CA2250648C - Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability - Google Patents
Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2250648C CA2250648C CA 2250648 CA2250648A CA2250648C CA 2250648 C CA2250648 C CA 2250648C CA 2250648 CA2250648 CA 2250648 CA 2250648 A CA2250648 A CA 2250648A CA 2250648 C CA2250648 C CA 2250648C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- oil
- well
- wet
- bore region
- injection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
- E21B43/24—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
- E21B43/2406—Steam assisted gravity drainage [SAGD]
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
Abstract
A process is disclosed for enhancing oil recovery in oil-containing reservoirs formed of water-wet sand. The process involves placing oil-wet sand in the near-bore region of a production well. The process can be used to provide an improvement to both a conventional pressure driven fluid drive process and a conventional steam-assisted gravity drainage process. In the fluid drive process, the drive fluid is injected intermittently.
Description
2 The present invention relates to improving a fluid drive or steam
3 assisted gravity drainage ("SAGD") process for recovering oil from a
4 subterranean, oil-containing, water-wet sand reservoir. More particularly the invention relates to altering the nature of the sand in the near bore region of 6 the production well to an oil-wet condition, to thereby obtain enhanced oil 7 recovery.
In a SAGD process, steam is injected into a reservoir through a 11 horizontal injection well to develop a vertically enlarging steam chamber.
12 Heated oil and water are produced from the chamber through a horizontal 13 production well which extends in closely spaced and parallel relation to the 14 injection well. The wells are positioned with the injection well directly over the production well or they may be side by side.
16 SAGD was originally field tested with respect to recovering bitumen 17 from the Athabasca oil sands in the Fort McMurray region of Alberta. This 18 test was conducted at the Underground Test Facility ("UTF") of the present 19 assignee. The process, as practiced, involved:
~ completing a pair of horizontal wells in vertically spaced apart, 21 parallel, co-extensive relationship near the bottom of the reservoir;
22 ~ starting up by circulating steam through both wells at the same time 23 to create hot elements which functioned to slowly heat the span of 24 formation between the wells by heat conductance, until the viscous bitumen in the span was heated and mobilized and could be 1 displaced by steam injection to the production well, thereby 2 establishing fluid communication from the developing chamber 3 down to the production well; and 4 ~ then injecting steam through the upper well and producing heated bitumen and condensate water through the lower well. The steam 6 rose in the developing bitumen-depleted steam chamber, heated 7 cold bitumen at the peripheral surface of the chamber and 8 condensed, with the result that heated bitumen and condensate 9 water drained, moved through the interwell span and were produced through the production well.
11 This process, as practised at the UTF, is described in greater detail in 12 Canadian patent 2,096,999.
13 Successful recovery of bitumen during the SAGD process depends 14 upon the efficient drainage of the mobilized bitumen from the produced zone to the production well.
16 One object of the present invention is to achieve improved drainage, as 17 evidenced by increased oil recovery.
The present invention had its beginnings in a research program 21 investigating the effect of wetting characteristics of oil reservoir sand on oil 22 recovery. Athabasca oil sand from the Fort McMurray region is water-wet in 23 its natural state. The following experiments were performed using water-wet 24 sand saturated with oil to mimic the naturally occurring oil sand.
1 Three pressure driven flood experimental runs from the program were 2 of interest. In each of these runs, oil-saturated, water-wet sand was packed 3 into a horizontal, cylindrical column and several pore volumes of brine were 4 injected under pressure through one end of the column (the "injection end").
Oil and brine were produced at the opposite end of the column (the 6 "production end"). The oil and brine were separated and the amount of oil 7 quantified. In the first run, the column was packed entirely with oil-saturated, 8 water-wet sand and the brine was pumped continuously. In the second run, a 9 thin, oil-wet membrane was added to the production end of a column that had been packed with water-wet sand and oil-saturated as in run 1. Again, the 11 injection of the brine was continuous. There was no appreciable difference in 12 oil recovery between runs 1 and 2. In the third run, the column was packed 13 as in run 2 and a thin, oil-wet membrane added to the production end.
14 However, in this run the injection of brine was intermittent. There were significant pauses or shut-downs (having a length anywhere from several 16 hours to several days) in pumping of the brine. The oil recovery from the third 17 run was significantly greater than had been the case for runs 1 and 2.
18 From these experiments and additional work, it was concluded and 19 hypothesized:
~ that provision of an oil-wet oil membrane at the production end of a 21 column of oil-saturated, water-wet sand was beneficial to recovery;
22 ~ that the pumping shut-downs or cyclic injection provided quiescent 23 periods during which we postulated that oil was drawn by capillary 24 effects or imbibed into the oil-wet membrane with corresponding displacement of resident water; and 1 ~ that this combination of features enabled oil to flow more easily 2 through the production end, leading to improved oil production rate 3 and recovery.
4 From this beginning it was further postulated that adding oil-wet sand to surround the production well and then practising the SAGD process might 6 provide an opportunity for imbibing to materialize (the SAGD process typically 7 does not involve large pressure differentials and might therefore provide a 8 quiescent condition similar to that occurring during the cyclic injection used in 9 the third pressure driven flood run).
At this point, a bench scale cell was used in a laboratory circuit, to 11 simulate an SAGD process. More specifically, an upper horizontal steam 12 injection well was mounted to extend into the cell, together with a lower 13 horizontal oil/water production well. Two runs of interest were conducted.
In 14 the first run, the cell was packed entirely with oil-saturated, water-wet sand.
