CA2897663C - Process for dewatering mineral tailings by the treatment of these tailings with at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a process of dewatering a suspension comprising particulate solids dispersed in an aqueous liquid, said particulate solids comprise clay and mineral particles of size below 50 µm, which process comprises the steps of, (a) subjecting the suspension to a kinetic energy stage to produce a modified suspension, (b) addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer to the suspension before, during or after step (a); (c) dewatering the treated suspension obtained after having conducted steps (a) and (b), in which the kinetic energy stage is a shearing stage and/or application of ultrasonic energy to the suspension.

Description

Process for dewatering Mineral Tailings by the treatment of these tailings with at least one ani-onic polymer and at least one cationic polymer Description The present invention relates to the treatment of mineral material, especially waste mineral slur-ries. The invention is particularly suitable for the disposal of tailings and other waste material resulting from mining and mineral processing operations. The invention is particularly suitable for the treatment of oil sand tailings and especially mature fine tailings (M
FT) derived from oil sand tailings.
Processes of treating mineral ores or oil sands in order to extract mineral values or in the case of oil sands to extract hydrocarbons will normally result in waste material.
Often the waste mate-rial consists of an aqueous slurry or sludge comprising particulate mineral material, for instance clay, shale, sand, grit, oil sand tailings, metal oxides etc. admixed with water.
In some cases the waste material such as mine tailings can be conveniently disposed of in an underground mine to form backfill. Generally backfill waste comprises a high proportion of coarse large sized particles together with other smaller sized particles and is pumped into the mine as slurry where it is allowed to dewater leaving the sedimented solids in place. It is com-mon practice to use flocculants to assist this process by flocculating the fine material to increase the rate of sedimentation. However, in this instance, the coarse material will normally sediment at a faster rate than the flocculated fines, resulting in a heterogeneous deposit of coarse and fine solids.
For other applications it may not be possible to dispose of the waste in a mine. In these in-stances it is common practice to dispose of this material by pumping the aqueous slurry to la-goons, heaps or stacks and allowing it to dewater gradually through the actions of sedimenta-tion, drainage and evaporation.
For example in oil sands processing, the ore is processed to recover the hydrocarbon fraction, and the remainder, including both process material and the gangue, constitutes the tailings that are to be disposed of. In oil sands processing, the main process material is water, and the gangue is mostly sand with some silt and clay. Physically, the tailings consist of a solid part (sand tailings) and a more or less fluid part (sludge). The most satisfactory place to dispose of these tailings is, of course, in the existing excavated hole in the ground. It turns out, however, that the sand tailings alone from the one cubic foot of ore occupy just about one cubic foot. The amount of sludge is variable, depending on ore quality and process conditions, but average about 0.3 cubic feet. The tailings simply will not fit back into the hole in the ground.
There is a great deal of environmental pressure to minimise the allocation of new land for dis-posal purposes and to more effectively use the existing waste areas. One method is to load multiple layers of waste onto an area to thus form higher stacks of waste.
However, this pre-

2 sents a difficulty of ensuring that the waste material can only flow over the surface of previously rigidified waste within acceptable boundaries, is allowed to rigidify to form a stack, and that the waste is sufficiently consolidated to support multiple layers of rigidified material, without the risk of collapse or slip. Thus the requirements for providing a waste material with the right sort of characteristics for stacking is altogether different from those required for other forms of disposal, such as back-filling within a relatively enclosed area.
In a typical mineral or oil sands processing operation, waste solids are separated from solids that contain mineral values in an aqueous process. The aqueous suspensions of waste solids often contain clays and other minerals, and are usually referred to as tailings. These solids are often concentrated by a flocculation process in a thickener to give a higher density underflow and to recover some of the process water. It is usual to pump the underflow to a surface holding area, often referred to as a tailings pit or dam or more usually a tailings pond in the case of oil sands. Once deposited at this surface holding area, water will continue to be released from the aqueous suspension resulting in further concentration of the solids over a period of time. Once a sufficient volume of water has been collected this is usually pumped back to the mineral or oil sands processing plant.
The tailings pond or dam is often of limited size in order to minimise the impact on the environ-ment. In addition, providing larger tailings ponds can be expensive due to the high costs of earth moving and the building of containment walls. These ponds tend to have a gently sloping bot-tom which allows any water released from the solids to collect in one area and which can then be pumped back to the plant. A problem that frequently occurs is when fine particles of solids are carried away with the run-off water, thus contaminating the water and having a detrimental impact on subsequent uses of the water.
In many mineral and oil sands processing operations, for instance a mineral sands beneficiation process, it is also common to produce a second waste stream comprising of mainly coarse (>0.1 mm) mineral particles. It is particularly desirable to dispose of the coarse and fine waste particles as a homogeneous mixture as this improves both the mechanical properties of the de-watered solids, greatly reducing the time and the cost eventually required to rehabilitate the land. However, this is not usually possible because even if the coarse waste material is thor-oughly mixed into the aqueous suspension of fine waste material prior to deposition in the dis-posal area, the coarse material will settle much faster than the fine material resulting in banding within the dewatered solids. Furthermore, when the quantity of coarse material to fine material is relatively high, the rapid sedimentation of the coarse material may produce excessive beach angles which promote the run off of aqueous waste containing high proportions of fine particles, further contaminating the recovered water. As a result, it is often necessary to treat the coarse and fine waste streams separately, and recombine these materials by mechanically re-working, once the dewatering process is complete.
Generally oil sands tailings ponds are located within close proximity of the oil sands mining and extraction operations in order to facilitate pipeline transportation, discharging and management

3 of the tailings. A tailings pond may be contained within a retaining structure which may be re-ferred to as a dyke structure. A suitable dyke structure may generally be constructed by placing the sand fraction of the tailings within cells or on beaches. Tailings streams initially discharged into the ponds may have relatively low densities and solids contents, for instance around 0.5 to 10% by weight.
In an oil sands tailings pond, the process water, unrecovered hydrocarbons and minerals settle naturally to form different strata. The upper stratum can be predominantly water that maybe recycled as process water to the extraction process. The lower stratum can contain settled re-sidual hydrocarbon and minerals which are predominantly fines. It is usual to refer to this lower stratum as "mature fine tailings" (M FT). It is known that mature fine tailings consolidate extreme-ly slowly and may take many hundreds of years to settle into a consolidated solid mass. Conse-quently mature fine tailings and the ponds containing them are a major challenge to tailings management and the mining industry.
The composition of mature fine tailings tends to be highly variable. The upper part of the stra-tum may have a mineral content of about 10% by weight but at the bottom of the stratum the mineral content may be as high as 50% by weight. The variation in the solids content is believed to be as a result of the slow settling of the solids and consolidation occurring over time. The average mineral content of the M FT tends to be of about 30% by weight.
The M FT generally comprises a mixture of sand, fines and clay. Generally the sand may re-ferred to siliceous particles of a size greater than 44 pm and may be present in the M FT in an amount of up to 15% by weight. The remainder of the mineral content of the M
FT tends to be made up of a mixture of clay and fines. Generally the fines refer to mineral particles no greater than 44 pm. The clay may be any material traditionally referred to as clays by virtue of its min-eralogy and will generally have a particle size of below 2 pm. Typically, the clays tend to be wa-ter swelling clays, such as montmorillonites. The clay content may be up to 75% of the solids.
Additional variations in the composition of M FT maybe as a result of the residual hydrocarbon which may be dispersed in the mineral or may segregate into mat layers of hydrocarbon. The M FT in a pond not only has a wide variation of compositions distributed from top to bottom of the pond but there may also be pockets of different compositions at random locations through-out the pond.
In addition, aqueous suspensions of waste solids from mining and mineral processing opera-tions including mining tailings, such as M FT, held in ponds of holding areas may also contain coarse debris. The type and composition of this coarse debris depends on the origin of the sus-pension. In the case of M FT the coarse debris tends to be of different sizes, shapes and chemi-cal compositions. For instance, M FT may include coarse debris such as biomass, such as wood or other plant material; petrified matter; solids having a density low enough to float at or near the surface of the pond; glass; plastic; metal; bitumen globules; or mats. The coarse debris found other mining tailings may include similar debris as in the case of M FT, with the exception of bi-

