
Background technology
Work long hours at sensor, be easier to break down, properly functioning in order to ensure equipment or system, it is necessary to Often carry out sensor checking verification, find sensor fault in time, in order to take the adequate measures such as replacing, correction.But It is that sensor fault often has certain disguise and fraudulence, is sometimes difficult to find.
Sensor fault judge mark method, in addition to conventional employing human at periodic intervals calibrates, on May 6th, 2015, by State gongwu academy chemical materials institute Cao Zhi is big, Liang Xiaohui et al. disclosed " system that sensor fault judges and Method " open (bulletin) number CN104596564A, disclose the system and method that a kind of sensor fault judges, according to necessarily adopting The measured value of sample frequency collection sensor;According to described measured value, calculate the meansigma methods of measured value in storehouse respectively, to meansigma methods Arrange according to size of data, and calculate the maximum difference of meansigma methods;If maximum difference is higher than certain value, then judge sensor event Barrier;If certain measured value of certain sensor is output as full value, also judge sensor fault.Cigarette on March 23rd, 2016 Henan Industry Co., Ltd Xu's twilight disclosed " a kind of sensor fault automatic judging method and system " open (bulletin) number CN105425775A, disclosed a kind of sensor fault automatic judging method, comprise the following steps: set up a sensor fault and sentence Disconnected data base, when described data base includes the sequence number corresponding to each sensor, minimax range value scope, normal work Average range and normal variation amplitude;Obtain the detection data in multiple sensor settings times in real time;According to obtaining Detection data in multiple sensor settings times come the minimax range value scope corresponding with described data base and normal work Average range and normal variation amplitude when making compare, to judge that the plurality of sensor is the most faulty and the class of fault Not.
Technique scheme, to using environment to have under certain limitation, especially interference environment, sensor is by on-the-spot each Planting interference effect, data distortion phenomenon ratio is more serious, due in normal data, containing substantial amounts of interference data.Tighter in interference In the case of Chong, it is difficult to normally judge sensor fault.
Summary of the invention
In fields such as automation control system, artificial environment system, robot operating system, environment friendly systems, if system In sensor occur that performance degeneration, fault or inefficacy find, the most in time by follow-up monitoring, control, fault diagnosis Have a strong impact on etc. bringing, make the reliability of system reduce, even produce maloperation, false alarm, cause immeasurable loss.
Owing to a lot of equipment are all configured with the sensing under the device of soft initiator, converter etc. high interference, interference environment Device is in electromagnetic field environment complicated and changeable, and the data acquisition of sensor, to carry, process, store be all at high-interference environment In carry out, interference signal many and chaotic, can say almost without any rule.If using technical side disclosed in CN105425775A Case, is necessarily mixed into substantial amounts of interference data, according to this in " obtaining the Monitoring Data in multiple sensor settings times in real time " The technical scheme fault judgment method (description 005 section) to sensor, " when the detection data of any sensor any time have When exceeding the minimax range value scope of correspondence, it is judged that described sensor is the absolute failure type need to overhauled or change ", several All of sensor all can be judged to fault sensor." system and method that sensor fault judges " open (bulletin) number The technical scheme of CN104596564A is to use the sensor of more than two, calculates the measurement data in intervals respectively Meansigma methods, be made whether to judge normally to its meansigma methods size and difference each other, can also under interference environment Use, but owing to interference data and normal data have been involved in the calculating of meansigma methods, therefore be likely to cause misjudgment, pass The precision of sensor breakdown judge is the highest.
It addition, the sensor that part is broken down or the sensor broken down once in a while, one can only be made now Analyze qualitatively, the most do not find a kind of can be with quantitative response sensor fault amount or the method for effective dose.It is true that Under high-interference environment, sensor is interfered and makes a mistake once in a while is absolute, the interference data produced because of interference, also Can a kind of fault at last, we are concerned about whether sensor creates fault, not equal to we are more concerned with fault rate Size in other words conj.or perhaps efficient size, effective percentage is a kind of dimensionless, and all it doesn't matter with the shape size of sensor, with The function of sensor, purposes, significance level are relevant.