Steam was injected through the upper well and oil and condensed water were 16 produced through the production well. In the second run, oil-wet sand was 17 provided to form a lower layer in the cell and the production well was located 18 in this layer; oil-saturated, water-wet oil sand formed the upper layer and 19 contained the injection well. As in the first run, steam was injected through the upper well and oil and condensed water were produced through the 21 production well. In the first run, about 27% of the oil in place was recovered 22 after 200 minutes of steam injection. In the second run, about 40% of the oil 23 was recovered over the same period. The oil production rate in the second 24 run was also higher than that for the first run.
In summary then, the invention has two broad aspects.
In a SAGD process, steam is injected into a reservoir through a 11 horizontal injection well to develop a vertically enlarging steam chamber.
12 Heated oil and water are produced from the chamber through a horizontal 13 production well which extends in closely spaced and parallel relation to the 14 injection well. The wells are positioned with the injection well directly over the production well or they may be side by side.
16 SAGD was originally field tested with respect to recovering bitumen 17 from the Athabasca oil sands in the Fort McMurray region of Alberta. This 18 test was conducted at the Underground Test Facility ("UTF") of the present 19 assignee. The process, as practiced, involved:
~ completing a pair of horizontal wells in vertically spaced apart, 21 parallel, co-extensive relationship near the bottom of the reservoir;
22 ~ starting up by circulating steam through both wells at the same time 23 to create hot elements which functioned to slowly heat the span of 24 formation between the wells by heat conductance, until the viscous bitumen in the span was heated and mobilized and could be 1 displaced by steam injection to the production well, thereby 2 establishing fluid communication from the developing chamber 3 down to the production well; and 4 ~ then injecting steam through the upper well and producing heated bitumen and condensate water through the lower well. The steam 6 rose in the developing bitumen-depleted steam chamber, heated 7 cold bitumen at the peripheral surface of the chamber and 8 condensed, with the result that heated bitumen and condensate 9 water drained, moved through the interwell span and were produced through the production well.
11 This process, as practised at the UTF, is described in greater detail in 12 Canadian patent 2,096,999.
13 Successful recovery of bitumen during the SAGD process depends 14 upon the efficient drainage of the mobilized bitumen from the produced zone to the production well.
16 One object of the present invention is to achieve improved drainage, as 17 evidenced by increased oil recovery.
The present invention had its beginnings in a research program 21 investigating the effect of wetting characteristics of oil reservoir sand on oil 22 recovery. Athabasca oil sand from the Fort McMurray region is water-wet in 23 its natural state. The following experiments were performed using water-wet 24 sand saturated with oil to mimic the naturally occurring oil sand.
1 Three pressure driven flood experimental runs from the program were 2 of interest. In each of these runs, oil-saturated, water-wet sand was packed 3 into a horizontal, cylindrical column and several pore volumes of brine were 4 injected under pressure through one end of the column (the "injection end").
Oil and brine were produced at the opposite end of the column (the 6 "production end"). The oil and brine were separated and the amount of oil 7 quantified. In the first run, the column was packed entirely with oil-saturated, 8 water-wet sand and the brine was pumped continuously. In the second run, a 9 thin, oil-wet membrane was added to the production end of a column that had been packed with water-wet sand and oil-saturated as in run 1. Again, the 11 injection of the brine was continuous. There was no appreciable difference in 12 oil recovery between runs 1 and 2. In the third run, the column was packed 13 as in run 2 and a thin, oil-wet membrane added to the production end.
14 However, in this run the injection of brine was intermittent. There were significant pauses or shut-downs (having a length anywhere from several 16 hours to several days) in pumping of the brine. The oil recovery from the third 17 run was significantly greater than had been the case for runs 1 and 2.
18 From these experiments and additional work, it was concluded and 19 hypothesized:
~ that provision of an oil-wet oil membrane at the production end of a 21 column of oil-saturated, water-wet sand was beneficial to recovery;
22 ~ that the pumping shut-downs or cyclic injection provided quiescent 23 periods during which we postulated that oil was drawn by capillary 24 effects or imbibed into the oil-wet membrane with corresponding displacement of resident water; and 1 ~ that this combination of features enabled oil to flow more easily 2 through the production end, leading to improved oil production rate 3 and recovery.
4 From this beginning it was further postulated that adding oil-wet sand to surround the production well and then practising the SAGD process might 6 provide an opportunity for imbibing to materialize (the SAGD process typically 7 does not involve large pressure differentials and might therefore provide a 8 quiescent condition similar to that occurring during the cyclic injection used in 9 the third pressure driven flood run).
At this point, a bench scale cell was used in a laboratory circuit, to 11 simulate an SAGD process. More specifically, an upper horizontal steam 12 injection well was mounted to extend into the cell, together with a lower 13 horizontal oil/water production well. Two runs of interest were conducted.
In 14 the first run, the cell was packed entirely with oil-saturated, water-wet sand.
Steam was injected through the upper well and oil and condensed water were 16 produced through the production well. In the second run, oil-wet sand was 17 provided to form a lower layer in the cell and the production well was located 18 in this layer; oil-saturated, water-wet oil sand formed the upper layer and 19 contained the injection well. As in the first run, steam was injected through the upper well and oil and condensed water were produced through the 21 production well. In the first run, about 27% of the oil in place was recovered 22 after 200 minutes of steam injection. In the second run, about 40% of the oil 23 was recovered over the same period. The oil production rate in the second 24 run was also higher than that for the first run.
In summary then, the invention has two broad aspects.
5 1 In one aspect, the invention provides an improvement to a conventional 2 pressure driven fluid flood or drive process conducted in an oil-containing 3 reservoir formed of water-wet sand using injection and production wells. The 4 improvement comprises: providing a body of oil-wet sand in the near-bore region of the production well and injecting the drive fluid intermittently.