4 tumen materials and may also include other debris materials such as lumps of ore or other masses depending on the geology of the ore mine, the ore extraction processing technique, or the location of the tailings pond.
It is known that aqueous suspensions and mining tailings, such as M FT, may be dewatered and solidified through the action chemical treatments. A typical chemical treatment employs the ad-dition of chemical flocculating agents to bring about flocculation and be so formed flocculated suspensions can be subjected to dewatering.
It is well known to concentrate these oil sand tailings in a thickener to give a higher density un-derflow and to recover some of the process water as mentioned above.
For example, Xu.Y et al, Mining Engineering, November 2003, pages 33 to 39 describe the ad-dition of anionic flocculants to the oil sand tailings in the thickener before disposal.
The underflow can be disposed of and/or subjected to further drying for subsequent disposal in an oil sand tailings stacking area.
In the Bayer process for recovery of alumina from bauxite, the bauxite is digested in an aqueous alkaline liquor to form sodium aluminate which is separated from the insoluble residue. This residue consists of both sand, and fine particles of mainly ferric oxide. The aqueous suspension of the latter is known as red mud.
After the primary separation of the sodium aluminate solution from the insoluble residue, the sand (coarse waste) is separated from the red mud. The supernatant liquor is further processed to recover aluminate. The red mud is then washed in a plurality of sequential washing stages, in which the red mud is contacted by a wash liquor and is then flocculated by addition of a floccu-lating agent. After the final wash stage the red mud slurry is thickened as much as possible and then disposed of. Thickening in the context of this specification means that the solids content of the red mud is increased. The final thickening stage may comprise settlement of flocculated slurry only, or sometimes, includes a filtration step. Alternatively or additionally, the mud may be subjected to prolonged settlement in a lagoon. In any case, this final thickening stage is limited by the requirement to pump the thickened aqueous suspension to the disposal area.
The mud can be disposed of and/or subjected to further drying for subsequent disposal on a mud stacking area. To be suitable for mud stacking the mud should have a high solids content and, when stacked, should not flow but should be relatively rigid in order that the stacking angle should be as high as possible so that the stack takes up as little area as possible for a given volume. The requirement for high solids content conflicts with the requirement for the material to remain pumpable as a fluid, so that even though it may be possible to produce a mud having the desired high solids content for stacking, this may render the mud unpumpable.

The sand fraction removed from the residue is also washed and transferred to the disposal area for separate dewatering and disposal.
EP-A-388108 describes adding a water-absorbent, water-insoluble polymer to a material com-

5 prising an aqueous liquid with dispersed particulate solids, such as red mud, prior to pumping and then pumping the material, allowing the material to stand and then allowing it to rigidify and become a stackable solid. The polymer absorbs the aqueous liquid of the slurry which aids the binding of the particulate solids and thus solidification of the material.
However this process has the disadvantage that it requires high doses of absorbent polymer in order to achieve adequate solidification. In order to achieve a sufficiently rigidified material it is often necessary to use dos-es as high as 10 to 20 kilograms per tonne of mud. Although the use of water swellable absor-bent polymer to rigidify the material may appear to give an apparent increase in solids, the aqueous liquid is in fact held within the absorbent polymer. This presents the disadvantage that as the aqueous liquid has not actually been removed from the rigidified material and under cer-tain conditions the aqueous liquid could be desorbed subsequently and this could risk re-fluidisation of the waste material, with the inevitable risk of destabilising the stack.
WO-A-96/05146 describes a process of stacking aqueous slurry of particulate solids, which comprises admixing an emulsion of a water-soluble polymer dispersed in a continuous oil phase with the slurry. Preference is given to diluting the emulsion polymer with a diluent, and which is preferably in a hydrocarbon liquid or gas and which will not invert the emulsion. Therefore it is a requirement of the process that the polymer is not added to the slurry as an aqueous solution.
WO-A-0192167 describes a process where a material comprising a suspension of particulate solids is pumped as a fluid and then allowed to stand and rigidify. The rigidification is achieved by introducing into the suspension particles of a water soluble polymer which has an intrinsic viscosity of at least 3 dl/g. This treatment enables the material to retain its fluidity as being pumped, but upon standing causes the material to rigidify. This process has the benefit that the concentrated solids can be easily stacked, which minimises the area of land required for dis-posal. The process also has the advantage over the use of cross linked water absorbent poly-mers in that water from the suspension is released rather than being absorbed and retained by the polymer. The importance of using particles of water soluble polymer is emphasised and it is stated that the use of aqueous solutions of the dissolved polymer would be ineffective. Very efficient release of water and convenient storage of the waste solids is achieved by this pro-cess, especially when applied to a red mud underflow from the Bayer alumina process.
W02004/060819 describes a process in which material comprising an aqueous liquid with dis-persed particulate solids is transferred as a fluid to a deposition area, then allowed to stand and rigidify, and in which rigidification is improved whilst retaining the fluidity of the material during transfer, by combining with the material an effective rigidifying amount of an aqueous solution of a water-soluble polymer. Also described is a process in which dewatering of the particulate sol-ids is achieved.