To this end, inventor team is through substantial amounts of research, it is proposed that a kind of simple and convenient and interference environment that precision is higher Sensor fault judge mark method: first screening and filtering falls underproof data, and the quantity of statistics valid data, during according to unit Interior effective quantity is how many, analyzes quantitatively and judges that sensor is the most faulty, is marked various faults, basis at this On can calculate the efficient size of sensor.
Interference environment sensor fault determination methods, it is characterised in that: a. sets up sensor database, setting sensor number According to maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value;B. after screening and filtering, the valid data that storage sensors gathers;C. significant figure is added up According to quantity, according to the quantity of valid data of storage in the unit interval, it is judged that whether sensor there occurs fault.Namely Say: pre-build a sensor database, set the bound of each sensing data, the data of sensor acquisition, logical Cross data mapping comparison or other convenient technical process screen, cross and filter to remove number of non-compliances evidence, then add up qualified data Quantity, according to the valid data quantity of storage in the unit interval, whether comprehensive descision sensor there occurs fault.
Interference environment sensor fault labeling method, on the basis of all the sensors has connected, follows the steps below: Use the Sybases such as Access, SQL Server, Oracle the most in advance, or sensor integration data set up by other softwares Storehouse, sensor, in basic database, has the maximum virtual value of more than one correspondence and minimum virtual value, according to user's need Want, it is also possible to increase by more than 1 layer, the upper limit or the alarm value of lower limit;B. by using the self-editing dedicated programs such as VB, V++ Or other general Data Analysis Services systems, in sensing data and the basic database that will gather, respective sensor is Big virtual value and minimum virtual value contrast;C. the sensing data of over range is invalid data, and automatic screening filters, to subtract Few data processing amount;D. the sensing data being between maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value is valid data, stores; E. the valid data quantity of sensor is added up;F. the valid data quantity in the unit interval is less than the biography of minimum quantity setting value Sensor, is labeled as failure of removal sensor;G. to the valid data quantity in the unit interval more than minimum quantity setting value, but do not have There is the sensor reaching normal number value, be labeled as the fault sensor of the partial failures such as droop, from valid data quantity Ratio with normal number value, it is also possible to the most intuitively arrive the departure degree of sensor fault;H. having in the unit interval Effect data bulk, more than the sensor of normal number value, is labeled as qualified sensor, and i. further analyzes, by efficient database Comprehensively analyze with time dimension, it appeared that drifting fault or droop fault.
In addition to the above method, it is possible to use the special-purpose softwares such as configuration software carry out data process, configuration software is utilized Process function in middle historical data base, carries out data screening filtration;Some special with data processing function can also be used Data collecting plate card, gather transmission time, as required to gather data automatically filter.Like this, above-mentioned The step of sensor fault labeling method is reduced to: a. previously according to sensor in basic database corresponding maximum effectively Value and minimum virtual value, set the filtercondition of sensing data;B. the sensing data of over range is invalid data, automatically Screening and filtering, to reduce data processing amount;C. the sensing data being between maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value is effective Data, deliver to data base, store;D. the valid data quantity of sensor is added up;E. to the valid data in the unit interval Quantity, less than the sensor of minimum quantity setting value, is labeled as failure of removal sensor;F. to the valid data in the unit interval Quantity is more than minimum quantity setting value, but is not reaching to the sensor of normal number value, is labeled as the partial failures such as droop Fault sensor, from the ratio of valid data quantity Yu normal number value, it is also possible to the most intuitively arrive sensor fault Departure degree;G. the valid data quantity in the unit interval is more than the sensor of normal number value, is labeled as qualified sensor.
For partial failure sensor, it is necessary first to judge the failure degree i.e. effective percentage of sensor, in order to intuitively The duty solving sensor and the size of the probability broken down, consequently facilitating decide whether to change in time or tie up Repair.The sensor that effective percentage is the least, may be interference once in a while, can disregard and be continuing with;And effective percentage is bigger Sensor, it is likely that be to occur in that deviation, needs to keep a close eye on, and changes or maintenance suitable time;And for those The sensor that effective percentage is the biggest, then should change as early as possible.Partial failure sensor effective percentage computational methods comprise the following steps: a. Setting up sensor integration data base, sensor, in basic database, has a corresponding maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value; B. the sensor total data quantity of statistics gatherer;C. the sensing data gathered and the maximum of respective sensor in basic database Virtual value and minimum virtual value contrast;D. the sensing data of over range is invalid data, and automatic screening filters;E. it is in Sensing data between maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value is valid data, stores;F. the effective of sensor is added up Data bulk;G. the ratio of the sensor total data quantity of the valid data quantity in the unit of account time and collection.