6 In another aspect, the invention provides an improvement to a
7 conventional steam-assisted gravity drainage process conducted in an oil-
8 containing reservoir formed of water-wet sand using injection and production
9 wells. The improvement comprises: providing a body of oil-wet sand in the near-bore region of the production well and then applying the SAGD process.
11 The body of oil-wet sand may be emplaced in the near-bore region by 12 any conventional method such as: completing the well with a gravel pack-13 type liner carrying the sand; or circulating the sand down the well to position it 14 in the annular space between the wellbore surface and the production string.
The "near well-bore region" is intended to mean any portion of that 16 region extending radially outward from the center line of the production string 17 to a depth of about 3 feet into the reservoir and extending longitudinally along 18 that portion of the production well in the reservoir.
19 By way of explanation, we believe that placement of oil-wet sand in the near well-bore region serves to maintain a continuous oil flow. This, when 21 combined with a low pressure differential regime, causes oil to imbibe into the 22 region and has the effect of easing oil flow into the well, which leads to 23 enhanced recovery.
2 Figure 1 is a simplified schematic vertical cross-section of a well 3 configuration for practicing the invention in the field;
4 Figure 2 is a schematic end view in section of the well configuration of Figure 1;
6 Figure 3 is a schematic of the laboratory column circuit used to carry 7 out the pressure drive runs;
8 Figure 4 is a schematic of the laboratory visualization cell circuit used 9 to carry out the SAGD runs;
Figure 5 is an expanded view of the cell of Figure 4 showing the sand 11 packing for the 2"d SAGD run;
12 Figure 6 is a plot of oil displacement versus pore volume injected 13 showing the effect of cyclic imbibition on oil recovery;
14 Figure 7 is a plot of the percent oil recovery versus time;
Figure 8 is a bar graph showing the percent recovery of oil after 200 16 minutes; and 17 Figure 9 is a plot of the cumulative oil production versus time in days.
The invention is concerned with modifying a conventional SAGD
21 system. Having reference to Figures 1 and 2, an SAGD system comprises 22 steam injection and oil/water production wells 1,2. The wells have horizontal 23 sections 1 a, 2a completed in an oil sand reservoir 3 so that the injection well 24 section 1 a overlies the production well section 2a. The reservoir 3 is formed of water-wet sand or other solids. The injection well 1 is equipped with a 1 tubular steam injection string 4 having a slotted liner 5 positioned in the 2 horizontal section 1 a. The production well 2 is equipped with a tubular 3 production string 6 having a slotted liner 7 positioned in the horizontal section 4 2a. Fluid communication is established between the wells 1,2, for example by circulating steam through each of the wells to heat the span 8 by conduction, 6 so that the oil in the span is mobilized and drains into the production well.
7 ~ Steam injection is then commenced at the injection well. The steam rises and 8 heats oil which drains, along with condensed water, down to the production 9 well and is produced. An expanding steam chest 9 is gradually developed as injection proceeds.
11 In accordance with the invention, a layer 10 of oil-wet sand is emplaced 12 along at least part of the horizontal section 2a of the production well.
This 13 may be accomplished by circulating the sand into place or packing it at 14 ground surtace into a gravel-pack type liner before running it into the well as part of the production string. Alternatively, one could treat the sand in-place 16 with a suitable solution to render the sand oil-wet. For example, one could 17 apply an acid wash to the formation in the near well-bore region.
18 The experimental work underlying the invention is now described.
19 Water-wet sand was used in the following experiments unless otherwise stated. The water-wet sand was packed in either a column or a test 21 cell and saturated with oil. About eighty-five percent (85%) of the pore 22 volume of the packed sand was oil, saturated.
1 Examale I
2 This example describes the treatment used to convert water-wet sand 3 to an oil-wet condition. This treatment involved coating the sand with 4 asphaltene to render it oil-wet.
It further describes a test used to assess the wetted nature of the 6 treated sand.
7 More particularly, water-wet sand was first dried by heating it at 500°C
8 for several hours. Asphaltenes were extracted from Athabasca bitumen and 9 diluted in toluene to give a 10 weight % asphaltene/toluene solution. The asphaltene/toluene solution was added to the dry sand in an amount sufficient 11 to totally coat the sand particles with asphaltene without having the sand 12 particles sticking together. Typically the amount of the asphaltenes added per 13 volume of sand was about 0.1 %. The asphaltene/toluene/sand mixture was 14 put in a rotary evaporator to evaporate the toluene. As the toluene evaporated, the asphaltene stuck to the sand particles in a thin film. The 16 treated sand was then heated in an oven at 150°C for several hours.
17 Wetting tests were conducted on the treated sand to determine 18 whether it was oil-wet. More particularly, treated sand saturated with oil was 19 placed in a glass tube and water was poured into the tube. Observation that no oil was displaced from the sand by the water was accepted as an 21 indication that the grains were oil-wet. In the case of non-treated water-wet 22 sand, the oil was easily displaced by water and flowed to the top by gravity.
23 This was accepted as an indication that the sand grains were water-wet.
r 1 The effect of steam on the oil-wet properties on the treated sand was 2 also tested. It was observed that when the treated sand was subjected to 3 steam at 115°C for 20 hours, it maintained its oil-wet properties in accordance 4 with the test described above.
Example II
6 This example describes 3 runs that showed that the provision of an oil-? wet membrane at the production end of a column would increase oil recovery 8 when coupled with intermittent flooding with brine.
9 More particularly, a laboratory circuit shown in Figure 3 was used. The entire volume of a 30 cm x 10 cm diameter column was packed with water-11 wet sand and then saturated with oil so that about 85% of the pore volume 12 was oil. The column was run in the horizontal position.