6 Canadian patent application 2512324 describes a process for the rigidification of a suspension which is or comprises oil sand tailings. The process involves transferring the suspension as a fluid to a deposition area in which an effective rigidifying amount of an aqueous solution of a water-soluble polymer is combined with the suspension during transfer and then allowing the so treated suspension to stand and rigidify. The rigidification is improved whilst retaining the fluidity of the material during transfer. The process was particularly suited to the treatment of tailings as they are produced from the oil sands processing operation.
WO 01/05712 Al discloses a process for treating an aqueous suspension of suspended solids by adding a concentrated polymer solution and a dilute polymer solution. This process is con-ducted to treat mineral tailings in general, tailings comprising very small particles like oil sand tailings, especially M FT, are not mentioned.
WO 97/06111 A 1 discloses a process for pressure dewatering an aqueous mineral suspension having a mineral solids content of at least 150 g/I comprising mixing into the suspension water-soluble anionic bridging polymeric flocculant having intrinsic viscosity at least 5 dl/g and water-soluble cationic polymeric flocculant, allowing the suspension to flocculate, followed by dewater-ing the flocculated suspension under pressure. According to this document the anionic and cati-onic flocculants are mixed into the suspension by blending one part by weight of the cationic polymeric flocculant with 2 to 20 parts by weight of the anionic polymeric bridging flocculant and sufficient water to give a polymer concentration of below 5% and under conditions whereby counter ionic precipitation can occur and thereby an aqueous composition in which substantially all the anionic polymer which is not precipitable by the cationic polymer is in solution is formed, followed by mixing this aqueous composition into the suspension.
However, suspensions which contain a very high proportion of fine solids and clays, such as M FT, are particularly difficult to dewater and generally require very high doses of chemical treatment aids.
Therefore it is an objective of the present invention to achieve a more efficient process for de-watering a suspension containing high levels of fine solids and clays, especially M FT derived from oil sand tailings. In particular it would be desirable if such a process required reduced lev-els of chemical treatment aids. Furthermore, the dewatering step of the solids containing sus-pension should be improved. Moreover, it would be desirable for the process of removing water or dewatering process is a rigidification process, wherein the level of rigidification should be high enough to provide a stable packing According to the present invention we provide a process of dewatering a suspension comprising particulate solids dispersed in an aqueous liquid, said particulate solids comprise clay and min-eral particles of size below 50 pm, which process comprises the steps of, (a) subjecting the suspension to a kinetic energy stage to produce a modified suspension;

7 (b) addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer to the suspen-sion before, during or after step (a);
(c) dewatering the treated suspension obtained after having conducted steps (a) and (b), in which the kinetic energy stage is a shearing stage and/or application of ultrasonic energy to the suspension.
The present invention preferably relates to the process according to the present invention, wherein the shearing stage comprises subjecting the suspension to shearing employing a shearing device and in which the shearing device is selected from the group consisting of:
a shearing device comprising moving elements which rotate, preferably impellers, kneading components, or moving plates;
a milling device comprising moving elements;
a static mixer, more preferably in which the operation of the moving elements is at least 5 cycles per second.
The process brings about significant improvements in removing water from the suspension us-ing lower levels of treatment chemicals than previously possible.
By mineral particles of particle size below 50 pm, we mean solid mineral particles that are not water swelling clays that may generally be referred to as fines. Often these mineral particles may be referred to as silt. Usually these mineral particles have a size of no greater than 44 pm.
Typically they will have a size between 2 pm and 44 pm, although their size may be smaller.
The mineral origin of the particles often will be silica and/or quartz and/or feldspar.
The mineral particles may typically be present in the suspension in an amount of at least 10%
by weight of the mineral content. Often the particles may be present in amount of at least 15%
for at least 20% by weight of the solids content. In some cases the solids content of the suspen-sion may be made up to 50 or 60% by weight.
The clay may be any material traditionally referred to as clays by virtue of its mineralogy and will tend to have a particle size of below 2 pm. Generally the clays may tend to be a mixture of clays. Typically the clay component may comprise kaolinite; illite; chlorite;
montmorillonites; kao-linite-smectite mixtures; illite-smectite mixtures. The clay content of the suspension would usual-ly be at least 20% by weight of the solids and may be as much as 75% by weight of the solids.
Without being limited by theory the inventors believe that suspensions which contain a high proportion of very small sized mineral particles and clay particles, especially where they have been held in tailings ponds over a considerable time, even many years, such as oil sands de-rived M FT, exhibit three-dimensional particle network structure based on the clays. These net-work structures are believed to include clay-clay intra-particle networks and clay-inter-particle network structures which incorporate the fine mineral particles. The inventors believe that these

8 network structures comprise clay particles linked to each other and network structures where clay particles and the fine particles are linked together by clay particles.
Further, it is believed that this network structure is responsible for retaining more water than in suspensions of equiva-lent solids. Furthermore, it is considered that the electrostatic forces within the clay inter-particle structure may be responsible for the difficulty in achieving adequate water release with conven-tional doses of chemical treatment aids.
Unexpectedly, the inventors discovered that applying kinetic energy to the suspension provides a modified suspension which is significantly more conducive to releasing water by chemical treatment using a combination of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer.
The inventors believe that the action of the kinetic energy on the suspension directly interacts with the clay-clay intra-particle network structures and the clay inter-particle network structures.
In fact it is believed that the kinetic energy will at least partially breakdown these network struc-tures.
Preferably, the suspension comprises mature fine tailings derived from oil sands tailings.
By kinetic energy we mean that the suspension is subjected to some energy which is or induces motion within the suspension. In one form the kinetic energy may be ultrasonic energy. General-ly it is expected that the application of ultrasonic energy will induce vibrations which will at least partially break down the network structures. Other forms of kinetic energy may be alternative means for inducing vibrations.
One particularly suitable form of kinetic energy is shearing.
The shearing according to step (a) may be carried out in a shearing vessel before being trans-ferred to the next step of the process. Alternatively, the shearing may be carried out in line as the suspension is being transferred.
Any conventional shearing device may be employed as such devices are very well known in the industry and also described in the literature. Industrial scale shear devices, for instance shear mixing devices or shear pumps are available from a variety of manufacturers, for instance IKA
which manufactures Ultra Turrax high shear devices, for instance the devices in the Ultra Turrax UTL 2000 range; Fluko-high shear mixers; SiIverson high shear mixers, for instance Ultramix mixers or In-line mixers; Euromixers; Greaves; Admix Inc which manufactures Rotosolver high shear devices; Charles Ross and Son Company which manufactures Ross high shear mixers;
Robbins Myers which manufactures Greerco high shear mixers; Powershear Mixers.
Suitable shearing devices generally have moving elements: such as rotating components, for instance impellers; kneeding components; or moving plates. The mixing pumps may also con-tain static elements such as baffles or plates, for instance containing orifices. The moving ele-ments will tend to move quite rapidly in order to generate shear. In general this will depend up-on the mode of action within the shearing chamber and the size of the volume that is being