The fault judgment method of above-mentioned interference environment lower sensor, interference environment lower sensor fault flag method, with And in partial failure sensor effective percentage computational methods, in order to reduce data processing amount, sensor preprocessed data can be set up Storehouse, the maximum sampling value of setting sensor data and minimum sample value, before sensing data processes, to the sensing collected Device primary data carries out pretreatment, removes the data of apparent error.The maximum sampling value of sensing data, the equipment that refers to is static In state, normal course of operation, during misoperation (i.e. equipment runs abnormal), the data of sensor acquisition are likely to be breached Maximum;The minimum sample value of sensing data, the equipment that refers in resting state, normal course of operation, misoperation (i.e. Equipment runs abnormal) during, the minima that the data of sensor acquisition are likely to be breached.Sensor number through pretreatment According to, filter the part data that sensor is substantially abnormal, i.e. left and be between maximum sampling value and minimum sample value Data, had both included the valid data that equipment is properly functioning, also included the valid data of equipment irregular operating, also included that equipment is transported Row is normal but invalid data during sensor failure.Then it is further carried out at the analysis described in claim 1,2,3 Reason.
More than judge that sensor fault method, mark sensor fault method, the effective percentage of partial failure sensor calculate Method, has the simple and convenient quick advantage such as the most accurately and reliably, is suitable under various environmental conditions using, is particularly suitable under interference environment Use.
Detailed description of the invention
Detailed description of the invention one: in the field of Environment Protections such as sewage disposal system, the kind of sensor and quantity all compare many, Include sewage and the flow of liquid medicine, temperature, pH value etc..The data of sensor are transported to industry control electricity by data collecting card Brain, pre-builds a sensor database in the configuration software in computer, set the bound of each sensing data, passes The data that sensor gathers, map comparison by data and screen, cross and filter to remove number of non-compliances evidence, write by qualified valid data Enter in data base, then add up the quantity of qualified data.According to the valid data quantity of storage in data base in the unit interval, and set Fixed desired value compares, it is judged that whether sensor there occurs fault.
Detailed description of the invention two: in the artificial environmental areas such as central air-conditioning, the kind of sensor and quantity are also a lot, bag Include the heat source side on water pipe and the flow of air-conditioning side, temperature, pressure, room conditioning air blow and return temperature, air quantity, blast, cleaning Degree, CO2 concentration etc..Interference environment sensor fault labeling method, in central air conditioner system installation, and all the sensors Connected on the basis of, follow the steps below: a. uses oracle database in advance, sensor, in basic database, has The maximum virtual value of more than one correspondence and minimum virtual value;B. by using exclusive data self-editing for VB to analyze and process system System, by the sensing data of collection with in basic database respective sensor maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value carry out right Ratio;C. the sensing data of over range is invalid data, and automatic screening filters, to reduce data processing amount;D. it is in maximum to have Sensing data between valid value and minimum virtual value is valid data, stores;E. the valid data number of sensor is added up Amount;F. to the valid data quantity in the unit interval less than the sensor of minimum quantity setting value, it is labeled as failure of removal sensing Device;G. to the valid data quantity in the unit interval more than minimum quantity setting value, but it is not reaching to the sensing of normal number value Device, is labeled as the fault sensor of the partial failures such as droop, from the ratio of valid data quantity Yu normal number value, also may be used The most intuitively to arrive the departure degree of sensor fault;H. the valid data quantity in the unit interval is more than normal number value Sensor, for qualified sensor, i. further analyzes, and efficient database and time dimension is comprehensively analyzed, permissible Find drifting fault or droop fault.