13 In run 1, brine was pumped through one end of the column (the 14 "injection end") at a constant rate of 25 cc/hr until it had been washed with 6 pore volumes of brine. Fractions of eluate were collected from the opposite 16 end of the column (the "production end"). The oil and brine were separated 17 and the amount of oil in each fraction quantified.
18 In runs 2 and 3, the column was packed with water-wet sand and 19 saturated with oil as in run 1. However, an oil-wet membrane (a 5mm metallic porous membrane that had been treated with organosaline) was placed at the 21 production end in both runs.
22 In run 2, the column was washed at a constant rate of 25 cc/hr with 23 three pore volumes of brine, fractions of eluate collected and the oil content in 24 each fraction quantified.
1 In run 3, the column was washed intermittently with brine. Brine was 2 pumped through the column at a rate of 25 cc/hr. However, after one pore 3 volume of brine had been pumped, the pump was shut off and the column 4 allowed to "rest" for several hours. Pumping of brine was resumed at a rate of 25 cc/hr for a short period of time and then pumping was stopped again. The 6 pumping of brine was resumed after several hours. The pumping was 7 stopped and restarted at least 15 times in total until 3 pore volumes of brine 8 had been added to the column. The stop periods would vary anywhere from 9 several hours to several days. Throughout the stop-start procedure, fractions of eluate were collected and oil content measured.
11 Figure 6 is a plot of oil displacement versus pore volume injected for 12 each of runs 1, 2 and 3. After injection of 2.7 pore volumes of brine, run 13 displaced 47.5% of the oil, run 2 displaced 49.2% of the oil and run 3 14 displaced 62.5% of the oil. The results indicate that the addition of the oil-wet membrane in run 2 did not markedly affect oil recovery. However, when the 16 oil-wet membrane was coupled with intermittent washes as in run 3, oil 17 recovery increased by about 50% relative to run 1.
18 Example III
19 This example describes 2 SAGD runs conducted in a test cell. The runs show that provision of oil-wet oil sand in the near-bore region of the 21 production well, when coupled with SAGD, increases recovery when 22 compared to the case where only water-wet oil sand is used.
1 More particularly, a 0.6 m x 0.21 m x 0.03 m thickness scaled 2 visualization cell 1 was used. The sides of the cell were transparent. An 3 upper injection well 2 and a lower production well 3 were provided. The wells 4 were horizontal and spaced one above the other in parallel relationship.
Both wells were constructed from 0.64 cm diameter stainless steel tube that was 6 slotted with 0.11 cm wide by 5.1 cm long slots. A schematic illustration of the 7 experimental set-up is shown in Figure 4. Steam flow rate was measured 8 using an orifice meter 4. A control valve 5 was used to deliver steam to the 9 injection well at about 20 kPa (~ 3 psig). An in-line ARI resistance heater and a heat trace were used to maintain a maximum of 10°C superheating at 11 the point of injection. To achieve "enthalpy control" (steam trap) control over 12 the production of fluids, a valve 7 was thermostatically controlled to throttle 13 the production well and ensure that only oil and condensate were produced.
14 In the baseline first run, the cell was entirely filled with oil-saturated, water-wet sand. In the second run, as shown in Figure 5, the bottom section 16 8 of the cell was packed with a layer of oil-wet sand treated in accordance 17 with Example I and the upper section 9 was packed with non-treated oil-18 . saturated, water-wet sand. In the second run, the steam injection well 2 was 19 located in the upper water-wet section 9 and the production well 3 was located in the lower oil-wet section 8.
21 The initialization of gravity drainage was achieved by injecting steam 22 for 30 minutes into both wells at once for about 30 minutes while producing 23 from both wells at the same time. Following the initialization period, steam 24 was injected into the top well only and production fluids were obtained from the bottom well. The experiment lasted for a total of 700 minutes. The 1 production fluids were collected every 15 minutes, the oil and water 2 separated, and the amount of oil recovered measured.
3 Both runs were done in duplicate and Figure 7 is a plot of the percent 4 oil recovery versus time in minutes for all four runs. It can be clearly seen from this plot that the addition of oil-wet sand around the production well 6 increased both the rate of oil recovery and the percent of oil recovery.
Having 7 reference to Figure 7, is can be seen that in the runs without the addition of 8 oil-wet sand, it took an average of 425 minutes to achieve 40% oil recovery.
9 However, in the runs where an oil-wet sand layer surrounded the production well, it took less than half the time (175 minutes) to achieve 40% oil recovery.
11 Figure 8 is a bar graph showing the percent recovery of oil for all runs after 12 200 minutes. The average recovery of oil for the runs without the oil-wet sand 13 layer was 27.5%. However, the average recovery of oil for the runs with the 14 oil-wet sand layer was 43%. This represents a 64% increase in the percent of oil recovered.
16 Example IV
17 The improvement in oil production observed during laboratory 18 experiments when an oil-wet region surrounded the production well was 19 further investigated using a numerical simulator to examine if the above phenomenon would prevail on a field scale. A 500 m deep reservoir was 21 assumed in a numerical model, which had a pay-zone thickness of 21 m.
22 Two superimposed horizontal wells, each 500 m long, were placed near the 23 bottom of the pay-zone 4 m apart from one another. A SAGD process was 24 simulated whereby steam was injected into the top well (the "injection well") at a pressure of 3.1 MPa and oil was collected in the bottom well (the 1 "production well"). In one instance, the reservoir surrounding the production 2 well remained water-wet. In another instance, an oil-wet zone was placed 3 around the production well. This was achieved by using capillary pressure 4 and relative permeability functions for water-wet and oil-wet sands.