9 sheared. This may be for instance at least 5 cycles per second (5 s-1), preferably at least 6 cy-cles per second (6 s-1), more preferably at least 7 cycles per second (7 s-1), most preferably at least 8 cycles per second (8 s-1), even more preferably 9 cycles per second (9 s-1), and usually at least 10 cycles per second (10 s-1), suitably at least 20 cycles per second (20 s-1). Typically this may be up to 170 s-1, up to 200 s-, or up to 300 s-, or more.
When the suspension, for instance oil sands derived M FT, is subjected to shearing, the period of shearing may be referred to as the residence time. The residence time in the shearing device may be, for instance at least 1 second. Often it will be at least 5 seconds and sometimes at least 10 seconds. It may be up to 30 seconds or more or it may be up to 15 seconds or up to 20 seconds. In some situations it may be at least 20 seconds, for instance at least 1 min and often may be several hours, for instance up 10 hours or more. Suitably the residence time may be at least 5 min, suitably at least 10 min and often at least 30 min. In many cases it may be at least one hour. In some cases the residence time may be up to 8 hours but desirably less than this.
The shearing device may even be a milling device. Milling devices include colloid mills, cone mills and rotor mills etc. In general milling devices tend to have moving elements, for instance cones, screens or plates containing gaps, grooves, slots or orifices which move against other static elements. The moving elements may move instance by rotation. These devices tend to generate a high level of shear stress on liquids and other materials passing through them. The moving elements tend to combine high-speed with a very small shear gap which produces in-tense friction on the material being processed. The friction and shear that result is commonly referred to as wet milling. In one form the milling device may contain a rotor and a stator, which are both cone-shaped and may have one or more stages of fine grooves, gaps, slots or orifices.
This stator can be adjusted to obtain the desired gap setting between the rotor and stator. The grooves, gaps, slots or orifices may change direction in each stage to increased turbulence. The moving elements will tend to move quite rapidly in order to generate sufficient shear. This may be for instance at least 5 cycles per second (5 s-1), preferably at least 6 cycles per second (6 s-1), more preferably at least 7 cycles per second (7 s-1), most preferably at least 8 cycles per second (8 s-1), even more preferably 9 cycles per second (9 s-1), and usually at least 10 cycles per second (10 s-1), suitably at least 20 cycles per second (20 s-1).
Typically this may be up to 170 s-1, up to 200 s-, or up to 300 s-, or more.
Alternatively the suspension may be passed through a static mixer or other static elements which bring about a shearing action, for instance baffles in a pipeline or alternatively a con-striction in a pipeline.
The inventors have noted that during the application of kinetic energy, for instance by shearing of the suspension, in particular the oil sands derived M FT, a notable reduction in viscosity of the suspension can occur. The inventors considered that this may be as a result of the clay-clay intra-particle network structures and clay inter-particle network structures being broken down and releasing water previously entrained within these networks. It is thought that this availability of the water may bring about a reduction in viscosity. Typically viscosity may be measured by an instrument called a controlled stress rheometer, such as Brookfield RS.
Viscosity may be measured at 25 C.
Generally the viscosity of the modified (for instance sheared) suspension would often be below 5 90% of the viscosity of the suspension prior to the application of kinetic energy, such as the shearing stage. Preferably the viscosity of the modified suspension, for instance sheared sus-pension, is no more than 80% of the viscosity of the suspension before the application of kinetic energy, such as shearing and more preferably no more than 70%. More preferably still the mod-ified suspension, for instance sheared suspension, viscosity will be up to 60%
and in particular

10 less than 50% of the suspension before the application of kinetic energy, for instance un-sheared suspension. In some cases the viscosity of the modified suspension, for instance sheared suspension, may be as little as 0.001% of the suspension before the application of ki-netic energy, for instance shearing, or even below. Often the modified suspension, for instance sheared suspension, will be at least 0.05% or 0.1% of the suspension before the application of kinetic energy, for instance un-sheared suspension. In many cases the modified suspension, for instance sheared suspension will be at least 1%, at least 5% or at least 10%
of the suspension before the application of kinetic energy, for instance un-sheared suspension.
In addition, also the yield stress of the modified (for instance sheared) suspension is decreased by the applica-tion of kinetic energy.
Generally, the change in viscosity from the suspension, before the application of kinetic energy to the modified suspension, for instance after the application of shear, tends to increase as the clay content of the suspension increases.
According to the present invention the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer can be added to the suspension before, during or after step (a).
Therefore, according to one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the steps of the process according to the present invention can be conducted in sequence (a), followed by (b), followed by (c).
According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the steps of the process according to the present invention can be conducted in sequence (b), followed by (a), followed by (c).
According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the steps of the process according to the present invention can be conducted in sequence (a) and (b) at the same time, followed by (c).
The process of the present invention involves addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer according to step (b).

11 The addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer according to the present invention facilitates the removal of water in the dewatering step. The inventors believe that the availability of water released from the clay-clay intra-particle network structures and clay inter-particle network structures facilitates the integration of the polymers throughout the solids of the suspension.
The dewatering of the polymer treated suspension according to step (c) may employ any known dewatering method. For instance the dewatering step may involve sedimentation of the polymer treated suspension to produce settled sediment. Such a process may be carried out in a vessel for example a gravimetric thickener or in a settlement pond. Alternatively the dewatering pro-cess may involve pressure dewatering, for example using a filter press, a belt press or a centri-fuge.
Preferably the dewatering process is a process of rigidification of the solids in the suspension and the dewatering step is part of the rigidification process. Thus in a preferred form of the in-vention the modified, preferably sheared, suspension is transferred as a fluid to a deposition area, then allowed to stand and rigidifying, in which the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer are added to the modified, preferably sheared, suspension during the transfer of the modified, preferably sheared, suspension.
Rigidification is a term that refers to a networked structure of particulate solids. Compared with settling or sedimentation, rigidification is faster, produces more recovered water and results in a chemically bonded tailings that occupy a smaller surface area, which is more quickly rehabilitated. Rigidified tailings are also less likely to spread laterally after deposition enabling more efficient land use; and would more rapidly form a solid structure in the form of a beach or stack; and have a greater yield stress when deposited, with increased uniformity or homogenity of coarse and fine particles. Further by reason of its heaped geometry as a beach or stack such rigidified material would result in downward compression forces, driving water out of the stack and more rapid release of water, with better clarity.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer may be added to the modified suspension in the form of solutions, preferably aqueous solutions, either simultaneously or separately.
The present invention therefore preferably relates to the process according to the present inven-tion in which the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer are added sim-ultaneously or separately, preferably separately.
The addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer, preferably as aqueous solution(s), allows the modified suspension to retain sufficient fluidity during transfer and then once the material is allowed to stand it will form a solid mass strong enough to support subsequent layers of rigidified material. We have unexpectedly found that the addition of the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer, preferably as aqueous solutions of