Detailed description of the invention three: in the artificial intelligence fields such as robot, the kind of sensor and quantity are also a lot, including Tactile sensor, vision sensor, proximity scnsor and hearing transducer etc..Below to say as a example by feeling Bright, proximity scnsor includes optical sensor, baroceptor, ultrasonic sensor, current vortex sensor etc., main purpose Shi Shi robot is moving or is knowing in operating process the degree of closeness of target (obstacle) thing, and mobile robot can realize keeping away Barrier, operation robot can avoid the impact that object is caused by paw owing to closing speed is too fast.Many sensings in robot In device, proximity scnsor belongs to an important class sensor, and Sensor section lost efficacy and may can also use reluctantly, but It is if failure degree is too serious, then may cause than more serious consequence.Sensor effective percentage computational methods include following step Rapid: a. sets up proximity scnsor basic database, each sensor in basic database, be both provided with one corresponding Big virtual value and minimum virtual value;B. the sensor total data quantity of statistics gatherer;C. the sensing data gathered and basis number Contrast according to the maximum virtual value of respective sensor in storehouse and minimum virtual value;D. the sensing data of over range is invalid number According to, automatic screening filters;E. the sensing data being between maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value is valid data, deposits Storage;F. the valid data quantity of sensor is added up;G. the valid data quantity in the unit of account time is total with the sensor of collection The ratio of data bulk, this ratio is exactly the effective percentage of this sensor.If carried out data prediction, it is also possible to calculate single The ratio of the sensor total data quantity through pretreatment of the valid data quantity in bit time and collection, this ratio is exactly The effective percentage of this sensor.According to the purposes of robot, different judgment criteria can be set, as effective percentage at 90%-100% is Operational excellence;Effective percentage is normal operation at 70%-90%;Effective percentage, needs to arrange as early as possible for can run reluctantly at 50%-70% Maintenance;Effective percentage runs for limiting at 30%-50%, needs just can be continuing with after assessment;Effective percentage is not below 30% Allowing to run, the effective percentage explanation sensor of less than 30% has occurred that the more serious fault of ratio, at this time runs and the most all may be used Can collide etc. dangerous.
Detailed description of the invention four: at fault judgment method, the interference ring of the interference environment lower sensor described in this specification In border lower sensor fault flag method and partial failure sensor effective percentage computational methods, the kind of sensor and quantity All compare many, include flow, temperature, pH value, room conditioning air blow and return temperature, air quantity, blast, cleanliness factor, CO2 concentration, touch Sense sensor, vision sensor, proximity scnsor and hearing transducer etc..The data of sensor are defeated by data collecting card Delivering to the processors such as industrial PC, the configuration software in the processor such as computer etc. processes in software and pre-builds a sensor number According to storehouse, set effective upper lower limit value of each sensing data, the data of sensor acquisition, map comparison by data and carry out Screening, crosses and filters to remove number of non-compliances evidence, by qualified valid data write into Databasce, then adds up the quantity of qualified data.Root According to the valid data quantity of storage in data base in the unit interval, compare with the desired value set, it is judged that whether sensor There occurs fault.In order to reduce data processing amount, on the basis of the sensor breakdown judge, labelling, calculating, set up sensing Device preprocessed data storehouse, the maximum sampling value of setting sensor data and minimum sample value, before breakdown judge, to collect Sensor primary data carries out pretreatment, removes the data of apparent error.The maximum sampling value of sensing data, refers at equipment In resting state, and the properly functioning running with misoperation, the maximum that sensor is likely to be breached;Sensing data Minimum sample value, refer in equipment resting state, and in the running of properly functioning and misoperation, sensor may The minima reached.
The foregoing is only the preferred embodiments of the present invention, be not limited to the present invention, for the skill of this area For art personnel, all within the spirit and principles in the present invention, any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement etc. made, all should comprise Within protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (4)

1. interference environment sensor fault determination methods, it is characterised in that: a. sets up sensor database, setting sensor data Maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value;B. after screening and filtering, the valid data that storage sensors gathers;C. valid data are added up Quantity, according to the quantity of valid data, it is judged that whether sensor there occurs fault.
2. interference environment sensor fault labeling method, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps: a. sets up sensor integration data Storehouse, sensor, in basic database, has a corresponding maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value;B. the sensing data gathered Contrast with maximum virtual value and the minimum virtual value of respective sensor in basic database;C. the sensing data of over range For invalid data, automatic screening filters, to reduce data processing amount;D. the biography between maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value it is in Sensor data are valid data, store;E. the valid data quantity of sensor is added up;F. to the significant figure in the unit interval Data bulk, less than the sensor of minimum quantity setting value, is labeled as failure of removal sensor;G. to the significant figure in the unit interval Data bulk is more than minimum quantity setting value, but is not reaching to the sensor of normal number value, and the fault being labeled as partial failure passes Sensor;H. the valid data quantity in the unit interval is more than the sensor of normal number value, is labeled as qualified sensor.