The field scale numerical results are shown in Figure 9, a plot of the 6 cumulative oil production versus time in days. It was clear that oil production 7 rates increased when an oil-wet region was added to the production zone.
8 Further, the results show that the starting of oil production can be advanced 9 when an oil-wet zone is placed around the production well. The effect of the oil-wet region was most significant during the first two years of operation.
11 Example V
12 Bottom water drive experiments were done in order to test the 13 effectiveness of various anti-coning agents in preventing penetration of the 14 production well by reservoir water. It was observed that when the porous region around the production well was rendered oil-wet, the coning of the 16 water was significantly reduced. The oil recovery in the oil-wet case was 17 higher by as much as 20% over that of the water-wet case.
18 Bottom-water drive experiments were done using visualization cells as 19 described in Paper 96-13 of the Petroleum Society of the CIM 47th Annual Technical Meeting, June 10 - 12, 1996. It was observed that when only 21 water-wet sand was used, coning around the production well occurred due to 22 imbibition and early breakthrough of water. By contrast, when oil-wet sand 23 was packed around the production well, water breakthrough to the producer 24 was delayed and therefore coning was also delayed.
11 The body of oil-wet sand may be emplaced in the near-bore region by 12 any conventional method such as: completing the well with a gravel pack-13 type liner carrying the sand; or circulating the sand down the well to position it 14 in the annular space between the wellbore surface and the production string.
The "near well-bore region" is intended to mean any portion of that 16 region extending radially outward from the center line of the production string 17 to a depth of about 3 feet into the reservoir and extending longitudinally along 18 that portion of the production well in the reservoir.
19 By way of explanation, we believe that placement of oil-wet sand in the near well-bore region serves to maintain a continuous oil flow. This, when 21 combined with a low pressure differential regime, causes oil to imbibe into the 22 region and has the effect of easing oil flow into the well, which leads to 23 enhanced recovery.
2 Figure 1 is a simplified schematic vertical cross-section of a well 3 configuration for practicing the invention in the field;
4 Figure 2 is a schematic end view in section of the well configuration of Figure 1;
6 Figure 3 is a schematic of the laboratory column circuit used to carry 7 out the pressure drive runs;
8 Figure 4 is a schematic of the laboratory visualization cell circuit used 9 to carry out the SAGD runs;
Figure 5 is an expanded view of the cell of Figure 4 showing the sand 11 packing for the 2"d SAGD run;
12 Figure 6 is a plot of oil displacement versus pore volume injected 13 showing the effect of cyclic imbibition on oil recovery;
14 Figure 7 is a plot of the percent oil recovery versus time;
Figure 8 is a bar graph showing the percent recovery of oil after 200 16 minutes; and 17 Figure 9 is a plot of the cumulative oil production versus time in days.
The invention is concerned with modifying a conventional SAGD
21 system. Having reference to Figures 1 and 2, an SAGD system comprises 22 steam injection and oil/water production wells 1,2. The wells have horizontal 23 sections 1 a, 2a completed in an oil sand reservoir 3 so that the injection well 24 section 1 a overlies the production well section 2a. The reservoir 3 is formed of water-wet sand or other solids. The injection well 1 is equipped with a 1 tubular steam injection string 4 having a slotted liner 5 positioned in the 2 horizontal section 1 a. The production well 2 is equipped with a tubular 3 production string 6 having a slotted liner 7 positioned in the horizontal section 4 2a. Fluid communication is established between the wells 1,2, for example by circulating steam through each of the wells to heat the span 8 by conduction, 6 so that the oil in the span is mobilized and drains into the production well.
7 ~ Steam injection is then commenced at the injection well. The steam rises and 8 heats oil which drains, along with condensed water, down to the production 9 well and is produced. An expanding steam chest 9 is gradually developed as injection proceeds.
11 In accordance with the invention, a layer 10 of oil-wet sand is emplaced 12 along at least part of the horizontal section 2a of the production well.
This 13 may be accomplished by circulating the sand into place or packing it at 14 ground surtace into a gravel-pack type liner before running it into the well as part of the production string. Alternatively, one could treat the sand in-place 16 with a suitable solution to render the sand oil-wet. For example, one could 17 apply an acid wash to the formation in the near well-bore region.
18 The experimental work underlying the invention is now described.
19 Water-wet sand was used in the following experiments unless otherwise stated. The water-wet sand was packed in either a column or a test 21 cell and saturated with oil. About eighty-five percent (85%) of the pore 22 volume of the packed sand was oil, saturated.
1 Examale I
2 This example describes the treatment used to convert water-wet sand 3 to an oil-wet condition. This treatment involved coating the sand with 4 asphaltene to render it oil-wet.
It further describes a test used to assess the wetted nature of the 6 treated sand.
7 More particularly, water-wet sand was first dried by heating it at 500°C
8 for several hours. Asphaltenes were extracted from Athabasca bitumen and 9 diluted in toluene to give a 10 weight % asphaltene/toluene solution. The asphaltene/toluene solution was added to the dry sand in an amount sufficient 11 to totally coat the sand particles with asphaltene without having the sand 12 particles sticking together. Typically the amount of the asphaltenes added per 13 volume of sand was about 0.1 %. The asphaltene/toluene/sand mixture was 14 put in a rotary evaporator to evaporate the toluene. As the toluene evaporated, the asphaltene stuck to the sand particles in a thin film. The 16 treated sand was then heated in an oven at 150°C for several hours.
17 Wetting tests were conducted on the treated sand to determine 18 whether it was oil-wet. More particularly, treated sand saturated with oil was 19 placed in a glass tube and water was poured into the tube. Observation that no oil was displaced from the sand by the water was accepted as an 21 indication that the grains were oil-wet. In the case of non-treated water-wet 22 sand, the oil was easily displaced by water and flowed to the top by gravity.
23 This was accepted as an indication that the sand grains were water-wet.
r 1 The effect of steam on the oil-wet properties on the treated sand was 2 also tested. It was observed that when the treated sand was subjected to 3 steam at 115°C for 20 hours, it maintained its oil-wet properties in accordance 4 with the test described above.
Example II
6 This example describes 3 runs that showed that the provision of an oil-? wet membrane at the production end of a column would increase oil recovery 8 when coupled with intermittent flooding with brine.
9 More particularly, a laboratory circuit shown in Figure 3 was used. The entire volume of a 30 cm x 10 cm diameter column was packed with water-11 wet sand and then saturated with oil so that about 85% of the pore volume 12 was oil. The column was run in the horizontal position.
13 In run 1, brine was pumped through one end of the column (the 14 "injection end") at a constant rate of 25 cc/hr until it had been washed with 6 pore volumes of brine. Fractions of eluate were collected from the opposite 16 end of the column (the "production end"). The oil and brine were separated 17 and the amount of oil in each fraction quantified.
18 In runs 2 and 3, the column was packed with water-wet sand and 19 saturated with oil as in run 1. However, an oil-wet membrane (a 5mm metallic porous membrane that had been treated with organosaline) was placed at the 21 production end in both runs.
22 In run 2, the column was washed at a constant rate of 25 cc/hr with 23 three pore volumes of brine, fractions of eluate collected and the oil content in 24 each fraction quantified.
1 In run 3, the column was washed intermittently with brine. Brine was 2 pumped through the column at a rate of 25 cc/hr. However, after one pore 3 volume of brine had been pumped, the pump was shut off and the column 4 allowed to "rest" for several hours. Pumping of brine was resumed at a rate of 25 cc/hr for a short period of time and then pumping was stopped again. The 6 pumping of brine was resumed after several hours. The pumping was 7 stopped and restarted at least 15 times in total until 3 pore volumes of brine 8 had been added to the column. The stop periods would vary anywhere from 9 several hours to several days. Throughout the stop-start procedure, fractions of eluate were collected and oil content measured.
11 Figure 6 is a plot of oil displacement versus pore volume injected for 12 each of runs 1, 2 and 3. After injection of 2.7 pore volumes of brine, run 13 displaced 47.5% of the oil, run 2 displaced 49.2% of the oil and run 3 14 displaced 62.5% of the oil. The results indicate that the addition of the oil-wet membrane in run 2 did not markedly affect oil recovery. However, when the 16 oil-wet membrane was coupled with intermittent washes as in run 3, oil 17 recovery increased by about 50% relative to run 1.
18 Example III
19 This example describes 2 SAGD runs conducted in a test cell. The runs show that provision of oil-wet oil sand in the near-bore region of the 21 production well, when coupled with SAGD, increases recovery when 22 compared to the case where only water-wet oil sand is used.
1 More particularly, a 0.6 m x 0.21 m x 0.03 m thickness scaled 2 visualization cell 1 was used. The sides of the cell were transparent. An 3 upper injection well 2 and a lower production well 3 were provided. The wells 4 were horizontal and spaced one above the other in parallel relationship.
Both wells were constructed from 0.64 cm diameter stainless steel tube that was 6 slotted with 0.11 cm wide by 5.1 cm long slots. A schematic illustration of the 7 experimental set-up is shown in Figure 4. Steam flow rate was measured 8 using an orifice meter 4. A control valve 5 was used to deliver steam to the 9 injection well at about 20 kPa (~ 3 psig). An in-line ARI resistance heater and a heat trace were used to maintain a maximum of 10°C superheating at 11 the point of injection. To achieve "enthalpy control" (steam trap) control over 12 the production of fluids, a valve 7 was thermostatically controlled to throttle 13 the production well and ensure that only oil and condensate were produced.
14 In the baseline first run, the cell was entirely filled with oil-saturated, water-wet sand. In the second run, as shown in Figure 5, the bottom section 16 8 of the cell was packed with a layer of oil-wet sand treated in accordance 17 with Example I and the upper section 9 was packed with non-treated oil-18 . saturated, water-wet sand. In the second run, the steam injection well 2 was 19 located in the upper water-wet section 9 and the production well 3 was located in the lower oil-wet section 8.
21 The initialization of gravity drainage was achieved by injecting steam 22 for 30 minutes into both wells at once for about 30 minutes while producing 23 from both wells at the same time. Following the initialization period, steam 24 was injected into the top well only and production fluids were obtained from the bottom well. The experiment lasted for a total of 700 minutes. The 1 production fluids were collected every 15 minutes, the oil and water 2 separated, and the amount of oil recovered measured.
3 Both runs were done in duplicate and Figure 7 is a plot of the percent 4 oil recovery versus time in minutes for all four runs. It can be clearly seen from this plot that the addition of oil-wet sand around the production well 6 increased both the rate of oil recovery and the percent of oil recovery.
Having 7 reference to Figure 7, is can be seen that in the runs without the addition of 8 oil-wet sand, it took an average of 425 minutes to achieve 40% oil recovery.
9 However, in the runs where an oil-wet sand layer surrounded the production well, it took less than half the time (175 minutes) to achieve 40% oil recovery.
11 Figure 8 is a bar graph showing the percent recovery of oil for all runs after 12 200 minutes. The average recovery of oil for the runs without the oil-wet sand 13 layer was 27.5%. However, the average recovery of oil for the runs with the 14 oil-wet sand layer was 43%. This represents a 64% increase in the percent of oil recovered.
16 Example IV
17 The improvement in oil production observed during laboratory 18 experiments when an oil-wet region surrounded the production well was 19 further investigated using a numerical simulator to examine if the above phenomenon would prevail on a field scale. A 500 m deep reservoir was 21 assumed in a numerical model, which had a pay-zone thickness of 21 m.
22 Two superimposed horizontal wells, each 500 m long, were placed near the 23 bottom of the pay-zone 4 m apart from one another. A SAGD process was 24 simulated whereby steam was injected into the top well (the "injection well") at a pressure of 3.1 MPa and oil was collected in the bottom well (the 1 "production well"). In one instance, the reservoir surrounding the production 2 well remained water-wet. In another instance, an oil-wet zone was placed 3 around the production well. This was achieved by using capillary pressure 4 and relative permeability functions for water-wet and oil-wet sands.
The field scale numerical results are shown in Figure 9, a plot of the 6 cumulative oil production versus time in days. It was clear that oil production 7 rates increased when an oil-wet region was added to the production zone.
8 Further, the results show that the starting of oil production can be advanced 9 when an oil-wet zone is placed around the production well. The effect of the oil-wet region was most significant during the first two years of operation.
11 Example V
12 Bottom water drive experiments were done in order to test the 13 effectiveness of various anti-coning agents in preventing penetration of the 14 production well by reservoir water. It was observed that when the porous region around the production well was rendered oil-wet, the coning of the 16 water was significantly reduced. The oil recovery in the oil-wet case was 17 higher by as much as 20% over that of the water-wet case.
18 Bottom-water drive experiments were done using visualization cells as 19 described in Paper 96-13 of the Petroleum Society of the CIM 47th Annual Technical Meeting, June 10 - 12, 1996. It was observed that when only 21 water-wet sand was used, coning around the production well occurred due to 22 imbibition and early breakthrough of water. By contrast, when oil-wet sand 23 was packed around the production well, water breakthrough to the producer 24 was delayed and therefore coning was also delayed.
Claims (9)
1. A thermal recovery method for recovering hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation, comprising:
(a) providing at least one injection well and at least one production well, the production well having a substantially oil-wet near well-bore region, wherein the injection well and production well are vertically spaced-apart in the formation and are disposed in a substantially horizontal and parallel arrangement;
(b) establishing fluid communication between the injection well and the production well (c) injecting steam into the formation through the injection well;
(d) recovering the hydrocarbons by gravity drainage to the production well, under a formation pressure gradient between the injection well and the production well of about 10 kPa/m, wherein the substantially oil-wet near well-bore region of the production well enhances the amount of hydrocarbons produced as compared to a substantially similar method of recovery in the formation, under the same pressure gradient, having a substantially water-wet near well-bore region.
(a) providing at least one injection well and at least one production well, the production well having a substantially oil-wet near well-bore region, wherein the injection well and production well are vertically spaced-apart in the formation and are disposed in a substantially horizontal and parallel arrangement;
(b) establishing fluid communication between the injection well and the production well (c) injecting steam into the formation through the injection well;
(d) recovering the hydrocarbons by gravity drainage to the production well, under a formation pressure gradient between the injection well and the production well of about 10 kPa/m, wherein the substantially oil-wet near well-bore region of the production well enhances the amount of hydrocarbons produced as compared to a substantially similar method of recovery in the formation, under the same pressure gradient, having a substantially water-wet near well-bore region.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said substantially oil-wet near well-bore region is provided by a pre-injection treatment of solids to produce oil-wet solids and injecting the oil-wet solids into the near well-bore region of the production well.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the pre-injection treatment includes treating water-wet solids, having a water layer external to the solids and an oil layer external to the water layer, with an acidic solution.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the pre-injection treatment includes treating the solids with a mixture comprising an asphaltene and a hydrocarbon solvent.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the substantially oil-wet near well-bore region is provided by an in situ treatment wherein a substantial portion of solids in the production well's near well-bore region is treated while in place in the production well's near well-bore region.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the in situ treatment includes treating, in the near well-bore region, water-wet solids, having a water layer external to the solids and an oil layer external to the water layer, with an acidic solution.
7. The method of claim 5 wherein the in situ treatment includes treating, in the near well-bore region, the solids with a mixture comprising an asphaltene and a hydrocarbon solvent.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the fluid communication is established by simultaneously circulating steam through the injection well and the production well to heat at least a portion of the formation by conduction so that the heat of conduction reduces the viscosity of at least a portion of the hydrocarbons between the injection well and the production well and the hydrocarbons with reduced viscosity thereby drain under a pressure gradient produced by gravity into the oil-wet near well-bore region.