12 the polymers, to the modified suspension does not cause instant rigidification or substantially any settling of the solids prior to standing.
The at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer, preferably as aqueous solutions, may be metered directly into the suspension as separate solutions.
This may be done at approximately the same dosing point. Where the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer, preferably as aqueous solutions, are added to the suspension separately, they may be added in either order. For instance if the at least one anionic polymer, preferably as aqueous solution, is added first the at least one cationic polymer, preferably as aqueous so-lution, may be added after flocculation and dewatering created by the anionic polymer have commenced.
Alternatively, it may be desirable to add the at least one anionic polymer after the addition of the at least one cationic polymer. When the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer are added separately it may be appropriate to allow or apply some degree mixing be-tween the dosing stages in order to allow the first polymer dose to become distributed through-out the suspension solids. This mixing may for instance include allowing the treated suspension to pass some distance along a flow line which optionally contains bends, baffles, constrictions or other features which induce gentle mixing.
Preferably the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer are introduced separately.
According to a further preferred embodiment, step (b) is conducted by addition of at least one anionic polymer dispersed in a, preferably aqueous, solution of at least one cationic polymer.
The present invention therefore preferably relates to the process according to the present inven-tion in which step (b) is conducted by addition of at least one anionic polymer dispersed in a, preferably aqueous, solution of at least one cationic polymer.
According to this preferred embodiment a, preferably aqueous, solution of the at least one cati-onic polymer is provided and the at least one anionic polymer is dispersed therein. According to this preferred embodiment, the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic poly-mer are added simultaneously to the suspension.
According to a further preferred embodiment, step (b) is conducted by addition of at least one cationic polymer dispersed in a, preferably aqueous, solution of at least one anionic polymer.
The present invention therefore preferably relates to the process according to the present inven-tion in which step (b) is conducted by addition of at least one cationic polymer dispersed in a, preferably aqueous, solution of at least one anionic polymer.

13 According to this preferred embodiment a, preferably aqueous, solution of the at least one ani-onic polymer is provided and the at least one cationic polymer is dispersed therein. According to this preferred embodiment, the at least one cationic polymer and the at least one anionic poly-mer are added simultaneously to the suspension.
According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the at least one anionic polymer is added first to the suspension, and the at least one cationic polymer is added after-wards.
This preferred embodiment is for example conducted by providing a mixture comprising the at least one anionic polymer in solution, preferably in aqueous solution, and the at least one cati-onic polymer in a capsule formation. According to this embodiment the at least one anionic pol-ymer is readily absorbed to the mineral after getting in contact. Afterwards, the at least one cati-onic polymer is released from the capsule formation, for example by the application of kinetic energy by mixing, stirring etc., and is also absorbed onto the minerals.
According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the at least one cationic polymer is added first to the suspension, and the at least one anionic polymer is added after-wards.
This further preferred embodiment is for example conducted by providing a mixture comprising the at least one cationic polymer in solution, preferably in aqueous solution, and the at least one anionic polymer in a capsule formation. According to this embodiment the at least one cationic polymer is readily absorbed to the mineral after getting in contact.
Afterwards, the at least one anionic polymer is released from the capsule formation, for example by the application of kinetic energy by mixing, stirring etc., and is also absorbed onto the minerals.
According to a further embodiment, the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cation-ic polymer are introduced into the suspension as one aqueous solution comprising both. The concentration of all polymers present in the composition is for example 0.01 to 1.0% by weight, preferably 0.05 to 0.5% by weight, based on the whole composition.
The weight ratio of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer is for example 90: 10, preferably 60 to 40. These preferred weight ratios of at least one anionic polymer to at least one cationic polymer are preferably present independent of how the polymers are added, either solid, dispersed and/or dissolved.
If single solutions of the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer are used, the concentration of the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer are for example 0.01 to1.0% by weight, preferably 0.05 to 0.5% by weight, in each case based on the single solution of either the anionic or the cationic polymer.

14 According to a preferred embodiment a, preferably aqueous, solution of at least one anionic polymer is used, having a concentration of 0.01 to 1.0% by weight, preferably 0.05 to 0.5% by weight, in each case based on the composition.
According to a preferred embodiment a, preferably aqueous, solution of at least one cationic polymer is used, having a concentration of 0.01 to 1.0 % by weight, preferably 0.05 to 0.5% by weight, in each case based on the composition.
Suitable doses of polymer range from 10 grams to 10,000 grams per tonne of material solids.
Generally the appropriate dose can vary according to the particular material and material solids content. Preferred doses are in the range 30 to 3,000 grams per tonne, while more preferred doses are in the range of from 60 to 200 or 400 grams per tonne, in each case in respect of the sum of all polymers applied.
In some instances better results may be obtained when the suspension, particular the oil sands derived M FT, is relatively concentrated and homogenous. It may also be desirable to combine the addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer with other addi-tives. For instance the flow properties of the material through a conduit may be facilitated by including a dispersant. Typically where a dispersant is included it would be included in conven-tional amounts. However, we have found that surprisingly the presence of dispersants or other additives does not impair the rigidification of the material on standing. It may also be desirable to pre-treat the material with either an inorganic or organic coagulant to pre-coagulate the fine material to aid its retention in the rigidified solids.
Thus in the present invention the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer, preferably as aqueous solutions or dispersions, are added directly to the aforementioned modi-fied suspension. The polymer solution or dispersions may consist wholly or partially of water-soluble polymers. Thus the polymer solutions or dispersions may comprise a blend of cross-linked polymer and water soluble polymer, provided sufficient of the polymer is in solution or behaves as though it is in solution to bring about rigidification on standing.
According to the present invention the at least one anionic polymer and/or the at least one cati-onic polymer may comprise one or more polymer(s). According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention "at least one anionic polymer" is understood in a way that one anionic pol-ymer or two, three, four etc. anionic polymers are present as a mixture.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention "at least one anionic polymer"
is understood in a way that one anionic polymer or two, three, four etc. anionic polymers and additionally further polymers are present as a mixture. The same applies to the at least one cationic polymer. Pref-erably, one anionic polymer and one cationic polymer are used.
The at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer may comprise a physical blend of swellable polymer and soluble polymer or alternatively a lightly cross-linked polymer for instance as described in EP202780. Although the polymers may comprise some cross-linked polymer it is preferred to the present invention that a significant amount of water soluble poly-mer is present. When the polymers comprise some swellable polymer it is desirable that at least 80% of the polymer is water-soluble.
5 Preferably the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer are wholly or at least substantially water soluble. The water soluble polymer may be branched by the pres-ence of branching agent, for instance as described in WO-A-9829604, for instance in claim 12, or alternatively the water soluble polymer is substantially linear.
10 Preferably the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymers are inde-pendently of another of moderate to high molecular weight. It will have an intrinsic viscosity of at least 3 dl/g and generally at least 5 or 6 dl/g, although the polymers may be of significantly high molecular weight and exhibit an intrinsic viscosity of 25 dl/g or 30 dl/g or even higher. Preferably the polymer will have an intrinsic viscosity in the range of 6 dl/g to 25 dl/g, more preferably 11