3. partial failure sensor effective percentage computational methods, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps: a. sets up sensor integration number According to storehouse, sensor, in basic database, has a corresponding maximum virtual value and minimum virtual value;B. the sensing of statistics gatherer Device total data quantity;C. the sensing data gathered is effective with maximum virtual value and the minimum of respective sensor in basic database Value contrasts;D. the sensing data of over range is invalid data, and automatic screening filters;E. maximum virtual value and minimum it are in Sensing data between virtual value is valid data, stores;F. the valid data quantity of sensor is added up;G. list is calculated The ratio of the sensor total data quantity of the valid data quantity in bit time and collection.
4. according to the method described in claim 1 or 2 or 3, it is characterised in that: set up sensor preprocessed data storehouse, set and pass The maximum sampling value of sensor data and minimum sample value, before sensing data processes, to the sensor initial number collected According to carrying out pretreatment, remove the data of apparent error.
CN201610615084.9A 2016-08-01 2016-08-01 A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method Pending CN106289363A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610615084.9A CN106289363A (en) 2016-08-01 2016-08-01 A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610615084.9A CN106289363A (en) 2016-08-01 2016-08-01 A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106289363A true CN106289363A (en) 2017-01-04

Family

ID=57663203

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610615084.9A Pending CN106289363A (en) 2016-08-01 2016-08-01 A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106289363A (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109323723A (en) * 2018-10-24 2019-02-12 中南民族大学 Tea garden environment data collection system and method
CN110319957A (en) * 2019-06-25 2019-10-11 哈尔滨工程大学 The irregular exceptional value method for diagnosing faults of Ship Structure stress monitoring system sensor
CN110531741A (en) * 2019-09-11 2019-12-03 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Sensor fault recognition methods and storage medium
CN110688376A (en) * 2019-09-27 2020-01-14 中冶赛迪重庆信息技术有限公司 Temperature data cleaning method, system and equipment
CN110700925A (en) * 2018-07-09 2020-01-17 卓品智能科技无锡有限公司 Vehicle-mounted nitrogen-oxygen sensor fault rate online counting and correcting method
CN110906508A (en) * 2019-12-09 2020-03-24 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Fault detection method and system for air conditioner sensor
CN111095146A (en) * 2017-06-12 2020-05-01 霍尼韦尔国际公司 Apparatus and method for automated identification and diagnosis of constraint violations
CN113607270A (en) * 2021-07-07 2021-11-05 中广核工程有限公司 Fault diagnosis method for steam turbine tile vibration sensor
CN110275170B (en) * 2018-03-15 2021-12-03 郑州宇通客车股份有限公司 Radar detection control method for vehicle and vehicle

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101696906A (en) * 2009-10-28 2010-04-21 上海电机学院 Multi-source information fusion based state monitoring system and method of wind-driven generator
CN101714190A (en) * 2009-11-20 2010-05-26 重庆大学 Role diagnostic system for bridge structural state
CN101718728A (en) * 2009-12-10 2010-06-02 杭州弗林科技有限公司 Method and device for detecting invalidation of catalytic combustion type sensor
EP2645073A2 (en) * 2012-03-28 2013-10-02 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Temperature Measurement Method for a Heated Sensor
CN104280253A (en) * 2013-07-08 2015-01-14 广州中国科学院先进技术研究所 Immune detector based fault diagnosis method and system
CN104807650A (en) * 2015-05-15 2015-07-29 山东大学 System and method for intelligently analyzing comprehensive performance of high-power engine
CN104816697A (en) * 2014-02-05 2015-08-05 丰田自动车株式会社 Collision prevention control apparatus

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101696906A (en) * 2009-10-28 2010-04-21 上海电机学院 Multi-source information fusion based state monitoring system and method of wind-driven generator
CN101714190A (en) * 2009-11-20 2010-05-26 重庆大学 Role diagnostic system for bridge structural state