9. The method of claim 8 whereby the hydrocarbons are imbibed into the oil-wet near well-bore region.
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2250648 CA2250648C (en) | 1998-10-19 | 1998-10-19 | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability |
| US09/176,123 US6186232B1 (en) | 1998-10-19 | 1998-10-21 | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability |
| PCT/CA1999/000967 WO2000023688A1 (en) | 1998-10-19 | 1999-10-19 | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2250648 CA2250648C (en) | 1998-10-19 | 1998-10-19 | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2250648A1 CA2250648A1 (en) | 2000-04-19 |
| CA2250648C true CA2250648C (en) | 2002-09-24 |
Family
ID=4162922
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2250648 Expired - Lifetime CA2250648C (en) | 1998-10-19 | 1998-10-19 | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2250648C (en) |
Cited By (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RU2555163C1 (en) * | 2014-01-21 | 2015-07-10 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "ЛУКОЙЛ-Коми" ООО "ЛУКОЙЛ-Коми" | Method of high-viscosity oil field production with horizontal wells |
| RU2599994C1 (en) * | 2015-08-28 | 2016-10-20 | Открытое акционерное общество "Татнефть" им. В.Д. Шашина | Method for developing heterogenous ultraviscous oil reservoir |
| RU2627795C1 (en) * | 2016-06-22 | 2017-08-11 | Публичное акционерное общество "Татнефть" имени В.Д. Шашина | Bitumnious oil field development method |
| US9970283B2 (en) | 2013-09-09 | 2018-05-15 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir |
| US10000998B2 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2018-06-19 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir |
| RU2669968C1 (en) * | 2017-12-05 | 2018-10-17 | Публичное акционерное общество "Татнефть" имени В.Д. Шашина | Method for mining deposits of bituminous oil from horizontal well |
| US10655053B2 (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2020-05-19 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and compositions for diversion during enhanced oil recovery |
| US11549051B2 (en) | 2020-10-22 | 2023-01-10 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and compositions for consolidating sand in subsurface formations |
| RU2803344C1 (en) * | 2023-04-20 | 2023-09-12 | Публичное акционерное общество "Татнефть" имени В.Д.Шашина | Method for developing superviscous oil deposits |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA2762451C (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2019-02-26 | Imperial Oil Resources Limited | Method and system for lifting fluids from a reservoir |
-
1998
- 1998-10-19 CA CA 2250648 patent/CA2250648C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9970283B2 (en) | 2013-09-09 | 2018-05-15 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir |
| US9970282B2 (en) | 2013-09-09 | 2018-05-15 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir |
| US10000998B2 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2018-06-19 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Recovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir |
| RU2555163C1 (en) * | 2014-01-21 | 2015-07-10 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "ЛУКОЙЛ-Коми" ООО "ЛУКОЙЛ-Коми" | Method of high-viscosity oil field production with horizontal wells |
| RU2599994C1 (en) * | 2015-08-28 | 2016-10-20 | Открытое акционерное общество "Татнефть" им. В.Д. Шашина | Method for developing heterogenous ultraviscous oil reservoir |
| RU2627795C1 (en) * | 2016-06-22 | 2017-08-11 | Публичное акционерное общество "Татнефть" имени В.Д. Шашина | Bitumnious oil field development method |
| RU2669968C1 (en) * | 2017-12-05 | 2018-10-17 | Публичное акционерное общество "Татнефть" имени В.Д. Шашина | Method for mining deposits of bituminous oil from horizontal well |
| US10655053B2 (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2020-05-19 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and compositions for diversion during enhanced oil recovery |
| US10907087B2 (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2021-02-02 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and compositions for diversion during enhanced oil recovery |
| US11021647B2 (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2021-06-01 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and compositions for diversion during enhanced oil recovery |
| US11549051B2 (en) | 2020-10-22 | 2023-01-10 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and compositions for consolidating sand in subsurface formations |
| RU2803344C1 (en) * | 2023-04-20 | 2023-09-12 | Публичное акционерное общество "Татнефть" имени В.Д.Шашина | Method for developing superviscous oil deposits |
| RU2803347C1 (en) * | 2023-04-20 | 2023-09-12 | Публичное акционерное общество "Татнефть" имени В.Д. Шашина | Method for developing superviscous oil deposits |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2250648A1 (en) | 2000-04-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6186232B1 (en) | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability | |
| US10989028B2 (en) | Steam foam methods for steam-assisted gravity drainage | |
| US2859818A (en) | Method of recovering petroleum | |
| US5771973A (en) | Single well vapor extraction process | |
| US10550681B2 (en) | Bottom-up gravity-assisted pressure drive | |
| US20150107833A1 (en) | Recovery From A Hydrocarbon Reservoir | |
| US10190400B2 (en) | Solvent injection recovery process | |
| CA2864646C (en) | Toe connector between producer and injector wells | |
| US20140000886A1 (en) | Petroleum recovery process and system | |
| CA2250648C (en) | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability | |
| CA2251157C (en) | Process for sequentially applying sagd to adjacent sections of a petroleum reservoir | |
| US4667739A (en) | Thermal drainage process for recovering hot water-swollen oil from a thick tar sand | |
| RU2203405C1 (en) | Method of development of oil field | |
| US11168538B2 (en) | Process for producing fluids from a hydrocarbon-bearing formation | |
| US20150345270A1 (en) | Thermally induced expansion drive in heavy oil reservoirs | |
| CA3008545A1 (en) | Heavy oil solvent recovery processes using artificially injected composite barriers | |
| WO2013166587A1 (en) | Steam anti-coning/cresting technology ( sact) remediation process | |
| Share | Enhanced oil recovery by altering wettability | |
| Tan et al. | The supercritical multithermal fluid flooding investigation: experiments and numerical simulation for deep offshore heavy oil reservoirs | |
| RU2027848C1 (en) | Method of exploitation of gas-oil pools | |
| Muradji et al. | Combining cyclic steam stimulation and solvent injection for increasing heat efficiency | |
| CA3107586A1 (en) | Process for producing hydrocarbons from a hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir | |
| CA3097200A1 (en) | Dimethyl ether-based method for recovering viscous oil from a water-wet reservoir | |
| CA2830614A1 (en) | Methods for recovery of viscous oil from reservoirs with permeable upper boundaries | |
| Bagci | SAGD process in fractured heavy oil reservoirs |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20181019 |