15 dl/g or 12 dl/g to 18 dl/g or 20 dl/g. It is possible that the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer have the same or different molecular weights.
Intrinsic viscosity of polymers may be determined by preparing an aqueous solution of the pol-ymer (0.5 to 1% w/w) based on the active content of the polymer. 2 g of this 0.5 to 1% w/w pol-ymer solution is diluted to 100 ml in a volumetric flask with 50 ml of 2M
sodium chloride solution that is buffered to pH 7.0 (using 1.56 g sodium dihydrogen phosphate and 32.26 g disodium hydrogen phosphate per litre of deionised water) and the whole is diluted to the 100 ml mark with deionised water. The intrinsic viscosity of the polymers is measured using a Number 1 sus-pended level viscometer at 25 C in 1M buffered salt solution.
The polymers may be a natural polymer or a synthetic polymer as long as they have an anionic or cationic character. Preferably the polymers are synthetic and preferably they are formed from an ethylenically unsaturated water-soluble monomer or blend of monomers.
The polymers may be formed from any suitable water-soluble monomers. Typically the water soluble monomers have solubility in water of at least 5g/100 ml at 25 C.
In general, the at least one anionic polymer may be selected from the group of all anionic poly-mers that are known to the skilled artisan.
Particularly preferred anionic polymers are formed from monomers selected from ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid and sulphonic acid monomers, preferably selected from (meth)acrylic acid, allyl sulphonic acid and 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulphonic acid (AMPS), and their salts, optionally in combination with non-ionic co-monomers, preferably se-lected from (meth) acrylamide, hydroxy alkyl esters of (meth) acrylic acid and N-vinyl pyrroli-done.

16 In general, the at least one cationic polymer may be selected from the group of all cationic pol-ymers that are known to the skilled artisan.
Preferred cationic polymers are formed from ethylenically unsaturated monomers selected from dimethyl amino ethyl (meth) acrylate - methyl chloride, (DMAEA.MeCI) quat, diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), trimethyl amino propyl (meth) acrylamide chloride (ATPAC) optionally in combination with non-ionic co-monomers, preferably selected from (meth) acryla-mide, hydroxy alkyl esters of (meth) acrylic acid and N-vinyl pyrrolidone.
According to a further embodiment of the present invention, in addition to the at least one anion-ic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer, further polymers may be added, for example non-ionic polymers. In general non-ionic polymers may be selected from the group of all non-ionic polymers that are known to the skilled artisan, for example non-ionic polymers may be formed from ethylenically unsaturated monomers selected from (meth) acrylamide, hydroxy al-kyl esters of (meth) acrylic acid and N-vinyl pyrrolidone.
In the invention, the polymers may be formed by any suitable polymerisation process. The pol-ymers may be prepared for instance as gel polymers by solution polymerisation, water-in-oil suspension polymerisation or by water-in-oil emulsion polymerisation. When preparing gel pol-ymers by solution polymerisation the initiators are generally introduced into the monomer solu-tion.
Optionally a thermal initiator system may be included. Typically a thermal initiator would include any suitable initiator compound that releases radicals at an elevated temperature, for instance azo compounds, such as azo-bis-isobutyronitrile. The temperature during polymerisation should rise to at least 70 C but preferably below 95 C. Alternatively polymerisation may be effected by irradiation (ultra violet light, microwave energy, heat etc.) optionally also using suitable radia-tion initiators. Once the polymerisation is complete and the polymer gel has been allowed to cool sufficiently the gel can be processed in a standard way by first commuting the gel into smaller pieces, drying to the substantially dehydrated polymer followed by grinding to a powder.
Alternatively polymers may be supplied in the form of polymer gels, for instance as neutron type gel polymer logs.
Such polymer gels may be prepared by suitable polymerisation techniques as described above, for instance by irradiation. The gels may be chopped to an appropriate size as required and then on application mixed with the material as partially hydrated water soluble polymer particles.
The polymers may be produced as beads by suspension polymerisation or as a water-in-oil emulsion or dispersion by water-in-oil emulsion polymerisation, for example according to a pro-cess defined by EP-A-150933, EP-A-102760 or EP-A126528.
Alternatively the polymers may be provided as dispersion in an aqueous medium.
This may for instance be a dispersion of polymer particles of at least 20 microns in an aqueous medium con-

17 taining an equilibrating agent as given in EP-A-170394. This may for example also include aqueous dispersions of polymer particles prepared by the polymerisation of aqueous monomers in the presence of an aqueous medium containing dissolved low IV polymers such as poly dial-lyl dimethyl ammonium chloride and optionally other dissolved materials for instance electrolyte and/or multi-hydroxy compounds e. g. polyalkylene glycols, as given in WO-A-9831749 or WO-A-9831748.
The, preferably aqueous, solutions of polymers are typically obtained by dissolving the polymers in preferably water or by diluting a more concentrated solution of the polymer. Generally solid particulate polymer, for instance in the form of powder or beads, is dispersed in preferably water and allowed to dissolve with agitation. This may be achieved using conventional make up equipment. Desirably, the polymer solution can be prepared using the Auto Jet Wet (trademark) supplied by BASF. Alternatively, the polymer may be supplied in the form of a reverse phase emulsion or dispersion which can then be inverted into preferably water.
According to a preferred embodiment, the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cat-ionic polymer are added simultaneously. According to this embodiment, the, preferably aque-ous, composition comprising the at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic pol-ymer may be formed by introducing the one kind of polymer solution into a flowing stream of the solution of the other kind of polymer.
According to one embodiment of the invention wherein an aqueous suspension of suspended solids is flocculated and dewatered, an aqueous composition is introduced into the suspension.
The aqueous composition comprises at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic pol-ymer.
It is desirable that the aqueous composition comprising at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer does not contain substantial amounts of undissolved polymer, for instance it is preferable that less than 5%, more preferably less than 2% by weight of total pol-ymer contained in the aqueous composition is not in solution. In many dewatering situations the most efficient use of the polymer is achieved if the amount of undissolved polymer is less than 1%, especially less than 0.5%.
According to a preferred embodiment of the process according to the present invention the at least one anionic polymer and at least one anionic polymer are added separately.
A suitable and effective rigidifying amount of the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer, preferably as aqueous solutions, can be mixed with the modified, preferably sheared, suspension prior to a pumping stage. In this way the polymers can be distributed throughout the modified, preferably sheared, suspension. Alternatively, the polymer solutions can be introduced and mixed with the modified, preferably sheared, suspension during a pump-ing stage or subsequently. The most effective point of addition will depend upon the substrate and the distance from the kinetic energy stage to the deposition area. If the conduit is relatively

18 short it may be advantageous to dose the polymer solutions close to where the modified, pref-erably sheared, suspension flows from the kinetic energy device. On the other hand, where the deposition area is significantly remote from the kinetic energy device in may be desirable to in-troduce the polymer solutions closer to the outlet. In some instances in may be convenient to introduce the polymer solutions into the modified, preferably sheared, suspension as it exits the outlet.
Preferably the polymer treated suspension will be pumped as a fluid to an outlet at the deposi-tion area and the so treated suspension allowed to flow over the surface of rigidified material.
The suspension is allowed to stand and rigidify and therefore forming a stack of rigidified mate-rial. This process may be repeated several times to form a stack that comprises several layers of rigidified solids of the suspension. The formation of stacks of rigidified material has the ad-vantage that less area is required for disposal.
The rheological characteristics of the polymer treated suspension as it flows through the conduit to the deposition area is important, since any significant reduction in flow characteristics could seriously impair the efficiency of the process. It is important that there is no significant settling of the solids as this could result in a blockage, which may mean that the plant has to be closed to allow the blockage to be cleared. In addition it is important that there is no significant reduction in flow characteristics, since this could drastically impair the pumpability on the suspension.
Such a deleterious effect could result in significantly increased energy costs as pumping be-comes harder and the likelihood of increased wear on the pumping equipment.
The rheological characteristics of the suspension as it rigidifies is important, since once the pol-ymer treated suspension is allowed to stand it is important that flow is minimised and that solidi-fication of the polymer treated suspension proceeds rapidly. If the polymer treated suspension is too fluid then it will not form an effective stack and there is also a risk that it will contaminate water released from the suspension. It is also necessary that the rigidified material is sufficiently strong to remain intact, but must be compressable, and withstand the weight of subsequent lay-ers of rigidified suspension being applied to it.
Preferably the process of the invention will achieve heaped disposal geometry and will co-immobilise the fine and any coarse fractions of the solids in the suspension and also allowing any released water to have a higher driving force to separate it from the suspension by virtue of hydraulic gravity drainage. The heaped geometry appears to give a higher downward compac-tion pressure on underlying solids which seems to be responsible for enhancing the rate of de-watering. We find that this geometry results in a higher volume of waste per surface area, which is both environmentally and economically beneficial.
A preferred feature of the present invention is the release of aqueous liquor that often occurs during the rigidification step. Thus in a preferred form of the invention the suspension is de-watered during rigidification to release liquor containing significantly less solids. The liquor can then be returned to the process thus reducing the volume of imported water required and there-

19 fore it is important that the liquor is clear and substantially free of contaminants, especially mi-grating particulate fines. Suitably the liquor may for instance be recycled to the mining opera-tion, for instance oil sands operation, from which the suspension originates.
Alternatively, the liquor can be recycled to the spirals or other processes within the same plant.
Furthermore clarifying polymers may optionally be added after the thickener to the underflow but before disposal by rigidification. This may enhance the clarity of the water released from the rigidifying stack.
The clarifying polymers are typically low molecular weight, polymers. For the purposes of the invention low molecular weight means an average molecular weight ranging from about 10,000 to about 1,000,000 g/mol. For example, anionic polymers in the range of about 10,000 to about 500,000 g/mol may be used.
The clarifying polymers can be anionic, non-ionic or cationic. They can be synthetic or naturally derived, e.g. from starch, gums or cellulose, e.g. carboxymethyl cellulose.
Preferably they are anionic, e.g. a homopolymer of sodium acrylate, or as a copolymer with acrylamide, or hydro-lysed polyacrylonitrile or hydrolysed acrylamide.
The amount of clarifying polymer will be determined by the composition of the oil sands tailings but generally about 5 to about 500 g/tonne of dry solids. For example the amount of clarifying polymer may be about 5 g to about 100 g/tonne of dry solids.
The clarifying polymer may be added as a solution and may be added in any suitable concen-tration. It may be desirable to employ a relatively concentrated solution, for instance up to 10%
or more based on weight of polymer in order to minimise the amount of water introduced into the material. The clarifying polymer solution can be added at a relatively dilute concentration, for instance as low as 0.01% by weight of polymer. Typically the clarifying polymer solution will normally be used at a concentration between 0.05 and 5% by weight of polymer.
Preferably the polymer concentration will be the range 0.1% to 2 or 3%. More preferably the concentration will range from 0.25% to about 1 or 1.5%.
The clarifying polymer may be added before, simultaneously, or after the rigidifying amount of the water-soluble polymer added according to the present invention.
The present invention also includes a test method for evaluating suspensions which contain fine mineral particles and clay, especially mature fine tailings derived from oil sands tailings.
A further aspect of the invention defines a method of testing a suspension which comprises par-ticulate solids dispersed in an aqueous liquid, said particulate solids comprises clay and mineral particles of size below 50 pm, which method comprises the steps of, (a) subjecting a sample of the suspension to kinetic energy to produce a modified suspension in which the kinetic energy comprises subjecting the sample to shearing in a shearing de-vice at a rate of at least 200 rpm;
5 (b) Addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer to the modified suspension before, during or after step (a);
(c) Transferring the polymer treated suspension obtained after having conducted steps (a) and (b) onto a mesh; and (d) Measuring the water drained through the mesh and measuring the yield stress of the de-posited material.
The measurement according to step (d) of the test method according to the present invention is preferably conducted using a rheometer fitted with a vane.
The suspension may be in accordance with the suspension already defined herein. Preferably the suspension comprises mature fine tailings (M FT) that have been derived from oil sands tail-ings.
By kinetic energy we mean that suspension is subjected some energy which is or induces mo-tion within the suspension. In one form the kinetic energy may be ultrasonic energy. Generally it is expected that the application of ultrasonic energy will induce vibrations which will at least par-tially break down the network structures. Other forms of kinetic energy may be alternative means for inducing vibrations.
One particularly suitable form of kinetic energy is shearing. General and preferred embodiments of shearing are outlined above.
The present invention preferably relates to the method according to the present invention in which the kinetic energy is shearing and the modified suspension is a sheared suspension.
The shearing may be carried out by any suitable shearing devices that may be employed in a laboratory. Typically such shearing devices may be domestic or laboratory shearing devices, such as those manufactured by SiIverson or Moulinex. One particularly suitable shearing device comprises a flat paddle impeller.
Suitably a sample of the suspension, desirably M FT, may be placed into a beaker or other con-venient receptacle, suitably having a circular cross-section. The shearing member of the shear-ing device should then be inserted into the suspension. When the shearing device comprises a flat paddle impeller it is preferred that the length of the paddle fits substantially across the diam-eter of the beaker or receptacle. By this we mean that there may be up to 1, 2, or 3 mm clear-ance between the wall of the beaker or receptacle and the ends of the flat paddle.

Desirably the sample should be sheared by operating the shearing device at a rate of at least 200 rpm, preferably at least 300 rpm and more preferably at least 400 rpm, especially at the 450 rpm. There is no upper limit to the rate of shearing but generally this would tend to depend on the type of shearing device and this would tend not to be greater 10,000 rpm or 20,000 rpm. In the case of the shearing device with the flat paddle impeller the upper rate of shearing may be no more than 1000 rpm and usually less than this. A desirable rate of shearing when using the flat paddle impeller may be in the range of between 200 and 800 rpm, preferably between 300 and 700 rpm, more preferably between 400 and 600 rpm, especially between 450 and 550 rpm.
The duration of the shearing will tend to be at least 1 or 2 seconds and usually at least 5 sec-onds and in some cases at least 30 seconds or at least 1 min. The period of shearing may be longer than this, for instance up to 30 min or more. Generally the period of shearing would be up to 20 min.
The at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymers, their general definitions and preferred embodiments are used as mentioned above.
Following the addition of the polymers to the modified, preferably sheared, suspension, it may be desirable to assist the polymer treated suspension to be integrated throughout the solids of the suspension. This may be achieved by stirring. Alternatively the polymer treated suspension may be transferred to a sealed container and inverted several times, for instance between 2 and 10 inversions, suitably between 3 and 5 inversions.
The mesh onto which the polymer treated suspension is applied maybe any suitable mesh which allows water to drain through it and retain the solids on top of it. The mesh may be part of a sieve. The mesh may be made from metal or other material such as plastic.
The test method is useful for determining which polymer products are likely to be most effective for the treatment of the suspension. The method should also be useful in determining the opti-mal doses of polymer solutions.
The present invention further relates to the use of a combination of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer and the application of kinetic energy to dewater a suspension comprising particulate solids dispersed in an aqueous liquid, said particulate solids comprises clay and mineral particles of size below 50 pm.
In respect of the at least one anionic polymer, at least one cationic polymer, the application of kinetic energy and the suspension that is to be dewatered, the above mentioned applies accord-ingly.
The following is an illustration of the invention.

Examples Example 1 One tonne of aqueous suspension comprising mature fines tailings (M FT) derived from oil sands is fed in to a shearing device (Ultra Turrax MK 2000). The aqueous suspension compris-ing M FT is sheared at 9 cycles per second for a duration of 30 seconds to produce a sheared suspension.
The sheared suspension is passed along a conduit and an anionic polyacrylamide, consisting of an aqueous solution of a copolymer of acrylamide with sodium acrylate (70/30 on a weight ba-sis) are an intrinsic viscosity of 19 dl/g at a concentration of 0.5%, and a 100% cationic polymer of polyDADMAC with an intrinsic viscosity of <3 dl/g is introduced into the suspension at a dose of 2000 g/tonne (based on active polymer per dry aqueous sheared suspension).
The polymer treated sheared suspension continues to flow along the conduit to an outlet where the polymer treated sheared suspension is allowed to flow on to a sand bed.
The so treated sheared suspension very quickly dewaters and forms a heap of rigidified, dewatered M FT sol-ids. As the M FT dewaters substantially clear aqueous fluid flows from the heap.
Example 2 A sample (100 mL) of an aqueous suspension comprising mature fines tailings (M
FT) derived from oil sands is fed into a laboratory shearing device. The shearing device comprises a flat bottomed flask of diameter of 10 cm containing a flat paddle stirrer with a 2 mm clearance from the wall of the flask which flat paddle stirrer is connected to a motor. The flat paddle stirrer is rotated at 500 rpm for 30 seconds thereby shearing the suspension comprising M
FT.
The sheared suspension of M FT is then treated with an aqueous solution of an anionic copoly-mer of acrylamide with sodium acrylate (70/30 on a weight basis) with an intrinsic viscosity of 19 dl/g at a concentration of 0.5% and a cationic copolymer of acrylamide with methyl chloride quarternisted Di-Methyl- Amino-Ethyl Acrylate (20/80 on a weight basis) with an intrinsic viscosi-ty of 6 dl/g at a dose of 1900 g/tonne (based on active polymer per dry aqueous sheared sus-pension).
The polymer treated M FT suspension is then poured on to a metal mesh (please defined mesh size) where it instantly dewaters and forms a rigidified mass of solids on the surface of the mesh. Water which drains through the mesh is then collected and measured. The yield stress of the deposited material is periodically measured to establish its increasing rigidity with time.

Claims (17)

Claims

1. A process of dewatering a suspension comprising particulate solids dispersed in an aqueous liquid, said particulate solids comprise clay and mineral particles of size below 50 µm, which process comprises the steps of, (a) subjecting the suspension to a kinetic energy stage to produce a modified suspension;
(b) addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer to the sus-pension before, during or after step (a);
(c) dewatering the treated suspension obtained after having conducted steps (a) and (b), in which the kinetic energy stage is a shearing stage and/or application of ultrasonic energy to the suspension

2. Process according to claim 1, wherein the shearing stage comprises subjecting the suspen-sion to shearing employing a shearing device and in which the shearing device is selected from the group consisting of:
a shearing device comprising moving elements which rotate, kneading components, or mov-ing plates;
a milling device comprising moving elements;
a static mixer.

3. A process according to claim 1 or 2 in which the suspension comprises mature fine tailings derived from oil sands tailings.

4. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 3 in which the modified suspension has a vis-cosity which is less than 90% of the viscosity of the suspension prior to the kinetic energy stage.

5. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 4 in which the modified suspension is trans-ferred as a fluid to a deposition area, then allowed to stand and rigidify, in which the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer are added to the modified suspension in step (b) during transfer of the modified suspension.

6. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 in which at least one anionic polymer and the at least one cationic polymer are formed from ethylenically unsaturated water-soluble mono-mer or blend of monomers.

7. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 in which the at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer are added simultaneously or separately.

8. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 7 in which step (b) is conducted by addition of at least one anionic polymer dispersed in a solution of at least one cationic polymer.

9. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 8 in which step (b) is conducted by addition of at least one cationic polymer dispersed in a solution of at least one anionic polymer.

10. A process according to claim 7 in which the at least one anionic polymer is present in a cap-sule formation.

11. A process according to claim 9 in which the at least one cationic polymer is present in a cap-sule formation.

12. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 11 in which the at least one anionic polymer is formed from monomer(s) selected from the group consisting of (meth)acrylic acid, allyl sul-phonic acid and 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulphonic acid as the free acids or salts thereof.

13. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 12 in which the at least one cationic polymer is formed from monomer(s) selected from the group consisting of dimethyl amino ethyl (meth)acrylate - methyl chloride, (DMAEA.MeCI) quat, diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), trimethyl amino propyl (meth)acrylamide chloride (ATPAC).

14. A method of testing a suspension which comprises particulate solids dispersed in an aqueous liquid, said particulate solids comprises clay and mineral particles of size below 50 pm, which method comprises the steps of, (a) subjecting a sample of the suspension to kinetic energy to produce a modified suspension in which the kinetic energy comprises subjecting the sample to shearing in a shearing de-vice at a rate of at least 200 rpm;
(b) addition of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer to the modified suspension before, during or after step (a);
(c) transferring the polymer treated suspension obtained after having conducted steps (a) and (b) onto a mesh; and (d) measuring the water drained through the mesh and measuring the yield stress of the de-posited material.

15. A method according to claim 14 in which the suspension comprises mature fine tailings de-rived from oil sands tailings.

16. A method according to claim 14 or claim 15 in which the kinetic energy is shearing and the modified suspension is a sheared suspension.

17. The use of a combination of at least one anionic polymer and at least one cationic polymer and the application of kinetic energy to dewater a suspension comprising particulate solids dispersed in an aqueous liquid, said particulate solids comprises clay and mineral particles of size below 50 µm.