CN101718728A (en) * 2009-12-10 2010-06-02 杭州弗林科技有限公司 Method and device for detecting invalidation of catalytic combustion type sensor
EP2645073A2 (en) * 2012-03-28 2013-10-02 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Temperature Measurement Method for a Heated Sensor
CN104280253A (en) * 2013-07-08 2015-01-14 广州中国科学院先进技术研究所 Immune detector based fault diagnosis method and system
CN104816697A (en) * 2014-02-05 2015-08-05 丰田自动车株式会社 Collision prevention control apparatus
CN104807650A (en) * 2015-05-15 2015-07-29 山东大学 System and method for intelligently analyzing comprehensive performance of high-power engine

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111095146A (en) * 2017-06-12 2020-05-01 霍尼韦尔国际公司 Apparatus and method for automated identification and diagnosis of constraint violations
CN110275170B (en) * 2018-03-15 2021-12-03 郑州宇通客车股份有限公司 Radar detection control method for vehicle and vehicle
CN110700925A (en) * 2018-07-09 2020-01-17 卓品智能科技无锡有限公司 Vehicle-mounted nitrogen-oxygen sensor fault rate online counting and correcting method
CN109323723A (en) * 2018-10-24 2019-02-12 中南民族大学 Tea garden environment data collection system and method
CN110319957A (en) * 2019-06-25 2019-10-11 哈尔滨工程大学 The irregular exceptional value method for diagnosing faults of Ship Structure stress monitoring system sensor
CN110531741A (en) * 2019-09-11 2019-12-03 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Sensor fault recognition methods and storage medium
CN110531741B (en) * 2019-09-11 2020-11-27 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Sensor failure recognition method and storage medium
CN110688376A (en) * 2019-09-27 2020-01-14 中冶赛迪重庆信息技术有限公司 Temperature data cleaning method, system and equipment
CN110688376B (en) * 2019-09-27 2021-01-22 中冶赛迪重庆信息技术有限公司 Temperature data cleaning method, system and equipment
CN110906508A (en) * 2019-12-09 2020-03-24 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Fault detection method and system for air conditioner sensor
CN113607270A (en) * 2021-07-07 2021-11-05 中广核工程有限公司 Fault diagnosis method for steam turbine tile vibration sensor

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106289363A (en) A kind of interference environment sensor fault judge mark method
CN106371939B (en) A kind of time series data method for detecting abnormality and its system
CN101726408B (en) Pressure relief valve monitoring system and method
CN101719299B (en) Alarm system and method for fire and combustible gas
CN104464158B (en) Fire alarm linkage control method and system
CN105910732A (en) Accurate drift fault detection method and system of temperature sensor, and air conditioner
CN104101053A (en) Air conditioner monitoring method, device and system
CN103178615A (en) Method and system for monitoring power equipment failures
WO2006046251A2 (en) Detection system for rare situation in processes
KR101563511B1 (en) Security incident anomalous event detection system and method using trend analytic technique of a support vector based on time series
CN106525107A (en) Method for identifying failure of sensor through arbitration
CN103033309B (en) Pressure transmitter with diagnosis
CN102740112A (en) Method for controlling equipment polling based on video monitoring system
JP6138066B2 (en) Integrated maintenance management system
EP3023953B1 (en) System and method of airflow monitoring for variable airflow environments
CN102507816B (en) Method for detecting effectiveness of oil chromatogram online monitoring data
CN110853268A (en) Method for realizing intrusion detection vulnerability real-time scanning based on analysis of mass data of pipe gallery system
KR101915236B1 (en) Integrated security management systme for smart-factory
CN206331290U (en) Oxygenerator long distance control system
CN116893654B (en) Operation state monitoring system of glucosamine sulfate capsule preparation equipment
Khanna et al. Hybrid Adaptive Fault Detection and Diagnosis System for Cleaning Robots
CN112259272A (en) Method and system for auxiliary operation of nuclear power plant
US20130158682A1 (en) Method of displaying abnormal status in plant operation monitoring system
KR20210000546A (en) Method for maintaining the predictive value of the device of the control output signal
CN107992408B (en) A kind of software probe method of software probe

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination